Bexar County

State of Texas

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

Bexar County is the 5th largest jurisdiction in Texas — 2,009,324 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — No. No county permit is required for a residential rooftop PV system on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate — where the county has jurisdiction. The Fire Marshal issues an 'Electrical Work Authorization' (EWA) distinct from the building permit: $150.00 when… Q4 Plan review — No county review for residential PV. The binding turnaround is the utility's: CPS Energy reviews the residential solar application in about 7-10 business days; Q18 Where you file — Split. Public Works Development Services uses OpenGov: countyofbexartx.portal.opengov.com (stormwater, post-construction, floodplain, right-of-way, Q20

Permit required
No. No county permit is required for a residential rooftop PV system on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County.95% source
What it costs
$0 — there is no county permit and therefore no county fee for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated Bexar County. CPS Energy charges no application fee for a residential DG interconnection.88% source
Plan review turnaround
No county review for residential PV. The binding turnaround is the utility's: CPS Energy reviews the residential solar application in about 7-10 business days;80% source
Key document
fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) cited by 4 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? No — not for residential rooftop PV on a single-family dwelling (3 or fewer dwelling units) in unincorporated Bexar County. Yes, it IS the AHJ for commercial establishments, public buildings and multifamily dwellings of 4+ units. 95% · department page (Public Works, Building Permits)
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both, but only for commercial/public/4+-unit multifamily. The Fire Marshal's Office issues the building permit AND a separate Electrical Work Authorization (EWA); Public Works only signs a prerequisite authorization form. For single-family residential: neither. 90% · department page + fee schedule + permit application
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? No. No county permit is required for a residential rooftop PV system on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County. A voluntary residential building permit may be requested but is 'Not required by law'. 95% · permit application form (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate — where the county has jurisdiction. The Fire Marshal issues an 'Electrical Work Authorization' (EWA) distinct from the building permit: $150.00 when associated with an active building permit, $250.00 when not. 'Each building under a building permit must have an appropriate associated work authorization permit.' For single-family residential PV: no permit of either kind is required. 90% · fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Sometimes — an HOA may require prior approval but may not prohibit. Tex. Property Code §202.010(b) voids any dedicatory-instrument provision that 'prohibits or restricts a property owner from installing a solar energy device', but §202.010(d)(8) preserves an HOA's ability to require prior approval, and §202.010(d)(5) permits specific aesthetic conditions (no extension beyond the roofline, conformity to roof slope, frames/brackets/visible wiring in silver, bronze or black tones). §202.010(e) bars the HOA from withholding approval where those conditions are met. CPS Energy's residential process Step 2 tells the homeowner to 'Check with your HOA to verify solar panel guidelines'. 92% · state statute (text extracted from the site's content endpoint https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PR/htm/PR.202.htm, because the public statutes page is now
    • Is there a historic-district review? No. There is no historic-district review, because there is no county zoning at all: 'In the unincorporated areas of the County (any area not within a municipal city limits) there are no zoning regulations.' 85% · department FAQ + Local Gov't Code §233.153(d)(2)
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No. TDI windstorm certification (WPI-8) applies only to the designated catastrophe area within the seacoast territory. Bexar County is inland and not in the seacoast territory. 85% · state regulator page + Insurance Code §2210.005
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No. No Specific Use Permit, conditional use permit or Commissioners Court approval exists for residential solar, because the county has no zoning power in unincorporated areas. 82% · department FAQ + Local Gov't Code §233.153(d)(2)
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No county cap. Utility thresholds rather than caps: above 25 kW requires signed and sealed engineered drawings; above 50 kWac the DG owner must provide a certificate of liability insurance (50 kWac and smaller are exempt); CPS Electric Service Standards §2002 frames the residential/small-DG regime as 'systems of 500 kW and below'. Separately, energy storage installed as part of a net-metered installation 'are not permitted to export power to the grid but can be used for powering essential loads in loss of power situations'. 82% · utility DG manual (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A TDLR-licensed electrician must perform the electrical work — this is state law and applies in unincorporated areas with no exception for the absence of a permit. TDLR FAQ 1.1.3: 'I live/work and perform electrical work in an unincorporated area. Do I need a license? Yes.' Where the county does issue an Electrical Work Authorization, the applicant must attach a Master's License. There is no county permit to pull for residential rooftop PV. 92% · state regulator FAQ (TDLR) + Occupations Code ch. 1305
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Not with the county — there is no county contractor registration for residential PV. But YES with the utility: 'To install solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, generators, or batteries in the CPS Energy territory, contractors must register with CPS Energy.' CPS publishes a Registered Solar Contractors list and the residential process routes the whole application through that registered contractor. 92% · utility program page
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes, in effect — nothing county-side stops it, and a homeowner may voluntarily seek a residential permit. State law also exempts an owner-occupier from electrical licensing for work 'in or on a dwelling by a person who owns and resides in the dwelling' where no municipal ordinance regulates it. CPS Energy, however, routes residential interconnection through a Registered Solar Contractor, so a self-install still needs a registered contractor to carry the interconnection application. 70% · department FAQ + Occupations Code §1305.003 + utility process document
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? No county submittal package exists for residential PV. The governing submittal is CPS Energy's Solar Application packet, submitted by the registered contractor: Registration Form; Interconnection Application; Electrical Drawings; Annual Savings Report; Disclosure Form (signed by customer); Purchase Contract (signed by customer). CPS Electric Service Standards §2006 adds the technical minimum: operational one-line diagram (residential); site plan showing geographic orientation with existing and proposed service and metering equipment; meter loop elevation drawing; all protective devices including rapid-shutdown equipment with size, rating, manufacturer, type, style, model and settings; manufacturer specifications for inverters and panels; photographs of the existing service. All sheets to scale, PDF. 92% · utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • How many copies, and in what format? Utility: PDF, to scale, emailed to DG@cpsenergy.com. County (commercial route only, not applicable to residential PV): 'TWO COMPLETE COPIES OF LICENSED ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRODUCED PLANS'; construction plans to scale, not exceeding 24x36 inches, submitted as a flattened PDF on a USB thumb drive at an in-person intake appointment. 75% · permit application form + utility DG page
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — by the utility, not the county. CPS Electric Service Standards §2006(2): 'Detailed site plan showing geographic orientation with location of existing and proposed service and metering equipment', plus §2006(3) a meter loop drawing (elevation view) showing the proposed equipment layout. 90% · utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — by the utility. CPS Electric Service Standards §2006(1): 'Detailed operational one-line diagram for residential installations and three-line diagram for commercial installations.' 92% · utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Not required by the county for residential rooftop PV — the county has no residential jurisdiction and no residential threshold exists. No structural PE threshold is published by the utility either; CPS's engineering threshold is electrical, not structural (see q14). 78% · adopted code amendments (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No county threshold. Utility threshold: CPS Electric Service Standards §2006 Note 2 — 'For DG 25 kW and above or where specifically required by CPS Energy, sealed, and signed drawings will be required by a State of Texas licensed or registered engineer.' The residential process sheet repeats it: 'Systems sized above 25kW will require engineered drawings.' 90% · utility electric service standards + utility process document
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Split. Public Works Development Services uses OpenGov: countyofbexartx.portal.opengov.com (stormwater, post-construction, floodplain, right-of-way, and the Permit Verification Form). The Fire Marshal's Office — which holds building and electrical permits — uses NO portal for submittal: 'All permit applications must be submitted IN PERSON BY APPOINTMENT ONLY' at 9810 Southton Rd, with plans on a USB thumb drive; only the intake appointment itself is booked online at www.bexar.org/fm. Neither touches residential rooftop PV. 90% · department page + portal redirect
    • Can the whole application be completed online? No. The county's building/electrical permits cannot be completed online — submittal is in person by appointment only, with plans on a USB thumb drive and payment by cash, credit card, money order or check to the Bexar County Clerk. Only Public Works' stormwater/floodplain/ROW permits and the Permit Verification Form go through the OpenGov portal. The CPS Energy residential solar application, by contrast, is fully by email (PDF to DG@cpsenergy.com or through the contractor solar portal). 90% · department page + permit application form
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? $0 — there is no county permit and therefore no county fee for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated Bexar County. CPS Energy charges no application fee for a residential DG interconnection. For reference, where the county does have jurisdiction: Electrical Work Authorization $150 (or $250 if not tied to an active building permit); 'All other permits as required by Section 105 of the 2021 International Fire Code and adopted amendments' $200; commercial building permits are valuation-based with a $100 minimum plan review and a 4.5% technology surcharge. 88% · fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • How is the fee calculated? Not applicable for residential PV (no fee). Where the county does charge: Valuation — an escalating table of plan-review base fee, plan-review admin fee per $1,000 of value, permit base fee and permit inspection fee per $1,000, plus a 4.5% technology improvement surcharge; flat $400 for commercial projects valued under $6,250. Work Authorizations (electrical/plumbing/HVAC) are Flat at $150/$250. 88% · fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Not applicable for residential PV. Where the county has jurisdiction: Yes — 'Plans Review Fees' is one of four separate components of a commercial building permit fee, base $100.00 minimum, plus a separate plan review admin fee. 85% · fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? No county review for residential PV. The binding turnaround is the utility's: CPS Energy reviews the residential solar application in about 7-10 business days; systems above 25 kW may take up to 30 business days. CPS's Distributed Generation landing page currently posts a longer figure — '20-25 working days from when CPS Energy receives a complete application' — for DG projects generally. For reference, the county's statutory deadline where it does have jurisdiction is 30 days (Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.063). 80% · utility process document + utility DG page
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Not applicable to residential PV (no permit). Where the county does issue one: 180 days from date of issuance, and construction must start within that window; renewal of an unexpired permit costs the permit and inspection fee only, while an expired permit forces full resubmittal as a new project. 88% · department FAQ
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? CPS Energy (municipally owned by the City of San Antonio) is the interconnecting utility for the great majority of unincorporated Bexar County. Contact: DG@cpsenergy.com, 210-353-2700; solar team 210-353-2SAV (2728), CPSESolar@CPSEnergy.com. 75% · utility company page + utility process document
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Before permit — and in unincorporated Bexar the utility is the only gate. CPS Energy reviews and stamps approval on the electrical drawings and interconnection application FIRST (Step 6: 'Installation should not begin until an approval has been granted and applicable permits obtained'); only then does the contractor pull any permit that a city or municipality requires (Step 7); installation follows (Step 8). Because there is no county permit for single-family PV, in unincorporated Bexar Step 7 is a no-op and the sequence is simply: CPS approval → install → CPS commissioning → PTO. 92% · utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout)

28 questions answered against Bexar County’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

No — not for residential rooftop PV on a single-family dwelling (3 or fewer dwelling units) in unincorporated Bexar County. Yes, it IS the AHJ for commercial establishments, public buildings and multifamily dwellings of 4+ units.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty's own Building Permits page draws exactly this line and gives the 3-unit definition; the Fire Marshal's New Construction FAQ and standing letter both say the county has no authority over residential construction. Not 100 because the county still offers a voluntary residential permit, so 'No' is true of mandatory jurisdiction rather than of all possible county involvement.

department page (Public Works, Building Permits) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/1463/Building-Permits

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both, but only for commercial/public/4+-unit multifamily. The Fire Marshal's Office issues the building permit AND a separate Electrical Work Authorization (EWA); Public Works only signs a prerequisite authorization form. For single-family residential: neither.

