City of Loma Linda
San Bernardino County
City of Loma Linda is a city authority in the State of California, serving 24,791 residents. 1,611 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Where you file — Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Online Permit Portal' (OPP) — cityoflomalindaca-energovweb.tylerhost.net Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- Residential: $275 flat, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15 kW AC. (Commercial: $545 for up to 50 kW, plus $3.50/kW from 51-250 kW, plus $2.50/kW above 250 kW.)95% source
- Key document
- department handout cited by 7 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · department handout
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · permit application form
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 65% · fee schedule
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No city-imposed HOA/architectural-approval requirement was found; where an HOA exists, state law controls it. 55% · state statute
- Is there a historic-district review? Conditional — only if the parcel is a designated cultural resource or within a designated historic district. 65% · municipal code
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No local windstorm-certification requirement found. 65% · municipal code
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No — residential rooftop PV does not appear as a Conditional-Use-Permit or Council-approval trigger anywhere in the zoning use tables. 55% · municipal code
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No codified residential system-size cap found. 55% · fee schedule
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 75% · permit application form
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 90% · permit application form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Plot plan (PV module locations, conduit/conductor routing, equipment incl. inverter/batteries, electrical service interface); single-line diagram with A/C disconnect; PV-module-to-rack and rack-to-roof attachment details; grounding/bonding detail; roof-load calculations if loading exceeds 6.5 lb/sf; manufacturer's specifications for modules, inverter, batteries, conductors, disconnects and overcurrent devices; conductor/overcurrent-device sizing justification; signage-location call-out for the permanent plaque per the CEC; roof plan showing 3-ft setbacks per the CA Fire Code. 95% · department handout
- How many copies, and in what format? Two full sets of plans, 11 in. x 17 in. 95% · department handout
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — a Plot Plan showing the location of the PV modules, the route of conduit/conductors, the equipment (inverter, batteries, etc.), and the electrical service interface. 95% · department handout
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 95% · department handout
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 90% · department handout
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Structural calculations are required once roof loading exceeds 6.5 lb/sf ('if it is over 6.5 lbs per s.f. submit roof load calculations'); the handout does not itself use the words 'PE stamp' or 'engineer'. 60% · department handout
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Online Permit Portal' (OPP) — cityoflomalindaca-energovweb.tylerhost.net 95% · department handout
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 85% · department handout
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Residential: $275 flat, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15 kW AC. (Commercial: $545 for up to 50 kW, plus $3.50/kW from 51-250 kW, plus $2.50/kW above 250 kW.) 95% · fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered 90% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No 60% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Southern California Edison (SCE) — NOT a municipal utility. 97% · adopted General Plan
28 questions answered against City of Loma Linda’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Dept. of Building and Safety issues residential building/electrical permits and publishes a dedicated Residential Solar Minimum Requirements handout on its own letterhead.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherPermit application letterhead reads 'CITY OF LOMA LINDA DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY'; plan-check requirements doc is issued by the 'Community Development Department, Building and Safety Division'; no third-party plan-check/inspection firm domain, email local-part, or county contract found anywhere on the city's building pages.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Permit%20Application%202022.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higher'Solar Photovoltaic Permit' is its own fee line (S-001F) in the current fee schedule, and the city publishes a dedicated 'Minimum Requirements for Residential Solar' submittal handout.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://lomalinda.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Planning%20and%20Building%20Fees%20Nov2025.docx
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherThe fee schedule carries a single 'Solar Photovoltaic Permit' line (S-001F) rather than separate building and electrical fee lines, and the Residential Solar Minimum Requirements handout bundles the single-line electrical diagram into the one submittal package — no evidence of a separately issued electrical permit for PV.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://lomalinda.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Planning%20and%20Building%20Fees%20Nov2025.docx
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Permit Application lets the permit be issued to either 'the Licensed Contractor' or 'the Property Owner' as permit holder of record (Section 2a/2b); the form does not restrict who may pull the permit to a licensed electrician specifically.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Permit%20Application%202022.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Building & Safety permit-applications page and the Building Permit Application form for a pre-application contractor-registration requirement; only a general city business-license tax on 'contractors possessing any state contractor's license' (LLMC Title 5, Ch. 5.08) was found, which is a citywide business tax, not a documented Building-Division pre-registration gate
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Application Section 2b is an 'OWNER-BUILDER'S DECLARATION' allowing the property owner to self-perform work under Bus. & Prof. Code §7044, with no exclusion for solar.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Permit%20Application%202022.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Plot plan (PV module locations, conduit/conductor routing, equipment incl. inverter/batteries, electrical service interface); single-line diagram with A/C disconnect; PV-module-to-rack and rack-to-roof attachment details; grounding/bonding detail; roof-load calculations if loading exceeds 6.5 lb/sf; manufacturer's specifications for modules, inverter, batteries, conductors, disconnects and overcurrent devices; conductor/overcurrent-device sizing justification; signage-location call-out for the permanent plaque per the CEC; roof plan showing 3-ft setbacks per the CA Fire Code.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim checklist on the city's own 'Minimum Requirements for Residential Solar' handout, City of Loma Linda Building Department letterhead, dated 31 Mar 2022 per pdfinfo.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Two full sets of plans, 11 in. x 17 in.
