City of Dallas
City of Dallas is the 7th largest jurisdiction in Texas — 1,304,379 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined — one application, two permits issued Q4 Where you file — DallasNow — Accela Citizen Access, at https://aca-prod.accela.com/DALLASTX/Default.aspx Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- Approximately $281 — Table B-II base permit fee $181 per dwelling unit plus $100 for the additional trade60% source
- Key document
- published checklist + inspector presentation cited by 11 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · published checklist
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 95% · department inspection configuration sheet
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · published checklist
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined — one application, two permits issued 90% · published checklist + inspector presentation
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — the City does not require HOA or architectural approval first 75% · published checklist
- Is there a historic-district review? Yes, where the property sits in a historic overlay or conservation district 65% · department record-type list + checklist
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No 65% · published checklist
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Licensed electrician — a registered electrical contractor pulls the electrical permit, and Dallas-amended NEC 705.8 requires a TDLR-licensed Master Electrician or Journeyman Electrician on site during the installation 90% · adopting ordinance (Chapter 56 amendments)
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes — must be registered with the City as a general/building contractor before applying; separate electrical contractor registration is needed if you do the electrical yourself (Master Electrician must appear in person at 320 E Jefferson Blvd, Room 210) 90% · portal job aid
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Effectively no for the PV interconnection 65% · department form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Residential: completed permit application; two sets of all construction documents sealed by a licensed PE; two copies of manufacturer's installation instructions; number of panels; location of panels (site plan may be required); roof plan showing existing condition and proposed equipment location; building elevations showing total height with equipment; engineered construction documents or sealed assembly/installation plans of the PV system; three-line electrical diagram complete with calculation; engineered construction documents of the connection to the structure (framing plans, connection details, structural calculations or load diagrams); declaration of whether a battery/ESS is present with total kWh; attestation of compliance with Zoning, PD and Conservation Districts. Electrical plan review additionally wants spec sheets showing listing and testing laboratory, and conductor calculations for all conductors including correction, adjustment and duty factors 92% · published checklist
- How many copies, and in what format? Two sets of construction documents; minimum text size 3/32"; sheet size minimum 11"x17", maximum 36"x48" ('E' size). Submittal is now electronic via DallasNow 75% · published checklist
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Conditionally — residential checklist says 'Location of solar panels. A site plan may be required (refer to commercial requirements)'. Where required it must show all property lines with length and metes and bounds, building lines, easements, a north arrow, all existing structures and the proposed solar equipment. Electrical plan review separately requires a site plan with equipment locations shown. A roof plan showing existing condition and proposed equipment location, and building elevations showing total height with equipment, are required unconditionally 85% · published checklist + inspector presentation
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — three-line diagram 95% · published checklist
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 88% · inspector presentation + checklist
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Yes — required on every residential PV job, no size threshold. All construction documents must be reviewed or designed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer to comply with Dallas Residential Code R301.1.3 or Dallas Building Code Chapter 16; engineered construction documents of the PV system's connection to the structure (framing plans, connection details, structural calculations or load diagrams) are separately required 90% · published checklist
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No separate electrical PE stamp is called out, but checklist general requirement 2 requires 'all construction documents and plans' to be sealed by a licensed PE, which on its face includes the electrical sheets 60% · published checklist
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? DallasNow — Accela Citizen Access, at https://aca-prod.accela.com/DALLASTX/Default.aspx 95% · portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · portal job aid
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Approximately $281 — Table B-II base permit fee $181 per dwelling unit plus $100 for the additional trade 60% · published fee schedule (eff. 1 Jul 2025)
- How is the fee calculated? Flat — flat base per dwelling unit plus a flat amount per additional trade (Table B-II), not valuation-based 60% · published fee schedule (eff. 1 Jul 2025)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 2 years (730 days) to make progress 88% · city code chapter
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC 80% · utility service territory page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel 60% · utility interconnection process page
28 questions answered against City of Dallas’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City publishes its own solar PV application checklist, its own Residential Solar/PV Permit record type (RES-SOLAR) and its own inspection codes for it
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist: 'A building permit and an electrical permit is required for flush-mounted or tilt-up photovoltaic systems.' The Inspection Configuration Sheet shows the RES-SOLAR record carrying Building, Electrical, Mechanical, Fire and Zoning inspection types
department inspection configuration sheet checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/Pages/code_directory.aspx
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherStated flatly on the checklist; the presentation adds 'No work may be performed until a permit is issued' and 'All PV installation must have a plan review'
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined — one application, two permits issued
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist: 'A building permit and an electrical permit is required... Separate applications are not required.' The presentation shows an issued building permit and a corresponding electrical permit with different inspection codes; it also warns 'Do not apply for a stand alone electrical permit online. It will be cancelled.' DallasNow has a single 'Residential Solar/PV Permit' application type
published checklist + inspector presentation checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Licensed electrician — a registered electrical contractor pulls the electrical permit, and Dallas-amended NEC 705.8 requires a TDLR-licensed Master Electrician or Journeyman Electrician on site during the installation
Why the confidence is not higherCh. 56 amendment no. 21 rewrites NEC 705.8 to name only Master or Journeyman as the qualifying on-site person. Note this supersedes the 2023 inspector presentation, which still offered a third option (a Residential Wireman with AHJ-approved PV training) — do not rely on that deck. The general contractor may subcontract to an already-registered electrician instead of registering as an electrical contractor themselves
