City of Houston
City of Houston is the 3rd largest jurisdiction in Texas — 2,304,580 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate — two permits (structural + electrical), but issued under one shared project/permit number Q4 Plan review — No turnaround is published for the traditional plan review route. However, since 15 July 2024 Houston accepts SolarAPP+ (NREL's automated plan review): eligible… Q18 Where you file — Two systems in tandem: iPermits (https://www.pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov/ILMS_Online_Permits/default.asp) for the permit application, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- There is NO solar-specific fee line item. The published components (2026 rates) are: minimum permit fee $91.06; administrative fee $33.56 (non-refundable);80% source
- Plan review turnaround
- No turnaround is published for the traditional plan review route. However, since 15 July 2024 Houston accepts SolarAPP+ (NREL's automated plan review): eligible rooftop PV submitted by a contractor…70% source
- Key document
- published guide (Exhibit 3, OCR of embedded image) cited by 17 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · permit page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 95% · published guide (CE-1198, rev. March 2024)
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · published guide
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate — two permits (structural + electrical), but issued under one shared project/permit number 90% · published guide
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — there is no city HOA or architectural approval step. But CE-1198 opens with a duty on the applicant: 'Prior to application, verify deed restrictions with the civic association or county real property records regarding placement of solar panels on the subject property.' Houston has civic associations and deed restrictions rather than zoning, so this check sits with the applicant and is not something the city adjudicates. 85% · published guide
- Is there a historic-district review? Yes — a historic district triggers an additional review, but it is currently benign. CE-1198 states properties located in a historic district 'will be subject to additional requirements'; Exhibit 2 elaborates: 'If the property is in a historic district, it will trigger a review by Planning, currently with no issues regarding solar panels.' (The same exhibit notes floodplain properties trigger a Floodplain Management Office review requiring the FMO Project Cost Estimate Worksheet, placed in the Flood folder of the Form section in ProjectDox; and properties in designated areas near an airport are also subject to additional requirements.) 80% · published guide (Exhibit 2, OCR of embedded image)
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate TDI/windstorm certification is called for by the city. Wind compliance is instead demonstrated inside the permit drawings: for buildings under the 2021 IRC, plans must show compliance with the minimum wind speed for the specific address per Table R301.2(1) footnote n and the ASCE 7 Hazard Tool (https://asce7hazardtool.online/), with the tool's printout included; for buildings under the 2021 IBC, the same via §1609.3. 'All roofing and equipment assemblies must comply with the appropriate minimum wind design.' 2022 ASCE 7 is separately adopted as a Houston construction code. Windborne debris matters in one concrete way: projects in windborne debris regions (basic wind speed design ≥140 mph) are excluded from SolarAPP+ and must go through traditional plan review. 78% · published guide + SolarAPP+ announcement
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Licensed electrician — specifically a registered licensed electrician (Texas-licensed master/contractor, registered with the City of Houston) 95% · published guide + department page
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 95% · department page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? No 75% · published guide (Exhibit 3, OCR of embedded image)
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Per CE-1198: (1) Building Permit Application via iPermits; (2) Declaration Supporting Building Permit Application, signed by the property owner and validated against HCAD records — plus proof of ownership if HCAD does not match; (3) cover sheet, index of plans and a code analysis sheet listing 2021 IRC or 2021 IBC (not both), 2023 NEC, 2021 IFC, 2021 IEBC, 2021 IECC, 2021 UMC, 2021 UPC, 2021 ISPSC and the Houston Amendments, Code Words and HFD Life Safety Bureau Standards; (4) site/plot plan to scale from a property survey; (5) roof plan to scale with panel layout, existing penetrations, rail/mounting locations relative to rafters, cross-section anchorage detail, and total sq ft of roof planes carrying panels; (6) structural letters, calculations, details and manufacturer installation instructions sealed by a Texas PE; (7) a sealed Texas engineer's letter that the existing structure complies, or sealed plans showing added framing; (8) ASCE 7 hazard tool wind-speed printout for the specific address; (9) electrical plans signed/sealed by a licensed electrician or Texas engineer showing NEC Art. 690 compliance; (10) spec sheets with approved listing-lab logos for all solar and associated electrical equipment; (11) labelling and placards per NEC Art. 690, 691 and 705; (12) dimensioned roof layout showing access, pathways and spacing per 2021 IFC 1205; (13) calculations/tabulations showing how the system was sized. Documents marked preliminary or 'not for construction' are returned without review. 92% · published checklist (CE-1198, rev. March 2024)
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic only — no paper copies. 'The application process and the submittal of plans must be done electronically': application via iPermits, plans and documents uploaded to ProjectDox. File standards (Solar Panel EPR User Guide v9.2, Fall 2024): DOC, DOCX and PDF accepted for calculations/reports; flat (unlayered) vector PDF or JPEG for drawings; plans to scale with a minimum output dimension of 24" x 36"; 1" clear border with a 4½" title block; a 2½"W x 3½"H area reserved at the upper right of each drawing for the approval stamp. 88% · EPR submittal guide v9.2, Fall 2024
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. A site or plot plan drawn to scale based on a survey of the property, showing: size and location of new construction and existing structures; distances to all property/lot lines; easements; setbacks; exterior equipment and pads; and storage batteries. There must be no encroachment into easements by the solar panels, rack/rail systems or equipment. A separate roof plan to scale must show panel layout, existing roof penetrations/chimneys/vents, rail and mounting locations relative to rafters, a cross-section anchorage detail, and the total square footage of the roof planes carrying panels. Exhibit 5 adds: multiple buildings labelled, property and setback lines labelled, duplex/townhouse fire-barrier location labelled, escape windows not blocked, a legend for eaves/ridges/rakes/hips/valleys, roof levels and planes labelled, flat roofs and parapets labelled, roof materials labelled, scale and north arrow shown. 90% · published checklist
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — one-line diagram is an explicit required item on the electrical plans 95% · published checklist
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes 90% · published checklist
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Yes — required on every residential PV job, with no size threshold. Structural letters, calculations, plans, details and rail/rack/attachment manufacturer instructions must be 'designed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer (PE)' to address added loads and anchorage to the existing structure, plus foundations for anything at grade. Either a sealed Texas engineer's letter confirming the existing structure complies, or sealed/signed/dated plans identifying additional framing. 'All engineered sheets shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Texas licensed engineer.' A SECOND PE involvement is required after construction: a post-installation special inspection letter (template CE-1387) certifying the completed install conforms to the city-approved design. 88% · published guide + CE-1387 template
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No electrical PE stamp required. CE-1198: 'Electrical plans shall be prepared and signed/sealed by either a licensed electrician or a Texas engineer' — the licensed electrician is an accepted alternative, so a PE is optional on the electrical side. (Contrast the structural side, where a Texas PE is mandatory.) 85% · published guide
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Two systems in tandem: iPermits (https://www.pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov/ILMS_Online_Permits/default.asp) for the permit application, fee payment and inspection scheduling; ProjectDox / Avolve (https://projectdox.houstonelectronicplanreview.org/ProjectDox/index.aspx) for electronic plan review upload and markups. SolarAPP+ (https://solarapp.nrel.gov/) is an additional route for eligible projects since 15 July 2024. NOTE: the city is building a replacement called HouPermits, which will replace iPermits (customer-facing), ILMS (back office) and Telework (inspector app); no launch date is published. 95% · permit page + HouPermits project page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes 90% · published guide
- What does a residential solar permit cost? There is NO solar-specific fee line item. The published components (2026 rates) are: minimum permit fee $91.06; administrative fee $33.56 (non-refundable); non-refundable plan review fee of 25% of the estimated building permit fee, payable once the application is finalised; reinspection fee $94.00 if needed. The Solar Panel Permit page itself quotes $91.06 permit + $33.56 admin. The structural portion above the minimum is charged from the one- and two-family residential tables (area/tier based); the electrical portion is charged from per-item schedules. Fees rose 1.3910% (CPI) effective 1 January 2026. 80% · 2026 Building Code Enforcement Permit Fee Schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered — with a floor. A minimum permit fee ($91.06) plus a flat administrative fee ($33.56) always apply. Above the minimum, the structural/building portion for one- and two-family dwellings is charged from tiered tables (a base charge per tier plus an incremental charge per additional square-foot increment, varying by construction type IA/IB/IIA/IIB etc.); the electrical portion is charged per item from a fixed schedule (e.g. meter loop and service up to 50kW $94.00; panels with eight or more circuits $9.39 each; heaters/generators over 10 kW $8.05 plus $1.81 per additional kW). Plan review is a percentage: 25% of the estimated building permit fee. 70% · 2026 fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes — 25% of the estimated building permit fee, non-refundable, paid once the application is finalised 95% · 2026 fee schedule + CE-1198
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? No turnaround is published for the traditional plan review route. However, since 15 July 2024 Houston accepts SolarAPP+ (NREL's automated plan review): eligible rooftop PV submitted by a contractor registered as an installer with both SolarAPP+ and the City is processed 'without needing traditional plan review' — i.e. the plan review step is eliminated rather than shortened. Projects in windborne debris regions (basic wind speed design ≥140 mph) are NOT eligible for SolarAPP+ and must use traditional plan review. 70% · department announcement
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Two years (≈730 days). Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §303.4: 'If work is not commenced under a permit within two years after the date of issuance or is abandoned at any time for a period of two years, the permit shall expire.' To recommence, the holder pays the full permit fee again and resubmits compliant plans. §303.4.1 lets the building official grant written extensions of not more than 180 days each. Separately, §304.3: an application for which no permit is issued within 180 calendar days expires by limitation (one extension of up to 180 days available). 80% · adopting ordinance / administrative code provisions
- Which utility handles interconnection here? CenterPoint Energy (Houston Electric) — the TDU 95% · city guide (naming the utility) + utility page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, but with a hard gate before construction. The city requires the CenterPoint interconnection application to be submitted directly to CenterPoint and approved BEFORE installation starts — it does not make city permit issuance conditional on it, so the two run alongside each other. CenterPoint's five-step sequence is: Customer inquiry and application → CenterPoint design and review → construction → CenterPoint final review → PTO issued. 70% · city guide + utility process page
28 questions answered against City of Houston’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 and the Solar Panel Permit page (HPWCODE1119) both state the City issues the permits and performs the inspections for residential rooftop PV inside city limits.
