Los Angeles County
State of California
Los Angeles County is the largest jurisdiction in California — 10,014,009 residents across 55 regions, with 31,479 residential solar installs on record. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. 'All solar photovoltaic systems require plan check' (B&S solar page); LACBC Ch. 68 presumes a permit and Electrical Code Sec. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined. LACBC 6804: 'A combined solar energy permit may be issued for photovoltaic systems, which will include all building and electrical work, Q4 Plan review — 1–3 business days on the expedited path. LACBC §6803: 'Upon receipt of a complete small residential rooftop solar energy system application, Q18 Where you file — EPIC-LA (Electronic Permitting and Inspections for the County of Los Angeles) — https://epicla.lacounty.gov/ — described by B&S as where applicants 'submit plans, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. 'All solar photovoltaic systems require plan check' (B&S solar page); LACBC Ch. 68 presumes a permit and Electrical Code Sec. 82-3 forbids installing electrical equipment without one.95% source
- What it costs
- Capped, not flat. The version of LACBC §6805 published by the County states: 'The combined permit fee for small residential rooftop photovoltaic systems shall not exceed $500 unless modified by or in…65% source
- Plan review turnaround
- 1–3 business days on the expedited path. LACBC §6803: 'Upon receipt of a complete small residential rooftop solar energy system application,85% source
- Key document
- adopted code (Sec. 82-5) + plan review checklist item 38 cited by 8 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — for an address in unincorporated LA County, LA County Public Works Building & Safety is the building and electrical AHJ, with LACoFD as the fire AHJ alongside it. 92% · adopted code (Title 27), 2026 edition
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both. It issues one combined solar energy permit including all building and electrical work. It delegates: ground-mount entitlement to Regional Planning; and it RECEIVES delegated fire review of conventional roof solar from LACoFD, which retains ESS, disconnect placarding, rapid-shutdown devices and some BIPV for its own separate inspection. 90% · adopted code (Title 26, Chapter 68) + LACoFD EG-10 guide
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. 'All solar photovoltaic systems require plan check' (B&S solar page); LACBC Ch. 68 presumes a permit and Electrical Code Sec. 82-3 forbids installing electrical equipment without one. 95% · department web page + adopted code
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined. LACBC 6804: 'A combined solar energy permit may be issued for photovoltaic systems, which will include all building and electrical work, however a separate plumbing permit, if needed, will be required.' 95% · adopted code (Title 26 Ch. 68 §6804)
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — not by this authority. HOA/architectural approval is not among the eligibility criteria in the expedited checklist, is not a listed submittal item, and is not an 'agency' on the referral sheet regime. Private CC&R restrictions on solar are separately limited by California Civil Code 714 (Solar Rights Act). 55% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026) — absence of requirement
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate wind or windstorm certification. Wind is handled inside the structural design: the expedited Structural Criteria works off design wind speed (110 mph typical, with Special Wind Region handling for 115–130 mph) and anchor/fastener tables; ballasted and ground-mounted systems trigger a wind design per SEAOC PV2-2017 or an ASCE 7 Chapter 31 wind tunnel test report, and a wind tunnel-based design additionally needs a Research Request with a filing fee under LACBC 104.2.7. 78% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 20-31 and 36-37
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for roof-mounted residential PV — 'Structure-mounted solar projects generally do not require review by Regional Planning.' For GROUND-mounted small-scale solar (energy used primarily on-site) a Site Plan Review is required if the property is not zoned O-S or W; a Minor CUP is required if a modification to development standards is sought OR the property is zoned O-S or W. Utility-scale ground-mounted facilities need a full CUP and are limited to listed zones, and are prohibited in Significant Ecological Areas and Economic Opportunity Areas. 78% · Regional Planning summary sheet (rev. 03/2019)
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No cap on generation as such — a cap on eligibility for the fast route. LACBC §6801/§6802 limit the expedited process to a PV system 'no larger than 10 kilowatts alternating current' nameplate rating on a one- or two-family dwelling (or 30 kWth solar thermal), and the Eligibility Checklist repeats '10kW AC CEC rating or less'. The Standard Plan is likewise scoped to systems 'not exceeding a system AC inverter output rating of 10kW'. Larger residential systems are still permittable — they go through standard plan check instead. Separate eligibility limits on the expedited path: interconnection to a single-phase 120/240 Vac service panel with a busbar rating of 225 A or less, load-side connection, no more than two inverters, and no battery storage. 85% · adopted code (Ch. 68 §§6801-6802) + BCM 6807 Att. B and C
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either. Electrical Code Sec. 82-4: 'The applicant for electrical permits for work exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) in value shall be a licensed contractor, registered maintenance electrician, homeowner, or authorized government representative.' A permit may also issue to a firm/partnership/corporation an officer or member of which is a licensed contractor, provided that person directly personally supervises the work. 95% · adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-4)
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? No. A CSLB-licensed contractor whose classification covers the work is entitled to perform it 'without personal local qualification or registration' (Sec. 82-4(a)). Note: a Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance must be presented to the local B&S office before a permit can be issued. Local registration exists only for the separate 'Registered Maintenance Electrician' category, which is not the contractor route. 93% · adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-4(a))
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes, with a hard condition. Sec. 82-4(c): a permit may issue to the owner of a single-family residence 'for his principal place of residence and appurtenances thereto, provided that work authorized under any such permit shall be done by the person to whom the permit is issued, or by a member of his immediate family.' Violation subjects the permit to immediate cancellation. The expedited path requires Form B — Affidavit for Owner-Builder. 93% · adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-4(c))
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? EXPEDITED path (≤10 kW AC, BCM 6807 Att. A): (a) completed permit application form; (b) demonstrated compliance with the Eligibility Checklist (Att. B); (c) a completed Standard Electrical Plan (Att. C central/string, or Att. D microinverter/ACM); (d) a roof plan showing roof layout, PV panels, approximate roof access point, code-compliant access pathways, PV system fire classification and the locations of all required labels and markings; (e) completed expedited Structural Criteria (Att. E) with supporting documentation; (f) completed Form A (contractor), Form B (owner-builder) or Form C affidavit acknowledging that a rooftop solar system shall not be installed on any unpermitted structure. STANDARD path (2026 Solar PV System Plan Review List, 2/1/2026): roof plan projected on a site plan; array/equipment locations and dimensions with access and pathways; roof fire classification, roofing material, number of layers, slopes, parapet height; all manufacturer specification sheets, installation instructions, certificates of compliance and UL listings; structural plans and calculations (see q13); electrical drawings signed with license information; single-line diagram; inverter, module and array data; conductor/OCPD sizing; label and warning samples; grounding details; rapid shutdown; plus 'Best Management Practice for Construction Activity' (Attachment A) attached and signed. All agency approvals are required prior to permit issuance per the attached agency referral sheet. 88% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026) + Building Code Manual 6807 Art. 1 Att. A
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic via EPIC-LA is the normal route for unincorporated areas. Where paper/hard copy is used: Electrical Code Sec. 82-5 — 'the applicant shall submit two sets of plans, specifications, calculations, and/or reports with the application.' On correction resubmittal the Plan Review List directs: 'Resubmit marked original plans and two corrected sets of plans, calculations and this plan review list.' Historic paper counter route: Electrical Section, 900 South Fremont Ave, Alhambra CA 91803, 3rd Floor. 85% · adopted code (Sec. 82-5) + plan review checklist
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. 'Provide a roof plan projected on a site plan. Show street name(s) and north arrow.' It must also show: the address of the building and the name and address of the owner(s) and of the person(s) preparing the plans on the first sheet; locations and dimensions of all PV arrays and equipment, depicted with roof access and pathways per Section 3111.3.4 or R329.6; roof fire classification, roofing material, number of layers, roof slope(s) and parapet height; the location of the main electrical service, the AC/DC disconnects, all PV equipment and the arrays. Expedited path adds: approximate location of roof access point, code-compliant access pathways, and the locations of all required labels and markings. 92% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026)
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes. Item 40: 'Single Line Diagram: Show array configuration, conduit and conductor sizes with derating calculations. (See Standard Electrical Diagram.)' A three-line diagram is not separately demanded. On the expedited path the county's own Standard Plan (BCM 6807 Att. C/D) contains pre-drawn single-line diagrams the applicant completes. 93% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 40
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes. Item 49: 'System Calculations: Show (VOC) x (temperature correction factor based on the lowest recorded temperature). (ISC) calculated x 125% (NEC 690) x 125% (UL 1703), OR (ISC) after the application of adjustment and correction factors. Size the PV circuit conductors to carry not less than the larger of the two. Overcurrent devices shall be rated to carry not less than (ISC) x 125%.' Item 44 additionally requires conductor ampacities adjusted with all derating factors and the rating and location of all OCPDs. On the expedited path these calculations are performed on the county's Standard Plan worksheet. 93% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 44 and 49
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Yes, with a defined exemption. Item 10: 'Structural plans and calculations signed by a licensed architect or civil engineer shall be submitted for the solar PV system… For one- and two-family dwellings, structural plans and calculations shall be submitted as described above, unless ALL of the following conditions are met: (a) existing roofing is wood shingle, asphalt shingle, or rolled/torch-down with two layers maximum; (b) the PV system weighs not more than 4 psf; (c) maximum concentrated load imposed by a support onto the roof structure is 40 lbs; (d) no portion of the panels is more than 18 in. above the roof immediately below; (e) maximum support spacing on wood-framed construction is 48 in. o.c., anchored to roof rafters or solid blocking with a minimum of one 5/16 in. diameter lag screw embedded a minimum of 2 1/2 in., or as recommended by the manufacturer, whichever is more stringent.' On the expedited path, BCM 6807 Att. E works the same way: if every checklist item is YES, 'No additional calculations are required'; if any item is NO, 'Attach project-specific drawings and calculations stamped and signed by a California-licensed Civil or Structural Engineer.' Ballasted and ground-mounted systems have their own engineering triggers (SEAOC PV1/PV2-2017, ASCE 7 Ch. 31 wind tunnel, ASTM G115 friction testing). 92% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 10 + BCM 6807 Att. E
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Not an absolute stamp for residential. Plan Review List item 38: electrical drawings 'shall bear the signature and license information of the person preparing the documents.' Electrical Code Sec. 82-5 is the governing rule: unless otherwise permitted by the Chief Electrical Inspector, plans, specifications and calculations 'shall be prepared and designed by a professional electrical engineer registered in the State of California… or by a person who is qualified to prepare electrical engineering documents and who is exempt from registration pursuant to the provisions of the Professional Engineer's Act,' and shall bear the preparer's signature and seal or stamp. In practice the licensed contractor route relies on that exemption, and the expedited Standard Plan is signed by 'Contractor/Engineer Name … License # and Class'. 78% · adopted code (Sec. 82-5) + plan review checklist item 38
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? EPIC-LA (Electronic Permitting and Inspections for the County of Los Angeles) — https://epicla.lacounty.gov/ — described by B&S as where applicants 'submit plans, specifications, and supporting documents for review and approval, pay permit fees, and apply for a permit.' The County publishes a solar-specific walkthrough, 'BSD Permit Road Map EPIC-LA Roof Mount Residential Solar'. Contract cities use a separate BSOP web application, not EPIC-LA. 95% · department web page + portal help documentation
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes. The County's permits page states applicants can 'Apply online for all your permitting and inspection needs', 'Submit electronic copies of all your plans and supporting documentation' and 'Pay all permit and inspection fees electronically', and inspections are requested in EPIC-LA. Chapter 68 §6803 confirms an application 'may be submitted in person or electronically through the online submittal system maintained by the Building Official'. A paper counter route remains available at Alhambra. 88% · department permits portal page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Capped, not flat. The version of LACBC §6805 published by the County states: 'The combined permit fee for small residential rooftop photovoltaic systems shall not exceed $500 unless modified by or in accordance with Government Code Section 66015 or other applicable law.' The later published edition of the same section replaces the dollar figure with 'shall not exceed the amount set forth in Government Code section 66015 or other applicable law.' The actual charge is computed from Building Code §107, Electrical Code §82-8 and Plumbing Code §§103.10/103.11, and Electrical Code fees are 'adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) pursuant to Section 107.17.' 65% · adopted code (Title 26 Ch. 68 §6805)
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered — valuation-based building fees (Building Code §107) plus an itemised per-unit electrical schedule (Electrical Code §82-8, charging separately for services, switchboards, panelboards, outlets, and generators/motors by HP/KW/KVA rating), CPI-adjusted annually, then subject to the statutory cap on the combined small-residential-rooftop-PV fee. It is not per kW and not per panel. 80% · adopted code (Sec. 82-8 fee schedule) + LACBC §6805
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes. Electrical Code Sec. 82-5: 'When a plan checking fee or other fees are required by this or any related ordinance or statute, such fees shall be collected at the time plans are filed.' Plan Review List instructions: 'Per section 107.2 of the LAC Building Code, additional fees may be charged for plan checks required after the second plan check.' Expiry of an application also forces a new plan checking or review fee. Both plan check and permit fees roll into the capped combined figure for a small residential rooftop PV system. 88% · plan review checklist instructions + adopted code Sec. 82-5
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? 1–3 business days on the expedited path. LACBC §6803: 'Upon receipt of a complete small residential rooftop solar energy system application, plan check review will be completed within one to three business days.' Where the application is incomplete, 'a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance will be issued.' No turnaround is published for the standard (non-expedited) plan check route. 85% · adopted code (Title 26 Ch. 68 §6803)
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 365 days to start, then 180 days of inactivity kills it. Electrical Code Sec. 82-2: a permit 'shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 12 months from the date such permit is issued, or the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days, or the permittee fails to obtain inspection as required by the provisions of Section 82-14 of this Code for a period of 180 days.' The Building Official may grant renewal within 180 days of expiration on written request plus a fee not exceeding 25% of the permit fee. EPIC-LA guidance mirrors this: request the first inspection within 12 months and schedule follow-up inspections every 6 months to keep the permit active. 92% · adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-2)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Southern California Edison (SCE) for the large majority of unincorporated LA County — interconnection under CPUC Electric Rule 21. SCE's territory covers Los Angeles County excluding the City of Los Angeles and certain other cities. LADWP serves the City of Los Angeles plus parts of a few adjacent areas, so a small number of unincorporated pockets may fall outside SCE. This must be confirmed per address. 65% · utility service territory map (secondary to the AHJ)
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with Permission to Operate strictly after the AHJ final. The interconnection application is filed with the utility alongside permitting, but PTO follows the passed building inspection. LACoFD adds a second gate on the same principle: 'A Passed Inspection Serves as an Operational Permit at a R-3/R-4 Occupancy, on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction (e.g., B&S, Utility, etc.).' 60% · LACoFD inspection checklist (2023-09-01)
28 questions answered against Los Angeles County’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — for an address in unincorporated LA County, LA County Public Works Building & Safety is the building and electrical AHJ, with LACoFD as the fire AHJ alongside it.
