City of Dunsmuir
Siskiyou County
City of Dunsmuir is a city authority in the State of California, serving 1,707 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Where you file — iWorq permit portal — dunsmuir_permit.portal.iworq.net Q20
- Permit required
- Yes90% source
- Key document
- absence confirmed against department page and code cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 92% · code of ordinances
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 76% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 90% · code of ordinances
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 50% · department page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Yes, conditionally — DMC 15.08.050 requires 'all applications for construction, addition or remodel of single family residences' to 'show evidence of review by any architectural review committee or other body so authorized to review plans as provided in any applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions,' i.e., if the parcel's CC&Rs establish an HOA/architectural review committee, evidence of that private review must accompany the city application. This is a city-mandated recognition of private HOA review, not a city design-review board of its own for non-historic properties. 78% · code of ordinances
- Is there a historic-district review? Yes, but geographically narrow — DMC Ch. 17.68 (Historic Preservation, adopted by Ord. 575, 6-29-2023) requires Planning Commission review (a discretionary 'Historic Site Alteration Permit,' $745 fee) before any permit issues for 'construction, relocation, modification, or demolition of a historic resource or... any material change to a historic resource,' with the same review extended to any property within a 300-ft buffer zone of the district. The one designated district — the 'Dunsmuir Historic Commercial District' — is described in the ordinance itself as 'the historic commercial core of the city' (roughly four blocks bounded by Sacramento Ave., Dunsmuir Ave., Pine St. and Cedar St.), plus one landmark (the California Theatre). No solar/PV carve-out was found anywhere in Ch. 17.68. For a residential rooftop system, this chapter would only be triggered if the home is inside the historic district/landmark or within its 300-ft buffer — most Dunsmuir residential parcels are outside that footprint, but the ordinance as written does not exempt solar even there. 70% · code of ordinances
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 80% · absence confirmed against department page and code
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Only in the historic-district/landmark/buffer-zone case — see Q25: a 'Historic Site Alteration Permit' is a discretionary Planning-Commission-level approval (with public hearing) required by DMC 17.68.110 for a qualifying property. Outside that footprint, no Specific Use Permit or Council approval requirement for standard residential rooftop PV was found anywhere in the zoning or building code. 65% · code of ordinances
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 50% · code of ordinances
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 62% · code of ordinances
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 82% · department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Not published as a solar-specific list. The Building Dept.'s general submittal set is: online building-permit application (iWorq portal), Owner-Builder Acknowledgement Form (if owner-builder), Authorization of Agent Form (if an agent signs for the owner), plus plans. Note: the department's own 'Plan Check Checklist' PDF linked from this page is, on OCR, a verbatim City of Redding, CA commercial tenant-improvement checklist (it cites 'Redding Municipal Code (RMC) 18.40.090' and 2019-cycle codes) with only the header changed to 'City of Dunsmuir' — it is not authoritative evidence of Dunsmuir's own residential/solar requirements and was not used as a source for what a residential PV submittal must contain. 55% · department page
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? A site/plot plan is implied as part of any building-permit submittal but no residential-solar-specific site-plan content list was published by the city. Pacific Power's own interconnection application (separate from the city permit) requires an applicant-submitted site plan showing the meter, AC disconnect switch, and main service panel locations (its published 'Example Site Plan' template). 50% · utility document
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes, at the utility interconnection stage — PacifiCorp/Pacific Power publishes an 'Example One-line Drawing' template as part of its rooftop-solar interconnection application materials. No independent city-level one-line-diagram requirement was found in DMC or on the Building Dept. page. 60% · utility document
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? iWorq permit portal — dunsmuir_permit.portal.iworq.net 90% · department page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 60% · department page
- How is the fee calculated? Likely Valuation-based for the building-permit portion (DMC Ch. 15.04 adopts the Uniform Administrative Code, whose standard Table 1-A fee schedule is construction-valuation-based), with the electrical-permit portion codified (but stale) as a per-unit ($/outlet) charge subject to council resolution. Current practice could not be confirmed because no current fee schedule is published. 50% · code of ordinances
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days (California statewide default under the adopted Building Code's standard permit-expiration provision — permit becomes invalid if work is not commenced within 180 days or is suspended/abandoned for 180 days) 55% · code of ordinances (inferred from statewide-standard incorporation)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Power (PacifiCorp) 78% · utility service-territory documentation
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Before permit (for utility application/authorization) — Pacific Power's own published rooftop-solar process lists: (1) get quotes, (2) submit interconnection application online, (3) await Pacific Power review/authorization, (4) THEN 'obtain permits and install your system (do not activate yet)', (5) inspection, (6) sign agreement, (7) meter install, (8) activation. 72% · utility DG process page
28 questions answered against City of Dunsmuir’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherDMC Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) adopts the Building Code (Ch. 15.08), Electrical Code (Ch. 15.36) and Fire Code (Ch. 15.24) 'for the city' and vests enforcement in city officials for city limits; the city's own Building Department page confirms it processes building permits under 'the most current version of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24.'