permit page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/hpwcode1119
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 verbatim: 'At minimum, structural and electrical building permits are required for installation of any photovoltaic system. Both permits are issued under the same project/permit number.' Nothing is delegated except the post-install structural certification letter.
published guide (CE-1198, rev. March 2024) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 requires structural and electrical permits for any PV system. The Solar Panel Permit page lists Plan Review: Required and Inspection: Required. There is no published exemption for small residential systems.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Separate — two permits (structural + electrical), but issued under one shared project/permit number
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 is explicit that both are required and share a project number. 90 not 95 because 'Separate' vs 'Combined' is a poor fit for this arrangement: two distinct permits, one project, and the electrical one must be purchased by a different party (a registered licensed electrician) after plan review approval.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Licensed electrician — specifically a registered licensed electrician (Texas-licensed master/contractor, registered with the City of Houston)
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 verbatim: 'A registered licensed electrician must purchase the electrical building permit.' The Electrical Inspections page adds 'All electrical work must be performed by a licensed electrical contractor.'
published guide + department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherSolar Panel Permit page: 'Licensed contractors seeking a permit for Solar Panel must register their license with the City of Houston.' The Electrical Inspections page carries the registration/renewal route (form CE-1203, email to Electrical Inspections). SolarAPP+ users must additionally register as an installer with both SolarAPP+ and the City.
department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/building-code-enforcement/electrical-inspections
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
No
Why the confidence is not higherTwo supports: CE-1198 states the electrical permit must be purchased by a registered licensed electrician; and CE-1198 Exhibit 3 lists the three signature options for the owner declaration as '1. Owner w/o Contractor (N/A). 2. Owner w/ Contractor... 3. Engineer or Architect (TX)' — owner-without-contractor marked N/A. 75 because that second reading comes from OCR of a slide image inside the PDF (there is no text layer for the exhibits), and because no page says 'homeowners may not self-permit' in so many words.
published guide (Exhibit 3, OCR of embedded image) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Per CE-1198: (1) Building Permit Application via iPermits; (2) Declaration Supporting Building Permit Application, signed by the property owner and validated against HCAD records — plus proof of ownership if HCAD does not match; (3) cover sheet, index of plans and a code analysis sheet listing 2021 IRC or 2021 IBC (not both), 2023 NEC, 2021 IFC, 2021 IEBC, 2021 IECC, 2021 UMC, 2021 UPC, 2021 ISPSC and the Houston Amendments, Code Words and HFD Life Safety Bureau Standards; (4) site/plot plan to scale from a property survey; (5) roof plan to scale with panel layout, existing penetrations, rail/mounting locations relative to rafters, cross-section anchorage detail, and total sq ft of roof planes carrying panels; (6) structural letters, calculations, details and manufacturer installation instructions sealed by a Texas PE; (7) a sealed Texas engineer's letter that the existing structure complies, or sealed plans showing added framing; (8) ASCE 7 hazard tool wind-speed printout for the specific address; (9) electrical plans signed/sealed by a licensed electrician or Texas engineer showing NEC Art. 690 compliance; (10) spec sheets with approved listing-lab logos for all solar and associated electrical equipment; (11) labelling and placards per NEC Art. 690, 691 and 705; (12) dimensioned roof layout showing access, pathways and spacing per 2021 IFC 1205; (13) calculations/tabulations showing how the system was sized. Documents marked preliminary or 'not for construction' are returned without review.
Why the confidence is not higherExtracted directly from CE-1198 with pdftotext -layout, not from a summary. 92 rather than 95 because the guide says 'shall include, but not be limited to', so the list is explicitly non-exhaustive.
published checklist (CE-1198, rev. March 2024) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic only — no paper copies. 'The application process and the submittal of plans must be done electronically': application via iPermits, plans and documents uploaded to ProjectDox. File standards (Solar Panel EPR User Guide v9.2, Fall 2024): DOC, DOCX and PDF accepted for calculations/reports; flat (unlayered) vector PDF or JPEG for drawings; plans to scale with a minimum output dimension of 24" x 36"; 1" clear border with a 4½" title block; a 2½"W x 3½"H area reserved at the upper right of each drawing for the approval stamp.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth facts come from the city's own documents. 88 because the current guide's 'REQUIRED FILES' bullet reads 'A fully completed commercial application for plan review' — an obvious copy-paste artifact from the commercial guide left in the solar guide, which makes that one bullet unreliable. Also note the Solar Panel Permit page links media/2286, which serves the SUPERSEDED June 2023 copy; the current Fall 2024 version is at the direct sites/g/files URL given here.
EPR submittal guide v9.2, Fall 2024 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/sites/g/files/nwywnm431/files/2024-08/9.2%20Solar%20Panel%20EPR%20User%20Guide_August%202024_English.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. A site or plot plan drawn to scale based on a survey of the property, showing: size and location of new construction and existing structures; distances to all property/lot lines; easements; setbacks; exterior equipment and pads; and storage batteries. There must be no encroachment into easements by the solar panels, rack/rail systems or equipment. A separate roof plan to scale must show panel layout, existing roof penetrations/chimneys/vents, rail and mounting locations relative to rafters, a cross-section anchorage detail, and the total square footage of the roof planes carrying panels. Exhibit 5 adds: multiple buildings labelled, property and setback lines labelled, duplex/townhouse fire-barrier location labelled, escape windows not blocked, a legend for eaves/ridges/rakes/hips/valleys, roof levels and planes labelled, flat roofs and parapets labelled, roof materials labelled, scale and north arrow shown.
Why the confidence is not higherThe main body text is from the PDF text layer; the Exhibit 5 checklist items are OCR of an embedded slide image, which is why this is 90 rather than 95.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes — one-line diagram is an explicit required item on the electrical plans
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 lists 'One-Line Diagram' among the required electrical plan contents. A three-line diagram is not separately called for.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 requires 'Conductor Size & Type' and 'Conductor Insulation Type' on the electrical plans, and separately 'Calculation/Tabulations to show how system was sized'. It does not use the phrase 'string calculations', so the mapping to that exact term is mine.
published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Yes — required on every residential PV job, with no size threshold. Structural letters, calculations, plans, details and rail/rack/attachment manufacturer instructions must be 'designed and sealed by a Texas Professional Engineer (PE)' to address added loads and anchorage to the existing structure, plus foundations for anything at grade. Either a sealed Texas engineer's letter confirming the existing structure complies, or sealed/signed/dated plans identifying additional framing. 'All engineered sheets shall be sealed, signed and dated by a Texas licensed engineer.' A SECOND PE involvement is required after construction: a post-installation special inspection letter (template CE-1387) certifying the completed install conforms to the city-approved design.
Why the confidence is not higherStated unconditionally in CE-1198 with no kW, panel-count or area trigger anywhere in the document. 88 rather than 95 only because a universal requirement is inferred from the absence of a threshold rather than from a sentence saying 'regardless of size'.
published guide + CE-1387 template checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No electrical PE stamp required. CE-1198: 'Electrical plans shall be prepared and signed/sealed by either a licensed electrician or a Texas engineer' — the licensed electrician is an accepted alternative, so a PE is optional on the electrical side. (Contrast the structural side, where a Texas PE is mandatory.)
Why the confidence is not higherThe word 'either' makes it unambiguous. 85 rather than higher because no threshold is discussed at all, so I cannot rule out an unpublished practice of demanding a PE seal on larger systems.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
There is NO solar-specific fee line item. The published components (2026 rates) are: minimum permit fee $91.06; administrative fee $33.56 (non-refundable); non-refundable plan review fee of 25% of the estimated building permit fee, payable once the application is finalised; reinspection fee $94.00 if needed. The Solar Panel Permit page itself quotes $91.06 permit + $33.56 admin. The structural portion above the minimum is charged from the one- and two-family residential tables (area/tier based); the electrical portion is charged from per-item schedules. Fees rose 1.3910% (CPI) effective 1 January 2026.
Why the confidence is not higher80 because I ran the controls on the 2026 fee schedule (positive: 'permit' = 144 hits; fabricated: 'zzqqx' = 0 hits) and there is genuinely no 'solar' or 'photovoltaic' line anywhere in it — so the total for a real job is not a published number, only assemblable from parts. The $91.06 / $33.56 figures shown on the permit page ARE the current published solar figures and match the 2026 fee notice exactly.
2026 Building Code Enforcement Permit Fee Schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2636/download
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered — with a floor. A minimum permit fee ($91.06) plus a flat administrative fee ($33.56) always apply. Above the minimum, the structural/building portion for one- and two-family dwellings is charged from tiered tables (a base charge per tier plus an incremental charge per additional square-foot increment, varying by construction type IA/IB/IIA/IIB etc.); the electrical portion is charged per item from a fixed schedule (e.g. meter loop and service up to 50kW $94.00; panels with eight or more circuits $9.39 each; heaters/generators over 10 kW $8.05 plus $1.81 per additional kW). Plan review is a percentage: 25% of the estimated building permit fee.
