City of Holmes Beach
City of Holmes Beach
Manatee County
City of Holmes Beach is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 3,010 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Holmes Beach against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Holmes Beach is the authority having jurisdiction 94% confidence
- Holds
- building, electrical, zoning/planning and floodplain — all in-house. The City runs its own Building Department (6 staff dedicated to FBC enforcement in FY2024-25: 3 Building Official & Inspectors, 1 Building Department Administrator, 2 Permit Technicians; Building Official Neal Schwartz, bofficial@holmesbeachfl.org, 941-708-5833). Code Sec. 14-66 establishes a city Electrical Inspection Department and designates the Building Official as the Electrical Official. LDC Sec. 9.14 puts the Floodplain Administrator inside the City (mayor designates). Nothing is delegated to Manatee County.
- Overridden by
- Fire only, and only for commercial work: the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District (an independent special fire control district under Chs. 2000-401/2007-282/2016-255, Laws of Florida) reviews fire/life safety. The City's own Building Department page states 'ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WILL BE ROUTED TO WEST MANATEE FIRE DISTRICT FOR APPROVAL' — residential is not routed, so a house draws no fire step. Code Sec. 2-201(6) makes WMFR review discretionary and additional ('may require'). Also overridden: FS 553.79(1)(g)'s new $7,500 single-family permit exemption does NOT reach this city (see q3); FS 553.791(2)(b) overrides Code Sec. 14-8(4)'s 15%/7.5% private-provider fee credit; FS 553.79(1)(c) overrides the local 6-month permit-commencement rule for a single-family dwelling.
- Why not higher
- Proved four ways: (1) the City's FS 553.80(7)(b) Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report FY2024-25 shows 6 dedicated staff, $596,432.90 personnel, 4,065 applications, 3,312 permits issued, 11,790 inspections performed — no contractor named anywhere; (2) the FY2025-26 adopted budget carries a Building Department with 7 full-time employees and $1,174,032 of personnel services, against only $25k of 'Outside Building Officials' inside a $90,000 professional-services line (holiday/overflow cover, not an outsourced department — the Melbourne Beach 'read the caption' test); (3) every name in the staff directory carries an @holmesbeachfl.org address and no parenthetical operator tag, and no document footer carries a corporate classification marking; (4) Code Ch. 14 Arts. II and III and LDC Art. IX vest building, electrical and floodplain administration in city officers. Marked down from 96 only because the fee schedule itself is unpublished, so the money side of the department cannot be read directly.
- Permit required
- Yes — and the City has published a ruling that the new state $7,500 exemption does not reach it. A building permit (with the electrical trade) is required for residential rooftop PV;96%
- Plan review
- The City publishes no standard plan-review turnaround, and its own application contains a device that defers the start of the statutory clock.80%
- Portal
- Citizenserve (Online Solutions LLC), installationID 185 — reached at https://www2.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showHomePage&ctzPagePrefix=Portal_&installationID=185.95%
- Electrical code
- NEC 2020, in force by state adoption through the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023.86%
- Own placard wording
- No — not for solar. The City specifies no placard wording for a PV system. The ONLY City-specified placard wording found anywhere in its instruments is on the TUG or Pre-Power Application…82%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal or phone. 'Building Inspections MAY BE SCHEDULED VIA THE ONLINE PORTAL... For those without computer access, please call the building department directly at 941-708-5833,94%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes — and the City has published a ruling that the new state $7,500 exemption does not reach it. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Either, in practice combined. The City's single Building Permit Application has a lettered ELECTRICAL section (F) alongside BUILDING (A), Q4 Plan review — The City publishes no standard plan-review turnaround, and its own application contains a device that defers the start of the statutory clock. Q18 Where you file — Citizenserve (Online Solutions LLC), installationID 185 — reached at… Q20
- Permit required
- Yes — and the City has published a ruling that the new state $7,500 exemption does not reach it. A building permit (with the electrical trade) is required for residential rooftop PV;96% source
- Plan review turnaround
- The City publishes no standard plan-review turnaround, and its own application contains a device that defers the start of the statutory clock.80% source
- Key document
- codified ordinance (Municode, codified through Ord. 26-03 enacted 1 April 2026, Supp. 23 Update 2) cited by 8 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes. The City of Holmes Beach is the AHJ for residential rooftop PV at any address inside the city — it issues the building and electrical permits, performs plan review and inspections, and administers zoning and the floodplain ordinance itself. 96% · codified ordinance (Municode, codified through Ord. 26-03 enacted 1 April 2026, Supp. 23 Update 2)
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both, plus zoning and floodplain, all in-house. Building and electrical permitting, plan review and inspection are the City's (Code Ch. 14 Art. II and Art. III; Sec. 14-66 creates a city Electrical Inspection Department with the Building Official as Electrical Official). Planning & Zoning and Engineering review every permit application before the Building Department clock starts. Floodplain administration is the City's (LDC Sec. 9.14). Nothing is delegated to Manatee County. The only outside desk is the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District, and the City routes only COMMERCIAL projects to it. 94% · city permit application (rev. 12/2023) + codified ordinance
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes — and the City has published a ruling that the new state $7,500 exemption does not reach it. A building permit (with the electrical trade) is required for residential rooftop PV; the City publishes a dedicated 'Solar' permit checklist. FS 553.79(1)(g), added by the 2026 act, requires local governments to exempt work valued under $7,500 on a single-family property, but (g)2.a excludes work on property 'partially or entirely located in a flood hazard area as defined by the Florida Building Code' and (g)2.b excludes 'any electrical, plumbing, structural, mechanical, or gas work performed on property containing a single-family dwelling'. A rooftop PV job on Anna Maria Island fails BOTH limbs. 96% · authority's own published FAQ (May 2026) + FS 553.79(1)(g) read first-hand
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Either, in practice combined. The City's single Building Permit Application has a lettered ELECTRICAL section (F) alongside BUILDING (A), and the Solar checklist asks only for 'A subcontractor form for any trade involved... including EL, PL, MECH, GAS' — i.e. the electrical sub is named on the one solar permit. A standalone electrical permit exists as a distinct type (Code Sec. 14-68 requires a permit from the electrical official; the FY2025-26 budget carries revenue account 3220-00-002 Permits-Electrical $10,000 separately from 3220-00-001 Permits-Building $1,780,000). 72% · authority's own Solar permit checklist (FBC 8th Ed., dated 12/2023) + adopted budget
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — there is no architectural or appearance gate, and no codified association co-signature. The City has NO architectural review board and issues no Certificate of Appropriateness ('certificate of appropriateness' = 0, 'design review' = 0, 'architectural review' = 0 across 1.87 MB of code; 'architectural' = 13 hits, all definitional or building-spacing). The caller's 'association' + 'approv' search was run inside the ZONING article (LDC Art. VI, 239,211 chars): 'association' = 4 hits, and none is an approval gate — two are the American Association of Nurserymen in the landscape standards, one is signs 'associated with' resort housing, and one requires a certificate of good standing from a CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION before a POOL is approved on a duplex condominium lot. 'HOA' anchored = 0, 'homeowners' = 0 in the zoning article; 'HOA' and 'homeowners association' both = 0 across the 301-page website. THE ONE LIVE LIMB: the City's Residential Plan Review Checklist carries a general item 18, 'Condominium Association Approval Letter' (tickable OK / N/A) — so a unit in a condominium may be asked for an association letter, and FS 163.04(2) then caps what the association may do: it 'may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors' and may only 'determine the specific location where solar collectors may be installed on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors'. 86% · authority's own plan review checklist + full-text search of the codified LDC + FS 163.04 read first-hand
- Is there a historic-district review? No. Holmes Beach has no historic preservation ordinance, no historic district and no Certificate of Appropriateness process. 'Certificate of appropriateness' = 0 and 'historic district' = 0 across the whole code; 'historic' = 51 hits, and the only operative ones are Code Sec. 18-13 (Demolition of damaged historic structures, a civil-emergency provision) and LDC Sec. 9.43 (a floodplain VARIANCE limb for historic buildings, which follows the 2012 state model wording). The LDC defines 'Historic resources' by reference to the Florida Master Site File, the National Register, or City designation — and no designating ordinance or roster exists. 88% · full-text search of the codified Code and Land Development Code
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate windstorm certification for a retrofit, but Florida Product Approval is required and the design numbers are high. The City's 'Design Certification for Windloads' form is expressly '(For new Construction Only)' and cites FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 8TH EDITION (2023), CHAPTER 6 OF ASCE 7-16. For any permit, the plan review checklist item 15 sets the design basis: 'Wind Loads (1609); Exposure (1609.4.3) Zone D; Wind Speed: Category I: 135mph, Category II: 145mph, Category III/IV: 155mph', and item 16 requires Product Approval information on sealed plans for structural components and new exterior envelope products per FS 553.842 and FAC 9B-72. The Solar checklist requires the engineered plans to show wind loads and requires Florida Product Approval numbers for all products used. Holmes Beach is NOT in the High Velocity Hurricane Zone (Miami-Dade and Broward only) but is in the ASCE 7 wind-borne debris region. 84% · authority's own wind-load certification form (rev. 12/2023) + Residential Plan Review Checklist
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No Special Exception or Commission approval for a rooftop array on an existing single-family or duplex house. LDC Sec. 3.5.A exempts one- and two-family construction from site development plan review; the major-site-plan triggers in Sec. 3.5.B.1 reach only vacant land, three-or-more dwelling units, non-residential buildings, height increases to NON-RESIDENTIAL OR MULTIFAMILY buildings, and accessory structures over 500 sq ft. Solar is not a listed special exception use in Sec. 3.9. THE RESIDUAL RISK, which a quote should name: LDC Sec. 6.8.C.1 and Charter Sec. 1.03(a)1 cap building height at 36 feet 'as measured from the crown of the road at the front center of the property to the HIGHEST POINT OF ANY PORTION OF THE BUILDING' — so an array that raises the highest point of a house already at the cap must rely on the Sec. 6.8.C.2 exemption, whose conditions are real (see q28). A ground mount over 500 sq ft would trigger a major site development plan application. 75% · codified LDC Secs. 3.5, 3.9, 6.8 and City Charter Sec. 1.03
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No kW cap in the city code — but there IS a roof-AREA cap, and it is in the CHARTER as well as the LDC. City Charter Sec. 1.03(a) and LDC Sec. 6.8.C both provide that 'Heating and air conditioning, SOLAR COLLECTORS, and similar equipment with appropriate screening' are exempt from the 36-foot height limit ONLY IF: '(1) Not more than ONE-THIRD OF THE TOTAL ROOF AREA may be consumed by such features. (2) The features... must be set back from the edge of the roof a minimum distance of ONE FOOT FOR EVERY FOOT by which such features extend above the roof surface of the principal building to which they are attached.' Utility-side caps (FPL Tier 1, filed tariff sheet 9.050 Sec. 2.1): Gross Power Rating not exceeding 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating; 10 kW AC or less (AC nameplate = installed DC nameplate x 0.85); and AC generating capacity of less than 115% of the customer's previous 12 months' kilowatt-hour usage. Above 10 kW: Tier 2 to 100 kW, $400 application fee; Tier 3 to 2 MW, $1,000. 88% · City Charter Sec. 1.03 (Ord. 14-17, 22 July 2014) + LDC Secs. 1.4 and 6.8.C + FPL filed tariff
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A licensed electrical contractor, or the homeowner for his own occupied home with a hard annual limit. Code Sec. 14-69: permits may be obtained by '(1) A homeowner who desires to install or maintain electrical work at his own single-family or duplex residence, providing that he or his immediate family occupies the residence. A property owner will be issued only ONE electrical permit, for a single-family or duplex residence, WITHIN A CALENDAR YEAR from the date of his last permit'; or '(2) A person who holds a current and valid electrical contractor's certificate of competency.' On the solar route the electrical sub is named on a Sub-Contractor Form and must be state-licensed with current GL and workers' comp. 88% · codified ordinance Sec. 14-69
