City of Campbell
Santa Clara County
City of Campbell is a city authority in the State of California, serving 43,959 residents. 2,450 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — Automatic (SolarAPP-style) track: permit issues in 1 day upon payment. Non-Automatic (standard plan check) track: 5-10 days. Q18 Where you file — MyGovernmentOnline (MGO) / MGO Connect — mygovernmentonline.org and mgoconnect.org Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- $477 flat for a Photovoltaic permit (with or without ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework); $228 flat if ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework is filed stand-alone as a basic electrical permit;80% source
- Plan review turnaround
- Automatic (SolarAPP-style) track: permit issues in 1 day upon payment. Non-Automatic (standard plan check) track: 5-10 days.85% source
- Key document
- building application guide cited by 17 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · authority page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · building application guide
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · municipal code
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 85% · building application guide
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 55% · municipal code
- Is there a historic-district review? No dedicated historic-district review for solar found 55% · municipal code
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 55% · municipal code
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not required for qualifying small residential rooftop PV (ministerial review under CMC 18.04.060/GC §65850.5); could be triggered for non-qualifying scope (e.g., system exceeding the 10kW AC/30kW-thermal ministerial threshold, or unusual siting) that falls back to standard discretionary review, though no specific SUP/Council-approval trigger for solar was found in Title 21. 55% · municipal code
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? 10 kW AC nameplate (or 30 kW thermal) is the threshold for the ministerial 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' expedited-review track under CMC 18.04.060; this is an eligibility cap for expedited/ministerial treatment, not a hard prohibition on larger residential systems (which would undergo standard, non-expedited review). 85% · municipal code
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 90% · building application guide
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 75% · building application guide
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 90% · building application guide
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Cover sheet (site address/APN/scope, ESS quantities/listings, required notations incl. CRC R324/CEC 690&705 conformance, torque-wrench note, meter height); Site plan; Floor plan (if indoor equipment); Roof plan (PV only, incl. pathway/access per State Fire Marshal & SCCFD guidance); Details incl. signage detail; Line diagram & electrical calcs; signed Acknowledgement Statement. Combined into a single PDF. 95% · building application guide
- How many copies, and in what format? Digital only — a single combined PDF (unlocked, not JPEG/PNG/DOC) uploaded through MyGovernmentOnline (MGO); a printed set must be kept on the jobsite once the permit is approved. Paper submittal is not accepted (a public kiosk exists for account setup only, not for downloading/emailing materials). 90% · building application guide
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. Must show property lines/dimensions and building setbacks; driveways/walkways/parking; existing structures/equipment (A/C, W/H, generators); location of new PV/EV/ESS/panel equipment; all interconnected equipment incl. existing utility service and sub-panel (labelled existing vs new, overhead vs underground); required 30"x36" working clearances; existing/proposed utility runs and points of contact; and location/method of rapid shutdown with conduit/cable routing. 95% · building application guide
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 90% · building application guide
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 85% · building application guide
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No fixed published PE-stamp threshold found for qualifying small-residential-rooftop systems. CMC 18.04.060(D)(1) only requires the applicant to 'verify...through the use of standard engineering evaluation techniques that the support structure...is stable and adequate' before submittal — self-verification, not a mandated PE stamp, for systems within the 10kW AC/30kW-thermal ministerial-review scope. A PE stamp would presumably be required case-by-case once a project falls outside that ministerial scope (e.g. ground mount, structural concern), but no such published numeric threshold was found. 55% · municipal code
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? MyGovernmentOnline (MGO) / MGO Connect — mygovernmentonline.org and mgoconnect.org 95% · authority page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · building application guide
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $477 flat for a Photovoltaic permit (with or without ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework); $228 flat if ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework is filed stand-alone as a basic electrical permit; $477 for a combination permit spanning ≥2 electrification disciplines; plan-check revisions $226 each. 80% · building application guide
- How is the fee calculated? Flat 85% · building application guide
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No 80% · building application guide
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Automatic (SolarAPP-style) track: permit issues in 1 day upon payment. Non-Automatic (standard plan check) track: 5-10 days. 85% · building application guide
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 365 days from issuance 70% · building application guide
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Note: Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) is Campbell's Community Choice Aggregator for electricity generation/supply, confirmed by the City's own 'Silicon Valley Clean Energy' page, but PG&E remains the wires-owning utility that handles interconnection/PTO. 85% · building application guide
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit / parallel-but-gated 65% · municipal code
28 questions answered against City of Campbell’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Division page and Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) Ch. 18.04 (adopting the Building Code) and 18.04.060 (Small Residential Rooftop PV review process) show the City issues building/electrical permits for residential PV.
