City of Bell
Los Angeles County
City of Bell is a city authority in the State of California, serving 33,559 residents. 262 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — 3 business days from a complete, checklist-compliant expedited solar application (BMC §15.16.010.F.1); Q18 Where you file — SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for residential solar design review/fee payment; a Transtech-operated eplan portal (gopost-transtech.eplansoftreview.com, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- Plan review turnaround
- 3 business days from a complete, checklist-compliant expedited solar application (BMC §15.16.010.F.1);90% source
- Key document
- municipal code (eCode360/BE4903, current through Ord. 1295, 10/8/2025) cited by 11 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · authority's own page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · authority's own page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · municipal code (eCode360/BE4903, current through Ord. 1295, 10/8/2025)
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 80% · authority's own page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 90% · municipal code
- Is there a historic-district review? No 80% · municipal code (chapter table of contents, controls: full chapter list enumerated)
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 70% · municipal code
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Yes — the Building Official may require a discretionary Use Permit if the system “could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health and safety”; denials/use-permit decisions are appealable to the Board of Appeals under BMC §17.92.050. 90% · municipal code
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No hard cap on system size, but only systems ≤10kW AC nameplate / 30kW thermal on a single- or duplex-family dwelling qualify for the mandatory expedited/ministerial permit path (BMC §15.16.010.B); larger residential systems fall outside that definition and would go through standard (non-expedited) plan review rather than being prohibited outright. 90% · municipal code
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 55% · municipal code
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? No 55% · municipal code
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 65% · municipal code + inference from comparable LA County process
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? SolarAPP+ automated approval document + the SolarAPP+-generated checklist + a single-line drawing, emailed to Buildingandsafety@cityofbell.org and the Building Permit Technician along with the SolarAPP+ permit itself 90% · authority's own page
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic only — SolarAPP+ approval PDF, checklist and single-line diagram submitted by email; no physical copies specified for the solar path (contrast: the City's generic non-SolarApp building-permit process still asks for 2 physical plan sets). 75% · authority's own page
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 90% · authority's own page
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No stamped PE letter required for a system meeting the “small residential rooftop solar” definition (≤10kW AC/30kW thermal, single/duplex dwelling): applicant self-certifies structural adequacy via “standard engineering evaluation techniques” under BMC §15.16.010.F.7.a. No separate threshold above which a stamp is required is stated in this section. 85% · municipal code
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No stamped electrical PE letter required for a qualifying small residential system — applicant self-verifies existing electrical system capacity via “standard electrical inspection techniques” under BMC §15.16.010.F.7.b. 85% · municipal code
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for residential solar design review/fee payment; a Transtech-operated eplan portal (gopost-transtech.eplansoftreview.com, portal=bell) for general Building Division plan-check submittal. 90% · authority's own page
- Can the whole application be completed online? No 80% · authority's own page
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation — fees for building, residential and electrical permits (including solar) are set at 115% of the Los Angeles County Schedule of Fees in effect at time of application, and the City's own Ch.15.02.050 (Valuation) directs the Building Official to use the ICC Building Valuation Data tables. 90% · municipal code (fee ordinance)
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes 60% · authority's own page + inference
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? 3 business days from a complete, checklist-compliant expedited solar application (BMC §15.16.010.F.1); for non-SolarApp/general building plan review the City states 15 business days for new construction, 14 for other reviews, with 10 business days per re-submittal. 90% · municipal code
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Issued permit voids if work not commenced within 1 year of issuance, or if no required inspection is approved within 1 year of the last approved inspection; extensions up to 180 days each, cumulative cap 2 years from original expiration. 92% · municipal code
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Southern California Edison (SCE) 60% · inference (absence proven on city site; utility not independently confirmed from a Bell document)
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? No dependency / after permit 80% · municipal code
28 questions answered against City of Bell’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity of Bell Building and Safety Division issues residential building/electrical permits for rooftop PV under its own codified expedited-solar chapter; LACoFD (contract fire dept.) separately retains fire-code jurisdiction over ESS/disconnects/placarding.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherBell's Building & Safety Division issues combined building/electrical ("combination") permits for residential solar via SolarAPP+; separately, LACoFD (a contract fire department, not a Bell delegation) retains fire-code review of ESS/disconnects/placarding as a parallel requirement, not something Bell delegates by choice.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Building-Permits-Process
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010(C): applies to permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems; only routine O&M or like-kind replacement is exempt.