Why the confidence is not higherStated in the County's own adopted Electrical Code preamble and confirmed by the B&S solar plan check page directing unincorporated-area submittals to EPIC-LA. Not 100 because jurisdiction is address-specific and the County is also electrical AHJ in 8 contract cities.
adopted code (Title 27), 2026 edition checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both. It issues one combined solar energy permit including all building and electrical work. It delegates: ground-mount entitlement to Regional Planning; and it RECEIVES delegated fire review of conventional roof solar from LACoFD, which retains ESS, disconnect placarding, rapid-shutdown devices and some BIPV for its own separate inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherLACBC 6804 is explicit on the combined permit. The delegation direction is quoted verbatim in the LACoFD EG-10 guide. Held below 95 because the LACoFD guide is Rev. 2024-09-04 and cites the 2023 fire code cycle.
adopted code (Title 26, Chapter 68) + LACoFD EG-10 guide checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/CHAPTER%2068.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. 'All solar photovoltaic systems require plan check' (B&S solar page); LACBC Ch. 68 presumes a permit and Electrical Code Sec. 82-3 forbids installing electrical equipment without one.
Why the confidence is not higherStated plainly on the authority's own current plan-check page and backed by two adopted code sections.
department web page + adopted code checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/plancheck/solar
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined. LACBC 6804: 'A combined solar energy permit may be issued for photovoltaic systems, which will include all building and electrical work, however a separate plumbing permit, if needed, will be required.'
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quotation from the adopted Building Code chapter.
adopted code (Title 26 Ch. 68 §6804) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/CHAPTER%2068.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either. Electrical Code Sec. 82-4: 'The applicant for electrical permits for work exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) in value shall be a licensed contractor, registered maintenance electrician, homeowner, or authorized government representative.' A permit may also issue to a firm/partnership/corporation an officer or member of which is a licensed contractor, provided that person directly personally supervises the work.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the currently adopted 2026 County Electrical Code (effective 1 Jan 2026).
adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-4) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
No. A CSLB-licensed contractor whose classification covers the work is entitled to perform it 'without personal local qualification or registration' (Sec. 82-4(a)). Note: a Certificate of Worker's Compensation Insurance must be presented to the local B&S office before a permit can be issued. Local registration exists only for the separate 'Registered Maintenance Electrician' category, which is not the contractor route.
Why the confidence is not higherThe phrase 'without personal local qualification or registration' is verbatim in the adopted code, which is as direct a negative as this question can get. The worker's-comp condition comes from the Feb-2026 Plan Review List, item 2.
adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-4(a)) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes, with a hard condition. Sec. 82-4(c): a permit may issue to the owner of a single-family residence 'for his principal place of residence and appurtenances thereto, provided that work authorized under any such permit shall be done by the person to whom the permit is issued, or by a member of his immediate family.' Violation subjects the permit to immediate cancellation. The expedited path requires Form B — Affidavit for Owner-Builder.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the adopted code; the affidavit form requirement is from BCM 6807 Art. 1, which is dated 04-04-16 and may have been re-issued.
adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-4(c)) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
EXPEDITED path (≤10 kW AC, BCM 6807 Att. A): (a) completed permit application form; (b) demonstrated compliance with the Eligibility Checklist (Att. B); (c) a completed Standard Electrical Plan (Att. C central/string, or Att. D microinverter/ACM); (d) a roof plan showing roof layout, PV panels, approximate roof access point, code-compliant access pathways, PV system fire classification and the locations of all required labels and markings; (e) completed expedited Structural Criteria (Att. E) with supporting documentation; (f) completed Form A (contractor), Form B (owner-builder) or Form C affidavit acknowledging that a rooftop solar system shall not be installed on any unpermitted structure. STANDARD path (2026 Solar PV System Plan Review List, 2/1/2026): roof plan projected on a site plan; array/equipment locations and dimensions with access and pathways; roof fire classification, roofing material, number of layers, slopes, parapet height; all manufacturer specification sheets, installation instructions, certificates of compliance and UL listings; structural plans and calculations (see q13); electrical drawings signed with license information; single-line diagram; inverter, module and array data; conductor/OCPD sizing; label and warning samples; grounding details; rapid shutdown; plus 'Best Management Practice for Construction Activity' (Attachment A) attached and signed. All agency approvals are required prior to permit issuance per the attached agency referral sheet.
Why the confidence is not higherThe standard-path list is the authority's own document dated 2/1/2026 and citing the 2026 County codes — current. The expedited list is BCM 6807 Art. 1 dated 04-04-16 and built on the 2014 LACBC, so item numbering and form names may have moved even though Chapter 68 still points to BCM 6807 by name.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026) + Building Code Manual 6807 Art. 1 Att. A checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic via EPIC-LA is the normal route for unincorporated areas. Where paper/hard copy is used: Electrical Code Sec. 82-5 — 'the applicant shall submit two sets of plans, specifications, calculations, and/or reports with the application.' On correction resubmittal the Plan Review List directs: 'Resubmit marked original plans and two corrected sets of plans, calculations and this plan review list.' Historic paper counter route: Electrical Section, 900 South Fremont Ave, Alhambra CA 91803, 3rd Floor.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth figures are verbatim from current adopted code and the 2/1/2026 review list. Held below 95 because the two documents describe submittal and resubmittal respectively, and neither states a copy count for a fully electronic EPIC-LA submittal.
adopted code (Sec. 82-5) + plan review checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. 'Provide a roof plan projected on a site plan. Show street name(s) and north arrow.' It must also show: the address of the building and the name and address of the owner(s) and of the person(s) preparing the plans on the first sheet; locations and dimensions of all PV arrays and equipment, depicted with roof access and pathways per Section 3111.3.4 or R329.6; roof fire classification, roofing material, number of layers, roof slope(s) and parapet height; the location of the main electrical service, the AC/DC disconnects, all PV equipment and the arrays. Expedited path adds: approximate location of roof access point, code-compliant access pathways, and the locations of all required labels and markings.
Why the confidence is not higherItems 4-7 and 39 of the authority's own Feb-2026 plan review list, verbatim, plus BCM 6807 Att. A(d).
plan review checklist (2/1/2026) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes. Item 40: 'Single Line Diagram: Show array configuration, conduit and conductor sizes with derating calculations. (See Standard Electrical Diagram.)' A three-line diagram is not separately demanded. On the expedited path the county's own Standard Plan (BCM 6807 Att. C/D) contains pre-drawn single-line diagrams the applicant completes.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the current plan review list. Slightly below 95 only because the list does not say whether a three-line is ever substituted or additionally required for more complex services.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 40 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes. Item 49: 'System Calculations: Show (VOC) x (temperature correction factor based on the lowest recorded temperature). (ISC) calculated x 125% (NEC 690) x 125% (UL 1703), OR (ISC) after the application of adjustment and correction factors. Size the PV circuit conductors to carry not less than the larger of the two. Overcurrent devices shall be rated to carry not less than (ISC) x 125%.' Item 44 additionally requires conductor ampacities adjusted with all derating factors and the rating and location of all OCPDs. On the expedited path these calculations are performed on the county's Standard Plan worksheet.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the current plan review list.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 44 and 49 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Yes, with a defined exemption. Item 10: 'Structural plans and calculations signed by a licensed architect or civil engineer shall be submitted for the solar PV system… For one- and two-family dwellings, structural plans and calculations shall be submitted as described above, unless ALL of the following conditions are met: (a) existing roofing is wood shingle, asphalt shingle, or rolled/torch-down with two layers maximum; (b) the PV system weighs not more than 4 psf; (c) maximum concentrated load imposed by a support onto the roof structure is 40 lbs; (d) no portion of the panels is more than 18 in. above the roof immediately below; (e) maximum support spacing on wood-framed construction is 48 in. o.c., anchored to roof rafters or solid blocking with a minimum of one 5/16 in. diameter lag screw embedded a minimum of 2 1/2 in., or as recommended by the manufacturer, whichever is more stringent.' On the expedited path, BCM 6807 Att. E works the same way: if every checklist item is YES, 'No additional calculations are required'; if any item is NO, 'Attach project-specific drawings and calculations stamped and signed by a California-licensed Civil or Structural Engineer.' Ballasted and ground-mounted systems have their own engineering triggers (SEAOC PV1/PV2-2017, ASCE 7 Ch. 31 wind tunnel, ASTM G115 friction testing).
Why the confidence is not higherThe threshold is quoted verbatim from the authority's current (2/1/2026) plan review list, and corroborated by the expedited Structural Criteria checklist. Note the standard path names a 'licensed architect or civil engineer' while the expedited path names a 'Civil or Structural Engineer' — the two county documents do not use identical wording.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 10 + BCM 6807 Att. E checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Not an absolute stamp for residential. Plan Review List item 38: electrical drawings 'shall bear the signature and license information of the person preparing the documents.' Electrical Code Sec. 82-5 is the governing rule: unless otherwise permitted by the Chief Electrical Inspector, plans, specifications and calculations 'shall be prepared and designed by a professional electrical engineer registered in the State of California… or by a person who is qualified to prepare electrical engineering documents and who is exempt from registration pursuant to the provisions of the Professional Engineer's Act,' and shall bear the preparer's signature and seal or stamp. In practice the licensed contractor route relies on that exemption, and the expedited Standard Plan is signed by 'Contractor/Engineer Name … License # and Class'.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth quotations are from current authoritative documents, but the code sets a conditional rather than a numeric threshold and delegates the call to the Chief Electrical Inspector — so there is no stated kW or service-size trigger to report.
adopted code (Sec. 82-5) + plan review checklist item 38 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Capped, not flat. The version of LACBC §6805 published by the County states: 'The combined permit fee for small residential rooftop photovoltaic systems shall not exceed $500 unless modified by or in accordance with Government Code Section 66015 or other applicable law.' The later published edition of the same section replaces the dollar figure with 'shall not exceed the amount set forth in Government Code section 66015 or other applicable law.' The actual charge is computed from Building Code §107, Electrical Code §82-8 and Plumbing Code §§103.10/103.11, and Electrical Code fees are 'adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) pursuant to Section 107.17.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe $500 figure is the County's own wording but appears in the Chapter 68 PDF built on the 2014 LACBC; the current edition's wording defers to Gov. Code 66015 instead of naming a number, and the electrical fee table is CPI-indexed annually. I could not find a published 2026 dollar figure for a residential PV permit on a County page, so I will not assert one.
adopted code (Title 26 Ch. 68 §6805) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/CHAPTER%2068.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered — valuation-based building fees (Building Code §107) plus an itemised per-unit electrical schedule (Electrical Code §82-8, charging separately for services, switchboards, panelboards, outlets, and generators/motors by HP/KW/KVA rating), CPI-adjusted annually, then subject to the statutory cap on the combined small-residential-rooftop-PV fee. It is not per kW and not per panel.