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.08UNBUCO_15.08.010BUCOAD
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherDMC vests the city with both building-permit authority (Ch. 15.08) and electrical-permit authority (Ch. 15.36), and the city's own Building Dept. page/portal issues both. However, this is functionally delegated day-to-day: the Building Dept. and Planning Dept. pages name a contract Building Inspector (separate phone line, not a city-domain contact) and a contract City Planner on a @devcomca.com email — devcomca.com is Development Compliance Solutions, Inc. (DEVCOM), a California municipal building/planning staffing firm — and neither appears on the city's own 'Staff' roster page. Legal authority is retained by the city; performance is contracted out.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/staff
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 15.36.030 requires an electrical permit before any wiring/apparatus installation or alteration; Ch. 15.08 adopts the (California) Building Code generally, which requires a building permit for the array mounting/structural work. No solar-specific exemption from permitting was found anywhere in the code.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL_15.36.030PEELINEQ
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Dept. page lists a single portal action — 'APPLY OR SEARCH FOR A BUILDING PERMIT' (iWorq) — with no separate electrical-permit application step described for residential work, suggesting current practice funnels a residential PV job through one building-permit application. However, the code itself keeps Building (Ch. 15.08) and Electrical (Ch. 15.36, its own permit/fee sections) as textually separate permit types, so the codified structure would support 'Separate.' Practice could not be confirmed inside the portal itself (see not_found for portal access).
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 15.36.030 requires 'securing from the electrical inspector a permit' but does not state who may apply for or perform the work (no licensed-electrician-only clause found), and the Building Dept. publishes an 'Owner Builder Acknowledgement Form,' implying owner-performed electrical work is contemplated subject to the state's owner-builder rules (Bus. & Prof. Code §7044). No explicit 'licensed electrician only' restriction was found.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL_15.36.030PEELINEQ
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 5.04.030 requires 'no person shall transact and carry on any business, trade, profession, calling or occupation in the city' without a city business license, and 5.04.150 sets a specific $25/quarter (or gross-receipts option) license tax for 'every person not having a fixed place of business within the city who engages in the business of contracting within the city' — i.e., an out-of-town solar installer must hold a Dunsmuir business license/pay the contractor tax. Not confirmed as a literal gate checked at building-permit intake (no permit-application form was found that asks for a city business-license number), hence not full confidence.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT5BULIRE_CH5.04BULIGE_5.04.150LITAONCO
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Department publishes a dedicated 'Owner Builder Acknowledgement Form' ('If you are an owner/builder you must also submit an owner/builder acknowledgement form... upload the file with your online building permit application'), which is the standard California owner-builder disclosure used precisely to allow homeowner self-permitting/self-performing work.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Not published as a solar-specific list. The Building Dept.'s general submittal set is: online building-permit application (iWorq portal), Owner-Builder Acknowledgement Form (if owner-builder), Authorization of Agent Form (if an agent signs for the owner), plus plans. Note: the department's own 'Plan Check Checklist' PDF linked from this page is, on OCR, a verbatim City of Redding, CA commercial tenant-improvement checklist (it cites 'Redding Municipal Code (RMC) 18.40.090' and 2019-cycle codes) with only the header changed to 'City of Dunsmuir' — it is not authoritative evidence of Dunsmuir's own residential/solar requirements and was not used as a source for what a residential PV submittal must contain.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Dept. page names the forms; the linked 'Plan Check Checklist' PDF was downloaded and OCR'd and found to be a mislabeled Redding, CA document — flagged rather than relied upon.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page (no copy-count/format instructions found), the 'Plan Check Checklist' PDF (found to be a mislabeled City of Redding document, so not usable as Dunsmuir's own instruction), and the iWorq applicant portal itself, which returned HTTP 403 Forbidden to both direct fetch and headless-Chrome rendering (dunsmuir_permit.portal.iworq.net) so its in-portal upload instructions could not be read.
https://dunsmuir_permit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dunsmuir_permit
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
A site/plot plan is implied as part of any building-permit submittal but no residential-solar-specific site-plan content list was published by the city. Pacific Power's own interconnection application (separate from the city permit) requires an applicant-submitted site plan showing the meter, AC disconnect switch, and main service panel locations (its published 'Example Site Plan' template).
Why the confidence is not higherNo Dunsmuir-specific residential/solar site-plan checklist was found on the Building or Planning Dept. pages; the utility-level requirement is documented in PacifiCorp's own example template.
utility document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Example_Site_Plan.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes, at the utility interconnection stage — PacifiCorp/Pacific Power publishes an 'Example One-line Drawing' template as part of its rooftop-solar interconnection application materials. No independent city-level one-line-diagram requirement was found in DMC or on the Building Dept. page.
Why the confidence is not higherConfirmed from Pacific Power's own customer-generation resource page listing an Example One-line Drawing template; city-level requirement not independently confirmed because no Dunsmuir solar checklist exists.
utility document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Example_One-line_Drawing.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Ch. 15.36 (Electricity) and Ch. 15.08 (Building Code) text, the Building Dept. page, and PacifiCorp's Facility Interconnection Requirements (Policy 138) — none states a submittal requirement for string/conductor sizing calculations on a simple residential net-metered system specifically (Policy 138 covers larger DER technical requirements, not a residential submittal checklist).
