City of Tustin

Orange County

Verified Aug. 4, 2026

City of Tustin is a city authority in the State of California, serving 80,276 residents. 3,221 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — Instant for SolarAPP+-eligible systems (automated code-compliance check); otherwise approx. Q18 Where you file — Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal — Tyler Technologies EnerGov, at tustinca-energovpub.tylerhost.net — plus SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org/solarapp.nrel.gov) for… Q20

Permit required
Yes95% source
What it costs
$535.00 flat (residential); $1,280.00 non-residential95% source
Plan review turnaround
Instant for SolarAPP+-eligible systems (automated code-compliance check); otherwise approx. 10 business days for first submittal / 5 business days for resubmittal (general Building Division standard,68% source
Key document
department page (absence) cited by 8 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · department page
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · department page
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · department page
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 78% · department page
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — not required by the City; a blanket HOA restriction on solar is separately pre-empted by California Civil Code §714 (Solar Rights Act) 58% · department page (absence)
    • Is there a historic-district review? Yes, for parcels within the City's Cultural Resource District (CRD) or on its Historic Resource Survey — those are excluded from SolarAPP+ and routed to the CSS Portal for traditional review with Planning staff 88% · city list (PDF)
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for standard residential rooftop PV; the only special-review trigger identified is Planning-staff review (not City Council approval) for CRD/Historic Resource Survey parcels 60% · department page
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 60% · eligibility checklist
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 78% · eligibility checklist
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes, via the general owner-builder route; the streamlined SolarAPP+ path requires a licensed, city-business-licensed contractor 55% · department page
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Either (a) a SolarAPP+ automated-review approval document plus a City CSS Portal permit application and fee payment, or (b) for CRD/historic or ineligible projects, plans + permit application submitted directly through the CSS Portal, incorporating the Tustin Standard Residential Photovoltaic Notes onto the plans 82% · department page
    • How many copies, and in what format? Electronic submission only, via the CSS Portal (EnerGov); no paper-copy count specified for PV 60% · department page
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes; must show zoning designation and Assessor's Parcel Number (APN), and (per the current inspection document list) a layout site plan showing the installation 82% · standard notes handout
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 90% · department page
    • Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes, implied by SolarAPP+ eligibility electrical thresholds (max 2 DC strings in parallel, max 9 current-carrying conductors per raceway, wire/terminal ratings) that must be shown to comply 60% · eligibility checklist
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal — Tyler Technologies EnerGov, at tustinca-energovpub.tylerhost.net — plus SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org/solarapp.nrel.gov) for automated review of eligible systems 95% · department page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · department page
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? $535.00 flat (residential); $1,280.00 non-residential 95% · fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Flat 90% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? No 78% · fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Instant for SolarAPP+-eligible systems (automated code-compliance check); otherwise approx. 10 business days for first submittal / 5 business days for resubmittal (general Building Division standard, not PV-specific) 68% · department page
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days (extended automatically while work is active and progressing) 95% · department page
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Southern California Edison (SCE) 92% · city page
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with utility Permission-to-Operate withheld until after the city's inspection is passed 58% · utility interconnection page

28 questions answered against City of Tustin’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherTustin's Community Development/Building Division issues its own building and electrical permits for residential PV via the CSS Portal and SolarAPP+; no evidence of delegation to Orange County for building/electrical (fire review is separately delegated to OCFA, see jurisdiction block).

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/153/Building

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Division issues both building and electrical permits itself through its own CSS Portal/SolarAPP+ process; OCFA (a separate JPA) independently reviews/inspects fire-code-triggered items (battery hazmat thresholds) per its own fee schedule.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higher"A building and/or electrical permit is required for the installation of any photovoltaic system" and current Permits Process page directs PV plans/applications through the CSS Portal.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/409/Permits-Process

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Combined

Why the confidence is not higherCSS Portal offers a single 'Electrical Photovoltaic (SolarAPP)' permit type (with sub-types for battery/panel-upgrade combos) rather than separate building+electrical permit numbers for a standard PV job.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either

Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ path requires 'a contractor with current Tustin Business License'; but the Forms & Handouts page separately publishes an Owner-Builder Permit Application Package and 'Considering Becoming an Owner-Builder' handout with no PV-specific carve-out, implying the traditional CSS route can be owner-pulled.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ eligibility requires the installing contractor to hold a current Tustin Business License and be a 'pre-approved contractor' registered with SolarAPP+ before submitting.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes, via the general owner-builder route; the streamlined SolarAPP+ path requires a licensed, city-business-licensed contractor

