City of Gilroy
Santa Clara County
City of Gilroy is a city authority in the State of California, serving 59,520 residents. 5,870 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — Not published as a fixed number of business days for standard PV review; systems submitted through SolarAPP+ receive automated (near-instant) approval rather than a… Q18 Where you file — SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for eligible systems; GO Permit (Gilroy Online Permit) for standard review, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes97% source
- What it costs
- $450 flat for residential systems ≤15 kW; $450 base + $15/kW above 15 kW for larger residential systems (per the Comprehensive Fee Schedule effective 7/1/2026 — supersedes the SolarApp+ page's…88% source
- Plan review turnaround
- Not published as a fixed number of business days for standard PV review; systems submitted through SolarAPP+ receive automated (near-instant) approval rather than a queued turnaround.55% source
- Key document
- department page + checklist forms cited by 10 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 92% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 97% · department page
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 88% · department page / fee schedule
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Yes, if applicable 85% · checklist form
- Is there a historic-district review? No 78% · department page
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 65% · department page (absence)
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for standard grid-tied rooftop PV, which is expressly exempted from separate planning review. Off-grid (standalone) residential PV/ESS systems are instead approved administratively, case-by-case, by the Building Official or the Community Development Director — not by Council or a Specific Use Permit process. 75% · handout (rev. 12/21/2025)
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No absolute residential size cap; 38.4 kW AC nameplate is only the ceiling for use of the automated SolarAPP+ pathway. Larger residential systems are permitted but route to standard (non-automated) plan review at commercial-tier fee lines. 80% · eligibility checklist (rev. 11/12/2024)
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 90% · FAQ handout (rev. 12/17/2024)
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 85% · FAQ handout (rev. 12/17/2024)
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 85% · handout (rev. 7/10/2018, still the linked doc as of this run)
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Completed permit application; electrical single-line diagram; roof/site plan showing PV layout, fire pathways and disconnect locations; equipment cut-sheets (module, inverter, racking, RSD device); structural documentation (simplified criteria form or PE/SE-stamped calcs for non-qualifying systems); Smoke/CO Self-Certification form; Water-Conserving Plumbing Fixture Self-Verification form; HOA approval letter if applicable; and, for SolarAPP+, the Eligibility Checklist itself. 90% · department page + checklist forms
- How many copies, and in what format? The PV Plan Check Submittal Checklist form calls for 2 copies of the standard electrical diagram for a counter/plan-check submittal. Systems run through SolarAPP+ are submitted entirely digitally (PDF uploads) via solarapp.nrel.gov / GO Permit, with no paper copies. 65% · checklist form (rev. 6/13/2024)
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — a site/roof plan is required showing north arrow, lot dimensions/setbacks, distance from property lines to adjacent structures, PV panel layout, roof access point, fire-code access pathways, PV system fire classification, and locations of all required labels/markings and electrical disconnects. 90% · department page
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 92% · department page
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 85% · department page
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? A structural PE/SE stamp is required for systems that don't meet the SolarAPP+/expedited 'Structural Criteria' simplified form; the 2018 handout put that threshold at total PV system weight exceeding 5 lb/sq ft, above which stamped calculations from a California-registered design professional are required. 55% · handout (dated, code references stale)
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Not separately published; an electrical PE stamp is not called out as a distinct requirement from the structural stamp fork described above — standard residential PV relies on the licensed installer's CEC-690-compliant plan set rather than an electrical PE stamp. 50% · department page
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for eligible systems; GO Permit (Gilroy Online Permit) for standard review, inspection scheduling and all other Community Development permits. 95% · portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 92% · portal landing page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $450 flat for residential systems ≤15 kW; $450 base + $15/kW above 15 kW for larger residential systems (per the Comprehensive Fee Schedule effective 7/1/2026 — supersedes the SolarApp+ page's slightly different '$500 + $15/kW' figure for the >15kW tier). 88% · fee schedule (effective 7/1/2026)
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered / Per kW 88% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No 70% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Not published as a fixed number of business days for standard PV review; systems submitted through SolarAPP+ receive automated (near-instant) approval rather than a queued turnaround. 55% · department page (absence)
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days (permit expires 180 days after the last passed inspection) 60% · handout (dated 2018)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) is the interconnecting/wires utility; Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) is Gilroy's Community Choice Aggregator for electricity generation/billing but does not touch interconnection. 82% · handout + CCA member list
28 questions answered against City of Gilroy’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity of Gilroy Building & Safety Division issues residential building and electrical permits directly; confirmed via its own Building Division and SolarApp+ pages.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/209/Building-Division
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding & Safety Division self-performs both building and electrical permitting/plan check/inspection; not delegated to the county. Fire life-safety review for standard rooftop PV is folded into the building review rather than routed to a separate department.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSolarApp+ page states a City of Gilroy Building Permit is required to install a rooftop solar PV system.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherA single Building Permit covers electrical work for PV; the fee schedule and SolarApp+ page show one 'Photovoltaic Permitting Fee' rather than separate building and electrical permit fees, and the page states no separate planning or fire review is needed for eligible systems.
department page / fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherThe 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines and the current Permitting FAQ both state a Building Permit may be issued to a State-licensed contractor or to the homeowner (owner-builder).
