Dallas County

State of Texas

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

Dallas County is the 2nd largest jurisdiction in Texas — 2,613,539 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — No — no county permit is required for a rooftop PV retrofit on an existing single-family home Q3 Electrical and building permits — Neither — Dallas County issues no electrical permit of any kind Q4 Plan review — Not published by DUAS. Statutory backstop for the county's commercial fire-code building permit: 30 days to issue or deny, Q18 Where you file — MyGov / MGO Connect — www.mgoconnect.org, jurisdiction 'Dallas County Unincorporated' Q20

Permit required
No — no county permit is required for a rooftop PV retrofit on an existing single-family home82% source
What it costs
$0 — no county fee for a residential rooftop PV system78% source
Plan review turnaround
Not published by DUAS. Statutory backstop for the county's commercial fire-code building permit: 30 days to issue or deny,72% source
Key document
department permit list cited by 6 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? No — not the AHJ for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated Dallas County 88% · department scope page
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Building — commercial only. Electrical — none, county holds no electrical jurisdiction. New residential construction is notice-only with inspection delegated to the builder's third-party inspector. 85% · department permit list
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? No — no county permit is required for a rooftop PV retrofit on an existing single-family home 82% · department permit list
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Neither — Dallas County issues no electrical permit of any kind 85% · issued-permit reports 2024-2026
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No county requirement. Private deed restrictions or an HOA may still apply as a matter of private contract — the county is not a party and does not check. 75% · department scope page
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No — a Specific Use Permit cannot exist here. 'In Texas, only cities — and not counties — have the authority to adopt zoning ordinances', and TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.153(d)(2) forbids construing the residential building code subchapter to authorise county zoning. 88% · department scope page
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? No county permit exists, so no county rule. State law governs: electrical work for the public requires a TDLR-licensed electrician/electrical contractor (Occ. Code ch. 1305). A person who owns and resides in the dwelling is exempt for work 'not specifically regulated by a municipal ordinance' — and in the unincorporated area there is no municipal ordinance. 80% · state statute (archived capture)
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? No — DUAS publishes no contractor-registration requirement 62% · department permit list
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes — no county permit to obtain, and the state licensing exemption covers an owner-occupier 70% · state statute (archived capture)
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Not applicable to rooftop PV (no county permit). Where a DUAS permit type IS triggered (e.g. a floodplain ground mount) a complete application is: completed application; authorization form if an agent is applying; fee (debit/credit only); copy of plat if platted; property deed; scope-of-work description; site plan; survey if unplatted. The substantive submittal for a rooftop system goes to Oncor, not the county: signed tariff application, interconnection agreement, layout sketch, one-line diagram, placard proofs, equipment details, and minimum 5 inspection photos. 85% · published checklist
    • How many copies, and in what format? County: survey at 11x17 as PDF; 'Full size (24x36) may be required'. Oncor: each diagram a single-page, flattened, non-editable PDF under 2MB. 80% · published checklist
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? County: a site plan is a listed component of any complete DUAS application, but no content specification is published. Oncor requires a bird's-eye Layout Sketch showing service address, ESI ID, all equipment labelled with manufacturer/model/quantity/voltage, the Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect, the Oncor meter, the measured distance in feet between them, a north arrow, street name and driveway. 88% · utility DG requirements
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — but by the UTILITY, not the county. Oncor requires a one-line diagram showing accurate equipment order, all existing equipment, and a separate VLLD between customer equipment and the Oncor meter. 90% · utility DG requirements
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No county PE stamp requirement for residential PV — no threshold exists because no county permit exists. (Contrast: the county's COMMERCIAL fire-code building permit does require a Fire Code Design and Compliance Review Sheet 'signed and sealed by a licensed architect or engineer registered in the State of Texas'.) 72% · adopted fire code (OCR'd)
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? MyGov / MGO Connect — www.mgoconnect.org, jurisdiction 'Dallas County Unincorporated' 92% · department page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes for the county's permit types — application, documents and card payment all go through MyGov, with a separate Paymentus link for DUAS fees. Moot for residential rooftop PV, which has no county application. 80% · portal/department page
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? $0 — no county fee for a residential rooftop PV system 78% · published fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Flat — every DUAS permit fee that exists is a flat amount by permit type (platting is the only tiered one, by lot count and acreage) 80% · published fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? No separate plan-check fee on the DUAS schedule. The Fire Marshal's (commercial) schedule does carry 'Plan Review and Revision $250.00 per hour' and notes the AHJ may have a PE review plans at the developer's cost. 75% · published fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Not published by DUAS. Statutory backstop for the county's commercial fire-code building permit: 30 days to issue or deny, and if the county does neither within 30 days the work is deemed approved (TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.063(c)-(d)). Special Event applications must be in 45 days ahead. 72% · state statute (archived capture)
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Oncor Electric Delivery (TDU) 65% · county issued-permit report
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? No dependency — the Oncor interconnection runs entirely independently of the county, because the county issues nothing to depend on. Sequence is: customer selects installer; installer sends tariff application for customer signature; installer submits via Oncor's eTRACK installer portal; Oncor reviews, performs a study, prepares the interconnection agreement; all parties sign; Oncor issues the PTO letter; meter reprogrammed. 85% · utility interconnection page

28 questions answered against Dallas County’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

No — not the AHJ for residential rooftop PV in unincorporated Dallas County

Why the confidence is not higherSee jurisdiction block. Absence is proved from the county's own exhaustive scope statements plus 2.5 years of its own issued-permit reports, not from a single negative page.

department scope page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/plandev/zoning.php

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Building — commercial only. Electrical — none, county holds no electrical jurisdiction. New residential construction is notice-only with inspection delegated to the builder's third-party inspector.