authority page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/1458/Building
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherCommunity Development Dept.'s Building Division issues both the building and electrical components as one 'Renewable Energy' (MGOC-RE) permit per the City's own Application Guide. Fire-code enforcement, and the fee for a stand-alone 'Energy Storage Systems' operational permit, are administered by Santa Clara County Fire Department per the City's own fee schedule footnote ('Fees are set by the City but administered by Santa Clara County Fire Department') — so fire is delegated for that slice, not the whole PV permit.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 18.04.060 codifies the mandatory GC §65850.5 ministerial review for 'small residential rooftop solar energy systems' and the City's Renewable Energy Building Application Guide requires a permit (MGOC-RE) for rooftop PV, ESS, EVCS and panel work.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherThe Guide issues one 'Renewable Energy' permit ($477) covering PV with or without ESS/EVCS/panel rework; a stand-alone ESS, EVCS, or panel-rework scope may instead be filed as a standard electrical sub-trade permit ($228). So PV itself is always combined with its electrical scope; only non-PV ancillary scopes can be pulled as a separate electrical permit.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherGuide states a Renewable Energy permit 'may only be issued to contractors with a B General, C-10 Electrical, C-46 Solar, or a C-39 Roofing class California Contractor's license or an Owner Builder where the owner is a physical person who will do the work themselves on their own home.'
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Guide's Acknowledgement Statement (signed at application) requires the contractor to 'maintain their required license and bond in good standing with the Contractors State License Board and a current City of Campbell Business License during the entirety of construction activity' — i.e. a City business license is a precondition, distinct from CSLB licensure.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSame Guide clause: an 'Owner Builder where the owner is a physical person who will do the work themselves on their own home' may be issued the permit; an LLC or corporation is explicitly excluded from Owner-Builder status.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Cover sheet (site address/APN/scope, ESS quantities/listings, required notations incl. CRC R324/CEC 690&705 conformance, torque-wrench note, meter height); Site plan; Floor plan (if indoor equipment); Roof plan (PV only, incl. pathway/access per State Fire Marshal & SCCFD guidance); Details incl. signage detail; Line diagram & electrical calcs; signed Acknowledgement Statement. Combined into a single PDF.
Why the confidence is not higherFull 'Required Application Materials Checklist' table (pages 3-5) in the City's own Renewable Energy Building Application Guide, with a Y/N matrix by PV/EV/ESS scope.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Digital only — a single combined PDF (unlocked, not JPEG/PNG/DOC) uploaded through MyGovernmentOnline (MGO); a printed set must be kept on the jobsite once the permit is approved. Paper submittal is not accepted (a public kiosk exists for account setup only, not for downloading/emailing materials).
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's 'Digital Submission Required' and 'Application Materials Submittal Requirements' sections.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. Must show property lines/dimensions and building setbacks; driveways/walkways/parking; existing structures/equipment (A/C, W/H, generators); location of new PV/EV/ESS/panel equipment; all interconnected equipment incl. existing utility service and sub-panel (labelled existing vs new, overhead vs underground); required 30"x36" working clearances; existing/proposed utility runs and points of contact; and location/method of rapid shutdown with conduit/cable routing.
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist item 2 ('Site Plan') in the City's Renewable Energy Building Application Guide.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist item 6 ('Line Diagram and Electrical Calculations') is marked required (Y) for PV and ESS scopes, covering grounding/bonding, interconnection method, overcurrent protection/disconnect, and wiring detail.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSame checklist item 6 requires 'conduit and conductor type and size,' 'array and inverter wiring,' and 'electrical load calculations for special circuitry, wiring, or breakers.'
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No fixed published PE-stamp threshold found for qualifying small-residential-rooftop systems. CMC 18.04.060(D)(1) only requires the applicant to 'verify...through the use of standard engineering evaluation techniques that the support structure...is stable and adequate' before submittal — self-verification, not a mandated PE stamp, for systems within the 10kW AC/30kW-thermal ministerial-review scope. A PE stamp would presumably be required case-by-case once a project falls outside that ministerial scope (e.g. ground mount, structural concern), but no such published numeric threshold was found.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the ordinance's self-verification language; no separate structural-engineering-threshold bulletin located on the City's site.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Renewable Energy Building Application Guide, Building Handouts & Forms page, and CMC Ch. 18.16 (Electrical Code) — no electrical PE-stamp threshold stated anywhere in these.
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$477 flat for a Photovoltaic permit (with or without ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework); $228 flat if ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework is filed stand-alone as a basic electrical permit; $477 for a combination permit spanning ≥2 electrification disciplines; plan-check revisions $226 each.