FAQ handout (rev. 12/17/2024) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/9538/Permitting-Plan-Check-and-Inspection-FAQ-Handout
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherPermitting FAQ: 'Contractors must have a current City of Gilroy Business License and current State of California Contractor's License' before a permit is issued.
FAQ handout (rev. 12/17/2024) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/9538/Permitting-Plan-Check-and-Inspection-FAQ-Handout
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal guidelines: 'If the work is performed by the Homeowner personally or by his/her workers... If the Homeowner hires workers, State Law requires the Homeowner to obtain Worker's Compensation Insurance.' Owner-builder self-permitting is explicitly contemplated.
handout (rev. 7/10/2018, still the linked doc as of this run) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Completed permit application; electrical single-line diagram; roof/site plan showing PV layout, fire pathways and disconnect locations; equipment cut-sheets (module, inverter, racking, RSD device); structural documentation (simplified criteria form or PE/SE-stamped calcs for non-qualifying systems); Smoke/CO Self-Certification form; Water-Conserving Plumbing Fixture Self-Verification form; HOA approval letter if applicable; and, for SolarAPP+, the Eligibility Checklist itself.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the current SolarApp+ page submittal-requirements list with the PV Plan Check Submittal Checklist form and the Eligibility Checklist PDF.
department page + checklist forms checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
The PV Plan Check Submittal Checklist form calls for 2 copies of the standard electrical diagram for a counter/plan-check submittal. Systems run through SolarAPP+ are submitted entirely digitally (PDF uploads) via solarapp.nrel.gov / GO Permit, with no paper copies.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 2-copies figure is from the 2018/2024-revised checklist form aimed at standard (non-SolarAPP+) counter submittals; SolarAPP+ itself is fully digital per the current SolarApp+ page. No single current document states a copy count for the SolarAPP+ path because none is needed.
checklist form (rev. 6/13/2024) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7684/Plan-Check---Photovoltaic-Solar-Checklist-Form-2018
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes — a site/roof plan is required showing north arrow, lot dimensions/setbacks, distance from property lines to adjacent structures, PV panel layout, roof access point, fire-code access pathways, PV system fire classification, and locations of all required labels/markings and electrical disconnects.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly enumerated on the current SolarApp+ page's submittal-requirements list and echoed in the PV Plan Check Checklist form.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSolarApp+ page requires 'a completed electrical plan and single line electrical diagram'; the PV checklist form also lists a 'Standard Electrical Diagram.'
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal requirements call for number of modules/strings, conductor/conduit type and size, and grounding/bonding — i.e., string and conductor sizing must be shown on the electrical plan.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
A structural PE/SE stamp is required for systems that don't meet the SolarAPP+/expedited 'Structural Criteria' simplified form; the 2018 handout put that threshold at total PV system weight exceeding 5 lb/sq ft, above which stamped calculations from a California-registered design professional are required.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 5-psf figure is from the 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines handout, which otherwise cites the now-superseded 2016 code cycle; the current Eligibility Checklist (rev. 11/12/2024) references a 'Structural Criteria' form with the same simplified/PE-stamp fork but the numeric threshold document itself was not linked or independently reachable in this run.
handout (dated, code references stale) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Not separately published; an electrical PE stamp is not called out as a distinct requirement from the structural stamp fork described above — standard residential PV relies on the licensed installer's CEC-690-compliant plan set rather than an electrical PE stamp.
Why the confidence is not higherNo Gilroy document reviewed (SolarApp+ page, PV checklist, submittal guidelines, eligibility checklist) mentions an electrical PE/EE stamp requirement at any threshold; absence is based on reading all four current Building Division PV documents, not a targeted search.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$450 flat for residential systems ≤15 kW; $450 base + $15/kW above 15 kW for larger residential systems (per the Comprehensive Fee Schedule effective 7/1/2026 — supersedes the SolarApp+ page's slightly different '$500 + $15/kW' figure for the >15kW tier).
Why the confidence is not higherComprehensive User Fee Schedule effective July 1, 2026 (current as of this Aug 2026 check) lists Photovoltaic Permitting Fees line items #49-50 with these exact figures, unchanged from the 'Current Fee' to the 'New Fee' column. This is the most recently dated of two City documents quoting this fee; the SolarApp+ webpage states '$500.00 + $15.00 per kW above 15 kW' for the same tier, a real, noted discrepancy between two of the City's own sources.
fee schedule (effective 7/1/2026) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/16483/Comprehensive-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered / Per kW
Why the confidence is not higherFlat $450 up to 15 kW, then a per-kW adder above that threshold — a tiered-plus-per-kW structure, per the Comprehensive Fee Schedule.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/16483/Comprehensive-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Photovoltaic Permitting Fees table has a single fee line per tier with no separate 'plan check' line item (unlike Energy Storage System fees, which do list a distinct plan-check fee). Standard PV plan review appears bundled into the permit fee under SolarAPP+/standard review.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/16483/Comprehensive-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Not published as a fixed number of business days for standard PV review; systems submitted through SolarAPP+ receive automated (near-instant) approval rather than a queued turnaround.
