Town of Colma
San Mateo County
Town of Colma is a city authority in the State of California, serving 1,507 residents. 106 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — No numeric turnaround is stated; CMC 5.05.060(d) only requires the Building Official to issue the permit 'within a reasonable period of time after receipt of a… Q18 Where you file — No dedicated online permitting portal; applications are submitted by email to building@colma.ca.gov, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- Plan review turnaround
- No numeric turnaround is stated; CMC 5.05.060(d) only requires the Building Official to issue the permit 'within a reasonable period of time after receipt of a complete application' -- there is no…70% source
- Key document
- ordinance (absence checked) + state law inference cited by 9 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · ordinance
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 80% · ordinance + permit application form
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · ordinance
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 65% · published application form (PDF, created Dec 2016)
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 50% · ordinance (absence checked) + state law inference
- Is there a historic-district review? No 55% · ordinance TOC (absence checked)
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 70% · ordinance (absence checked)
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Yes, but narrowly: an Administrative Use Permit may be required only if the Building Official finds, based on substantial evidence, that the system 'could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety'; that decision is appealable to the City Council 90% · ordinance
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No absolute cap on residential solar generation size, but the streamlined 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' definition -- the only path with guaranteed nondiscretionary, expedited processing -- is capped at 10 kW AC nameplate (or 30 kW thermal), limited to single/duplex-family dwellings, and the array must not exceed the Town's maximum legal building height 85% · ordinance
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 50% · department page (forms list) + ordinance silence
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? No 55% · department page (absence checked)
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 60% · department page (forms list)
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No PE-stamp threshold is stated; the ordinance requires only that the applicant verify structural adequacy 'through the use of standard engineering evaluation techniques' before submitting, without mandating a licensed engineer's stamp for small residential rooftop systems 60% · ordinance
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No PE-stamp threshold is stated for the electrical scope either; the applicant must verify (at their own cost) that the existing electrical system can carry the new PV load 'using standard electrical inspection techniques,' with no licensed-engineer stamp mandated 55% · ordinance
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? No dedicated online permitting portal; applications are submitted by email to building@colma.ca.gov, and inspections/appointments are booked via a Town-hosted Microsoft 365 booking page (outlook.office365.com/book/TownofColma@colma.ca.gov) 80% · department page
- Can the whole application be completed online? No 75% · department page
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? No numeric turnaround is stated; CMC 5.05.060(d) only requires the Building Official to issue the permit 'within a reasonable period of time after receipt of a complete application' -- there is no day-count standard for solar specifically (contrast with CMC 5.05.080's explicit numeric inspection-scheduling standard, discussed at Q50). 70% · ordinance
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 12 months (1 year) from issuance to commence work, or the permit becomes null and void; a lapsed permit may be reactivated within 2 years of the original issuance date (fee = 1/2 of original permit fee if unstarted, 1/2 or 1/4 if work had commenced and was suspended) 90% · ordinance
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 65% · secondary inference from town news content + county-wide utility territory
28 questions answered against Town of Colma’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.04.010(a)-(b) applies the 'Colma Building Codes' to all construction within the Town of Colma, and CMC 5.05.010(a) states the chapter 'applies to the permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems in the City.' Colma is ~92% cemetery land with a population of about 1,509 residents (per the Town's own site), so residential rooftop solar is a genuinely rare case here, but the Town is unambiguously the AHJ where it occurs.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Building Department (Building Division) issues both building and electrical permits under one Building Permit Application; CMC 5.04.060(a) (amending CBC §1.11.2.1) expressly keeps enforcement of State Fire Marshal building standards for Group R-3 occupancies with the Town's own Building Official rather than delegating it away. No Building Official is named by name anywhere on the Town's site (only the generic building@colma.ca.gov / (650) 757-8888 contact), and a 2016-dated Building Permit Application PDF carries a field labeled 'CSG#:' -- CSG Consultants is a common Bay Area contract plan-check firm -- which may indicate a delegated plan-check arrangement, but this is a single dated document and not confirmed by any staff directory, council record, or current department page, so it is flagged as an inference, not a finding.
ordinance + permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/03/Colma-Building-Permit-App.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.030(b): 'Applications for small residential rooftop solar energy systems shall require a building permit or administrative use permit as set forth in this Subchapter.'
