Kings County

State of California

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

Kings County is a county authority in the State of California, covering 7 regions, serving 152,486 residents. 706 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined (administratively) — one solar application yields all required permits together Q4 Plan review — 5 business days (non-over-the-counter); qualifying standard-plan submittals may be approved over the counter same-day Q18 Where you file — Kings County Online Permit Center (cdapermits.countyofkings.com) Q20

Permit required
Yes98% source
What it costs
Not a flat fee — building permit fee 'Per CBC' (valuation table) + electrical permit 'Per CEC' (valuation table) + a fixed $80 'PV Solar data processing/Permit' Public Works add-on.88% source
Plan review turnaround
5 business days (non-over-the-counter); qualifying standard-plan submittals may be approved over the counter same-day76% source
Key document
department bulletin cited by 7 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · code of ordinances
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · code of ordinances
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 98% · department bulletin
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined (administratively) — one solar application yields all required permits together 72% · code of ordinances
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 80% · department bulletin
    • Is there a historic-district review? No 75% · department bulletin
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not required for qualifying (≤10kW AC) systems — Planning/Council review is expressly waived; unclear whether a non-qualifying (larger/ground-mount) system would ever trigger an SUP, since no county document addresses that scenario. 62% · department bulletin
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No hard cap — 10 kW AC is only the eligibility threshold for the expedited/streamlined process; larger residential systems are still permittable through standard (non-expedited) review. 88% · checklist
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 82% · code of ordinances
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? No 68% · form
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 72% · permit portal
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Permit application form; site/roof plan showing panel layout, access pathways, fire classification and label locations; single-line diagram (via the applicable Standard Plan) or, for non-qualifying systems, engineer-stamped drawings; Structural Criteria form (or engineer-stamped structural calcs if it fails); proof of equipment listing. 88% · department bulletin
    • How many copies, and in what format? Electronic only — the CDA 'has shifted from accepting paper applications for permits to only digital applications'; submit via the online portal or by email to kcgc.building@co.kings.ca.us. 85% · department page
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — a site/roof plan showing owner/address/APN, north arrow, adjacent streets, setback dimensions to structures/well/septic/propane, easements (general Ch.5 plan requirements), plus for solar specifically: roof layout, PV panel/module locations, approximate location of roof access points, code-compliant access pathways, PV fire classification, and locations of all required labels/markings. 90% · department bulletin
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 90% · standard plan
    • Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 75% · standard plan
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Only if the array fails the county's prescriptive Structural Criteria checklist (roof condition, framing, anchor spacing/embedment) — then 'project-specific drawings and calculations stamped and signed by a California-licensed civil or structural engineer' are required. No threshold expressed as a weight/size number; it's pass/fail against the prescriptive checklist. 92% · checklist/form
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Kings County Online Permit Center (cdapermits.countyofkings.com) 95% · portal landing page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 82% · portal landing page
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? Not a flat fee — building permit fee 'Per CBC' (valuation table) + electrical permit 'Per CEC' (valuation table) + a fixed $80 'PV Solar data processing/Permit' Public Works add-on. No single dollar figure is published for a typical residential system. 88% · fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Valuation (building & electrical portions) plus a flat $80 add-on fee 88% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes 68% · fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

28 questions answered against Kings County’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherCounty's own current Code of Ordinances designates the Building Official (Community Development Agency) as enforcement authority for the unincorporated area.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 5-7 requires building, electric, plumbing and mechanical permits all 'from the building official'; solar's expedited process (§5-72) is administered entirely in-house with Planning/Fire review expressly waived for qualifying systems.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherStated plainly in both the county's own submittal-requirements bulletin and Code §5-7.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Combined (administratively) — one solar application yields all required permits together

Why the confidence is not higherBase ordinance (§5-7) technically names building/electric/plumbing/mechanical as separate permit types, but §5-72(e) says the building official 'shall approve the application administratively, and issue all required permits' as a single expedited action — practically one combined process for solar.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-6: 'no licensing or other requirement or qualification shall be required to do any work of any kind referred to in this chapter... irrespective of the person who may perform the same' (subject to Bus. & Prof. Code §7031.5). County imposes no additional trade-license gate of its own.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

No

Why the confidence is not higherNo pre-registration/business-license step found in the ordinance, submittal bulletin, or checklist; the structural-criteria form only records a license number/class on the application itself, not a separate county registration.

form checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9766/635792236901870000

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherFollows from §5-6 (no licensing required to perform the work) plus the portal's open account-registration for any applicant; not stated in so many words as 'homeowner self-permit is allowed.'

permit portal checked 2026-08-30 https://cdapermits.countyofkings.com/

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Permit application form; site/roof plan showing panel layout, access pathways, fire classification and label locations; single-line diagram (via the applicable Standard Plan) or, for non-qualifying systems, engineer-stamped drawings; Structural Criteria form (or engineer-stamped structural calcs if it fails); proof of equipment listing.

