Broward County

Broward County

State of Florida

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

Broward County is the 2nd largest jurisdiction in Florida — 1,944,375 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for Broward County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

Broward County is the authority having jurisdiction 85% confidence
Holds
Building, electrical, mechanical and plumbing permitting AND inspection -- but ONLY for the Broward Municipal Services District (BMSD: the unincorporated communities of Boulevard Gardens, Broadview Park, Franklin Park, Hillsboro Pines, Hillsboro Ranches, Rosevelt Gardens and Washington Park) plus Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. This is a small fraction of the county's population, NOT the county-wide 1,944,375 some earlier record apparently carried -- Broward has ~30 incorporated municipalities, each running its own building department for residential solar within its own limits.
Delegated to
Every incorporated municipality is its own AHJ for solar inside its own limits -- the County Building Code Division (BCD) does not hold or delegate permitting there in the ordinary case. A number of municipalities separately hold interlocal agreements (ILAs) with BCD; broward.org states there are 22 such agreements, but the one I was able to open in full (Town of Pembroke Park, via Broward Legistar) is an 'Emergency/Nonguaranteed Supplemental Support' staffing agreement only -- the Town keeps its own permitting authority and fees, and County staff are loaned hourly, only 'when specifically requested in writing by Town.' I could not obtain a definitive named list of the other 21 agreements or confirm whether any of them are full permitting delegations rather than supplemental-staffing arrangements like Pembroke Park's -- the County's own 'Current Service Agreements' index page is fully client-side-rendered (Sitecore/Next.js) and returned no list to either WebFetch or a raw curl of its server HTML.
Overridden by
The Broward County Board of Rules and Appeals (BORA) amends the Florida Building Code and Florida Fire Prevention Code COUNTY-WIDE -- binding on every building official in Broward, incorporated and unincorporated alike -- via its administrative provisions and formal/technical interpretations, but BORA itself issues no permits (easy to mistake for an AHJ; it is not one). Florida Statute 163.04 preempts any local HOA/deed-restriction prohibition on solar. Broward is, with Miami-Dade, one of only two Florida counties in the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone (HVHZ), which drives mandatory product-approval and PE/RA-sealed wind-load documentation requirements on top of the base Florida Building Code for every roof attachment. Florida Power & Light (FPL), not any Broward AHJ, controls net-metering interconnection, the AC-disconnect location/labeling relative to the meter, and permission-to-operate timing.
Why not higher
broward.org's own Building Code pages (BuildingPermits and default) state in near-identical language that BCD 'regulates construction in unincorporated Broward County and cities we contract with' and 'provides permitting, code compliance and enforcement to the Broward Municipal Services District (BMSD) and Fort Lauderdale International Airport,' naming the BMSD communities explicitly. The Pembroke Park ILA (a recorded exhibit on Broward's own Legistar system) was read in full and shows a materially different -- supplemental-staffing-only -- relationship than a 'contract city' framing would suggest. Deduction from 95: I could not obtain the actual named list of all interlocal-agreement municipalities or verify whether any go beyond Pembroke Park's supplemental-staffing model, so I cannot rule out that one or more IS effectively a full delegation.

https://www.broward.org/Building/BuildingPermits/Pages/BuildingPermits.aspx

Permit required
Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in BMSD.90%
Permit cost
No PV-specific fee line exists; a residential solar permit is priced like any other permit under Broward's general fee schedule: the greater of a $125 minimum base fee,60%
Plan review
Two statutory clocks apply, both read from the enrolled text, and BOTH bind Broward's own BCD review of a residential PV/electrical permit (this is NOT limited to the private-provider…75%
Portal
Broward County ePermits OneStop (broward.org/ePermits), login at access.broward.org, used for County (BMSD) permits and by participating municipalities alike.60%
Electrical code
NEC 2020 (NFPA 70-2020), adopted through the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023.85%
Booking an inspection
Portal or by phone/office visit: 'Building permit inspections can now be requested online by selecting the online inspections portal,' requiring the permit number,65%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in BMSD. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Effectively combined under a single master permit per system type, with separate trade reviews/inspections tied to it. Q4 Plan review — Two statutory clocks apply, both read from the enrolled text, and BOTH bind Broward's own BCD review of a residential PV/electrical permit (this is NOT limited to… Q18 Where you file — Broward County ePermits OneStop (broward.org/ePermits), login at access.broward.org, used for County (BMSD) permits and by participating municipalities alike. Q20

