City of San Antonio
City of San Antonio is the 6th largest jurisdiction in Texas — 1,434,625 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate — a standalone Solar/Photovoltaic trade permit, which is a sub-type of the electrical permit. It is explicitly never part of a combination permit. Q4 Plan review — 3 business days. DSD reviews the application for completeness within three working days and forwards it to technical review; Q18 Where you file — BuildSA Customer Portal (Accela Citizen Access) at https://aca-prod.accela.com/COSA/default.aspx. Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- Roughly $63–$100 for a typical residential system. There is no solar line item; the fee is assembled from the electrical schedule: basic electrical inspection permit fee $50.00,60% source
- Plan review turnaround
- 3 business days. DSD reviews the application for completeness within three working days and forwards it to technical review;90% source
- Key document
- department information bulletin cited by 12 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · department information bulletin
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both — DSD holds building and electrical. Nothing is delegated to Bexar County. CPS Energy (city-owned utility) separately controls interconnection. 92% · adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-01-30-0075)
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · department information bulletin
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate — a standalone Solar/Photovoltaic trade permit, which is a sub-type of the electrical permit. It is explicitly never part of a combination permit. 95% · department permitting guide
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — not a city requirement. Nothing in the DSD permit process or the automatic technical-review list conditions a solar permit on HOA or architectural-committee approval. 60% · department permitting guide
- Is there a historic-district review? Yes, where the property applies. Applicants proposing to install or modify a PV system on a premise containing a designated historical resource, or within a historic district, are required to meet with the Historic Design and Review Commission BEFORE submitting the project to DSD. Office of Historic Preservation is also one of the technical reviews the portal generates automatically based on location, as is Neighborhood Conservation District. 92% · department information bulletin
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for residential rooftop PV. The Unified Development Code's renewable-energy provision (§ 35-398) addresses ground-mounted fixed-panel photovoltaic solar farms and small wind systems, not roof-mounted residential arrays. For solar farms it sets an average array height limit of 12 feet, a 30-foot setback only where abutting residential uses or zones, open fencing up to 8 feet, no screening requirement from public streets, and requires an executed CPS Energy interconnection agreement before occupancy. 55% · third-party code publisher (UDC § 35-398)
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Not capped by the city, but capped by the utility. CPS Energy: 'DG Facilities connected at secondary voltages cannot have a maximum capacity rating that exceeds the size of the transformer serving the secondary. Service upgrades will be designed and installed by CPS Energy at the owner's expense.' Also relevant to residential: energy storage installed as part of a net-metered installation is not permitted to export power to the grid, though it may power essential loads during an outage. Clustering thresholds (30% of minimum circuit peak) can trigger an interconnection study. Systems ≥25 kWac cross into PE-sealed drawings and a longer CPS review. 85% · utility DG manual
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Licensed electrician — a Texas state-licensed Master Electrician, registered with the City of San Antonio, must be the applicant of record. Office staff may act only as delegates on that licensee's portal account. 95% · department information bulletin
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes — state-licensed electrical contractors must register with the city before performing any electrical work, and the registration must be current (active insurance and active state licence) at the time of application. 95% · adopting ordinance
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? No — there is no homeowner self-permit route for the solar/electrical permit. 80% · adopting ordinance
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Site plan (existing and proposed structures, setbacks/dimensions to property and internal lot lines; main electrical service wall layout showing existing and proposed equipment; PV equipment — rapid shutdown equipment, conduits and combiner boxes, inverters and disconnects, batteries if applicable, modules/panels, listed mounting system). Roof plan (array layout; roof covering, number of overlays, deck type; rafter/beam sizes, spacing and roof slope; plumbing/mechanical/attic vent terminals; fire-fighter access clearances per IFC 1205.2/1205.3). Array/panel fastening method — manufacturer fastening spec sheets or engineered design, plus method of sealing roof penetrations. Engineering calculations where a threshold is triggered (see q13). Single- or three-line diagram (conductor size and type; voltage and amperage of all circuits; ampacity and type of all overcurrent protection; equipment grounding; AC and DC disconnecting devices). Voltage and ampacity of main service and main service disconnect. Manufacturer specification sheets and listing information for all components. Separately, CPS Energy requires its own package: DER application, one-line diagram, site layout/plan, photos, and equipment specifications. 90% · department information bulletin
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic only — PDF files uploaded to the BuildSA Plan Room. No paper copies. May be one PDF or multiple PDFs; filenames do not matter; files must not be password-protected. Construction plans are split into sheets and reviewed sheet by sheet, so each construction-plan file needs its sheet number entered. Resubmittals must reuse the original sheet title so the sheet becomes Version 2; uploading a whole replacement file triggers a full re-review. The upload is not received by the city until 'Finish' is clicked. 88% · department permitting guide
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. Must show: existing structures on the property and any newly proposed structures, with setback locations and dimensions to property lines and internal lot lines; the main electrical service as a wall layout showing existing equipment (electrical, foreign, etc.) and proposed equipment; and the PV equipment — rapid shutdown equipment (optimizers, micro-inverters, 'birdhouse'), conduits and combiner boxes, inverters and disconnect(s), batteries if applicable, modules/panels, listed mounting system, and any other equipment. CPS Energy additionally requires a detailed site plan showing geographic orientation with the location of existing and proposed service and metering equipment, plus a meter loop drawing (elevation view) showing proposed equipment layout, all drawings to scale. 92% · department information bulletin
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — a single-line diagram for residential (three-line for commercial). Required by both DSD and CPS Energy. 95% · department information bulletin
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes in substance, though not phrased as 'calculations'. The one-line must carry conductor size and type, voltage and amperage of all circuits, ampacity and type of all overcurrent protection, equipment grounding, and AC and DC disconnecting devices, plus voltage and ampacity of the main service and main service disconnect. For load-side interconnection CPS requires the main breaker to be used in the bus ampere rating calculation. 78% · department information bulletin
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Required for single family, R-3, duplex and townhome roof-mounted arrays where ANY of: (i) the array weighs more than 6 lbs per sq ft when installed on roofs with slopes of less than 4:12; (ii) two or more existing applications of any type of roof covering are encountered; or (iii) a new structure such as a trellis, patio cover, canopy, carport or similar intended to support the PV system, which would otherwise be exempt from a building permit. Calculations must be from an engineer licensed in the State of Texas. All commercial buildings require them unconditionally. Separately, a new solar pergola intended to support PV requires engineered foundation and roof-mount plans, and PV added to an existing pergola requires a structural letter verifying the structure can carry the added load. 92% · department information bulletin
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Two separate thresholds, both of which can bite on a residential job. CITY (IB 153 / Chapter 10): electrical plans must be sealed by a Texas-licensed PE for installation or alteration of equipment on the customer side of the CPS Energy point of delivery rated over 600 amps at 250 volts or less, over 400 amps at 250 volts or greater, any system above 600 volts, or when otherwise required by the Texas Engineering Practice Act. UTILITY (CPS Energy): sealed and signed Texas PE one-line diagram AND site plan are required for ALL DG designs of 25 kWac and above at any voltage, and for DG of any size within the Downtown Network Area. 88% · utility electric service standards
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? BuildSA Customer Portal (Accela Citizen Access) at https://aca-prod.accela.com/COSA/default.aspx. The PV application sits under the Building module tab, as an MEP Trade Permits Application. Records split in two: an application record (MEP-TRD-APP…) used for uploads, plan review, resubmittals, fee payment and downloading approved stamped plans, and a permit record (MEP-SOL-PMT…) used for scheduling inspections, additional fees, the CPS release workflow and the Letter of Completion. 95% · department information bulletin
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes — application, document upload, plan-review responses, fee payment, download of approved stamped plans, inspection scheduling and receipt of the Letter of Completion are all online. Approved stamped plans must then be printed and kept on site for inspection. 92% · department permitting guide
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Roughly $63–$100 for a typical residential system. There is no solar line item; the fee is assembled from the electrical schedule: basic electrical inspection permit fee $50.00, plus a 'UPS/generator/distributed generation/storage batteries' item priced by size (1–5 kW $1.60; 5–50 kW $3.25; 51–300 kW $4.85), plus a permit processing fee $10.00, plus any service-rating item if the service is touched (0–200 A $3.25; 201–600 A $6.50), plus a panelboard/loadcenter item $4.85 if an additional panelboard is installed. Inspection scheduling is free online, $3.00 by phone. 60% · adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54)
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered — an itemised schedule: a flat basic permit fee plus per-item charges, with the distributed-generation item banded by kW and the service item banded by amperage. Not valuation-based, not per panel. 80% · adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54)
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Not as a standing separate charge on a solar permit. The schedule carries 'Electrical plan review only (without building plan number) — $100.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum', which is for standalone review; on a normal PV permit the technical review is part of the permit, but DSD may assess additional fees during technical review and invoice them before permit issuance. 65% · adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? 3 business days. DSD reviews the application for completeness within three working days and forwards it to technical review; technical review has a stated goal of three working days for initial review. DSD's solar guide tells applicants to 'Expect to receive Issues within three (3) business days'. Total time to permit depends on submittal quality and resubmittal speed. Note the separate utility clock: CPS Energy's initial DER review is stated as 10 business days in IB 153 but as 20–25 working days on CPS Energy's own distributed generation page. 90% · department information bulletin
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days. A permit becomes invalid unless work on the site is commenced within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended or abandoned for 180 days after commencing. The Building Official may grant one or more written extensions of not more than 180 days each, on written request with justifiable cause. A permit extension fee is charged at 50% of the permit (plus the cost of the permit). 92% · adopting ordinance
- Which utility handles interconnection here? CPS Energy — the City of San Antonio's own municipally owned utility. DG contact: (210) 353-2700, DG@cpsenergy.com; solar applications to cpsesolar@cpsenergy.com; general (210) 353-2641. 95% · utility corporate page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel — IB 153 says it is 'highly recommended that you submit your application and required documentation, as applicable, to both entities simultaneously'. But the dependencies are strict at both ends: CPS Energy's approval of the preconstruction package produces a Construction Letter 'authorizing the commencement of work', so CPS approval must precede construction; and at the far end CPS 'will only schedule a Commissioning Test if the permit is released by DSD'. So: submit in parallel, build after CPS's construction letter, inspect with DSD, then CPS commissions and grants Approval for Operation. 88% · department information bulletin
28 questions answered against City of San Antonio’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 (DSD's own bulletin, revision stamp May 2025) sets out the DSD permit, plan review and inspection process for PV in San Antonio; DSD's solar permitting guide confirms the record types.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both — DSD holds building and electrical. Nothing is delegated to Bexar County. CPS Energy (city-owned utility) separately controls interconnection.
