City of Atlantis
City of Atlantis
Palm Beach County
City of Atlantis is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 2,142 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Atlantis against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Atlantis is the authority having jurisdiction 93% confidence
- Holds
- building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, zoning, floodplain and architectural review - all issued and inspected by the City's own Construction Services Department (Code ch. 4 art. III, Ord. 472 of 20 Jul 2022), operated as a dedicated enterprise fund with a CONTRACTED Building Official and inspection service ($115,000 contract against $63,570 in-house payroll, FY2024-25)
- Delegated to
- Fire only, to GREENACRES FIRE RESCUE by contract (general fund 001-522340 Fire Rescue Service Contract $399,374 plus Fire Assessment Fund 102 at $707,742, revenue equal to expenditure to the dollar). Greenacres' own site states it serves 'over 2,000 residents within the City of Atlantis'. Palm Beach County Fire Rescue appears in the 'Dispatched by' bucket of its three-bucket municipality table, NOT the 'Served by' bucket - it answers the phone, Greenacres sends the truck. Fire plan review is COMMERCIAL-ONLY (Code Sec. 7-30(a)(1) exempts one- and two-family dwellings), so a residential PV job gets no fire review at all.
- Overridden by
- FS 163.04(1) - an ordinance that 'prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors' is expressly prohibited; FS 163.04(2) - no deed restriction, covenant or approving entity may deny solar, and may only choose a roof location within 45 degrees east or west of due south where that does not impair effective operation; FS 163.04(3) awards costs and attorney's fees to the prevailing party. Also FS 553.792(1)(a) (30 business days for a structure under 7,500 sq ft, matching the City's own codified 30-working-day rule at FBC-amendment 105.3.4), FS 553.79(1)(f) (contract and cost-basis fee limits, against which the City's FBC-amendment 109.3 and its 2%/2.25%-of-cost fee sit badly), and FS 553.791 (private provider single-trade route, defined in Code Sec. 4-33 but with no local procedure).
- Why not higher
- Permit-issuing status settled in one request from the DBPR/floridabuilding.org register (392 entries; four positive controls present, five negative controls absent, fabricated control zero) and corroborated by the City's own enterprise fund. Building, electrical, zoning and fire were established separately, as the standing brief requires, and fire turned out to be the split. The contracted-Building-Official shape is read off two adopted budgets; the contractor is not named in either, which is the main reason this is 93 and not higher.
- Permit required
- Yes, and the trigger is unusually wide. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(1): no structure may be 'erected, moved, added to, structurally altered OR AESTHETICALLY ALTERED' without a building permit.95%
- Permit cost
- TWO DIFFERENT PUBLISHED FORMULAS, on the same website, and they disagree. FAQ (Building): '$60 for the first $1,000 dollars worth of work,70%
- Plan review
- 30 WORKING DAYS for a single-family dwelling, codified. FBC-amendment 105.3.4: 'A building permit for a single-family residential dwelling must be issued within 30 working days of…88%
- Portal
- NONE. Atlantis operates no permit portal. Applications are paper, filed at City Hall, 260 Orange Tree Drive;90%
- Electrical code
- GENUINELY UNSETTLED, and it is a two-instrument problem. Sec. 4-24 (Ord. 419, 21 Mar 2012): 'The MOST CURRENT EDITION of the National Electrical Code ...75%
- Own placard wording
- FPL does, verbatim. XIII.A.6: 'INTERCONNECTING METER CAN / WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - a…92%
- Booking an inspection
- By telephone to City Hall, 561-965-1744 ext. 112. There is no online scheduler; the City runs no permit portal.85%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes, and the trigger is unusually wide. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(1): no structure may be 'erected, moved, added to, Q3 Electrical and building permits — Electrical is a separate 'Trade permit'. Code Sec. 4-33 defines 'Trade permit' as a structural, electrical, mechanical or plumbing permit, Q4 Plan review — 30 WORKING DAYS for a single-family dwelling, codified. FBC-amendment 105.3.4: 'A building permit for a single-family residential dwelling must be issued within 30… Q18 Where you file — NONE. Atlantis operates no permit portal. Applications are paper, filed at City Hall, 260 Orange Tree Drive; Q20
- Permit required
- Yes, and the trigger is unusually wide. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(1): no structure may be 'erected, moved, added to, structurally altered OR AESTHETICALLY ALTERED' without a building permit.95% source
- What it costs
- TWO DIFFERENT PUBLISHED FORMULAS, on the same website, and they disagree. FAQ (Building): '$60 for the first $1,000 dollars worth of work,70% source
- Plan review turnaround
- 30 WORKING DAYS for a single-family dwelling, codified. FBC-amendment 105.3.4: 'A building permit for a single-family residential dwelling must be issued within 30 working days of application…88% source
- Key document
- codified ordinance + department checklist cited by 14 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes. The City of Atlantis is the AHJ for residential solar: it is one of the 392 Florida local governments listed on the DBPR/floridabuilding.org local-government (surcharge) dropdown as an entity that actually issues building permits, and it runs its own Construction Services Department under Code Art. III, ch. 4 (Ord. 472, 20 Jul 2022) as a dedicated enterprise fund. 95% · state permit-issuer register
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Atlantis itself holds building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, zoning and floodplain permitting and inspection; it CONTRACTS the Building Official and the inspections themselves (budget line 450-524311 'Building Official Contract' $115,000 against $63,570 of in-house payroll; the FY23-24 budget names the same line 'Building Official and Inspections $110,000'). FIRE is delegated to GREENACRES FIRE RESCUE by contract (general fund 001-522340 'Fire Rescue Service Contract' $399,374 plus Fire Assessment Fund 102 at $707,742). Palm Beach County Fire Rescue only DISPATCHES for Atlantis; it does not serve it. 92% · adopted budget + provider and county pages
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes, and the trigger is unusually wide. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(1): no structure may be 'erected, moved, added to, structurally altered OR AESTHETICALLY ALTERED' without a building permit. The Building Department page states 'Atlantis requires permits prior to making all exterior alterations or installations'. A rooftop PV array is both a structural and an aesthetic alteration of the exterior. FBC-amendment 105.2 exempts only replacement/repair under $1,000, interior finish work, film sets, playground equipment, retractable awnings and small movable fixtures - and four of those six exemptions are expressly qualified 'providing such work does not otherwise require ARC approval'. No solar exemption anywhere. 95% · codified ordinance + department page
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Electrical is a separate 'Trade permit'. Code Sec. 4-33 defines 'Trade permit' as a structural, electrical, mechanical or plumbing permit, a 'Master permit' as the permit for the complete work, a 'Subsidiary permit' as a trade permit under a master, and a 'Stand-alone permit' as a trade permit pulled without a master. The New Residential Construction checklist confirms the practice: the permit fee 'includes structural, electrical and plumbing' for new construction, but 'All other disciplines must have separate permit for work.' For a retrofit PV job on an existing dwelling the expected shape is a master/structural permit with a subsidiary electrical permit. 75% · codified ordinance + department checklist
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? YES, AND IT IS THE STRONGEST ARCHITECTURAL GATE IN THIS SURVEY - BUT IT IS SUBSTANTIVELY PREEMPTED FOR SOLAR. (a) ARCHITECTURAL: Sec. 15-10(e)(3) - the ARC 'shall review EVERY application for a permit ... to erect a building, sign, or structure of any kind, whatsoever, or to ALTER, REMODEL, REPAIR, OR CHANGE THE EXTERIOR of any structure'. No residential exemption. Sec. 15-10(c)(2): plans 'must be approved by the city architectural committee ... PRIOR TO THEIR SUBMISSION WITH THE APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT'. The ARC is 'the final decision-making authority'. (b) HOA: the City enforces the association's decision as a permit condition - 'For homes in a homeowners association, exterior work must include written association approval'; 'Any permits for exterior work on condos, villas or homeowner groups must include written association approval OR IT WILL NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE ARC OR APPROVED UNTIL IT IS PROVIDED'; the permit application carries 'Association approval must be submitted when applicable' against both SINGLE FAMILY and CONDO/VILLA GROUP. Sec. 15-6(a) goes further and adopts the covenant as the standard: where the zoning chapter and 'deed restrictions or covenants' differ, 'the most restrictive or that imposing the higher standards shall govern'. (c) THE PREEMPTION: FS 163.04(1) makes an ordinance that 'prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors' EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED, and 163.04(2) bars any deed restriction or approving entity from denying solar, limiting it to choosing a location on the roof within 45 degrees east or west of due south and only 'if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors'; 163.04(3) awards costs and attorney's fees to the prevailing party. So both approvals are procedurally required and substantively cannot be used to refuse a PV array. 92% · codified ordinance + Florida Statutes
- Is there a historic-district review? NO. Atlantis has no historic district, no local register, no historic preservation board and no certificate of appropriateness. Across 1,267,061 characters of codified text the phrase 'certificate of appropriate' appears ZERO times; the 14 hits on 'historic' are the code publisher's own boilerplate, a flood-chapter variance keyed to FBC Existing Building ch. 12, the fire appeals board's 'historic, geographic or unusual conditions' criterion, and 'historic surface water drainage flows'. The City's Boards page lists ARC, Board of Adjustment, Commission on Ethics, Finance & Audit, Infrastructure Surtax Oversight, Local Planning Agency and the Neighborhood Improvement District - no historic board. 90% · codified ordinance, enumerated
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Not a separate certification, but the wind criteria are codified and high. Sec. 4-23 (Ord. 419, 2012) establishes design wind speeds under FBC 1609.3: Category I 160 mph, Category II 170 mph, Category III and IV 180 mph. A dwelling is Category II, so 170 mph. Product approvals (NOAs) are a mandatory submittal item - 'Two (2) sets and NOA's of plans' on the application, 'Two sets of product approvals' on the Building Department page - and 107.2.1.2 requires the construction documents to show the wind resistance rating and either product evaluation or an architect/engineer statement for the specific site. 90% · codified ordinance + permit application
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Council approval is not routine, but it is the top of the appeal ladder and the ARC decision is a committee decision on every permit. Sec. 15-10(e)(6): the ARC is the final decision maker; a denied applicant has 30 days to petition the ARC for reconsideration, the ARC acts within 30 days, and only then may the applicant appeal to the City Council, which acts within 45 days and 'may not waive requirements specifically set forth in the code'. A variance from a code requirement goes instead to the Board of Adjustment under Sec. 15-9. No special use permit exists for solar. 88% · codified ordinance
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No City cap. The City code says 'solar' once in 1.27 MB and it is not a size rule. The binding caps are FPL's: Tier 1 is an inverter AC rating of 10 kW or less (about 11.76 kW DC at FAC 25-6.065(2)(b)'s AC = DC x 0.85), Tier 2 above 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 above 100 kW to 2 MW; and generation is capped at 90% of the serving FPL transformer rating. Crossing 10 kW AC is what buys a mandatory visually-open DER disconnect switch. 88% · utility standards + codified ordinance (absence)