Why the confidence is not higher'Size of plans 11 X 17' and 'Two sets of plans are required' stated directly on the Residential Solar Minimum Requirements handout.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes — a Plot Plan showing the location of the PV modules, the route of conduit/conductors, the equipment (inverter, batteries, etc.), and the electrical service interface.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from the city's own solar submittal handout.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherHandout requires a 'Single-Line Diagram (A/C Disconnect required)'.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherHandout requires 'Justification for all conductor and over-current device sizing'.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Structural calculations are required once roof loading exceeds 6.5 lb/sf ('if it is over 6.5 lbs per s.f. submit roof load calculations'); the handout does not itself use the words 'PE stamp' or 'engineer'.
Why the confidence is not higherTrigger figure is the city's own, but the document is silent on whether a PE/architect stamp is required on those calculations — inferred from general CA practice, not stated outright.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Residential Solar Minimum Requirements handout and the Title 15 building-code adoption chapter for any electrical-PE-stamp threshold; neither mentions one
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Residential: $275 flat, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15 kW AC. (Commercial: $545 for up to 50 kW, plus $3.50/kW from 51-250 kW, plus $2.50/kW above 250 kW.)
Why the confidence is not higherFee schedule 'Solar Photovoltaic Permit' line S-001F, in the city's 'Planning and Building Fees' document; internal revision reads Nov 2025, current.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://lomalinda.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Planning%20and%20Building%20Fees%20Nov2025.docx
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered
Why the confidence is not higherFlat base fee up to 15 kW, then a per-kW increment above that threshold — a tiered structure, not pure flat or pure per-kW throughout.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://lomalinda.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Planning%20and%20Building%20Fees%20Nov2025.docx
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Solar Photovoltaic Permit fee (S-001F) sits in the same fee table, at the same flat/tiered-dollar format, as other combined-fee line items (e.g., Water Heater Permit $85, HVAC Changeout $85) that the schedule's own closing note distinguishes from valuation-based general building fees — i.e., S-001F appears to already be the all-in figure, with no additional PV-specific plan-check line found anywhere in the document.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://lomalinda.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Planning%20and%20Building%20Fees%20Nov2025.docx
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe fee schedule and every Building & Safety and Community Development page fetched for a stated plan-review turnaround time; none was found
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedLLMC §15.08.020 (the city's own list of local amendments to the 2025 CBC) for a local permit-expiration rule; none of its listed amendments touch permit validity, and no dated city handout states a validity period, so the applicable figure could not be independently pinned to a fetched source in this run
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Online Permit Portal' (OPP) — cityoflomalindaca-energovweb.tylerhost.net
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Online Permit Portal Instructions document names and links this portal; city's Building & Safety page directs all applicants to it.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety/Online%20Permit%20Portal%20Instructions_GIS%20Parcel%20APN%20Number.pdf
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherOPP instructions state it lets residents/contractors 'remotely submit your application and electronic plans, pay fees, track progress, and more,' with 24/7 access; introduced 'at the start of 2024.'
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety/Online%20Permit%20Portal%20Instructions_GIS%20Parcel%20APN%20Number.pdf
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Southern California Edison (SCE) — NOT a municipal utility.
