City of Pinole
Contra Costa County
City of Pinole is a city authority in the State of California, serving 19,022 residents. 1,026 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, the 2022 California Electrical Code code cycle it enforces, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — 3 business days for expedited/complete solar applications (PMC 15.56.060.C); the City's general page separately states 'specialty permits (solar, Q18 Where you file — eTRAKiT (pino-trk.aspgov.com/eTRAKiT) for standard applications, plus Symbium for qualifying instant-permitting projects. Q20
- Permit required
- Yes97% source
- What it costs
- $225 flat for systems <=15kW; $450 base fee plus $15/kW for each kW above 15kW96% source
- Plan review turnaround
- 3 business days for expedited/complete solar applications (PMC 15.56.060.C); the City's general page separately states 'specialty permits (solar,90% source
- Key document
- published checklist cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 96% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both (Building & Electrical) in-house via the Building Division/Community Development Dept.; Fire enforcement is codified to 'the Pinole Fire Department' (PMC 15.20.020) but fire SERVICES are contracted to Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (Con Fire) since 1 Mar 2023. 90% · municipal code
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 97% · municipal code
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 78% · department page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 96% · municipal code
- Is there a historic-district review? No dedicated historic-district review reaches solar 72% · municipal code
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No windstorm-certification requirement found 58% · municipal code
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No 88% · municipal code
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Two uncoordinated figures: codified PMC 15.56.020.G caps 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' eligibility at 10kW AC / 30kW thermal on a single/duplex dwelling (tracking AB 2188/Gov. Code SS65850.5); but the City's LIVE Symbium/SB 379 instant-permitting portal runs a materially larger 38.4kW AC ceiling with battery storage capped at 20kWh per battery. No separate zoning-code numeric cap exists; height is effectively uncapped absent a Building-Official adverse-impact finding (PMC 17.36.040.B). 90% · department page + municipal code
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 88% · department page
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 80% · department page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 88% · department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Plan set (title page with address/contacts/scope/date/reviewer-notes area; existing roof rafter size, spacing and span; roof plan showing fire setbacks); Submittal/Resubmittal Form; Contractor or Owner-Builder Declaration Package; accurate project valuation; a Self-Certification Affidavit for smoke/CO alarms at completion. 88% · published checklist
- How many copies, and in what format? Digital only, via eTRAKiT; PDF preferred, filenames descriptive with street address, pages indexed/bookmarked and landscape-oriented; paper and email applications are no longer accepted. 88% · department page
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes -- a roof plan showing fire setbacks is required for solar specifically; the general city site-plan standard (property lines/dimensions, setbacks, existing structures, north arrow, address/owner, project location, scale, 3in x 3in stamp block) applies as the baseline site plan. 82% · published checklist
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes, by inference 68% · municipal code
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No explicit residential-solar PE stamp threshold found; the checklist requires only prescriptive roof-framing data (existing rafter size, spacing, span), suggesting Building Official review against the CA Solar Permitting Guidebook's standard/prescriptive plan is the default path, with engineering escalation only for systems outside that prescriptive scope. 55% · published checklist
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? eTRAKiT (pino-trk.aspgov.com/eTRAKiT) for standard applications, plus Symbium for qualifying instant-permitting projects. 95% · portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $225 flat for systems <=15kW; $450 base fee plus $15/kW for each kW above 15kW 96% · fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered 94% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No 82% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? 3 business days for expedited/complete solar applications (PMC 15.56.060.C); the City's general page separately states 'specialty permits (solar, windows)' are 'expected approval within 2-3 business days' via standard eTRAKiT, or same-day via the Symbium instant-permitting portal for eligible systems. 90% · municipal code
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 calendar days from issuance if work has not commenced 92% · municipal code
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 92% · department page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit (for Permission to Operate) 85% · utility DG manual
28 questions answered against City of Pinole’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Division administers permits for residential rooftop solar under PMC Ch. 15.56; no other body claims jurisdiction over the building/electrical permit itself.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/departments/building/
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both (Building & Electrical) in-house via the Building Division/Community Development Dept.; Fire enforcement is codified to 'the Pinole Fire Department' (PMC 15.20.020) but fire SERVICES are contracted to Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (Con Fire) since 1 Mar 2023.