Permit required
Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in BMSD.90% source
What it costs
No PV-specific fee line exists; a residential solar permit is priced like any other permit under Broward's general fee schedule: the greater of a $125 minimum base fee, or 1.85% of job value,60% source
Plan review turnaround
Two statutory clocks apply, both read from the enrolled text, and BOTH bind Broward's own BCD review of a residential PV/electrical permit (this is NOT limited to the private-provider route): under…75% source
Key document
BORA Board Policy #09-02, 'Administrative Guidelines for Processing Solar Thermal/Electric Permits' (eff. 15 May 2009), OCR'd from the archived PDF (no text lay cited by 10 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Only for addresses inside the Broward Municipal Services District (BMSD) -- the unincorporated communities of Boulevard Gardens, Broadview Park, Franklin Park, Hillsboro Pines, Hillsboro Ranches, Rosevelt Gardens and Washington Park -- plus Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. For an address inside any of Broward's ~30 incorporated municipalities, the County Building Code Division is NOT the AHJ; that city's own building department is. 92% · county department page
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both building and electrical (plus mechanical/plumbing), performed directly by Broward County Building Code Division (BCD), but ONLY for BMSD + the airport. Every incorporated municipality either runs its own building department or has separately negotiated an interlocal agreement (ILA) for supplemental staffing -- and the one ILA I could open (Town of Pembroke Park) is emergency/nonguaranteed SUPPLEMENTAL STAFFING only: the Town still issues its own permits and keeps the fees, County staff are loaned hourly and 'Building Official Services shall only be provided by County when specifically requested in writing by Town.' I could not find a definitive named list of any municipality where BCD holds first-line permitting authority the way it does in BMSD. 78% · interlocal agreement (recorded exhibit, Broward Legistar) + county page (JS-rendered, no list retrievable)
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in BMSD. 90% · BORA Board Policy #09-02, 'Administrative Guidelines for Processing Solar Thermal/Electric Permits' (eff. 15 May 2009), OCR'd from the archived PDF (no text lay
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Effectively combined under a single master permit per system type, with separate trade reviews/inspections tied to it. BORA Policy #09-02(B): 'Building Departments shall establish an individual master permit for both Solar Thermal and Solar Electric installations to which applicable subsidiary categories are to be tied. Adding additional categories to the master permit may not require an additional permit ... but will require a separate trade review in every instance.' 78% · BORA Board Policy #09-02(B)
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No -- an HOA/architectural-approval cannot be required as a gate to a Broward building permit; under Florida Statute 163.04, a deed restriction, covenant or declaration may not prohibit solar collectors, and an association's rights are limited to reasonably determining panel placement/orientation (within 45 degrees of due south) without impairing system performance. 70% · Florida Statute 163.04 (statewide)
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No stand-alone 'windstorm certification' document exists as a separate step, but its function is subsumed into the mandatory PE/RA-stamped wind-load/uplift/lateral design package required on every roof-mounted PV submittal because Broward is in the HVHZ (see q13) -- functionally equivalent to a windstorm certification. 62% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (HVHZ wind-load documentation)
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No for a standard rooftop residential system -- Broward Code of Ordinances §39-109 (unincorporated zoning) treats rooftop PV as 'permitted accessory equipment' 'in all zoning districts,' which does not require a Specific Use Permit or Commission approval. 60% · Broward County Code of Ordinances §39-109 (quoted via search-engine synthesis of Municode content; primary page 403'd to direct fetch)
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No generation-capacity (kW) cap found; §39-109 instead imposes a physical HEIGHT cap: a rooftop PV system 'must not exceed roof lines in height or be higher than 5 feet above flat roofs.' 58% · Broward County Code of Ordinances §39-109 (search-engine synthesis; primary page 403'd to direct fetch)
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A Certified Solar Contractor (CV license) may pull the master permit in either the Solar Thermal or Solar Electric category. A Certified/Registered Electrical Contractor may pull it in the Solar Electric category. A Certified/Registered Plumbing Contractor may pull it in the Solar Thermal category. A Registered Solar Contractor may pull it in the Solar Thermal category but restricted to residential installations only. Each may self-perform only their own trade's scope and must subcontract other trades' work. 85% · BORA Board Policy #09-02(C)
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes for the local trade license: Broward County requires contractors to hold a Broward County Certificate of Competency (issued via the County's Central Examining Board / Building Code Division Contractor Licensing section) in addition to any state DBPR license, before they may pull permits in the county's jurisdiction. BCD's own page states it 'regulate[s] all trades and occupations associated with the installation, repair, alteration, design or modification of electrical, plumbing, ... building construction industry ... as mandated by the Florida Statutes and Chapter 9 of the Broward County Code of Ordinances' and separately offers a 'Contractor' packet to 'apply, renew or obtain a Certificate of Competency.' 65% · county department page (Chapter 9 BCC reference) + Central Examining Board schedule documents
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Not confirmed for Broward specifically. Florida's statewide owner-builder exemption (F.S. 489.103(7)) lets a homeowner pull permits and act as their own contractor on their own residence generally, and I found no Broward-specific carve-out that excludes solar from that exemption -- but I also found no Broward document that affirmatively discusses owner-builder solar. 50% · Florida Statute (statewide, not Broward-specific)
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Per the county-wide BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix: for roof-mounted PV panels/BIPV/solar thermal collectors -- signed & sealed drawings and design calculations by a licensed PE or Registered Architect documenting wind-load compliance of the exposed panel equipment, uplift/lateral force compliance of support framing, connection design for wind loads, and dead-load capacity of structural supports; a Uniform HVHZ Photovoltaic (BIPV) Application; a detail of the roof-penetration flashing; and clearance-requirement documentation. For solar water heaters: FSEC Approval/Listing and a System Reference Drawing (or, if PV-pump powered, a listing for the PV panel and pump). For the electrical scope: an electrical diagram per NEC Art. 690 in its entirety, and component documentation showing FSEC certification / NEC 110.3(B) listing. 85% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, Board Policy #09-02
    • How many copies, and in what format? At least two sets of plans/specifications per application ('two or more sets of plans and/or specifications ... with each application for a permit'); electronic media is permitted when approved by the Building Official. 70% · Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 106.1.1/106.1.5 (quoted in BORA Policy #09-02)
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? A site plan is implied by the general permit-application requirement (Sec. 105.3.2: application 'shall describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done, by legal description and address') but I could not find a Broward-published, PV-specific site-plan content checklist (property lines, easements, meter locations, etc.) the way some other AHJs publish one. 45% · Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 105.3.2
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes. 'Submit electrical diagram designed in accordance to the National Electrical Code Article 690 Solar Photovoltaic Systems, in its entirety.' 88% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Required for all roof-mounted PV panels/BIPV and solar thermal collector equipment, with no dollar-value threshold stated: the matrix requires 'signed and sealed drawings & design calculations by licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Architect' documenting wind-load, uplift/lateral, connection, and dead-load compliance -- for every such installation, because Broward is in the HVHZ (High-Velocity Hurricane Zone). 82% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix
    • Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Only above a size/capacity threshold, per F.S. cited in the matrix: 'Plans must be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer if: (a) the system has a value of more than $50,000, or (b) the system has an aggregate service capacity of 600 amperes (240 volts) or more for a residential electrical system, or (c) 800 amperes (240 volts) or more for commercial/industrial.' Below those thresholds, the installing electrical/solar contractor's own exemption applies and no separate electrical PE stamp is required. 80% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, citing F.S. 471.003(h)
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Broward County ePermits OneStop (broward.org/ePermits), login at access.broward.org, used for County (BMSD) permits and by participating municipalities alike. Separately, 'Go SOLAR Broward' is a DOE-grant-funded streamlined online solar-specific permitting system with pre-approved/pre-engineered mounting designs, flat fee, and same-day approval for qualifying simple residential systems -- but its own materials describe it as available where the property 'is governed by a participating municipality,' and I could not confirm BMSD itself (as opposed to individual cities like Sunrise or North Lauderdale) is a participating jurisdiction on Go SOLAR. 60% · county ePermits landing page + secondary program descriptions (Go SOLAR)
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes for ePermits OneStop generally -- 'allows customers applying for permits in their city or municipality to submit applications and receive approval for associated Broward County permits and licenses online.' I could not confirm from a BCD-specific page whether a BMSD residential-solar master permit specifically can be fully completed online end-to-end (vs. requiring an in-person or mailed wet-stamped plan set given the PE/RA-stamp requirements in q13). 60% · county ePermits landing page
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? No PV-specific fee line exists; a residential solar permit is priced like any other permit under Broward's general fee schedule: the greater of a $125 minimum base fee, or 1.85% of job value, charged separately per trade (Structural for the racking/roof work, Electrical for the PV/inverter work, and Plumbing if a solar-thermal collector is involved). For a typical residential rooftop PV job (Electrical trade) that is $125 minimum or 1.85% of job value, whichever is greater -- e.g. roughly $370 on a $20,000 job. 60% · county fee schedule (Sec. 40.27/40.29/40.30), Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024 -- live URL and elaws.us mirror both unreachable at time of research
    • How is the fee calculated? Valuation -- percentage of job value (1.85% per the most recent schedule I could open), with a flat $125 minimum base fee applied if greater. Not flat, not per-kW, not per-panel. 70% · county fee schedule, Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes, potentially -- Sec. 40.27(d)(1): 'At application, a nonrefundable minimum permit fee and any assessable plan review fees per the Plan Review Fee Schedule, Exhibit 40A, will be assessed.' I could not open Exhibit 40A itself to give its rate. 55% · county fee schedule Sec. 40.27(d)(1), referencing Exhibit 40A (not independently opened)
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Two statutory clocks apply, both read from the enrolled text, and BOTH bind Broward's own BCD review of a residential PV/electrical permit (this is NOT limited to the private-provider route): under F.S. 553.792(1)(a), AS AMENDED BY CS/CS/HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026), a Broward-reviewed ELECTRICAL permit for an EXISTING single-family dwelling must be approved/approved-with-conditions/denied within 5 BUSINESS DAYS of a complete application if the value of the work is under $15,000; otherwise (value $15,000+, or new construction) it falls under the general residential timeframe of 30 business days for a structure under 7,500 sq ft. Separately, F.S. 553.791 (the private-provider/alternative-plans-review route, most recently amended by 2025 HB 683 and further amended by the same HB 803) lets an applicant bypass the local reviewer's queue entirely by hiring a licensed private provider, on that route's own faster statutory clock. No Broward-published turnaround figure of its own was found -- these are the statewide statutory floors, not a BCD-stated number. 75% · enrolled bill text, CS/CS/HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63), effective 1 Jul 2026, amending F.S. 553.792(1)(a) -- read directly, not from a summary
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? A minimum of 1 year from issuance -- Florida law now sets this as a statewide FLOOR for any Broward-issued single-family-dwelling permit, including a solar permit: 'A building permit issued by a county for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit OR on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, WHICHEVER IS LATER.' The county may send a written 30-day-advance expiration notice but this paragraph 'does not prevent a local government from extending a building permit beyond the expiration date.' No Broward-specific document was found stating a different (shorter or longer) period for BCD permits specifically, so the state floor is the answer. 78% · enrolled bill text, CS/CS/HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63), effective 1 Jul 2026, amending F.S. 125.56(4)(d) -- read directly, not from a summary
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light (FPL) -- Broward County (including BMSD) sits within FPL's service territory; none of Broward's jurisdictions operate a municipal electric utility. 70% · FPL net metering guidelines page (utility-side, not independently checked against a PSC territory map)
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel with a hard downstream gate: the AHJ (BCD or the city) permit and final inspection are independent of FPL, but FPL prohibits energizing the system ('Operation of the renewable generation system ... prior to the installation of a new bi-directional meter is strictly prohibited') until its own net-metering interconnection process, including installing the bi-directional meter, is complete -- so FPL's step effectively comes after the AHJ's final inspection in practice even though the two approval tracks run independently. 60% · FPL net metering guidelines page

28 questions answered against Broward County’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Only for addresses inside the Broward Municipal Services District (BMSD) -- the unincorporated communities of Boulevard Gardens, Broadview Park, Franklin Park, Hillsboro Pines, Hillsboro Ranches, Rosevelt Gardens and Washington Park -- plus Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. For an address inside any of Broward's ~30 incorporated municipalities, the County Building Code Division is NOT the AHJ; that city's own building department is.