Why the confidence is not higherNo Gilroy page or handout reviewed states a plan-review turnaround in business days for PV; SolarApp+ page emphasizes automated/instant review instead. This is an absence proved by reading the SolarApp+ page, Building Division page, and Building Forms page — none states a turnaround figure.
department page (absence) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days (permit expires 180 days after the last passed inspection)
Why the confidence is not higherStated in the 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines Inspection Procedures section; this is a standard administrative-code provision (CBC/CRC Sec. 105) unlikely to have changed with the 2025 code cycle, but was not independently re-confirmed against a 2025-cycle-dated document.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for eligible systems; GO Permit (Gilroy Online Permit) for standard review, inspection scheduling and all other Community Development permits.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth are named and linked directly from the City's own SolarApp+ and Building Division pages.
portal landing page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/986/GO-Permit
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ provides automated instant permitting entirely online; GO Permit separately offers 24-hour online application, plan-review tracking, and inspection scheduling for non-SolarAPP+ submittals.
portal landing page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/986/GO-Permit
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) is the interconnecting/wires utility; Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) is Gilroy's Community Choice Aggregator for electricity generation/billing but does not touch interconnection.
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E is named directly in the City's own 2018 PV Submittal Guidelines sample placard wording ('THIS PANEL IS FED BY MULTIPLE SOURCES — PG&E AND SOLAR'). SVCE's own member-communities page lists Gilroy as a member community; SVCE structurally only handles generation/billing, PG&E remains the distribution utility for interconnection statewide in its territory.
handout + CCA member list checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPG&E Rule 21 tariff PDF (pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf, 26MB, download/extraction not completed this run) and all Gilroy Building Division / SolarApp+ pages reviewed, none of which state utility-sequencing relative to the permit.
https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
Yes, if applicable
Why the confidence is not higherBoth the PV Plan Check Checklist form and the Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines require an 'HOA approval letter (if applicable)' as part of the submittal package.
checklist form checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7684/Plan-Check---Photovoltaic-Solar-Checklist-Form-2018
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe SolarApp+ page states eligible rooftop PV permits 'do not require a separate planning or fire services review and approval,' and the City's Historic Resources page makes no mention of solar or a design-review trigger for PV.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherGilroy's Applicable Codes & Design Criteria page publishes engineering wind design parameters (92 mph, Exposure C) for structural design, but there is no windstorm-certification program of the Texas-TDI type; absence checked directly against that page.
department page (absence) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/565/Applicable-Codes-Design-Criteria
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Not for standard grid-tied rooftop PV, which is expressly exempted from separate planning review. Off-grid (standalone) residential PV/ESS systems are instead approved administratively, case-by-case, by the Building Official or the Community Development Director — not by Council or a Specific Use Permit process.
Why the confidence is not higherSolarApp+ page exempts standard rooftop PV from planning review; the Residential Off-Grid Solar PV Guidelines (rev. 12/21/2025) state off-grid systems are approved administratively case-by-case.
handout (rev. 12/21/2025) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/20218/Residential-Off-Grid-Solar-PV-System-Guidelines
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No absolute residential size cap; 38.4 kW AC nameplate is only the ceiling for use of the automated SolarAPP+ pathway. Larger residential systems are permitted but route to standard (non-automated) plan review at commercial-tier fee lines.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Eligibility Checklist and SolarApp+ page both frame 38.4 kW as an eligibility cutoff for the expedited program, not a hard cap on residential PV size; the fee schedule has separate uncapped 'more than 15 kW' tiers.