Why the confidence is not higherCORRECTS THE BRIEF: the city's own adopted General Plan, Public Services & Facilities Element §8.10.1, states plainly 'The Southern California Edison Company (SCE) provides electrical service in the Planning Area. SCE owns, operates, and maintains both above- and below-ground facilities in the Planning Area.' Independently, the city's own Utility Services webpage lists the city itself as providing only water, sewer, and refuse/recycling, and gives SCE's own customer-service number under 'Other Helpful Phone Numbers.' No 'Loma Linda Electric' entity, municipal-electric department, or POU billing line was found anywhere on the city's site, in its General Plan, or in its Title 15/17 municipal code search.
adopted General Plan checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Our%20City/General%20Plan/Chapter%208%20-%20Public%20Services%20&%20Facilities%20Element.pdf
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSCE's own DG-interconnection / Rule 21 pages (which soft-404 or are otherwise unreachable, a known SCE-wide pattern) and every Loma Linda city document fetched; none states where SCE sits relative to the city's own permit/inspection sequence
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No city-imposed HOA/architectural-approval requirement was found; where an HOA exists, state law controls it.
Why the confidence is not higherNo HOA-approval clause appears anywhere in Title 15 or Title 17 of the municipal code (control-checked). Under Civil Code §714 (CA Solar Rights Act), any CC&R provision that 'effectively prohibits or restricts' solar is void, an HOA may still run its own architectural-review process but cannot impose restrictions that materially raise cost or cut efficiency, and non-response within 45 days is a deemed approval — this is state law, not a Loma Linda ordinance, so recorded as inference rather than a city-sourced fact.
state statute checked 2026-08-31 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=714.&lawCode=CIV
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Conditional — only if the parcel is a designated cultural resource or within a designated historic district.
Why the confidence is not higherLLMC Ch. 17.80 'Historic Preservation Ordinance' requires a Certificate of Appropriateness only for a 'designated cultural resource,' 'designated site,' or property within a 'historic district'; its own scope clause (§17.80.030) applies 'to all cultural resources within the city,' not to every parcel. No PV-specific exemption or trigger appears in the chapter (control-checked: 0 'photovolt'/'solar' hits in the whole zoning title's historic chapter).
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42460583
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No local windstorm-certification requirement found.
Why the confidence is not higherThe city's own itemized list of local amendments to the 2025 CBC (LLMC §15.08.020) contains no wind-speed, exposure-category, or windstorm-certification provision; 'windstorm' returns zero hits and 'ASCE' only one incidental hit across the whole Title 15 corpus, which passed positive ('electrical' 23, 'fire' 275) and fabricated ('zzqqx' 0) controls. Unamended ASCE 7-22 via the adopted 2025 CBC/CRC governs.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No — residential rooftop PV does not appear as a Conditional-Use-Permit or Council-approval trigger anywhere in the zoning use tables.
Why the confidence is not higherReviewed Title 17's permitted/conditional-use tables; 'solar collection devices' appear only as an accessory-structure category, with no CUP flag attached, unlike other listed uses that are explicitly marked CUP.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42460583
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No codified residential system-size cap found.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Solar Photovoltaic Permit fee (S-001F) scales per kW above 15 kW with no stated ceiling, and no size cap appears in Title 15 or Title 17 (control-checked, 0 'solar'/'photovolt' hits outside the definitions and fire-code sections already reviewed).