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Building Permit Application (a single form) has one shared set of scope-of-work checkboxes including 'ELECTRICAL' alongside 'RESIDENTIAL,' 'REMODEL,' etc. -- there is no separate electrical-permit application published on the Forms & Checklists page. The form itself is dated December 2016 (per its PDF metadata), so this may not reflect any newer process not yet republished.
published application form (PDF, created Dec 2016) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/03/Colma-Building-Permit-App.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherNo solar-specific restriction on who may pull the permit was found in CMC Ch. 5.05. The Town separately publishes a 'Disclosure Form for Owner/Builders Applying for Construction Permits,' confirming the Town accepts owner-builder permits generally (a state Contractors State License Board mandated disclosure), which would extend to a homeowner self-permitting a solar installation absent a carve-out; a licensed contractor route is of course also available via the standard Building Permit Application's contractor fields.
department page (forms list) + ordinance silence checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/bldg-forms-checklists/
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo contractor pre-registration requirement with the Town was found on the Building Department page, the Building Permit Services page, or in CMC Ch. 5.04/5.05; the Building Permit Application simply asks for the contractor's CA license number at the time of submittal.
department page (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/building-services/
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town publishes a 'Disclosure Form for Owner/Builders Applying for Construction Permits' on its Forms & Checklists page, confirming it accepts owner-builder permits; nothing in CMC Ch. 5.05 (the small residential rooftop solar chapter) excludes solar from this general path.
department page (forms list) checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/bldg-forms-checklists/
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCMC 5.05.030(d)-(e) required the Building Official to adopt, by 9/30/2015, 'an administrative, nondiscretionary expedited review process... which shall include standard plan(s) and checklist(s)' substantially conforming to the state Solar Permitting Guidebook. The Town's own 'Forms & Checklists' page for the Building Department was read in full and lists only: Building Permit Application, Construction & Demolition Form, Disclosure Form for Owner/Builders, Special Inspection Request Form, Application for Unreasonable Hardship to Disabled Access Requirements, PCBs Screening Assessment Form, and the School District Fee Schedule/Form -- no solar-specific checklist or standard plan. Site search for 'solar checklist,' 'solar permit,' 'expedited solar,' 'standard plan solar,' and 'solar standard plan' each returned zero results, control-checked against a positive control ('building', ~50+ results) and a fabricated control ('zzqqx', explicit 'no results were found').
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame checklist/standard-plan absence as Q8 -- no solar-specific document exists to state a copy count or format; the only stated submittal channel is the Building Department's general email (building@colma.ca.gov).
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo solar-specific checklist exists to specify site-plan content (see Q8); the generic Building Permit Application form itself does not include a site-plan checkbox or specification.
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo solar-specific checklist exists to confirm a one-line/three-line diagram requirement (see Q8). CMC 5.05.040(a)(2) only requires the applicant, at their own cost, to verify the existing electrical system is adequately sized using 'standard electrical inspection techniques' -- it does not itself mandate a diagram be submitted.
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo solar-specific checklist exists to confirm a string/conductor-calculations requirement (see Q8's finding that the ordinance-required checklist was never published); CMC Ch. 5.05 does not itself mention string or conductor calculations.
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No PE-stamp threshold is stated; the ordinance requires only that the applicant verify structural adequacy 'through the use of standard engineering evaluation techniques' before submitting, without mandating a licensed engineer's stamp for small residential rooftop systems
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.040(a)(1) is the only structural-verification clause in the chapter, and it stops short of requiring a PE stamp or naming a valuation/size threshold.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No PE-stamp threshold is stated for the electrical scope either; the applicant must verify (at their own cost) that the existing electrical system can carry the new PV load 'using standard electrical inspection techniques,' with no licensed-engineer stamp mandated
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.040(a)(2) is the only electrical-verification clause in the chapter.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Town's Master Fee Schedule (Colma Administrative Code Subchapter 1.10, current revision stamped 'October 2024' on its own pages though the page metadata says 2017) was read in full end-to-end: it covers Affordable Housing Mitigation, Police Services, Animal Control, Massage Establishments, Solid Waste Haulers, Food & Drinking Establishments, Cardroom Establishments, Special Event Fees, and an EV Charging Fee -- there is no Building, Planning, or Plan Check fee line anywhere in it. CMC 5.04.060(f)/5.04.080(d) both say building/residential permit fees are set 'in accordance with Resolutions and Ordinances... established by action of the City Council,' implying a separate fee resolution exists, but no such document could be located: site search for 'building permit fee,' 'plan check fee,' 'building valuation,' and 'building division fee' each returned zero results (control-checked against 'building' and 'zzqqx').
