City of Fresno

Fresno County

Verified Aug. 4, 2026

City of Fresno is one of the busiest jurisdictions in California for residential solar — 4th by installs on record — 542,107 residents, with 56,968 residential solar installs on record. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — SolarAPP+ eligible single-family/duplex: real time - the permit auto-issues on payment with no plan review. Q18 Where you file — Accela Citizen Access, plus NREL SolarAPP+ for eligible single-family and duplex rooftop PV. Q20

Permit required
Yes95% source
What it costs
$333.22 for a residential system up to 15 kW ($170.37 plan check + $162.85 inspection), plus $11.27 per additional kW above 15 kW.85% source
Plan review turnaround
SolarAPP+ eligible single-family/duplex: real time - the permit auto-issues on payment with no plan review.75% source
Key document
ordinance (absence proved by reading the adopted text and the checklist) cited by 7 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · adopting ordinance (FMC ch. 11 art. 1, Ord. 2025-040 eff. 31 Oct 2025)
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 95% · adopting ordinance
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · department page
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 85% · fee schedule (Master Fee Schedule, all fees effective 07/01/2026, MFS Amendment #590)
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 80% · ordinance
    • Is there a historic-district review? Yes 85% · department page (Historic Preservation FAQ)
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 60% · ordinance (absence proved by reading the adopted text and the checklist)
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No. FMC 11-111 makes small residential rooftop solar an administrative, expedited permit; Development Code Table 15-2012-B allows rooftop solar panels to project up to 10 ft above the district height limit with no coverage limitation, so no variance, Conditional Use Permit or Council action is triggered by a normal residential rooftop array. Development Code Articles 20 and 27 contain no solar-specific use permit. 75% · development code
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No size cap on residential generation in the Municipal Code. Two route-specific limits exist: SolarAPP+ is restricted to single-family and duplex dwellings (mobile homes and commercial excluded), and the FMC 11-111 expedited process only covers systems up to 10 kW AC nameplate (or 30 kW thermal) on a single or duplex dwelling. Larger residential systems still get a permit, just through standard plan check. 80% · ordinance
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Two routes. (1) SolarAPP+ (single-family and duplex only, not mobile homes, not commercial): SolarAPP+ approval number plus three uploads to Accela - SolarAPP+ Approval Checklist, solar equipment spec sheets, and an electrical one-line diagram; permit auto-issues on payment. (2) Standard plan check: complete plan set signed by the preparer with address, phone and licence stamp/number on every sheet; site plan; roof plan; electrical single-line; structural details; manufacturer cut-sheets for all products; structural calculations for ground mount and reverse tilt (>24 in. at the tall side); dimensioned foundation plan and elevations for ground mount; warning/hazard stickers applicable to the project; plus the Building Permit Application form. 90% · published checklist
    • How many copies, and in what format? Digital only, submitted through Accela Citizen Access. Plan sheets 11 in. x 17 in. minimum to 30 in. x 42 in. maximum; calculations and product cut-sheets may be 8.5 in. x 11 in.; each sheet must carry a clear 3 in. x 3 in. 'City use only' space; file size limited to 200 MB. No paper copy count is published. 90% · published checklist
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. The site plan must show project data, scope of work and owner authorization; a north arrow; the property owner's name, address and phone; and the building footprint with lot dimensions and setbacks including all structures. A separate roof plan must show panel location and orientation, points of service connection and equipment locations, and fire/service access pathways. 90% · published checklist
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 95% · published checklist
    • Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 75% · published checklist
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No PE stamp for a normal flush roof-mount. Structural calculations are required for ground mount and for reverse tilt greater than 24 in. at the tall side, and each plan sheet must carry the preparer's licence stamp and number 'if applicable' - so the threshold is the mounting geometry, not system size. 80% · published checklist
    • Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Not required. No electrical PE stamp threshold appears in FMC ch. 11 art. 1, in the residential solar checklist, or on the Building and Safety pages; the only stamp requirement is the preparer's licence stamp on each sheet 'if applicable'. 70% · adopting ordinance + published checklist
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Accela Citizen Access, plus NREL SolarAPP+ for eligible single-family and duplex rooftop PV. NOTE: the live portal is now https://aca-prod.accela.com/FRESNO/Default.aspx - the lmsaca.fresno.gov/CitizenAccess address still linked from the Building and Safety page, the SolarAPP+ page and the SolarAPP+ instruction PDF now serves only a notice saying 'We have a new Citizen Access website'. 90% · portal landing page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · department handout (SolarAPP+ Application Instructions)
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? $333.22 for a residential system up to 15 kW ($170.37 plan check + $162.85 inspection), plus $11.27 per additional kW above 15 kW. A $27.08 permit issuance fee, a $23.79 technology surcharge on all building permits, a $33.84 workers'-compensation verification fee and the state SMIP seismic fee may also apply; the state Strong-Motion fee is set by the Department of Conservation. 85% · fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Tiered 85% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes 90% · fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? SolarAPP+ eligible single-family/duplex: real time - the permit auto-issues on payment with no plan review. Non-SolarAPP+ small residential rooftop qualifying for expedited review: FMC 11-111(a)(3) defines the Expedited Solar Permitting Process as 'a processing timeline not to exceed 3 days'. No general published turnaround exists for a standard (non-expedited) residential solar plan check. 75% · ordinance (FMC 11-111) + department handout
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days 90% · department page
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) 85% · department page
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel 85% · utility DG process page

28 questions answered against City of Fresno’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherFresno Municipal Code sec. 11-102 amends CBC 103.1/104.1 to establish the Planning and Development Department as the City's code enforcement agency and its Director (or designee) as Building Official for all building, residential, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and energy work inside the city limits. FMC sec. 11-111 sets the City's own expedited review process for small residential rooftop solar. Fresno COUNTY is a separate AHJ and its answer does not carry over.

adopting ordinance (FMC ch. 11 art. 1, Ord. 2025-040 eff. 31 Oct 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both

Why the confidence is not higherFMC sec. 11-101 to 11-109 adopt the CBC, CRC, CEC, CMC, CPC, Energy Code and CALGreen into the 'Fresno Building Code' administered by the Building and Safety Services Division; electrical is retained, not delegated. Only fire-code review passes to the Fresno Fire Department (FMC ch. 10 art. 5). No third-party or county delegation is stated anywhere on the Building and Safety pages.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Center page quotes CBC ch. 1 sec. 105.1 verbatim as the City's rule and the Building Permit Application (rev. 20 Feb 2026) carries a dedicated 'Residential Solar' block (panel count, DC kW, battery, reverse tilt/ground mount). The Master Fee Schedule prices 'Photovoltaic Systems - Residential'. No exemption for rooftop PV exists.