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A contractor holding the relevant Florida licence who is REGISTERED with the City first, or the homeowner under an Owner/Builder Affidavit. There is no local licence class list for solar; Sec. 4-22 adopts FBC 105.1 ('Any contractor, owner, or agent authorized in accordance with Chapter 489, F.S.'). 85% · department page + codified FBC amendment
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes, and before any work at all. 'All contractors/companies working in Atlantis must be registered with us'; 'You must be registered in order to do business in the city'; 'Companies doing business in Atlantis are required to register with the City PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.' A Business Tax Receipt is required, renewed every 1 October, supported by Certificate of Competency, Palm Beach County licence, proof of liability and workers' comp insurance and the State licence. The FAQ puts it bluntly: 'Only companies who have obtained a business tax receipt from City Hall can do jobs in the City of Atlantis.' 95% · department page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. An Owner Builder Affidavit is a published form and is a listed alternative to the contract on both the building permit application and the ARC application ('Copy of contract OR Owner/Builder Affidavit'). Note FS 489.103(7)(a)3, the dedicated solar owner-builder limb, remains conditional on a DOE SunShot Rooftop Solar Challenge grant and in any event requires a licensed electrical contractor for the wiring. 85% · city form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? From the permit application form itself: (1) completed, notarised application; (2) TWO sets of plans WITH NOAs (product approvals) and a survey showing setbacks met; (3) a COPY OF THE CONTRACT; (4) Notice of Commencement; (5) Owner/Builder affidavit if applicable; (6) payment at submission; (7) pictures of the house for exterior work. The Building Department page adds: two sets of photos of proposed replacement items, a product sample where applicable, two sets of product approvals, and - for any home in a homeowners association - WRITTEN ASSOCIATION APPROVAL. The 17-digit County Property Control Number is a required field. ARC approval must already exist (Sec. 15-10(c)(2)). 'INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.' 90% · permit application form
- How many copies, and in what format? TWO paper sets for residential, on paper. 'Two paper copies of supporting documents (plans, photos, et al.) must be submitted.' FBC-amendment 107.1 says 'two or more sets'. ARC needs 'two sets of detailed plans and/or detailed specifications'. Commercial is three sets because of the Greenacres fire review. Plans must be to a minimum 1/8 inch scale on substantial paper (107.2.1.4). Electronic submission is discretionary only ('Electronic media documents shall be submitted when required by the building official'). 92% · department page + codified FBC amendment
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. FBC-amendment 107.2.5 requires a site plan to scale showing size and location of new construction and existing structures, distances from lot lines, street grades, proposed finished grades and, as applicable, flood hazard areas, floodways and design flood elevations, drawn from an accurate boundary line survey. The permit application separately requires 'plans with survey ... showing setback requirements being met'. The building official may waive it for alteration or repair. Sec. 4-6 requires a signed and sealed boundary AND tie-in survey only where the work alters the structure's distance to a lot line - which a roof-mounted array does not and a ground mount does. 90% · codified FBC amendment
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Effectively yes, expressed as a riser rather than a one-line. FBC-amendment 107.3.5.3(9), the minimum plan review criteria for one- and two-family dwellings, requires: 'Electrical: Electric service riser with wire sizes, conduit detail and grounding detail, Complete load calculations, Panel schedules.' Separately FPL requires a Single Line Diagram that includes the meter number, and a three-line diagram in some cases. 88% · codified FBC amendment
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes - 'Complete load calculations' and 'Panel schedules' are both named in the codified residential minimum plan review criteria (107.3.5.3(9)), alongside wire sizes, conduit detail and grounding detail. 107.2.1.3 lets the building official require further 'details, computations, stress diagrams, and other data'. 88% · codified FBC amendment
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? A DOLLAR threshold, and it is the lowest found in this survey. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(4): 'All drawings and specifications for RESIDENCES OF $10,000.00 VALUE OR MORE ... shall bear the signature and seal of a registered architect or engineer, registered in the State of Florida', and 'Any structural remodeling or structural alteration plans are to be prepared by a registered architect or engineer.' A typical residential PV job at $25,000-$55,000 is far over the threshold, so signed and sealed drawings are required as a matter of course - not on an engineering judgement but on price. 90% · codified zoning ordinance
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? The same clause. Sec. 15-10(c)(4) does not separate electrical from structural: all drawings and specifications for residences of $10,000 value or more must bear the seal of a Florida registered architect or engineer. No separate electrical-PE threshold is published. 80% · codified zoning ordinance
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? NONE. Atlantis operates no permit portal. Applications are paper, filed at City Hall, 260 Orange Tree Drive; the forms are downloadable PDFs from a CivicPlus Document Center and the application must be NOTARISED. The site has no eTRAKiT, iWorQ, Cloudpermit, MyGov, SolarAPP or equivalent - a keyword sweep of all 119 sitemap pages returned zero hits for every one of those names and for 'portal'. The only transactional systems the City runs are utility bill payment (municipalonlinepayments.com/atlantisfl) and a Laserfiche document repository. 90% · enumerated city website + department page
- Can the whole application be completed online? No. Two paper copies of plans and supporting documents must be submitted, the application must be notarised, payment is due at submission, and a $200/$500 cash bond must be deposited with the City Clerk before the permit issues. Electronic media is submitted only 'when required by the building official' (107.1). FS 553.79(1)(b)'s electronic-submission expectation is not met here. 88% · department page + codified FBC amendment
- What does a residential solar permit cost? TWO DIFFERENT PUBLISHED FORMULAS, on the same website, and they disagree. FAQ (Building): '$60 for the first $1,000 dollars worth of work, and 2.25% for the remainder of the cost of the job up to $50,000. Contact City Hall ... for fees for projects over $50,000.' Checklist for New Residential Construction: 'Permit Fees are $50.00 up to $2,500 (value of the job) - otherwise the fee is 2% of the cost of the job.' On a $40,000 PV job that is $937.50 by the FAQ and $800.00 by the checklist. Add a REFUNDABLE CASH BOND of $500 for any permit over $10,000 (Sec. 4-7), a building surcharge of 1 cent per square foot, and possible separate plan review, engineering and re-inspection fees named on the application. Quote a range, not a number, and confirm with City Hall on 561-965-1744 x112. 70% · department FAQ + department checklist
- How is the fee calculated? By VALUATION - a percentage of the cost of the job, plus a flat base. FBC-amendment 109.3 defines valuation as 'total replacement value to include structural, electric, plumbing, mechanical, interior finish, relative site work, architectural and design fees, marketing costs, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; excluding only land value', with Marshall-Swift/Means as reference data and 'Final building permit valuation shall be set by the building official.' The application says 'the above permit fee is based on the value of the job as described herein.' *** This sits squarely against FS 553.79(1)(f), which bars requiring a contract 'or any associated document, including ... material costs lists, labor costs, or overhead or profit statements' and says 'Inspection fees may not be based on the total cost of a project and may not exceed the actual inspection costs incurred' - yet 109.3 says the permit SHALL BE DENIED unless the applicant produces 'detailed, quantity estimates, and/or bona fide signed contracts'. *** 90% · codified FBC amendment
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Not in the published formulas, but the permit application warns of one: 'Additional fees including but not limited to PLAN REVIEW, Engineering and Re-inspection fees may apply.' Neither of the two published fee statements contains a plan-check line, and the FY2024-25 budget's Construction Services fund has only two fee revenue accounts - 450-322100 Building Permits $247,000 and 450-329100 Reinspection Fees $5,000 - with no separate plan-review account. 70% · permit application form + adopted budget
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? 30 WORKING DAYS for a single-family dwelling, codified. FBC-amendment 105.3.4: 'A building permit for a single-family residential dwelling must be issued within 30 working days of application therefore unless unusual circumstances...' That matches FS 553.792(1)(a) limb 2 (30 business days, structure under 7,500 sq ft). BUT the clock cannot start until the ARC has approved, because Sec. 15-10(c)(2) makes ARC approval a condition of SUBMITTING the application - and the ARC has its own 45-day deemed-approval window. Realistic worst case before issue: ARC 45 days + 30 working days. 88% · codified FBC amendment
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? TWO REGIMES IN ONE CODE, AND THEY CONFLICT. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(6)-(7): the permit expires if work has not BEGUN within 90 days, and expires if not SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED within two years. FBC-amendment 105.4.1.2-105.4.1.3: a permit becomes null if no approved inspection in six months, and a new permit must be obtained within six months of expiry; 105.5 'Expiration' is 'Reserved'. Separately Sec. 4-63(2) creates a rebuttable presumption of a construction-delay violation, citable before the special master, if no inspection is requested for 45 days. 85% · codified ordinance
- Which utility handles interconnection here? FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT. The City owns only its water, sewer and stormwater utility; electricity is bought from FPL and the City takes a franchise fee from it. The FY2023-24 budget names the line 'Franchise - FPL $280,000 / $290,000' and the FY2024-25 chart of accounts carries '001-323100 Franchise Fee - Electricity $290,000'. A city cannot pay itself a franchise fee. The City also levies a 5% public service tax on every sale of electricity (Sec. 12.5-50, Ord. 486 of 14 May 2024), budgeted at $241,667. 95% · adopted budget + codified ordinance
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? FPL sits at both ends and the City sits in the middle. FPL's Electric Service Standards XIII.A recommend written interconnection approval BEFORE procuring material, and FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) requires local code approval BEFORE parallel operation, with 10 days' notice before placing in service. Atlantis adds a front-end step nobody else does: ARC approval before the permit application may even be filed. For new construction the City also holds the meter - Sec. 15-10(c)(9): 'Permanent electric power shall not be connected until after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.' 85% · utility standards + codified ordinance
28 questions answered against City of Atlantis’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. The City of Atlantis is the AHJ for residential solar: it is one of the 392 Florida local governments listed on the DBPR/floridabuilding.org local-government (surcharge) dropdown as an entity that actually issues building permits, and it runs its own Construction Services Department under Code Art. III, ch. 4 (Ord. 472, 20 Jul 2022) as a dedicated enterprise fund.
