City of Clovis
Fresno County
City of Clovis is a busy jurisdiction for residential solar — 8th in California by installs on record — 120,124 residents, with 22,855 residential solar installs on record. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — Next business day for a complete over-the-counter application; within 3 business days for a complete electronic application; real time for a SolarAPP+ submittal. Q18 Where you file — Tyler EnerGov Citizen Self Service ('CSS portal') at https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/home, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- Plan review turnaround
- Next business day for a complete over-the-counter application; within 3 business days for a complete electronic application; real time for a SolarAPP+ submittal.85% source
- Key document
- published checklist + eligibility list cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · adopting ordinance (CMC Title 8 ch. 8.1)
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 95% · adopting ordinance (CMC ch. 8.1, 8.2, 8.15)
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + department page
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 55% · permit application form
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 95% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06)
- Is there a historic-district review? No 70% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + municipal code search
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 85% · department page
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Only exceptionally. CMC 8.14.06 allows the Building Official to require a use permit for a small residential rooftop solar energy system only on substantial evidence that the system 'could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety', with any denial requiring written findings including the basis for rejecting feasible alternatives, and any such decision appealable to the City of Clovis Appeals Board. No Council approval is required. Separately, Development Code Table 2-2 (CMC 9.10.020) lists 'Solar and Wind Generation Facilities' as a NONRESIDENTIAL use requiring a Conditional Use Permit in every residential district (AR, R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, MHP) - that entry addresses standalone generation facilities, not accessory rooftop PV on a dwelling, which is covered by CMC ch. 8.14. 70% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + development code (CMC 9.10.020 Table 2-2)
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No cap on residential generation as such, but two path-specific ceilings. CMC 8.14.02(f) confines the expedited AB 2188 process to a system 'no larger than ten (10) kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or thirty (30) kilowatts thermal', on a single or duplex dwelling, not exceeding the maximum legal building height. The City's SolarAPP+/expedited Eligibility List sets its own limits: PV maximum 38.4 kWdc, paired ESS maximum 38.4 kWdc, existing service only with no service upgrade or like-for-like panel change, main service not exceeding 400 A, single phase, no existing PV or ESS on the home, one module type / one racking type / one micro-inverter or optimiser type / one AC-module type per submittal, flat-plate modules only, non-building-integrated (no solar roof tiles), single-family dwelling or residentially permitted auxiliary building. 85% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.02(f)) + eligibility list
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 90% · ordinance (CMC 8.2.102(a))
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 80% · published checklist (Residential Plan Check List 2025)
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 85% · ordinance (CMC 8.2.102(a)) + department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Per the City's Residential Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic Submittal Requirements: (1) permit application (description of work, address, owner, contractor, valuation, signed); (2) construction documents - plan-set cover sheet (address, vicinity map, owner name and phone, designer name and address, contractor info, scope, full equipment list including modules, inverters, MPU, sub-panels, combiners, load centres, ESS, gateways, rapid-shutdown devices, optimisers, existing PV; list of applicable California codes; sheet index; legend); site plan; roof plan showing fire setbacks and access pathways; attachment details; electrical one-line or three-line with equipment schedule, OCPD ratings, 120% calculation, conduit sizes and types with calculations, conductor schedule, main-service status and derate calculations, existing interconnected sources, ESS; labelling sheet showing all labels in colour plus a directory placard; datasheets for inverters/micro-inverters, modules, RSD devices/optimisers, racking, attachment system, array bonding, combiners, service/sub-panels, monitoring, batteries/ESS, transfer switches, specialty equipment and generators; and clouded/deltaed revision sheets with a full written description for any resubmittal. Owner-builders additionally file the Owner-Builder form; contractors provide a City of Clovis business licence. 90% · published checklist
- How many copies, and in what format? Residential: one set for the initial submittal (Building FAQ). On resubmittal the Residential Plan Check List requires one copy of all corrected documents with the redlined set plus a thumb drive holding a PDF of all documents, and all redlined sheets returned. Electronic submittal is available and, for PV, is one of three routes: (1) in person, (2) online through the CSS portal, (3) SolarAPP+ through the CSS portal (contractors only). CMC 8.14.05(b)-(c) require electronic submittal to be available for small residential rooftop solar and require electronic signatures to be accepted in lieu of wet signatures. 75% · department FAQ + published checklist
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. Per the PV submittal handout the site plan (cited to 2025 CRC R106.1) must show: the lot with property lines and the footprint of existing structures; the house location on the parcel; the location and label of all equipment and system components (modules, inverters, main-panel upgrades, sub-panels, combiners, load centres, ESS, gateways, rapid-shutdown devices, optimisers, existing PV); streets shown and labelled; and a north arrow. The Residential Plan Check List additionally requires a completed City of Clovis Site Plan (Plot Plan) form. 90% · published checklist
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 95% · published checklist
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 90% · published checklist
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No stamp threshold is set for a standard roof-mounted residential PV system. The PV submittal handout asks only for attachment points on rafters/trusses within the datasheet's maximum span and cantilever, plus an expanded attachment/flashing detail - no engineer's calculations or stamp. The SolarAPP+/expedited Eligibility List instead sets prescriptive structural limits: PV modules and hardware not exceeding 4 psf, roof designed for a 20 psf minimum live load, array no more than 10 inches above the roof deck, no wood shake or wood-shingle roofs, and no non-permanent structures (free-standing carports, sheds). A design outside those limits falls to the general rule in the Residential Plan Check List - sheets stamped by an architect or engineer licensed in California per Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 5537, 'when applicable', with a digital signature accepted. 70% · published checklist + eligibility list
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No electrical PE stamp is required and no threshold is published. The PV submittal handout asks for electrical calculations but never for a stamp; the Residential Plan Check List's only stamp requirement is the general Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 5537 'when applicable' architect/engineer stamp. 70% · published checklist
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Tyler EnerGov Citizen Self Service ('CSS portal') at https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/home, with NREL SolarAPP+ available through the same portal for eligible contractor-submitted residential PV (SB 379). 90% · portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 85% · department page
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation 45% · notice to industry + ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 304.2)
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes 80% · ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 304.3)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Next business day for a complete over-the-counter application; within 3 business days for a complete electronic application; real time for a SolarAPP+ submittal. Optional expedited plan review (any project, extra fee) targets comments within 10 working days. 85% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + department policy
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days. CMC 8.1.01.1 amends UAC 303.4: a permit expires and becomes null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days of the permit date, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for 180 days after commencement. 'Failure to pass a required inspection every 180 days shall constitute the abandonment of work.' A new permit at one half the original fee revives it if the plans are unchanged and the lapse has not exceeded one year; beyond that a full new permit fee is due. 90% · ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 303.4)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) 85% · department page + city solar page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit 85% · utility DG process page
28 questions answered against City of Clovis’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherClovis is a separate incorporated city and its own AHJ; neither the City of Fresno's nor Fresno County's answer carries over. Clovis Municipal Code Title 8 (Building Regulations) creates the Building Division, and CMC 8.1.02 adopts the California Building Code 'for the purpose of regulating the erection, construction... of buildings and structures in the City'. The Building Division's own page states it 'is created under Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code'. Fire code enforcement sits with the Clovis Fire Department under CMC Title 4 ch. 4.4.
adopting ordinance (CMC Title 8 ch. 8.1) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002744
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherCMC ch. 8.1 adopts the CBC, ch. 8.2 the California Electrical Code, ch. 8.15 the CRC, ch. 8.5 CMC, ch. 8.6 CPC, ch. 8.16 Energy, ch. 8.17 CALGreen - all administered by the Building Division at 1033 Fifth Street. Electrical is retained, not delegated: CMC 8.2.102(a) sets the City's own rules on who may be issued an electrical permit. Nothing is delegated to Fresno County or a third party. Only fire-code review and enforcement passes to the Clovis Fire Department (CMC ch. 4.4), and CMC 8.14.06 contemplates 'a separate fire inspection... if deemed required by the Clovis Fire Department'.
adopting ordinance (CMC ch. 8.1, 8.2, 8.15) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002761
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC ch. 8.14 (Small Residential Rooftop Solar Energy Systems) presumes a permit and sets an expedited process for issuing it; the Building Division's own page describes 'three ways to submit for a photovoltaic permit'; the Residential Building Permit Application has a 'Photovoltaic' work-type checkbox. The FAQ's no-permit-required list (sheds under 120 sq ft, fences, low retaining walls, paint, small pools) does not include solar.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + department page checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherOne Residential Building Permit Application covers the job; 'Photovoltaic' and 'Electrical' are separate tick-boxes on the same form and a PV submittal is made as a single package (application + plans + electrical one-line + datasheets) under the Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic Submittal Requirements. The City does also issue standalone electrical permits with their own issuance rules (CMC 8.2.102(a)) and its own fee table E-1, so the two are not merged as a matter of code. Confidence is held down because no Clovis handout says in terms whether a second electrical permit is drawn for a PV job.
permit application form checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Residential%20Building%20Permit%20Application%202025.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.2.102(a) 'Add New Section Regarding Permit Issuance' - permits shall be issued only to: (1) owners of single-family dwellings where the work is on a dwelling to be occupied by the permittee; (2) electrical contractors holding a valid State Electrical Contractor's licence; (3) governmental agencies; (4) State-licensed general or specialty contractors within the scope of their licences; (5) certified plant electricians for plant maintenance. For the SolarAPP+/eligibility route the City narrows this: C-46 or C-10 for PV only, C-10 required where an ESS is included.