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-permit-center/

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Combined

Why the confidence is not higherResidential PV is permitted as one building permit record covering the electrical work: the Master Fee Schedule has a single 'Photovoltaic Systems - Residential' line with a plan check and an inspection component, not a separate electrical permit, and the SolarAPP+ route issues one auto-issued 'B' record. The stand-alone Mechanical/Plumbing/Electrical fee table is for stand-alone M/P/E projects, not PV.

fee schedule (Master Fee Schedule, all fees effective 07/01/2026, MFS Amendment #590) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MFS-Planning_593_CPI_CPI-UGM_CPI-Parking-ED-2026.07.01-10w1657-10w1683.pdf

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either

Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Permit Application takes a Contractor's State License number OR runs as an owner-builder; the City publishes the CSLB Owner-Builder checklist. The SolarAPP+ path is narrower: the instructions require the applicant to complete 'licensed professional information' in Accela and the SolarAPP+ page says 'Licensed contractors, who have registered as an installer with SolarAPP+' submit. No local electrician-only rule was found in FMC ch. 11.

permit application form (rev. 20 Feb 2026) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Building-Permit-Application-Updated-2.20.26-10w1355.pdf

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherNot a trade registration, but the Finance Department states that anyone holding a California State Contractor's License and operating in the City must obtain a City Business Tax Certificate, and publishes a 'Contractor Schedule S' form (rev. 06/2026). The Master Fee Schedule also charges a per-transaction 'Workers' Compensation Insurance Verification' fee of $33.84. No separate Building-and-Safety contractor registry was found.

department page (Finance - Business License and Tax Certificate) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/finance/business-license-and-tax-certificate/

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Permit Center publishes an 'Owner Builder Checklist' (the CSLB owner-builder pamphlet) among its Single Family permit documents, and the Building Permit Application accepts an applicant with no contractor licence entered. Note the owner-builder cannot use SolarAPP+, which requires a registered licensed installer.

department handout (Owner-Builder checklist linked from the Building Permit Center) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/OwnerBuildersPamphlet.pdf

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Two routes. (1) SolarAPP+ (single-family and duplex only, not mobile homes, not commercial): SolarAPP+ approval number plus three uploads to Accela - SolarAPP+ Approval Checklist, solar equipment spec sheets, and an electrical one-line diagram; permit auto-issues on payment. (2) Standard plan check: complete plan set signed by the preparer with address, phone and licence stamp/number on every sheet; site plan; roof plan; electrical single-line; structural details; manufacturer cut-sheets for all products; structural calculations for ground mount and reverse tilt (>24 in. at the tall side); dimensioned foundation plan and elevations for ground mount; warning/hazard stickers applicable to the project; plus the Building Permit Application form.

Why the confidence is not higherTaken from the 'Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements' checklist (updated July 2023) and the SolarAPP+ Application Instructions, which list the three mandatory Accela attachments by name. Note FMC 11-111(b)(2) refers to an 'Eligibility Checklist for Expedited Solar Photovoltaic Permitting' that is NOT published on the Building and Safety forms page, the Applications/Forms/Fees page, or anywhere returned by a site-wide search for 'expedited solar' or 'eligibility checklist'.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Digital only, submitted through Accela Citizen Access. Plan sheets 11 in. x 17 in. minimum to 30 in. x 42 in. maximum; calculations and product cut-sheets may be 8.5 in. x 11 in.; each sheet must carry a clear 3 in. x 3 in. 'City use only' space; file size limited to 200 MB. No paper copy count is published.

Why the confidence is not higherItems 5-7 of the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements, plus its opening line 'Use this checklist to assemble the materials required for your application when submitting in Accela ... must be submitted digitally'. The City's Building Industry Bulletin 'Notice Regarding Electronic Submittals' confirms the electronic-only policy.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Yes. The site plan must show project data, scope of work and owner authorization; a north arrow; the property owner's name, address and phone; and the building footprint with lot dimensions and setbacks including all structures. A separate roof plan must show panel location and orientation, points of service connection and equipment locations, and fire/service access pathways.

Why the confidence is not higherPlan Content items 1 and 2 of the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements checklist. Ground mounts additionally need a dimensioned foundation plan and elevations (items 3-4).

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherStandard route: Plan Content item 6, 'Electrical Single Line diagram showing all electrical components'. SolarAPP+ route: the one-line diagram is one of three documents that must be uploaded separately to Accela, and the instructions state the application cannot continue without all three.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherThe single-line must show wire/conduit sizing (Plan Content 6a), and electrical load calculations are required if the main service panel is being derated (6b). The application form asks 'De-Rating Panel YES/NO' and 'Adding MPU YES/NO'. Full PV string/voltage-drop calculations are not called out as a separate deliverable, so this is conductor sizing on the drawing rather than a stand-alone calculation package.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

No PE stamp for a normal flush roof-mount. Structural calculations are required for ground mount and for reverse tilt greater than 24 in. at the tall side, and each plan sheet must carry the preparer's licence stamp and number 'if applicable' - so the threshold is the mounting geometry, not system size.

Why the confidence is not higherRequired Exhibits items 1 and 2 of the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements. The Building Permit Application asks 'Reverse Tilt or Ground Mount YES/NO' as a screening question, which matches. No kW or dead-load threshold for a structural stamp appears in FMC ch. 11 or in the checklist.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Not required. No electrical PE stamp threshold appears in FMC ch. 11 art. 1, in the residential solar checklist, or on the Building and Safety pages; the only stamp requirement is the preparer's licence stamp on each sheet 'if applicable'.

Why the confidence is not higherSearched the adopting ordinance text (FMC 11-101 to 11-113, Ord. 2025-040) and the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements; neither mentions an electrical engineer's stamp. Positive control: 'electrical' appears throughout both; fabricated control 'zzqqx' returns zero.

adopting ordinance + published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

$333.22 for a residential system up to 15 kW ($170.37 plan check + $162.85 inspection), plus $11.27 per additional kW above 15 kW. A $27.08 permit issuance fee, a $23.79 technology surcharge on all building permits, a $33.84 workers'-compensation verification fee and the state SMIP seismic fee may also apply; the state Strong-Motion fee is set by the Department of Conservation.

Why the confidence is not higherMaster Fee Schedule, 'PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING FEES / MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS' table, line 'Photovoltaic Systems / Residential / First 15kW 170.37 (plan check) 162.85 (inspect) / Ea. Add'l kW 11.27'. All fees effective 07/01/2026, CPI-adjusted each 1 July. The base sits comfortably under the Gov. Code 66015 cap of $450 + $15/kW above 15 kW, and the per-kW adder ($11.27) is under the $15/kW statutory adder, so no written cost finding is needed.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MFS-Planning_593_CPI_CPI-UGM_CPI-Parking-ED-2026.07.01-10w1657-10w1683.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Tiered

Why the confidence is not higherFlat base for the first 15 kW then a per-kW adder ($11.27/kW), split into a plan-check component and an inspection component. It is explicitly not valuation-based, which matches Gov. Code 65850.55. Commercial PV uses a different three-tier structure (first 50 kW, then per kW to 250 kW, then per kW over 250 kW).

fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MFS-Planning_593_CPI_CPI-UGM_CPI-Parking-ED-2026.07.01-10w1657-10w1683.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherThe Master Fee Schedule prints Plan Check Fee and Inspect Fee as two separate columns for 'Photovoltaic Systems - Residential': $170.37 plan check and $162.85 inspection. A SolarAPP+ submittal still pays both because the fee line is not split by route.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MFS-Planning_593_CPI_CPI-UGM_CPI-Parking-ED-2026.07.01-10w1657-10w1683.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

SolarAPP+ eligible single-family/duplex: real time - the permit auto-issues on payment with no plan review. Non-SolarAPP+ small residential rooftop qualifying for expedited review: FMC 11-111(a)(3) defines the Expedited Solar Permitting Process as 'a processing timeline not to exceed 3 days'. No general published turnaround exists for a standard (non-expedited) residential solar plan check.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC sec. 11-111(a)(3) and (b)(3) - which also warns 'Processing times shall be dependent on the number of applications provided at the time of submittal' - plus the SolarAPP+ instructions step 15: 'Your permit will be auto issued.' The Building Services page describes four project levels with 'some even approved over the counter' but publishes no day counts.

ordinance (FMC 11-111) + department handout checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

180 days

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Center: 'Every permit issued shall become invalid unless work on the site authorized by such permit is commenced within 180 days after its issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days' (CBC ch. 1 sec. 105.4). The clock resets to 180 days from each APPROVED INSPECTION. The Building Official may grant one extension of up to 180 days on a written request received before expiry. No activity for one year voids the permit outright; a lapsed permit can be renewed for 25% of the original fee (minimum $67.65).

