City of Coconut Creek
City of Coconut Creek
Broward County
City of Coconut Creek is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 57,833 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Coconut Creek against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Coconut Creek is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
- Holds
- Building AND Electrical (and all other trades — Plumbing, Mechanical). The city's own Uniform Permit Application lets the applicant select one of Building/Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical/Other, and the city's Building Division (within the Department of Sustainable Development) issues, reviews and inspects all of them itself. Planning/zoning (Urban Design and Development) and Fire (Coconut Creek Fire Rescue, its own department with 3 stations) also sit inside the City — nothing is delegated to Broward County for a routine residential rooftop PV permit.
- Overridden by
- Florida HB 803 (2026), effective 1 Jul 2026, amends F.S. §553.79(1)(c) to set a mandatory 1-year permit expiration for a single-family dwelling, which supersedes the City's own Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(d)(3) 180-day commencement rule where they conflict. FPL (utility) controls interconnection/parallel-operation timing and requires the City's own final inspection/certification before energization (FPL Electric Tariff, Rate Schedule 'Tier 1', Sec. 3.4). Broward County's Board of Rules and Appeals (BORA) issues countywide code interpretations that bind all Broward AHJs including Coconut Creek on code-interpretation questions (not on permitting authority itself) — could not be independently verified this run because archive.org was returning 'Temporarily Offline' throughout (checked repeatedly, 2026-09-12) and broward.org's own robots.txt disallows automated fetch; see not_found for the specific BORA items this would otherwise have settled (Q29, Q45–46). Coconut Creek is NOT on Broward County's list of municipalities served directly by the county building department (that list is limited to the unincorporated Broward Municipal Services District — Boulevard Gardens, Broadview Park, Franklin Park, Northern County, Roosevelt Gardens, Washington Park — plus the airport); Coconut Creek's own ordinance, fee schedule, forms, portal and department confirm full self-permitting. Broward County ePermits OneStop links on the City's own Building Department page cover only Notice of Commencement, Asbestos Certificate and Transportation Concurrency/Environmental Review — not a delegation of building/electrical permitting.
- Why not higher
- Building Department page (coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department) states the Building Division issues combined permits and lists ebuilding@coconutcreek.gov / 954-973-6750 as the point of contact; the Uniform Building Permit Application (Broward-standard form used by the City, revised 1-08-2026 / effective 3-09-2026) has the City's own permit-officer approval block; Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38 (Building permits) and Sec. 13-83 (fee schedule, including a green-permitting solar/PV line) are the City's own ordinances; the FY2025 Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report shows 13 personnel dedicated by the local government versus only 78 of 11,264 inspections performed by a private provider (0.7%) — i.e. City staff, not a contracted plan-review vendor, do the work. Deduction of 8 for the three Broward-wide BORA documents I could not reach this run (Internet Archive down, broward.org disallows automated fetch).
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- $200.00 flat (Photovoltaic) / $200.00 flat (Solar systems, i.e. solar thermal) — fee includes all necessary applications92%
- Portal
- ePermits (the City's own online permit portal, at www3.coconutcreek.gov/sd/permit/, with forms/enrollment routed through coconutcreek.gov)90%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal82%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate Q4 Where you file — ePermits (the City's own online permit portal, at www3.coconutcreek.gov/sd/permit/, with forms/enrollment routed through coconutcreek.gov) Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- $200.00 flat (Photovoltaic) / $200.00 flat (Solar systems, i.e. solar thermal) — fee includes all necessary applications92% source
- Key document
- ePermits Tutorial (general requirement, not solar-specific) cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes 95% · authority's own department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both 90% · Broward County Uniform Building Permit Application (as hosted by the City), rev. 01-08-2026 / eff. 03-09-2026
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(a)
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate 88% · Uniform Building Permit Application, rev. 01-08-2026
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — not required by the City as part of the building-permit process 58% · inference from the City's own permit application form
- Is there a historic-district review? No 75% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-311 (full zoning-district list) + site navigation survey
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Yes, indirectly — Broward is one of Florida's two High-Velocity Hurricane Zone (HVHZ) counties, and the City's own ePermits Tutorial requires uploading Notice of Acceptance (NOA) or Florida Product Approval documentation ('NOA's/Product Approvals must be labeled with the number form the cover sheet') for wind-rated products, which functions as the wind/windstorm certification for PV racking and equipment. 65% · ePermits Tutorial (HVHZ product-approval requirement)
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either 72% · authority's own department page + permit application form