adopting ordinance (Chapter 56 amendments) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/adopt%202023%20National%20Electrical%20Code%20w%20edits.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes — must be registered with the City as a general/building contractor before applying; separate electrical contractor registration is needed if you do the electrical yourself (Master Electrician must appear in person at 320 E Jefferson Blvd, Room 210)
Why the confidence is not higherStated in the current DallasNow solar job aid (step 20) and in the inspector presentation. The in-person requirement for the Master Electrician appears in both
portal job aid checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/8.%20Applying%20for%20a%20Submit%20a%20Solar%20PV%20Permit%20Application%20in%20DallasNow.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Effectively no for the PV interconnection
Why the confidence is not higherInference from two City documents, not a direct statement. The Homeowner's Exemption form lets a homestead owner act as their own contractor, but its list of eligible work is fences, accessory buildings, patio covers, interior remodel, plumbing, irrigation, mechanical, roofing, and 'electrical repairs after passing an approved City of Dallas oral or written exam' — solar PV is not on it. Separately, Dallas-amended NEC 705.8 requires a TDLR Master or Journeyman Electrician on site for the whole install. The form is also stale (REV 01-01-2018, still names the old 'Sustainable Development and Construction Department')
department form checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/pdf/BI_Homeowner%27s%20Exemption%20from%20Registration%20as%20a%20Contractor.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Residential: completed permit application; two sets of all construction documents sealed by a licensed PE; two copies of manufacturer's installation instructions; number of panels; location of panels (site plan may be required); roof plan showing existing condition and proposed equipment location; building elevations showing total height with equipment; engineered construction documents or sealed assembly/installation plans of the PV system; three-line electrical diagram complete with calculation; engineered construction documents of the connection to the structure (framing plans, connection details, structural calculations or load diagrams); declaration of whether a battery/ESS is present with total kWh; attestation of compliance with Zoning, PD and Conservation Districts. Electrical plan review additionally wants spec sheets showing listing and testing laboratory, and conductor calculations for all conductors including correction, adjustment and duty factors
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the City's own checklist (revision-stamped 5/10/2024), supplemented by the Chief Electrical Inspector's plan-review slides
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Two sets of construction documents; minimum text size 3/32"; sheet size minimum 11"x17", maximum 36"x48" ('E' size). Submittal is now electronic via DallasNow
Why the confidence is not higherThe copy count and sheet sizes come from the checklist (rev 5/10/2024), which is written for counter submittal; the current route is upload to DallasNow, so 'two sets' may be vestigial. The sheet-size and text-size limits are still meaningful for the uploaded PDF
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Conditionally — residential checklist says 'Location of solar panels. A site plan may be required (refer to commercial requirements)'. Where required it must show all property lines with length and metes and bounds, building lines, easements, a north arrow, all existing structures and the proposed solar equipment. Electrical plan review separately requires a site plan with equipment locations shown. A roof plan showing existing condition and proposed equipment location, and building elevations showing total height with equipment, are required unconditionally
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist is explicit that the site plan is conditional for residential and defines contents only under the commercial heading; the electrical plan-review slide requires one without qualification, so the two City sources are not fully consistent
published checklist + inspector presentation checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes — three-line diagram
Why the confidence is not higherResidential checklist item 10: 'Three-line electrical diagram complete with calculation'. The electrical plan-review slide repeats 'The proposed three-line diagram'. Note Dallas asks for three-line, not one-line
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThree sources agree: checklist requires the three-line 'complete with calculation'; the plan-review slide requires 'Conductor calculations for all conductors... including all correction, adjustment and duty factors'; and Chapter 56 amendment no. 13 (Article 220) requires calculations to be provided when loads are added. Structural calculations or load diagrams are separately required
inspector presentation + checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/presentations/Registration,%20Permitting%20and%20Inspections%20for%20Solar.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Yes — required on every residential PV job, no size threshold. All construction documents must be reviewed or designed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer to comply with Dallas Residential Code R301.1.3 or Dallas Building Code Chapter 16; engineered construction documents of the PV system's connection to the structure (framing plans, connection details, structural calculations or load diagrams) are separately required
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist general requirement 2 and residential requirements 9 and 11; the building plan-review slide confirms 'Structural plans bearing an engineer's seal'. Confidence is not higher only because the checklist states no kW or area threshold at all, so 'no threshold' is read from its silence
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No separate electrical PE stamp is called out, but checklist general requirement 2 requires 'all construction documents and plans' to be sealed by a licensed PE, which on its face includes the electrical sheets
Why the confidence is not higherThis is a reading of a general clause, not a stated electrical requirement — the checklist names an engineer's seal only in structural contexts, and the electrical plan-review slide asks for a three-line, spec sheets and calculations without mentioning a seal
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Approximately $281 — Table B-II base permit fee $181 per dwelling unit plus $100 for the additional trade
Why the confidence is not higherThe fee schedule effective 1 Jul 2025 has NO line item for solar, photovoltaic or a residential electrical permit — I ran controls on the extracted text ('fee' hits 122 times, fabricated term 'zzqqx' zero) so this is a real absence, not a broken search. Table B-II 'Alterations or Repairs of Single-Family and Duplex Structures' is the table a rooftop retrofit falls under, giving $181/dwelling unit + $100 per additional trade, but the schedule never says solar is an alteration. The schedule's own disclaimer says final fees are calculated at submittal. Treat as an estimate
published fee schedule (eff. 1 Jul 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/DSDFees%20%281%29.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Flat — flat base per dwelling unit plus a flat amount per additional trade (Table B-II), not valuation-based
Why the confidence is not higherSame inference as q15. Note the parallel Table B-I for alterations generally IS valuation-based with a $175 minimum, so which table applies is the whole question and the schedule does not say
published fee schedule (eff. 1 Jul 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/DSDFees%20%281%29.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFee schedule effective 1 Jul 2025 (full text extracted, controls passed) and the fees page. There IS a 'Residential Plan Review Fee — $0.046 per sq.ft. or $577 whichever is greater' line, but it is expressed per square foot and reads as a new-construction/addition fee; nothing states whether a solar alteration attracts a plan-check fee on top of the Table B-II permit fee, and Table B-II is described as a permit fee with no plan-review component named. The inspector presentation confirms all PV goes through plan review but is silent on a separate fee
