Town of Fairfax
Marin County
Town of Fairfax is a city authority in the State of California, serving 7,605 residents. 516 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Where you file — No dedicated online building-permit portal identified — the Town uses a paper/PDF 'Construction Permit Application' submitted or emailed directly to the Building… Q20
- Permit required
- Yes90% source
- What it costs
- $0 (fee WAIVED) for both residential and commercial solar95% source
- Key document
- published fee schedule cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · published fee schedule
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 85% · permit application form
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 90% · published fee schedule
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 80% · published fee schedule
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 55% · municipal code (redlined ordinance text)
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No fee-based size cap found: the Town's 'Solar' fee line is a single flat WAIVED entry with no kW/size tiers, unlike other trade lines in the same schedule. A zoning-level size or height cap may exist in Title 17 (Zoning) but could not be confirmed this run. 55% · published fee schedule
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 90% · permit application form
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes, generally (not solar-specific) 55% · department page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 90% · permit application form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — Fairfax's locally-added Fire Code §1201.4 ('Construction Documents') requires 'a scaled and dimensioned site plan showing the location of all energy systems, property lines, buildings, service and electrical panels, transfer switches, disconnects, underground wiring and piping, fuel type and piping, map placard and signage,' with the site plan required to 'clearly designate property frontage for viewer orientation.' 85% · adopting ordinance / staff report attachment (full ordinance text)
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? No dedicated online building-permit portal identified — the Town uses a paper/PDF 'Construction Permit Application' submitted or emailed directly to the Building Official (mlockaby@townoffairfaxca.gov); checks for Accela (aca-prod.accela.com/FAIRFAXCA) and CitizenServe (fairfaxca.citizenserve.com) both failed to resolve/404'd. Separately, Ross Valley Fire Department (the fire-code enforcer for Fairfax) requires digital-only plan submittal through its own online form and books inspections via an Acuity Scheduling portal. 70% · department page + vendor portal probes
- Can the whole application be completed online? No 75% · permit application form
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $0 (fee WAIVED) for both residential and commercial solar 95% · published fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Flat ($0, waived) 90% · published fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No (also effectively $0) 82% · municipal code (redlined ordinance text)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days from date of issuance; may be extended once, for one additional 180 days, by written request to the Building Official prior to expiration (no permit shall be extended more than once) 95% · permit application form
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) for wires/interconnection; Marin Clean Energy (MCE) is the Community Choice Aggregator providing generation/billing for most Fairfax accounts 78% · department/program page (Town's own)
28 questions answered against Town of Fairfax’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own current Master Fee Schedule (Resolution No. 25-24, effective through FY25-26) lists a 'Solar' line item under 'EXHIBIT B — Building Plan Checks / Permits' for both Residential and Commercial, and the Town's own general Construction Permit Application form is used to permit all building/electrical/mechanical/plumbing work including solar.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2026/06/fdc0865b-25-26-fairfax-master-fee-schedule.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Construction Permit Application form has one permit number series (BLD##) with a single 'For Official Use Only' fee summary listing BUILDING / ELECTRICAL / MECHANICAL / PLUMBING subtotals together under one Town-issued permit, and the Master Fee Schedule prices 'Solar' as a single all-inclusive line (not split building vs. electrical). Building Official Mark Lockaby is in-house on the Town's own domain, not a contract firm.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Master Fee Schedule's 'Solar' line reads 'WAIVED' (i.e., the fee is $0), not 'N/A' or absent — meaning a permit is still required and processed, only the fee is not charged. Confirmed by reading the fee-schedule PDF directly with pdftotext -layout, not a summary.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2026/06/fdc0865b-25-26-fairfax-master-fee-schedule.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherOne 'Solar' fee line (not split into separate Building and Electrical Service lines the way ordinary electrical work is priced separately at $257-$328), and the general Construction Permit Application groups Building/Electrical/Mechanical/Plumbing subtotals under a single permit number.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2026/06/fdc0865b-25-26-fairfax-master-fee-schedule.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Construction Permit Application has both a '2a — California Licensed Contractor's Declaration' box and a '2b — Owner-Builder's Declaration' box (citing Bus. & Prof. Code §7044); nothing restricts solar permits to licensed electricians only.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes, generally (not solar-specific)
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's Finance/Business-Tax-Licenses page states a business license is required 'of most businesses that conduct business within the Fairfax Town limits, even if your physical office is located outside Town limits.' This is a general municipal business-license tax ordinance, not a solar- or contractor-specific registry, and the Construction Permit Application itself has no business-license-number field, so I could not confirm it is checked as a gate at permit intake.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://townoffairfaxca.gov/departments/business-tax-licenses/
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherConstruction Permit Application box 2b lets an owner declare 'I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do all of or portions of the work' (Bus. & Prof. Code §7044 owner-builder exemption). Nothing in the Town's building-code amendments excludes solar from this general path.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's 'Forms & Permits' page (12 documents listed, none solar-specific), site search for 'solar' (returns only the /solar/ landing page, fee schedule, and green-program pages), and the general Construction Permit Application PDF itself (a universal form with no attached submittal-package list). No dedicated solar submittal checklist was found anywhere on the Town's site.