Why the confidence is not higher70 because the fee schedule contains no solar line item, so which electrical line items a PV system is actually charged under is not published — I can see the tiered structure and the minimum with certainty, but the mapping of a PV array onto those line items is inference from two of the city's own documents rather than a stated rule.
2026 fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2636/download
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes — 25% of the estimated building permit fee, non-refundable, paid once the application is finalised
Why the confidence is not higherStated identically in two places: the 2026 fee schedule ('Building Permit Plan Review (Non-Refundable) — 25% of estimated building permit fee') and CE-1198 ('A plan review fee (25% of the permit fee) must be paid once the application is finalized').
2026 fee schedule + CE-1198 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2636/download
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
No turnaround is published for the traditional plan review route. However, since 15 July 2024 Houston accepts SolarAPP+ (NREL's automated plan review): eligible rooftop PV submitted by a contractor registered as an installer with both SolarAPP+ and the City is processed 'without needing traditional plan review' — i.e. the plan review step is eliminated rather than shortened. Projects in windborne debris regions (basic wind speed design ≥140 mph) are NOT eligible for SolarAPP+ and must use traditional plan review.
Why the confidence is not higherThe SolarAPP+ facts are from the city's own announcement page and are solid. 70 because the question asks for a duration in business days and no such number is published for the traditional route — I checked the Solar Panel Permit page, CE-1198, the Plan Review page, the Residential Plan Review page and the Solar Panel EPR User Guide (controls run on the guide: 'plan' = 21 hits, 'zzqqx' = 0), and 'business day', 'turnaround' and 'review time' returned zero hits in all of them.
department announcement checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/news-events/new-solarapp-streamlined-solar-panel-permitting
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Two years (≈730 days). Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §303.4: 'If work is not commenced under a permit within two years after the date of issuance or is abandoned at any time for a period of two years, the permit shall expire.' To recommence, the holder pays the full permit fee again and resubmits compliant plans. §303.4.1 lets the building official grant written extensions of not more than 180 days each. Separately, §304.3: an application for which no permit is issued within 180 calendar days expires by limitation (one extension of up to 180 days available).
Why the confidence is not higher80 rather than 95 because this is the ELECTRICAL administrative code. The structural/building permit's expiry sits in Houston Building Code §118, which I did not open in this run — so I have proved the rule for one of the two permits on a solar job, not both.
adopting ordinance / administrative code provisions checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Two systems in tandem: iPermits (https://www.pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov/ILMS_Online_Permits/default.asp) for the permit application, fee payment and inspection scheduling; ProjectDox / Avolve (https://projectdox.houstonelectronicplanreview.org/ProjectDox/index.aspx) for electronic plan review upload and markups. SolarAPP+ (https://solarapp.nrel.gov/) is an additional route for eligible projects since 15 July 2024. NOTE: the city is building a replacement called HouPermits, which will replace iPermits (customer-facing), ILMS (back office) and Telework (inspector app); no launch date is published.
Why the confidence is not higherAll four named on the city's own pages. The HouPermits replacement is flagged because any portal answer recorded here has a known expiry.
permit page + HouPermits project page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/hpwcode1119
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198: 'The application process and the submittal of plans must be done electronically' — electronic is mandatory, not merely available. Fees are paid online through iPermits. 90 rather than 95 because the owner Declaration Supporting Building Permit Application must be signed by the property owner and, per Exhibit 3, notarised where an owner-with-contractor signature is used — a wet-signature/notary step outside the portal, even though the resulting document is uploaded.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
CenterPoint Energy (Houston Electric) — the TDU
Why the confidence is not higherNamed by the city itself, not inferred from a ZIP lookup. CE-1198 NOTICE: 'In addition to City of Houston requirements, an application for interconnection must be submitted directly to Center Point Energy for approval and subsequent inspection approval prior to the start of installation.' CE-1198 Exhibit 1 also shows a sample cover sheet with 'UTILITY: CENTERPOINT / AHJ: HOUSTON'. Confirmed independently on CenterPoint's own solar interconnection page. PowerToChoose was not used.
city guide (naming the utility) + utility page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, but with a hard gate before construction. The city requires the CenterPoint interconnection application to be submitted directly to CenterPoint and approved BEFORE installation starts — it does not make city permit issuance conditional on it, so the two run alongside each other. CenterPoint's five-step sequence is: Customer inquiry and application → CenterPoint design and review → construction → CenterPoint final review → PTO issued.
Why the confidence is not higherThe city's sentence — 'must be submitted directly to Center Point Energy for approval and subsequent inspection approval prior to the start of installation' — is doing a lot of work and is genuinely ambiguous about whether 'prior to the start of installation' governs the application, the approval, or both. 70 because the fit onto the Before/After/Parallel options is my reading, not the city's or the utility's stated sequencing relative to the permit.
city guide + utility process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — there is no city HOA or architectural approval step. But CE-1198 opens with a duty on the applicant: 'Prior to application, verify deed restrictions with the civic association or county real property records regarding placement of solar panels on the subject property.' Houston has civic associations and deed restrictions rather than zoning, so this check sits with the applicant and is not something the city adjudicates.
Why the confidence is not higherThe instruction is verbatim from the city's guide. 85 because the guide tells the applicant to verify but never says what happens if a deed restriction conflicts, and does not mention the Texas Property Code limits on restricting solar devices — so the practical effect of a restriction is not published.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Yes — a historic district triggers an additional review, but it is currently benign. CE-1198 states properties located in a historic district 'will be subject to additional requirements'; Exhibit 2 elaborates: 'If the property is in a historic district, it will trigger a review by Planning, currently with no issues regarding solar panels.' (The same exhibit notes floodplain properties trigger a Floodplain Management Office review requiring the FMO Project Cost Estimate Worksheet, placed in the Flood folder of the Form section in ProjectDox; and properties in designated areas near an airport are also subject to additional requirements.)
Why the confidence is not higherThe trigger itself is in the PDF text layer (high confidence). The 'currently with no issues regarding solar panels' qualifier is OCR of an embedded slide image and, being a statement about current practice in a March 2024 document, is the kind of thing that changes without the document changing — hence 80.
published guide (Exhibit 2, OCR of embedded image) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No separate TDI/windstorm certification is called for by the city. Wind compliance is instead demonstrated inside the permit drawings: for buildings under the 2021 IRC, plans must show compliance with the minimum wind speed for the specific address per Table R301.2(1) footnote n and the ASCE 7 Hazard Tool (https://asce7hazardtool.online/), with the tool's printout included; for buildings under the 2021 IBC, the same via §1609.3. 'All roofing and equipment assemblies must comply with the appropriate minimum wind design.' 2022 ASCE 7 is separately adopted as a Houston construction code. Windborne debris matters in one concrete way: projects in windborne debris regions (basic wind speed design ≥140 mph) are excluded from SolarAPP+ and must go through traditional plan review.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ASCE 7 requirement and the SolarAPP+ exclusion are both verbatim from city sources. 78 because 'No' here is an absence — I found no windstorm-certification requirement in CE-1198, but I did not check TDI's own designated catastrophe area maps to establish whether any part of the City of Houston falls inside the state windstorm inspection program.
published guide + SolarAPP+ announcement checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCE-1198 in full (8 pages, text layer + 400 dpi OCR of all 11 exhibits) — it names only three overlay triggers (flood plain → Floodplain Management Office review; historic district → Planning review; designated areas near an airport) and no Specific Use Permit or Council approval; the 90-page 2021 Code Words compendium (positive control 'code' = 635 hits, fabricated control 'zzqqx' = 0) — no SUP or Council-approval interpretation for solar. Houston famously has no zoning, which makes an SUP mechanism unlikely, but I did not open the Houston Code of Ordinances Chapter 42 to prove it, so this is recorded as not found rather than as 'No'.
