City of Chico

Butte County

Verified Aug. 4, 2026

City of Chico is a city authority in the State of California, serving 101,475 residents. 13,272 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate Q4 Where you file — eTRAKiT (hosted at chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit) Q20

Permit required
Yes95% source
What it costs
$450 flat (systems ≤15 kW); $500 plus $15 per kW above 15 kW (systems >15 kW). Separate Ground Mount Solar racking permit = $876.95% source
Key document
fee schedule cited by 4 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 90% · department page
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 88% · municipal code
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate 85% · municipal code
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 60% · municipal code
    • Is there a historic-district review? Yes, conditionally 68% · municipal code
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 85% · municipal code
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 78% · department page
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 85% · municipal code
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • How many copies, and in what format? Digital only — no paper copies required 80% · department page
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No fixed weight/height threshold found; 16.10.060.C gives the building official discretion to require plans/calculations be prepared by a licensed engineer or architect on a case-by-case basis (not solar-specific). 55% · municipal code
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? eTRAKiT (hosted at chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit) 95% · portal landing page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 82% · portal landing page
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? $450 flat (systems ≤15 kW); $500 plus $15 per kW above 15 kW (systems >15 kW). Separate Ground Mount Solar racking permit = $876. 95% · fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Tiered 92% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? No separate plan-check fee for a standard over-the-counter residential solar permit (the $450/$500+ fee is listed under 'OVER THE COUNTER PERMITS'); BUT the schedule notes 'Plan Check and applicable fees may be required for systems exceeding 40 lbs/sf OR for systems being installed on a Conventional Framed Roof' — in that case the general Plan Check & Inspection fee ($282/hr) applies on top. 75% · fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days from issuance if work has not commenced, or 180 consecutive days of suspension/abandonment after commencement (extendable once by up to 180 days for cause). A lapsed permit may be renewed within one year at 50% of the original building permit fee if no plan changes. 92% · municipal code
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 62% · utility company page

28 questions answered against City of Chico’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherCity Building Division issues building and electrical permits directly for all construction including PV; no evidence of county or special-district jurisdiction over residential solar.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://chicoca.gov/__catapult_pages/b7a3b3b4-7f20-4be8-9814-20c356b202dc/Building-Division.html

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both

Why the confidence is not higherMunicipal Code 16.10.020 (basic building permits) and 16.10.030.A (electrical permits) are both required and both issued by the City; nothing is delegated.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11637

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherFee schedule lists a dedicated 'Residential Solar' permit fee row, and 16.10.020 requires a basic building permit for any installation not specifically exempted (rooftop PV is not on the exemption list).

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://catapultfilemanager-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/e12a7475-6d0d-4986-a8bb-538a9e5496e0/FY%202026-2027%20MASTER%20FEE%20SCHEDULE%20-%20Updated%2007-06-2026.pdf

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Separate

Why the confidence is not higher16.10.030.A defines the electrical permit as a distinct required permit from the basic building permit (16.10.020); fee schedule likewise lists 'Electrical Plan Review Required' as its own line separate from the solar permit fee.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11637

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either

Why the confidence is not higher16.10.070 allows the applicant to be either a person holding a valid CSLB contractor's license, OR an owner-builder exempt under B&P Code §7040 — both may pull the permit.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11726#JD_16.10.070

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherCity's Building Permit Information page states new contractors must have 'a valid City of Chico business license number' and their CSLB number to apply online — a form of registration before applying. Not fully certain this is enforced for over-the-counter/in-person applications too.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://chicoca.gov/__catapult_pages/6c3b7f9d-5d6b-4a75-aef5-9465cd039942/Building-Permit-Information.html

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes

Why the confidence is not higher16.10.070.B and 16.10.080 establish a full owner-builder path (CA H&SC §19825/§19830-31 verification form) with no carve-out excluding solar/electrical work.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11726#JD_16.10.070

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information and Building Division pages on chicoca.gov (both reference 'Forms, Handouts and Policies' and 'Building FAQs' pages, but both guessed URLs 404'd); did not locate the actual current URLs for those resource pages.

https://chicoca.gov/post/forms-handouts-and-policies

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Digital only — no paper copies required

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Information page states plans are submitted digitally and 'does not require paper copies of plans.'