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.02.020 places the Building Division under the Community Development Director with authority to enforce Title 15's codes; the City's Fire Dept. page independently confirms the Con Fire service contract; the codified fire-enforcement clause was not updated to name Con Fire.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-27340
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.030 (Applicability): 'This chapter applies to the permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems in the City.'
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28568
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not highereTRAKiT permit subtypes ('Solar Panels Only', 'Solar Panels and Main Panel Upgrade', etc.) and the Master Fee Schedule's single 'Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit' line treat PV + its electrical work as one permit; there is no separate mandatory electrical-permit line layered on top for a standard solar job.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherApplication requires either a Contractor Declaration Package (licensed contractor/agent) or an Owner-Builder Declaration Package (property owner).
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity page: 'All parties who conduct business in the City of Pinole must have a valid City of Pinole Business License' -- verified during plan review rather than a solar-specific pre-registration, so scored short of 90.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-requirements/
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherOwner-Builder Declaration Package is an explicit application option for principal-residence projects (subject to the standard CA owner-builder 2-structures/3-years restriction).
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Plan set (title page with address/contacts/scope/date/reviewer-notes area; existing roof rafter size, spacing and span; roof plan showing fire setbacks); Submittal/Resubmittal Form; Contractor or Owner-Builder Declaration Package; accurate project valuation; a Self-Certification Affidavit for smoke/CO alarms at completion.
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own itemised 'Residential Solar' checklist under Building Permit Project Types.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Digital only, via eTRAKiT; PDF preferred, filenames descriptive with street address, pages indexed/bookmarked and landscape-oriented; paper and email applications are no longer accepted.
Why the confidence is not higherExplicit statement on the Building Permit Requirements page.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-requirements/
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes -- a roof plan showing fire setbacks is required for solar specifically; the general city site-plan standard (property lines/dimensions, setbacks, existing structures, north arrow, address/owner, project location, scale, 3in x 3in stamp block) applies as the baseline site plan.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the solar-specific checklist item with the general Building Permit Requirements site-plan spec; not one single consolidated document.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes, by inference
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.050.C requires the City's standard plan/checklist to 'substantially conform to the checklist and standard plans contained in the most current version of the California Solar Permitting Guidebook,' which itself requires a one-line diagram; the City's own posted 'Residential Solar' checklist page does not separately list one-line diagram as an item, which is why this is not scored higher.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28605
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's 'Residential Solar' checklist on the Building Permit Project Types page, and PMC Ch. 15.56 -- neither states whether string/conductor calculations are required.
https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No explicit residential-solar PE stamp threshold found; the checklist requires only prescriptive roof-framing data (existing rafter size, spacing, span), suggesting Building Official review against the CA Solar Permitting Guidebook's standard/prescriptive plan is the default path, with engineering escalation only for systems outside that prescriptive scope.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the checklist's prescriptive framing-data item plus PMC 15.56.050.C's Guidebook-conformance requirement; no city document states a stamp threshold outright.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame checklist and code chapter as q.13; no electrical PE-stamp threshold stated anywhere found for residential solar.
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$225 flat for systems <=15kW; $450 base fee plus $15/kW for each kW above 15kW
Why the confidence is not higherMaster Fee Schedule, Building Fees Section A, item 8 'Residential Solar Photovoltaic System - Solar Permit'; document ModDate 9 Apr 2026 per pdfinfo, current.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Proposed-Master-Fee-Schedule-FY2025-26-v2.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered
Why the confidence is not higherFlat fee under 15kW, then a base fee plus a per-kW increment above 15kW -- a tiered structure, not a single flat or pure per-kW/per-panel rate.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Proposed-Master-Fee-Schedule-FY2025-26-v2.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No
Why the confidence is not higherMaster Fee Schedule Section A header states fees in that section 'include all applicable inspection, and plan review fees'; the separate Section C 75%-of-permit-fee plan-check line applies to the general (non-listed) building-permit path, not to the flat/tiered Section-A solar line.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Proposed-Master-Fee-Schedule-FY2025-26-v2.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
3 business days for expedited/complete solar applications (PMC 15.56.060.C); the City's general page separately states 'specialty permits (solar, windows)' are 'expected approval within 2-3 business days' via standard eTRAKiT, or same-day via the Symbium instant-permitting portal for eligible systems.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified figure plus a consistent live department statement; both agree closely.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28610
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 calendar days from issuance if work has not commenced
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.02.040 Expiration of Permits, current 2025-cycle codification.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-5963
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
eTRAKiT (pino-trk.aspgov.com/eTRAKiT) for standard applications, plus Symbium for qualifying instant-permitting projects.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth portals are the City's own linked, live systems.