Why the confidence is not higherDirectly enumerated in the county's own Solar PV Submittal Requirements bulletin.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Electronic only — the CDA 'has shifted from accepting paper applications for permits to only digital applications'; submit via the online portal or by email to kcgc.building@co.kings.ca.us.

Why the confidence is not higherStated on the current CDA department page itself.

department page checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Yes — a site/roof plan showing owner/address/APN, north arrow, adjacent streets, setback dimensions to structures/well/septic/propane, easements (general Ch.5 plan requirements), plus for solar specifically: roof layout, PV panel/module locations, approximate location of roof access points, code-compliant access pathways, PV fire classification, and locations of all required labels/markings.

Why the confidence is not higherCombines the general Plan Requirements bulletin with the solar-specific Submittal Requirements bulletin, both the county's own current documents.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherThe county's Standard Plans (central/string and micro-inverter) are built around a required Single Line Diagram, explicitly called out as such in the plan's own instructions ('Steps 11-19... use Single Line Diagram 1/2').

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherStandard Plan requires the applicant to work through conductor ampacity/temperature-rating tables, string-combining decisions, and overcurrent-device sizing (e.g., the 120%-of-busbar check) as part of completing the plan; not a separately labeled 'calculations' submittal but functionally required.

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

Only if the array fails the county's prescriptive Structural Criteria checklist (roof condition, framing, anchor spacing/embedment) — then 'project-specific drawings and calculations stamped and signed by a California-licensed civil or structural engineer' are required. No threshold expressed as a weight/size number; it's pass/fail against the prescriptive checklist.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from the county's own Structural Criteria form.

checklist/form checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9766/635792236901870000

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolar Submittal Requirements bulletin and both Standard Plans (central/string and micro-inverter) for an electrical-PE-stamp threshold distinct from the structural one

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

Not a flat fee — building permit fee 'Per CBC' (valuation table) + electrical permit 'Per CEC' (valuation table) + a fixed $80 'PV Solar data processing/Permit' Public Works add-on. No single dollar figure is published for a typical residential system.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from the internal revision stamp of the current fee schedule PDF itself ('[Adopted 2026 Fee Schedule updated 1-17-26.xls]'), matching its stated effective date — this is the authority's own live document, not a stale one.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/39705/639052097138370000

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Valuation (building & electrical portions) plus a flat $80 add-on fee

Why the confidence is not higherSame fee-schedule line items as Q15.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/39705/639052097138370000

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes

Why the confidence is not higher'Building Plan Check — Per CBC' is listed as its own fee-schedule line distinct from the base building permit fee, though both are valuation-based and typically billed together.

fee schedule checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/39705/639052097138370000

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

5 business days (non-over-the-counter); qualifying standard-plan submittals may be approved over the counter same-day

Why the confidence is not higherCounty's own Submittal Requirements bulletin, though the document carries no visible revision date to confirm currency against the Jan 2026 code cycle.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCode of Ordinances Ch.5 (§§5-1 through 5-84, all articles) and the solar submittal bulletin, for a Kings-County-specific permit expiration/validity period; only the adopted CBC's own default (§105.5, ~180 days) would apply by blanket reference, not restated locally

https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Kings County Online Permit Center (cdapermits.countyofkings.com)

Why the confidence is not higherLinked directly from the CDA department page as 'the New Online Permit Center for all Building Permits and Planning Permits.'

portal landing page checked 2026-08-30 https://cdapermits.countyofkings.com/

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherPortal supports application submittal, plan upload, payment, and inspection requests once an account is registered/verified; email submittal is also expressly authorized for solar under §5-72(a).

portal landing page checked 2026-08-30 https://cdapermits.countyofkings.com/

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Southern California Edison (SCE)

Why the confidence is not higherNOT PG&E, despite that being the more common assumption for the San Joaquin Valley — verified against two independent sources naming Kings County/Hanford specifically as SCE territory, since neither the county's own solar documents nor SCE's own website were found stating this directly. Treat as a utility-level fact, re-confirm against SCE's own DG interconnection manual before relying on it operationally.