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-permit-center/

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Accela Citizen Access, plus NREL SolarAPP+ for eligible single-family and duplex rooftop PV. NOTE: the live portal is now https://aca-prod.accela.com/FRESNO/Default.aspx - the lmsaca.fresno.gov/CitizenAccess address still linked from the Building and Safety page, the SolarAPP+ page and the SolarAPP+ instruction PDF now serves only a notice saying 'We have a new Citizen Access website'.

Why the confidence is not higherFetched lmsaca.fresno.gov/CitizenAccess/Default.aspx directly: HTTP 200 but the payload is a 2,932-byte redirect notice, not the portal. aca-prod.accela.com/FRESNO/Default.aspx returns the live 'Welcome to the City of Fresno!' portal. Every City page still points at the old host, so installers following the published link land on the notice page.

portal landing page checked 2026-08-28 https://aca-prod.accela.com/FRESNO/Default.aspx

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ instructions walk the whole flow online: create the application in ACA, enter the SolarAPP+ ID, choose Solar or Solar and Storage, enter kW, upload the three attachments, checkout and pay, and the permit auto-issues under Record Info > Attachments. The Building and Safety page advertises ACA as 'Available 24/7' for create, submit, search, backcheck/addendum, inspection scheduling, invoices and payment. Only the inspection call-out is directed to a phone number.

department handout (SolarAPP+ Application Instructions) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/SolarAPP-Instruction.pdf

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)

Why the confidence is not higherThe City's own Building and Safety 'Additional Resources' list links pge.com under 'Need Gas or Electric service established', and FMC 11-102 (CBC 112.1) makes the electrical meter a City-side condition of final inspection rather than a City-supplied service. Fresno has no municipal electric utility.

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Parallel

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E tells customers to 'Ensure that your contractor fills out the Interconnection Agreement application early. This way you can start generating energy shortly after your system passes local city or county inspections.' The interconnection application runs alongside the City permit; the City permit is not gated on it, but PTO is gated on the City's final building permit.

utility DG process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No

Why the confidence is not higherNothing in FMC ch. 11 art. 1 or the residential solar checklist conditions a permit on HOA or architectural approval, and Gov. Code 65850.5 forbids it for eligible small residential rooftop systems. The City's expedited process at FMC 11-111 is administrative and non-discretionary.

ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherHistoric Preservation FAQ, answering directly on solar: 'Because the installation of a new roof requires a building permit application, it is subject to Historic Review... When reviewing a proposal for solar panel installation on a historic property, Staff acknowledges that solar panels are a removable installation but will be looking for an installation that does not negatively impact or obstruct character-defining features.' Applies to the four designated local historic districts (Porter Tract, Wilson Island, Huntington Boulevard, Chandler Airfield) and to the 274 individually listed Local Register properties. Most are approved administratively by the Historic Preservation Specialist unless substantial.

department page (Historic Preservation FAQ) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/historic-preservation/

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

No

Why the confidence is not higherNo wind or windstorm certification appears anywhere in FMC ch. 11 art. 1, in the fire-code amendments at FMC ch. 10 art. 5, or in the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements. Wind loading is handled through the CBC/CRC structural provisions in the structural calculations required for ground mount and reverse tilt. Fresno is inland San Joaquin Valley with no TDI-style windstorm regime; the state has no equivalent programme.

ordinance (absence proved by reading the adopted text and the checklist) checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

No. FMC 11-111 makes small residential rooftop solar an administrative, expedited permit; Development Code Table 15-2012-B allows rooftop solar panels to project up to 10 ft above the district height limit with no coverage limitation, so no variance, Conditional Use Permit or Council action is triggered by a normal residential rooftop array. Development Code Articles 20 and 27 contain no solar-specific use permit.

Why the confidence is not higherRead Development Code Part III Article 20 (General Site Regulations) and Article 27 (Standards for Specific Uses and Activities) in full: the single solar reference in either is the height-projection row in Table 15-2012-B. Positive control: 'height' appears 69 times in Article 20; fabricated control 'zzqqx' returns zero.

development code checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOCHFRCA_CH15CIDECOINRE_PTIIIREAPSOALDI_ART20GESIRE

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No size cap on residential generation in the Municipal Code. Two route-specific limits exist: SolarAPP+ is restricted to single-family and duplex dwellings (mobile homes and commercial excluded), and the FMC 11-111 expedited process only covers systems up to 10 kW AC nameplate (or 30 kW thermal) on a single or duplex dwelling. Larger residential systems still get a permit, just through standard plan check.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 11-111(a)(2)(i)-(iv) for the 10 kW AC definition, and the SolarAPP+ page: 'for single-family and duplex projects... Commercial solar installations do not qualify to use SolarAPP+.' No maximum-kW provision found in FMC ch. 11 or the Development Code.

ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 95% · adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-040, eff. 31 Oct 2025)
    • Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (2024 IBC base) and 2025 California Residential Code (2024 IRC base), adopted as the Fresno Building Code and Fresno Residential Code by Ord. 2025-040, effective 31 October 2025. Appendix B of the CBC is excluded. 2025 CMC, 2025 CPC, 2025 California Energy Code and 2025 CALGreen are adopted in the same ordinance. 95% · adopting ordinance
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (2024 IFC base), including Appendix Chapters E and F, adopted as the Fresno Fire Code by Ord. 2025-039, effective 31 October 2025. 95% · adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-039, eff. 31 Oct 2025)
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 95% · adopting ordinance
    • What is the installation judged against? The Fresno Electrical Code - the 2025 California Electrical Code (2023 NEC) adopted verbatim at FMC 11-104 with no local electrical amendments, so NEC Articles 690 and 705 apply as written. Administration runs off Chapter 1 of the Fresno Building Code rather than CEC Article 89 where the two overlap. Structural and fire aspects are judged against the Fresno Building/Residential Code (2025 CBC/CRC) and the Fresno Fire Code (2025 CFC as amended at FMC 10-511205.1). 90% · adopting ordinance
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Locally amended and MORE restrictive than the state base. FMC 10-511205.1 deletes CFC 1205.2.1 and substitutes: 1205.2.1.1 Pathways to ridge - not fewer than TWO 36-inch-wide pathways on separate roof planes from lowest roof edge to ridge on ALL buildings, at least one of them on the street or driveway side; and for each roof plane carrying an array, at least one 36-inch pathway from lowest roof edge to ridge on that same plane or an adjacent plane. 1205.2.1.2 Setbacks at ridge - ALL photovoltaic arrays must have a minimum 36-inch-wide setback on BOTH sides of a horizontal ridge. CFC 1205.2.1.3 is deleted and reserved. 90% · fire code local amendment
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes - NEC 690.12 of the 2023 NEC as adopted in the 2025 CEC (FMC 11-104), with no California or Fresno amendment to Article 690. Fresno adds a local placement rule at FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.4.1.3: 'All photovoltaic solar power system disconnecting means, including rapid shutdown equipment, shall be indicating, of an approved size and type, and shall be placed in an approved position that is plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel.' 90% · fire code local amendment + adopting ordinance
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Three layers. (1) NEC 2023 Articles 690/705 markings apply unamended - PV system disconnect, rapid shutdown label, interactive-system placard at the service equipment, and the 705.10 directory. (2) City fire-code additions: BIPV hazard-area markings that must be reflective and visible from grade (FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.2.3), and all PV disconnecting means including rapid shutdown equipment must be indicating and plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel (sec. 1205.4.1.3). (3) PG&E adds permanently attached signage on the front of the AC disconnect switch, e.g. 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'. The submittal checklist requires 'Warning/Hazard stickers applicable to project' to be shown on the plans. 85% · fire code local amendment + published checklist + utility DG spec
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 65% · fire code local amendment (absence of prescribed wording proved by reading the adopted amendments)
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? City: BIPV hazard markings 'shall be reflective and be visible from grade as required by the fire code official' (FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.2.3) - no letter height or colour specified. PG&E, which governs the AC disconnect signage: labels shall be permanent and suitable for the environment and shall be engraved phenolic or comply with ANSI Z535.4; lettering a minimum 3/8 in. high and in ALL CAPITALS. 85% · utility DG spec (PG&E 060559 rev. 07)
    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes, in two forms. NEC 705.10 of the unamended 2023 NEC requires the permanent plaque or directory at the service equipment showing all electric power sources. PG&E adds: where the AC disconnect switch is NOT grouped with the meter panel, 'provide a map showing the location'; if a Net Generation Output Meter is installed and is not grouped with the other meter(s) and the disconnect, provide proper labelling plus a map showing its location; and if the device is not adjacent to PG&E's revenue meter, 'a clear map and signs indicating of the location of the disconnect switch are required'. Where the disconnect is not accessible outside a locked premises, add signs with contact information and a PG&E-approved locking device. 85% · utility DG spec
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes. PG&E requires permanently attached signage on the front of the AC disconnect explaining it is the AC disconnect switch for the generation (example wording 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'), engraved phenolic or ANSI Z535.4 compliant, minimum 3/8 in. all-capital lettering; marking or signage on the switch clearly indicating the open (off) and closed (on) positions; a device label with ratings and UL certification; location maps and signs where the disconnect or NGOM is not grouped with the meter panel; and contact-information signs where the device sits behind a locked premises. 90% · utility DG spec
    • Where must the labels be placed? At the service equipment / point of common coupling. The PG&E AC disconnect (and its signage) must sit 10 feet or less from PG&E's electric meter, in line of sight, easily seen from the meter panel, at the same grade level if outdoors with the meter, wall- or pad-mounted with the top of the enclosure between 48 in. and 75 in. above ground, and never above grade level, on a roof, or in a room that is not an approved electric meter room. Where the disconnect is remote from the meter, add a location map and signs. NEC 705.10 places the source directory at the service equipment. The City requires PV disconnects and rapid shutdown equipment to be positioned 'plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel', and BIPV hazard markings to be visible from grade. 90% · utility DG spec + fire code local amendment
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Within 10 feet of the PG&E meter, in line of sight, easily seen from the meter panel; between the PG&E meter and all generation sources; at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors; wall- or pad-mounted with the top of the enclosure 48-75 in. above ground; not on any floor above grade, not on a roof, and not in a room that is not an approved electric meter room; lockable in the open position with a PG&E padlock, with a visible air gap. Exemption: inverter-based systems on single-phase PG&E services up to 240 V may be exempted from the disconnect entirely if the meter panel is self-contained (not transformer-rated), accepts form 'S' socket-based meters (not bolt-on), is rated 320 A or less continuous, and is single-phase 120/240 V or 120/208 V - which covers most Fresno houses. 90% · utility DG spec
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No City approved-equipment list. Equipment must be listed/UL certified in the ordinary code sense, and the checklist requires manufacturer cut-sheets for everything installed. PG&E points interconnection applicants at the California Energy Commission's eligible inverter and PV module lists, and requires the disconnect switch to be from an approved type (it publishes cross-reference sheets for Eaton and Siemens safety switches and an approved primary-voltage disconnect switch list). 70% · published checklist + utility handbook page
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, permitted, under the 2025 California Fire Code ch. 12 and 2025 CRC R330 as adopted by Ord. 2025-039/2025-040, with NO local amendment - I read the whole of FMC ch. 10 art. 5 and found no CFC 1207 / ESS / battery amendment. Procedurally the battery rides on the same solar permit: the Building Permit Application has a 'Battery YES/NO' field inside the Residential Solar block, and the SolarAPP+ Accela flow offers project type 'Solar or Solar and Storage'. 85% · adopting ordinance + permit application form
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No 80% · permit application form
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes 85% · published checklist
    • Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local busbar or service-upgrade rule. It is handled procedurally: the Building Permit Application screens 'De-Rating Panel YES/NO' and 'Adding MPU YES/NO' in the Residential Solar block, and the submittal checklist requires electrical load calculations if the main service panel is being derated. Sizing itself falls to NEC 705.12 in the unamended 2023 NEC. FMC 11-102 (CBC 112.1) adds one local condition: the electrical meter must be in place and operational before final electrical inspection. 80% · permit application form + ordinance
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No specific mounting system or attachment spacing is mandated. The checklist requires manufacturer cut-sheets for all products used, structural details, and - for ground mount and for reverse tilt greater than 24 in. at the tall side - a full set of structural calculations plus a dimensioned foundation plan and elevations. 80% · published checklist

20 questions answered against City of Fresno’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2023

Why the confidence is not higherFMC sec. 11-104: 'The California Electrical Code, 2025 Edition... which incorporates the adoption of the 2023 Edition of the National Electrical Code as amended with necessary California amendments and the 2023 National Electrical Code of the National Fire Protection Association, is hereby adopted.' Added by Ord. 2025-040 sec. 4, effective 31 October 2025. The City is CURRENT - it did not stall at the 2022 codes the way Fresno County did.

adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-040, eff. 31 Oct 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2025 California Building Code (2024 IBC base) and 2025 California Residential Code (2024 IRC base), adopted as the Fresno Building Code and Fresno Residential Code by Ord. 2025-040, effective 31 October 2025. Appendix B of the CBC is excluded. 2025 CMC, 2025 CPC, 2025 California Energy Code and 2025 CALGreen are adopted in the same ordinance.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC secs. 11-101, 11-103, 11-105, 11-107, 11-108, 11-109, each carrying '(Added Ord. 2025-040, sec. 4, eff. 10-31-25)'. Municode supplement 54, codified through Ordinance No. 2026-002 effective 19 Feb 2026. This is the headline finding for this authority: the City tracks the current triennial cycle, unlike Fresno County, whose ordinance still adopts the 2022 code. The City has also posted 2025 CALGreen residential and non-residential mandatory measures checklists (April 2026). The one stale artefact is the Building Industry Bulletin list, whose newest code bulletin is still the '2022 Code Adoption Bulletin' dated 14 Sep 2022 - a bulletin gap, not a code gap.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

2025 California Fire Code (2024 IFC base), including Appendix Chapters E and F, adopted as the Fresno Fire Code by Ord. 2025-039, effective 31 October 2025.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC sec. 10-50100: 'The 2025 California Fire Code, as promulgated by the California Building Standards Commission, which incorporates the adoption of the 2024 edition of the International Fire Code... including Appendix Chapters E and F, are hereby adopted and amended by the City of Fresno.' FMC 10-50101.1 confirms that CFC means the 2025 California Fire Code.

adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-039, eff. 31 Oct 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 11-102 amends CBC ch. 1 (enforcement agency, Building Official, fees, combined inspections, service utilities, appeals board), FMC 11-106 amends the CMC (wood-burning appliances), FMC 11-107A amends the CPC. The fire side is heavier and directly touches PV: FMC 10-511205.1 rewrites CFC 1205 pathways, ridge setbacks, BIPV markings and disconnect visibility, and FMC 10-5R329 amends CRC R329 rooftop and BIPV solar. All added by Ord. 2025-039/2025-040. There are no local amendments to the CEC or to NEC Article 690/705.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The Fresno Electrical Code - the 2025 California Electrical Code (2023 NEC) adopted verbatim at FMC 11-104 with no local electrical amendments, so NEC Articles 690 and 705 apply as written. Administration runs off Chapter 1 of the Fresno Building Code rather than CEC Article 89 where the two overlap. Structural and fire aspects are judged against the Fresno Building/Residential Code (2025 CBC/CRC) and the Fresno Fire Code (2025 CFC as amended at FMC 10-511205.1).

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 11-104 adopts the CEC and states 'Where provisions of Chapter 1 of the Fresno Building Code overlap with provisions of Article 89 of the Fresno Electrical Code, the Fresno Building Code shall control.' Searched the whole of FMC ch. 11 art. 1 for solar/photovoltaic amendments: the only hit is sec. 11-111, the review-process section, with no technical electrical amendment.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

No local busbar or service-upgrade rule. It is handled procedurally: the Building Permit Application screens 'De-Rating Panel YES/NO' and 'Adding MPU YES/NO' in the Residential Solar block, and the submittal checklist requires electrical load calculations if the main service panel is being derated. Sizing itself falls to NEC 705.12 in the unamended 2023 NEC. FMC 11-102 (CBC 112.1) adds one local condition: the electrical meter must be in place and operational before final electrical inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Application rev. 20 Feb 2026 Residential Solar block; Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements Plan Content 6b; FMC 11-102 amendment to CBC 112.1. No busbar rule found in FMC ch. 11 art. 1.

permit application form + ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Building-Permit-Application-Updated-2.20.26-10w1355.pdf

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

No specific mounting system or attachment spacing is mandated. The checklist requires manufacturer cut-sheets for all products used, structural details, and - for ground mount and for reverse tilt greater than 24 in. at the tall side - a full set of structural calculations plus a dimensioned foundation plan and elevations.

Why the confidence is not higherRequired Exhibits 2-3 and Plan Content 3-5 of the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements. No prescriptive attachment-spacing amendment appears in FMC ch. 11 art. 1 or in the FMC 10-5R329 CRC amendment, which only cross-references the fire-code section.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Locally amended and MORE restrictive than the state base. FMC 10-511205.1 deletes CFC 1205.2.1 and substitutes: 1205.2.1.1 Pathways to ridge - not fewer than TWO 36-inch-wide pathways on separate roof planes from lowest roof edge to ridge on ALL buildings, at least one of them on the street or driveway side; and for each roof plane carrying an array, at least one 36-inch pathway from lowest roof edge to ridge on that same plane or an adjacent plane. 1205.2.1.2 Setbacks at ridge - ALL photovoltaic arrays must have a minimum 36-inch-wide setback on BOTH sides of a horizontal ridge. CFC 1205.2.1.3 is deleted and reserved.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC sec. 10-511205.1, added by Ord. 2025-039 sec. 3, eff. 31 Oct 2025. Worth flagging: the state base for one- and two-family dwellings normally allows an 18-inch ridge setback in defined cases, so the flat 36-inch requirement on both sides of the ridge is a more-restrictive residential standard. Ord. 2025-039 took effect 31 Oct 2025, inside the AB 130 (Stats. 2025 ch. 22) window barring more-restrictive residential standards from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031. I have not found a BSC filing or a Health & Safety Code 17958.7 findings resolution addressing that, so treat the enforceability of the 36-inch ridge setback against a residential applicant as contestable - but it is what the City has published and what an inspector will apply.

fire code local amendment checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes - NEC 690.12 of the 2023 NEC as adopted in the 2025 CEC (FMC 11-104), with no California or Fresno amendment to Article 690. Fresno adds a local placement rule at FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.4.1.3: 'All photovoltaic solar power system disconnecting means, including rapid shutdown equipment, shall be indicating, of an approved size and type, and shall be placed in an approved position that is plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel.'

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 11-104 (2025 CEC / 2023 NEC adopted with no local electrical amendment) plus the quoted fire-code amendment at FMC 10-511205.1, added by Ord. 2025-039 eff. 31 Oct 2025.

fire code local amendment + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Three layers. (1) NEC 2023 Articles 690/705 markings apply unamended - PV system disconnect, rapid shutdown label, interactive-system placard at the service equipment, and the 705.10 directory. (2) City fire-code additions: BIPV hazard-area markings that must be reflective and visible from grade (FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.2.3), and all PV disconnecting means including rapid shutdown equipment must be indicating and plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel (sec. 1205.4.1.3). (3) PG&E adds permanently attached signage on the front of the AC disconnect switch, e.g. 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'. The submittal checklist requires 'Warning/Hazard stickers applicable to project' to be shown on the plans.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 10-511205.1 secs. 1205.2.3 and 1205.4.1.3; Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements Plan Content item 7; PG&E numbered document 060559 rev. 07 (25 Mar 2022) 'Labeling'.

fire code local amendment + published checklist + utility DG spec checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No

Why the confidence is not higherThe City requires 'approved markings' and 'approved size and type' but prescribes no wording of its own anywhere in FMC ch. 11 art. 1 or FMC ch. 10 art. 5. The only example wording in the chain is PG&E's, not the AHJ's: 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'. Text otherwise defaults to NEC 690/705 of the unamended 2023 NEC. Confidence held down because 'approved' leaves the Building Official and fire code official free to impose wording case by case without publishing it.

fire code local amendment (absence of prescribed wording proved by reading the adopted amendments) checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