Why the confidence is not higherDropdown parsed directly: 392 options, 'City of Atlantis' present (option value 2038); positive controls Polk City/Frostproof/Eagle Lake/Dade City present, negative controls Bowling Green/Wauchula/Zolfo Springs/St. Leo/San Antonio absent, fabricated control 'zzqqx' zero. Confirmed on the money side by the City's own budget fund 450 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.
state permit-issuer register checked 2026-09-13 https://www.floridabuilding.org/sc/sc_org_srch.aspx
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Atlantis itself holds building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, zoning and floodplain permitting and inspection; it CONTRACTS the Building Official and the inspections themselves (budget line 450-524311 'Building Official Contract' $115,000 against $63,570 of in-house payroll; the FY23-24 budget names the same line 'Building Official and Inspections $110,000'). FIRE is delegated to GREENACRES FIRE RESCUE by contract (general fund 001-522340 'Fire Rescue Service Contract' $399,374 plus Fire Assessment Fund 102 at $707,742). Palm Beach County Fire Rescue only DISPATCHES for Atlantis; it does not serve it.
Why the confidence is not higherFour independent sources: the two budget funds; the City's Forms page directing commercial plans to the Greenacres Fire Marshal at 5800 Melaleuca Lane, 561-642-2052; Greenacres Fire Rescue's own page saying it serves 'over 2,000 residents within the City of Atlantis'; and PBCFR's three-bucket table listing Atlantis under 'Dispatched by', not 'Served by'. Dollar figures are FY2024-25 budgeted, not actual.
adopted budget + provider and county pages checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/425/FY-2024-2025-Budget
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes, and the trigger is unusually wide. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(1): no structure may be 'erected, moved, added to, structurally altered OR AESTHETICALLY ALTERED' without a building permit. The Building Department page states 'Atlantis requires permits prior to making all exterior alterations or installations'. A rooftop PV array is both a structural and an aesthetic alteration of the exterior. FBC-amendment 105.2 exempts only replacement/repair under $1,000, interior finish work, film sets, playground equipment, retractable awnings and small movable fixtures - and four of those six exemptions are expressly qualified 'providing such work does not otherwise require ARC approval'. No solar exemption anywhere.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the codified permit trigger and the full 105.2 exemption list rather than the summary page; the list was enumerated item by item.
codified ordinance + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Electrical is a separate 'Trade permit'. Code Sec. 4-33 defines 'Trade permit' as a structural, electrical, mechanical or plumbing permit, a 'Master permit' as the permit for the complete work, a 'Subsidiary permit' as a trade permit under a master, and a 'Stand-alone permit' as a trade permit pulled without a master. The New Residential Construction checklist confirms the practice: the permit fee 'includes structural, electrical and plumbing' for new construction, but 'All other disciplines must have separate permit for work.' For a retrofit PV job on an existing dwelling the expected shape is a master/structural permit with a subsidiary electrical permit.
Why the confidence is not higherThe four permit classes are codified and unambiguous; how the City applies them specifically to a retrofit PV job is inference from the checklist's new-construction wording, not a published solar instruction - the City publishes none.
codified ordinance + department checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A contractor holding the relevant Florida licence who is REGISTERED with the City first, or the homeowner under an Owner/Builder Affidavit. There is no local licence class list for solar; Sec. 4-22 adopts FBC 105.1 ('Any contractor, owner, or agent authorized in accordance with Chapter 489, F.S.').
Why the confidence is not higherRegistration is stated three times (Building Department page, General Permitting Guidelines, Licensing page). The City does not publish which Ch. 489 classes it will accept for PV - unlike neighbouring Haverhill, which names CVC+EC or EC+CCC.
department page + codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/159/Licensing
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes, and before any work at all. 'All contractors/companies working in Atlantis must be registered with us'; 'You must be registered in order to do business in the city'; 'Companies doing business in Atlantis are required to register with the City PRIOR TO STARTING WORK.' A Business Tax Receipt is required, renewed every 1 October, supported by Certificate of Competency, Palm Beach County licence, proof of liability and workers' comp insurance and the State licence. The FAQ puts it bluntly: 'Only companies who have obtained a business tax receipt from City Hall can do jobs in the City of Atlantis.'
Why the confidence is not higherFour separate City pages say the same thing in the same terms; the document list is itemised on the Licensing page.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/159/Licensing
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes. An Owner Builder Affidavit is a published form and is a listed alternative to the contract on both the building permit application and the ARC application ('Copy of contract OR Owner/Builder Affidavit'). Note FS 489.103(7)(a)3, the dedicated solar owner-builder limb, remains conditional on a DOE SunShot Rooftop Solar Challenge grant and in any event requires a licensed electrical contractor for the wiring.
Why the confidence is not higherThe form and its role are published; the City gives no solar-specific owner-builder guidance, and the statutory limb is a state-level constraint the City does not address.
city form checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/406
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
From the permit application form itself: (1) completed, notarised application; (2) TWO sets of plans WITH NOAs (product approvals) and a survey showing setbacks met; (3) a COPY OF THE CONTRACT; (4) Notice of Commencement; (5) Owner/Builder affidavit if applicable; (6) payment at submission; (7) pictures of the house for exterior work. The Building Department page adds: two sets of photos of proposed replacement items, a product sample where applicable, two sets of product approvals, and - for any home in a homeowners association - WRITTEN ASSOCIATION APPROVAL. The 17-digit County Property Control Number is a required field. ARC approval must already exist (Sec. 15-10(c)(2)). 'INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.'
Why the confidence is not higherCompiled from the OCR'd application form (its body is a scanned image; the text layer alone yields only the checklist strip) plus two department pages. No solar-specific package exists - the site search returns zero results for 'solar' against a positive control of 78 for 'fee schedule' and zero for the fabricated term.
permit application form checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/402
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
TWO paper sets for residential, on paper. 'Two paper copies of supporting documents (plans, photos, et al.) must be submitted.' FBC-amendment 107.1 says 'two or more sets'. ARC needs 'two sets of detailed plans and/or detailed specifications'. Commercial is three sets because of the Greenacres fire review. Plans must be to a minimum 1/8 inch scale on substantial paper (107.2.1.4). Electronic submission is discretionary only ('Electronic media documents shall be submitted when required by the building official').
Why the confidence is not higherThree sources agree on two sets; the paper-only default is stated positively in the General Permitting Guidelines. No electronic portal exists to contradict it.
department page + codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/237/General-Permitting-Guidelines
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. FBC-amendment 107.2.5 requires a site plan to scale showing size and location of new construction and existing structures, distances from lot lines, street grades, proposed finished grades and, as applicable, flood hazard areas, floodways and design flood elevations, drawn from an accurate boundary line survey. The permit application separately requires 'plans with survey ... showing setback requirements being met'. The building official may waive it for alteration or repair. Sec. 4-6 requires a signed and sealed boundary AND tie-in survey only where the work alters the structure's distance to a lot line - which a roof-mounted array does not and a ground mount does.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text read in full, including the waiver sentence and the Sec. 4-6 trigger. The roof/ground split is my reading of 'alter or change their existing distance to boundary or lot lines', not a published solar ruling.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Effectively yes, expressed as a riser rather than a one-line. FBC-amendment 107.3.5.3(9), the minimum plan review criteria for one- and two-family dwellings, requires: 'Electrical: Electric service riser with wire sizes, conduit detail and grounding detail, Complete load calculations, Panel schedules.' Separately FPL requires a Single Line Diagram that includes the meter number, and a three-line diagram in some cases.
Why the confidence is not higherThis is the codified residential minimum review list, quoted verbatim; it is the City's only statement of electrical drawing content. The words 'one-line' and 'three-line' do not appear in the City code - that language comes from FPL's standards.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes - 'Complete load calculations' and 'Panel schedules' are both named in the codified residential minimum plan review criteria (107.3.5.3(9)), alongside wire sizes, conduit detail and grounding detail. 107.2.1.3 lets the building official require further 'details, computations, stress diagrams, and other data'.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the codified list. String/conductor sizing specific to PV is not called out by name anywhere in the code.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
A DOLLAR threshold, and it is the lowest found in this survey. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(4): 'All drawings and specifications for RESIDENCES OF $10,000.00 VALUE OR MORE ... shall bear the signature and seal of a registered architect or engineer, registered in the State of Florida', and 'Any structural remodeling or structural alteration plans are to be prepared by a registered architect or engineer.' A typical residential PV job at $25,000-$55,000 is far over the threshold, so signed and sealed drawings are required as a matter of course - not on an engineering judgement but on price.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the clause in full. It is a zoning-chapter requirement keyed to job value, which is unusual; FBC-amendment 107.1 separately defers to Ch. 471/481 thresholds. The $10,000 figure is old (Ord. 96 lineage, amended through Ord. 495 of 2025) and has not been indexed.
codified zoning ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
The same clause. Sec. 15-10(c)(4) does not separate electrical from structural: all drawings and specifications for residences of $10,000 value or more must bear the seal of a Florida registered architect or engineer. No separate electrical-PE threshold is published.