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes in substance, and the City's two instruments disagree on the paperwork. Code Sec. 14-7 establishes a contractor licence registration with the City requiring name/address/phone/email, state licence number and expiry, proof of general liability insurance and proof of workers' compensation (or statutory exemption), at an initial fee of $80.00 per year. The live Building Department page says 'No registration forms are required' but that 'Contractors must provide proof of State of Florida registration, along with current GL and WC insurances' at application. 85% · department page + codified ordinance Sec. 14-7
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes in law, but the City's own solar packet silently omits the route, and most of the island's housing is disqualified. FS 489.103(7)(a)1 exempts owners acting as their own contractor when improving 'one-family or two-family residences... for the occupancy or use of such owners and NOT OFFERED FOR SALE OR LEASE'. The City's permit guide agrees ('an owner can serve as a contractor providing the residence is for their own use or occupancy and does not offer the property for sale or lease within 1 year after CO/CC') and adds 'Owners cannot pull permits in multi-family (3 or more units) OR FOR RENTAL OR LEASED PROPERTIES.' The owner must personally appear to sign the Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement. Code Sec. 14-69(1) separately allows a homeowner one electrical permit per calendar year for his own occupied home. FS 489.103(7)(a)3, the dedicated solar limb, does NOT apply here: it is conditioned on the local government participating in a US DOE 'SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge' grant, and 'SunShot' returns zero across the City's code and 301-page website corpus. 82% · authority's own permit guide (06/04/2025) + FS 489.103(7) read first-hand + checklist diff
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? From the City's own dedicated Solar checklist (FBC 8th Edition 2023, dated 12/2023): (1) Building Permit Application, complete, with 'N/A' in non-applicable fields; (2) Scope of Work with Project Cost Breakdown; (3) Notice of Commencement (see why — the City's two instruments give different thresholds), recorded with the Manatee County Clerk and submitted before the first inspection is scheduled; (4) Engineered Plans — 'a signed and sealed detail from a certified engineer for the proposed panels and mounting hardware', showing installation location(s), wind loads, panel connections, roofing materials and any applicable waterproofing, at 1/4-inch scale; (5) Electrical Load Calculations demonstrating wire sizing and ampacity, temperature derating, conduit fill derating, voltage drop for all conductors, sizes of disconnects and overcurrent protection, and input/output current and voltage/power specs for all major equipment; (6) Solar Panel Wiring Diagram showing wire sizes and types per the load calcs, junction boxes, disconnects, overcurrent protection, grounding, SIGNAGE and AC connection, plus a riser diagram showing how the new system ties into the existing service; (7) Product Approval Specification Sheet — Florida Product Approval numbers for all products (NOA copies not needed, numbers only); (8) Sub-Contractor Forms for every trade involved, including EL, PL, MECH, GAS; (9) Solar Affidavit — signed and sealed by the contractor of record verifying the panels were mounted correctly and to the engineered specifications on the plans. 95% · authority's own Solar permit checklist
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic only, one set, PDF. The Residential Plan Review Checklist requires 'All plans to be submitted in 1/4-inch scale (i.e. 1/4 inch = 1 foot) AND IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT', and item 20: 'Digital format is now required. Plans and drawings will be accepted in Portable Document Format (PDF). For photographs, please use JPEG (jpg.) or PDF format.' Submittal is through the Citizenserve portal. No paper copy count is published. 88% · authority's own plan review checklist
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes in substance, though not called a site plan for a retrofit. The Solar checklist requires the engineered plans to 'show the installation location(s), wind loads, panel connections, roofing materials and any applicable waterproofing'. The City's general Residential Plan Review Checklist adds a 'Fully dimensional plot plan', job address on plans, and — for any work touching the ground — sediment and erosion control measures shown on the survey or plot plan. Formal LDC site development plan review does NOT reach a single-family retrofit: LDC Sec. 3.5.A exempts 'the construction of one single-family or two-family structure on an individual lot or parcel and associated accessory structures' from site development plan application, and none of the major-site-plan triggers in Sec. 3.5.B.1 reaches a rooftop array on an existing house. 78% · authority's own checklists + codified LDC Sec. 3.5
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes. 'Solar Panel Wiring Diagram — The diagram needs to show the wire sizes and types per the load calcs, junction boxes, disconnects, overcurrent protection, grounding, signage and AC connection. Please provide a riser diagram that shows how the new system ties into the existing service.' The Residential Plan Review Checklist's Electrical section separately lists 'Wiring Diagram' as a reviewed item. 95% · authority's own Solar permit checklist
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Yes, and in unusual detail. 'Electrical Load Calculations — Please provide electrical load calculations that demonstrate the wire sizing and proper ampacity, temperature derating, conduit fill derating, voltage drop for all conductors, sizes of disconnects and overcurrent protection, input and output current and voltage/power specs for all major equipment.' The City also publishes a blank 'Electrical Load Calculations Form', and the Residential Plan Review Checklist's Electrical section is headed 'Electrical Load Calculations shall be submitted with all electrical permits.' 96% · authority's own Solar permit checklist
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Yes — unconditionally, with NO threshold. The Solar checklist requires, as part of the Engineered Plans: 'A signed and sealed detail from a certified engineer for the proposed panels and mounting hardware.' There is no dollar, kW, panel-count or roof-type trigger; every solar permit needs a sealed structural detail. The plan review checklist adds 'Architect / Engineer Seals' as a reviewed building item and requires a sealed truss report before a frame inspection on new work. 94% · authority's own Solar permit checklist
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No electrical PE stamp is required for a residential PV job. The Solar checklist scopes its sealed-engineering requirement expressly to 'the proposed panels and mounting hardware' (structural) and asks for the electrical load calculations and wiring diagram without any seal. The City publishes no electrical-engineering threshold of its own. 80% · authority's own Solar permit checklist (inference from scope)
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Citizenserve (Online Solutions LLC), installationID 185 — reached at https://www2.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showHomePage&ctzPagePrefix=Portal_&installationID=185. 'You must register an account through Citizenserve to apply for a building permit via the portal. No registration forms are needed.' The FY2025-26 budget funds it: '5031-40-005 IT Services... Citizenserve 11 users $16,800'. 95% · department page + adopted budget line item
- Can the whole application be completed online? Almost, but not quite — and the gaps are at both ends. The portal takes remote application submittal and payment, document upload, permit search, project tracking and inspection requests. But: 'ONLY CONTRACTORS OR THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENTS MAY PICK UP PERMITS'; 'only contractors and their authorized agents can upload documents and request inspections via the portal'; an owner-builder 'must personally appear to sign the Owner/Contractor affidavit'; the Design Certification for Windloads and Owner/Builder Disclosure are notarised or witnessed in person; and a Notice of Commencement must be recorded separately with the Manatee County Clerk and uploaded before the first inspection. 86% · department page + FAQ + storm recovery page
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation. Code Sec. 2-201(3): 'Permit valuations will be determined by the building official for the proposed work or contract signed by the owner and contractor. Valuation documentation must be submitted at the time of permit application.' The permit application asks for 'TOTAL VALUE OF WORK — MATERIALS AND LABOR PER FBC 109.3', and the Solar checklist requires a 'Scope of Work with Project Cost Breakdown'. On top of the valuation-based permit fee sit: a plan review fee that is 'a percentage based on total permit costs' (Sec. 2-201(4)); the two state surcharges totalling 2.5% with a $4.00 minimum (Sec. 2-201(5)); a re-inspection fee on every failed inspection (Sec. 2-201(7)); and possible separate city engineer, city planner and West Manatee Fire District review fees (Sec. 2-201(6)). 90% · codified ordinance Sec. 2-201 (Ord. 20-08, 18 Aug 2020; Ord. 22-12, 27 July 2022)
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes, and it is mandatory and non-refundable. Code Sec. 2-201(4): 'All permit plan reviews will incur a plan review fee, which shall be a percentage based on total permit costs associated with Florida Building Code Compliance.' Sec. 14-28 (FBC 109.2 as amended): 'On all buildings, structures, electrical systems... or alterations requiring a permit, a nonrefundable, plan review fee for each permit shall be paid as required at the time of filing application.' FBC 109.6 as amended: 'Plan Review Fees are also nonrefundable.' The percentage itself is not published. 92% · codified ordinance Secs. 2-201(4) and 14-28 (FBC 109.2, 109.6)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? The City publishes no standard plan-review turnaround, and its own application contains a device that defers the start of the statutory clock. The Building Permit Application states: 'All permit applications may require an application review by the Planning & Zoning (P&Z) and Engineering departments... The statutory schedule for review and issuance of a Building Permit (pursuant to 553.79(16), and Private Provider 553.791 Fla. Statutes), SHALL COMMENCE UPON THE APPLICATION APPROVAL BY THE P&Z AND ENGINEERING. An application approval date by P&Z and Engineering will be recorded in Citizenserve and will establish the date by which the Building Department is to comply with the statutory schedule.' The binding backstop is FS 553.792(1)(a)1: FIVE BUSINESS DAYS after a complete and sufficient application for an electrical (or structural/roofing) permit on an EXISTING single-family residential dwelling where the value of the work is less than $15,000; 30 business days otherwise under 7,500 sq ft; (1)(c) a 5-business-day completeness notice failing which the application is automatically deemed complete; (1)(e) a 10% permit-fee reduction for each business day late. The only published speed commitment is on the Storm Recovery Permitting page: 'Our goal is to issue repair permits within a 1-3-day period.' 80% · authority's own permit application + FS 553.792 and 553.79(16) read first-hand
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Local rule: six months to commence, six months between inspections, one 90-day extension, three years outright. Sec. 14-28 (FBC 105.5 as amended): 'Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work authorized by the permit is commenced within six (6) months after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of six (6) months after the time the work is commenced; provided, however, that one extension of time, for a period not exceeding ninety (90) days, shall be allowed by the Building Official... All permits shall become invalid if the work has not been completed within three (3) years of the permit issuance date, unless reasonable continuous progress can be demonstrated by the completion of required inspections.' Requests for extension must be in writing before the permit becomes invalid; the City publishes a Permit Extension Request form. STATE FLOOR: FS 553.79(1)(c) — 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later.' 88% · codified ordinance Sec. 14-28 (FBC 105.5) + FS 553.79(1)(c)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light (FPL) — an investor-owned utility, so FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 binds it. Settled four ways city-side without relying on any territory map. 94% · adopted budget revenue and expenditure schedules (OCR'd) + city web pages
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, then after — and Holmes Beach is one of the few authorities where the CITY has a codified duty to call the utility. Two distinct mechanisms run: (a) POWER RELEASE — Code Sec. 14-73(b): 'Upon final inspection and approval of the electrical installation and other related building, plumbing, and mechanical work, when required, the electrical official or his agent SHALL NOTIFY THE POWER COMPANY TO CONNECT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.' The City also publishes a 'TUG or Pre-Power Application and Agreement' by which it authorises the utility to energise early, and reserves the right to direct the utility to terminate service. (b) INTERCONNECTION/PTO — FPL's Tier 1 tariff sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.4: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation... that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications', and Sec. 3.5: the customer shall notify FPL at least TEN CALENDAR DAYS before initially placing the equipment in service. FPL executes the interconnection agreement within 30 calendar days of a completed application (3.6). 88% · FPL filed tariff Third Revised Sheet No. 9.050 (Issued by Tiffany Cohen, VP Financial Planning and Rate Strategy; Effective January 1, 2026) + codified ordinanc
28 questions answered against City of Holmes Beach’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. The City of Holmes Beach is the AHJ for residential rooftop PV at any address inside the city — it issues the building and electrical permits, performs plan review and inspections, and administers zoning and the floodplain ordinance itself.