municipal code (eCode360/BE4903, current through Ord. 1295, 10/8/2025) checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherCity's general Building Permits Process page states most single-family/homeowner work uses a "combination permit" covering structural/electrical together; the solar ordinance does not carve out a separate electrical-only permit.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Building-Permits-Process
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherNeither BMC §15.16.010 nor Ch.15.08 (Electrical Code adoption) impose a city-specific restriction on who pulls the permit beyond state contractor-licensing law (B&P Code); no explicit "licensed electrician only" clause found in the sections reviewed.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225138
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo solar-specific contractor pre-registration requirement found in BMC §15.16.010 or the Building Permits Process page; standard state contractor's license and City business license appear to be the only checked prerequisites.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010.F.7 addresses "the applicant" self-verifying structural/electrical adequacy without requiring a licensed installer, consistent with CA owner-builder allowance (B&P Code §7044); LA County's parallel roof-mount-solar roadmap (used by many LA County-area jurisdictions) explicitly includes an "Owner-Builder" affidavit form, though that specific form is the County's rather than Bell's own.
municipal code + inference from comparable LA County process checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
SolarAPP+ automated approval document + the SolarAPP+-generated checklist + a single-line drawing, emailed to Buildingandsafety@cityofbell.org and the Building Permit Technician along with the SolarAPP+ permit itself
Why the confidence is not higherDirect steps listed on the City's own Solar Permits page.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic only — SolarAPP+ approval PDF, checklist and single-line diagram submitted by email; no physical copies specified for the solar path (contrast: the City's generic non-SolarApp building-permit process still asks for 2 physical plan sets).
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Solar Permits page describes an entirely email/electronic workflow; the 2-sets-of-plans requirement is stated only on the generic Building Permits Process page for non-expedited work.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Solar Permits page and the eplan submittal guide PDF — neither describes site-plan content requirements; SolarAPP+'s own national intake likely requires a roof/site sketch internally but the City does not publish its own site-plan spec.
https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Solar Permits page explicitly requires "a single line drawing" as part of the submittal emailed with the SolarAPP+ permit.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Solar Permits page and eplan submittal guide — no mention of string/conductor calculations as a distinct submittal item beyond the single-line drawing and SolarAPP+'s internal (NREL) engine.
https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No stamped PE letter required for a system meeting the “small residential rooftop solar” definition (≤10kW AC/30kW thermal, single/duplex dwelling): applicant self-certifies structural adequacy via “standard engineering evaluation techniques” under BMC §15.16.010.F.7.a. No separate threshold above which a stamp is required is stated in this section.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect text of the City's own expedited-solar ordinance, modeled on the AB 2188 template.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No stamped electrical PE letter required for a qualifying small residential system — applicant self-verifies existing electrical system capacity via “standard electrical inspection techniques” under BMC §15.16.010.F.7.b.
Why the confidence is not higherSame ordinance section as Q13.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBell's own fee ordinance ties the dollar figure to 115% of LA County's Building/Electrical Code Schedule of Fees (BMC 15.04.030/15.08.020), but LA County's own fee-schedule PDFs at dpw.lacounty.gov/lib/fp/fees/County/ are behind an Incapsula bot-mitigation layer that returned a soft 'Page Not Found' HTML wrapper to every fetch attempt (plain curl, browser-header curl, and headless Chrome all blocked) — could not retrieve the underlying valuation table to compute an actual dollar figure. Also could not access Bell's own Master Fee Schedule PDF (403 to curl and to a CDP-driven headless-Chrome fetch; Chrome's built-in PDF viewer intercepted the response body before it could be captured).
https://dpw.lacounty.gov/lib/fp/fees/County/2026-27%20County%20Building%20Code%20Fees.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation — fees for building, residential and electrical permits (including solar) are set at 115% of the Los Angeles County Schedule of Fees in effect at time of application, and the City's own Ch.15.02.050 (Valuation) directs the Building Official to use the ICC Building Valuation Data tables.