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC 15.08.020 (Building Code amendments) sets a general minimum 70 psf roof live/snow load but does not set any solar-specific structural engineering/PE-stamp trigger; the Building Dept. page and available forms are silent on a threshold for PV arrays specifically.
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Ch. 15.36 (Electricity) and the Building Dept. page do not state an electrical PE-stamp threshold; no separate electrical-engineering-stamp policy was found.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC 15.36.050 codifies only a stale, pre-2015-superseded electrical fee ($0.20/outlet, $2.50 minimum) that the same section says 'may be changed at any time by resolution of city council' — no current resolution/fee schedule was found. Checked: Building Dept. page (no fee info), Finance Dept. page (links only to Annual Compensation Reports, Audited Financial Statements and Adopted Budgets — no fee-schedule link), and the Planning Dept.'s own current fee resolution (Exhibit A-1 to Resolution 2021-27), which covers Planning applications only (e.g. Historic Site Alteration Permit $745, Sign Permit $130) and contains no building/electrical/PV permit fee line.
https://dunsmuirca.gov/s/2021-27-Exhibit-A-1-Proposed-Planning-Fees.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Likely Valuation-based for the building-permit portion (DMC Ch. 15.04 adopts the Uniform Administrative Code, whose standard Table 1-A fee schedule is construction-valuation-based), with the electrical-permit portion codified (but stale) as a per-unit ($/outlet) charge subject to council resolution. Current practice could not be confirmed because no current fee schedule is published.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the adopted Uniform Administrative Code's standard fee-table structure (Ch. 15.04) and the per-outlet formula still on the books at DMC 15.36.050(A), not from a current published fee schedule.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.04UNADCO_15.04.010ADCOAD
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo current fee schedule was found (see Q15); the Planning fee resolution (Exhibit A-1 to Res. 2021-27) covers only Planning applications and has no building plan-check line.
https://dunsmuirca.gov/s/2021-27-Exhibit-A-1-Proposed-Planning-Fees.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Dept. page and 'Guidelines for Residential Construction' PDF both discuss the permit process generally but state no turnaround-time figure in business days.
https://dunsmuirca.gov/s/Guidelines-for-Residential-Construction.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days (California statewide default under the adopted Building Code's standard permit-expiration provision — permit becomes invalid if work is not commenced within 180 days or is suspended/abandoned for 180 days)
Why the confidence is not higherDMC does not restate a permit-validity period of its own; Ch. 15.04 adopts the Uniform/California Building Code's administrative provisions by reference, which carry this as the statewide-standard figure. Not independently confirmed in a Dunsmuir-specific document.
code of ordinances (inferred from statewide-standard incorporation) checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.04UNADCO_15.04.010ADCOAD
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
iWorq permit portal — dunsmuir_permit.portal.iworq.net
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Dept. page's own button is labeled 'APPLY OR SEARCH FOR A BUILDING PERMIT' and links directly to this iWorq portal instance; it is also used for Encroachment and Fence permit applications.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Dept. page instructs owner-builders to 'upload the file with your online building permit application,' implying the application itself, including attachments, is completed online. The portal's own interface could not be verified directly — it returned HTTP 403 Forbidden to both direct fetch and headless-Chrome rendering.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Power (PacifiCorp)
Why the confidence is not higherNot PG&E. PacifiCorp's own Wikipedia summary of its California operations lists 'Crescent City, Dunsmuir, Mount Shasta, Yreka' as major California cities served; PacifiCorp's own simplified service-area map shows a Northern California cluster centered on Yreka/Mt. Shasta that geographically brackets Dunsmuir (which sits directly between Mt. Shasta and Weed on I-5); and the Siskiyou County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan independently documents Pacific Power as the electric utility for the immediately adjacent cities of Weed and Mt. Shasta, with no PG&E presence mentioned anywhere in Siskiyou County materials reviewed. No first-party Dunsmuir-specific 'Pacific Power serves this address' statement was found, hence not full confidence.
utility service-territory documentation checked 2026-08-31 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PacifiCorp
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Before permit (for utility application/authorization) — Pacific Power's own published rooftop-solar process lists: (1) get quotes, (2) submit interconnection application online, (3) await Pacific Power review/authorization, (4) THEN 'obtain permits and install your system (do not activate yet)', (5) inspection, (6) sign agreement, (7) meter install, (8) activation.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly quoted from Pacific Power's own customer-generation/rooftop-solar page, which states permits are obtained only after interconnection authorization is received; final activation still waits on a separate post-permit-inspection utility step.
utility DG process page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/savings-energy-choices/customer-generation.html
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
Yes, conditionally — DMC 15.08.050 requires 'all applications for construction, addition or remodel of single family residences' to 'show evidence of review by any architectural review committee or other body so authorized to review plans as provided in any applicable covenants, conditions and restrictions,' i.e., if the parcel's CC&Rs establish an HOA/architectural review committee, evidence of that private review must accompany the city application. This is a city-mandated recognition of private HOA review, not a city design-review board of its own for non-historic properties.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from DMC 15.08.050(A).