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://chicoca.gov/__catapult_pages/6c3b7f9d-5d6b-4a75-aef5-9465cd039942/Building-Permit-Information.html

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMunicipal Code 16.10.050/16.10.060 (general application content requirements — no solar-specific site-plan checklist found); Forms/Handouts page inaccessible (404).

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMunicipal Code 16.10.060 (general plans/specs/engineering-calculations requirement, not solar-specific); no dedicated solar checklist located.

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame as Q11 — no solar-specific checklist located.

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

No fixed weight/height threshold found; 16.10.060.C gives the building official discretion to require plans/calculations be prepared by a licensed engineer or architect on a case-by-case basis (not solar-specific).

Why the confidence is not higherThis is a discretionary clause, not a stated PSF or size threshold, so it only partially answers the question.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11637

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMunicipal Code 16.10.060.C (discretionary engineer/architect stamp clause, not electrical-specific or threshold-based); no dedicated electrical PE stamp rule found.

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

$450 flat (systems ≤15 kW); $500 plus $15 per kW above 15 kW (systems >15 kW). Separate Ground Mount Solar racking permit = $876.

Why the confidence is not higherFY2026-27 Master Fee Schedule (effective 7/6/2026), residential occupancy section, explicit 'Residential Solar' fee rows plus a separate ground-mount racking permit line.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://catapultfilemanager-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/e12a7475-6d0d-4986-a8bb-538a9e5496e0/FY%202026-2027%20MASTER%20FEE%20SCHEDULE%20-%20Updated%2007-06-2026.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Tiered

Why the confidence is not higherFlat fee up to 15 kW, then flat-plus-per-kW above that threshold — a tiered structure, not pure flat/valuation/per-panel.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://catapultfilemanager-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/e12a7475-6d0d-4986-a8bb-538a9e5496e0/FY%202026-2027%20MASTER%20FEE%20SCHEDULE%20-%20Updated%2007-06-2026.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

No separate plan-check fee for a standard over-the-counter residential solar permit (the $450/$500+ fee is listed under 'OVER THE COUNTER PERMITS'); BUT the schedule notes 'Plan Check and applicable fees may be required for systems exceeding 40 lbs/sf OR for systems being installed on a Conventional Framed Roof' — in that case the general Plan Check & Inspection fee ($282/hr) applies on top.

Why the confidence is not higherFee schedule states this conditionally rather than as a flat yes/no; residential solar is grouped with other OTC (non-plan-check) permits by default.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://catapultfilemanager-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/e12a7475-6d0d-4986-a8bb-538a9e5496e0/FY%202026-2027%20MASTER%20FEE%20SCHEDULE%20-%20Updated%2007-06-2026.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding Division and Building Permit Information pages on chicoca.gov — neither states a plan-review turnaround time in business days.

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

180 days from issuance if work has not commenced, or 180 consecutive days of suspension/abandonment after commencement (extendable once by up to 180 days for cause). A lapsed permit may be renewed within one year at 50% of the original building permit fee if no plan changes.

Why the confidence is not higherDirectly quoted from Municipal Code 16.10.180, currently in force.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11637

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

eTRAKiT (hosted at chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit)

Why the confidence is not higherNamed directly on the City's Building Division and Building Permit Information pages as the online permit portal.

portal landing page checked 2026-08-30 https://chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit/

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Information page: apply online, digital-only plan submittal (no paper copies); eTRAKiT portal page confirms apply, pay fees, and schedule inspections online. Not 100% certain because the portal's own marketing copy doesn't explicitly confirm plan upload happens within the same session as application.

portal landing page checked 2026-08-30 https://chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit/

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's own company-profile page places its territory from Eureka to Bakersfield in northern/central CA, which includes Chico/Butte County — but this is a general territory statement, not an address-specific PG&E territory map or a Chico city-source confirmation, per the standing caution against assuming utility from indirect sources.

utility company page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/en/about/company-information/company-profile.html

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedFee schedule and Building Division/Permit Info pages — no utility DG manual or sequencing statement found for PG&E interconnection relative to permit issuance.