Why the confidence is not higherThe fee mechanism is stated in LACBC §6805 and the structure is visible in the §82-8 fee table in the adopted 2026 Electrical Code, which contains no solar- or per-kW-specific line item. Held below 90 because I read the electrical schedule's headings and sample entries rather than every line of the table.
adopted code (Sec. 82-8 fee schedule) + LACBC §6805 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes. Electrical Code Sec. 82-5: 'When a plan checking fee or other fees are required by this or any related ordinance or statute, such fees shall be collected at the time plans are filed.' Plan Review List instructions: 'Per section 107.2 of the LAC Building Code, additional fees may be charged for plan checks required after the second plan check.' Expiry of an application also forces a new plan checking or review fee. Both plan check and permit fees roll into the capped combined figure for a small residential rooftop PV system.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth quotations are verbatim from current documents; below 95 because neither states the plan check fee as a discrete published amount for solar.
plan review checklist instructions + adopted code Sec. 82-5 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
1–3 business days on the expedited path. LACBC §6803: 'Upon receipt of a complete small residential rooftop solar energy system application, plan check review will be completed within one to three business days.' Where the application is incomplete, 'a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance will be issued.' No turnaround is published for the standard (non-expedited) plan check route.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the County's adopted Chapter 68, and the same language appears in the later published edition of the chapter. Below 95 because the PDF I read is the edition based on the 2014 LACBC and I confirmed the wording's survival through a secondary code library rather than the 2026 County printing.
adopted code (Title 26 Ch. 68 §6803) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/CHAPTER%2068.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
365 days to start, then 180 days of inactivity kills it. Electrical Code Sec. 82-2: a permit 'shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 12 months from the date such permit is issued, or the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days, or the permittee fails to obtain inspection as required by the provisions of Section 82-14 of this Code for a period of 180 days.' The Building Official may grant renewal within 180 days of expiration on written request plus a fee not exceeding 25% of the permit fee. EPIC-LA guidance mirrors this: request the first inspection within 12 months and schedule follow-up inspections every 6 months to keep the permit active.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the currently adopted 2026 Electrical Code and consistent with the County's own permit portal guidance.
adopted code (Title 27, Sec. 82-2) checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
EPIC-LA (Electronic Permitting and Inspections for the County of Los Angeles) — https://epicla.lacounty.gov/ — described by B&S as where applicants 'submit plans, specifications, and supporting documents for review and approval, pay permit fees, and apply for a permit.' The County publishes a solar-specific walkthrough, 'BSD Permit Road Map EPIC-LA Roof Mount Residential Solar'. Contract cities use a separate BSOP web application, not EPIC-LA.
Why the confidence is not higherNamed and linked on the authority's own current solar plan check page, with a solar-specific help document.
department web page + portal help documentation checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/plancheck/solar
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes. The County's permits page states applicants can 'Apply online for all your permitting and inspection needs', 'Submit electronic copies of all your plans and supporting documentation' and 'Pay all permit and inspection fees electronically', and inspections are requested in EPIC-LA. Chapter 68 §6803 confirms an application 'may be submitted in person or electronically through the online submittal system maintained by the Building Official'. A paper counter route remains available at Alhambra.
Why the confidence is not higherThe authority's own portal and code both say so. Held below 95 because I confirmed end-to-end online issuance from the portal's description rather than by running a real application through it, and the LACoFD leg of the process is explicitly booked by phone and email, not through EPIC-LA.
department permits portal page checked 2026-08-28 https://permits.lacounty.gov/permits/building-and-safety/
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Southern California Edison (SCE) for the large majority of unincorporated LA County — interconnection under CPUC Electric Rule 21. SCE's territory covers Los Angeles County excluding the City of Los Angeles and certain other cities. LADWP serves the City of Los Angeles plus parts of a few adjacent areas, so a small number of unincorporated pockets may fall outside SCE. This must be confirmed per address.
Why the confidence is not higherSCE's own territory description and Rule 21 are solid, but no LA County Public Works document names the interconnecting utility, and the utility is a per-address fact, not a per-jurisdiction one. Deliberately not asserted as a single answer for the whole authority.
utility service territory map (secondary to the AHJ) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/custom-files/docs/PDF/080508_Service_Territory_Map.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, with Permission to Operate strictly after the AHJ final. The interconnection application is filed with the utility alongside permitting, but PTO follows the passed building inspection. LACoFD adds a second gate on the same principle: 'A Passed Inspection Serves as an Operational Permit at a R-3/R-4 Occupancy, on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction (e.g., B&S, Utility, etc.).'
Why the confidence is not higherThe LACoFD quotation is the authority's own and confirms the utility is a separate downstream gate, but no LA County document sets out where the interconnection application sits in the sequence — the 'parallel' characterisation comes from general SCE Rule 21 practice, not from the AHJ.
LACoFD inspection checklist (2023-09-01) checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — not by this authority. HOA/architectural approval is not among the eligibility criteria in the expedited checklist, is not a listed submittal item, and is not an 'agency' on the referral sheet regime. Private CC&R restrictions on solar are separately limited by California Civil Code 714 (Solar Rights Act).
Why the confidence is not higherThis is an inference from two County documents that do not mention HOAs, rather than a positive statement that HOA approval is not required. I read the Chapter 68 eligibility checklist and the Feb-2026 plan review list in full; neither names an HOA. I did not obtain the agency referral sheet itself.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026) — absence of requirement checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFull text of the 2026 Solar PV System Plan Review List (2/1/2026), including its 'REFERRALS' block which states only 'ALL AGENCY APPROVALS are required prior to permit issuance. Please see the attached agency referral sheet for details'; full text of LACBC Chapter 68 and of BCM 6807 Art. 1 including the Eligibility Checklist (Att. B). No historic-district or landmark review is named in any of them. I did NOT obtain the agency referral sheet itself, which is where such a referral would appear, and LA County does operate a historic preservation ordinance and landmark/historic district programme under Title 22. Cannot record either a Yes or a No honestly.
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No separate wind or windstorm certification. Wind is handled inside the structural design: the expedited Structural Criteria works off design wind speed (110 mph typical, with Special Wind Region handling for 115–130 mph) and anchor/fastener tables; ballasted and ground-mounted systems trigger a wind design per SEAOC PV2-2017 or an ASCE 7 Chapter 31 wind tunnel test report, and a wind tunnel-based design additionally needs a Research Request with a filing fee under LACBC 104.2.7.
Why the confidence is not higherThe mechanism is set out verbatim in the current plan review list (items 21-24, 36-37) and BCM 6807 Att. E. Scored below 90 because it is the absence of a separate certificate being inferred from a complete reading of the wind provisions, not an explicit statement that none exists.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 20-31 and 36-37 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Not for roof-mounted residential PV — 'Structure-mounted solar projects generally do not require review by Regional Planning.' For GROUND-mounted small-scale solar (energy used primarily on-site) a Site Plan Review is required if the property is not zoned O-S or W; a Minor CUP is required if a modification to development standards is sought OR the property is zoned O-S or W. Utility-scale ground-mounted facilities need a full CUP and are limited to listed zones, and are prohibited in Significant Ecological Areas and Economic Opportunity Areas.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from LA County Regional Planning's own summary sheet, but that sheet is marked 'Revised_ 03/2019' and the Renewable Energy Ordinance may have been amended since.
Regional Planning summary sheet (rev. 03/2019) checked 2026-08-28 https://planning.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ground-mounted-solar-projects-summary.pdf
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No cap on generation as such — a cap on eligibility for the fast route. LACBC §6801/§6802 limit the expedited process to a PV system 'no larger than 10 kilowatts alternating current' nameplate rating on a one- or two-family dwelling (or 30 kWth solar thermal), and the Eligibility Checklist repeats '10kW AC CEC rating or less'. The Standard Plan is likewise scoped to systems 'not exceeding a system AC inverter output rating of 10kW'. Larger residential systems are still permittable — they go through standard plan check instead. Separate eligibility limits on the expedited path: interconnection to a single-phase 120/240 Vac service panel with a busbar rating of 225 A or less, load-side connection, no more than two inverters, and no battery storage.
Why the confidence is not higherAll figures verbatim from the County's own Chapter 68 and BCM 6807 Att. B/C. Flagged: California's SB 379 automated-permitting threshold is 38.4 kW AC, which is higher than the County's own published 10 kW expedited scope — the County document may lag the state standard.
adopted code (Ch. 68 §§6801-6802) + BCM 6807 Att. B and C checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/CHAPTER%2068.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC, as the 2025 California Electrical Code, adopted locally as the 2026 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code (Title 27), effective January 1, 2026. The County's title page reads: 'Adopting by reference Portions of the 2025 Edition CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE… TITLE 27 Of the Los Angeles County Code. Effective January 1, 2026.' The submittal date, not the issuance date, determines which cycle applies. 95% · adopted code, cover and preamble
- Which building code edition is in force? 2026 County of Los Angeles Building Code (Title 26), adopting the 2025 California Building Code, effective January 1, 2026. The same cycle covers: Electrical Title 27, Plumbing Title 28, Mechanical Title 29, Residential Title 30, Green Building Standards Title 31, Existing Building Title 33. For one- and two-family dwellings the operative document is the 2026 County of Los Angeles Residential Code (Title 30). Enforcement runs from application date on or after 1 January 2026. 95% · department code page + adopting ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. 'Each Code incorporates local County of Los Angeles amendments and the respective State and model codes.' Fire Code amendments material to solar are the ones that bite: LACFC §509/§509.3 (grouped disconnect location), §509.1.1 and §1207.11.5.1 (disconnect placarding), §1207.11 and §1207.11.3.1 (residential ESS), and §603.4/§603.4.1 (working clearances treating PV and ESS each as electrical service equipment). Notably, I found NO local amendment to Electrical Code Articles 690, 705, 706 or 480 — Title 27 is the administrative title and adopts the 2025 CEC technical requirements unmodified. 85% · department code page + full-text search of adopted Title 27 + LACoFD guides
- What is the installation judged against? The 2026 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code (i.e. the 2025 California Electrical Code / 2023 NEC as locally adopted), plus the approved plans. Plan Review List item 38: 'Provide electrical drawings to show compliance with the applicable provisions of the 2026 Los Angeles County Electrical Code.' The BCM inspection guide repeatedly frames field checks as conformance 'according to the approved plan'. Chapter 68 §6807.4 adds that the PV system 'shall be identified and listed for the application as referenced in the Electrical Code'. 92% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 38
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Required, and judged against named code sections. Plan Review List item 6: 'Show the locations and dimensions of all solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays and equipment. Depict the array(s) with roof access and pathways per Section 3111.3.4 or R329.6' — i.e. LA County Building Code §3111.3.4 (2025 CBC) for non-R3, and Residential Code §R329.6 for one- and two-family dwellings. Item 17 adds: 'Do not cover mechanical and plumbing vents at roof with solar PV panels.' The expedited roof plan must show 'approximate location of roof access point, location of code-compliant access pathways, PV system fire classification', with the State Fire Marshal Solar PV Installation Guide cited for pathway examples. Fire-side, LACoFD flags Ridge-Vent Openings (in the Wildland-Urban Interface) and Escape and Rescue Opening Pathways as matters requiring its regional office for BIPV designs. 82% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 6 and 17
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — 2023 NEC as the 2025 CEC. Plan Review List item 52: 'Rapid Shutdown: Provide a rapid shutdown function that controls specific conductors in accordance with 2025 CEC Article 690.12(A) through (D).' Item 48 separately requires arc-fault protection per 2025 CEC Article 690.11 for systems operating at 80 V DC or greater between any two conductors. Additionally, LACoFD requires the rapid-shutdown initiation device to be one of the placarded, exterior-accessible disconnects and to be counted in the placard numbering: 'placards shall be included in the total number of placards ("Y") as necessary to ensure inclusion of any/all switches necessary to initiate each PV "Rapid Shutdown" or similar function for each PV system having one, new or existing.' 92% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 52 + LACoFD Guide Appendix B