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.08UNBUCO_15.08.050ARRE
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Yes, but geographically narrow — DMC Ch. 17.68 (Historic Preservation, adopted by Ord. 575, 6-29-2023) requires Planning Commission review (a discretionary 'Historic Site Alteration Permit,' $745 fee) before any permit issues for 'construction, relocation, modification, or demolition of a historic resource or... any material change to a historic resource,' with the same review extended to any property within a 300-ft buffer zone of the district. The one designated district — the 'Dunsmuir Historic Commercial District' — is described in the ordinance itself as 'the historic commercial core of the city' (roughly four blocks bounded by Sacramento Ave., Dunsmuir Ave., Pine St. and Cedar St.), plus one landmark (the California Theatre). No solar/PV carve-out was found anywhere in Ch. 17.68. For a residential rooftop system, this chapter would only be triggered if the home is inside the historic district/landmark or within its 300-ft buffer — most Dunsmuir residential parcels are outside that footprint, but the ordinance as written does not exempt solar even there.
Why the confidence is not higherDMC Ch. 17.68 read in full (all 20 sections); no exemption for solar or any energy system was found. Whether any specific residential address falls in the 300-ft buffer is address-dependent and outside the scope of this authority-level review.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17ZO_CH17.68HIPR_17.68.110PRAUCODEREMACHHIRE
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherCalifornia is not a wind-certification (TDI-style) state; no Dunsmuir ordinance, form, or department page mentions a wind/windstorm certification requirement for residential solar.
absence confirmed against department page and code checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Only in the historic-district/landmark/buffer-zone case — see Q25: a 'Historic Site Alteration Permit' is a discretionary Planning-Commission-level approval (with public hearing) required by DMC 17.68.110 for a qualifying property. Outside that footprint, no Specific Use Permit or Council approval requirement for standard residential rooftop PV was found anywhere in the zoning or building code.
Why the confidence is not higherBased on the full read of DMC Ch. 17.68 and the absence of any SUP/Council-approval clause for solar elsewhere in Title 15 or Title 17.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17ZO_CH17.68HIPR_17.68.110PRAUCODEREMACHHIRE
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Title 15 (Buildings) and Title 17 (Zoning) — no chapter titled Solar/Photovoltaic/Renewable Energy exists anywhere in the code's table of contents (confirmed by walking all 19 titles), and no numeric residential generation-capacity cap was found in the zoning accessory-use/accessory-structure provisions either.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=16005
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (as the current California Electrical Code cycle), by evergreen local adoption 62% · code of ordinances (evergreen clause) + department page
- Which building code edition is in force? Current California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2), by evergreen local adoption 62% · department page + code of ordinances (evergreen clause)
- Which fire code edition is in force? Current California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9), by evergreen local adoption 58% · code of ordinances
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 82% · code of ordinances
- What is the installation judged against? The currently-adopted California Building Standards Code (CBC/CEC/CRC/CFC/Energy Code, Title 24), as incorporated by DMC Chs. 15.04/15.08/15.24/15.32/15.36's evergreen adoption clauses, plus the local amendments listed at Q32. No Dunsmuir-specific solar/PV installation standard (e.g., a local PV ordinance or checklist) was found. 65% · department page
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of Dunsmuir on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown is a requirement of NEC Article 690.12, which DMC 15.36.010 incorporates by reference as part of whichever NEC edition is currently in force (see Q29, currently the 2023 NEC cycle). No local amendment to or exemption from 690.12 was found. 58% · code of ordinances (inferred from NEC incorporation)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? No Dunsmuir-specific placard requirement was found beyond the (evergreen-adopted) NEC's own labeling articles. The interconnecting utility, Pacific Power, separately requires its own placards at the service point: an engraved meter-base label, an engraved AC (knife-blade) disconnect label, and — if a battery/ESS is present — an engraved battery-disconnect label, plus (since 11/1/2025) two required photos of the meter/disconnect at the interconnection-application stage. 75% · utility document
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No (the AHJ itself does not specify placard wording) — but the interconnecting UTILITY does: Pacific Power's standard hazard placard reads 'HAZARD OF ELECTRICAL SHOCK OR BURN — SERVICE BY UTILITY AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY — DO NOT PAINT OVER OR REMOVE THIS LABEL' (bilingual English/Spanish), plus separate short labels for the meter base, AC disconnect and battery disconnect. 75% · utility document
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? The city specifies none of its own. Pacific Power specifies: lettering 3/8 inch high on the standard engraved placards (meter base, AC disconnect, battery disconnect labels); red background with white lettering; for a 'director placard' (where required), lettering at least 9 mm (1/4 inch) tall, comparable to 25-pt Arial, on an approximately 5x5 inch placard sized for readability. 78% · utility document
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — extensively. Pacific Power's 'Engraved Placard Examples' document specifies placards well beyond a bare NEC minimum: separate engraved labels for the meter base, the AC knife-blade disconnect, and the battery disconnect (which may state the battery's physical location and how to visually confirm it is shut down); a standard bilingual hazard-of-shock placard; and, where a 'director placard' is required, specific lettering-height and sizing guidance. 92% · utility document