Why the confidence is not higherbroward.org's own Building Code pages state the Division 'regulates construction in unincorporated Broward County and cities we contract with' and name the BMSD communities by name (both the BuildingPermits and default Building Code pages give the identical list). Confidence held below 95 because the same pages assert a separate, unnamed population of 'cities we contract with' whose identity I could not pin down (see q2/jurisdiction).

county department page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/Building/BuildingPermits/Pages/BuildingPermits.aspx

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both building and electrical (plus mechanical/plumbing), performed directly by Broward County Building Code Division (BCD), but ONLY for BMSD + the airport. Every incorporated municipality either runs its own building department or has separately negotiated an interlocal agreement (ILA) for supplemental staffing -- and the one ILA I could open (Town of Pembroke Park) is emergency/nonguaranteed SUPPLEMENTAL STAFFING only: the Town still issues its own permits and keeps the fees, County staff are loaned hourly and 'Building Official Services shall only be provided by County when specifically requested in writing by Town.' I could not find a definitive named list of any municipality where BCD holds first-line permitting authority the way it does in BMSD.

Why the confidence is not higherPembroke Park ILA (Exhibit 1, Broward Legistar) read in full: Article 1.1/1.3/1.4 verbatim as summarized. The County's own 'Current Service Agreements' index page (broward.org/Building/Government2Government/Pages/CurrentServiceAgreements.aspx) is fully client-rendered (Sitecore/Next.js) and returned no list in either WebFetch or raw curl of the server HTML -- I could not get a machine-readable list of the other ~21 ILAs to check whether any of them are full delegations rather than supplemental-staffing agreements like Pembroke Park's.

interlocal agreement (recorded exhibit, Broward Legistar) + county page (JS-rendered, no list retrievable) checked 2026-09-11 https://broward.legistar.com/View.ashx?GUID=85C3F28D-0EE0-42CA-B642-B33D434E1793&ID=14578983&M=F

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in BMSD.

Why the confidence is not higherBroward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 105.3 'Application for Permit Required' (quoted in full in BORA Policy #09-02) requires a written permit application for work regulated by the FBC; BORA Policy #09-02 itself exists specifically to standardize 'permit application submittals' for solar thermal/electric installations, which presupposes a permit is required. No exemption for solar appears in the text I read.

BORA Board Policy #09-02, 'Administrative Guidelines for Processing Solar Thermal/Electric Permits' (eff. 15 May 2009), OCR'd from the archived PDF (no text lay checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Effectively combined under a single master permit per system type, with separate trade reviews/inspections tied to it. BORA Policy #09-02(B): 'Building Departments shall establish an individual master permit for both Solar Thermal and Solar Electric installations to which applicable subsidiary categories are to be tied. Adding additional categories to the master permit may not require an additional permit ... but will require a separate trade review in every instance.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from BORA Policy #09-02(B), a county-wide binding administrative guideline. Marked down because the policy is dated 2009 and I could not confirm it is still in force unamended (BCD's current permit-type list was not independently opened).

BORA Board Policy #09-02(B) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

A Certified Solar Contractor (CV license) may pull the master permit in either the Solar Thermal or Solar Electric category. A Certified/Registered Electrical Contractor may pull it in the Solar Electric category. A Certified/Registered Plumbing Contractor may pull it in the Solar Thermal category. A Registered Solar Contractor may pull it in the Solar Thermal category but restricted to residential installations only. Each may self-perform only their own trade's scope and must subcontract other trades' work.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from BORA Policy #09-02(C), a county-wide binding guideline covering BCD and (per its own administration/enforcement scope language) all Broward building officials.

BORA Board Policy #09-02(C) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes for the local trade license: Broward County requires contractors to hold a Broward County Certificate of Competency (issued via the County's Central Examining Board / Building Code Division Contractor Licensing section) in addition to any state DBPR license, before they may pull permits in the county's jurisdiction. BCD's own page states it 'regulate[s] all trades and occupations associated with the installation, repair, alteration, design or modification of electrical, plumbing, ... building construction industry ... as mandated by the Florida Statutes and Chapter 9 of the Broward County Code of Ordinances' and separately offers a 'Contractor' packet to 'apply, renew or obtain a Certificate of Competency.'

Why the confidence is not higherThe 'must register before applying' framing is my inference from two facts on the County's own page (Chapter 9 licensing authority + Certificate of Competency packet) rather than a single sentence that says 'you must register before you may apply for a permit.' I did not open Chapter 9 of the Broward County Code of Ordinances directly to confirm the mandatory-before-permit sequencing.

county department page (Chapter 9 BCC reference) + Central Examining Board schedule documents checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/Building/Pages/default.aspx

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Not confirmed for Broward specifically. Florida's statewide owner-builder exemption (F.S. 489.103(7)) lets a homeowner pull permits and act as their own contractor on their own residence generally, and I found no Broward-specific carve-out that excludes solar from that exemption -- but I also found no Broward document that affirmatively discusses owner-builder solar.

Why the confidence is not higherThis is inference from a state statute that applies to every Florida AHJ, not a Broward-specific confirmation; BCD's own permit-application/owner-builder forms were not directly retrievable (see not_found list) to check for a solar-specific carve-out.

Florida Statute (statewide, not Broward-specific) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2024/0489.103

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Per the county-wide BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix: for roof-mounted PV panels/BIPV/solar thermal collectors -- signed & sealed drawings and design calculations by a licensed PE or Registered Architect documenting wind-load compliance of the exposed panel equipment, uplift/lateral force compliance of support framing, connection design for wind loads, and dead-load capacity of structural supports; a Uniform HVHZ Photovoltaic (BIPV) Application; a detail of the roof-penetration flashing; and clearance-requirement documentation. For solar water heaters: FSEC Approval/Listing and a System Reference Drawing (or, if PV-pump powered, a listing for the PV panel and pump). For the electrical scope: an electrical diagram per NEC Art. 690 in its entirety, and component documentation showing FSEC certification / NEC 110.3(B) listing.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the BORA Uniform Permit Submittal Matrix (Board Policy #09-02), which cites its own FBC/BCAP section numbers for each line item. Marked down slightly because the matrix's HVHZ code citations (FBCB 1512.3, 1516.2, 1514, 1522.3.1 etc.) are dated 2009-era section numbers that may have been renumbered across the 6th/7th/8th FBC cycles since.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, Board Policy #09-02 checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

At least two sets of plans/specifications per application ('two or more sets of plans and/or specifications ... with each application for a permit'); electronic media is permitted when approved by the Building Official.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 106.1.1/106.1.5, as quoted inside BORA Policy #09-02. This is the general BCD submittal rule, not a solar-specific one, and I could not confirm whether BCD's current ePermits system has since made this fully electronic-only (the ePermits OneStop portal description suggests full online submission is now normal).

Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 106.1.1/106.1.5 (quoted in BORA Policy #09-02) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

A site plan is implied by the general permit-application requirement (Sec. 105.3.2: application 'shall describe the land on which the proposed work is to be done, by legal description and address') but I could not find a Broward-published, PV-specific site-plan content checklist (property lines, easements, meter locations, etc.) the way some other AHJs publish one.

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 105.3.2 (quoted verbatim in BORA Policy #09-02) establishes only the general legal-description/address requirement for any permit, not a PV-specific site-plan spec; I did not locate a residential-PV checklist page (see not_found for q57/q58) that would itemize what a solar site plan must show.

Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 105.3.2 checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes. 'Submit electrical diagram designed in accordance to the National Electrical Code Article 690 Solar Photovoltaic Systems, in its entirety.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (Board Policy #09-02), 'Electrical Diagram' row.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedThe BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (Board Policy #09-02) requires an 'electrical diagram ... in accordance to ... NEC Article 690 ... in its entirety' but does not separately itemize string or conductor sizing calculations as a distinct submittal line, and I found no other Broward-published PV electrical checklist that does. Cannot honestly answer yes/no above 40.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

Required for all roof-mounted PV panels/BIPV and solar thermal collector equipment, with no dollar-value threshold stated: the matrix requires 'signed and sealed drawings & design calculations by licensed Professional Engineer or Registered Architect' documenting wind-load, uplift/lateral, connection, and dead-load compliance -- for every such installation, because Broward is in the HVHZ (High-Velocity Hurricane Zone).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim requirement line in the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, which does not gate the PE/RA-stamp requirement behind a size or value threshold the way the electrical-PE threshold is gated (see q14) -- consistent with Broward's HVHZ status driving mandatory engineered wind-load documentation on every roof attachment.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Only above a size/capacity threshold, per F.S. cited in the matrix: 'Plans must be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer if: (a) the system has a value of more than $50,000, or (b) the system has an aggregate service capacity of 600 amperes (240 volts) or more for a residential electrical system, or (c) 800 amperes (240 volts) or more for commercial/industrial.' Below those thresholds, the installing electrical/solar contractor's own exemption applies and no separate electrical PE stamp is required.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the BORA matrix, which itself cites 'F.S. 471.003(h)' for this contractor-exemption threshold (that citation is the document's own, not independently verified against the current statute text).