Why the confidence is not higherFigures are from the City's Renewable Energy (MGOC-RE) Building Application Guide, dated (CreationDate) 25 Sep 2024 and still the currently-linked guide from the Building Application Guides page as of this check. The FY 2026-27 Master Fee Schedule (effective 1 Jul 2026) does not itemize a Renewable Energy/PV line separately, so this flat MGOC-RE program fee could not be cross-confirmed against the newest general schedule; a nearby 'four-inspection sub-trade' line in that schedule prices at $474, suggesting the $477 figure is close to current but may have shifted slightly.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Flat
Why the confidence is not higherThe Renewable Energy permit is a flat $477/$228 fee per the Guide, not tied to system valuation, kW, or panel count.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Guide's flat fee covers plan review for both the 'Automatic' (skips plan check) and 'Non-Automatic' (in-house plan-checked) tracks; the only itemized additional charge is a $226 revision fee, not a separate up-front plan-check fee.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Automatic (SolarAPP-style) track: permit issues in 1 day upon payment. Non-Automatic (standard plan check) track: 5-10 days.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's 'Review Timelines' section: 'Automatic Renewable Energy permit applications are issued upon payment in 1 day. Non-Automatic...take 5-10 days for processing.'
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
365 days from issuance
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's 'Permit Deadlines and Refunds' section states explicitly: 'An issued Renewable Energy permit will expire 365 days from the date of issuance.' Note this conflicts with the Guide's own general Acknowledgement Statement clause 5, which states permits expire without refund if the applicant fails to secure a permit or pass an inspection within 180 days — the two clauses are in tension within the same document; the more specific 365-day PV clause is used here.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
MyGovernmentOnline (MGO) / MGO Connect — mygovernmentonline.org and mgoconnect.org
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding page links to mgoconnect.org for applications, and the City's own inspection/scheduling handouts direct users to mygovernmentonline.org; both are the same MyGovernmentOnline platform (MGOC).
authority page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/1458/Building
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherGuide requires 'Digital Submission Required' — all application materials must be submitted electronically through MGO; a kiosk exists only for account setup, not for paper submittal.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Note: Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) is Campbell's Community Choice Aggregator for electricity generation/supply, confirmed by the City's own 'Silicon Valley Clean Energy' page, but PG&E remains the wires-owning utility that handles interconnection/PTO.
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Renewable Energy Guide names PG&E under 'Other Agency Approvals' ('Only PG&E can remove and replace meters and service connections... contact PG&E Hookups'); City's own SVCE page confirms the CCA relationship separately from wires ownership. Not sourced from PowerToChoose.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit / parallel-but-gated
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 18.04.060(G): city approval/permit issuance 'does not authorize an applicant to connect the small residential rooftop energy system to the local utility provider's electricity grid. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such approval or permission from the local utility provider.' In practice NEM applications can be filed in parallel, but PTO depends on the utility's own process following AHJ final sign-off.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo HOA/architectural pre-approval step appears in CMC 18.04.060 or the City's Renewable Energy Guide submittal requirements; California's Solar Rights Act (Civil Code §714) preempts HOA restrictions on solar statewide, which is consistent with its absence here. Inference, not an explicit City statement that HOA approval is never required.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No dedicated historic-district review for solar found
Why the confidence is not higherSearched Title 21, Chapter 21.33 (Historic Preservation) of the Campbell Municipal Code on Municode — it covers demolition/repair criteria for historic buildings and California Historic Building Code adoption, but contains no solar-specific review step (positive control 'historic' hits throughout the chapter; fabricated control 'zzqqx' returns zero). Absence proved by reading the chapter, not assumed.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT21ZO_CH21.33HIPR
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherCalifornia has no windstorm/TDI certification program comparable to Texas; CRC Table R301.2 (Campbell-specific) sets a Wind Design Speed of 95 MPH as a design criterion for structural design purposes, but no separate wind 'certification' document or process was found for solar installs.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.11CARECO_18.11.010ADCARECO
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Not required for qualifying small residential rooftop PV (ministerial review under CMC 18.04.060/GC §65850.5); could be triggered for non-qualifying scope (e.g., system exceeding the 10kW AC/30kW-thermal ministerial threshold, or unusual siting) that falls back to standard discretionary review, though no specific SUP/Council-approval trigger for solar was found in Title 21.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from CMC 18.04.060's eligibility limits combined with the absence of any solar-specific discretionary-permit trigger in Title 21 Zoning.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
10 kW AC nameplate (or 30 kW thermal) is the threshold for the ministerial 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' expedited-review track under CMC 18.04.060; this is an eligibility cap for expedited/ministerial treatment, not a hard prohibition on larger residential systems (which would undergo standard, non-expedited review).