Why the confidence is not higherLDC Sec. 3.2.B: 'No building or structure shall be erected and no existing building or structure shall be moved, altered or enlarged until a permit therefore has been issued by the building official.' Code Sec. 14-28 (FBC 105.1 as locally amended) requires a permit from the Building Official for any work on an electrical system. The City's FY2024-25 utilization report shows it issued 3,312 permits and performed 11,790 inspections itself. Manatee County is not in the chain.
codified ordinance (Municode, codified through Ord. 26-03 enacted 1 April 2026, Supp. 23 Update 2) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both, plus zoning and floodplain, all in-house. Building and electrical permitting, plan review and inspection are the City's (Code Ch. 14 Art. II and Art. III; Sec. 14-66 creates a city Electrical Inspection Department with the Building Official as Electrical Official). Planning & Zoning and Engineering review every permit application before the Building Department clock starts. Floodplain administration is the City's (LDC Sec. 9.14). Nothing is delegated to Manatee County. The only outside desk is the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District, and the City routes only COMMERCIAL projects to it.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 14-66(a): 'There is hereby established a department to be called the electrical inspection department... The building official shall be designated as the electrical official.' The City's Building Permit Application states 'All permit applications may require an application review by the Planning & Zoning (P&Z) and Engineering departments.' The Building Department page states commercial projects only are routed to WMFR. Marked down from 96 because Sec. 2-201(6) says WMFR review 'may' be required on a permit application generally, which is in tension with the department page's 'ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS' framing.
city permit application (rev. 12/2023) + codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Permit%20Application_2023FBC.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — and the City has published a ruling that the new state $7,500 exemption does not reach it. A building permit (with the electrical trade) is required for residential rooftop PV; the City publishes a dedicated 'Solar' permit checklist. FS 553.79(1)(g), added by the 2026 act, requires local governments to exempt work valued under $7,500 on a single-family property, but (g)2.a excludes work on property 'partially or entirely located in a flood hazard area as defined by the Florida Building Code' and (g)2.b excludes 'any electrical, plumbing, structural, mechanical, or gas work performed on property containing a single-family dwelling'. A rooftop PV job on Anna Maria Island fails BOTH limbs.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Building Department FAQ carries an 'UPDATE MAY 2026' notice quoting (g)1 and (g)2 verbatim and concluding: 'notwithstanding the general exemption created by HB 803, property owners and contractors in Holmes Beach will still be required to obtain permits for work otherwise covered by the City's permitting requirements.' The statute text was re-read first-hand at leg.state.fl.us and matches the City's quotation word for word. Independently, 98.09% of the City's land area is in an SFHA (see q-note under flood, measured this run), and the City's own permit guide states 'the entire island is designated by FEMA as a Special Flood Hazard Area'. So the exemption is a dead letter here twice over.
authority's own published FAQ (May 2026) + FS 553.79(1)(g) read first-hand checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department_faq/index.php
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Either, in practice combined. The City's single Building Permit Application has a lettered ELECTRICAL section (F) alongside BUILDING (A), and the Solar checklist asks only for 'A subcontractor form for any trade involved... including EL, PL, MECH, GAS' — i.e. the electrical sub is named on the one solar permit. A standalone electrical permit exists as a distinct type (Code Sec. 14-68 requires a permit from the electrical official; the FY2025-26 budget carries revenue account 3220-00-002 Permits-Electrical $10,000 separately from 3220-00-001 Permits-Building $1,780,000).
Why the confidence is not higherThe subcontractor-form route on the Solar checklist is strong evidence of a single combined permit; the separate revenue account and Sec. 14-68 prove a separate electrical permit type exists. The City publishes no statement resolving which applies to a solar retrofit, and the fee schedule that would settle it is unpublished. Recorded as Either with the two mechanisms named rather than guessing.
authority's own Solar permit checklist (FBC 8th Ed., dated 12/2023) + adopted budget checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A licensed electrical contractor, or the homeowner for his own occupied home with a hard annual limit. Code Sec. 14-69: permits may be obtained by '(1) A homeowner who desires to install or maintain electrical work at his own single-family or duplex residence, providing that he or his immediate family occupies the residence. A property owner will be issued only ONE electrical permit, for a single-family or duplex residence, WITHIN A CALENDAR YEAR from the date of his last permit'; or '(2) A person who holds a current and valid electrical contractor's certificate of competency.' On the solar route the electrical sub is named on a Sub-Contractor Form and must be state-licensed with current GL and workers' comp.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 14-69 read verbatim from the current supplement. The one-permit-per-calendar-year cap on homeowner electrical permits is unusual and is recorded because it bites a homeowner who has already pulled an electrical permit that year. Marked down from 94 because Sec. 14-69 derives from the 1978 Code and the City's live documents (Solar checklist, Building Department page) speak only of licensed contractors and subs.
codified ordinance Sec. 14-69 checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes in substance, and the City's two instruments disagree on the paperwork. Code Sec. 14-7 establishes a contractor licence registration with the City requiring name/address/phone/email, state licence number and expiry, proof of general liability insurance and proof of workers' compensation (or statutory exemption), at an initial fee of $80.00 per year. The live Building Department page says 'No registration forms are required' but that 'Contractors must provide proof of State of Florida registration, along with current GL and WC insurances' at application.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 14-7 (Ord. 14-15, 13 May 2014) read verbatim; the department page read first-hand. Both are current-facing, and they conflict on whether a form and an annual $80 fee still apply — recorded as a conflict rather than resolved, because nothing on the site publishes a registration form and nothing repeals Sec. 14-7.
department page + codified ordinance Sec. 14-7 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/index.php
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes in law, but the City's own solar packet silently omits the route, and most of the island's housing is disqualified. FS 489.103(7)(a)1 exempts owners acting as their own contractor when improving 'one-family or two-family residences... for the occupancy or use of such owners and NOT OFFERED FOR SALE OR LEASE'. The City's permit guide agrees ('an owner can serve as a contractor providing the residence is for their own use or occupancy and does not offer the property for sale or lease within 1 year after CO/CC') and adds 'Owners cannot pull permits in multi-family (3 or more units) OR FOR RENTAL OR LEASED PROPERTIES.' The owner must personally appear to sign the Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement. Code Sec. 14-69(1) separately allows a homeowner one electrical permit per calendar year for his own occupied home. FS 489.103(7)(a)3, the dedicated solar limb, does NOT apply here: it is conditioned on the local government participating in a US DOE 'SunShot Initiative: Rooftop Solar Challenge' grant, and 'SunShot' returns zero across the City's code and 301-page website corpus.
Why the confidence is not higher*** THE PACKET DIFF IS THE FINDING. The Re-Roof checklist and the Mechanical Changeout checklist each carry an 'Owner Builder Disclosure Statement' line; the SOLAR checklist has no owner-builder line at all and instead requires a Solar Affidavit 'signed and sealed from the CONTRACTOR OF RECORD'. *** That is a silent omission, not a prohibition, and the general guide plainly permits owner-builders — so it is recorded as permitted-but-undocumented. Commercially decisive here: the City certifies 783 vacation-rental units (FY2025-26 budget, $545 per unit), so a large share of the housing stock is 'offered for lease' and out of the exemption.
authority's own permit guide (06/04/2025) + FS 489.103(7) read first-hand + checklist diff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/DO_I_NEED_A_PERMIT%2006.04.2025.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
From the City's own dedicated Solar checklist (FBC 8th Edition 2023, dated 12/2023): (1) Building Permit Application, complete, with 'N/A' in non-applicable fields; (2) Scope of Work with Project Cost Breakdown; (3) Notice of Commencement (see why — the City's two instruments give different thresholds), recorded with the Manatee County Clerk and submitted before the first inspection is scheduled; (4) Engineered Plans — 'a signed and sealed detail from a certified engineer for the proposed panels and mounting hardware', showing installation location(s), wind loads, panel connections, roofing materials and any applicable waterproofing, at 1/4-inch scale; (5) Electrical Load Calculations demonstrating wire sizing and ampacity, temperature derating, conduit fill derating, voltage drop for all conductors, sizes of disconnects and overcurrent protection, and input/output current and voltage/power specs for all major equipment; (6) Solar Panel Wiring Diagram showing wire sizes and types per the load calcs, junction boxes, disconnects, overcurrent protection, grounding, SIGNAGE and AC connection, plus a riser diagram showing how the new system ties into the existing service; (7) Product Approval Specification Sheet — Florida Product Approval numbers for all products (NOA copies not needed, numbers only); (8) Sub-Contractor Forms for every trade involved, including EL, PL, MECH, GAS; (9) Solar Affidavit — signed and sealed by the contractor of record verifying the panels were mounted correctly and to the engineered specifications on the plans.
Why the confidence is not higherTranscribed verbatim from the City's published 'Solar' checklist. The City's name was grepped in the PDF before quoting (3 hits, correct jurisdiction, correct address 5801 Marina Drive) — the borrowed-document test the survey now runs on every vendor-shaped form. NOC threshold conflict recorded rather than resolved: the Solar checklist says 'higher than $5,000.00'; the Building Department FAQ says 'in the amount of $2,500 & over' per Ch. 713 FS (except mechanical replacement at $15,000 & over), and the FAQ matches the statute.
authority's own Solar permit checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic only, one set, PDF. The Residential Plan Review Checklist requires 'All plans to be submitted in 1/4-inch scale (i.e. 1/4 inch = 1 foot) AND IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT', and item 20: 'Digital format is now required. Plans and drawings will be accepted in Portable Document Format (PDF). For photographs, please use JPEG (jpg.) or PDF format.' Submittal is through the Citizenserve portal. No paper copy count is published.
Why the confidence is not higherRead first-hand from the City's Residential Plan Review Checklist 2023 FBC (file timestamp 2024-06-24) and the Building Department page. Marked down from 94 because the checklist is written for new construction/remodel and the City publishes no separate submittal-format rule for a trade retrofit, and because only contractors or their authorized agents may upload documents to the portal.
authority's own plan review checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Residential%20Plan%20Review%20Checklist%202023%20FBC.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes in substance, though not called a site plan for a retrofit. The Solar checklist requires the engineered plans to 'show the installation location(s), wind loads, panel connections, roofing materials and any applicable waterproofing'. The City's general Residential Plan Review Checklist adds a 'Fully dimensional plot plan', job address on plans, and — for any work touching the ground — sediment and erosion control measures shown on the survey or plot plan. Formal LDC site development plan review does NOT reach a single-family retrofit: LDC Sec. 3.5.A exempts 'the construction of one single-family or two-family structure on an individual lot or parcel and associated accessory structures' from site development plan application, and none of the major-site-plan triggers in Sec. 3.5.B.1 reaches a rooftop array on an existing house.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth checklists read first-hand and LDC Sec. 3.5 read verbatim. Marked down because Sec. 3.5.A's exemption is written around 'construction of' a structure rather than alterations to an existing one, so a reviewer could in principle call a retrofit a 'land development activity'; the City publishes no interpretation. For a GROUND mount the analysis changes — see q47.
authority's own checklists + codified LDC Sec. 3.5 checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes. 'Solar Panel Wiring Diagram — The diagram needs to show the wire sizes and types per the load calcs, junction boxes, disconnects, overcurrent protection, grounding, signage and AC connection. Please provide a riser diagram that shows how the new system ties into the existing service.' The Residential Plan Review Checklist's Electrical section separately lists 'Wiring Diagram' as a reviewed item.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the City's Solar checklist. Note the diagram must itself show SIGNAGE — the City's only solar-specific signage requirement is a plan-content requirement, not a field specification (see q39).