Why the confidence is not higherNo PV-specific prohibition on owner-builder found; Forms & Handouts publishes a general Owner-Builder Permit Application Package, but SolarAPP+'s own eligibility sheet requires a contractor, so self-install would have to go through traditional CSS review, not confirmed either way in a PV-specific document.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/382/Forms-Handouts

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Either (a) a SolarAPP+ automated-review approval document plus a City CSS Portal permit application and fee payment, or (b) for CRD/historic or ineligible projects, plans + permit application submitted directly through the CSS Portal, incorporating the Tustin Standard Residential Photovoltaic Notes onto the plans

Why the confidence is not higherCombines the current SolarAPP+ page process description with the PV Standard Notes handout, which states its notes 'must be reproduced onto the plans.'

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Electronic submission only, via the CSS Portal (EnerGov); no paper-copy count specified for PV

Why the confidence is not higherPermits Process and Building Submittal Requirements pages both direct all plans/applications to the online CSS Portal with no stated physical-copy requirement for solar; general (non-solar) plan-check-by-appointment guidance mentions email submittal for other permit types only.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/383/Building-Submittal-Requirements

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Yes; must show zoning designation and Assessor's Parcel Number (APN), and (per the current inspection document list) a layout site plan showing the installation

Why the confidence is not higherPV Standard Notes item 3 requires zoning + APN on the plans; SolarAPP+ page lists 'Layout site plan and single-line diagram' among documents required on site for inspection.

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ page explicitly requires a 'single-line diagram' to be part of the approved plans and on-site at inspection.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Yes, implied by SolarAPP+ eligibility electrical thresholds (max 2 DC strings in parallel, max 9 current-carrying conductors per raceway, wire/terminal ratings) that must be shown to comply

Why the confidence is not higherThe eligibility checklist sets numeric electrical limits that necessarily require string/conductor calculations to verify, though no separate 'calculations' submittal is named.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolarAPP+ PV Eligibility Checklist (structural section: 4 psf weight cap, roof-pitch/height limits, Class A roofing, no metal/low-slope roof over 15 psf snow load) and Tustin's PV Standard Notes handout — both set structural constraints but neither states a PE-stamp trigger threshold or requires a stamped structural calc for standard residential PV.

https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolarAPP+ PV Eligibility Checklist and PV Standard Notes — neither states an electrical PE-stamp requirement or threshold for residential PV.

https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

$535.00 flat (residential); $1,280.00 non-residential

Why the confidence is not higherFY2026-27 Comprehensive Fee Schedule (Council-adopted 1/20/2026, effective 4/1/2026, the current schedule) line item: 'Solar / PV System - Residential Permit and Inspection - Per AB 1414 - $535.00'.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/19836/2026-Comprehensive-Schedule-of-Fees

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Flat

Why the confidence is not higherFee schedule lists a single flat dollar figure per AB 1414 (the state's solar permit fee cap statute) rather than a per-kW/per-panel/valuation formula.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/19836/2026-Comprehensive-Schedule-of-Fees

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

No

Why the confidence is not higherThe $535 line item is labelled 'Permit and Inspection' as one combined fee, unlike other building-permit categories in the same schedule that separately break out plan-check hourly fees; no separate PV plan-check line found.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/19836/2026-Comprehensive-Schedule-of-Fees

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Instant for SolarAPP+-eligible systems (automated code-compliance check); otherwise approx. 10 business days for first submittal / 5 business days for resubmittal (general Building Division standard, not PV-specific)

Why the confidence is not higherGeneral turnaround figures come from the current Permits Process page and are not solar-specific; a 2015 handout (superseded practice under old Ordinance 1456) claimed a 3-day PV-specific turnaround, which is stale and not repeated on any current page.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/409/Permits-Process

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

180 days (extended automatically while work is active and progressing)

Why the confidence is not higherStated plainly on the current Permits Process page.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/409/Permits-Process

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal — Tyler Technologies EnerGov, at tustinca-energovpub.tylerhost.net — plus SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org/solarapp.nrel.gov) for automated review of eligible systems