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 10 vests building and electrical in the Building Official/DSD; IB 153 shows DSD issuing the PV permit and inspecting. Held below 95 because the state third-party option under SB 1202 means an applicant may lawfully route review and inspection away from DSD, which is a partial de facto delegation DSD has not published anything about.
adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-01-30-0075) checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 Step 3: 'The Customer/Contractor is to obtain a separate electrical permit from DSD to install the photovoltaic system.'
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Separate — a standalone Solar/Photovoltaic trade permit, which is a sub-type of the electrical permit. It is explicitly never part of a combination permit.
Why the confidence is not higherDSD's solar permitting guide states 'A Solar standalone permit is never part of a combination permit, even if a solar system is being installed on a new building under construction' and 'A Solar/Photovoltaic Trade Permit is a subtype of the electrical permit.' IB 153 calls it 'a separate electrical permit'.
department permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/DSDUploads/SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Licensed electrician — a Texas state-licensed Master Electrician, registered with the City of San Antonio, must be the applicant of record. Office staff may act only as delegates on that licensee's portal account.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153: 'The PV application is a sub-type of the Electrical Permit, applied for by state licensed master electricians who are registered with the City of San Antonio. The master electrician must be the applicant.' DSD's solar guide: 'Only Texas State Master Electrician may apply' and 'The Solar application requires the applicant to be the LP.'
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes — state-licensed electrical contractors must register with the city before performing any electrical work, and the registration must be current (active insurance and active state licence) at the time of application.
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 10: 'State licensed electrical contractors and electrical sign contractors shall register with the city before performing any electrical work.' DSD's solar guide: 'The LP must be registered with DSD and current with their registration (active insurance and active state license).' Insurance minimum is $300,000 per occurrence / $600,000 aggregate.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
No — there is no homeowner self-permit route for the solar/electrical permit.
Why the confidence is not higherProved as an absence with a positive control in the same document. Chapter 10 § 10-6(j) lists who may obtain permits and the homeowner exemption there is confined to PLUMBING: 'Any homeowner performing plumbing work on a homestead wherein he/she resides.' Searching the whole ordinance for 'homestead', 'own home' and 'single-family residence' returns no electrical equivalent (positive control 'electrical' = 245 hits, fabricated control 'zzqqx' = 0). IB 153 and the DSD solar guide both say the master electrician must be the applicant. 80 rather than 95 because this is proved by the absence of an exemption plus a positive rule, not by a sentence that says 'homeowners may not'.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Site plan (existing and proposed structures, setbacks/dimensions to property and internal lot lines; main electrical service wall layout showing existing and proposed equipment; PV equipment — rapid shutdown equipment, conduits and combiner boxes, inverters and disconnects, batteries if applicable, modules/panels, listed mounting system). Roof plan (array layout; roof covering, number of overlays, deck type; rafter/beam sizes, spacing and roof slope; plumbing/mechanical/attic vent terminals; fire-fighter access clearances per IFC 1205.2/1205.3). Array/panel fastening method — manufacturer fastening spec sheets or engineered design, plus method of sealing roof penetrations. Engineering calculations where a threshold is triggered (see q13). Single- or three-line diagram (conductor size and type; voltage and amperage of all circuits; ampacity and type of all overcurrent protection; equipment grounding; AC and DC disconnecting devices). Voltage and ampacity of main service and main service disconnect. Manufacturer specification sheets and listing information for all components. Separately, CPS Energy requires its own package: DER application, one-line diagram, site layout/plan, photos, and equipment specifications.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from IB 153 'DSD Electronic Document Requirements', extracted with pdftotext -layout, not summarised. Held at 90 because IB 153 covers commercial and residential in one list and a few items (e.g. three-line diagrams) are commercial-only per CPS's parallel standard.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic only — PDF files uploaded to the BuildSA Plan Room. No paper copies. May be one PDF or multiple PDFs; filenames do not matter; files must not be password-protected. Construction plans are split into sheets and reviewed sheet by sheet, so each construction-plan file needs its sheet number entered. Resubmittals must reuse the original sheet title so the sheet becomes Version 2; uploading a whole replacement file triggers a full re-review. The upload is not received by the city until 'Finish' is clicked.
Why the confidence is not higherDSD's own solar permitting guide, which is a step-by-step of the actual Accela workflow. Held at 88 because the guide is undated on its face — the filename says 'March29' but authorities update these in place, and I could not open a revision stamp inside it.
department permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/DSDUploads/SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. Must show: existing structures on the property and any newly proposed structures, with setback locations and dimensions to property lines and internal lot lines; the main electrical service as a wall layout showing existing equipment (electrical, foreign, etc.) and proposed equipment; and the PV equipment — rapid shutdown equipment (optimizers, micro-inverters, 'birdhouse'), conduits and combiner boxes, inverters and disconnect(s), batteries if applicable, modules/panels, listed mounting system, and any other equipment. CPS Energy additionally requires a detailed site plan showing geographic orientation with the location of existing and proposed service and metering equipment, plus a meter loop drawing (elevation view) showing proposed equipment layout, all drawings to scale.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 item 1 verbatim, plus CPS Electric Service Standards § 2006. Both are the authority's/utility's own current documents.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes — a single-line diagram for residential (three-line for commercial). Required by both DSD and CPS Energy.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153: 'Provide a single or three-line diagram showing...'. CPS ESS § 2006(1): 'Detailed operational one-line diagram for residential installations and three-line diagram for commercial installations.'
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes in substance, though not phrased as 'calculations'. The one-line must carry conductor size and type, voltage and amperage of all circuits, ampacity and type of all overcurrent protection, equipment grounding, and AC and DC disconnecting devices, plus voltage and ampacity of the main service and main service disconnect. For load-side interconnection CPS requires the main breaker to be used in the bus ampere rating calculation.
Why the confidence is not higherThe underlying data is required verbatim by IB 153 and the busbar calculation by CPS ESS § 2005(H)(1), but neither document uses the words 'string calculations' or requires a submitted calculation sheet, so this is my reading of what the required content amounts to rather than a stated requirement to submit calculations.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Required for single family, R-3, duplex and townhome roof-mounted arrays where ANY of: (i) the array weighs more than 6 lbs per sq ft when installed on roofs with slopes of less than 4:12; (ii) two or more existing applications of any type of roof covering are encountered; or (iii) a new structure such as a trellis, patio cover, canopy, carport or similar intended to support the PV system, which would otherwise be exempt from a building permit. Calculations must be from an engineer licensed in the State of Texas. All commercial buildings require them unconditionally. Separately, a new solar pergola intended to support PV requires engineered foundation and roof-mount plans, and PV added to an existing pergola requires a structural letter verifying the structure can carry the added load.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 item 2(c)/(d) verbatim, plus IB 405 for the pergola case. Held at 92 rather than 95 because IB 153's threshold (i) is written as a single compound condition and could be read either as 'over 6 psf AND slope under 4:12' or as two triggers; the plain reading is the conjunctive one and I have stated it that way.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Two separate thresholds, both of which can bite on a residential job. CITY (IB 153 / Chapter 10): electrical plans must be sealed by a Texas-licensed PE for installation or alteration of equipment on the customer side of the CPS Energy point of delivery rated over 600 amps at 250 volts or less, over 400 amps at 250 volts or greater, any system above 600 volts, or when otherwise required by the Texas Engineering Practice Act. UTILITY (CPS Energy): sealed and signed Texas PE one-line diagram AND site plan are required for ALL DG designs of 25 kWac and above at any voltage, and for DG of any size within the Downtown Network Area.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 item 3(e) and CPS ESS § 90.3 Exception 2 ('CPS Energy will require documents to be prepared by a licensed or registered engineer for all designs of 25 kWAC and above for any voltage'), corroborated by the DG application form's own routing instruction ('For DG systems less than 25kWac, proceed to Section 6'). Held at 88 because the CPS 25 kW rule sits in a 2021-edition standard.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Roughly $63–$100 for a typical residential system. There is no solar line item; the fee is assembled from the electrical schedule: basic electrical inspection permit fee $50.00, plus a 'UPS/generator/distributed generation/storage batteries' item priced by size (1–5 kW $1.60; 5–50 kW $3.25; 51–300 kW $4.85), plus a permit processing fee $10.00, plus any service-rating item if the service is touched (0–200 A $3.25; 201–600 A $6.50), plus a panelboard/loadcenter item $4.85 if an additional panelboard is installed. Inspection scheduling is free online, $3.00 by phone.
Why the confidence is not higherThe line items are verbatim from the adopted fee schedule at Chapter 10 § 10-54, so the components are certain — but the TOTAL is my arithmetic, not a published figure, and DSD's own solar guide warns that 'Plan Reviewers check the fees. They may (and often do) add a fee', so the real invoice routinely differs from what the applicant selects at submission. I am also not certain the service-rating item is charged on a PV-only permit where the service is not altered. Treat the components as reliable and the total as indicative.
adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54) checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered — an itemised schedule: a flat basic permit fee plus per-item charges, with the distributed-generation item banded by kW and the service item banded by amperage. Not valuation-based, not per panel.
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 10 § 10-54 is structured exactly this way, and DSD's solar guide tells the applicant to 'Choose the fee associated with the type and number of items being installed'. 80 rather than higher because 'Tiered' is the closest of the offered options to what is really an itemised unit-price schedule, and none of the offered options is an exact fit.
adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54) checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Not as a standing separate charge on a solar permit. The schedule carries 'Electrical plan review only (without building plan number) — $100.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum', which is for standalone review; on a normal PV permit the technical review is part of the permit, but DSD may assess additional fees during technical review and invoice them before permit issuance.