authority's own Solar permit checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Yes, and in unusual detail. 'Electrical Load Calculations — Please provide electrical load calculations that demonstrate the wire sizing and proper ampacity, temperature derating, conduit fill derating, voltage drop for all conductors, sizes of disconnects and overcurrent protection, input and output current and voltage/power specs for all major equipment.' The City also publishes a blank 'Electrical Load Calculations Form', and the Residential Plan Review Checklist's Electrical section is headed 'Electrical Load Calculations shall be submitted with all electrical permits.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the Solar checklist and corroborated by the plan review checklist and a standing city form. This is one of the most explicit string/conductor-calculation requirements recorded in the Florida survey.
authority's own Solar permit checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Yes — unconditionally, with NO threshold. The Solar checklist requires, as part of the Engineered Plans: 'A signed and sealed detail from a certified engineer for the proposed panels and mounting hardware.' There is no dollar, kW, panel-count or roof-type trigger; every solar permit needs a sealed structural detail. The plan review checklist adds 'Architect / Engineer Seals' as a reviewed building item and requires a sealed truss report before a frame inspection on new work.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim. Marked down from 96 only because 'certified engineer' is not further defined (Florida PE is the obvious reading, and the City's Affidavit Inspection Report form asks for a 'Florida PE NUMBER or AR NUMBER'). The Solar checklist is dated 12/2023 and its published file timestamp is 09 Jan 2024, while the City refreshed most of its other checklists on 03 Oct 2025 — so the solar packet is the older layer.
authority's own Solar permit checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No electrical PE stamp is required for a residential PV job. The Solar checklist scopes its sealed-engineering requirement expressly to 'the proposed panels and mounting hardware' (structural) and asks for the electrical load calculations and wiring diagram without any seal. The City publishes no electrical-engineering threshold of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the Solar checklist's own scoping (structural seal named, electrical seal conspicuously not) plus the plan review checklist, whose Electrical section lists no seal item while the Building section lists 'Architect / Engineer Seals'. Not 90+ because it is an argument from the structure of a checklist rather than an express statement, and because the state exemption threshold in FS 471.003(2)(h) was not re-read first-hand this run.
authority's own Solar permit checklist (inference from scope) checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe dollar amount of a residential solar permit is not published anywhere the City controls. The fee schedule is set by resolution (Code Secs. 2-201(1), 14-1, 14-28/FBC 109.2, LDC 1.5.A-B all say 'by resolution of the city commission') and no resolution or schedule is published. Looked in: the Forms & Checklists index enumerated by HREF, all 75 documents (no fee schedule among them); the Building Department page and the Building Department FAQ (the FAQ answers 'How much does a permit cost?' with 'Permit costs vary based on the value of the contracted work and extent of the scope of work... plan review, code compliance research, inspections, the required cost evaluation for properties below the BFE... and completion process' — the City itself declines to publish a number); the City Treasurer / Budgets and Financial Statements page and the full FY2025-26 adopted budget (18 pages, no text layer, rendered at 300 dpi and OCR'd — it budgets $1,780,000 of building permit revenue but prints no rates); the Storm Recovery Permitting page (which refers to 'the City's current fee schedule and regulations' without linking one); the Land Development Application; the Citizenserve portal, which is entirely behind a login for installation 185; and the eScribe meeting portal at pub-holmesbeachfl.escribemeetings.com (214 past meetings; its search is an ASP.NET postback whose results are not rendered server-side, so it could not be driven and is recorded as a capability limit rather than a passed control). Filename guesses on the City's CDN (cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/) for Fee Schedule / Building Fee Schedule / Permit Fee Schedule / Master Fee Schedule / Resolution 22-12 all returned 404 against a working positive control on the same host. WHAT IS KNOWN is recorded in the answer to q15 above: the fee is valuation-based, with a percentage plan-review fee, 2.5% of state surcharges ($4.00 minimum), possible engineer/planner/fire review fees and a re-inspection fee on every failure. WHAT IS ESTABLISHED, from Code Sec. 2-201 read verbatim, is the SHAPE of the bill even though no rate is published: '(1) All permits are subject to non-refundable fees, the amount of which will be established BY RESOLUTION of the city commission... Fees may only be waived by the building official. Fee waiver applications must be in writing. (2) All after-the-fact permit fees are assessed at double the normal fee, plus original fees. (3) Permit valuations will be determined by the building official for the proposed work or contract signed by the owner and contractor. Valuation documentation must be submitted at the time of permit application. (4) All permit plan reviews will incur a plan review fee, which shall be a percentage based on total permit costs associated with Florida Building Code Compliance. (5) State surcharge fees... The minimum charge shall be $4.00. (6) Permit applications may require city engineer, city planner, and/or West Manatee Fire District review in addition to Building Code review. Separate fees may apply. (7) A re-inspection fee applies to all failed inspections.' So the payable items on a residential solar permit are a valuation-based permit fee, a percentage plan-review fee, 2.5% of state surcharges with a $4.00 minimum, possible engineer/planner review fees, and a re-inspection fee on any failure - each at a rate the City does not publish. A TEMPORARY WAIVER EXISTED AND HAS BEEN NARROWED, so read the sunset: the Storm Recovery Permitting page states 'Effective March 1, 2026, building permit fees for hurricane-related repairs (like-for-like repairs to restore the property to its pre-storm condition) within the City of Holmes Beach will no longer be automatically waived. Fee waivers will be granted only to the original homeowner who owned the property at the time of the storm.' That waiver never reached solar - a PV array is not a like-for-like storm repair - and it is now closed to anyone who bought after Helene/Milton.
https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department_faq/index.php
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation. Code Sec. 2-201(3): 'Permit valuations will be determined by the building official for the proposed work or contract signed by the owner and contractor. Valuation documentation must be submitted at the time of permit application.' The permit application asks for 'TOTAL VALUE OF WORK — MATERIALS AND LABOR PER FBC 109.3', and the Solar checklist requires a 'Scope of Work with Project Cost Breakdown'. On top of the valuation-based permit fee sit: a plan review fee that is 'a percentage based on total permit costs' (Sec. 2-201(4)); the two state surcharges totalling 2.5% with a $4.00 minimum (Sec. 2-201(5)); a re-inspection fee on every failed inspection (Sec. 2-201(7)); and possible separate city engineer, city planner and West Manatee Fire District review fees (Sec. 2-201(6)).
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 2-201 and the permit application read verbatim. *** FLAG: the valuation machinery is in tension with FS 553.79(1)(f), read first-hand this run: 'A local government may not require a contract between a builder and an owner, any copies of such contract, or any associated document, including, but not limited to, letters of intent, material costs lists, labor costs, or overhead or profit statements, for the issuance of a building permit or as a requirement for the submission of a building permit application. Inspection fees may not be based on the total cost of a project.' Sec. 2-201(3) requires valuation documentation at application and names the signed contract as a valuation source; FS 553.791(2)(a) separately bars requiring the private-provider contract at application. Recorded as a conflict, not resolved. *** *** THE RATES ARE THE TEST, NOT THE LABELS, AND HERE THE LABELS FAIL WHILE THE TOTAL PASSES. Sec. 2-201(5) reads 'State surcharge fees of 1.5 PERCENT FOR THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION and ONE PERCENT FOR THE BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATORS AND INSPECTORS FUND associated with Florida Building Code compliance will be collected for all permits pursuant to F.S. 553.721 and 468.631. The minimum charge shall be $4.00.' Read first-hand: FS 553.721 assesses 'a surcharge assessed at the rate of 1 PERCENT of the permit fees' for the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, minimum $2 per permit; FS 468.631 assesses '1.5 PERCENT of all permit fees' into the Building Code Administrators and Inspectors Fund, minimum $2 per permit. THE CITY HAS THE TWO RATES CROSSED. Both statutes are cited correctly and both rates are stated correctly - they are simply attached to the wrong funds. The aggregate 2.5% and the combined $4.00 minimum are right, so an installer's bill is unaffected; the citation is wrong. A NEW SHAPE for the survey: Biscayne Park cited ONE statute for BOTH rates; Melbourne Beach named an abolished agency; Holmes Beach cites both statutes correctly and swaps the rates between them. Cited-authority sweep also run: the survey's recurring ghost '553.19' returns ZERO, and anchored '533.' returns ZERO, across 1.87 MB of code and 2.24 MB of website text. *** TWO FURTHER FEE DEFECTS: (a) Sec. 2-201(2) assesses an after-the-fact permit at 'DOUBLE the normal fee, plus original fees' while Sec. 14-28 (FBC 109.4 as amended) assesses 'a penalty of TRIPLE the usual permit fee' for work commenced before permit issuance, and the live Building Department page says 'triple fees' - the City's own code contradicts itself on the same conduct. (b) Sec. 2-201(1) provides that 'FEES MAY ONLY BE WAIVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. Fee waiver applications must be in writing' - a discretionary, individually-applied waiver route with no published criteria, which is the only fee relief a solar applicant has.
codified ordinance Sec. 2-201 (Ord. 20-08, 18 Aug 2020; Ord. 22-12, 27 July 2022) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes, and it is mandatory and non-refundable. Code Sec. 2-201(4): 'All permit plan reviews will incur a plan review fee, which shall be a percentage based on total permit costs associated with Florida Building Code Compliance.' Sec. 14-28 (FBC 109.2 as amended): 'On all buildings, structures, electrical systems... or alterations requiring a permit, a nonrefundable, plan review fee for each permit shall be paid as required at the time of filing application.' FBC 109.6 as amended: 'Plan Review Fees are also nonrefundable.' The percentage itself is not published.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo codified provisions read verbatim and agreeing. The rate sits in the unpublished fee resolution (see q15). Note FS 553.791(2)(b), read first-hand: 'The local jurisdiction may not charge fees for plans review or building inspections if the fee owner or the fee owner's contractor hires a private provider to perform such services' — which would disapply this fee entirely on the private-provider route, against the City's own 15% credit (see q52).
codified ordinance Secs. 2-201(4) and 14-28 (FBC 109.2, 109.6) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
The City publishes no standard plan-review turnaround, and its own application contains a device that defers the start of the statutory clock. The Building Permit Application states: 'All permit applications may require an application review by the Planning & Zoning (P&Z) and Engineering departments... The statutory schedule for review and issuance of a Building Permit (pursuant to 553.79(16), and Private Provider 553.791 Fla. Statutes), SHALL COMMENCE UPON THE APPLICATION APPROVAL BY THE P&Z AND ENGINEERING. An application approval date by P&Z and Engineering will be recorded in Citizenserve and will establish the date by which the Building Department is to comply with the statutory schedule.' The binding backstop is FS 553.792(1)(a)1: FIVE BUSINESS DAYS after a complete and sufficient application for an electrical (or structural/roofing) permit on an EXISTING single-family residential dwelling where the value of the work is less than $15,000; 30 business days otherwise under 7,500 sq ft; (1)(c) a 5-business-day completeness notice failing which the application is automatically deemed complete; (1)(e) a 10% permit-fee reduction for each business day late. The only published speed commitment is on the Storm Recovery Permitting page: 'Our goal is to issue repair permits within a 1-3-day period.'