CPUC filing (secondary), corroborated by https://energycenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/nav/programs/smp/20.%20SCE%20Service%20Territory%20Cities.pdf listing checked 2026-08-30 https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/environment/info/esa/mascot/PEA/mascot_app.pdf

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

No dependency for permit issuance / parallel — utility interconnection approval is a separate track the applicant must pursue on their own

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-72(e): building-permit approval 'does not authorize an applicant to connect the small residential rooftop energy system to the local utility provider's electricity grid. The applicant is responsible for obtaining such approval or permission from the local utility provider.'

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No

Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal bulletin: 'Planning ... review [is] not required for solar PV installations of this size' — HOA/architectural conditions are handled through Planning elsewhere in the code, so this exemption removes that gate for qualifying systems.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

No

Why the confidence is not higherSame Planning-review exemption as Q24; no historic-district overlay referenced anywhere in the solar-specific materials reviewed.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedStructural Criteria form and Solar Submittal Requirements bulletin, for a wind/windstorm certification requirement

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9766/635792236901870000

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

Not required for qualifying (≤10kW AC) systems — Planning/Council review is expressly waived; unclear whether a non-qualifying (larger/ground-mount) system would ever trigger an SUP, since no county document addresses that scenario.

Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal Requirements bulletin: 'Planning and Fire Department review are not required for solar PV installations of this size' — but nothing found addressing SUP/Council review for larger systems routed to standard review.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No hard cap — 10 kW AC is only the eligibility threshold for the expedited/streamlined process; larger residential systems are still permittable through standard (non-expedited) review.

Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal bulletin explicitly routes non-qualifying systems to 'the standard process' rather than rejecting them.

checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9758/635792236887570000

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 (as adopted within the current 2025 California Electrical Code cycle) 85% · portal notice + code auto-adoption clause
    • Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (13th edition cycle), effective 1 Jan 2026 85% · portal notice + code auto-adoption clause
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 2019 California Fire Code (Ord. No. 694, adopted 12/17/2019) — the last fire-code-specific ordinance found 65% · code of ordinances
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 90% · code of ordinances
    • What is the installation judged against? The currently-adopted California Building/Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Codes (Title 24, via the county's self-updating adoption clauses) plus CEC Articles 690 & 705, CRC §R331 (fire pathways), and CFC §605.11.1 for PV-specific markings. 82% · standard plan
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Clear access pathways and roof access points required, per checklist, but Kings County does not publish its own numeric pathway/setback dimensions — it points applicants to the State Fire Marshal's Solar PV Installation Guideline for examples. 78% · department bulletin
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Required (flows from the currently-adopted 2023 NEC/2025 CEC cycle, NEC 690.12); Kings County's own standard-plan documents do not use the phrase 'rapid shutdown' anywhere — verified with a positive control ('electrical': 3 hits) and a fabricated control ('zzqqx': 0 hits) to confirm the search itself was working, not a broken query. 75% · code adoption clause (inference)
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? PV System AC Disconnect placard; PV System DC Disconnect placard; 'Dual Power Sources' warning at the main service panel; electric-shock-hazard warning at the inverter; 'Photovoltaic Power Source' warning at junction/combiner boxes and along exposed conduit (marked every 10 feet). 90% · standard plan
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 82% · standard plan
    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes — a roof diagram/facility map showing panel layout, roof access point location, code-compliant access pathways, PV fire classification, and locations of all required labels/markings. 85% · department bulletin
    • Where must the labels be placed? At the PV system AC and DC disconnects, at the inverter, at junction/combiner boxes, along exposed conduit runs (every 10 ft), and at the main service panel. 88% · standard plan
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes 90% · standard plan
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Batteries/ESS are excluded from the expedited path — eligibility checklist item D requires the system be 'utility interactive and without battery storage.' Systems with batteries must go through standard (non-expedited) review; specific conditions for that path were not found in the documents reviewed. 82% · checklist
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Yes — prescriptive lag-screw/anchor spacing table (Table 1, by roof slope and rafter spacing), 5/16" diameter lag screws with 2.5" embedment (or manufacturer-rated fastener) as the default attachment method. 92% · checklist/form