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame fee-schedule gap as Q15 -- no building/solar fee line exists to determine whether it is flat, valuation-based, per-kW, or tiered.
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame fee-schedule gap as Q15 -- no plan-check line item exists in the published Master Fee Schedule to confirm or rule out a separate plan-check fee.
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
No numeric turnaround is stated; CMC 5.05.060(d) only requires the Building Official to issue the permit 'within a reasonable period of time after receipt of a complete application' -- there is no day-count standard for solar specifically (contrast with CMC 5.05.080's explicit numeric inspection-scheduling standard, discussed at Q50).
Why the confidence is not higherRead in full from the operative statutory clause governing permit issuance timing; the absence of a numeric standard is itself the finding.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
12 months (1 year) from issuance to commence work, or the permit becomes null and void; a lapsed permit may be reactivated within 2 years of the original issuance date (fee = 1/2 of original permit fee if unstarted, 1/2 or 1/4 if work had commenced and was suspended)
Why the confidence is not higherCBC §105.5 and CRC §R105.5, both amended identically by CMC 5.04.060(e)/5.04.080(c). The Town's Building Permit Services page separately states inspections must be scheduled within 180 days of issuance and every 180 days thereafter to maintain the permit's full term, a distinct continuity rule layered on top of the 12-month commencement rule.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
No dedicated online permitting portal; applications are submitted by email to building@colma.ca.gov, and inspections/appointments are booked via a Town-hosted Microsoft 365 booking page (outlook.office365.com/book/TownofColma@colma.ca.gov)
Why the confidence is not higherStated directly on the Building Permit Services page: 'The Town of Colma accepts Building permit applications through our general email' and 'You can request an inspection for issued Building permits only by clicking here' (linking to the Town's own Outlook booking calendar, not a third-party permitting system).
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/building-services/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No
Why the confidence is not higherApplication submittal is by email attachment, not a web form or permitting portal; only inspection/appointment scheduling can be completed online, via the Town-hosted Outlook booking widget.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/building-services/
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Why the confidence is not higherColma's own site does not name an interconnection utility directly, but its news content consistently frames Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE) as the community-choice electricity generation provider being compared against PG&E rates ('PCE energy rates are 10% lower than PG&E'), and San Mateo County sits entirely within PG&E's distribution/interconnection territory with no municipal utility. PCE supplies generation only; PG&E remains the wires utility responsible for interconnection.
secondary inference from town news content + county-wide utility territory checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/peninsula-clean-energy-providing-energy-bill-relief-to-customers/
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Colma-sourced statement of interconnection sequencing was found (Building Department and Building Permit Services pages are silent on utility sequencing), and PG&E's own interconnection/NEM pages were not fetched in this run.
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo HOA or architectural-approval gate is imposed by CMC Ch. 5.05 (read in full); California Civil Code §714 separately and generally bars an HOA from unreasonably restricting solar installations statewide, but Colma's own ordinance does not add an explicit anti-HOA clause the way some other CA jurisdictions' ordinances do (contrast Napa County §15.14.100(F)), so this is inferred from the ordinance's silence plus state law rather than an express local statement.
ordinance (absence checked) + state law inference checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo chapter titled 'Historic District' appears in the Chapter 5 (Planning, Zoning, Use & Development of Land) table of contents, which was read in full (5.01 through 5.22); CMC 5.04.130 adopts only the statewide California Historical Building Code, which applies solely to buildings already granted historical status, not a blanket zoning-overlay review layer for ordinary residential parcels.
ordinance TOC (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherCalifornia does not use a Texas/Florida-style wind/windstorm certification mechanism, and no such requirement appears anywhere in the Town's 2025 CBC/CRC adoption or its local amendments (CMC 5.04.050-5.04.080, read in full).