- Where must the labels be placed? Per Pacific Power: one engraved label on or next to the utility meter base; one engraved label on or next to the AC knife-blade disconnect for the solar system; and, where present, one engraved label on the battery disconnect (which may be combined with the manual/AC disconnect label if the systems share one disconnect). The visible disconnect itself must be located within sight and within 10 feet of the utility meter (or at a PacifiCorp-approved alternate location with signage at the meter pointing to it). 88% · utility policy document
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Per Pacific Power's DER Interconnection Policy (Policy 138), §3.2: the customer-side visible disconnect switch must be 'accessible to PacifiCorp personnel,' 'capable of being locked in the open position,' 'gang-operated,' and 'located within sight and within 10 feet of the utility meter or at a PacifiCorp-approved location with acceptable signage at the utility meter indicating the location of the disconnect.' 88% · utility policy document
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, by general definition — DMC 17.08.040 defines 'Accessory structure' broadly as 'a structure that is physically detached from, secondary, and incidental to, and commonly associated with the existing primary structure' (excluding tents/vehicles/habitable buildings), which would capture a ground-mounted PV array. Accessory structures in residential/mixed-use zones must not project into the front-yard setback and (unless attached) must sit at least 10 feet from any residential dwelling on the same or an adjacent lot (DMC 17.92.190(F)). No solar-specific ground-mount ordinance exists; this is inferred from the general accessory-structure rule. 62% · code of ordinances (inferred)
20 questions answered against City of Dunsmuir’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC (as the current California Electrical Code cycle), by evergreen local adoption
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 15.36.010 literally still names 'the National Electrical Code... 1993 Edition' but includes an evergreen clause: 'For future revisions, the most recent edition of the code referred to in this section shall be effective on the first day of January following the date of publication.' The Building Dept. page separately states the city follows 'the most current version of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24' and links to the state Building Standards Commission's code page. Applying that clause to the current statewide Title 24 cycle, the operative electrical code is the 2023 NEC as amended into the California Electrical Code. The codified section itself has not been updated to say so explicitly, which is why confidence is not higher.
code of ordinances (evergreen clause) + department page checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL_15.36.010ELCOAD
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Current California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2), by evergreen local adoption
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 15.08.010 names the 1991 Uniform Building Code but carries the same evergreen 'most recent edition... effective January 1 following publication' clause, and the Building Dept. page independently states the city follows 'the most current version of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24,' linking to bsc.ca.gov.
department page + code of ordinances (evergreen clause) checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Current California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9), by evergreen local adoption
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 15.24.010 names the 1991 Uniform Fire Code but carries the identical evergreen 'most recent edition' clause seen in the Building and Electrical chapters; no independent city confirmation of the fire-code cycle (comparable to the Building Dept.'s Title-24 statement) was found for fire specifically.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.24FIPR_15.24.010UNFICOAD
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherDMC 15.08.020 amends the adopted Building Code (snow load raised to a 70 psf minimum roof live load; metal-roofing color-approval clause; downtown wood-siding fire-rating specifications in item C; Energy Code cross-reference); 15.08.030 establishes local fire zones; Ch. 17.68 (2023) adds a locally-designed Historic Preservation review layer on top of the base code. None of these amendments is solar-specific.
code of ordinances checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.08UNBUCO_15.08.020AMADDE
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The currently-adopted California Building Standards Code (CBC/CEC/CRC/CFC/Energy Code, Title 24), as incorporated by DMC Chs. 15.04/15.08/15.24/15.32/15.36's evergreen adoption clauses, plus the local amendments listed at Q32. No Dunsmuir-specific solar/PV installation standard (e.g., a local PV ordinance or checklist) was found.
Why the confidence is not higherSynthesized from the Building Dept. page's Title-24 statement and the DMC chapters' evergreen-adoption language; no dedicated solar installation standard exists to check installations against beyond the state code.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Ch. 15.08 (Building Code amendments) and Ch. 15.36 (Electricity) — neither contains a service-upgrade or busbar-sizing amendment; such a rule would instead come from the current NEC's own busbar/120% rule, which is not a local amendment.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Ch. 15.08 (Building Code amendments) contains general structural amendments (snow load, wood-siding assembly details) but nothing addressing PV mounting systems or attachment spacing specifically; no separate solar ordinance exists to check.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Ch. 15.24 (Fire Protection) adopts the Uniform/California Fire Code by reference and adds only fire-zone-map and hazard-severity-zone provisions (15.24.030, 15.24.130) — no ridge-setback or fire-access-pathway amendment specific to rooftop PV was found; that content would come from the adopted CFC/CRC's own standard tables rather than a local amendment.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.24FIPR
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — rapid shutdown is a requirement of NEC Article 690.12, which DMC 15.36.010 incorporates by reference as part of whichever NEC edition is currently in force (see Q29, currently the 2023 NEC cycle). No local amendment to or exemption from 690.12 was found.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the evergreen NEC adoption at DMC 15.36.010; Dunsmuir has not published its own rapid-shutdown bulletin, so this is a code-incorporation inference rather than a locally stated rule.