ordinance (CMC 8.2.102(a)) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002761
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Residential Plan Check List requires, twice, 'Provide a City of Clovis Business License for the Contractor' as a cover-sheet and documents item. Clovis operates a Business Registration & Tax Certificate scheme administered by Finance; the licence is a business-tax registration rather than a trade registration, and there is no separate contractor-registration programme in the Building Division.
published checklist (Residential Plan Check List 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Residential%20Plan%20Check%20List%202025.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.2.102(a)(1) allows a permit to be issued to the owner of a single-family dwelling provided the work is on a dwelling to be occupied by the permittee, and the City publishes a Notice to Owner/Builders and an Owner-Builder Disclosure and Authorization form. Limit: the Building Division page states the SolarAPP+ route 'is for contractors only (Owner builders are required to use method 1 or 2)', i.e. in-person or ordinary online submittal.
ordinance (CMC 8.2.102(a)) + department page checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002761
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Per the City's Residential Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic Submittal Requirements: (1) permit application (description of work, address, owner, contractor, valuation, signed); (2) construction documents - plan-set cover sheet (address, vicinity map, owner name and phone, designer name and address, contractor info, scope, full equipment list including modules, inverters, MPU, sub-panels, combiners, load centres, ESS, gateways, rapid-shutdown devices, optimisers, existing PV; list of applicable California codes; sheet index; legend); site plan; roof plan showing fire setbacks and access pathways; attachment details; electrical one-line or three-line with equipment schedule, OCPD ratings, 120% calculation, conduit sizes and types with calculations, conductor schedule, main-service status and derate calculations, existing interconnected sources, ESS; labelling sheet showing all labels in colour plus a directory placard; datasheets for inverters/micro-inverters, modules, RSD devices/optimisers, racking, attachment system, array bonding, combiners, service/sub-panels, monitoring, batteries/ESS, transfer switches, specialty equipment and generators; and clouded/deltaed revision sheets with a full written description for any resubmittal. Owner-builders additionally file the Owner-Builder form; contractors provide a City of Clovis business licence.
Why the confidence is not higherTaken verbatim from the City's own six-page handout 'Residential Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic Submittal Requirements', which cites the 2025 CRC and 2025 CEC throughout. The handout's page footers still carry Rev. 05-24-2024 and 08-15-2024 stamps even though the body has been renumbered to the 2025 code, so the City has updated the content in place without changing every revision block.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Residential: one set for the initial submittal (Building FAQ). On resubmittal the Residential Plan Check List requires one copy of all corrected documents with the redlined set plus a thumb drive holding a PDF of all documents, and all redlined sheets returned. Electronic submittal is available and, for PV, is one of three routes: (1) in person, (2) online through the CSS portal, (3) SolarAPP+ through the CSS portal (contractors only). CMC 8.14.05(b)-(c) require electronic submittal to be available for small residential rooftop solar and require electronic signatures to be accepted in lieu of wet signatures.
Why the confidence is not higherCopy count comes from the Building FAQ ('Residential: One set for initial submittal. Commercial: Four sets'). The thumb-drive/redline resubmittal rule and 'All Commercial, Single-family dwellings, and multifamily dwellings shall be submitted through the portal' come from the Residential Plan Check List, which is a new-construction document - the City publishes no separate copy-count rule for a retrofit PV package, hence 75 not higher.
department FAQ + published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/services/planning_development/building/faqs.php
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. Per the PV submittal handout the site plan (cited to 2025 CRC R106.1) must show: the lot with property lines and the footprint of existing structures; the house location on the parcel; the location and label of all equipment and system components (modules, inverters, main-panel upgrades, sub-panels, combiners, load centres, ESS, gateways, rapid-shutdown devices, optimisers, existing PV); streets shown and labelled; and a north arrow. The Residential Plan Check List additionally requires a completed City of Clovis Site Plan (Plot Plan) form.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from the City's PV submittal handout section 2(b) and the Residential Plan Check List 'DOCUMENTS' item 1. The Plot Plan Form and Instructions on the Building page are still the 2022-dated versions.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherPV submittal handout section 2(e), Electrical - 2025 CEC: 'Show a complete electrical one-line or three-line diagram.'
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherPV submittal handout section 2(e) requires: 'Provide electrical calculations supporting the proposed loads on the overcurrent protection devices. 120% rule, CEC 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b)'; 'Show all conduit sizes and types. Provide electrical calculations supporting the conduit sizes and types'; 'Provide conductor schedule, including sizes, types, and quantities'; and calculations supporting any derate of the main service breaker.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No stamp threshold is set for a standard roof-mounted residential PV system. The PV submittal handout asks only for attachment points on rafters/trusses within the datasheet's maximum span and cantilever, plus an expanded attachment/flashing detail - no engineer's calculations or stamp. The SolarAPP+/expedited Eligibility List instead sets prescriptive structural limits: PV modules and hardware not exceeding 4 psf, roof designed for a 20 psf minimum live load, array no more than 10 inches above the roof deck, no wood shake or wood-shingle roofs, and no non-permanent structures (free-standing carports, sheds). A design outside those limits falls to the general rule in the Residential Plan Check List - sheets stamped by an architect or engineer licensed in California per Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 5537, 'when applicable', with a digital signature accepted.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo City documents read together; neither states a kW or psf trigger for a PE stamp on PV specifically, so the honest answer is that Clovis publishes no PV stamp threshold rather than that none can ever be demanded.
published checklist + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No electrical PE stamp is required and no threshold is published. The PV submittal handout asks for electrical calculations but never for a stamp; the Residential Plan Check List's only stamp requirement is the general Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 5537 'when applicable' architect/engineer stamp.
Why the confidence is not higherProved by absence across the two documents that would carry it - the PV submittal requirements (six pages, electrical section 2(e)) and the 44-page Residential Plan Check List, neither of which mentions an electrical engineer's stamp.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Division page and its complete document library (every PDF href enumerated from the page source - 60-odd documents including the 2025 Residential Plan Check List, PV Minimum Submittal Requirements, PV Option Matrix, PV System Eligibility List, Expedited Plan Review Policy, Notice to Owner Builder and all three 2025 Building Industry Bulletins); Planning Applications & Fees page (which publishes only the Clovis Planning Division Fee Schedule 2026 effective 7 July 2026 - planning entitlements, not building permits); Finance > Financial Documents and its Budget page (budget books back to 2012, no master fee schedule); the CSS/EnerGov portal Fee Estimator at https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/feeEstimator, which redirects to a login and is not public; and the municipal code itself, where CMC 8.1.01.1 (amended UAC 304.2) states the fee for each permit 'shall be as set forth in Tables B-1, E-1, M-1, P-1, S-1, and 3-G and 3-H, adopted by Ordinance and on file with the building official' - i.e. the tables are deliberately kept out of the code. What IS published: the base hourly rate behind the tables rose from $95.00 to $110.00 in 2025 (Bulletin 2025-2, 17 March 2025, signed Jesse Newton); the valuation table is the ICC Building Valuation Data, updated to the August 2025 edition on 22 September 2025 at $170.80/sq ft for one- and two-family homes; a $20.00 information-management fee applies to every permit transaction and a Council-set Planning Program fee to all building permits (CMC 8.1.01.1 Table 3.1); and expedited plan review costs a minimum of four hours at $110.00/hour. The Building Division page states that 'All residential roof-mounted and ground-mounted photovoltaic permits will have a new fee structure on the Building web page... See 2023 Code Notice to Industry - Letter 1' - that letter is no longer in the document library and the fee structure it announced is not published anywhere on the site. Under Gov. Code 66015 the residential PV fee is capped at $450 plus $15/kW above 15 kW absent a written finding, and Gov. Code 65850.55 forbids a valuation-based fee for a solar energy system, so the unpublished PV structure cannot lawfully be the ICC valuation table.
https://www.clovisca.gov/services/planning_development/building/index.php
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation
Why the confidence is not higherFor building permits generally the answer is unambiguous and valuation-based: CMC 8.1.01.1 amends UAC 304.2 so that fees come from Tables B-1, E-1, M-1, P-1, S-1, 3-G and 3-H 'adopted by Ordinance and on file with the building official', and the City's 18 August 2025 Notice to Industry confirms it 'will be updating its valuation-based fee structure based on the latest Building Valuation Data report published by the International Code Council', adopting the August 2025 ICC table on 22 September 2025 at $170.80 per square foot for one- and two-family homes. The base hourly rate behind those tables was raised from $95.00 to $110.00 in 2025. BUT the Building Division page states that 'All residential roof-mounted and ground-mounted photovoltaic permits will have a new fee structure', referring to a '2023 Code Notice to Industry - Letter 1' that is no longer on the site, and that structure is not published anywhere. Flag: Gov. Code 65850.55 forbids a valuation-based fee for a solar energy system and Gov. Code 66015 caps the residential PV fee at $450 + $15/kW above 15 kW, so a valuation basis could not lawfully be applied to PV - which is presumably why a separate PV structure was created. Confidence is 45 because the published methodology and the methodology that actually applies to PV are not the same thing.
notice to industry + ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 304.2) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/2025%2008-18-2025%20%20%20Valuation%20Up-Date%20Notice%20to%20Industry.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.1.01.1 amends UAC 304.3: 'a plan review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting the submittal documents for plan review. Said plan review fee shall be 65 percent of the building permit fee as shown in Table B-1. The plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25 percent of the total permit fee as set forth in Tables E-1, M-1 and P-1... The plan review fees specified in this section are separate fees from the permit fees.' Additional plan review is charged again where documents are incomplete or changed. A separate, optional expedited plan review is charged at a minimum of four hours at $110.00/hour. Whether the separate PV fee structure preserves a distinct plan-check line is not published.
ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 304.3) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002744
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Next business day for a complete over-the-counter application; within 3 business days for a complete electronic application; real time for a SolarAPP+ submittal. Optional expedited plan review (any project, extra fee) targets comments within 10 working days.
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.14.06: 'The Building Department shall issue a permit or other nondiscretionary permit the following business day for over-the-counter applications which are deemed complete or within three (3) business days for electronic applications of receipt of a complete application and meets the requirements of the approved checklist and standard plan.' The 10-working-day figure is from the Expedited Plan Review Policy (Rev. 09-30-2025), which is the paid expedited service and covers Building Division comments only - not Planning, Engineering or Fire. There is no statutory review deadline for solar in California, so these are the City's own commitments.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + department policy checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days. CMC 8.1.01.1 amends UAC 303.4: a permit expires and becomes null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days of the permit date, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for 180 days after commencement. 'Failure to pass a required inspection every 180 days shall constitute the abandonment of work.' A new permit at one half the original fee revives it if the plans are unchanged and the lapse has not exceeded one year; beyond that a full new permit fee is due.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the codified local amendment. Note this amends the 1997 Uniform Administrative Code, which Clovis still adopts at CMC 8.1.01 as its administrative code alongside the 2025 California codes - the 180/180 rule therefore governs rather than CBC 105.5's 12 months.
ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 303.4) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002744
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Tyler EnerGov Citizen Self Service ('CSS portal') at https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/home, with NREL SolarAPP+ available through the same portal for eligible contractor-submitted residential PV (SB 379).
Why the confidence is not higherNamed on the Building Division page, on the Residential Building Permit Application footer ('Apply Online'), in the Inspection Requests handout and in the Residential Plan Check List. Caution: every City reference still uses the legacy css.cityofclovis.com host even though the City's public site has moved from cityofclovis.com to clovisca.gov; the css. host still resolves and serves the portal.
portal landing page checked 2026-08-28 https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/home
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Division page lists three PV submittal routes: in person; online through the CSS portal; or a SolarAPP+ application through the CSS portal. CMC 8.14.05(b)-(c) require the City to offer electronic submittal of the application and documents and to accept electronic signatures in lieu of wet signatures. Inspection requests are also portal-only. The SolarAPP+ route is closed to owner-builders, who must use method 1 or 2.
department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/services/planning_development/building/index.php
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)
Why the confidence is not higherClovis has no municipal electric utility: the Clovis Public Utilities Department lists refuse and recycling, water, sewer, streets, street lighting and parks, and no electricity. The City's own Building > Solar page describes PG&E's On-Bill Financing paid 'through your monthly utility bills' as the local option, and Clovis sits inside PG&E's Fresno-area distribution territory. Held at 85 because no Clovis page states the electric provider in terms.
department page + city solar page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/services/public_utilities/index.php
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's own process places interconnection after the AHJ: the contractor completes the interconnection application, the system must pass city or county inspection to obtain a final building permit, and then 'Your contractor submits all required paperwork to PG&E... The Interconnection Application, A single line diagram of the system, A copy of the final building permit.' PG&E then reviews, changes the meter and issues written Permission to Operate, typically 5-10 business days and up to 30. Nothing in the Clovis code makes a utility sign-off a condition of the building permit.
utility DG process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.14.06: 'The City of Clovis shall not condition approval of an application on the approval of an association, as defined in Section 4080 of the Civil Code.' This mirrors Gov. Code 65850.5. A private CC&R obligation may still exist between homeowner and HOA, but it is not a City permit condition.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo historic-district design review attaches to a small residential rooftop PV permit. CMC 8.14.06 makes review 'administrative, nondiscretionary' and limits it to 'the Building Official's review of whether the application meets local, State, and Federal health and safety requirements'. Clovis does have a Historic Preservation Board (defined at CMC 9.120.020H) and a historic resources inventory, and the Fire Code amendment at CMC 4.4.102(a) carries a historic-buildings exemption, but a full-text search of the Clovis Municipal Code returns no historic-district design-review requirement that would reach rooftop PV.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + municipal code search checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo wind or windstorm certification exists in California; that is a Texas (TDI) instrument. Clovis instead publishes its design criteria on the Building Division page - wind exposure 85 V-asd / 110 V-ult, Seismic Design Category D, Climate Zone 13, Exposure B or C, soil 1500 psf, roof live load 20 psf, 3 inches yearly rain, zero snow load - and the PV Eligibility List requires the roof to be designed for a 20 psf minimum live load. No certificate is issued or demanded.
department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/services/planning_development/building/index.php
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Only exceptionally. CMC 8.14.06 allows the Building Official to require a use permit for a small residential rooftop solar energy system only on substantial evidence that the system 'could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety', with any denial requiring written findings including the basis for rejecting feasible alternatives, and any such decision appealable to the City of Clovis Appeals Board. No Council approval is required. Separately, Development Code Table 2-2 (CMC 9.10.020) lists 'Solar and Wind Generation Facilities' as a NONRESIDENTIAL use requiring a Conditional Use Permit in every residential district (AR, R-A, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, MHP) - that entry addresses standalone generation facilities, not accessory rooftop PV on a dwelling, which is covered by CMC ch. 8.14.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 8.14.06 half is verbatim. The Table 2-2 half is a genuine trap for anyone reading the zoning code cold, so it is recorded here with the boundary stated; the Development Code contains no definition of 'Solar and Wind Generation Facilities' to settle the line, hence 70.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) + development code (CMC 9.10.020 Table 2-2) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No cap on residential generation as such, but two path-specific ceilings. CMC 8.14.02(f) confines the expedited AB 2188 process to a system 'no larger than ten (10) kilowatts alternating current nameplate rating or thirty (30) kilowatts thermal', on a single or duplex dwelling, not exceeding the maximum legal building height. The City's SolarAPP+/expedited Eligibility List sets its own limits: PV maximum 38.4 kWdc, paired ESS maximum 38.4 kWdc, existing service only with no service upgrade or like-for-like panel change, main service not exceeding 400 A, single phase, no existing PV or ESS on the home, one module type / one racking type / one micro-inverter or optimiser type / one AC-module type per submittal, flat-plate modules only, non-building-integrated (no solar roof tiles), single-family dwelling or residentially permitted auxiliary building.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth ceilings are quoted from source. A larger system is not prohibited - it simply drops out of the expedited route into ordinary plan check.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.02(f)) + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic-System-Eligibility-List.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 95% · adopting ordinance (CMC 8.2.101, Ord. 25-12 eff. 31 Dec 2025)
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2, 2024 IBC base), excluding Chapter 29 Plumbing and including Appendix J Grading, plus the 2025 California Residential Code (2024 IRC base) for one- and two-family dwellings. Both adopted by Ord. 25-12, effective 31 December 2025. The 1997 Uniform Administrative Code remains adopted at CMC 8.1.01 as the City's administrative code. 95% · adopting ordinance (CMC 8.1.02, 8.15.101; Ord. 25-12 eff. 31 Dec 2025)
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (Title 24 Part 9, 2024 IFC base), including Chapter 1 and Appendix Chapters D, E and F. Adopted by CMC 4.4.101, Ord. 25-13, effective 31 December 2025. 95% · adopting ordinance (CMC 4.4.101, Ord. 25-13 eff. 31 Dec 2025)
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes - but none of them touches solar. Clovis amends the administrative code (CMC 8.1.01.1: permit expiry, fee tables, 65%/25% plan-check fees, investigation fees, required inspections, certificate of occupancy), the Building Code (CMC 8.1.02.1: violations and penalties, moved buildings and a Moved Building Review Committee), the Electrical Code (CMC 8.2.102: who may be issued a permit, dangerous electrical equipment), the Plumbing Code (CMC 8.6.102) and the Fire Code (CMC 4.4.102: historic buildings, fire prevention department, operational permits, sprinkler thresholds for Groups E, F-1 and others). A full-text read of the whole of CMC ch. 4.4 (about 41,000 characters) returns no occurrence of 'solar', 'photovoltaic', 'setback', 'pathway' or CFC 1205, and the solar chapter (CMC ch. 8.14) contains no technical amendment. AB 130 (Stats. 2025 ch. 22) constrains new residential amendments between 1 Oct 2025 and 1 Jun 2031, and the City acknowledged this in Building Industry Bulletin 2025-03. 90% · ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1, 8.1.02.1, 8.2.102, 4.4.102) + full-text code search
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 California Electrical Code (2023 NEC) as adopted at CMC 8.2.101, plus the local permit-issuance and dangerous-equipment amendments at CMC 8.2.102 - there is no local technical amendment to NEC Articles 690, 705 or 706. In practice a Clovis PV plan is judged against the City's Residential Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic Submittal Requirements, which cite the 2025 CEC for the one-line/three-line diagram, OCPD ratings and the 120% rule at CEC 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b), conduit and conductor schedules with supporting calculations, main-service derate calculations, existing interconnected sources and their rapid-shutdown status, and ESS. Where codes conflict, CMC 8.2.101 makes 'the most restrictive Code providing the highest level of safety, as determined by the Building Official' prevail. 90% · ordinance (CMC 8.2.101/8.2.102) + published checklist
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? The state rule, unamended. The City's PV handout applies 2025 CRC R329.6 and R329.6.1 to roof assemblies with a slope greater than 2:12 and requires the plans to show fire setbacks between horizontal ridges and PV arrays with dimensions, the total percentage of the plan view of the rooftop covered by the array(s), and whether the residence has fire sprinklers. Access pathways: TWO pathways minimum 36 inches wide, running from the roof's lowest edge to the fire setback on the same plane, an adjacent plane, or straddling both, with ONE of them from the street side of the residence (in front of the fence); they must be in areas capable of supporting firefighters and with minimal obstructions. Emergency escape and rescue openings (2025 CRC R329.6.3): no PV modules below such openings and a path of not less than 36 inches to them. NOTE: Clovis has NOT imposed the City of Fresno's stricter local rule of a 36-inch setback on BOTH sides of the ridge - the whole of CMC ch. 4.4 contains no PV setback or pathway amendment, and the Clovis Fire Department's published standards list (30 standards, all reissued for 2026) contains no solar standard. 88% · published checklist (2025 CRC R329.6) + fire code review