Why the confidence is not higherFire Marshal fee schedule item 11 prices 'Electrical, Plumbing, or HVAC Work Authorizations' and the permit application form lists 'Electrical Work Authorization (Attach Masters License)'; the Code Enforcement page says the Fire Marshal 'is responsible for issuing building construction permits for the construction of commercial and public accessible buildings and multi-family dwellings'. Not higher because no single document states the building/electrical split in one place — it is assembled from the fee schedule, the application form and the department page.

department page + fee schedule + permit application checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/642/Code-Enforcement-and-Inspections

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

No. No county permit is required for a residential rooftop PV system on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County. A voluntary residential building permit may be requested but is 'Not required by law'.

Why the confidence is not higherThe permit application form's own tick-box reads 'Residential Building Voluntary – Not required by law'; the New Construction FAQ says the county may issue a residential permit only 'if the residential plans are submitted for permitting on a voluntary basis' and names the only two practical triggers (an HOA requirement or a lender needing a CO). Application form is stamped 'BCFMO Rev. May 1, 2019', which is old but consistent with the current FAQ and current fee schedule.

permit application form (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/1170/Building-and-System-Permit-Application-PDF

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Separate — where the county has jurisdiction. The Fire Marshal issues an 'Electrical Work Authorization' (EWA) distinct from the building permit: $150.00 when associated with an active building permit, $250.00 when not. 'Each building under a building permit must have an appropriate associated work authorization permit.' For single-family residential PV: no permit of either kind is required.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the Fire Marshal fee schedule item 11 (dated 1 January 2024) and corroborated by the application form's separate EWA tick-box. Held below 95 because the fee schedule does not say whether an EWA can be issued standalone against a voluntary residential permit.

fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40055/Bexar-County-2021-Fee-Schedule

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

A TDLR-licensed electrician must perform the electrical work — this is state law and applies in unincorporated areas with no exception for the absence of a permit. TDLR FAQ 1.1.3: 'I live/work and perform electrical work in an unincorporated area. Do I need a license? Yes.' Where the county does issue an Electrical Work Authorization, the applicant must attach a Master's License. There is no county permit to pull for residential rooftop PV.

Why the confidence is not higherTDLR's own FAQ answers the unincorporated-area question directly, and Occupations Code §1305.151 requires a licence except as exempted by §1305.003. Not higher because §1305.003(a)(6) exempts 'work not specifically regulated by a municipal ordinance that is performed in or on a dwelling by a person who owns and resides in the dwelling' — so a resident owner-occupier is statutorily exempt, which complicates a single-choice answer.

state regulator FAQ (TDLR) + Occupations Code ch. 1305 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/electricians/elecfaq.htm

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Not with the county — there is no county contractor registration for residential PV. But YES with the utility: 'To install solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, generators, or batteries in the CPS Energy territory, contractors must register with CPS Energy.' CPS publishes a Registered Solar Contractors list and the residential process routes the whole application through that registered contractor.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from CPS Energy's live Solar Options page and corroborated by the Residential Step-by-Step Solar Interconnection Process (steps 3 and 4). Not 95+ because the CPS page is undated.

utility program page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/en/my-home/savenow/solar.html

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes, in effect — nothing county-side stops it, and a homeowner may voluntarily seek a residential permit. State law also exempts an owner-occupier from electrical licensing for work 'in or on a dwelling by a person who owns and resides in the dwelling' where no municipal ordinance regulates it. CPS Energy, however, routes residential interconnection through a Registered Solar Contractor, so a self-install still needs a registered contractor to carry the interconnection application.

Why the confidence is not higherThe county half is well sourced (New Construction FAQ, voluntary permit). The state licensing exemption is verbatim Occupations Code §1305.003(a)(6). The CPS half is an inference from the residential process document, which assumes a registered contractor throughout but never states in terms that a homeowner cannot apply — I found no CPS page addressing self-install.

department FAQ + Occupations Code §1305.003 + utility process document checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

No county submittal package exists for residential PV. The governing submittal is CPS Energy's Solar Application packet, submitted by the registered contractor: Registration Form; Interconnection Application; Electrical Drawings; Annual Savings Report; Disclosure Form (signed by customer); Purchase Contract (signed by customer). CPS Electric Service Standards §2006 adds the technical minimum: operational one-line diagram (residential); site plan showing geographic orientation with existing and proposed service and metering equipment; meter loop elevation drawing; all protective devices including rapid-shutdown equipment with size, rating, manufacturer, type, style, model and settings; manufacturer specifications for inverters and panels; photographs of the existing service. All sheets to scale, PDF.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo of the utility's own current documents agree — the Residential Step-by-Step process (footer-dated 4 Nov 2024, filename suggests a March 2025 revision) and Electric Service Standards §2006. Not higher because the two lists are framed differently (administrative vs technical) and the process sheet's date is ambiguous between footer and filename.

utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Utility: PDF, to scale, emailed to DG@cpsenergy.com. County (commercial route only, not applicable to residential PV): 'TWO COMPLETE COPIES OF LICENSED ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRODUCED PLANS'; construction plans to scale, not exceeding 24x36 inches, submitted as a flattened PDF on a USB thumb drive at an in-person intake appointment.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth figures are verbatim from the authority's/utility's own documents, but the county half answers the neighbouring commercial question, not residential PV, and the application form carries a May 2019 revision stamp.

permit application form + utility DG page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/1170/Building-and-System-Permit-Application-PDF

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Yes — by the utility, not the county. CPS Electric Service Standards §2006(2): 'Detailed site plan showing geographic orientation with location of existing and proposed service and metering equipment', plus §2006(3) a meter loop drawing (elevation view) showing the proposed equipment layout.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from CPS Electric Service Standards §2006. Held below 95 because the manual is styled '2021 Edition' and its PV figures still cite the 2017 NEC, so it is a dated document even though it is the version CPS currently publishes (re-issued as an ADA PDF in 2025).

utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes — by the utility. CPS Electric Service Standards §2006(1): 'Detailed operational one-line diagram for residential installations and three-line diagram for commercial installations.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, and it distinguishes residential from commercial explicitly, which is exactly the question. Below 95 only for the 2021-edition dating of the manual.

utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCPS Electric Service Standards §2006 'Technical Information Required' (the six-item submittal list), the Bexar County Building & System Permit Application, and the county's Construction Plan Submittal Checklist reference. §2006(4) requires 'all protective devices including rapid shut-down equipment ... size, rating, manufacturer, type, style, model, and settings' and §2006(5) manufacturer specifications for inverters and panels, but neither CPS nor the county requires string sizing or conductor ampacity calculations as a submittal item. Recorded as not found rather than 'No' because the requirement could sit inside the interconnection application form (Appendix D of the DG Manual), which I did not extract separately.

https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

Not required by the county for residential rooftop PV — the county has no residential jurisdiction and no residential threshold exists. No structural PE threshold is published by the utility either; CPS's engineering threshold is electrical, not structural (see q14).

Why the confidence is not higherProved absence rather than a positive statement: I searched the Bexar County 2021 IFC/IBC local amendments (including the Chapter 15 Roof Assemblies amendments and the IBC amendments), the fee schedule, the permit application and the Permit Verification Guidelines, with positive controls ('electrical' 17 hits, 'residential' 10 hits in the amendments) and a fabricated control ('zzqqx' 0 hits). Nothing on structural stamps for PV. Marked down because an absence is weaker evidence than a statement, and because the county's commercial route does require 'LICENSED ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, OR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRODUCED PLANS', which does not transfer to residential.

adopted code amendments (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

No county threshold. Utility threshold: CPS Electric Service Standards §2006 Note 2 — 'For DG 25 kW and above or where specifically required by CPS Energy, sealed, and signed drawings will be required by a State of Texas licensed or registered engineer.' The residential process sheet repeats it: 'Systems sized above 25kW will require engineered drawings.'

Why the confidence is not higherTwo CPS documents state the same 25 kW threshold, one technical and one customer-facing. Below 95 because §2006 says '25 kW and above' while the process sheet says 'above 25kW' — a one-system-size discrepancy at exactly 25 kW.

utility electric service standards + utility process document checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

$0 — there is no county permit and therefore no county fee for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated Bexar County. CPS Energy charges no application fee for a residential DG interconnection. For reference, where the county does have jurisdiction: Electrical Work Authorization $150 (or $250 if not tied to an active building permit); 'All other permits as required by Section 105 of the 2021 International Fire Code and adopted amendments' $200; commercial building permits are valuation-based with a $100 minimum plan review and a 4.5% technology surcharge.

