City of Redwood City
San Mateo County
City of Redwood City is a city authority in the State of California, serving 84,292 residents. 4,034 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — Over-the-counter / same-day for SolarAPP+-eligible systems; general 'Roofing and Subpermits' category is listed as 'Over the Counter' on the current Plan Review… Q18 Where you file — E-TRAKiT (permits.redwoodcity.org/etrakit), accessed through the SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org) automatic-permitting workflow for residential PV Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- Plan review turnaround
- Over-the-counter / same-day for SolarAPP+-eligible systems; general 'Roofing and Subpermits' category is listed as 'Over the Counter' on the current Plan Review Times page (captured 5 Mar 2026)72% source
- Key document
- department FAQ / inference cited by 7 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · department FAQ
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 75% · department page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 50% · department FAQ / inference
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No — Redwood City has a design wind speed (85 mph, 3-second gust) used in structural calculations, but no separate 'windstorm certification' program (that concept is specific to Gulf Coast/TDI states) 60% · department page
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No 65% · state statute
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 55% · state statute
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 60% · state statute
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Site plan showing array location, roof plan, electrical line (one-line) diagram, load calculations, and manufacturer's specification sheets for all proposed equipment (modules, inverter(s), mounting system) 90% · department FAQ
- How many copies, and in what format? Digital submittal only 75% · department page
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — must show location of the solar array on the site plan 90% · department FAQ
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 88% · department FAQ
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 82% · department FAQ
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? E-TRAKiT (permits.redwoodcity.org/etrakit), accessed through the SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org) automatic-permitting workflow for residential PV 95% · department page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · department page
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Over-the-counter / same-day for SolarAPP+-eligible systems; general 'Roofing and Subpermits' category is listed as 'Over the Counter' on the current Plan Review Times page (captured 5 Mar 2026) 72% · department page
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 365 days from issuance; each passed inspection extends validity another 365 days; a one-time 365-day extension is available for a fee if within the current code cycle 88% · department FAQ
- Which utility handles interconnection here? PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) 85% · utility document
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with PTO gated on the AHJ's passed final inspection 60% · utility document
28 questions answered against City of Redwood City’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Division (Community Development and Transportation dept) issues residential PV permits directly through SolarAPP+ automatic permitting and E-TRAKiT; the department page states this plainly.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20250224105553/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/building-inspection-code-enforcement/solarapp-automatic-permitting
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Division issues one 'residential solar permit' covering both building and electrical review via SolarAPP+/E-TRAKiT; no separate delegation of building or electrical review found. Fire Prevention (also a city department, not delegated to any JPA/district) enforces Fire Code items but does not separately permit single-family PV.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20250224105553/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/building-inspection-code-enforcement/solarapp-automatic-permitting
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ page and Building FAQs both describe a required residential solar permit process (submittal items, fastest route via One-Stop).
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ issues a single automatic permit per project through E-TRAKiT rather than separate building/electrical permit numbers for PV; inferred from the one-permit SolarAPP+ workflow, not from an explicit city statement using the word 'combined'.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20250224105553/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/building-inspection-code-enforcement/solarapp-automatic-permitting
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherNo Redwood City page found restricting who may pull a residential PV electrical permit beyond standard CA contractor licensing. Under CA Business & Professions Code §7044, a homeowner may act as owner-builder on their own single-family residence; otherwise a C-10 or C-46 licensed contractor applies. This is a state-law inference, not a city-specific statement, hence moderate confidence.
state statute checked 2026-08-30 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=BPC§ionNum=7044
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs, Permit Checklist, and Permit Submittal pages for a city contractor-registration/business-license-before-applying requirement specific to solar electrical work; none found beyond standard CA CSLB licensing and (for commercial/multifamily) a City of Redwood City business license mention in the FAQ.
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherNo Redwood City-specific bar on homeowner self-permitting was found. CA Business & Professions Code §7044 (owner-builder exemption) allows an owner to perform and permit work on their own principal residence statewide; whether SolarAPP+'s automated track itself excludes owner-installers could not be confirmed (gosolarapp.org FAQ returned 403 to automated fetch).
state statute checked 2026-08-30 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=BPC§ionNum=7044
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Site plan showing array location, roof plan, electrical line (one-line) diagram, load calculations, and manufacturer's specification sheets for all proposed equipment (modules, inverter(s), mounting system)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building FAQs page answers 'What do I need to provide on my plans for a solar permit?' with this exact list.