portal landing page checked 2026-08-31 https://pino-trk.aspgov.com/eTRAKiT/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Requirements page: 'You need to apply online. Paper and email applications are no longer accepted'; Symbium issues an instant permit fully online for qualifying systems.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-requirements/
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Utilities page names PG&E for gas & electricity; MCE Clean Energy (see q.jurisdiction notes) is a generation-only CCA layered on top and is not the interconnecting/wires utility.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/city-services/utilities/
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit (for Permission to Operate)
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E Electric Rule 21 SS D.13.b (verified directly in the current, June-2026-dated tariff PDF): PTO for NEM/NBT systems <=1MW is processed after PG&E receives, among other items, 'evidence of Applicant's final electric inspection clearance from the Governmental Authority having jurisdiction.'
utility DG manual checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.060.E: 'Approval of an application shall not be conditioned upon the approval of a homeowner's association.'
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28610
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No dedicated historic-district review reaches solar
Why the confidence is not higherTitle 17's full chapter TOC (Articles I-VI) contains no historic-preservation chapter at all (control-checked by listing every chapter); an 'Old Town' design-guidelines area exists but is invoked only for non-like-for-like reroof material changes, and PMC 17.72.020 makes solar a ministerial building/electrical/plumbing-permit-only process that does not route through Design Review.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-11260
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No windstorm-certification requirement found
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence-based: no wind/windstorm term appears in the Building Code local amendments (control-checked: 'building' 40 hits, 'zzqqx' 0 hits) or on the solar-specific checklist page; Pinole is a Bay Area city outside California's special-wind-region zones, consistent with this being a genuine absence rather than an omission.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-6007
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 17.72.020: solar energy systems 'are permitted by right in all zoning districts subject to approval of a building permit, plumbing permit, and/or electrical permit issued by the Building Official' -- no CUP, no Council action.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-11260
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Two uncoordinated figures: codified PMC 15.56.020.G caps 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' eligibility at 10kW AC / 30kW thermal on a single/duplex dwelling (tracking AB 2188/Gov. Code SS65850.5); but the City's LIVE Symbium/SB 379 instant-permitting portal runs a materially larger 38.4kW AC ceiling with battery storage capped at 20kWh per battery. No separate zoning-code numeric cap exists; height is effectively uncapped absent a Building-Official adverse-impact finding (PMC 17.36.040.B).
Why the confidence is not higherBoth figures are sourced directly from current City documents; reported together rather than resolved, per the codified-vs-live divergence pattern seen elsewhere in California.