Why the confidence is not higherThe fee schedule (effective 1 January 2024) has no solar or PV line item at all — searched with controls: 'solar' 0, 'photovoltaic' 0, against 'inspection' 73, 'plan review' 13, 'residential' 6 and fabricated 'zzqqx' 0. Its only residential heading is 'Commercial-Residential Permit Fees (Apartments, Town Homes, Condominiums, Etc.)', i.e. multifamily. Below 95 because a $0 is inferred from the absence of jurisdiction plus the absence of a line item, and because the voluntary residential permit route would attract a plan review fee that the schedule never quantifies for one- and two-family dwellings.

fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40055/Bexar-County-2021-Fee-Schedule

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Not applicable for residential PV (no fee). Where the county does charge: Valuation — an escalating table of plan-review base fee, plan-review admin fee per $1,000 of value, permit base fee and permit inspection fee per $1,000, plus a 4.5% technology improvement surcharge; flat $400 for commercial projects valued under $6,250. Work Authorizations (electrical/plumbing/HVAC) are Flat at $150/$250.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the fee schedule's valuation table. Marked down because the answer is a compound (valuation for buildings, flat for work authorizations) and because the county calculates 'valuation' by an assumed construction cost — $200/sq ft per the fee schedule, but $25/sq ft per the New Construction FAQ, which is an unreconciled contradiction between two of the authority's own current documents.

fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40055/Bexar-County-2021-Fee-Schedule

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Not applicable for residential PV. Where the county has jurisdiction: Yes — 'Plans Review Fees' is one of four separate components of a commercial building permit fee, base $100.00 minimum, plus a separate plan review admin fee.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the fee schedule. Marked down only because it answers the commercial neighbouring question, not residential PV.

fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40055/Bexar-County-2021-Fee-Schedule

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

No county review for residential PV. The binding turnaround is the utility's: CPS Energy reviews the residential solar application in about 7-10 business days; systems above 25 kW may take up to 30 business days. CPS's Distributed Generation landing page currently posts a longer figure — '20-25 working days from when CPS Energy receives a complete application' — for DG projects generally. For reference, the county's statutory deadline where it does have jurisdiction is 30 days (Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.063).

Why the confidence is not higherBoth figures are from CPS's own current material, but they disagree: the residential step-by-step sheet says 7-10 business days while the live DG page says 20-25 working days and attributes the increase to demand. The DG page is undated, so I cannot tell which supersedes. That unresolved conflict is the whole reason this is 80 and not 92.

utility process document + utility DG page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

Not applicable to residential PV (no permit). Where the county does issue one: 180 days from date of issuance, and construction must start within that window; renewal of an unexpired permit costs the permit and inspection fee only, while an expired permit forces full resubmittal as a new project.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the county's own New Construction FAQ, which is on the live site. Marked down because it answers the commercial neighbouring question and the FAQ carries no revision date.

department FAQ checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Split. Public Works Development Services uses OpenGov: countyofbexartx.portal.opengov.com (stormwater, post-construction, floodplain, right-of-way, and the Permit Verification Form). The Fire Marshal's Office — which holds building and electrical permits — uses NO portal for submittal: 'All permit applications must be submitted IN PERSON BY APPOINTMENT ONLY' at 9810 Southton Rd, with plans on a USB thumb drive; only the intake appointment itself is booked online at www.bexar.org/fm. Neither touches residential rooftop PV.

Why the confidence is not higherThe OpenGov URL was confirmed by following the county's own portal link through its redirect; the in-person requirement is verbatim (capitalised in the original) on the Permits & Applications page and repeated on the application form. Below 95 because the OpenGov portal is a JavaScript application whose record-type list I could not enumerate, so I cannot rule out a permit type there that the county's own pages do not list.

department page + portal redirect checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/643/Permits-Applications

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

No. The county's building/electrical permits cannot be completed online — submittal is in person by appointment only, with plans on a USB thumb drive and payment by cash, credit card, money order or check to the Bexar County Clerk. Only Public Works' stormwater/floodplain/ROW permits and the Permit Verification Form go through the OpenGov portal. The CPS Energy residential solar application, by contrast, is fully by email (PDF to DG@cpsenergy.com or through the contractor solar portal).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the Fire Marshal's Permits & Applications page and the application form footer. Same portal-enumeration caveat as q20.

department page + permit application form checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/643/Permits-Applications

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

CPS Energy (municipally owned by the City of San Antonio) is the interconnecting utility for the great majority of unincorporated Bexar County. Contact: DG@cpsenergy.com, 210-353-2700; solar team 210-353-2SAV (2728), CPSESolar@CPSEnergy.com.

Why the confidence is not higherCPS Energy's own About Us page says it serves 'San Antonio and portions of seven adjoining counties', which implies whole-county coverage of Bexar plus spill-over, and the residential process sheet makes Step 1 'Ensure your home is within CPS Energy Service Area' — an instruction that only makes sense if coverage is not universal. I could NOT exclude electric-cooperative pockets inside unincorporated Bexar: Guadalupe Valley EC publishes only '13 counties' without naming them, and I could not reach a Bandera EC or Medina EC territory page that names Bexar. So the address must be checked against CPS's own account/territory lookup before this is relied on. That unresolved edge is why this is 75 and not 90. Per the standing rule, no ZIP-level lookup service was used as a source.

utility company page + utility process document checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/en/about-us.html

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Before permit — and in unincorporated Bexar the utility is the only gate. CPS Energy reviews and stamps approval on the electrical drawings and interconnection application FIRST (Step 6: 'Installation should not begin until an approval has been granted and applicable permits obtained'); only then does the contractor pull any permit that a city or municipality requires (Step 7); installation follows (Step 8). Because there is no county permit for single-family PV, in unincorporated Bexar Step 7 is a no-op and the sequence is simply: CPS approval → install → CPS commissioning → PTO.

Why the confidence is not higherThe ten-step sequence is explicit and ordered in CPS's own residential process document. Note the wording of Step 7 is itself corroborating evidence for the jurisdiction finding: it says 'from your local city or municipality' and 'If you are outside San Antonio jurisdiction, contact your local municipality' — it never contemplates a county permit. Below 95 only for the document's ambiguous date.

utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

Sometimes — an HOA may require prior approval but may not prohibit. Tex. Property Code §202.010(b) voids any dedicatory-instrument provision that 'prohibits or restricts a property owner from installing a solar energy device', but §202.010(d)(8) preserves an HOA's ability to require prior approval, and §202.010(d)(5) permits specific aesthetic conditions (no extension beyond the roofline, conformity to roof slope, frames/brackets/visible wiring in silver, bronze or black tones). §202.010(e) bars the HOA from withholding approval where those conditions are met. CPS Energy's residential process Step 2 tells the homeowner to 'Check with your HOA to verify solar panel guidelines'.

Why the confidence is not higherFull statute text read directly, not summarised. Below 95 because whether an HOA exists at all is address-specific, and there is no county-level answer.

state statute (text extracted from the site's content endpoint https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/PR/htm/PR.202.htm, because the public statutes page is now checked 2026-08-28 https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PR/htm/PR.202.htm

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

No. There is no historic-district review, because there is no county zoning at all: 'In the unincorporated areas of the County (any area not within a municipal city limits) there are no zoning regulations.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the county's own New Construction FAQ, and consistent with Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.153(d)(2), which expressly declines to authorise a commissioners court to adopt or enforce zoning regulations. Below 90 because the FAQ is undated and because the county does administer other place-based overlays (Military Lighting Regions, floodplain) that are not zoning but do constrain development.

department FAQ + Local Gov't Code §233.153(d)(2) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

No. TDI windstorm certification (WPI-8) applies only to the designated catastrophe area within the seacoast territory. Bexar County is inland and not in the seacoast territory.

Why the confidence is not higherTex. Insurance Code §2210.005(a) permits the commissioner to designate 'an area of the seacoast territory of this state as a catastrophe area' — the power is confined to the seacoast by its own terms — and TDI's windstorm page opens 'If you live on the coast, your property must meet certain building standards to get windstorm insurance.' Below 90 because neither source enumerates the designated counties, so this is a negative inferred from the geographic limit of the power rather than read off a list.

state regulator page + Insurance Code §2210.005 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.tdi.texas.gov/wind/index.html

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

No. No Specific Use Permit, conditional use permit or Commissioners Court approval exists for residential solar, because the county has no zoning power in unincorporated areas.

Why the confidence is not higherFollows from the county FAQ's 'there are no zoning regulations' plus §233.153(d)(2). Marked down because it is a negative inferred from the absence of the enabling power rather than a statement that no SUP is required for solar specifically.

department FAQ + Local Gov't Code §233.153(d)(2) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No county cap. Utility thresholds rather than caps: above 25 kW requires signed and sealed engineered drawings; above 50 kWac the DG owner must provide a certificate of liability insurance (50 kWac and smaller are exempt); CPS Electric Service Standards §2002 frames the residential/small-DG regime as 'systems of 500 kW and below'. Separately, energy storage installed as part of a net-metered installation 'are not permitted to export power to the grid but can be used for powering essential loads in loss of power situations'.