eligibility checklist (rev. 11/12/2024) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/13707/Eligibility-Checklist-for-Expedited-Solar-Photovoltaic-Permitting-for-One-and-Two-Family-Dwellings
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 80% · adopting-code page
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code and 2025 California Residential Code, effective January 1, 2026, adopted locally with amendments via Ordinance 2025-06. 92% · adopting-code page
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code, effective January 1, 2026, adopted with amendments via Ordinance 2025-07. 90% · adopting-code page
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — local amendments exist for both the building/green code cycle (Ordinance 2025-06) and the fire code (Ordinance 2025-07); the prior cycle's amendments were Ordinances 2022-10 (building), 2022-11 (green), and 2022-12 (fire). 88% · adopting-code page
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 California Electrical Code (CEC Article 690 Solar Photovoltaic and Article 705), the 2025 CBC/CRC, and Gilroy's local amendments (Ordinance 2025-06/2025-07), plus manufacturer listing/installation instructions per CEC 110.3(B). 82% · adopting-code page + handout
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Per the 2018 PV Submittal Guidelines: modules no higher than 3 ft below the ridge; gable roofs require two 3-ft-wide access pathways from eave to ridge on each slope with modules; hip roofs require one 3-ft-wide pathway; modules kept at least 1.5 ft from hips/valleys. 62% · handout (dated 2018)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown is required, with a required plaque/directory wording 'PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN' per CEC 690.56(C). Note: the City's linked 2018 handout still cites the 2016 CEC (pre-module-level-RSD era); the current 2025 CEC (based on 2023 NEC) requires module-level rapid shutdown per NEC 690.12, which the 2018 handout's underlying code citations predate even though its plaque wording happens to match the modern format. 65% · handout (dated 2018) + current adopting-code page
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Main service disconnect marking ('CAUTION! SOLAR ELECTRIC SYSTEM CONNECTED'); DC conduit/raceway marking ('CAUTION! SOLAR CIRCUIT'); AC disconnect placard; DC disconnect placard; shock-hazard warning at disconnects with line/load terminals energized; ungrounded-system warning where applicable; rapid-shutdown plaque; multiple-source/point-of-interconnection placard; inverter-output 'do not relocate' warning. 80% · handout (dated 2018)
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes 85% · handout (dated 2018)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Yes — warning signs: red background, white lettering, minimum 3/8 in., all caps, Arial or similar font, weather-resistant material (UL 969 recommended). Rapid-shutdown plaque: reflective, white lettering on red background, minimum letter height 3/8 in. (9.5 mm), all capitals. 82% · handout (dated 2018)
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes — a roof/site diagram (facility map) is required showing the PV panel layout, north arrow, lot dimensions/setbacks, roof access point, fire-code access pathways, PV system fire classification, and locations of all required labels and disconnects. On re-roof-with-existing-PV jobs, the final inspector specifically checks that panels were reinstalled in the same location shown on this placard/roof-layout document. 85% · handout (rev. 3/14/2025)
- Where must the labels be placed? Main service disconnect marking at or on the main service panel/disconnect cover; DC conduit/raceway markings every 10 ft, at turns, and above/below penetrations, plus at all DC combiner/junction boxes; AC and DC disconnect placards at their respective disconnecting means; rapid-shutdown plaque and multi-source placard at an accessible location at the service/point of interconnection. 80% · handout (dated 2018)
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Not specified by the City with a fixed distance from the meter; the AC disconnect must simply be marked/placarded and, per CEC, located per manufacturer instructions and accessible to the utility/fire service. PG&E's own DG interconnection manual (which typically sets a meter-adjacent or readily-accessible standard) could not be retrieved/extracted in this run. 45% · handout (partial absence)
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No — no City-maintained approved-products list; the standard is general UL/NRTL listing of all equipment plus installation per manufacturer's instructions (CEC 110.3(B)). 72% · handout (rev. 12/21/2025)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, batteries/ESS are permitted, but they disqualify a system from the automated SolarAPP+ pathway — the Eligibility Checklist requires the system be 'utility interactive and without battery storage' and 'does not utilize storage batteries.' Battery systems instead go through standard plan review, with their own ESS permit fee and, above 20 kWh, a dedicated Fire Prevention Division plan check/inspection. 85% · eligibility checklist (rev. 11/12/2024)
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Yes 88% · fee schedule (effective 7/1/2026)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Ground-mounted PV is processed through the same Building Division permit as roof-mounted (the PV Plan Check Checklist form has a 'Roof / Ground / Other' installation field), implying it is treated as requiring the same structural/building review; whether Gilroy's zoning code separately classifies it as an accessory structure for setback purposes could not be confirmed in this run. 50% · checklist form (partial answer; zoning code unreachable)
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? The Eligibility Checklist for SolarAPP+ requires the PV system be interconnected to a single-phase 120/240V service with a bus-bar rating of 225A or less and central/string inverters not combined prior to the inverter; systems needing a service/main panel upgrade are routed to a separate Main Service Panel Upgrade permit rather than being handled inside the PV permit. 75% · eligibility checklist
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Not separately specified beyond requiring manufacturer cut sheets/installation instructions for the racking system and a structural-criteria form (simplified for qualifying systems, PE/SE-stamped calculations otherwise) describing attachment method and spacing. 60% · department page (partial absence)
20 questions answered against City of Gilroy’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Applicable Codes & Design Criteria page states the 2025 California Electrical Code is in force effective 1/1/2026; the 2025 CA code cycle is statewide based on the 2023 NEC (NFPA 70). The City's own page names the 2025 CEC but does not itself spell out the underlying NEC edition number.