Why the confidence is not higherBoth portal links are published directly from Tustin's own SolarAPP+ page.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ submittal, fee payment, and inspection scheduling are all described as done through the online portals; the page states permit fees are collected only through CSS or in person, with no mailed/faxed path described for PV.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Southern California Edison (SCE)

Why the confidence is not higherConfirmed directly from the City's own 'Local Utilities' page, not from PowerToChoose or a territory-map inference.

city page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/606/Local-Utilities

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Parallel, with utility Permission-to-Operate withheld until after the city's inspection is passed

Why the confidence is not higherSCE's own Rule 21 interconnection page describes the interconnection application/technical-review process as available to run alongside project construction, with SCE's own PTO checklist/process being a separate track; this is SCE's general process description, not Tustin-specific, so it is an inference rather than a documented sequence.

utility interconnection page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.sce.com/business/smart-energy-solar/solar-for-business/grid-interconnections/interconnecting-generation-under-rule-21

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No — not required by the City; a blanket HOA restriction on solar is separately pre-empted by California Civil Code §714 (Solar Rights Act)

Why the confidence is not higherNo Tustin PV document (SolarAPP+ page, PV Standard Notes, Permits Process) mentions an HOA-approval step; absence across three of the City's own current documents plus known state preemption law.

department page (absence) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Yes, for parcels within the City's Cultural Resource District (CRD) or on its Historic Resource Survey — those are excluded from SolarAPP+ and routed to the CSS Portal for traditional review with Planning staff

Why the confidence is not higherStated directly on the SolarAPP+ page, with a published parcel-level Ineligible Properties list confirming real addresses.

city list (PDF) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10937/TUSTIN_IneligiblePropertiesList

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolarAPP+ PV Eligibility Checklist and PV Standard Notes handout — neither mentions wind/windstorm certification (not a TDI-jurisdiction requirement in California); no separate Tustin wind-cert handout found on Forms & Handouts.

https://www.tustinca.org/382/Forms-Handouts

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

Not for standard residential rooftop PV; the only special-review trigger identified is Planning-staff review (not City Council approval) for CRD/Historic Resource Survey parcels

Why the confidence is not higherSolarAPP+ page names Planning staff contact for CRD/historic-survey properties but never mentions a Specific Use Permit or Council hearing for residential PV.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolarAPP+ page, PV Eligibility Checklist, PV Standard Notes, and Comprehensive Schedule of Fees — none states a City-imposed system-size cap for residential generation (sizing is governed by SCE's Net Energy Metering/Solar Billing Plan rules at the utility/PUC level, not a Tustin ordinance).