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.04.030 (Building), §15.06.030 (Residential) and §15.08.020 (Electrical) all state fees = 115% of LA County's schedule for the same service/permit, adjusted whenever the County's fee changes; §15.02.050 confirms a valuation basis using ICC BVD.
municipal code (fee ordinance) checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225102
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's general permit process describes plan-check fees being assessed and paid separately at submittal, prior to a distinct permit-issuance fee; LA County's own schedule (which Bell's fee is pegged to at 115%) is structured with separate plan-review and inspection fee lines, but Bell's own dollar figures could not be independently retrieved (see Q15 not_found).
authority's own page + inference checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Building-Permits-Process
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
3 business days from a complete, checklist-compliant expedited solar application (BMC §15.16.010.F.1); for non-SolarApp/general building plan review the City states 15 business days for new construction, 14 for other reviews, with 10 business days per re-submittal.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect ordinance text for the solar-specific expedited path, corroborated by the generic Building Permits Process page for non-solar context.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Issued permit voids if work not commenced within 1 year of issuance, or if no required inspection is approved within 1 year of the last approved inspection; extensions up to 180 days each, cumulative cap 2 years from original expiration.
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.02.030(B), adopted by Ord. 1295 (10/8/2025) as part of the current Building Codes Administration chapter.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/48119820
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for residential solar design review/fee payment; a Transtech-operated eplan portal (gopost-transtech.eplansoftreview.com, portal=bell) for general Building Division plan-check submittal.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth portals are named and linked directly on the City's own Solar Permits and Building & Safety pages.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ automates design review and fee payment, but the City's own page requires the applicant to email the SolarAPP+ approval, checklist and single-line drawing to City staff to obtain the actual City permit, and inspections are booked by email (BInspector@) rather than online — the process is not fully self-contained online end to end.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Southern California Edison (SCE)
Why the confidence is not higherNo Bell-city-side document naming the utility was found (checked Public Works Permits page, Building & Safety pages, Title 13 Public Services chapters for a franchise reference — none named an electric utility); this rests on well-established regional service territory for this part of southeast LA County (SCE, not LADWP or a municipal utility) rather than a Bell-issued document. Flagged per brief's instruction never to use PowerToChoose — this was not used.
inference (absence proven on city site; utility not independently confirmed from a Bell document) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Public-Works/Public-Works-Permits
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
No dependency / after permit
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010.F.11: City permit issuance “does not authorize… connect… to the local utility provider's electricity grid. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such approval… from the local utility provider” — utility interconnection/PTO is expressly decoupled from and follows City permit issuance.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010.F.5: “The city shall not condition the approval of an application on the approval of an association as defined in Civil Code Section 4080” — an explicit local codification of the state Solar Rights Act's HOA-preemption rule.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherFull Title 17 (Zoning) chapter list (17.04 through 17.108) contains no historic-district or historic-preservation overlay chapter; Bell has no codified historic review process to trigger for a rooftop PV permit.