Why the confidence is not higher*** CITED-AUTHORITY CHECK, AND IT FAILS: FS 553.79(16), read first-hand, is about CLOSING a permit (a property owner may close a permit, assume the role of owner-builder under ss. 489.103(7) and 489.503(6), and a local agency may close a permit 6 years after issuance). It says nothing about a review schedule. The section that sets the review-and-issuance timeframes is FS 553.792. This is the run-220 shape — a real statute, correctly numbered, about the wrong subject — and here it is load-bearing, because the City uses that citation to justify starting the clock only after P&Z and Engineering sign off, while FS 553.792(1)(a) starts it on 'receipt of a completed and sufficient application' and (1)(c) puts a 5-business-day completeness clock on the local government. *** Recorded at 80 rather than higher because the City publishes no turnaround figure to check against.
authority's own permit application + FS 553.792 and 553.79(16) read first-hand checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Permit%20Application_2023FBC.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Local rule: six months to commence, six months between inspections, one 90-day extension, three years outright. Sec. 14-28 (FBC 105.5 as amended): 'Every permit issued shall become invalid unless the work authorized by the permit is commenced within six (6) months after its issuance, or if the work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned for a period of six (6) months after the time the work is commenced; provided, however, that one extension of time, for a period not exceeding ninety (90) days, shall be allowed by the Building Official... All permits shall become invalid if the work has not been completed within three (3) years of the permit issuance date, unless reasonable continuous progress can be demonstrated by the completion of required inspections.' Requests for extension must be in writing before the permit becomes invalid; the City publishes a Permit Extension Request form. STATE FLOOR: FS 553.79(1)(c) — 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later.'
Why the confidence is not higherLocal text read verbatim from the current supplement; statute read first-hand. The six-month commencement rule is narrower than the statutory one-year floor for a single-family dwelling and is recorded as a conflict, not resolved — the same defect found at Melbourne Beach (run 220).
codified ordinance Sec. 14-28 (FBC 105.5) + FS 553.79(1)(c) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Citizenserve (Online Solutions LLC), installationID 185 — reached at https://www2.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showHomePage&ctzPagePrefix=Portal_&installationID=185. 'You must register an account through Citizenserve to apply for a building permit via the portal. No registration forms are needed.' The FY2025-26 budget funds it: '5031-40-005 IT Services... Citizenserve 11 users $16,800'.
Why the confidence is not higherPortal identified from the hrefs on the City's own Building Department pages (checked the href, not the label — the same installationID 185 appears behind labels for parking citations, code-compliance payments and permits, and three different citizenserve hostnames www/www2/www6 all resolve to the same installation). Budget corroborates independently.
department page + adopted budget line item checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/index.php
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Almost, but not quite — and the gaps are at both ends. The portal takes remote application submittal and payment, document upload, permit search, project tracking and inspection requests. But: 'ONLY CONTRACTORS OR THEIR AUTHORIZED AGENTS MAY PICK UP PERMITS'; 'only contractors and their authorized agents can upload documents and request inspections via the portal'; an owner-builder 'must personally appear to sign the Owner/Contractor affidavit'; the Design Certification for Windloads and Owner/Builder Disclosure are notarised or witnessed in person; and a Notice of Commencement must be recorded separately with the Manatee County Clerk and uploaded before the first inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherAll limbs quoted from the City's own Building Department page, FAQ and Storm Recovery Permitting page. Marked down from 92 because 'pick up permits' may in practice mean download; the City does not say. Capability limit recorded: the Citizenserve portal for installation 185 is entirely behind a login — the apply, search and inspection-status routes all return the login page anonymously — so no live permit record or inspection-type catalogue could be pulled this run.
department page + FAQ + storm recovery page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/index.php
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Florida Power & Light (FPL) — an investor-owned utility, so FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 binds it. Settled four ways city-side without relying on any territory map.
Why the confidence is not higher*** THE BUDGET IS THE PROOF AND IT WORKS BOTH WAYS. FY2025-26 adopted budget revenue schedule: '3131-00-001 Franchise Fees-Electric $540,000' — EXACTLY ONE electric franchise account, with the only other franchise lines being Natural Gas $8,400 and Garbage $165,000, and NO second electric seller anywhere in the line-item detail. Then the expenditure ANNOTATION COLUMN names the seller outright: 'FPL (increase 2.88%) $2,000, MCPUD $2,400, Verizon' and '...FPL Increase; Satellite Phone Service...'. *** Corroborated first-party on the City's Flood Protection page ('REPORT DOWNED POWER LINES TO FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT AT 941-917-0708') and on a dedicated 'FPL Update' page (Mayor Titsworth met FPL representatives on power restoration). 'Duke' returns ZERO across 1.87 MB of code and 2.24 MB of website text. The code names no electric utility and has no electric franchise chapter at all (Ch. 19 does not exist; 'franchise' = 8 hits, all solid waste, cable or charter procedure). The budget is a scan with no text layer and had to be rendered at 300 dpi and OCR'd to read it.
adopted budget revenue and expenditure schedules (OCR'd) + city web pages checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/FINAL%20Adopted%20Budget%20FY%2025-26.pdf
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, then after — and Holmes Beach is one of the few authorities where the CITY has a codified duty to call the utility. Two distinct mechanisms run: (a) POWER RELEASE — Code Sec. 14-73(b): 'Upon final inspection and approval of the electrical installation and other related building, plumbing, and mechanical work, when required, the electrical official or his agent SHALL NOTIFY THE POWER COMPANY TO CONNECT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.' The City also publishes a 'TUG or Pre-Power Application and Agreement' by which it authorises the utility to energise early, and reserves the right to direct the utility to terminate service. (b) INTERCONNECTION/PTO — FPL's Tier 1 tariff sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.4: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation... that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications', and Sec. 3.5: the customer shall notify FPL at least TEN CALENDAR DAYS before initially placing the equipment in service. FPL executes the interconnection agreement within 30 calendar days of a completed application (3.6).
Why the confidence is not higherCode section and tariff sheet both read verbatim. The two mechanisms are different facts and are recorded together: the City calls the power company for service connection; the customer carries the Building Official's certification to FPL for interconnection. Marked down from 94 because Sec. 14-73 derives from the 1978 Code and predates net metering, so its 'connect electrical service' duty is about service, not PTO.
FPL filed tariff Third Revised Sheet No. 9.050 (Issued by Tiffany Cohen, VP Financial Planning and Rate Strategy; Effective January 1, 2026) + codified ordinanc checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — there is no architectural or appearance gate, and no codified association co-signature. The City has NO architectural review board and issues no Certificate of Appropriateness ('certificate of appropriateness' = 0, 'design review' = 0, 'architectural review' = 0 across 1.87 MB of code; 'architectural' = 13 hits, all definitional or building-spacing). The caller's 'association' + 'approv' search was run inside the ZONING article (LDC Art. VI, 239,211 chars): 'association' = 4 hits, and none is an approval gate — two are the American Association of Nurserymen in the landscape standards, one is signs 'associated with' resort housing, and one requires a certificate of good standing from a CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION before a POOL is approved on a duplex condominium lot. 'HOA' anchored = 0, 'homeowners' = 0 in the zoning article; 'HOA' and 'homeowners association' both = 0 across the 301-page website. THE ONE LIVE LIMB: the City's Residential Plan Review Checklist carries a general item 18, 'Condominium Association Approval Letter' (tickable OK / N/A) — so a unit in a condominium may be asked for an association letter, and FS 163.04(2) then caps what the association may do: it 'may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors' and may only 'determine the specific location where solar collectors may be installed on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors'.
Why the confidence is not higherSearched both ways as briefed and both came back clean. Marked down from 92 because of the condominium-association line on the City's own plan review checklist, which is a real routing item even though it is not codified — and because Holmes Beach has a large duplex/condominium stock where that line will be ticked.
authority's own plan review checklist + full-text search of the codified LDC + FS 163.04 read first-hand checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Residential%20Plan%20Review%20Checklist%202023%20FBC.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No. Holmes Beach has no historic preservation ordinance, no historic district and no Certificate of Appropriateness process. 'Certificate of appropriateness' = 0 and 'historic district' = 0 across the whole code; 'historic' = 51 hits, and the only operative ones are Code Sec. 18-13 (Demolition of damaged historic structures, a civil-emergency provision) and LDC Sec. 9.43 (a floodplain VARIANCE limb for historic buildings, which follows the 2012 state model wording). The LDC defines 'Historic resources' by reference to the Florida Master Site File, the National Register, or City designation — and no designating ordinance or roster exists.
Why the confidence is not higherProved across a complete codified corpus (990 documents, 819/819 leaf nodes, 0 empty non-Reserved) with controls passing (building 1,463, permit 958, zoning 243, electrical 98, fabricated zzqqxvv 0). Marked down from 94 because the LDC's 'Historic resources' definition contemplates City designation, so a designation could exist outside the code — nothing on the 301-page website suggests one does.
full-text search of the codified Code and Land Development Code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No separate windstorm certification for a retrofit, but Florida Product Approval is required and the design numbers are high. The City's 'Design Certification for Windloads' form is expressly '(For new Construction Only)' and cites FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 8TH EDITION (2023), CHAPTER 6 OF ASCE 7-16. For any permit, the plan review checklist item 15 sets the design basis: 'Wind Loads (1609); Exposure (1609.4.3) Zone D; Wind Speed: Category I: 135mph, Category II: 145mph, Category III/IV: 155mph', and item 16 requires Product Approval information on sealed plans for structural components and new exterior envelope products per FS 553.842 and FAC 9B-72. The Solar checklist requires the engineered plans to show wind loads and requires Florida Product Approval numbers for all products used. Holmes Beach is NOT in the High Velocity Hurricane Zone (Miami-Dade and Broward only) but is in the ASCE 7 wind-borne debris region.
Why the confidence is not higherForm and checklist read first-hand. Marked down from 90 because the plan review checklist prints 'Exposure (1609.4.3) Zone D' in a way that conflates exposure category with a zone label, and because the wind speeds are on a general residential checklist rather than in an ordinance.
authority's own wind-load certification form (rev. 12/2023) + Residential Plan Review Checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Design%20Certification%20for%20Wind%20Load%20Form%20(002).pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No Special Exception or Commission approval for a rooftop array on an existing single-family or duplex house. LDC Sec. 3.5.A exempts one- and two-family construction from site development plan review; the major-site-plan triggers in Sec. 3.5.B.1 reach only vacant land, three-or-more dwelling units, non-residential buildings, height increases to NON-RESIDENTIAL OR MULTIFAMILY buildings, and accessory structures over 500 sq ft. Solar is not a listed special exception use in Sec. 3.9. THE RESIDUAL RISK, which a quote should name: LDC Sec. 6.8.C.1 and Charter Sec. 1.03(a)1 cap building height at 36 feet 'as measured from the crown of the road at the front center of the property to the HIGHEST POINT OF ANY PORTION OF THE BUILDING' — so an array that raises the highest point of a house already at the cap must rely on the Sec. 6.8.C.2 exemption, whose conditions are real (see q28). A ground mount over 500 sq ft would trigger a major site development plan application.
Why the confidence is not higherLDC Secs. 3.5, 3.9, 6.8 and Charter Sec. 1.03 read verbatim. Recorded at 75 because the conclusion is an inference from what the triggers do NOT list rather than an express exemption for solar, and because the City publishes no interpretation of whether a rooftop array is a 'land development activity'.
codified LDC Secs. 3.5, 3.9, 6.8 and City Charter Sec. 1.03 checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No kW cap in the city code — but there IS a roof-AREA cap, and it is in the CHARTER as well as the LDC. City Charter Sec. 1.03(a) and LDC Sec. 6.8.C both provide that 'Heating and air conditioning, SOLAR COLLECTORS, and similar equipment with appropriate screening' are exempt from the 36-foot height limit ONLY IF: '(1) Not more than ONE-THIRD OF THE TOTAL ROOF AREA may be consumed by such features. (2) The features... must be set back from the edge of the roof a minimum distance of ONE FOOT FOR EVERY FOOT by which such features extend above the roof surface of the principal building to which they are attached.' Utility-side caps (FPL Tier 1, filed tariff sheet 9.050 Sec. 2.1): Gross Power Rating not exceeding 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating; 10 kW AC or less (AC nameplate = installed DC nameplate x 0.85); and AC generating capacity of less than 115% of the customer's previous 12 months' kilowatt-hour usage. Above 10 kW: Tier 2 to 100 kW, $400 application fee; Tier 3 to 2 MW, $1,000.