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 18.04.060(A) definition of 'small residential rooftop solar energy systems' — 'no larger than ten kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or thirty kilowatts thermal.'
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2022 CEC (based on the 2020 NEC / NFPA 2021 edition text) is what is currently codified in Campbell's Municode text (CMC 18.16.010, Ord. No. 2290, 11-15-2022), and that is the latest codified edition as of Municode's most recent supplement (Supplement 41, published 15 Oct 2024, posted online 11 Jun 2025). Statewide, the 2025 CEC (based on the 2023 NEC) took effect 1 Jan 2026 under Title 24 — Campbell's own codified ordinance text had not visibly caught up to that cycle as of this check; no newer Campbell electrical-code adoption ordinance was found on Municode. 60% · municipal code
- Which building code edition is in force? 2022 CBC (2021 IBC as amended 2022 by the State) per CMC 18.04.010, and 2022 CRC per CMC 18.11.010, both under Ord. No. 2290 (11-15-2022) — the latest adoption ordinance visible in Municode's current supplement. Same statewide-2025-cycle lag caveat as Q29 applies. 60% · municipal code
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2022 California Fire Code / 2021 International Fire Code, per CMC 17.04.010 (same Ord. No. 2290 cycle). Same statewide-2025-cycle lag caveat as Q29/Q30. 60% · municipal code
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 90% · municipal code
- What is the installation judged against? The 2022 CRC Sections R324.1 through R324.7.2.7 (rooftop PV fire classification/access/pathways), 2022 CEC Articles 690 and 705, and the Campbell Municipal Code generally — per the City's own required cover-sheet notation in its Renewable Energy Building Application Guide. 90% · building application guide
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Governed by the 2022 CRC Sections R324.1-R324.7.2.7 (State-level fire classification, access pathway and setback standard for rooftop PV), which the City's own Guide points installers to directly; no additional/different local ridge-setback or pathway amendment was found in Campbell's Title 17 Fire Code local-amendments section (17.04.060), meaning the state CRC pathway numbers control unmodified in Campbell. 75% · municipal code
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown is required. The City's Guide requires the site plan to show 'Location and/or method of rapid shutdown of the ESS, conduit/cable routing of battery storage system, PV, and related circuits,' consistent with the currently codified 2022 CEC (based on NFPA NEC 2020), Article 690.12. 80% · building application guide
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? A phenolic placard/plaque at the equipment, plus a required cover-sheet 'Details' signage detail (location, size, color, content of sticker/signage). No separate distinct facility-map placard beyond what's captured on the required Site Plan. 70% · building application guide
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 60% · building application guide
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Phenolic plaque, contrasting colors between text and background, no fixed type size specified by the City but 20-point (3/8") text is the City's stated minimum to consider. 90% · building application guide
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? The required Site Plan sheet functions as the facility map: it must show all interconnected equipment (existing utility service, sub-panels — labelled existing vs. new, with panel sizes and overhead/underground service), plus location/method of rapid shutdown and conduit/cable routing. No separate stand-alone 'facility map' placard document beyond this plan sheet was found. 65% · building application guide
- Where must the labels be placed? At the electrical service/equipment location shown in the 'Details' plan sheet, with location/size/color/content specified there; for ESS, location markings implicit in the CBC §1207.11.3 permitted-location list (detached garage, separated attached garage, exterior ≥3ft from doors/windows, or enclosed non-combustible utility space). 65% · building application guide
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes for ESS 75% · department handout
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, under CBC §1207.11 (Group R-3/R-4 ESS): must be listed/labeled to UL 9540 (commercial/utility-only listed units barred from residential use); minimum 3-ft unit spacing (unless justified by large-scale fire testing); permitted only in detached garages/accessory structures, an attached garage separated per CRC R302.6, outdoors/exterior wall ≥3ft from doors & windows, or an enclosed non-combustible utility/storage space; barred from sleeping rooms, closets opening to sleeping rooms, or other habitable space. 90% · department handout
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Effectively yes for larger installations 75% · fee schedule
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Not explicitly stated either way 50% · municipal code
20 questions answered against City of Campbell’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2022 CEC (based on the 2020 NEC / NFPA 2021 edition text) is what is currently codified in Campbell's Municode text (CMC 18.16.010, Ord. No. 2290, 11-15-2022), and that is the latest codified edition as of Municode's most recent supplement (Supplement 41, published 15 Oct 2024, posted online 11 Jun 2025). Statewide, the 2025 CEC (based on the 2023 NEC) took effect 1 Jan 2026 under Title 24 — Campbell's own codified ordinance text had not visibly caught up to that cycle as of this check; no newer Campbell electrical-code adoption ordinance was found on Municode.