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPermitting & Inspections landing page, residential permits page, Inspections page, DallasNow page and its full set of job aids, and the RSVP Information Bulletin 201. Dallas publishes no plan-review turnaround for solar or for residential alterations generally. The one expedited programme, Rapid Single-Family VIP (RSVP), is same-day but explicitly scoped to NEW single-family dwellings and duplexes at $200/hour, so it does not apply to a rooftop retrofit. The only published timing commitments I found were RSVP's 7-calendar-day resubmittal review and the state 3-business-day issuance clock under TX LGC §247.0025
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
2 years (730 days) to make progress
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 52 §302.5.1: a permit 'will expire and be void ab initio if no progress has been made toward completion of the project... before the second anniversary of its issuance'; §302.5.2 allows extensions of up to 120 days each. §311.2 adds a five-year outer limit on the project from first application. The inspector presentation states the same 2-year rule. Confidence held at 88 because this Chapter 52 copy is stamped 'as of 3-27-24' and a 2025 amendment ordinance (25-0688) exists — I checked it and it does not touch §302.5
city code chapter checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/Chapter%2052%20as%20of%203-27-24.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
DallasNow — Accela Citizen Access, at https://aca-prod.accela.com/DALLASTX/Default.aspx
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's DallasNow page links this portal and publishes a solar-PV-specific job aid for it. Important: the Chief Electrical Inspector's presentation still names ProjectDox — that deck is dated 27 Mar 2023 and predates the DallasNow migration; ProjectDox now survives only for commercial electronic plan review
portal landing page checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/Pages/DallasNow.aspx
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's own 29-step job aid 'How to Submit a Solar/PV Permit Application in DallasNow' runs end to end online: create application, select 'Residential Solar/PV Permit', address, project details, contacts, licensed professional, review, certify, check out, submit payment, pay. Confidence not higher because contractor registration still requires the Master Electrician to appear in person, so the first-ever application is not purely online
portal job aid checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/8.%20Applying%20for%20a%20Submit%20a%20Solar%20PV%20Permit%20Application%20in%20DallasNow.pdf
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC
Why the confidence is not higherOncor is the transmission and distribution utility for Dallas and publishes the DG requirements and placard rules that Dallas installers work to. Confidence is 80, not higher, because I confirmed Oncor operates a service-territory lookup rather than reading an address-level result, and no City of Dallas document I retrieved names the utility. Per the standing rule I did not use PowerToChoose. Dallas is not a municipally-owned-utility city
utility service territory page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/oncor-service-territory-page.html
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel
Why the confidence is not higherOncor's published interconnection process — installer submits the tariff application and project through the installer portal, Oncor reviews and studies it, an interconnection agreement is signed, then Oncor issues PTO — makes no reference at any step to a municipal permit or a passed city inspection. So the two tracks are independent on the face of Oncor's own description. Marked 60 because absence of a stated dependency is not proof of no dependency, and Oncor does require 'Inspection Images' uploaded at the Agreement Available step
utility interconnection process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/residential-small-commercial-thinking-about-solar.html
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — the City does not require HOA or architectural approval first
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist general requirement 5 puts private restrictions squarely outside the City's process: 'The applicant will comply with other restriction the City of Dallas may not enforce, such as private deed restrictions.' That is the City declining to police HOA approval, not a statement that none applies to the owner
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Yes, where the property sits in a historic overlay or conservation district
Why the confidence is not higherTwo City sources point at it without stating a solar trigger: the checklist requires the applicant to verify compliance with Zoning, Planned Development Districts and Conservation Districts ('subject to plan review'), and the Inspection Configuration Sheet carries separate 'Certificate of Appropriateness' (COA) and 'Conservation District Work Certificate' record types, with the fee schedule listing appeals of Landmark Commission decisions on certificates of appropriateness. Note the current checklist revision dropped the words 'Historic Districts' that appeared in the 2015 version, so the direct textual hook is weaker than it was
department record-type list + checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/Pages/code_directory.aspx
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherThe checklist's residential requirements are an enumerated list of twelve items and none mentions windstorm or wind certification; nothing in the fee schedule or the Inspection Configuration Sheet does either. Dallas is inland and TDI windstorm certification is a coastal-catastrophe-area programme, but I did not verify TDI's designated-county list, so this rests on the City's silence
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSolar PV checklist (its zoning clause names Zoning, Planned Development Districts and Conservation Districts, but no SUP trigger), and the Inspection Configuration Sheet, which has a 'Specific Use Permit' record type (SUP-25-000001) but does not tie it to solar. The Dallas Development Code itself is on American Legal, which returned a Cloudflare interstitial (HTTP 403) on every attempt including with a referer header — so I could not read the zoning text where an SUP trigger would live. This is a tooling failure, not an absence in the code
https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/dallas/latest/overview
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSolar PV checklist (asks only for the number of panels and total kWh of storage, sets no cap), Chapter 56 NEC amendments (all 24 items enumerated — none caps system size), and the fee schedule. No City-side generation cap found. Any effective cap is likely to sit in Oncor's interconnection tariff rather than with the AHJ, and I did not retrieve the tariff
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC 95% · adopting ordinance + department letter
- Which building code edition is in force? 2021 IBC as Chapter 53 (Dallas Building Code) and 2021 IRC as Chapter 57 (Dallas Residential Code, Ordinance 33099), both with Dallas amendments, effective 12 May 2023. 2021 IEBC is Chapter 58 90% · department code list
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2021 International Fire Code with Dallas amendments, as Chapter 16 (Dallas Fire Code), effective 10 February 2023 90% · adopting ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — every code is adopted with Dallas amendments (city code chapters 16, 52–62) 95% · department code list + adopting ordinances
- What is the installation judged against? 2023 NEC as amended by Dallas City Code Chapter 56, together with the 2021 IRC as Chapter 57 (Dallas Residential Code) for the structural side; administration is Chapter 52 92% · adopting ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? 2021 IFC Section 1204 (Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems) as adopted, with no Dallas amendment 72% · adopting ordinance (proved absence of local amendment)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — 2023 NEC 690.12, unamended by Dallas 85% · adopting ordinance