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Digital submittal only
Why the confidence is not higherGeneral Permit Submittal page states applications and drawings are uploaded to a Box.com link and confirmed by email — 'paperless' digital submittal guidelines are referenced on the general Permit Checklist page. Residential solar specifically goes through the SolarAPP+ online portal/E-TRAKiT rather than the Box upload route; number of file copies for the SolarAPP+ track was not separately stated.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190556/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/building-inspection-code-enforcement/permit-submittal
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes — must show location of the solar array on the site plan
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding FAQs: solar permit plans must include a 'Site plan to show location of the solar array'.
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding FAQs list an 'Electrical line diagram' as a required solar plan item (city's term for the one-line/three-line diagram).
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding FAQs list 'Load calculations' among required solar permit plan contents.
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs, Permit Checklist, and Building Codes & Standards pages for a structural PE-stamp threshold specific to residential rooftop PV; none stated. General residential construction checklist requires structural calculations/soils reports for new buildings but does not tie a PE-stamp threshold to solar retrofits specifically.
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame pages as Q13 checked; no electrical PE-stamp threshold for residential PV stated.
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedLooked for the current Master Fee Schedule: the Finance dept 'Master Fee Schedule' page and its linked FY2021-22 PDF (redwoodcity.org/home/showpublisheddocument/24502/...). The live redwoodcity.org domain returns HTTP 403 to every automated fetch (Akamai bot-management block on the whole site, confirmed on root '/' and on robots.txt too), and the linked PDF itself was never crawled by the Internet Archive (wayback 'available' API returns no snapshot for that document ID), so the fee amount could not be verified from any reachable primary source.
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame fee-schedule access failure as Q15.
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame fee-schedule access failure as Q15.
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Over-the-counter / same-day for SolarAPP+-eligible systems; general 'Roofing and Subpermits' category is listed as 'Over the Counter' on the current Plan Review Times page (captured 5 Mar 2026)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Approximate Plan Review Times page groups Roofing and Subpermits under 'Over the Counter' (as opposed to the 3-8 week ranges for new buildings/additions/TIs), consistent with SolarAPP+ automatic (same-day) issuance for eligible residential PV.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20260305174002/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/plan-review/approximate-plan-review-times
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
365 days from issuance; each passed inspection extends validity another 365 days; a one-time 365-day extension is available for a fee if within the current code cycle
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding FAQs directly answer 'When does my permit expire?' and 'What do I do if my permit expires?' with this policy.
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
E-TRAKiT (permits.redwoodcity.org/etrakit), accessed through the SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org) automatic-permitting workflow for residential PV
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ Automatic Permitting page: 'follow the permitting guide below to pull your residential solar permit through E-TRAKiT... For any questions relating to the SolarAPP+ permitting process, please contact Jonah Glen...'
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20250224105553/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/building-inspection-code-enforcement/solarapp-automatic-permitting
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ is a fully online automated permitting platform; Redwood City's own page directs applicants to gosolarapp.org and E-TRAKiT for the complete residential solar permit process with no in-person step described.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20250224105553/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/building-inspection-code-enforcement/solarapp-automatic-permitting
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric)
Why the confidence is not higherRedwood City is in PG&E's core Bay Area service territory (not one of the handful of CA cities with a municipal electric utility). Corroborated by the city's own site referencing 'PG&E Public Safety Power Shutoff' under its Fire Department pages, and by PG&E's own Electric & Gas Service Requirements ('Greenbook') being the applicable interconnection manual for the area.
utility document checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, with PTO gated on the AHJ's passed final inspection
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's Greenbook (TD-7001M) Section 6, 'Electric Generation Interconnection (EGI) Overview', describes the interconnection application (Rule 21 / EGI program) as a track that runs alongside the applicant's construction process rather than strictly before or after the building permit; standard PG&E/CA practice (not spelled out verbatim in the Greenbook) is that Permission to Operate is only granted once the AHJ's inspection has passed. Moderate confidence because the Greenbook itself does not use the word 'parallel' or explicitly sequence PTO against city inspection.
utility document checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherRedwood City's residential building/solar permit checklist and FAQs do not list HOA or architectural approval as a submittal requirement; under CA Civil Code §714 and §4600 et seq. (Solar Rights Act provisions for HOAs), an HOA cannot be a precondition the City enforces for permit issuance. Moderate confidence — no explicit city statement was found either way.
department FAQ / inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs and the Building Codes & Standards page for a historic-district review trigger on residential permits; Redwood City's historic-preservation content ('Path of History') is a heritage/education program, not clearly tied to a building-permit review step, and no residential solar-specific historic review requirement was stated on any page reached.