department page + municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/instant-permitting-for-residential-energy-projects/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 (as the 2025 California Electrical Code, effective statewide 1 Jan 2026) 94% · adopting ordinance
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2) 94% · adopting ordinance
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code, as codified (PMC 15.20.010); note Con Fire's own Solar Application (PV) plan-review form -- the operative document for PV-specific fire requirements -- still cites the 2022 California Fire Code, a cross-document lag between the City's adoption ordinance and the fire agency's own working paperwork. 88% · adopting ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes generally (local amendments exist to the Building Code, PMC 15.04.030, and the Fire Code, PMC 15.20.030), but NONE are solar/PV/ESS/rapid-shutdown specific -- control-checked: 0 hits for '690', 'rapid shutdown', 'battery' or 'energy storage' across the full Fire Code amendment text (268 'fire' hits, 0 'zzqqx'), and 0 hits for solar/battery in the Building Code amendment text (40 'building' hits, 0 'zzqqx'). The Electrical Code chapter (15.10) has no local-amendment section at all -- adoption by reference only. 90% · municipal code
- What is the installation judged against? The unamended 2025 CEC/CBC/CRC and the 2025 CFC (whose local amendments do not touch solar), plus Con Fire's own CFC Chapter 1205-series pathway, rapid-shutdown-labeling and DC-marking requirements (per Con Fire's Solar Application (PV) form, citing the 2022 CFC text of those sections). 84% · fire agency application form
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Con Fire's own Solar Application (PV) form (citing CFC 1205): for Group R-3, no fewer than two 36-inch-wide pathways on separate roof planes from lowest roof edge to highest ridge, at least one on the street/driveway side (CFC 1205.2.1.1); DC conductors/raceways routed as close as possible to ridge, hip or valley, direct route to an outside wall, DC combiner boxes sited to minimize conduit runs (CFC 1205.2.4/1205.3.4). 80% · fire agency application form
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, required under NEC 690.12 as incorporated into the 2025 CEC statewide. Con Fire's own permanent-label wording spec (citing CFC 1205.5.1, still under the 2022 CFC text) requires: 'SOLAR PV SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN. TURN RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH TO THE OFF POSITION TO SHUTDOWN PV SYSTEM AND REDUCE SHOCK HAZARD IN ARRAY.' 85% · fire agency application form
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? (a) DC-conductor/raceway 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' markings per CEC 690.31(D)(1)/(2); (b) rapid-shutdown permanent label per CFC 1205.5.1; (c) PG&E's own visible-AC-disconnect open/closed markings per Rule 21 SS H.1.d. 84% · fire agency application form + utility DG manual
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes 84% · fire agency application form
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? DC/PV source marking: minimum 3/8-inch letters, white on red, weather-resistant reflective material. Rapid-shutdown label: minimum 3/8-inch uppercase characters, black on yellow. 84% · fire agency application form
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes -- PG&E Rule 21 SS H.1.d requires a visible AC disconnect that (i) clearly indicates open/closed position, (ii) is reachable without obstacles, keys or special/security clearance for operation, maintenance, inspection or testing, (iii) can be locked in the open position, and (iv) if not adjacent to the point of common coupling, requires permanent signage at a PG&E-approved location describing the device's location. 88% · utility DG manual
- Where must the labels be placed? DC/PV markings: exposed raceways/cable trays, covers/enclosures of pull and junction boxes, unused conduit openings, every wiring section separated by enclosures/walls/partitions/ceilings/floors, every 10 feet, and at all DC combiner/junction boxes. Rapid-shutdown label: on or at the service/disconnect equipment per CFC 1205.5.1. PG&E's visible AC disconnect: reachable without obstacles for operation/maintenance/inspection. 82% · fire agency application form
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, by inference 74% · municipal code
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes. Building-side: Master Fee Schedule prices 'Battery Backup Storage - Residential' at a flat $199. Fire-side: the City's own Master Fee Schedule mirrors Con Fire's 'Battery Systems/Energy Storage' plan-review line at $632 minimum (one hour review + one inspection) but explicitly states Con Fire's own current amounts supersede if different; Con Fire's own July-2026 Engineering Fee Schedule in fact shows $944 minimum plus a separate $516 UL9540A review. eTRAKiT permit subtypes distinguish ESS <=20kWh per battery from ESS >20kWh per battery. No CFC local amendment specific to residential battery placement/venting was found (control-checked: 0 'battery'/'energy storage' hits in the Fire Code amendments). 85% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Yes 80% · department page
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, by inference 58% · municipal code
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No 88% · municipal code
20 questions answered against City of Pinole’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 (as the 2025 California Electrical Code, effective statewide 1 Jan 2026)
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.10.010 adopts 'the 2025 California Electrical Code, California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 3' by reference -- the 2025 CEC amendment cycle is based on the 2023 NEC.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-6112
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2)
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.04.010 adoption-by-reference; cross-referenced again in PMC 15.02.020 and 15.02.040.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-6000
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code, as codified (PMC 15.20.010); note Con Fire's own Solar Application (PV) plan-review form -- the operative document for PV-specific fire requirements -- still cites the 2022 California Fire Code, a cross-document lag between the City's adoption ordinance and the fire agency's own working paperwork.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth documents read directly and dated.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-6216
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes generally (local amendments exist to the Building Code, PMC 15.04.030, and the Fire Code, PMC 15.20.030), but NONE are solar/PV/ESS/rapid-shutdown specific -- control-checked: 0 hits for '690', 'rapid shutdown', 'battery' or 'energy storage' across the full Fire Code amendment text (268 'fire' hits, 0 'zzqqx'), and 0 hits for solar/battery in the Building Code amendment text (40 'building' hits, 0 'zzqqx'). The Electrical Code chapter (15.10) has no local-amendment section at all -- adoption by reference only.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth amendment chapters extracted and searched in full with positive and fabricated controls.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-27342
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The unamended 2025 CEC/CBC/CRC and the 2025 CFC (whose local amendments do not touch solar), plus Con Fire's own CFC Chapter 1205-series pathway, rapid-shutdown-labeling and DC-marking requirements (per Con Fire's Solar Application (PV) form, citing the 2022 CFC text of those sections).