Why the confidence is not higherAll four figures are verbatim from CPS's own DG Manual (9th Edition, 1 May 2024, Rev 1.0) and Electric Service Standards. Marked down because none of them is stated as a maximum system size for a residence — they are review, insurance and scope thresholds — so 'no cap' is an absence across two documents rather than a published statement that no cap exists.

utility DG manual (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Distributed%20Generation%20Manual.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC. In unincorporated Texas the state electrical code governs by force of Tex. Occupations Code §1305.201(e), and TDLR 'has adopted the National Electric Code 2023 Edition, as it existed on August 25, 2022 ... It became effective September 1, 2023.' Note two lower-tier documents still cite older editions and will mislead: the Bexar County fire code amendments reference 'the 2020 National Electrical Code' (in the natural-gas generator amendment), and CPS Energy's Electric Service Standards PV figures cite the 2017 NEC throughout. 90% · state regulator compliance guide + Occupations Code §1305.201(e)
    • Which building code edition is in force? 2021 International Building Code, with Appendices C, E, F, H, I, J, K, N and referenced codes — but it binds only commercial, public and 4+-unit multifamily buildings. It does NOT apply to a single-family dwelling. Adopted by Commissioners Court on 12 December 2023, effective 1 January 2024. For the voluntary residential permit route, the Fire Marshal reviews and inspects against the International Residential Code (One- and Two-Family Dwelling Code). 92% · adopted code amendments + department page (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 2021 International Fire Code, plus Appendices A, B, C, D, I, K, L and N, cited as 'the Fire Code of UNINCORPORATED BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS'. Effective 1 January 2024. Applies only to commercial establishments, public buildings and multifamily dwellings of 4+ units (Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.062(a)) — never to a single-family dwelling. 95% · adopted code amendments (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — 82 pages of local amendments, published as 'BCFMO Fire Code Amendments for 2021 IFC and IBC', effective 01/01/2024. But NONE of them touches solar PV on a dwelling. The county 'does not enforce City of San Antonio locally developed amendments'. 92% · adopted code amendments (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • What is the installation judged against? The 2023 NEC, as the Texas state electrical code — but with no county body to judge it against. Tex. Occupations Code §1305.201(e): 'Electrical work performed in an unincorporated area of the state must be installed in accordance with standards at least as stringent as the requirements of the state electrical code as adopted under Section 1305.101.' In practice the only party that inspects the installation is CPS Energy at commissioning, against CPS Electric Service Standards §2000, the CPS DG Manual, the NEC, NESC, UL, IEEE 1547 and ERCOT operating guides. 90% · state statute (text extracted from https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm) + utility standards
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? None imposed on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County — the county fire code does not reach it, and the county adopted no local amendment to the IFC's solar provisions. For buildings the county does regulate (commercial, public, 4+-unit multifamily), the unamended 2021 IFC Chapter 12 access-and-pathway provisions apply as adopted. 82% · adopted code amendments + Local Gov't Code §233.062(a)
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes. Rapid shutdown is required, and CPS Energy enforces it at commissioning: Electric Service Standards §2005.2(I) — 'Rapid shutdown shall be required in accordance with the NEC and shall be included in the design with proper labeling.' Which NEC edition is the live question: the legally governing edition in unincorporated Texas is the 2023 NEC (TDLR, effective 1 Sep 2023), but CPS's own placard figure is drawn to 2017 NEC 690.12(C) and 690.56. 82% · utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? None from the county. The utility governs. CPS Energy Electric Service Standards Figure 2000.6 requires, at or around the service equipment: (1) a customer service panel directory/plaque (705.10); (2) a rapid shutdown placard (690.56) on the service panel — one of two variants depending on whether the system shuts down the array and the conductors leaving it, or only the conductors within 10 ft of leaving the array; (3) a PV system AC disconnect label (690.13(B)) with rated AC output current and nominal operating AC voltage; (4) a PV system DC disconnect label (690.53) with maximum voltage, maximum circuit current and maximum rated output current of the charge controller or DC-to-DC converter; (5) a rapid shutdown switch label (690.12(C)) on the inverter DC disconnect switch; (6) an inverter output connection warning (705.12(B)(2)(3)(b)) reading 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE'; (7) 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors; (8) 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL' where an aggregate panel exists. Section references are to the 2017 NEC as printed. 88% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Not the county — no. The utility — yes. CPS Energy prints its own placard wording in Figure 2000.6, including verbatim strings such as 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE', 'RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM', 'SOLAR PV SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN' and 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL'. 88% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No letter height, colour or material is specified by either the county or the utility. CPS states a durability and standards requirement only: Figure 2000.6 Note 1 — 'LABELING SHALL BE PERMANTLY AFFIXED AND SUITABLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2017 NEC, ARTICLE 110.21(B).' [typo 'PERMANTLY' is in the original.] The dimensional specification therefore falls back to the NEC. 85% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 notes (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes — required by the utility, not the county. CPS Figure 2000.6 requires a 'CUSTOMER SERVICE PANEL DIRECTORY/PLAQUE (2017 NEC ARTICLE 705.10)', to be 'PLACED ON SERVICE PANEL AND ON SYSTEM DISCONNECTS FOR OTHER ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCTION SOURCES WHEN NOT GROUPED'. The content specification is the NEC's 705.10 (permanent plant/facility diagram showing the relative locations of the service disconnect and all power source disconnects); CPS adds no content requirement of its own. 85% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY source of placard requirements, since the county specifies none. The whole of Figure 2000.6 (see q38) is a utility specification, mandated by Electric Service Standards §2005.2(G): 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' Note the specification sits in the Electric Service Standards, NOT in the Distributed Generation Manual — the DG Manual contains no placard specification at all. 90% · utility electric service standards §2005.2(G) + Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Where must the labels be placed? Per CPS Figure 2000.6 and §2005.2: on the customer service panel (directory/plaque and rapid shutdown placard); on system disconnects for other electric power production sources when not grouped; on the PV AC disconnect; on the PV DC disconnect; on the inverter DC disconnect switch (rapid shutdown switch label); on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors; on a PV/AC aggregate panel where one exists; and on BOTH the revenue meter socket and the PV meter socket where the two meters have been approved to be remote from one another. Additionally, §2005.2(K): where PV system AC conductors run in attic spaces, 'the conductors shall be installed in approved raceways/conduits with labels denoting PV AC conductors'. 88% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 + §2005.2(K) (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Immediately adjacent to the revenue meter. CPS Electric Service Standards Figure 2000.5 Note 4: 'THE PV AC SERVICE DISCONNECT AND PV METER SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE REVENUE METER.' Figure 2000.6 Note 2 adds 'PV METER SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE REVENUE METER UNLESS PRE-APPROVED BY CPS ENERGY TO BE LOCATED REMOTELY DUE TO SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.' §2005.2(F): the PV AC meter disconnect goes on the load side of the inverters and before the CPS PV metering equipment, 'immediately adjacent to the PV system metering equipment', readily accessible and capable of being locked in the open position; an additional disconnect to isolate the PV meter is required where the interconnection is remote from the PV meter. §2005.2(C) Note 2: 'In no case will CPS Energy permit the PV meter to be located on floor(s) other than the level that the revenue meter is located.' DG Manual §4.7: the DG owner pays the full cost of a visible load-break disconnect switch 'by and to the sole specification of CPS Energy', readily accessible to CPS personnel and 'of a type that can be secured in an open position by a CPS Energy padlock'. 92% · utility electric service standards Figures 2000.5/2000.6 and §2005.2 + DG manual §4.7 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, effectively — by the utility. CPS DG Manual §7.1.3: 'For DG Systems up to 50 kWac, certified equipment and equipment listed with an approved test label may be installed on CPS Energy's distribution system in accordance with CPS Energy approved interconnection control and protection scheme without further review of the DG Owner's design by CPS Energy.' CPS points to an external list for certified equipment (the California Energy Commission solar equipment lists). Equipment not on that route triggers CPS design review. 80% · utility DG manual §7.1.3 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, permitted. County: no jurisdiction over a battery at a single-family dwelling. Where the county does have jurisdiction, its fire code amendments require a construction permit for ESS (amended IFC §105.6.5: 'A construction permit is required to install energy storage systems regulated by Section 1207') while removing the operational permits for battery systems (§105.6.2) and capacitor energy storage systems (§105.6.3); IFC 1207 itself is left unamended. Utility: batteries are within the CPS DG regime and require contractor registration, but 'Energy storage systems installed as part of a net-metered installation are not permitted to export power to the grid but can be used for powering essential loads in loss of power situations.' CPS also warns that the DG Manual 'is currently undergoing revisions to include Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)' and directs BESS questions to CPS directly. 78% · utility DG manual + county code amendments (both extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No — not for a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County, where the county has no jurisdiction. Yes, for buildings the county does regulate: a separate ESS construction permit is required under amended IFC §105.6.5, with no separate ESS operational permit. 82% · adopted code amendments §105.6.5 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? No — not by Bexar County, for a residence. The county has no residential building-code jurisdiction, no zoning and no setback regime in unincorporated areas, so a residential ground mount is not permitted, reviewed or treated as a structure by the county. (Interestingly, the county's fire code amendments DO contemplate utility-scale PV as a structure: amended §503.1.1 treats 'solar photovoltaic power generation facilities' as 'Group U facilities' for fire apparatus access road purposes.) 72% · department FAQ + adopted code amendments
    • Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes — a utility rule, not a county one. CPS Electric Service Standards §2005.2(H)(1): 'Load-Side Interconnections shall be made on the load-side of the Customer's main service panel. A main breaker is required and shall be used in the bus ampere rating calculation to ensure the bus rating is not exceeded. Interconnections for residential installations shall be made at exterior panels.' §2005.2(H)(2) adds that line-side interconnections must be made in a junction box or auxiliary gutter ahead of the service disconnecting means, not less than 12x12 inches, with locking provisions, and that conductors from that junction box to the PV AC Disconnect are treated as service-entrance conductors and 'in no case shall the distance exceed 10 feet'. 90% · utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout)

20 questions answered against Bexar County’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2023 NEC. In unincorporated Texas the state electrical code governs by force of Tex. Occupations Code §1305.201(e), and TDLR 'has adopted the National Electric Code 2023 Edition, as it existed on August 25, 2022 ... It became effective September 1, 2023.' Note two lower-tier documents still cite older editions and will mislead: the Bexar County fire code amendments reference 'the 2020 National Electrical Code' (in the natural-gas generator amendment), and CPS Energy's Electric Service Standards PV figures cite the 2017 NEC throughout.