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame sources as Q8 — no copies/format requirement is stated anywhere for solar submittals specifically.
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes — Fairfax's locally-added Fire Code §1201.4 ('Construction Documents') requires 'a scaled and dimensioned site plan showing the location of all energy systems, property lines, buildings, service and electrical panels, transfer switches, disconnects, underground wiring and piping, fuel type and piping, map placard and signage,' with the site plan required to 'clearly designate property frontage for viewer orientation.'
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly (pdftotext -layout) from the Town's own Ordinance No. 899 staff report/attachment, which is the full, current text of Fairfax Municipal Code Chapter 8.04, adopted 5 Nov 2025.
adopting ordinance / staff report attachment (full ordinance text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe 191-page Ordinance 901 (building code) text and the 68-page Ordinance 899 (fire code) text, both fully read via pdftotext -layout — neither states a one-line/three-line electrical-diagram submittal requirement for solar specifically (this would ordinarily live in a dedicated solar checklist, which does not exist here per Q8/Q57).
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame two ordinance documents as Q11 — no string/conductor calculation submittal requirement stated.
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance 901's full redlined Building Code/Residential Code text — no valuation, weight, or condition threshold triggering a structural PE stamp for solar is stated; no dedicated solar checklist exists to check instead (see Q8).
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame document as Q13 — no electrical PE stamp threshold stated anywhere in the local amendments.
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$0 (fee WAIVED) for both residential and commercial solar
Why the confidence is not higherMaster Fee Schedule, Exhibit B (Bldg. Plan Check / Permits), Resolution No. 25-24: the 'Solar' line reads 'WAIVED' across every fiscal year column (FY20-21 through FY25-26) in both the RESIDENTIAL and COMMERCIAL sections. This is the Town's own current, in-force fee resolution, extracted directly from the PDF — not a summary. Note: Ross Valley Fire Department separately charges its own 'Photovoltaic Power System' ($328) and 'Battery Systems' ($465) prevention fees (see Q46) — the Town's waiver does not extend to the fire agency's fee.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2026/06/fdc0865b-25-26-fairfax-master-fee-schedule.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Flat ($0, waived)
Why the confidence is not higherThe fee is a flat waiver regardless of system size — no per-kW or per-panel scaling is shown on the Solar line, unlike some other trade lines. Same source as Q15.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2026/06/fdc0865b-25-26-fairfax-master-fee-schedule.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No (also effectively $0)
Why the confidence is not higherTown Code §15.04.025 (Plan Check Fees) sets the plan-review fee at '65% of the building permit fee' generally — and since the Solar building-permit fee itself is $0/WAIVED (Q15), the plan-check component computes to $0 as well. No separate flat solar plan-check line exists in the fee schedule.
municipal code (redlined ordinance text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's 'Building Permits,' 'Forms & Permits,' and 'Planning and Building' department pages — none states a committed plan-review turnaround in days for the Town's own (building-side) review. Only Ross Valley Fire Department's separate fire-plan-review turnaround is published: reviewed in order received with no committed day-count for standard review, or an expedited 48-business-hour option for a $412 fee — but that is the fire agency's turnaround, not the Town's stated building turnaround, so it does not answer this question as asked.
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days from date of issuance; may be extended once, for one additional 180 days, by written request to the Building Official prior to expiration (no permit shall be extended more than once)
Why the confidence is not higherPrinted directly on the Town's own current Construction Permit Application / Inspection Record card, citing 'CBC Sec. 105.5' as authority.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
No dedicated online building-permit portal identified — the Town uses a paper/PDF 'Construction Permit Application' submitted or emailed directly to the Building Official (mlockaby@townoffairfaxca.gov); checks for Accela (aca-prod.accela.com/FAIRFAXCA) and CitizenServe (fairfaxca.citizenserve.com) both failed to resolve/404'd. Separately, Ross Valley Fire Department (the fire-code enforcer for Fairfax) requires digital-only plan submittal through its own online form and books inspections via an Acuity Scheduling portal.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proven by: (1) the Town's own 'Forms & Permits' and 'Building Permits' pages linking only a static fillable PDF application, with no portal link found; (2) direct probes of the two most common CA muni permit-portal vendors both failing (Accela 404, CitizenServe connection failure); (3) RVFD's own 'Permit and Plan Submittals' page confirming its separate digital-only intake and Acuity-based inspection scheduler.
