Town of Loomis
Placer County
Town of Loomis is a city authority in the State of California, serving 6,836 residents. 2,201 residential solar installs are on record here. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined Q4 Plan review — 1-3 business days Q18 Where you file — Symbium (SB 379 automated instant-permit portal) for roof-mount residential solar and roof-mount solar batteries; Q20
- Permit required
- Yes92% source
- What it costs
- Residential roof-mounted: $420 flat for systems 15 kW AC or less, plus $4 per additional kW above 15 kW.95% source
- Plan review turnaround
- 1-3 business days85% source
- Key document
- published checklist cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 92% · ordinance (staff report + adopted ordinance text, OCR'd from scanned PDF)
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 82% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 92% · ordinance
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined 82% · department page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No 85% · permit application form
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No dedicated windstorm certification program; wind is handled purely as a structural design parameter (88-105 mph basic wind speed depending on risk category, per the Town's current Design Criteria). 65% · department page
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Yes, conditionally 90% · ordinance
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No hard citywide size cap on residential generation; the 10 kW AC / 30 kW thermal figure in LMC 11.12.010(B)(1) defines eligibility for the EXPEDITED Chapter 11.12 process only, not a ceiling on system size. 85% · ordinance + fee schedule cross-check
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 75% · department page
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 85% · permit application form
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 85% · department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Per the Town's 'Photovoltaic Requirements' handout (Building Department, dated Jan 2023): 3 sets of plans (min. 11x17 for residential) + 2 sets of equipment specifications; a signed contract between Contractor and Owner; proof of an active Town of Loomis Business License for the contractor; a cover sheet (address, current CA Code Design Criteria, owner/preparer info, scope of work, sheet index, legend, kW rating/module count, occupancy/construction type, sprinkler status); a plot plan; a roof plan; framing cross-sections; a single-line electrical diagram; calculation pages; fastener specifications; and manufacturer specification/UL-listing sheets. 92% · published checklist
- How many copies, and in what format? 3 sets of plans (minimum 11x17 paper) + 2 sets of equipment specification sheets, residential. Commercial arrays must be drawn to scale, fully dimensioned, and bear a licensed professional's wet stamp and signature. 90% · published checklist
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes -- a plot plan showing property lines, approximate structure locations with a north arrow, panel-installation location(s) with code-compliant fire pathways, the main service location, and the locations of all equipment and disconnects. 92% · published checklist
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes 95% · published checklist
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 92% · published checklist
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Yes, for tile roofs or panel-integrated (BIPV) systems: 'Structural calculations (Stamped and wet signed by a California Licensed Design Professional) are required for tile roofs or systems involving panels which are integrated into rooftiles.' Otherwise only a designer's (unstamped) name and signature are required on the cover sheet. 88% · published checklist
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Symbium (SB 379 automated instant-permit portal) for roof-mount residential solar and roof-mount solar batteries; all other solar (ground-mount, commercial) and general building permits are submitted by email to bldgpermit@loomis.ca.gov -- there is no separate online application portal for those categories. 88% · department page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes, for roof-mounted residential solar/ESS via Symbium's automated online review; No for ground-mount and commercial solar, which are submitted as a document package by email for staff review. 82% · department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Residential roof-mounted: $420 flat for systems 15 kW AC or less, plus $4 per additional kW above 15 kW. Residential ground-mounted: $2,409 base for 15 kW AC or less, plus $5 per additional kW above 15 kW. A separate 'Battery / Energy Storage System (ESS) Residential' fee of $574 applies. Commercial/multi-family figures also published (roof: $2,693 base to 50 kW, then $10/kW to 250 kW, then $7/kW; ground: $3,002 base to 50 kW, same per-kW steps). 95% · published fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered 88% · published fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No separate plan-check fee identified for solar specifically 62% · published fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? 1-3 business days 85% · department page
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 365 days from permit issuance for work to commence (with 365 days to pass final inspection); this is the Town's general building-permit expiration rule, not a solar-specific figure. 78% · permit application form (general permit-expiration language)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 60% · Town council document (indirect corroboration)
28 questions answered against Town of Loomis’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherLMC 11.12.030(A) as enacted: 'This Ordinance applies to the permitting of all small residential rooftop solar energy systems in the Town.' The Town's own live Solar Permits, Roof Solar Permit, and Ground Solar Permit pages run the current process.