municipal code (chapter table of contents, controls: full chapter list enumerated) checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225612
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010.F.7.a requires only a self-verification of wind/seismic/dead/live load adequacy via “standard engineering evaluation techniques” — no separate stamped wind/windstorm certification is called for, consistent with CA (non-coastal-wind-zone) practice generally.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Yes — the Building Official may require a discretionary Use Permit if the system “could have a specific adverse impact upon the public health and safety”; denials/use-permit decisions are appealable to the Board of Appeals under BMC §17.92.050.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect text, BMC §15.16.010.C.1 and .F.3.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No hard cap on system size, but only systems ≤10kW AC nameplate / 30kW thermal on a single- or duplex-family dwelling qualify for the mandatory expedited/ministerial permit path (BMC §15.16.010.B); larger residential systems fall outside that definition and would go through standard (non-expedited) plan review rather than being prohibited outright.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect text of the “small residential rooftop solar energy system” definition in BMC §15.16.010.B, an AB 2188-era 10kW AC/30kW thermal cap consistent with numerous other CA cities' still-codified chapters.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 88% · municipal code (adopting ordinance)
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2) and 2025 California Residential Code (Title 24 Part 2.5), both adopted by Ord. 1295, effective 10/8/2025 92% · municipal code
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2016 California Fire Code as locally amended by LA County (cited in Bell's own code as the “2017 County of Los Angeles Fire Code, based on the 2015 International Fire Code”) — codified at BMC §8.16.010, last amended by Ord. 1219 §11 in 2017. This is a significant code-cycle lag: LACoFD's own current live guidance (Expedited PV/ESS Checklist and Guide, both dated 2023-09-01) already administers under the 2023 LACFC (a locally amended 2022 CFC), i.e. two full code cycles ahead of what is still codified in Bell's own municipal code. 85% · municipal code
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 85% · municipal code
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 CBC/CRC/CEC (Title 24, all adopted by Ord. 1295, 10/8/2025) as locally amended, administered through Ch.15.02's unified permit/inspection/valuation administration provisions; for qualifying small systems, compliance is judged against the checklist/standard-plan required by BMC §15.16.010.E.4 which must “substantially conform” to the current California Solar Permitting Guidebook. 80% · municipal code
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of Bell on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown is required (2023 NEC §690.12 via the 2025 CEC), and LACoFD's own Expedited PV/ESS checklist separately treats “Rapid-Shutdown attenuation devices, and associated placarding” as an item it inspects on every PV job. 88% · AHJ (fire) own current document
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? LACoFD's “F.D. – Electrical / Bldg Disconnect / #X of Y” placard system covers every power-source disconnect (utility, PV, ESS, generator, etc.) at the service equipment on every PV/ESS job in Bell, since Bell is an LACoFD contract city; the City's own code specifies no additional placard. 92% · AHJ (fire) own current document
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes 92% · AHJ (fire) own current document
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Exterior placard: min. 2in x 3.5in weather-resistant plastic, red letters engraved into yellow background, solid all-caps Arial, min font size 24 (“F.D.” and “#X of Y” bold min. size 28), attached with permanent epoxy. Panel-interior placard: min. 7/16in x 3/4in, same color scheme, solid all-caps Arial bold min. size 24, epoxy-mounted. 92% · AHJ (fire) own current document
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Not found in Bell's own code or in LACoFD's Guide/Checklist as a distinct “facility map” placard requirement beyond the disconnect placarding system and NEC 705.10 baseline; LACoFD's checklist references only the disconnect placarding system (Section IV) and does not describe a separate site-plan/facility-map placard. 45% · AHJ (fire) own current document
- Where must the labels be placed? Exterior placards: on the wall or exterior of electrical panels/enclosures, at the disconnect location itself, within 6 feet of the main service panel on the same wall plane per 2023 LACFC §509.3; panel-interior placards: on/inside the panel to identify the specific breaker/switch. 88% · AHJ (fire) own current document
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, with conditions: individual ESS units capped at 20kWh; aggregate 80kWh max per site and per location (garage/outdoor/ground); 3ft ESS-to-ESS spacing, 3ft from openings, 5ft from lot lines/other buildings/combustibles, 10ft from vegetation; impact protection required if subject to vehicular impact; detection/notification required if in an attached garage; UL 9540 (unit) and UL 1741 (inverter) listing required; ESS listed solely for utility/commercial use may not be used residentially. 90% · AHJ (fire) own current document
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Yes 88% · AHJ (fire) own current fee ordinance
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Not found in Bell's own zoning code 45% · municipal code (absence proven with controls)
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local amendment found 80% · municipal code (absence proven — full chapter text reviewed)
20 questions answered against City of Bell’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023
Why the confidence is not higherBell adopted the 2025 California Electrical Code (Title 24 Part 3) by reference via Ord. 1295 (10/8/2025); the 2025 CEC cycle is based on the 2023 NEC statewide (effective 1 Jan 2026), though Bell's own ordinance text does not spell out the underlying NEC year.