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCE-1198 (full text + exhibit OCR) — sets no kW or panel-count cap; the 2026 fee schedule, where a size threshold would surface as a fee tier (zero hits for 'solar' or 'photovoltaic'; positive control 'permit' = 144, 'zzqqx' = 0); the Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC (zero hits for 'solar'/'photovoltaic'/'690'/'705'; positive control 'electrical' = 183, 'zzqqx' = 0); the SolarAPP+ announcement page, which states only a wind-speed eligibility exclusion (≥140 mph windborne debris regions) and no system-size limit. The one size-adjacent figure found anywhere is CE-1198 Exhibit 6's plan-check question 'Arrays maximum of 150' in either direction?', which is an array dimension constraint from IFC 1205, not a generation cap. Generation capacity limits for residential DG in ERCOT are more likely to sit with CenterPoint than with the city, and I could not reach a CenterPoint DG manual.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (NFPA 70). State-mandated in Texas effective 1 September 2023; the City of Houston's Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC were adopted by Ord. No. 2023-907, passed 25 October 2023, effective 1 January 2024. 95% · adopted codes list (CE-1199) + adopting ordinance
- Which building code edition is in force? 2021 International Residential Code (with Houston Amendments) for one- and two-family dwellings, and 2021 International Building Code (with Houston Amendments) — both effective 1 January 2024. CE-1198 requires the code analysis sheet to cite '2021 IRC or 2021 IBC (not both)'. Also in force: 2022 ASCE 7 (Minimum Design Loads), 2021 IEBC, 2021 IECC, 2021 UMC, 2021 UPC, 2021 ISPSC, all with Houston Amendments and all effective 1 January 2024. Collectively the 2021 Houston Construction Code, adopted by Ord. No. 2023-907 on 25 October 2023. 95% · adopted codes list (CE-1199)
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2021 International Fire Code with Houston Amendments (Exhibit F to Ord. No. 2023-907), effective 1 January 2024. Houston Fire Department Life Safety Bureau (LSB) Standards are separately in force and CE-1198 requires them to be cited on the code analysis sheet. 95% · adopting ordinance Exhibit F
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — extensive Houston Amendments to every adopted code (Ord. No. 2023-907, Exhibits A–L). For solar specifically, three findings matter, two positive and one negative: (POSITIVE) Houston IBC §1613.3 prohibits ballasted roof-mounted PV outright — see Q35. (POSITIVE) Houston NEC administrative provisions §504.1.1 impose a bespoke available-fault-current label — see Q40. (NEGATIVE, PROVED) the Houston IFC amendments do NOT amend §1205 (Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems) or §1207 (ESS): §1205 appears in the amendments only inside the referenced-standards list, and the only Chapter 12 amendment is §1203.4.2 on emergency/standby power scheduling. Likewise the Houston 2023 NEC provisions contain zero occurrences of '690', '705', 'solar', 'photovoltaic' or 'rapid shutdown', and §513 'Articles Not Adopted' lists only NEC 240.91(B), 312.5(C) and 645.25. 92% · adopting ordinance exhibits A–L
- What is the installation judged against? CE-1198 verbatim: 'The inspection requirements for installation of solar photovoltaic panels shall be based on the approved plans, the manufacturer's installation manual, and the Houston Construction Code, whichever is more restrictive.' Structurally, the same whichever-is-more-restrictive test is applied to the manufacturer's installation specifications vs the Houston Construction Code. Electrically, plans must show compliance with NEC Article 690, with 2023 NEC Article 705 'incorporated into the electrical design', and panels listed to UL Standard 1703. 95% · published guide
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Governed by 2021 IFC Section 1205, adopted UNAMENDED (proved — see Q32). The city's own plan-review checklist (CE-1198 Exhibit 6) states how it reads it: '18" required on both sides if panels are on both sides of hip or valley. When on 1 side of the hip or valley, solar panels can go up to the edge.' The exhibit's roof diagram is annotated 18", 18" and 36". Checklist questions: 'Ridge, rake, & valley, duplex-townhouse dividing line pathways?', 'Arrays maximum of 150' in either direction?', 'Equipment clearances shown?'. Dimensioned roof layout plans showing roof access, required pathways and spacing per 2021 IFC §1205 are a required submittal item. 80% · published checklist (Exhibit 6, OCR) + adopted IFC
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — rapid shutdown per 2023 NEC 690.12, applying unamended. 80% · NEC administrative code provisions (proved absence) + adopted codes list
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Two layers. (1) Model code, adopted unamended: CE-1198 requires 'Labeling and placards as required in NEC Article 690, 691 & Article 705: Interconnect Electrical Power Production Systems', and adds 'Compliance with 2023 NEC Article 705 Interconnect Electrical Power Production Systems must be incorporated into the electrical design.' 'Current Labels & Markings' is a required item on the electrical plans. (2) Houston's own, at the service equipment: the available fault current label under NEC administrative provisions §504.1.1 — see Q40. Panels must be listed to UL 1703 and spec sheets with approved listing-lab logos supplied for all solar and associated electrical equipment. 88% · published guide + NEC administrative code provisions
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No — for PV placards. Houston prescribes no placard wording of its own for solar; it points at NEC Articles 690, 691 and 705. The single Houston-written label specification anywhere in the electrical code (§504.1.1, available fault current) prescribes size, colour and required content, but not exact wording. 85% · NEC administrative code provisions (proved absence)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Yes — for one label, and it is Houston's own. Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §504.1.1 Available Fault Current Labeling: 'In lieu of the maximum available fault current marking as required by 110.24, a permanently affixed label shall be applied with the available fault current at the time of installation and calculation. The label shall be 2 inches by 3 inches in size and shall be blue lettering on a contrasting background. This label shall also include the date of the calculation.' So: size 2" x 3", blue lettering, contrasting background, permanently affixed, must carry the calculation date. NO letter height, colour or material is specified by Houston for any PV-specific placard — those default to NEC Articles 690/691/705. 88% · adopting ordinance Exhibit D (NEC administrative code provisions)
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? No local addition. 2023 NEC 705.10 applies as adopted — Houston does not amend Article 705 and does not list it among the articles not adopted. CE-1198 requires the plan-drawing equivalent (site/plot plan to scale showing structures, property lines, easements, setbacks, exterior equipment and pads, and storage batteries; dimensioned roof layout showing access and pathways), but imposes no site-plan-placard requirement beyond the NEC's. 70% · NEC administrative code provisions (proved absence)
- Where must the labels be placed? Placement follows the NEC (Articles 690/691/705) — Houston adds no general PV placement rule. The one Houston-specific placement instruction is for the available fault current label under §504.1.1: 'permanently affixed', and because it stands in lieu of the NEC 110.24 marking, it belongs at the service equipment. §504.2 separately fixes the service disconnect operating handle between 4 ft and 6 ft 7 in above floor or finished grade, which constrains where service-adjacent labelling is read from. 70% · NEC administrative code provisions
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes — listing by an approved agency is mandatory, though not a single named list. Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §508: 'All electrical materials and equipment shall be listed and labeled for intended use and shall be included in a list published by an approved agency', and 'The maker's name, trademark, or other identification symbol shall be placed on all electrical materials, apparatus, devices, appliances, fixtures, and equipment used or installed under the provisions of this code.' CE-1198 adds that panels 'shall be listed for compliance with UL Standard 1703' and requires 'Specification sheets with approved logos for all solar and associated solar electrical equipment showing listing by a recognized testing laboratory.' NEW module products not previously permitted, not considered mainstream, or missing labelling/listings or code approvals may require an Alternative Method submittal under city handout CE-1103. 90% · NEC administrative code provisions + CE-1198
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, and governed by Houston Residential Code §R328 (Stationary Storage Battery Systems) for one- and two-family dwellings. Submittal: storage batteries must be shown on the site/plot plan, and battery size, type AND weight must appear on the electrical plans. Houston has published TWO formal interpretations, both specific to residential ESS and both recent: CODE WORD 2021-R12 'Impact Protection for Residential ESS' (published 15 April 2025) and CODE WORD 2021-R13 'ESS in Residential Garages, Locations Requiring Impact Protection' (published 28 May 2025). R12 imports the 2024 IRC §R330.8.3 barrier menu as acceptable to the Building Official: bollards (48" x 3" Sch 80 steel pipe in a 12"-deep x 6"-dia concrete pier, ≥36" exposed, concrete-filled, max 5 ft spacing, ≥6" from the ESS; or 36" x 3" Sch 80 welded to a ≥8" x ¼" plate bolted with four ½" anchors ≥3" embedment, max 60" spacing, ≥6" from the ESS; or premanufactured concrete-filled steel bollards per manufacturer instructions at max 60" spacing); wheel barriers (concrete or polymer 4"H x 5"W x 70"L anchored every ≤36", ≥54" from the ESS; or premanufactured per manufacturer instructions); or any approved method resisting 2,000 psf in the direction of travel at 24" above grade. R13 defines when protection is triggered in a garage: the 'normal driving path' is the space from the garage vehicle opening to the interior face of the back wall, to 48" above finished floor, at the width of the garage door opening. Protection is required for an ESS on the back wall within 36" left or right of that path, or on a side wall within 24" of the back wall and 36" of the path. Exemption: where the clear height of the garage opening is ≤7 ft 6 in, an ESS mounted ≥36" above finished floor needs no impact protection. Fire-code side: the Houston IFC amendments do NOT amend §1207, and the retroactive FMEA requirement for pre-2018 lithium-ion ESS (Houston IFC §1107.1) carries the express 'Exception: Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses'. 88% · 2021 Code Words (formal interpretations) + IFC amendments + CE-1198
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No separate ESS permit appears to exist — batteries are handled inside the solar permit package. CE-1198 folds storage batteries into the ordinary solar submittal (shown on the site/plot plan; size, type and weight on the electrical plans) and never mentions a distinct ESS permit or a distinct ESS inspection. 55% · published guide (inference from silence)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes. CE-1198 Exhibit 4: 'Ground-mounted panels are counted as structures and have setback requirements.' Exhibit 7 confirms the review treatment for a ground-mounted structure: address checked, setbacks checked, equipment checked, FOUNDATION checked, engineer's seal checked. The main text requires 'detailed structural design of new foundations or structures located at grade', sealed by a Texas PE. Two related rules from the same exhibit: all single-family residential buildings are classified R3 and R3 accessory (not Group U); each address requires a separate solar permit; and 'Solar panels are prohibited from installation on un-permitted structures.' 85% · published guide (Exhibits 4 and 7, OCR) + main text
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Three Houston-specific electrical rules bear on the service: (1) §504.1.1 Available Fault Current Labeling — in lieu of the NEC 110.24 marking, a permanently affixed label showing the available fault current at time of installation and calculation, 2 inches by 3 inches, blue lettering on a contrasting background, including the date of the calculation. (2) §504.2 Service Disconnect — the centre of the operating handle must be not less than 4 ft and not more than 6 ft 7 in above floor or finished grade (tiered metering on multifamily may vary 2 ft 6 in to 6 ft 6 in). §504.2.1 permits the service disconnect and meter disconnect to be the same where approved and space is insufficient. (3) CE-1198 requires main breaker side tap conductors to be minimum #6 AWG copper or #4 aluminium. There is NO Houston busbar-sizing amendment for PV interconnection — NEC 705.12 is not amended. 85% · NEC administrative code provisions + CE-1198
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Yes — Houston prohibits an entire mounting class. Houston Amendment to the 2021 IBC, §1613.3 Ballasted photovoltaic panel systems: 'Ballasted, roof-mounted photovoltaic panel systems shall not be installed on roofs within Houston. All roof-mounted photovoltaic panel systems shall conform to Section 3111.' Beyond that, attachment spacing is not prescribed by the city — it is set by the manufacturer's installation instructions or the Houston Construction Code, whichever is more restrictive, and must be shown on the plans: rail and mounting locations clearly identified relative to roof rafters, with a cross-section anchorage detail and anchorage specifications, all sealed by a Texas PE. Where manufacturer cut/installation sheets document options, the engineer or installer must designate the specific code-compliant product to be installed. 82% · adopting ordinance Exhibit A (Houston IBC amendments)
20 questions answered against City of Houston’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC (NFPA 70). State-mandated in Texas effective 1 September 2023; the City of Houston's Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC were adopted by Ord. No. 2023-907, passed 25 October 2023, effective 1 January 2024.