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The 2023 NEC set (690.13(B) disconnect marking, 690.56 PV system markings, 705.10 directory, plus 690.12 rapid-shutdown labelling), unamended by Dallas — PLUS Oncor's caution placards on the visible lockable labeled AC disconnect (Class 1, 2 or 3 depending on distance to the Oncor meter). Oncor also requires the words 'Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect' spelled out at least once on both the layout sketch and the one-line diagram 82% · utility DG requirements + adopting ordinance
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No 85% · adopting ordinance (proved absence)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No City specification. Oncor specifies MATERIAL but not letter height or colour: placards must be UV-resistant and follow the same material standards as the NEC; colour cast acrylic is acceptable, as are sticker-type materials if outdoor-rated and of similar NEC specification; both must carry a UV inhibitor rated for exterior use. If cast acrylic is used the customer must also supply double-sided exterior adhesive tape, preferred brand 3M Scotch VHB (4956, 4941, 4936 or 4926), minimum 1 inch wide 82% · utility placard guideline
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes for Oncor Class 3 installations (DG fed from an Oncor pad-mounted transformer, or a high-voltage delivery point with remote DG). The site map must show: (1) location of the Oncor meter and Oncor delivery equipment, (2) location of the generator's main AC disconnect, (3) the facility address, (4) a north indicator with basic street and building layout, (5) a title, e.g. 'Solar System Disconnecting Means'. Three sets are required — one for existing Oncor equipment, one spare for when Oncor equipment is replaced, one for the customer's main equipment. NEC 705.10 also applies unamended 85% · utility placard guideline
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — this is where the real placard specification lives for Dallas. Oncor requires caution/warning placards on ALL distributed generation projects, graded by how far the visible lockable labeled disconnect (VLLD) sits from the Oncor meter. Class 1: VLLD within 10 ft of the Oncor meter — a basic caution placard, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT'. Class 2: VLLD more than 10 ft away — a placard at the Oncor meter naming where the disconnect is, e.g. '...DISCONNECT LOCATED ON WEST WALL OF THIS STRUCTURE', plus one on the disconnect. Class 3: pad-mounted transformer or HV delivery with remote DG — caution placard plus site map, three sets, and for pad-mount an extra pre-drilled caution placard attached to the secondary cables inside the Oncor transformer. Placard proofs must be uploaded to the Placards section of the eTRACK installer portal; Class 1 proofs may instead be shown on the layout sketch, and installers may reuse a Class 1 template. Class 2 and 3 placards are unique per project 90% · utility DG requirements
- Where must the labels be placed? On the visible lockable labeled AC disconnect — explicitly NOT on the Oncor meter. Oncor also requests identical placards on the customer's main equipment for additional recognition. For Class 2, an additional placard goes at the Oncor meter location pointing to where the disconnect is. For Class 3 pad-mount, an extra placard attaches to the secondary cables inside the Oncor transformer, and Oncor's own operations group mounts the placards on Oncor equipment (the contractor furnishes the placards and adhesive tape) 90% · utility placard guideline
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? A single separate Visible Lockable Labeled AC Disconnect (VLLD) must be located BETWEEN the Oncor meter and ALL sources of distributed generation, on an accessible exterior wall, within 10 feet of the Oncor meter. If it is more than 10 ft from the meter, Class 2 or Class 3 placards must be used. It must have an external handle, be lockable in the open position, and have a visual break appropriate to the voltage; molded-case breakers are NOT acceptable as VLLDs. It must be accessible at all times. The distance between the disconnect and the Oncor meter must be stated in feet on both the layout sketch and the one-line diagram, and the words 'Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect' must be written out at least once on each before the acronym VLLD may be used. No meter collars — the space within the meter socket is reserved for Oncor 95% · utility DG requirements
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes — equipment must be listed and labeled by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory. Spec sheets submitted at plan review must show the listing and the testing laboratory; the department points to OSHA's current NRTL list 90% · inspector presentation + checklist
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes. The solar permit application requires a declaration of whether a battery/energy storage system is present and its total kWh of storage. ESS is governed by 2021 IFC Section 1207 as adopted in Dallas Fire Code Chapter 16, unamended locally, and a fire operational permit is required under Dallas Fire Code 105.5.14 for stationary and mobile energy storage systems regulated by Section 1207. Oncor separately requires batteries and ESS to appear on the layout sketch and one-line with manufacturer, model, quantity and voltage 75% · adopting ordinance + checklist
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Yes for the fire operational permit — Dallas Fire Code 105.5.14 requires an operational permit for stationary and mobile energy storage systems regulated by Section 1207. There is no separate ESS building permit: storage is declared on the same Solar/PV permit application, and the RES-SOLAR record already carries a Fire Specialty Inspection (code 603) 70% · adopting ordinance
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes — Chapter 56 amendment no. 13 (Article 220) requires calculations to be provided when loads are added. Related amendments the department flagged for attention: NEC 215.18 surge protection required on feeders supplying dwellings, and 230.85(C) emergency disconnect required when replacing service equipment 80% · adopting ordinance + department letter
20 questions answered against City of Dallas’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC
Why the confidence is not higherAdopted by Dallas City Council 23 April 2025, effective 23 May 2025, as Chapter 56 'Dallas Electrical Code'. WARNING: the City's own 'Current City Codes' page still says 'CHAPTER 56: 2020 National Electrical Code with Dallas Amendments (effective June 13, 2022)' — that page is stale. I did not take the adoption from the page; I read the adopting ordinance and the Chief Electrical Code Administrator's 23 Apr 2025 letter to contractors, which both state the 2023 edition and the 23 May 2025 effective date
adopting ordinance + department letter checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/Letter%20to%20Contractors%20for%20%2723NEC.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2021 IBC as Chapter 53 (Dallas Building Code) and 2021 IRC as Chapter 57 (Dallas Residential Code, Ordinance 33099), both with Dallas amendments, effective 12 May 2023. 2021 IEBC is Chapter 58
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Current City Codes page lists these with effective dates. Confidence is 90 rather than 95 because that same page proved stale on the NEC entry, so its dates are corroborated only by itself here; note also a '2025 Code Amendment Process' is under way
department code list checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/Pages/know_code.aspx
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2021 International Fire Code with Dallas amendments, as Chapter 16 (Dallas Fire Code), effective 10 February 2023
Why the confidence is not higherConfirmed against the adopting ordinance itself, whose caption reads 'amending Chapter 16, Dallas Fire Code... adopting with certain changes the 2021 Edition of the International Fire Code'. The ordinance number is not legible with confidence — the scan OCRs as either 32381 or 32581 — so I have not recorded it