Why the confidence is not higher*** THE HEIGHT DEFINITION WAS READ BEFORE THE EXCEPTION LIST, AS BRIEFED, AND HERE THE DEFINITION MAKES THE LIST BITE RATHER THAN IRRELEVANT. LDC Sec. 1.4: 'Building height. The vertical distance measured from the CROWN OF THE ROAD at the front center of the property to the HIGHEST POINT OF ANY PORTION OF THE BUILDING.' A rooftop array is part of the building and raises that highest point; measurement is from the crown of the road, not from grade and not from BFE — so on an island where the lowest floor must sit at BFE+3 ft (BFE 7-11 ft), houses are commonly built to the 36-ft cap and the array then needs the exemption. *** Whether the one-third roof-area condition is lawful as applied to PV is an open question under FS 163.04(1), which bars an ordinance that 'prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors' — flagged, not resolved. The charter limb matters because a charter amendment needs a referendum. Marked at 88 because the City publishes no interpretation of whether 'solar collectors' in a 1970s-vintage exemption list includes photovoltaic modules (it is the only 'solar' wording in the entire code — 2 hits, these two mirrored sections).
City Charter Sec. 1.03 (Ord. 14-17, 22 July 2014) + LDC Secs. 1.4 and 6.8.C + FPL filed tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020, in force by state adoption through the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023. Holmes Beach names no NEC year anywhere: anchored 'NEC' = 1 hit and 'National Electrical Code' = 1 hit in 1.87 MB of code, both incidental (the telecommunications-tower standards list, and Sec. 14-3 requiring a temporary construction pole to conform to 'the National Electrical Code in effect at the time of permitting' — a floating reference). The substantive Division 1 of the City's Electrical Code article was REPEALED in its entirety by Ord. 02-01 on 7 May 2002, leaving Secs. 14-66 to 14-75 as pure administration, so there is no local electrical technical code at all. 86% · codified ordinance Ch. 14 Art. III + state adoption position
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), with local administrative and technical amendments — notwithstanding that the code text literally says 2010. Code Sec. 14-27(a) adopts 'the 2010 Florida Building Code, as same may be amended by the state' and then floats it forward: 'If Florida Statutes or the Florida Administrative Code should require a more recent edition of any of the codes adopted by this article, then the subsequent edition shall be deemed to be adopted without any further amendment to this article.' The City's own permit guide states: 'Currently, Holmes Beach is under the 2023 Florida Building Codes with amendments which was adopted by ordinance and authorized by State Statute 553... The city enforces the most current version of these codes as amended periodically by the Florida Building Commission.' Every current checklist, the permit application and the wind-load form are all headed 'Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023)'. 93% · authority's own permit guide (06/04/2025) + codified ordinance Sec. 14-27
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, statewide edition, enforced by the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District — and the District has just deliberately stripped out its own local code. WMFR Ordinance No. 2026-07 repeals and replaces Ordinance 2024-01 and records that 'the Board of Fire Commissioners finds that it is in the best interest of the public for the District to LIMIT ITS ENFORCEMENT to the requirements set forth in the Florida Fire Prevention Code, applicable Florida Administrative Code rules, and applicable Florida Statutes and REPEAL THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED LOCAL FIRE CODE and table of fire alarm, sprinkler, and standpipe requirements.' It relies on FS 633.208 (the FFPC is deemed adopted by each special district) and FS 633.202 (adopted statewide without local adoption). Code Sec. 14-27(a)(2) separately adopts 'Florida Fire Prevention Code and the Life Safety Code' with the same float-forward clause. STALE-DOCUMENT FLAG: the District's own live contractor handout still prints 'Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2020, 7th Edition (NFPA 1 and NFPA 101, 2018 Edition respectively)'. 84% · West Manatee Fire & Rescue District Ordinance 2026-07 (current local ordinance, as published by the District)
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — substantial, current, and the flood amendments are the ones that matter. Code Sec. 14-28 (last amended by Ord. 26-01, 10 February 2026) rewrites FBC Chapter 1 for administration and then amends the technical flood provisions: FBC-B 1612.4.3 'The minimum elevation requirements for buildings and structures IN ALL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS, and for buildings and structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line, shall be the higher of the elevation specified in ASCE 24, THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS 3 FEET, or the elevation required by Section 3109 and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection'; FBC-B 1612.4.4 'STEM WALLS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ANY ZONE'; FBC-R R322.2.1 lowest floors at BFE + 3 ft or the DFE, whichever is higher; FBC-R R322.2.3 'Foundations... shall be designed by a registered design professional. STRUCTURAL FILL IS NOT PERMITTED'; FBC-R R322.3.2 in V zones and Coastal A, bottom of lowest horizontal structural member at BFE + 3 ft or DFE; R322.3.3 pilings or columns, space below free of obstruction or with breakaway walls. Administrative amendments include a 6-month permit-commencement rule, a triple-fee penalty for work before permit, and a 5-business-day duty on the permit holder to call for inspection after completing work. 95% · codified ordinance Sec. 14-28 + City Attorney's published notice on Ord. 23-01
- What is the installation judged against? Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) — Building, Residential and Existing Building volumes — plus NEC 2020 as incorporated, as amended by Code Sec. 14-28 (BFE+3 freeboard in all flood hazard areas, no stem walls, no structural fill, foundations by a registered design professional), plus LDC Article IX Floodplain Management, plus the zoning and height provisions of LDC Art. VI and Charter Sec. 1.03, plus Florida Product Approval on all products used. There is no local electrical technical code (Electrical Code Division 1 repealed 2002) and no local solar standard of any kind. 88% · codified ordinance Secs. 14-27, 14-28, LDC Art. IX + authority's own checklists
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Nothing local — the Florida Fire Prevention Code floor only, and no fire officer looks at a house here. The City routes only COMMERCIAL projects to the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District ('ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WILL BE ROUTED TO WEST MANATEE FIRE DISTRICT FOR APPROVAL'), and WMFR Ordinance 2026-07 repealed the District's own local fire code, limiting District enforcement to the FFPC, the FAC and Florida Statutes. So the applicable ridge setback and access pathway rules for residential PV are those of the FFPC as adopted statewide (NFPA 1 as incorporated, which carries the rooftop PV access and pathway provisions) with no local amendment and no local review step. 'Solar' and 'photovoltaic' return zero in WMFR Ord. 2026-07, and 'rapid shutdown' returns zero across the City's code and website. 72% · City Building Department page + WMFR Ordinance 2026-07
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — NEC 2020 Article 690.12 rapid shutdown, by state adoption through FBC 8th Edition (2023) effective 31 December 2023. Nothing local: 'rapid shutdown' returns ZERO across 1.87 MB of code and 2.24 MB of website text, and the City's Solar checklist does not mention it (it requires the wiring diagram to show 'disconnects, overcurrent protection grounding, signage and AC connection', without naming rapid shutdown). 84% · state adoption position + full-text search of code and website
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The City specifies none of its own for solar; FPL's are the operative ones, plus the NEC 2020 labels. FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.A.6 (revision 10-30-25): 'All labels MUST be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements. The following labels must be installed at the interconnecting meter can and the DER disconnect switch.' INTERCONNECTING METER CAN: 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. DER DISCONNECT SWITCH: 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. For battery storage, FPL XIII.C.1: 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility."' The City's only contribution is a plan-content requirement — the Solar checklist requires the wiring diagram to show 'signage'. 86% · FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (revision 10-30-25), OCR'd first-hand
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No — not for solar. The City specifies no placard wording for a PV system. The ONLY City-specified placard wording found anywhere in its instruments is on the TUG or Pre-Power Application and Agreement: 'Sign must be affixed to electrical panel warning of "ENERGIZED PARTS"' — a temporary-power requirement, not a solar one. The other City placard provisions are the unsafe-structure notices in Sec. 14-28 (FBC 116.1.4, 'This Structure is Unsafe and/or Unfit for Human Habitation'). 82% · authority's own TUG/Pre-Power form + full-text search of the code
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? The City specifies nothing. FPL specifies MATERIAL and METHOD but no dimensions: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS' (Section XIII.A.6). There is no letter height, no colour, no substrate thickness and no font anywhere in the 13 pages of Section XIII, and none in the Tier 1 tariff. For the relocated-disconnect case the tariff adds only 'a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches' (Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3) — again with no dimensions. 80% · FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII + FPL filed tariff sheets 9.050-9.051
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? No local site-plan/facility-map placard requirement. NEC 2020 705.10 applies by state adoption and requires a permanent plaque or directory at each service equipment location denoting the location of all electric power source disconnecting means. The City's only adjacent requirement is documentary rather than field-mounted: the Solar checklist requires a riser diagram showing how the new system ties into the existing service, and requires 'signage' to be shown on the wiring diagram. FPL's tariff Sec. 5.3 requires a location plaque only where the manual disconnect has been relocated away from the meter socket by agreement. 70% · authority's own Solar checklist + state-adopted NEC + FPL tariff
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, and they are the only real placard requirements on the job. FPL Section XIII.A.6 (not tier-scoped, mandatory 'must') requires engraved, permanent, weatherproof/UV-resistant placards at the interconnecting meter can AND at the DER disconnect switch, with the wording set out at q38. FPL Section XIII.C.1 requires, for any behind-the-meter battery, 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility"', and requires the storage equipment to carry NRTL certification to the current UL 1741 standard, with non-UL-1741 storage 'DC coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device'. FPL tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3 adds a weather-proof location plaque where a required manual disconnect has been relocated. 92% · FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (rev. 10-30-25) + FPL filed tariff
- Where must the labels be placed? At the interconnecting meter can and at the DER disconnect switch (FPL XIII.A.6). The battery placard goes on the meter enclosure (XIII.C.1). Where a required manual disconnect has been relocated by agreement, the location plaque goes adjacent to FPL's meter socket (tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3). The DER disconnect itself, where required, must be 'mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET and must always remain accessible to FPL', with 'no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch', and 'Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' The City specifies no label locations of its own. 92% · FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII + FPL filed tariff
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? It depends on the TAP POINT, not on the kilowatts — ask the tap point before quoting the label and hardware count. (a) A UL 1741-listed, inverter-based Tier 1 system (10 kW AC or less) needs NO customer-installed manual disconnect: FPL tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.1, and FAC 25-6.065(6)(a) 'Inverter-based Tier 1 customer-owned renewable generation systems shall be exempt from this requirement, unless the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense.' (b) FPL Section XIII.A.4 is tier-scoped: 'All tier 2 and tier 3 systems require an FPL approved visually open Distributed Energy Resource (DER) disconnect switch.' (c) BUT Section XIII.A.5 is NOT tier-scoped: 'If the interconnection is performed on the LINE SIDE of the customers main electrical panel (per NEC) A MANUAL AC DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED between AC generation output and the point of interconnection to FPL facilities. The manual disconnect switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET and must always remain accessible to FPL.' Where a switch is required: visible open (blades, jaws and air gap visible, not obscured by any dead-front or arc shield), lockable in the open position, FPL padlock shank 3/8 inch must fit the cover hasp, the switch may not be modified to accept the lock, enclosure properly grounded, no locked gates/doors/fences between it and the meter socket, and the plans must show the dimension. Tier 1 non-UL-1741 systems also need one (tariff 5.2). The City of Holmes Beach imposes no AC disconnect rule of its own ('disconnect' returns zero in the codified corpus; the only city disconnect wording is the TUG/Pre-Power form's 'DISCONNECT SERVICE'-type sequencing). 92% · FPL Electric Service Standards XIII.A.4-A.6 + FPL filed tariff + FAC 25-6.065 read first-hand