Why the confidence is not higherStated in the city's own List of Currently Adopted Construction Codes (form CE-1199, rev. 7 March 2024) — which explicitly marks the 2023 NEC as '(State Mandated)' — and on the cover of the Administrative Code Provisions PDF itself. CE-1198 independently instructs applicants to list 2023 NEC on the code analysis sheet.
adopted codes list (CE-1199) + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2001/download
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2021 International Residential Code (with Houston Amendments) for one- and two-family dwellings, and 2021 International Building Code (with Houston Amendments) — both effective 1 January 2024. CE-1198 requires the code analysis sheet to cite '2021 IRC or 2021 IBC (not both)'. Also in force: 2022 ASCE 7 (Minimum Design Loads), 2021 IEBC, 2021 IECC, 2021 UMC, 2021 UPC, 2021 ISPSC, all with Houston Amendments and all effective 1 January 2024. Collectively the 2021 Houston Construction Code, adopted by Ord. No. 2023-907 on 25 October 2023.
Why the confidence is not higherFrom form CE-1199 (the city's own adopted-codes list, revised 7 March 2024) cross-checked against the Code Development page's exhibit table.
adopted codes list (CE-1199) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2001/download
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2021 International Fire Code with Houston Amendments (Exhibit F to Ord. No. 2023-907), effective 1 January 2024. Houston Fire Department Life Safety Bureau (LSB) Standards are separately in force and CE-1198 requires them to be cited on the code analysis sheet.
Why the confidence is not higherForm CE-1199 and the Code Development page exhibit table agree; I downloaded and read the IFC amendments PDF itself.
adopting ordinance Exhibit F checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9051/download
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes — extensive Houston Amendments to every adopted code (Ord. No. 2023-907, Exhibits A–L). For solar specifically, three findings matter, two positive and one negative: (POSITIVE) Houston IBC §1613.3 prohibits ballasted roof-mounted PV outright — see Q35. (POSITIVE) Houston NEC administrative provisions §504.1.1 impose a bespoke available-fault-current label — see Q40. (NEGATIVE, PROVED) the Houston IFC amendments do NOT amend §1205 (Solar Photovoltaic Power Systems) or §1207 (ESS): §1205 appears in the amendments only inside the referenced-standards list, and the only Chapter 12 amendment is §1203.4.2 on emergency/standby power scheduling. Likewise the Houston 2023 NEC provisions contain zero occurrences of '690', '705', 'solar', 'photovoltaic' or 'rapid shutdown', and §513 'Articles Not Adopted' lists only NEC 240.91(B), 312.5(C) and 645.25.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery absence above was proved with controls in the same run: NEC provisions positive control 'electrical' = 183 hits / fabricated 'zzqqx' = 0; IFC amendments positive 'fire' = 560 / 'zzqqx' = 0; IBC amendments positive 'fire' = 237 / 'zzqqx' = 0; IRC amendments positive 'fire' = 54 / 'zzqqx' = 0. All four PDFs were extracted locally with pdftotext -layout, never summarised. 92 rather than higher because one internal inconsistency undermines the NEC document: it is titled and adopted for the 2023 NEC, yet its technical sections 501–513 repeatedly reference 'National Electrical Code, 2020 Edition' — an un-updated carryover that makes the edition those technical amendments actually modify ambiguous on its face.
adopting ordinance exhibits A–L checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/building-code-enforcement/code-development
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
CE-1198 verbatim: 'The inspection requirements for installation of solar photovoltaic panels shall be based on the approved plans, the manufacturer's installation manual, and the Houston Construction Code, whichever is more restrictive.' Structurally, the same whichever-is-more-restrictive test is applied to the manufacturer's installation specifications vs the Houston Construction Code. Electrically, plans must show compliance with NEC Article 690, with 2023 NEC Article 705 'incorporated into the electrical design', and panels listed to UL Standard 1703.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quotation from the city's current guide. Minor caveat only: the guide's reference to 'UL Standard 1703' is dated — UL 1703 has largely been superseded by UL 61730 — but that is what the city's document says.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Three Houston-specific electrical rules bear on the service: (1) §504.1.1 Available Fault Current Labeling — in lieu of the NEC 110.24 marking, a permanently affixed label showing the available fault current at time of installation and calculation, 2 inches by 3 inches, blue lettering on a contrasting background, including the date of the calculation. (2) §504.2 Service Disconnect — the centre of the operating handle must be not less than 4 ft and not more than 6 ft 7 in above floor or finished grade (tiered metering on multifamily may vary 2 ft 6 in to 6 ft 6 in). §504.2.1 permits the service disconnect and meter disconnect to be the same where approved and space is insufficient. (3) CE-1198 requires main breaker side tap conductors to be minimum #6 AWG copper or #4 aluminium. There is NO Houston busbar-sizing amendment for PV interconnection — NEC 705.12 is not amended.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three quoted from the city's own documents. The busbar negative was proved by grep across the NEC provisions and the IBC/IRC amendments ('busbar' hits only in the multi-tenant service cable tap box section §504.4, which carries an explicit 'EXCEPTION: Residential occupancies'; '705.12' zero hits). 85 rather than higher because of the 2020/2023 edition inconsistency noted in Q32, which affects §504 directly.
NEC administrative code provisions + CE-1198 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Yes — Houston prohibits an entire mounting class. Houston Amendment to the 2021 IBC, §1613.3 Ballasted photovoltaic panel systems: 'Ballasted, roof-mounted photovoltaic panel systems shall not be installed on roofs within Houston. All roof-mounted photovoltaic panel systems shall conform to Section 3111.' Beyond that, attachment spacing is not prescribed by the city — it is set by the manufacturer's installation instructions or the Houston Construction Code, whichever is more restrictive, and must be shown on the plans: rail and mounting locations clearly identified relative to roof rafters, with a cross-section anchorage detail and anchorage specifications, all sealed by a Texas PE. Where manufacturer cut/installation sheets document options, the engineer or installer must designate the specific code-compliant product to be installed.
Why the confidence is not higherThe prohibition is verbatim from the adopting ordinance Exhibit A, extracted locally. 82 rather than 95 for a scoping reason worth flagging: §1613.3 sits in the IBC amendments, and a typical single-family house is reviewed under the 2021 IRC — CE-1198 says to cite '2021 IRC or 2021 IBC (not both)'. I grepped the Houston IRC amendments for 'ballast' and got zero hits, so whether the ballast prohibition formally reaches IRC-scoped dwellings is not resolved on the documents. In practice it is moot for pitched residential roofs, where ballasted mounting is not used anyway.
adopting ordinance Exhibit A (Houston IBC amendments) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9031/download
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Governed by 2021 IFC Section 1205, adopted UNAMENDED (proved — see Q32). The city's own plan-review checklist (CE-1198 Exhibit 6) states how it reads it: '18" required on both sides if panels are on both sides of hip or valley. When on 1 side of the hip or valley, solar panels can go up to the edge.' The exhibit's roof diagram is annotated 18", 18" and 36". Checklist questions: 'Ridge, rake, & valley, duplex-townhouse dividing line pathways?', 'Arrays maximum of 150' in either direction?', 'Equipment clearances shown?'. Dimensioned roof layout plans showing roof access, required pathways and spacing per 2021 IFC §1205 are a required submittal item.
Why the confidence is not higherThat the model code applies unamended is proved with controls. The specific 18"/150 ft figures are OCR of an embedded slide image in the city's PDF (re-run at 400 dpi to confirm), which is why this is 80 not 95 — the numbers are legible and internally consistent with IFC 1205, but they come from a picture, not a text layer.
published checklist (Exhibit 6, OCR) + adopted IFC checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — rapid shutdown per 2023 NEC 690.12, applying unamended.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo-step inference from the authority's own documents, both steps controlled. Step 1: the 2023 NEC is in force (CE-1199, state-mandated). Step 2: Houston has not touched Article 690 — the Administrative Code Provisions contain zero occurrences of '690', 'rapid shutdown', 'solar' or 'photovoltaic' (positive control 'electrical' = 183 hits, fabricated control 'zzqqx' = 0), and §513 'Articles Not Adopted' lists only 240.91(B), 312.5(C) and 645.25. 80 rather than 95 because no Houston document says the words 'rapid shutdown' at all — the answer is 'the unamended model code applies', not a city statement.