Why the confidence is not higherDUAS applications page states the Building Permit Application is 'Required for the construction of new commercial buildings'; the fixed list of 16 application types contains no electrical permit. Not 95 because the DUAS fee schedule (last updated 8/30/2023) still carries a 'Residential Building Permit $100.00' line that the current applications page does not offer — an unexplained conflict between two county documents.

department permit list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

No — no county permit is required for a rooftop PV retrofit on an existing single-family home

Why the confidence is not higherNone of the 16 DUAS application types covers it: Building Permit is commercial; Notice of Residential Construction covers 'new residential construction, additions, and major structural renovations'; the Zoning page narrows the residential code to new dwellings and 500+ sq ft additions outside a city ETJ. Held at 82, not higher, because 'major structural renovations' is undefined and a heavy ballasted array or a re-framed roof could in principle be argued into it — call (214) 653-6565 for a specific address. A GROUND mount is different: most of the unincorporated area is floodplain and a Development/Floodplain Development Permit would be required.

department permit list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Neither — Dallas County issues no electrical permit of any kind

Why the confidence is not higherNo electrical permit appears in the DUAS application list, and no electrical permit appears anywhere in the county's own issued-permit reports for 2024, 2025 and Jan-Jul 2026 (the only 'electric' hit in ~370 permits is a commercial New Building permit for an Oncor substation). Search controls in the same run: 'Permit Type' matched 8 times across the reports; 'zzqqx' matched 0.

issued-permit reports 2024-2026 checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/permit-reports.php

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

No county permit exists, so no county rule. State law governs: electrical work for the public requires a TDLR-licensed electrician/electrical contractor (Occ. Code ch. 1305). A person who owns and resides in the dwelling is exempt for work 'not specifically regulated by a municipal ordinance' — and in the unincorporated area there is no municipal ordinance.

Why the confidence is not higherOcc. Code 1305.003(a)(6) read verbatim. Held at 80 because the exemption's phrasing turns on the absence of a municipal ordinance, which is true of unincorporated territory but is my inference, not a TDLR ruling; and the statute text came from a 2023 Wayback capture (see methodology note).

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2023/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

No — DUAS publishes no contractor-registration requirement

Why the confidence is not higherThe DUAS applications page lists the complete-application contents (application, authorization form, fees, plat, deed, scope of work, site plan, survey) and never mentions contractor registration; no registration form exists among the 16 application types. This is an absence from the published list rather than a stated 'no registration required'.

department permit list checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes — no county permit to obtain, and the state licensing exemption covers an owner-occupier

Why the confidence is not higherFollows from Q3 and Q5 combined, both of which are county/state sources, but no Dallas County document addresses homeowner self-install directly. Note Occ. Code 1305.201(e) still requires the work to meet the state NEC even when unpermitted.

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2023/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Not applicable to rooftop PV (no county permit). Where a DUAS permit type IS triggered (e.g. a floodplain ground mount) a complete application is: completed application; authorization form if an agent is applying; fee (debit/credit only); copy of plat if platted; property deed; scope-of-work description; site plan; survey if unplatted. The substantive submittal for a rooftop system goes to Oncor, not the county: signed tariff application, interconnection agreement, layout sketch, one-line diagram, placard proofs, equipment details, and minimum 5 inspection photos.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty list quoted from the DUAS applications page; Oncor list from its Residential/Small Commercial Project Requirements rev. 1 May 2025. Not 95 because the county list is prefaced '(if applicable)' and is generic across all 16 permit types.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

County: survey at 11x17 as PDF; 'Full size (24x36) may be required'. Oncor: each diagram a single-page, flattened, non-editable PDF under 2MB.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth quoted directly. The county line is hedged ('may be required') in its own text.

published checklist checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

County: a site plan is a listed component of any complete DUAS application, but no content specification is published. Oncor requires a bird's-eye Layout Sketch showing service address, ESI ID, all equipment labelled with manufacturer/model/quantity/voltage, the Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect, the Oncor meter, the measured distance in feet between them, a north arrow, street name and driveway.

Why the confidence is not higherOncor's specification is itemised in nine numbered points in its 1 May 2025 requirements document. The county side is a bare list entry with no content spec published anywhere I looked on the DUAS pages.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes — but by the UTILITY, not the county. Oncor requires a one-line diagram showing accurate equipment order, all existing equipment, and a separate VLLD between customer equipment and the Oncor meter.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's requirements document, extracted with pdftotext -layout. The county requires none because it issues no permit.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedOncor Residential/Small Commercial Project Requirements rev 1 May 2025 (full text, 19pp, pdftotext -layout) — it specifies drawings and equipment details but never string or conductor calculations; and the DUAS complete-application list, which has no calculation item. Not recorded as a 'No' because neither document is a plan-review checklist, so it may simply be silent rather than negative.

https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

No county PE stamp requirement for residential PV — no threshold exists because no county permit exists. (Contrast: the county's COMMERCIAL fire-code building permit does require a Fire Code Design and Compliance Review Sheet 'signed and sealed by a licensed architect or engineer registered in the State of Texas'.)

Why the confidence is not higherThe commercial requirement is quoted verbatim from Fire Code Part 4 s.4.2(a)(1); the residential 'none' is inferred from the absence of any residential permit path. TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.154 allows but does not require a licensed engineer as one of six acceptable inspector types for new residential construction.

adopted fire code (OCR'd) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications and fee pages, Dallas County Fire Code Part 4 (which requires a sealed Fire Code Design and Compliance Review Sheet for COMMERCIAL work only). Nothing addresses an electrical PE stamp for residential, and there is no county electrical review to attach one to.

https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

$0 — no county fee for a residential rooftop PV system

Why the confidence is not higherThe DUAS fee schedule has no solar, PV, electrical or residential-alteration line item, and the Fire Marshal fee schedule likewise has none (positive control 'Inspection' matched 8 times in the fire fee schedule; 'zzqqx' 0; 'solar' 0). The schedule DOES list 'Notice of Residential $50.00' and 'Residential Building Permit $100.00' — those attach to new residential construction, not a PV retrofit. Held at 78 because the DUAS schedule is stamped 'Last update: 8/30/2023' and the applications page tells applicants to phone to confirm the fee amount, which means the published schedule is not treated as authoritative by the county itself.

published fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/duas/DUAS-Fees-Schedule.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Flat — every DUAS permit fee that exists is a flat amount by permit type (platting is the only tiered one, by lot count and acreage)

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the fee schedule table. Dated 8/30/2023.

published fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/duas/DUAS-Fees-Schedule.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

No separate plan-check fee on the DUAS schedule. The Fire Marshal's (commercial) schedule does carry 'Plan Review and Revision $250.00 per hour' and notes the AHJ may have a PE review plans at the developer's cost.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth schedules read in full. The fire-side line applies only to commercial/public/4+ multifamily work, which excludes a detached dwelling.

published fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-FIre-Marshals-Office-Updated-Fee-Schedule.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Not published by DUAS. Statutory backstop for the county's commercial fire-code building permit: 30 days to issue or deny, and if the county does neither within 30 days the work is deemed approved (TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.063(c)-(d)). Special Event applications must be in 45 days ahead.

