City of San Ramon
Contra Costa County
City of San Ramon is a city authority in the State of California, serving 84,605 residents. 7,894 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit systems: automated/near-instant code-compliance review. Non-eligible/standard review: up to 15 business days for the first plan-check… Q18 Where you file — Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' (CSS) portal at sanramon.ca.gov/csspermits (backend: tyeplweb.sanramon.ca.gov/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService); Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- $566 flat for residential PV ≤10 kW (+$17 per additional kW above 10 kW); $450 flat for 'SolarAPP+ Permit Designs'. Residential Solar Heating/Cooling is a separate line ($566 base + $19/kWth).90% source
- Plan review turnaround
- SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit systems: automated/near-instant code-compliance review. Non-eligible/standard review: up to 15 business days for the first plan-check round,80% source
- Key document
- checklist cited by 5 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 90% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both (Building and Electrical, combined at the City); fire-code pathway/setback compliance is checked at the City's own final inspection, but SRVFPD separately bills for and reviews Solar PV and ESS as line items on its own fee schedule for at least some residential jobs 75% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · department page
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 75% · department page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — not required by the City as a condition of permit issuance, though the City's own checklist prompts the applicant to note whether they've checked with their HOA 65% · checklist
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No — California's Solar Rights Act (Gov. Code §65850.5) requires cities to administratively/ministerially approve residential solar permit applications and bars aesthetic design review; a use permit may only be imposed on a documented specific-adverse-impact-to-health-and-safety finding, which is not part of San Ramon's ordinary process for typical rooftop PV. 80% · state statute
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either (licensed contractor, typically C-46/C-10, or a qualifying homeowner as owner-builder) 70% · checklist
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 80% · checklist
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 75% · department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? For SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit residential rooftop PV: an active San Ramon business license, contractor added to SolarAPP+ eligibility list, and NREL SolarAPP+ approved plans, submitted through the CSS portal. For non-eligible/standard-review projects: the general Residential Plan Submittal Checklist package — job-site address, owner name, energy calcs/CF1R, electrical, site plan, structural drawings & calcs, stamp and sign, plus CSLB license copy, City business license, workers'-comp certificate, and owner-authorization letter. 80% · department page + checklist
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes, a site plan is required as part of the standard Residential Plan Submittal Checklist (item 8 of 13); the checklist does not itemize what the site plan must show beyond the general submittal list 65% · checklist
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 80% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes for string sizing when 3+ strings are combined 70% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' (CSS) portal at sanramon.ca.gov/csspermits (backend: tyeplweb.sanramon.ca.gov/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService); SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov, NREL) is used as the automated code-compliance review front-end for eligible residential retrofit PV before the City permit is applied for. 90% · department page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $566 flat for residential PV ≤10 kW (+$17 per additional kW above 10 kW); $450 flat for 'SolarAPP+ Permit Designs'. Residential Solar Heating/Cooling is a separate line ($566 base + $19/kWth). Residential battery/ESS: $396 for the first battery, $35 for each additional. 90% · fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered (flat base fee for systems ≤10kW plus a per-kW increment above that threshold); a separate flat fee applies for SolarAPP+ automated permit designs 85% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No — the solar/PV flat fees appear to be all-inclusive line items, not subject to the separate 55%-of-building-permit plan-check add-on that applies to valuation-based permits 55% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit systems: automated/near-instant code-compliance review. Non-eligible/standard review: up to 15 business days for the first plan-check round, 10 business days for each subsequent round (plan-check fee covers up to 3 rounds). 80% · checklist
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 90% · utility manual
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with the final utility sign-off (Permission to Operate) coming after the permit is finalized: the contractor submits PG&E's interconnection application before/alongside applying for the City permit, but PTO is issued only after the City inspection passes and the final building permit is submitted to PG&E along with the interconnection paperwork and system diagram. 85% · utility process page
28 questions answered against City of San Ramon’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building and Safety pages (SolarAPP+, Photovoltaic Plan Submittal, Purpose of Building Codes) describe the City Building Division as the issuing/inspecting authority for residential rooftop PV via its EnerGov CSS portal. See jurisdiction block for the SRVFPD split on fire-code review/ESS.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/photovoltaic_plan_submittal/
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both (Building and Electrical, combined at the City); fire-code pathway/setback compliance is checked at the City's own final inspection, but SRVFPD separately bills for and reviews Solar PV and ESS as line items on its own fee schedule for at least some residential jobs
Why the confidence is not higherCity issues a single 'Electrical Photovoltaic (SolarAPP)' permit per its SolarAPP+ page; SRVFPD's Plan Review Fees page (effective 9/1/2025, archived 4/19/2026) separately lists 'Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems $927' and 'Energy Storage Systems $720' as plan-check-and-construction-permit line items, so the fire district is not purely passive.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/solar_a_p_p_/
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higher2025 California Residential Code section 105.1 requires a permit for electrical system installation (city's own 'Purpose of Building Codes' page quotes this verbatim), and PV is not on the City's own R105.2 permit-exemption list.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/purpose_of_building_codes/
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherCity's SolarAPP+ page instructs applicants to 'Apply for a City of San Ramon Electrical Photovoltaic (SolarAPP) permit' — a single combined electrical/PV permit type in the CSS/EnerGov system, not separate building + electrical permits.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/solar_a_p_p_/
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either (licensed contractor, typically C-46/C-10, or a qualifying homeowner as owner-builder)
Why the confidence is not higherResidential Plan Submittal Checklist requires CSLB pocket-license copy and a City business license for contractors, but also lists an 'Owner-Builder Disclosure' form among standard forms, implying homeowner self-permitting is accepted under CA owner-builder law.
checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Residential%20Plan%20Submittal%20Checklist.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherResidential Plan Submittal Checklist requires, as contractor information: 'City of San Ramon Business License', CSLB pocket-license copy, workers' comp certificate naming the City, and a letter of authorization — all required as part of the submittal.
checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Residential%20Plan%20Submittal%20Checklist.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Forms and Handouts page lists an 'Owner-Builder Disclosure' form among standard applications, consistent with CA owner-builder self-permitting rights; no explicit solar-specific carve-out found either way.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/building_forms_and_handouts/
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
For SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit residential rooftop PV: an active San Ramon business license, contractor added to SolarAPP+ eligibility list, and NREL SolarAPP+ approved plans, submitted through the CSS portal. For non-eligible/standard-review projects: the general Residential Plan Submittal Checklist package — job-site address, owner name, energy calcs/CF1R, electrical, site plan, structural drawings & calcs, stamp and sign, plus CSLB license copy, City business license, workers'-comp certificate, and owner-authorization letter.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the City's own SolarAPP+ page process description with its general Residential Plan Submittal Checklist; the checklist itself is generic (not solar-specific), so solar-only nuances (e.g. one-line diagram) are inferred from the separate Solar-Residential PV inspection handout rather than stated on the checklist itself.
department page + checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/solar_a_p_p_/
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedResidential Plan Submittal Checklist PDF and Building Forms and Handouts page — neither states how many copies or what file format (paper vs. electronic) is required; the CSS portal being fully online implies electronic/PDF submission but this is not stated as a rule
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes, a site plan is required as part of the standard Residential Plan Submittal Checklist (item 8 of 13); the checklist does not itemize what the site plan must show beyond the general submittal list
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own generic Residential Plan Submittal Checklist lists 'Site Plan' as a required submittal component but gives no solar-specific content requirement for it.
checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Residential%20Plan%20Submittal%20Checklist.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Solar-Residential PV inspection handout requires that the 'Electrical Line Diagram matches approved plans' at inspection, which necessarily means a one-line diagram is part of the approved plan set submitted at permit application.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes for string sizing when 3+ strings are combined
Why the confidence is not higherHandout instructs the inspector to 'Verify string overcurrent protection is sized adequately and rated of DC voltage (check calculations if 3 or more strings being combined)', implying string/conductor calcs are part of the reviewed plan set.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedResidential Plan Submittal Checklist (lists 'Stamp and Sign' and 'Structural Drawings & Calcs' as generic items with no threshold) and the Solar-Residential PV inspection handout (no PE-stamp threshold mentioned at all)
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame two documents as Q13 — no electrical PE-stamp threshold stated for residential PV anywhere on the City's Building and Safety pages found
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$566 flat for residential PV ≤10 kW (+$17 per additional kW above 10 kW); $450 flat for 'SolarAPP+ Permit Designs'. Residential Solar Heating/Cooling is a separate line ($566 base + $19/kWth). Residential battery/ESS: $396 for the first battery, $35 for each additional.
Why the confidence is not higherCity of San Ramon Master Fee Schedule FY2026-27 (Exhibit 1 to the Fee Resolution), page 6-7 of the PDF, lists these as distinct flat-fee line items under 'Photovoltaic (PV) Installation – Residential' and 'Residential Solar Energy Storage (Battery)'. This is the current fiscal-year schedule (FY26-27), extracted directly with pdftotext, not summarized.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Fee%20Resolution/feeresolution.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered (flat base fee for systems ≤10kW plus a per-kW increment above that threshold); a separate flat fee applies for SolarAPP+ automated permit designs
Why the confidence is not higherSame FY2026-27 Master Fee Schedule table structure: '10kWth or less — Each — $566' then 'Per Addl kWth — Per kWth — $17'.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Fee%20Resolution/feeresolution.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No — the solar/PV flat fees appear to be all-inclusive line items, not subject to the separate 55%-of-building-permit plan-check add-on that applies to valuation-based permits
Why the confidence is not higherFee schedule's 'Building Plan Check Fees' section (Plan Check Fee = 55% of Building Permit) sits in a section preceding the solar 'Flat Fees' table; because the solar fees have no underlying valuation-based 'Building Permit' fee to apply 55% against, I infer no separate plan-check line applies to solar, but the document does not say this explicitly either way.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Fee%20Resolution/feeresolution.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit systems: automated/near-instant code-compliance review. Non-eligible/standard review: up to 15 business days for the first plan-check round, 10 business days for each subsequent round (plan-check fee covers up to 3 rounds).
Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ page describes automated review for eligible systems; the general Residential Plan Submittal Checklist states the 15/10-business-day turnaround, which is not solar-specific but is the City's own stated default for residential plan review.
checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Residential%20Plan%20Submittal%20Checklist.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Forms and Handouts page and Purpose of Building Codes page — neither states a permit-validity/expiration period; the Fee Resolution has a 'Permit Extension Fee (before permit expiration) $207' line proving an expiration policy exists, but not stating the duration, and I could not reach San Ramon's Municode-hosted ordinance (library.municode.com/ca/san_ramon renders only an Angular shell to a plain fetch and the api.municode.com endpoints returned nothing) to check for a local amendment to CBC/CRC §105.5
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' (CSS) portal at sanramon.ca.gov/csspermits (backend: tyeplweb.sanramon.ca.gov/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService); SolarAPP+ (solarapp.nrel.gov, NREL) is used as the automated code-compliance review front-end for eligible residential retrofit PV before the City permit is applied for.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly named on the City's own SolarAPP+ and Building Inspection pages; verified the CSS URL resolves to a Tyler 'talking-t' EnerGov Self Service app.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/solar_a_p_p_/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Inspection page states 'Permitting is Completely On-line at: https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/csspermits' and describes applying, paying, and requesting inspections all within the CSS account.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/permit_center/building_inspection
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Why the confidence is not higherSan Ramon (Contra Costa County) has no municipal electric utility; confirmed against PG&E's own Greenbook (TD-7001M), whose Chapter 6 'Electric Generation Interconnection' explicitly lists solar as an example DG resource type covered by PG&E's EGI/NEM program, and against the brief's stated utility.
utility manual checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, with the final utility sign-off (Permission to Operate) coming after the permit is finalized: the contractor submits PG&E's interconnection application before/alongside applying for the City permit, but PTO is issued only after the City inspection passes and the final building permit is submitted to PG&E along with the interconnection paperwork and system diagram.
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's own consumer-facing 'Getting Started with Solar' page lays out the 5-step sequence: application → installation → city/county inspection → submit interconnection application + diagram + final building permit to PG&E → PTO issued 5-30 business days later.
utility process page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — not required by the City as a condition of permit issuance, though the City's own checklist prompts the applicant to note whether they've checked with their HOA
Why the confidence is not higherResidential Plan Submittal Checklist includes a 'Have you checked with your Homeowner's Association? Yes/No' line, but this is a self-certification checkbox, not a required HOA-approval document to be submitted to or verified by the City.
checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Residential%20Plan%20Submittal%20Checklist.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPurpose of Building Codes page and the zoning-ordinance link on the Business > Building Permits page — no historic-district overlay was mentioned on either; I did not do a full block-walk of the zoning code itself (San Ramon's municipal code is only reachable through a JS-only Municode shell I could not render) so I cannot rule out a historic-preservation chapter I simply didn't reach
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCity's Building and Safety pages and the Solar-Residential PV handout — no wind/windstorm certification program is mentioned anywhere on the City's site (California has no TDI-style windstorm-certification body comparable to Texas), but I did not find a City or CBSC page that affirmatively states this absence, so I'm not recording a confident No
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No — California's Solar Rights Act (Gov. Code §65850.5) requires cities to administratively/ministerially approve residential solar permit applications and bars aesthetic design review; a use permit may only be imposed on a documented specific-adverse-impact-to-health-and-safety finding, which is not part of San Ramon's ordinary process for typical rooftop PV.
Why the confidence is not higherState statute directly controls and overrides any local discretionary-approval practice; no San Ramon page describes an SUP/Council-approval step for ordinary residential rooftop PV.