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No — Redwood City has a design wind speed (85 mph, 3-second gust) used in structural calculations, but no separate 'windstorm certification' program (that concept is specific to Gulf Coast/TDI states)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Building Codes & Standards page lists 'Basic Wind Speed 85 mph - 3 second gust' as a structural design parameter, not a separate certification/inspection program.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20240116084451/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-codes-standards
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherCA Government Code §65850.5 (Solar Rights Act) restricts local agencies from requiring discretionary review (e.g., conditional use permit, Council approval) for most residential solar energy systems; no Redwood City page describes a Council-approval step for residential PV.
state statute checked 2026-08-30 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV§ionNum=65850.5
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building Codes & Standards, Building FAQs, and the SolarAPP+ page for a stated residential system-size cap; none found. CA Gov. Code §65850.5 constrains a local agency's ability to impose arbitrary size caps below the customer's own load/NEM eligibility, but no Redwood City-specific cap or confirmation of its absence in the local ordinance text was found (Municode's Redwood City code_of_ordinances is a JavaScript application that returns no content to an automated fetch).
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (via the 2025 California Electrical Code, part of the 2025 Title 24 cycle effective 1 Jan 2026) as the statewide default 50% · department page + inference
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (13th/14th edition per cycle, statewide, effective 1 Jan 2026) as the statewide default 50% · department page (stale) + inference
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (statewide default, effective 1 Jan 2026) 45% · department page + inference
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 85% · department page / ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The California Building Code, California Electrical Code (NEC as amended), and California Fire Code as adopted by the City, plus the City's Reach Codes ordinance 55% · inference
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of Redwood City on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, rapid shutdown is required at the array boundary and PV source/output conductors, per NEC 690.12 as incorporated into whichever CEC cycle is currently in force (2023 NEC via the 2025 CEC, statewide default per Q29) 50% · inference from statewide code
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — PG&E requires permanent signage on distributed-generation installations independent of any AHJ requirement 95% · utility manual (Greenbook)
- Where must the labels be placed? At the meter panel (permanent generation-source signage), and — if the AC disconnect is more than 10 feet from or out of line of sight of the meter — an additional sign/map at the meter panel showing the disconnect's location; an engraved placard at the metering equipment is required where a fusible AC disconnect serves a line/supply-side connection 90% · utility manual (Greenbook)
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Behind/after the meter on most self-contained and all transformer-rated panels (AC disconnect required); not required on single-phase, ≤320A self-contained socket-based panels with an inverter-based generator, unless it's a K-base meter panel (always requires one). Where required, PG&E-approved AC disconnect switches are installed after the meter and ahead of the main breaker for line/supply-side connections, or on a dedicated manufactured generation breaker. 92% · utility manual (Greenbook)
20 questions answered against City of Redwood City’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC (via the 2025 California Electrical Code, part of the 2025 Title 24 cycle effective 1 Jan 2026) as the statewide default
Why the confidence is not higherRedwood City's own 'Building Codes & Standards' page is stale — captured Jan 2024 it still headlines the '2019 California Building Standard Code,' which cannot be current given the mandatory 2022 and 2025 Title 24 cycles. The city's Reach Codes page (captured Mar 2026) confirms Council updated Reach Codes on 28 Nov 2022 'for the 2023 Building Code cycle' referencing 'updated 2023 Building and Fire Codes' — i.e. the 2022 cycle — so the city was at minimum current through that cycle. Redwood City's local ordinance text for the current 2025 cycle could not be reached (live site 403s; Municode is JS-only), so this answer defaults to the statewide-mandated edition rather than a confirmed local ordinance citation.
department page + inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20260317064717/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/reach-codes
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code (13th/14th edition per cycle, statewide, effective 1 Jan 2026) as the statewide default
Why the confidence is not higherSame basis and same caveat as Q29 — the city's own 'Building Codes & Standards' page is stale (references 2019 CBC as of a Jan 2024 capture), while the Reach Codes page confirms at least the 2022 CBC cycle was locally in force as of late 2022. Could not confirm the city has formally adopted the 2025 cycle via its own ordinance text due to site/Municode access failures.