Why the confidence is not higherStatute quoted verbatim from an archived capture. Held below 80 because the 30-day rule is a state deadline on a permit type that does not apply to residential PV, not a DUAS service-level statement — and DUAS publishes no turnaround at all. Note LGC 233.901's 45-day county permit deadline does NOT apply here: it is limited to counties of 3.3 million or more and Dallas County is ~2.6 million.

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications page and fee schedule, and the Fire Code Part 4 (Permits) sections 4.1-4.5. Part 4 covers issuance, posting, modification and conditions but I found no expiry period; DUAS publishes none for any permit type.

https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

MyGov / MGO Connect — www.mgoconnect.org, jurisdiction 'Dallas County Unincorporated'

Why the confidence is not higherThe county states 'All permits will now be submitted through www.mgoconnect.org' and gives step-by-step account creation naming Texas and 'Dallas County Unincorporated'. Not 100 because mgoconnect.org is a JavaScript app that would not render for me, so I could not confirm the live jurisdiction listing or which application types are actually open in it.

department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/pre-development-meetings.php

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes for the county's permit types — application, documents and card payment all go through MyGov, with a separate Paymentus link for DUAS fees. Moot for residential rooftop PV, which has no county application.

Why the confidence is not higherThe applications page describes an entirely online flow ('All fees are to be paid by debit/credit card', email confirmation of completeness). Held at 80 because the county also tells applicants to phone to confirm the fee amount, so at least one step is not self-service.

portal/department page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Oncor Electric Delivery (TDU)

Why the confidence is not higherNot confirmed from a territory map — Oncor's own service-territory page is a JS lookup tool with no county list, and I did not use PowerToChoose. Evidence is indirect but county-side: the county's own June 2026 permit report records a commercial permit for an 'Oncor Electrical Substation' at 3200 Van Road, Wilmer, inside the unincorporated area, and Oncor's rooftop-solar pages address the DFW market generally. CAVEAT WORTH CHECKING PER ADDRESS: Garland Power & Light is a municipally-owned utility and several unincorporated parcels in the county's permit record carry Garland mailing addresses (e.g. the Everly Dr. subdivision, 75043). A municipal utility's boundary is not the mailing-address boundary in either direction — confirm the ESI ID's TDU before assuming Oncor.

county issued-permit report checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/duas/permit-reports/2026/June-permits.pdf

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

No dependency — the Oncor interconnection runs entirely independently of the county, because the county issues nothing to depend on. Sequence is: customer selects installer; installer sends tariff application for customer signature; installer submits via Oncor's eTRACK installer portal; Oncor reviews, performs a study, prepares the interconnection agreement; all parties sign; Oncor issues the PTO letter; meter reprogrammed.

Why the confidence is not higherSeven-step sequence quoted from Oncor's residential solar page. Held at 85 because the page is undated. Notably, neither that page nor Oncor's 2025 requirements document mentions a permit, an AHJ, or a jurisdictional inspection anywhere — I searched both ('permit' 0 hits, 'AHJ'/'jurisdiction' 0 hits, control 'Oncor' 61 hits, 'zzqqx' 0).

utility interconnection page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/residential-small-commercial-thinking-about-solar.html

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No county requirement. Private deed restrictions or an HOA may still apply as a matter of private contract — the county is not a party and does not check.

Why the confidence is not higherFollows from the county having no permit and no zoning power. The Fire Code s.1.5 does acknowledge that recorded covenants and deed restrictions exist alongside it. Not verified against any specific subdivision's restrictions.

department scope page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/plandev/zoning.php

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS 16-item application list, the Planning & Development index (which lists a Historical Commission but describes it as a historic-preservation activity, not a permit review), and the Zoning page's enumeration of every subject the county regulates in the unincorporated area — historic-district review appears in none of them. Not recorded as a 'No' because I did not reach a Historical Commission page stating its remit.

https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/plandev/zoning.php

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications and fee pages and the Zoning page's list of regulated subjects — no windstorm or wind certification appears. I did not reach a Texas Department of Insurance source in this run to confirm that Dallas County lies outside the designated seacoast territory, so I am not recording a value.

https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

No — a Specific Use Permit cannot exist here. 'In Texas, only cities — and not counties — have the authority to adopt zoning ordinances', and TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.153(d)(2) forbids construing the residential building code subchapter to authorise county zoning.

Why the confidence is not higherFirst clause is a verbatim quotation from the county's own Zoning page; the statutory bar is quoted from the archived statute. Commissioners Court approval is not part of any DUAS permit path.

department scope page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/plandev/zoning.php

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications page and fee schedule, Dallas County Fire Code (OCR'd in full — 'solar' appears twice, both in the Chapter 12 scope list, with no size threshold), and Oncor's residential solar and installer pages, which distinguish certified from non-certified systems but publish no residential kW cap. Oncor's tariff would be the place to look and I did not open it.