Why the confidence is not higherThe $100/hr line item is verbatim from § 10-54 but is captioned for review 'without building plan number', which is not the normal PV path. IB 153 says 'If additional fees are assessed during technical review, the applicant will review an e-mail with invoice' without naming a plan-check fee. So the answer is assembled from two of the authority's documents, neither of which addresses the question head-on.
adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54) checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
3 business days. DSD reviews the application for completeness within three working days and forwards it to technical review; technical review has a stated goal of three working days for initial review. DSD's solar guide tells applicants to 'Expect to receive Issues within three (3) business days'. Total time to permit depends on submittal quality and resubmittal speed. Note the separate utility clock: CPS Energy's initial DER review is stated as 10 business days in IB 153 but as 20–25 working days on CPS Energy's own distributed generation page.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 and the DSD solar guide agree on the 3-working-day figure, and both are DSD's own current documents. Held at 90 because IB 153 calls it a 'goal', not a commitment, and because the two CPS figures for the utility review flatly contradict each other — the 10-day figure is in the city bulletin, the 20–25-day figure on the utility's own page, and I could not resolve which is current.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days. A permit becomes invalid unless work on the site is commenced within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended or abandoned for 180 days after commencing. The Building Official may grant one or more written extensions of not more than 180 days each, on written request with justifiable cause. A permit extension fee is charged at 50% of the permit (plus the cost of the permit).
Why the confidence is not higherChapter 10 § 10-6(o) verbatim from the adopted ordinance, plus the extension fee from § 10-54. This is the general building-related permit rule; it is not solar-specific, which is the only reason it is not 95.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
BuildSA Customer Portal (Accela Citizen Access) at https://aca-prod.accela.com/COSA/default.aspx. The PV application sits under the Building module tab, as an MEP Trade Permits Application. Records split in two: an application record (MEP-TRD-APP…) used for uploads, plan review, resubmittals, fee payment and downloading approved stamped plans, and a permit record (MEP-SOL-PMT…) used for scheduling inspections, additional fees, the CPS release workflow and the Letter of Completion.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 gives the URL directly; DSD's solar guide documents the two-record structure with the actual record-number formats.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes — application, document upload, plan-review responses, fee payment, download of approved stamped plans, inspection scheduling and receipt of the Letter of Completion are all online. Approved stamped plans must then be printed and kept on site for inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 and the DSD solar guide describe an end-to-end online workflow. Held at 92 because the CPS Energy side is not in the same portal — the DER application goes by email to cpsesolar@cpsenergy.com or through CPS's separate DG Review Portal — so 'the whole application' is only true of the city half.
department permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/DSDUploads/SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL.pdf
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
CPS Energy — the City of San Antonio's own municipally owned utility. DG contact: (210) 353-2700, DG@cpsenergy.com; solar applications to cpsesolar@cpsenergy.com; general (210) 353-2641.
Why the confidence is not higherConfirmed from both sides as the brief requires, never from a ZIP lookup. Utility side: CPS Energy's own 'who we are' page states 'The City of San Antonio municipal government acquires the former San Antonio Public Service Company, later to be named City Public Service before becoming CPS Energy' and that in 1942 'every citizen of San Antonio became the investors and direct benefactors of CPS Energy'. City side: IB 153 is jointly authored by DSD and CPS Energy, and Chapter 10 names CPS Energy in the adopted NEC amendments (Art. 701.4 and 706.7). Texas SB 1202 § 247.0025(b)(2) separately treats a municipally owned utility as a distinct category whose interconnection policies survive the third-party route.
utility corporate page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/corporate/en/about-us/who-we-are.html
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel — IB 153 says it is 'highly recommended that you submit your application and required documentation, as applicable, to both entities simultaneously'. But the dependencies are strict at both ends: CPS Energy's approval of the preconstruction package produces a Construction Letter 'authorizing the commencement of work', so CPS approval must precede construction; and at the far end CPS 'will only schedule a Commissioning Test if the permit is released by DSD'. So: submit in parallel, build after CPS's construction letter, inspect with DSD, then CPS commissions and grants Approval for Operation.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 Steps 1–4 verbatim, corroborated by the DG Manual's process chapter (2.8 Inspection/Commissioning, 2.10 Permission to Operate). Held at 88 because 'Parallel' is true of the submission but understates how hard the CPS construction letter gates the build.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — not a city requirement. Nothing in the DSD permit process or the automatic technical-review list conditions a solar permit on HOA or architectural-committee approval.
Why the confidence is not higherThis is a proved absence on the city side only. DSD's solar guide lists every technical review that a solar application can generate — Electrical (always), Addressing, Flood, Office of Historic Preservation, Neighborhood Conservation District, Tree Commercial — and HOA approval is not among them. But an HOA is a private covenant, not a city instrument, so the city's silence does not mean an HOA cannot restrict; Texas Property Code limits on HOA solar restrictions exist but I did not fetch that statute this run and am not asserting its content.
department permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/DSDUploads/SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Yes, where the property applies. Applicants proposing to install or modify a PV system on a premise containing a designated historical resource, or within a historic district, are required to meet with the Historic Design and Review Commission BEFORE submitting the project to DSD. Office of Historic Preservation is also one of the technical reviews the portal generates automatically based on location, as is Neighborhood Conservation District.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 has a dedicated 'Historical Review' heading stating the HDRC meeting requirement and its sequencing ahead of DSD submittal; the DSD solar guide independently lists OHP as an auto-generated review. Held at 92 because IB 153 does not say what the HDRC applies as its standard for rooftop PV.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedEnacted ordinance Ord. 2025-01-30-0075 (246 pp, all of Chapter 10 plus the Chapter 11 fire amendments) — searched for 'wind', 'windstorm', 'TDI', 'catastrophe'; IB 153 and IB 405 in full; UDC § 35-398. No windstorm-certification requirement appears in any city document, and Bexar County is inland rather than in a coastal catastrophe area — but I did not reach a Texas Department of Insurance source this run to confirm the designated-catastrophe-area boundary, and DSD's own pages were unreachable (sa.gov returned HTTP 403 throughout). Recording no answer rather than asserting an absence I cannot prove from the authority's side.
https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Not for residential rooftop PV. The Unified Development Code's renewable-energy provision (§ 35-398) addresses ground-mounted fixed-panel photovoltaic solar farms and small wind systems, not roof-mounted residential arrays. For solar farms it sets an average array height limit of 12 feet, a 30-foot setback only where abutting residential uses or zones, open fencing up to 8 feet, no screening requirement from public streets, and requires an executed CPS Energy interconnection agreement before occupancy.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from eLaws, a third-party publisher, because the city's own code library at sa.gov was unreachable (HTTP 403) and codelibrary.amlegal.com also returned 403 all run. I could not date the eLaws copy or confirm it reflects the current UDC. The negative for residential rooftop follows from what the section covers rather than from an express exclusion. Do not act on this without re-checking against the city's own UDC.
third-party code publisher (UDC § 35-398) checked 2026-08-28 http://sanantonio-tx.elaws.us/code/cid14228/35-398/
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Not capped by the city, but capped by the utility. CPS Energy: 'DG Facilities connected at secondary voltages cannot have a maximum capacity rating that exceeds the size of the transformer serving the secondary. Service upgrades will be designed and installed by CPS Energy at the owner's expense.' Also relevant to residential: energy storage installed as part of a net-metered installation is not permitted to export power to the grid, though it may power essential loads during an outage. Clustering thresholds (30% of minimum circuit peak) can trigger an interconnection study. Systems ≥25 kWac cross into PE-sealed drawings and a longer CPS review.
Why the confidence is not higherCPS DG Manual §§ 1.2.1 and 3.1.1 verbatim from the 9th Edition (May 1 2024, Revision 1.0). Held at 85 because the transformer cap is expressed as a design constraint rather than a numeric residential limit, so the practical ceiling varies address by address.