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes - to the 2023 NEC, adopted unamended as the 2025 California Electrical Code at CMC 8.2.101, so NEC 690.12 rapid shutdown applies in full. The City's PV handout requires rapid-shutdown devices and optimisers to be listed on the cover sheet, their datasheets supplied, information given on any existing interconnected power sources indicating whether they comply with non-rapid-shutdown or rapid-shutdown devices with calculations and one-line drawings, and on the labelling sheet 'dotted lines around exiting [existing] arrays that do not conform to the Rapid Shut Down requirements of 2025 CEC'. 92% · ordinance (CMC 8.2.101) + published checklist
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The 2023 NEC set, unamended, plus PG&E's. The City adds no placard of its own; its handout simply requires the plan set to 'Show all applicable labeling in color' and to include a Directory placard. So at the service equipment the required markings are the NEC ones: the PV system disconnect marking (690.13(B)), rapid shutdown labelling (690.56(C)), the interactive-system / power-source plaque or directory at the service equipment (705.10), and the ESS markings of Article 706 where a battery is installed. PG&E adds, on the AC disconnect, permanently attached signage on the front explaining that it is the AC disconnect switch for the generation (example wording 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'), plus marking indicating open (off) and closed (on) positions on the switch itself, and a location map where the disconnect is not grouped with the meter panel. 85% · published checklist + utility document (PG&E 060559 Rev. 07)
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 88% · published checklist + municipal code search
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Clovis specifies none. The City's only formatting instruction is a plan-set one - 'Show all applicable labeling in color' - which governs how labels are drawn on the submitted plans, not the physical placard. Letter height, colour and material for the installed markings come from the unamended 2023 NEC (690.13(B), 690.56(C), 705.10, 706) and its referenced standards. PG&E does specify material for the AC disconnect signage: 'Labels shall be permanent and suitable for the environment and shall be engraved phenolic or' equivalent, permanently attached to the front of the switch. 85% · published checklist + utility document (PG&E 060559)
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes, twice over. The City requires a Directory placard on the plan set showing (1) the location of the array(s), equipment and point of connection, and (2) dotted lines around existing arrays that do not conform to the 2025 CEC rapid-shutdown requirements. That sits on top of the unamended NEC 705.10 permanent plaque or directory at the service equipment denoting the location of all electric power source disconnecting means. PG&E adds a third: where the AC disconnect switch is not grouped with the meter panel a map showing its location is required, and where a Net Generation Output Meter is installed, proper labelling and a map of its location if not grouped with the other meter(s) and disconnect. 88% · published checklist + 705.10 + utility document
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes. PG&E Document 060559 (Disconnect Switch Requirements for Distributed Generation Customers, Rev. #07, 25 March 2022, also part of PG&E's Distribution Interconnection Handbook) requires on the AC disconnect: permanently attached signage on the front explaining that this is the AC disconnect switch for the generation, example 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'; labels permanent and suitable for the environment and engraved phenolic or equivalent; marking or signage on the switch clearly indicating the open (off) and closed (on) positions; a map showing the disconnect's location where it is not grouped with the meter panel; and, if a Net Generation Output Meter is fitted, proper labelling plus a location map where not grouped with the other meters and the disconnect. Where the disconnect is not accessible outside locked premises, signs with contact information plus a provider-approved locking device are required. 88% · utility DG document (PG&E 060559 Rev. 07)
- Where must the labels be placed? At the service equipment for the NEC markings - the 705.10 plaque or directory goes at the service equipment or at an approved readily visible location, the PV system disconnect marking on the disconnect itself, rapid shutdown labelling at the service disconnecting means. For PG&E's signage, on the front of the AC disconnect switch, which must itself sit 10 feet or less from PG&E's electric meter, in line of sight and easily seen from the meter panel, at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors, mounted with the top of the enclosure between 48 and 75 inches above ground, never above grade level, never on a roof, and never in a room that is not an approved electric meter room. Clovis adds no placement rule of its own beyond requiring the locations to be drawn on the plans. 85% · utility DG document + published checklist
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Within 10 feet of the PG&E electric meter at the point of common coupling, in line of sight and easily seen from the meter panel; installed between the PG&E meter and all generation sources; isolating generation only and not customer loads; at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors; top of the enclosure between 48 inches minimum and 75 inches maximum above ground when wall- or pad-mounted; never on any floor or level above grade, never on a roof, never in a room that is not an approved electric meter room; easily accessible to PG&E on request; lockable with a PG&E padlock taking a 5/16-inch shaft (keyed locks not allowed); visible-open with air-gap verification, and with a viewing window on all pad-mounted switches. EXEMPTION, which catches most ordinary houses: an inverter-based system on a PG&E single-phase service up to 240 V may be exempted from installing a disconnect at all, as determined by PG&E, where the interconnected meter panel is self-contained (not transformer-rated), accepts form 'S' socket-based meters (not bolt-on), is rated CL 320 or less continuous, and is single-phase 120/240 V or 120/208 V. 90% · utility DG document (PG&E 060559 Rev. 07)
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes in the listing sense, no in the approved-products-list sense. CMC 8.14.04(c) requires solar electric systems to 'meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission'. The Eligibility List requires 'PV modules must be listed' and 'ESS equipment will be listed, and all specifications for the ESS will be provided'. The City publishes no roster of approved makes or models. PG&E does maintain a list - only PG&E-approved disconnect switch models, currently the Eaton and Siemens models listed in PG&E's Distribution Interconnection Handbook, are acceptable, and molded-case circuit breakers and pull-out disconnects are not. 80% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.04) + eligibility list + utility document
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, permitted, on the 2025 CRC R330 terms which the City reproduces in full in its PV submittal handout. Individual ESS units maximum 20 kWh; total aggregate on the property not exceeding 600 kWh; per-location aggregate caps of 40 kWh within utility closets, basements and storage or utility spaces inside the dwelling, 80 kWh in attached garages, 100 kWh on or within 3 feet of exterior walls of the dwelling and attached garages (200 kWh where those walls and eaves are noncombustible), 200 kWh in detached garages and detached accessory structures (600 kWh where at least 10 feet from property lines and dwellings), 200 kWh outdoors on the ground at least 3 feet from property lines and dwellings (600 kWh at 10 feet). Units separated by less than 3 feet only where documentation under the California Fire Code permits. Approved locations: detached garages and accessory structures, attached garages, outdoors or on an exterior wall, 3 feet from doors and windows opening directly into the dwelling, and utility closets, basements or utility spaces with finished or noncombustible enclosure (5/8-inch type X gypsum board where walls and ceilings are unfinished). NOT in bedrooms, closets, or spaces opening directly into a sleeping room. Smoke alarms per R310 in rooms and areas with ESS, with a listed interconnected heat detector where a smoke alarm cannot be sited. Equipment must be listed with full specifications provided. For the expedited/SolarAPP+ route the ESS must be lithium-ion only, installed by a C-10 contractor, and maximum 38.4 kWdc paired with the PV. 88% · published checklist (2025 CRC R330) + eligibility list
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No - the ESS is carried inside the PV submittal, not permitted separately. The City's PV handout treats energy storage as one of the components to be listed on the cover sheet, shown on the site plan, covered by the electrical section, and supported by battery/ESS and transfer-switch datasheets, and devotes its final pages to the R330 ESS requirements. The Eligibility List likewise treats a PV+ESS package as one submittal, requiring only that the installer hold a C-10 for the ESS. The Residential Building Permit Application has a single 'Photovoltaic' work-type box with no ESS box. A separate fire inspection may still be performed if the Clovis Fire Department deems it required (CMC 8.14.06). 55% · published checklist + eligibility list
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes - a ground-mounted array is permitted as a structure and needs its own building permit. The Building Division page refers to 'All residential roof-mounted and ground-mounted photovoltaic permits' as a class, so the City issues them. It falls outside the streamlined routes: CMC ch. 8.14 and its AB 2188 protections apply only to a 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' installed on a single or duplex dwelling, and the SolarAPP+/expedited Eligibility List is restricted to 'a residential roof-mounted photovoltaic system only'. Clovis publishes no ground-mount handout, no setback table for arrays and no foundation detail; Development Code CMC 9.24.100 does allow 'solar devices' among the features that may project into a required setback. 60% · department page + ordinance (CMC 8.14.02(f)) + eligibility list
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing. The governing rule is the unamended 2023 NEC 705.12 - the City's PV handout requires 'electrical calculations supporting the proposed loads on the overcurrent protection devices. 120% rule, CEC 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b): Point of connection', asks whether the main service panel is existing or will be upgraded, and requires calculations supporting any derate of the main service breaker. The expedited/SolarAPP+ Eligibility List instead excludes the question: existing service only, no service upgrades and no like-for-like service panel changes, no sub-panels used to relocate breakers from the service panel, main service not exceeding 400 A, single phase. 85% · published checklist + eligibility list
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No proprietary mounting system or fixed attachment spacing is mandated. The PV handout requires the plans to show points of attachment within the array on rafters or trusses, to meet the maximum span and cantilever in the racking datasheet, and to give an expanded view of the attachment showing the build-up of roofing, attachment mechanism, flashing and sealing, with datasheets for racking, attachment system and array bonding. The Eligibility List adds prescriptive limits for the expedited route: PV modules and hardware not exceeding 4 psf, array designed a maximum of 10 inches above the roof deck, conduit raised a minimum of 7/8 inch off the roof deck, EMT conduit above ground, no wood shake or wood-shingle roofs, no non-permanent structures (free-standing carports, sheds), and a roof designed for a 20 psf minimum live load. 85% · published checklist + eligibility list
20 questions answered against City of Clovis’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.2.101: 'For the purpose of regulating electrical systems, the 2025 California Electrical Code (CEC) promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission, which incorporates the adoption of the 2023 edition of the National Electrical Code, is hereby adopted by reference.' Adopted by Ord. 25-12, effective 31 December 2025. CLOVIS IS CURRENT - it is not in the position of Fresno County, which still publishes the 2022 cycle. NEC Article 690 is adopted with no California and no Clovis amendment.