department page + vendor portal probes checked 2026-08-31 https://townoffairfaxca.gov/forms-permits/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own building-permit process is a fillable PDF submitted/emailed to the Building Official, not an online application/payment system; no city-run web portal was found (see Q20). Fire-side (RVFD) plan submittal is digital, but the overall Town building-permit application cannot be completed online end-to-end.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) for wires/interconnection; Marin Clean Energy (MCE) is the Community Choice Aggregator providing generation/billing for most Fairfax accounts
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own 'Fairfax's efforts to go green' page names PG&E as a funding co-partner (via Willdan's heat-pump-water-heater electrification program) and states the Town 'continues to purchase MCE Deep Green for all Town-owned buildings' — confirming both entities' roles in Fairfax specifically, consistent with PG&E serving all of incorporated Marin County. Not from PowerToChoose or any third-party utility lookup, per this brief's caution about that source; not at 90+ because the Town page does not use the word 'interconnection' explicitly.
department/program page (Town's own) checked 2026-08-31 https://townoffairfaxca.gov/fairfaxs-efforts-to-go-green/
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's solar landing page (/solar/, essentially blank), 'Fairfax's efforts to go green' page, and the Construction Permit Application — none states where PG&E interconnection sits in the permit sequence. PG&E's own Rule 21/DG interconnection handbook was not fetched this run.
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedConstruction Permit Application (no HOA field), Ordinance 901's full redlined text (no HOA/architectural-approval clause tied to solar) — Title 17 (Zoning), which is the more likely location for any HOA/architectural-review trigger, is hosted on codelibrary.amlegal.com and returned a Cloudflare 403 challenge to every access attempt this run.
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/fairfax/latest/overview
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame blocked source as Q24 (Title 17, Zoning, on codelibrary.amlegal.com — Cloudflare 403). The Master Fee Schedule lists a general 'Design Review — Residential Construction' fee but nothing ties it specifically to solar or to a historic-district trigger.
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/fairfax/latest/overview
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherNo windstorm/wind certification program was found anywhere in the Town's current adopted building-code ordinance (Ord. No. 901, full text read via pdftotext) — California does not run a TDI-style windstorm certification; wind design is handled via ASCE 7 as incorporated into the CBC/CRC without a separate owner-facing certificate. Confidence is not higher because this is an absence proven only within the ordinance text, not an explicit 'no certification required' statement.
municipal code (redlined ordinance text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance 899/901 full text (no SUP/Council-approval clause for solar) and Title 17 (Zoning), which would be the more likely location — codelibrary.amlegal.com returned a Cloudflare 403 challenge to every access pattern tried (plain fetch, browser User-Agent, API endpoint, WebFetch tool) this run.
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/fairfax/latest/overview
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No fee-based size cap found: the Town's 'Solar' fee line is a single flat WAIVED entry with no kW/size tiers, unlike other trade lines in the same schedule. A zoning-level size or height cap may exist in Title 17 (Zoning) but could not be confirmed this run.