utility DG manual checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Distributed%20Generation%20Manual.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC (NFPA 70, 2023 edition), as amended by Chapter 10 Article VI. Effective 1 May 2025. 88% · adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-01-30-0075)
- Which building code edition is in force? 2024 International Building Code and 2024 International Residential Code (one- and two-family dwellings), effective 1 May 2025. Also 2024 IEBC, IMC, IPC, IFGC, ISPSC. Energy: 2021 IECC, unchanged and still in effect. 95% · adopting ordinance
- Which fire code edition is in force? 2024 International Fire Code, including Appendices B, C, D, F, I, L and M. Adopted not in Chapter 10 but at City Code Chapter 11 (Fire Prevention), Article III, § 11-32, with local amendments at § 11-40. 95% · adopting ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — extensive local amendments to all adopted codes. The solar-relevant ones are: IBC 1604.5.2 (PV panel systems risk categories) amended by striking item 6; NEC Art. 230.82(6) amended to permit solar PV, fuel cell, wind, ESS and interconnected power production sources on the supply side of the service disconnect only with a disconnect listed as suitable for service equipment, with such connections not made within service equipment enclosures; NEC Art. 705.50 amended so microgrid systems may island only during loss of utility power, as a backup source; NEC Art. 706.7(A) amended so ESS commissioning for one- and two-family dwellings SHALL be conducted by CPS Energy (the model code's exclusion of one- and two-family dwellings was struck); NEC Art. 701.4(D)(2) requiring distributed generation transfer schemes to be approved by CPS Energy's Distributed Generation section; IRC R409 Photovoltaic (PV) Capable, requiring reserved electrical service space for a dual-pole breaker labelled 'For Future Solar Electric'; IFC 105.6.21 (solar photovoltaic power system construction permit) and 105.6.6 (energy storage systems) REPEALED; IFC 1107.1 amended so the lithium-ion ESS hazard-analysis duty begins 1 January 2026 and expressly excepts detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses. 95% · adopting ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The 2023 NEC as amended by Chapter 10 Article VI (§§ 10-51 to 10-53), plus the 2024 IRC/IBC for structural and fire-classification aspects and the 2024 IFC (Ch. 11 § 11-40) for access pathways; and, in parallel and enforced by the utility rather than the city, CPS Energy's Electric Service Standards Section 2000 and the CPS Energy DG Manual. Roof-mounted PV panels or modules must have the same fire classification as the roof assembly per the IRC/IBC. 88% · department information bulletin + adopting ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? The unamended 2024 IFC applies. Drawings must 'Show measurements for clearance for fire fighter access as required by the International Fire Code Section 1205.2 and 1205.3'. Residential (single family, duplex, townhomes) and commercial with sloped roofs greater than 2:12 follow IFC § 1205.2; commercial flat roofs or roofs at or below 2:12 follow the other track. In both cases solar arrays shall not be greater than 150 feet on any one side — larger dimensions create multiple arrays with further access pathways between them. Ground-mounted PV arrays are not subject to setback requirements but shall maintain a clear brush-free area of 10 feet. 85% · department information bulletin + adopting ordinance
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — to the 2023 NEC (Art. 690.12), which is the edition adopted by the city effective 1 May 2025. Rapid shutdown equipment (optimizers, micro-inverters, 'birdhouse') must be shown on the submitted site plan, and all protective devices including rapid-shutdown equipment must be shown with size, rating, manufacturer, type, style, model and settings on the CPS submittal. CPS Energy adds: 'Rapid shutdown shall be required in accordance with the NEC and shall be included in the design with proper labeling'; SolarEdge inverter installations may use the PV DC disconnect as the rapid shutdown switch and micro-inverter installations may use the PV AC disconnect, with rapid-shutdown labelling per Figure 2000.6 required on both; and rapid shutdown is NOT required at all for ground-mounted array systems provided the DC conductors do not route inside the building. 85% · utility electric service standards
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The placard set is specified by CPS Energy, not by DSD, at Electric Service Standards Figure 2000.6 'Labeling requirements for typical photovoltaic (PV) systems'. Required labels: PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT (with maximum voltage, maximum circuit current, and maximum rated output current of the charge controller or DC-to-DC converter if installed); PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT (with rated AC output current and nominal operating AC voltage); PV METER at the PV meter socket and REVENUE METER at the CPS Energy revenue meter socket (required on both where the meters have been approved to be remote from one another); customer service panel directory/plaque per NEC 705.10; rapid shutdown placards — a different one for systems that shut down the array and the conductors leaving the array versus systems that only shut down conductors within 10 ft of leaving the array; RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM on the inverter DC disconnect switch where that switch shuts down the array and conductors leaving it; 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION — DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE'; 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' on raceways/enclosures containing DC conductors; and 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL'. The figure states it 'is not intended to include all labeling which may be required by the NEC and AHJ'. 82% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes, but the wording comes from the municipally owned utility, not from DSD. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 prescribes actual label text — e.g. 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION / DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE', 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL', 'RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM', 'PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT', 'PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT', 'PV METER', 'REVENUE METER'. DSD's Chapter 10 imposes only generic electrical marking (§ 10-53(b): disconnecting means legibly and durably marked to indicate purpose; electrical room doors marked ELECTRICAL ROOM or similar approved wording) and no PV-specific wording of its own. 82% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No independent letter height, colour or material specification. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 Note 1 instead defers to the NEC: 'LABELING SHALL BE PERMANENTLY AFFIXED AND SUITABLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2017 NEC, ARTICLE 110.21(B).' So the governing requirements are permanence, environmental suitability, and NEC 110.21(B) — read at the 2023 edition now in force in the city. Neither DSD nor CPS specifies a millimetre letter height, a colour, or a substrate. 85% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 Note 1
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes — a customer service panel directory/plaque per NEC 705.10. CPS Figure 2000.6 requires it 'PLACED ON SERVICE PANEL AND ON SYSTEM DISCONNECTS FOR OTHER ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCTION SOURCES WHEN NOT GROUPED'. Chapter 10 § 10-53 and CPS ESS § 407.3 add the general parallel rule that where a building is supplied by more than one service, a permanent plaque or directory must be installed at each service disconnect location denoting all other services. Neither document prescribes the plaque's graphical content beyond the NEC 705.10 reference. 82% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — and this is where the placard requirements actually live for San Antonio. CPS Energy ESS § 2005(G): 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' The full set is at q38. Note that the CPS DG Manual — the document an installer would most naturally reach for — contains NO labelling requirements at all; the placards are in the separate Electric Service Standards. 85% · utility electric service standards § 2005(G)
- Where must the labels be placed? Per CPS Figure 2000.6 and the Figure 2000.2/2000.3 notes: on the PV DC disconnect; on the PV AC disconnect; on the PV meter socket and on the CPS Energy revenue meter socket (the meter placards required on BOTH sockets where the meters are approved to be remote from one another); on the customer service panel (the 705.10 directory/plaque), and on system disconnects for other electric power production sources when not grouped; on the service panel for the rapid shutdown placard; on the inverter DC disconnect switch for the rapid shutdown switch label; on the overcurrent device for the inverter output connection warning; on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors for the 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' label; on the PV/AC aggregate panel; and on PV AC conductors run in attic spaces, whose raceways must carry labels denoting PV AC conductors. All labelling must be in place at the time of CPS commissioning. 85% · utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Immediately adjacent to the meter. CPS Energy ESS § 409: 'On all Distributed Generation (DG) Systems, a meter disconnect switch shall be installed ahead of CPS Energy's kWh meter to isolate it from the DG power source. The meter disconnect switch shall be located immediately adjacent to the meter.' ESS § 2005(F): the PV AC meter disconnect is furnished and installed by the customer on the load side of the inverters and before CPS Energy PV system metering equipment, 'shall be located immediately adjacent to the PV system metering equipment and shall be readily accessible and capable of being locked in the open position'. Figure 2000.3 Note 4: 'THE PV AC DISCONNECT AND PV METER SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE REVENUE METER.' Figure 2000.6 Note 2: the PV meter shall be located adjacent to the revenue meter unless pre-approved by CPS Energy to be located remotely due to special circumstances; where the interconnection is made remote from the PV meter, an additional disconnect to isolate the PV meter is required. The DG Manual § 4.7 adds that the owner pays the full cost of a visible load-break disconnect switch 'by and to the sole specification of CPS Energy', readily accessible to CPS Energy personnel and 'of a type that can be secured in an open position by a CPS Energy padlock'. 90% · utility electric service standards §§ 409 and 2005(F)
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, at utility level. CPS DG Manual § 7.1.3: for DG systems up to 50 kWac, certified equipment and equipment listed with an approved test label may be installed 'without further review of the DG Owner's design by CPS Energy', and for the list of certified equipment CPS points to the California Energy Commission solar equipment lists at https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/solar-equipment-lists. Where the owner is exporting using certified equipment, the protective settings and operations shall be those specified by CPS Energy. City side, IB 153 requires manufacturer specification sheets and listing information for all components, and a listed mounting system and listed battery racking, but names no list. 80% · utility DG manual
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, permitted. Conditions: batteries must be installed in a listed racking system and located in areas provided with ventilation in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions (IB 153), and batteries must be shown on the submitted site plan. The IFC lithium-ion ESS hazard-analysis duty (§ 1107.1 as amended, operative from 1 January 2026) expressly excepts detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses. Commissioning is the notable local twist: Chapter 10 amends NEC Art. 706.7(A) so that 'Commissioning for one-and-two family dwellings shall be conducted by CPS Energy' — the model code's exclusion of one- and two-family dwellings was deliberately struck. Storage installed as part of a net-metered installation may not export to the grid but may power essential loads during loss of power. CPS Energy's DG Manual is explicitly still being revised for Battery Energy Storage Systems and directs applicants to contact CPS directly (DG@cpsenergy.com, 210-353-2700) for BESS interconnection in the interim. 85% · department information bulletin + adopting ordinance + utility DG manual
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No separate city permit. The IFC construction permit for energy storage systems (§ 105.6.6) was repealed by the city's fire code amendments, as was the IFC solar photovoltaic power system permit (§ 105.6.21) — so neither triggers a separate fire construction permit; the ESS is covered by the electrical/solar trade permit. There IS a separate utility step: under the amended NEC Art. 706.7(A), ESS commissioning for one- and two-family dwellings shall be conducted by CPS Energy. 80% · adopting ordinance
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes for structural purposes. IBC § 1604.5.2 as locally amended assigns risk categories to PV panel systems and elevated PV support structures, with ground-mounted PV panel systems serving only Group R-3 buildings assigned to Risk Category I and other ground-mounted systems to Risk Category II. For fire access, ground-mounted PV arrays are not subject to setback requirements but shall maintain a clear brush-free area of 10 feet. A new structure such as a trellis, patio cover, canopy or carport intended to support PV — which would otherwise be exempt from a building permit — triggers Texas PE engineering calculations. 72% · adopting ordinance + department information bulletin
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes, and it is at utility level. CPS Energy ESS § 2005(H): load-side interconnections shall be made on the load side of the customer's main service panel; 'A main breaker is required and shall be used in the bus ampere rating calculation to ensure the bus rating is not exceeded'; and 'Interconnections for residential installations shall be made at exterior panels'. Line-side interconnections shall be made in a junction box or auxiliary gutter ahead of the service disconnecting means, the junction box provided with locking provisions and not less than 12 in x 12 in; conductors from that junction box to the PV AC disconnect are treated as service-entrance conductors and 'in no case shall the distance exceed 10 feet'. Raceways containing inverter output conductors must be EMT for all above-ground portions and must not contain conduit bodies (LBs) or junction boxes unless specifically approved by CPS Energy; underground may be PVC, with Schedule 80 permitted above ground if securely supported and not extending more than 4 feet. Where the point of interconnection is ahead of the service equipment it must be after the CPS revenue meter and pre-approved. PV DC conductors in attic spaces must be in approved metal raceways/conduits; PV AC conductors in attics must be in approved raceways with labels denoting PV AC conductors. City side: Chapter 10's NEC 230.82(6) amendment governs supply-side connections. 88% · utility electric service standards
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No prescribed proprietary system or fixed attachment spacing. What is required: a 'Listed Mounting System' shown on the site plan; a 'Listed and labeled, Array/Panel fastening method'; and either fastening specification sheets from the manufacturer or an engineered design for anchorage and support of the array panels to the roof structure; plus the method of sealing roof penetrations. Batteries must be installed in a listed racking system. 88% · department information bulletin
20 questions answered against City of San Antonio’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2023 NEC (NFPA 70, 2023 edition), as amended by Chapter 10 Article VI. Effective 1 May 2025.