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes — Florida Product Approval on the City side and UL 1741 / IEEE 1547 on the utility side. Solar checklist: 'Product Approval Specification Sheet — Please provide the product approval numbers for all products used. Copies of the NOA's are not necessary — only the numbers are needed.' Plan review checklist item 16 requires 'Product Approval Information on sealed plans for: exterior doors, windows, panel wall, roofing products, shutters, skylights, STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS and new exterior envelope products (Req'd by F.S. 553.842 and FL Admin Code 9B-72)'. Utility side: FPL tariff Sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.1 requires the generation to be listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for continuous interactive operation 'in compliance with the applicable codes and standards of IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, and UL 1741', and 3.2 requires a utility-interactive inverter that automatically isolates on grid loss. 92% · authority's own Solar checklist and plan review checklist + FPL tariff
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, with no local rule at all — the constraints are the utility's, the state code's, and the flood ordinance's. The City's code is silent: 'battery' = 0, 'energy storage' = 0, 'inverter' = 0, 'NFPA 855' = 0 across 1.87 MB. So: (a) FPL — behind-the-meter storage must carry NRTL certification to the current UL 1741 standard; a placard 'Battery storage utilized in this facility' permanently affixed to the meter enclosure; storage paired with renewable generation may not export to the grid; storage without generation that charges from the grid and operates interconnected requires notification to FPL and a Small Generator Interconnection Application; stand-alone storage is not 'renewable energy' under FAC 25-6.065(2)(d) and its output is not net metered. (b) State code — NEC 2020 Art. 706 and the FFPC as adopted. (c) *** FLOOD, AND THIS IS THE LIMB THAT BITES HARDEST HERE: LDC Sec. 9.73(4) requires all development for which specific provisions are not given to 'Have mechanical, plumbing, and ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION, except that minimum electric service required to address life safety and electric code requirements is permitted below the design flood elevation provided it conforms to the provisions of the electrical part of building code for wet locations.' With 98.09% of the City's land in an SFHA and a design flood elevation of BFE + 3 feet, a wall-mounted battery, a ground-level inverter or a disconnect has to clear the DFE. Sec. 9.23(1)(A) adds a recorded agreement for elevated buildings that there shall be 'no additional... electrical devices except as necessary for safety, installed below the design flood elevation.' *** 88% · codified LDC Secs. 9.23 and 9.73 + FPL Electric Service Standards XIII.C + full-text search
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No separate ESS permit or ESS inspection type is published. A battery is permitted work under the ordinary building/electrical permit (Code Sec. 14-68 covers 'any installations, alterations, repairs or replacement of equipment, or systems'), and the City publishes no ESS checklist among its 75-plus building forms and 24 trade checklists. FPL treats storage separately from the PV interconnection — notification, and in some configurations a Small Generator Interconnection Application of its own. 80% · authority's own Forms & Checklists index (enumerated by href) + full-text search of the code
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes — and read the DEFINITION before the rules. LDC Sec. 1.4: 'Accessory structure: A STRUCTURE, ANY PART OF WHICH IS LOCATED MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND, on the same parcel of property as a principal structure and the use of which is incidental to the use of the principal structure... FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PURPOSES, THIS TERM INCLUDES ONLY THOSE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES USED FOR PARKING AND STORAGE.' And 'Structure: Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires a permanent location on land or attachment to something having a permanent location on land.' So a ground-mounted array whose top is more than 36 inches above the ground is an accessory structure for zoning, and a roof-mounted array is part of the principal building rather than an accessory structure. THE GEOMETRY IS THE REAL CONSTRAINT: 'Yard: A required open space unoccupied by any structure or portion of a structure FROM 48 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND, UPWARD' — so a ground mount above 48 inches cannot stand in any required yard, and the required yards are large (R-1AA front 25-30 ft, side 10-15 ft, rear 15-20 ft; waterfront 20-50 ft; Gulf 50 ft from the erosion control line). For FLOOD purposes a ground mount is not an 'accessory structure' at all — it falls under LDC Sec. 9.73 'other development' and, in V zones and Coastal A, Sec. 9.76, which requires analyses by qualified registered design professionals demonstrating no harmful diversion of floodwaters or wave run-up. 82% · codified LDC Sec. 1.4 definitions + Secs. 9.73, 9.76 + district regulations
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local busbar or service-upgrade rule. The City's Building Permit Application has a dedicated electrical block — 'F. ELECTRICAL: New / Remodel/Alteration / Service Change / Temporary — Upgrade in service size from ___ to ___, Same location / new panel / New meter can' — and Code Sec. 14-72(c) makes 'service change' a named required inspection type, so a service upgrade is ordinary permitted work with its own inspection. The sizing rules are NEC 2020 (705.12 as adopted) with nothing added locally: 'busbar' returns zero across the code and the 301-page website corpus, and the Residential Plan Review Checklist's Electrical section lists only 'Service Size', 'Underground Service', 'Wiring Diagram', 'Over Current Protection', 'Grounding' and 'Elevation (BFE)' as reviewed items. 72% · authority's own permit application + plan review checklist + codified Sec. 14-72
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No prescriptive attachment spacing — a sealed engineered detail instead, plus Florida Product Approval. Solar checklist: 'Engineered Plans — Plans should include the following: a signed and sealed detail from a certified engineer for the proposed panels and mounting hardware. Plans must also show the installation location(s), WIND LOADS, PANEL CONNECTIONS, ROOFING MATERIALS and any applicable WATERPROOFING. Plans shall be to 1/4-inch scale.' Product Approval numbers are required for all products used. Design wind speeds per the plan review checklist: Vult Category I 135 mph, Category II 145 mph, Category III/IV 155 mph, ASCE 7-16 under FBC 8th Edition (2023); the whole city is in the wind-borne debris region (not HVHZ). Completion is certified by a 'Solar Affidavit... signed and sealed from the contractor of record that verifies that the panels have been mounted correctly and to the engineered specifications provided on the plans.' 88% · authority's own Solar permit checklist
20 questions answered against City of Holmes Beach’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
NEC 2020, in force by state adoption through the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023. Holmes Beach names no NEC year anywhere: anchored 'NEC' = 1 hit and 'National Electrical Code' = 1 hit in 1.87 MB of code, both incidental (the telecommunications-tower standards list, and Sec. 14-3 requiring a temporary construction pole to conform to 'the National Electrical Code in effect at the time of permitting' — a floating reference). The substantive Division 1 of the City's Electrical Code article was REPEALED in its entirety by Ord. 02-01 on 7 May 2002, leaving Secs. 14-66 to 14-75 as pure administration, so there is no local electrical technical code at all.
Why the confidence is not higherRecorded on the state position, and said so. Beware the local trap: every current Holmes Beach form is headed 'Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023)' and the permit guide says 'Holmes Beach is under the 2023 Florida Building Codes' — that is the FBC EDITION, not the NEC edition. The repeal of Electrical Code Division 1 is the affirmative part of the finding and is recorded from the Municode editor's note.
codified ordinance Ch. 14 Art. III + state adoption position checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), with local administrative and technical amendments — notwithstanding that the code text literally says 2010. Code Sec. 14-27(a) adopts 'the 2010 Florida Building Code, as same may be amended by the state' and then floats it forward: 'If Florida Statutes or the Florida Administrative Code should require a more recent edition of any of the codes adopted by this article, then the subsequent edition shall be deemed to be adopted without any further amendment to this article.' The City's own permit guide states: 'Currently, Holmes Beach is under the 2023 Florida Building Codes with amendments which was adopted by ordinance and authorized by State Statute 553... The city enforces the most current version of these codes as amended periodically by the Florida Building Commission.' Every current checklist, the permit application and the wind-load form are all headed 'Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023)'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe float clause and the City's own first-party statement agree, and thirteen published checklists carry the 8th Edition heading. Recorded at 93 rather than 96 because the codified number is a fossil three cycles out of date and would mislead anyone who read only the ordinance.
authority's own permit guide (06/04/2025) + codified ordinance Sec. 14-27 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/DO_I_NEED_A_PERMIT%2006.04.2025.pdf
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, statewide edition, enforced by the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District — and the District has just deliberately stripped out its own local code. WMFR Ordinance No. 2026-07 repeals and replaces Ordinance 2024-01 and records that 'the Board of Fire Commissioners finds that it is in the best interest of the public for the District to LIMIT ITS ENFORCEMENT to the requirements set forth in the Florida Fire Prevention Code, applicable Florida Administrative Code rules, and applicable Florida Statutes and REPEAL THE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED LOCAL FIRE CODE and table of fire alarm, sprinkler, and standpipe requirements.' It relies on FS 633.208 (the FFPC is deemed adopted by each special district) and FS 633.202 (adopted statewide without local adoption). Code Sec. 14-27(a)(2) separately adopts 'Florida Fire Prevention Code and the Life Safety Code' with the same float-forward clause. STALE-DOCUMENT FLAG: the District's own live contractor handout still prints 'Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2020, 7th Edition (NFPA 1 and NFPA 101, 2018 Edition respectively)'.
Why the confidence is not higherWMFR Ord. 2026-07 read first-hand (25 KB of extracted text; controls fire 138, code 80, fabricated zzqqxvv 0; 'residential' 0, 'dwelling' 0, 'solar' 0, 'photovoltaic' 0). Marked down from 92 because neither the District ordinance nor the City code names an FFPC EDITION year, so the edition is carried by the state adoption rather than by any local instrument, and the District's own handout prints the superseded 7th Edition.
West Manatee Fire & Rescue District Ordinance 2026-07 (current local ordinance, as published by the District) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.wmfr.org/files/3cecfb358/2026-07+Fire+Prevention+Code.pdf
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes — substantial, current, and the flood amendments are the ones that matter. Code Sec. 14-28 (last amended by Ord. 26-01, 10 February 2026) rewrites FBC Chapter 1 for administration and then amends the technical flood provisions: FBC-B 1612.4.3 'The minimum elevation requirements for buildings and structures IN ALL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS, and for buildings and structures seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line, shall be the higher of the elevation specified in ASCE 24, THE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS 3 FEET, or the elevation required by Section 3109 and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection'; FBC-B 1612.4.4 'STEM WALLS SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED IN ANY ZONE'; FBC-R R322.2.1 lowest floors at BFE + 3 ft or the DFE, whichever is higher; FBC-R R322.2.3 'Foundations... shall be designed by a registered design professional. STRUCTURAL FILL IS NOT PERMITTED'; FBC-R R322.3.2 in V zones and Coastal A, bottom of lowest horizontal structural member at BFE + 3 ft or DFE; R322.3.3 pilings or columns, space below free of obstruction or with breakaway walls. Administrative amendments include a 6-month permit-commencement rule, a triple-fee penalty for work before permit, and a 5-business-day duty on the permit holder to call for inspection after completing work.
Why the confidence is not higherRead verbatim from Sec. 14-28 in the current supplement (40,506 characters of extracted text). The BFE+3 amendment is corroborated by the City Attorney's own published message on Ordinance 23-01 (15 February 2023): 'Changes to elevation requirements requiring all new construction to be built at a minimum elevation of the base flood elevation (BFE) plus 3 feet IN ALL ZONING DISTRICTS; or DEP Minimum Elevation; Prohibiting the use of stem walls in any new construction; ... Prohibition on the use of structural fill.'
codified ordinance Sec. 14-28 + City Attorney's published notice on Ord. 23-01 checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Ord.%2023-01%20Message.pdf
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) — Building, Residential and Existing Building volumes — plus NEC 2020 as incorporated, as amended by Code Sec. 14-28 (BFE+3 freeboard in all flood hazard areas, no stem walls, no structural fill, foundations by a registered design professional), plus LDC Article IX Floodplain Management, plus the zoning and height provisions of LDC Art. VI and Charter Sec. 1.03, plus Florida Product Approval on all products used. There is no local electrical technical code (Electrical Code Division 1 repealed 2002) and no local solar standard of any kind.