Why the confidence is not higherThe clause is general ('all drawings and specifications'); reading it to reach the electrical sheets is the plain meaning, but the City publishes no electrical-specific statement.
codified zoning ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
TWO DIFFERENT PUBLISHED FORMULAS, on the same website, and they disagree. FAQ (Building): '$60 for the first $1,000 dollars worth of work, and 2.25% for the remainder of the cost of the job up to $50,000. Contact City Hall ... for fees for projects over $50,000.' Checklist for New Residential Construction: 'Permit Fees are $50.00 up to $2,500 (value of the job) - otherwise the fee is 2% of the cost of the job.' On a $40,000 PV job that is $937.50 by the FAQ and $800.00 by the checklist. Add a REFUNDABLE CASH BOND of $500 for any permit over $10,000 (Sec. 4-7), a building surcharge of 1 cent per square foot, and possible separate plan review, engineering and re-inspection fees named on the application. Quote a range, not a number, and confirm with City Hall on 561-965-1744 x112.
Why the confidence is not higher70 because the City's two published statements cannot both be right and neither is the Council-adopted fee schedule that Sec. 4-35.4 and FBC-amendment 109.2 require ('as established by resolution of the City Council'); that resolution is not published - the site search for 'fee schedule' returns 78 results and none of them is it.
department FAQ + department checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/FAQ.aspx?QID=64
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
By VALUATION - a percentage of the cost of the job, plus a flat base. FBC-amendment 109.3 defines valuation as 'total replacement value to include structural, electric, plumbing, mechanical, interior finish, relative site work, architectural and design fees, marketing costs, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; excluding only land value', with Marshall-Swift/Means as reference data and 'Final building permit valuation shall be set by the building official.' The application says 'the above permit fee is based on the value of the job as described herein.' *** This sits squarely against FS 553.79(1)(f), which bars requiring a contract 'or any associated document, including ... material costs lists, labor costs, or overhead or profit statements' and says 'Inspection fees may not be based on the total cost of a project and may not exceed the actual inspection costs incurred' - yet 109.3 says the permit SHALL BE DENIED unless the applicant produces 'detailed, quantity estimates, and/or bona fide signed contracts'. ***
Why the confidence is not higherThe valuation mechanic is codified verbatim. The statutory conflict is my reading of the caller's first-hand text of FS 553.79(1)(f); I did not re-pull the statute this run, so the conflict is flagged rather than asserted as adjudicated.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Not in the published formulas, but the permit application warns of one: 'Additional fees including but not limited to PLAN REVIEW, Engineering and Re-inspection fees may apply.' Neither of the two published fee statements contains a plan-check line, and the FY2024-25 budget's Construction Services fund has only two fee revenue accounts - 450-322100 Building Permits $247,000 and 450-329100 Reinspection Fees $5,000 - with no separate plan-review account.
Why the confidence is not higherBounded from two directions: the form says such a fee may apply, the chart of accounts has no line for it. The amount is not published anywhere.
permit application form + adopted budget checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/402
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
30 WORKING DAYS for a single-family dwelling, codified. FBC-amendment 105.3.4: 'A building permit for a single-family residential dwelling must be issued within 30 working days of application therefore unless unusual circumstances...' That matches FS 553.792(1)(a) limb 2 (30 business days, structure under 7,500 sq ft). BUT the clock cannot start until the ARC has approved, because Sec. 15-10(c)(2) makes ARC approval a condition of SUBMITTING the application - and the ARC has its own 45-day deemed-approval window. Realistic worst case before issue: ARC 45 days + 30 working days.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 30-working-day figure is codified and quoted. The compounding with the ARC gate is my reading of the two clauses together; the City nowhere states a combined timetable.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
TWO REGIMES IN ONE CODE, AND THEY CONFLICT. Zoning Sec. 15-10(c)(6)-(7): the permit expires if work has not BEGUN within 90 days, and expires if not SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED within two years. FBC-amendment 105.4.1.2-105.4.1.3: a permit becomes null if no approved inspection in six months, and a new permit must be obtained within six months of expiry; 105.5 'Expiration' is 'Reserved'. Separately Sec. 4-63(2) creates a rebuttable presumption of a construction-delay violation, citable before the special master, if no inspection is requested for 45 days.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three clauses read in full. The conflict between the 90-day/2-year zoning rule and the 6-month FBC rule is on the face of the code; the City does not reconcile them.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
NONE. Atlantis operates no permit portal. Applications are paper, filed at City Hall, 260 Orange Tree Drive; the forms are downloadable PDFs from a CivicPlus Document Center and the application must be NOTARISED. The site has no eTRAKiT, iWorQ, Cloudpermit, MyGov, SolarAPP or equivalent - a keyword sweep of all 119 sitemap pages returned zero hits for every one of those names and for 'portal'. The only transactional systems the City runs are utility bill payment (municipalonlinepayments.com/atlantisfl) and a Laserfiche document repository.
Why the confidence is not higherProved by enumeration over the complete 119-URL sitemap, all fetched at HTTP 200 with real body text, plus the site's own search. An absence of this kind can only be as good as the enumeration, which is why the denominator is named.
enumerated city website + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/156/Building-Department
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No. Two paper copies of plans and supporting documents must be submitted, the application must be notarised, payment is due at submission, and a $200/$500 cash bond must be deposited with the City Clerk before the permit issues. Electronic media is submitted only 'when required by the building official' (107.1). FS 553.79(1)(b)'s electronic-submission expectation is not met here.
Why the confidence is not higherPositively stated by the City ('Two paper copies ... must be submitted'), not inferred from the absence of a portal.
department page + codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/237/General-Permitting-Guidelines
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT. The City owns only its water, sewer and stormwater utility; electricity is bought from FPL and the City takes a franchise fee from it. The FY2023-24 budget names the line 'Franchise - FPL $280,000 / $290,000' and the FY2024-25 chart of accounts carries '001-323100 Franchise Fee - Electricity $290,000'. A city cannot pay itself a franchise fee. The City also levies a 5% public service tax on every sale of electricity (Sec. 12.5-50, Ord. 486 of 14 May 2024), budgeted at $241,667.
Why the confidence is not higherNamed in the City's own budget narrative, cross-checked against the chart of accounts, the Utility Billing page ('The City of Atlantis owns its own water, sewer, and stormwater utility') and the public service tax ordinance. FPL is one of only two retail electricity sellers in Palm Beach County.
adopted budget + codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/365/FY-2023-2024-Budget
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
FPL sits at both ends and the City sits in the middle. FPL's Electric Service Standards XIII.A recommend written interconnection approval BEFORE procuring material, and FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) requires local code approval BEFORE parallel operation, with 10 days' notice before placing in service. Atlantis adds a front-end step nobody else does: ARC approval before the permit application may even be filed. For new construction the City also holds the meter - Sec. 15-10(c)(9): 'Permanent electric power shall not be connected until after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy.'
Why the confidence is not higherSequence assembled from FPL's own standards (re-fetched and OCR'd this run), the FAC rule and two codified City clauses. The City publishes no PV sequence of its own.
utility standards + codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
YES, AND IT IS THE STRONGEST ARCHITECTURAL GATE IN THIS SURVEY - BUT IT IS SUBSTANTIVELY PREEMPTED FOR SOLAR. (a) ARCHITECTURAL: Sec. 15-10(e)(3) - the ARC 'shall review EVERY application for a permit ... to erect a building, sign, or structure of any kind, whatsoever, or to ALTER, REMODEL, REPAIR, OR CHANGE THE EXTERIOR of any structure'. No residential exemption. Sec. 15-10(c)(2): plans 'must be approved by the city architectural committee ... PRIOR TO THEIR SUBMISSION WITH THE APPLICATION FOR A BUILDING PERMIT'. The ARC is 'the final decision-making authority'. (b) HOA: the City enforces the association's decision as a permit condition - 'For homes in a homeowners association, exterior work must include written association approval'; 'Any permits for exterior work on condos, villas or homeowner groups must include written association approval OR IT WILL NOT BE PRESENTED BEFORE THE ARC OR APPROVED UNTIL IT IS PROVIDED'; the permit application carries 'Association approval must be submitted when applicable' against both SINGLE FAMILY and CONDO/VILLA GROUP. Sec. 15-6(a) goes further and adopts the covenant as the standard: where the zoning chapter and 'deed restrictions or covenants' differ, 'the most restrictive or that imposing the higher standards shall govern'. (c) THE PREEMPTION: FS 163.04(1) makes an ordinance that 'prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors' EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED, and 163.04(2) bars any deed restriction or approving entity from denying solar, limiting it to choosing a location on the roof within 45 degrees east or west of due south and only 'if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors'; 163.04(3) awards costs and attorney's fees to the prevailing party. So both approvals are procedurally required and substantively cannot be used to refuse a PV array.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ordinance text was read in full, including the applicability clause rather than the board's description of itself, and FS 163.04 was pulled first-hand from leg.state.fl.us and is quoted. 92 not higher because no Atlantis decision applying 163.04 to a PV array is published, and 'solar collector' is undefined in 163.04.
codified ordinance + Florida Statutes checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
NO. Atlantis has no historic district, no local register, no historic preservation board and no certificate of appropriateness. Across 1,267,061 characters of codified text the phrase 'certificate of appropriate' appears ZERO times; the 14 hits on 'historic' are the code publisher's own boilerplate, a flood-chapter variance keyed to FBC Existing Building ch. 12, the fire appeals board's 'historic, geographic or unusual conditions' criterion, and 'historic surface water drainage flows'. The City's Boards page lists ARC, Board of Adjustment, Commission on Ethics, Finance & Audit, Infrastructure Surtax Oversight, Local Planning Agency and the Neighborhood Improvement District - no historic board.