department page (stale) + inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20240116084451/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-codes-standards
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code (statewide default, effective 1 Jan 2026)
Why the confidence is not higherSame access limitation as Q29/30. Reach Codes page confirms 'updated 2023 ... Fire Codes' were reviewed by Council in Oct 2022, evidencing the 2022 CFC cycle was adopted; the current 2025 cycle adoption could not be confirmed against the city's own ordinance text.
department page + inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20260317064717/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/reach-codes
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherRedwood City Reach Codes (Ordinance No. 2487, first adopted Sept 2020, renewed by Council 28 Nov 2022 for the 2023 Building Code cycle) mandate all-electric construction and energy efficiency measures for new residential, commercial and multifamily buildings (not additions/alterations). This is a local amendment layered on the base CBC/CEC, though it targets new construction electrification rather than solar retrofits specifically.
department page / ordinance checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20260317064717/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/reach-codes
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The California Building Code, California Electrical Code (NEC as amended), and California Fire Code as adopted by the City, plus the City's Reach Codes ordinance
Why the confidence is not higherComposite of Q29-32 findings; base code editions default to the statewide cycle since local ordinance text could not be directly reached.
inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20260317064717/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/reach-codes
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building Codes & Standards and Building FAQs for a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing (e.g., 120%-rule amendments); none stated. Municode (JS-only app, returns no content to automated fetch) could not be searched for a local electrical-code amendment on this point.
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building Codes & Standards and Building FAQs for a specific mounting-system/attachment-spacing amendment; none found beyond the general structural design parameters (wind speed, soil bearing capacity) listed on the Building Codes & Standards page, which are not solar-specific.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedLooked for a local Fire Code amendment on rooftop PV ridge setbacks/access pathways (the CA Fire Code's statewide PV pathway requirements) in Redwood City's own Fire Prevention pages and in Municode; the Fire Prevention landing page describes only general fire-education/inspection functions, and Municode's Redwood City code_of_ordinances is a JavaScript application returning no content to an automated fetch, so no city-specific setback/pathway text (or confirmation the statewide default applies unamended) could be verified.
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes, rapid shutdown is required at the array boundary and PV source/output conductors, per NEC 690.12 as incorporated into whichever CEC cycle is currently in force (2023 NEC via the 2025 CEC, statewide default per Q29)
Why the confidence is not higherRapid shutdown is a base NEC 690.12 requirement; no Redwood City amendment to it was found, and the current local CEC-cycle adoption itself could not be confirmed against the city's own ordinance text (see Q29 caveat).
inference from statewide code checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20260317064717/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-and-transportation/reach-codes
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs, Building Codes & Standards, and the SolarAPP+ page for an AHJ-specific placard/label list at the service equipment (as distinct from PG&E's own placard requirements, see Q42/Q43/Q48); none found.
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame pages as Q38 checked for city-specified placard wording; none found.
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame pages as Q38 checked for a city-specified letter height, colour, or material spec; none found.
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame pages as Q38 checked for an AHJ-required site plan/facility-map placard (NEC 705.10 marking of multiple sources) beyond the general site-plan submittal requirement in Q10; no distinct facility-map placard spec found.
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — PG&E requires permanent signage on distributed-generation installations independent of any AHJ requirement
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E Electric & Gas Service Requirements ('Greenbook'), TD-7001M, Table 7-7 'Labeling Options and Requirements': 'Customers who install distributed generation (e.g., solar, wind, battery storage) that is connected to the electric meter panel are required to install permanent signage affixed to the panel indicating an alternative source of generation is interconnected... Signage and maps also are required at the meter panel for the ac disconnect switch location when it is more than 10 feet away and out of the line of sight from the meter panel.' Also Section 6.3: a fusible AC disconnect for line/supply-side connections requires 'an engraved placard (signage), indicating there is a line/supply side connection.'
utility manual (Greenbook) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the meter panel (permanent generation-source signage), and — if the AC disconnect is more than 10 feet from or out of line of sight of the meter — an additional sign/map at the meter panel showing the disconnect's location; an engraved placard at the metering equipment is required where a fusible AC disconnect serves a line/supply-side connection
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E Greenbook TD-7001M, Table 7-7 and Section 6.3 (quoted in Q42).
utility manual (Greenbook) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs and Building Codes & Standards for an approved-equipment-list requirement; none found beyond the general expectation (implicit in the FAQ's 'manufacturer's specifications... and listing information' for items like gas fireplaces) that listed equipment is used. No specific 'must be on an approved list' requirement located for PV modules/inverters.