https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/for-installers.html

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2023 NEC — by state adoption, not county adoption. 16 TAC 73.100: 'Effective September 1, 2023, the department adopts the 2023 National Electrical Code'. Occ. Code 1305.201(e) makes it the floor in unincorporated areas: 'Electrical work performed in an unincorporated area of the state must be installed in accordance with standards at least as stringent as the requirements of the state electrical code'. 82% · state administrative rule (archived capture)
    • Which building code edition is in force? None for an existing dwelling — Dallas County has adopted no building code reaching alterations or retrofits of a detached house. For NEW residential construction outside a city ETJ, TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.153(a) sets the standard as the IRC edition in force in the county seat (City of Dallas), and the county collects a Notice of Residential Construction naming the IRC version the builder will use. 70% · state statute (archived capture)
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 2024 International Fire Code, with Appendices B, C, D, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O — Dallas County Fire Code, Court Order 2015-1143, amended 10-21-2025, effective 10-21-2025. BUT s.1.2: 'this Code does not apply to detached one- and two-family dwellings.' 90% · adopted fire code (OCR'd)
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — Exhibit A to the Dallas County Fire Code is a schedule of additions, insertions, deletions and changes to the 2024 IFC, including an amended Chapter 12 (Clean Energy Systems) and amended/added Sections 1207 and 1208. All of it is confined to buildings within the code's scope, which excludes detached dwellings. 88% · adopted fire code (OCR'd)
    • What is the installation judged against? The 2023 NEC as the state electrical code (Occ. Code 1305.201(e) + 16 TAC 73.100). There is no county electrical code, no county inspector, and no county plan review to judge it against — compliance is a matter of the licensed electrician's obligation, not a county sign-off. 82% · state statute (archived capture)
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? No county ridge setback or access pathway requirement applies to a detached one- or two-family dwelling. The Dallas County Fire Code adopts the 2024 IFC but s.1.2 excludes detached one- and two-family dwellings, and TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.062(a) would bar the county from reaching them even if it wanted to. 85% · adopted fire code (OCR'd)
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, via the state-adopted 2023 NEC (Article 690.12) — not via any county rule. Nobody at the county inspects for it. 72% · state statute (archived capture)
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The AHJ requires none. The UTILITY does: 'Oncor requires caution or warning placards on all distributed generation projects to alert company employees of a potential alternate source of power.' Class 1 where the visible AC disconnect is within 10 ft of the Oncor meter; Class 2 where it is farther; Class 3 for pad-mount transformer or high-voltage delivery installations. 88% · utility DG placard specification
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? County: No. Utility: yes — Oncor gives example wording, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT' (Class 1), and for Class 2 the same with 'DISCONNECT LOCATED ON WEST WALL OF THIS STRUCTURE'. 85% · utility DG placard specification
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Material is specified; letter height and colour are not. Oncor: 'Placards materials are to be UV resistant and follow the same material standards as utilized in the National Electric Code.' Colour cast acrylic is accepted, as are outdoor-rated sticker-type placards of similar NEC specification, both with a UV inhibitor rated for exterior use. If cast acrylic is used the customer must supply adhesive tape — preferred 3M Scotch VHB family (4956, 4941, 4936 or 4926), minimum 1 inch wide, double-sided, exterior VHB. 82% · utility DG placard specification
    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes for Class 3 installations (DG remote from the Oncor meter, pad-mount transformer or HV delivery). The site map must show: location of the Oncor meter and delivery equipment; location of the generator's main AC disconnect; facility address; a north indicator with basic street and building layout; and a map title, e.g. 'Solar System Disconnecting Means'. Three sets are requested — one for existing Oncor equipment, one spare for future equipment replacement, one for the customer's main equipment. 85% · utility DG placard specification
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY placard authority, because the AHJ specifies none. Oncor's placard scheme is additional to the NEC and explicitly so: 'Oncor placard specifications are not intended to replace any requirements in the National Electric Code.' Placard proofs must be uploaded to the Placards section of the eTRACK installer portal (separately from the design packet, or review is delayed), and Class 1 proofs may alternatively be shown on the layout sketch or one-line. 90% · utility DG requirements
    • Where must the labels be placed? On the visible AC disconnect, not on the Oncor meter: 'Placards are requested to be located on the visible AC disconnect and not on the Oncor meter.' Where the disconnect is remote from the meter (Class 2), a placard goes at the meter location AND on the disconnect. For Class 3, identical placards on the Oncor equipment and on the customer's main equipment, mounted by Oncor's operations group, plus a drilled two-hole caution placard attached to the secondary cables inside the Oncor pad-mount transformer. 88% · utility DG placard specification
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? A single separate Visible Lockable Labeled AC Disconnect (VLLD) MUST sit between the Oncor meter and all sources of distributed generation, on an accessible EXTERIOR wall within 10 feet of the Oncor meter, and must be accessible at all times. It must have an external handle and be lockable — 'Molded-case breakers are NOT considered acceptable VLLDs.' Beyond 10 ft triggers Class 2 or Class 3 placards. The distance in feet must be stated on both the layout sketch and the one-line, and the words 'Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect' must be written out in full at least once on each drawing before the acronym VLLD is used. No meter collars — the meter socket space is reserved for Oncor. 92% · utility DG requirements
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No county approved-equipment list. Oncor distinguishes a 'certified' system — an inverter-based system tested and certified to UL-1741 Utility Interactive — from a non-certified one, and routes them down different application paths; non-certified and small induction systems attract a tariff study fee. 70% · utility FAQ
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, and unregulated by the county at a detached dwelling. The Dallas County Fire Code's ESS provisions (amended IFC 1207, added 1208, NFPA 855 2023, FM Global DS 5-33, UL 9540A) apply by their own terms 'to all commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities', and the code as a whole does not apply to detached one- and two-family dwellings. The permit thresholds (>15 cu ft of lithium-ion batteries; >20 kWh at SOC over 30%; commercial bulk storage; any facility integrating batteries with renewable systems) sit inside that commercial-only section. 85% · adopted fire code (OCR'd)
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No — no separate county ESS permit or inspection for a detached dwelling. Oncor does require an interconnection agreement for a battery: 'If the battery system operates in parallel, for any length of time, with the utility then an interconnection agreement is required.' 78% · utility FAQ
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Not as a building — the county has no residential structural code reaching it. But it is very likely to need a Development / Floodplain Development Permit: the county states 'Most of the County's unincorporated area is considered to be in the floodplain. As a result, no development is allowed within the unincorporated area without a permit which either verifies that the development is not located within the floodplain or that it will be sufficiently elevated or protected from flooding.' The Floodplain Management Regulations (Court Order 2019-0322) define DEVELOPMENT as 'any man-made change in improved and unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials.' Fee: Development Permit Level 1 $35, Levels 2-3 $100, Level 4 $250. 74% · department scope page + adopted floodplain regulations

20 questions answered against Dallas County’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2023 NEC — by state adoption, not county adoption. 16 TAC 73.100: 'Effective September 1, 2023, the department adopts the 2023 National Electrical Code'. Occ. Code 1305.201(e) makes it the floor in unincorporated areas: 'Electrical work performed in an unincorporated area of the state must be installed in accordance with standards at least as stringent as the requirements of the state electrical code'.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth quoted verbatim. Held at 82, not 95, because the Texas SOS rules site has migrated to a JavaScript Appian portal that I could not read, so 16 TAC 73.100 came from a 2025 Wayback capture — TDLR is statutorily required to adopt each new NEC edition (Occ. Code 1305.101(a)(2)), so a 2026 NEC adoption may have landed since that capture and should be re-checked.

state administrative rule (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2025id_/https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=16&pt=4&ch=73&rl=100

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

None for an existing dwelling — Dallas County has adopted no building code reaching alterations or retrofits of a detached house. For NEW residential construction outside a city ETJ, TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.153(a) sets the standard as the IRC edition in force in the county seat (City of Dallas), and the county collects a Notice of Residential Construction naming the IRC version the builder will use.