Why the confidence is not higherPositive finding from the fee schedule (read directly); the zoning ordinance (Title 17) is hosted on codelibrary.amlegal.com, which returned a Cloudflare 'Just a moment...' challenge (HTTP 403) to every direct-fetch and browser-UA attempt made this run, so a zoning-level cap could be neither confirmed nor ruled out.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2026/06/fdc0865b-25-26-fairfax-master-fee-schedule.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 95% · adopting ordinance / staff report (Town's own, dated 5 Nov 2025)
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2), based upon the 2024 International Building Code (IBC) 95% · adopting ordinance / staff report
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9), based on the 2024 International Fire Code (IFC), with local amendments; the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code (based on the 2024 IWUIC) is adopted separately (Ordinance No. 900, FMC Ch. 8.06) 95% · adopting ordinance / staff report
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 98% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
- What is the installation judged against? The 2025 CBC/CRC/CEC/CFC (Title 24) as locally amended by Ordinances 899/900/901 92% · municipal code (adopting ordinance)
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? No Fairfax-specific ridge-setback or fire-pathway dimension found. Town Code §15.04.055 (Alternative Power Supplies) simply requires PV to comply with the state-adopted CBC/CRC/CEC/CFC 'as amended' — meaning any ridge-setback/pathway figures come from the unamended state Fire Code (CFC Ch. 12/1205 series) rather than a Fairfax-specific number. Fairfax's own locally-added Fire Code Chapter 12 ('Energy Systems') covers site plans, signage and disconnects but contains no setback-in-feet or pathway-width language. 65% · adopting ordinance (redlined text), control-checked absence
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, via NEC/CEC 690.12 as incorporated by reference through the 2025 California Electrical Code (based on the 2023 NEC), adopted wholesale by Ordinance 901 (§15.04.010(d)). No Fairfax ordinance names 'rapid shutdown' or '690.12' verbatim. 75% · adopting ordinance, control-checked absence + code-adoption inference
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Caution signs/labels identifying the quantity and type of additional power source(s), required at the main service panel and on all disconnect equipment (additional locations may be required by the fire code official); plus a single, clearly-labeled, readily-accessible exterior disconnect for all alternate power sources (PV, ESS, generators). 88% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 80% · adopting ordinance (redlined text), control-checked absence
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes — Fire Code §1201.4 requires 'a scaled and dimensioned site plan showing the location of all energy systems, property lines, buildings, service and electrical panels, transfer switches, disconnects, underground wiring and piping, fuel type and piping, map placard and signage,' oriented to clearly show property frontage. 88% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
- Where must the labels be placed? At the main service panel and on all disconnect equipment (Fire Code §1201.5); the single required exterior disconnect itself must be installed 'as close as possible to the main service panel' and located prior to any load/service panel (§1201.6). 85% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Not stated relative to the meter specifically — Fairfax's Fire Code §1201.6 requires the single exterior disconnect to be installed 'as close as possible to the main service panel or as approved by the fire code official,' but does not reference the utility meter's location. PG&E's own DG interconnection/Greenbook rules on meter proximity were not checked this run. 60% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Mixed — explicit only for one related equipment type: Fire Code §1208.5 requires Home Backup Generators to be 'listed and labeled in accordance with UL 2200.' No equivalent Fairfax-specific listing clause was found naming PV modules or inverters directly; general listing of PV/inverter equipment would instead come from the state-adopted CEC by reference. 55% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, as part of a combined 'Energy Systems' framework covering PV, ESS and generators together: a scaled site plan (§1201.4), caution signs/labels (§1201.5), a single exterior disconnect (§1201.6), and mandatory operational shutdown testing that explicitly names 'photovoltaic system, energy storage systems, and generators' (§1201.7) — the test simulates a normal-power failure and requires the single disconnect(s) to fully terminate all alternate power sources. 88% · adopting ordinance (redlined text)
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Fire-side: yes, separately priced — Ross Valley Fire Department's own fee schedule prices 'Photovoltaic Power System' ($328) and 'Battery Systems' ($465) as two distinct line items. Building-side: no — the Town's Master Fee Schedule has only one 'Solar' line (WAIVED), with no distinct battery/ESS line. 75% · published fee schedule (fire district), page text self-extracted
20 questions answered against Town of Fairfax’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own 5 Nov 2025 staff report for Ordinance No. 901 states plainly: '2025 California Electrical Code (Title 24, Part 3) based upon the 2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)' — and the ordinance's own redlined §15.04.010(d) confirms the same, striking the prior '2020 NEC' reference.
adopting ordinance / staff report (Town's own, dated 5 Nov 2025) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code (Title 24, Part 2), based upon the 2024 International Building Code (IBC)
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance No. 901, adopted 5 Nov 2025 (staff report prepared by Mark Lockaby, Building Official), confirmed by the Town's own news post 'Fairfax Town Council Updated Building and Fire Codes on November 5, 2025.'
adopting ordinance / staff report checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code (Title 24, Part 9), based on the 2024 International Fire Code (IFC), with local amendments; the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code (based on the 2024 IWUIC) is adopted separately (Ordinance No. 900, FMC Ch. 8.06)
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance No. 899 (Fire Code, FMC Ch. 8.04) and Ordinance No. 900 (WUI Code, FMC Ch. 8.06) were both adopted 5 Nov 2025, per the Town's own agenda item staff reports and confirmed by Ross Valley Fire Department's own 'Fire Code' page, which names Fairfax's ordinance as 'Fire Code - Section 8.04.'
adopting ordinance / staff report checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherExtensive, explicit local amendments read directly from the ordinance redlines: a new Fire Code Chapter 12 'Energy Systems' (§§1201.4-1201.8, added), a new Chapter 12 'Home Backup Generator' subsection, Building Code §15.04.055 'Alternative Power Supplies,' §15.04.025 'Plan Check Fees' (65% of permit fee), §15.04.030 'Roof Coverings' (Class A roof assembly), sprinkler-related amendments broadening state minimums, and fire-apparatus-access-road amendments, among others.