adopting ordinance (CMC 8.2.101, Ord. 25-12 eff. 31 Dec 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002761
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code (Title 24 Part 2, 2024 IBC base), excluding Chapter 29 Plumbing and including Appendix J Grading, plus the 2025 California Residential Code (2024 IRC base) for one- and two-family dwellings. Both adopted by Ord. 25-12, effective 31 December 2025. The 1997 Uniform Administrative Code remains adopted at CMC 8.1.01 as the City's administrative code.
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.1.02 and CMC 8.15.101 quoted directly from the codified text on eCode360, with the ordinance history showing Ord. 25-12 eff. 31 Dec 2025 superseding Ord. 22-10 eff. 7 Dec 2022. Building Industry Bulletin 2025-04 (6 Aug 2025) and 2025-03 (3 Sep 2025) walked the industry through the change, and Bulletin 2025-05 (13 Oct 2025) explains the HSC 18938.5 transition. The state edition is the 2025 code / 2023 NEC and Clovis matches it.
adopting ordinance (CMC 8.1.02, 8.15.101; Ord. 25-12 eff. 31 Dec 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002744
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code (Title 24 Part 9, 2024 IFC base), including Chapter 1 and Appendix Chapters D, E and F. Adopted by CMC 4.4.101, Ord. 25-13, effective 31 December 2025.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from CMC 4.4.101 on eCode360. The Fire Code Official holds the copies; the Fire Prevention Division sits within the Clovis Fire Department under CMC 4.4.102(c) amending CFC 103.1.
adopting ordinance (CMC 4.4.101, Ord. 25-13 eff. 31 Dec 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/49995772
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes - but none of them touches solar. Clovis amends the administrative code (CMC 8.1.01.1: permit expiry, fee tables, 65%/25% plan-check fees, investigation fees, required inspections, certificate of occupancy), the Building Code (CMC 8.1.02.1: violations and penalties, moved buildings and a Moved Building Review Committee), the Electrical Code (CMC 8.2.102: who may be issued a permit, dangerous electrical equipment), the Plumbing Code (CMC 8.6.102) and the Fire Code (CMC 4.4.102: historic buildings, fire prevention department, operational permits, sprinkler thresholds for Groups E, F-1 and others). A full-text read of the whole of CMC ch. 4.4 (about 41,000 characters) returns no occurrence of 'solar', 'photovoltaic', 'setback', 'pathway' or CFC 1205, and the solar chapter (CMC ch. 8.14) contains no technical amendment. AB 130 (Stats. 2025 ch. 22) constrains new residential amendments between 1 Oct 2025 and 1 Jun 2031, and the City acknowledged this in Building Industry Bulletin 2025-03.
Why the confidence is not higherPositive control ('electrical') returned 20 hits across the code including the target sections; fabricated control ('zzqqx') returned zero, so the search that proves the solar absence is sound. Contrast worth naming: the City of Fresno DID amend its fire code for PV (36-inch setbacks both sides of a ridge); Clovis did not.
ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1, 8.1.02.1, 8.2.102, 4.4.102) + full-text code search checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/49995772
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 California Electrical Code (2023 NEC) as adopted at CMC 8.2.101, plus the local permit-issuance and dangerous-equipment amendments at CMC 8.2.102 - there is no local technical amendment to NEC Articles 690, 705 or 706. In practice a Clovis PV plan is judged against the City's Residential Roof-Mounted Photovoltaic Submittal Requirements, which cite the 2025 CEC for the one-line/three-line diagram, OCPD ratings and the 120% rule at CEC 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b), conduit and conductor schedules with supporting calculations, main-service derate calculations, existing interconnected sources and their rapid-shutdown status, and ESS. Where codes conflict, CMC 8.2.101 makes 'the most restrictive Code providing the highest level of safety, as determined by the Building Official' prevail.
Why the confidence is not higherAdoption text and amendment text read in full on eCode360; technical requirements taken from the City's own 2025 PV handout.
ordinance (CMC 8.2.101/8.2.102) + published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002761
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing. The governing rule is the unamended 2023 NEC 705.12 - the City's PV handout requires 'electrical calculations supporting the proposed loads on the overcurrent protection devices. 120% rule, CEC 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b): Point of connection', asks whether the main service panel is existing or will be upgraded, and requires calculations supporting any derate of the main service breaker. The expedited/SolarAPP+ Eligibility List instead excludes the question: existing service only, no service upgrades and no like-for-like service panel changes, no sub-panels used to relocate breakers from the service panel, main service not exceeding 400 A, single phase.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth statements are quoted from City documents. CMC 8.2.102 was read in full and adds nothing on busbars or service capacity - only the permit-issuance list and a dangerous-equipment section.
published checklist + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No proprietary mounting system or fixed attachment spacing is mandated. The PV handout requires the plans to show points of attachment within the array on rafters or trusses, to meet the maximum span and cantilever in the racking datasheet, and to give an expanded view of the attachment showing the build-up of roofing, attachment mechanism, flashing and sealing, with datasheets for racking, attachment system and array bonding. The Eligibility List adds prescriptive limits for the expedited route: PV modules and hardware not exceeding 4 psf, array designed a maximum of 10 inches above the roof deck, conduit raised a minimum of 7/8 inch off the roof deck, EMT conduit above ground, no wood shake or wood-shingle roofs, no non-permanent structures (free-standing carports, sheds), and a roof designed for a 20 psf minimum live load.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the two City handouts. Spacing is left to the manufacturer's listing rather than set by the City.
published checklist + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
The state rule, unamended. The City's PV handout applies 2025 CRC R329.6 and R329.6.1 to roof assemblies with a slope greater than 2:12 and requires the plans to show fire setbacks between horizontal ridges and PV arrays with dimensions, the total percentage of the plan view of the rooftop covered by the array(s), and whether the residence has fire sprinklers. Access pathways: TWO pathways minimum 36 inches wide, running from the roof's lowest edge to the fire setback on the same plane, an adjacent plane, or straddling both, with ONE of them from the street side of the residence (in front of the fence); they must be in areas capable of supporting firefighters and with minimal obstructions. Emergency escape and rescue openings (2025 CRC R329.6.3): no PV modules below such openings and a path of not less than 36 inches to them. NOTE: Clovis has NOT imposed the City of Fresno's stricter local rule of a 36-inch setback on BOTH sides of the ridge - the whole of CMC ch. 4.4 contains no PV setback or pathway amendment, and the Clovis Fire Department's published standards list (30 standards, all reissued for 2026) contains no solar standard.
Why the confidence is not higherThe pathway detail is quoted from the City's own 2025 handout, which is the operative document at plan check. The 'street side' pathway is a Clovis-specific gloss on R329.6 rather than a codified amendment. The absence of a local fire amendment was proved by reading CMC 4.4.102 in full and by listing every current Clovis Fire Standard; the 2010-vintage Clovis Fire Standard 48 'Solar Photovoltaic Installations' no longer appears in that list. One inconsistency in the City's own paperwork: the handout cites 'R329.6, and R324.9.2' for access pathways, R324 being the pre-2025 numbering.
published checklist (2025 CRC R329.6) + fire code review checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes - to the 2023 NEC, adopted unamended as the 2025 California Electrical Code at CMC 8.2.101, so NEC 690.12 rapid shutdown applies in full. The City's PV handout requires rapid-shutdown devices and optimisers to be listed on the cover sheet, their datasheets supplied, information given on any existing interconnected power sources indicating whether they comply with non-rapid-shutdown or rapid-shutdown devices with calculations and one-line drawings, and on the labelling sheet 'dotted lines around exiting [existing] arrays that do not conform to the Rapid Shut Down requirements of 2025 CEC'.