adopting-code page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/565/Applicable-Codes-Design-Criteria
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code and 2025 California Residential Code, effective January 1, 2026, adopted locally with amendments via Ordinance 2025-06.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated on the Applicable Codes & Design Criteria page, which supersedes an older Permitting FAQ handout (rev. 12/17/2024) still showing the prior 2022 cycle/Ordinance 2022-10 — a real staleness gap between two of the City's own documents, resolved here in favor of the more recently dated/more specific page.
adopting-code page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/565/Applicable-Codes-Design-Criteria
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code, effective January 1, 2026, adopted with amendments via Ordinance 2025-07.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated on the Applicable Codes & Design Criteria page.
adopting-code page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/565/Applicable-Codes-Design-Criteria
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes — local amendments exist for both the building/green code cycle (Ordinance 2025-06) and the fire code (Ordinance 2025-07); the prior cycle's amendments were Ordinances 2022-10 (building), 2022-11 (green), and 2022-12 (fire).
Why the confidence is not higherNamed directly on the Applicable Codes & Design Criteria page and cross-confirmed by the older Permitting FAQ's list of the prior cycle's ordinance numbers.
adopting-code page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/565/Applicable-Codes-Design-Criteria
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 California Electrical Code (CEC Article 690 Solar Photovoltaic and Article 705), the 2025 CBC/CRC, and Gilroy's local amendments (Ordinance 2025-06/2025-07), plus manufacturer listing/installation instructions per CEC 110.3(B).
Why the confidence is not higherCEC Article 690 is cited explicitly in the Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines; the current code-cycle names come from the Applicable Codes page.
adopting-code page + handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/565/Applicable-Codes-Design-Criteria
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
The Eligibility Checklist for SolarAPP+ requires the PV system be interconnected to a single-phase 120/240V service with a bus-bar rating of 225A or less and central/string inverters not combined prior to the inverter; systems needing a service/main panel upgrade are routed to a separate Main Service Panel Upgrade permit rather than being handled inside the PV permit.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated on the Eligibility Checklist (rev. 11/12/2024) and confirmed by the Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines noting 'a solar permit does not include replacement or upgrading of the existing electrical panel or service.'
eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/13707/Eligibility-Checklist-for-Expedited-Solar-Photovoltaic-Permitting-for-One-and-Two-Family-Dwellings
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Not separately specified beyond requiring manufacturer cut sheets/installation instructions for the racking system and a structural-criteria form (simplified for qualifying systems, PE/SE-stamped calculations otherwise) describing attachment method and spacing.
Why the confidence is not higherNo prescriptive attachment-spacing table was found in any of the four PV documents reviewed; requirements are performance-based (manufacturer instructions + structural sign-off) rather than a fixed City spacing standard.
department page (partial absence) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Per the 2018 PV Submittal Guidelines: modules no higher than 3 ft below the ridge; gable roofs require two 3-ft-wide access pathways from eave to ridge on each slope with modules; hip roofs require one 3-ft-wide pathway; modules kept at least 1.5 ft from hips/valleys.
Why the confidence is not higherThis is from the 2018-dated handout, which otherwise cites the superseded 2016 code cycle, so the numeric setbacks are flagged as possibly stale relative to the current 2025 CFC; the current SolarApp+ Eligibility Checklist and submittal page both still require 'clear access pathways' and reference the State Fire Marshal Solar PV Installation Guide but do not restate the numeric setbacks themselves.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — rapid shutdown is required, with a required plaque/directory wording 'PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN' per CEC 690.56(C). Note: the City's linked 2018 handout still cites the 2016 CEC (pre-module-level-RSD era); the current 2025 CEC (based on 2023 NEC) requires module-level rapid shutdown per NEC 690.12, which the 2018 handout's underlying code citations predate even though its plaque wording happens to match the modern format.
Why the confidence is not higherPlaque wording is drawn from the 2018 handout; the module-level-RSD requirement itself is inferred from the current 2025 CEC/2023 NEC adoption on the Applicable Codes page, not independently re-confirmed in a 2025-cycle-dated Gilroy PV document — flagged as the exact 'stale RSD language' risk called out for this survey.
handout (dated 2018) + current adopting-code page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Main service disconnect marking ('CAUTION! SOLAR ELECTRIC SYSTEM CONNECTED'); DC conduit/raceway marking ('CAUTION! SOLAR CIRCUIT'); AC disconnect placard; DC disconnect placard; shock-hazard warning at disconnects with line/load terminals energized; ungrounded-system warning where applicable; rapid-shutdown plaque; multiple-source/point-of-interconnection placard; inverter-output 'do not relocate' warning.
Why the confidence is not higherAll wording is transcribed verbatim from the City's own 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines Section 5 (Signage), citing State Fire Marshal and CEC 690 sections for each placard.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe handout specifies exact wording for each required placard (see q38), attributed to the State Fire Marshal and CEC sections rather than being left to the installer's discretion.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — warning signs: red background, white lettering, minimum 3/8 in., all caps, Arial or similar font, weather-resistant material (UL 969 recommended). Rapid-shutdown plaque: reflective, white lettering on red background, minimum letter height 3/8 in. (9.5 mm), all capitals.