Why the confidence is not higherTDLR's own Compliance Guide states the edition and effective date verbatim, and §1305.201(e) supplies the mechanism ('standards at least as stringent as the requirements of the state electrical code'). Held at 90 rather than higher precisely because the two documents an installer actually reads on site — the county amendments and the CPS standards — name 2020 and 2017 respectively, so a field dispute is realistic even though the state edition is the one legally in force.

state regulator compliance guide + Occupations Code §1305.201(e) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/electricians/compliance-guide.htm

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2021 International Building Code, with Appendices C, E, F, H, I, J, K, N and referenced codes — but it binds only commercial, public and 4+-unit multifamily buildings. It does NOT apply to a single-family dwelling. Adopted by Commissioners Court on 12 December 2023, effective 1 January 2024. For the voluntary residential permit route, the Fire Marshal reviews and inspects against the International Residential Code (One- and Two-Family Dwelling Code).

Why the confidence is not higherThe adoption date and effective date are stated on the county's Code Enforcement page; the IBC edition and appendix list are verbatim from amended §102.4 of the local rules PDF, which I extracted myself. The IRC point comes from the Fire Marshal's standing letter, which is undated and carries a superseded office address — that is the only soft element.

adopted code amendments + department page (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

2021 International Fire Code, plus Appendices A, B, C, D, I, K, L and N, cited as 'the Fire Code of UNINCORPORATED BEXAR COUNTY TEXAS'. Effective 1 January 2024. Applies only to commercial establishments, public buildings and multifamily dwellings of 4+ units (Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.062(a)) — never to a single-family dwelling.

Why the confidence is not higherTitle and appendix list are verbatim from amended §101.1 and §101.2.1 of the local rules PDF; the effective date is on the PDF cover page and matches the Code Enforcement page; the scope limit is verbatim statute. All three agree.

adopted code amendments (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes — 82 pages of local amendments, published as 'BCFMO Fire Code Amendments for 2021 IFC and IBC', effective 01/01/2024. But NONE of them touches solar PV on a dwelling. The county 'does not enforce City of San Antonio locally developed amendments'.

Why the confidence is not higherI extracted all 82 pages with pdftotext -layout and searched with controls: positive control 'electrical' 17 hits, 'residential' 10 hits, 'one- and two-family' 1 hit; fabricated control 'zzqqx' 0 hits. The single 'solar photovoltaic' hit is an amendment to §503.1.1 exempting or modifying fire apparatus access roads for 'solar photovoltaic power generation facilities, cellular towers, or similar types of Group U facilities' — i.e. utility-scale PV as a Group U structure, not rooftop PV. The amendments' Chapter 12 (Energy Systems) contains only natural-gas and diesel generator provisions; IFC 1204 (solar PV) and 1207 (ESS) are untouched. Below 95 because 'no local amendment' for a question this broad is an absence, however well controlled.

adopted code amendments (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The 2023 NEC, as the Texas state electrical code — but with no county body to judge it against. Tex. Occupations Code §1305.201(e): 'Electrical work performed in an unincorporated area of the state must be installed in accordance with standards at least as stringent as the requirements of the state electrical code as adopted under Section 1305.101.' In practice the only party that inspects the installation is CPS Energy at commissioning, against CPS Electric Service Standards §2000, the CPS DG Manual, the NEC, NESC, UL, IEEE 1547 and ERCOT operating guides.

Why the confidence is not higherStatute read in full text; the CPS design-standard list is verbatim from Electric Service Standards §2005.2 and DG Manual §7.1.1. Below 95 because §1305.201(e) sets a standard with no enforcement mechanism attached in an unincorporated area — TDLR's own FAQ 2.1 says 'The local licensing or inspecting authority (i.e. cities, counties, and regions with jurisdiction) is responsible for inspecting work performed in their area(s). TDLR does not perform inspections' — so nobody enforces it where no local authority has jurisdiction.

state statute (text extracted from https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm) + utility standards checked 2026-08-28 https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Yes — a utility rule, not a county one. CPS Electric Service Standards §2005.2(H)(1): 'Load-Side Interconnections shall be made on the load-side of the Customer's main service panel. A main breaker is required and shall be used in the bus ampere rating calculation to ensure the bus rating is not exceeded. Interconnections for residential installations shall be made at exterior panels.' §2005.2(H)(2) adds that line-side interconnections must be made in a junction box or auxiliary gutter ahead of the service disconnecting means, not less than 12x12 inches, with locking provisions, and that conductors from that junction box to the PV AC Disconnect are treated as service-entrance conductors and 'in no case shall the distance exceed 10 feet'.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the utility's own standards, and it addresses busbar rating and residential panel location directly. Below 95 for the 2021-edition dating of the manual.

utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedAll 82 pages of the Bexar County 2021 IFC/IBC local amendments, extracted with pdftotext -layout, including the Chapter 15 'Roof Assemblies and Rooftop Structures' amendments (which cover only roof drainage at zero lot lines and gutters for Group R/U roof edges within 3 ft of a property line) and the IBC amendment chapters. Controls: positive 'electrical' 17 hits, 'residential' 10 hits; fabricated 'zzqqx' 0 hits. Also checked CPS Electric Service Standards §2000 and Figures 2000.1-2000.6, which specify conduit/raceway type but no mounting system or attachment spacing. No mounting or attachment-spacing requirement published by either party.

https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

None imposed on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County — the county fire code does not reach it, and the county adopted no local amendment to the IFC's solar provisions. For buildings the county does regulate (commercial, public, 4+-unit multifamily), the unamended 2021 IFC Chapter 12 access-and-pathway provisions apply as adopted.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo layers of proof: the statutory scope limit in §233.062(a), and a controlled search of all 82 pages of the local amendments finding 'setback' 0 hits, 'roof access' 0 hits, 'ridge' 1 hit (unrelated) against positive controls 'electrical' 17 and 'pathway' 2 (fire apparatus access roads, not roof pathways) and fabricated control 'zzqqx' 0. Marked down from the 90s because 'nothing applies' is an absence, and because a homeowner who takes the voluntary permit route would be inspected against the IRC, whose rooftop-PV access requirements I did not separately establish.

adopted code amendments + Local Gov't Code §233.062(a) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes. Rapid shutdown is required, and CPS Energy enforces it at commissioning: Electric Service Standards §2005.2(I) — 'Rapid shutdown shall be required in accordance with the NEC and shall be included in the design with proper labeling.' Which NEC edition is the live question: the legally governing edition in unincorporated Texas is the 2023 NEC (TDLR, effective 1 Sep 2023), but CPS's own placard figure is drawn to 2017 NEC 690.12(C) and 690.56.

Why the confidence is not higherThe requirement itself is verbatim and unambiguous, and CPS ties it to 'the NEC' generically, which floats to the current edition. The edition mismatch inside CPS's own figures is real and unresolved — an installer labelling to CPS's printed 2017-style placard may not satisfy the 2023 NEC, and CPS's figure carries the caveat that it 'is not intended to include all labeling which may be required by the NEC and AHJ'. That conflict is the reason for 82 rather than 92.

utility electric service standards (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

None from the county. The utility governs. CPS Energy Electric Service Standards Figure 2000.6 requires, at or around the service equipment: (1) a customer service panel directory/plaque (705.10); (2) a rapid shutdown placard (690.56) on the service panel — one of two variants depending on whether the system shuts down the array and the conductors leaving it, or only the conductors within 10 ft of leaving the array; (3) a PV system AC disconnect label (690.13(B)) with rated AC output current and nominal operating AC voltage; (4) a PV system DC disconnect label (690.53) with maximum voltage, maximum circuit current and maximum rated output current of the charge controller or DC-to-DC converter; (5) a rapid shutdown switch label (690.12(C)) on the inverter DC disconnect switch; (6) an inverter output connection warning (705.12(B)(2)(3)(b)) reading 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE'; (7) 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors; (8) 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL' where an aggregate panel exists. Section references are to the 2017 NEC as printed.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off Figure 2000.6, which I extracted myself with pdftotext -layout rather than accepting any summary — and verified identically in both the older Electric_Service_Standards.pdf and the current ADA re-issue. Marked down to 88 because the figure is a graphic and some label artwork OCRs imperfectly, and because it is expressly non-exhaustive: 'LABELS LISTED BELOW REPRESENT BASIC LABELING ... AND IS NOT INTENDED TO INCLUDE ALL LABELING WHICH MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE NEC AND AHJ.'

utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Not the county — no. The utility — yes. CPS Energy prints its own placard wording in Figure 2000.6, including verbatim strings such as 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE', 'RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM', 'SOLAR PV SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN' and 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL'.

Why the confidence is not higherThe wording is printed in the figure and I transcribed it from my own extraction. Below 95 because most of it tracks the NEC's own model wording rather than being CPS-originated, and because a few label images render imperfectly in text extraction.

utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No letter height, colour or material is specified by either the county or the utility. CPS states a durability and standards requirement only: Figure 2000.6 Note 1 — 'LABELING SHALL BE PERMANTLY AFFIXED AND SUITABLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2017 NEC, ARTICLE 110.21(B).' [typo 'PERMANTLY' is in the original.] The dimensional specification therefore falls back to the NEC.

Why the confidence is not higherA proved absence: I searched the whole Electric Service Standards ('placard' 3 hits, 'label' 23 hits, fabricated 'zzqqx' 0) and the whole DG Manual ('placard' 0, 'label' 1, 'sign' 89 — all fire-safety or signature senses, fabricated 'zzqqx' 0), and read Figure 2000.6 and its notes in full. No height, colour or material anywhere. Marked down because CPS's deferral to 110.21(B) means the real answer lives in the NEC edition dispute noted at q29/q37.

utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 notes (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes — required by the utility, not the county. CPS Figure 2000.6 requires a 'CUSTOMER SERVICE PANEL DIRECTORY/PLAQUE (2017 NEC ARTICLE 705.10)', to be 'PLACED ON SERVICE PANEL AND ON SYSTEM DISCONNECTS FOR OTHER ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCTION SOURCES WHEN NOT GROUPED'. The content specification is the NEC's 705.10 (permanent plant/facility diagram showing the relative locations of the service disconnect and all power source disconnects); CPS adds no content requirement of its own.