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2025 CBC/CRC/CEC/CFC (Title 24) as locally amended by Ordinances 899/900/901
Why the confidence is not higherTown Code §15.04.055 (Alternative Power Supplies), added by Ordinance 901, states: 'Roof-mounted photovoltaic panels/modules and other alternative electrical power supply sources shall comply with the requirements of the California Building Code as amended, the California Residential Code as amended, the California Electrical Code, and the California Fire Code as amended.'
municipal code (adopting ordinance) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance 901's full redlined Building/Electrical Code text (Ch. 15.04) — no service-upgrade-sizing or busbar-sizing local rule was found; only a generic 'Service Panel Upgrade' concept exists implicitly via the general electrical-service fee, with no accompanying technical rule.
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance 901's full text and Ordinance 899's Fire Code Ch. 12 — no mounting-system or attachment-spacing requirement was found; no dedicated solar checklist exists to check instead.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
No Fairfax-specific ridge-setback or fire-pathway dimension found. Town Code §15.04.055 (Alternative Power Supplies) simply requires PV to comply with the state-adopted CBC/CRC/CEC/CFC 'as amended' — meaning any ridge-setback/pathway figures come from the unamended state Fire Code (CFC Ch. 12/1205 series) rather than a Fairfax-specific number. Fairfax's own locally-added Fire Code Chapter 12 ('Energy Systems') covers site plans, signage and disconnects but contains no setback-in-feet or pathway-width language.
Why the confidence is not higherFull text of the Town's newly-added Fire Code Chapter 12 (§§1201.4-1201.8) was read directly (pdftotext -layout) and control-checked — 'ridge,' 'pathway,' and 'setback' each return zero on-topic hits inside that chapter (the only 'setback' hits in the whole 68-page fire-code document are about fire-apparatus gate setbacks, unrelated to solar), while a positive control term ('electrical,' 10 hits) confirms the search was working.
adopting ordinance (redlined text), control-checked absence checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes, via NEC/CEC 690.12 as incorporated by reference through the 2025 California Electrical Code (based on the 2023 NEC), adopted wholesale by Ordinance 901 (§15.04.010(d)). No Fairfax ordinance names 'rapid shutdown' or '690.12' verbatim.
Why the confidence is not higherControl-checked: full-text search of the Town's own 68-page Fire Code ordinance and 191-page Building Code ordinance for 'rapid shutdown' and '690.12' returns zero hits in both, while the positive control 'electrical' returns 10 and 67 hits respectively, confirming the search itself was working. Because the 2023-NEC-based CEC is adopted wholesale without exception, 690.12 applies by reference even though no local document states so in its own words.
adopting ordinance, control-checked absence + code-adoption inference checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/794857ba-item-6.-2025-building-code-update.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Caution signs/labels identifying the quantity and type of additional power source(s), required at the main service panel and on all disconnect equipment (additional locations may be required by the fire code official); plus a single, clearly-labeled, readily-accessible exterior disconnect for all alternate power sources (PV, ESS, generators).
Why the confidence is not higherFairfax Fire Code §1201.5 ('Signs and Labels') and §1201.6 ('Disconnect'), added by Ordinance No. 899, read directly from the ordinance text. Ross Valley Fire Department's own published standards catalog (19 documents) has no additional solar-specific placard standard — its only placard/labeling standard ('309 Placard and Labeling') is scoped to hazardous materials, not solar.
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No
Why the confidence is not higherFire Code §1201.5 requires generic 'caution signs or labels' identifying quantity/type of power source, but prescribes no exact wording — unlike, e.g., LACoFD's or Hollister's verbatim-wording placard specs. Read directly from the ordinance text.
adopting ordinance (redlined text), control-checked absence checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFire Code Ch. 12 (§§1201.4-1201.8), added by Ordinance 899, read in full — it requires 'caution signs or labels' generically but specifies no letter height, colour, or material anywhere in the chapter.
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — Fire Code §1201.4 requires 'a scaled and dimensioned site plan showing the location of all energy systems, property lines, buildings, service and electrical panels, transfer switches, disconnects, underground wiring and piping, fuel type and piping, map placard and signage,' oriented to clearly show property frontage.
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from Fairfax's Ordinance No. 899 (adding Fire Code Ch. 12), the Town's own current, adopted local amendment.
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPG&E's own DG interconnection / Greenbook manual was not fetched this run (utility-level document, out of scope of what the Town or RVFD themselves publish).
https://www.pge.com/en/about/company-information/company-profile.html
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the main service panel and on all disconnect equipment (Fire Code §1201.5); the single required exterior disconnect itself must be installed 'as close as possible to the main service panel' and located prior to any load/service panel (§1201.6).