https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC, adopted as the 2025 California Electrical Code, effective 1 Jan 2026 85% · adopting regulation
    • Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (based on the 2024 IBC), effective 1 Jan 2026 95% · adopting regulation
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code, effective 1 Jan 2026 (enforced by the Orange County Fire Authority under its JPA authority for the City of Tustin) 90% · adopting regulation
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — Ordinance No. 1569 (eff. 1/1/2026) adopts the 2025 code cycle with local amendments/supplemental regulations developed in partnership with OCFA, though the ordinance text contains no PV-specific amendment 85% · adopting ordinance
    • What is the installation judged against? The current 2025 CBC/CEC/CFC cycle (effective 1/1/2026), plus the City's own Residential Photovoltaic Standard Notes handout for installation-detail requirements 75% · standard notes handout
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    Nothing recorded for City of Tustin on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, rapid shutdown is required per NEC 690.12, under the 2023 NEC as adopted via the 2025 CEC (effective 1/1/2026) 78% · adopting regulation
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? A permanent plaque at the point of interconnection stating max AC output operating current and operating AC voltage (NEC 690.54); 'PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY AC DISCONNECTS' signage at all AC disconnects; a warning label at the inverter output/distribution equipment; a directory sign if disconnects are >6 ft from the overcurrent device; DC-conduit markings ('CAUTION: SOLAR CIRCUIT') every 10 ft, at turns, and at penetrations/junction boxes; a shock-hazard warning label where switch/breaker terminals stay energized when open 95% · standard notes handout
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes 95% · standard notes handout
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Yes — red background, white lettering, minimum 3/8 inch letter height, all capital letters, Arial or similar font, non-bold, reflective weather-resistant material 95% · standard notes handout
    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? A facility-map/directory placard showing main service disconnect, PV AC disconnect, and DC disconnect locations is required only for commercial projects, per the Standard Notes; no equivalent residential facility-map placard is specified 90% · standard notes handout
    • Where must the labels be placed? At the point of interconnection (POI plaque); at every AC disconnect; on the distribution equipment/inverter output connection; on all interior/exterior DC conduits, raceways, enclosures, cable assemblies and junction boxes (every 10 ft, at turns, and above/below penetrations); at the main service disconnect (on/inside the cover); and at the overcurrent-device location if disconnects sit more than 6 ft away 92% · standard notes handout
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No city-specific approved-product list; general UL/NRTL listing is required (modules and inverters 'must be listed by UL' per the eligibility checklist). SCE separately maintains its own pre-approved inverter/power-control-system list at the utility level for Rule 21 interconnection. 65% · eligibility checklist
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes — the CSS Portal offers 'solar with battery' and 'solar with battery and panel upgrade' permit types; OCFA separately reviews/inspects battery/stationary-storage systems once chemical quantities trigger CFC Article 64 / 2007 IFC §608 thresholds 82% · department page
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Yes — OCFA's fee schedule carries separate line items for battery-system plan review (PR375, $963) and inspection (PR375i, $233), distinct from its PV-only items (PR362/PR362i) 85% · fee schedule
    • Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? For SolarAPP+-eligible systems only: max 400A service, max 225A service/main disconnect, max 225A busbars, no aluminum wire, no existing PV on the same building, panel upgrades/derates must be pre-existing (not part of the same expedited application) 80% · eligibility checklist
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? For SolarAPP+-eligible systems: modules must sit no more than ~6 inches above a pitched roof (PV Standard Notes says 4-6 inches), only one mounting-hardware type per project (flush/parallel to roof), Class A roofing only, PV+hardware weight ≤4 psf 82% · eligibility checklist

20 questions answered against City of Tustin’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2023 NEC, adopted as the 2025 California Electrical Code, effective 1 Jan 2026

Why the confidence is not higherGoverning Codes & Ordinances page lists the '2025 California Electrical Code' as in force from 1/1/2026 (California's 2025 Title 24 cycle is based on the 2023 NEC). Flagging a tension: the City's own SolarAPP+ Eligibility Checklist, dated 6/22/2023, still says 'Limited to 2020 NEC' and has not been updated for the current cycle.

adopting regulation checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1286/Governing-Codes-Ordinances

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2025 California Building Code (based on the 2024 IBC), effective 1 Jan 2026

Why the confidence is not higherListed directly on the Governing Codes & Ordinances page.

adopting regulation checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1286/Governing-Codes-Ordinances

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

2025 California Fire Code, effective 1 Jan 2026 (enforced by the Orange County Fire Authority under its JPA authority for the City of Tustin)

Why the confidence is not higherListed on the Governing Codes & Ordinances page; OCFA's own member-cities page confirms Tustin as a member city for fire jurisdiction.

adopting regulation checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1286/Governing-Codes-Ordinances

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes — Ordinance No. 1569 (eff. 1/1/2026) adopts the 2025 code cycle with local amendments/supplemental regulations developed in partnership with OCFA, though the ordinance text contains no PV-specific amendment

Why the confidence is not higherRead the enrolled ordinance text directly (via Granicus agenda packet) rather than a summary; ran a positive control ('electrical', 19 hits) and fabricated control ('zzqqx', 0 hits) confirming the extraction worked, and found no solar/photovoltaic/rapid-shutdown/ridge-setback language anywhere in it.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-30 https://tustin.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=5&event_id=2038&meta_id=168420

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The current 2025 CBC/CEC/CFC cycle (effective 1/1/2026), plus the City's own Residential Photovoltaic Standard Notes handout for installation-detail requirements

Why the confidence is not higherTension flagged: the Standard Notes handout (revised 5/19/23) still cites 2022 CEC section numbers, one cycle behind the current 2025 CEC — the handout has not been reissued for the current code cycle even though it remains the linked current document.