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the code adoption chapters plus Con Fire's own operative form.
fire agency application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No
Why the confidence is not higherPMC Chapter 15.10 (California Electrical Code) has only two sections -- 15.10.010 Adoption by Reference and 15.10.020 Copy on File -- confirmed via the code's own TOC-chain API; no local amendment section exists at all, so no local busbar or service-upgrade rule (Palm Springs-shape) exists here.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-6106
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Project Types 'Residential Solar' checklist and PMC Ch. 15.56 -- neither specifies a mounting-system or attachment-spacing standard beyond requesting existing roof-rafter data.
https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Con Fire's own Solar Application (PV) form (citing CFC 1205): for Group R-3, no fewer than two 36-inch-wide pathways on separate roof planes from lowest roof edge to highest ridge, at least one on the street/driveway side (CFC 1205.2.1.1); DC conductors/raceways routed as close as possible to ridge, hip or valley, direct route to an outside wall, DC combiner boxes sited to minimize conduit runs (CFC 1205.2.4/1205.3.4).
Why the confidence is not higherThis is Con Fire's 'Commercial Engineering Applications' form; residential Pinole applicants formally submit only the no-fee Photovoltaic Notification Form, but the substantive CFC 1205 pathway/setback text plainly governs R-3 buildings and is the only PV-specific pathway spec found anywhere in the Pinole/Con Fire document set.
fire agency application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes, required under NEC 690.12 as incorporated into the 2025 CEC statewide. Con Fire's own permanent-label wording spec (citing CFC 1205.5.1, still under the 2022 CFC text) requires: 'SOLAR PV SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN. TURN RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH TO THE OFF POSITION TO SHUTDOWN PV SYSTEM AND REDUCE SHOCK HAZARD IN ARRAY.'
Why the confidence is not higherState-mandated NEC provision plus a directly-read, verbatim local fire-agency label spec.
fire agency application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
(a) DC-conductor/raceway 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' markings per CEC 690.31(D)(1)/(2); (b) rapid-shutdown permanent label per CFC 1205.5.1; (c) PG&E's own visible-AC-disconnect open/closed markings per Rule 21 SS H.1.d.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from Con Fire's Solar Application (PV) form and PG&E's own current Rule 21 tariff.
fire agency application form + utility DG manual checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCon Fire's form gives verbatim wording for both the DC/PV source marking and the rapid-shutdown label.
fire agency application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
DC/PV source marking: minimum 3/8-inch letters, white on red, weather-resistant reflective material. Rapid-shutdown label: minimum 3/8-inch uppercase characters, black on yellow.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim spec from Con Fire's Solar Application (PV) form.
fire agency application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame checklist; only a 'roof plan showing fire setbacks' is required, not a distinct NEC-705.10-style site/facility-map placard.
https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes -- PG&E Rule 21 SS H.1.d requires a visible AC disconnect that (i) clearly indicates open/closed position, (ii) is reachable without obstacles, keys or special/security clearance for operation, maintenance, inspection or testing, (iii) can be locked in the open position, and (iv) if not adjacent to the point of common coupling, requires permanent signage at a PG&E-approved location describing the device's location.