City: BIPV hazard markings 'shall be reflective and be visible from grade as required by the fire code official' (FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.2.3) - no letter height or colour specified. PG&E, which governs the AC disconnect signage: labels shall be permanent and suitable for the environment and shall be engraved phenolic or comply with ANSI Z535.4; lettering a minimum 3/8 in. high and in ALL CAPITALS.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.2.3 for the City side; PG&E 060559 rev. 07 (25 Mar 2022) 'Labeling' bullets for the letter height, all-caps and material spec. The City itself sets no letter height, so the operative dimensional spec on a Fresno job comes from the utility document.

utility DG spec (PG&E 060559 rev. 07) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes, in two forms. NEC 705.10 of the unamended 2023 NEC requires the permanent plaque or directory at the service equipment showing all electric power sources. PG&E adds: where the AC disconnect switch is NOT grouped with the meter panel, 'provide a map showing the location'; if a Net Generation Output Meter is installed and is not grouped with the other meter(s) and the disconnect, provide proper labelling plus a map showing its location; and if the device is not adjacent to PG&E's revenue meter, 'a clear map and signs indicating of the location of the disconnect switch are required'. Where the disconnect is not accessible outside a locked premises, add signs with contact information and a PG&E-approved locking device.

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E 060559 rev. 07 'Labeling' and 'Location' sections. The City adds no facility-map placard of its own; the FMC amendments are silent on 705.10.

utility DG spec checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes. PG&E requires permanently attached signage on the front of the AC disconnect explaining it is the AC disconnect switch for the generation (example wording 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'), engraved phenolic or ANSI Z535.4 compliant, minimum 3/8 in. all-capital lettering; marking or signage on the switch clearly indicating the open (off) and closed (on) positions; a device label with ratings and UL certification; location maps and signs where the disconnect or NGOM is not grouped with the meter panel; and contact-information signs where the device sits behind a locked premises.

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E numbered document 060559 rev. 07, approved 25 Mar 2022, 'Disconnect Switch Requirements for Distributed Generation Customers', Labeling and Location sections plus the callout table (item 2 'Visible ON/OFF label', item 5 'Device Label'). Extracted with pdftotext, not summarised.

utility DG spec checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

At the service equipment / point of common coupling. The PG&E AC disconnect (and its signage) must sit 10 feet or less from PG&E's electric meter, in line of sight, easily seen from the meter panel, at the same grade level if outdoors with the meter, wall- or pad-mounted with the top of the enclosure between 48 in. and 75 in. above ground, and never above grade level, on a roof, or in a room that is not an approved electric meter room. Where the disconnect is remote from the meter, add a location map and signs. NEC 705.10 places the source directory at the service equipment. The City requires PV disconnects and rapid shutdown equipment to be positioned 'plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel', and BIPV hazard markings to be visible from grade.

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E 060559 rev. 07 Location section and 'Clearly marked on the submitted single-line diagram'; FMC 10-511205.1 secs. 1205.2.3 and 1205.4.1.3.

utility DG spec + fire code local amendment checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

No City approved-equipment list. Equipment must be listed/UL certified in the ordinary code sense, and the checklist requires manufacturer cut-sheets for everything installed. PG&E points interconnection applicants at the California Energy Commission's eligible inverter and PV module lists, and requires the disconnect switch to be from an approved type (it publishes cross-reference sheets for Eaton and Siemens safety switches and an approved primary-voltage disconnect switch list).

Why the confidence is not higherSearched FMC ch. 11 art. 1 and the residential solar checklist: no local approved-products list. PG&E's interconnection handbook page carries the 'Approved Equipment' block linking the CEC Eligible Inverters and PV Module lists.

published checklist + utility handbook page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Yes, permitted, under the 2025 California Fire Code ch. 12 and 2025 CRC R330 as adopted by Ord. 2025-039/2025-040, with NO local amendment - I read the whole of FMC ch. 10 art. 5 and found no CFC 1207 / ESS / battery amendment. Procedurally the battery rides on the same solar permit: the Building Permit Application has a 'Battery YES/NO' field inside the Residential Solar block, and the SolarAPP+ Accela flow offers project type 'Solar or Solar and Storage'.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 10-50100 (2025 CFC adopted); full-text read of FMC ch. 10 art. 5 with word-boundary search for energy storage, ESS, battery and section 1207 - no hits (positive control: 'fire code' appears 90 times; fabricated control 'zzqqx' zero). Building Permit Application rev. 20 Feb 2026; SolarAPP+ Application Instructions step 9.

adopting ordinance + permit application form checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

No

Why the confidence is not higherStorage is a line item on the same solar permit record, not a separate permit: 'Battery YES/NO' sits inside the Residential Solar block of the single Building Permit Application, and SolarAPP+ offers 'Solar and Storage' as one project type producing one auto-issued 'B' record. No separate ESS permit type or ESS inspection is listed on the Building and Safety forms page or in the Master Fee Schedule.

permit application form checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Building-Permit-Application-Updated-2.20.26-10w1355.pdf

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherA ground mount is engineered as a structure: the checklist requires a complete set of structural calculations for ground mount, a dimensioned foundation plan, elevations, and structural details - none of which is required for a normal flush roof mount. The Building Permit Application screens for it with 'Reverse Tilt or Ground Mount YES/NO'. Ground-mounted PV is also carved out of the fire-code rooftop rules and sent to CFC 1205.5 (FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.1).

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/New-Residential-Solar-Plan-Check-Submittal.pdf

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Within 10 feet of the PG&E meter, in line of sight, easily seen from the meter panel; between the PG&E meter and all generation sources; at the same grade level as the meter if outdoors; wall- or pad-mounted with the top of the enclosure 48-75 in. above ground; not on any floor above grade, not on a roof, and not in a room that is not an approved electric meter room; lockable in the open position with a PG&E padlock, with a visible air gap. Exemption: inverter-based systems on single-phase PG&E services up to 240 V may be exempted from the disconnect entirely if the meter panel is self-contained (not transformer-rated), accepts form 'S' socket-based meters (not bolt-on), is rated 320 A or less continuous, and is single-phase 120/240 V or 120/208 V - which covers most Fresno houses.

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E 060559 rev. 07 (25 Mar 2022), requirements 3-4, Location section and 'Exemption to the Disconnect Switch installation Requirement'. Text extracted with pdftotext -layout.

utility DG spec checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/about/doing-business-with-pge/060559.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 90% · department page
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated - the City of Fresno Building and Safety Services Division inspects. The only split is fire: the Fresno Fire Department Fire Prevention Division issues and inspects separate permits for fire protection and life safety systems, which does not touch residential rooftop PV. 85% · department page
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a small residential rooftop solar energy system eligible for expedited review, ONE inspection - 'only one inspection shall be required and may include a consolidated inspection' (FMC 11-111(c)). If it fails, subsequent re-inspections are authorised and are not bound by the single-inspection rule. The Building Official may separately require inspections of differing trades to be combined in chronological order (FMC 11-102, CBC 110.3.8). Note FMC 11-102 (CBC 112.1) requires the electrical meter to be in place and operational before final electrical inspection. 90% · ordinance
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 80% · ordinance + department handout
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? Final 80% · utility DG process page + fee schedule
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 90% · utility DG process page
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $100.21 per trip for 'Reinspection other than entitled calls'. Related penalties: 'Premature inspection all (work not ready)' $67.65 per trip, 'Incorrect address/location given by applicant' $67.65 per trip, and working without a required permit is charged at up to four times the permit fee. All CPI-adjusted each 1 July. 85% · fee schedule
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Through Accela Citizen Access. The City advertises ACA for 'Submit Backcheck & Addendums' and 'Obtain Application Status, Comments, & Due Dates', and publishes an Addendum Form (rev. 20 Feb 2026). For SolarAPP+ jobs the loop runs back through SolarAPP+: 'Submit your revisions through Solar App+. Once approved through Solar App+, upload your new revised checklist into the City of Fresno's online ACA portal. Upload the approved checklist into your original B record.' Field corrections are cleared by re-inspection, chargeable at $100.21 per trip beyond entitled calls. 80% · department handout + department page