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, citing F.S. 471.003(h) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

No PV-specific fee line exists; a residential solar permit is priced like any other permit under Broward's general fee schedule: the greater of a $125 minimum base fee, or 1.85% of job value, charged separately per trade (Structural for the racking/roof work, Electrical for the PV/inverter work, and Plumbing if a solar-thermal collector is involved). For a typical residential rooftop PV job (Electrical trade) that is $125 minimum or 1.85% of job value, whichever is greater -- e.g. roughly $370 on a $20,000 job.

Why the confidence is not higher1.85% rate and $125 minimum are confirmed verbatim in the County's own Fee Schedule (Sec. 40.29/40.30), from the most recent archived snapshot I could open (6 Jul 2024). A search-engine-generated summary (not a document I could open myself) claimed a newer rate of '3.0% of job value ($1-$9,999,999.99) / 2.5% (over $10M)' effective from a page dated 2025-05-05 -- I could not independently verify that newer rate because both the live broward.org fee-schedule URL and its elaws.us mirror were unreachable (Sitecore soft-404 and DNS/timeout respectively) during this research session, so I am not using that unverified figure and am flagging the possibility the rate has since changed.

county fee schedule (Sec. 40.27/40.29/40.30), Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024 -- live URL and elaws.us mirror both unreachable at time of research checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240706175705/https://www.broward.org/Building/Forms/Documents/40.27.___General_Fees_Schedule.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Valuation -- percentage of job value (1.85% per the most recent schedule I could open), with a flat $125 minimum base fee applied if greater. Not flat, not per-kW, not per-panel.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from Fee Schedule Sec. 40.29/40.30 (structural/electrical), 6 Jul 2024 Internet Archive snapshot. Same caveat as q15 about a possibly newer, unverified rate.

county fee schedule, Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024 checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240706175705/https://www.broward.org/Building/Forms/Documents/40.27.___General_Fees_Schedule.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes, potentially -- Sec. 40.27(d)(1): 'At application, a nonrefundable minimum permit fee and any assessable plan review fees per the Plan Review Fee Schedule, Exhibit 40A, will be assessed.' I could not open Exhibit 40A itself to give its rate.

Why the confidence is not higherThe clause confirms a separate plan-review fee schedule (Exhibit 40A) exists and is charged at application, but I did not locate/open Exhibit 40A to quote its actual rate.

county fee schedule Sec. 40.27(d)(1), referencing Exhibit 40A (not independently opened) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240706175705/https://www.broward.org/Building/Forms/Documents/40.27.___General_Fees_Schedule.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Two statutory clocks apply, both read from the enrolled text, and BOTH bind Broward's own BCD review of a residential PV/electrical permit (this is NOT limited to the private-provider route): under F.S. 553.792(1)(a), AS AMENDED BY CS/CS/HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026), a Broward-reviewed ELECTRICAL permit for an EXISTING single-family dwelling must be approved/approved-with-conditions/denied within 5 BUSINESS DAYS of a complete application if the value of the work is under $15,000; otherwise (value $15,000+, or new construction) it falls under the general residential timeframe of 30 business days for a structure under 7,500 sq ft. Separately, F.S. 553.791 (the private-provider/alternative-plans-review route, most recently amended by 2025 HB 683 and further amended by the same HB 803) lets an applicant bypass the local reviewer's queue entirely by hiring a licensed private provider, on that route's own faster statutory clock. No Broward-published turnaround figure of its own was found -- these are the statewide statutory floors, not a BCD-stated number.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from the enrolled bill text (CS/CS/HB 803, Engrossed 2, 2026 Legislature -- not a summary): Section 10 amends F.S. 553.792(1)(a)1 to add the 5-business-day/$15,000/existing-single-family-dwelling/electrical-among-other-trades clock, with 553.792(1)(a)2 as the 30-business-day default for smaller residential structures otherwise. F.S. 553.791 itself (Section 9 of the same act) was reviewed for its private-provider definitions but I did not re-derive its own specific day-count for the private-provider route from this bill text (see q19 sourcing note) -- flagged at reduced confidence for that half only. No Broward-specific document states BCD's own administrative turnaround separately from these state floors, and I could not confirm whether Broward requires the 5-day/$15,000 track for a typical residential PV job (PV jobs, especially with battery storage, may commonly exceed $15,000 in value, which would push them to the 30-business-day track instead).

enrolled bill text, CS/CS/HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63), effective 1 Jul 2026, amending F.S. 553.792(1)(a) -- read directly, not from a summary checked 2026-09-11 https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/803/BillText/er/PDF

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

A minimum of 1 year from issuance -- Florida law now sets this as a statewide FLOOR for any Broward-issued single-family-dwelling permit, including a solar permit: 'A building permit issued by a county for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit OR on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, WHICHEVER IS LATER.' The county may send a written 30-day-advance expiration notice but this paragraph 'does not prevent a local government from extending a building permit beyond the expiration date.' No Broward-specific document was found stating a different (shorter or longer) period for BCD permits specifically, so the state floor is the answer.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from the enrolled bill text (CS/CS/HB 803, Engrossed 2, 2026 Legislature): Section 1 amends F.S. 125.56(4)(d) (the COUNTY-level provision -- directly applicable to Broward County as a county issuing building permits in BMSD) with this exact 1-year-or-next-FBC-edition floor; an identically worded provision for local governments generally appears elsewhere in the same act (around new/amended text following F.S. 553.79). Marked down from higher confidence only because I did not find a Broward-specific document confirming BCD does not apply a LONGER validity period on top of this floor (the statute sets a minimum, not a ceiling, and 105.5-type provisions at other AHJs sometimes extend it for certain project types).

enrolled bill text, CS/CS/HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63), effective 1 Jul 2026, amending F.S. 125.56(4)(d) -- read directly, not from a summary checked 2026-09-11 https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/803/BillText/er/PDF

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Broward County ePermits OneStop (broward.org/ePermits), login at access.broward.org, used for County (BMSD) permits and by participating municipalities alike. Separately, 'Go SOLAR Broward' is a DOE-grant-funded streamlined online solar-specific permitting system with pre-approved/pre-engineered mounting designs, flat fee, and same-day approval for qualifying simple residential systems -- but its own materials describe it as available where the property 'is governed by a participating municipality,' and I could not confirm BMSD itself (as opposed to individual cities like Sunrise or North Lauderdale) is a participating jurisdiction on Go SOLAR.

Why the confidence is not higherePermits OneStop identity and login URL are from the County's own ePermits landing page. The 'Go SOLAR Broward' description is from secondary sources (Sunrise's and North Lauderdale's own program pages plus a clean-energy news aggregator), not from a Broward County BCD page stating BMSD participates -- so I am not asserting BMSD uses Go SOLAR.

county ePermits landing page + secondary program descriptions (Go SOLAR) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/ePermits/pages/default.aspx

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes for ePermits OneStop generally -- 'allows customers applying for permits in their city or municipality to submit applications and receive approval for associated Broward County permits and licenses online.' I could not confirm from a BCD-specific page whether a BMSD residential-solar master permit specifically can be fully completed online end-to-end (vs. requiring an in-person or mailed wet-stamped plan set given the PE/RA-stamp requirements in q13).

Why the confidence is not higherThe 'yes' is the portal's own general description; the residential-solar-specific caveat is my own inference given the PE/RA stamp and multi-trade review requirements documented elsewhere in this file.

county ePermits landing page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/ePermits/pages/default.aspx

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Florida Power & Light (FPL) -- Broward County (including BMSD) sits within FPL's service territory; none of Broward's jurisdictions operate a municipal electric utility.

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from FPL's own net-metering and disconnect-switch documents (which are the only utility-side documents that came up for any Broward-area solar search) and general knowledge of FPL's territory, rather than from opening a dedicated FPL or PSC territory map for this research session -- flagged per the standing warning against trusting an unverified utility assumption.

FPL net metering guidelines page (utility-side, not independently checked against a PSC territory map) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Parallel with a hard downstream gate: the AHJ (BCD or the city) permit and final inspection are independent of FPL, but FPL prohibits energizing the system ('Operation of the renewable generation system ... prior to the installation of a new bi-directional meter is strictly prohibited') until its own net-metering interconnection process, including installing the bi-directional meter, is complete -- so FPL's step effectively comes after the AHJ's final inspection in practice even though the two approval tracks run independently.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL's own guidelines page states the bi-directional-meter/energization gate; no Broward document states the sequencing relative to the County's own permit/inspection process, so the 'after AHJ final inspection' framing is my inference from how net-metering typically sequences, not a Broward-stated rule.