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

For SolarAPP+-eligible systems only: max 400A service, max 225A service/main disconnect, max 225A busbars, no aluminum wire, no existing PV on the same building, panel upgrades/derates must be pre-existing (not part of the same expedited application)

Why the confidence is not higherThese are eligibility thresholds for the streamlined path specifically, not necessarily universal rules for traditionally-reviewed projects.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

For SolarAPP+-eligible systems: modules must sit no more than ~6 inches above a pitched roof (PV Standard Notes says 4-6 inches), only one mounting-hardware type per project (flush/parallel to roof), Class A roofing only, PV+hardware weight ≤4 psf

Why the confidence is not higherCombines the eligibility checklist and the PV Standard Notes item 2; both are the City's own current documents.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedOrdinance No. 1569 (2025 code-adoption ordinance, full text read via Granicus, controls run: positive 'electrical' 19 hits, fabricated 'zzqqx' 0 hits — no PV/ridge-setback/access-pathway language) and OCFA Guideline E-01 Architectural Review 2025 plus its Appendix A (same controls run: 'sprinkler'/'fire' hit, 'zzqqx' did not — no PV/solar/battery mention). Ridge setback and access-pathway figures appear to be governed by the unamended CFC/CRC text itself, which was not independently retrievable to quote specific dimensions.

https://tustin.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=5&event_id=2038&meta_id=168420

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes, rapid shutdown is required per NEC 690.12, under the 2023 NEC as adopted via the 2025 CEC (effective 1/1/2026)

Why the confidence is not higherNo Tustin-specific amendment to 690.12 found in Ordinance 1569; the City's SolarAPP+ Eligibility Checklist (dated 2023) still references the prior 2020-NEC-based cycle, so the exact array-boundary rapid-shutdown parameters in that specific document are stale relative to the code edition now nominally in force.

adopting regulation checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1286/Governing-Codes-Ordinances

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

A permanent plaque at the point of interconnection stating max AC output operating current and operating AC voltage (NEC 690.54); 'PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY AC DISCONNECTS' signage at all AC disconnects; a warning label at the inverter output/distribution equipment; a directory sign if disconnects are >6 ft from the overcurrent device; DC-conduit markings ('CAUTION: SOLAR CIRCUIT') every 10 ft, at turns, and at penetrations/junction boxes; a shock-hazard warning label where switch/breaker terminals stay energized when open

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the City's own current, dedicated Residential Photovoltaic Standard Notes handout, which the Building Division requires be reproduced onto submitted plans.

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherExact wording is prescribed verbatim for multiple placards (e.g. 'PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY AC DISCONNECTS', 'WARNING INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', the shock-hazard warning block).

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes — red background, white lettering, minimum 3/8 inch letter height, all capital letters, Arial or similar font, non-bold, reflective weather-resistant material

Why the confidence is not higherSpecified explicitly for the DC-conduit and AC-disconnect marking requirements in the current PV Standard Notes.

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

A facility-map/directory placard showing main service disconnect, PV AC disconnect, and DC disconnect locations is required only for commercial projects, per the Standard Notes; no equivalent residential facility-map placard is specified

Why the confidence is not higherItem 17 of the Standard Notes explicitly limits this plaque requirement to 'Commercial projects', distinguishing it from the residential POI plaque (item 16) required under 690.54.

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSCE's live Rule 21 interconnection page links to both its Rule 21 tariff and its Interconnection Handbook via edisonintl.sharepoint.com; confirmed with curl -IL that the on.sce.com/InterconnectionHandbook shortlink 302-chains through SharePoint into a Microsoft OAuth login (login.microsoftonline.com) with no anonymous access. Wayback CDX shows only 302 captures for this shortlink, none resolving to a readable document.

https://www.sce.com/business/smart-energy-solar/solar-for-business/grid-interconnections/interconnecting-generation-under-rule-21

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

At the point of interconnection (POI plaque); at every AC disconnect; on the distribution equipment/inverter output connection; on all interior/exterior DC conduits, raceways, enclosures, cable assemblies and junction boxes (every 10 ft, at turns, and above/below penetrations); at the main service disconnect (on/inside the cover); and at the overcurrent-device location if disconnects sit more than 6 ft away

Why the confidence is not higherDirectly enumerated in the current PV Standard Notes handout.

standard notes handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/7759/Tustin-Standard-Residential-Photovoltaic-Notes-PDF

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

No city-specific approved-product list; general UL/NRTL listing is required (modules and inverters 'must be listed by UL' per the eligibility checklist). SCE separately maintains its own pre-approved inverter/power-control-system list at the utility level for Rule 21 interconnection.