Why the confidence is not higherAdoption confirmed in the codified ordinance; the plan-check treatment is quoted from the City's 2025 handout. No local amendment to Article 690.
ordinance (CMC 8.2.101) + published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The 2023 NEC set, unamended, plus PG&E's. The City adds no placard of its own; its handout simply requires the plan set to 'Show all applicable labeling in color' and to include a Directory placard. So at the service equipment the required markings are the NEC ones: the PV system disconnect marking (690.13(B)), rapid shutdown labelling (690.56(C)), the interactive-system / power-source plaque or directory at the service equipment (705.10), and the ESS markings of Article 706 where a battery is installed. PG&E adds, on the AC disconnect, permanently attached signage on the front explaining that it is the AC disconnect switch for the generation (example wording 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'), plus marking indicating open (off) and closed (on) positions on the switch itself, and a location map where the disconnect is not grouped with the meter panel.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's own PV handout is the only Clovis document on labelling and specifies no placard text; the NEC set applies through CMC 8.2.101 without amendment. The PG&E requirements are read directly from PG&E Document 060559 Rev. #07 (25 March 2022), not from a summary.
published checklist + utility document (PG&E 060559 Rev. 07) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No
Why the confidence is not higherClovis specifies no placard wording of its own. The City's PV handout requires only that applicable labelling be shown in colour on the plans and that a directory placard be drawn; it prescribes no text. Full-text search of the Clovis Municipal Code returns no placard, marking or signage provision for PV in CMC ch. 8.1, 8.2, 8.14 or 4.4. The only prescribed wording in the chain is PG&E's example 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'.
published checklist + municipal code search checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Clovis specifies none. The City's only formatting instruction is a plan-set one - 'Show all applicable labeling in color' - which governs how labels are drawn on the submitted plans, not the physical placard. Letter height, colour and material for the installed markings come from the unamended 2023 NEC (690.13(B), 690.56(C), 705.10, 706) and its referenced standards. PG&E does specify material for the AC disconnect signage: 'Labels shall be permanent and suitable for the environment and shall be engraved phenolic or' equivalent, permanently attached to the front of the switch.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved by reading the City's PV handout in full (six pages, extracted with pdftotext, not summarised) and searching the municipal code; the positive control on that code search returned the expected sections and the fabricated control returned nothing.
published checklist + utility document (PG&E 060559) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, twice over. The City requires a Directory placard on the plan set showing (1) the location of the array(s), equipment and point of connection, and (2) dotted lines around existing arrays that do not conform to the 2025 CEC rapid-shutdown requirements. That sits on top of the unamended NEC 705.10 permanent plaque or directory at the service equipment denoting the location of all electric power source disconnecting means. PG&E adds a third: where the AC disconnect switch is not grouped with the meter panel a map showing its location is required, and where a Net Generation Output Meter is installed, proper labelling and a map of its location if not grouped with the other meter(s) and disconnect.
Why the confidence is not higherCity requirement quoted from the PV handout section 2(f); NEC requirement follows from unamended adoption at CMC 8.2.101; PG&E requirement read from 060559 Rev. #07.
published checklist + 705.10 + utility document checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes. PG&E Document 060559 (Disconnect Switch Requirements for Distributed Generation Customers, Rev. #07, 25 March 2022, also part of PG&E's Distribution Interconnection Handbook) requires on the AC disconnect: permanently attached signage on the front explaining that this is the AC disconnect switch for the generation, example 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'; labels permanent and suitable for the environment and engraved phenolic or equivalent; marking or signage on the switch clearly indicating the open (off) and closed (on) positions; a map showing the disconnect's location where it is not grouped with the meter panel; and, if a Net Generation Output Meter is fitted, proper labelling plus a location map where not grouped with the other meters and the disconnect. Where the disconnect is not accessible outside locked premises, signs with contact information plus a provider-approved locking device are required.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the PG&E PDF itself with pdftotext, including the revision block, not from a summary. The whole requirement is disapplied where PG&E grants the disconnect exemption - see q48.
utility DG document (PG&E 060559 Rev. 07) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the service equipment for the NEC markings - the 705.10 plaque or directory goes at the service equipment or at an approved readily visible location, the PV system disconnect marking on the disconnect itself, rapid shutdown labelling at the service disconnecting means. For PG&E's signage, on the front of the AC disconnect switch, which must itself sit 10 feet or less from PG&E's electric meter, in line of sight and easily seen from the meter panel, at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors, mounted with the top of the enclosure between 48 and 75 inches above ground, never above grade level, never on a roof, and never in a room that is not an approved electric meter room. Clovis adds no placement rule of its own beyond requiring the locations to be drawn on the plans.
Why the confidence is not higherPlacement quoted from PG&E 060559 Rev. #07; the Clovis silence was proved by reading the City's PV handout and searching the municipal code.
utility DG document + published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes in the listing sense, no in the approved-products-list sense. CMC 8.14.04(c) requires solar electric systems to 'meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission'. The Eligibility List requires 'PV modules must be listed' and 'ESS equipment will be listed, and all specifications for the ESS will be provided'. The City publishes no roster of approved makes or models. PG&E does maintain a list - only PG&E-approved disconnect switch models, currently the Eaton and Siemens models listed in PG&E's Distribution Interconnection Handbook, are acceptable, and molded-case circuit breakers and pull-out disconnects are not.
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.14.04(c) and the Eligibility List quoted; the PG&E approved-model list read from 060559 Rev. #07.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.04) + eligibility list + utility document checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, permitted, on the 2025 CRC R330 terms which the City reproduces in full in its PV submittal handout. Individual ESS units maximum 20 kWh; total aggregate on the property not exceeding 600 kWh; per-location aggregate caps of 40 kWh within utility closets, basements and storage or utility spaces inside the dwelling, 80 kWh in attached garages, 100 kWh on or within 3 feet of exterior walls of the dwelling and attached garages (200 kWh where those walls and eaves are noncombustible), 200 kWh in detached garages and detached accessory structures (600 kWh where at least 10 feet from property lines and dwellings), 200 kWh outdoors on the ground at least 3 feet from property lines and dwellings (600 kWh at 10 feet). Units separated by less than 3 feet only where documentation under the California Fire Code permits. Approved locations: detached garages and accessory structures, attached garages, outdoors or on an exterior wall, 3 feet from doors and windows opening directly into the dwelling, and utility closets, basements or utility spaces with finished or noncombustible enclosure (5/8-inch type X gypsum board where walls and ceilings are unfinished). NOT in bedrooms, closets, or spaces opening directly into a sleeping room. Smoke alarms per R310 in rooms and areas with ESS, with a listed interconnected heat detector where a smoke alarm cannot be sited. Equipment must be listed with full specifications provided. For the expedited/SolarAPP+ route the ESS must be lithium-ion only, installed by a C-10 contractor, and maximum 38.4 kWdc paired with the PV.
Why the confidence is not higherExtracted from the City's own six-page PV handout with pdftotext. Two errors in the City's document worth flagging: the table is headed 'TABLE R328.5' while the surrounding text is renumbered to R330.5, and section (I) cites '2022 California Residential Code Section 330' - leftovers from the pre-2025 numbering where storage sat at R328.
published checklist (2025 CRC R330) + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No - the ESS is carried inside the PV submittal, not permitted separately. The City's PV handout treats energy storage as one of the components to be listed on the cover sheet, shown on the site plan, covered by the electrical section, and supported by battery/ESS and transfer-switch datasheets, and devotes its final pages to the R330 ESS requirements. The Eligibility List likewise treats a PV+ESS package as one submittal, requiring only that the installer hold a C-10 for the ESS. The Residential Building Permit Application has a single 'Photovoltaic' work-type box with no ESS box. A separate fire inspection may still be performed if the Clovis Fire Department deems it required (CMC 8.14.06).
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from how every City document handles ESS rather than from an explicit statement that no separate permit is needed - no Clovis handout says either way, so this is held at 55.
published checklist + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Photovoltaic%20Minimum%20Submittal%20Requirements%20for%20Roof%20Mounted%20Systems%202025.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes - a ground-mounted array is permitted as a structure and needs its own building permit. The Building Division page refers to 'All residential roof-mounted and ground-mounted photovoltaic permits' as a class, so the City issues them. It falls outside the streamlined routes: CMC ch. 8.14 and its AB 2188 protections apply only to a 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' installed on a single or duplex dwelling, and the SolarAPP+/expedited Eligibility List is restricted to 'a residential roof-mounted photovoltaic system only'. Clovis publishes no ground-mount handout, no setback table for arrays and no foundation detail; Development Code CMC 9.24.100 does allow 'solar devices' among the features that may project into a required setback.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's own page proves ground-mount permits are issued; the exclusion from both streamlined routes is quoted. What Clovis does NOT publish is any ground-mount-specific standard, so the treatment beyond 'it is a permitted structure' is not documented - hence 60.
department page + ordinance (CMC 8.14.02(f)) + eligibility list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/services/planning_development/building/index.php
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Within 10 feet of the PG&E electric meter at the point of common coupling, in line of sight and easily seen from the meter panel; installed between the PG&E meter and all generation sources; isolating generation only and not customer loads; at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors; top of the enclosure between 48 inches minimum and 75 inches maximum above ground when wall- or pad-mounted; never on any floor or level above grade, never on a roof, never in a room that is not an approved electric meter room; easily accessible to PG&E on request; lockable with a PG&E padlock taking a 5/16-inch shaft (keyed locks not allowed); visible-open with air-gap verification, and with a viewing window on all pad-mounted switches. EXEMPTION, which catches most ordinary houses: an inverter-based system on a PG&E single-phase service up to 240 V may be exempted from installing a disconnect at all, as determined by PG&E, where the interconnected meter panel is self-contained (not transformer-rated), accepts form 'S' socket-based meters (not bolt-on), is rated CL 320 or less continuous, and is single-phase 120/240 V or 120/208 V.