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedLooked for a residential battery/ESS provision in Redwood City's Fire Prevention pages and Building Codes & Standards page; neither addresses batteries/ESS specifically, and Municode (JS-only) could not be searched for a CFC Chapter 12-equivalent local amendment.
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame access limitation as Q45 — no city page found stating whether a separate ESS permit/inspection is required.
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building Codes & Standards and Building FAQs for whether a ground-mount PV array is treated as an accessory structure (e.g., triggering setback/structural permit review as a 'structure'); no statement found.
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Behind/after the meter on most self-contained and all transformer-rated panels (AC disconnect required); not required on single-phase, ≤320A self-contained socket-based panels with an inverter-based generator, unless it's a K-base meter panel (always requires one). Where required, PG&E-approved AC disconnect switches are installed after the meter and ahead of the main breaker for line/supply-side connections, or on a dedicated manufactured generation breaker.
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E Greenbook TD-7001M, Section 6.3, Table 6-3 'Requirements for AC Disconnect Switches' and accompanying notes a-d.
utility manual (Greenbook) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Phone (24-hour recorded line) or walk-in at the Building Counter, City Hall 88% · department page
- How much notice is required? Effectively 1 business day — requests must be received by 2 p.m. to be placed on the following day's inspection schedule 85% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No stated AM/PM window — inspections are available Monday-Friday 9 a.m.-4 p.m. with no time-slot confirmation ('you will not get a call back to confirm your inspection') 75% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 70% · department page / inference
- If delegated, to whom? N/A — not delegated; performed by the City's own Building Division 75% · department page / inference
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
Nothing recorded for City of Redwood City on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- What must be on site at inspection? At minimum, a copy of the permit card, posted on site in a weatherproof sleeve and visible from the street 55% · department FAQ
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer/applicant, following the passed AHJ final inspection 55% · utility manual (Greenbook) / inference
14 questions answered against City of Redwood City’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Phone (24-hour recorded line) or walk-in at the Building Counter, City Hall
Why the confidence is not higher'Schedule a Building Inspection' page: 'Call: (650) 780-7361 (24-hr recording) or Come in person to City Hall: 1017 Middlefield Road, Building Counter.' No online portal-based self-scheduling is described on this page.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20251007210348/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/inspections/schedule-a-building-inspection
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Effectively 1 business day — requests must be received by 2 p.m. to be placed on the following day's inspection schedule
Why the confidence is not higherSame 'Schedule a Building Inspection' page: 'Inspection requests must be received by 2 p.m. (subject to change) to be placed on the following days inspection schedule.'
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20251007210348/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/inspections/schedule-a-building-inspection
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
No stated AM/PM window — inspections are available Monday-Friday 9 a.m.-4 p.m. with no time-slot confirmation ('you will not get a call back to confirm your inspection')
Why the confidence is not higherSame page: 'Available Inspection Dates/Times: Monday to Friday: 9 a.m. - 4 p.m.' and 'Please note that you will not get a call back to confirm your inspection.'
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20251007210348/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/inspections/schedule-a-building-inspection
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherRedwood City's own Building Division schedules and conducts inspections directly (via its Building Counter and 24-hr inspection request line) rather than referring callers to a separate agency; no delegation of final solar inspection to a district or county was found anywhere in the department's pages.
department page / inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20251007210348/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/inspections/schedule-a-building-inspection
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
N/A — not delegated; performed by the City's own Building Division
Why the confidence is not higherSee Q52.
department page / inference checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20251007210348/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/inspections/schedule-a-building-inspection
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs, Permit Checklist, and Schedule-a-Building-Inspection pages for a published solar-specific inspection sequence (e.g., rough electrical, mid-roof, final); none of the reached pages list inspection stages for PV specifically, only the general request/booking mechanics.
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame pages as Q54 checked; no statement on whether a rough-in/mid-roof inspection is required for a rooftop PV retrofit.