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Two stacked sets. (A) NEC/CEC-derived labels, which the County's expedited Standard Plan lays out explicitly as 'CEC Articles 690 and 705 and CRC Section R331 require the following labels or markings be installed at these components': WARNING / INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION; DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE (CEC 705.12(D)(7), not required if the panelboard is rated not less than the sum of the ampere ratings of all overcurrent devices supplying it); WARNING / DUAL POWER SOURCES / SECOND SOURCE IS PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT — ___ AMPS AC / NORMAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ___ VOLTS (CEC 690.54 & 705.12(D)(4)); PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT — ___ AMPS / AC NORMAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ___ VOLTS (CEC 690.54); PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT / RATED MAX POWER-POINT CURRENT — ___ ADC / RATED MAX POWER-POINT VOLTAGE — ___ VDC / SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT — ___ ADC / MAXIMUM SYSTEM VOLTAGE — ___ VDC (CEC 690.53); WARNING / ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD. THE DC CONDUCTORS OF THIS PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM ARE UNGROUNDED AND MAY BE ENERGIZED (CEC 690.35(F), ungrounded systems only); WARNING / ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD / IF A GROUND FAULT IS INDICATED, NORMALLY GROUNDED CONDUCTORS MAY BE UNGROUNDED AND ENERGIZED (CEC 690.5(C)); WARNING / ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD / DO NOT TOUCH TERMINALS / TERMINALS ON BOTH LINE AND LOAD SIDES MAY BE ENERGIZED IN THE OPEN POSITION (CEC 690.17); WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE (CRC R331.2 and CFC 605.11.1) marked on junction/combiner boxes and on conduit every 10 ft; and a permanent plaque or directory denoting all electric power sources on or in the premises (CEC 705.12). (B) The LACoFD Electrical Power Source Disconnect Placarding System — a County-specific exterior placard reading 'F.D. – ELECTRICAL BLDG DISCONNECT # X of Y', plus panel-interior placards reading '#X' to identify specific switches/breakers within a panel. Current plan review list item 45 requires 'System Labels and Warnings: Show required signage on the plans per 2025 CEC Article 690.13. Show directory placard denoting all power sources and disconnects on the site.' 85% · BCM 6807 Att. C Markings page + LACoFD Guide Appendix B + plan review checklist item 45
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes — emphatically, and this is the distinctive local requirement. LACoFD specifies its own placard verbiage, not found in the NEC: exterior placards read 'F.D. – ELECTRICAL BLDG DISCONNECT # X of Y'; panel-interior placards read '#X'. 'Verbiage and word arrangement shall be as pictured above, wherein "X" and "Y" are replaced with the appropriate numbers based upon the determination of a C-10 electrician (or other classification when a C-10 is not required for the scope of work being performed), with approval of the fire code official. All "X"s shall account for the total number "Y" of essential switches and/or panels to be operated in order to completely disconnect the structure from all power sources (and activate rapid shutdown, when applicable).' The system must account for every power source capable of supplying the structure — utility, generator, PV, ESS, wind, fuel-cell, vehicle-to-grid — and 'A pre-wired optional auxiliary power source input shall also constitute a wired capability to be served by more than one power source, and therefore shall require a placarded disconnect'. 90% · LACoFD Guide for ESS, PV and Disconnects, Appendix B (2023-09-01)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Yes — unusually precise. LACoFD Appendix B: SIZE AND MATERIAL — 'Exterior Placards (FIGURE 1) shall be a minimum 2 inches tall by 3.5 inches wide weather resistant plastic, with verbiage engraved'; 'Panel-Interior Placards (FIGURE 2) shall be a minimum 7/16 inches tall by ¾ inches wide weather resistant plastic, with verbiage engraved'. COLOUR — 'Color shall be red letters engraved into a yellow "background" with the verbiage as displayed.' CHARACTER TYPE — Exterior: 'Solid, all-capitals, in Arial font, minimum font size 24. "F.D." and "# X of Y" shall be in bold type and minimum font size 28'; Panel-Interior: 'Solid, all-capitals, in Arial font, bold, minimum font size 24.' ATTACHMENT — 'Attachment shall be by means of permanent epoxy that is material, weather, and surface compatible.' Separately, for the NEC-derived labels, BCM 6807 gives an advisory rather than a mandate: 'ANSI Z535.4 provides guidelines… A phenolic plaque with contrasting colors between the text and background would meet the intent of the code for permanency. No type size is specified, but 20 point (3/8") should be considered the minimum.' 90% · LACoFD Guide Appendix B, §B.1-B.4 (2023-09-01)
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? A directory placard, yes; a facility site map, only for ESS plan submittals. Plan Review List item 45 requires: 'Show directory placard denoting all power sources and disconnects on the site' — this is the CEC 705.12 'permanent plaque or directory, denoting all electric power sources on or in the premises', and the BCM inspection guide lists it among the signs checked in the field. There is no separate firefighter site-map placard specified for a residential rooftop PV system. The equivalent function is served by the LACoFD 'X of Y' numbering, which tells a firefighter at the panel how many disconnects exist and that they have found one of them. For ESS projects going to Fire plan review, a scaled site plan is a submittal requirement (showing unit locations, spacing, setbacks, impact protection) — but that is a drawing, not a placard. 80% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 45 + BCM 6807 Att. A + LACoFD Guide
- Where must the labels be placed? LACoFD placards: 'Each placarded disconnect initiation device shall be accessible from the exterior of the structure(s).' 'Exterior Placards shall be placed onto the exterior of, or immediately adjacent to, each panel/enclosure or standalone disconnect switch that is necessary to be operated. Additional Exterior Placards may be required by the fire code official, such as when an enclosure houses multiple panels, or when more than the "Main" within a placarded panel is necessary to be operated.' 'Panel-Interior Placards are required to be placed inside a panel to identify specific switches/breakers when multiple switches within a single panel/enclosure are required to be operated.' Placement locations are 'determined by a C-10 electrician… and are subject to approval by the fire code official', and where the need for additional 'X of Y' placards is unclear the fire code official decides. NEC-derived labels go at their code-specified components: at the DC disconnect, at the AC point of connection, at the switch for the alternative power system, on junction/combiner boxes, on raceways carrying PV circuits every 10 ft, and the directory at the service equipment. 90% · LACoFD Guide Appendix B §B.7 + BCM 6807 Att. A
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Two rules stack, and the fire rule is the binding one locally. ELECTRICAL (plan review item 47): 'Disconnects: Show AC/DC disconnects at inverter that are grouped together and identified. AC disconnects required to be within sight of the inverter and readily accessible.' FIRE (LACFC §509.3, as enforced by LACoFD): electrical disconnection means and rapid shutdown activation devices for all power sources serving a structure 'shall be located: on the exterior, within 6 feet (1829 mm) of the main service panel, on the same wall plane, and maintained not separated from one another by walls, gates, fences, vegetation, or architectural features of the building.' Where remote means are necessary, 'physical disconnection shall be achieved at the source of the hazard itself, such as by use of relay(s)'. The fire code official may grant case-by-case exceptions where site constraints make this impractical, but 'clear, permanent signage shall be provided in all cases', with colour, content, number and medium as determined by the fire code official. Working clearance in front of the equipment: not less than 30 in. wide (or the equipment width if wider), 36 in. deep, 78 in. high, kept clear of stored materials — and both an ESS and a PV system each count as electrical service equipment for this purpose. 88% · LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist §IV.1 and §IV.3 + plan review checklist item 47
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes in effect. Listing is mandatory: Chapter 68 §6807.4 — the PV system 'shall be identified and listed for the application as referenced in the Electrical Code'; plan review item 8 requires all manufacturer specification sheets, installation instructions, certificates of compliance and UL listings attached to the plans. ESS item 53: 'All energy storage system equipment shall be listed by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory either individually or as a complete, self-contained system… UL 1973, UL 1989, and UL 9540. Section R328.2. Residential ESS shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL9540.' BESS inverters must be tested to UL 1741 and Supplement SA or SB, and a BESS spec sheet must go to the California Energy Commission for JA12 certification. A County-maintained list does exist for racking: item 46 permits satisfying grounding/bonding by using 'a Los Angeles County-recognized UL 2703 racking system', and the expedited fastener check accepts an anchor that is 'LA County approved for such application'. 82% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 8, 46, 53, 63-64 + LACBC §6807.4
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, but NOT on the expedited rooftop path, and under substantial fire conditions. Chapter 68's Eligibility Checklist requires 'Solar system is utility interactive and without battery storage', and the Standard Plan says it 'is not intended for… systems that utilize storage batteries'. Batteries therefore go through standard plan check. Conditions then: equipment listed by an NRTL, residential ESS listed and labelled to UL 9540 (R328.2); location restricted — 'Section R328.4 only permits non-habitable locations within a residence for ESS (such as a garage or utility room for example)'; a disconnecting means for all ungrounded conductors per 2025 CEC 706.15(A)-(D), readily accessible, within sight of the ESS, lockable in the open position, and 'For one-family and two-family dwellings, a disconnecting means shall be located at a readily accessible location outside the building'; overcurrent protection at the energy-storage-component end where circuits pass through a wall, floor or ceiling (706.31(F)); impact protection where subject to physical damage, not required where no portion of the unit is less than 36 inches above the finished floor. LACoFD fire limits: individual ESS units capped at 20 kWh; aggregate per site 80 kWh maximum, with 80 kWh sub-limits by location (inside attached garages, inside detached garages, outdoors on the outer side of exterior walls, outdoors on the ground); units separated from each other by at least 3 feet, and maintained a minimum of 3 feet from specified features including a 3-foot separation from dwelling gas-meter equipment; pre-existing ESS counts toward the aggregate. ESS inside attached garages cannot use the Fire Fast-Track process and requires plan submittal to Fire. 85% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 53-58 + LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist §II + BCM 6807 Att. B
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Not a separate B&S permit, but yes a separate FIRE inspection. On the B&S side ESS work is added to the building/electrical permit and reviewed under the standard path. On the fire side, LACoFD requires its own inspection for 'ESS installations with a capacity of more than 3 kWh (2023 LACFC Section 1207.11)' — capacity meaning 'the total energy capable of being stored (nameplate rating), not the usable energy rating'. That inspection is separately requested, separately invoiced, and must be passed before use. 88% · LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist §I.2.b (2023-09-01)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes — and on two tracks. Structurally: 'Structural plans and calculations shall be submitted for ground mounted solar PV system including materials specifications, supporting member sizes, foundation dimensions, and the loads imposed on the foundation. Exception: For one- and two-family dwellings, a site review and electrical plan check are required when no portion of the system is greater than 72 inches above grade not to exceed 3:1 slope.' Structures adjacent to ascending or descending slopes must maintain setbacks per §1808.7, with structural plans and calculations required for foundations on slopes steeper than 1:3 (33.3%). Also required: a raceway/enclosure for PV source conductors OR a fence detail guarding the array perimeter (with extra bonding if the fence is metallic). Zoning-wise it is also a land-use matter: ground-mounted small-scale solar needs Regional Planning Site Plan Review (or a Minor CUP), max height 15 feet, and counts toward a maximum lot coverage of '25% of lot or 2.5 acres, whichever is lesser (including all accessory structures)'. Roof-mounted PV, by contrast, 'generally do[es] not require review by Regional Planning'. 85% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 32-35 + Regional Planning ground-mounted solar summary
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes, several. (1) Item 50: 'Clearly identify the point of interconnection with the utility supplied wiring system and provide details on main breaker, PV breaker and rating of bussing. Service and distribution panels shall comply with the interconnection requirements of 2025 CEC Article Sect. 705.12(B)(3)(1) through (6). Show compliance with one of these methods on the plans.' (2) Item 51: identify whether main service equipment is new or existing and give the ratings of the main service panel and service disconnecting means. (3) BCM inspection check: 'Sum of the main OCPD and the inverter OCPD is rated for not more than 120% of the bus bar rating', and 'Inverter output circuit breaker is located at opposite end of bus from utility supply… (not required if the sum of the inverter and utility supply circuit breakers is less than or equal to the panelboard bus rating).' (4) Expedited eligibility caps the busbar at 225 A on a 120/240 V single-phase service. (5) Items 59-60 govern Power Control Systems under 705.13, requiring listed PCS equipment and the PCS setting shown on the plans. 88% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 50-51, 59-60 + BCM 6807 Att. A/B/F
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No specific product is mandated, but attachment spacing is prescribed. Standard path exemption criteria (item 10e): maximum support spacing on wood-framed construction 48 in. o.c., anchored to roof rafters or solid blocking with a minimum of one 5/16 in. diameter lag screw embedded a minimum of 2 1/2 in., or per manufacturer, whichever is more stringent. Expedited path Structural Criteria Table 1 (Maximum Horizontal Anchor Spacing, PV arrays at 4 psf max) is tighter and slope-dependent: flat to 6:12 (0-26°) — 5'-4" at 16" o.c. rafters, 6'-0" at 24", 5'-4" at 32"; 7:12 to 12:12 (27-45°) and 13:12 to 24:12 (46-63°) — 1'-4" at 16", 2'-0" at 24", 2'-8" at 32". The expedited fastener check asks whether '5/16" diameter lag screws with 2.5" embedment into the rafter' are used, OR the anchor is 'LA County approved for such application'. Racking: grounding may be satisfied by using 'a Los Angeles County-recognized UL 2703 racking system'. Ballasted arrays need a minimum 4 ft setback from the roof edge per SEAOC PV2-2017. 85% · plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 10, 28b, 46 + BCM 6807 Att. E Table 1
20 questions answered against Los Angeles County’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC, as the 2025 California Electrical Code, adopted locally as the 2026 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code (Title 27), effective January 1, 2026. The County's title page reads: 'Adopting by reference Portions of the 2025 Edition CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE… TITLE 27 Of the Los Angeles County Code. Effective January 1, 2026.' The submittal date, not the issuance date, determines which cycle applies.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off the cover of the County's own adopted code document, and corroborated by the Feb-2026 plan review list which cites '2025 CEC' throughout.
adopted code, cover and preamble checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Electrical/Electrical%20Code%20Amendments/2026%20County%20of%20Los%20Angeles%20Electrical%20Code.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2026 County of Los Angeles Building Code (Title 26), adopting the 2025 California Building Code, effective January 1, 2026. The same cycle covers: Electrical Title 27, Plumbing Title 28, Mechanical Title 29, Residential Title 30, Green Building Standards Title 31, Existing Building Title 33. For one- and two-family dwellings the operative document is the 2026 County of Los Angeles Residential Code (Title 30). Enforcement runs from application date on or after 1 January 2026.