20 questions answered against Kings County’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2023 (as adopted within the current 2025 California Electrical Code cycle)

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-71 self-executes: '180 days after the publication of any subsequent triennial edition of the California Electrical Code... that subsequent triennial edition shall replace the previous edition' — the codified text still literally reads '2013 edition' because Ch.5 hasn't been retyped since 2015, but the county's own live permit portal states 'AS OF JANUARY 1, 2026 ALL SUBMITTALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NEW 2025 BUILDING CODES,' confirming the ratchet has already fired.

portal notice + code auto-adoption clause checked 2026-08-30 https://cdapermits.countyofkings.com/

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2025 California Building Code (13th edition cycle), effective 1 Jan 2026

Why the confidence is not higherSame auto-ratchet mechanism (§5-36) plus the portal's direct Jan 2026 notice.

portal notice + code auto-adoption clause checked 2026-08-30 https://cdapermits.countyofkings.com/

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

2019 California Fire Code (Ord. No. 694, adopted 12/17/2019) — the last fire-code-specific ordinance found

Why the confidence is not higherImportant asymmetry: unlike Building/Electrical/Plumbing (§§5-36, 5-71, 5-81), the Fire Code adoption section (§10-1) contains NO self-updating triennial-ratchet clause — it names '2019 California Fire Code' as a fixed reference. As of the current Municode supplement (through Apr 2025), no newer fire-code ordinance is codified, so the Fire Code may genuinely lag the 2025 cycle the Building/Electrical codes just auto-adopted. Confirm with the Fire Department directly before relying on this.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH10FIPRPR

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherFire Code carries multiple named local amendments (§101.1 title, §507.5.1.1 hydrant distance, §901.6.3.2 added, several NFPA 13D amendments); Plumbing Code carries a local septic-table amendment (§5-82).

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH10FIPRPR

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The currently-adopted California Building/Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical Codes (Title 24, via the county's self-updating adoption clauses) plus CEC Articles 690 & 705, CRC §R331 (fire pathways), and CFC §605.11.1 for PV-specific markings.

Why the confidence is not higherSynthesized from Ch.5 adoption sections and the standard-plan documents' own code citations.

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCode §§5-36/5-71 (adoption clauses) and both Standard Plans, for a Kings-specific local amendment on service-upgrade/busbar sizing beyond the standard national 120%-busbar rule already in the NEC/CEC

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Yes — prescriptive lag-screw/anchor spacing table (Table 1, by roof slope and rafter spacing), 5/16" diameter lag screws with 2.5" embedment (or manufacturer-rated fastener) as the default attachment method.

Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from the county's own Structural Criteria form.

checklist/form checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9766/635792236901870000

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Clear access pathways and roof access points required, per checklist, but Kings County does not publish its own numeric pathway/setback dimensions — it points applicants to the State Fire Marshal's Solar PV Installation Guideline for examples.

Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal bulletin cites 'examples of clear path access pathways ... available in the State Fire Marshal Solar PV Installation Guide' rather than restating dimensions locally.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Required (flows from the currently-adopted 2023 NEC/2025 CEC cycle, NEC 690.12); Kings County's own standard-plan documents do not use the phrase 'rapid shutdown' anywhere — verified with a positive control ('electrical': 3 hits) and a fabricated control ('zzqqx': 0 hits) to confirm the search itself was working, not a broken query.

Why the confidence is not higherRequirement is inherited from the adopted code edition rather than restated by the county; genuine absence of the term in county documents, proven by control search.

code adoption clause (inference) checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

PV System AC Disconnect placard; PV System DC Disconnect placard; 'Dual Power Sources' warning at the main service panel; electric-shock-hazard warning at the inverter; 'Photovoltaic Power Source' warning at junction/combiner boxes and along exposed conduit (marked every 10 feet).

Why the confidence is not higherFull label text reproduced verbatim in the county's own Standard Plan, citing CEC 690/705, CRC R331.2, and CFC 605.11.1.

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No

Why the confidence is not higherThe wording reproduced in the Standard Plan is the standard CEC/CRC/CFC code-required marking language, not a Kings-County-invented custom wording.