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/pdf/23-0118%202021%20IFC%20amendments.pdf
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes — every code is adopted with Dallas amendments (city code chapters 16, 52–62)
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly in the adopting ordinances for the NEC and the IFC; the Current City Codes page lists 'with Dallas Amendments' against each chapter
department code list + adopting ordinances checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/Pages/know_code.aspx
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
2023 NEC as amended by Dallas City Code Chapter 56, together with the 2021 IRC as Chapter 57 (Dallas Residential Code) for the structural side; administration is Chapter 52
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 56 amendment no. 23 makes all NEC chapters subchapters of Chapter 56, and no. 2 applies Chapter 52's administrative procedures. The checklist points structural compliance at Dallas Residential Code R301.1.3
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/adopt%202023%20National%20Electrical%20Code%20w%20edits.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Yes — Chapter 56 amendment no. 13 (Article 220) requires calculations to be provided when loads are added. Related amendments the department flagged for attention: NEC 215.18 surge protection required on feeders supplying dwellings, and 230.85(C) emergency disconnect required when replacing service equipment
Why the confidence is not higherThe load-calculation and 705.8 items are read from the adopting ordinance; the 215.18 and 230.85(C) items are from the department's own contractor letter listing amendments that 'bear special attention'. No local busbar-sizing rule (NEC 705.12 is not amended)
adopting ordinance + department letter checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/Letter%20to%20Contractors%20for%20%2723NEC.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChapter 56 NEC adopting ordinance (complete numbered amendment list, items 1–24), the solar PV checklist, and the fire code amendments. No local rule prescribes a mounting system, attachment spacing or fastener pattern. Dallas instead pushes this onto the engineer: it requires engineered construction documents of the PV system's connection to the structure — framing plans, connection details and structural calculations or load diagrams — sealed by a Texas PE. So the absence is real, but it is an absence by design rather than a gap
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
2021 IFC Section 1204 (Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems) as adopted, with no Dallas amendment
Why the confidence is not higherI walked the Dallas fire-code adopting ordinance's amendments to IFC Chapter 12: the only section it touches is 1203 (Emergency and Standby Power Systems). Sections 1204 (solar PV) and 1207 (ESS) appear only as cross-references, never as amendments — so the model text governs unamended. Controls passed on the extraction ('fire' 1625 hits, 'zzqqx' zero), and searches for 'ridge', 'pathway' and 'setback' returned nothing relevant. I am telling you where the rule lives, not quoting its content: the IFC text itself is behind ICC's paywall and I did not read it, which is why this is 72
adopting ordinance (proved absence of local amendment) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/pdf/23-0118%202021%20IFC%20amendments.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — 2023 NEC 690.12, unamended by Dallas
Why the confidence is not higherDallas's Chapter 56 ordinance amends exactly four provisions in the PV/interconnection space — 690.9(D), 695.6(A)(1), 705.8 and 705.80. 690.12 is not among them, so the 2023 NEC rapid-shutdown requirement applies as written. Proved by enumerating the ordinance's complete numbered amendment list (items 1–24), with controls passing
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/adopt%202023%20National%20Electrical%20Code%20w%20edits.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The 2023 NEC set (690.13(B) disconnect marking, 690.56 PV system markings, 705.10 directory, plus 690.12 rapid-shutdown labelling), unamended by Dallas — PLUS Oncor's caution placards on the visible lockable labeled AC disconnect (Class 1, 2 or 3 depending on distance to the Oncor meter). Oncor also requires the words 'Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect' spelled out at least once on both the layout sketch and the one-line diagram
Why the confidence is not higherThe AHJ side is a proved absence of local amendment rather than an affirmative Dallas placard list; the utility side is stated explicitly in Oncor's current requirements document (revised 1 May 2025). In practice the Oncor placards are the ones with authority-specific wording
utility DG requirements + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No
Why the confidence is not higherA proved absence. I enumerated every numbered amendment in the Chapter 56 adopting ordinance (items 1–24): the PV-related ones are 690.9(D), 695.6(A)(1), 705.8 and 705.80, none of which touches placard or marking wording. 690.13, 690.56, 705.10 and 705.12 are not amended at all. The Dallas fire code amendments likewise do not touch IFC 1204. The wording that IS prescribed comes from Oncor, not the City
adopting ordinance (proved absence) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/adopt%202023%20National%20Electrical%20Code%20w%20edits.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No City specification. Oncor specifies MATERIAL but not letter height or colour: placards must be UV-resistant and follow the same material standards as the NEC; colour cast acrylic is acceptable, as are sticker-type materials if outdoor-rated and of similar NEC specification; both must carry a UV inhibitor rated for exterior use. If cast acrylic is used the customer must also supply double-sided exterior adhesive tape, preferred brand 3M Scotch VHB (4956, 4941, 4936 or 4926), minimum 1 inch wide
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's Placard Guideline, which is reproduced inside the current 1 May 2025 requirements document — so although the standalone guideline is stamped rev 01/03/2012, its text is live. No letter height and no colour are specified anywhere; the example placards show black-on-white and black-on-yellow without mandating either
utility placard guideline checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/Placard%20Guideline.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes for Oncor Class 3 installations (DG fed from an Oncor pad-mounted transformer, or a high-voltage delivery point with remote DG). The site map must show: (1) location of the Oncor meter and Oncor delivery equipment, (2) location of the generator's main AC disconnect, (3) the facility address, (4) a north indicator with basic street and building layout, (5) a title, e.g. 'Solar System Disconnecting Means'. Three sets are required — one for existing Oncor equipment, one spare for when Oncor equipment is replaced, one for the customer's main equipment. NEC 705.10 also applies unamended
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's placard guideline as carried in the current requirements document. Class 3 is uncommon for a typical single-family rooftop retrofit — most residential jobs are Class 1 — so this is the exception path, not the norm
utility placard guideline checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — this is where the real placard specification lives for Dallas. Oncor requires caution/warning placards on ALL distributed generation projects, graded by how far the visible lockable labeled disconnect (VLLD) sits from the Oncor meter. Class 1: VLLD within 10 ft of the Oncor meter — a basic caution placard, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT'. Class 2: VLLD more than 10 ft away — a placard at the Oncor meter naming where the disconnect is, e.g. '...DISCONNECT LOCATED ON WEST WALL OF THIS STRUCTURE', plus one on the disconnect. Class 3: pad-mounted transformer or HV delivery with remote DG — caution placard plus site map, three sets, and for pad-mount an extra pre-drilled caution placard attached to the secondary cables inside the Oncor transformer. Placard proofs must be uploaded to the Placards section of the eTRACK installer portal; Class 1 proofs may instead be shown on the layout sketch, and installers may reuse a Class 1 template. Class 2 and 3 placards are unique per project