FPL net metering guidelines page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No -- an HOA/architectural-approval cannot be required as a gate to a Broward building permit; under Florida Statute 163.04, a deed restriction, covenant or declaration may not prohibit solar collectors, and an association's rights are limited to reasonably determining panel placement/orientation (within 45 degrees of due south) without impairing system performance.

Why the confidence is not higherF.S. 163.04 is a statewide statute (verbatim substance quoted), not a Broward-specific rule, but it overrides any Broward HOA covenant to the contrary and no Broward document imposes an HOA pre-approval requirement of its own.

Florida Statute 163.04 (statewide) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.flsenate.gov/laws/statutes/2011/163.04

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked in the BuildingPermits/default Building Code pages, BORA Policy #09-02, and the zoning §39-109 text found via search -- none discusses historic-district review for rooftop PV. Section 39-109 does state general zoning/planning treatment for rooftop PV (accessory equipment, permitted in all zoning districts) but does not carve out or mention historic districts.

https://www.broward.org/Building/BuildingPermits/Pages/BuildingPermits.aspx

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

No stand-alone 'windstorm certification' document exists as a separate step, but its function is subsumed into the mandatory PE/RA-stamped wind-load/uplift/lateral design package required on every roof-mounted PV submittal because Broward is in the HVHZ (see q13) -- functionally equivalent to a windstorm certification.

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the HVHZ engineering-documentation requirement in the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix; no Broward document uses the term 'windstorm certification' or names a distinct certificate.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (HVHZ wind-load documentation) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

No for a standard rooftop residential system -- Broward Code of Ordinances §39-109 (unincorporated zoning) treats rooftop PV as 'permitted accessory equipment' 'in all zoning districts,' which does not require a Specific Use Permit or Commission approval.

Why the confidence is not higherSourced from a search-engine-synthesized quotation of §39-109 (I could not open the live Municode page directly -- it 403'd to automated fetch); the substance is corroborated across two independent search queries returning identical wording, which raises confidence above the floor for an unverifiable AI-search summary but I have not read the primary ordinance text myself.

Broward County Code of Ordinances §39-109 (quoted via search-engine synthesis of Municode content; primary page 403'd to direct fetch) checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/broward_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH39ZO_ARTIXGEPR

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No generation-capacity (kW) cap found; §39-109 instead imposes a physical HEIGHT cap: a rooftop PV system 'must not exceed roof lines in height or be higher than 5 feet above flat roofs.'

Why the confidence is not higherSame sourcing caveat as q27 -- quoted via search-engine synthesis of the Municode ordinance text, not read directly from the primary page.

Broward County Code of Ordinances §39-109 (search-engine synthesis; primary page 403'd to direct fetch) checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/broward_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH39ZO_ARTIXGEPR

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Florida Building Code Residential §R324.6 (roof access & pathways) and §R324.6.2 (setback at ridge): not fewer than two 36-inch-wide pathways from lowest roof edge to ridge on separate roof planes (one on the street/driveway side, one on/adjacent to each PV-array roof plane); ridge setback of 18 inches on both sides where the PV array covers 33% or less of the plan-view roof area (or 66% or less with an NFPA 13D/P2904 residential fire sprinkler system installed), rising to 36 inches above those thresholds; §R324.6.2.2 additionally bars panels directly below an emergency escape/rescue opening and requires a 36-inch pathway to it. Exceptions exist for detached non-habitable accessory structures and for roofs at or under a 2:12 slope. 72% · ICC 'Significant Changes' commentary reproducing IRC/FBCR §R324.6 verbatim, cross-checked against a Florida county government's own §R324 mirror (Leon County)
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? No Broward-AHJ-specific facility-map placard requirement found; NEC Art. 690 (adopted in its entirety) contains the general directory/plaque requirement for multiple disconnects. Separately, FPL (the utility, not the AHJ) requires 'a sign noting the location of the disconnect switch ... installed at the meter to enable FPL personnel to easily locate the disconnect switch in the event of an emergency,' and requires customers to 'contact FPL for approval ... of the verbiage or the location of the sign prior to final design.' 60% · FPL Net Metering Guidelines (utility-level, not AHJ) + absence across documents opened
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes -- FPL (utility) requires signage beyond anything the AHJ documents I could open ask for: a location sign at the meter so FPL personnel can find the disconnect switch in an emergency, plus a warning sign on the switch itself stating both sides may be energized; FPL must be contacted to approve the sign's wording/location before final design; the switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, remain accessible to FPL at all times, and be lockable with a single FPL padlock (not locked inside a meter room). 80% · FPL Net Metering Guidelines
    • Where must the labels be placed? AHJ-side: unresolved -- would most likely be answered by FI-37 (solar disconnect placard interpretation) which I could not retrieve (see q38). Utility-side (FPL): the location sign goes at the meter (not necessarily on the disconnect itself), and the warning sign goes on the disconnect switch enclosure; the switch itself must be mounted adjacent to (not inside) the meter enclosure. 55% · FPL Net Metering Guidelines; AHJ-side unresolved per q38
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Per FPL (the utility, since the AC disconnect requirement here is a utility interconnection rule rather than a Broward AHJ rule): the manual disconnect switch (required for Tier 2/Tier 3 systems, i.e. systems above the smallest net-metering tier) must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket -- 'nearby and readily accessible from the meter location' -- remain accessible to FPL at all times, and be lockable in the open position with a single FPL padlock; it must not be locked inside a meter room. 78% · FPL Net Metering Guidelines
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, functionally -- every HVHZ roof attachment component (panel, racking/mounting system, clamps, flashing, fasteners) must carry a current Florida Product Approval (marked for HVHZ use) or a Miami-Dade County Notice of Acceptance (NOA); and NEC 110.3(B) ('listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling') is cited directly in the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix as a component-documentation requirement, alongside required FSEC certification/listing for solar-thermal equipment. 75% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (NEC 110.3(B) / FSEC citation) + secondary HVHZ product-approval sources
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, under Florida's statewide adoption of NFPA 855 (Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems) via the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), and Florida Building Code Residential §R328 (added in the 2023/8th-edition cycle to correlate with NFPA 855). Reported general NFPA 855 residential conditions: units restricted to specific locations (garage, utility closet, outdoors -- not habitable rooms such as bedrooms), an aggregate capacity limit (commonly cited as up to 280 kWh per dwelling once Ch. 15 location-based limits are correctly applied), minimum 3-foot spacing between ESS units (unless UL 9540A testing supports closer spacing), and interconnected smoke/heat alarms where installed in a garage or closet. I found no Broward-specific ESS amendment beyond this statewide baseline. 55% · secondary sources on statewide NFPA 855 / FBC Residential §R328 adoption (Broward-specific amendment text not independently opened)
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No single prescribed mounting system or spacing, but every roof-attached component (panels, racking, clamps, flashing, lag bolts) must individually carry HVHZ product approval -- either a statewide Florida Product Approval marked 'Approved for use in the HVHZ' or a Miami-Dade County Notice of Acceptance (NOA) -- plus PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift, lateral-force and connection-design calculations per component, because Broward is in the HVHZ. 75% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix + secondary sources on HVHZ product-approval mechanism

20 questions answered against Broward County’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

NEC 2020 (NFPA 70-2020), adopted through the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023.

Why the confidence is not higherCORRECTED 11 Sep 2026. This answer originally read 2023 NEC, inferred from the 8th-edition FBC cycle 'nationally corresponding' to NFPA 70 2023 — and its own note said the Electrical-volume adoption text had not been opened. That inference is wrong: the FBC 8th Edition (2023) references NEC 2020, which is the counterintuitive part and why the guess failed. The City of Hollywood's run confirmed 2020 from a LIVE Broward BORA Formal Interpretations index, where FI-35 cites 'NFPA 70, 2020'. Forty other Florida authority files, each researched independently, also say 2020; this was the single outlier in the state.

Broward BORA Formal Interpretations index (FI-35 cites NFPA 70, 2020), corroborated by 40 independently researched Florida files checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Pages/Default.aspx

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) -- Building, Residential and Existing Building volumes -- effective 31 December 2023, with Broward-specific HVHZ provisions (Broward is, with Miami-Dade, one of only two Florida counties in the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone).

Why the confidence is not higherCorroborated across the BORA CodeAppeals page (links to 'Municode - Florida Building Code, Chapter 1 (8th Edition)'), BORA's own '2023 Formal Interpretations (8th Edition)' compilation (effective date stamped 31 Dec 2023, read and OCR'd/extracted directly), and BORA's '(2023) Residential Technical Amendments, 8th Edition' document title.