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Yes, but narrowly: an Administrative Use Permit may be required only if the Building Official finds, based on substantial evidence, that the system 'could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety'; that decision is appealable to the City Council
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.060(e) and 5.05.070(a)-(c).
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No absolute cap on residential solar generation size, but the streamlined 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' definition -- the only path with guaranteed nondiscretionary, expedited processing -- is capped at 10 kW AC nameplate (or 30 kW thermal), limited to single/duplex-family dwellings, and the array must not exceed the Town's maximum legal building height
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.020 definitions section.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 95% · adopting ordinance
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (based on the 2024 IBC) and 2025 California Residential Code (based on the 2024 IRC) 95% · adopting ordinance
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (based on the 2024 IFC) 95% · adopting ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 95% · ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 CBC/CRC/CEC(2023 NEC)/CFC/CGBSC, all as locally amended by CMC Ch. 5.04 (Ord. 2026-828, 1/14/26), plus the process requirements of CMC Ch. 5.05 for small residential rooftop solar 90% · ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? No local ridge-setback or pathway rule for rooftop PV; the Fire Prevention Code chapter's enumerated local CFC amendments (Ch.1 admin, fire-hydrant Table C102.1 spacing, Chapter 4 emergency planning, water-flow/meter sizing, basement sprinklers, standpipe risers, Appendix D fire-apparatus roads) do not touch CFC §605.11 (rooftop PV). Baseline unamended 2025 CFC §605.11 pathway/setback provisions would apply by default 65% · ordinance (absence checked)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, per NEC Article 690.12 (Rapid Shutdown) as incorporated via the 2023 NEC / 2025 CEC, adopted by the Town unamended on this point 80% · adopting ordinance (inference)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 80% · ordinance (absence checked)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No 75% · ordinance (absence checked)
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, but only via the baseline unamended 2025 CEC's general listing/labeling requirements for all electrical equipment; no Colma-specific solar-equipment approved list was found 55% · ordinance (inference)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Not locally specified beyond the state baseline: the Fire Prevention Code chapter's enumerated local CFC amendments add no battery/ESS provision at all (zero hits for 'battery,' 'ESS,' or 'energy storage' across the full Building & Construction PDF), so batteries in R-3 dwellings would be governed entirely by the unamended 2025 CFC Chapter 12 as it stands statewide, not by any Colma-specific condition 65% · ordinance (absence checked)
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No evidence of a distinct, separate ESS-only permit or inspection process locally 55% · ordinance (absence checked)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, functionally 55% · ordinance (inference)
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local rule; CMC 5.04.090 adopts the 2025 CEC by reference with zero amendment subsections (unlike the Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fire chapters, each of which lists lettered local amendments) -- confirmed by reading the entire Electrical Code section 80% · ordinance (absence checked)
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No local rule; CMC 5.05.040(a)(1) requires only that the applicant 'verify... that the support structure... is stable and adequate' using standard engineering evaluation techniques -- no specific mounting system or attachment-spacing standard is stated anywhere in Ch. 5.04 or 5.05 60% · ordinance (absence checked)
20 questions answered against Town of Colma’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.04.090: the 2025 California Electrical Code 'incorporates and amends the 2023 Edition of the National Electrical Code,' adopted by Ord. 2026-828 (1/14/26).
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code (based on the 2024 IBC) and 2025 California Residential Code (based on the 2024 IRC)
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.04.050 and 5.04.070, adopted by Ord. 2026-828 (1/14/26).
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code (based on the 2024 IFC)
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.04.140, adopted by Ord. 2026-828 (1/14/26).