Why the confidence is not higherRead CMC 18.16.010 directly via Municode's API/library route; flagging a probable codification lag rather than asserting Campbell has NOT adopted the 2025 cycle (state building standards apply automatically statewide from their effective date regardless of local codification lag).
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.16ELCO_18.16.010ADNAELCO
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2022 CBC (2021 IBC as amended 2022 by the State) per CMC 18.04.010, and 2022 CRC per CMC 18.11.010, both under Ord. No. 2290 (11-15-2022) — the latest adoption ordinance visible in Municode's current supplement. Same statewide-2025-cycle lag caveat as Q29 applies.
Why the confidence is not higherRead CMC 18.04.010 and 18.11.010 directly.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.010ADINBUCO
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2022 California Fire Code / 2021 International Fire Code, per CMC 17.04.010 (same Ord. No. 2290 cycle). Same statewide-2025-cycle lag caveat as Q29/Q30.
Why the confidence is not higherRead CMC 17.04.010 directly via Municode.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17FIPR_CH17.04INFICO_17.04.010AD2022CAFICO2021INFICO
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherExtensive local amendments exist: CMC 18.04.020 excludes several CBC appendices; CMC 18.04.060 adds the local ministerial small-residential-PV review process beyond the bare state code; CMC 17.04.060 contains local Fire Code amendments; CMC 18.11.010 sets Campbell-specific Table R301.2 climate/design criteria; and a separate 2024 Air Quality (NOx) Ordinance (No. 2316) amends construction standards for new residential/commercial buildings.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.010ADINBUCO
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2022 CRC Sections R324.1 through R324.7.2.7 (rooftop PV fire classification/access/pathways), 2022 CEC Articles 690 and 705, and the Campbell Municipal Code generally — per the City's own required cover-sheet notation in its Renewable Energy Building Application Guide.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's checklist item 1 (Cover Sheet) required notation: 'The PV system shall conform to the adopted and most recent CRC R324.1 through R324.7.2.7 and CEC Articles 690, 705 and Campbell's Municipal Code.'
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Renewable Energy Building Application Guide and CMC Ch. 18.16 (Electrical Code) — the Guide requires a household electrical-load-calculation worksheet only when the existing main panel is ≤125A, but no explicit local busbar-sizing or service-upgrade percentage rule (e.g. a 120%-rule equivalent) beyond referencing NEC/CEC Art. 690/705 generally.
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Renewable Energy Building Application Guide, Building Handouts & Forms page, and CMC Title 18 — no specific mounting-system brand/attachment-spacing standard published for residential rooftop PV beyond general manufacturer-listing compliance and standard CBC/CRC roof-load requirements.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Governed by the 2022 CRC Sections R324.1-R324.7.2.7 (State-level fire classification, access pathway and setback standard for rooftop PV), which the City's own Guide points installers to directly; no additional/different local ridge-setback or pathway amendment was found in Campbell's Title 17 Fire Code local-amendments section (17.04.060), meaning the state CRC pathway numbers control unmodified in Campbell.
Why the confidence is not higherSearched CMC 17.04.060 (local Fire Code amendments) in full for 'pathway,' 'setback,' 'ridge,' and '605' (CFC rooftop-PV access section) — none found; combined with the City's own Guide citing CRC R324 as the controlling standard for PV conformance.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17FIPR_CH17.04INFICO_17.04.060AMINFICOCAFICO
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — rapid shutdown is required. The City's Guide requires the site plan to show 'Location and/or method of rapid shutdown of the ESS, conduit/cable routing of battery storage system, PV, and related circuits,' consistent with the currently codified 2022 CEC (based on NFPA NEC 2020), Article 690.12.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's Site Plan checklist item 2 and Floor Plan checklist item 3 both require rapid-shutdown location/method to be shown. Edition tied to the 2022 CEC currently codified per Q29's caveat.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
A phenolic placard/plaque at the equipment, plus a required cover-sheet 'Details' signage detail (location, size, color, content of sticker/signage). No separate distinct facility-map placard beyond what's captured on the required Site Plan.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide checklist item 5 ('Details'): 'Provide typical detail of signage. Signage should be a phenolic plaque with contrasting colors between the text and background...' The same item cites 'Warning signs or labels shall comply with 2016 CEC Art. 110.21(B)' — this specific code-year citation (2016 CEC) appears to be a stale holdover from an older template, since the code cycle actually in force at the Guide's own creation date (Sep 2024) was the 2022 CEC, not 2016; flagging rather than propagating that citation as current.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Guide specifies placard material, contrast and minimum letter size but does not dictate a fixed wording script; it only cross-references NEC/CEC Art. 110.21(B) labeling-content requirements generically.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Phenolic plaque, contrasting colors between text and background, no fixed type size specified by the City but 20-point (3/8") text is the City's stated minimum to consider.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide checklist item 5: 'No type size is specified, but 20 point (3/8") should be considered the minimum.'