Why the confidence is not higherListed on the authority's own Building and Safety code page, and the adopting ordinance states it adopts 'the 2025 California Building Code, with certain changes and modifications'.
department code page + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/general
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe LA County Building and Safety code page, which lists the 2026 County of Los Angeles Building, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Residential, Green Building Standards and Existing Building Codes effective 1 January 2026 but does NOT list the Fire Code (Title 32) — fire is administered by LACoFD, a separate department. Every LACoFD document I read is one cycle behind: the Guide for ESS, PV and Disconnects (Rev. 3, 2023-09-01) and the Expedited-Permitting Checklist (2023-09-01) both state installations 'shall comply with the 2023 edition of the Los Angeles County Fire Code ("LACFC", a locally amended version of the 2022 California Fire Code)', and the EG-10 guide (Rev. 2024-09-04) cites the 2023 LACFC. Given the County adopted the 2025 California codes effective 1 Jan 2026, a 2026 LACFC based on the 2025 CFC very likely exists, but I could not confirm its adoption or effective date from a LACoFD or County source, so I will not state an edition.
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes. 'Each Code incorporates local County of Los Angeles amendments and the respective State and model codes.' Fire Code amendments material to solar are the ones that bite: LACFC §509/§509.3 (grouped disconnect location), §509.1.1 and §1207.11.5.1 (disconnect placarding), §1207.11 and §1207.11.3.1 (residential ESS), and §603.4/§603.4.1 (working clearances treating PV and ESS each as electrical service equipment). Notably, I found NO local amendment to Electrical Code Articles 690, 705, 706 or 480 — Title 27 is the administrative title and adopts the 2025 CEC technical requirements unmodified.
Why the confidence is not higherThe amendment fact is stated by the authority. The electrical negative is a searched absence, not an assumption: I text-extracted the full adopted 2026 County Electrical Code and searched it for 'solar', 'photovoltaic', '690', '705', 'rapid shutdown' and 'energy storage' with zero hits, having first run controls in the same document ('electrical' = 218 hits, fabricated term 'zzqqx' = 0). The fire amendments are cited by section number in LACoFD's own guides, which are on the 2023 fire code cycle.
department code page + full-text search of adopted Title 27 + LACoFD guides checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/general
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2026 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code (i.e. the 2025 California Electrical Code / 2023 NEC as locally adopted), plus the approved plans. Plan Review List item 38: 'Provide electrical drawings to show compliance with the applicable provisions of the 2026 Los Angeles County Electrical Code.' The BCM inspection guide repeatedly frames field checks as conformance 'according to the approved plan'. Chapter 68 §6807.4 adds that the PV system 'shall be identified and listed for the application as referenced in the Electrical Code'.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the authority's current plan review list and adopted code chapter.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 38 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Yes, several. (1) Item 50: 'Clearly identify the point of interconnection with the utility supplied wiring system and provide details on main breaker, PV breaker and rating of bussing. Service and distribution panels shall comply with the interconnection requirements of 2025 CEC Article Sect. 705.12(B)(3)(1) through (6). Show compliance with one of these methods on the plans.' (2) Item 51: identify whether main service equipment is new or existing and give the ratings of the main service panel and service disconnecting means. (3) BCM inspection check: 'Sum of the main OCPD and the inverter OCPD is rated for not more than 120% of the bus bar rating', and 'Inverter output circuit breaker is located at opposite end of bus from utility supply… (not required if the sum of the inverter and utility supply circuit breakers is less than or equal to the panelboard bus rating).' (4) Expedited eligibility caps the busbar at 225 A on a 120/240 V single-phase service. (5) Items 59-60 govern Power Control Systems under 705.13, requiring listed PCS equipment and the PCS setting shown on the plans.
Why the confidence is not higherAll quoted from the authority's own documents. The 225 A eligibility figure comes from BCM 6807 Att. B, which is dated 09-01-15 and may not track the current cycle.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 50-51, 59-60 + BCM 6807 Att. A/B/F checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No specific product is mandated, but attachment spacing is prescribed. Standard path exemption criteria (item 10e): maximum support spacing on wood-framed construction 48 in. o.c., anchored to roof rafters or solid blocking with a minimum of one 5/16 in. diameter lag screw embedded a minimum of 2 1/2 in., or per manufacturer, whichever is more stringent. Expedited path Structural Criteria Table 1 (Maximum Horizontal Anchor Spacing, PV arrays at 4 psf max) is tighter and slope-dependent: flat to 6:12 (0-26°) — 5'-4" at 16" o.c. rafters, 6'-0" at 24", 5'-4" at 32"; 7:12 to 12:12 (27-45°) and 13:12 to 24:12 (46-63°) — 1'-4" at 16", 2'-0" at 24", 2'-8" at 32". The expedited fastener check asks whether '5/16" diameter lag screws with 2.5" embedment into the rafter' are used, OR the anchor is 'LA County approved for such application'. Racking: grounding may be satisfied by using 'a Los Angeles County-recognized UL 2703 racking system'. Ballasted arrays need a minimum 4 ft setback from the roof edge per SEAOC PV2-2017.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 2026 figures are verbatim and current; the Table 1 spacings come from BCM 6807 Att. E dated 09-01-15 and built on the 2013 CBC, so those specific numbers may have been superseded.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 10, 28b, 46 + BCM 6807 Att. E Table 1 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Required, and judged against named code sections. Plan Review List item 6: 'Show the locations and dimensions of all solar photovoltaic (PV) arrays and equipment. Depict the array(s) with roof access and pathways per Section 3111.3.4 or R329.6' — i.e. LA County Building Code §3111.3.4 (2025 CBC) for non-R3, and Residential Code §R329.6 for one- and two-family dwellings. Item 17 adds: 'Do not cover mechanical and plumbing vents at roof with solar PV panels.' The expedited roof plan must show 'approximate location of roof access point, location of code-compliant access pathways, PV system fire classification', with the State Fire Marshal Solar PV Installation Guide cited for pathway examples. Fire-side, LACoFD flags Ridge-Vent Openings (in the Wildland-Urban Interface) and Escape and Rescue Opening Pathways as matters requiring its regional office for BIPV designs.
Why the confidence is not higherThe requirement and its governing sections are quoted verbatim from the authority's current document. I am NOT quoting the dimensions — the County's own documents point outward to CBC 3111.3.4 / CRC R329.6 rather than restating pathway widths and ridge setbacks, and I did not read those code sections directly, so the commonly cited '3-foot pathway / 3 feet below ridge' figures are not sourced here. See not_found q36-dimensions.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 6 and 17 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — 2023 NEC as the 2025 CEC. Plan Review List item 52: 'Rapid Shutdown: Provide a rapid shutdown function that controls specific conductors in accordance with 2025 CEC Article 690.12(A) through (D).' Item 48 separately requires arc-fault protection per 2025 CEC Article 690.11 for systems operating at 80 V DC or greater between any two conductors. Additionally, LACoFD requires the rapid-shutdown initiation device to be one of the placarded, exterior-accessible disconnects and to be counted in the placard numbering: 'placards shall be included in the total number of placards ("Y") as necessary to ensure inclusion of any/all switches necessary to initiate each PV "Rapid Shutdown" or similar function for each PV system having one, new or existing.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe electrical requirement is verbatim from the County's 2/1/2026 document citing the current code cycle. The fire placarding overlay is verbatim from LACoFD, whose guide is Rev. 3 dated 2023-09-01 and cites the 2022 CEC — one cycle behind, though its substance is a placement/identification rule rather than a code-edition-sensitive one.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 52 + LACoFD Guide Appendix B checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Two stacked sets. (A) NEC/CEC-derived labels, which the County's expedited Standard Plan lays out explicitly as 'CEC Articles 690 and 705 and CRC Section R331 require the following labels or markings be installed at these components': WARNING / INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION; DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE (CEC 705.12(D)(7), not required if the panelboard is rated not less than the sum of the ampere ratings of all overcurrent devices supplying it); WARNING / DUAL POWER SOURCES / SECOND SOURCE IS PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT — ___ AMPS AC / NORMAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ___ VOLTS (CEC 690.54 & 705.12(D)(4)); PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT — ___ AMPS / AC NORMAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ___ VOLTS (CEC 690.54); PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT / RATED MAX POWER-POINT CURRENT — ___ ADC / RATED MAX POWER-POINT VOLTAGE — ___ VDC / SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT — ___ ADC / MAXIMUM SYSTEM VOLTAGE — ___ VDC (CEC 690.53); WARNING / ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD. THE DC CONDUCTORS OF THIS PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM ARE UNGROUNDED AND MAY BE ENERGIZED (CEC 690.35(F), ungrounded systems only); WARNING / ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD / IF A GROUND FAULT IS INDICATED, NORMALLY GROUNDED CONDUCTORS MAY BE UNGROUNDED AND ENERGIZED (CEC 690.5(C)); WARNING / ELECTRIC SHOCK HAZARD / DO NOT TOUCH TERMINALS / TERMINALS ON BOTH LINE AND LOAD SIDES MAY BE ENERGIZED IN THE OPEN POSITION (CEC 690.17); WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE (CRC R331.2 and CFC 605.11.1) marked on junction/combiner boxes and on conduit every 10 ft; and a permanent plaque or directory denoting all electric power sources on or in the premises (CEC 705.12). (B) The LACoFD Electrical Power Source Disconnect Placarding System — a County-specific exterior placard reading 'F.D. – ELECTRICAL BLDG DISCONNECT # X of Y', plus panel-interior placards reading '#X' to identify specific switches/breakers within a panel. Current plan review list item 45 requires 'System Labels and Warnings: Show required signage on the plans per 2025 CEC Article 690.13. Show directory placard denoting all power sources and disconnects on the site.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe LACoFD placard is current-County-specific and quoted verbatim. The NEC-derived label wording is quoted verbatim from BCM 6807 Att. C, but that Standard Plan is dated 09-01-15 and its citations are 2014-NEC-era (690.35(F), 690.5(C), 705.12(D)) — under the now-adopted 2025 CEC / 2023 NEC several of those article numbers have moved, so the wording is right in substance but the citations are stale. The current 2/1/2026 list defers to '2025 CEC Article 690.13' rather than restating label text.
BCM 6807 Att. C Markings page + LACoFD Guide Appendix B + plan review checklist item 45 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/BCM%206807%20Article%201%20-%20Expedited%20Permitting%20Process%20for%20Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems%20COMPLETE%20POLICY%2004-04-16.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — emphatically, and this is the distinctive local requirement. LACoFD specifies its own placard verbiage, not found in the NEC: exterior placards read 'F.D. – ELECTRICAL BLDG DISCONNECT # X of Y'; panel-interior placards read '#X'. 'Verbiage and word arrangement shall be as pictured above, wherein "X" and "Y" are replaced with the appropriate numbers based upon the determination of a C-10 electrician (or other classification when a C-10 is not required for the scope of work being performed), with approval of the fire code official. All "X"s shall account for the total number "Y" of essential switches and/or panels to be operated in order to completely disconnect the structure from all power sources (and activate rapid shutdown, when applicable).' The system must account for every power source capable of supplying the structure — utility, generator, PV, ESS, wind, fuel-cell, vehicle-to-grid — and 'A pre-wired optional auxiliary power source input shall also constitute a wired capability to be served by more than one power source, and therefore shall require a placarded disconnect'.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from LACoFD's own published Appendix B and repeated as inspection line items in its checklist. Held below 95 only because the guide is Rev. 3 dated 2023-09-01 citing the 2023 LACFC, and I could not confirm a 2026-cycle revision.
LACoFD Guide for ESS, PV and Disconnects, Appendix B (2023-09-01) checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LACoFD-Guide-for-ESS-PV-and-Disconnects-Rev-3-2023-09-01-w-Appendices-SECURED.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — unusually precise. LACoFD Appendix B: SIZE AND MATERIAL — 'Exterior Placards (FIGURE 1) shall be a minimum 2 inches tall by 3.5 inches wide weather resistant plastic, with verbiage engraved'; 'Panel-Interior Placards (FIGURE 2) shall be a minimum 7/16 inches tall by ¾ inches wide weather resistant plastic, with verbiage engraved'. COLOUR — 'Color shall be red letters engraved into a yellow "background" with the verbiage as displayed.' CHARACTER TYPE — Exterior: 'Solid, all-capitals, in Arial font, minimum font size 24. "F.D." and "# X of Y" shall be in bold type and minimum font size 28'; Panel-Interior: 'Solid, all-capitals, in Arial font, bold, minimum font size 24.' ATTACHMENT — 'Attachment shall be by means of permanent epoxy that is material, weather, and surface compatible.' Separately, for the NEC-derived labels, BCM 6807 gives an advisory rather than a mandate: 'ANSI Z535.4 provides guidelines… A phenolic plaque with contrasting colors between the text and background would meet the intent of the code for permanency. No type size is specified, but 20 point (3/8") should be considered the minimum.'
Why the confidence is not higherAll figures verbatim from LACoFD Appendix B, which is a County document written for this exact purpose. The 20-point advisory is explicitly framed as an informational note in a 2015-dated attachment, and I have reported it as advisory rather than as a requirement.
LACoFD Guide Appendix B, §B.1-B.4 (2023-09-01) checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LACoFD-Guide-for-ESS-PV-and-Disconnects-Rev-3-2023-09-01-w-Appendices-SECURED.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
A directory placard, yes; a facility site map, only for ESS plan submittals. Plan Review List item 45 requires: 'Show directory placard denoting all power sources and disconnects on the site' — this is the CEC 705.12 'permanent plaque or directory, denoting all electric power sources on or in the premises', and the BCM inspection guide lists it among the signs checked in the field. There is no separate firefighter site-map placard specified for a residential rooftop PV system. The equivalent function is served by the LACoFD 'X of Y' numbering, which tells a firefighter at the panel how many disconnects exist and that they have found one of them. For ESS projects going to Fire plan review, a scaled site plan is a submittal requirement (showing unit locations, spacing, setbacks, impact protection) — but that is a drawing, not a placard.