14 questions answered against City of Fresno’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal

Why the confidence is not higherAccela Citizen Access lists 'Schedule an Inspection' among its 24/7 services on the Building and Safety page. Phone is the documented fallback and is the route the City's own SolarAPP+ handout gives: 'When ready to schedule an inspection, please call (559) 621-8116.' The City also runs an automated voice system, 'Voice Permits', to schedule and check inspection status.

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding and Safety page (ACA 24/7 services list, in-person services block, phone numbers), Building Services and Reports (Construction Inspection Services paragraph describing the 'Voice Permits' automated system), Building Permit Center, and the SolarAPP+ Application Instructions (which give only 'When ready to schedule an inspection, please call (559) 621-8116'). No advance-notice period in business days is published anywhere; the Accela portal itself requires a logged-in session to expose next available inspection dates.

https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-services-and-reports/

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame three department pages plus the SolarAPP+ instructions and the Master Fee Schedule inspection fee blocks. The Master Fee Schedule does price after-hours inspection time ('Other than regular business hours (except Sundays...)'), which implies scheduling windows exist, but no AM/PM window, same-day option or time-slot policy is published on any City page or handout.

https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherConstruction Inspection Services 'provide field inspections during construction process for compliance after the necessary permits have been issued by the Permit Center staff. Field inspectors are assigned an area of the City and perform daily inspections in that area.' FMC 11-111(c) speaks of the City's own single consolidated inspection for expedited solar. No third-party or delegated inspection scheme appears anywhere on the Building and Safety pages.

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-services-and-reports/

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated - the City of Fresno Building and Safety Services Division inspects. The only split is fire: the Fresno Fire Department Fire Prevention Division issues and inspects separate permits for fire protection and life safety systems, which does not touch residential rooftop PV.

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Services and Reports (Construction Inspection Services) for the City's own inspectors; Fresno Fire Department Prevention page for the fire-system carve-out ('A City of Fresno - Building and Safety Services Issued Demolition Permit does not include any approval for the demolition or alteration of any fire protection or life safety system').

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-services-and-reports/

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

For a small residential rooftop solar energy system eligible for expedited review, ONE inspection - 'only one inspection shall be required and may include a consolidated inspection' (FMC 11-111(c)). If it fails, subsequent re-inspections are authorised and are not bound by the single-inspection rule. The Building Official may separately require inspections of differing trades to be combined in chronological order (FMC 11-102, CBC 110.3.8). Note FMC 11-102 (CBC 112.1) requires the electrical meter to be in place and operational before final electrical inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherFMC secs. 11-111(c) and 11-102 (amendments to CBC 110.3.8 and 112.1), Ord. 2025-040 / Ord. 2015-26.

ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

No

Why the confidence is not higherFMC 11-111(c) allows only one, consolidated inspection for eligible small residential rooftop solar, which forecloses a mandatory rough-in or mid-roof stage. No mid-roof or rough-in stage for PV appears on the Building Services and Reports page or in the SolarAPP+ instructions, which go straight from auto-issued permit to 'When ready to schedule an inspection, please call (559) 621-8116.'

ordinance + department handout checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherIndirect but concrete: FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.4.1.3 makes disconnect and rapid-shutdown equipment 'of an approved size and type' in 'an approved position' - approval is an inspection act; sec. 1205.2.3 requires BIPV markings 'as required by the fire code official'; and the submittal checklist requires warning/hazard stickers to be shown on the approved plans, which the single consolidated inspection is checking the installation against. The City publishes no explicit statement that the inspector verifies labels and listings, which is why this is 65 and not higher.

fire code local amendment + published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH10REREPUNUREPRCOUS_ART5FIPR

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

No

Why the confidence is not higherThe City publishes SUBMITTAL checklists, not inspection checklists. The Building Services and Reports page has an 'Application Submittal Completeness Check' block (Commercial New Plan Check, Storage Racks, Commercial Solar, New Residential Solar, New Residential, Recommended Elements for Complete Building Permit Plan Review, Grading, At-Risk Grading) and a Permit Applications/Forms/Worksheets block - none is an inspection checklist. The Building Permit Center page and the Building Industry Bulletin list carry none either. A site-wide search of fresno.gov returned no inspection checklist; positive control 'building safety' returned 40 pages, fabricated control 'zzqqxx' returned zero.

department page (absence proved) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-services-and-reports/

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding Permit Center (which covers permit issuance, expiration, extension and renewal but says nothing about on-site documents), Building Services and Reports, the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements (submittal-side only), the Building Permit Application rev. 20 Feb 2026, the SolarAPP+ Application Instructions, and the Building Industry Bulletin list. The City publishes no statement of what must be on site at inspection - no job-card, approved-plans-on-site or permit-posting instruction. FMC 11-102's CBC ch. 1 amendments do not add one either.

https://www.fresno.gov/planning/building-and-safety/building-permit-center/

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$100.21 per trip for 'Reinspection other than entitled calls'. Related penalties: 'Premature inspection all (work not ready)' $67.65 per trip, 'Incorrect address/location given by applicant' $67.65 per trip, and working without a required permit is charged at up to four times the permit fee. All CPI-adjusted each 1 July.

Why the confidence is not higherMaster Fee Schedule, Planning & Development - Building Fees, 'Penalty' block (appears in both the general and the miscellaneous fee tables). All fees effective 07/01/2026.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/MFS-Planning_593_CPI_CPI-UGM_CPI-Parking-ED-2026.07.01-10w1657-10w1683.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Through Accela Citizen Access. The City advertises ACA for 'Submit Backcheck & Addendums' and 'Obtain Application Status, Comments, & Due Dates', and publishes an Addendum Form (rev. 20 Feb 2026). For SolarAPP+ jobs the loop runs back through SolarAPP+: 'Submit your revisions through Solar App+. Once approved through Solar App+, upload your new revised checklist into the City of Fresno's online ACA portal. Upload the approved checklist into your original B record.' Field corrections are cleared by re-inspection, chargeable at $100.21 per trip beyond entitled calls.