NEC administrative code provisions (proved absence) + adopted codes list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Two layers. (1) Model code, adopted unamended: CE-1198 requires 'Labeling and placards as required in NEC Article 690, 691 & Article 705: Interconnect Electrical Power Production Systems', and adds 'Compliance with 2023 NEC Article 705 Interconnect Electrical Power Production Systems must be incorporated into the electrical design.' 'Current Labels & Markings' is a required item on the electrical plans. (2) Houston's own, at the service equipment: the available fault current label under NEC administrative provisions §504.1.1 — see Q40. Panels must be listed to UL 1703 and spec sheets with approved listing-lab logos supplied for all solar and associated electrical equipment.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth layers quoted from city documents extracted locally. 88 because the city delegates the PV placard set wholesale to the NEC rather than enumerating placards itself, so 'which placards' resolves to Articles 690/691/705 rather than to a Houston list.
published guide + NEC administrative code provisions checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No — for PV placards. Houston prescribes no placard wording of its own for solar; it points at NEC Articles 690, 691 and 705. The single Houston-written label specification anywhere in the electrical code (§504.1.1, available fault current) prescribes size, colour and required content, but not exact wording.
Why the confidence is not higherProved absence with controls: zero occurrences of 'placard' in the Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, and zero of 'solar'/'photovoltaic'/'690'/'705' (positive control 'electrical' = 183, 'zzqqx' = 0). The three 'placard' hits in the Houston IFC amendments are all about placarding dangerous buildings for abatement, nothing to do with equipment labelling — and one of them explicitly says 'The wording of the placard shall be factually accurate, but no particular wording is prescribed.' 85 rather than higher because I did not walk the full Houston Building Code Chapter 46 (Sign Code) or every one of the 22 HFD Life Safety Bureau Standards.
NEC administrative code provisions (proved absence) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — for one label, and it is Houston's own. Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §504.1.1 Available Fault Current Labeling: 'In lieu of the maximum available fault current marking as required by 110.24, a permanently affixed label shall be applied with the available fault current at the time of installation and calculation. The label shall be 2 inches by 3 inches in size and shall be blue lettering on a contrasting background. This label shall also include the date of the calculation.' So: size 2" x 3", blue lettering, contrasting background, permanently affixed, must carry the calculation date. NO letter height, colour or material is specified by Houston for any PV-specific placard — those default to NEC Articles 690/691/705.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the ordinance exhibit, extracted with pdftotext -layout. This is the single most product-relevant Houston-specific label spec found in the run. 88 rather than 95 because of the 2020/2023 edition inconsistency in that document noted at Q32 — §504 is one of the sections that references the '2020 Edition' internally — and because §504.1.1 is a service-equipment rule that applies to services generally, not a solar rule.
adopting ordinance Exhibit D (NEC administrative code provisions) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No local addition. 2023 NEC 705.10 applies as adopted — Houston does not amend Article 705 and does not list it among the articles not adopted. CE-1198 requires the plan-drawing equivalent (site/plot plan to scale showing structures, property lines, easements, setbacks, exterior equipment and pads, and storage batteries; dimensioned roof layout showing access and pathways), but imposes no site-plan-placard requirement beyond the NEC's.
Why the confidence is not higher70 because this is a proved absence plus a model-code inference rather than a positive city statement. The absence itself is well controlled ('705' = 0 occurrences in the NEC administrative provisions; positive control 'electrical' = 183, 'zzqqx' = 0), but no Houston document affirmatively says 'a facility map placard is required' — that obligation comes from the adopted NEC, and I did not open 705.10 itself in this run.
NEC administrative code provisions (proved absence) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCenterPoint Energy's own site. Their solar interconnection page (https://www.centerpointenergy.com/en-us/our-services/electric-utility/technology/solar-energy) describes the five-step process but contains no labelling, placard or disconnect content — I fetched the raw HTML and grepped it directly. I probed four plausible DG-manual URL patterns (/en-us/services/electricity/distributed-generation, /en-us/business/services/electricity/distributed-generation-interconnection, /en-us/business/electricity/distributed-generation, /en-us/Corporate/Services/Electric/distributed-generation-interconnection) — all returned HTTP 404. I searched centerpointenergy.com/sitemap.xml for any <loc> containing 'distributed', 'interconnect' or 'solar' and it exposes no interconnection guide or DG manual document. The only DG-specific resource CenterPoint publishes is a login-gated installer portal at https://plus.anbetrack.com/cnp-dg/#/, which I could not enter. This answer belongs at utility level, not authority level, and CenterPoint has not published it openly.
https://www.centerpointenergy.com/en-us/our-services/electric-utility/technology/solar-energy
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Placement follows the NEC (Articles 690/691/705) — Houston adds no general PV placement rule. The one Houston-specific placement instruction is for the available fault current label under §504.1.1: 'permanently affixed', and because it stands in lieu of the NEC 110.24 marking, it belongs at the service equipment. §504.2 separately fixes the service disconnect operating handle between 4 ft and 6 ft 7 in above floor or finished grade, which constrains where service-adjacent labelling is read from.
Why the confidence is not higher70 because the Houston-specific part is solid but narrow, and the general answer is 'the adopted NEC governs' — an absence-plus-model-code inference, not a city statement. The absence was controlled as at Q39/Q41.
NEC administrative code provisions checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes — listing by an approved agency is mandatory, though not a single named list. Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §508: 'All electrical materials and equipment shall be listed and labeled for intended use and shall be included in a list published by an approved agency', and 'The maker's name, trademark, or other identification symbol shall be placed on all electrical materials, apparatus, devices, appliances, fixtures, and equipment used or installed under the provisions of this code.' CE-1198 adds that panels 'shall be listed for compliance with UL Standard 1703' and requires 'Specification sheets with approved logos for all solar and associated solar electrical equipment showing listing by a recognized testing laboratory.' NEW module products not previously permitted, not considered mainstream, or missing labelling/listings or code approvals may require an Alternative Method submittal under city handout CE-1103.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth quotations extracted locally from city documents. 90 rather than 95 because the question asks about 'a specific approved list' and Houston requires listing by any approved agency rather than maintaining a named list of its own. Note again that CE-1198's 'UL Standard 1703' reference is dated relative to UL 61730.
NEC administrative code provisions + CE-1198 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/9076/download
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Permitted, and governed by Houston Residential Code §R328 (Stationary Storage Battery Systems) for one- and two-family dwellings. Submittal: storage batteries must be shown on the site/plot plan, and battery size, type AND weight must appear on the electrical plans. Houston has published TWO formal interpretations, both specific to residential ESS and both recent: CODE WORD 2021-R12 'Impact Protection for Residential ESS' (published 15 April 2025) and CODE WORD 2021-R13 'ESS in Residential Garages, Locations Requiring Impact Protection' (published 28 May 2025). R12 imports the 2024 IRC §R330.8.3 barrier menu as acceptable to the Building Official: bollards (48" x 3" Sch 80 steel pipe in a 12"-deep x 6"-dia concrete pier, ≥36" exposed, concrete-filled, max 5 ft spacing, ≥6" from the ESS; or 36" x 3" Sch 80 welded to a ≥8" x ¼" plate bolted with four ½" anchors ≥3" embedment, max 60" spacing, ≥6" from the ESS; or premanufactured concrete-filled steel bollards per manufacturer instructions at max 60" spacing); wheel barriers (concrete or polymer 4"H x 5"W x 70"L anchored every ≤36", ≥54" from the ESS; or premanufactured per manufacturer instructions); or any approved method resisting 2,000 psf in the direction of travel at 24" above grade. R13 defines when protection is triggered in a garage: the 'normal driving path' is the space from the garage vehicle opening to the interior face of the back wall, to 48" above finished floor, at the width of the garage door opening. Protection is required for an ESS on the back wall within 36" left or right of that path, or on a side wall within 24" of the back wall and 36" of the path. Exemption: where the clear height of the garage opening is ≤7 ft 6 in, an ESS mounted ≥36" above finished floor needs no impact protection. Fire-code side: the Houston IFC amendments do NOT amend §1207, and the retroactive FMEA requirement for pre-2018 lithium-ion ESS (Houston IFC §1107.1) carries the express 'Exception: Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses'.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth Code Words extracted locally from the 90-page compendium (controls: 'code' = 635 hits, 'zzqqx' = 0). The §1207 negative is controlled as at Q32. 88 rather than 95 because the Code Words compendium's cover is stamped 'Published 01-02-2024' while the two ESS interpretations inside carry 2025 publication dates — the document is updated in place under the same filename, so the cover date is not the document's date, and there may be newer interpretations not in the copy I pulled today.
2021 Code Words (formal interpretations) + IFC amendments + CE-1198 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/8551/download
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No separate ESS permit appears to exist — batteries are handled inside the solar permit package. CE-1198 folds storage batteries into the ordinary solar submittal (shown on the site/plot plan; size, type and weight on the electrical plans) and never mentions a distinct ESS permit or a distinct ESS inspection.