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's current (rev 1 May 2025) residential/small-commercial DG requirements, which incorporates the placard guideline in full. The Oncor checklist makes placard class a pass/fail submission item
utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
On the visible lockable labeled AC disconnect — explicitly NOT on the Oncor meter. Oncor also requests identical placards on the customer's main equipment for additional recognition. For Class 2, an additional placard goes at the Oncor meter location pointing to where the disconnect is. For Class 3 pad-mount, an extra placard attaches to the secondary cables inside the Oncor transformer, and Oncor's own operations group mounts the placards on Oncor equipment (the contractor furnishes the placards and adhesive tape)
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's placard guideline as carried in the current 2025 requirements document. The 'not on the Oncor meter' instruction is stated twice
utility placard guideline checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes — equipment must be listed and labeled by a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory. Spec sheets submitted at plan review must show the listing and the testing laboratory; the department points to OSHA's current NRTL list
Why the confidence is not higherChecklist residential item 4 ('Equipment must be listed and labeled'); the electrical plan-review slides require 'Spec sheets with listings and testing laboratory' and give the OSHA NRTL URL. Dallas-amended NEC 110.2 also makes approval evident by listing and labeling
inspector presentation + checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/presentations/Registration,%20Permitting%20and%20Inspections%20for%20Solar.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes. The solar permit application requires a declaration of whether a battery/energy storage system is present and its total kWh of storage. ESS is governed by 2021 IFC Section 1207 as adopted in Dallas Fire Code Chapter 16, unamended locally, and a fire operational permit is required under Dallas Fire Code 105.5.14 for stationary and mobile energy storage systems regulated by Section 1207. Oncor separately requires batteries and ESS to appear on the layout sketch and one-line with manufacturer, model, quantity and voltage
Why the confidence is not higherThe declaration and the operational-permit trigger are read directly from City documents; the substance of what is permitted sits in IFC 1207, whose text is paywalled and which I did not read. Dallas does not amend 1207 — proved by walking the fire ordinance's Chapter 12 amendments, which touch only 1203
adopting ordinance + checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/pdf/23-0118%202021%20IFC%20amendments.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Yes for the fire operational permit — Dallas Fire Code 105.5.14 requires an operational permit for stationary and mobile energy storage systems regulated by Section 1207. There is no separate ESS building permit: storage is declared on the same Solar/PV permit application, and the RES-SOLAR record already carries a Fire Specialty Inspection (code 603)
Why the confidence is not higherBoth halves come from City documents, but the relationship between them is inferred: no document I found states 'the operational permit is in addition to / instead of the solar permit'. The fire code PDF is an OCR'd scan of variable quality, though controls passed and this passage is clean
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/pdf/23-0118%202021%20IFC%20amendments.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSolar PV checklist (written throughout for roof-mounted systems — roof plan, building elevations, connection to the structure — and never mentions ground mount), the Inspection Configuration Sheet (RES-SOLAR carries a Zoning Final inspection and there is a separate 'Residential Accessory Structure Permit' record type, but nothing states which one a ground mount falls under), and the fee schedule. The answer would sit in the Dallas Development Code's accessory-structure and setback provisions, which are on American Legal and blocked by Cloudflare (HTTP 403). I will not infer this one
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
A single separate Visible Lockable Labeled AC Disconnect (VLLD) must be located BETWEEN the Oncor meter and ALL sources of distributed generation, on an accessible exterior wall, within 10 feet of the Oncor meter. If it is more than 10 ft from the meter, Class 2 or Class 3 placards must be used. It must have an external handle, be lockable in the open position, and have a visual break appropriate to the voltage; molded-case breakers are NOT acceptable as VLLDs. It must be accessible at all times. The distance between the disconnect and the Oncor meter must be stated in feet on both the layout sketch and the one-line diagram, and the words 'Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect' must be written out at least once on each before the acronym VLLD may be used. No meter collars — the space within the meter socket is reserved for Oncor
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's current requirements document, revised 1 May 2025, and repeated in its submission checklist. This is the single most consequential installation constraint on the list and it comes from the utility, not the City
utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal or Phone — online via DallasNow, or by IVR at 214-670-5313 (the IVR has been upgraded for voice activation) 95% · department page
- How much notice is required? 1 working day 90% · city code chapter
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No AM/PM windows are published. The practice is that your assigned field inspector's name and phone number are printed on the issued permit, and you call that inspector between 8:00 and 8:30 AM to get a timeframe for their arrival 55% · inspector presentation (dated)
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — the City performs its own, but since 1 Sep 2025 the applicant may elect third-party inspection 88% · department page + state statute
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated — City of Dallas inspectors, in the Building Inspection Division of Planning & Development. Optional third-party route under TX LGC §247.0025 is elected by the applicant, not delegated by the City 85% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For the Residential Solar/PV Permit record (RES-SOLAR) the department's Inspection Configuration Sheet lists these inspection types and IVR codes: Building Final 100, Building Rough All Above Floor 102, Building Rough Ceiling 103, Building Rough Walls 104, Electrical Final 300, Electrical Rough All Above Floor 302, Electrical Rough Below Floor 303, Electrical Rough Ceiling 304, Electrical Rough Walls 305, Electrical Service 306, Mechanical Final 400, Mechanical Rough Above Floor 403, Mechanical Rough Below Floor 405, Fire Specialty 603, Zoning Final 914 — with the note 'Required inspection may vary depending on the scope of work'. Order: electrical inspections must precede all building inspections for the same phase of construction. In practice roughly 99% of single-family PV jobs are just two: Electrical Final then Building Final 85% · department inspection configuration sheet
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No for a typical rooftop retrofit — rough inspections are required only where something will be covered 80% · inspector presentation
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No 70% · department pages (proved absence)
- What must be on site at inspection? City approved and stamped plans; the engineer's sealed structural drawings; a clearly posted building address and permit card; and a qualified electrician (TDLR Master or Journeyman) on site to open any energized equipment. The work must actually be ready and accessible 85% · city code + inspector presentation