state statute checked 2026-08-30 https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=65850.5&lawCode=GOV
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFY2026-27 Fee Resolution (tiered by kW with no stated cap) and the SolarAPP+/Photovoltaic Plan Submittal pages — no City-specific system-size cap was found; any cap for NEM eligibility would sit at the CPUC/PG&E tariff level rather than in a San Ramon ordinance
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (adopted via the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions within the 2025 California Electrical Code) 95% · department page
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code and 2025 California Residential Code, effective January 1, 2026 95% · department page
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code 90% · department page
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? No local amendments identified for residential PV; the City's own code-adoption page lists the state codes straight, with no San Ramon-specific amendment ordinance referenced for the 2025 cycle. This is also consistent with AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22), which bars any city/county from adopting a new more-restrictive residential building-standard amendment from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031. 60% · department page
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 California Electrical Code (with 2023 NEC via UACP) and 2025 California Residential/Building Code, plus the City's own Solar-Residential PV inspection handout which itemizes CEC-specific verification points (bonding, grounding electrode conductor sizing, arc-fault protection, rapid shutdown, etc.). 90% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Panels/modules no higher than 3 ft below the ridge; 3-ft-wide clear access pathway from eave to ridge on each slope where panels are located (no conduit/obstructions in the pathway); panels no closer than 18 in. to a hip or valley when panels are placed on both sides of it. None of these apply to roof slopes of 2:12 or less. 95% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown is required, to the 2023 NEC (690.12) as adopted within the 2025 CEC 90% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Main service disconnect marking; a permanent directory/plaque at the main service disconnect showing all power sources (utility + PV) per CEC 705.10; DC conduit/raceway/enclosure/junction-box/disconnect marking; module and AC-module nameplate marking; DC PV power source label at the disconnect; ground-fault detection warning label on/near the inverter; disconnection warning sign where terminals may be energized when open; inverter-output panelboard connection marking. 90% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes, for several of the mandatory labels (ground-fault detection warning, disconnection warning, inverter-output panelboard marking) the handout gives the exact wording to use, though it renders as blank boxes in the extracted text where the PDF used embedded graphics/boxes for the required sentence — the wording itself did not extract as text. 70% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Marking materials must be reflective, weather-resistant, suitable for the environment; unless otherwise noted, all letters capitalized with a minimum height of 3/8 inch, white lettering on a red background (CEC 690.31(4)) 90% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes — a permanent plaque or directory must be installed at the main service disconnect (and at each additional service equipment/power-source location) identifying the location of all power sources on the property (utility and PV), per CEC 705.10 90% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — PG&E requires permanent signage affixed to the meter panel indicating an alternative source of generation (solar/wind/battery) is interconnected, separate from and in addition to any AHJ-required NEC labeling. PG&E also requires signage/maps at the meter panel identifying the AC disconnect location whenever that disconnect is more than 10 ft away or out of line of sight from the meter panel. 90% · utility manual
- Where must the labels be placed? AHJ labels: at the main service disconnect, on DC conduits/raceways/enclosures/junction boxes (every 10 ft, within 1 ft of bends and roof/wall penetrations), at modules, and at the PV disconnect. Utility (PG&E) labels: permanent signage affixed to the meter panel itself, plus signage/maps at the meter panel pointing to the AC disconnect if that disconnect is more than 10 ft away or out of sight of the meter. 90% · utility manual + department handout
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? The AC disconnect must be adjacent to the meter, within line of sight and not more than 10 ft away (PG&E's general main-service-disconnect rule); San Ramon's own handout separately confirms the AC point-of-connection is an acceptable disconnecting means location 'if within sight and 10 ft of inverter.' 90% · utility manual
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, implicitly — equipment must be listed/labeled per its markings (module nameplate ratings, AC-module ratings, DC power-source label) and installed per its own listing, per CEC 690.4(B), 690.51, 690.52, 690.53 70% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, batteries/ESS are permitted; the City's own FY2026-27 fee schedule prices 'Residential Solar Energy Storage (Battery)' at $396 for the first battery and $35 for each additional battery. 85% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Ambiguous / likely partially yes: the City's fee schedule prices the battery as a distinct line item under the same PV/solar permit category (not obviously a wholly separate permit type), but SRVFPD separately lists 'Energy Storage Systems – per system... $720' as its own plan-review-and-inspection fee, suggesting the fire district treats ESS as its own reviewable scope even where the City's building permit covers the PV+battery installation together. 55% · fee schedule
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local rule found beyond the standard NEC 705.12 busbar/backfed-breaker sizing carried by the adopted 2023 NEC; the handout tells inspectors to verify the existing panel is safe and requires a separate electrical permit if the panel must be replaced, but states no local numeric busbar rule of its own. 60% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Mounting system must be installed per the approved plan and per the module/rack manufacturer's listing (bolt/lag packaging kept on site for inspection; flashing/counter-flashing verified); no separate numeric attachment-spacing table of San Ramon's own was found. 65% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
20 questions answered against City of San Ramon’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC (adopted via the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions within the 2025 California Electrical Code)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own 'Purpose of Building Codes' page lists '2025 California Electrical Code *Includes the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 National Electrical Code' among the current applicable codes, and the Solar-Residential PV handout's header independently states 'Based on the 2025 California Electrical Code, Effective January 1, 2026'.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/purpose_of_building_codes/
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code and 2025 California Residential Code, effective January 1, 2026
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own 'Purpose of Building Codes' page lists the 2025 CBC and 2025 CRC among 'the current applicable codes' in accordance with State of California law; corroborated by the Solar handout's own effective-date header.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/purpose_of_building_codes/
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code
Why the confidence is not higherListed among 'the current applicable codes' on the City's own 'Purpose of Building Codes' page; the Solar-Residential PV handout separately invokes 'CFC requirements' for roof pathway/setback enforcement, consistent with the 2025 cycle.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/purpose_of_building_codes/
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
No local amendments identified for residential PV; the City's own code-adoption page lists the state codes straight, with no San Ramon-specific amendment ordinance referenced for the 2025 cycle. This is also consistent with AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22), which bars any city/county from adopting a new more-restrictive residential building-standard amendment from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 'Purpose of Building Codes' page names only the straight state code editions with no amendment ordinance cited; I did not separately pull San Ramon's adopting ordinance/municipal code chapter (Municode link for San Ramon returned an Angular shell that a plain fetch/curl could not render, and the API route returned nothing), so I cannot rule out a pre-AB130 amendment still on the books that AB130 merely freezes rather than repeals.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/purpose_of_building_codes/
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 California Electrical Code (with 2023 NEC via UACP) and 2025 California Residential/Building Code, plus the City's own Solar-Residential PV inspection handout which itemizes CEC-specific verification points (bonding, grounding electrode conductor sizing, arc-fault protection, rapid shutdown, etc.).