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherExtensive local amendments run across the Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing, Green Building Standards, and Fire chapters (permit expiration, fee-setting authority, work-before-permit penalty, survey stakes, fire sprinkler exceptions, fire code official/administration, hydrant spacing, waste-management diversion, etc.) -- the Electrical Code chapter (5.04.090) is the one exception, adopted with zero local amendment subsections.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 CBC/CRC/CEC(2023 NEC)/CFC/CGBSC, all as locally amended by CMC Ch. 5.04 (Ord. 2026-828, 1/14/26), plus the process requirements of CMC Ch. 5.05 for small residential rooftop solar
Why the confidence is not higherSynthesized from CMC 5.04.050-5.04.170 and 5.05.010-5.05.080.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local rule; CMC 5.04.090 adopts the 2025 CEC by reference with zero amendment subsections (unlike the Building, Residential, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fire chapters, each of which lists lettered local amendments) -- confirmed by reading the entire Electrical Code section
Why the confidence is not higherFull read of CMC 5.04.090 (Colma Electrical Code); no service-upgrade or busbar-sizing amendment appears anywhere in the Building & Construction PDF (control-checked: 'electrical' returns 8 hits, all administrative/adoption text; 'zzqqx' returns 0).
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No local rule; CMC 5.05.040(a)(1) requires only that the applicant 'verify... that the support structure... is stable and adequate' using standard engineering evaluation techniques -- no specific mounting system or attachment-spacing standard is stated anywhere in Ch. 5.04 or 5.05
Why the confidence is not higherFull-text search of both chapters for 'mounting,' 'spacing,' and 'attachment' returns no solar-specific hit (control-checked).
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
No local ridge-setback or pathway rule for rooftop PV; the Fire Prevention Code chapter's enumerated local CFC amendments (Ch.1 admin, fire-hydrant Table C102.1 spacing, Chapter 4 emergency planning, water-flow/meter sizing, basement sprinklers, standpipe risers, Appendix D fire-apparatus roads) do not touch CFC §605.11 (rooftop PV). Baseline unamended 2025 CFC §605.11 pathway/setback provisions would apply by default
Why the confidence is not higherFull read of CMC 5.04.140's amendment list, items (1) through the Appendix D adoption; zero hits for 'solar,' 'photovoltaic,' 'pathway,' or '605.11' anywhere in the chapter (control-checked against 'fire', 79 hits, and 'zzqqx', 0 hits).
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes, per NEC Article 690.12 (Rapid Shutdown) as incorporated via the 2023 NEC / 2025 CEC, adopted by the Town unamended on this point
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.04.090 adopts the 2025 CEC with zero local amendments (see Q34), so the unamended NEC 690.12 rapid-shutdown requirement stands.
adopting ordinance (inference) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Colma-specific placard list was found. CMC Ch. 5.05 (small residential rooftop solar) contains no placard requirement, and the Fire Prevention Code's enumerated local amendments (CMC 5.04.140) do not add one; baseline unamended NEC/CFC placarding requirements would apply, but no Town-specific list is published anywhere the Building Department's own pages or documents were searched.
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No
Why the confidence is not higherFull-text search of both the combined Building & Construction PDF (which includes the Fire Prevention Code chapter) and the small-residential-solar PDF for 'placard,' 'disconnect,' and 'label' returns no solar-specific placard-wording provision -- control-checked against 'fire' (79 hits) and 'electrical' (8 hits) as positive controls and 'zzqqx' (0 hits) as fabricated control.
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No
Why the confidence is not higherSame absence as Q39 -- no letter-height, colour, or material specification for PV signage appears anywhere in the Town's Building, Electrical, or Fire code chapters.
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo local amendment to NEC 705.10/705.12 facility-map or site-plan placarding was found in the Electrical Code chapter (which has zero local amendments, see Q34); the unamended NEC baseline would apply but that is not a Colma-sourced answer.
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo utility (PG&E) DG-manual or interconnection-handbook placard requirements were retrieved in this run; PG&E's own interconnection pages were not fetched.
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo local label-placement rule distinct from the unamended NEC/CFC baseline was found in the Electrical Code or Fire Prevention Code chapters.
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, but only via the baseline unamended 2025 CEC's general listing/labeling requirements for all electrical equipment; no Colma-specific solar-equipment approved list was found
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.04.090 adopts the 2025 CEC without local amendment (see Q34); the only 'UL listed' reference found anywhere in Ch. 5.04 relates to a fire backflow-prevention device, not solar equipment.
ordinance (inference) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Not locally specified beyond the state baseline: the Fire Prevention Code chapter's enumerated local CFC amendments add no battery/ESS provision at all (zero hits for 'battery,' 'ESS,' or 'energy storage' across the full Building & Construction PDF), so batteries in R-3 dwellings would be governed entirely by the unamended 2025 CFC Chapter 12 as it stands statewide, not by any Colma-specific condition
Why the confidence is not higherFull read of CMC 5.04.140 (Fire Prevention Code local amendments); control-checked ('fire' 79 hits, 'zzqqx' 0 hits).