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No

Why the confidence is not higherThe City's required-application-contents list (16.10.050) has no HOA/architectural-approval item; HOA review would be a private CC&R matter, not a city permit condition. Not independently confirmed by an explicit 'no HOA requirement' statement.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11726

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Yes, conditionally

Why the confidence is not higherMunicipal Code Ch. 19.37 (Historic Preservation) exists as a distinct review chapter, and 16R.02.010.C separately adopts the 2025 California Historical Code for 'qualified historical buildings.' Review applies only if the property is a designated historic resource — not a blanket requirement for all residential solar permits.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21492

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16R.02 (Basic Building Standards adoption) table of contents/section text — no windstorm/TDI-style certification section found; not full-text searched for the word 'wind'.

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedTitle 19 Division III (Land Use and Development Permit Procedures) chapter list — no chapter naming rooftop solar specifically; did not confirm whether any existing SUP/Use Permit chapter (19.24/19.25) is ever triggered by residential PV.

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedTitle 16, 16R, and Title 19 chapter-by-chapter tables of contents — no chapter or section titled/covering a residential generation size cap was found.

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (as incorporated into the 2025 California Electrical Code) 90% · municipal code
    • Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (Part 2, Title 24 CCR) 95% · municipal code
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (Part 9, Title 24 CCR), which amends/repeals sections of the 2024 International Fire Code 95% · municipal code
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — but concentrated in the Fire Code, not building/electrical/residential 85% · municipal code
    • What is the installation judged against? The 2025 California Electrical Code (Title 24, Part 3) as adopted in Chapter 16R.04 88% · municipal code
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    Nothing recorded for City of Chico on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown per NEC 690.12, as incorporated into the 2025 CEC (2023 NEC cycle) 75% · adopting ordinance (inference)
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes 88% · fee schedule

20 questions answered against City of Chico’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2023 NEC (as incorporated into the 2025 California Electrical Code)

Why the confidence is not higher16R.04.010 adopts the '2025 California Electrical Code (CEC), Part 3, Title 24 CCR' by reference via Ord. No. 2619 (eff. 1-6-26); the 2025 CEC cycle is based on NFPA 70 2023.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21518

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2025 California Building Code (Part 2, Title 24 CCR)

Why the confidence is not higher16R.02.010.A adopts the 2025 CBC by reference, current per Ord. No. 2619, effective 1-6-26.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21492

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

2025 California Fire Code (Part 9, Title 24 CCR), which amends/repeals sections of the 2024 International Fire Code

Why the confidence is not higher16R.42.010.A states this explicitly, current per Ord. No. 2619, eff. 1-6-26.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21766

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes — but concentrated in the Fire Code, not building/electrical/residential

Why the confidence is not higher16R.42.010.C lists roughly a dozen specific CFC amendments (LP-gas permits, appeals routing, rear addressing, fire-hydrant spacing table, etc.). By contrast, 16R.02 (building), 16R.04 (electrical), and 16R.12 (residential) each simply adopt their 2025 state code with no equivalent amendment list — consistent with CA AB 130's freeze on more-restrictive residential amendments (1 Oct 2025–1 Jun 2031).

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21766

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The 2025 California Electrical Code (Title 24, Part 3) as adopted in Chapter 16R.04

Why the confidence is not higher16.06.030.A ties all electrical work to the standards in 16R.04, which is the 2025 CEC with no local electrical amendments found.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21518

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16R.04 Electrical Standards (adoption section only, 16R.04.010) — no separate service-upgrade/busbar-sizing amendment section found.

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16R.02 Building Standards adoption section — no mounting-system/attachment-spacing amendment found; likely governed by unamended 2025 CBC/CRC wind/seismic provisions only.

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16R.42 Fire Regulation Standards (fully read) — only fire-hydrant spacing table and general amendments found; no PV-specific ridge-setback/access-pathway amendment. Did not check Chapter 16R.41 Wildland-Urban Interface Code.

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes — rapid shutdown per NEC 690.12, as incorporated into the 2025 CEC (2023 NEC cycle)

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the adopted code edition (2025 CEC / 2023 NEC), which mandates 690.12 rapid shutdown for PV systems on or attached to buildings; I did not find or read the literal 690.12 text as locally modified, and no local amendment to it was located.

adopting ordinance (inference) checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21518

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16R.10 Sign Standards was identified in the Title 16R chapter list but not opened (governs advertising signage under zoning, likely not the source for NEC-required equipment labels in any case).