Why the confidence is not higherSelf-verified directly from the current PG&E Electric Rule 21 tariff PDF (pdfinfo dated 25 Jun 2026), not inherited from a prior run.
utility DG manual checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
DC/PV markings: exposed raceways/cable trays, covers/enclosures of pull and junction boxes, unused conduit openings, every wiring section separated by enclosures/walls/partitions/ceilings/floors, every 10 feet, and at all DC combiner/junction boxes. Rapid-shutdown label: on or at the service/disconnect equipment per CFC 1205.5.1. PG&E's visible AC disconnect: reachable without obstacles for operation/maintenance/inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from Con Fire's form and PG&E's Rule 21.
fire agency application form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/209/Solar-Application-PV-PDF
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, by inference
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.040.C requires electricity-producing solar systems to meet CEC, IEEE, and 'accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories' standards and applicable PUC rules -- effectively a listed/certified-equipment requirement, though the City does not maintain a separate published 'approved equipment list.'
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28601
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes. Building-side: Master Fee Schedule prices 'Battery Backup Storage - Residential' at a flat $199. Fire-side: the City's own Master Fee Schedule mirrors Con Fire's 'Battery Systems/Energy Storage' plan-review line at $632 minimum (one hour review + one inspection) but explicitly states Con Fire's own current amounts supersede if different; Con Fire's own July-2026 Engineering Fee Schedule in fact shows $944 minimum plus a separate $516 UL9540A review. eTRAKiT permit subtypes distinguish ESS <=20kWh per battery from ESS >20kWh per battery. No CFC local amendment specific to residential battery placement/venting was found (control-checked: 0 'battery'/'energy storage' hits in the Fire Code amendments).
Why the confidence is not higherMultiple current, first-party fee documents cross-checked against each other; the City's own schedule flags itself as potentially stale relative to Con Fire's.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Proposed-Master-Fee-Schedule-FY2025-26-v2.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Yes
Why the confidence is not highereTRAKiT has distinct ESS-only and PV+ESS permit subtypes, and both the City's Master Fee Schedule and Con Fire's own fee schedule price 'Battery Systems/Energy Storage' plan review/inspection as a line item separate from the PV permit fee.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/building-permit-project-types-and-requirements/
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, by inference
Why the confidence is not higherPMC Chapter 17.72 (Solar Energy Systems) contains only building-mounted guidelines and states no ground-mount-specific rule; PMC Chapter 17.30 (Accessory Structures) regulates any detached accessory structure exceeding 120 sq ft or 8 ft in height, which would capture most ground-mount PV arrays absent an explicit carve-out -- no such carve-out was found (control-checked: Ch. 17.30 makes no mention of solar).
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-9689
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPG&E's public Electric Rule 21 tariff (full text searched, 0 hits for a meter-proximity or disconnect-distance figure) -- consistent with that spec sitting in PG&E's gated Greenbook (TD-2306M/TD-7001M), which requires a PG&E Job Owner login not available here.