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No evidence of a distinct, separate ESS-only permit or inspection process locally
Why the confidence is not higherSame absence basis as Q45 -- no ESS-specific permit/inspection language appears in Ch. 5.04 or Ch. 5.05.
ordinance (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, functionally
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05 does not address ground-mounted arrays specifically, but CMC 5.04.010(a)-(b) applies the Colma Building Codes broadly to 'the construction... of any building or structure... within the Town of Colma,' so a ground-mounted rack/array would be evaluated as a structure requiring a standard building permit under the general Building Code rather than a distinct exempt category.
ordinance (inference) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Electrical Code chapter (CMC 5.04.090) has zero local amendments (see Q34), so AC-disconnect-to-meter placement would be governed entirely by the unamended NEC/CEC and by PG&E's own interconnection ('Greenbook') requirements, neither of which was retrievable as a Colma-specific answer in this run.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal 85% · department page
- How much notice is required? 1 business day 90% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM (8:30am-12pm) and PM (1pm-4:30pm) windows are offered; same-day bookings are explicitly not accommodated 90% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 90% · ordinance
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated for the required building inspection (performed by the Town itself); a separate, optional fire-safety inspection 'may be performed by the Colma Fire Protection District, as determined by the Building Official' -- CFPD is an independent special fire district, not a private firm, and its own website (colmafd.org, linked from the Town's own CFPD listing page) is dead in DNS as of this run 75% · ordinance + DNS test
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Only one inspection is required for eligible expedited small residential rooftop solar systems, performed by the Town's Building Division; a separate, optional fire-safety inspection by the Colma Fire Protection District may also occur 'as determined by the Building Official' 85% · ordinance
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 80% · ordinance
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No 75% · department page (absence checked)
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final 50% · ordinance (inference)
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Incomplete applications receive a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies for resubmission (CMC 5.05.060(b)); if a system fails inspection, a subsequent inspection is authorized but 'need not conform to the requirements of this section' (i.e., the expedited-process guarantees do not carry over) (CMC 5.05.080(b)) 85% · ordinance
14 questions answered against Town of Colma’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Permit Services page states: 'You can request an inspection for issued Building permits only by clicking here,' linking to the Town's own Outlook online-scheduler booking page; phone and email are offered separately for permit pick-up appointments rather than field inspections.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/building-services/
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
1 business day
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Services page: 'At least 1 business day's notice is required before the requested inspection date. Cut-off time for next-day requests is 3PM. Same-day bookings cannot be accommodated.'
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/building-services/
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
AM (8:30am-12pm) and PM (1pm-4:30pm) windows are offered; same-day bookings are explicitly not accommodated
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Permit Services page, 'Availability' and 'Inspection Constraints' sections.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/building-services/
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.080(a): 'Only one inspection shall be required and performed by the Town for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review.'
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated for the required building inspection (performed by the Town itself); a separate, optional fire-safety inspection 'may be performed by the Colma Fire Protection District, as determined by the Building Official' -- CFPD is an independent special fire district, not a private firm, and its own website (colmafd.org, linked from the Town's own CFPD listing page) is dead in DNS as of this run
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.080(a); DNS resolution for colmafd.org and www.colmafd.org both failed (curl exit code 6) when tested directly.
ordinance + DNS test checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Only one inspection is required for eligible expedited small residential rooftop solar systems, performed by the Town's Building Division; a separate, optional fire-safety inspection by the Colma Fire Protection District may also occur 'as determined by the Building Official'
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.080(a).
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.080(a) caps eligible small residential rooftop solar systems at a single required inspection; no separate rough-in or mid-roof stage is contemplated.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCMC Ch. 5.05 describes only that 'the inspection shall be done in a timely manner' (5.05.080(a)) without itemizing what the inspector checks; no published inspection checklist exists to confirm labels/listings verification (see Q57).