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from PG&E Document 060559 Rev. #07, approved 25 March 2022, extracted with pdftotext. Clovis imposes no disconnect location rule of its own; the City's PV handout asks only that the disconnect be shown on the plans.
utility DG document (PG&E 060559 Rev. 07) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal 80% · department handout (Inspection Requests, Rev. 11/20/2025)
- How much notice is required? 1 business day. The Inspection Requests handout: 'The online inspection request can be completed by midnight the day before.' The superseded FAQ gives the same effect in different words - '24 hours in advance so that field personnel can be scheduled'. For a small residential rooftop solar system CMC 8.14.06 goes further and binds the City: 'An inspection will be scheduled within two (2) business days of a request'. 80% · department handout + ordinance (CMC 8.14.06)
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Requests are considered but not guaranteed. Inspection Requests handout: 'A.M., P.M., or specific time requests will be considered but not guaranteed. These types of requests are dependent on the inspector's workload.' For eligible small residential rooftop solar CMC 8.14.06 requires the City to 'provide a four (4) hour inspection window'. No same-day service is offered - the online request closes at midnight the day before. 85% · department handout + ordinance (CMC 8.14.06)
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 90% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06)
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated. The only other body that may inspect is the Clovis Fire Department, which under CMC 8.14.06 may perform a separate fire inspection if it deems one required, and which holds fire-code review and enforcement generally under CMC ch. 4.4. 88% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06, 4.4.101)
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For an eligible small residential rooftop PV system: ONE inspection, the final, performed by the Building Division, plus a possible separate Clovis Fire Department inspection if the Fire Department requires it. CMC 8.14.06 also requires that the inspection 'be done in a timely manner and should include consolidated inspections', and that a failed system may be reinspected without the reinspection having to meet the chapter's timing rules. For work outside the expedited route the general sequence in CMC 8.1.01.1 (amended UAC 305.5) applies: foundation, concrete slab or under-floor, frame, lath and/or wallboard, other inspections per the adopted building code, and final. 85% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06, 8.1.01.1 sec. 305.5)
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 85% · ordinance (CMC 8.14.06)
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No 80% · department document library (enumerated)
- What must be on site at inspection? Approved plans and the job card, with the inspector given access to them. Inspection Requests handout: 'ensure that the approved plans and job cards are on-site and that the inspector has access to these documents', and 'ensure that the work to be inspected is complete and per approved plans'. No further on-site document list (licence, insurance, datasheets) is published. 85% · department handout
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes 55% · department handout + published checklist (inference stated)
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final 70% · ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 309) + utility process page
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 88% · utility DG process page
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Plan-check corrections are issued on the Building Division's dated correction form naming the plans examiner, their email and phone, the permit number and the standard plan number. Clearing them is prescriptive: plans are not back-checked over the counter; every revision must be clouded or marked with a delta; redlines are not accepted at the counter and corrections must be properly incorporated into the plans, blueprinted, ink-drawn or equivalent, no ink pens and no pencils; all marked-up plans, specifications, structural calculations, truss packages and energy documents must be RETURNED with the resubmittal, together with one copy of all corrected documents and a thumb drive holding a PDF of everything; plans returned without corrections as noted 'will be subject to additional plan check fees'. For a solar application specifically, CMC 8.14.06 requires that where an application is deemed incomplete 'a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance shall be sent to the applicant for resubmission'. Field corrections after a failed inspection are not documented beyond CMC 8.14.06's allowance that 'a subsequent inspection is authorized but need not conform to the requirements of this chapter'. 75% · published checklist + ordinance (CMC 8.14.06)
14 questions answered against City of Clovis’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Division's Inspection Requests handout (Rev. 11/20/2025) is explicit: 'To request an inspection with the City of Clovis, use the City of Clovis web page: https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/home to schedule an inspection... The Building Division does not have an Inspection Request Phone line. Please do not call other division phone lines to request an inspection.' The Residential Plan Check List repeats that 'All inspection requests must be requested through the CSS Portal'. CONTRADICTION worth flagging: the Building Division's own index page still tells installers to open Today's Inspections, find their permit and 'Call the inspector to see what times are available', and the Building FAQ still gives an inspection request line on (559) 324-2337 with 24 hours' notice. The Nov 2025 handout is the most recent of the three and supersedes them.
department handout (Inspection Requests, Rev. 11/20/2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Inspection%20Requests%202025.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
1 business day. The Inspection Requests handout: 'The online inspection request can be completed by midnight the day before.' The superseded FAQ gives the same effect in different words - '24 hours in advance so that field personnel can be scheduled'. For a small residential rooftop solar system CMC 8.14.06 goes further and binds the City: 'An inspection will be scheduled within two (2) business days of a request'.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth the practical cut-off and the code commitment are quoted from source. They answer slightly different questions - how late you may book, and how soon the City must come - so both are given.
department handout + ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Inspection%20Requests%202025.pdf
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Requests are considered but not guaranteed. Inspection Requests handout: 'A.M., P.M., or specific time requests will be considered but not guaranteed. These types of requests are dependent on the inspector's workload.' For eligible small residential rooftop solar CMC 8.14.06 requires the City to 'provide a four (4) hour inspection window'. No same-day service is offered - the online request closes at midnight the day before.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the City handout and the codified ordinance.
department handout + ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Inspection%20Requests%202025.pdf
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 8.14.06: 'Only one inspection shall be required and performed by the Building Department for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review. A separate fire inspection may be performed if deemed required by the Clovis Fire Department.' The Building Division's inspectors do the work; nothing is contracted out or delegated to Fresno County.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated. The only other body that may inspect is the Clovis Fire Department, which under CMC 8.14.06 may perform a separate fire inspection if it deems one required, and which holds fire-code review and enforcement generally under CMC ch. 4.4.
Why the confidence is not higherFollows from CMC 8.14.06 and the fire-code adoption at CMC 4.4.101. There is no third-party inspection programme and no county involvement.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06, 4.4.101) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For an eligible small residential rooftop PV system: ONE inspection, the final, performed by the Building Division, plus a possible separate Clovis Fire Department inspection if the Fire Department requires it. CMC 8.14.06 also requires that the inspection 'be done in a timely manner and should include consolidated inspections', and that a failed system may be reinspected without the reinspection having to meet the chapter's timing rules. For work outside the expedited route the general sequence in CMC 8.1.01.1 (amended UAC 305.5) applies: foundation, concrete slab or under-floor, frame, lath and/or wallboard, other inspections per the adopted building code, and final.
Why the confidence is not higherThe one-inspection rule is quoted from the codified ordinance and matches Gov. Code 65850.5. The general sequence is the codified local amendment and is given for context, not because a rooftop retrofit passes through it.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06, 8.1.01.1 sec. 305.5) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No
Why the confidence is not higherFor an eligible small residential rooftop solar system CMC 8.14.06 permits only one inspection, so there is no rough-in or mid-roof stage. No Clovis handout describes a mid-roof or rough-in PV inspection; the City does publish a separate Re-Roof Procedures and Inspections document, which is a different scope of work.
ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50003302
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherInferential rather than stated. The City requires the plan set to show all applicable labelling in colour plus a directory placard, and to carry datasheets establishing the listing of modules, inverters, RSD devices, racking, attachment system, combiners, panels, monitoring and ESS; CMC 8.14.04(c) requires listed and standards-compliant equipment; and the Inspection Requests handout tells applicants to 'ensure that the work to be inspected is complete and per approved plans' with the approved plans on site for the inspector. An inspection against approved plans that carry the labelling and listing therefore checks them. No Clovis document says in terms that the inspector verifies labels and listings, so this is 55, not higher.
department handout + published checklist (inference stated) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Inspection%20Requests%202025.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No
Why the confidence is not higherClovis publishes plan-check checklists, not inspection checklists, for PV. The Building Division document library holds a Residential Plan Check List, PV Minimum Submittal Requirements, a PV Option Matrix, a PV System Eligibility List, Single Family Dwelling and Additions/Alterations submittal requirements, Standard Notes, an EVSE checklist, Re-Roof Procedures and Inspections, Swimming Pool Inspections and a Trash Enclosure Inspection List - and nothing that is a PV inspection checklist. Every document in that library was enumerated from the page source, not sampled.
department document library (enumerated) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/services/planning_development/building/index.php
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Approved plans and the job card, with the inspector given access to them. Inspection Requests handout: 'ensure that the approved plans and job cards are on-site and that the inspector has access to these documents', and 'ensure that the work to be inspected is complete and per approved plans'. No further on-site document list (licence, insurance, datasheets) is published.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the City's Inspection Requests handout, Rev. 11/20/2025.
department handout checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Inspection%20Requests%202025.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame enumerated Building Division document library (no fee schedule of any kind, and the Inspection Requests handout Rev. 11/20/2025 says nothing about charges for a repeat visit); the municipal code, where a full-text search for 'reinspection' returns exactly one hit - CMC 9.92.090 in the Development Code, a CODE-ENFORCEMENT reinspection fee for unabated violations, which is not a building-inspection re-inspection fee and is expressly 'separate' from other charges; CMC 8.1.01.1 (amended UAC 304.5.2), which sets an investigation fee equal to the permit fee for un-permitted work with a progressive multiplier up to ten times, again a different instrument; and CMC 8.5.102 'Special inspection fees', which is mechanical-code specific. The CSS portal Fee Estimator that would show it requires a login. CMC 8.14.06 confirms a failed solar system may be reinspected - 'a subsequent inspection is authorized but need not conform to the requirements of this chapter' - without pricing it.