municipal code (adopting ordinance) checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225138
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2) and 2025 California Residential Code (Title 24 Part 2.5), both adopted by Ord. 1295, effective 10/8/2025
Why the confidence is not higherDirect adoption text, BMC §15.04.010 and §15.06.010.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225102
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2016 California Fire Code as locally amended by LA County (cited in Bell's own code as the “2017 County of Los Angeles Fire Code, based on the 2015 International Fire Code”) — codified at BMC §8.16.010, last amended by Ord. 1219 §11 in 2017. This is a significant code-cycle lag: LACoFD's own current live guidance (Expedited PV/ESS Checklist and Guide, both dated 2023-09-01) already administers under the 2023 LACFC (a locally amended 2022 CFC), i.e. two full code cycles ahead of what is still codified in Bell's own municipal code.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect text of BMC §8.16.010, cross-checked against LACoFD's own live SB-379 page which cites the 2023 LACFC/2022 CFC — the lag is real and worth flagging per the brief's guidance, not resolved either way.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44222938
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding (§15.04.020), Residential (§15.06.020) and Fire (§8.16.050) chapters all carry local amendments; by contrast the Electrical Code chapter (15.08) was checked and found to carry NO technical amendment section (see Q34) — amendments are not uniform across all adopted codes.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225102
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 CBC/CRC/CEC (Title 24, all adopted by Ord. 1295, 10/8/2025) as locally amended, administered through Ch.15.02's unified permit/inspection/valuation administration provisions; for qualifying small systems, compliance is judged against the checklist/standard-plan required by BMC §15.16.010.E.4 which must “substantially conform” to the current California Solar Permitting Guidebook.
Why the confidence is not higherSynthesis of the Building/Residential/Electrical adoption sections and the solar ordinance's own cross-reference to the state Solar Permitting Guidebook.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local amendment found
Why the confidence is not higherBMC Ch.15.08 (Electrical Code) contains only 4 sections — adoption (.010), fees (.020), effect of adoption (.030), penalties (.040) — with no “Amendments” section, unlike the parallel Building (§15.04.020) and Residential (§15.06.020) chapters which do carry local technical amendments. No busbar/service-upgrade rule was found anywhere in the chapter.
municipal code (absence proven — full chapter text reviewed) checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225138
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Solar Permits page, eplan submittal guide, and BMC §15.16.010 (self-certification of structural adequacy only) — none specify a mounting-system or attachment-spacing standard; this is left to manufacturer listing + SolarAPP+'s national structural criteria rather than a Bell-specific rule.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBMC Ch.8.16 (Fire Code, only 2 dated 1985 UFC-era local amendments, neither PV-related) and LACoFD's current Expedited PV/ESS Checklist and Guide (grep for 'ridge'/'pathway'/'access' returned zero hits in either document) — no local ridge-setback or fire-access-pathway rule found; the governing standard would be the base adopted CFC/CRC roof-access provisions, which is a state-code default rather than a local answer.
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — rapid shutdown is required (2023 NEC §690.12 via the 2025 CEC), and LACoFD's own Expedited PV/ESS checklist separately treats “Rapid-Shutdown attenuation devices, and associated placarding” as an item it inspects on every PV job.
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD's own Expedited Permitting Checklist, Section I.c.ii, plus the 2025 CEC adoption (Q29).
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
LACoFD's “F.D. – Electrical / Bldg Disconnect / #X of Y” placard system covers every power-source disconnect (utility, PV, ESS, generator, etc.) at the service equipment on every PV/ESS job in Bell, since Bell is an LACoFD contract city; the City's own code specifies no additional placard.