Why the confidence is not higherSpecified verbatim in the 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines, citing the State Fire Marshal.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — a roof/site diagram (facility map) is required showing the PV panel layout, north arrow, lot dimensions/setbacks, roof access point, fire-code access pathways, PV system fire classification, and locations of all required labels and disconnects. On re-roof-with-existing-PV jobs, the final inspector specifically checks that panels were reinstalled in the same location shown on this placard/roof-layout document.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the current SolarApp+ submittal requirements with the Re-Roofing with Solar PV Policy (rev. 3/14/2025), which explicitly ties the final inspection to the 'PV roof layout placard mounted to the electric panel.'
handout (rev. 3/14/2025) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/11627/Re-Roofing-with-Solar-PV-Policy---Residential
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame PG&E Rule 21 tariff PDF (too large to extract this run) and the PG&E Greenbook landing page (pge.com/greenbook) were not reached; Gilroy's own PV documents only cite CEC/State Fire Marshal placards (captured in q38-q40), not utility-specific ones.
https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Main service disconnect marking at or on the main service panel/disconnect cover; DC conduit/raceway markings every 10 ft, at turns, and above/below penetrations, plus at all DC combiner/junction boxes; AC and DC disconnect placards at their respective disconnecting means; rapid-shutdown plaque and multi-source placard at an accessible location at the service/point of interconnection.
Why the confidence is not higherPlacement instructions transcribed from the same 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines Section 5.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
No — no City-maintained approved-products list; the standard is general UL/NRTL listing of all equipment plus installation per manufacturer's instructions (CEC 110.3(B)).
Why the confidence is not higherOff-Grid Solar PV Guidelines (rev. 12/21/2025) state 'all equipment shall be listed (UL) or by another (NRTL) nationally recognized testing laboratory'; no City page or handout reviewed lists specific approved brands/models.
handout (rev. 12/21/2025) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/20218/Residential-Off-Grid-Solar-PV-System-Guidelines
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, batteries/ESS are permitted, but they disqualify a system from the automated SolarAPP+ pathway — the Eligibility Checklist requires the system be 'utility interactive and without battery storage' and 'does not utilize storage batteries.' Battery systems instead go through standard plan review, with their own ESS permit fee and, above 20 kWh, a dedicated Fire Prevention Division plan check/inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated on the current Eligibility Checklist (rev. 11/12/2024) — this corrects an initial mis-read from an automated page summary that had suggested batteries were compatible with SolarAPP+ itself; reading the checklist's actual PDF text shows the opposite for the automated pathway, while the Comprehensive Fee Schedule shows a full ESS fee structure for the standard-review path.
eligibility checklist (rev. 11/12/2024) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/13707/Eligibility-Checklist-for-Expedited-Solar-Photovoltaic-Permitting-for-One-and-Two-Family-Dwellings
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherComprehensive Fee Schedule (eff. 7/1/2026) lists a separate 'Energy Storage System - Permit Fee' ($117), 'Plan Check (Building)' ($189), and 'Inspection (Building)' ($166), plus separate Fire Prevention Division 'Plan Check' ($478) and 'Inspection' ($312) fees for ESS exceeding 20 kWh.
fee schedule (effective 7/1/2026) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/16483/Comprehensive-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Ground-mounted PV is processed through the same Building Division permit as roof-mounted (the PV Plan Check Checklist form has a 'Roof / Ground / Other' installation field), implying it is treated as requiring the same structural/building review; whether Gilroy's zoning code separately classifies it as an accessory structure for setback purposes could not be confirmed in this run.
Why the confidence is not higherGilroy's zoning/municipal code has migrated to eCode360 (ecode360.com/GI4458), which returned a Cloudflare bot-check (HTTP 403) to both curl and the WebFetch tool even with a browser user agent; no Internet Archive snapshot exists for that URL either. This is a genuine access gap, not an assumed absence.
checklist form (partial answer; zoning code unreachable) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7684/Plan-Check---Photovoltaic-Solar-Checklist-Form-2018
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Not specified by the City with a fixed distance from the meter; the AC disconnect must simply be marked/placarded and, per CEC, located per manufacturer instructions and accessible to the utility/fire service. PG&E's own DG interconnection manual (which typically sets a meter-adjacent or readily-accessible standard) could not be retrieved/extracted in this run.