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly stated across the City's Purpose of Building Codes page and the Solar-Residential PV handout, which cites specific CEC sections (690.4(B), 690.31, 690.43, 690.45, 690.47, 690.51-53, 110.21) as the installation's standard of judgment.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local rule found beyond the standard NEC 705.12 busbar/backfed-breaker sizing carried by the adopted 2023 NEC; the handout tells inspectors to verify the existing panel is safe and requires a separate electrical permit if the panel must be replaced, but states no local numeric busbar rule of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the absence of any San Ramon-specific busbar/service-upgrade rule in the Solar-Residential PV handout, which otherwise cites specific code sections whenever a local or code-specific requirement applies.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Mounting system must be installed per the approved plan and per the module/rack manufacturer's listing (bolt/lag packaging kept on site for inspection; flashing/counter-flashing verified); no separate numeric attachment-spacing table of San Ramon's own was found.
Why the confidence is not higherHandout states 'Mounting System – Installed per plan... Bonding of rack mounting system installed per listing of modules' with no additional prescriptive spacing table beyond manufacturer instructions.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Panels/modules no higher than 3 ft below the ridge; 3-ft-wide clear access pathway from eave to ridge on each slope where panels are located (no conduit/obstructions in the pathway); panels no closer than 18 in. to a hip or valley when panels are placed on both sides of it. None of these apply to roof slopes of 2:12 or less.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the City's own 'Solar - Residential PV' inspection handout, which explicitly attributes these to CFC fire-safety enforcement even though 'the CRC does not specify these pathways.' Updated June 2026 per the document's own footer.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — rapid shutdown is required, to the 2023 NEC (690.12) as adopted within the 2025 CEC
Why the confidence is not higherHandout requires the contractor to have 'an electrical testing meter onsite to test the rapid shutdown and other disconnecting means' and to 'demonstrate the full and correct operation of the system for the inspector, including the rapid shutdown function' at final inspection.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Main service disconnect marking; a permanent directory/plaque at the main service disconnect showing all power sources (utility + PV) per CEC 705.10; DC conduit/raceway/enclosure/junction-box/disconnect marking; module and AC-module nameplate marking; DC PV power source label at the disconnect; ground-fault detection warning label on/near the inverter; disconnection warning sign where terminals may be energized when open; inverter-output panelboard connection marking.
Why the confidence is not higherFull 'MARKINGS, SIGNS AND LABELS' section of the City's own Solar-Residential PV handout, citing CEC 690.31, 690.43/45/47/51/52/53, 705.10, 609.5, and 110.21.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, for several of the mandatory labels (ground-fault detection warning, disconnection warning, inverter-output panelboard marking) the handout gives the exact wording to use, though it renders as blank boxes in the extracted text where the PDF used embedded graphics/boxes for the required sentence — the wording itself did not extract as text.
Why the confidence is not higherThe handout's 'Marking unless otherwise noted... the marking shall contain the words:' and similar prompts are followed by blank space in the pdftotext extraction, indicating the required wording was set as an image/graphic in the PDF rather than as text; I could not recover the literal wording without OCR, so I can only confirm that specified wording exists, not quote it verbatim.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Marking materials must be reflective, weather-resistant, suitable for the environment; unless otherwise noted, all letters capitalized with a minimum height of 3/8 inch, white lettering on a red background (CEC 690.31(4))
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly quoted from the City's own Solar-Residential PV handout's markings section.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — a permanent plaque or directory must be installed at the main service disconnect (and at each additional service equipment/power-source location) identifying the location of all power sources on the property (utility and PV), per CEC 705.10
Why the confidence is not higherHandout states: 'There shall be a permanent site plaque or directory providing the location of the service disconnecting means and the PV system disconnecting means if not located at the same location... (CEC 690.56(B))' and separately, under markings, 'Directory Placard... (CEC 705.10)'.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — PG&E requires permanent signage affixed to the meter panel indicating an alternative source of generation (solar/wind/battery) is interconnected, separate from and in addition to any AHJ-required NEC labeling. PG&E also requires signage/maps at the meter panel identifying the AC disconnect location whenever that disconnect is more than 10 ft away or out of line of sight from the meter panel.