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Guide for ESS, PV, & Disconnects, Appendix B (re-confirmed verbatim this run); Bell's own solar ordinance (BMC §15.16.010) has no placard clause.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LACoFD-Guide-for-ESS-PV-and-Disconnects-Rev-3-2023-09-01-w-Appendices-SECURED.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Appendix B specifies exact wording: exterior placard reads “F.D. – ELECTRICAL / BLDG DISCONNECT / # X of Y”.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LACoFD-Guide-for-ESS-PV-and-Disconnects-Rev-3-2023-09-01-w-Appendices-SECURED.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Exterior placard: min. 2in x 3.5in weather-resistant plastic, red letters engraved into yellow background, solid all-caps Arial, min font size 24 (“F.D.” and “#X of Y” bold min. size 28), attached with permanent epoxy. Panel-interior placard: min. 7/16in x 3/4in, same color scheme, solid all-caps Arial bold min. size 24, epoxy-mounted.
Why the confidence is not higherRe-confirmed verbatim from LACoFD Guide Appendix B this run — matches the brief's prior findings exactly.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LACoFD-Guide-for-ESS-PV-and-Disconnects-Rev-3-2023-09-01-w-Appendices-SECURED.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Not found in Bell's own code or in LACoFD's Guide/Checklist as a distinct “facility map” placard requirement beyond the disconnect placarding system and NEC 705.10 baseline; LACoFD's checklist references only the disconnect placarding system (Section IV) and does not describe a separate site-plan/facility-map placard.
Why the confidence is not higherChecked LACoFD's Expedited Checklist (all 5 pages) and Guide Appendix B — neither describes a facility map placard distinct from the disconnect placards; not confident this is a true absence versus something addressed elsewhere in the Guide's other appendices not fully reviewed this run.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSCE's DG/interconnection and generating-your-own-power pages all returned 404 on every URL pattern tried this run; no Bell-city document references utility-specific placarding beyond LACoFD's own disconnect placard system.
https://www.sce.com/business/generating-your-own-power/interconnections
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Exterior placards: on the wall or exterior of electrical panels/enclosures, at the disconnect location itself, within 6 feet of the main service panel on the same wall plane per 2023 LACFC §509.3; panel-interior placards: on/inside the panel to identify the specific breaker/switch.
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Checklist Section IV.1 and Guide Appendix B Figure 1/Figure 2 captions.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBMC §15.16.010 and LACoFD's Expedited Checklist — both require UL 9540/UL 1741 listing for ESS but neither references a specific approved-equipment LIST (as opposed to listing/certification standards) for PV modules/inverters generally.
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, with conditions: individual ESS units capped at 20kWh; aggregate 80kWh max per site and per location (garage/outdoor/ground); 3ft ESS-to-ESS spacing, 3ft from openings, 5ft from lot lines/other buildings/combustibles, 10ft from vegetation; impact protection required if subject to vehicular impact; detection/notification required if in an attached garage; UL 9540 (unit) and UL 1741 (inverter) listing required; ESS listed solely for utility/commercial use may not be used residentially.
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Expedited PV/ESS Checklist, Sections II–III, re-confirmed verbatim this run.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD requires and fees for a distinct ESS inspection/plan review for Group R-3/R-4 (Appendix QQ Table QQ104.3(4) line 13, $195 plan review; Table QQ104.4(4) line 7 general ESS field inspection, $390) separate from the PV inspection.
AHJ (fire) own current fee ordinance checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2023-LACFC-Appendix-QQ-Certified-Ord-Eff.-2024-01-11-Secured.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Not found in Bell's own zoning code
Why the confidence is not higherChecked Title 17 Zoning chapter list (no “Alternative Energy”/“Solar Access” chapter) and Ch.17.52 (General Design and Use Requirements, controls passed: “yard”=17 hits, “zzqqx”=0) and Ch.17.16 (R-1 zone, controls passed) — neither mentions ground-mounted PV or solar at all. Bell is a small, dense, small-lot city (~2.5 sq mi) where ground-mount PV is plausibly simply not contemplated; absent a specific provision, CBC's general “structure” definition would apply by default, but that is state code, not a Bell-specific answer.