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's Forms & Checklists page (read in full, see Q8) contains no published solar-specific inspection checklist; site search for 'solar checklist' and related terms returned zero results, control-checked.
department page (absence checked) checked 2026-08-31 https://www.colma.ca.gov/bldg-forms-checklists/
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNeither CMC Ch. 5.05 nor the Building Permit Services page states what must be physically present on-site at the time of a solar inspection (e.g., posted permit, approved plans, inspection card); no such statement was located for Colma specifically.
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame fee-schedule gap as Q15-17: the Master Fee Schedule (CAC 1.10) contains no re-inspection fee line, and no separate building fee resolution could be located on the Town's site.
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Incomplete applications receive a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies for resubmission (CMC 5.05.060(b)); if a system fails inspection, a subsequent inspection is authorized but 'need not conform to the requirements of this section' (i.e., the expedited-process guarantees do not carry over) (CMC 5.05.080(b))
Why the confidence is not higherCMC 5.05.060(b) and 5.05.080(b).
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/uploads/2017/04/5.05-Small-Residential-Rooftop-Solar.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final
Why the confidence is not higherNeither CMC Ch. 5.05 nor the Building Permit Services page names the specific document issued on a passed solar inspection; inferred as a Building Final (rather than a new Certificate of Occupancy) because a rooftop PV retrofit is added to an already-occupied existing dwelling, consistent with the amended CBC §105.3.3's framing of Certificates of Occupancy around new/altered construction generally.
ordinance (inference) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/colmaca/2017/04/9d6354f1-5.04-building-construction-january-2026.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Colma-sourced statement was found naming who notifies the utility for Permission to Operate; PG&E's own interconnection/NEM pages were not fetched in this run.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Colma against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of Colma is the authority having jurisdiction 88% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (self-performed by the Town's Building Department/Division). Fire-code ENFORCEMENT for Group R-3 (one- and two-family dwelling) occupancies is expressly retained by the Town's own Building Official rather than handed to the fire district -- CMC 5.04.060(a) amends CBC §1.11.2.1 to delegate State Fire Marshal R-3 building-standards enforcement to 'the Building Official of Town of Colma.' The separate Colma Fire Protection District's Fire Chief is the Town's general Fire Code Official/Fire Marshal for the balance of the Fire Prevention Code, and CMC 5.05.080(a) allows (but does not require) CFPD to perform one additional, optional fire-safety inspection on small residential rooftop solar, 'as determined by the Building Official.'
- Overridden by
- State Solar Rights Act / AB 2188 (Chapter 521, Statutes 2014) limits the Town's discretionary review to a written 'specific, adverse impact' finding (CMC 5.05.060(e), 5.05.070); CBC §1.11.2.1 as locally amended keeps R-3 fire-code enforcement with the Town Building Official rather than the fire district.
- Why not higher
- CMC 5.04.010(a)-(b) applies the Colma Building Codes Townwide, and CMC 5.05.010(a) states its purpose is 'the permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems in the City.' Colma is an unusual AHJ to confirm this for: per the Town's own site it has about 1,509 residents on a roughly 2-sq-mi footprint that is overwhelmingly cemetery land, so a residential rooftop solar permit is a genuinely rare event here rather than a routine caseload -- but the ordinance and code chapters are current (Ord. 2026-828, effective 1/14/26, on the 2025 code cycle) and directly on point. One caveat lowering confidence slightly below the high 90s: the Town's own 2016-dated Building Permit Application form carries a 'CSG#:' field (CSG Consultants is a common Bay Area contract building/plan-check firm), which could indicate the Building Division's plan-check function is contracted out, but no staff directory, named Building Official, or current department statement confirms this -- it is flagged as an inference from one dated document, not a finding.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Plan review
- No numeric turnaround is stated; CMC 5.05.060(d) only requires the Building Official to issue the permit 'within a reasonable period of time after receipt of a complete application' --…70%
- Portal
- No dedicated online permitting portal; applications are submitted by email to building@colma.ca.gov,80%
- Electrical code
- 202395%
- Own placard wording
- No80%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal85%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 80%
No
Size, colour & material 75%
No
Where they go None%
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.