Why the confidence is not higherProved by enumeration with a named denominator: the complete Municode harvest, 749 documents, 0 empty, 2.54 MB of Content, controls 'electrical' 91 / 'Atlantis' 191 / 'zoning' 177 hits against fabricated 'zzqqxplorp' and 'qqzzxyzzy' at 0. Cross-checked against the City's own board list.
codified ordinance, enumerated checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Not a separate certification, but the wind criteria are codified and high. Sec. 4-23 (Ord. 419, 2012) establishes design wind speeds under FBC 1609.3: Category I 160 mph, Category II 170 mph, Category III and IV 180 mph. A dwelling is Category II, so 170 mph. Product approvals (NOAs) are a mandatory submittal item - 'Two (2) sets and NOA's of plans' on the application, 'Two sets of product approvals' on the Building Department page - and 107.2.1.2 requires the construction documents to show the wind resistance rating and either product evaluation or an architect/engineer statement for the specific site.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified figures quoted directly; the NOA requirement appears on both the application and the department page. No separate windstorm certificate is issued.
codified ordinance + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Council approval is not routine, but it is the top of the appeal ladder and the ARC decision is a committee decision on every permit. Sec. 15-10(e)(6): the ARC is the final decision maker; a denied applicant has 30 days to petition the ARC for reconsideration, the ARC acts within 30 days, and only then may the applicant appeal to the City Council, which acts within 45 days and 'may not waive requirements specifically set forth in the code'. A variance from a code requirement goes instead to the Board of Adjustment under Sec. 15-9. No special use permit exists for solar.
Why the confidence is not higherThe two-step ladder is the current codified text (Ord. 495, 18 Jun 2025, Supp. 6 through Ord. 500). Note the City's own ARC board webpage still describes the OLD single-step appeal and is one ordinance out of date.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No City cap. The City code says 'solar' once in 1.27 MB and it is not a size rule. The binding caps are FPL's: Tier 1 is an inverter AC rating of 10 kW or less (about 11.76 kW DC at FAC 25-6.065(2)(b)'s AC = DC x 0.85), Tier 2 above 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 above 100 kW to 2 MW; and generation is capped at 90% of the serving FPL transformer rating. Crossing 10 kW AC is what buys a mandatory visually-open DER disconnect switch.
Why the confidence is not higherCity absence proved by the full-code enumeration above; FPL tiers quoted from Section XIII page 1 of the Electric Service Standards, re-fetched and OCR'd this run.
utility standards + codified ordinance (absence) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? GENUINELY UNSETTLED, and it is a two-instrument problem. Sec. 4-24 (Ord. 419, 21 Mar 2012): 'The MOST CURRENT EDITION of the National Electrical Code ... is hereby adopted' - a floating adoption of the NEC in the City's own right. Sec. 4-21 separately adopts 'the most current edition of the Florida Building Code' - also floating - and the City's flood page states the current adoption as 'Florida Building Code 2023 Edition 8', whose electrical provisions run on NEC 2020. So the codified City answer is 'whatever NEC edition is current', while the FBC route gives NEC 2020. Ask the Building Official which he enforces before designing to either. 75% · codified ordinance
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), adopted by floating reference in Sec. 4-21 and named explicitly on the City's floodplain Permits page: 'The City of Atlantis has adopted the Florida Building Code 2023 Edition 8.' 92% · department page + codified ordinance
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, current edition, adopted by floating reference. Sec. 7-26(a) adopts 'the Florida Fire Prevention Code, composed of the Fire Prevention Code, NFPA 1 and the Life Safety Code, Pamphlet 101, CURRENT EDITIONS, as adopted by the state fire marshal'. The enforcing fire official, the Greenacres Fire Marshal, names the 7th Edition on the Greenacres Fire Rescue site. 85% · codified ordinance + fire provider page
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Building: YES and they are extensive - Sec. 4-22 is 216,855 characters of local amendments to FBC Chapter 1 Administration (Sections 101-119), covering permits, exemptions, fees, valuation, inspections, certificates and appeals. Electrical: NO local technical amendments; Sec. 4-24 simply adopts the NEC. Fire: NO - Sec. 7-28, which formerly amended NFPA 1, was REPEALED in its entirety by Ord. 333 of 20 Mar 2002 and is 'Reserved', and the former Sec. 7-29 amending NFPA 101 was likewise repealed and replaced with an appeals procedure. Wind speed lines are locally established (Sec. 4-23). 90% · codified ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code 2023 (8th ed.) as locally amended by Sec. 4-22, plus the NEC per Sec. 4-24, plus FBC-amendment 101.4.1 which routes electrical to 'the provisions of Chapter 27 of the Florida Building Code, Building'. FBC-amendment 101.3.2 disclaims warranty and liability for the City's review and inspection. 85% · codified ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of Atlantis on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Not addressed locally; it follows the adopted NEC edition (NEC 690.12), which is itself unsettled between 'the most current edition' under Sec. 4-24 and NEC 2020 via FBC 2023. The words 'rapid shutdown' appear nowhere in the City code. 70% · codified ordinance (absence)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? FPL's, not the City's. The City specifies no placards at all. FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (stamped 10-30-25), XIII.A.6: two engraved placards, one at the INTERCONNECTING METER CAN and one at the DER DISCONNECT SWITCH. If a battery is present, XIII.C.1 adds a third placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure. 92% · utility standards
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? FPL does, verbatim. XIII.A.6: 'INTERCONNECTING METER CAN / WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - a FOUR-LINE placard with TWO job-specific numeric fields. And 'DER DISCONNECT SWITCH / GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - three lines, two numeric fields. Battery: XIII.C.1 - 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.' The identical placard block is printed TWICE in Section XIII, at A.6 (page XIII:2) where it reads 'All labels MUST be permanent' and again at B.6 (page XIII:9) where the same sentence reads 'All labels SHOULD be permanent'. 92% · utility standards
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Partly. FPL requires 'permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS'. It specifies NO letter height and NO colour. The City specifies nothing. 90% · utility standards
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? No AHJ placard. FPL's requirement is a drawing, not a placard: XIII.A.3 - 'Meter numbers associated with interconnecting premise must be included in Single Line Diagrams (SLD) and/or plans', and XIII.A.4 - 'Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' XIII.A.7 may require a System Impact Study with all relaying, protection and metering on a one-line, and a three-line in some cases. 88% · utility standards
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? YES - and they are the ONLY placards on the job. Atlantis requires none, so every label on an Atlantis PV installation is an FPL requirement. Note XIII.A.6 is NOT tier-scoped, so the meter-can placard reaches even a Tier 1 (10 kW AC or less) system that needs no disconnect switch at all. 90% · utility standards
- Where must the labels be placed? At the interconnecting meter can, and on the DER disconnect switch. Battery placard: 'permanently affixed to the meter enclosure'. Where a DER disconnect is required it must sit separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, within 10 feet, always accessible to FPL, with no locked gates, doors or fences between them. 92% · utility standards
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Tier 1 (inverter AC rating 10 kW or less): NO DER disconnect switch required - XIII.A.4 is expressly scoped, 'All TIER 2 AND TIER 3 systems require an FPL approved visually open DER disconnect switch', and FAC 25-6.065(6)(a) exempts inverter-based Tier 1 unless the utility pays. Where one IS required it must be on the AC side, mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET, always accessible to FPL, with no locked gates, doors or fences between, load side of the meter to the IEEE 1547 inverter and line side to FPL's grid, with the dimensions shown on the plans. Separately XIII.A.5 is NOT tier-scoped: a LINE-SIDE TAP ahead of the main panel forces a manual AC disconnect within 10 feet of the meter socket at any tier - so ask the tap point before quoting. 92% · utility standards
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No local approved-equipment list, but three external ones bite. FPL XIII.A.1: the inverter must be certified to UL 1741 SA and IEEE 1547 - 'Inverters that have not been certified to UL Standard will be denied interconnection.' FPL XIII.C.1: battery equipment must be NRTL-certified to the current UL 1741, or DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device. The City requires Notices of Acceptance (product approvals) with every application and two sets of product approvals with the permit, and FBC-amendment 104.9 lets the building official approve materials and equipment. 90% · utility standards + permit application
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, under FPL's conditions, with no City rule at all. XIII.C.2: energy stored is for the customer's use only and 'at this time the customer may not export power from the battery to the grid'. XIII.C.3: a backup-only battery with no renewable generation may charge from the grid and 'No interconnection agreement is required', with the customer responsible for preventing back-feed. XIII.C.4: a grid-charging, grid-interconnected battery must be notified to FPL and, for now, submitted on a Small Generator Interconnection Application. Stand-alone battery storage is not 'renewable energy' under FAC 25-6.065(2)(d) and its output is not net metered. The words 'battery', 'energy storage' and 'ESS' do not appear as regulated terms anywhere in the Atlantis code. 90% · utility standards + codified ordinance (absence)
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No separate City ESS permit or inspection is published. A battery would ride on the electrical trade permit (Sec. 4-33) and the electrical rough-in and final inspections (110.3.B). FS 553.791(1)(r) treats 'solar energy and energy storage installations or alterations' as single-trade work. 65% · codified ordinance (inference)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, and a ground mount is caught in at least four places a roof mount is not. (1) Sec. 15-3(4): 'structure' is broadly defined and Sec. 15-10(c)(1) requires a permit to erect any structure. (2) R-1 accessory buildings and structures are limited to two floors and 20 feet. (3) Sec. 4-6 requires a signed and sealed boundary AND tie-in survey for any work that alters a structure's distance to lot lines - which a ground mount does and a roof array does not. (4) In the AE flood zone, Sec. 8-102 catches it as 'other development': anchored against flotation, collapse and lateral movement including buoyancy, built of flood damage-resistant materials, with 'mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION'. There is also a strong appearance analogue: Sec. 15-6(e) requires all roof-top appurtenances 'excluding solar heating devices' to be adequately screened from public view, and the ARC's generator rules demand sight screening and bar front-yard installation outright. 85% · codified ordinance
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No busbar or service-upgrade rule of its own, but one clause bites hard on a service change: Sec. 4-10 requires that when any existing building is 'reconstructed, substantially extended or enlarged OR STRUCTURALLY ALTERED', it 'shall have an entirely underground location for all utility service lines, electrical distribution systems, wires and cables'. A PV job that involves a service or meter relocation should assume underground. FBC-amendment 102.8 separately bars the City from requiring that existing rooftop mechanical equipment be moved. 70% · codified ordinance
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No mounting-system or attachment-spacing rule for PV. The only roof-specific local requirements are material and appearance: Sec. 4-61 limits roofing materials citywide to concrete tiles, barrel tile and cedar shake shingles, while Sec. 15-5(f)(7) codifies a named roof product for each of thirteen-plus villa groups (Entegra Butterscotch Tile; Englert Metal Sierra Tan; White Flat Cement Tile; Westlake Royal Saxony 900 Split Shake Sierra Brown w/Black Antique; Boral Saxony 900 Slate Flat White Tile; Eagle Bel Air 4502 Arcadia Canyon Brown; standing seam metal Dove Gray; standing seam metal Mansard Brown; Crown Smoked Fireclay Tuscany red barrel; and others). Mounting hardware and flashing must suit tile or standing-seam metal, and note that the two clauses conflict - Sec. 4-61 does not permit metal roofing that Sec. 15-5 mandates for three villa groups. 85% · codified zoning ordinance
20 questions answered against City of Atlantis’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
GENUINELY UNSETTLED, and it is a two-instrument problem. Sec. 4-24 (Ord. 419, 21 Mar 2012): 'The MOST CURRENT EDITION of the National Electrical Code ... is hereby adopted' - a floating adoption of the NEC in the City's own right. Sec. 4-21 separately adopts 'the most current edition of the Florida Building Code' - also floating - and the City's flood page states the current adoption as 'Florida Building Code 2023 Edition 8', whose electrical provisions run on NEC 2020. So the codified City answer is 'whatever NEC edition is current', while the FBC route gives NEC 2020. Ask the Building Official which he enforces before designing to either.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth adoption clauses read verbatim; the conflict is on the face of the code. 75 because the City publishes no reconciliation and no local electrical amendments exist to settle it.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), adopted by floating reference in Sec. 4-21 and named explicitly on the City's floodplain Permits page: 'The City of Atlantis has adopted the Florida Building Code 2023 Edition 8.'