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's own Greenbook (Utility Manual TD-7001M, Electric & Gas Service Requirements), Section 7.7 'Labeling Requirements', Page 7-27. This is the current edition: Publication Date 04/22/2026, Effective Date 06/22/2026, Rev. 2026-04 — read exactly off the document itself, not carried over from another authority's file.
utility manual checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
AHJ labels: at the main service disconnect, on DC conduits/raceways/enclosures/junction boxes (every 10 ft, within 1 ft of bends and roof/wall penetrations), at modules, and at the PV disconnect. Utility (PG&E) labels: permanent signage affixed to the meter panel itself, plus signage/maps at the meter panel pointing to the AC disconnect if that disconnect is more than 10 ft away or out of sight of the meter.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the City's Solar-Residential PV handout (AHJ labels) with PG&E's Greenbook Section 7.7 (utility labels) — attributed separately per the AHJ vs. utility distinction required by this survey.
utility manual + department handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, implicitly — equipment must be listed/labeled per its markings (module nameplate ratings, AC-module ratings, DC power-source label) and installed per its own listing, per CEC 690.4(B), 690.51, 690.52, 690.53
Why the confidence is not higherThe handout's inspection points repeatedly require verifying nameplate/listing information rather than stating a separate City-maintained 'approved equipment list'; this reads as a listing (UL/CEC) requirement rather than a City-specific approved-products list.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, batteries/ESS are permitted; the City's own FY2026-27 fee schedule prices 'Residential Solar Energy Storage (Battery)' at $396 for the first battery and $35 for each additional battery.
Why the confidence is not higherCity of San Ramon Master Fee Schedule FY2026-27, page 7 of the PDF.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Fee%20Resolution/feeresolution.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Ambiguous / likely partially yes: the City's fee schedule prices the battery as a distinct line item under the same PV/solar permit category (not obviously a wholly separate permit type), but SRVFPD separately lists 'Energy Storage Systems – per system... $720' as its own plan-review-and-inspection fee, suggesting the fire district treats ESS as its own reviewable scope even where the City's building permit covers the PV+battery installation together.
Why the confidence is not higherNeither document states outright whether the City issues one permit covering both PV and battery or two; inference drawn from how each fee schedule structures its line items.
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Fee%20Resolution/feeresolution.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBusiness > Building Permits page's CRC/CBC §105.2 exemption list (accessory structures under 120 sq ft are exempt; ground-mount PV racking is not named either way) and the Solar-Residential PV handout (addresses only roof-mounted systems, no ground-mount section)
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
The AC disconnect must be adjacent to the meter, within line of sight and not more than 10 ft away (PG&E's general main-service-disconnect rule); San Ramon's own handout separately confirms the AC point-of-connection is an acceptable disconnecting means location 'if within sight and 10 ft of inverter.'
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E Greenbook (TD-7001M) Section 7.8 'Main Service Disconnects and Switching Sequences', Page 7-28: 'Applicants must place the main service disconnect switch adjacent to the meter(s), not more than 10 feet away and within line of sight.' Corroborated independently by the City's own Solar-Residential PV handout. Publication Date 04/22/2026, Effective Date 06/22/2026, Rev. 2026-04, read directly off this document (not carried over from another authority's Greenbook citation).
utility manual checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/assets/pge/docs/account/service-requests/greenbook-manual-full.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal (request inspections through the CSS/EnerGov account); phone lines are also staffed for inspector questions during limited morning hours 80% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes for the building/electrical final; Delegated in part to SRVFPD for the circumstances described in the jurisdiction block (sprinklered-home modifications, ESS, and PV systems that trigger the District's own plan-review fee) 80% · department page
- If delegated, to whom? San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD), for the residential PV/ESS scenarios described in the jurisdiction block 70% · utility/district fee schedule (Wayback Machine capture — live site 403s automated fetches)
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a typical residential rooftop retrofit PV system, only a single 'Final Inspection' is required by the City — the handout's own section heading is 'REQUIRED INSPECTIONS – Final Inspection', covering mounting, wiring, grounding, labeling, rapid shutdown demonstration, and fire-pathway compliance all at that one visit. 80% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No separate rough-in/mid-roof inspection is called out for typical retrofit PV — attic access to verify roof framing and conduit routing is checked as part of the single final inspection 70% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes — the 'Solar - Residential PV' document itself is the City's published inspection checklist 100% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- What must be on site at inspection? Approved plans, permits, and manufacturer installation instructions for ALL components; a ladder extending 18 in. above the roof edge and secured at the top; a calibrated torque wrench/screwdriver for torque testing; an electrical testing meter to test rapid shutdown and other disconnects 90% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes 95% · department handout (Building and Safety Services)
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final (a passed final inspection recorded in the CSS/EnerGov system); no separate Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a retrofit PV addition to an existing dwelling 60% · department page
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer (the contractor submits the interconnection application, system diagram, and final building permit to PG&E; PG&E then issues Permission to Operate) 90% · utility process page
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $151 90% · fee schedule
14 questions answered against City of San Ramon’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal (request inspections through the CSS/EnerGov account); phone lines are also staffed for inspector questions during limited morning hours
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Inspection page: 'Request inspections' is listed as a CSS-account action, and 'Building Inspector's Office Hours (by telephone): Monday to Friday – 7:30 am to 8:00 am' is given as a separate phone contact channel.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/permit_center/building_inspection
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Inspection department page — gives inspector phone hours and portal access but does not state a minimum advance-notice period for booking an inspection
https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/permit_center/building_inspection
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Inspection department page — mentions 'Check today's inspections for times and inspector assignments' as a CSS feature but does not describe AM/PM window options
https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/permit_center/building_inspection
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes for the building/electrical final; Delegated in part to SRVFPD for the circumstances described in the jurisdiction block (sprinklered-home modifications, ESS, and PV systems that trigger the District's own plan-review fee)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's Building Inspection page states the Division is responsible for 'Monitoring and inspection of projects in all phases of construction performed by residents and contractors,' and its Solar-Residential PV handout is itself an inspection checklist used by City inspectors at final. SRVFPD's own fee schedule shows it separately performs plan review + field inspection + re-inspection for 'Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems' and 'Energy Storage Systems.'