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 90% · authority's own ePermits Tutorial page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 85% · authority's own department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Broward County Uniform Building Permit Application (selecting Building and/or Electrical trade), a survey by a Florida-registered land surveyor (per Sec. 13-38(b)), architectural/engineering plans digitally signed and sealed, Contractor Registration on file, and for HVHZ product-controlled equipment a Notice of Acceptance (NOA) or Florida Product Approval uploaded and labeled to the cover-sheet item number. No solar/PV-specific checklist is published separately from the general building-permit submittal requirements. 68% · ePermits Tutorial + Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38
- How many copies, and in what format? For paper submittal: two (2) sets of construction plans (Sec. 13-38(c)(1)). For ePermits (the City's primary route): PDF only, one file per document type, each plan sheet uploaded and individually labeled (e.g. E.1, S1.2), architectural/engineering plans digitally signed and sealed. 72% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(c) + ePermits Tutorial
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — a survey prepared by a Florida-registered land surveyor must accompany the application; no separate site-plan content list is published for routine building permits (that level of site-plan detail applies to Development Review Committee submittals, which routine residential rooftop PV would not need to go through). 65% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(b)
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? A structural PE/engineer's seal is required in general (the ePermits Tutorial requires 'Architectural/Engineering plans' to be 'digitally signed and sealed') but no dollar-value or system-size threshold is published; in practice Broward's HVHZ product-approval regime (NOA) effectively requires an engineered mounting/attachment analysis for every PV racking installation regardless of size. 55% · ePermits Tutorial (general requirement, not solar-specific)
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? ePermits (the City's own online permit portal, at www3.coconutcreek.gov/sd/permit/, with forms/enrollment routed through coconutcreek.gov) 90% · authority's own department page + portal pages
- Can the whole application be completed online? Partially — Yes for registered contractors (full online submittal, status checks and inspection scheduling through ePermits after a one-time contractor registration + password enrollment); owner-builder permits must be applied for in-person. 82% · ePermits Tutorial + Building Department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $200.00 flat (Photovoltaic) / $200.00 flat (Solar systems, i.e. solar thermal) — fee includes all necessary applications 92% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o, fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Flat 92% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No — the green-permitting solar/PV fee is explicitly all-inclusive 85% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o and (2)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? City ordinance: 180 days from issuance to commence work (Sec. 13-38(d)(3)). Superseding state law: Florida HB 803 (2026), amending F.S. §553.79(1)(c), effective 1 Jul 2026, sets a 1-year expiration for a building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling (or the effective date of the next FBC edition, whichever is later). The City's own ordinance has not yet been amended to reflect this; the statute controls where the two conflict. 85% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(d)(3) + enrolled 2026 HB 803 (F.S. §553.79(1)(c))
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light (FPL) 95% · FPL PSC-filed electric tariff, Section 7
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit 82% · FPL Electric Tariff Sec. 9 (Rate Schedule, Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement) §3.4
28 questions answered against City of Coconut Creek’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Department page describes the Building Division issuing and inspecting permits directly; the City is a fully incorporated Broward municipality and is not on Broward County's Municipal Services District list (which covers only unincorporated pockets). Checked 2026-09-12.
authority's own department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both
Why the confidence is not higherUniform Building Permit Application used by the City lets the applicant select Building, Electrical, Plumbing or Mechanical as separate trades, all processed by the City's own Building Division; the City also has its own Fire Rescue Department and its own Urban Design/Planning function — nothing here is delegated to the county for a residential PV job.
Broward County Uniform Building Permit Application (as hosted by the City), rev. 01-08-2026 / eff. 03-09-2026 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.browardcdn.org/api/public/content/8d8d0a2a71564e149836ceaecc63343b
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCode of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(a): 'A building permit is necessary for all new construction as well as for any alterations...' (Building Dept page paraphrase) and the codified text: 'A building permit is required for construction, addition, alteration, movement, repair or change to a new or different use of any building, structure or land.'
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(a) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV3IMPR_S13-38BUPE
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Separate
Why the confidence is not higherThe Uniform Building Permit Application requires the applicant to 'Select One Trade: Building / Electrical / Plumbing / Mechanical / Other' and states on its own signature page: 'I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, and AIR CONDITIONERS, etc.'