municipal code (absence proven with controls) checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225612
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSCE's DG/interconnection and generating-your-own-power pages all 404'd on every URL pattern tried this run; Bell's own code and Solar Permits page do not address AC-disconnect placement relative to the meter. Not guessing/substituting a PG&E rule per brief instruction.
https://www.sce.com/business/generating-your-own-power/interconnections
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Email 85% · authority's own page
- How much notice is required? 2 business days 85% · municipal code
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Delegated 85% · authority's own page
- If delegated, to whom? Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD), Fire Prevention Division 90% · authority's own page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? 1) SolarAPP+ automated design review and permit issuance; 2) one consolidated City building/electrical inspection (BMC §15.16.010.F.8: “Only one inspection shall be required” for expedited-eligible systems); 3) mandatory LACoFD Fire Prevention final inspection of ESS/disconnects/rapid-shutdown placarding, required prior to use of the system. 85% · municipal code + authority's own page
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- What must be on site at inspection? Digital proof of the construction permit (SolarAPP+/expedited-permit approval) and any inspection checklist provided with it; disconnect placarding must already be in place; LACoFD fees must be paid, per LACoFD's own pre-inspection checklist. 88% · AHJ (fire) own current document
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final (City building final) plus a separate LACoFD-issued operational sign-off for the fire/ESS/disconnect scope, which LACoFD's checklist calls “an Operational Permit” for the R-3/R-4 PV/ESS installation. 80% · AHJ (fire) own current document
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 75% · municipal code
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $98 (LACoFD, “Additional inspections after initial inspection and one reinspection”) 88% · AHJ (fire) own current fee ordinance
14 questions answered against City of Bell’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Solar Permits page: building inspections booked by emailing BInspector@cityofbell.org with contact/permit/address/inspection-type/date details; LACoFD final booked by phone/email to the LACoFD Fire Prevention regional office per its own Expedited Checklist Section I.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
2 business days
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010.F.9: “An inspection will be scheduled within two business days of a request”; corroborated by the City's own (older, Covid-era but still-linked) “How to Request Building Inspections” handout which also states 2 business days.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Solar Permits page and its 'How to Request Building Inspections' handout — neither states whether AM/PM windows or same-day inspection are offered, only a 2-business-day scheduling turnaround.
https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Delegated
Why the confidence is not higherCity of Bell Building Division performs its own building final for the solar permit, but a passing LACoFD final is a separate, mandatory precondition to PV/ESS use (LACoFD checklist: “A Passed Inspection Serves as an Operational Permit at a R-3/R-4 Occupancy… on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction e.g., B&S, Utility”) — i.e. final sign-off is split between two AHJs, not a single self-contained final.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD), Fire Prevention Division
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Solar Permits page directs applicants to LACoFD for the required fire final and links LACoFD's own SB-379 page directly.
authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
1) SolarAPP+ automated design review and permit issuance; 2) one consolidated City building/electrical inspection (BMC §15.16.010.F.8: “Only one inspection shall be required” for expedited-eligible systems); 3) mandatory LACoFD Fire Prevention final inspection of ESS/disconnects/rapid-shutdown placarding, required prior to use of the system.
Why the confidence is not higherSynthesis of BMC §15.16.010.F and the City's Solar Permits page instructions.
municipal code + authority's own page checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBMC §15.16.010.F.8-10 (only one consolidated inspection is required/permitted for the expedited path) — no separate rough-in/mid-roof inspection stage is described for qualifying small residential systems.
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Solar Permits and inspection handout pages — neither states explicitly that the inspector verifies labels/listings, though LACoFD's own checklist (a separate AHJ) explicitly does verify UL listings and placarding.
https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Building & Safety and Solar Permits pages — no published City inspection checklist found (LACoFD publishes its own, separate, checklist for the fire scope only).
https://www.cityofbell.gov/City-Hall/Community-Development/Building-and-Safety/Solar-Permits
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Digital proof of the construction permit (SolarAPP+/expedited-permit approval) and any inspection checklist provided with it; disconnect placarding must already be in place; LACoFD fees must be paid, per LACoFD's own pre-inspection checklist.
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Expedited Checklist Section V — “Requirements for Site Inspection.”