ordinance (staff report + adopted ordinance text, OCR'd from scanned PDF) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town issues one combined 'Solar Permit' covering Building and (for standard PV) Electrical scope; a separate stand-alone Electrical Permit is required only 'if scope includes new or modified electrical panels' per the Town's own Roof Solar Permit page. No evidence of delegation to Placer County for either function.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/roofsolarpermit/
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherLMC 11.12.030(A) applies the permitting requirement to all small residential rooftop solar systems; the Town's live Solar Permit pages confirm an active permit process for roof-mount, ground-mount, and commercial solar today.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined
Why the confidence is not higherThe Roof Solar Permit (Symbium) page states plainly that a separate Electrical Permit application is required only 'if scope includes new or modified electrical panels' -- implying standard PV/battery work is issued under the single Solar Permit. The Electrical Permit page itself directs solar applicants away to the Solar Permit page rather than covering solar wiring under the general Electrical Permit.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/electricalpermit/
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's Contractor Permit Application requires a CSLB license/classification, and a separate Owner-Builder Building Permit Application path exists (in effect since 4/8/2025) alongside it. Note a narrower carve-out: the Roof Solar Permit page states 'ESS only systems require a C-46 and C-10 license,' meaning a stand-alone battery project cannot use the owner-builder or generalist-contractor path.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/roofsolarpermit/
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Contractor Permit Application form contains a mandatory field, 'Town of Loomis Business License Number,' with the printed statement 'All contractors performing work within the Town of Loomis must have a Town business license' -- a gate built into the intake form itself, not just a general licensing ordinance.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2025/04/24.7.2026-permit-app-contractor-6e108749.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town publishes a distinct 'Owner-Builder Building Permit Application,' explicitly separated from the Contractor application as of 4/8/2025, plus an 'Owner-Builder Permit Responsibilities' handout and CSLB caution documents. Nothing in Chapter 11.12 excludes solar from this general path.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/owner-builder-permits/
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Per the Town's 'Photovoltaic Requirements' handout (Building Department, dated Jan 2023): 3 sets of plans (min. 11x17 for residential) + 2 sets of equipment specifications; a signed contract between Contractor and Owner; proof of an active Town of Loomis Business License for the contractor; a cover sheet (address, current CA Code Design Criteria, owner/preparer info, scope of work, sheet index, legend, kW rating/module count, occupancy/construction type, sprinkler status); a plot plan; a roof plan; framing cross-sections; a single-line electrical diagram; calculation pages; fastener specifications; and manufacturer specification/UL-listing sheets.
Why the confidence is not higherExtracted directly from the PDF with pdftotext -layout, not a summary. Document is dated January 1, 2023 and cites the 2022 CRC by section number, so it predates the Town's current (2025-cycle, effective 1 Jan 2026) code adoption -- I treat the checklist contents as still operative since it remains the only live linked document, but flag the code-cycle lag.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
3 sets of plans (minimum 11x17 paper) + 2 sets of equipment specification sheets, residential. Commercial arrays must be drawn to scale, fully dimensioned, and bear a licensed professional's wet stamp and signature.
Why the confidence is not higherSame handout, extracted directly.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes -- a plot plan showing property lines, approximate structure locations with a north arrow, panel-installation location(s) with code-compliant fire pathways, the main service location, and the locations of all equipment and disconnects.
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist item 1 under 'Other required information on additional plan sheets.'
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist item 5 explicitly requires 'a single line drawing of the electrical installation' covering panel layout, short-circuit current rating, conductor size/type/routing, wiring methods, grounding, inverter/disconnect/battery/sub-panel locations, point of connection, and main service size.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist item 11 requires calculation pages for short-circuit current (Isc), open-circuit voltage/temperature coefficient (Voc), voltage drop/temperature factors, and point-of-connection calculations; item 12 adds a load calculation whenever the service panel is changed out or the main breaker reduced.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Yes, for tile roofs or panel-integrated (BIPV) systems: 'Structural calculations (Stamped and wet signed by a California Licensed Design Professional) are required for tile roofs or systems involving panels which are integrated into rooftiles.' Otherwise only a designer's (unstamped) name and signature are required on the cover sheet.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the checklist's structural section; the threshold is roof-covering type / BIPV, not a valuation or weight figure.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPhotovoltaic Requirements checklist (full text extracted via pdftotext -layout) and the enacted Chapter 11.12 ordinance text (OCR'd from the scanned 2015 staff-report PDF) -- neither states a valuation, ampacity, or size threshold triggering a separate electrical PE stamp beyond the general designer-signature requirement already covered under q13.