Uniform Building Permit Application, rev. 01-08-2026 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.browardcdn.org/api/public/content/8d8d0a2a71564e149836ceaecc63343b
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either
Why the confidence is not higherThe Uniform Permit Application has both a 'Qualifier's Name / License Number' field for a licensed contractor and an 'Owner-Builder' checkbox; the Building Department page separately confirms 'Owner-builders permits can be applied for in-person.' No city document restricts the electrical trade specifically to a licensed electrician only.
authority's own department page + permit application form checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherePermits Tutorial page states outright: 'Contractor registration is required prior to ePermits enrollment. Complete a contractor registration form and email it along with all the supporting documents as pdf attachments to ebuilding@coconutcreek.gov.'
authority's own ePermits Tutorial page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page, 'Owner-Builder' section: 'Owner-builders permits can be applied for in-person. Please contact the Building Division for additional information.' Deduction: in-person only, not available through the online ePermits portal, which is otherwise the City's main submittal route.
authority's own department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Broward County Uniform Building Permit Application (selecting Building and/or Electrical trade), a survey by a Florida-registered land surveyor (per Sec. 13-38(b)), architectural/engineering plans digitally signed and sealed, Contractor Registration on file, and for HVHZ product-controlled equipment a Notice of Acceptance (NOA) or Florida Product Approval uploaded and labeled to the cover-sheet item number. No solar/PV-specific checklist is published separately from the general building-permit submittal requirements.
Why the confidence is not higherComposite of Sec. 13-38(b)-(c) ('Applications shall be accompanied by a survey prepared by a registered land surveyor...'), the ePermits Tutorial ('Architectural/Engineering plans should be digitally signed and sealed... NOA's/Product Approvals... must be labeled with the number from the cover sheet'), and the Uniform Permit Application itself. Deduction: I looked specifically for a PV-titled checklist on the Building Department page's full forms list (10 named forms) and found none — this answer is the general building-permit package, not a solar-specific one.
ePermits Tutorial + Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
For paper submittal: two (2) sets of construction plans (Sec. 13-38(c)(1)). For ePermits (the City's primary route): PDF only, one file per document type, each plan sheet uploaded and individually labeled (e.g. E.1, S1.2), architectural/engineering plans digitally signed and sealed.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 13-38(c)(1) ('two (2) sets of construction plans') is the codified paper-era rule; the ePermits Tutorial gives the current digital-submittal format instructions in detail. Both are the City's own documents but may be in tension since the ordinance was not rewritten when ePermits went digital.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(c) + ePermits Tutorial checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes — a survey prepared by a Florida-registered land surveyor must accompany the application; no separate site-plan content list is published for routine building permits (that level of site-plan detail applies to Development Review Committee submittals, which routine residential rooftop PV would not need to go through).
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 13-38(b): 'Applications shall be accompanied by a survey prepared by a registered land surveyor of the state.' No PV-specific site-plan content checklist located.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(b) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV3IMPR_S13-38BUPE
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCoconut Creek Code of Ordinances Ch. 13 Art. I (Sec. 13-1 through 13-84, full text rendered and read) and the Building Department's published forms list — no one-line/three-line diagram requirement stated anywhere city-specific; would ordinarily be settled by a solar-specific checklist, which the City does not publish
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame Ch. 13 Art. I review as Q11; no string/conductor calculation requirement stated
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
A structural PE/engineer's seal is required in general (the ePermits Tutorial requires 'Architectural/Engineering plans' to be 'digitally signed and sealed') but no dollar-value or system-size threshold is published; in practice Broward's HVHZ product-approval regime (NOA) effectively requires an engineered mounting/attachment analysis for every PV racking installation regardless of size.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the ePermits Tutorial's general sign/seal requirement plus the general HVHZ context; no Coconut Creek document states a specific threshold, and the county-wide 'Uniform Permit Submittal Matrix for Solar Thermal and Solar Electric Installations in the HVHZ' (Broward BORA Policy #09-02) that would likely give an exact threshold could not be retrieved this run — archive.org was down throughout and broward.org disallows automated fetch (robots.txt).
ePermits Tutorial (general requirement, not solar-specific) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedePermits Tutorial and Uniform Permit Application; both address 'Architectural/Engineering' plans generally with no electrical-PE-specific threshold or requirement distinct from Q13
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$200.00 flat (Photovoltaic) / $200.00 flat (Solar systems, i.e. solar thermal) — fee includes all necessary applications
Why the confidence is not higherCode of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o, 'Green permitting': 'When submitted as a separate permit, incorporating green building techniques, permit fees shall be based on the following discounted schedule: 1. Solar systems (fee includes all necessary applications): $200.00 2. Photovoltaic (fee includes all necessary applications): $200.00.' Amendment history for this section runs through Ord. No. 2024-012, § 2, 4-11-24 — read live on Municode 2026-09-12 via rendered browser (library.municode.com blocks the ClaudeBot user agent, so a headless-Chrome render was used).