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://lomalinda.hosted.civiclive.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Planning%20and%20Building%20Fees%20Nov2025.docx
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (via the 2025 California Electrical Code) 95% · adopting ordinance
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code Vols. 1 & 2 (based on the 2024 IBC); 2025 California Residential Code (based on the 2024 IRC). 95% · adopting ordinance
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2022 California Fire Code / 2021 International Fire Code — a full code-cycle behind the 2025 building/electrical cycle. 95% · adopting ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. 90% · municipal code
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 California Electrical Code (based on the 2023 NEC), unamended locally for PV-specific electrical requirements. 90% · adopting ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? 3-ft roof-plan setbacks per the California Fire Code (per the city's own submittal handout); the local fire-code amendment (LLMC §15.28.430-450) rewrites CFC §1205.2 'Access and Pathways' and §1205.2.1/.2.3 but leaves the underlying numeric pathway/setback table in the unamended CFC. 90% · department handout
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, rapid shutdown is required, under the 2023 NEC (§690.12) as adopted via the 2025 California Electrical Code. 80% · adopting ordinance
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Only the standard CEC/NEC-mandated labels at the service equipment/disconnect; no additional AHJ-specific placard product was found. 75% · department handout
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No — the city defers to the CEC's own wording rather than specifying its own. 75% · department handout
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No city-specific letter-height, colour, or material spec found; the city's document again points only to the CEC's own requirement. 70% · department handout
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? No local amendment addressing residential batteries/ESS was found; conditions default to the unamended 2022 CFC's own energy-storage provisions. 55% · municipal code
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes. 80% · municipal code
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local busbar-sizing or service-upgrade rule found. 80% · municipal code
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No prescriptive attachment-spacing standard found; the city only requires the design to be shown, not a specific spacing figure. 65% · department handout
20 questions answered against City of Loma Linda’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC (via the 2025 California Electrical Code)
Why the confidence is not higherLLMC §15.08.010: 'the California Electrical Code, 2025 Edition, based on the 2023 National Electrical Code as published by the National Fire Protection Association,' adopted by Ord. 789, effective 12/9/2025 — current cycle.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code Vols. 1 & 2 (based on the 2024 IBC); 2025 California Residential Code (based on the 2024 IRC).
Why the confidence is not higherSame LLMC §15.08.010 omnibus adoption section, Ord. 789, 12/9/2025.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2022 California Fire Code / 2021 International Fire Code — a full code-cycle behind the 2025 building/electrical cycle.
Why the confidence is not higherLLMC §15.28.010, Ord. 772 § 1, 2022: 'hereby adopts and amends the 2022 Edition of the California Fire Code... and the 2021 Edition of the International Fire Code.' No later fire-code adoption ordinance was found on eCode360, so Fire is genuinely a cycle behind Building/Electrical (2025, Ord. 789).
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes.
Why the confidence is not higherLocal CBC amendments (fence height, grading-exemption threshold, relocation-permit provisions, swimming-pool-safety findings) at LLMC §15.08.020/.030, and local CFC amendments at §15.28.430-450 rewriting CFC §1205.2 (roof access/pathways), §1205.2.1 (deleting an exception) and §1205.2.3 (rewriting the BIPV exception to cite CEC §690.12(B)(2)). No local amendment to the California Electrical Code itself was found.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 California Electrical Code (based on the 2023 NEC), unamended locally for PV-specific electrical requirements.
Why the confidence is not higherLLMC §15.08.010 adoption; no 'Changes to California Electrical Code' section exists in Title 15 (searched and control-checked).
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local busbar-sizing or service-upgrade rule found.
Why the confidence is not higherTitle 15's CBC/CEC amendment sections (§15.08.020 et seq.) contain no ampere, busbar, or panel-sizing language; 'busbar', 'ampere', '225A', and '200A' all return zero hits, while the same corpus passed positive controls ('electrical' 23, 'fire' 275) and the fabricated control ('zzqqx' 0) — a controlled, provable absence, unlike Palm Springs' or Manhattan Beach's codified minimums.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No prescriptive attachment-spacing standard found; the city only requires the design to be shown, not a specific spacing figure.
Why the confidence is not higherThe solar submittal handout asks only for 'Attachment details of the PV modules to the support rack and the rack to roof structure' — a documentation requirement, not a numeric standard (e.g., no O.C. spacing figure like Banning's 48 in.).
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
3-ft roof-plan setbacks per the California Fire Code (per the city's own submittal handout); the local fire-code amendment (LLMC §15.28.430-450) rewrites CFC §1205.2 'Access and Pathways' and §1205.2.1/.2.3 but leaves the underlying numeric pathway/setback table in the unamended CFC.
Why the confidence is not higher'Roof Plan showing 3' setbacks per California Fire Code' is stated directly on the city's solar handout; the local amendment text at §15.28.430-450 was read in full and modifies only the access/BIPV exception language, not the numeric setback table.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes, rapid shutdown is required, under the 2023 NEC (§690.12) as adopted via the 2025 California Electrical Code.