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published statement found on whether the inspector specifically verifies labels/listings at inspection (as opposed to it being standard NEC-driven practice everywhere); Redwood City has not published an inspection checklist that would confirm this.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked the Building Applications & Handouts and Permit Checklist pages for a published inspection checklist (as distinct from the pre-permit plan checklist already found for Q8); none found.
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
At minimum, a copy of the permit card, posted on site in a weatherproof sleeve and visible from the street
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding FAQs, 'What do I do with my permit once it's issued?': 'A copy of the front of the permit card shall be posted on the site in a weather proof sleeve. The permit shall be visible from the street in public view.' This answers permit-card posting but the page does not separately confirm whether approved plans must also be on site at time of inspection, so this is likely incomplete.
department FAQ checked 2026-08-30 https://web.archive.org/web/20231109190056/https://www.redwoodcity.org/departments/community-development-department/building-inspection-code-enforcement/building-faqs
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame fee-schedule access failure as Q15 — could not locate or reach a current fee schedule listing a re-inspection fee.
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs and Schedule-a-Building-Inspection pages for how corrections are issued/cleared; not described (only re-inspection booking mechanics were found).
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building FAQs and Schedule-a-Building-Inspection pages for what document/status is issued on a passed final (CO / Final / Green tag / Letter); none of the reached pages state this explicitly for residential PV.
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer/applicant, following the passed AHJ final inspection
Why the confidence is not higherNot explicitly stated by either the City or in the searchable portion of PG&E's Greenbook (TD-7001M), which describes the EGI/Rule 21 interconnection application process but does not use the phrase 'Permission to Operate' in the sections reached. This reflects standard CA IOU practice (installer submits proof of passed inspection to the utility to trigger PTO) rather than a directly quoted source.
utility manual (Greenbook) / inference checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Redwood City against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Redwood City is the authority having jurisdiction 85% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (Building Division, Community Development and Transportation dept); Fire Prevention is also a City of Redwood City department (not delegated to Menlo Park Fire District or any JPA), though it does not separately permit single-family rooftop PV
- Overridden by
- CA Gov. Code §65850.5 (Solar Rights Act, restricts discretionary review/size caps) and §65850.52/SB 379 (automated permitting mandate, implemented here via SolarAPP+); AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22) currently bars the City from adopting any more-restrictive residential amendment (1 Oct 2025-1 Jun 2031). Utility interconnection requirements (AC disconnect placement, DG signage) are set by PG&E's Greenbook/Rule 21, not the City.
- Why not higher
- The lead to verify was whether Redwood City runs its own fire department or shares one regionally (as several San Mateo County cities do via JPAs). Its own site structure (Fire Department > Fire Prevention Bureau, with its own staff directory and no JPA/district language anywhere in the Fire Prevention or Fire Prevention Staff pages) shows Redwood City operates its own Fire Department — it is NOT delegated to Menlo Park Fire Protection District or any joint authority. Building and electrical permitting for residential PV is confirmed self-performed via the City's own SolarAPP+/E-TRAKiT page, contradicting nothing in the brief. Fire's specific role in single-family PV plan review/inspection could not be confirmed (no residential-PV-specific fire page was found), which is reflected in the 'holds' note rather than treated as a jurisdiction split.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Plan review
- Over-the-counter / same-day for SolarAPP+-eligible systems; general 'Roofing and Subpermits' category is listed as 'Over the Counter' on the current Plan Review Times page (captured 5 Mar…72%
- Portal
- E-TRAKiT (permits.redwoodcity.org/etrakit), accessed through the SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org) automatic-permitting workflow for residential PV95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC (via the 2025 California Electrical Code, part of the 2025 Title 24 cycle effective 1 Jan 2026) as the statewide default50%
- Booking an inspection
- Phone (24-hour recorded line) or walk-in at the Building Counter, City Hall88%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording None%
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go 90%
At the meter panel (permanent generation-source signage), and — if the AC disconnect is more than 10 feet from or out of line of sight of the meter — an additional sign/map at the meter panel showing the disconnect's location; an engraved placard at the metering equipment is required where a fusible AC disconnect serves a line/supply-side connection
What the utility wants on top 95%
Yes — PG&E requires permanent signage on distributed-generation installations independent of any AHJ requirement
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.