Why the confidence is not higherThe directory placard requirement is verbatim and current. The 'no separate site-map placard' half is a searched absence across the plan review list, BCM 6807 and the LACoFD guide and checklist, all of which specify placards in detail and none of which describes a site-plan placard for residential PV — but an absence across four documents is still weaker than a positive statement.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), item 45 + BCM 6807 Att. A + LACoFD Guide checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThis is a utility-level question and belongs at utility level, not authority level. Nothing in the LA County Public Works or LACoFD material addresses utility-imposed placards: I searched the 2026 Solar PV System Plan Review List, BCM 6807 Art. 1 (all attachments), LACBC Chapter 68, the adopted 2026 County Electrical Code and the two LACoFD guides — none mentions a utility-specified label, meter-adjacent utility placard, or SCE-specific marking. I did not consult SCE's Rule 21 interconnection handbook or its metering/service requirements, which is where any such requirement would live. Given the utility itself is unconfirmed per-address (see q22), this should be re-run against SCE's own documents.
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
LACoFD placards: 'Each placarded disconnect initiation device shall be accessible from the exterior of the structure(s).' 'Exterior Placards shall be placed onto the exterior of, or immediately adjacent to, each panel/enclosure or standalone disconnect switch that is necessary to be operated. Additional Exterior Placards may be required by the fire code official, such as when an enclosure houses multiple panels, or when more than the "Main" within a placarded panel is necessary to be operated.' 'Panel-Interior Placards are required to be placed inside a panel to identify specific switches/breakers when multiple switches within a single panel/enclosure are required to be operated.' Placement locations are 'determined by a C-10 electrician… and are subject to approval by the fire code official', and where the need for additional 'X of Y' placards is unclear the fire code official decides. NEC-derived labels go at their code-specified components: at the DC disconnect, at the AC point of connection, at the switch for the alternative power system, on junction/combiner boxes, on raceways carrying PV circuits every 10 ft, and the directory at the service equipment.
Why the confidence is not higherFirst half verbatim from LACoFD Appendix B; second half from the BCM 6807 inspection list of signs. Same 2023/2015 dating caveat as q38-q40.
LACoFD Guide Appendix B §B.7 + BCM 6807 Att. A checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LACoFD-Guide-for-ESS-PV-and-Disconnects-Rev-3-2023-09-01-w-Appendices-SECURED.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes in effect. Listing is mandatory: Chapter 68 §6807.4 — the PV system 'shall be identified and listed for the application as referenced in the Electrical Code'; plan review item 8 requires all manufacturer specification sheets, installation instructions, certificates of compliance and UL listings attached to the plans. ESS item 53: 'All energy storage system equipment shall be listed by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory either individually or as a complete, self-contained system… UL 1973, UL 1989, and UL 9540. Section R328.2. Residential ESS shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL9540.' BESS inverters must be tested to UL 1741 and Supplement SA or SB, and a BESS spec sheet must go to the California Energy Commission for JA12 certification. A County-maintained list does exist for racking: item 46 permits satisfying grounding/bonding by using 'a Los Angeles County-recognized UL 2703 racking system', and the expedited fastener check accepts an anchor that is 'LA County approved for such application'.
Why the confidence is not higherAll quotations are verbatim and current (2/1/2026). Scored below 90 because the phrases 'Los Angeles County-recognized' and 'LA County approved' imply a published recognition list (likely a Research Report register) that I did not locate, so I cannot say where an installer checks whether a given rail is on it.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 8, 46, 53, 63-64 + LACBC §6807.4 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, but NOT on the expedited rooftop path, and under substantial fire conditions. Chapter 68's Eligibility Checklist requires 'Solar system is utility interactive and without battery storage', and the Standard Plan says it 'is not intended for… systems that utilize storage batteries'. Batteries therefore go through standard plan check. Conditions then: equipment listed by an NRTL, residential ESS listed and labelled to UL 9540 (R328.2); location restricted — 'Section R328.4 only permits non-habitable locations within a residence for ESS (such as a garage or utility room for example)'; a disconnecting means for all ungrounded conductors per 2025 CEC 706.15(A)-(D), readily accessible, within sight of the ESS, lockable in the open position, and 'For one-family and two-family dwellings, a disconnecting means shall be located at a readily accessible location outside the building'; overcurrent protection at the energy-storage-component end where circuits pass through a wall, floor or ceiling (706.31(F)); impact protection where subject to physical damage, not required where no portion of the unit is less than 36 inches above the finished floor. LACoFD fire limits: individual ESS units capped at 20 kWh; aggregate per site 80 kWh maximum, with 80 kWh sub-limits by location (inside attached garages, inside detached garages, outdoors on the outer side of exterior walls, outdoors on the ground); units separated from each other by at least 3 feet, and maintained a minimum of 3 feet from specified features including a 3-foot separation from dwelling gas-meter equipment; pre-existing ESS counts toward the aggregate. ESS inside attached garages cannot use the Fire Fast-Track process and requires plan submittal to Fire.
Why the confidence is not higherThe electrical and location conditions are verbatim from the County's current 2/1/2026 document. The kWh caps and separations are verbatim from LACoFD's checklist and guide, which are dated 2023-09-01 / 2024-09-04 and cite the 2023 LACFC — one fire code cycle behind, so the numbers should be re-confirmed against the current LACFC.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 53-58 + LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist §II + BCM 6807 Att. B checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Not a separate B&S permit, but yes a separate FIRE inspection. On the B&S side ESS work is added to the building/electrical permit and reviewed under the standard path. On the fire side, LACoFD requires its own inspection for 'ESS installations with a capacity of more than 3 kWh (2023 LACFC Section 1207.11)' — capacity meaning 'the total energy capable of being stored (nameplate rating), not the usable energy rating'. That inspection is separately requested, separately invoiced, and must be passed before use.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 3 kWh trigger is verbatim from LACoFD's own checklist. Below 95 because the checklist is dated 2023-09-01 and cites the 2023 LACFC.
LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist §I.2.b (2023-09-01) checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes — and on two tracks. Structurally: 'Structural plans and calculations shall be submitted for ground mounted solar PV system including materials specifications, supporting member sizes, foundation dimensions, and the loads imposed on the foundation. Exception: For one- and two-family dwellings, a site review and electrical plan check are required when no portion of the system is greater than 72 inches above grade not to exceed 3:1 slope.' Structures adjacent to ascending or descending slopes must maintain setbacks per §1808.7, with structural plans and calculations required for foundations on slopes steeper than 1:3 (33.3%). Also required: a raceway/enclosure for PV source conductors OR a fence detail guarding the array perimeter (with extra bonding if the fence is metallic). Zoning-wise it is also a land-use matter: ground-mounted small-scale solar needs Regional Planning Site Plan Review (or a Minor CUP), max height 15 feet, and counts toward a maximum lot coverage of '25% of lot or 2.5 acres, whichever is lesser (including all accessory structures)'. Roof-mounted PV, by contrast, 'generally do[es] not require review by Regional Planning'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe structural half is verbatim from the current 2/1/2026 list. The zoning half is verbatim from Regional Planning but from a sheet marked 'Revised_ 03/2019'.
plan review checklist (2/1/2026), items 32-35 + Regional Planning ground-mounted solar summary checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Two rules stack, and the fire rule is the binding one locally. ELECTRICAL (plan review item 47): 'Disconnects: Show AC/DC disconnects at inverter that are grouped together and identified. AC disconnects required to be within sight of the inverter and readily accessible.' FIRE (LACFC §509.3, as enforced by LACoFD): electrical disconnection means and rapid shutdown activation devices for all power sources serving a structure 'shall be located: on the exterior, within 6 feet (1829 mm) of the main service panel, on the same wall plane, and maintained not separated from one another by walls, gates, fences, vegetation, or architectural features of the building.' Where remote means are necessary, 'physical disconnection shall be achieved at the source of the hazard itself, such as by use of relay(s)'. The fire code official may grant case-by-case exceptions where site constraints make this impractical, but 'clear, permanent signage shall be provided in all cases', with colour, content, number and medium as determined by the fire code official. Working clearance in front of the equipment: not less than 30 in. wide (or the equipment width if wider), 36 in. deep, 78 in. high, kept clear of stored materials — and both an ESS and a PV system each count as electrical service equipment for this purpose.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 6-foot/same-wall-plane rule is quoted verbatim in two separate LACoFD documents and attributed to LACFC §509.3; the electrical half is from the County's current 2/1/2026 list. Below 95 because the fire documents cite the 2023 LACFC, one cycle behind the January 2026 code adoption.
LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist §IV.1 and §IV.3 + plan review checklist item 47 checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal, for the B&S inspection — EPIC-LA. 'Use EPIC-LA to request inspections': log in, click Request Inspection from the home page or top menu bar, select the permit case(s), pick a requested date and window, and receive an email confirmation once staff schedule it. Multiple permits can be selected at once. If a permit is not listed, the request can be made through the permit record itself, or by calling the office that issued the permit (the number is on the top and bottom of page 1 of the permit). Note the previously scheduled inspection must be updated by the inspector before the next one can be requested. The separate LACoFD PV/ESS inspection is NOT booked in EPIC-LA — it is booked by phone plus email to the regional Fire Prevention office, with the email subject 'PV/ESS Inspection Request: [Insert Project Address]', and the LACoFD invoice must be paid before the inspection or it is cancelled. 88% · EPIC-LA help document + LACoFD checklist §I.1
- How much notice is required? Effectively about one business day, but not guaranteed. BCM 6807 Att. A: 'Inspection requests received within business hours are typically scheduled for the next business day. If next business day is not available, inspection should happen within a five-day window.' EPIC-LA is blunter: 'Please note, date and timeframe selected are not guaranteed… Staff will review the request and schedule the inspection in the next available slot.' 70% · BCM 6807 Att. A §5 (04-04-16) + EPIC-LA help document
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM/PM windows are offered but not guaranteed. In EPIC-LA: 'Select Requested Date and AM or PM. Please note, date and timeframe selected are not guaranteed.' Where multiple permits are requested together, a 'Use same date for all' checkbox applies one requested date across them. No same-day option is described. 88% · EPIC-LA help document
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — but it is not the only final. LA County B&S performs its own combination inspection (structural, electrical and plumbing components in one visit) under LACBC 6806.2. Separately, LACoFD performs its own inspection of the electrical disconnects, placarding and rapid-shutdown devices (and ESS over 3 kWh) and states: 'The applicant for this construction permit shall contact the County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD) Fire Prevention Division and schedule and pass an inspection prior to use of the PV or ESS installation(s).' So a residential PV job in unincorporated LA County has two separate passing inspections by two agencies. 90% · LACoFD expedited PV/ESS page + LACBC §6806.2
- If delegated, to whom? Delegation runs both directions. LACoFD → B&S: fire-official authority for plan review and inspection of conventional residential solar-on-roof at R-3/R-4 dwellings is delegated to the jurisdictional building and safety department, but 'This agreement, however, does not extend to' ESS, electrical disconnects and placarding, rapid-shutdown devices, and qualifying BIPV — and 'the ultimate responsibility to uphold and enforce the LA County Fire Code rests with the LACoFD, as the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).' B&S itself does not delegate its combination inspection; it is performed by County inspectors, and the Building and Safety Division 'has utilized the combination inspection system; that is, one inspector performs all code inspections, i.e. building, grading, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical, within a given geographical area.' 88% · LACoFD EG-10 ESS & PV Requirement Guide §II.A + adopted Title 27 preamble
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a small residential rooftop system: ONE B&S combination inspection, then one LACoFD inspection before use. LACBC 6806.2: 'A combination inspection shall be conducted to inspect the structural, electrical, and plumbing components of the installation of small residential rooftop solar energy systems. One inspection shall be required for the system.' It is conditional on evidence: satisfactory evidence per BCM 6807 Art. 1 must be provided at the inspection to verify installation and labelling; otherwise the Building Official may require exposure of (1) fastening of the roof mounting system to structural framing members, (2) grounding and bonding of panels, (3) nameplates of modules and inverters. Then LACoFD: 'schedule and pass an inspection prior to use of the PV or ESS installation(s)', for which digital proof of the construction permit and the placarding already in place are prerequisites. Sequence: B&S permit → install → B&S combination inspection → LACoFD PV/ESS inspection → utility PTO. 88% · adopted code (Ch. 68 §6806) + LACoFD checklist §V
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No — one inspection is sufficient, provided concealed work is documented. 'One inspection shall be sufficient for the system when satisfactory evidence is submitted to verify that the installation and labeling of components meet requirements of the Building, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes. However, if any of the critical components of the system are concealed during installation, the installer shall provide photographs or video evidence at the time of inspection showing all items that have been concealed, including, but not limited to the following: 1. Fastening of roof mounting systems to structural framing members. 2. Grounding and bonding of panels. 3. Nameplates of modules and inverters. 4. Clearance from bottom of roof in attic for conduits installed in this area (18 inch minimum required).' Photos of attachment must 'display 10% but no fewer than two of the total attachment points.' 90% · BCM 6807 Art. 1 'Inspection' + LACBC §6806.2