https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal (eTRAKiT) or phone 88% · department page
- How much notice is required? 24 hours (business-day) notice for standard building-permit inspections 88% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM (8:00am-12:00pm) and PM (1:00pm-3:30pm) windows offered Monday-Thursday; no Friday construction inspections; requested window is not guaranteed due to volume. 86% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 88% · municipal code
- If delegated, to whom? N/A for the standard residential path -- the City's own Building Division performs the inspection. Con Fire receives only the Photovoltaic Notification Form for dispatch-safety purposes and does not run a documented residential field inspection. 78% · fire agency form
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? A single, consolidated final inspection by the Building Division; no separate rough-in/mid-roof stage is codified for the expedited category. 86% · municipal code
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 80% · municipal code
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- What must be on site at inspection? Approved plans and permits, the inspection card, manufacturer installation instructions, and (for roof access) an OSHA-compliant extension ladder extending at least 3 feet above the roofline, rated for a minimum 250 lbs, and firmly secured. 88% · department page
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A passed 'Final' inspection sign-off on the building permit (no separate 'green tag' or CO terminology found for single-family solar work). 72% · department page
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer/Applicant 74% · utility DG manual
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $99 (2nd re-inspection or more); a separate Missed Inspection Fee of $97 applies for late cancellations. The first re-inspection is included free in the permit fee. 90% · fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? For expedited applications, a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies is sent to the applicant for resubmission (PMC 15.56.060.D). Generally, corrections must be completed before a re-inspection is scheduled, per the City's Re-Inspection Policy FAQ. 76% · department page
14 questions answered against City of Pinole’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal (eTRAKiT) or phone
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Inspections page and Building Division phone number are both live, current department channels.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/inspections/
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
24 hours (business-day) notice for standard building-permit inspections
Why the confidence is not higherExplicit statement on the Inspections page ('You need to schedule inspections at least 24 hours in advance'); a separate 48-hour rule applies only to rental-unit inspections, not solar.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/inspections/
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
AM (8:00am-12:00pm) and PM (1:00pm-3:30pm) windows offered Monday-Thursday; no Friday construction inspections; requested window is not guaranteed due to volume.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/inspections/
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.060.F: 'Only one inspection shall be required and performed by the Building Division for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review.' Con Fire's residential-side process is limited to a no-fee dispatch-notification form with no documented field visit.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28610
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
N/A for the standard residential path -- the City's own Building Division performs the inspection. Con Fire receives only the Photovoltaic Notification Form for dispatch-safety purposes and does not run a documented residential field inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from Con Fire's residential-vs-commercial form split (Photovoltaic Notification Form under 'Residential Engineering Applications' vs. the full Solar Application (PV) with a scheduled fire-district field inspection under 'Commercial Engineering Applications').
fire agency form checked 2026-08-31 https://www.cccfpd.org/DocumentCenter/View/195/Photovoltaic-Notification-Form-PDF
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
A single, consolidated final inspection by the Building Division; no separate rough-in/mid-roof stage is codified for the expedited category.
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.060.F.1: consolidated inspections, scheduled within 2 business days of a request.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28610
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No
Why the confidence is not higherPMC 15.56.060.F specifies only one inspection for expedited-eligible systems; no rough-in/mid-roof requirement is codified.
municipal code checked 2026-08-31 https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/pinole/latest/pinole_ca/0-0-0-28610
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedInspections page and the Building Permit Project Types checklist -- neither states whether the inspector specifically verifies equipment labels/listings as part of the final.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedInspections page and Building Division pages -- only a pre-submittal plan checklist was found; no dedicated published PV inspection checklist document was located.
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Approved plans and permits, the inspection card, manufacturer installation instructions, and (for roof access) an OSHA-compliant extension ladder extending at least 3 feet above the roofline, rated for a minimum 250 lbs, and firmly secured.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/inspections/
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$99 (2nd re-inspection or more); a separate Missed Inspection Fee of $97 applies for late cancellations. The first re-inspection is included free in the permit fee.
Why the confidence is not higherMaster Fee Schedule, Building Fees Section D, items 19-20; corroborated by the Inspections page's plain-language description of the same policy.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Proposed-Master-Fee-Schedule-FY2025-26-v2.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
For expedited applications, a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies is sent to the applicant for resubmission (PMC 15.56.060.D). Generally, corrections must be completed before a re-inspection is scheduled, per the City's Re-Inspection Policy FAQ.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text plus a referenced (not independently opened) FAQ document named on the Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/inspections/
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A passed 'Final' inspection sign-off on the building permit (no separate 'green tag' or CO terminology found for single-family solar work).