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o, fee schedule checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV4FE_S13-83APFEMISECH
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Flat
Why the confidence is not higherSame Sec. 13-83(5)o green-permitting line item: flat $200.00 for Solar and $200.00 for Photovoltaic, each stated to include all necessary applications (i.e. not valuation-based, not per-kW, not per-panel).
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV4FE_S13-83APFEMISECH
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No — the green-permitting solar/PV fee is explicitly all-inclusive
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 13-83(5)o states both the Solar and Photovoltaic $200.00 line items '(fee includes all necessary applications)', which on its face folds any plan-review/application fee into the single $200 charge. Note this differs from the general (non-green-permitted) track, where Sec. 13-83(2) lists a separate $200 'Application fee' credited toward the permit fee and a $200/discipline plan re-review fee after a 2nd correction cycle — those would apply if a PV job were NOT filed under the green-permitting discount.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)o and (2) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV4FE_S13-83APFEMISECH
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page, ePermits Tutorial, and the Sec. 13-83 fee schedule (which mentions an 'Early start administrative fee' and an 'expedited plan review' for green-permitted tech but gives no business-day figure for standard plan review)
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
City ordinance: 180 days from issuance to commence work (Sec. 13-38(d)(3)). Superseding state law: Florida HB 803 (2026), amending F.S. §553.79(1)(c), effective 1 Jul 2026, sets a 1-year expiration for a building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling (or the effective date of the next FBC edition, whichever is later). The City's own ordinance has not yet been amended to reflect this; the statute controls where the two conflict.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 13-38(d)(3): 'All building and construction permits shall expire if construction does not commence within one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of issuance.' Cross-checked against the enrolled text of 2026 HB 803 (CS/CS/HB 803), Sec. 8 amending F.S. §553.79: 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later,' effective 1 Jul 2026 (Sec. 12 of the act). Recorded per brief instruction: city-published figure and statute figure side by side, not resolved into one number.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-38(d)(3) + enrolled 2026 HB 803 (F.S. §553.79(1)(c)) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/803/BillText/er/PDF
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
ePermits (the City's own online permit portal, at www3.coconutcreek.gov/sd/permit/, with forms/enrollment routed through coconutcreek.gov)
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page names 'ePermits' as 'how contractors working in Coconut Creek apply for building, engineering, and landscaping permits'; the 'Schedule an Inspection' and 'Permit Status' links both resolve to www3.coconutcreek.gov/sd/permit/ login/search pages under the same ePermits system.
authority's own department page + portal pages checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Partially — Yes for registered contractors (full online submittal, status checks and inspection scheduling through ePermits after a one-time contractor registration + password enrollment); owner-builder permits must be applied for in-person.
Why the confidence is not higherePermits Tutorial documents an entirely online, 10-step contractor submittal workflow ending 'Your application has been sent successfully'; Building Department page separately states 'Owner-builders permits can be applied for in-person.'
ePermits Tutorial + Building Department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Florida Power & Light (FPL)
Why the confidence is not higherCoconut Creek is listed by name in FPL's own PSC-filed Electric Tariff, Section 7, 'Communities Served' ('...Coconut Creek...'). This is the utility's own filed tariff, not a third-party aggregator like PowerToChoose.
FPL PSC-filed electric tariff, Section 7 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section7.pdf
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit
Why the confidence is not higherFPL's Interconnection Agreement for Customer-Owned Renewable Generation, Tier 1 (≤10 kW), Sec. 3.4: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' Energization/parallel operation follows the City's final approval, not the reverse.