Why the confidence is not higherThe statutory rule and the county's Notice-of-Construction permit type are both solid; what I could not verify is which IRC edition the City of Dallas currently has in force — dallascityhall.com failed TLS verification on fetch. So the pointer is sourced but the value it points at is not. The county's Zoning page also says its residential building code documents are 'available at the bottom of this page' and no such links exist in the page HTML.

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

2024 International Fire Code, with Appendices B, C, D, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N and O — Dallas County Fire Code, Court Order 2015-1143, amended 10-21-2025, effective 10-21-2025. BUT s.1.2: 'this Code does not apply to detached one- and two-family dwellings.'

Why the confidence is not higherRead from the adopted code itself. The PDF has no text layer, so I rendered it at 200dpi and OCR'd all 42 pages with tesseract rather than accept any summary — the quoted scope sentence and the 2024 IFC adoption both read cleanly. Held at 90 for OCR risk on the appendix-letter list. The revision stamp was read from the document's own cover page, not from its URL.

adopted fire code (OCR'd) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes — Exhibit A to the Dallas County Fire Code is a schedule of additions, insertions, deletions and changes to the 2024 IFC, including an amended Chapter 12 (Clean Energy Systems) and amended/added Sections 1207 and 1208. All of it is confined to buildings within the code's scope, which excludes detached dwellings.

Why the confidence is not higherExhibit A is named on the code's own contents page and the Chapter 12 / 1207 amendments are reproduced in the body. OCR quality is the only reservation.

adopted fire code (OCR'd) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The 2023 NEC as the state electrical code (Occ. Code 1305.201(e) + 16 TAC 73.100). There is no county electrical code, no county inspector, and no county plan review to judge it against — compliance is a matter of the licensed electrician's obligation, not a county sign-off.

Why the confidence is not higherSame sources and same caveat as Q29. The absence of any county electrical standard is corroborated by 'county' appearing nowhere in Occ. Code ch. 1305's local-government subchapter (control: 'MUNICIPAL' found at offset 42666, 'COUNTY' returned -1 in the same search of the same text).

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2023/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDallas County Fire Code full OCR text and the DUAS pages. No service-upgrade or busbar rule exists because the county holds no electrical jurisdiction at all; NEC 705.12 would apply as the state standard, unenforced locally.

https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDallas County Fire Code full OCR text and DUAS application list. No mounting-system or attachment-spacing rule exists; the county adopts no residential structural code reaching a retrofit.

https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

No county ridge setback or access pathway requirement applies to a detached one- or two-family dwelling. The Dallas County Fire Code adopts the 2024 IFC but s.1.2 excludes detached one- and two-family dwellings, and TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.062(a) would bar the county from reaching them even if it wanted to.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo independent legs — the county's own scope sentence and the statutory ceiling above it. I also searched the full OCR'd code for 'pathway', 'ridge' and 'setback': zero hits, against a positive control of 'electric' at 33 hits and 'zzqqx' at 0. Held at 85 because a zero-hit OCR search is weaker evidence than a positive quotation.

adopted fire code (OCR'd) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes, via the state-adopted 2023 NEC (Article 690.12) — not via any county rule. Nobody at the county inspects for it.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from Q29/Q33: the 2023 NEC is the mandatory installation standard for unincorporated electrical work, and rapid shutdown is in that edition. Held at 72 because the chain is statutory rather than a Dallas County document naming rapid shutdown, and because the NEC edition itself rests on an archived rule capture.

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2023/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/OC/htm/OC.1305.htm

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

The AHJ requires none. The UTILITY does: 'Oncor requires caution or warning placards on all distributed generation projects to alert company employees of a potential alternate source of power.' Class 1 where the visible AC disconnect is within 10 ft of the Oncor meter; Class 2 where it is farther; Class 3 for pad-mount transformer or high-voltage delivery installations.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the Oncor Placard Guideline, extracted with pdftotext -layout. Held at 88 because that guideline is stamped 'rev 01/03/2012' — 14 years old — though Oncor's 1 May 2025 requirements document still references the same Class 1/2/3 scheme, which is good evidence it is live.

utility DG placard specification checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/Placard%20Guideline.pdf

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

County: No. Utility: yes — Oncor gives example wording, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT' (Class 1), and for Class 2 the same with 'DISCONNECT LOCATED ON WEST WALL OF THIS STRUCTURE'.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim. Oncor presents these as 'Examples' rather than mandated text, and requires placard proofs to be submitted for review with the application — so the wording is approved case-by-case rather than fixed, which is why this is 85 and not higher.

utility DG placard specification checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/Placard%20Guideline.pdf

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Material is specified; letter height and colour are not. Oncor: 'Placards materials are to be UV resistant and follow the same material standards as utilized in the National Electric Code.' Colour cast acrylic is accepted, as are outdoor-rated sticker-type placards of similar NEC specification, both with a UV inhibitor rated for exterior use. If cast acrylic is used the customer must supply adhesive tape — preferred 3M Scotch VHB family (4956, 4941, 4936 or 4926), minimum 1 inch wide, double-sided, exterior VHB.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the guideline's 'Placard Materials' section. No letter height and no colour requirement appears anywhere in the 5-page document. Discounted for the 2012 revision date.

utility DG placard specification checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/Placard%20Guideline.pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes for Class 3 installations (DG remote from the Oncor meter, pad-mount transformer or HV delivery). The site map must show: location of the Oncor meter and delivery equipment; location of the generator's main AC disconnect; facility address; a north indicator with basic street and building layout; and a map title, e.g. 'Solar System Disconnecting Means'. Three sets are requested — one for existing Oncor equipment, one spare for future equipment replacement, one for the customer's main equipment.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim five-point list from the guideline. Class 3 is uncommon for a typical detached house; Class 1 (within 10 ft) needs no map. Discounted for the 2012 revision date.

utility DG placard specification checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/Placard%20Guideline.pdf