Why the confidence is not higherIMPORTANT CONFLICT, resolved against the enacted ordinance. The Chapter 10 PDF that DSD itself publishes still reads 'Sec. 10-51. Adoption of National Electrical Code (2020)' and 'The 2020 edition ... is adopted', and its Article II definitions likewise say 'NFPA 70, 2020 edition' — even though the same PDF's front matter says the 2023 edition was adopted. The enacted ordinance (Ord. 2025-01-30-0075, 246 pages, read directly) says 'Sec. 10-51. Adoption of National Electrical Code (2023)' and 'The 2023 edition of the National Electrical Code ... is adopted', with the caption and enacting clause both naming the 2023 NEC and § 5 preserving the 2020 NEC only for the period it was in force. The enacted ordinance controls, so 2023 is the answer — but note that the ordinance's own Article II definitions were NOT conformed and still say 2020, and the DSD-hosted codified PDF is stale on this point. Anyone relying on the DSD PDF will get this wrong. 88 not 95 because the authority's own published documents disagree with each other.
adopting ordinance (Ord. 2025-01-30-0075) checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2024 International Building Code and 2024 International Residential Code (one- and two-family dwellings), effective 1 May 2025. Also 2024 IEBC, IMC, IPC, IFGC, ISPSC. Energy: 2021 IECC, unchanged and still in effect.
Why the confidence is not higherEnacted ordinance § 1 and Chapter 10 Article II definitions both state these editions, and the ordinance was adopted 30 January 2025 with an effective date of 1 May 2025 printed on the codified chapter's cover. No conflict here, unlike the NEC.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
2024 International Fire Code, including Appendices B, C, D, F, I, L and M. Adopted not in Chapter 10 but at City Code Chapter 11 (Fire Prevention), Article III, § 11-32, with local amendments at § 11-40.
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance § 2 repeals and replaces § 11-32 verbatim: 'The 2024 edition of the International Fire Code, including Appendices B, C, D, F, I, L and M ... is hereby adopted'. Ordinance § 4 replaces § 11-40 with 'Amendments made to the 2024 International Fire Code'. Worth flagging that the fire code lives in a different chapter from the rest, which is easy to miss.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes — extensive local amendments to all adopted codes. The solar-relevant ones are: IBC 1604.5.2 (PV panel systems risk categories) amended by striking item 6; NEC Art. 230.82(6) amended to permit solar PV, fuel cell, wind, ESS and interconnected power production sources on the supply side of the service disconnect only with a disconnect listed as suitable for service equipment, with such connections not made within service equipment enclosures; NEC Art. 705.50 amended so microgrid systems may island only during loss of utility power, as a backup source; NEC Art. 706.7(A) amended so ESS commissioning for one- and two-family dwellings SHALL be conducted by CPS Energy (the model code's exclusion of one- and two-family dwellings was struck); NEC Art. 701.4(D)(2) requiring distributed generation transfer schemes to be approved by CPS Energy's Distributed Generation section; IRC R409 Photovoltaic (PV) Capable, requiring reserved electrical service space for a dual-pole breaker labelled 'For Future Solar Electric'; IFC 105.6.21 (solar photovoltaic power system construction permit) and 105.6.6 (energy storage systems) REPEALED; IFC 1107.1 amended so the lithium-ion ESS hazard-analysis duty begins 1 January 2026 and expressly excepts detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses.
Why the confidence is not higherAll read verbatim from the enacted ordinance with pdftotext -layout. Positive control 'electrical' = 245 hits, fabricated control 'zzqqx' = 0, so the searches behind these are sound.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2023 NEC as amended by Chapter 10 Article VI (§§ 10-51 to 10-53), plus the 2024 IRC/IBC for structural and fire-classification aspects and the 2024 IFC (Ch. 11 § 11-40) for access pathways; and, in parallel and enforced by the utility rather than the city, CPS Energy's Electric Service Standards Section 2000 and the CPS Energy DG Manual. Roof-mounted PV panels or modules must have the same fire classification as the roof assembly per the IRC/IBC.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the adopting ordinance and IB 153 (which states the fire-classification rule verbatim and points to the adopted codes and amendments). 88 rather than higher because it is a synthesis across four documents rather than one sentence in one document, and because it inherits the NEC-edition conflict noted at q29.
department information bulletin + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Yes, and it is at utility level. CPS Energy ESS § 2005(H): load-side interconnections shall be made on the load side of the customer's main service panel; 'A main breaker is required and shall be used in the bus ampere rating calculation to ensure the bus rating is not exceeded'; and 'Interconnections for residential installations shall be made at exterior panels'. Line-side interconnections shall be made in a junction box or auxiliary gutter ahead of the service disconnecting means, the junction box provided with locking provisions and not less than 12 in x 12 in; conductors from that junction box to the PV AC disconnect are treated as service-entrance conductors and 'in no case shall the distance exceed 10 feet'. Raceways containing inverter output conductors must be EMT for all above-ground portions and must not contain conduit bodies (LBs) or junction boxes unless specifically approved by CPS Energy; underground may be PVC, with Schedule 80 permitted above ground if securely supported and not extending more than 4 feet. Where the point of interconnection is ahead of the service equipment it must be after the CPS revenue meter and pre-approved. PV DC conductors in attic spaces must be in approved metal raceways/conduits; PV AC conductors in attics must be in approved raceways with labels denoting PV AC conductors. City side: Chapter 10's NEC 230.82(6) amendment governs supply-side connections.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from CPS Electric Service Standards § 2005, extracted with pdftotext -layout. Held at 88 because the Standards are the 2021 Edition and cite the 2017 NEC throughout, while the city has since moved to the 2023 NEC — the CPS rules are additive local requirements and are unlikely to have lapsed, but the document has not been refreshed against the current code cycle.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No prescribed proprietary system or fixed attachment spacing. What is required: a 'Listed Mounting System' shown on the site plan; a 'Listed and labeled, Array/Panel fastening method'; and either fastening specification sheets from the manufacturer or an engineered design for anchorage and support of the array panels to the roof structure; plus the method of sealing roof penetrations. Batteries must be installed in a listed racking system.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 items 1(c)(v), 2(b) and 3(d) verbatim. The absence of a spacing rule is proved by reading the full mounting requirements in the only DSD document that addresses PV mounting; held at 88 because a spacing amendment could in principle live in the IRC amendments, and while I found no PV mounting amendment there, my search of the ordinance targeted 'solar'/'photovolt' rather than every fastener term.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
The unamended 2024 IFC applies. Drawings must 'Show measurements for clearance for fire fighter access as required by the International Fire Code Section 1205.2 and 1205.3'. Residential (single family, duplex, townhomes) and commercial with sloped roofs greater than 2:12 follow IFC § 1205.2; commercial flat roofs or roofs at or below 2:12 follow the other track. In both cases solar arrays shall not be greater than 150 feet on any one side — larger dimensions create multiple arrays with further access pathways between them. Ground-mounted PV arrays are not subject to setback requirements but shall maintain a clear brush-free area of 10 feet.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 item 2(a)(v)-(vi) verbatim for the local overlay, plus a proved absence for local amendment: the city's fire amendments (Ch. 11 § 11-40, Attachment B to the ordinance) do amend Chapter 12 of the IFC — § 1203.1 is amended and § 1204.10 is amended — but § 1205 is not amended anywhere in the ordinance (0 occurrences of '1205' in the whole 246-page enacted text, against a working search that found 1203, 1204 and 1207). So the model 2024 IFC § 1205 setbacks and pathways govern unchanged. Held at 85 because IB 153 does not restate the actual dimensions from § 1205, so the numeric setback and pathway widths must be read out of the 2024 IFC itself, which is a paywalled ICC document I did not open.
department information bulletin + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — to the 2023 NEC (Art. 690.12), which is the edition adopted by the city effective 1 May 2025. Rapid shutdown equipment (optimizers, micro-inverters, 'birdhouse') must be shown on the submitted site plan, and all protective devices including rapid-shutdown equipment must be shown with size, rating, manufacturer, type, style, model and settings on the CPS submittal. CPS Energy adds: 'Rapid shutdown shall be required in accordance with the NEC and shall be included in the design with proper labeling'; SolarEdge inverter installations may use the PV DC disconnect as the rapid shutdown switch and micro-inverter installations may use the PV AC disconnect, with rapid-shutdown labelling per Figure 2000.6 required on both; and rapid shutdown is NOT required at all for ground-mounted array systems provided the DC conductors do not route inside the building.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 and CPS ESS § 2005(I) plus the Figure 2000.2/2000.3 notes, all extracted directly. The NEC edition is inherited from q29 and carries that answer's conflict. The CPS ground-mount exemption and the SolarEdge/micro-inverter notes are written against the 2017 NEC in a 2021-edition standard, so their exact article references are out of date even though the substance is likely unchanged.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The placard set is specified by CPS Energy, not by DSD, at Electric Service Standards Figure 2000.6 'Labeling requirements for typical photovoltaic (PV) systems'. Required labels: PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT (with maximum voltage, maximum circuit current, and maximum rated output current of the charge controller or DC-to-DC converter if installed); PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT (with rated AC output current and nominal operating AC voltage); PV METER at the PV meter socket and REVENUE METER at the CPS Energy revenue meter socket (required on both where the meters have been approved to be remote from one another); customer service panel directory/plaque per NEC 705.10; rapid shutdown placards — a different one for systems that shut down the array and the conductors leaving the array versus systems that only shut down conductors within 10 ft of leaving the array; RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM on the inverter DC disconnect switch where that switch shuts down the array and conductors leaving it; 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION — DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE'; 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' on raceways/enclosures containing DC conductors; and 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL'. The figure states it 'is not intended to include all labeling which may be required by the NEC and AHJ'.