FPL Electric Tariff Sec. 9 (Rate Schedule, Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement) §3.4 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — not required by the City as part of the building-permit process
Why the confidence is not higherThe Uniform Building Permit Application collects Property Owner, Contracting Co., Architect/Engineer, Bonding Company, Fee Simple Titleholder and Mortgage Lender information but has no HOA/architectural-review field or attachment requirement. Florida law (F.S. §163.04) separately limits what an HOA/deed restriction may do to block solar collectors, but that is a state constraint on HOAs, not a City permitting step.
inference from the City's own permit application form checked 2026-09-12 https://www.browardcdn.org/api/public/content/8d8d0a2a71564e149836ceaecc63343b
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No
Why the confidence is not higherCode of Ordinances Sec. 13-311 lists every zoning district the City has (RS-1, RS-3, RS-4, RC-5, RC-8, RM-10, MH-1, PUD, B-2, B-3, B-4, O-2, O-3, PCD, IO-1, IM-1, A-1, CF, GC, P) and none is a historic-preservation district; no 'historic district' or 'historic preservation' page or division appears anywhere in the City's full site navigation (checked the Government, Business, Residents and Visitors menus in full).
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-311 (full zoning-district list) + site navigation survey checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIIIZORE_DIV2ZOCLGERE_S13-311GEDEZODI
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Yes, indirectly — Broward is one of Florida's two High-Velocity Hurricane Zone (HVHZ) counties, and the City's own ePermits Tutorial requires uploading Notice of Acceptance (NOA) or Florida Product Approval documentation ('NOA's/Product Approvals must be labeled with the number form the cover sheet') for wind-rated products, which functions as the wind/windstorm certification for PV racking and equipment.
Why the confidence is not higherNo City document uses the words 'wind certification' by name; this is inferred from the HVHZ product-approval requirement stated on the City's own ePermits Tutorial page.
ePermits Tutorial (HVHZ product-approval requirement) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCode of Ordinances Sec. 13-38 (general building-permit processing) and Sec. 13-320 (Green Building Code); neither mentions a Specific Use Permit or City Commission approval step for routine residential PV
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSec. 13-38, Sec. 13-83 (fees), Sec. 13-320 (Green Building Code) — none states a kW or system-size cap on residential generation; FPL's Tier system (Tier 1 ≤10kW / Tier 2 >10-100kW / Tier 3 101kW-2MW) is a utility interconnection tier, not a City-imposed cap
https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 2023 (8th Edition) 80% · City form filename + fee-schedule FBC section citations
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes 78% · Code of Ordinances Ch. 13, Art. I & Art. III Div. 2
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code (as locally amended in Ch. 13 of the City's Code of Ordinances), incorporated by reference per Sec. 13-2(4): 'The Florida Building Code, as may be amended, incorporated by reference.' 78% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-2(4)
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of Coconut Creek on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
Nothing recorded for City of Coconut Creek on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — FPL requires its own placards beyond anything the City specifies: at the INTERCONNECTING METER CAN, a placard reading 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; at the DER DISCONNECT SWITCH, 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; and for battery storage, a placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility' (required unless the battery is UL 1741-listed and DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 device). 92% · FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII (OCR'd)
- Where must the labels be placed? At the interconnecting meter can and at the DER (generation system AC) disconnect switch. The disconnect switch itself must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to (within 10 feet of), the FPL meter socket, and must remain readily accessible to FPL. Battery-storage placards go on the battery meter enclosure. 90% · FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII (OCR'd)
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? The AC/DER disconnect must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to (within 10 feet of), the FPL meter socket, and must remain readily accessible to FPL at all times. 92% · FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII (OCR'd)
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes — HVHZ product-approved equipment (Miami-Dade NOA or a Florida Product Approval evaluated for HVHZ) is required for roof-mounted racking/attachment hardware, and FPL separately requires UL 1741 / IEEE 1547 & 1547.1 certified inverters and, for battery storage, NRTL certification to UL 1741. 78% · ePermits Tutorial (City) + FPL Electric Tariff Sec. 9 (utility)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? FPL (utility-side, not the City) requires UL 1741 NRTL certification on any battery behind the meter and a permanent placard reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility'; batteries paired with a customer-owned renewable-generation system may not export to the grid at this time; Tier 3 battery-paired systems are reviewed in FPL's fast-track study. No Coconut Creek fire-code or building-permit document specific to residential battery/ESS installation was located this run. 60% · FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII.C (OCR'd) — utility-level only
20 questions answered against City of Coconut Creek’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCoconut Creek Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-2 (FBC adoption clause) and Ch. 13 Art. I generally — no NFPA 70/NEC edition named anywhere in the City's own code (Florida adopts NEC at the state level via Building Commission rule, not by city ordinance). Broward County BORA Formal Interpretation FI-35 would likely settle this county-wide but could not be retrieved: archive.org returned 'Internet Archive: Temporarily Offline' on every attempt during this run (2026-09-12), broward.org's robots.txt disallows the ClaudeBot user agent, and Common Crawl CC-MAIN-2026-34 has no capture for the FI page. Confirmed to exist, unreachable — not a proven absence.