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from Ordinance No. 899's added Fire Code Chapter 12.
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Mixed — explicit only for one related equipment type: Fire Code §1208.5 requires Home Backup Generators to be 'listed and labeled in accordance with UL 2200.' No equivalent Fairfax-specific listing clause was found naming PV modules or inverters directly; general listing of PV/inverter equipment would instead come from the state-adopted CEC by reference.
Why the confidence is not higherThe UL 2200 clause for generators is explicit and dated (Ord. 899, Ch. 12, §1208.5); the absence of an equivalent explicit PV/inverter clause was checked in the same 68-page fire-code document and the 191-page building-code document, both fully read, with no hit for 'listed' in a PV/inverter context.
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, as part of a combined 'Energy Systems' framework covering PV, ESS and generators together: a scaled site plan (§1201.4), caution signs/labels (§1201.5), a single exterior disconnect (§1201.6), and mandatory operational shutdown testing that explicitly names 'photovoltaic system, energy storage systems, and generators' (§1201.7) — the test simulates a normal-power failure and requires the single disconnect(s) to fully terminate all alternate power sources.
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from Ordinance No. 899's added Fire Code Chapter 12, the Town's own current local amendment (adopted 5 Nov 2025).
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Fire-side: yes, separately priced — Ross Valley Fire Department's own fee schedule prices 'Photovoltaic Power System' ($328) and 'Battery Systems' ($465) as two distinct line items. Building-side: no — the Town's Master Fee Schedule has only one 'Solar' line (WAIVED), with no distinct battery/ESS line.
Why the confidence is not higherRVFD fee figures were extracted directly from the raw page text of rossvalleyfire.gov/fee-schedule-prevention-services (not a WebFetch summary — verified myself via a regex text-strip of the fetched HTML, which is a Streamline-CMS page that does render its content into static HTML, unlike its JS-only sibling pages). Town figure per Q15's fee-schedule PDF.
published fee schedule (fire district), page text self-extracted checked 2026-08-31 https://www.rossvalleyfire.gov/fee-schedule-prevention-services
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance 901's full redlined Building/Residential Code text and Ordinance 899's Fire Code Ch. 12 — no mention of ground-mounted solar arrays was found anywhere in either document (both are otherwise thorough enough to cover roof-mounted PV in detail), so the ground-mount question is genuinely unaddressed rather than answered as 'no.'
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Not stated relative to the meter specifically — Fairfax's Fire Code §1201.6 requires the single exterior disconnect to be installed 'as close as possible to the main service panel or as approved by the fire code official,' but does not reference the utility meter's location. PG&E's own DG interconnection/Greenbook rules on meter proximity were not checked this run.
Why the confidence is not higherThe only Fairfax-side disconnect-location rule found (§1201.6) speaks to the main service panel, not the meter; this is a partial answer to the question as posed, not a full negative, so recorded with a caveat rather than as not_found.
adopting ordinance (redlined text) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2025/10/4ed1e6c8-item-4.-2025-fire-code-update.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Phone for Building Division final inspections (415-453-2263, per the Town's own permit/inspection card); Portal (Acuity Scheduling, self-serve online) for Ross Valley Fire Department's separate fire-prevention inspections. 85% · permit application / inspection record card + fire district department page
- How much notice is required? 24 hours (Building Division, by phone); 72 business hours (Ross Valley Fire Department, for its own fire-side inspections, booked online) 88% · permit application / inspection record card + fire district department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No dedicated AM/PM booking windows found for the Town's own building inspections — the department page states inspections occur 'Monday-Thursday mornings and afternoons' generically, without a same-day or discrete AM/PM slot system. Ross Valley Fire's Acuity-based online scheduler does let the applicant 'select the available day and time,' which functions as a windowed system for fire-side inspections. 55% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 80% · department page
- If delegated, to whom? For the fire-code 'Energy Systems' component only (site-plan/signage/disconnect review and the required operational shutdown test): Ross Valley Fire Department, a 4-agency JPA (Town of Fairfax, Town of San Anselmo, Town of Ross, Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection District), formed 1982 under Gov. Code §§6500-6514, enforcing Fairfax's own adopted Fire Code (FMC Ch. 8.04). 85% · fire district's own department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Building/electrical side (Town): the permit's own generic Inspection Record card lists 'Rough Electrical' (122) and 'Electrical Final' (176) among available inspection types, ending in 'Building Final' (199) — no solar-specific stage code exists; it uses the same codes as any electrical/building job. Fire side (RVFD): a separate inspection tied to the 'Photovoltaic Power System' / 'Battery Systems' permit line, including the Ch. 12 operational shutdown test. 75% · permit application / inspection record card
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No 80% · department page, control-checked absence
- What must be on site at inspection? The Town's Inspection Record card itself, which must be 'Post[ed] ... In A Conspicuous Place' on the job site. 70% · permit application / inspection record card
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final (building final inspection sign-off) 60% · permit application / inspection record card
14 questions answered against Town of Fairfax’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Phone for Building Division final inspections (415-453-2263, per the Town's own permit/inspection card); Portal (Acuity Scheduling, self-serve online) for Ross Valley Fire Department's separate fire-prevention inspections.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding-side instruction is printed directly on the Town's own Construction Permit Application / Inspection Record card ('Please Call At Least 24 Hours Prior To Your Desired Inspection Time (415) 453-2263'). Fire-side is from RVFD's own 'Scheduling Inspections' page describing an online Acuity-based self-serve scheduler.