BORA compiled Formal Interpretations document, 8th Edition (2023), effective date printed on the document itself checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/2023%20Formal%20Interpretations%20(8th%20Edition).pdf

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), with Broward County amendments -- effective alongside the 8th-edition FBC cycle (31 Dec 2023).

Why the confidence is not higherThe BORA CodeAppeals page links directly to 'Municode - Florida Fire Prevention Code, Broward County Amendments (8th Edition)'; the Florida State Fire Marshal's own FFPC page corroborates the 8th-edition/NFPA-1-and-101 basis statewide. I did not open the Broward-specific amendment text itself.

BORA CodeAppeals page (links to Municode FFPC Broward Amendments, 8th Ed.) + Florida State Fire Marshal FFPC page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Pages/Default.aspx

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes. BORA maintains and publishes Broward-specific technical amendments to the 8th-edition FBC by volume -- e.g. 'FBC (2023) Residential Technical Amendments, 8th Edition' and 'FBC (2023) Plumbing Appendix F-Ch 3, Ch 6' -- plus the county-wide administrative provisions in Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 (permit application, submittal, inspection and fee rules quoted throughout this file) and the HVHZ-specific R44xx/1512-series sections that apply only in Broward and Miami-Dade.

Why the confidence is not higherDocument TITLES themselves ('FBC (2023) Residential Technical Amendments, 8th Edition' etc.) were found via search and correspond to a real floridabuilding.org-hosted filing (CodeID_7784, dated 2023-12-29) for the Plumbing volume specifically; I did not open the Residential Technical Amendments PDF itself to quote its content.

Florida Building Commission filing of Broward's local amendment (Plumbing volume), dated 29 Dec 2023 checked 2026-09-11 https://floridabuilding.org/Upload/FBC/CodeID_7784_fba1_Broward%20County%20Local%20Amnd%208th%20Ed%20FBC%202023%20PLUMB%20%20AppxF-Ch3%20Ch%206--2023-12-29.pdf

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The 8th-edition (2023) Florida Building Code (Building/Residential/Existing Building volumes) as locally amended by Broward County's Administrative Chapter 1 and BORA's technical amendments, the HVHZ-specific wind/product-approval provisions, NEC Article 690 'in its entirety,' and the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (Board Policy #09-02) governing what must be submitted and reviewed.

Why the confidence is not higherComposite answer built from the BORA Policy #09-02 matrix (which cites its own FBCB/FBCR/FBCEB section numbers) plus corroborating evidence of the current 8th-edition adoption; no single Broward document states this synthesis in one place.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix + corroborating 8th-edition FBC adoption evidence checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked in BORA Policy #09-02 and the fee-schedule/admin-chapter text quoted within it for a Broward-specific rule on service-panel upgrades or busbar sizing tied to a PV interconnection (the kind of local rule some AHJs publish, e.g. 120% rule interpretations) -- found none. The BORA matrix requires an NEC Art. 690 electrical diagram 'in its entirety' but does not add a Broward-specific busbar/service-upgrade rule on top of the NEC.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

No single prescribed mounting system or spacing, but every roof-attached component (panels, racking, clamps, flashing, lag bolts) must individually carry HVHZ product approval -- either a statewide Florida Product Approval marked 'Approved for use in the HVHZ' or a Miami-Dade County Notice of Acceptance (NOA) -- plus PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift, lateral-force and connection-design calculations per component, because Broward is in the HVHZ.

Why the confidence is not higherThe HVHZ product-approval mechanism (Florida Product Approval vs. Miami-Dade NOA, component-by-component) is corroborated across multiple industry sources describing Broward/Miami-Dade HVHZ solar racking requirements; the PE/RA wind-load-calculation requirement is verbatim from the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (Board Policy #09-02). I did not open a Broward-specific ordinance section stating the HVHZ product-approval requirement in so many words (it is a Florida Building Code statewide HVHZ mechanism that applies in Broward because Broward is HVHZ, not a Broward-authored rule).

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix + secondary sources on HVHZ product-approval mechanism checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Florida Building Code Residential §R324.6 (roof access & pathways) and §R324.6.2 (setback at ridge): not fewer than two 36-inch-wide pathways from lowest roof edge to ridge on separate roof planes (one on the street/driveway side, one on/adjacent to each PV-array roof plane); ridge setback of 18 inches on both sides where the PV array covers 33% or less of the plan-view roof area (or 66% or less with an NFPA 13D/P2904 residential fire sprinkler system installed), rising to 36 inches above those thresholds; §R324.6.2.2 additionally bars panels directly below an emergency escape/rescue opening and requires a 36-inch pathway to it. Exceptions exist for detached non-habitable accessory structures and for roofs at or under a 2:12 slope.

Why the confidence is not higherThis is the model IRC/R324 language (as reproduced in an ICC 'Significant Changes' commentary volume I was able to open and OCR/extract directly) that the Florida Building Code Residential volume is understood to carry forward via its own §R324 (confirmed to exist in the FBCR 8th edition by an UpCodes excerpt and a Leon County, FL government mirror using identical section numbers) -- but I did not open Broward's own local-amendment text to confirm Broward has not modified these specific numbers, so I cannot rule out a Broward-specific variation on top of the state baseline.

ICC 'Significant Changes' commentary reproducing IRC/FBCR §R324.6 verbatim, cross-checked against a Florida county government's own §R324 mirror (Leon County) checked 2026-09-11 https://cms.leoncountyfl.gov/Portals/0/DeptFiles/DSEM/Building/Residential%20Roof%20Access%20Requirements.pdf

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes, required by NEC Art. 690.12 under the 2023 NEC as adopted via the 8th-edition (2023) Florida Building Code, Electrical volume. No Broward-specific amendment to the rapid-shutdown requirement was found.

Why the confidence is not higherThe 'yes, and to which edition' answer is inference from the NEC edition in force (see q29, itself only 70-confidence) rather than a Broward document stating a rapid-shutdown rule in terms; the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix requires an NEC Art. 690 diagram 'in its entirety,' which by extension includes 690.12, but does not name rapid shutdown specifically.

Inference from NEC edition in force + BORA matrix's 'NEC Art. 690 in its entirety' requirement checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedThe brief for this run flagged a BORA formal interpretation on solar disconnect placards, indexed FI-37 (8th Edition, 2023). I made an extensive effort to retrieve it and could not: the live URL (broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/FI-37%20(8th%20Edition,%202023).pdf) returns Sitecore's client-rendered 'not found' shell (confirmed by inspecting the raw HTML -- it is a Next.js app shell with zero server-rendered body content, the same failure mode as a CivicPlus soft-404); the Wayback Machine CDX index has no snapshot at all for FI-35 through FI-40 (confirmed archived: FI-30 through FI-34 and FI-38 only, as filenames, with no readable content); the BORA 'Formal Interpretations' index page (CodeAppeals/Pages/FormalInterpretations.aspx) is itself fully client-rendered with no FI list in its server HTML; and two independent web searches for FI-37's actual subject returned an AI-synthesized claim that FI-37 is titled 'Exhaust Openings,' which directly CONTRADICTS the brief's claim of a solar-disconnect-placard interpretation -- I could not verify either claim against a primary document, so I am treating both as unconfirmed rather than picking one. What I CAN confirm: the county-wide compiled '2023 Formal Interpretations (8th Edition)' PDF (effective 31 Dec 2023, opened and read directly) only runs through item #21 and contains no solar-placard interpretation, meaning if FI-37 exists on this subject it was issued after 31 Dec 2023 and is not in that compilation.

https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/FI-37%20(8th%20Edition,%202023).pdf

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame retrieval failure as q38 for FI-37. Absent that document, the only placard-adjacent text I could confirm from a Broward source is the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix's general requirement that the electrical scope comply with 'NEC Article 690 ... in its entirety' (which includes NEC's own general marking/labeling article, 690.56/690.53 etc.) -- but no Broward document I could open specifies placard WORDING of its own.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame retrieval failure as q38 for FI-37 (the document that would most likely carry a Broward-specific letter-height/color/material spec). No other Broward document I opened specifies placard letter height, color or material for PV; NEC 2023 Art. 690's own generic marking requirements would govern by default but that is a state/national baseline, not a Broward-specific answer to this question.

https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/FI-37%20(8th%20Edition,%202023).pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No Broward-AHJ-specific facility-map placard requirement found; NEC Art. 690 (adopted in its entirety) contains the general directory/plaque requirement for multiple disconnects. Separately, FPL (the utility, not the AHJ) requires 'a sign noting the location of the disconnect switch ... installed at the meter to enable FPL personnel to easily locate the disconnect switch in the event of an emergency,' and requires customers to 'contact FPL for approval ... of the verbiage or the location of the sign prior to final design.'