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Residential roof-mounted: $420 flat for systems 15 kW AC or less, plus $4 per additional kW above 15 kW. Residential ground-mounted: $2,409 base for 15 kW AC or less, plus $5 per additional kW above 15 kW. A separate 'Battery / Energy Storage System (ESS) Residential' fee of $574 applies. Commercial/multi-family figures also published (roof: $2,693 base to 50 kW, then $10/kW to 250 kW, then $7/kW; ground: $3,002 base to 50 kW, same per-kW steps).
Why the confidence is not higherCurrent Town of Loomis Schedule of User Fees, effective 1 Jul 2026, 'Solar / Photovoltaic' section -- read directly from the PDF with pdftotext -layout, not summarized.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2026/06/fee-schedule-final-134b1dbf.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered
Why the confidence is not higherA flat 'Base' fee applies up to a 15 kW threshold, then a per-kW rate applies above it -- this is a tiered structure rather than a pure Flat, Valuation, or Per-kW basis. Same shape for roof-mount and ground-mount, at different base amounts.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2026/06/fee-schedule-final-134b1dbf.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No separate plan-check fee identified for solar specifically
Why the confidence is not higherThe fee schedule's 'Plan Check -- % of Bldg. Permit Fee -- 100%' line sits inside the general valuation-based 'New Construction, Tenant Improvement, Remodel & Addition' section; the 'Solar / Photovoltaic' section is a separate, self-contained set of flat/tiered 'Base' fees with no accompanying plan-check line of its own. This is a structural inference from the document's layout, not an explicit statement that solar plan check is bundled.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2026/06/fee-schedule-final-134b1dbf.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
1-3 business days
Why the confidence is not higherRoof Solar Permit (Symbium) page: 'permit processing can take 1-3 business days, depending on staff availability.'
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/roofsolarpermit/
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
365 days from permit issuance for work to commence (with 365 days to pass final inspection); this is the Town's general building-permit expiration rule, not a solar-specific figure.
Why the confidence is not higherContractor Permit Application, Section F: 'Every permit issued by the Building Official... shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days of permit issuance, and/or completed within the prescribed time frame.' No solar-specific override was found in Chapter 11.12 or elsewhere.
permit application form (general permit-expiration language) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2025/04/24.7.2026-permit-app-contractor-6e108749.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Symbium (SB 379 automated instant-permit portal) for roof-mount residential solar and roof-mount solar batteries; all other solar (ground-mount, commercial) and general building permits are submitted by email to bldgpermit@loomis.ca.gov -- there is no separate online application portal for those categories.
Why the confidence is not higherSymbium is named and linked directly on the Roof Solar Permit page; the general Building Permits page confirms email-only submission with no third-party portal for other permit types.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/roofsolarpermit/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes, for roof-mounted residential solar/ESS via Symbium's automated online review; No for ground-mount and commercial solar, which are submitted as a document package by email for staff review.
Why the confidence is not higherRoof Solar Permit page describes an automated online partnership platform; Ground Solar and Commercial Solar pages both describe emailing plan sets to bldgpermit@loomis.ca.gov with a 25 MB size limit, i.e., not a self-contained online application.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/groundsolarpermit/
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
Why the confidence is not higherLoomis is not a municipal-utility town; the only Town-sourced corroboration found this run is a Town Council document titled '12 PG&E Underground Utility,' confirming PG&E as the electric utility franchise operating in Loomis. I did not independently verify against PG&E's own service-territory map this run, per the brief's rule not to rely on third-party utility lookups alone -- flagging this as utility-level and moderately, not fully, confirmed.