Why the confidence is not higherNo Tustin document names a City-maintained equipment list; the UL-listing requirement is general code compliance, not a City list. The SCE approved-list reference is at utility level, called out separately per govbot guidance to not conflate utility and AHJ requirements.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Yes — the CSS Portal offers 'solar with battery' and 'solar with battery and panel upgrade' permit types; OCFA separately reviews/inspects battery/stationary-storage systems once chemical quantities trigger CFC Article 64 / 2007 IFC §608 thresholds

Why the confidence is not higherCombines Tustin's own SolarAPP+ page (permit-type list) with OCFA's current fee schedule line item PR375, which is Tustin's delegated fire-code reviewer.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

Yes — OCFA's fee schedule carries separate line items for battery-system plan review (PR375, $963) and inspection (PR375i, $233), distinct from its PV-only items (PR362/PR362i)

Why the confidence is not higherOCFA's own current (2026) fee schedule PDF, extracted with pdftotext and checked against controls ('sprinkler'/'fire' hit, 'zzqqx' did not) confirming the extraction is reliable.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://storageocfaprod001.blob.core.windows.net/blobocfaprod01/2025/06/PD-Fee-Schedule-2026.pdf

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedTustin's Zoning Code lives on Municode (library.municode.com/ca/tustin), which returns a JS-rendered application shell with no code text to both curl and WebFetch (WebFetch: 403); the City's own Planning & Zoning Documents page has no ground-mount-specific handout. SolarAPP+ Eligibility Checklist only says ground-mounted systems are excluded from the streamlined program, not how they are zoned when traditionally reviewed.

https://library.municode.com/ca/tustin/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSCE's Electrical Service Requirements (ESR) manual and Interconnection Handbook, both linked from SCE's Rule 21 page, are SharePoint-gated behind Microsoft OAuth (same evidence chain as Q42); Tustin's PV Standard Notes describe disconnect labeling but not required physical placement relative to the meter.

https://www.sce.com/business/smart-energy-solar/solar-for-business/grid-interconnections/interconnecting-generation-under-rule-21

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Portal (CSS Portal), with phone support available for confirming an AM/PM window 92% · department page
    • How much notice is required? By 3:00 PM the prior business day for next-day inspection (effectively about 1 business day) 88% · department page
    • Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM/PM window can be requested but is not guaranteed; callers can get a firmer timeframe by phoning assigned inspectors between 7:30-8:00 AM the day of inspection 88% · department handout
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 92% · department page
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated for building/electrical; Orange County Fire Authority is the delegate only for the fire-code-triggered portion (battery/ESS hazmat thresholds) 75% · JPA member-agency page
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? Historically (under 2015 Ordinance 1456 guidance) a single final inspection for eligible small residential PV, with no pre-inspection/rough-in step; current SolarAPP+ page does not restate an inspection count but lists a single 'Schedule Inspection' step per permit 62% · handout (dated 2015)
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No — per the (dated) 2015 guidance, 'Pre-inspections or rough inspections will not be required' for eligible expedited-review PV systems 60% · handout (dated 2015)
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes — the SolarAPP+ PV Eligibility Checklist functions as a published pre-inspection compliance checklist; a 'Common Inspection Guidelines' document is also referenced by title in the 2015 handout 60% · eligibility checklist
    • What must be on site at inspection? Job Card, Permit, layout site plan and single-line diagram, SolarAPP approval document, and equipment Spec Sheet 95% · department page
    • Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes, inferred — the inspector is required to have the SolarAPP+ approval document and spec sheet on site, which exist to verify installed equipment matches the approved listing/design, and the PV Standard Notes mandate specific labels the field inspector must be able to see 68% · department page
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $123.00 per hour, minimum 2 hours 82% · fee schedule

14 questions answered against City of Tustin’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal (CSS Portal), with phone support available for confirming an AM/PM window

Why the confidence is not higherBoth the Inspection Requests page and the illustrated 'How to Request an Inspection' PDF walk through booking exclusively via the CSS Portal.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/406/Inspection-Requests

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

By 3:00 PM the prior business day for next-day inspection (effectively about 1 business day)

Why the confidence is not higherStated on both the Inspection Requests page ('requests received by 3:00 p.m. will be performed the following workday') and the SolarAPP+ page ('deadline for next-day inspections is 3:00 PM the prior business day').