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The required Site Plan sheet functions as the facility map: it must show all interconnected equipment (existing utility service, sub-panels — labelled existing vs. new, with panel sizes and overhead/underground service), plus location/method of rapid shutdown and conduit/cable routing. No separate stand-alone 'facility map' placard document beyond this plan sheet was found.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide checklist item 2 (Site Plan) requirements.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Renewable Energy Guide (only notes 'Only PG&E can remove and replace meters and service connections'); attempted to pull PG&E's own DG placard/labeling spec from the Greenbook (TD-2306M, stated by PG&E to be accessible only 'through your PG&E Job Owner') and the public Electric Rule 21 tariff PDF, but did not retrieve PG&E-specific placard/labeling text within this run.
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the electrical service/equipment location shown in the 'Details' plan sheet, with location/size/color/content specified there; for ESS, location markings implicit in the CBC §1207.11.3 permitted-location list (detached garage, separated attached garage, exterior ≥3ft from doors/windows, or enclosed non-combustible utility space).
Why the confidence is not higherGuide checklist item 5 (signage detail) plus the ESS Handout's Section 1207.11.3 location rules.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes for ESS
Why the confidence is not higherESS Handout: 'ESS shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 9540. ESS listed and labeled solely for utility or commercial use shall not be used for residential applications' (CBC 1207.11.1). No separate distinct 'approved equipment list' was found for PV modules/inverters beyond standard code-compliance/listing requirements.
department handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16633/ESS-Handout
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, under CBC §1207.11 (Group R-3/R-4 ESS): must be listed/labeled to UL 9540 (commercial/utility-only listed units barred from residential use); minimum 3-ft unit spacing (unless justified by large-scale fire testing); permitted only in detached garages/accessory structures, an attached garage separated per CRC R302.6, outdoors/exterior wall ≥3ft from doors & windows, or an enclosed non-combustible utility/storage space; barred from sleeping rooms, closets opening to sleeping rooms, or other habitable space.
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own ESS Handout, quoting CBC §1207.11.1-1207.11.3 verbatim.
department handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16633/ESS-Handout
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Effectively yes for larger installations
Why the confidence is not higherESS can be filed either combined with a PV Renewable Energy permit or stand-alone as a $228 electrical permit per the Guide. Separately, the FY 2026-27 Master Fee Schedule lists a dedicated Fire operational-permit line 'Energy Storage Systems — $474' under 'Fire Fees / Operational Permits,' administered by SCCFD; the schedule does not state the residential kWh/size threshold that triggers this fire operational permit (ambiguous scope, flagged rather than resolved — comparable to the Gilroy pattern in this brief).
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/29705/FY-2027-Master-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Not explicitly stated either way
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 21.36.220 (Zoning – Solar energy systems) applies the same district height/setback/development standards to solar collectors generally ('as a part of a structure or incidental to a group of structures'), without a distinct clause classifying a ground-mounted array as an accessory structure. Read the full chapter (searched 'ground' — no hit) — this is a genuine absence of an explicit statement, not an assumption.