Why the confidence is not higherRead verbatim off Figure 2000.6 after extracting the 306-page PDF with pdftotext -layout — this figure does not survive summarisation and would have been missed entirely if I had stopped at the DG Manual. Held at 82 because the Standards are the 2021 Edition and every article reference in the figure is to the 2017 NEC (690.53, 690.13(B), 690.56, 690.12(C), 705.12(B)(2)(3)(b), 110.21(B)), whereas the city adopted the 2023 NEC in May 2025. The label content is still the operative CPS requirement, but the article numbering and some 2023 NEC label wording will have moved on, and the figure itself disclaims completeness.
utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, but the wording comes from the municipally owned utility, not from DSD. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 prescribes actual label text — e.g. 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION / DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE', 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL', 'RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM', 'PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT', 'PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT', 'PV METER', 'REVENUE METER'. DSD's Chapter 10 imposes only generic electrical marking (§ 10-53(b): disconnecting means legibly and durably marked to indicate purpose; electrical room doors marked ELECTRICAL ROOM or similar approved wording) and no PV-specific wording of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherSame source and same 2021-edition/2017-NEC caveat as q38. The DSD half is a proved absence: searching the enacted ordinance for 'placard' returns zero hits against a working control.
utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No independent letter height, colour or material specification. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 Note 1 instead defers to the NEC: 'LABELING SHALL BE PERMANENTLY AFFIXED AND SUITABLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2017 NEC, ARTICLE 110.21(B).' So the governing requirements are permanence, environmental suitability, and NEC 110.21(B) — read at the 2023 edition now in force in the city. Neither DSD nor CPS specifies a millimetre letter height, a colour, or a substrate.
Why the confidence is not higherA proved absence rather than a guess: the note that would carry a height/colour spec exists and says something else instead. Held at 85 because the note cites the 2017 NEC while the city is on the 2023 NEC, so the cross-reference needs re-reading at the current edition.
utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 Note 1 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — a customer service panel directory/plaque per NEC 705.10. CPS Figure 2000.6 requires it 'PLACED ON SERVICE PANEL AND ON SYSTEM DISCONNECTS FOR OTHER ELECTRIC POWER PRODUCTION SOURCES WHEN NOT GROUPED'. Chapter 10 § 10-53 and CPS ESS § 407.3 add the general parallel rule that where a building is supplied by more than one service, a permanent plaque or directory must be installed at each service disconnect location denoting all other services. Neither document prescribes the plaque's graphical content beyond the NEC 705.10 reference.
Why the confidence is not higherFigure 2000.6 verbatim plus ESS § 407.3. Held at 82 for the same 2017-NEC-in-a-2021-edition reason as q38: what must appear ON the plaque is governed by NEC 705.10 at the 2023 edition, which the CPS figure has not been updated to.
utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — and this is where the placard requirements actually live for San Antonio. CPS Energy ESS § 2005(G): 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' The full set is at q38. Note that the CPS DG Manual — the document an installer would most naturally reach for — contains NO labelling requirements at all; the placards are in the separate Electric Service Standards.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo-document finding, both extracted with pdftotext -layout. The DG Manual absence is proved with controls in the same run: 'placard', 'signage', 'marking', 'CAUTION' and 'WARNING' all return zero across the 93-page DG Manual, against a working positive control ('electrical' = 19) and a clean fabricated control ('zzqqx' = 0); the single 'label' hit is about an equipment test label. Had I stopped at the DG Manual I would have booked a false absence for this question. Held at 85 only because of the Standards' 2021 edition date.
utility electric service standards § 2005(G) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Per CPS Figure 2000.6 and the Figure 2000.2/2000.3 notes: on the PV DC disconnect; on the PV AC disconnect; on the PV meter socket and on the CPS Energy revenue meter socket (the meter placards required on BOTH sockets where the meters are approved to be remote from one another); on the customer service panel (the 705.10 directory/plaque), and on system disconnects for other electric power production sources when not grouped; on the service panel for the rapid shutdown placard; on the inverter DC disconnect switch for the rapid shutdown switch label; on the overcurrent device for the inverter output connection warning; on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors for the 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' label; on the PV/AC aggregate panel; and on PV AC conductors run in attic spaces, whose raceways must carry labels denoting PV AC conductors. All labelling must be in place at the time of CPS commissioning.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Figure 2000.6's placement captions, ESS § 2005(G) and § 2005(K). Same 2021-edition caveat as q38.
utility electric service standards, Figure 2000.6 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, at utility level. CPS DG Manual § 7.1.3: for DG systems up to 50 kWac, certified equipment and equipment listed with an approved test label may be installed 'without further review of the DG Owner's design by CPS Energy', and for the list of certified equipment CPS points to the California Energy Commission solar equipment lists at https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/solar-equipment-lists. Where the owner is exporting using certified equipment, the protective settings and operations shall be those specified by CPS Energy. City side, IB 153 requires manufacturer specification sheets and listing information for all components, and a listed mounting system and listed battery racking, but names no list.
Why the confidence is not higherDG Manual § 7.1.3 verbatim from the current 9th Edition. Held at 80 because the CEC list functions as a safe harbour that avoids design review rather than as a strict approved-products mandate — the manual does not say equipment off the list is prohibited, only that listed equipment skips further review.
utility DG manual checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Distributed%20Generation%20Manual.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, permitted. Conditions: batteries must be installed in a listed racking system and located in areas provided with ventilation in accordance with the manufacturer's installation instructions (IB 153), and batteries must be shown on the submitted site plan. The IFC lithium-ion ESS hazard-analysis duty (§ 1107.1 as amended, operative from 1 January 2026) expressly excepts detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses. Commissioning is the notable local twist: Chapter 10 amends NEC Art. 706.7(A) so that 'Commissioning for one-and-two family dwellings shall be conducted by CPS Energy' — the model code's exclusion of one- and two-family dwellings was deliberately struck. Storage installed as part of a net-metered installation may not export to the grid but may power essential loads during loss of power. CPS Energy's DG Manual is explicitly still being revised for Battery Energy Storage Systems and directs applicants to contact CPS directly (DG@cpsenergy.com, 210-353-2700) for BESS interconnection in the interim.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from four of the authority's/utility's own current documents, each read verbatim. Held at 85 because the CPS side is expressly in flux — the DG Manual's own front-page memorandum (dated 5/21/2024) says the BESS requirements are unwritten and interim — so the utility half of this answer is a moving target.
department information bulletin + adopting ordinance + utility DG manual checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No separate city permit. The IFC construction permit for energy storage systems (§ 105.6.6) was repealed by the city's fire code amendments, as was the IFC solar photovoltaic power system permit (§ 105.6.21) — so neither triggers a separate fire construction permit; the ESS is covered by the electrical/solar trade permit. There IS a separate utility step: under the amended NEC Art. 706.7(A), ESS commissioning for one- and two-family dwellings shall be conducted by CPS Energy.
Why the confidence is not higherThe repeal is verbatim in the enacted ordinance ('SECTIONS [A]105.6.6 ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS, ... and [A]105.6.21 SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SYSTEM are repealed'), and the 706.7(A) amendment is verbatim in Chapter 10 Article VI. Held at 80 because the repeal proves no separate FIRE permit rather than proving no separate ESS permit of any kind, and because I could not reach DSD's own permit-type list on sa.gov (HTTP 403) to confirm there is no distinct ESS record type in Accela.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes for structural purposes. IBC § 1604.5.2 as locally amended assigns risk categories to PV panel systems and elevated PV support structures, with ground-mounted PV panel systems serving only Group R-3 buildings assigned to Risk Category I and other ground-mounted systems to Risk Category II. For fire access, ground-mounted PV arrays are not subject to setback requirements but shall maintain a clear brush-free area of 10 feet. A new structure such as a trellis, patio cover, canopy or carport intended to support PV — which would otherwise be exempt from a building permit — triggers Texas PE engineering calculations.
Why the confidence is not higherThe risk-category assignment and the 10-foot brush clearance are verbatim from the ordinance and IB 153 respectively, so the structural treatment is well evidenced. But neither document says in terms 'a ground mount is a structure requiring a building permit', and I could not reach DSD's permit-type pages to confirm whether a residential ground mount takes a building permit in addition to the electrical/solar permit. 72 reflects that the inference is sound but the permit consequence is unconfirmed.
adopting ordinance + department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Immediately adjacent to the meter. CPS Energy ESS § 409: 'On all Distributed Generation (DG) Systems, a meter disconnect switch shall be installed ahead of CPS Energy's kWh meter to isolate it from the DG power source. The meter disconnect switch shall be located immediately adjacent to the meter.' ESS § 2005(F): the PV AC meter disconnect is furnished and installed by the customer on the load side of the inverters and before CPS Energy PV system metering equipment, 'shall be located immediately adjacent to the PV system metering equipment and shall be readily accessible and capable of being locked in the open position'. Figure 2000.3 Note 4: 'THE PV AC DISCONNECT AND PV METER SHALL BE LOCATED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE REVENUE METER.' Figure 2000.6 Note 2: the PV meter shall be located adjacent to the revenue meter unless pre-approved by CPS Energy to be located remotely due to special circumstances; where the interconnection is made remote from the PV meter, an additional disconnect to isolate the PV meter is required. The DG Manual § 4.7 adds that the owner pays the full cost of a visible load-break disconnect switch 'by and to the sole specification of CPS Energy', readily accessible to CPS Energy personnel and 'of a type that can be secured in an open position by a CPS Energy padlock'.