Why the confidence is not higherNo Gilroy handout states a specific dimensional relationship between the AC disconnect and the meter; PG&E's Rule 21 tariff PDF (26MB) could not be downloaded/parsed within this run. This is close to the confidence floor and is being kept as an answer rather than not_found because the City-side placard/labeling requirement (from q38/q43) is itself confirmed, only the meter-relative placement figure is missing.
handout (partial absence) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal (GO Permit, online) or Email (Inspect@CityofGilroy.org), with legacy 8-digit permits calling 408-846-0235. 90% · department page
- How much notice is required? 3 business days (inspections are booked '72 hours out') 88% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM/PM windows may be requested ('You may request AM or PM') rather than a fixed same-day/named time slot. 80% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 90% · department page
- If delegated, to whom? N/A — not delegated 90% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a straightforward roof-mount retrofit: typically a single final inspection once the system is complete. A rough/mid-roof inspection is added only if structural attachment work is concealed before roofing is finished (e.g., re-roof-with-PV jobs get a roof-deck inspection, then a roofing final, then a PV final if the array was modified). 62% · handout (rev. 3/14/2025) + 2018 handout
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No, not for a standard exposed roof-mount retrofit; a rough-in is only required 'if any work is inside walls or ceilings and will be covered with finish materials' (e.g., a concealed conduit run or a service panel upgrade performed alongside the PV work). 60% · handout (dated 2018)
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? A general (non-solar-specific) Inspection Requirements List is published for residential/related buildings; solar-specific checklists that exist are for submittal/plan-check (PV Checklist, Eligibility Checklist), not a dedicated PV final-inspection checklist. 65% · department page
- What must be on site at inspection? The permit card and a City-approved 'JOB COPY' stamped set of plans must be on site and accessible for every inspection; roof access (an OSHA-approved, minimum Type I, 250-lb-rated ladder, properly secured) must be provided by the contractor/owner. 80% · department page
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes 85% · eligibility checklist
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final 75% · handout (dated 2018)
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 45% · inference from statewide utility practice
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $102 (general 'Re-inspection fees assessed determination' line, all divisions, plus applicable division hourly rate) 78% · fee schedule (effective 7/1/2026)
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections are noted at the failed inspection and tracked/cleared through the GO Permit portal (for BLDR/BLDNR-prefixed permits) or by contacting the inspector directly for legacy 8-digit permits; the permit is not 'finaled' until all corrections are resolved and a passing final inspection is recorded. 60% · department page (inference)
14 questions answered against City of Gilroy’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal (GO Permit, online) or Email (Inspect@CityofGilroy.org), with legacy 8-digit permits calling 408-846-0235.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated on both the SolarApp+ page and the Building Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
3 business days (inspections are booked '72 hours out')
Why the confidence is not higherStated identically on both the SolarApp+ page and the Building Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
AM/PM windows may be requested ('You may request AM or PM') rather than a fixed same-day/named time slot.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated in the Building Inspections page's inspection-request instructions.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherGilroy's own ICC-certified Building Division inspectors perform final inspections; not delegated to the county or a contract firm.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
N/A — not delegated
Why the confidence is not higherSame source as q52 shows in-house inspection staff.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For a straightforward roof-mount retrofit: typically a single final inspection once the system is complete. A rough/mid-roof inspection is added only if structural attachment work is concealed before roofing is finished (e.g., re-roof-with-PV jobs get a roof-deck inspection, then a roofing final, then a PV final if the array was modified).
Why the confidence is not higherDrawn from the 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines' Inspection Procedures section and the Re-Roofing with Solar PV Policy (rev. 3/14/2025), which together describe the sequence for both the simple and re-roof-concurrent cases.
handout (rev. 3/14/2025) + 2018 handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/11627/Re-Roofing-with-Solar-PV-Policy---Residential
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No, not for a standard exposed roof-mount retrofit; a rough-in is only required 'if any work is inside walls or ceilings and will be covered with finish materials' (e.g., a concealed conduit run or a service panel upgrade performed alongside the PV work).
Why the confidence is not higherGeneral rough-inspection trigger rule stated in the 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines' Inspection Procedures section.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Eligibility Checklist's Fire Safety Requirements explicitly include 'All required markings and labels are provided' as a checked item, and the Re-Roofing with Solar PV Policy states the final inspector verifies panels were reinstalled per the roof-layout placard.
eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/13707/Eligibility-Checklist-for-Expedited-Solar-Photovoltaic-Permitting-for-One-and-Two-Family-Dwellings
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
A general (non-solar-specific) Inspection Requirements List is published for residential/related buildings; solar-specific checklists that exist are for submittal/plan-check (PV Checklist, Eligibility Checklist), not a dedicated PV final-inspection checklist.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Inspections page publishes a general Inspection Requirements List covering foundation-through-final stages for all residential work, with no PV-specific final-inspection section; the PV-specific checklists found (q8-q10) are submittal/plan-check documents, a distinction worth holding onto rather than conflating the two.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The permit card and a City-approved 'JOB COPY' stamped set of plans must be on site and accessible for every inspection; roof access (an OSHA-approved, minimum Type I, 250-lb-rated ladder, properly secured) must be provided by the contractor/owner.