Town council document (indirect corroboration) checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/documents/12-pge-underground-utility/
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's Roof Solar Permit, Ground Solar Permit, and Commercial Solar Permit pages -- none states where the utility sits relative to the Town's permit sequence (before/after/parallel). I did not fetch PG&E's own Rule 21 / distributed-generation interconnection handbook this run, so this is a genuine gap rather than a proven absence at the utility level.
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Contractor Permit Application states plainly: 'Building permit approval and issuance does not constitute Homeowner's Association or a subdivision's Design Review Committee approval. It is the applicant's responsibility to contact the necessary association to obtain project approval prior to work beginning.' The Town does not gate its own permit on HOA sign-off.
permit application form checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2025/04/24.7.2026-permit-app-contractor-6e108749.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFull text of the enacted Chapter 11.12 ordinance (OCR'd) -- contains no historic-district or architectural-review clause comparable to some neighbouring cities' solar chapters. Also ran the Town's own site search for 'historic', which returned only historic/cultural-committee and environmental-assessment results, none describing a formal historic-district review trigger for solar. Could not check the Town's Zoning Title directly for a Historic Overlay District definition because ecode360.com (which hosts the Loomis Municipal Code) returned a Cloudflare bot-challenge 403 to every access method tried (WebFetch, curl with the recommended iccsafe.org Referer header, and a Jina reader proxy).
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No dedicated windstorm certification program; wind is handled purely as a structural design parameter (88-105 mph basic wind speed depending on risk category, per the Town's current Design Criteria).
Why the confidence is not higherTown's own Building Code summary page states the design wind-speed range; California does not run a separate windstorm-certificate program the way some Gulf-state jurisdictions do, and no Loomis document describes one.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/building-code/
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Yes, conditionally
Why the confidence is not higherLMC 11.12.060(A) as enacted: 'a building official may require an applicant to apply for a use permit if the official finds, based on substantial evidence, that the solar energy system could have a specific, adverse impact upon the public health and safety.' Such a decision, and any resulting denial, is appealable to the Planning Commission per 11.12.060(A) and (C).
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No hard citywide size cap on residential generation; the 10 kW AC / 30 kW thermal figure in LMC 11.12.010(B)(1) defines eligibility for the EXPEDITED Chapter 11.12 process only, not a ceiling on system size.
Why the confidence is not higherLMC 11.12.010(B) defines a 'small residential rooftop solar energy system' at that size purely 'for purposes of' the expedited chapter; the current fee schedule's per-kW tiers running well past 15 kW AC on both the standard roof-mount and ground-mount lines show the Town routinely permits larger residential systems outside the expedited path.
ordinance + fee schedule cross-check checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 72% · department page (code-cycle inference)
- Which building code edition is in force? 2025 California Building Code / California Residential Code (Part 2 / Part 2.5 of Title 24), effective 1 January 2026 92% · department page
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2025 California Fire Code (Part 9 of Title 24), per the Town's own code-adoption page; South Placer Fire Protection District, a separate special district, is the agency named on the Town's own Fire and Business License pages as performing fire review/inspection for Loomis, but I could not reach southplacerfire.org this run (TLS connection reset on every attempt, both curl and the fetch tool) to confirm the district's own fire-code edition or any local amendment independently. 62% · department page
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 75% · department page
- What is the installation judged against? LMC 11.12.040(C): solar-electric systems 'shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability.' 90% · ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Roof plan must show ridges/hips/valleys, fire pathways 'in compliance with the 2022 CRC section 324,' percentage of roof coverage, and points of roof-mount connection -- no distinct city-specific ridge-setback dimension found beyond that state CRC §324 pathway standard. 68% · published checklist (dated reference)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Not cited by section number in any Town document -- the Photovoltaic Requirements checklist only says to 'provide signage requirements complying with CEC 690' (a generic reference to the whole Article 690, not §690.12 specifically). Rapid shutdown nonetheless applies as a matter of state law because the Town has wholesale-adopted the current CEC (2023 NEC base) -- see q29/q30. 60% · published checklist (control-checked absence)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
Nothing recorded for Town of Loomis on this step yet — 6 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes 88% · published checklist