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 2023 (8th Edition)
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's own current form is filed as 'fbc-2023-single-family-reroofing-affidavit.pdf' on the Building Department page, and Sec. 13-83(5)g quotes 'Per FBC 105.3.2.4' / 'FBC 105.3.1.1' provisions that match the 2023 FBC's administrative chapter numbering. No page states '8th Edition (2023)' in so many words, hence not scored higher.
City form filename + fee-schedule FBC section citations checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/docs/default-source/sddocs/fbc-2023-single-family-reroofing-affidavit.pdf?sfvrsn=73a0d08a_1
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCoconut Creek Fire Rescue Department page (coconutcreek.gov/residents/public-safety/fire-rescue-department) — no fire-code edition stated; no dedicated fire-prevention-code adoption page found on the City site
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/residents/public-safety/fire-rescue-department
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City has its own local amendments layered onto the FBC administrative process: Sec. 13-38 (local permit-processing rules, 180-day expiration, plat-recordation conditions), Sec. 13-83 (locally set fee schedule including the green-permitting solar/PV discount), and Sec. 13-320 (locally enacted Green Building Code with its own applicability and exemption rules). These are local amendments/supplements to the state-adopted FBC administrative chapter, not the FBC's technical content itself.
Code of Ordinances Ch. 13, Art. I & Art. III Div. 2 checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV3IMPR_S13-38BUPE
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code (as locally amended in Ch. 13 of the City's Code of Ordinances), incorporated by reference per Sec. 13-2(4): 'The Florida Building Code, as may be amended, incorporated by reference.'
Why the confidence is not higherDirect text of Sec. 13-2(4). This is the general adoption clause; a Coconut-Creek-specific citation naming an NEC edition for electrical work was not found (see not_found, Q29).
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-2(4) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV1GE_S13-2SC
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCh. 13 Art. I (Sec. 13-38, 13-83) full text — no service-upgrade or busbar-sizing rule stated
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame Ch. 13 Art. I review; no mounting-system/attachment-spacing rule stated. Broward BORA's countywide HVHZ Solar Thermal/Electric Permit Guidelines (Policy #09-02) would likely cover this but could not be retrieved — archive.org down throughout this run, broward.org disallows automated fetch. Confirmed to exist, unreachable.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCoconut Creek Fire Rescue Department page and Ch. 13 Land Development Code — no ridge-setback or fire-access-pathway rule found in either
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/residents/public-safety/fire-rescue-department
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCh. 13 Art. I and Art. III Div. 2 (rendered, searched for 'rapid shutdown' — zero hits in both) — tied directly to the NEC edition question (Q29), which is itself unresolved this run
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCh. 13 Art. I and Art. III Div. 2 (searched for 'placard' and 'label' — 'placard' returned zero hits in both sections; 'label' hits were all unrelated to signage/placards). No Coconut-Creek-specific placard requirement located; only the utility's own placards were confirmed (see Q42)
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame search as Q38 — no City-specified placard wording found
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame search as Q38 — no letter-height/colour/material specification found
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame search as Q38 — no NEC 705.10 site-plan/facility-map placard requirement stated by the City itself
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — FPL requires its own placards beyond anything the City specifies: at the INTERCONNECTING METER CAN, a placard reading 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; at the DER DISCONNECT SWITCH, 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; and for battery storage, a placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility' (required unless the battery is UL 1741-listed and DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 device).
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from FPL's Electric Service Standards (rev. 10-30-25), Section XIII 'Distributed Generation', pages 162 and 170. This document uses an embedded Type 3 font that pdftotext could not decode (confirmed: text layer extracted as garbled cipher-text); content was recovered via pdftoppm 300dpi + tesseract OCR on the specific pages.
FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII (OCR'd) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the interconnecting meter can and at the DER (generation system AC) disconnect switch. The disconnect switch itself must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to (within 10 feet of), the FPL meter socket, and must remain readily accessible to FPL. Battery-storage placards go on the battery meter enclosure.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards (rev. 10-30-25) p.162: 'The manual disconnect switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket within 10 feet and must always remain accessible to FPL... The following labels must be installed at the interconnecting meter can and the DER disconnect switch.' This is the utility's own requirement, not the City's — flagged accordingly.
FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII (OCR'd) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes — HVHZ product-approved equipment (Miami-Dade NOA or a Florida Product Approval evaluated for HVHZ) is required for roof-mounted racking/attachment hardware, and FPL separately requires UL 1741 / IEEE 1547 & 1547.1 certified inverters and, for battery storage, NRTL certification to UL 1741.
Why the confidence is not higherCity's ePermits Tutorial: 'Roofing packets, Product Approvals, Notice of Acceptance (NOA's) and the like to be uploaded as one multi-sheet file per document type. NOA's/Product Approvals must be labeled with the number form the cover sheet.' FPL Tier 1/Tier 2 tariff language separately requires equipment 'in compliance with... standards of IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, and UL 1741.'
ePermits Tutorial (City) + FPL Electric Tariff Sec. 9 (utility) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
FPL (utility-side, not the City) requires UL 1741 NRTL certification on any battery behind the meter and a permanent placard reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility'; batteries paired with a customer-owned renewable-generation system may not export to the grid at this time; Tier 3 battery-paired systems are reviewed in FPL's fast-track study. No Coconut Creek fire-code or building-permit document specific to residential battery/ESS installation was located this run.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards (rev. 10-30-25) p.170 (OCR'd), quoted directly. The AHJ side of this question (fire-code conditions on residential ESS) could not be confirmed — Coconut Creek's Fire Rescue Department page has no published fire-code/ESS content, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code edition adopted was not independently confirmed this run.
FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII.C (OCR'd) — utility-level only checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCh. 13 Art. I and Art. III Div. 2 (searched for 'battery' and 'energy storage' — one incidental, unrelated 'battery' hit in the Green Building Code text, zero for 'energy storage'); Fire Rescue Department page has no ESS-permit content
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/residents/public-safety/fire-rescue-department
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSec. 13-38 (general structure/building permit definition) only — did not reach the Land Development Code's Accessory Uses and Structures article (Ch. 13 Art. III Div. 4), which is the section that would define whether a ground-mounted rack is treated as an accessory structure
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
The AC/DER disconnect must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to (within 10 feet of), the FPL meter socket, and must remain readily accessible to FPL at all times.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, FPL Electric Service Standards (rev. 10-30-25), Sec. XIII, p.162 (OCR'd): 'The manual disconnect switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket within 10 feet and must always remain accessible to FPL.'
FPL Electric Service Standards, rev. 10-30-25, Sec. XIII (OCR'd) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal 82% · authority's own ePermits scheduling/login page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes 78% · City's own FS §553.80 Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report, FY2025
- If delegated, to whom? N/A — not delegated; City staff perform inspections in-house 75% · City's own FS §553.80 Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report, FY2025
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
Nothing recorded for City of Coconut Creek on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No — no published solar/PV-specific inspection checklist was found 62% · authority's own department page — full forms/documents list
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer 52% · FPL Electric Tariff Sec. 9, Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement
- Is there a re-inspection fee? Tiered: $50.00 (1st occurrence), $100.00 (2nd occurrence), $150.00 (3rd occurrence) 90% · Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)f
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections are issued through plan-review comments in the ePermits system; the applicant receives a submittal-upload link to post revised documents. A $200.00-per-discipline plan re-review fee applies for corrections after the 2nd review cycle (Sec. 13-83(3)a). 65% · ePermits Tutorial + Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(3)
14 questions answered against City of Coconut Creek’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's 'Schedule an Inspection' link resolves to the same www3.coconutcreek.gov/sd/permit/ ePermits login system used for permit submittal and status ('Initial Logon for Permit Submittal... Applying for permits, obtaining permit status, and scheduling inspections is convenient for online users through ePermits').
authority's own ePermits scheduling/login page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/business/permits-and-payments/schedule-inspections
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page, ePermits Tutorial, and the www3.coconutcreek.gov ePermits scheduling login page — none states a minimum notice period in business days for booking an inspection
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/business/permits-and-payments/schedule-inspections
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame pages as Q50 — no mention of same-day or AM/PM inspection windows
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/business/permits-and-payments/schedule-inspections
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe FY2025 Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report shows 'Building Inspections & Re-inspections Conducted: 11,264' against 'Building Inspections Conducted by a Private Provider: 78' (0.7%) and 'Personnel Dedicated by the Local Government: 13' — the overwhelming majority of inspections, including final inspections, are performed by City staff, not a contracted vendor. This report does not break inspections out by trade/system type, so it is not solar-specific.