Why the confidence is not higherStated on the Building Inspections page (permit + job-copy plans) and the 2018 Minimum PV Submittal Guidelines (ladder/roof-access requirement).
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$102 (general 'Re-inspection fees assessed determination' line, all divisions, plus applicable division hourly rate)
Why the confidence is not higherComprehensive Fee Schedule effective 7/1/2026, 'General Inspections and Fees (all divisions)' section, item 5; this is a cross-division fee rather than one specifically labeled for solar, but it is the fee that would apply to a missed/failed PV inspection.
fee schedule (effective 7/1/2026) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/16483/Comprehensive-Fee-Schedule---Effective-July-1-2026
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Corrections are noted at the failed inspection and tracked/cleared through the GO Permit portal (for BLDR/BLDNR-prefixed permits) or by contacting the inspector directly for legacy 8-digit permits; the permit is not 'finaled' until all corrections are resolved and a passing final inspection is recorded.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the Building Inspections page's description of GO Permit's tracking features and the general re-inspection/fee framework; no document spells out a formal written-correction-notice process specific to solar.
department page (inference) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/215/Building-Inspections
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final
Why the confidence is not higherPV permits for existing single-family homes are alteration permits, not new construction, so what is issued is a passed/'finaled' building permit (final inspection approval) rather than a Certificate of Occupancy; stated in both the 2018 Submittal Guidelines and the Re-Roofing with Solar PV Policy.
handout (dated 2018) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/DocumentCenter/View/7783/Minimum-Photovoltaic-Solar-Submittal-Guidelines-Handout-2018
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer
Why the confidence is not higherThis is standard PG&E Rule 21/NEM practice statewide (the installer submits the PTO/interconnection paperwork, including proof of the AHJ's final permit sign-off, to PG&E) rather than something stated on a Gilroy City page; PG&E's own Rule 21 tariff document (26MB) could not be downloaded/parsed in this run to confirm the exact mechanism for Gilroy specifically.
inference from statewide utility practice checked 2026-08-30 https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Gilroy against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Gilroy is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (both self-performed); fire-life-safety requirements for PV are folded into the building plan check/inspection rather than a separate fire-department review, except for battery/ESS systems which do get a dedicated Fire Prevention Division plan check and inspection above 20 kWh
- Overridden by
- State law (Gov. Code §65850.5 and AB 2143) requires jurisdictions over 50,000 population to offer an expedited/automated solar permitting program; Gilroy (pop. ~59,000) implements this mandate via SolarAPP+ rather than a locally-written ministerial ordinance. This shapes process but does not transfer jurisdiction away from the City.
- Why not higher
- City of Gilroy Building & Safety Division (Community Development) is a full city department — not delegated to Santa Clara County — and its own page states it issues both building and electrical permits and performs its own inspections. Gilroy also has its own city Fire Department (confirmed on the Fire Department page, which references itself and its own stations/administration, not a contract or JPA arrangement), and the SolarApp+ page states standard rooftop PV permits 'do not require a separate planning or fire services review and approval,' with fire-marshal requirements verified through building plan check/inspection instead. The one carve-out found is Energy Storage Systems, which do get a dedicated Fire Prevention Division fee line (plan check + inspection) for ESS >20 kWh per the current fee schedule.
https://www.cityofgilroy.org/975/SolarApp-for-Residential-Solar-Installer
- Permit required
- Yes97%
- Permit cost
- $450 flat for residential systems ≤15 kW; $450 base + $15/kW above 15 kW for larger residential systems (per the Comprehensive Fee Schedule effective 7/1/2026 — supersedes the SolarApp+…88%
- Plan review
- Not published as a fixed number of business days for standard PV review; systems submitted through SolarAPP+ receive automated (near-instant) approval rather than a queued turnaround.55%
- Portal
- SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov) for eligible systems; GO Permit (Gilroy Online Permit) for standard review, inspection scheduling and all other Community Development permits.95%
- Electrical code
- 202380%
- Own placard wording
- Yes85%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal (GO Permit, online) or Email (Inspect@CityofGilroy.org), with legacy 8-digit permits calling 408-846-0235.90%
Labels & placards for this authority
City of Gilroy writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 85%
Yes
Size, colour & material 82%
Yes — warning signs: red background, white lettering, minimum 3/8 in., all caps, Arial or similar font, weather-resistant material (UL 969 recommended). Rapid-shutdown plaque: reflective, white lettering on red background, minimum letter height 3/8 in. (9.5 mm), all capitals.
Where they go 80%
Main service disconnect marking at or on the main service panel/disconnect cover; DC conduit/raceway markings every 10 ft, at turns, and above/below penetrations, plus at all DC combiner/junction boxes; AC and DC disconnect placards at their respective disconnecting means; rapid-shutdown plaque and multi-source placard at an accessible location at the service/point of interconnection.
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.