Why the confidence is not higherFPL portion verbatim from FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines page. The 'no Broward-AHJ-specific requirement' half is an absence proved only across the documents I was able to open (BORA Policy #09-02, the BORA compiled Formal Interpretations through #21, the zoning §39-109 text) -- it is not proved against FI-37, which I could not open (see q38).

FPL Net Metering Guidelines (utility-level, not AHJ) + absence across documents opened checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes -- FPL (utility) requires signage beyond anything the AHJ documents I could open ask for: a location sign at the meter so FPL personnel can find the disconnect switch in an emergency, plus a warning sign on the switch itself stating both sides may be energized; FPL must be contacted to approve the sign's wording/location before final design; the switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, remain accessible to FPL at all times, and be lockable with a single FPL padlock (not locked inside a meter room).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines page (utility document, not the AHJ).

FPL Net Metering Guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

AHJ-side: unresolved -- would most likely be answered by FI-37 (solar disconnect placard interpretation) which I could not retrieve (see q38). Utility-side (FPL): the location sign goes at the meter (not necessarily on the disconnect itself), and the warning sign goes on the disconnect switch enclosure; the switch itself must be mounted adjacent to (not inside) the meter enclosure.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL portion verbatim from FPL's Net Metering Guidelines. AHJ portion is an acknowledged gap tied to the FI-37 retrieval failure documented at q38.

FPL Net Metering Guidelines; AHJ-side unresolved per q38 checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Yes, functionally -- every HVHZ roof attachment component (panel, racking/mounting system, clamps, flashing, fasteners) must carry a current Florida Product Approval (marked for HVHZ use) or a Miami-Dade County Notice of Acceptance (NOA); and NEC 110.3(B) ('listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling') is cited directly in the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix as a component-documentation requirement, alongside required FSEC certification/listing for solar-thermal equipment.

Why the confidence is not higherNEC 110.3(B)/FSEC-certification citation is verbatim from the BORA matrix (Board Policy #09-02). The HVHZ product-approval mechanism is corroborated by multiple secondary sources on Broward/Miami-Dade HVHZ solar requirements (see q35) rather than a Broward ordinance I opened directly.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (NEC 110.3(B) / FSEC citation) + secondary HVHZ product-approval sources checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Yes, under Florida's statewide adoption of NFPA 855 (Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems) via the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), and Florida Building Code Residential §R328 (added in the 2023/8th-edition cycle to correlate with NFPA 855). Reported general NFPA 855 residential conditions: units restricted to specific locations (garage, utility closet, outdoors -- not habitable rooms such as bedrooms), an aggregate capacity limit (commonly cited as up to 280 kWh per dwelling once Ch. 15 location-based limits are correctly applied), minimum 3-foot spacing between ESS units (unless UL 9540A testing supports closer spacing), and interconnected smoke/heat alarms where installed in a garage or closet. I found no Broward-specific ESS amendment beyond this statewide baseline.

Why the confidence is not higherThis is the statewide NFPA 855/FBC-R328 baseline as described by multiple secondary industry sources, not a Broward-specific document I opened directly (I did not locate or open the FFPC 8th Edition Broward Amendments text, nor a Broward BCD battery/ESS permitting page).

secondary sources on statewide NFPA 855 / FBC Residential §R328 adoption (Broward-specific amendment text not independently opened) checked 2026-09-11 https://floridasolardesigngroup.com/residential-battery-ess-size-limits

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked in BORA Policy #09-02 and the general fee schedule for a Broward-specific statement that ESS/battery installations require a permit separate from the PV master permit -- found none either way. BORA Policy #09-02(B) does state that 'adding additional categories to the master permit may not require an additional permit ... but will require a separate trade review in every instance,' which would suggest a battery added to an existing PV master permit gets a trade review rather than a wholly separate permit -- but the document predates NFPA 855/ESS-specific permitting practice (2009) and does not mention batteries/ESS by name at all, so I am not stretching it into a yes/no answer.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked in Broward County Code of Ordinances §39-109 (titled specifically for ROOFTOP photovoltaic systems) and could not find a Broward ground-mount-specific solar ordinance; §39-388/39-389 (yards & setbacks / accessory uses & structures) were identified by search as the general provisions that would presumably govern a ground-mounted array as an accessory structure, but I did not open their text directly, so I cannot state whether Broward affirmatively classifies a ground mount as a 'structure' for zoning purposes.

https://library.municode.com/fl/broward_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH39ZO_ARTIXGEPR

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Per FPL (the utility, since the AC disconnect requirement here is a utility interconnection rule rather than a Broward AHJ rule): the manual disconnect switch (required for Tier 2/Tier 3 systems, i.e. systems above the smallest net-metering tier) must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket -- 'nearby and readily accessible from the meter location' -- remain accessible to FPL at all times, and be lockable in the open position with a single FPL padlock; it must not be locked inside a meter room.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines page (utility document). I did not confirm the exact kW threshold dividing FPL's net-metering tiers for this research session -- 'Tier 2 and Tier 3' language is FPL's own, not independently cross-checked against FPL's tariff sheet.

FPL Net Metering Guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes for BMSD -- Broward County Building Code Division performs its own final solar inspections there (Building/Structure/Roofing and Electrical, per the BORA inspection matrix). For addresses in incorporated municipalities, their own building department inspects (BCD is not the AHJ there -- see jurisdiction/q1). 75% · BORA Policy #09-02(D)
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated within BMSD -- Broward County Building Code Division performs the inspections itself with its own inspectors. (Outside BMSD, in any incorporated municipality, the relevant city building department is the inspecting authority instead of BCD -- see q1/q2/jurisdiction.) 70% · BORA Policy #09-02(D)
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? Per BORA Policy #09-02(D), by system type: Solar Thermal -- Building/Structure/Roofing (at time of installation, then Final) and Plumbing (Final). Solar Electric -- Building/Structure/Roofing (at time of installation, then Final) and Electrical (Rough, then Final). Hybrid (combined PV + integral solar water panel) systems -- Building/Structure/Roofing (installation + Final), Electrical (Rough + Final), and Plumbing (Final). The Board recommends all required inspections for a given visit be completed within a two-hour window. 85% · BORA Policy #09-02(D)
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes for Solar Electric and Hybrid systems -- an Electrical Rough inspection is required in addition to Electrical Final (per BORA Policy #09-02(D)). Solar Thermal-only systems do not get a distinct 'rough' inspection line under the same policy (only Building/Structure/Roofing at installation + final, and Plumbing final). 80% · BORA Policy #09-02(D)
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Not explicitly stated as an inspection checkpoint in any Broward document I could open, but it follows necessarily from two things that ARE stated: (1) BORA's Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix requires 'FSEC Certification' and NEC 110.3(B) listed/labeled-equipment compliance as a component-documentation submittal, and (2) the FBC generally requires installed work to conform to the approved plans, which include that listing/labeling documentation -- so a Broward final inspection would necessarily be checking installed equipment against the submitted listing/labeling documentation even though no Broward inspection checklist I opened spells this out as a separate line item. 55% · Inference from BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (component-documentation/listing requirement)
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? Most likely 'Final' (a passed Final Electrical/Final Building inspection sign-off) rather than a new Certificate of Occupancy, since a PV retrofit on an existing residence is not a change of occupancy -- but no Broward document I opened states this in terms for solar specifically, and BCD's fee schedule does separately price 'Issuing original Certificate of Occupancy / Certificate of Completion / Temporary CO / Partial CO per discipline' as its own line item, which leaves open the possibility Broward issues some form of completion certificate on a solar master-permit close-out. 45% · inference from county fee schedule Sec. 40.29(a) framework; no direct Broward statement for solar found
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Most likely the installer/customer, via FPL's own net-metering interconnection application -- FPL's guidelines state that operating the system 'prior to the installation of a new bi-directional meter is strictly prohibited,' which gates PTO behind FPL's own process rather than an automatic AHJ-to-utility notification, but FPL's document does not explicitly name who is responsible for submitting/triggering that process (installer vs. homeowner vs. AHJ). 45% · FPL Net Metering Guidelines (silent on who specifically notifies FPL)
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $66.00 for the first reinspection, doubling for each subsequent reinspection of the same violation: 2nd $132.00, 3rd $198.00, 4th $264.00, and so on in multiples of $66. (General BCD fee, not solar-specific.) 75% · county fee schedule Sec. 40.27(d)(3)(c), Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024

14 questions answered against Broward County’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal or by phone/office visit: 'Building permit inspections can now be requested online by selecting the online inspections portal,' requiring the permit number, a phone access code found on the permit fee invoice, inspection type, requested date, and a day-of point of contact. BCD's main line (954-765-4400) and its Fort Lauderdale office (2307 W. Broward Blvd Suite 300) remain available as alternate routes.