Why the confidence is not higher55 deliberately. This is an inference from silence in one document, not a statement. CE-1198 nowhere says 'no separate ESS permit is required' — it simply treats batteries as part of the PV package. I did not find an ESS entry in the Permits A–Z list or the fee schedule ('battery' and 'energy storage' both return zero hits in the 2026 fee schedule), which supports the reading, but the honest position is that the city has not published an answer either way.
published guide (inference from silence) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes. CE-1198 Exhibit 4: 'Ground-mounted panels are counted as structures and have setback requirements.' Exhibit 7 confirms the review treatment for a ground-mounted structure: address checked, setbacks checked, equipment checked, FOUNDATION checked, engineer's seal checked. The main text requires 'detailed structural design of new foundations or structures located at grade', sealed by a Texas PE. Two related rules from the same exhibit: all single-family residential buildings are classified R3 and R3 accessory (not Group U); each address requires a separate solar permit; and 'Solar panels are prohibited from installation on un-permitted structures.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe 'structures located at grade' requirement for sealed foundation design is in the PDF text layer. The explicit 'counted as structures and have setback requirements' sentence is OCR of an embedded slide image, re-run at 400 dpi to confirm — hence 85 rather than 95. The two readings corroborate each other.
published guide (Exhibits 4 and 7, OCR) + main text checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame as q42 — CenterPoint publishes no reachable DG interconnection manual, and their solar page says nothing about an AC disconnect switch or its position relative to the meter. On the city side I also checked the Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC §504.2, which fixes SERVICE disconnect handle height (4 ft to 6 ft 7 in above floor/finished grade) but says nothing about a PV AC disconnect's location relative to the meter, and CE-1198, which requires 'Disconnect Size & Type' to be shown on the electrical plans but specifies no location. This is a utility-level answer and CenterPoint has not published it.
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal or Phone. Scheduled by the licensed electrical contractor performing the work, not the homeowner. 'Inspections may be scheduled online or by calling the IVR system at 713-222-9922. A 4-digit scheduling PIN is required.' Online scheduling/lookup is at https://www.pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov/cohilms/webs/Inspection_Lookup.asp. Note: the inspector-side app (Telework) and the scheduling back end are both due to be replaced by HouPermits. 92% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — with a documented split. The city performs the electrical inspection itself (Houston Public Works Electrical Inspections, 832.394.8860) and holds Structural Inspections (832.394.8840). But the post-installation STRUCTURAL verification is not done by a city inspector: 'The structural engineer must provide a special inspection letter certifying that the completed installation conforms to the city approved design.' So the city inspects, and a private Texas PE certifies the structure. 92% · published guide
- If delegated, to whom? Only the structural post-install certification is delegated, and it goes to the project's own Texas-licensed structural engineer — not to another authority or third-party agency. The special inspection letter (template CE-1387) may be handed to the field inspector during the final field inspection, or delivered to the Structural Inspections Office at 1002 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor, Houston, TX 77002. The CE-1387 template shows what it must confirm: rails bolted to roof rafters per manufacturer specification or the Houston Construction Code (whichever is more restrictive), lag bolt size and spacing, flashing and waterproofing method, no damage to structural elements, and that the array does not obstruct egress from any egress door or emergency escape and rescue window. 85% · CE-1387 template + CE-1198
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a residential rooftop PV job the published sequence is short: (1) the licensed electrical contractor schedules an inspection at the time of completion of the work; (2) at that inspection the contractor must be on the job with one of the solar panels, the drawings and all relevant paperwork, and the inspector verifies labels, listings and conformance to the approved plans; (3) the structural engineer's post-installation special inspection letter is provided — either handed to the field inspector at the final field inspection, or delivered to the Structural Inspections Office. Separately, if existing roof coverings must be removed (not adequate for covering over; wood shake, slate, clay, cement, asbestos; or two or more existing layers) a roofing permit is required, and CE-1198 Exhibit 11 notes it 'can combine with solar permit'. 82% · published guide
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No 65% · published guide (proved absence in the solar-specific document)
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes — form CE-1198 'Solar Photovoltaic Panel Permit & Inspection Guide and Checklist' (rev. March 2024, 8 pages), whose stated purpose is 'to identify requirements associated with the plan review and inspection process related to the installation of solar photovoltaic systems and serve as a checklist prior to submission to the Plan Review group'. Eleven exhibits carry the plan-review check items. The CE-1387 letter template separately references 'the approved Solar Inspection Checklist'. 92% · published checklist (CE-1198)
- What must be on site at inspection? CE-1198 verbatim: 'The manufacturer's installation manual and the permit drawings shall remain on the jobsite during all inspections.' At the inspection itself: 'The licensed electrical contractor shall be on the job, and have one of the solar panels, the drawings, and all relevant paperwork for the inspector.' Plus the structural engineer's post-installation special inspection letter, which may be submitted to the field inspector during the final field inspection. 95% · published guide
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Yes — explicitly and in writing 95% · published guide
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final — the permit is 'finaled' on the project number. Code Word 2021-E01 uses that terminology: 'Upon approval by the inspector, the electrical permit on the primary project number will be finaled.' Separately, Electrical Inspections lists 'Performing utility releases' among its responsibilities, i.e. the city's approval is what releases the utility connection. 55% · 2021 Code Words 2021-E01 (analogous, not solar-specific)
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer. CenterPoint's own process page: 'Customer's installer company applies online through the utility grid interconnection portal' (https://plus.anbetrack.com/cnp-dg/#/), and the five-step sequence ends 'CenterPoint's final review → PTO issued'. After construction and confirmation of the as-built design, CenterPoint issues the PTO and remotely reprograms the meter to capture excess generation export readings. The City of Houston does not notify the utility for PTO — the city's 'utility release' function is a separate thing, releasing the electrical service connection, not granting interconnection permission. 85% · utility process page
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $94.00 (2026 rate) 80% · 2026 fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? For PLAN REVIEW corrections: issued inside ProjectDox as markups and changemarks, with standard markup names and colours per reviewing discipline so the applicant can tell which discipline raised what; a markup may carry more than one changemark. The applicant corrects and resubmits through the portal. (For the paper One-Stop Walk-In route, which does not apply to solar: 'If revisions are needed, update your plans and upon return request a new ticket for plan review.') For FIELD INSPECTION corrections, no process is published — see not_found. 70% · EPR submittal guide
14 questions answered against City of Houston’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal or Phone. Scheduled by the licensed electrical contractor performing the work, not the homeowner. 'Inspections may be scheduled online or by calling the IVR system at 713-222-9922. A 4-digit scheduling PIN is required.' Online scheduling/lookup is at https://www.pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov/cohilms/webs/Inspection_Lookup.asp. Note: the inspector-side app (Telework) and the scheduling back end are both due to be replaced by HouPermits.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the Electrical Inspections department page, and CE-1198 independently states 'The licensed electrical contractor shall schedule an inspection at the time of the completion of the work.' 92 rather than 95 because the online scheduling page is a JavaScript application I could not read, so I confirmed the online route exists but not its behaviour.
department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/building-code-enforcement/electrical-inspections
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Electrical Inspections department page, which gives the scheduling routes (online, or IVR 713-222-9922 with a 4-digit PIN) but states no notice period; CE-1198, which says only that the contractor 'shall schedule an inspection at the time of the completion of the work'; the iPermits How-To Guide (media/5946), which turned out to contain no inspection content at all — positive control 'inspect' = 0 hits, so that document simply does not cover this and its silence is not evidence; the Houston Permitting Center FAQ page; and the online inspection scheduling application at pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov, which is a JavaScript app with no readable server-rendered content. No cutoff time, next-business-day rule or minimum notice is published on any of them.
https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/building-code-enforcement/electrical-inspections
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame sources as q50 — the Electrical Inspections page, CE-1198, the FAQ, and the inspection scheduling application. No AM/PM window, time-slot or same-day option is published anywhere. The scheduling application itself may expose windows once authenticated with a contractor PIN, which I do not have; note also that the inspector-side system (Telework) is being replaced by the HouPermits Inspector App, so any window policy is likely to change at that cutover.
https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/building-code-enforcement/electrical-inspections
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — with a documented split. The city performs the electrical inspection itself (Houston Public Works Electrical Inspections, 832.394.8860) and holds Structural Inspections (832.394.8840). But the post-installation STRUCTURAL verification is not done by a city inspector: 'The structural engineer must provide a special inspection letter certifying that the completed installation conforms to the city approved design.' So the city inspects, and a private Texas PE certifies the structure.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth halves verbatim from CE-1198's INSPECTION PACKAGE CONTENTS section, plus the department contact list on the same page. 92 rather than 95 because 'Yes / No / Delegated' does not cleanly capture an arrangement that is both.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Only the structural post-install certification is delegated, and it goes to the project's own Texas-licensed structural engineer — not to another authority or third-party agency. The special inspection letter (template CE-1387) may be handed to the field inspector during the final field inspection, or delivered to the Structural Inspections Office at 1002 Washington Avenue, 4th Floor, Houston, TX 77002. The CE-1387 template shows what it must confirm: rails bolted to roof rafters per manufacturer specification or the Houston Construction Code (whichever is more restrictive), lag bolt size and spacing, flashing and waterproofing method, no damage to structural elements, and that the array does not obstruct egress from any egress door or emergency escape and rescue window.
Why the confidence is not higherFrom CE-1198 and the CE-1387 example letter, both extracted locally. 85 because the question expects a named body (FK) and the correct answer is 'the applicant's own engineer', which is a category the field does not really hold.
CE-1387 template + CE-1198 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/6971/download
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For a residential rooftop PV job the published sequence is short: (1) the licensed electrical contractor schedules an inspection at the time of completion of the work; (2) at that inspection the contractor must be on the job with one of the solar panels, the drawings and all relevant paperwork, and the inspector verifies labels, listings and conformance to the approved plans; (3) the structural engineer's post-installation special inspection letter is provided — either handed to the field inspector at the final field inspection, or delivered to the Structural Inspections Office. Separately, if existing roof coverings must be removed (not adequate for covering over; wood shake, slate, clay, cement, asbestos; or two or more existing layers) a roofing permit is required, and CE-1198 Exhibit 11 notes it 'can combine with solar permit'.