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY placard authority, because the AHJ specifies none. Oncor's placard scheme is additional to the NEC and explicitly so: 'Oncor placard specifications are not intended to replace any requirements in the National Electric Code.' Placard proofs must be uploaded to the Placards section of the eTRACK installer portal (separately from the design packet, or review is delayed), and Class 1 proofs may alternatively be shown on the layout sketch or one-line.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth documents agree and the submission mechanics come from the current (1 May 2025) requirements document, which raises confidence above the 2012 guideline alone.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

On the visible AC disconnect, not on the Oncor meter: 'Placards are requested to be located on the visible AC disconnect and not on the Oncor meter.' Where the disconnect is remote from the meter (Class 2), a placard goes at the meter location AND on the disconnect. For Class 3, identical placards on the Oncor equipment and on the customer's main equipment, mounted by Oncor's operations group, plus a drilled two-hole caution placard attached to the secondary cables inside the Oncor pad-mount transformer.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim across all three placard classes. Discounted only for the guideline's 2012 revision date.

utility DG placard specification checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/Placard%20Guideline.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

No county approved-equipment list. Oncor distinguishes a 'certified' system — an inverter-based system tested and certified to UL-1741 Utility Interactive — from a non-certified one, and routes them down different application paths; non-certified and small induction systems attract a tariff study fee.

Why the confidence is not higherOncor's FAQ text on the installer page is clear on the UL-1741 definition, and a separate 'Tariff Study Fee Small Induction and Non-Certified Inverter Systems' document is linked. Held at 70 because the FAQ is undated and I did not open the tariff-study-fee document.

utility FAQ checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/for-installers.html

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Permitted, and unregulated by the county at a detached dwelling. The Dallas County Fire Code's ESS provisions (amended IFC 1207, added 1208, NFPA 855 2023, FM Global DS 5-33, UL 9540A) apply by their own terms 'to all commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities', and the code as a whole does not apply to detached one- and two-family dwellings. The permit thresholds (>15 cu ft of lithium-ion batteries; >20 kWh at SOC over 30%; commercial bulk storage; any facility integrating batteries with renewable systems) sit inside that commercial-only section.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo nested scope limits, both quoted from the OCR'd code. Worth flagging: the 20 kWh threshold would catch a typical home battery on its face, and only the section's own 'commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities' wording plus s.1.2 keeps a house outside it — a homeowner installing a large ESS should get that in writing from the Fire Marshal at (214) 653-7970.

adopted fire code (OCR'd) checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

No — no separate county ESS permit or inspection for a detached dwelling. Oncor does require an interconnection agreement for a battery: 'If the battery system operates in parallel, for any length of time, with the utility then an interconnection agreement is required.'

Why the confidence is not higherCounty side follows from Q45's scope limits; the Oncor quotation is verbatim from its installer FAQ, which is undated.

utility FAQ checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/for-installers.html

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Not as a building — the county has no residential structural code reaching it. But it is very likely to need a Development / Floodplain Development Permit: the county states 'Most of the County's unincorporated area is considered to be in the floodplain. As a result, no development is allowed within the unincorporated area without a permit which either verifies that the development is not located within the floodplain or that it will be sufficiently elevated or protected from flooding.' The Floodplain Management Regulations (Court Order 2019-0322) define DEVELOPMENT as 'any man-made change in improved and unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials.' Fee: Development Permit Level 1 $35, Levels 2-3 $100, Level 4 $250.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth quotations are verbatim from county documents. Held at 74 because neither document names solar: 'solar' and 'photovoltaic' return zero hits in the full 11,295-word regulations text (positive control 'floodplain' 94 hits, 'zzqqx' 0), so classifying a ground-mount array as 'development' is my reading of a broad definition, not the county's stated position. Which Level applies is also not published.

department scope page + adopted floodplain regulations checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/plandev/zoning.php

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

A single separate Visible Lockable Labeled AC Disconnect (VLLD) MUST sit between the Oncor meter and all sources of distributed generation, on an accessible EXTERIOR wall within 10 feet of the Oncor meter, and must be accessible at all times. It must have an external handle and be lockable — 'Molded-case breakers are NOT considered acceptable VLLDs.' Beyond 10 ft triggers Class 2 or Class 3 placards. The distance in feet must be stated on both the layout sketch and the one-line, and the words 'Visible Lockable Labeled Disconnect' must be written out in full at least once on each drawing before the acronym VLLD is used. No meter collars — the meter socket space is reserved for Oncor.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's Residential/Small Commercial Project Requirements, revised 1 May 2025 — current, specific, and repeated identically in both the layout-sketch and one-line sections. This is a utility-level answer; the AHJ has no rule.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    Nothing recorded for Dallas County on this step yet — 3 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? No — Dallas County performs no inspection of a residential rooftop PV system. It performs no residential final of any kind: even for new residential construction it takes a notice and never inspects itself. 85% · state statute (archived capture) + county permit reports
    • If delegated, to whom? Nobody, for rooftop PV — there is no inspection to delegate. For NEW residential construction the builder contracts the inspections to one of six permitted types: a licensed engineer, a registered architect, a TREC-licensed professional inspector, a municipally employed plumbing inspector licensed by the TSBPE, a building inspector employed by a political subdivision, or an ICC-certified residential combination inspector. The same or different inspectors may be used for each stage. 88% · state statute (archived capture)
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? None for rooftop PV. For NEW residential construction on a vacant lot, three third-party inspections in order: foundation, before placement of concrete; framing and mechanical systems, before covering with drywall or other interior wall covering; and on completion of construction. For an addition, the same stages 'as necessary based on the scope of work'. Notice of the final inspection result must reach the county within 10 days. 88% · state statute (archived capture)
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? No county inspection checklist for solar exists. Oncor publishes a nine-item submission checklist in its Residential/Small Commercial Project Requirements covering service address, ESI ID, equipment labelling, the written-out VLLD wording, the meter-to-VLLD distance, placard class, placard proofs uploaded, equipment matching the eTRACK tab, and inspection images uploaded at the Agreement Available step. 80% · utility DG requirements
    • Does the inspector verify labels and listings? No county inspector verifies anything on a residential PV system. Oncor performs a documentary check instead of a site inspection: a minimum of five clear photos — street view with house number, equipment nameplates showing model number (per-site photos, 'DO NOT use stock photos or the same photo for multiple projects'), the exterior wall showing equipment connected to the utility meter and main service panel, the installed panels/inverters/ESS/batteries/ATS, and images of all VLLDs and their placarding — and the equipment on the drawings must match the equipment tab in eTRACK. 88% · utility DG requirements
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? Nothing is issued by the county for a residential PV system — there is no county final, no green tag and no CO. The document that ends the process is Oncor's Permission To Operate (PTO) letter, sent to both customer and installer once the interconnection agreement is signed by all parties. 85% · utility interconnection page
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer — the installer submits the project through Oncor's eTRACK web installer portal and uploads the required inspection images at the 'Agreement Available' step; Oncor then issues the PTO. There is no AHJ notification step because there is no AHJ involvement. 88% · utility DG requirements
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? No county re-inspection fee reaches a residential PV system. The Fire Marshal's schedule (commercial) sets Fire & Safety Final Re-Inspection at no charge for the first, then $125.00, then $175.00; TABC-related re-inspections are $150.00 then $200.00. 75% · published fee schedule