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No

Why the confidence is not higherNo Chico-specific placard wording was found in the Sign Standards chapter (16R.10, which governs advertising/zoning signs, not NEC labels) or anywhere in Title 16/16R; equipment labeling appears to rely solely on the adopted 2025 CEC (NEC Art. 690) requirements.

municipal code (absence) checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-21481

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame as Q38/39 — Sign Standards chapter not opened; no other placard-wording section found in chapters reviewed.

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapters 16R.04 (Electrical) and 16R.42 (Fire) — no site-plan/facility-map placard requirement found beyond what NEC 705.10 itself would require.

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDid not access a PG&E Rule 21 / Distributed Generation interconnection handbook; not checked.

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame as Q38/40/41 — no local label-placement rule found in chapters reviewed.

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapters 16R.02/16R.04 adoption sections — no equipment-listing/approved-list requirement beyond standard CEC/CBC listing rules.

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16R.42 Fire Regulation Standards, section 16R.42.010 (general adoption) only — did not reach any battery/ESS-specific CFC chapter or amendment.

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame as Q45 — ESS permit chapter not located/opened.

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherFee schedule has a distinct 'Ground Mount Solar racking permit for Residential and Commercial Projects — $876.00 — Separate Permit Required' line, and notes supporting structures over 7' high require a separate permit — i.e., treated as its own structure/permit, not folded into the rooftop solar fee.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://catapultfilemanager-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/e12a7475-6d0d-4986-a8bb-538a9e5496e0/FY%202026-2027%20MASTER%20FEE%20SCHEDULE%20-%20Updated%2007-06-2026.pdf

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedFee schedule and Electrical Standards chapter — no AC-disconnect placement rule found; this is typically set by the utility's own Greenbook/interconnection requirements, not reviewed.

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Portal 80% · portal page
    • How much notice is required? Request by 3:00 PM for next-business-day inspection 85% · department page
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 75% · municipal code
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    Nothing recorded for City of Chico on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • What must be on site at inspection? An inspection record card posted at a conspicuous location on-site (required from permit issuance until final approval); approved plans/specifications should be available on-site since a fee may be assessed if they are not ('approved plans and specifications for such work are not readily available to the building official at the work site'). 75% · municipal code
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $281.00 (Construction-Reinspection Fee, 1/2-hour minimum) — charged for more than two requests to inspect the same work item 92% · fee schedule

14 questions answered against City of Chico’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal

Why the confidence is not highereTRAKiT portal page advertises 'Schedule Next-Day Inspections'; a separate 'Today's Inspections' viewer is linked from the Building Division page. Phone/email/walk-in booking may also exist but weren't confirmed as offered.

portal page checked 2026-08-30 https://chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit/ExistingInspections.aspx

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Request by 3:00 PM for next-business-day inspection

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Division page states this cutoff explicitly.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://chicoca.gov/__catapult_pages/b7a3b3b4-7f20-4be8-9814-20c356b202dc/Building-Division.html

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedeTRAKiT portal and Building Division pages — next-day scheduling by 3pm confirmed, but no AM/PM window detail found.

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherInspections chapter (16.14) places inspection authority with the City building official/designated inspector, with no reference to any outside inspecting agency for residential building/electrical work.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11897

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedN/A — Q52 answered Yes (not delegated), so this question does not apply.

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16.14 Inspections — only sections 16.14.080–16.14.130 were retrieved (access, record card, fees, surveys, tests); sections 16.14.010–.070, which likely list the required inspection types/order, were not retrieved.

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame as Q54 — rough-in/mid-roof inspection section not retrieved.

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16.14 sections retrieved (080–130) do not mention label/listing verification explicitly; standard CEC/CBC inspection practice would suggest yes but this was not confirmed from a Chico source.

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedForms/Handouts and Building FAQs pages on chicoca.gov — both guessed URLs 404'd; could not confirm whether a published inspection checklist exists.

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

An inspection record card posted at a conspicuous location on-site (required from permit issuance until final approval); approved plans/specifications should be available on-site since a fee may be assessed if they are not ('approved plans and specifications for such work are not readily available to the building official at the work site').

Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from 16.14.090 and 16.14.110.A.3, though these are general building-permit provisions, not solar-specific.

municipal code checked 2026-08-30 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/chico/latest/chico_ca/0-0-0-11897

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$281.00 (Construction-Reinspection Fee, 1/2-hour minimum) — charged for more than two requests to inspect the same work item

Why the confidence is not higherExplicit line item in the FY2026-27 Master Fee Schedule building fees section.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://catapultfilemanager-prod.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/e12a7475-6d0d-4986-a8bb-538a9e5496e0/FY%202026-2027%20MASTER%20FEE%20SCHEDULE%20-%20Updated%2007-06-2026.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapter 16.14 sections retrieved — no corrections/re-inspection process description found beyond the re-inspection fee itself (Q59).

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChapters 16.10 and 16.12 (Certificates of Occupancy) — 16.12 was identified in the TOC but not opened; final sign-off document for a PV retrofit (vs. new construction CO) not confirmed.

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding Division/Permit Info pages and fee schedule — no statement of who files for PTO with PG&E; not checked against a PG&E interconnection source.

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Chico against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

City of Chico is the authority having jurisdiction 85% confidence
Holds
Building, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Fire — all performed directly by City of Chico departments (Building Division; Fire Department), with no delegation observed to Butte County
Overridden by
CA Gov. Code §65850.5 (expedited/ministerial residential solar permitting, as amended by AB 2188) sets a ceiling on what the City may require for small residential PV; CA AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22) freezes any MORE-restrictive local residential-code amendment from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031. Consistent with that freeze, Chico's current adoption ordinance (Ord. No. 2619, eff. 1-6-26) adopts the 2025 CBC, CRC, and CEC essentially without amendment — all local amendment activity found was in the Fire Code chapter (16R.42), not building/electrical/residential.
Why not higher
City's own Building Division page (chicoca.gov) and Chico Municipal Code Ch. 16.06/16.10/16R confirm the City issues both basic building permits and electrical permits itself, with an owner-builder path and no reference to any other AHJ. No county building/electrical delegation language found anywhere in Title 16 or 16R. Confidence is not higher because I did not find a Chico-specific ordinance implementing the Gov. Code §65850.5 expedited-review procedure by name (it appears to be handled administratively via eTRAKiT rather than codified).

https://chicoca.gov/__catapult_pages/b7a3b3b4-7f20-4be8-9814-20c356b202dc/Building-Division.html

Permit required
Yes95%
Permit cost
$450 flat (systems ≤15 kW); $500 plus $15 per kW above 15 kW (systems >15 kW). Separate Ground Mount Solar racking permit = $876.95%
Portal
eTRAKiT (hosted at chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit)95%
Electrical code
2023 NEC (as incorporated into the 2025 California Electrical Code)90%
Own placard wording
No62%
Booking an inspection
Portal80%
Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 62%

No

Size, colour & material None%

Where they go None%

What the utility wants on top None%

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
City
County
Butte County
Regions served
1
Regions covered
City of Chico · city
Solar Requirements
Separate roof inspection
Resources are available for your convenience. Reports and Data Archive arrow Monthly reports on Permit Applications, Construction Activity, and annual reports. Today's Inspections arrow A list of inspections scheduled for today. Building Inspection Information arrow Inspection request new cut off ti
Separate fire inspection
RESOURCES RESOURCES City Fee Schedule Useful Links Useful Links Useful Links The Building Standards Commission The International Code Council California Building Officials California Energy Commission California Government Code (legislation) Contractors State License Board​ PG&E Rebates & Savings
Authority Contact
Address
411 Main Street, Chico, CA 95928
Main Phone
(530) 879-6700
Building Department
Department
Community Development - Building Division
Direct Phone
(530) 896-7200
Portal Software
eTRAKiT
Booking & Scheduling
Preferred channel
online_portal
Book in advance
1
Notes
City of Chico uses eTRAKiT (hosted at chico.csqrcloud.com/community-etrakit/) for all permit and inspection management. Solar PV permits applied for and inspections scheduled online. Inspections must be requested by 3:00 PM the day prior; cancellations by 7:00 AM day-of. All fees must be paid before scheduling an inspection. Building Division is paperless — no paper plan copies required. Portal accessible via chicoca.gov/eTRAKiT redirect. Physical address: 411 Main Street, Chico CA 95928. Planning Division: (530) 879-6800. Key staff: Dale Fletcher (Chief Building Official), Mike Callaway (Supervising Inspector).