Why the confidence is not higherThe requirement, the NEC citation and the placement instruction are all verbatim from the figure. Marked down because CPS specifies the requirement without specifying content, so what must actually be drawn on the plaque comes from the NEC — and CPS cites the 2017 edition while the 2023 NEC is the edition in force.

utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY source of placard requirements, since the county specifies none. The whole of Figure 2000.6 (see q38) is a utility specification, mandated by Electric Service Standards §2005.2(G): 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' Note the specification sits in the Electric Service Standards, NOT in the Distributed Generation Manual — the DG Manual contains no placard specification at all.

Why the confidence is not higherThe mandate sentence and its commissioning deadline are verbatim from §2005.2(G). The DG Manual absence is proved with controls ('placard' 0, 'label' 1 in a listing-of-equipment sense, against 'disconnect' 45 and 'sign' 89 as positive controls, fabricated 'zzqqx' 0). Below 95 for the 2021-edition dating and the 2017 NEC references.

utility electric service standards §2005.2(G) + Figure 2000.6 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Per CPS Figure 2000.6 and §2005.2: on the customer service panel (directory/plaque and rapid shutdown placard); on system disconnects for other electric power production sources when not grouped; on the PV AC disconnect; on the PV DC disconnect; on the inverter DC disconnect switch (rapid shutdown switch label); on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors; on a PV/AC aggregate panel where one exists; and on BOTH the revenue meter socket and the PV meter socket where the two meters have been approved to be remote from one another. Additionally, §2005.2(K): where PV system AC conductors run in attic spaces, 'the conductors shall be installed in approved raceways/conduits with labels denoting PV AC conductors'.

Why the confidence is not higherEvery placement above is stated in the figure or in §2005.2(K), and I transcribed them from my own extraction. Below 95 because the figure is graphical and placement is conveyed partly by layout, and because the meter-socket placement is conditional on a CPS pre-approval that is itself case-by-case.

utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 + §2005.2(K) (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Yes, effectively — by the utility. CPS DG Manual §7.1.3: 'For DG Systems up to 50 kWac, certified equipment and equipment listed with an approved test label may be installed on CPS Energy's distribution system in accordance with CPS Energy approved interconnection control and protection scheme without further review of the DG Owner's design by CPS Energy.' CPS points to an external list for certified equipment (the California Energy Commission solar equipment lists). Equipment not on that route triggers CPS design review.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the DG Manual (9th Edition, 1 May 2024). Marked down because the listing requirement is framed as a fast-track condition rather than an absolute prohibition, and because CPS's cited list is another state's regulator list, which is an odd and possibly stale reference on a Texas utility's manual.

utility DG manual §7.1.3 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Distributed%20Generation%20Manual.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Yes, permitted. County: no jurisdiction over a battery at a single-family dwelling. Where the county does have jurisdiction, its fire code amendments require a construction permit for ESS (amended IFC §105.6.5: 'A construction permit is required to install energy storage systems regulated by Section 1207') while removing the operational permits for battery systems (§105.6.2) and capacitor energy storage systems (§105.6.3); IFC 1207 itself is left unamended. Utility: batteries are within the CPS DG regime and require contractor registration, but 'Energy storage systems installed as part of a net-metered installation are not permitted to export power to the grid but can be used for powering essential loads in loss of power situations.' CPS also warns that the DG Manual 'is currently undergoing revisions to include Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)' and directs BESS questions to CPS directly.

Why the confidence is not higherEach element is verbatim from a current document. Held down because the utility side is expressly in flux — the DG Manual's own cover memorandum (dated 5/21/2024) says the BESS requirements are not yet written and to phone CPS — so any answer about batteries here is provisional by the utility's own admission.

utility DG manual + county code amendments (both extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Distributed%20Generation%20Manual.pdf

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

No — not for a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County, where the county has no jurisdiction. Yes, for buildings the county does regulate: a separate ESS construction permit is required under amended IFC §105.6.5, with no separate ESS operational permit.

Why the confidence is not higherThe §105.6.5 text is verbatim from the amendments I extracted. Marked down because the answer flips on building type and the amendments themselves never state the scope limit — that comes from §233.062(a) and from the county's Building Permits page.

adopted code amendments §105.6.5 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40054/2021-IFC-and-IBC-Local-Rules

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

No — not by Bexar County, for a residence. The county has no residential building-code jurisdiction, no zoning and no setback regime in unincorporated areas, so a residential ground mount is not permitted, reviewed or treated as a structure by the county. (Interestingly, the county's fire code amendments DO contemplate utility-scale PV as a structure: amended §503.1.1 treats 'solar photovoltaic power generation facilities' as 'Group U facilities' for fire apparatus access road purposes.)

Why the confidence is not higherThe negative follows from the same jurisdictional finding as q1 and from the county FAQ's 'there are no zoning regulations'. Marked down to 72 because it is an inference rather than a statement — I found no county document that addresses ground-mount solar at a residence at all, and because Bexar County's building/set-back line power under Local Gov't Code ch. 233 subch. B and its floodplain court order are both live powers that could in principle reach a ground-mounted structure on a particular parcel.

department FAQ + adopted code amendments checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Immediately adjacent to the revenue meter. CPS Electric Service Standards Figure 2000.5 Note 4: 'THE PV AC SERVICE DISCONNECT AND PV METER SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE REVENUE METER.' Figure 2000.6 Note 2 adds 'PV METER SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE REVENUE METER UNLESS PRE-APPROVED BY CPS ENERGY TO BE LOCATED REMOTELY DUE TO SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.' §2005.2(F): the PV AC meter disconnect goes on the load side of the inverters and before the CPS PV metering equipment, 'immediately adjacent to the PV system metering equipment', readily accessible and capable of being locked in the open position; an additional disconnect to isolate the PV meter is required where the interconnection is remote from the PV meter. §2005.2(C) Note 2: 'In no case will CPS Energy permit the PV meter to be located on floor(s) other than the level that the revenue meter is located.' DG Manual §4.7: the DG owner pays the full cost of a visible load-break disconnect switch 'by and to the sole specification of CPS Energy', readily accessible to CPS personnel and 'of a type that can be secured in an open position by a CPS Energy padlock'.

Why the confidence is not higherFive mutually consistent statements across two of the utility's own documents, all extracted directly. Below 95 only because 'immediately adjacent' is not dimensioned anywhere — there is no published distance in feet or inches — so a field disagreement about what counts as adjacent has no published tiebreaker.

utility electric service standards Figures 2000.5/2000.6 and §2005.2 + DG manual §4.7 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Email — to the utility, not the county. The registered solar contractor requests the final commissioning from CPS Energy (CPSESolar@CPSEnergy.com / DG@cpsenergy.com), and CPS emails the scheduled date to contractor and customer. No county inspection exists to book for a single-family PV system. Where the county does inspect, the statutory route is a written request to the county (Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.064(d)). 85% · utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • How much notice is required? 5-10 business days for the CPS Energy final commissioning: 'Please provide CPS Energy 5-10 business days to schedule a date/time.' No county notice period applies to residential PV. Where the county does inspect, the statute gives it 5 business days to begin after a written request (10 business days for counties over 3.3 million population — Bexar is below that threshold, so 5 applies), failing which the building 'is considered approved'. 88% · utility process document + Local Gov't Code §233.064(e)
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? No — the county performs no final solar inspection on a single-family dwelling, and says so in terms: 'the County does not have legal authority to regulate residential construction, conduct residential construction inspections, or issue a residential Certificate of Occupancy', and 'the County will not conduct a residential construction inspection once the building has been completed'. The final inspection that actually happens is CPS Energy's commissioning and anti-islanding test. 95% · department FAQ + Fire Marshal standing letter
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated — the function is absent, not transferred. The only body that inspects a residential PV installation in unincorporated Bexar County is CPS Energy, and it does so as the interconnecting utility under its own Electric Service Standards §2007, not as a delegate of the county. Where the county does inspect (commercial/public/4+ multifamily), it uses its own staff: 'Fire Inspectors or Fire Investigators from the Bexar County Fire Marshal's Office will perform the inspection of your building project.' 88% · department FAQ + utility electric service standards §2007
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? For residential PV in unincorporated Bexar County there is exactly one inspection and it belongs to the utility: CPS Energy's final commissioning, which is 'the required inspection and anti-islanding test', performed on site with the contractor present, after which CPS sets the PV meter and activates the system the same day. For reference, the county's sequence where it does have jurisdiction is: structural frame (for required fire resistance/fire separation), electrical rough-in, HVAC rough-in, and final inspection for issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (Compliance) — with a Fire Marshal inspector or investigator entitled to conduct an inspection at any time to verify construction documents are on site. 90% · utility process document + department FAQ
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No — no rough-in or mid-roof inspection exists for residential PV here, because no county inspection regime applies and CPS Energy inspects only once, at final commissioning. Where the county does have jurisdiction, an electrical rough-in and an HVAC rough-in are both required. 80% · department FAQ + utility process document
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? No published inspection checklist for solar PV, from either the county or the utility. The county publishes checklists only for fire-safety occupancy inspections (Assisted Living Facilities, Licensed Child-Care Home, Foster Family Home, Foster Group Home, Licensed Daycare Center, Residential Care Facilities, Boarding Home, Fuel Systems) and a Construction Plan Submittal Checklist for commercial plan review. None concerns solar. 88% · department page document index + sitemap enumeration
    • What must be on site at inspection? For the CPS commissioning: the contractor must be on site, and CPS must be able to access the equipment — 'To avoid delays, please ensure your contractor is on site and CPS Energy can access your equipment to perform inspection.' The CPS-stamped approved electrical drawings and interconnection application are the governing approved documents. Labelling per Figure 2000.6 must already be in place at commissioning. No county documents are required, because no county permit exists; where the county does have jurisdiction, the permit/work authorisation and approved plans must be on site or a $150 per-day fee applies. 85% · utility process document + utility standards + county code amendments
    • Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes — the utility does. CPS Electric Service Standards §2005.2(G) makes labelling a commissioning-gated requirement: 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' §2007 gives the commissioning inspector the mandate to 'inspect and perform acceptance tests on the DG Facilities to determine compliance with technical requirements'. Listings are handled by §7.1.3 of the DG Manual (certified/listed equipment). The county verifies nothing on a residential PV job. 85% · utility electric service standards §2005.2(G) and §2007 (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? Letter — specifically a Permission to Operate (PTO) email from CPS Energy, issued within 24-48 hours of passed commissioning, with the PV meter set and the system activated on the same day as the commissioning. No county Final, green tag or Certificate of Occupancy is issued, and for existing homes in unincorporated Bexar County a residential CO generally does not exist at all: 'most residential construction has not been constructed under a residential permit, and therefore a residential Certificate of Occupancy does not exist.' 90% · utility process document + department FAQ
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Utility pulls — there is nobody to notify. CPS Energy performs the commissioning itself, sets the PV meter and issues the PTO email directly to the customer within 24-48 hours; no AHJ sign-off is transmitted because none exists. The installer's only trigger is requesting the commissioning (Step 9). Note that CPS's older Solar Rebate Program Manual contemplates 'An AHJ permit release (if applicable)' being emailed to CPSESolar@cpsenergy.com before a commissioning can be scheduled — the '(if applicable)' is exactly the carve-out that unincorporated Bexar falls into. 88% · utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout)
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? Utility: no re-inspection fee published — 'Once corrections are made, your solar contractor may re-request the commissioning', with no charge stated. County (not applicable to residential PV): Building Code Re-inspection Fee $100.00 per building; Re-inspection Fee (Prevention) $65.00 per building, also charged for failing to appear at or cancel a scheduled inspection within four hours; plus $150.00 where the permit or approved plans are not on the work site. 85% · fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) + utility process document
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Utility: on a failed commissioning 'your solar contractor will be notified with reason of failure. Once corrections are made, your solar contractor may re-request the commissioning.' Deficiencies found during application review are likewise routed to the contractor to correct. County (not applicable to residential PV): the Fire Marshal issues Notices of Violation, Fire Marshal's Orders and Citations, with escalation to the district attorney for civil or criminal case preparation where voluntary compliance fails. 78% · utility process document + department page