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBoth Standard Plans (central and micro-inverter) and the Submittal Requirements bulletin, for county-specified letter height, color, or material for placards beyond the generic code 'WARNING' signal-word format

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes — a roof diagram/facility map showing panel layout, roof access point location, code-compliant access pathways, PV fire classification, and locations of all required labels/markings.

Why the confidence is not higherItem (d) of the county's own Submittal Requirements bulletin.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCounty documents only this run — the utility's (SCE) own DG/Rule 21 interconnection manual was not fetched, so any utility-specific placard requirements beyond the AHJ's are unconfirmed

https://ia.cpuc.ca.gov/environment/info/esa/mascot/PEA/mascot_app.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

At the PV system AC and DC disconnects, at the inverter, at junction/combiner boxes, along exposed conduit runs (every 10 ft), and at the main service panel.

Why the confidence is not higherSame Standard Plan marking pages as Q38.

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherStandard Plan cites CEC 690.4(D) and CEC 110.3: equipment must be 'identified and listed for the application' and installed per its listing.

standard plan checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Batteries/ESS are excluded from the expedited path — eligibility checklist item D requires the system be 'utility interactive and without battery storage.' Systems with batteries must go through standard (non-expedited) review; specific conditions for that path were not found in the documents reviewed.

Why the confidence is not higherDirect from the county's own Eligibility Checklist for Expedited Solar Photovoltaic Permitting.

checklist checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9758/635792236887570000

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCode §5-72, Solar Submittal Requirements bulletin, and Eligibility Checklist, for a separate ESS-specific permit or inspection requirement

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9758/635792236887570000

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCode Ch.5 and all solar documents reviewed (checklist explicitly scopes to roof-mounted systems only) for ground-mount-specific treatment as a structure

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9758/635792236887570000

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBoth Standard Plans, for a stated AC-disconnect-to-meter positioning rule; this is typically set by the utility's own DG manual (SCE Rule 21 handbook), which was not fetched this run

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9762/635792236894670000

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Phone or electronic/web request 90% · department bulletin
    • Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Not offered as such — requests received during business hours are 'typically scheduled for the next business day,' with no same-day or AM/PM window language found. 62% · department bulletin
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? One combined building-and-fire final inspection after installation is complete (expedited path); a follow-up re-inspection is authorized if the first fails. 90% · code of ordinances
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 88% · code of ordinances
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 85% · code of ordinances
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Written correction notice detailing all deficiencies and any additional information needed for expedited approval. 85% · code of ordinances

14 questions answered against Kings County’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Phone or electronic/web request

Why the confidence is not higherSubmittal bulletin: schedule by 'telephone at (559) 852-2672 or (559) 852-2652 or electronically'; the online portal also has a dedicated 'Request a Building Permit Inspection' function.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolar Submittal Requirements bulletin, for an explicit 'X business days advance notice' requirement; the document instead describes turnaround (next-business-day) rather than a notice period

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Not offered as such — requests received during business hours are 'typically scheduled for the next business day,' with no same-day or AM/PM window language found.

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the absence of same-day/window language in the county's own bulletin, which does describe next-business-day turnaround explicitly.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-72(f): for expedited-eligible systems, the required inspection 'shall include a combined building and fire inspection, both of which shall be conducted by the building official.'

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCode §5-72(f) — not applicable; inspection is self-performed by the building official, not delegated

https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

One combined building-and-fire final inspection after installation is complete (expedited path); a follow-up re-inspection is authorized if the first fails.

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-72(f).

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

No

Why the confidence is not higher§5-72(f) specifies 'only one inspection shall be required' for expedited-eligible systems — no separate rough-in/mid-roof step.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherThe county's own submittal bulletin includes a field-verification section checking that 'appropriate signs are properly constructed, installed and displayed' and that 'equipment ratings are consistent with application and installed signs,' i.e., an inspector-facing checklist.

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Yes

Why the confidence is not higherSame document doubles as a published field-inspection checklist (grounding, box access, fastening, conductor sizing, signage, equipment ratings).

department bulletin checked 2026-08-30 https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSolar Submittal Requirements bulletin (truncated 'must be prepared to show conformance with all technical requir[ements]...') for an itemized on-site-documents list

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/16185/636342431702200000

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCurrent (Jan 17, 2026) fee schedule PDF, page-by-page, for a re-inspection fee line specific to a failed solar/building inspection (a general 'Compliance Inspection $330' code-enforcement fee exists but is not evidently the same fee)

https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/39705/639052097138370000

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Written correction notice detailing all deficiencies and any additional information needed for expedited approval.