code of ordinances (inferred from NEC incorporation) checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL_15.36.010ELCOAD
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No Dunsmuir-specific placard requirement was found beyond the (evergreen-adopted) NEC's own labeling articles. The interconnecting utility, Pacific Power, separately requires its own placards at the service point: an engraved meter-base label, an engraved AC (knife-blade) disconnect label, and — if a battery/ESS is present — an engraved battery-disconnect label, plus (since 11/1/2025) two required photos of the meter/disconnect at the interconnection-application stage.
Why the confidence is not higherCity side: no local ordinance/checklist requirement found (see Q39-40 for the utility-specific detail). Utility side: directly from Pacific Power's own 'Engraved Placard Examples' document.
utility document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Engraved_Placard_Examples.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No (the AHJ itself does not specify placard wording) — but the interconnecting UTILITY does: Pacific Power's standard hazard placard reads 'HAZARD OF ELECTRICAL SHOCK OR BURN — SERVICE BY UTILITY AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY — DO NOT PAINT OVER OR REMOVE THIS LABEL' (bilingual English/Spanish), plus separate short labels for the meter base, AC disconnect and battery disconnect.
Why the confidence is not higherNo Dunsmuir ordinance or department document specifies its own placard wording; the wording found is entirely from Pacific Power's Engraved Placard Examples document.
utility document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Engraved_Placard_Examples.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The city specifies none of its own. Pacific Power specifies: lettering 3/8 inch high on the standard engraved placards (meter base, AC disconnect, battery disconnect labels); red background with white lettering; for a 'director placard' (where required), lettering at least 9 mm (1/4 inch) tall, comparable to 25-pt Arial, on an approximately 5x5 inch placard sized for readability.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly quoted/paraphrased from Pacific Power's Engraved Placard Examples PDF; no city-level letter-height/color/material specification was found.
utility document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Engraved_Placard_Examples.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Chs. 15.08 and 15.36, and the Building Dept. page — none addresses a site plan/facility map placard beyond the general NEC 705.10 requirement that would apply via evergreen code adoption; no local amendment or supplement was found.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — extensively. Pacific Power's 'Engraved Placard Examples' document specifies placards well beyond a bare NEC minimum: separate engraved labels for the meter base, the AC knife-blade disconnect, and the battery disconnect (which may state the battery's physical location and how to visually confirm it is shut down); a standard bilingual hazard-of-shock placard; and, where a 'director placard' is required, specific lettering-height and sizing guidance.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from Pacific Power's own published placard-specification document.
utility document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Engraved_Placard_Examples.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Per Pacific Power: one engraved label on or next to the utility meter base; one engraved label on or next to the AC knife-blade disconnect for the solar system; and, where present, one engraved label on the battery disconnect (which may be combined with the manual/AC disconnect label if the systems share one disconnect). The visible disconnect itself must be located within sight and within 10 feet of the utility meter (or at a PacifiCorp-approved alternate location with signage at the meter pointing to it).
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from Pacific Power's Engraved Placard Examples document and its DER Interconnection Policy (Policy 138) §3.2 Visible Disconnect.
utility policy document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Facility_Interconnection_Requirements_for_Distribution.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC Ch. 15.36 (Electricity) and the Building Dept. page — neither states an equipment-listing requirement of the city's own; any listing requirement (e.g., UL 1703/UL 1741) would come from the adopted NEC/CEC rather than a distinct Dunsmuir list.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.36EL
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDMC has no Battery/ESS-specific chapter or amendment anywhere in Title 15; conditions would default to whatever the currently-adopted California Fire Code (evergreen-incorporated at DMC 15.24.010) states for ESS, which was not independently checked against a Dunsmuir-specific amendment because none exists to check.
https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT15BUCO_CH15.24FIPR
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo DMC provision or Building Dept. document addresses a separate ESS permit or inspection distinct from the general building/electrical permit.
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, by general definition — DMC 17.08.040 defines 'Accessory structure' broadly as 'a structure that is physically detached from, secondary, and incidental to, and commonly associated with the existing primary structure' (excluding tents/vehicles/habitable buildings), which would capture a ground-mounted PV array. Accessory structures in residential/mixed-use zones must not project into the front-yard setback and (unless attached) must sit at least 10 feet from any residential dwelling on the same or an adjacent lot (DMC 17.92.190(F)). No solar-specific ground-mount ordinance exists; this is inferred from the general accessory-structure rule.