14 questions answered against Dallas County’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications and pre-development pages and the Fire Marshal pages. No inspection-booking method is published for any residential work; for commercial fire work the code requires the permit holder to employ an ICC-certified inspector and submit an as-built certification which 'shall serve as a request for final inspection' — a document route, not a booking route.

https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS and Fire Marshal pages. Nothing published. The only statutory notice figure I found is LGC 233.064(e): for fire-code buildings the county must BEGIN inspection within five business days of a written request — that is a duty on the county, not a notice period for the applicant, and it does not reach dwellings.

https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS and Fire Marshal department pages. No AM/PM or same-day windows published. The Fire Marshal fee schedule does price 'After Hours Inspection $150.00 hour with a $400.00 minimum', which implies scheduled hours exist but does not state them.

https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-FIre-Marshals-Office-Updated-Fee-Schedule.pdf

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

No — Dallas County performs no inspection of a residential rooftop PV system. It performs no residential final of any kind: even for new residential construction it takes a notice and never inspects itself.

Why the confidence is not higherTX Loc. Gov't Code 233.154(a)(3) puts the inspection duty on the builder to contract out, and 233.153(d)(1) forbids construing the subchapter to require prior county approval. The county's issued-permit reports show 308 'Notice Of Construction (R)' entries and no residential inspection product.

state statute (archived capture) + county permit reports checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Nobody, for rooftop PV — there is no inspection to delegate. For NEW residential construction the builder contracts the inspections to one of six permitted types: a licensed engineer, a registered architect, a TREC-licensed professional inspector, a municipally employed plumbing inspector licensed by the TSBPE, a building inspector employed by a political subdivision, or an ICC-certified residential combination inspector. The same or different inspectors may be used for each stage.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim six-item list from LGC 233.154(a)(3), from an archived capture of the statute.

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

None for rooftop PV. For NEW residential construction on a vacant lot, three third-party inspections in order: foundation, before placement of concrete; framing and mechanical systems, before covering with drywall or other interior wall covering; and on completion of construction. For an addition, the same stages 'as necessary based on the scope of work'. Notice of the final inspection result must reach the county within 10 days.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from LGC 233.154(a)(1)-(2) and (c). Archived capture.

state statute (archived capture) checked 2026-08-28 https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLGC 233.154 gives a framing/mechanical stage for new residential construction, but that is the builder's third-party inspection regime, not a county rough-in. For rooftop PV there is no county inspection sequence at all, so the question has no county answer to record.

https://web.archive.org/web/2024id_/https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/LG/htm/LG.233.htm

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

No county inspector verifies anything on a residential PV system. Oncor performs a documentary check instead of a site inspection: a minimum of five clear photos — street view with house number, equipment nameplates showing model number (per-site photos, 'DO NOT use stock photos or the same photo for multiple projects'), the exterior wall showing equipment connected to the utility meter and main service panel, the installed panels/inverters/ESS/batteries/ATS, and images of all VLLDs and their placarding — and the equipment on the drawings must match the equipment tab in eTRACK.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Oncor's 1 May 2025 requirements. Note this verifies placards and equipment identity but is a photo review by the utility, not a listing inspection by an AHJ.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

No county inspection checklist for solar exists. Oncor publishes a nine-item submission checklist in its Residential/Small Commercial Project Requirements covering service address, ESI ID, equipment labelling, the written-out VLLD wording, the meter-to-VLLD distance, placard class, placard proofs uploaded, equipment matching the eTRACK tab, and inspection images uploaded at the Agreement Available step.

Why the confidence is not higherThe Oncor checklist is quoted from the current document. The county 'none' rests on the absence of any inspection page, form or checklist across the DUAS, Fire Marshal and Public Works sites I walked.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications page, Fire Marshal pages, Fire Code Part 4. The Fire Code requires the permit holder to post the permit at the jobsite 'visible from the nearest public road' and to display the street address per IFC 505.1 — but only for permits under that code, which excludes dwellings. Nothing is published for residential work.

https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-Fire-Code.pdf

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

No county re-inspection fee reaches a residential PV system. The Fire Marshal's schedule (commercial) sets Fire & Safety Final Re-Inspection at no charge for the first, then $125.00, then $175.00; TABC-related re-inspections are $150.00 then $200.00.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the fire fee schedule. It applies only to occupancies within the fire code's scope, which excludes detached dwellings. The DUAS schedule carries no re-inspection line at all.

published fee schedule checked 2026-08-28 https://www.dallascounty.org/Assets/uploads/docs/fire/Dallas-County-FIre-Marshals-Office-Updated-Fee-Schedule.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedDUAS applications page (which says only that 'Applicants will receive an email confirming application completeness and/or approval') and Fire Code s.4.3(b), which covers written denial and resubmission for commercial fire permits. No correction-and-clearance process is published for residential work, and there is none to publish.

https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/duas/applications-permits.php

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Nothing is issued by the county for a residential PV system — there is no county final, no green tag and no CO. The document that ends the process is Oncor's Permission To Operate (PTO) letter, sent to both customer and installer once the interconnection agreement is signed by all parties.