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/permit_center/building_inspection
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD), for the residential PV/ESS scenarios described in the jurisdiction block
Why the confidence is not higherSRVFPD's own Plan Review Fees schedule (effective 9/1/2025) lists 'Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems' ($927, includes plan review, re-submittal, field inspection and re-inspection) and 'Energy Storage Systems' ($720, same inclusions) as its own billable scope, distinct from the City's building permit.
utility/district fee schedule (Wayback Machine capture — live site 403s automated fetches) checked 2026-08-30 http://web.archive.org/web/20260419092211/https://www.firedepartment.org/business/submit-plans/plan-review-fees
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For a typical residential rooftop retrofit PV system, only a single 'Final Inspection' is required by the City — the handout's own section heading is 'REQUIRED INSPECTIONS – Final Inspection', covering mounting, wiring, grounding, labeling, rapid shutdown demonstration, and fire-pathway compliance all at that one visit.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Solar-Residential PV handout is structured as a single checklist under the heading 'REQUIRED INSPECTIONS – Final Inspection', with no separate rough-in section named.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No separate rough-in/mid-roof inspection is called out for typical retrofit PV — attic access to verify roof framing and conduit routing is checked as part of the single final inspection
Why the confidence is not higherHandout says 'Access to attic area required to verify roof framing matches plan' and 'If any part of the system has been run through the attic, provide access to attic area required to verify conduit installation' under the same 'Final Inspection' heading, with no separate rough-in stage named.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherHandout requires inspectors to 'verify the information located on the modules and equipment on rooftops', match 'number and type of modules... against plan' via nameplate tags, and separately lists 'Verification of all markings, signs and labels' as a required check.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Yes — the 'Solar - Residential PV' document itself is the City's published inspection checklist
Why the confidence is not higherThis is the document being cited throughout this survey; it is titled/functions explicitly as a residential PV inspection checklist, hosted on the City's own Building Forms and Handouts page, updated June 2026 per its own footer.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Approved plans, permits, and manufacturer installation instructions for ALL components; a ladder extending 18 in. above the roof edge and secured at the top; a calibrated torque wrench/screwdriver for torque testing; an electrical testing meter to test rapid shutdown and other disconnects
Why the confidence is not higherAll directly listed in the City's Solar-Residential PV handout as items the contractor must have on site / be prepared to demonstrate.
department handout (Building and Safety Services) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Departments/Community%20Development/Building%20and%20Safety%20Services/Forms%20and%20Handouts/Plan%20Submittals/Residential/Solar%20-%20Residential%20PV.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$151
Why the confidence is not higherCity of San Ramon Master Fee Schedule FY2026-27: 'Re-Inspection Fee Assessed When the Work for a Scheduled Inspection is Not Ready to be Inspected — Each — $151'. Not solar-specific but is the City's general re-inspection fee, and the handout itself warns 'Failure to comply with the inspection requirements will result in re-inspection fees.'
fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/UserFiles/Servers/Server_10826046/File/Our%20City/Fee%20Resolution/feeresolution.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Inspection department page and Solar-Residential PV handout — the handout repeatedly says a failed item 'will not be passed' and requires re-inspection, and the Purpose of Building Codes page mentions a general 'Correction Notice' for code violations, but neither describes the actual mechanics of how a correction is issued/documented and then cleared
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final (a passed final inspection recorded in the CSS/EnerGov system); no separate Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a retrofit PV addition to an existing dwelling
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the process description on the SolarAPP+ page (apply, pay, 'Return the Signed permit card to the City', then 'Schedule Inspection') and the handout's single 'Final Inspection' framing; no document explicitly names the document/tag issued on pass.