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$98 (LACoFD, “Additional inspections after initial inspection and one reinspection”)
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Appendix QQ, Table QQ104.4(6), line 2, current fee ordinance effective 2024-01-11, republished Oct 2025.
AHJ (fire) own current fee ordinance checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/2023-LACFC-Appendix-QQ-Certified-Ord-Eff.-2024-01-11-Secured.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Building Permits Process and Solar Permits pages — general plan-check correction process (pick up plans, resubmit 2 sets, 10-business-day re-review) is described for the non-SolarApp path, but no description of how corrections are issued/cleared specifically for the SolarAPP+/solar path was found.
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final (City building final) plus a separate LACoFD-issued operational sign-off for the fire/ESS/disconnect scope, which LACoFD's checklist calls “an Operational Permit” for the R-3/R-4 PV/ESS installation.
Why the confidence is not higherLACoFD Expedited Checklist, final note under Section V.
AHJ (fire) own current document checked 2026-08-30 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer
Why the confidence is not higherBMC §15.16.010.F.11: the City's permit approval “does not authorize… connect… to the local utility provider's electricity grid. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such approval or permission from the local utility provider” — PTO is placed on the applicant/installer, not the City.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://ecode360.com/44225207
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Bell against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Bell is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (Community Development / Building and Safety Division, in-house permit counter, plan review appears contracted through a Transtech-operated eplan portal). Fire review/inspection is retained by LA County Fire Department (LACoFD) as Bell's contract fire department (Division 9), which keeps jurisdiction over ESS >3kWh, a defined BIPV subcategory, and ALL power-source disconnect/rapid-shutdown placarding on every PV job, and must pass its own final before use.
- Delegated to
- Los Angeles County Fire Department (LACoFD), Division 9 — Bell is listed by name on LACoFD's live contract-cities roster alongside Bell Gardens, Commerce, El Monte, Rosemead, South El Monte, Temple City
- Overridden by
- LACoFD retains fire-code jurisdiction over ESS>3kWh, BIPV egress subcategory, and all electrical-disconnect/rapid-shutdown placarding regardless of city permit; California Solar Rights Act (Civil Code §714/§4600) and BMC §15.16.010.F.5 bar the city from conditioning permit approval on HOA/association approval
- Why not higher
- Confirmed by name in raw HTML of LACoFD's live contracting page (https://fire.lacounty.gov/contracting/, 200 OK; the brief's guessed URL /contract-cities/ actually 404s here — correcting that). City of Bell's own Solar Permits page independently confirms the same split: it routes design/fee/permit through SolarAPP+ and the Building Division, and separately instructs applicants to contact LACoFD Fire Prevention for a mandatory final before PV/ESS use, citing LACoFD's own SB-379 page.
Check the code edition before you build
This authority's published code edition does not match what the state has adopted. That usually means the authority's ordinance has not been updated for the current cycle — but a local amendment can also be lawful. Confirm with the building department before you submit.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Plan review
- 3 business days from a complete, checklist-compliant expedited solar application (BMC §15.16.010.F.1);90%
- Portal
- SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for residential solar design review/fee payment; a Transtech-operated eplan portal (gopost-transtech.eplansoftreview.com,90%
- Electrical code
- 202388%
- Own placard wording
- Yes92%
- Booking an inspection
- Email85%
Labels & placards for this authority
City of Bell writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 92%
Yes
Size, colour & material 92%
Exterior placard: min. 2in x 3.5in weather-resistant plastic, red letters engraved into yellow background, solid all-caps Arial, min font size 24 (“F.D.” and “#X of Y” bold min. size 28), attached with permanent epoxy. Panel-interior placard: min. 7/16in x 3/4in, same color scheme, solid all-caps Arial bold min. size 24, epoxy-mounted.
Where they go 88%
Exterior placards: on the wall or exterior of electrical panels/enclosures, at the disconnect location itself, within 6 feet of the main service panel on the same wall plane per 2023 LACFC §509.3; panel-interior placards: on/inside the panel to identify the specific breaker/switch.
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.