Why the confidence is not higherFollows directly from the adopted 2023 NEC/2025 CEC (LLMC §15.08.010); no city document independently restates §690.12, but no local amendment removes or modifies it either.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Only the standard CEC/NEC-mandated labels at the service equipment/disconnect; no additional AHJ-specific placard product was found.
Why the confidence is not higherThe city's own handout states only 'Signage locations for permanent plaque per California Electrical Code' — pointing applicants to the CEC's own labeling requirements rather than adding a Loma-Linda-specific placard.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No — the city defers to the CEC's own wording rather than specifying its own.
Why the confidence is not higherSame handout language ('...per California Electrical Code') is the only placard instruction found; no separate wording appears anywhere in Title 15's fire-code or building-code amendments (control-checked, 0 'solar' hits outside the sections already read).
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No city-specific letter-height, colour, or material spec found; the city's document again points only to the CEC's own requirement.
Why the confidence is not higherOnly sourced text is 'per California Electrical Code' on the solar handout; no numeric or material spec (of the Manhattan Beach/Banning kind) appears in Title 15.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe city's solar handout and the local fire-code amendment chapter (LLMC §15.28.430-.460) for a distinct facility-map/site placard requirement beyond the submittal-package plot plan; none found
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSCE's own DG/interconnection pages (known city-wide pattern of soft-404s) for a utility-specific placard requirement beyond the AHJ's; none reachable
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe city's solar handout and Title 15 fire/building amendments for a stated physical placement location for labels; neither specifies one beyond 'at the service equipment' implied by CEC adoption
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe solar handout's submittal checklist and Title 15's amendment chapters for an approved-equipment-list requirement; none found
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
No local amendment addressing residential batteries/ESS was found; conditions default to the unamended 2022 CFC's own energy-storage provisions.
Why the confidence is not higherTitle 15's fire-code amendment sections (§15.28.xxx) were read in full; the only 'battery' hit concerns battery-operated candles at religious ceremonies, unrelated to ESS, and 'energy storage' returns zero hits — a controlled absence (same corpus passed 'fire'=275, 'zzqqx'=0 controls) rather than an unsearched gap.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42458972
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe same fire-code amendment chapter and the fee schedule for a separate ESS permit or inspection line; none found
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes.
Why the confidence is not higherLLMC Title 17's definitions list 'solar collection devices (freestanding)' as an example use under both 'Accessory Nonresidential Structures' and 'Accessory Residential Structures,' meaning a ground-mount array is classified and regulated as an accessory structure.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://ecode360.com/print/LO4960?guid=42460583
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe city's own solar handout (which requires only that a single-line diagram show the A/C disconnect, without a meter-proximity figure) and SCE's own DG pages (unreachable, a known city-wide pattern); no distance-from-meter spec found anywhere
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal. 85% · department handout
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes. 90% · department form
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated — performed in-house by the City of Loma Linda Building Inspector. 85% · department form
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? At minimum, a Fire final inspection is required before the Building final inspection for residential solar. 85% · department handout
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No published inspection checklist found for residential solar. 70% · department page
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
Nothing recorded for City of Loma Linda on this step yet — 4 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
14 questions answered against City of Loma Linda’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Online Permit Portal Instructions document states the OPP lets users 'schedule inspections' alongside applying and paying fees, all online.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety/Online%20Permit%20Portal%20Instructions_GIS%20Parcel%20APN%20Number.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe OPP instructions document and Building & Safety pages for a stated inspection-notice lead time; none given
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame OPP instructions and Building & Safety pages for AM/PM or same-day inspection windows; none stated
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 'Deputy Inspector Registration' form is validated and stamped by 'the City Building Inspector,' confirming in-house field inspection; the solar handout's own sequencing note ('Fire final inspection required prior to Building final') presupposes a Building final performed by the city itself, not a delegate.
department form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/City%20of%20Loma%20Linda%20Deputy%20Inspector%20Registration.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated — performed in-house by the City of Loma Linda Building Inspector.
Why the confidence is not higherSame Deputy Inspector Registration form names 'the City of Loma Linda Building Inspector' as the validating authority; no third-party inspection firm domain or contract found anywhere on the city's Building & Safety pages.
department form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/City%20of%20Loma%20Linda%20Deputy%20Inspector%20Registration.pdf
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
At minimum, a Fire final inspection is required before the Building final inspection for residential solar.