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT21ZO_CH21.36PRAPSPUS_21.36.220SOENSY
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Renewable Energy Building Application Guide (only states meter height 48"-66" and that only PG&E may touch the meter/service connection) and the City's Building Handouts & Forms page — no AC-disconnect-to-meter placement rule found; this would come from PG&E's own Greenbook/Electric Rule 21, which was not retrieved with disconnect-placement detail in this run.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal (MyGovernmentOnline / MGO Connect) or Phone (866-957-3764) 90% · authority page
- How much notice is required? Requests submitted before midnight are guaranteed for the following business day — effectively ~1 business day's notice. 80% · department handout
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Yes — AM window 8:00 AM-12:30 PM, PM window 12:30-5:00 PM (per note preference in the scheduling request). 75% · authority page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 80% · building application guide
- If delegated, to whom? Santa Clara County Fire Department — for the fire-code-administered slice only (e.g. the Energy Storage Systems operational permit); confirmed as Campbell's fire authority by SCCFD's own site. 80% · authority page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a standard Renewable Energy (PV) permit: Final Electrical and SD/CO (smoke/CO detector) Detection inspections, which may be scheduled the same day. For general construction the City's standard Sequence of Inspections runs footings/foundation → underfloor plumbing/mech/elec → underfloor frame → slab → underfloor insulation → shear/roof nailing → rough trades → frame/interior shear → insulation → lath/final gas → final plumbing/mech/elec/Planning/Public Works/Fire/Energy compliance → building final, as applicable to scope. 85% · building application guide
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 70% · building application guide
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes 85% · department handout
- What must be on site at inspection? The approved/printed construction-plan set (required once approved); a torque wrench for the electrical final; and, if used in lieu of interior inspector access, a signed SD/CO Self-Certification form. 80% · building application guide
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes 70% · building application guide
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final 75% · building application guide
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer / Applicant 85% · municipal code
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $237/hour 85% · fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections are issued as review comments through the applicant's MGOC (MyGovernmentOnline) project file/email; the applicant satisfies the comments and re-submits a complete revised drawing set using an incremented revision number (e.g. Rev 1, then .1/.2 for subsequent comment rounds), each clouded and delta-flagged on the affected sheets; approval is confirmed by email with the approved drawings attached. 85% · building application guide
14 questions answered against City of Campbell’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal (MyGovernmentOnline / MGO Connect) or Phone (866-957-3764)
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Inspections page: 'You can now schedule building inspections through MyGovernmentOnline or by phone at (866) 957-3764.'
authority page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/133/Inspections
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Requests submitted before midnight are guaranteed for the following business day — effectively ~1 business day's notice.
Why the confidence is not higher'How to Schedule Inspections' handout: 'Inspection requests that are submitted before midnight for the following business day are guaranteed.'
department handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/120/How-to-Schedule-Inspections
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Yes — AM window 8:00 AM-12:30 PM, PM window 12:30-5:00 PM (per note preference in the scheduling request).
Why the confidence is not higherCurrent Building Inspections webpage: 'You may also check your AM or PM time window... AM window is from 8:00 AM to 12:30 PM. PM window is from 12:30 PM to 5:00 PM.' Note an older 'How to Schedule Inspections' PDF (creation date 9 Apr 2021) instead states inspections run 9:00 AM-4:00 PM M-F; the current webpage is treated as authoritative over the older, undated-on-its-face handout.
authority page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/133/Inspections
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Division 'field inspection' staff (ICC-certified combination inspectors) perform the Final Electrical and SD/CO inspections for Renewable Energy permits per the Guide; fire-code-specific items (e.g. an ESS operational permit inspection) are administered by SCCFD rather than Campbell Building.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Santa Clara County Fire Department — for the fire-code-administered slice only (e.g. the Energy Storage Systems operational permit); confirmed as Campbell's fire authority by SCCFD's own site.
Why the confidence is not higherSCCFD's Municipal Codes & Fees page lists 'City of Campbell' among its member jurisdictions, and its own site footer states it is 'serving...the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, San Martin, Saratoga'; Campbell's own fee schedule states fire fees are 'set by the City but administered by Santa Clara County Fire Department.'
authority page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sccfd.org/fire-prevention/municipal-codes-fees/
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For a standard Renewable Energy (PV) permit: Final Electrical and SD/CO (smoke/CO detector) Detection inspections, which may be scheduled the same day. For general construction the City's standard Sequence of Inspections runs footings/foundation → underfloor plumbing/mech/elec → underfloor frame → slab → underfloor insulation → shear/roof nailing → rough trades → frame/interior shear → insulation → lath/final gas → final plumbing/mech/elec/Planning/Public Works/Fire/Energy compliance → building final, as applicable to scope.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's 'Inspections' section for PV-specific sequence; 'Sequence of Inspection Scheduling' handout for the general order.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No
Why the confidence is not higherFor a Renewable-Energy-only permit the Guide lists only Final Electrical + SD/CO Detection as required inspections — no separate rough-in or mid-roof step is called out for PV scope specifically.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherGuide requires 'Contractor is to have a torque wrench on site and be prepared to torque all breakers and terminal lugs in view of the inspector,' and the Final Electrical inspection 'will include observation of the torquing of all breakers and terminal lugs' — implying equipment/label verification occurs at that inspection; ESS equipment listing (UL 9540) is a submittal/plan-check item enforced before installation.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City publishes both the Renewable Energy Building Application Guide's 'Required Application Materials Checklist' and a separate general 'Sequence of Inspection Scheduling' handout.
department handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/11376/Building-Sequence-of-Inspections
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The approved/printed construction-plan set (required once approved); a torque wrench for the electrical final; and, if used in lieu of interior inspector access, a signed SD/CO Self-Certification form.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's 'Plan Preparation Requirements' (printed set on job site), torque-wrench notation, and Inspections section (SD/CO self-certification form).