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-72(d).

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCode §5-72 and Solar Submittal Requirements bulletin, for the specific document/term issued on a passed final inspection (no 'CO'/'Final'/'Green tag'/'Letter' terminology found)

https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Installer

Why the confidence is not higherCode §5-72(e): permit approval 'does not authorize an applicant to connect... The applicant is responsible for obtaining such approval or permission from the local utility provider' — the AHJ takes no role in PTO notification.

code of ordinances checked 2026-08-30 https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for Kings County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

Kings County is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
Holds
Building and Electrical (both handled by the same Building Division; Planning and Fire review are expressly waived for qualifying ≤10kW residential solar)
Overridden by
CA Gov Code §65850.5 (AB 2188) mandates the expedited process, codified locally as Kings County Code §5-72; Civil Code §714 (Solar Rights Act) limits HOA/CC&R restriction; AB 130 (Stats. 2025 Ch. 22) now bars the county from adopting any residential amendment more restrictive than the state code through 1 Jun 2031
Why not higher
County's own Code of Ordinances §5-4 designates the CDA Building Official as enforcement authority for the unincorporated area; §5-72 (adopted to satisfy Gov Code §65850.5) confirms this authority also runs the state-mandated expedited solar process itself rather than delegating it. Note: this is §65850.5 (AB 2188, the base expedited-permitting mandate), not §65850.52 (SB 379's separate SolarAPP+ automated-permitting mandate) — no evidence found that Kings County uses SolarAPP+ instant issuance.

https://library.municode.com/ca/kings_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH5BUST

Check the code edition before you build

This authority's published code edition does not match what the state has adopted. That usually means the authority's ordinance has not been updated for the current cycle — but a local amendment can also be lawful. Confirm with the building department before you submit.

Fire code
This authority publishes 2019 2019 California Fire Code (Ord. No. 694, adopted 12/17/2019) — the last fire-code-specific ordinance found 65% · source
The state has adopted 2024/2025 2025 California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9), based on the 2024 International Fire Code, adopted by the Office of the State Fire Marshal with BSC approval. 90% · source
Permit required
Yes98%
Permit cost
Not a flat fee — building permit fee 'Per CBC' (valuation table) + electrical permit 'Per CEC' (valuation table) + a fixed $80 'PV Solar data processing/Permit' Public Works add-on.88%
Plan review
5 business days (non-over-the-counter); qualifying standard-plan submittals may be approved over the counter same-day76%
Portal
Kings County Online Permit Center (cdapermits.countyofkings.com)95%
Electrical code
2023 (as adopted within the current 2025 California Electrical Code cycle)85%
Own placard wording
No82%
Booking an inspection
Phone or electronic/web request90%
Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 82%

No

Size, colour & material None%

Where they go 88%

At the PV system AC and DC disconnects, at the inverter, at junction/combiner boxes, along exposed conduit runs (every 10 ft), and at the main service panel.

What the utility wants on top None%

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
County
County
Kings County
Regions served
7
Regions covered
Armona · county
Grangeville · county
Hardwick · county
Home Garden · county
Kettleman City · county
County of Kings · county
Stratford · county
Solar Requirements
Notes
Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.countyofkingsca.gov/departments/community-development-agency
Authority Contact
Address
1400 W. Lacey Blvd., Building #6, Hanford, CA 93230
Main Phone
(559) 852-2670
Building Department
Department
Community Development Agency - Building Division
Direct Phone
(559) 852-2670
Booking & Scheduling
Preferred channel
online
Notes
Final solar inspections are requested through the Kings County Web Permitting portal at cdapermits.countyofkings.com. Account registration is not required — unregistered users can request building inspections directly via the portal. Plans and specifications for permits can also be submitted electronically to kcgc.building@co.kings.ca.us. Deputy Director / Building Official: Darren Verdegaal at (559) 852-2683. Inspections line: (559) 852-2681. Fax: (559) 584-8989. Note: some sources list the address as 1440 W. Lacey Blvd. (collected Jul 2026)