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/406/Inspection-Requests

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

AM/PM window can be requested but is not guaranteed; callers can get a firmer timeframe by phoning assigned inspectors between 7:30-8:00 AM the day of inspection

Why the confidence is not higherBoth the SolarAPP+ page and the 'How to Request an Inspection' PDF describe requesting AM/PM as a preference only.

department handout checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/719

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherNamed City Building Division inspectors (Rod, Atul, Chris) with direct phone lines are listed for booking/timeframe confirmation, i.e. the City performs its own building/electrical inspections rather than delegating.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/406/Inspection-Requests

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated for building/electrical; Orange County Fire Authority is the delegate only for the fire-code-triggered portion (battery/ESS hazmat thresholds)

Why the confidence is not higherTustin's own inspectors handle building/electrical; OCFA's separate fee line items for battery inspection (PR375i) confirm OCFA is the delegate specifically for that fire-code aspect, consistent with OCFA's confirmed membership of Tustin.

JPA member-agency page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.ocfa.org/about-us/member-cities/

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

Historically (under 2015 Ordinance 1456 guidance) a single final inspection for eligible small residential PV, with no pre-inspection/rough-in step; current SolarAPP+ page does not restate an inspection count but lists a single 'Schedule Inspection' step per permit

Why the confidence is not higherThe single-inspection detail comes from an August 2015 handout that is dated and may not reflect current SolarAPP+-era practice, though it remains the only City document on this point and is still linked from the current Forms & Handouts page.

handout (dated 2015) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/671/User-Guide-for-the-Installation-of-Photovoltaic-Systems-PDF

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

No — per the (dated) 2015 guidance, 'Pre-inspections or rough inspections will not be required' for eligible expedited-review PV systems

Why the confidence is not higherSame 2015 handout as Q54; flagged as dated and unconfirmed against current SolarAPP+ practice.

handout (dated 2015) checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/671/User-Guide-for-the-Installation-of-Photovoltaic-Systems-PDF

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Yes, inferred — the inspector is required to have the SolarAPP+ approval document and spec sheet on site, which exist to verify installed equipment matches the approved listing/design, and the PV Standard Notes mandate specific labels the field inspector must be able to see

Why the confidence is not higherNo document says explicitly 'the inspector checks labels and listings' in those words; this is an inference from what documents must be on site and what the Standard Notes require to exist physically on the installation.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Yes — the SolarAPP+ PV Eligibility Checklist functions as a published pre-inspection compliance checklist; a 'Common Inspection Guidelines' document is also referenced by title in the 2015 handout

Why the confidence is not higherThe eligibility checklist is confirmed current and live; the 'Common Inspection Guidelines' title comes from the 2015 handout and its live status was not independently confirmed as a still-hosted, separate document.

eligibility checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/10497/Tustin-SolarAPP-PV-Eligibility

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

Job Card, Permit, layout site plan and single-line diagram, SolarAPP approval document, and equipment Spec Sheet

Why the confidence is not higherListed verbatim on the current SolarAPP+ page as required to be printed and on site for all inspections.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/1436/SolarApp-for-Solar-Installers

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$123.00 per hour, minimum 2 hours

Why the confidence is not higherThis is the Building Division's general re-inspection fee in the current fee schedule; it is not a solar-specific line item, but it is the applicable one since Solar/PV has no separate re-inspection fee of its own.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.tustinca.org/DocumentCenter/View/19836/2026-Comprehensive-Schedule-of-Fees

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedPermits Process, Inspection Requests, and SolarAPP+ pages — none describes how correction notices are issued or how they are cleared/re-verified.

https://www.tustinca.org/409/Permits-Process

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedPermits Process, Inspection Requests, SolarAPP+ page, and Comprehensive Schedule of Fees (which lists a 'Temporary Certificate of Occupancy' fee for other permit types) — none states what document/tag is issued when a residential PV inspection passes.

https://www.tustinca.org/406/Inspection-Requests

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSCE's Rule 21 page and its PTO/Solar Billing Plan sub-pages (a direct sce.com/residential/.../solar-billing-plan URL guess 404'd, and no readable Wayback capture of an SCE PTO-notification page was found); no Tustin document addresses who submits final-inspection proof to SCE.

https://www.sce.com/business/smart-energy-solar/solar-for-business/grid-interconnections/interconnecting-generation-under-rule-21