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, permitted, with conditions: an 'ESS only' system requires a contractor holding both C-46 and C-10 CSLB classifications; any project with an ESS, or a roof-mount PV system of 10 kW AC or more, is routed to South Placer Fire District review, which must be satisfied before final inspection; ground-mount solar batteries are covered under the Ground Solar Permit. 82% · department page + published checklist
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Yes, apparently -- the current fee schedule carries a stand-alone 'Battery / Energy Storage System (ESS) Residential' fee of $574, listed separately from the 'Solar / Photovoltaic' roof-mount and ground-mount fee lines, and the Roof Solar Permit page treats an 'ESS only' project as its own category with its own contractor-licensing rule. 68% · published fee schedule
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No proprietary city-mandated mounting system; the plan set must document the manufacturer-specific attachment method -- 'Indicate the style, diameter, length of embedment of bolts or other approved fastener' (checklist item 4). 85% · published checklist
20 questions answered against Town of Loomis’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Building Code page names 'CEC (California Electrical Code), Part 3' as part of the '2025 California Building Standards Code' now in effect (1 Jan 2026) but does not itself spell out the underlying NEC edition. The 2025 CEC statewide is based on the 2023 NEC per the standard California code-cycle mapping; I am inferring the NEC year from that mapping rather than reading it stated in Loomis's own words, hence the reduced confidence.
department page (code-cycle inference) checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/building-code/
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2025 California Building Code / California Residential Code (Part 2 / Part 2.5 of Title 24), effective 1 January 2026
Why the confidence is not higherTown's own Building Code page: 'The 2025 California Building Standards Code is now in effect as of January 1, 2026,' with the prior (2022) cycle's specific parts listed for reference.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/building-code/
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2025 California Fire Code (Part 9 of Title 24), per the Town's own code-adoption page; South Placer Fire Protection District, a separate special district, is the agency named on the Town's own Fire and Business License pages as performing fire review/inspection for Loomis, but I could not reach southplacerfire.org this run (TLS connection reset on every attempt, both curl and the fetch tool) to confirm the district's own fire-code edition or any local amendment independently.
Why the confidence is not higherTown-sourced adoption is solid (95-level); the fire-agency-side confirmation is not, given the connectivity failure -- blending to a lower overall confidence and flagging the gap explicitly rather than guessing.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/building-code/
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Building Code page lists locally-specific Design Criteria alongside the adopted state code parts -- Seismic Design Category D (C for certain residential/wood-frame buildings), a 1,500 psf default soil-bearing value, Climate Zone 11, and a 1.5 in/hr (100-year) rain-load figure -- which function as local amendments/overlays to the base state code rather than being restated verbatim from it.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/building-code/
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
LMC 11.12.040(C): solar-electric systems 'shall meet all applicable safety and performance standards established by the California Electrical Code, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories and, where applicable, rules of the Public Utilities Commission regarding safety and reliability.'
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the enacted ordinance text.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPhotovoltaic Requirements checklist and Ground Solar Permit page -- the only related item is a generic 'Load Calculations Form (if electrical panel derate applies)' requirement, with no stated technical busbar-sizing or service-upgrade rule. Could not check the Municipal Code's Electrical Code adoption chapter directly (ecode360.com blocked -- see q25 note).
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No proprietary city-mandated mounting system; the plan set must document the manufacturer-specific attachment method -- 'Indicate the style, diameter, length of embedment of bolts or other approved fastener' (checklist item 4).
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the Photovoltaic Requirements checklist.
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Roof plan must show ridges/hips/valleys, fire pathways 'in compliance with the 2022 CRC section 324,' percentage of roof coverage, and points of roof-mount connection -- no distinct city-specific ridge-setback dimension found beyond that state CRC §324 pathway standard.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the checklist's roof-plan section; caveat that the document is dated Jan 2023 and cites the 2022 CRC code cycle, while the Town's currently adopted cycle (per its Building Code page) is the 2025 CBSC effective 1 Jan 2026 -- so the pathway standard actually enforced today is the current CRC's, which may carry the same section number or a renumbered one I could not independently confirm.
published checklist (dated reference) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Not cited by section number in any Town document -- the Photovoltaic Requirements checklist only says to 'provide signage requirements complying with CEC 690' (a generic reference to the whole Article 690, not §690.12 specifically). Rapid shutdown nonetheless applies as a matter of state law because the Town has wholesale-adopted the current CEC (2023 NEC base) -- see q29/q30.