Why the confidence is not higherNo dedicated 'solar' or 'ground-mounted system' definition exists in DMC Title 17; the answer is inferred from the general accessory-structure definition and setback rule, which is the closest applicable text.
code of ordinances (inferred) checked 2026-08-31 https://library.municode.com/ca/dunsmuir/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT17ZO_CH17.08DE_17.08.040ACST
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Per Pacific Power's DER Interconnection Policy (Policy 138), §3.2: the customer-side visible disconnect switch must be 'accessible to PacifiCorp personnel,' 'capable of being locked in the open position,' 'gang-operated,' and 'located within sight and within 10 feet of the utility meter or at a PacifiCorp-approved location with acceptable signage at the utility meter indicating the location of the disconnect.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from PacifiCorp's own DER Interconnection Policy No. 138, §3.2 (Visible Disconnect). No separate Dunsmuir city rule on disconnect placement was found, so the utility rule is the governing published standard here.
utility policy document checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/content/dam/pcorp/documents/en/pp-rmp/customer-generation/Facility_Interconnection_Requirements_for_Distribution.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Phone 85% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Delegated 60% · staff roster page (absence) + corroborating vendor site
- If delegated, to whom? Development Compliance Solutions, Inc. (DEVCOM) — inferred contract Building Inspector 55% · vendor website (inference)
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
Nothing recorded for City of Dunsmuir on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No 65% · PDF found to be mislabeled/non-authoritative — absence otherwise confirmed
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer (functionally) — Pacific Power's own published process has the customer/installer 'upload inspection documentation and safety sign photos' into the PowerClerk interconnection portal as the step following the AHJ inspection, which triggers Pacific Power's next steps (agreement, meter installation, activation). No Dunsmuir city document assigns this responsibility. 68% · utility DG process page
14 questions answered against City of Dunsmuir’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Phone
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Dept. page instructs: 'For general building permit questions, substandard building reports, complaints, plan check status, or to request an inspection on your existing permit: Call Anthony Hanner: 530-776-4024, leave your permit#, address on permit, contact details and type of inspection needed.'
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/building-department
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Dept. page and 'Guidelines for Residential Construction' PDF — neither states a required advance-notice period for scheduling an inspection.
https://dunsmuirca.gov/s/Guidelines-for-Residential-Construction.pdf
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Dept. page — no mention of same-day service or AM/PM inspection windows.
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Delegated
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Inspector position that performs inspections (Anthony Hanner, 530-776-4024) does not appear on the city's own 'Staff' page of in-house City Staff and uses a separate phone line from every other city department, matching the pattern of contract staffing via Development Compliance Solutions, Inc. (DEVCOM) — the same firm confirmed (by @devcomca.com email) to supply Dunsmuir's contract City Planner and which markets Building Department/Inspector staffing to California cities on its own website. Legal authority to inspect remains the city's; performance appears contracted.
staff roster page (absence) + corroborating vendor site checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/staff
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Development Compliance Solutions, Inc. (DEVCOM) — inferred contract Building Inspector
Why the confidence is not higherInferred, not confirmed in a single document: DEVCOM's own site advertises 'Building Department' and 'Inspectors' staffing services to California municipalities and is confirmed as Dunsmuir's Planning contractor; the Building Inspector's absence from the city Staff page and separate phone number are consistent with the same arrangement, but no document names DEVCOM as the Building Inspector's employer explicitly.
vendor website (inference) checked 2026-08-31 https://devcomca.com/
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published solar-specific inspection-stage sequence was found on the Building Dept. page or in any of its linked PDFs (Guidelines for Residential Construction, Plan Check Checklist — the latter also disqualified as a mislabeled City of Redding document, see Q8).
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Dept. page and Guidelines PDF do not mention a rough-in or mid-roof inspection stage for any permit type.
https://dunsmuirca.gov/s/Guidelines-for-Residential-Construction.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Dunsmuir document states inspector practice regarding verifying labels/equipment listings at final inspection; not observable from published sources.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo published inspection checklist (solar or general) was found on the Building Dept. page or among its linked PDFs. The only 'checklist' document linked from that page (the 'Plan Check Checklist' PDF) was found on OCR to be a mislabeled City of Redding, CA commercial-tenant-improvement document (references 'Redding Municipal Code (RMC) 18.40.090' and 2019-cycle codes) and does not represent a genuine Dunsmuir inspection checklist.
PDF found to be mislabeled/non-authoritative — absence otherwise confirmed checked 2026-08-31 https://dunsmuirca.gov/s/Plan-Check-Checklist.pdf
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Dunsmuir document lists what must be physically present on site at the time of a solar inspection (e.g., approved plans, permit card).
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo current fee schedule is published (see Q15); DMC 15.36.050 sets only the superseded $2.50-minimum electrical inspection fee and states current fees are set 'by resolution,' but no such resolution was found online.
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Dunsmuir document describes a corrections/re-inspection process.
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Dunsmuir document states which of CO / Final / Green tag / Letter is issued on a passed residential solar inspection.