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes 62% · inference from checklist + presentation + city code
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final — approved Building Final (100) and Electrical Final (300) inspections on the permit. No Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a solar retrofit 62% · department inspection configuration sheet (inference)
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 90% · utility interconnection process page
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $125 per trade inspection 65% · published fee schedule (eff. 1 Jul 2025)
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Chapter 52 §304.4: on inspection the building official either indicates the portion inspected is satisfactory as completed, or notifies the permit holder or their agent how the construction fails to comply. Non-complying work must be corrected and must not be covered or concealed until authorized. Any reinspection fees assessed must be paid before any further inspections are made on that job site. Results and status are visible in DallasNow, and reinspection is rebooked the same way as the original 70% · city code chapter
14 questions answered against City of Dallas’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal or Phone — online via DallasNow, or by IVR at 214-670-5313 (the IVR has been upgraded for voice activation)
Why the confidence is not higherStated on the department's current Inspections page, which also carries a live operational notice effective 1 June 2026, so the page is maintained
department page checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/pages/Inspections.aspx
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
1 working day
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 52 §304.3.1: 'All requests for inspection must be made at least one working day before the inspection is desired.' Same caveat as q19 — this Chapter 52 copy is stamped as of 3-27-24, and the 2025 amendment ordinance does not touch §304.3
city code chapter checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/Chapter%2052%20as%20of%203-27-24.pdf
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
No AM/PM windows are published. The practice is that your assigned field inspector's name and phone number are printed on the issued permit, and you call that inspector between 8:00 and 8:30 AM to get a timeframe for their arrival
Why the confidence is not higherThis comes only from the Chief Electrical Inspector's presentation, which is dated 27 Mar 2023 and is demonstrably out of date on other points (it names ProjectDox, and legacy inspection codes 340/140). The department's current Inspections page says nothing about time windows. Treat as practice-as-of-2023, not a published commitment
inspector presentation (dated) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/presentations/Registration,%20Permitting%20and%20Inspections%20for%20Solar.pdf
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — the City performs its own, but since 1 Sep 2025 the applicant may elect third-party inspection
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Inspection Services page and its Inspection Configuration Sheet show City inspectors and City inspection codes for the RES-SOLAR record. The qualification is TX Local Government Code §247.0025 (SB 1202, 89R), which lets a TDLR electrical inspector or licensed master electrician conduct the development inspection without requesting it from the City, for a 'home backup power installation' — whose application to a plain grid-tied array is arguable
department page + state statute checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/pages/Inspections.aspx
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated — City of Dallas inspectors, in the Building Inspection Division of Planning & Development. Optional third-party route under TX LGC §247.0025 is elected by the applicant, not delegated by the City
Why the confidence is not higherFollows from q52; no delegation agreement with Dallas County or a third-party agency appears anywhere in the department's pages or in Chapter 52
department page checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/pages/Inspections.aspx
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For the Residential Solar/PV Permit record (RES-SOLAR) the department's Inspection Configuration Sheet lists these inspection types and IVR codes: Building Final 100, Building Rough All Above Floor 102, Building Rough Ceiling 103, Building Rough Walls 104, Electrical Final 300, Electrical Rough All Above Floor 302, Electrical Rough Below Floor 303, Electrical Rough Ceiling 304, Electrical Rough Walls 305, Electrical Service 306, Mechanical Final 400, Mechanical Rough Above Floor 403, Mechanical Rough Below Floor 405, Fire Specialty 603, Zoning Final 914 — with the note 'Required inspection may vary depending on the scope of work'. Order: electrical inspections must precede all building inspections for the same phase of construction. In practice roughly 99% of single-family PV jobs are just two: Electrical Final then Building Final
Why the confidence is not higherThe code list is from the current configuration sheet (record IDs are -25- series, matching DallasNow). The ordering rule and the 'two inspections' practice are from the inspector presentation. IMPORTANT: that presentation cites codes 340 and 140 — those are legacy POSSE numbers, superseded by 300 and 100 in DallasNow. Use the configuration sheet's codes
department inspection configuration sheet checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/Pages/code_directory.aspx
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No for a typical rooftop retrofit — rough inspections are required only where something will be covered
Why the confidence is not higherThe presentation states all work must be inspected prior to covering (underground runs between structures, portions concealed by permanent wall coverings) and that 'if nothing is to be covered, only final inspections need be performed'. Rough codes exist on the RES-SOLAR record for the cases where they do apply
inspector presentation checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/presentations/Registration,%20Permitting%20and%20Inspections%20for%20Solar.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherInference from three City documents rather than a statement about what the inspector does at final: equipment must be listed and labeled (checklist item 4); plan review requires spec sheets showing listing and testing laboratory against the OSHA NRTL list; and Chapter 52 §303.5.7 makes 'city approved plans are not on the job site available to the inspector' a chargeable failed inspection, which implies the inspector checks the install against the approved spec. No published inspection checklist confirms label verification directly
inference from checklist + presentation + city code checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/DCH%20documents/SOLARPANELWATERHEATEROROTHERSYSTEM.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No
Why the confidence is not higherA proved absence, with the caveat that it is a negative. What IS published is the Dallas Inspection Configuration Sheet, which lists which inspection TYPES attach to the Residential Solar/PV Permit and their IVR codes — but that is a record-type map, not a checklist of what an inspector verifies. I looked at: the Inspections page, the Inspection Code Directory, the residential permits page's full forms-and-checklists list, the solar PV checklist (which is a submittal checklist), and the Chief Electrical Inspector's presentation. The only solar checklist Dallas publishes governs application, not inspection
department pages (proved absence) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/pages/Inspections.aspx
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
City approved and stamped plans; the engineer's sealed structural drawings; a clearly posted building address and permit card; and a qualified electrician (TDLR Master or Journeyman) on site to open any energized equipment. The work must actually be ready and accessible