Why the confidence is not higher'Fire final inspection required prior to Building final' is stated verbatim on the city's own Residential Solar Minimum Requirements handout — establishing Fire-then-Building as the required order; no further intermediate stages (e.g., rough-in) are named in any city document found.
department handout checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_7279443/File/Departments/Building/Residential%20Solar%20Minimum%20Requirements.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe solar handout and Building & Safety pages for a distinct rough-in/mid-roof inspection stage; none is named beyond the Fire-final-then-Building-final sequence already sourced
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding & Safety and Fire pages for a stated practice of verifying labels/listings at inspection; no published inspection checklist or department statement was found either way
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No published inspection checklist found for residential solar.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building & Safety 'Permit Applications' page's full document list (submittal checklists, standards handouts, owner-builder packet) contains no inspection checklist, and the Fire Department's only prevention-adjacent page (Community Risk Reduction) is a one-paragraph contact stub with no forms or checklists at all — a searched, sourced absence rather than an unlooked gap.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.lomalinda-ca.gov/our_city/departments/fire/community_risk_reduction
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding & Safety pages and the solar handout for a stated list of documents required on-site at inspection (beyond the general Deputy Inspector Registration form, which is not solar-specific); none found
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFull text of the current 'Planning and Building Fees' schedule (Nov 2025) for a re-inspection fee line; none appears anywhere in the document, though a separate valuation-based Building fee resolution referenced by the schedule's own closing note was not locatable in this run and could contain one
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding & Safety and Community Development pages for a stated corrections/re-inspection process; none found
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding & Safety pages and the solar handout for what document/tag is issued on a passed final (CO, Final, green tag, or letter); none stated
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity documents and SCE's own (unreachable) interconnection pages for who notifies the utility for PTO; neither source states it
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Loma Linda against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Loma Linda is the authority having jurisdiction 95% confidence
- Holds
- Both (building and electrical)
- Why not higher
- City of Loma Linda's Department of Building and Safety (organizationally the Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department) issues both building and electrical permits for residential PV in-house: its own letterhead, its own 'Minimum Requirements for Residential Solar' handout, its own Tyler EnerGov 'Online Permit Portal,' and its own Building Inspector performing and stamping final inspections (Deputy Inspector Registration form). The Loma Linda Fire Department is also a genuine in-house city department (not San Bernardino County Fire — SBCoFD has no role here) and performs its own required final PV inspection before Building's final. CORRECTION TO THE BRIEF: the brief asserts Loma Linda runs a municipal electric utility ('Loma Linda Electric'). No such entity exists in any source found in this run. The city's own adopted General Plan (Public Services & Facilities Element §8.10.1) states outright that 'The Southern California Edison Company (SCE) provides electrical service in the Planning Area,' and the city's own Utility Services page lists the city itself as providing only water, sewer, and refuse/recycling, directing residents to SCE for electric service. Every Loma Linda-specific 'municipal electric utility' checklist item in the brief (gating shape, NEM vs. avoided-cost, sizing cap, PPA policy, utility-specific signage, disconnect-location rule, application fee, interconnection sequence, and territory) is therefore moot: there is no such utility, and interconnection runs through ordinary SCE Rule 21 channels, which this run could not independently document beyond confirming the utility's identity (SCE's own DG/Rule-21 pages are a known city-wide soft-404 pattern).
Check the code edition before you build
This authority's published code edition does not match what the state has adopted. That usually means the authority's ordinance has not been updated for the current cycle — but a local amendment can also be lawful. Confirm with the building department before you submit.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- Residential: $275 flat, plus $15 per kW for each kW above 15 kW AC. (Commercial: $545 for up to 50 kW, plus $3.50/kW from 51-250 kW, plus $2.50/kW above 250 kW.)95%
- Portal
- Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Online Permit Portal' (OPP) — cityoflomalindaca-energovweb.tylerhost.net95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC (via the 2025 California Electrical Code)95%
- Own placard wording
- No — the city defers to the CEC's own wording rather than specifying its own.75%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal.85%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 75%
No — the city defers to the CEC's own wording rather than specifying its own.
Size, colour & material 70%
No city-specific letter-height, colour, or material spec found; the city's document again points only to the CEC's own requirement.
Where they go None%
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.