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Tustin against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

City of Tustin is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
Holds
Building and electrical (Tustin Building Division, Community Development Department)
Delegated to
Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) for fire-code review/inspection, including the CFC Article 64 hazmat-threshold trigger for battery/ESS systems
Why not higher
Tustin's own Building Division issues and inspects both building and electrical permits for residential PV directly through its CSS Portal and SolarAPP+ program — no evidence of delegation to Orange County for building/electrical. However, fire jurisdiction is separate: Tustin is confirmed BY NAME on OCFA's own current member-cities page (https://www.ocfa.org/about-us/member-cities/, 'Orange County Fire Jurisdictions' list), so fire-code plan review and inspection (relevant mainly to battery/ESS hazmat thresholds) sits with OCFA, a regional JPA, not a City of Tustin fire department (Tustin has none). SCE independently gatekeeps interconnection/PTO, confirmed as Tustin's utility from the City's own 'Local Utilities' page rather than PowerToChoose.

https://www.ocfa.org/about-us/member-cities/

Permit required
Yes95%
Permit cost
$535.00 flat (residential); $1,280.00 non-residential95%
Plan review
Instant for SolarAPP+-eligible systems (automated code-compliance check); otherwise approx. 10 business days for first submittal / 5 business days for resubmittal (general Building Division…68%
Portal
Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal — Tyler Technologies EnerGov, at tustinca-energovpub.tylerhost.net — plus SolarAPP+ (gosolarapp.org/solarapp.nrel.gov) for automated review of eligible…95%
Electrical code
2023 NEC, adopted as the 2025 California Electrical Code, effective 1 Jan 202685%
Own placard wording
Yes95%
Booking an inspection
Portal (CSS Portal), with phone support available for confirming an AM/PM window92%
Labels & placards for this authority

City of Tustin writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.

Wording 95%

Yes

Size, colour & material 95%

Yes — red background, white lettering, minimum 3/8 inch letter height, all capital letters, Arial or similar font, non-bold, reflective weather-resistant material

Where they go 92%

At the point of interconnection (POI plaque); at every AC disconnect; on the distribution equipment/inverter output connection; on all interior/exterior DC conduits, raceways, enclosures, cable assemblies and junction boxes (every 10 ft, at turns, and above/below penetrations); at the main service disconnect (on/inside the cover); and at the overcurrent-device location if disconnects sit more than 6 ft away

What the utility wants on top None%

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
City
County
Orange County
Regions served
1
Regions covered
City of Tustin · city
Solar Requirements
Required placards
Building  | Tustin, CA Skip to Main Content Create a Website Account - Manage notification subscriptions, save form progress and more. Website Sign In Home Departments Community Development Building Building The Building Division serves residents, businesses, contractors, and design professionals by providing plan review, permit, and inspection services that support safe, high-quality development
Separate roof inspection
How do I get a building permit? Does a permit expire? How many plans are required to be submitted into plan check? How do I request a building inspection? View All FAQs /FAQ.aspx Government Websites by CivicPlus® Loading Loading Do Not Show Again Close Arrow Left Arrow Right [] Slideshow Left Arrow
Authority Contact
Address
300 Centennial Way, Tustin, CA 92780
Main Phone
Building Department
Department
Building Division
Direct Phone
714-573-3130
Dept Hours
7:30 a.m. – 5:30 p.m.
Portal Software
EnerGov (Tyler)
Booking & Scheduling
Preferred channel
online
Book in advance
1
Booking phone
Notes
Schedule via CSS Portal (EnerGov/Tyler Technologies) at https://tustinca-energovpub.tylerhost.net/Apps/SelfService#/home — available 24/7. Requests submitted by 3:00 PM are scheduled for the next business day. Alternatively call the inspection request line at 714-573-3141 and leave permit number, project address, and contact name. To get a time window on inspection day, call an inspector between 7:30–8:00 AM: Rod (714) 573-3128, Atul (714) 573-3158, Chris (714) 573-3120. Solar permits via SolarApp+ use permit format SAPP-202X-XXXXX; required on-site documents include job card, permit, layout diagram, SolarApp approval document, and spec sheet. Solar-specific email: PVSubmittals@tustinca.org. Counter hours: Mon–Thu 7:30 AM–5:30 PM, Fri 8:00 AM–5:00 PM. (collected Jul 2026)