department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/community_development/building_and_safety_services/solar_a_p_p_/
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer (the contractor submits the interconnection application, system diagram, and final building permit to PG&E; PG&E then issues Permission to Operate)
Why the confidence is not higherPG&E's own 'Getting Started with Solar' page: 'Your contractor submits required paperwork to PG&E, including the interconnection application, system diagram, and final building permit... After PG&E approves the documents, we'll upgrade your meter and send you official written permission to operate.'
utility process page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.pge.com/en/clean-energy/solar/getting-started-with-solar.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of San Ramon against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of San Ramon is the authority having jurisdiction 80% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (City of San Ramon Building and Safety Services, part of Community Development); Fire Code compliance for rooftop pathway/setback and PV/ESS plan review is split with the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD), a separate special fire district
- Delegated to
- San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District for: (a) any home with existing residential fire sprinklers where a 'modification' submittal is triggered, per the District's own FAQ, and (b) Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems and Energy Storage Systems plan review/inspection, which appear as their own line items on the District's Plan Review Fee schedule ($927 and $720 respectively, effective 9/1/2025)
- Overridden by
- CA Gov. Code section 65850.5 (Solar Rights Act) requires ministerial, non-discretionary approval and bars use-permit/design review for aesthetics; AB 130 (Stats. 2025 Ch. 22) bars San Ramon from adopting any new more-restrictive residential building-standard amendment 10/1/2025-6/1/2031
- Why not higher
- City's own Building and Safety pages (Solar APP+, Photovoltaic Plan Submittal, Building Codes and Enforcement) describe the City as the permit-issuing and inspecting authority for residential rooftop PV, and the City's 'Solar - Residential PV' inspection handout cites CFC pathway rules as being 'enforced' at the City's own final inspection. Separately, SRVFPD (confirmed as the AHJ's name via its own site firedepartment.org, archived 6/7/2026) is a distinct special district with its own fee schedule listing 'Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems' ($927) and 'Energy Storage Systems' ($720) as billable plan-review/inspection line items, and its own FAQ states a Fire District submittal is required for 'any modification' to a home that already has fire sprinklers (very common in San Ramon's Dougherty Valley, built under sprinkler-mandatory code cycles), or when square footage is added. This is a split-jurisdiction pattern (city holds building/electrical; fire district retains a parallel review/inspection track for PV and ESS in defined circumstances) rather than a single-AHJ answer, and I could not get SRVFPD to confirm in writing exactly which residential PV jobs it reviews vs. defers entirely to the City (its own site is on an Akamai edge that 403s a bot fetch, so this is sourced from Wayback Machine captures, not a live fetch).
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- $566 flat for residential PV ≤10 kW (+$17 per additional kW above 10 kW); $450 flat for 'SolarAPP+ Permit Designs'.90%
- Plan review
- SolarAPP+-eligible retrofit systems: automated/near-instant code-compliance review. Non-eligible/standard review: up to 15 business days for the first plan-check round,80%
- Portal
- Tyler Technologies EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' (CSS) portal at sanramon.ca.gov/csspermits (backend: tyeplweb.sanramon.ca.gov/EnerGov_Prod/SelfService);90%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC (adopted via the Uniform Administrative Code Provisions within the 2025 California Electrical Code)95%
- Own placard wording
- Yes, for several of the mandatory labels (ground-fault detection warning, disconnection warning, inverter-output panelboard marking) the handout gives the exact wording to use,70%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal (request inspections through the CSS/EnerGov account); phone lines are also staffed for inspector questions during limited morning hours80%
Labels & placards for this authority
City of San Ramon writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 70%
Yes, for several of the mandatory labels (ground-fault detection warning, disconnection warning, inverter-output panelboard marking) the handout gives the exact wording to use, though it renders as blank boxes in the extracted text where the PDF used embedded graphics/boxes for the required sentence — the wording itself did not extract as text.
Size, colour & material 90%
Marking materials must be reflective, weather-resistant, suitable for the environment; unless otherwise noted, all letters capitalized with a minimum height of 3/8 inch, white lettering on a red background (CEC 690.31(4))
Where they go 90%
AHJ labels: at the main service disconnect, on DC conduits/raceways/enclosures/junction boxes (every 10 ft, within 1 ft of bends and roof/wall penetrations), at modules, and at the PV disconnect. Utility (PG&E) labels: permanent signage affixed to the meter panel itself, plus signage/maps at the meter panel pointing to the AC disconnect if that disconnect is more than 10 ft away or out of sight of the meter.
What the utility wants on top 90%
Yes — PG&E requires permanent signage affixed to the meter panel indicating an alternative source of generation (solar/wind/battery) is interconnected, separate from and in addition to any AHJ-required NEC labeling. PG&E also requires signage/maps at the meter panel identifying the AC disconnect location whenever that disconnect is more than 10 ft away or out of line of sight from the meter panel.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.