Why the confidence is not higherThe plans, sealed structural drawings and qualified-electrician requirements are from the inspector presentation; the address/permit card posting and the accessibility requirements are independently confirmed by Chapter 52 §303.5.7, which makes each of them a chargeable reinspection trigger. Two sources agreeing on the plans-on-site point
city code + inspector presentation checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/Chapter%2052%20as%20of%203-27-24.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$125 per trade inspection
Why the confidence is not higherThe current fee schedule (effective 1 Jul 2025) lists 'Additional Inspection Service Fee — $125 per trade inspection', with a table scaling to $250 for two trades, $375 for three and so on. But there is a live CONFLICT in the City's own documents: Chapter 52 §303.5.7 still says 'A reinspection fee will be assessed for each failed inspection. A fee of $75.00...'. The fee schedule is the newer instrument (its disclaimer points to Ordinance 33080) so I have taken $125, but a caller should expect either figure. Note also the schedule is headed 'Additional Inspection Service Fee', not 'reinspection fee'
published fee schedule (eff. 1 Jul 2025) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/DSDFees%20%281%29.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Chapter 52 §304.4: on inspection the building official either indicates the portion inspected is satisfactory as completed, or notifies the permit holder or their agent how the construction fails to comply. Non-complying work must be corrected and must not be covered or concealed until authorized. Any reinspection fees assessed must be paid before any further inspections are made on that job site. Results and status are visible in DallasNow, and reinspection is rebooked the same way as the original
Why the confidence is not higherThe substance is verbatim from Chapter 52 §§304.4 and 303.5.7. The DallasNow-visibility part is inferred from the portal being the system of record for inspections — no document states how a correction notice reaches the contractor
city code chapter checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/DCH%20documents/Chapter%2052%20as%20of%203-27-24.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final — approved Building Final (100) and Electrical Final (300) inspections on the permit. No Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a solar retrofit
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the Inspection Configuration Sheet: Certificate of Occupancy is a separate record type (CO-25-000001) with its own inspection set, and it is not among the inspection types on the RES-SOLAR record; the RES-SOLAR record terminates in Final inspections. No City document states in words what is issued on pass, and I found no reference to a green tag or completion letter
department inspection configuration sheet (inference) checked 2026-08-28 https://dallascityhall.com/departments/sustainabledevelopment/buildinginspection/Pages/code_directory.aspx
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer
Why the confidence is not higherOncor's published interconnection process: 'Installer submits the solar installation via the web-based installer portal... Once the interconnection agreement is signed by all parties, Oncor provides a Permission To Operate (PTO) letter to both the customer and the installer.' The DERTRACK/eTRACK installer guide shows the workflow terminating in 'Interconnection Approved (PTO Issued)'. The City of Dallas has no role in notifying the utility
utility interconnection process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/residential-small-commercial-thinking-about-solar.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Dallas against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Dallas is the authority having jurisdiction 88% confidence
- Holds
- building and electrical (and mechanical, fire and zoning sign-off on the same record); also contractor registration
- Overridden by
- TX Local Government Code ch. 247 (added by HB 14, 88R 2023) as amended by SB 1202, 89R 2025, effective 1 Sep 2025 — new §247.0025 lets an applicant use a third-party reviewer/inspector (incl. a TDLR electrical inspector or licensed master electrician) instead of the city for a 'home backup power installation' (generating facility, energy storage facility or standby system serving a 1–2 family dwelling at ≤600V). The city must then issue the permit within 3 business days of the approving notice, may charge no fee for that review/inspection, and construction may begin on submission of the notice.
- Why not higher
- Two corrections to the brief. (1) The department name is wrong: Development Services merged with Planning & Urban Design in June 2024 and is now 'Planning & Development' — building and electrical sit in its Building Inspection Division at 320 E Jefferson Blvd. (2) The brief's 'SB 1202' is not the 87th-session bill (that one is about EV charging service); the relevant act is SB 1202 of the 89th Legislature (2025), and it is a third-party-review right, not a bar on inspecting listed equipment. Its application to a plain grid-tied PV array is arguable — the statutory term is 'home backup power installation' — which is why this is 88 and not higher. Dallas is a home-rule city with its own construction codes (Dallas City Code chs. 52–62); Dallas County is not involved inside the city limits.
https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01202F.htm
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- Approximately $281 — Table B-II base permit fee $181 per dwelling unit plus $100 for the additional trade60%
- Portal
- DallasNow — Accela Citizen Access, at https://aca-prod.accela.com/DALLASTX/Default.aspx95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC95%
- Own placard wording
- No85%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal or Phone — online via DallasNow, or by IVR at 214-670-5313 (the IVR has been upgraded for voice activation)95%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 85%
No
Size, colour & material 82%
No City specification. Oncor specifies MATERIAL but not letter height or colour: placards must be UV-resistant and follow the same material standards as the NEC; colour cast acrylic is acceptable, as are sticker-type materials if outdoor-rated and of similar NEC specification; both must carry a UV inhibitor rated for exterior use. If cast acrylic is used the customer must also supply double-sided exterior adhesive tape, preferred brand 3M Scotch VHB (4956, 4941, 4936 or 4926), minimum 1 inch wide
Where they go 90%
On the visible lockable labeled AC disconnect — explicitly NOT on the Oncor meter. Oncor also requests identical placards on the customer's main equipment for additional recognition. For Class 2, an additional placard goes at the Oncor meter location pointing to where the disconnect is. For Class 3 pad-mount, an extra placard attaches to the secondary cables inside the Oncor transformer, and Oncor's own operations group mounts the placards on Oncor equipment (the contractor furnishes the placards and adhesive tape)
What the utility wants on top 90%
Yes — this is where the real placard specification lives for Dallas. Oncor requires caution/warning placards on ALL distributed generation projects, graded by how far the visible lockable labeled disconnect (VLLD) sits from the Oncor meter. Class 1: VLLD within 10 ft of the Oncor meter — a basic caution placard, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT'. Class 2: VLLD more than 10 ft away — a placard at the Oncor meter naming where the disconnect is, e.g. '...DISCONNECT LOCATED ON WEST WALL OF THIS STRUCTURE', plus one on the disconnect. Class 3: pad-mounted transformer or HV delivery with remote DG — caution placard plus site map, three sets, and for pad-mount an extra pre-drilled caution placard attached to the secondary cables inside the Oncor transformer. Placard proofs must be uploaded to the Placards section of the eTRACK installer portal; Class 1 proofs may instead be shown on the layout sketch, and installers may reuse a Class 1 template. Class 2 and 3 placards are unique per project
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.