Why the confidence is not higherTwo sources - the floating codified adoption and the City's own plain statement of what that currently means. A floating adoption follows the state cycle automatically, so this answer will move with the state.
department page + codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/204/Permits
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, current edition, adopted by floating reference. Sec. 7-26(a) adopts 'the Florida Fire Prevention Code, composed of the Fire Prevention Code, NFPA 1 and the Life Safety Code, Pamphlet 101, CURRENT EDITIONS, as adopted by the state fire marshal'. The enforcing fire official, the Greenacres Fire Marshal, names the 7th Edition on the Greenacres Fire Rescue site.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's adoption is floating; the operative edition is named by the department that actually enforces it. The FFPC text itself is paywalled and was not read.
codified ordinance + fire provider page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.greenacresfl.gov/504/Fire-Prevention-and-Life-Safety
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Building: YES and they are extensive - Sec. 4-22 is 216,855 characters of local amendments to FBC Chapter 1 Administration (Sections 101-119), covering permits, exemptions, fees, valuation, inspections, certificates and appeals. Electrical: NO local technical amendments; Sec. 4-24 simply adopts the NEC. Fire: NO - Sec. 7-28, which formerly amended NFPA 1, was REPEALED in its entirety by Ord. 333 of 20 Mar 2002 and is 'Reserved', and the former Sec. 7-29 amending NFPA 101 was likewise repealed and replaced with an appeals procedure. Wind speed lines are locally established (Sec. 4-23).
Why the confidence is not higherThe repeals are recorded in the editor's notes to the two sections and were read directly. The absence of electrical amendments is proved against the full-code harvest.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code 2023 (8th ed.) as locally amended by Sec. 4-22, plus the NEC per Sec. 4-24, plus FBC-amendment 101.4.1 which routes electrical to 'the provisions of Chapter 27 of the Florida Building Code, Building'. FBC-amendment 101.3.2 disclaims warranty and liability for the City's review and inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified chain read end to end; the NEC edition question at q29 carries through here.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No busbar or service-upgrade rule of its own, but one clause bites hard on a service change: Sec. 4-10 requires that when any existing building is 'reconstructed, substantially extended or enlarged OR STRUCTURALLY ALTERED', it 'shall have an entirely underground location for all utility service lines, electrical distribution systems, wires and cables'. A PV job that involves a service or meter relocation should assume underground. FBC-amendment 102.8 separately bars the City from requiring that existing rooftop mechanical equipment be moved.
Why the confidence is not higherThe underground clause is codified and unambiguous, but whether the City reads a PV interconnection as a 'structural alteration' triggering it is not published; treat it as a question to ask, not a settled requirement. Busbar/120% rule: no local text, so NEC 705.12 governs.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No mounting-system or attachment-spacing rule for PV. The only roof-specific local requirements are material and appearance: Sec. 4-61 limits roofing materials citywide to concrete tiles, barrel tile and cedar shake shingles, while Sec. 15-5(f)(7) codifies a named roof product for each of thirteen-plus villa groups (Entegra Butterscotch Tile; Englert Metal Sierra Tan; White Flat Cement Tile; Westlake Royal Saxony 900 Split Shake Sierra Brown w/Black Antique; Boral Saxony 900 Slate Flat White Tile; Eagle Bel Air 4502 Arcadia Canyon Brown; standing seam metal Dove Gray; standing seam metal Mansard Brown; Crown Smoked Fireclay Tuscany red barrel; and others). Mounting hardware and flashing must suit tile or standing-seam metal, and note that the two clauses conflict - Sec. 4-61 does not permit metal roofing that Sec. 15-5 mandates for three villa groups.
Why the confidence is not higherThe villa-group table was read in full from the codified text; it is the City's zoning code, not an HOA document. The absence of a PV attachment rule is proved against the full-code harvest. 85 because OCR/codification of some product names may be imperfect (one reads 'Tnglert', plainly Englert).
codified zoning ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFFPC ridge setbacks and access pathway dimensions: the Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1 / NFPA 101, current editions) is adopted by floating reference at Sec. 7-26 but the FFPC text is paywalled and was NOT READ - unread means unreached. What IS settled and recorded as the answer: Atlantis Code Sec. 7-30(a)(1) exempts 'one- or two-family dwellings or other appurtenances' from fire plan review; the permit application routes fire review to Greenacres only for COMMERCIAL; the Forms page scopes the Greenacres Fire Marshal review to commercial structures and enumerates its eight covered work types, none residential and none solar; Sec. 7-28, the former local NFPA 1 amendments, was repealed by Ord. 333 in 2002 and is Reserved; and the Greenacres fire chapter itself (Municode client 2443, product 12151, job 487882, chapter 5, 11 of 11 documents non-empty, 14,588 characters) says 'photovoltaic' ZERO times, 'solar' ZERO times and contains no single-family exemption clause - so the Hypoluxo/Boynton shape, where a neighbour's fire chapter carried '*Exceptions: ... photovoltaic systems*', does NOT repeat here.
https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Not addressed locally; it follows the adopted NEC edition (NEC 690.12), which is itself unsettled between 'the most current edition' under Sec. 4-24 and NEC 2020 via FBC 2023. The words 'rapid shutdown' appear nowhere in the City code.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved against the full-code harvest; the answer therefore inherits the q29 ambiguity, which is why it is not higher.
codified ordinance (absence) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
FPL's, not the City's. The City specifies no placards at all. FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (stamped 10-30-25), XIII.A.6: two engraved placards, one at the INTERCONNECTING METER CAN and one at the DER DISCONNECT SWITCH. If a battery is present, XIII.C.1 adds a third placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure.
Why the confidence is not higherRe-fetched and re-read first-hand this run: the 10,244,699-byte ESS, 173 pages, ModDate 1 Sep 2026, Section XIII stamped 10-30-25; Section XIII has no usable text layer (font-substitution mojibake) so pages 150-173 were rasterised at 200 dpi and OCR'd with --psm 6 inside the scratchpad, page 1 eyeballed for sanity. City absence proved against the full-code harvest and the zero-result site search for 'solar'.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
FPL does, verbatim. XIII.A.6: 'INTERCONNECTING METER CAN / WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - a FOUR-LINE placard with TWO job-specific numeric fields. And 'DER DISCONNECT SWITCH / GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - three lines, two numeric fields. Battery: XIII.C.1 - 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.' The identical placard block is printed TWICE in Section XIII, at A.6 (page XIII:2) where it reads 'All labels MUST be permanent' and again at B.6 (page XIII:9) where the same sentence reads 'All labels SHOULD be permanent'.
Why the confidence is not higherTranscribed from OCR of the current edition. The must/should discrepancy between the two identical paragraphs is quoted from the two pages and is new - design to 'must'.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Partly. FPL requires 'permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS'. It specifies NO letter height and NO colour. The City specifies nothing.
Why the confidence is not higherRead in full; the absence of height and colour is an absence within a specification that does address material and lettering method, so it is a real negative rather than an unread one.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No AHJ placard. FPL's requirement is a drawing, not a placard: XIII.A.3 - 'Meter numbers associated with interconnecting premise must be included in Single Line Diagrams (SLD) and/or plans', and XIII.A.4 - 'Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' XIII.A.7 may require a System Impact Study with all relaying, protection and metering on a one-line, and a three-line in some cases.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the re-read standards. The City requires a site plan (107.2.5) but no facility map placard - proved against the full-code harvest.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
YES - and they are the ONLY placards on the job. Atlantis requires none, so every label on an Atlantis PV installation is an FPL requirement. Note XIII.A.6 is NOT tier-scoped, so the meter-can placard reaches even a Tier 1 (10 kW AC or less) system that needs no disconnect switch at all.