Why the confidence is not higherFour mutually consistent statements across two utility documents, all extracted verbatim. Held at 90 rather than 95 because the Electric Service Standards are the 2021 Edition and 'immediately adjacent' is not given a dimension anywhere, so the practical tolerance is at the inspector's discretion.
utility electric service standards §§ 409 and 2005(F) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.cpsenergy.com/content/dam/corporate/en/Documents/Electric_Service_Standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal — online through BuildSA, on the PERMIT record (not the application record): open the permit record, Record Info tab, Inspections, choose the inspection, Actions, Schedule, then choose the date and the time. Phone is available as a paid fallback: DSD customer service on (210) 207-1111, M-F 7:45am–4:30pm. The fee schedule prices this explicitly — 'Inspection schedule fee (free on-line) $3.00'. 92% · department information bulletin + fee schedule
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? The portal presents a date and then a time to select for the chosen inspection, and the request can carry a contact for the inspection and notes for the inspector; bookings can be rescheduled or cancelled from the Actions drop-down. 62% · department permitting guide
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — DSD performs its own inspections. Note the statutory alternative: since 1 September 2025, under TX SB 1202 (89th Leg.) an applicant may instead have a third-party electrical inspector or licensed master electrician conduct the inspection without requesting it from the city, in which case the city must issue the approval/permit/certification within three business days of notice and may not charge an additional fee for it. 88% · department information bulletin + state statute
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated by the city. Where the applicant elects the statutory route, the inspection is performed by an electrical inspector as defined in Occupations Code § 1305.002, or a master electrician described by § 1305.153 licensed under Subchapter D of Chapter 1305. The reviewer/inspector must give the city a copy of any inspection note or report and notify the city of the result within 15 days of completing it, and is personally liable for damages from negligent acts or omissions; the city is not liable for a review or inspection so conducted. This does not displace CPS Energy's own commissioning. 70% · state statute (enrolled bill)
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Rough-in and final, and for residential PV they are typically called at the same time: 'After the installation is completed, the contractor must request inspections with DSD. Typically, the rough-in and final are called at the same time. For commercial there may be a separate Work with CPS inspection.' After all inspections are approved, DSD issues the release to CPS Energy and a Letter of Completion. CPS Energy then performs its own commissioning test and, if satisfied, both parties sign the 'Approval for Operation' (Certificate of Completion) document authorising parallel operation. A solar permit does not directly hold up a Certificate of Occupancy, although it may hold up an Electrical Final. 85% · department information bulletin
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes — a rough-in inspection exists, but in practice it is called together with the final on residential PV rather than as a separate earlier visit. No mid-roof inspection is mentioned. 82% · department information bulletin
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- What must be on site at inspection? The approved city-stamped PDF drawings, downloaded from the Plan Room on the application record and printed — IB 153: the applicant 'may download the approved stamped PDF file drawings in the Plan Room from the application record, to be printed out and made available on the site for inspections.' Also the permit itself: Chapter 10 § 10-6(r) 'The building permit or copy shall be kept on the site of the work until the completion of the project.' For solar pergolas, an engineer's foundation and frame letter is additionally required. 85% · department information bulletin + adopting ordinance
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Letter — a Letter of Completion (LOC), issued once all inspections are approved, emailed with the LOC attached to all contacts on the permit. Not a CO: DSD states 'A solar permit does not directly hold up a Certificate of Occupancy, although it may hold up an Electrical Final.' The separate final artefact on the utility side is CPS Energy's 'Approval for Operation' / Certificate of Completion, signed and dated by both the DG owner and a CPS Energy representative. 92% · department permitting guide
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? AHJ — the city notifies the utility. IB 153: 'After a successful inspection, DSD will notify CPS Energy that the equipment is ready for a Commissioning Test and the installation of a meter.' DSD's solar guide describes 'Solar – Photovoltaic' as one of its CPS release types: 'The release occurs once all inspections and criteria are met for the project. Email sent to customer and notification sent to CPS. CPS reviews work order sent by COSA.' CPS then commissions and issues the Approval for Operation. The installer's residual duty is to coordinate with CPS after the DSD release; the customer must hold a CPS Energy electric service account number for the specified address. 90% · department information bulletin
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $51.50 re-inspection fee (electrical). Related: after-hour inspection fee $100.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum; inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $100.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum; permit amendment fee $10.00; open permit review fee $3.00 per permit; permit refund fee $50.00. 90% · adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54)
- How are corrections issued and cleared? For PLAN REVIEW corrections the process is published and specific: results are emailed and posted to the BuildSA Plan Room; corrections are raised as 'Issues', some attached to a specific sheet with markups; the applicant must open and respond to every Issue and save it (status becomes 'answered'), then upload revised PDF sheets under a new review package (e.g. 'Electrical Cycle 2'); a revised sheet must keep the same title as the original so it becomes Version 2, and uploading a whole replacement file causes the city to review the entire project again. Any revised file or sheet must contain all the information supplied in the original plus indications of corrections made. 72% · department information bulletin + permitting guide
14 questions answered against City of San Antonio’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal — online through BuildSA, on the PERMIT record (not the application record): open the permit record, Record Info tab, Inspections, choose the inspection, Actions, Schedule, then choose the date and the time. Phone is available as a paid fallback: DSD customer service on (210) 207-1111, M-F 7:45am–4:30pm. The fee schedule prices this explicitly — 'Inspection schedule fee (free on-line) $3.00'.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 ('Inspections can be requested by scheduling on-line using the BuildSA Customer Portal or for a fee by contacting customer service at (210) 207-1111'), the DSD solar guide's step-by-step, and the adopted fee schedule all agree, including on the price of not using the portal.
department information bulletin + fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedIB 153 'DSD Inspection Requirements' section (which gives the booking methods and the phone number but states no notice period); DSD's solar permitting guide 'Scheduling of Inspections' walkthrough (which shows date and time selection but no lead-time rule); Chapter 10 §§ 10-6 and 10-53 in the enacted ordinance; the Chapter 10 § 10-54 fee schedule. No notice requirement is published in any document I could open. A 24–48 hour figure circulates on third-party solar-permitting sites but has no authority source behind it, so I have not recorded it. The one place it would be — DSD's inspections page — is on sa.gov, which returned HTTP 403 (Akamai) to every request this run.
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
The portal presents a date and then a time to select for the chosen inspection, and the request can carry a contact for the inspection and notes for the inspector; bookings can be rescheduled or cancelled from the Actions drop-down.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off DSD's own step-by-step solar guide ('6. Choose the Date, 7. Click the Time'), which proves selectable time slots exist. It does not say whether those are AM/PM windows or narrower, nor whether same-day is ever offered, and I could not reach DSD's inspections page on sa.gov (HTTP 403) to find out. Treat as 'time slots are selectable', not as a published window policy.
department permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/DSDUploads/SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL.pdf
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — DSD performs its own inspections. Note the statutory alternative: since 1 September 2025, under TX SB 1202 (89th Leg.) an applicant may instead have a third-party electrical inspector or licensed master electrician conduct the inspection without requesting it from the city, in which case the city must issue the approval/permit/certification within three business days of notice and may not charge an additional fee for it.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 and the DSD solar guide both describe DSD inspectors performing rough-in and final. Held at 88 because SB 1202 makes 'Yes' true only by default — the applicant, not the city, chooses — and DSD has published nothing acknowledging the third-party route that I could find (sa.gov unreachable).
department information bulletin + state statute checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated by the city. Where the applicant elects the statutory route, the inspection is performed by an electrical inspector as defined in Occupations Code § 1305.002, or a master electrician described by § 1305.153 licensed under Subchapter D of Chapter 1305. The reviewer/inspector must give the city a copy of any inspection note or report and notify the city of the result within 15 days of completing it, and is personally liable for damages from negligent acts or omissions; the city is not liable for a review or inspection so conducted. This does not displace CPS Energy's own commissioning.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the enrolled SB 1202 (89R) text read directly from the Texas Legislature, not summarised. 70 rather than higher because this is a state right that the city has not published anything about, so how DSD operationalises it in Accela is unknown, and because whether a grid-tied rooftop array is a 'home backup power installation' is my reading of the definition (see jurisdiction.why).
state statute (enrolled bill) checked 2026-08-28 https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/billtext/html/SB01202F.htm
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Rough-in and final, and for residential PV they are typically called at the same time: 'After the installation is completed, the contractor must request inspections with DSD. Typically, the rough-in and final are called at the same time. For commercial there may be a separate Work with CPS inspection.' After all inspections are approved, DSD issues the release to CPS Energy and a Letter of Completion. CPS Energy then performs its own commissioning test and, if satisfied, both parties sign the 'Approval for Operation' (Certificate of Completion) document authorising parallel operation. A solar permit does not directly hold up a Certificate of Occupancy, although it may hold up an Electrical Final.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153 verbatim for the DSD stages, DSD's solar guide for the release and LOC, and DG Manual §§ 2.8–2.10 and 5.2 for the CPS end. Held at 85 because IB 153 says 'typically', which is a description of practice rather than a fixed required sequence.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Yes — a rough-in inspection exists, but in practice it is called together with the final on residential PV rather than as a separate earlier visit. No mid-roof inspection is mentioned.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153: 'Typically, the rough-in and final are called at the same time.' The absence of a mid-roof stage is proved only by its absence from the one DSD document that lists the PV inspection stages; held at 82 for that reason.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedIB 153 (which requires listing information and manufacturer specification sheets at SUBMITTAL, and requires a listed mounting system and listed battery racking, but says nothing about what the inspector verifies in the field); DSD's solar permitting guide; Chapter 10 § 10-53. The only affirmative statement about labels being verified is on the utility side — CPS ESS § 2005(G), 'Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning' — which is CPS's commissioning, not DSD's inspection. Inferring that DSD inspectors check labels would be reasonable but unsourced, and would rate below 40, so it is not recorded.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookeddocsonline.sanantonio.gov DSD document host — retrieved and read IB 153 (Requirements for Solar Photovoltaic Systems, rev. May 2025), IB 405 (Solar Pergolas, Aug 2023) and the DSD solar permitting guide (SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL); none is an inspection checklist and none references one. Also searched the enacted ordinance. IB 153 is a submittal-requirements bulletin, not an inspection checklist. I cannot convert this to a proved 'No' because DSD's own website (sa.gov/Directory/Departments/DSD) returned HTTP 403 to every request this run, so I could not enumerate DSD's published handouts — an inspection checklist may exist there under a filename I did not guess.
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The approved city-stamped PDF drawings, downloaded from the Plan Room on the application record and printed — IB 153: the applicant 'may download the approved stamped PDF file drawings in the Plan Room from the application record, to be printed out and made available on the site for inspections.' Also the permit itself: Chapter 10 § 10-6(r) 'The building permit or copy shall be kept on the site of the work until the completion of the project.' For solar pergolas, an engineer's foundation and frame letter is additionally required.