Why the confidence is not higherSteps 1–3 are verbatim from CE-1198's INSPECTION PACKAGE CONTENTS. The roofing note is OCR of Exhibit 11. 82 rather than higher because the guide describes the inspection at completion but never presents a numbered stage list, so 'and in what order' is only partly answered — and the interaction between the electrical final and the structural sign-off is left to the letter's delivery route rather than stated as an ordering.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No
Why the confidence is not higher65 — this is an absence, and a partly-proved one. CE-1198's INSPECTION PACKAGE CONTENTS section describes only an inspection at completion of the work plus the engineer's post-install letter; no rough-in, mid-roof or pre-cover stage is named anywhere in the solar guide. The counterweight is that the Electrical Inspections department page lists cover inspections generally ('Ditch or slab cover inspection, Wall cover inspection, Ceiling cover inspection, Temporary cut-in inspection') as situations requiring an electrical inspection — none of which apply to a retrofit rooftop array, but the list is prefaced 'Some situations that require an electrical inspection include', so it is not exhaustive.
published guide (proved absence in the solar-specific document) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Yes — explicitly and in writing
Why the confidence is not higherCE-1198 verbatim: 'The inspector will verify the labels and listings and whether the installation matches the approved plans.' This is unusually direct — most authorities leave it to practice — and it is the strongest single datapoint in this survey for label-product relevance. It also cuts directly against any SB 1202 abstention: Houston states in its own published guide that its inspector checks labels and listings on solar equipment.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Yes — form CE-1198 'Solar Photovoltaic Panel Permit & Inspection Guide and Checklist' (rev. March 2024, 8 pages), whose stated purpose is 'to identify requirements associated with the plan review and inspection process related to the installation of solar photovoltaic systems and serve as a checklist prior to submission to the Plan Review group'. Eleven exhibits carry the plan-review check items. The CE-1387 letter template separately references 'the approved Solar Inspection Checklist'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe document exists and I read all 8 pages. 92 rather than 95 because it is weighted toward plan review rather than field inspection — the field-inspection content is three numbered items on the last page — and because the 'approved Solar Inspection Checklist' the CE-1387 template names is not itself published anywhere I could find.
published checklist (CE-1198) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
CE-1198 verbatim: 'The manufacturer's installation manual and the permit drawings shall remain on the jobsite during all inspections.' At the inspection itself: 'The licensed electrical contractor shall be on the job, and have one of the solar panels, the drawings, and all relevant paperwork for the inspector.' Plus the structural engineer's post-installation special inspection letter, which may be submitted to the field inspector during the final field inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quotation from the city's current guide. Note the unusual requirement to have a physical spare solar panel available for the inspector — that is a real, checkable field expectation.
published guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2211/download
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$94.00 (2026 rate)
Why the confidence is not higher'Reinspection Fee $94.00' appears in the ADMINISTRATIVE & GENERAL INSPECTION FEES block of the 2026 Building Code Enforcement Permit Fee Schedule. 80 rather than 95 because of a layout trap I had to resolve: pdftotext -layout renders the phrase 'FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS ONLY' on the same line as the reinspection fee. Reading the two-column page structure, that phrase is the subheading of the adjacent STRUCTURAL/BUILDING PERMIT FEES – VALUATION TABLE in the right-hand column, not a qualifier on the reinspection fee in the left-hand column. I am confident in that reading but it is a reading, not a statement.
2026 fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/2636/download
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
For PLAN REVIEW corrections: issued inside ProjectDox as markups and changemarks, with standard markup names and colours per reviewing discipline so the applicant can tell which discipline raised what; a markup may carry more than one changemark. The applicant corrects and resubmits through the portal. (For the paper One-Stop Walk-In route, which does not apply to solar: 'If revisions are needed, update your plans and upon return request a new ticket for plan review.') For FIELD INSPECTION corrections, no process is published — see not_found.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ProjectDox changemark mechanism is described in the city's own current Solar Panel EPR User Guide (v9.2, Fall 2024). 70 because it answers only half the question: how plan-review comments are issued and cleared, not how a failed field inspection's corrections are issued or cleared, which I could not find published.
EPR submittal guide checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/sites/g/files/nwywnm431/files/2024-08/9.2%20Solar%20Panel%20EPR%20User%20Guide_August%202024_English.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final — the permit is 'finaled' on the project number. Code Word 2021-E01 uses that terminology: 'Upon approval by the inspector, the electrical permit on the primary project number will be finaled.' Separately, Electrical Inspections lists 'Performing utility releases' among its responsibilities, i.e. the city's approval is what releases the utility connection.
Why the confidence is not higher55 deliberately. The 'finaled' terminology is the city's own, but Code Word 2021-E01 is about the Utility Release Option for appliances absent at final inspection in new residences — it is not a solar document, and its publication date is 15 October 1996. No Houston document I found states what is issued on passing a residential solar final. No certificate, green tag or letter is named anywhere in CE-1198.
2021 Code Words 2021-E01 (analogous, not solar-specific) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.houstonpermittingcenter.org/media/8551/download
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer. CenterPoint's own process page: 'Customer's installer company applies online through the utility grid interconnection portal' (https://plus.anbetrack.com/cnp-dg/#/), and the five-step sequence ends 'CenterPoint's final review → PTO issued'. After construction and confirmation of the as-built design, CenterPoint issues the PTO and remotely reprograms the meter to capture excess generation export readings. The City of Houston does not notify the utility for PTO — the city's 'utility release' function is a separate thing, releasing the electrical service connection, not granting interconnection permission.
Why the confidence is not higherFrom CenterPoint's own solar interconnection page. 85 rather than 95 because the page is undated and I could not reach an authoritative CenterPoint DG interconnection manual to confirm — every DG URL pattern I tried on centerpointenergy.com returned 404, and their sitemap exposes no interconnection guide PDF.
utility process page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.centerpointenergy.com/en-us/our-services/electric-utility/technology/solar-energy
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Houston against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Houston is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
- Holds
- Both structural (building) and electrical, inside the city limits. Both permits are issued by Houston Public Works, Building Code Enforcement, under the SAME project/permit number. Plan review, permit issuance and field inspection (Electrical Inspections + Structural Inspections) are all city functions.
- Delegated to
- Partial and narrow: post-installation STRUCTURAL verification is delegated to the project's own Texas-licensed PE, who must issue a special inspection letter certifying the completed install matches the city-approved design (form CE-1387). It goes to the field inspector at final, or to the Structural Inspections Office. The city does not do that verification itself.
- Overridden by
- Texas state law in three places: (1) the 2023 NEC is STATE-MANDATED in Texas (effective 1 Sep 2023) — Houston adopted only Administrative Code Provisions for it, effective 1 Jan 2024; (2) electrician licensing is state-level under Occupations Code Ch. 1305, which the city's own solar permit page links to; (3) Texas Property Code limits on HOA solar restrictions sit above the deed-restriction check the city asks applicants to make. NO published City of Houston position on SB 1202 was found — see below.
- Why not higher
- The city's own current guide (CE-1198, rev. March 2024) and the Solar Panel Permit page both state the city issues structural and electrical permits and performs the inspections. 92 rather than higher because the structural-verification delegation to a private PE is a genuine split that the question set's binary does not capture, and because the SB 1202 finding is an absence rather than a positive statement.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- There is NO solar-specific fee line item. The published components (2026 rates) are: minimum permit fee $91.06; administrative fee $33.56 (non-refundable);80%
- Plan review
- No turnaround is published for the traditional plan review route. However, since 15 July 2024 Houston accepts SolarAPP+ (NREL's automated plan review): eligible rooftop PV submitted by a…70%
- Portal
- Two systems in tandem: iPermits (https://www.pdinet.pd.houstontx.gov/ILMS_Online_Permits/default.asp) for the permit application, fee payment and inspection scheduling;95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC (NFPA 70). State-mandated in Texas effective 1 September 2023; the City of Houston's Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC were adopted by Ord. No.95%
- Own placard wording
- No — for PV placards. Houston prescribes no placard wording of its own for solar; it points at NEC Articles 690, 691 and 705.85%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal or Phone. Scheduled by the licensed electrical contractor performing the work, not the homeowner. 'Inspections may be scheduled online or by calling the IVR system at 713-222-9922.92%
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 85%
No — for PV placards. Houston prescribes no placard wording of its own for solar; it points at NEC Articles 690, 691 and 705. The single Houston-written label specification anywhere in the electrical code (§504.1.1, available fault current) prescribes size, colour and required content, but not exact wording.
Size, colour & material 88%
Yes — for one label, and it is Houston's own. Administrative Code Provisions for the 2023 NEC, §504.1.1 Available Fault Current Labeling: 'In lieu of the maximum available fault current marking as required by 110.24, a permanently affixed label shall be applied with the available fault current at the time of installation and calculation. The label shall be 2 inches by 3 inches in size and shall be blue lettering on a contrasting background. This label shall also include the date of the calculation.' So: size 2" x 3", blue lettering, contrasting background, permanently affixed, must carry the calculation date. NO letter height, colour or material is specified by Houston for any PV-specific placard — those default to NEC Articles 690/691/705.
Where they go 70%
Placement follows the NEC (Articles 690/691/705) — Houston adds no general PV placement rule. The one Houston-specific placement instruction is for the available fault current label under §504.1.1: 'permanently affixed', and because it stands in lieu of the NEC 110.24 marking, it belongs at the service equipment. §504.2 separately fixes the service disconnect operating handle between 4 ft and 6 ft 7 in above floor or finished grade, which constrains where service-adjacent labelling is read from.
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.