Why the confidence is not higherThe tier-scoping point was checked by reading A.4 ('All tier 2 and tier 3 systems require...') against A.6 (no tier language) on the same OCR'd pages.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the interconnecting meter can, and on the DER disconnect switch. Battery placard: 'permanently affixed to the meter enclosure'. Where a DER disconnect is required it must sit separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, within 10 feet, always accessible to FPL, with no locked gates, doors or fences between them.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from XIII.A.4 and XIII.A.6 as re-read this run.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
No local approved-equipment list, but three external ones bite. FPL XIII.A.1: the inverter must be certified to UL 1741 SA and IEEE 1547 - 'Inverters that have not been certified to UL Standard will be denied interconnection.' FPL XIII.C.1: battery equipment must be NRTL-certified to the current UL 1741, or DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device. The City requires Notices of Acceptance (product approvals) with every application and two sets of product approvals with the permit, and FBC-amendment 104.9 lets the building official approve materials and equipment.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL text re-read first-hand; the NOA requirement appears on both the application form and the department page.
utility standards + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, under FPL's conditions, with no City rule at all. XIII.C.2: energy stored is for the customer's use only and 'at this time the customer may not export power from the battery to the grid'. XIII.C.3: a backup-only battery with no renewable generation may charge from the grid and 'No interconnection agreement is required', with the customer responsible for preventing back-feed. XIII.C.4: a grid-charging, grid-interconnected battery must be notified to FPL and, for now, submitted on a Small Generator Interconnection Application. Stand-alone battery storage is not 'renewable energy' under FAC 25-6.065(2)(d) and its output is not net metered. The words 'battery', 'energy storage' and 'ESS' do not appear as regulated terms anywhere in the Atlantis code.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Section XIII.C re-read first-hand this run (page XIII:10). City absence proved against the full-code harvest - the only 'battery' hits in 1.27 MB are 'sexual battery' in the adult-entertainment definitions and 'lead-acid batteries' in the solid waste definitions.
utility standards + codified ordinance (absence) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No separate City ESS permit or inspection is published. A battery would ride on the electrical trade permit (Sec. 4-33) and the electrical rough-in and final inspections (110.3.B). FS 553.791(1)(r) treats 'solar energy and energy storage installations or alterations' as single-trade work.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the City's own permit taxonomy and inspection list, not a published ESS instruction - the City publishes none. 65 because the City has never been asked this in writing on any page I could reach.
codified ordinance (inference) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, and a ground mount is caught in at least four places a roof mount is not. (1) Sec. 15-3(4): 'structure' is broadly defined and Sec. 15-10(c)(1) requires a permit to erect any structure. (2) R-1 accessory buildings and structures are limited to two floors and 20 feet. (3) Sec. 4-6 requires a signed and sealed boundary AND tie-in survey for any work that alters a structure's distance to lot lines - which a ground mount does and a roof array does not. (4) In the AE flood zone, Sec. 8-102 catches it as 'other development': anchored against flotation, collapse and lateral movement including buoyancy, built of flood damage-resistant materials, with 'mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION'. There is also a strong appearance analogue: Sec. 15-6(e) requires all roof-top appurtenances 'excluding solar heating devices' to be adequately screened from public view, and the ARC's generator rules demand sight screening and bar front-yard installation outright.
Why the confidence is not higherEach limb read in its own section. The flood limb only fires on the 1.28% of the place polygon in Zone AE. The 15-6(e) point is discussed at q24/q57 - see the note there about 'solar HEATING devices'.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Tier 1 (inverter AC rating 10 kW or less): NO DER disconnect switch required - XIII.A.4 is expressly scoped, 'All TIER 2 AND TIER 3 systems require an FPL approved visually open DER disconnect switch', and FAC 25-6.065(6)(a) exempts inverter-based Tier 1 unless the utility pays. Where one IS required it must be on the AC side, mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET, always accessible to FPL, with no locked gates, doors or fences between, load side of the meter to the IEEE 1547 inverter and line side to FPL's grid, with the dimensions shown on the plans. Separately XIII.A.5 is NOT tier-scoped: a LINE-SIDE TAP ahead of the main panel forces a manual AC disconnect within 10 feet of the meter socket at any tier - so ask the tap point before quoting.
Why the confidence is not higherThe tier scoping and the line-side-tap limb were both re-read first-hand from the OCR'd current edition this run.
utility standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? By telephone to City Hall, 561-965-1744 ext. 112. There is no online scheduler; the City runs no permit portal. The Standby Generators page adds that 'The electrician is responsible for calling in the final generator inspection', i.e. the trade contractor books their own trade final. 85% · department page
- How much notice is required? A 3:30 pm PRIOR-DAY CUT-OFF. 'Required inspections must be called in no later than 3:30 p.m. for an inspection to be scheduled for the next day. Inspections called in after 3:30 p.m. will not be processed until the following day.' Office hours are Monday-Friday 8:30 am to 4:30 pm. 95% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Not published. No AM/PM windows and no same-day option are stated anywhere; the only timing rule is the 3:30 pm prior-day cut-off, which by its terms produces next-business-day inspections with no window. 60% · department page (bounded)
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes - the City's own Construction Services Department performs the inspections, but through a CONTRACTED Building Official and inspection service rather than employees. Budget 450-524311 'Building Official Contract' $115,000 against $63,570 of in-house payroll; the FY23-24 budget names it 'Building Official and Inspections $110,000'. FBC-amendment 104.4: 'The building official shall make all of the required inspections, or the building official shall have the authority to accept reports of approved agencies.' 88% · adopted budget + codified FBC amendment
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated for building or electrical. Fire is delegated to GREENACRES FIRE RESCUE, whose Fire Marshal (Peter 'Tyler' Wallwork, 561-642-2163, Greenacres City Hall, 5800 Melaleuca Lane, Greenacres FL 33463) performs fire plan review and final fire inspections - but for COMMERCIAL structures only, so not on a residential PV job. Private providers are defined in Sec. 4-33 by reference to FS 553.791 but no local private-provider procedure, reservation list or affidavit form is published. 88% · fire provider page + city form page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? For an electrical trade permit, FBC-amendment 110.3.B lists four: (1) Underground inspection including bonding and ground, before backfill; (2) Rough-in, after dry-in and framing, before insulation or membranes; (3) Low voltage, for security, alarm, elevator and special uses; (4) Final, after the work is complete and properly connected. Building-side, 110.3.A includes a roofing inspection covering dry-in, insulation, roof coverings including in-progress, and flashing. 110.6: 'Work shall not be done beyond the point indicated in each successive inspection without first obtaining the approval of the building inspector.' 110.3 gives the building official discretion over 'the timing and sequencing of when inspections occur and what elements are inspected at each inspection'. A useful analogue is the published Standby Generators sequence: Slab, Electric Rough, Gas Rough, Gas Final, Electric Final done at the same time as the final generator inspection. 85% · codified FBC amendment
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes for electrical - 110.3.B.2 rough-in - though on a retrofit roof array with no concealed work the building official's 110.3 discretion over 'what elements are inspected at each inspection' may collapse it into the final. No mid-roof inspection type exists; the roofing inspection (110.3.A.3) does cover 'roof coverings (including in-progress)'. 70% · codified FBC amendment
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? For solar, NO. The City publishes checklists for New Residential Construction, Commercial Construction, Swimming Pools, Standby Generators, Air Conditioning Replacement and Landscape - and none for solar. The Standby Generators page is the closest published analogue and does give a full required-information list and inspection sequence. The site search returns ZERO results for 'solar' against 78 for 'fee schedule' and zero for the fabricated control. 88% · department page, enumerated
- What must be on site at inspection? One approved set of construction documents. FBC-amendment 107.3.1: one reviewed set is retained by the building official, 'The other set shall be returned to the applicant, shall be kept at the site of work and shall be open to inspection by the building official.' 105.7: 'The building permit or copy shall be kept on the site of the work until the completion of the project.' 105.8/Sec. 713.135 F.S.: the recorded Notice of Commencement 'must be recorded and posted on the job site BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION'. 92% · codified FBC amendment + permit application
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Not published as a distinct check. FBC-amendment 110.3.B.4 requires the electrical final to confirm that 'all required electrical fixtures are in place and properly connected or protected'; 104.9 makes approval of materials and equipment the building official's job. There is no published statement that labels or listings are verified at final. FPL, not the City, enforces the placards and the UL 1741 SA / IEEE 1547 listing - and FPL's leverage is the interconnection, not the inspection. 60% · codified FBC amendment (bounded)
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? For work in an existing dwelling, a Certificate of Completion; a Certificate of Occupancy is required only for use, occupancy or a change of occupancy classification (111.1), and is not issued for work exempt from permits. 111.2 lists thirteen mandatory contents of a CO including the permit number, the name of the building official and 'The edition of the code under which the permit was issued'. For new construction, landscaping must be complete per the ARC-approved plan before a CO issues (Sec. 15-10(c)(8)) and permanent power is withheld until the CO (Sec. 15-10(c)(9)). The $200/$500 cash bond is refunded after the site is cleared (Sec. 4-7). 80% · codified FBC amendment
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? The customer or the contractor, not the City. FPL XIII.A: 'All net metering systems require written approval and agreement from FPL'; FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) requires local code approval before parallel operation and (5)(b) ten days' notice before placing the system in service, with the agreement executed within 30 calendar days under (7)(c). Nothing in the Atlantis code, on its website or on its forms requires or permits the City to notify FPL. Contact for FPL net metering: netmetering@fpl.com. 85% · utility standards + codified ordinance (absence)
- Is there a re-inspection fee? YES, and it is budgeted. Revenue account 450-329100 'Reinspection Fees' $5,000 in the FY2024-25 Construction Services fund; the FY23-24 budget shows it created that year ('Building Permit Reinspection Fees $0 -> $5,000'). The permit application warns that 'Re-inspection fees may apply'. The Standby Generators page shows it in use: if landscaping and shielding are not in place at final, 'the inspection will fail and a re-inspection fee will be charged.' Sec. 7-48(e) separately provides a fire reinspection service fee set by Council resolution. THE AMOUNT IS NOT PUBLISHED. 85% · adopted budget + department page
- How are corrections issued and cleared? In writing at the inspection, section by section. FBC-amendment 110.6: the building official 'shall either indicate the portion of the construction that is satisfactory as completed, or notify the permit holder or his or her agent wherein the same fails to comply with this code. Any portions that do not comply shall be corrected and such portion shall not be covered or concealed until authorized by the building official.' Clearing is by re-inspection, chargeable. Watch Sec. 4-63(2): no inspection requested for 45 days creates a rebuttable presumption of a construction-delay violation, citable before the special master. 85% · codified FBC amendment
14 questions answered against City of Atlantis’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
By telephone to City Hall, 561-965-1744 ext. 112. There is no online scheduler; the City runs no permit portal. The Standby Generators page adds that 'The electrician is responsible for calling in the final generator inspection', i.e. the trade contractor books their own trade final.