permit application / inspection record card + fire district department page checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
24 hours (Building Division, by phone); 72 business hours (Ross Valley Fire Department, for its own fire-side inspections, booked online)
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding figure printed directly on the Town's own Inspection Record card. Fire figure from RVFD's own Scheduling Inspections page: 'Inspection requests shall be made a minimum of 72 business hours prior to the inspection date,' with cancellations required within 48 hours to avoid a re-inspection charge.
permit application / inspection record card + fire district department page checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
No dedicated AM/PM booking windows found for the Town's own building inspections — the department page states inspections occur 'Monday-Thursday mornings and afternoons' generically, without a same-day or discrete AM/PM slot system. Ross Valley Fire's Acuity-based online scheduler does let the applicant 'select the available day and time,' which functions as a windowed system for fire-side inspections.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding-side info is from the Town's own Building Inspections department page, which only gives generic morning/afternoon availability, not a same-day or AM/PM slot commitment; fire-side info is inferred from RVFD's Acuity Scheduling description of picking 'day and time,' which implies discrete time slots without RVFD explicitly using the words 'AM/PM window.'
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://townoffairfaxca.gov/departments/planning-building/
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own in-house Building Division (Mark Lockaby, Building Official) performs building/electrical final inspection directly — there is no evidence of delegation for that scope. The separate fire-code 'Energy Systems' operational shutdown test (§1201.7) is performed for/by Ross Valley Fire Department, the JPA that enforces Fairfax's own Fire Code — see Q53.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://townoffairfaxca.gov/departments/planning-building/
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
For the fire-code 'Energy Systems' component only (site-plan/signage/disconnect review and the required operational shutdown test): Ross Valley Fire Department, a 4-agency JPA (Town of Fairfax, Town of San Anselmo, Town of Ross, Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection District), formed 1982 under Gov. Code §§6500-6514, enforcing Fairfax's own adopted Fire Code (FMC Ch. 8.04).
Why the confidence is not higherRVFD's own 'Fire Code' page states it enforces 'Town of Fairfax: Fire Code - Section 8.04' rather than a single unified district code, and its own 'Joint Powers Authority (JPA)' page names all four member agencies and the 1982 formation date.
fire district's own department page checked 2026-08-31 https://www.rossvalleyfire.gov/joint-powers-authority-jpa
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Building/electrical side (Town): the permit's own generic Inspection Record card lists 'Rough Electrical' (122) and 'Electrical Final' (176) among available inspection types, ending in 'Building Final' (199) — no solar-specific stage code exists; it uses the same codes as any electrical/building job. Fire side (RVFD): a separate inspection tied to the 'Photovoltaic Power System' / 'Battery Systems' permit line, including the Ch. 12 operational shutdown test.
Why the confidence is not higherThe inspection-type list is printed directly on the Town's own Construction Permit Application / Inspection Record card; the fire-side sequence is inferred from RVFD's separate PV/Battery fee lines plus the Ch. 12 testing requirement, since RVFD does not publish a solar-specific step-by-step sequence page.
permit application / inspection record card checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Town's Inspection Record card lists 'Rough Electrical' as an available generic inspection type, but no document I could access states whether a rough-in or mid-roof inspection is mandatory specifically for solar (as opposed to available/optional).
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown department pages and the Construction Permit Application/Inspection Record — none explicitly states that the inspector checks equipment labels/listings as a discrete verification step for solar, even though UL 2200 listing is explicitly required for backup generators (Q44).