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes — three published, all downloadable. (1) BCM 6807 Article 1, Attachment F — 'Inspection Guide for PV Systems for One- and Two-Family Dwellings', a numbered 20-item field checklist (grounding/bonding per listed instructions; 18" minimum attic conduit clearance; neat and workmanlike per CEC 110.12; module model/quantity/location per approved plan; firefighter access per approved plan; roof penetrations flashed/sealed with plumbing vents checked; conductor securing and routing; conduit per CRC R331.3 and CEC 690.4(F); listing and labelling; CEC 690.35 for ungrounded inverters; 'utility interactive' inverter label; disconnect locations; OCPD type and size; inverter breaker at the opposite end of the bus; markings and signs; grounding electrode connection; and CEC 110.26 access and working space). (2) BCM 6807 Att. A §5, a shorter common-points list including the required signs. (3) LACoFD 'Expedited PV/ESS Permitting Process — Inspection Checklist for Group R-3/-4 ESS, PV, and Electrical-Disconnect Placarding', a 5-page Y/N/NA form. Appendices A-E of BCM 6807 provide example photographs (project location, structural connections and flashing, PV panel label, grounding/bonding, attic conduit clearance). 92% · BCM 6807 Att. A and F + LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist
- What must be on site at inspection? For the B&S inspection: the approved plans (the inspector 'will verify that the installation is in conformance with applicable code requirements and with the approved plans'); the permit; and photographic or video evidence of everything concealed during installation — fastening of roof mounting systems to structural framing, grounding and bonding of panels, nameplates of modules and inverters, and attic conduit clearance — with attachment photos showing '10% but no fewer than two of the total attachment points'. Attic access must be provided where conduit runs there. 'Permit holders must be prepared to show conformance with all technical requirements in the field at the time of inspection.' For the LACoFD inspection, three things are required prior: 'Digital Proof of Construction Permit obtained via Expedited-Permitting Process employed by the jurisdictional Building and Safety Department… including any inspection checklist provided to the applicant with the permit'; 'Disconnect Placarding in Place: Per the LACoFD Electrical Power Source Disconnect Placarding System'; and 'Fee(s) Paid: LACoFD Fire Prevention fee(s) paid.' 90% · BCM 6807 Att. A §5 + LACBC §6806.2 + LACoFD checklist §V.1
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes, both, and explicitly. LACBC 6806.2 conditions the single inspection on evidence 'to verify that the installation and labeling of components meet all applicable requirements'. BCM 6807 Att. F item 12: 'Equipment installed, listed and labeled according to the approved plan (e.g., PV modules, DC/DC converters (power optimizer), combiners, inverters, disconnects, load centers and electrical service equipment)'; item 14: 'For grid-connected systems, inverter is labeled as "utility interactive"'; item 18: 'PV system markings, labels and signs according to the approved plan.' Att. A adds that the inspector checks 'Appropriate signs are property [sic] constructed, installed and displayed' and that equipment ratings are consistent with the installed signs — e.g. the inverter rated at least as high as the max voltage on the PV power source sign, DC OCPDs DC-rated at least as high, and the AC OCPD rated at least 125% of maximum current on the sign and no larger than the maximum OCPD on the inverter listing label. LACoFD separately inspects placard size, material, colour, character type, verbiage, attachment means and placement as discrete pass/fail line items. 92% · BCM 6807 Att. A and Att. F + LACoFD checklist §IV.2
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A final inspection approval on the combined solar energy permit — not a Certificate of Occupancy. LACBC 6806.1 frames it as work remaining 'accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved by the Building Official as specified in Section 108', and BCM 6807 Att. A: the system 'must be inspected before final approval is granted for the solar system'. On the fire side the pass has an explicit status: 'A Passed Inspection Serves as an Operational Permit at a R-3/R-4 Occupancy, on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction (e.g., B&S, Utility, etc.).' 80% · LACoFD checklist §V + LACBC §6806.1 + BCM 6807 Att. A §5
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer — by inference, not by rule. No LA County Public Works or LACoFD document assigns responsibility for notifying the utility. LACoFD's checklist treats the utility as a wholly separate downstream authority ('on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction (e.g., B&S, Utility, etc.)'), which places the burden on the applicant/installer to carry the signed-off permit to SCE under Rule 21 rather than on the AHJ to push it. 50% · inference from LACoFD checklist §V note + absence across five AHJ documents
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Via a written correction notice, then a marked resubmittal. At application stage, Chapter 68 §6805: 'When an incomplete application is submitted, a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance will be issued.' At plan check, the Solar Energy System Plan Review List is itself the correction vehicle — 'Corrections with circled item numbers apply to this plan check'; 'In the left-hand margin of the circled corrections, please indicate the sheet number and detail or note number on the plans where the corrections are made. Resubmit marked original plans and two corrected sets of plans, calculations and this plan review list'; 'Incomplete, unclear, or faded drawings or calculations will not be accepted.' The plan check engineer is available for conference and telephone calls in stated hours, appointments recommended. Additional fees may be charged for plan checks after the second plan check (LACBC 107.2). A failed application expires on a stated date and must be re-filed with new plans and a new plan check fee. 90% · plan review checklist instructions (2/1/2026) + LACBC §6805
14 questions answered against Los Angeles County’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal, for the B&S inspection — EPIC-LA. 'Use EPIC-LA to request inspections': log in, click Request Inspection from the home page or top menu bar, select the permit case(s), pick a requested date and window, and receive an email confirmation once staff schedule it. Multiple permits can be selected at once. If a permit is not listed, the request can be made through the permit record itself, or by calling the office that issued the permit (the number is on the top and bottom of page 1 of the permit). Note the previously scheduled inspection must be updated by the inspector before the next one can be requested. The separate LACoFD PV/ESS inspection is NOT booked in EPIC-LA — it is booked by phone plus email to the regional Fire Prevention office, with the email subject 'PV/ESS Inspection Request: [Insert Project Address]', and the LACoFD invoice must be paid before the inspection or it is cancelled.
Why the confidence is not higherThe EPIC-LA steps are from the County's own step-by-step help document; the LACoFD route is verbatim from its checklist page 1. Below 95 because BCM 6807 Att. A still tells applicants that 'On-site inspections can be scheduled by contacting the local office by telephone', which contradicts the newer portal-first guidance — the County's documents are not consistent with each other on this point.
EPIC-LA help document + LACoFD checklist §I.1 checked 2026-08-28 https://epicla.lacounty.gov/help/doc/HowToRequestAnInspectionBSD.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Effectively about one business day, but not guaranteed. BCM 6807 Att. A: 'Inspection requests received within business hours are typically scheduled for the next business day. If next business day is not available, inspection should happen within a five-day window.' EPIC-LA is blunter: 'Please note, date and timeframe selected are not guaranteed… Staff will review the request and schedule the inspection in the next available slot.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe next-business-day language is the authority's own, but it comes from BCM 6807 Att. A dated 04-04-16 and it is hedged ('typically', 'should'). The current portal document explicitly declines to guarantee the requested date, so no firm notice period is actually published.
BCM 6807 Att. A §5 (04-04-16) + EPIC-LA help document checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/BCM%206807%20Article%201%20-%20Expedited%20Permitting%20Process%20for%20Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems%20COMPLETE%20POLICY%2004-04-16.pdf
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
AM/PM windows are offered but not guaranteed. In EPIC-LA: 'Select Requested Date and AM or PM. Please note, date and timeframe selected are not guaranteed.' Where multiple permits are requested together, a 'Use same date for all' checkbox applies one requested date across them. No same-day option is described.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the County's own portal help document, including the explicit non-guarantee. Below 95 because the absence of a same-day option is inferred from that document rather than stated.
EPIC-LA help document checked 2026-08-28 https://epicla.lacounty.gov/help/doc/HowToRequestAnInspectionBSD.pdf
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — but it is not the only final. LA County B&S performs its own combination inspection (structural, electrical and plumbing components in one visit) under LACBC 6806.2. Separately, LACoFD performs its own inspection of the electrical disconnects, placarding and rapid-shutdown devices (and ESS over 3 kWh) and states: 'The applicant for this construction permit shall contact the County of Los Angeles Fire Department (LACoFD) Fire Prevention Division and schedule and pass an inspection prior to use of the PV or ESS installation(s).' So a residential PV job in unincorporated LA County has two separate passing inspections by two agencies.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth halves are quoted from the respective authorities' own current documents. Below 95 because the LACoFD page and checklist are on the 2023 fire code cycle and I could not confirm the two-inspection practice against a single joint document.
LACoFD expedited PV/ESS page + LACBC §6806.2 checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/fire-prevention-expeditedpvess/
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Delegation runs both directions. LACoFD → B&S: fire-official authority for plan review and inspection of conventional residential solar-on-roof at R-3/R-4 dwellings is delegated to the jurisdictional building and safety department, but 'This agreement, however, does not extend to' ESS, electrical disconnects and placarding, rapid-shutdown devices, and qualifying BIPV — and 'the ultimate responsibility to uphold and enforce the LA County Fire Code rests with the LACoFD, as the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ).' B&S itself does not delegate its combination inspection; it is performed by County inspectors, and the Building and Safety Division 'has utilized the combination inspection system; that is, one inspector performs all code inspections, i.e. building, grading, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical, within a given geographical area.'
Why the confidence is not higherBoth quotations are verbatim from the agencies' own documents. Below 95 because the delegation is described in a Fire Department guide (EG-10, Rev. 2024-09-04) rather than in a published interagency agreement I could read.
LACoFD EG-10 ESS & PV Requirement Guide §II.A + adopted Title 27 preamble checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/fire-prevention-expeditedpvess/
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For a small residential rooftop system: ONE B&S combination inspection, then one LACoFD inspection before use. LACBC 6806.2: 'A combination inspection shall be conducted to inspect the structural, electrical, and plumbing components of the installation of small residential rooftop solar energy systems. One inspection shall be required for the system.' It is conditional on evidence: satisfactory evidence per BCM 6807 Art. 1 must be provided at the inspection to verify installation and labelling; otherwise the Building Official may require exposure of (1) fastening of the roof mounting system to structural framing members, (2) grounding and bonding of panels, (3) nameplates of modules and inverters. Then LACoFD: 'schedule and pass an inspection prior to use of the PV or ESS installation(s)', for which digital proof of the construction permit and the placarding already in place are prerequisites. Sequence: B&S permit → install → B&S combination inspection → LACoFD PV/ESS inspection → utility PTO.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from adopted Chapter 68 and the LACoFD page/checklist. The ordering of the last two steps is implied by LACoFD requiring 'Digital Proof of Construction Permit' and by the note that its pass is conditional on other agencies, rather than stated as a numbered sequence anywhere.
adopted code (Ch. 68 §6806) + LACoFD checklist §V checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/CHAPTER%2068.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No — one inspection is sufficient, provided concealed work is documented. 'One inspection shall be sufficient for the system when satisfactory evidence is submitted to verify that the installation and labeling of components meet requirements of the Building, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes. However, if any of the critical components of the system are concealed during installation, the installer shall provide photographs or video evidence at the time of inspection showing all items that have been concealed, including, but not limited to the following: 1. Fastening of roof mounting systems to structural framing members. 2. Grounding and bonding of panels. 3. Nameplates of modules and inverters. 4. Clearance from bottom of roof in attic for conduits installed in this area (18 inch minimum required).' Photos of attachment must 'display 10% but no fewer than two of the total attachment points.'
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from BCM 6807 Art. 1 and mirrored in adopted LACBC 6806.2, so the substance is codified. The photo percentage rule comes from the 2016-dated BCM.
BCM 6807 Art. 1 'Inspection' + LACBC §6806.2 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/BCM%206807%20Article%201%20-%20Expedited%20Permitting%20Process%20for%20Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems%20COMPLETE%20POLICY%2004-04-16.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes, both, and explicitly. LACBC 6806.2 conditions the single inspection on evidence 'to verify that the installation and labeling of components meet all applicable requirements'. BCM 6807 Att. F item 12: 'Equipment installed, listed and labeled according to the approved plan (e.g., PV modules, DC/DC converters (power optimizer), combiners, inverters, disconnects, load centers and electrical service equipment)'; item 14: 'For grid-connected systems, inverter is labeled as "utility interactive"'; item 18: 'PV system markings, labels and signs according to the approved plan.' Att. A adds that the inspector checks 'Appropriate signs are property [sic] constructed, installed and displayed' and that equipment ratings are consistent with the installed signs — e.g. the inverter rated at least as high as the max voltage on the PV power source sign, DC OCPDs DC-rated at least as high, and the AC OCPD rated at least 125% of maximum current on the sign and no larger than the maximum OCPD on the inverter listing label. LACoFD separately inspects placard size, material, colour, character type, verbiage, attachment means and placement as discrete pass/fail line items.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim across three of the authorities' own documents, including a codified requirement. The BCM attachments are 2015/2016-dated but the codified 6806.2 language carries them.