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding and Safety page (ACA services list); Addendum Form linked from Building Services and Reports; SolarAPP+ Application Instructions, 'Addendums and Field Revisions'; Master Fee Schedule reinspection line.

department handout + department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.fresno.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/SolarAPP-Instruction.pdf

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Final

Why the confidence is not higherThe residential PV permit closes on a passed final inspection on the Accela record - there is no certificate of occupancy for a rooftop PV retrofit (the Master Fee Schedule prices a Certificate of Occupancy for 'Multifamily/Commercial only'). PG&E's PTO packet asks for 'A copy of the final building permit', which is the document the passed final produces.

utility DG process page + fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Installer

Why the confidence is not higherPG&E: 'To get permission to operate your system, your contractor submits all required paperwork to PG&E. The paperwork includes: The Interconnection Application, A single line diagram of the system, A copy of the final building permit.' The City does not notify PG&E. After PG&E approves the documents it upgrades the meter and sends written PTO, typically 5-10 business days and up to a maximum of 30 business days.

utility DG process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Fresno against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

City of Fresno is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
Holds
Building, residential, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, energy and green-code permitting, plan review and inspection for all property inside the City of Fresno limits, through the Building and Safety Services Division of the Planning and Development Department (2600 Fresno Street, Third Floor, Room 3043). The Director of Planning and Development or designee is the Building Official (FMC 11-102, amending CBC 104.1); the Building Services Manager signing current forms is Eric C. Frampton, RCE, CBO. Electrical is retained, not delegated - the 2025 CEC is adopted with no local electrical amendment.
Overridden by
Fire code review and enforcement sits with the Fresno Fire Department Fire Prevention Division under FMC ch. 10 art. 5, and its local CFC 1205 amendments (two 36-inch ridge pathways, 36-inch setback both sides of the ridge, BIPV reflective markings, disconnect visibility) bind residential rooftop PV. Above the City: Gov. Code 65850.5 (AB 2188) makes small residential rooftop solar administrative and non-discretionary - implemented locally at FMC 11-111; Gov. Code 65850.52 (SB 379) drives the SolarAPP+ deployment; Gov. Code 66015 caps the residential PV fee at $450 + $15/kW above 15 kW, which Fresno's $333.22 + $11.27/kW sits under; Gov. Code 65850.55 bars valuation-based fees. Health & Safety Code 18938(b) would apply the state edition regardless of local re-adoption, but that is moot here because the City is current. AB 130 (Stats. 2025 ch. 22) bars more-restrictive residential standards from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031, which puts the City's 36-inch ridge setback (Ord. 2025-039, effective 31 Oct 2025) in tension with state law. Interconnection and PTO are PG&E's under CPUC Rule 21; PG&E's numbered document 060559 governs the AC disconnect and its signage.
Why not higher
The brief's department name is CORRECT and confirmed on the City's own letterhead: the Residential Solar Plan Check Submittal Requirements and the Building Industry Bulletins are headed 'Planning and Development Department / Building and Safety Services Division'. The web path is /planning/building-and-safety/. The headline finding for this run is that the CITY IS CURRENT WHERE THE COUNTY IS STALE: Fresno County's ordinance still adopts the 2022 California Building Code, but the City of Fresno adopted the 2025 CBC, CRC, CEC (2023 NEC), CMC, CPC, Energy Code and CALGreen by Ordinance 2025-040, adopted 25 September 2025 and effective 31 October 2025, and the 2025 California Fire Code by Ordinance 2025-039 on the same effective date. Municode supplement 54 is codified through Ordinance 2026-002 effective 19 February 2026, so this is the live text. The county's answer was not inherited in either direction. Two cautions: the City's Building Industry Bulletin list still tops out at the '2022 Code Adoption Bulletin' dated 14 September 2022, so an installer reading the bulletins alone would get the wrong code year; and every City page still links the retired lmsaca.fresno.gov portal, which now serves only a redirect notice, while the live portal is aca-prod.accela.com/FRESNO.

https://library.municode.com/ca/fresno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCOFR_CH11BUPERE_ART1CABUREELMEPLENCO

Permit required
Yes95%
Permit cost
$333.22 for a residential system up to 15 kW ($170.37 plan check + $162.85 inspection), plus $11.27 per additional kW above 15 kW.85%
Plan review
SolarAPP+ eligible single-family/duplex: real time - the permit auto-issues on payment with no plan review.75%
Portal
Accela Citizen Access, plus NREL SolarAPP+ for eligible single-family and duplex rooftop PV. NOTE: the live portal is now https://aca-prod.accela.com/FRESNO/Default.aspx - the…90%
Electrical code
202395%
Own placard wording
No65%
Booking an inspection
Portal80%
Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 65%

No

Size, colour & material 85%

City: BIPV hazard markings 'shall be reflective and be visible from grade as required by the fire code official' (FMC 10-511205.1 sec. 1205.2.3) - no letter height or colour specified. PG&E, which governs the AC disconnect signage: labels shall be permanent and suitable for the environment and shall be engraved phenolic or comply with ANSI Z535.4; lettering a minimum 3/8 in. high and in ALL CAPITALS.

Where they go 90%

At the service equipment / point of common coupling. The PG&E AC disconnect (and its signage) must sit 10 feet or less from PG&E's electric meter, in line of sight, easily seen from the meter panel, at the same grade level if outdoors with the meter, wall- or pad-mounted with the top of the enclosure between 48 in. and 75 in. above ground, and never above grade level, on a roof, or in a room that is not an approved electric meter room. Where the disconnect is remote from the meter, add a location map and signs. NEC 705.10 places the source directory at the service equipment. The City requires PV disconnects and rapid shutdown equipment to be positioned 'plainly visible to approaching fire department personnel', and BIPV hazard markings to be visible from grade.

What the utility wants on top 90%

Yes. PG&E requires permanently attached signage on the front of the AC disconnect explaining it is the AC disconnect switch for the generation (example wording 'UTILITY AC DISCONNECT SWITCH'), engraved phenolic or ANSI Z535.4 compliant, minimum 3/8 in. all-capital lettering; marking or signage on the switch clearly indicating the open (off) and closed (on) positions; a device label with ratings and UL certification; location maps and signs where the disconnect or NGOM is not grouped with the meter panel; and contact-information signs where the device sits behind a locked premises.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
City
County
Fresno County
Regions served
1
Regions covered
City of Fresno · city
Solar Requirements
Separate roof inspection
Click here for Information on how to apply for instantly approved solar permits . For more information please contact: David Densley [email protected] Projects Administrator (559) 621-8473 Building Industry Bulletins At Risk Final Ord 2022-008, Article 22 to Chapter 12 Flexible Ductwork New Standard
Authority Contact
Address
2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721
Main Phone
(559) 621-2489
Building Department
Department
Building and Safety Services Division (Planning and Development Department)
Direct Phone
(559) 621-8116
Portal Software
Accela
Booking & Scheduling
Preferred channel
online_portal
Notes
Inspections scheduled 24/7 via Accela Citizen Access (ACA) portal at lmsaca.fresno.gov/CitizenAccess/Default.aspx. Automated 'Voice Permits' phone system also available at (559) 621-8116 to avoid hold times. Building permits line: (559) 621-8084. Residential solar PV permits can be instantly approved via SolarAPP+ for eligible rooftop systems (https://www.fresno.gov/planning/get-an-instantly-approved-solar-permit-through-solar-app/); after permit issuance, inspection scheduled via ACA portal. Field inspectors are zone-assigned. In-person appointments at Building Permit Center (2600 Fresno Street) via QLess kiosk. Address: 2600 Fresno Street, Fresno, CA 93721.