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proven, not assumed: the Town's own 'Forms & Permits' page lists 12 named documents (Building Permit, Zoning Regulations, Code Enforcement Complaint, Planning Application, Planning Process, Resale Inspection Report, Tree Removal Application, Fee Schedule, Cannabis Permit, PDD Checklist, Appeal Form, AB2533 ADU Checklist) and none is a solar/PV checklist; a site search for 'solar' on townoffairfaxca.gov returns only the bare /solar/ landing page (no checklist), the fee schedule, and general climate-program pages. RVFD's own 19-item published standards catalog likewise has no solar-specific document.
department page, control-checked absence checked 2026-08-31 https://townoffairfaxca.gov/forms-permits/
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The Town's Inspection Record card itself, which must be 'Post[ed] ... In A Conspicuous Place' on the job site.
Why the confidence is not higherPrinted instruction on the Town's own Construction Permit Application / Inspection Record card. No further solar-specific on-site document requirement (e.g., approved plans on site) was separately stated in what I could access, though that is standard practice generally implied by the permit process.
permit application / inspection record card checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Town's own 8-page Master Fee Schedule was read in full (pdftotext -layout) and contains no re-inspection fee line at all. Ross Valley Fire Department's 'Permit and Plan Submittals' page references (per a WebFetch-rendered summary, not independently verified in raw page text since the page is JavaScript-rendered) 'additional charges for large projects or re-inspections,' but no dollar figure could be confirmed from the raw HTML, so this is recorded as not_found rather than guessed.
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown department pages and the Construction Permit Application — no document describes how corrections are issued or cleared after a failed inspection, for solar or generally.
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final (building final inspection sign-off)
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Inspection Record card's last listed inspection type is '199 Building Final,' with no separate 'Certificate of Occupancy,' 'Green Tag,' or 'Letter' terminology used anywhere in the documents I could access for a residential solar retrofit (as opposed to new construction, which is a different fee-schedule item).
permit application / inspection record card checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/fairfaxca/2024/12/10988961-2026-permit-application.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's solar landing page and 'Fairfax's efforts to go green' page — neither states who submits interconnection/PTO paperwork to PG&E. PG&E's own Rule 21 process was not fetched this run.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Fairfax against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of Fairfax is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical (combined, in-house Building Division within Planning & Building)
- Overridden by
- Fire-code compliance for residential solar/battery/generator installations (Fairfax Municipal Code Ch. 8.04, adopting the 2025 CFC with local Chapter 12 'Energy Systems' amendments via Ordinance No. 899) is enforced by the Ross Valley Fire Department (RVFD) — a 4-member JPA (Town of Fairfax, Town of San Anselmo, Town of Ross, Sleepy Hollow Fire Protection District) formed in 1982 under Gov. Code §§6500-6514. RVFD charges its own separate 'Photovoltaic Power System' ($328) and 'Battery Systems' ($465) prevention-services fees, independent of the Town's own building permit fee for solar, which is WAIVED. AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22) also freezes the Town from adopting new more-restrictive residential building-code amendments from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031 (cited explicitly in the Town's own Nov 2025 staff report).
- Why not higher
- The Town's own Planning & Building department page names Mark Lockaby as 'Building Official' on the Town's own domain (mlockaby@townoffairfaxca.gov), and the Town's own Construction Permit Application is issued/signed by 'Mark L[ockaby], Building Official' — no evidence of delegation to a contract firm for building/electrical. Separately, Ross Valley Fire Department's own 'Fire Code' page states outright that it enforces 'Town of Fairfax: Fire Code - Section 8.04' (i.e., the Town's own adopted code, not a district-wide code), confirming the split: Town holds building/electrical and fire-code ADOPTION; RVFD performs fire-code plan review/inspection/fee collection as the Town's fire agency under a JPA. Not 100 because I could not independently reach the Town's zoning title (Title 17, on American Legal / codelibrary.amlegal.com) to confirm there is no additional zoning-level carve-out — that codifier returned a Cloudflare challenge (403) to every access pattern tried this run.
- Permit required
- Yes90%
- Permit cost
- $0 (fee WAIVED) for both residential and commercial solar95%
- Portal
- No dedicated online building-permit portal identified — the Town uses a paper/PDF 'Construction Permit Application' submitted or emailed directly to the Building Official…70%
- Electrical code
- 202395%
- Own placard wording
- No80%
- Booking an inspection
- Phone for Building Division final inspections (415-453-2263, per the Town's own permit/inspection card);85%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 80%
No
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go 85%
At the main service panel and on all disconnect equipment (Fire Code §1201.5); the single required exterior disconnect itself must be installed 'as close as possible to the main service panel' and located prior to any load/service panel (§1201.6).
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.