Why the confidence is not higherThe phone route is stated on the Forms page ('Contact City Hall at 561-965-1744 x112') and the inspection cut-off rule is written in terms of calling in; the portal absence is proved by the 119-URL enumeration.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/237/General-Permitting-Guidelines
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
A 3:30 pm PRIOR-DAY CUT-OFF. 'Required inspections must be called in no later than 3:30 p.m. for an inspection to be scheduled for the next day. Inspections called in after 3:30 p.m. will not be processed until the following day.' Office hours are Monday-Friday 8:30 am to 4:30 pm.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the City's General Permitting Guidelines.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/237/General-Permitting-Guidelines
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Not published. No AM/PM windows and no same-day option are stated anywhere; the only timing rule is the 3:30 pm prior-day cut-off, which by its terms produces next-business-day inspections with no window.
Why the confidence is not higherBounded rather than proved: the City publishes a cut-off but no window policy, across the complete 119-page sitemap. A window may exist in practice and simply not be written down.
department page (bounded) checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/237/General-Permitting-Guidelines
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes - the City's own Construction Services Department performs the inspections, but through a CONTRACTED Building Official and inspection service rather than employees. Budget 450-524311 'Building Official Contract' $115,000 against $63,570 of in-house payroll; the FY23-24 budget names it 'Building Official and Inspections $110,000'. FBC-amendment 104.4: 'The building official shall make all of the required inspections, or the building official shall have the authority to accept reports of approved agencies.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe contract/payroll split is read straight off two adopted budgets; the contractor is not named in either. This is the mirror image of neighbouring Haverhill, where payroll exceeds the contract.
adopted budget + codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/425/FY-2024-2025-Budget
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated for building or electrical. Fire is delegated to GREENACRES FIRE RESCUE, whose Fire Marshal (Peter 'Tyler' Wallwork, 561-642-2163, Greenacres City Hall, 5800 Melaleuca Lane, Greenacres FL 33463) performs fire plan review and final fire inspections - but for COMMERCIAL structures only, so not on a residential PV job. Private providers are defined in Sec. 4-33 by reference to FS 553.791 but no local private-provider procedure, reservation list or affidavit form is published.
Why the confidence is not higherGreenacres confirmed from both sides - the City's Forms page with address and phone, and Greenacres Fire Rescue's own page stating it serves 'over 2,000 residents within the City of Atlantis'. The private-provider gap is proved against the full-code harvest and the 119-page site enumeration.
fire provider page + city form page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.greenacresfl.gov/195/Fire-Rescue
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
For an electrical trade permit, FBC-amendment 110.3.B lists four: (1) Underground inspection including bonding and ground, before backfill; (2) Rough-in, after dry-in and framing, before insulation or membranes; (3) Low voltage, for security, alarm, elevator and special uses; (4) Final, after the work is complete and properly connected. Building-side, 110.3.A includes a roofing inspection covering dry-in, insulation, roof coverings including in-progress, and flashing. 110.6: 'Work shall not be done beyond the point indicated in each successive inspection without first obtaining the approval of the building inspector.' 110.3 gives the building official discretion over 'the timing and sequencing of when inspections occur and what elements are inspected at each inspection'. A useful analogue is the published Standby Generators sequence: Slab, Electric Rough, Gas Rough, Gas Final, Electric Final done at the same time as the final generator inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherThe catalogue is codified and was read in full. There is no published solar-specific inspection sequence, so the applicable subset for a roof PV job (rough-in and final, plus a mount/attachment check if the roof is opened) is inference.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Yes for electrical - 110.3.B.2 rough-in - though on a retrofit roof array with no concealed work the building official's 110.3 discretion over 'what elements are inspected at each inspection' may collapse it into the final. No mid-roof inspection type exists; the roofing inspection (110.3.A.3) does cover 'roof coverings (including in-progress)'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe rough-in exists in the catalogue; whether it fires on a surface-mounted retrofit is a judgement the code expressly leaves to the building official, so this is bounded rather than settled.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Not published as a distinct check. FBC-amendment 110.3.B.4 requires the electrical final to confirm that 'all required electrical fixtures are in place and properly connected or protected'; 104.9 makes approval of materials and equipment the building official's job. There is no published statement that labels or listings are verified at final. FPL, not the City, enforces the placards and the UL 1741 SA / IEEE 1547 listing - and FPL's leverage is the interconnection, not the inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherBounded: I can name what the inspection clauses do say across the whole codified inspection article and the 119-page site, and none of it mentions labels or listings. The City may check in practice.
codified FBC amendment (bounded) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
For solar, NO. The City publishes checklists for New Residential Construction, Commercial Construction, Swimming Pools, Standby Generators, Air Conditioning Replacement and Landscape - and none for solar. The Standby Generators page is the closest published analogue and does give a full required-information list and inspection sequence. The site search returns ZERO results for 'solar' against 78 for 'fee schedule' and zero for the fabricated control.
Why the confidence is not higherProved by enumeration of the complete Forms page checklist table plus the site search with both controls run in the same session.
department page, enumerated checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/157/Forms
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
One approved set of construction documents. FBC-amendment 107.3.1: one reviewed set is retained by the building official, 'The other set shall be returned to the applicant, shall be kept at the site of work and shall be open to inspection by the building official.' 105.7: 'The building permit or copy shall be kept on the site of the work until the completion of the project.' 105.8/Sec. 713.135 F.S.: the recorded Notice of Commencement 'must be recorded and posted on the job site BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION'.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three clauses quoted from the codified FBC amendments and the application form's warning to owner.
codified FBC amendment + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
YES, and it is budgeted. Revenue account 450-329100 'Reinspection Fees' $5,000 in the FY2024-25 Construction Services fund; the FY23-24 budget shows it created that year ('Building Permit Reinspection Fees $0 -> $5,000'). The permit application warns that 'Re-inspection fees may apply'. The Standby Generators page shows it in use: if landscaping and shielding are not in place at final, 'the inspection will fail and a re-inspection fee will be charged.' Sec. 7-48(e) separately provides a fire reinspection service fee set by Council resolution. THE AMOUNT IS NOT PUBLISHED.
Why the confidence is not higherExistence proved four ways including a dedicated budget line with a dollar total; the per-inspection rate lives in the unpublished Council fee resolution. Worth pairing with FS 553.79(7)(a)'s 10 percent refund where an inspector fails to give a code-based reason within 5 business days.
adopted budget + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://atlantisfl.gov/DocumentCenter/View/425/FY-2024-2025-Budget
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
In writing at the inspection, section by section. FBC-amendment 110.6: the building official 'shall either indicate the portion of the construction that is satisfactory as completed, or notify the permit holder or his or her agent wherein the same fails to comply with this code. Any portions that do not comply shall be corrected and such portion shall not be covered or concealed until authorized by the building official.' Clearing is by re-inspection, chargeable. Watch Sec. 4-63(2): no inspection requested for 45 days creates a rebuttable presumption of a construction-delay violation, citable before the special master.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text quoted. The mechanism is stated; the correction-notice document itself is not published.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
For work in an existing dwelling, a Certificate of Completion; a Certificate of Occupancy is required only for use, occupancy or a change of occupancy classification (111.1), and is not issued for work exempt from permits. 111.2 lists thirteen mandatory contents of a CO including the permit number, the name of the building official and 'The edition of the code under which the permit was issued'. For new construction, landscaping must be complete per the ARC-approved plan before a CO issues (Sec. 15-10(c)(8)) and permanent power is withheld until the CO (Sec. 15-10(c)(9)). The $200/$500 cash bond is refunded after the site is cleared (Sec. 4-7).
Why the confidence is not higherThe CO/CC distinction and its contents are codified; which of the two a retrofit PV permit closes with is inference from 111.1's scope, since the City publishes no solar close-out instruction.
codified FBC amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/atlantis/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
The customer or the contractor, not the City. FPL XIII.A: 'All net metering systems require written approval and agreement from FPL'; FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) requires local code approval before parallel operation and (5)(b) ten days' notice before placing the system in service, with the agreement executed within 30 calendar days under (7)(c). Nothing in the Atlantis code, on its website or on its forms requires or permits the City to notify FPL. Contact for FPL net metering: netmetering@fpl.com.
Why the confidence is not higherThe obligation sits on the customer side in FPL's own standards; the City absence is proved against the full-code harvest and the 119-page site enumeration.
utility standards + codified ordinance (absence) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 92%
FPL does, verbatim. XIII.A.6: 'INTERCONNECTING METER CAN / WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - a FOUR-LINE placard with TWO job-specific numeric fields. And 'DER DISCONNECT SWITCH / GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS' - three lines, two numeric fields. Battery: XIII.C.1 - 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.' The identical placard block is printed TWICE in Section XIII, at A.6 (page XIII:2) where it reads 'All labels MUST be permanent' and again at B.6 (page XIII:9) where the same sentence reads 'All labels SHOULD be permanent'.
Size, colour & material 90%
Partly. FPL requires 'permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS'. It specifies NO letter height and NO colour. The City specifies nothing.
Where they go 92%
At the interconnecting meter can, and on the DER disconnect switch. Battery placard: 'permanently affixed to the meter enclosure'. Where a DER disconnect is required it must sit separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, within 10 feet, always accessible to FPL, with no locked gates, doors or fences between them.
What the utility wants on top 90%
YES - and they are the ONLY placards on the job. Atlantis requires none, so every label on an Atlantis PV installation is an FPL requirement. Note XIII.A.6 is NOT tier-scoped, so the meter-can placard reaches even a Tier 1 (10 kW AC or less) system that needs no disconnect switch at all.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.