BCM 6807 Att. A and Att. F + LACoFD checklist §IV.2 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/BCM%206807%20Article%201%20-%20Expedited%20Permitting%20Process%20for%20Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems%20COMPLETE%20POLICY%2004-04-16.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Yes — three published, all downloadable. (1) BCM 6807 Article 1, Attachment F — 'Inspection Guide for PV Systems for One- and Two-Family Dwellings', a numbered 20-item field checklist (grounding/bonding per listed instructions; 18" minimum attic conduit clearance; neat and workmanlike per CEC 110.12; module model/quantity/location per approved plan; firefighter access per approved plan; roof penetrations flashed/sealed with plumbing vents checked; conductor securing and routing; conduit per CRC R331.3 and CEC 690.4(F); listing and labelling; CEC 690.35 for ungrounded inverters; 'utility interactive' inverter label; disconnect locations; OCPD type and size; inverter breaker at the opposite end of the bus; markings and signs; grounding electrode connection; and CEC 110.26 access and working space). (2) BCM 6807 Att. A §5, a shorter common-points list including the required signs. (3) LACoFD 'Expedited PV/ESS Permitting Process — Inspection Checklist for Group R-3/-4 ESS, PV, and Electrical-Disconnect Placarding', a 5-page Y/N/NA form. Appendices A-E of BCM 6807 provide example photographs (project location, structural connections and flashing, PV panel label, grounding/bonding, attic conduit clearance).
Why the confidence is not higherAll three documents were retrieved and read in full. Below 95 only because the BCM attachments are dated 09-01-15 / 04-04-16 and the LACoFD checklist 2023-09-01, so item numbering may have moved even though the documents remain published.
BCM 6807 Att. A and F + LACoFD Expedited-Permitting Checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/BCM%206807%20Article%201%20-%20Expedited%20Permitting%20Process%20for%20Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems%20COMPLETE%20POLICY%2004-04-16.pdf
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
For the B&S inspection: the approved plans (the inspector 'will verify that the installation is in conformance with applicable code requirements and with the approved plans'); the permit; and photographic or video evidence of everything concealed during installation — fastening of roof mounting systems to structural framing, grounding and bonding of panels, nameplates of modules and inverters, and attic conduit clearance — with attachment photos showing '10% but no fewer than two of the total attachment points'. Attic access must be provided where conduit runs there. 'Permit holders must be prepared to show conformance with all technical requirements in the field at the time of inspection.' For the LACoFD inspection, three things are required prior: 'Digital Proof of Construction Permit obtained via Expedited-Permitting Process employed by the jurisdictional Building and Safety Department… including any inspection checklist provided to the applicant with the permit'; 'Disconnect Placarding in Place: Per the LACoFD Electrical Power Source Disconnect Placarding System'; and 'Fee(s) Paid: LACoFD Fire Prevention fee(s) paid.'
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from both authorities' own documents, with the concealed-work evidence rule also codified in LACBC 6806.2. Dating caveats as above.
BCM 6807 Att. A §5 + LACBC §6806.2 + LACoFD checklist §V.1 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems/BCM%206807%20Article%201%20-%20Expedited%20Permitting%20Process%20for%20Small%20Residential%20Rooftop%20Solar%20Energy%20Systems%20COMPLETE%20POLICY%2004-04-16.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedAdopted 2026 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code Sec. 82-8 fee schedule and Secs. 82-11 (Refund), 82-13 (Exemption from Fees) and 82-14 (Inspection); LACBC Chapter 68 §6805; and the fee/instruction blocks of the 2/1/2026 plan review list. I found a plan-check re-check charge — 'additional fees may be charged for plan checks required after the second plan check' (LACBC 107.2) — but no published re-INSPECTION fee amount for a failed field inspection. Separately, LACoFD Fire Prevention inspection services are invoiced per job (the applicant supplies billing details up front and 'Invoices unpaid at the time of the inspection will result in a cancellation of inspection'), but no dollar figure is published in the checklist or guide. No amount can be stated for either agency.
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Via a written correction notice, then a marked resubmittal. At application stage, Chapter 68 §6805: 'When an incomplete application is submitted, a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance will be issued.' At plan check, the Solar Energy System Plan Review List is itself the correction vehicle — 'Corrections with circled item numbers apply to this plan check'; 'In the left-hand margin of the circled corrections, please indicate the sheet number and detail or note number on the plans where the corrections are made. Resubmit marked original plans and two corrected sets of plans, calculations and this plan review list'; 'Incomplete, unclear, or faded drawings or calculations will not be accepted.' The plan check engineer is available for conference and telephone calls in stated hours, appointments recommended. Additional fees may be charged for plan checks after the second plan check (LACBC 107.2). A failed application expires on a stated date and must be re-filed with new plans and a new plan check fee.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the authority's current 2/1/2026 plan review list and adopted Chapter 68. This covers plan-check corrections; the list does not describe how a failed FIELD inspection correction is issued and cleared, so that part is unstated.
plan review checklist instructions (2/1/2026) + LACBC §6805 checked 2026-08-28 https://dpw.lacounty.gov/bsd/lib/fp/Building/Solar%20Review/Solar%20PV%20System%20Plan%20Review%20List_2025_v1.0.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A final inspection approval on the combined solar energy permit — not a Certificate of Occupancy. LACBC 6806.1 frames it as work remaining 'accessible and exposed for inspection purposes until approved by the Building Official as specified in Section 108', and BCM 6807 Att. A: the system 'must be inspected before final approval is granted for the solar system'. On the fire side the pass has an explicit status: 'A Passed Inspection Serves as an Operational Permit at a R-3/R-4 Occupancy, on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction (e.g., B&S, Utility, etc.).'
Why the confidence is not higherThe LACoFD 'operational permit' wording is verbatim and unambiguous. The B&S side is characterised as 'final approval' by the authority's own documents, but neither Chapter 68 nor BCM 6807 names the artefact issued (green tag, final card, signed permit), so the exact form of the B&S sign-off is not stated.
LACoFD checklist §V + LACBC §6806.1 + BCM 6807 Att. A §5 checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer — by inference, not by rule. No LA County Public Works or LACoFD document assigns responsibility for notifying the utility. LACoFD's checklist treats the utility as a wholly separate downstream authority ('on the condition that it passes other necessary requirements from other agencies having jurisdiction (e.g., B&S, Utility, etc.)'), which places the burden on the applicant/installer to carry the signed-off permit to SCE under Rule 21 rather than on the AHJ to push it.
Why the confidence is not higherThis is inference from an absence plus general SCE Rule 21 practice, not a sourced statement. I searched the Chapter 68 text, BCM 6807, the 2/1/2026 plan review list, the LACoFD guide and the LACoFD checklist; none mentions PTO, the utility notification, or who sends it. Treat as unconfirmed and verify with SCE.
inference from LACoFD checklist §V note + absence across five AHJ documents checked 2026-08-28 https://fire.lacounty.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Expedited-Permitting-Checklist-LACoFD-ESS-PV-Disconnects-2023-09-01-SECURED.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Los Angeles County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Los Angeles County is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
- Holds
- Building and electrical permitting, plan check and field inspection for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated LA County. Issues a single 'combined solar energy permit' covering all building and electrical work (LACBC 6804); a separate plumbing permit only if plumbing work is involved.
- Delegated to
- Split three ways. (1) LA County Fire Department (LACoFD) is the AHJ for the LA County Fire Code and states it 'has historically delegated fire-official authority, for plan review and inspection of conventional residential solar-on-roof installations at R-3/R-4 dwellings to the jurisdictional building and safety department' — but expressly retains ESS, electrical-disconnect placarding, rapid-shutdown activation devices and certain BIPV, and requires its OWN separate inspection before the system is used. (2) LA County Department of Regional Planning handles ground-mounted solar entitlement; 'Structure-mounted solar projects generally do not require review by Regional Planning.' (3) Public Works B&S also acts as the electrical AHJ for the 8 of 88 incorporated cities that contract for County electrical inspection — so 'LA County B&S' is not automatically the unincorporated-only answer at a given address.
- Overridden by
- California state law. Gov. Code 65850.5 / AB 2188 / SB 379 compel the expedited streamlined process and the checklist (LACBC Ch. 68 is the county's implementation); Gov. Code 66015 caps the combined permit fee; Civil Code 714 (Solar Rights Act) limits private restrictions. LACFC/CFC 105.3.6 preserves the fire code official's power to require correction even where a permit was issued in error.
- Why not higher
- The County's own adopted Electrical Code states 'The County of Los Angeles Electrical Code applies to all electrical work in the unincorporated portion of Los Angeles County'; Chapter 68 of the Building Code and the Feb-2026 Solar PV Plan Review List are County B&S documents. Held below 95 only because the LACoFD delegation language comes from a 2024 Fire Department guide rather than a written interagency agreement I could read, and because the county is also the electrical AHJ in contract cities.
- Permit required
- Yes. 'All solar photovoltaic systems require plan check' (B&S solar page); LACBC Ch. 68 presumes a permit and Electrical Code Sec. 82-3 forbids installing electrical equipment without one.95%
- Permit cost
- Capped, not flat. The version of LACBC §6805 published by the County states: 'The combined permit fee for small residential rooftop photovoltaic systems shall not exceed $500 unless…65%
- Plan review
- 1–3 business days on the expedited path. LACBC §6803: 'Upon receipt of a complete small residential rooftop solar energy system application,85%
- Portal
- EPIC-LA (Electronic Permitting and Inspections for the County of Los Angeles) — https://epicla.lacounty.gov/ — described by B&S as where applicants 'submit plans, specifications,95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC, as the 2025 California Electrical Code, adopted locally as the 2026 County of Los Angeles Electrical Code (Title 27), effective January 1, 2026.95%
- Own placard wording
- Yes — emphatically, and this is the distinctive local requirement. LACoFD specifies its own placard verbiage, not found in the NEC: exterior placards read 'F.D.90%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal, for the B&S inspection — EPIC-LA. 'Use EPIC-LA to request inspections': log in, click Request Inspection from the home page or top menu bar, select the permit case(s),88%
Labels & placards for this authority
Los Angeles County writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 90%
Yes — emphatically, and this is the distinctive local requirement. LACoFD specifies its own placard verbiage, not found in the NEC: exterior placards read 'F.D. – ELECTRICAL BLDG DISCONNECT # X of Y'; panel-interior placards read '#X'. 'Verbiage and word arrangement shall be as pictured above, wherein "X" and "Y" are replaced with the appropriate numbers based upon the determination of a C-10 electrician (or other classification when a C-10 is not required for the scope of work being performed), with approval of the fire code official. All "X"s shall account for the total number "Y" of essential switches and/or panels to be operated in order to completely disconnect the structure from all power sources (and activate rapid shutdown, when applicable).' The system must account for every power source capable of supplying the structure — utility, generator, PV, ESS, wind, fuel-cell, vehicle-to-grid — and 'A pre-wired optional auxiliary power source input shall also constitute a wired capability to be served by more than one power source, and therefore shall require a placarded disconnect'.
Size, colour & material 90%
Yes — unusually precise. LACoFD Appendix B: SIZE AND MATERIAL — 'Exterior Placards (FIGURE 1) shall be a minimum 2 inches tall by 3.5 inches wide weather resistant plastic, with verbiage engraved'; 'Panel-Interior Placards (FIGURE 2) shall be a minimum 7/16 inches tall by ¾ inches wide weather resistant plastic, with verbiage engraved'. COLOUR — 'Color shall be red letters engraved into a yellow "background" with the verbiage as displayed.' CHARACTER TYPE — Exterior: 'Solid, all-capitals, in Arial font, minimum font size 24. "F.D." and "# X of Y" shall be in bold type and minimum font size 28'; Panel-Interior: 'Solid, all-capitals, in Arial font, bold, minimum font size 24.' ATTACHMENT — 'Attachment shall be by means of permanent epoxy that is material, weather, and surface compatible.' Separately, for the NEC-derived labels, BCM 6807 gives an advisory rather than a mandate: 'ANSI Z535.4 provides guidelines… A phenolic plaque with contrasting colors between the text and background would meet the intent of the code for permanency. No type size is specified, but 20 point (3/8") should be considered the minimum.'
Where they go 90%
LACoFD placards: 'Each placarded disconnect initiation device shall be accessible from the exterior of the structure(s).' 'Exterior Placards shall be placed onto the exterior of, or immediately adjacent to, each panel/enclosure or standalone disconnect switch that is necessary to be operated. Additional Exterior Placards may be required by the fire code official, such as when an enclosure houses multiple panels, or when more than the "Main" within a placarded panel is necessary to be operated.' 'Panel-Interior Placards are required to be placed inside a panel to identify specific switches/breakers when multiple switches within a single panel/enclosure are required to be operated.' Placement locations are 'determined by a C-10 electrician… and are subject to approval by the fire code official', and where the need for additional 'X of Y' placards is unclear the fire code official decides. NEC-derived labels go at their code-specified components: at the DC disconnect, at the AC point of connection, at the switch for the alternative power system, on junction/combiner boxes, on raceways carrying PV circuits every 10 ft, and the directory at the service equipment.
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.