City's own FS §553.80 Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report, FY2025 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-utilization-report
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
N/A — not delegated; City staff perform inspections in-house
Why the confidence is not higherSame FY2025 Building Utilization Report showing 13 local-government personnel and only 0.7% of inspections via a private provider.
City's own FS §553.80 Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report, FY2025 checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-utilization-report
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page's full forms list and Sec. 13-38 — no published sequence of required PV inspections (e.g. rough electrical, mid-roof, final) found
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as Q54 — no statement on whether a rough-in/mid-roof inspection is required for PV specifically
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page and ePermits Tutorial — neither states whether the inspector checks labels/listings at final; this is standard Florida Building Official practice but not documented by the City in a form I could cite
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No — no published solar/PV-specific inspection checklist was found
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Department page's full 'Application and Forms' list was read in its entirety (Uniform Permit Application, Permit Application Addendum, Plan ReSubmittal Form, AC Replacement Form, Renew/Reinstate Permit Form, Re-Roofing Affidavit – Single Family, Window/Door/Shutter Submittal Package, Contractor Registration Form, Special Inspector Form) and none is titled or described as a solar/PV/photovoltaic inspection checklist. Note: the site's own internal search tool returned zero results for both a fabricated control ('zzqqx') and a known-positive control ('electrical'), so it is broken and was NOT used as evidence of absence — this finding rests only on the direct, manual enumeration of the department's published forms list.
authority's own department page — full forms/documents list checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page and ePermits Tutorial — no published 'what must be on site' list for inspections
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Tiered: $50.00 (1st occurrence), $100.00 (2nd occurrence), $150.00 (3rd occurrence)
Why the confidence is not higherCode of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)f, 'Reinspection fees': '1. 1st occurrence: $50.00 2. 2nd occurrence: $100.00 3. 3rd occurrence: $150.00. Reinspection fees shall be paid prior to further inspections being done.'
Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(5)f checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/coconut_creek/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH13LADECO_ARTIADREPR_DIV4FE_S13-83APFEMISECH
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Corrections are issued through plan-review comments in the ePermits system; the applicant receives a submittal-upload link to post revised documents. A $200.00-per-discipline plan re-review fee applies for corrections after the 2nd review cycle (Sec. 13-83(3)a).
Why the confidence is not higherePermits Tutorial: 'You will receive two emails. One will have your temporary permit number and one will have your submittal upload link necessary for uploading additional documents related to this permit... for any corrections and/or revisions.' Fee cross-referenced from Sec. 13-83(3)a: 'Plan re-review for corrections after the 2nd review, etc., per discipline: $200.00.'
ePermits Tutorial + Code of Ordinances Sec. 13-83(3) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.coconutcreek.gov/government/city-directory/resilient-design-and-development/building-department/epermits-tutorial
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page, ePermits Tutorial, and permit-status portal description — none states what document/tag is issued upon a passed final inspection for an accessory PV permit (as distinct from a full Certificate of Occupancy for new construction)
https://www.coconutcreek.gov/sustainable-development/building-department
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from FPL's Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement structure: the Customer/installer executes and returns the Interconnection Agreement to FPL and provides the Local Building Code Official's certification of final approval; FPL does not initiate this itself. Not an explicit 'who notifies' statement from FPL, hence capped confidence.
FPL Electric Tariff Sec. 9, Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording None%
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go 90%
At the interconnecting meter can and at the DER (generation system AC) disconnect switch. The disconnect switch itself must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to (within 10 feet of), the FPL meter socket, and must remain readily accessible to FPL. Battery-storage placards go on the battery meter enclosure.
What the utility wants on top 92%
Yes — FPL requires its own placards beyond anything the City specifies: at the INTERCONNECTING METER CAN, a placard reading 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; at the DER DISCONNECT SWITCH, 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; and for battery storage, a placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility' (required unless the battery is UL 1741-listed and DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 device).
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.