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer (functionally) — Pacific Power's own published process has the customer/installer 'upload inspection documentation and safety sign photos' into the PowerClerk interconnection portal as the step following the AHJ inspection, which triggers Pacific Power's next steps (agreement, meter installation, activation). No Dunsmuir city document assigns this responsibility.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from Pacific Power's own step-by-step rooftop-solar process page; not stated in those exact terms ('who notifies the utility'), but the workflow assigns the upload/notification action to the customer-generation applicant, i.e., the installer/homeowner rather than the AHJ.
utility DG process page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pacificpower.net/savings-energy-choices/customer-generation.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Dunsmuir against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Dunsmuir is the authority having jurisdiction 80% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (DMC Title 15: Ch. 15.08 Building Code, Ch. 15.36 Electricity), performed day-to-day by contract staff rather than in-house city employees; fire-code enforcement/prevention runs through the tri-entity Dunsmuir-Castella Fire Department (City of Dunsmuir + Dunsmuir Fire Protection District + Castella Fire Protection District), not the city alone
- Delegated to
- Development Compliance Solutions, Inc. (DEVCOM), a California municipal building/planning staffing firm — confirmed as the source of the contract City Planner (Amber DePaola, @devcomca.com) and inferred (not fully confirmed) as the source of the contract Building Inspector (Anthony Hanner, who like the Planner is absent from the city's own 'Staff' roster page and reachable only at a phone number distinct from every other department). Fire prevention/plan review functionally sits with the joint Dunsmuir-Castella Fire Department rather than a city fire marshal.
- Overridden by
- CA Gov. Code §65850.5 (AB 2188) governs ministerial small-residential-rooftop-PV permitting statewide, and AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22) bars the city from adopting any residential-code amendment more restrictive than the state code through 1 Jun 2031 — a live tension with DMC Ch. 17.68 (Historic Preservation, adopted by Ord. 575 on 6-29-2023), which requires discretionary Planning Commission review with no solar carve-out for any 'material change' to a resource inside the Dunsmuir Historic Commercial District or its 300-ft buffer zone. No dedicated local solar/AB 2188 ordinance was found anywhere in the code (confirmed by walking the full 19-title table of contents), so it is unclear whether the city has separately adopted the state-mandated expedited/ministerial solar process at all.
- Why not higher
- DMC Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) names the city as the adopting/enforcing authority for the Building, Electrical and Fire codes within city limits, and the Building Dept. page confirms it processes permits under 'the most current version of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24.' But the city's own 'Staff' page lists no Building Official, Building Inspector, or Planner among in-house City Staff (it lists City Manager, City Clerk, Finance Director/Clerk, Community Service Liaison, Fire Chief, Public Works Director/staff, and a Resilience Planner only) — while the Building Dept. and Planning Dept. pages separately name Anthony Hanner (a phone number distinct from every city-hall extension) and Amber DePaola (an @devcomca.com email, not @dunsmuirca.gov) as the people who actually run those functions. devcomca.com is Development Compliance Solutions, Inc., which markets exactly this kind of Building/Planning staff-augmentation to California public agencies. Fire response and prevention sit with the Dunsmuir-Castella Fire Department, which the city's own Fire Department page describes as 'comprised of three different governmental entities: the City of Dunsmuir, the Dunsmuir Fire Protection District, and the Castella Fire Protection District.'
- Permit required
- Yes90%
- Portal
- iWorq permit portal — dunsmuir_permit.portal.iworq.net90%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC (as the current California Electrical Code cycle), by evergreen local adoption62%
- Own placard wording
- No (the AHJ itself does not specify placard wording) — but the interconnecting UTILITY does: Pacific Power's standard hazard placard reads 'HAZARD OF ELECTRICAL SHOCK OR BURN — SERVICE BY…75%
- Booking an inspection
- Phone85%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 75%
No (the AHJ itself does not specify placard wording) — but the interconnecting UTILITY does: Pacific Power's standard hazard placard reads 'HAZARD OF ELECTRICAL SHOCK OR BURN — SERVICE BY UTILITY AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY — DO NOT PAINT OVER OR REMOVE THIS LABEL' (bilingual English/Spanish), plus separate short labels for the meter base, AC disconnect and battery disconnect.
Size, colour & material 78%
The city specifies none of its own. Pacific Power specifies: lettering 3/8 inch high on the standard engraved placards (meter base, AC disconnect, battery disconnect labels); red background with white lettering; for a 'director placard' (where required), lettering at least 9 mm (1/4 inch) tall, comparable to 25-pt Arial, on an approximately 5x5 inch placard sized for readability.
Where they go 88%
Per Pacific Power: one engraved label on or next to the utility meter base; one engraved label on or next to the AC knife-blade disconnect for the solar system; and, where present, one engraved label on the battery disconnect (which may be combined with the manual/AC disconnect label if the systems share one disconnect). The visible disconnect itself must be located within sight and within 10 feet of the utility meter (or at a PacifiCorp-approved alternate location with signage at the meter pointing to it).
What the utility wants on top 92%
Yes — extensively. Pacific Power's 'Engraved Placard Examples' document specifies placards well beyond a bare NEC minimum: separate engraved labels for the meter base, the AC knife-blade disconnect, and the battery disconnect (which may state the battery's physical location and how to visually confirm it is shut down); a standard bilingual hazard-of-shock placard; and, where a 'director placard' is required, specific lettering-height and sizing guidance.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.