Why the confidence is not higherThe online-portal description and its required fields are from a search-engine synthesis of a Broward inspections page I could not open directly server-side (client-rendered Sitecore page, same failure mode noted throughout this file); the phone/office fallback is corroborated by the County's own contact info on the Building Code default page.

county contact info (opened directly) + search-engine synthesis of the (client-rendered, not directly opened) inspection-request page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/Building/Pages/default.aspx

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Inspection requests made after 3:00 PM are pushed to the next business day -- implying same-day requests up to that cutoff and effectively no formal advance-notice period beyond that daily cutoff for standard inspections. Overtime/after-hours inspections require 48 hours' advance notice, requested directly with the relevant Trade Chief.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth figures are from a search-engine synthesis of the same client-rendered Broward inspections page referenced at q49 -- I could not open the page's server HTML directly to quote it verbatim, so this is one step removed from the primary source.

search-engine synthesis of a client-rendered county inspections page (not independently opened) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/Building/Pages/default.aspx

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked for a Broward-specific statement on AM/PM inspection windows or same-day-of scheduling detail beyond the 3:00 PM cutoff noted at q50; found nothing more specific in any document I could open or in the search-engine synthesis of the inspections page.

https://www.broward.org/Building/Pages/default.aspx

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes for BMSD -- Broward County Building Code Division performs its own final solar inspections there (Building/Structure/Roofing and Electrical, per the BORA inspection matrix). For addresses in incorporated municipalities, their own building department inspects (BCD is not the AHJ there -- see jurisdiction/q1).

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from BORA Policy #09-02(D), which lists the inspections BCD ('Building Departments') is required to provide for solar thermal/electric/hybrid systems, combined with the jurisdiction scope established at q1/q2.

BORA Policy #09-02(D) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated within BMSD -- Broward County Building Code Division performs the inspections itself with its own inspectors. (Outside BMSD, in any incorporated municipality, the relevant city building department is the inspecting authority instead of BCD -- see q1/q2/jurisdiction.)

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the same BORA Policy #09-02(D) inspection-duty language as q52; no document names specific BCD inspector titles or a further sub-delegation within BMSD.

BORA Policy #09-02(D) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

Per BORA Policy #09-02(D), by system type: Solar Thermal -- Building/Structure/Roofing (at time of installation, then Final) and Plumbing (Final). Solar Electric -- Building/Structure/Roofing (at time of installation, then Final) and Electrical (Rough, then Final). Hybrid (combined PV + integral solar water panel) systems -- Building/Structure/Roofing (installation + Final), Electrical (Rough + Final), and Plumbing (Final). The Board recommends all required inspections for a given visit be completed within a two-hour window.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from BORA Policy #09-02(D), a county-wide binding administrative guideline.

BORA Policy #09-02(D) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

Yes for Solar Electric and Hybrid systems -- an Electrical Rough inspection is required in addition to Electrical Final (per BORA Policy #09-02(D)). Solar Thermal-only systems do not get a distinct 'rough' inspection line under the same policy (only Building/Structure/Roofing at installation + final, and Plumbing final).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from BORA Policy #09-02(D).

BORA Policy #09-02(D) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Not explicitly stated as an inspection checkpoint in any Broward document I could open, but it follows necessarily from two things that ARE stated: (1) BORA's Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix requires 'FSEC Certification' and NEC 110.3(B) listed/labeled-equipment compliance as a component-documentation submittal, and (2) the FBC generally requires installed work to conform to the approved plans, which include that listing/labeling documentation -- so a Broward final inspection would necessarily be checking installed equipment against the submitted listing/labeling documentation even though no Broward inspection checklist I opened spells this out as a separate line item.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from the submittal-matrix listing requirement plus general FBC final-inspection practice, not a direct Broward statement that an inspector checks labels/listings.

Inference from BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (component-documentation/listing requirement) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked for a Broward-published, PV-specific inspection checklist (the kind some AHJs post as a standalone PDF) across the BuildingPermits page, the Building Code default page, BORA Policy #09-02, and search results -- found none. BORA Policy #09-02 states what inspections are required (see q54) but is not itself formatted as an inspector's field checklist.

https://www.broward.org/Building/BuildingPermits/Pages/BuildingPermits.aspx

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked for a Broward-specific statement of what must be physically on site at a solar inspection (approved plans, permit card, manufacturer specs, etc.) across BORA Policy #09-02 and the pages I could open -- found only the general Chapter 1 rule that construction documents/permit records exist and must conform to the Code, not an itemized on-site-document list comparable to what other AHJs publish for solar specifically.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$66.00 for the first reinspection, doubling for each subsequent reinspection of the same violation: 2nd $132.00, 3rd $198.00, 4th $264.00, and so on in multiples of $66. (General BCD fee, not solar-specific.)

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the County's general Fee Schedule Sec. 40.27(d)(3)(c), Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024. Same currency caveat as q15 -- I could not verify whether a later 2025 fee-schedule revision changed this figure.

county fee schedule Sec. 40.27(d)(3)(c), Internet Archive snapshot of 6 Jul 2024 checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240706175705/https://www.broward.org/Building/Forms/Documents/40.27.___General_Fees_Schedule.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedLooked for a Broward-specific description of how corrections are issued (written notice, portal flag, etc.) and cleared for a solar/electrical inspection -- found none in BORA Policy #09-02 or the pages I could open. The general reinspection FEE structure is documented (q59) but not the correction-notice PROCESS itself.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240706175705/https://www.broward.org/Building/Forms/Documents/40.27.___General_Fees_Schedule.pdf

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Most likely 'Final' (a passed Final Electrical/Final Building inspection sign-off) rather than a new Certificate of Occupancy, since a PV retrofit on an existing residence is not a change of occupancy -- but no Broward document I opened states this in terms for solar specifically, and BCD's fee schedule does separately price 'Issuing original Certificate of Occupancy / Certificate of Completion / Temporary CO / Partial CO per discipline' as its own line item, which leaves open the possibility Broward issues some form of completion certificate on a solar master-permit close-out.

Why the confidence is not higherInference by analogy to how PV retrofits are typically closed out at other Florida AHJs and to the general FBC CO/Completion-Certificate framework named in Broward's own fee schedule (Sec. 40.29(a)) -- not a direct Broward statement about what a solar permit holder receives.

inference from county fee schedule Sec. 40.29(a) framework; no direct Broward statement for solar found checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240706175705/https://www.broward.org/Building/Forms/Documents/40.27.___General_Fees_Schedule.pdf

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Most likely the installer/customer, via FPL's own net-metering interconnection application -- FPL's guidelines state that operating the system 'prior to the installation of a new bi-directional meter is strictly prohibited,' which gates PTO behind FPL's own process rather than an automatic AHJ-to-utility notification, but FPL's document does not explicitly name who is responsible for submitting/triggering that process (installer vs. homeowner vs. AHJ).

Why the confidence is not higherFPL's own guidelines page establishes the bi-directional-meter gate but is silent on who specifically notifies FPL; 'installer/customer' is the typical net-metering practice by inference, not a stated Broward or FPL rule naming a responsible party.

FPL Net Metering Guidelines (silent on who specifically notifies FPL) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.

Labels & placards for this authority

Wording None%

Size, colour & material None%

Where they go 55%

AHJ-side: unresolved -- would most likely be answered by FI-37 (solar disconnect placard interpretation) which I could not retrieve (see q38). Utility-side (FPL): the location sign goes at the meter (not necessarily on the disconnect itself), and the warning sign goes on the disconnect switch enclosure; the switch itself must be mounted adjacent to (not inside) the meter enclosure.

What the utility wants on top 80%

Yes -- FPL (utility) requires signage beyond anything the AHJ documents I could open ask for: a location sign at the meter so FPL personnel can find the disconnect switch in an emergency, plus a warning sign on the switch itself stating both sides may be energized; FPL must be contacted to approve the sign's wording/location before final design; the switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, remain accessible to FPL at all times, and be lockable with a single FPL padlock (not locked inside a meter room).

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
County
County
Broward County
Regions covered
Authority Contact
Building Department
Direct Phone
954-765-4400
Booking & Scheduling