14 questions answered against Bexar County’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Email — to the utility, not the county. The registered solar contractor requests the final commissioning from CPS Energy (CPSESolar@CPSEnergy.com / DG@cpsenergy.com), and CPS emails the scheduled date to contractor and customer. No county inspection exists to book for a single-family PV system. Where the county does inspect, the statutory route is a written request to the county (Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.064(d)).

Why the confidence is not higherThe utility route is explicit in the residential process document Step 9 and its contact block. Marked down because that document names the request channel by implication (contractor 'will request') rather than prescribing a form or method in terms, and because the county's own pages publish no inspection-booking method at all.

utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

5-10 business days for the CPS Energy final commissioning: 'Please provide CPS Energy 5-10 business days to schedule a date/time.' No county notice period applies to residential PV. Where the county does inspect, the statute gives it 5 business days to begin after a written request (10 business days for counties over 3.3 million population — Bexar is below that threshold, so 5 applies), failing which the building 'is considered approved'.

Why the confidence is not higherThe 5-10 business day figure is verbatim from the utility's residential process sheet; the statutory figures are verbatim from §233.064(e)/(e-1) read in full text. Below 95 because the utility figure is a request ('please provide') rather than a commitment, and because the CPS DG page separately warns that review timelines have stretched due to demand.

utility process document + Local Gov't Code §233.064(e) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCPS Energy Residential Step-by-Step Solar Interconnection Process (Steps 9-10, which give 5-10 business days to schedule and state that the date is emailed, but no AM/PM window and no same-day option); CPS DG Manual; Bexar County Fire Marshal Code Enforcement and Inspections page; Bexar County Fire Inspections FAQs; Bexar County fee schedule (which prices a $65 penalty for failing to cancel within four hours of a scheduled time, implying scheduled slots exist but not describing them). No published window structure from either party.

https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

No — the county performs no final solar inspection on a single-family dwelling, and says so in terms: 'the County does not have legal authority to regulate residential construction, conduct residential construction inspections, or issue a residential Certificate of Occupancy', and 'the County will not conduct a residential construction inspection once the building has been completed'. The final inspection that actually happens is CPS Energy's commissioning and anti-islanding test.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the county's own live FAQ, corroborated by the Fire Marshal's standing letter, which gives the practical reason (the required structural, electrical, plumbing and HVAC inspections 'cannot be conducted on a completed residential building without causing substantial damage'). Two independent county documents, both saying the same thing.

department FAQ + Fire Marshal standing letter checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated — the function is absent, not transferred. The only body that inspects a residential PV installation in unincorporated Bexar County is CPS Energy, and it does so as the interconnecting utility under its own Electric Service Standards §2007, not as a delegate of the county. Where the county does inspect (commercial/public/4+ multifamily), it uses its own staff: 'Fire Inspectors or Fire Investigators from the Bexar County Fire Marshal's Office will perform the inspection of your building project.'

Why the confidence is not higherBoth halves verbatim from the county FAQ and CPS §2007. Marked down because 'not delegated' is a characterisation of an absence, and because §233.061(b) does permit a county and a municipality to contract with one another for fire code administration — I found no such Bexar contract, but I did not exhaust Commissioners Court records.

department FAQ + utility electric service standards §2007 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

For residential PV in unincorporated Bexar County there is exactly one inspection and it belongs to the utility: CPS Energy's final commissioning, which is 'the required inspection and anti-islanding test', performed on site with the contractor present, after which CPS sets the PV meter and activates the system the same day. For reference, the county's sequence where it does have jurisdiction is: structural frame (for required fire resistance/fire separation), electrical rough-in, HVAC rough-in, and final inspection for issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (Compliance) — with a Fire Marshal inspector or investigator entitled to conduct an inspection at any time to verify construction documents are on site.

Why the confidence is not higherThe utility sequence is verbatim from residential process Steps 9-10; the county sequence is verbatim from the New Construction FAQ. Both are the authority's/utility's own current material. Below 95 because the county list is expressly a minimum ('At a minimum, the following inspections are required') and answers the commercial neighbouring question.

utility process document + department FAQ checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

No — no rough-in or mid-roof inspection exists for residential PV here, because no county inspection regime applies and CPS Energy inspects only once, at final commissioning. Where the county does have jurisdiction, an electrical rough-in and an HVAC rough-in are both required.

Why the confidence is not higherThe county rough-in requirement is verbatim from the FAQ; the residential 'no' is inferred from the absence of any earlier inspection stage in CPS's ten-step process, which goes straight from installation (Step 8) to final commissioning (Steps 9-10). An absence in a process document is weaker than a statement, hence 80.

department FAQ + utility process document checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/2896/New-Constructions-FAQs

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Yes — the utility does. CPS Electric Service Standards §2005.2(G) makes labelling a commissioning-gated requirement: 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' §2007 gives the commissioning inspector the mandate to 'inspect and perform acceptance tests on the DG Facilities to determine compliance with technical requirements'. Listings are handled by §7.1.3 of the DG Manual (certified/listed equipment). The county verifies nothing on a residential PV job.

Why the confidence is not higherThe linkage from labelling to commissioning is explicit and is the strongest available evidence that labels are actually checked. Marked down because CPS nowhere publishes a commissioning checklist enumerating label-by-label verification, so 'verifies labels' is inferred from the timing requirement plus the inspector's general compliance mandate rather than stated.

utility electric service standards §2005.2(G) and §2007 (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards_Manual_ADA_73125.pdf

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

No published inspection checklist for solar PV, from either the county or the utility. The county publishes checklists only for fire-safety occupancy inspections (Assisted Living Facilities, Licensed Child-Care Home, Foster Family Home, Foster Group Home, Licensed Daycare Center, Residential Care Facilities, Boarding Home, Fuel Systems) and a Construction Plan Submittal Checklist for commercial plan review. None concerns solar.

Why the confidence is not higherThis is a well-controlled absence, not a failure to look. I enumerated every document link on the Fire Marshal's Permits & Applications page and the Code Enforcement page and listed them by name; I extracted the 82-page local rules, the fee schedule, the permit application, the General Permit Process and the Permit Verification Guidelines and searched each with positive and fabricated controls; and I walked all 1,377 entries of the county's own sitemap, where 'solar' and 'photovoltaic' return 0 hits against positive controls 'permit' 15 and 'inspection' 5 and fabricated control 'zzqqxfoo' 0. Below 95 because the county's site search is a JavaScript application I could not query server-side, so the sitemap walk is a title-level check rather than a full-text site search.

department page document index + sitemap enumeration checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/643/Permits-Applications

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

For the CPS commissioning: the contractor must be on site, and CPS must be able to access the equipment — 'To avoid delays, please ensure your contractor is on site and CPS Energy can access your equipment to perform inspection.' The CPS-stamped approved electrical drawings and interconnection application are the governing approved documents. Labelling per Figure 2000.6 must already be in place at commissioning. No county documents are required, because no county permit exists; where the county does have jurisdiction, the permit/work authorisation and approved plans must be on site or a $150 per-day fee applies.

Why the confidence is not higherThe contractor-presence and access requirement is verbatim from residential process Step 10; the labelling deadline from §2005.2(G); the county on-site document rule from amended IFC §105.3.9 and the fee schedule penalty table. Marked down because CPS publishes no explicit 'documents on site' list for a residential commissioning — the answer is assembled from three requirements rather than read off one list.

utility process document + utility standards + county code amendments checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

Utility: no re-inspection fee published — 'Once corrections are made, your solar contractor may re-request the commissioning', with no charge stated. County (not applicable to residential PV): Building Code Re-inspection Fee $100.00 per building; Re-inspection Fee (Prevention) $65.00 per building, also charged for failing to appear at or cancel a scheduled inspection within four hours; plus $150.00 where the permit or approved plans are not on the work site.