Why the confidence is not higherGrepped the extracted checklist text for '690.12' and 'rapid shutdown' -- zero hits; the only related string is the single generic 'CEC 690' reference in item 13. Fabricated control ('zzqqx') also returned zero hits, confirming the search itself worked and this is a real absence in the Town's own wording, not a search failure.
published checklist (control-checked absence) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPhotovoltaic Requirements checklist (item 13 says only 'provide signage requirements complying with CEC 690', no city-specific wording); Town site search for 'placard' and 'disconnect label' terms; could not check the Municipal Code's Signs title directly because ecode360.com (Loomis's code host) 403'd every access attempt with a Cloudflare bot challenge, including with the documented iccsafe.org Referer header workaround.
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame search as q38 -- no city-specific placard wording found in any reachable Loomis document.
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame search as q38 -- no letter-height, colour, or material specification found in any reachable Loomis document.
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPhotovoltaic Requirements checklist requires a plot plan showing equipment/disconnect locations, but no dedicated 'facility map placard' (NEC 705.10-style) requirement is named in any Loomis document reached this run.
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDid not fetch PG&E's own Rule 21/DG interconnection handbook this run -- a utility-level document out of scope of what the Town itself publishes; the Town's own solar pages are silent on utility-specific placard requirements beyond the AHJ's.
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame search as q38 -- no city-specified label-placement location beyond the general 'locations of all equipment and disconnects' item on the checklist's plot-plan requirement.
https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist item 14 requires 'specification sheets- manufacture information/engineering and UL listing' for solar modules, rails/mounting brackets, inverters, and 'any equipment used in the installation'; LMC 11.12.040(C) separately requires standards 'established by... accredited testing laboratories such as Underwriters Laboratories.'
published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2020/04/2023-Solar-Requirements.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, permitted, with conditions: an 'ESS only' system requires a contractor holding both C-46 and C-10 CSLB classifications; any project with an ESS, or a roof-mount PV system of 10 kW AC or more, is routed to South Placer Fire District review, which must be satisfied before final inspection; ground-mount solar batteries are covered under the Ground Solar Permit.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the Roof Solar Permit page's licensing/fire-routing language with the Photovoltaic Requirements checklist's parallel statement that 'Residential Roof mount Solar Systems over 10kac or involving Energy Storage Systems, Ground mount Systems, or Commercial Solar Systems require routing to the local Fire district.'
department page + published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/roofsolarpermit/
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Yes, apparently -- the current fee schedule carries a stand-alone 'Battery / Energy Storage System (ESS) Residential' fee of $574, listed separately from the 'Solar / Photovoltaic' roof-mount and ground-mount fee lines, and the Roof Solar Permit page treats an 'ESS only' project as its own category with its own contractor-licensing rule.
Why the confidence is not higherThe fee schedule's separate line item is strong first-party evidence of a distinct fee, but no Town document explicitly says whether this rides on a distinct 'ESS Permit' record or is simply an add-on charge within a combined Solar Permit application when batteries are included -- I could not resolve that mechanical distinction this run.
published fee schedule checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2026/06/fee-schedule-final-134b1dbf.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedGround Solar Permit page and Photovoltaic Requirements checklist -- neither states whether a ground-mount array is legally treated as a 'structure' for zoning/setback purposes. Could not check the Municipal Code's Zoning Title definitions directly because ecode360.com (Loomis's code host) 403'd every access attempt.