Why the confidence is not higherPTO step quoted from Oncor's residential solar page (undated). The county 'nothing' follows from Q52. For completeness: the county DOES issue a Certificate of Compliance on commercial fire-code work, and no building within the fire code's scope may be occupied until it is issued — irrelevant to a house.

utility interconnection page checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/oncorwww/us/en/home/smart-energy/renewables-solar-and-more/residential-small-commercial-thinking-about-solar.html

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Installer — the installer submits the project through Oncor's eTRACK web installer portal and uploads the required inspection images at the 'Agreement Available' step; Oncor then issues the PTO. There is no AHJ notification step because there is no AHJ involvement.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth the seven-step sequence and the checklist line 'Are all required Inspection Images uploaded during the Agreement Available step?' are quoted from Oncor's own documents, the requirements one dated 1 May 2025.

utility DG requirements checked 2026-08-28 https://www.oncor.com/content/dam/oncorwww/documents/for-installers/New-Residential-Requirements-2025.pdf.coredownload.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for Dallas County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

Dallas County is not the permitting authority for residential solar here 88% confidence
Holds
For its unincorporated area only (<10% of county land, mostly the SE corner): floodplain/development permits, platting and subdivision, addressing, commercial building construction + commercial fire code (Fire Marshal), a Notice of Residential Construction for NEW dwellings and 500+ sq ft additions outside a city ETJ, mobile-home/RV placement, driveway/culvert, ROW/utility, operational (business) permits, special events, septic (HHS). It holds NO electrical jurisdiction of any kind, and no jurisdiction over alterations or retrofits to an existing detached dwelling.
Delegated to
For new residential construction the county takes a notice only — inspection is contracted by the BUILDER to a licensed engineer, registered architect, TREC professional inspector, municipal/political-subdivision building inspector, or ICC residential combination inspector (TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.154(a)(3)). Where the parcel is inside a municipality's ETJ and that city has adopted a building code, the CITY's code controls and the county standard has no effect (233.153(c)).
Overridden by
TX Loc. Gov't Code 233.062(a) — county fire code may reach only commercial establishments, public buildings and 4+ unit multifamily, so a detached house is out of reach by statute. 233.151/233.153 — county residential building standards reach only new houses/duplexes and additions increasing area or value by >50%, may not be construed to require prior county approval, and the county may not charge a fee to enforce them. TX Occupations Code 1305.201 grants inspection/permit/fee powers to MUNICIPALITIES ONLY — the word 'county' does not appear in that subchapter; 1305.201(e) instead requires electrical work in an unincorporated area to meet the state electrical code, which 16 TAC 73.100 sets as the 2023 NEC (effective 1 Sep 2023).
Why not higher
Three independent county sources agree and none contradicts: (1) the DUAS applications list shows Building Permit = commercial only, with no electrical or solar permit type at all; (2) the county's own Zoning page enumerates exactly what it regulates in the unincorporated area and limits the residential building code to 'a new residential housing unit or an addition of at least 500 square feet' outside a city ETJ; (3) the Dallas County Fire Code s.1.2 states it 'does not apply to detached one- and two-family dwellings.' Corroborated by the county's own issued-permit reports for 2024-Jul 2026 (~370 permits): 308 Notice Of Construction (R), zero electrical permits, and the only three 'Solar' entries are commercial New Building (C) permits for utility-scale Solar/BESS projects. Held at 88 not 95 because the county has never published a positive statement that rooftop PV needs nothing — this is proved by the exhaustive scope statements plus the permit record, not by a sentence saying so. NOTE ON THE BRIEF: the department is DUAS, sitting under Planning & Development; commercial fire is the separate Fire Marshal's Office and floodplain administration is Public Works — 'Dallas County' as a single AHJ is not how the work is actually split.

https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/plandev/zoning.php

Permit required
No — no county permit is required for a rooftop PV retrofit on an existing single-family home82%
Permit cost
$0 — no county fee for a residential rooftop PV system78%
Plan review
Not published by DUAS. Statutory backstop for the county's commercial fire-code building permit: 30 days to issue or deny,72%
Portal
MyGov / MGO Connect — www.mgoconnect.org, jurisdiction 'Dallas County Unincorporated'92%
Electrical code
2023 NEC — by state adoption, not county adoption. 16 TAC 73.100: 'Effective September 1, 2023, the department adopts the 2023 National Electrical Code'. Occ.82%
Own placard wording
County: No. Utility: yes — Oncor gives example wording, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT' (Class 1),85%
Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 85%

County: No. Utility: yes — Oncor gives example wording, e.g. 'CAUTION / POWER TO THIS SERVICE IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ON-SITE SOLAR/WIND GENERATION / AC SYSTEM DISCONNECT' (Class 1), and for Class 2 the same with 'DISCONNECT LOCATED ON WEST WALL OF THIS STRUCTURE'.

Size, colour & material 82%

Material is specified; letter height and colour are not. Oncor: 'Placards materials are to be UV resistant and follow the same material standards as utilized in the National Electric Code.' Colour cast acrylic is accepted, as are outdoor-rated sticker-type placards of similar NEC specification, both with a UV inhibitor rated for exterior use. If cast acrylic is used the customer must supply adhesive tape — preferred 3M Scotch VHB family (4956, 4941, 4936 or 4926), minimum 1 inch wide, double-sided, exterior VHB.

Where they go 88%

On the visible AC disconnect, not on the Oncor meter: 'Placards are requested to be located on the visible AC disconnect and not on the Oncor meter.' Where the disconnect is remote from the meter (Class 2), a placard goes at the meter location AND on the disconnect. For Class 3, identical placards on the Oncor equipment and on the customer's main equipment, mounted by Oncor's operations group, plus a drilled two-hole caution placard attached to the secondary cables inside the Oncor pad-mount transformer.

What the utility wants on top 90%

Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY placard authority, because the AHJ specifies none. Oncor's placard scheme is additional to the NEC and explicitly so: 'Oncor placard specifications are not intended to replace any requirements in the National Electric Code.' Placard proofs must be uploaded to the Placards section of the eTRACK installer portal (separately from the design packet, or review is delayed), and Class 1 proofs may alternatively be shown on the layout sketch or one-line.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
County
County
Dallas County
Regions covered
Solar Requirements
Separate fire inspection
All permits can now be applied online at www.mgoconnect.org All permits will now be submitted through www.mgoconnect.org Development Activities (residential or non-residential construction/installation, grading/filling, development, floodplain, on site sewerage facility/OSSF, sand & gravel operation
Authority Contact
Building Department
Direct Phone
(214) 653-6565
Booking & Scheduling