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Division materials describe the Final inspection result generically; no PV-specific certificate name found.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pinole.gov/inspections/
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer/Applicant
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E Rule 21 SS D.13.b requires the Applicant to supply PG&E with 'evidence of Applicant's final electric inspection clearance from the Governmental Authority having jurisdiction' to trigger PTO processing -- i.e., the customer/installer, not the City, forwards proof of the City's sign-off to PG&E; no City document states the City itself notifies PG&E.
utility DG manual checked 2026-08-31 https://www.pge.com/tariffs/assets/pdf/tariffbook/ELEC_RULES_21.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Pinole against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Pinole is the authority having jurisdiction 93% confidence
- Holds
- Both Building and Electrical, in-house (Building Division within the Community Development Department, under a named Chief Building Official). Fire is a separate, split arrangement: the City's own Municipal Code (PMC 15.20.010/.020) codifies the 2025 California Fire Code as enforced by 'the bureau of fire prevention of the Pinole Fire Department...under the Chief of the Fire Department' (re-enacted as recently as Ord. 2025-05), but the City's own Fire Department page states plainly that since 1 March 2023 the City contracts fire protection services to the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (CCCFPD, 'Con Fire'), which staffs Stations 73 and 74 in Pinole. So the codified enforcement title is stale relative to the live service arrangement -- a Maywood/Oakdale-shaped split: the City retains code adoption, Con Fire performs the work. For residential PV specifically, Con Fire's role is limited to a no-fee 'Photovoltaic Notification Form' (dispatch notice only); it does not run a residential PV fee line or a documented residential field inspection.
- Delegated to
- Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (Con Fire) -- fire services only, under a City-Con Fire contract effective 1 March 2023; Building and Electrical are not delegated.
- Overridden by
- State law on several axes: Civil Code SS714 (Solar Rights Act) underlies PMC 15.56.060.E's bar on HOA conditioning; Gov. Code SS65850.5/AB2188 underlies the codified 10kW AC/30kW thermal chapter (PMC 15.56); Gov. Code SS65850.55/66015 cap permit fees (cited in PMC 15.56.050.D and the Master Fee Schedule's own footnote); and the City's live Symbium/SB379 instant-permitting portal runs a materially larger 38.4kW AC / 20kWh-per-battery ceiling that is not reconciled with the codified 10kW/30kW figure.
- Why not higher
- City's own Building Division page, staff directory (named Chief Building Official Keith Marks on a pinole.gov email, matching every other Building/Planning staff name), and Municipal Code Ch. 15.02/15.04/15.10/15.56 confirm in-house Building/Electrical. The Fire delegation is stated in the City's own Fire Department page in plain prose, while the codified fire chapter (last touched 2025) still names a 'Pinole Fire Department' -- both read directly, both current, genuinely in tension; reported rather than resolved.
- Permit required
- Yes97%
- Permit cost
- $225 flat for systems <=15kW; $450 base fee plus $15/kW for each kW above 15kW96%
- Plan review
- 3 business days for expedited/complete solar applications (PMC 15.56.060.C); the City's general page separately states 'specialty permits (solar,90%
- Portal
- eTRAKiT (pino-trk.aspgov.com/eTRAKiT) for standard applications, plus Symbium for qualifying instant-permitting projects.95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 (as the 2025 California Electrical Code, effective statewide 1 Jan 2026)94%
- Own placard wording
- Yes84%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal (eTRAKiT) or phone88%
Labels & placards for this authority
City of Pinole writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 84%
Yes
Size, colour & material 84%
DC/PV source marking: minimum 3/8-inch letters, white on red, weather-resistant reflective material. Rapid-shutdown label: minimum 3/8-inch uppercase characters, black on yellow.
Where they go 82%
DC/PV markings: exposed raceways/cable trays, covers/enclosures of pull and junction boxes, unused conduit openings, every wiring section separated by enclosures/walls/partitions/ceilings/floors, every 10 feet, and at all DC combiner/junction boxes. Rapid-shutdown label: on or at the service/disconnect equipment per CFC 1205.5.1. PG&E's visible AC disconnect: reachable without obstacles for operation/maintenance/inspection.
What the utility wants on top 88%
Yes -- PG&E Rule 21 SS H.1.d requires a visible AC disconnect that (i) clearly indicates open/closed position, (ii) is reachable without obstacles, keys or special/security clearance for operation, maintenance, inspection or testing, (iii) can be locked in the open position, and (iv) if not adjacent to the point of common coupling, requires permanent signage at a PG&E-approved location describing the device's location.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.