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's solar pages and Photovoltaic Requirements checklist -- none states an AC-disconnect-to-meter placement rule; this is typically a PG&E service-equipment/Rule 21 requirement, which I did not fetch this run.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal -- an Outlook Bookings calendar embedded on the Town's own Inspections page, at outlook.office.com/book/BuildingInspections@loomis.ca.gov 90% · department page (embedded booking widget)
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM (9am-12pm arrival window) and PM (12pm-3pm arrival window) requests are offered; same-day inspections are explicitly NOT accommodated. 92% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 88% · ordinance
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a small residential rooftop solar system eligible for expedited review: a single final inspection performed by the Building Department (LMC 11.12.060(H)-(I)). Systems requiring Fire District routing (ESS, >10 kW AC roof-mount, ground-mount, commercial) additionally require South Placer Fire District sign-off before that final Building inspection. 78% · ordinance + published checklist
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 85% · ordinance
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- What must be on site at inspection? Building Permit and Inspection Cards must be posted on-site: 'Building Permits and Inspection Cards are required to be posted on-site. Failure to post may result in the building inspector requiring the inspection to be rescheduled.' 88% · department page
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- Is there a re-inspection fee? No re-inspection fee line published 75% · published fee schedule (control-checked absence)
- How are corrections issued and cleared? For an incomplete application, LMC 11.12.060(G) requires 'a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance... sent to the applicant for resubmission.' No Loomis document was found describing a distinct post-inspection (as opposed to pre-approval) correction-notice procedure. 68% · ordinance
14 questions answered against Town of Loomis’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal -- an Outlook Bookings calendar embedded on the Town's own Inspections page, at outlook.office.com/book/BuildingInspections@loomis.ca.gov
Why the confidence is not higherFound in the page's raw HTML as an embedded iframe on the Town's live /inspections/ page. The mailbox is on the loomis.ca.gov-controlled Outlook tenant (BuildingInspections@loomis.ca.gov), indicating an in-house booking calendar rather than a delegated firm's calendar.
department page (embedded booking widget) checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/inspections/
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's own Inspections page -- states the inspection days (Mon/Wed/Thu) and AM/PM windows, and that same-day requests cannot be accommodated, but never states a minimum number of business days of advance notice required to book.
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
AM (9am-12pm arrival window) and PM (12pm-3pm arrival window) requests are offered; same-day inspections are explicitly NOT accommodated.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the Town's own Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/inspections/
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherLMC 11.12.060(H): 'Only one inspection may be required and performed by the Building Department for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review.' The Town's own Building Inspector (Shawn Berrigan) is named and performs inspections in-house.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedN/A -- not applicable. LMC 11.12.060(H) states the Building Department itself performs the single required solar inspection, so there is no delegate to name for the standard Building sign-off. (South Placer Fire District separately performs its own review/inspection for ESS, >10kW AC roof-mount, ground-mount, and commercial systems -- see q45 -- but no Town document describes that as a delegation of the Building inspection itself.)
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For a small residential rooftop solar system eligible for expedited review: a single final inspection performed by the Building Department (LMC 11.12.060(H)-(I)). Systems requiring Fire District routing (ESS, >10 kW AC roof-mount, ground-mount, commercial) additionally require South Placer Fire District sign-off before that final Building inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the ordinance's single-inspection rule with the Photovoltaic Requirements checklist's fire-routing trigger list; no Town document lays out the exact sequencing of Fire vs. Building sign-off.
ordinance + published checklist checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No
Why the confidence is not higherLMC 11.12.060(H): 'Only one inspection may be required and performed by the Building Department for small residential rooftop solar energy systems eligible for expedited review' -- no separate rough-in or mid-roof stage described.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance and department pages describe the review/submittal and inspection process but never explicitly state that the inspector checks equipment labels/listings as a discrete inspection step, even though UL listing is required at submittal (q44). Not stated outright, so recorded as not_found rather than assumed.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's Inspections page and the Photovoltaic Requirements document -- the latter is a submittal checklist, not an inspection checklist; no dedicated published solar inspection checklist was found on the Town's site.
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Building Permit and Inspection Cards must be posted on-site: 'Building Permits and Inspection Cards are required to be posted on-site. Failure to post may result in the building inspector requiring the inspection to be rescheduled.'