Why the confidence is not higherThe county figures are verbatim from the fee schedule effective 1 January 2024. The utility 'no fee' is an absence — CPS's process document describes re-requesting commissioning without mentioning a charge, and CPS charges no residential DG application fee — so the negative is inferred rather than stated, which is what holds this at 85.

fee schedule (extracted with pdftotext -layout) + utility process document checked 2026-08-28 https://www.bexar.org/DocumentCenter/View/40055/Bexar-County-2021-Fee-Schedule

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Utility: on a failed commissioning 'your solar contractor will be notified with reason of failure. Once corrections are made, your solar contractor may re-request the commissioning.' Deficiencies found during application review are likewise routed to the contractor to correct. County (not applicable to residential PV): the Fire Marshal issues Notices of Violation, Fire Marshal's Orders and Citations, with escalation to the district attorney for civil or criminal case preparation where voluntary compliance fails.

Why the confidence is not higherThe utility half is verbatim from residential process Steps 5 and 10. The county half is verbatim from the Code Enforcement page but describes enforcement against violations generally rather than a construction-corrections workflow, and neither party publishes a correction notice format or a clearance procedure. Marked down accordingly.

utility process document + department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Letter — specifically a Permission to Operate (PTO) email from CPS Energy, issued within 24-48 hours of passed commissioning, with the PV meter set and the system activated on the same day as the commissioning. No county Final, green tag or Certificate of Occupancy is issued, and for existing homes in unincorporated Bexar County a residential CO generally does not exist at all: 'most residential construction has not been constructed under a residential permit, and therefore a residential Certificate of Occupancy does not exist.'

Why the confidence is not higherThe PTO timing is verbatim from residential process Step 10; the county CO position is verbatim from the New Construction FAQ. Below 95 because 'Letter' is my mapping of an email notification onto the question's option set, which is a judgement call.

utility process document + department FAQ checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Utility pulls — there is nobody to notify. CPS Energy performs the commissioning itself, sets the PV meter and issues the PTO email directly to the customer within 24-48 hours; no AHJ sign-off is transmitted because none exists. The installer's only trigger is requesting the commissioning (Step 9). Note that CPS's older Solar Rebate Program Manual contemplates 'An AHJ permit release (if applicable)' being emailed to CPSESolar@cpsenergy.com before a commissioning can be scheduled — the '(if applicable)' is exactly the carve-out that unincorporated Bexar falls into.

Why the confidence is not higherSteps 9-10 of the residential process are unambiguous and current. The rebate manual corroboration is useful but that document is dated 'Effective June 1, 2017, Revised June 21, 2019' and describes a rebate programme CPS has since discontinued for residential ('CPS Energy does not currently offer rebates for residential solar installations'), so it is supporting evidence only, not the basis. Below 95 for that reason.

utility process document (extracted with pdftotext -layout) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/EnergyEfficiency/Residential_Solar_Process_31425_ADA.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for Bexar County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

Bexar County is not the permitting authority for residential solar here 95% confidence
Holds
For a residential rooftop PV system on a single-family dwelling (defined by the county as a single structure of 3 or fewer dwelling units) in unincorporated Bexar County, the county holds NOTHING mandatory: no building permit, no electrical permit, no plan review, no inspection, no certificate of occupancy. Bexar County's building/fire code authority is capped by Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.062(a) at commercial establishments, public buildings, and multifamily dwellings of 4+ units. The county offers a VOLUNTARY residential building permit (with plan review, IRC-based inspections, and a CO) which owners take up only when an HOA or a lender demands it. Two departments are involved for the permits the county does issue, and the brief's likely assumption is wrong on which: the Bexar County FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE (9810 Southton Rd, 210-335-0300) holds building permits, plan review, construction inspection and Certificates of Occupancy/Compliance, plus Electrical/Plumbing/HVAC Work Authorizations. Public Works Development Services (1948 Probandt St, 210-335-6700) does NOT issue building permits; it issues only a prerequisite 'Permit Verification / Building Permit Authorization' form plus stormwater, floodplain, right-of-way, post-construction and OSSF permits. The de facto gatekeeper for residential rooftop PV here is the utility, CPS Energy, whose approval-then-commissioning process is the only mandatory review and the only mandatory inspection. Two possible county-side overlays remain: (a) the Bexar County Floodplain Damage Prevention Court Order (adopted 22 Aug 2023) defines 'development' as 'any man-made change to improved and unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures', which on its face could reach work on a property inside or within 100 ft of a FEMA 1% floodplain — the order never names solar and I did not find an interpretation, so treat as an open question, not a requirement; (b) property inside the City of San Antonio or City of Helotes ETJ picks up limited city requirements (platting, stormwater, military lighting, tree/sign/irrigation), which are not building-code requirements.
Delegated to
Not delegated — the power does not exist to delegate. Texas counties are creatures of enumerated power; the Fire Marshal's own published letter states 'County Government was not given authority by the State Legislature to regulate commercial construction until 1993, and even today, does not have authority to regulate residential construction.'
Overridden by
Tex. Local Gov't Code §233.062(a) caps the county fire/building code at commercial, public and 4+-unit multifamily buildings — single-family is excluded by statute. Tex. Local Gov't Code ch. 233 subch. F (residential IRC standards) would not help even if adopted: it reaches only 'new residential construction' — a house/duplex on a vacant lot, or an addition increasing square footage or value by more than 50% — so a rooftop PV retrofit is outside it, and §233.153(d)(1) forbids construing it to require prior county approval while §233.153(f) forbids charging a fee. Tex. Occupations Code §1305.201(e) supplies the actual installation standard: 'Electrical work performed in an unincorporated area of the state must be installed in accordance with standards at least as stringent as the requirements of the state electrical code' — the 2023 NEC, adopted by TDLR effective 1 Sep 2023 — and §1305.201(a) grants inspection/permit power to a 'municipality or region' only, never a county. Tex. Property Code §202.010 voids HOA prohibitions on solar devices.
Why not higher
Four of the authority's own current documents agree with each other and with the governing statute, and the statute was read in full text rather than summary. Bexar County's Building Permits page states in terms that the Fire Marshal 'determines when building permits are required for structures or areas that are not for a "single-family dwelling" use' and defines single-family dwelling as '3 or less residential dwelling units'. The Fire Marshal's New Construction FAQ says 'unless a residential building permit was issued on a voluntary basis, the County does not have legal authority to regulate residential construction, conduct residential construction inspections, or issue a residential Certificate of Occupancy', and 'the County will not conduct a residential construction inspection once the building has been completed'. The Fire Marshal's standing letter (Residential Permitting and Certificates of Occupancy) says 'residential properties are permitted on a voluntary basis only'. The permit application form itself carries the tick-box 'Residential Building Voluntary – Not required by law'. Held back from 100 only because the standing letter is undated and still carries the Fire Marshal's former 622 Dolorosa address (current office is 9810 Southton Rd), so it is an older document — though the current FAQ links to it and restates its substance, which is why this is 95 and not lower.

https://www.bexar.org/1463/Building-Permits

Permit required
No. No county permit is required for a residential rooftop PV system on a single-family dwelling in unincorporated Bexar County.95%
Permit cost
$0 — there is no county permit and therefore no county fee for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated Bexar County.88%
Plan review
No county review for residential PV. The binding turnaround is the utility's: CPS Energy reviews the residential solar application in about 7-10 business days;80%
Portal
Split. Public Works Development Services uses OpenGov: countyofbexartx.portal.opengov.com (stormwater, post-construction, floodplain, right-of-way, and the Permit Verification Form).90%
Electrical code
2023 NEC. In unincorporated Texas the state electrical code governs by force of Tex. Occupations Code §1305.201(e), and TDLR 'has adopted the National Electric Code 2023 Edition,90%
Own placard wording
Not the county — no. The utility — yes. CPS Energy prints its own placard wording in Figure 2000.6,88%
Booking an inspection
Email — to the utility, not the county. The registered solar contractor requests the final commissioning from CPS Energy (CPSESolar@CPSEnergy.com / DG@cpsenergy.com),85%
Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 88%

Not the county — no. The utility — yes. CPS Energy prints its own placard wording in Figure 2000.6, including verbatim strings such as 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE', 'RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM', 'SOLAR PV SYSTEM EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN' and 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL'.

Size, colour & material 85%

No letter height, colour or material is specified by either the county or the utility. CPS states a durability and standards requirement only: Figure 2000.6 Note 1 — 'LABELING SHALL BE PERMANTLY AFFIXED AND SUITABLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2017 NEC, ARTICLE 110.21(B).' [typo 'PERMANTLY' is in the original.] The dimensional specification therefore falls back to the NEC.

Where they go 88%

Per CPS Figure 2000.6 and §2005.2: on the customer service panel (directory/plaque and rapid shutdown placard); on system disconnects for other electric power production sources when not grouped; on the PV AC disconnect; on the PV DC disconnect; on the inverter DC disconnect switch (rapid shutdown switch label); on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors; on a PV/AC aggregate panel where one exists; and on BOTH the revenue meter socket and the PV meter socket where the two meters have been approved to be remote from one another. Additionally, §2005.2(K): where PV system AC conductors run in attic spaces, 'the conductors shall be installed in approved raceways/conduits with labels denoting PV AC conductors'.

What the utility wants on top 90%

Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY source of placard requirements, since the county specifies none. The whole of Figure 2000.6 (see q38) is a utility specification, mandated by Electric Service Standards §2005.2(G): 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' Note the specification sits in the Electric Service Standards, NOT in the Distributed Generation Manual — the DG Manual contains no placard specification at all.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
County
County
Bexar County
Regions covered
Solar Requirements
Required placards
Summary You may submit a building permit application to the Fire Marshal before Public Works signs the Permit Verification Form (pages one and two of the Fire Marshal's Building Permit Application). The building permit will not be issued until the Fire Marshal Office receives a signed Permit Verification Form from Public Works and the Fire Marshal Office has completed their review. For the Permit
Separate fire inspection
Building Permits | Bexar County, TX - Official Website Skip to Main Content Search Home Government Offices & Departments Public Works Department Permits Building Permits Building Permits In the areas of Bexar County that are outside of a municipality's limits, the Bexar County Fire Marshal Office (
Authority Contact
Building Department
Direct Phone
(210-335-0300
Booking & Scheduling