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$237/hour
Why the confidence is not higherFY 2026-27 Master Fee Schedule, Building Fees item 22: 'Re-inspection Fee (must be paid before inspection) — $237, per hour.' The Guide separately prices plan-check revisions (a different fee) at $226 each.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/29705/FY-2027-Master-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Corrections are issued as review comments through the applicant's MGOC (MyGovernmentOnline) project file/email; the applicant satisfies the comments and re-submits a complete revised drawing set using an incremented revision number (e.g. Rev 1, then .1/.2 for subsequent comment rounds), each clouded and delta-flagged on the affected sheets; approval is confirmed by email with the approved drawings attached.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide's 'Revisions (PV, ESS, EVCS, Panel Rework)' process steps 1-13.
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final
Why the confidence is not higherFor the Renewable Energy permit specifically, passing the Final Electrical + SD/CO inspections closes out that permit (no separate 'Green tag'/CO terminology used in the Guide); for a full building project the general Sequence of Inspections culminates in a 'Building final.'
building application guide checked 2026-08-30 https://www.campbellca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/22892/AppGuideSimple-Construction---Part-II-2024-Final-Solarapp
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer / Applicant
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 18.04.060(G): City approval/permit issuance 'does not authorize an applicant to connect the small residential rooftop energy system to the local utility provider's electricity grid. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such approval or permission from the local utility provider.'
municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18BUCORE_CH18.04BUCO_18.04.060SMREROPHLTENSYREPR
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Campbell against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Campbell is the authority having jurisdiction 90% confidence
- Holds
- building and electrical
- Delegated to
- Santa Clara County Fire Department (fire-code enforcement and administration of the Fire operational-permit fee line, e.g. for Energy Storage Systems); PG&E retains sole authority over interconnection/PTO and meter/service-connection work
- Overridden by
- CA Gov. Code §65850.5 (mandatory ministerial review for small residential rooftop PV, codified locally as CMC 18.04.060); AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22) freezes further local residential building-code amendments statewide from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031
- Why not higher
- City's own Building Division page (Community Development Dept.) and Campbell Municipal Code Title 18 (Building Codes and Regulations) confirm the City issues building and electrical permits for residential PV, including a codified local ministerial ordinance (CMC 18.04.060) implementing the state's GC §65850.5 mandate. Santa Clara County Fire Department is independently confirmed (by SCCFD's own municipal-codes-fees page and site footer, and by Campbell's own fee-schedule note that 'Fees are set by the City but administered by Santa Clara County Fire Department') as the fire authority serving Campbell, holding fire-code enforcement and certain ESS-related fire fees. No brief-name correction was needed here: 'Community Development Department' is in fact the correct current department name for Building in Campbell (Building Official Bob Lennen reports to Community Development Director Rob Eastwood), unlike the Alameda County case cited in the brief.
Check the code edition before you build
This authority's published code edition does not match what the state has adopted. That usually means the authority's ordinance has not been updated for the current cycle — but a local amendment can also be lawful. Confirm with the building department before you submit.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- $477 flat for a Photovoltaic permit (with or without ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework); $228 flat if ESS/EVCS/Panel Rework is filed stand-alone as a basic electrical permit;80%
- Plan review
- Automatic (SolarAPP-style) track: permit issues in 1 day upon payment. Non-Automatic (standard plan check) track: 5-10 days.85%
- Portal
- MyGovernmentOnline (MGO) / MGO Connect — mygovernmentonline.org and mgoconnect.org95%
- Electrical code
- 2022 CEC (based on the 2020 NEC / NFPA 2021 edition text) is what is currently codified in Campbell's Municode text (CMC 18.16.010, Ord. No.60%
- Own placard wording
- No60%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal (MyGovernmentOnline / MGO Connect) or Phone (866-957-3764)90%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 60%
No
Size, colour & material 90%
Phenolic plaque, contrasting colors between text and background, no fixed type size specified by the City but 20-point (3/8") text is the City's stated minimum to consider.
Where they go 65%
At the electrical service/equipment location shown in the 'Details' plan sheet, with location/size/color/content specified there; for ESS, location markings implicit in the CBC §1207.11.3 permitted-location list (detached garage, separated attached garage, exterior ≥3ft from doors/windows, or enclosed non-combustible utility space).
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.