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the Town's own Inspections page.
department page checked 2026-08-31 https://loomis.ca.gov/inspections/
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
No re-inspection fee line published
Why the confidence is not higherThe current (1 Jul 2026) Town of Loomis Schedule of User Fees, extracted in full with pdftotext -layout, contains zero lines for 're-inspection' or 'reinspect' anywhere in its 11 pages. Control-checked: the term 'inspection' itself appears multiple times elsewhere in the same document (e.g. 'Building Permit and Inspection Fees', 'Grading Inspection', 'Engineering Inspection'), and a fabricated control term ('zzqqx') returns zero hits -- confirming the search worked and this is a genuine absence in the Town's current fee schedule, not a lookup failure.
published fee schedule (control-checked absence) checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/2026/06/fee-schedule-final-134b1dbf.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
For an incomplete application, LMC 11.12.060(G) requires 'a written correction notice detailing all deficiencies in the application and any additional information or documentation required to be eligible for expedited permit issuance... sent to the applicant for resubmission.' No Loomis document was found describing a distinct post-inspection (as opposed to pre-approval) correction-notice procedure.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ordinance's correction-notice language is explicitly about application review, not post-inspection field corrections; I found no separate solar-specific inspection-failure procedure.
ordinance checked 2026-08-31 https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/loomisca/uploads/2021/06/8__Second_Reading_Solar_Permits.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedOrdinance describes pass/fail of the single solar inspection but never names the document issued on pass (Final, Green Tag, Letter, or Certificate of Occupancy) for a solar retrofit on an existing home specifically.
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedTown's solar and building pages never state who submits interconnection/PTO completion paperwork to the utility (installer vs. AHJ vs. homeowner); this is typically a PG&E-side process I did not verify this run.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Loomis against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of Loomis is the authority having jurisdiction 85% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical, combined into one in-house 'Solar Permit' process (roof-mount via Symbium/SB 379 automated review; ground-mount and commercial via direct email submittal to the Building Division). South Placer Fire Protection District (an independent special district, not a Town department) reviews any residential PV roof system over 10 kW AC, any project with an Energy Storage System, all ground-mount systems, and all commercial solar prior to final inspection.
- Overridden by
- CA Gov. Code §65850.5 (AB 2188, 2014), codified locally as Loomis Municipal Code Chapter 11.12 (adopted by Ordinance, 2nd reading 13 Oct 2015); CA Gov. Code §65850.52 (SB 379) underlies the Town's automated Symbium instant-permit path; AB 130 (Stats. 2025, Ch. 22) freezes the Town from adopting any more-restrictive residential building-code amendment from 1 Oct 2025 to 1 Jun 2031.
- Why not higher
- The Town operates its own named in-house Building Division (Permit Technician Jordan Tibbits, Building Inspector Shawn Berrigan, both @loomis.ca.gov), its own fee schedule, its own Chapter 11.12 solar ordinance, and its own inspection-booking calendar hosted on an Outlook Bookings link under the loomis.ca.gov-controlled mailbox (BuildingInspections@loomis.ca.gov) -- all first-party evidence of self-performance, not delegation to Placer County. However, the Town's own current Contractor Permit Application lists a single combined staff-approval checkbox reading 'Building Department/ Bureau Veritas' -- Bureau Veritas is a known plan-check/inspection staffing firm -- alongside separate checkboxes for Planning, Engineering, and Fire. I could not resolve from any other Town source whether Bureau Veritas is an active contract backstop, a legacy line never removed from the form, or scoped to specific permit types, so I have not treated the Building Division as purely in-house at full confidence. Fire is a genuinely separate legal agency: South Placer Fire Protection District, confirmed via the Town's own Fire department page (naming Fire Chief Darin Snedeker and Fire Marshal Jeff Ingolia) and its own Business License application (which requires SPFD inspection before a commercial license issues). I could not reach southplacerfire.org directly this run -- both curl and the fetch tool got a TLS connection reset (not a soft-404) on every attempt -- so SPFD's own fee schedule and any solar-specific SPFD document are not verified from the district's own side.
- Permit required
- Yes92%
- Permit cost
- Residential roof-mounted: $420 flat for systems 15 kW AC or less, plus $4 per additional kW above 15 kW.95%
- Plan review
- 1-3 business days85%
- Portal
- Symbium (SB 379 automated instant-permit portal) for roof-mount residential solar and roof-mount solar batteries;88%
- Electrical code
- 202372%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal -- an Outlook Bookings calendar embedded on the Town's own Inspections page, at outlook.office.com/book/BuildingInspections@loomis.ca.gov90%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording None%
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go None%
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.