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Plan-check corrections are issued on the Building Division's dated correction form naming the plans examiner, their email and phone, the permit number and the standard plan number. Clearing them is prescriptive: plans are not back-checked over the counter; every revision must be clouded or marked with a delta; redlines are not accepted at the counter and corrections must be properly incorporated into the plans, blueprinted, ink-drawn or equivalent, no ink pens and no pencils; all marked-up plans, specifications, structural calculations, truss packages and energy documents must be RETURNED with the resubmittal, together with one copy of all corrected documents and a thumb drive holding a PDF of everything; plans returned without corrections as noted 'will be subject to additional plan check fees'. For a solar application specifically, CMC 8.14.06 requires that where an application is deemed incomplete 'a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance shall be sent to the applicant for resubmission'. Field corrections after a failed inspection are not documented beyond CMC 8.14.06's allowance that 'a subsequent inspection is authorized but need not conform to the requirements of this chapter'.
Why the confidence is not higherPlan-check side quoted from the Residential Plan Check List cover page; solar-specific notice quoted from the ordinance. The field-correction side is thin because the City publishes no correction-notice procedure for inspections.
published checklist + ordinance (CMC 8.14.06) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.clovisca.gov/documents/Services/Planning%20Development/Building/Residential%20Plan%20Check%20List%202025.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final
Why the confidence is not higherA rooftop PV retrofit is signed off by a final inspection on the job card, not by a certificate of occupancy: CMC 8.1.01.1 (amended UAC 309.1) reserves the certificate of occupancy for use or occupancy of a building or a change of occupancy classification, and CMC 8.14.06 provides for the single inspection that ends the process. PG&E then requires 'A copy of the final building permit' as part of the interconnection package. No Clovis document names the artefact (green tag, card, letter), so the label is inferred from the code and from what PG&E asks to be handed.
ordinance (CMC 8.1.01.1 sec. 309) + utility process page checked 2026-08-28 https://ecode360.com/50002744
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's process: the contractor completes the interconnection application, the system passes the city inspection to obtain a final building permit, and then 'Your contractor submits all required paperwork to PG&E... The Interconnection Application, A single line diagram of the system, A copy of the final building permit.' PG&E reviews, changes the meter and sends the customer written Permission to Operate, typically 5-10 business days and up to a maximum of 30. The City of Clovis has no role in notifying PG&E and no Clovis document claims one.
utility DG process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Clovis against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Clovis is the authority having jurisdiction 90% confidence
- Holds
- Building, residential, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, energy and green-code permitting, plan review and inspection for everything inside the Clovis city limits, through the Building Division of the Planning and Development Services Department, 1033 Fifth Street, Clovis CA 93612, (559) 324-2390, building@cityofclovis.com. The Building Division 'is created under Title 8 of the Clovis Municipal Code'. The Building Official is Jesse Newton (signing as Interim Building Official in March 2025 and as Building Official from August 2025), (559) 324-2334; a Deputy Building Official is also referenced in the plan-check documents. Electrical is retained, not delegated - CMC 8.2.101 adopts the 2025 CEC and CMC 8.2.102 sets the City's own electrical permit-issuance rules.
- Overridden by
- Fire code review and enforcement sit with the Clovis Fire Department under CMC Title 4 ch. 4.4 (2025 CFC adopted by Ord. 25-13, eff. 31 Dec 2025), and CMC 8.14.06 lets the Fire Department call a separate fire inspection on a solar job. Above the City: Gov. Code 65850.5 (AB 2188), implemented locally as CMC ch. 8.14 - administrative, non-discretionary review, one inspection, no HOA-approval condition; Gov. Code 65850.52 (SB 379), which the City answers with SolarAPP+ through its CSS portal for contractor submittals; Gov. Code 66015, capping the residential PV fee at $450 + $15/kW above 15 kW; Gov. Code 65850.55, forbidding valuation-based fees for solar - live here because Clovis's general building fee is expressly ICC-valuation-based; H&SC 18938.5, which the City set out in full in Building Industry Bulletin 2025-05; and AB 130 (Stats. 2025 ch. 22), which the City acknowledged in Bulletin 2025-03 as narrowing its power to amend residential standards from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031. Interconnection, the AC disconnect and its signage, and Permission to Operate are PG&E's under CPUC Rule 21 and PG&E Document 060559 Rev. #07.
- Why not higher
- The brief's framing is confirmed and the headline finding is a NEGATIVE on both neighbours: Clovis is neither the City of Fresno nor Fresno County. It is CURRENT, not stale - CMC 8.1.02, 8.15.101 and 8.2.101 adopt the 2025 CBC, 2025 CRC and 2025 CEC (2023 NEC) by Ordinance 25-12 effective 31 December 2025, and CMC 4.4.101 adopts the 2025 CFC by Ordinance 25-13 on the same date. So unlike Fresno County, which still publishes the 2022 cycle, no H&SC 18938(b) rescue is needed here. And unlike the City of Fresno, Clovis has adopted NO stricter local fire pathway rule: the whole of CMC ch. 4.4 (about 41,000 characters, read in full) contains no occurrence of solar, photovoltaic, setback, pathway or CFC 1205, and the Clovis Fire Department's published standards - all 30 of them reissued for 2026 - include no solar standard, the 2010-vintage Standard 48 'Solar Photovoltaic Installations' having been retired. Fire setbacks and access pathways in Clovis are the plain 2025 CRC R329.6 rule, with the City adding only the practical gloss that one of the two 36-inch pathways must come from the street side of the residence. Search integrity: the eCode360 positive control ('electrical') returned the expected sections and the fabricated control ('zzqqx') returned nothing, in the same run. Two corrections to note. First, the department name: this is the Building Division of PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, and the Fire Department's Life Safety and Enforcement Bureau, not a single combined department. Second, the domain: cityofclovis.com now 301-redirects to clovisca.gov, but the City's own handouts and the permit portal still carry cityofclovis.com addresses throughout (css.cityofclovis.com, building@cityofclovis.com, the footer of every PDF) - those still resolve, but any link-checking against clovisca.gov will look inconsistent. Third, the code is on eCode360 (CL4388): codepublishing.com/CA/Clovis now only redirects there, and the Municode library still carries a Clovis entry that is not the live code.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Plan review
- Next business day for a complete over-the-counter application; within 3 business days for a complete electronic application; real time for a SolarAPP+ submittal.85%
- Portal
- Tyler EnerGov Citizen Self Service ('CSS portal') at https://css.cityofclovis.com/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService#/home,90%
- Electrical code
- 202395%
- Own placard wording
- No88%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal80%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 88%
No
Size, colour & material 85%
Clovis specifies none. The City's only formatting instruction is a plan-set one - 'Show all applicable labeling in color' - which governs how labels are drawn on the submitted plans, not the physical placard. Letter height, colour and material for the installed markings come from the unamended 2023 NEC (690.13(B), 690.56(C), 705.10, 706) and its referenced standards. PG&E does specify material for the AC disconnect signage: 'Labels shall be permanent and suitable for the environment and shall be engraved phenolic or' equivalent, permanently attached to the front of the switch.
Where they go 85%
At the service equipment for the NEC markings - the 705.10 plaque or directory goes at the service equipment or at an approved readily visible location, the PV system disconnect marking on the disconnect itself, rapid shutdown labelling at the service disconnecting means. For PG&E's signage, on the front of the AC disconnect switch, which must itself sit 10 feet or less from PG&E's electric meter, in line of sight and easily seen from the meter panel, at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors, mounted with the top of the enclosure between 48 and 75 inches above ground, never above grade level, never on a roof, and never in a room that is not an approved electric meter room. Clovis adds no placement rule of its own beyond requiring the locations to be drawn on the plans.
What the utility wants on top 88%
Yes. PG&E Document 060559 (Disconnect Switch Requirements for Distributed Generation Customers, Rev. #07, 25 March 2022, also part of PG&E's Distribution Interconnection Handbook) requires on the AC disconnect: permanently attached signage on the front explaining that this is the AC disconnect switch for the generation, example 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'; labels permanent and suitable for the environment and engraved phenolic or equivalent; marking or signage on the switch clearly indicating the open (off) and closed (on) positions; a map showing the disconnect's location where it is not grouped with the meter panel; and, if a Net Generation Output Meter is fitted, proper labelling plus a location map where not grouped with the other meters and the disconnect. Where the disconnect is not accessible outside locked premises, signs with contact information plus a provider-approved locking device are required.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.