Why the confidence is not higherIB 153, Chapter 10 § 10-6(r) and IB 405 each verbatim. Held at 85 because § 10-6(r) is phrased for building permits generally rather than trade permits specifically, and because there may be further on-site document expectations published on DSD's inspections page, which I could not reach.
department information bulletin + adopting ordinance checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$51.50 re-inspection fee (electrical). Related: after-hour inspection fee $100.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum; inspection for which no fee is specifically indicated $100.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum; permit amendment fee $10.00; open permit review fee $3.00 per permit; permit refund fee $50.00.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the adopted electrical fee schedule, Chapter 10 § 10-54, in the enacted ordinance effective 1 May 2025. Held at 90 because the fee schedule is adopted by ordinance but the city can revise fees by separate action, and I could not cross-check against a DSD-published current fee page (sa.gov HTTP 403).
adopted fee schedule (Ch. 10 § 10-54) checked 2026-08-28 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/11508/1339820/pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
For PLAN REVIEW corrections the process is published and specific: results are emailed and posted to the BuildSA Plan Room; corrections are raised as 'Issues', some attached to a specific sheet with markups; the applicant must open and respond to every Issue and save it (status becomes 'answered'), then upload revised PDF sheets under a new review package (e.g. 'Electrical Cycle 2'); a revised sheet must keep the same title as the original so it becomes Version 2, and uploading a whole replacement file causes the city to review the entire project again. Any revised file or sheet must contain all the information supplied in the original plus indications of corrections made.
Why the confidence is not higherAll of this is verbatim from IB 153 and DSD's solar guide — but it answers plan-review corrections, not field-inspection corrections. How a failed inspection's correction notice is issued and cleared is not covered in any document I could reach; the only field-side evidence is the $51.50 re-inspection fee, which implies a re-inspection is requested and paid for. Do not read this as the inspection-correction process.
department information bulletin + permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Letter — a Letter of Completion (LOC), issued once all inspections are approved, emailed with the LOC attached to all contacts on the permit. Not a CO: DSD states 'A solar permit does not directly hold up a Certificate of Occupancy, although it may hold up an Electrical Final.' The separate final artefact on the utility side is CPS Energy's 'Approval for Operation' / Certificate of Completion, signed and dated by both the DG owner and a CPS Energy representative.
Why the confidence is not higherDSD's solar guide states the LOC and its distribution verbatim under 'Permit Closure'; the DG Manual § 2.10 states the Approval for Operation verbatim. Held at 92 because the DSD guide carries no internal revision stamp.
department permitting guide checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/DSDUploads/SolarPermitsMarch29_FINAL.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
AHJ — the city notifies the utility. IB 153: 'After a successful inspection, DSD will notify CPS Energy that the equipment is ready for a Commissioning Test and the installation of a meter.' DSD's solar guide describes 'Solar – Photovoltaic' as one of its CPS release types: 'The release occurs once all inspections and criteria are met for the project. Email sent to customer and notification sent to CPS. CPS reviews work order sent by COSA.' CPS then commissions and issues the Approval for Operation. The installer's residual duty is to coordinate with CPS after the DSD release; the customer must hold a CPS Energy electric service account number for the specified address.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo DSD documents state the notification flows city-to-utility, and the DG Manual confirms CPS issues the final authorisation. Held at 90 because IB 153 also tells the applicant they 'must still coordinate with CPS Energy' after release, so the installer is not passive even though the formal notification is the AHJ's.
department information bulletin checked 2026-08-28 https://docsonline.sanantonio.gov/FileUploads/dsd/IB153.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of San Antonio against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of San Antonio is the authority having jurisdiction 88% confidence
- Holds
- Building and electrical, both held by the City of San Antonio Development Services Department (DSD). Residential rooftop PV is permitted as a 'Solar/Photovoltaic' sub-type of the ELECTRICAL trade permit, applied for on the BuildSA (Accela) portal. DSD performs plan review and all inspections. CPS Energy — the City's own municipally owned utility — is a parallel, separate gatekeeper: it runs its own DER application, its own technical standards (Electric Service Standards Section 2000 and the DG Manual), and its own commissioning test and Approval for Operation. Several answers below (placards, AC disconnect location, equipment listing, ESS commissioning) live at CPS Energy level, not at city level.
- Overridden by
- TX SB 1202, 89th Legislature (2025), eff. 1 Sep 2025 — adds Local Gov't Code § 247.0025. For a 'home backup power installation' (an electric generating facility, energy storage facility, standby system and associated infrastructure serving a one- or two-family dwelling at 600V or less), a third-party electrical inspector or licensed master electrician may review the development documents and conduct the inspection WITHOUT submitting to or requesting them from the city; the city must then issue the approval/permit/certification not later than the third business day after notice, and may not impose an additional fee for that review or inspection. Critically for San Antonio, § 247.0025(b)(2) says the section 'does not limit the authority of ... an electric cooperative or a municipally owned utility to enforce interconnection and service policies' — so CPS Energy's DER review, standards and commissioning are NOT displaced by the third-party route. Also TX HB 3526, 88th Legislature (2023), Local Gov't Code § 214.221, eff. 1 Sep 2023 — a municipality may not apply a municipal building code to the construction of a solar pergola.
- Why not higher
- DSD's own Information Bulletin 153 (rev. May 2025) and DSD's own solar permitting guide both state plainly that the PV permit is an electrical sub-type issued by DSD and that DSD performs the inspections, so the AHJ identification is near-certain. Held below 95 for two reasons. (1) A CORRECTION TO THE BRIEF: the brief cited 'TX SB 1202' as limiting what a municipality may inspect on listed equipment. SB 1202 of the 87th Legislature is not that bill — its caption is 'Relating to the applicability of certain utility provisions to a vehicle charging service' and it adds Utilities Code §§ 31.0021 and 37.002 about EV charging. SB 1202 of the 88th Legislature died in committee (nursing-facility generators). The bill that matters is SB 1202 of the 89th Legislature (2025), read here in the enrolled text, and its mechanism is a third-party review/inspection right plus a 3-business-day issuance deadline — NOT a bar on inspecting listed equipment. I have applied it as written rather than as briefed. (2) Whether a grid-tied residential rooftop PV array counts as a 'home backup power installation' is my reading of the statutory definition ('an electric generating facility ... intended to provide electrical power to a one- or two-family dwelling, regardless of whether the facility or system is capable of participating in a wholesale electric market, that is connected at 600 volts or less') against a caption that says 'home backup power'. The definition plainly covers it; the caption invites argument. I have not found a San Antonio document acknowledging the third-party route, because sa.gov itself was unreachable to me all run (HTTP 403, Akamai).
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- Roughly $63–$100 for a typical residential system. There is no solar line item; the fee is assembled from the electrical schedule: basic electrical inspection permit fee $50.00,60%
- Plan review
- 3 business days. DSD reviews the application for completeness within three working days and forwards it to technical review;90%
- Portal
- BuildSA Customer Portal (Accela Citizen Access) at https://aca-prod.accela.com/COSA/default.aspx. The PV application sits under the Building module tab, as an MEP Trade Permits Application.95%
- Electrical code
- 2023 NEC (NFPA 70, 2023 edition), as amended by Chapter 10 Article VI. Effective 1 May 2025.88%
- Own placard wording
- Yes, but the wording comes from the municipally owned utility, not from DSD. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 prescribes actual label text — e.g.82%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal — online through BuildSA, on the PERMIT record (not the application record): open the permit record, Record Info tab, Inspections, choose the inspection, Actions, Schedule,92%
Labels & placards for this authority
City of San Antonio writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 82%
Yes, but the wording comes from the municipally owned utility, not from DSD. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 prescribes actual label text — e.g. 'WARNING: INVERTER OUTPUT CONNECTION / DO NOT RELOCATE THIS OVERCURRENT DEVICE', 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE', 'PV/AC AGGREGATE PANEL: DO NOT REMOVE, ADD OR RELOCATE ANY CIRCUITS FROM THIS PANEL', 'RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM', 'PV SYSTEM DC DISCONNECT', 'PV SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT', 'PV METER', 'REVENUE METER'. DSD's Chapter 10 imposes only generic electrical marking (§ 10-53(b): disconnecting means legibly and durably marked to indicate purpose; electrical room doors marked ELECTRICAL ROOM or similar approved wording) and no PV-specific wording of its own.
Size, colour & material 85%
No independent letter height, colour or material specification. CPS Energy Figure 2000.6 Note 1 instead defers to the NEC: 'LABELING SHALL BE PERMANENTLY AFFIXED AND SUITABLE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2017 NEC, ARTICLE 110.21(B).' So the governing requirements are permanence, environmental suitability, and NEC 110.21(B) — read at the 2023 edition now in force in the city. Neither DSD nor CPS specifies a millimetre letter height, a colour, or a substrate.
Where they go 85%
Per CPS Figure 2000.6 and the Figure 2000.2/2000.3 notes: on the PV DC disconnect; on the PV AC disconnect; on the PV meter socket and on the CPS Energy revenue meter socket (the meter placards required on BOTH sockets where the meters are approved to be remote from one another); on the customer service panel (the 705.10 directory/plaque), and on system disconnects for other electric power production sources when not grouped; on the service panel for the rapid shutdown placard; on the inverter DC disconnect switch for the rapid shutdown switch label; on the overcurrent device for the inverter output connection warning; on raceways and enclosures containing DC conductors for the 'WARNING: PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER SOURCE' label; on the PV/AC aggregate panel; and on PV AC conductors run in attic spaces, whose raceways must carry labels denoting PV AC conductors. All labelling must be in place at the time of CPS commissioning.
What the utility wants on top 85%
Yes — and this is where the placard requirements actually live for San Antonio. CPS Energy ESS § 2005(G): 'Customer shall be responsible for all labeling of DG Facilities equipment as outlined in Figure 2000.6. Such labeling shall be in place at time of commissioning.' The full set is at q38. Note that the CPS DG Manual — the document an installer would most naturally reach for — contains NO labelling requirements at all; the placards are in the separate Electric Service Standards.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.