Why the confidence is not higherComposite of instruments each read verbatim this run. Marked at 88 rather than higher because the NEC year is carried by state adoption rather than by any local instrument (see q29).
codified ordinance Secs. 14-27, 14-28, LDC Art. IX + authority's own checklists checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local busbar or service-upgrade rule. The City's Building Permit Application has a dedicated electrical block — 'F. ELECTRICAL: New / Remodel/Alteration / Service Change / Temporary — Upgrade in service size from ___ to ___, Same location / new panel / New meter can' — and Code Sec. 14-72(c) makes 'service change' a named required inspection type, so a service upgrade is ordinary permitted work with its own inspection. The sizing rules are NEC 2020 (705.12 as adopted) with nothing added locally: 'busbar' returns zero across the code and the 301-page website corpus, and the Residential Plan Review Checklist's Electrical section lists only 'Service Size', 'Underground Service', 'Wiring Diagram', 'Over Current Protection', 'Grounding' and 'Elevation (BFE)' as reviewed items.
Why the confidence is not higherAn absence backed by a positive: the City clearly contemplates service upgrades (application block, named inspection type) and equally clearly adds no sizing rule. Recorded at 72 because it is an argument from silence across the two places a local rule would live, and because the electrical technical code was repealed rather than replaced.
authority's own permit application + plan review checklist + codified Sec. 14-72 checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Permit%20Application_2023FBC.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No prescriptive attachment spacing — a sealed engineered detail instead, plus Florida Product Approval. Solar checklist: 'Engineered Plans — Plans should include the following: a signed and sealed detail from a certified engineer for the proposed panels and mounting hardware. Plans must also show the installation location(s), WIND LOADS, PANEL CONNECTIONS, ROOFING MATERIALS and any applicable WATERPROOFING. Plans shall be to 1/4-inch scale.' Product Approval numbers are required for all products used. Design wind speeds per the plan review checklist: Vult Category I 135 mph, Category II 145 mph, Category III/IV 155 mph, ASCE 7-16 under FBC 8th Edition (2023); the whole city is in the wind-borne debris region (not HVHZ). Completion is certified by a 'Solar Affidavit... signed and sealed from the contractor of record that verifies that the panels have been mounted correctly and to the engineered specifications provided on the plans.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the Solar checklist and the plan review checklist. Note the City requires the affidavit but publishes no Solar Affidavit FORM — unlike its Roofing Inspection Affidavit and Affidavit Inspection Report, both of which are published as blanks. Marked at 88 for that gap.
authority's own Solar permit checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing local — the Florida Fire Prevention Code floor only, and no fire officer looks at a house here. The City routes only COMMERCIAL projects to the West Manatee Fire & Rescue District ('ALL COMMERCIAL PROJECTS WILL BE ROUTED TO WEST MANATEE FIRE DISTRICT FOR APPROVAL'), and WMFR Ordinance 2026-07 repealed the District's own local fire code, limiting District enforcement to the FFPC, the FAC and Florida Statutes. So the applicable ridge setback and access pathway rules for residential PV are those of the FFPC as adopted statewide (NFPA 1 as incorporated, which carries the rooftop PV access and pathway provisions) with no local amendment and no local review step. 'Solar' and 'photovoltaic' return zero in WMFR Ord. 2026-07, and 'rapid shutdown' returns zero across the City's code and website.
Why the confidence is not higherBOUNDED, and the bound is named: the City and the District between them publish no pathway dimensions, so the numbers must come from the FFPC text itself, which neither government reproduces and which the District's own contractor handout still cites at the superseded 7th Edition (2020). The affirmative half — that no fire officer reviews a residential PV job here — is solid and first-party.
City Building Department page + WMFR Ordinance 2026-07 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/index.php
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — NEC 2020 Article 690.12 rapid shutdown, by state adoption through FBC 8th Edition (2023) effective 31 December 2023. Nothing local: 'rapid shutdown' returns ZERO across 1.87 MB of code and 2.24 MB of website text, and the City's Solar checklist does not mention it (it requires the wiring diagram to show 'disconnects, overcurrent protection grounding, signage and AC connection', without naming rapid shutdown).
Why the confidence is not higherAnswered on the state position with a proved local silence. Recorded at 84, not higher, because the City's own solar packet never names the requirement, so an installer relying on the packet alone would not see it.
state adoption position + full-text search of code and website checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The City specifies none of its own for solar; FPL's are the operative ones, plus the NEC 2020 labels. FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.A.6 (revision 10-30-25): 'All labels MUST be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements. The following labels must be installed at the interconnecting meter can and the DER disconnect switch.' INTERCONNECTING METER CAN: 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. DER DISCONNECT SWITCH: 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. For battery storage, FPL XIII.C.1: 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility."' The City's only contribution is a plan-content requirement — the Solar checklist requires the wiring diagram to show 'signage'.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Section XIII located by OCR'ing page headers across a window rather than trusting a page range (it is at PDF pages 161-173 of the 173-page manual, CreationDate 26 May 2026, ModDate 1 September 2026 — confirming run 218's correction and disconfirming the 155-173 recorded by run 219). The section is in the subsetted-font cipher and was read by pdftoppm -r 300 -gray plus tesseract --psm 6. A.6 is NOT tier-scoped and says 'must', so the engraved meter-can placard reaches a Tier 1 job that needs no disconnect at all. Marked at 86 because the City itself is silent and the NEC 705/690 label set is carried by state adoption.
FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (revision 10-30-25), OCR'd first-hand checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No — not for solar. The City specifies no placard wording for a PV system. The ONLY City-specified placard wording found anywhere in its instruments is on the TUG or Pre-Power Application and Agreement: 'Sign must be affixed to electrical panel warning of "ENERGIZED PARTS"' — a temporary-power requirement, not a solar one. The other City placard provisions are the unsafe-structure notices in Sec. 14-28 (FBC 116.1.4, 'This Structure is Unsafe and/or Unfit for Human Habitation').
Why the confidence is not higher'placard' returns 17 hits across the code, all of them unsafe-structure or condemnation notices; 'label' returns 1, in the Property Maintenance Code amendments. The TUG wording was read first-hand and is recorded because it is the one place the City writes its own sign text, and because it shows the department does specify wording when it wants to. Marked at 82 because an unpublished counter-desk practice cannot be excluded.
authority's own TUG/Pre-Power form + full-text search of the code checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/TUG%20or%20Pre-POWER%20APPLICATION.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The City specifies nothing. FPL specifies MATERIAL and METHOD but no dimensions: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS' (Section XIII.A.6). There is no letter height, no colour, no substrate thickness and no font anywhere in the 13 pages of Section XIII, and none in the Tier 1 tariff. For the relocated-disconnect case the tariff adds only 'a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches' (Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3) — again with no dimensions.
Why the confidence is not higherBOUNDED, not absent: three specification attributes are given (permanent, weatherproof/UV resistant, engraved letters) and the dimensional attributes are genuinely not published. All 13 pages of Section XIII were OCR'd and read, and the whole of tariff Section 9 was searched (its text layer is intact, so no OCR was needed there).
FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII + FPL filed tariff sheets 9.050-9.051 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No local site-plan/facility-map placard requirement. NEC 2020 705.10 applies by state adoption and requires a permanent plaque or directory at each service equipment location denoting the location of all electric power source disconnecting means. The City's only adjacent requirement is documentary rather than field-mounted: the Solar checklist requires a riser diagram showing how the new system ties into the existing service, and requires 'signage' to be shown on the wiring diagram. FPL's tariff Sec. 5.3 requires a location plaque only where the manual disconnect has been relocated away from the meter socket by agreement.
Why the confidence is not higherThe local absence is proved across a complete code corpus and a 301-page website with controls passing; the positive limb is the state-adopted NEC, which is not a Holmes Beach instrument. Recorded at 70 for that reason.
authority's own Solar checklist + state-adopted NEC + FPL tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, and they are the only real placard requirements on the job. FPL Section XIII.A.6 (not tier-scoped, mandatory 'must') requires engraved, permanent, weatherproof/UV-resistant placards at the interconnecting meter can AND at the DER disconnect switch, with the wording set out at q38. FPL Section XIII.C.1 requires, for any behind-the-meter battery, 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility"', and requires the storage equipment to carry NRTL certification to the current UL 1741 standard, with non-UL-1741 storage 'DC coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device'. FPL tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3 adds a weather-proof location plaque where a required manual disconnect has been relocated.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three limbs read first-hand this run — XIII.A.6 and XIII.C.1 by 300 dpi OCR of the cipher-font pages, and the tariff from an intact text layer. The A.6 'must' versus the 'should' used in the parallel Section B and Section E limbs was checked by count, as in earlier runs.
FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (rev. 10-30-25) + FPL filed tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the interconnecting meter can and at the DER disconnect switch (FPL XIII.A.6). The battery placard goes on the meter enclosure (XIII.C.1). Where a required manual disconnect has been relocated by agreement, the location plaque goes adjacent to FPL's meter socket (tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3). The DER disconnect itself, where required, must be 'mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET and must always remain accessible to FPL', with 'no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch', and 'Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' The City specifies no label locations of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from Section XIII.A.4 to A.6 and the tariff. The City's silence was proved across a complete code corpus with controls passing.
FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII + FPL filed tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes — Florida Product Approval on the City side and UL 1741 / IEEE 1547 on the utility side. Solar checklist: 'Product Approval Specification Sheet — Please provide the product approval numbers for all products used. Copies of the NOA's are not necessary — only the numbers are needed.' Plan review checklist item 16 requires 'Product Approval Information on sealed plans for: exterior doors, windows, panel wall, roofing products, shutters, skylights, STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS and new exterior envelope products (Req'd by F.S. 553.842 and FL Admin Code 9B-72)'. Utility side: FPL tariff Sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.1 requires the generation to be listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for continuous interactive operation 'in compliance with the applicable codes and standards of IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, and UL 1741', and 3.2 requires a utility-interactive inverter that automatically isolates on grid loss.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth limbs quoted verbatim. Note the checklist's 'NOA' wording is Miami-Dade vocabulary on a Manatee County form — Holmes Beach is not HVHZ, so the operative instrument is a statewide Florida Product Approval number, not a Notice of Acceptance. Recorded as a vocabulary fossil, not a jurisdictional error.
authority's own Solar checklist and plan review checklist + FPL tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Solar%20Checklist.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Permitted, with no local rule at all — the constraints are the utility's, the state code's, and the flood ordinance's. The City's code is silent: 'battery' = 0, 'energy storage' = 0, 'inverter' = 0, 'NFPA 855' = 0 across 1.87 MB. So: (a) FPL — behind-the-meter storage must carry NRTL certification to the current UL 1741 standard; a placard 'Battery storage utilized in this facility' permanently affixed to the meter enclosure; storage paired with renewable generation may not export to the grid; storage without generation that charges from the grid and operates interconnected requires notification to FPL and a Small Generator Interconnection Application; stand-alone storage is not 'renewable energy' under FAC 25-6.065(2)(d) and its output is not net metered. (b) State code — NEC 2020 Art. 706 and the FFPC as adopted. (c) *** FLOOD, AND THIS IS THE LIMB THAT BITES HARDEST HERE: LDC Sec. 9.73(4) requires all development for which specific provisions are not given to 'Have mechanical, plumbing, and ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION, except that minimum electric service required to address life safety and electric code requirements is permitted below the design flood elevation provided it conforms to the provisions of the electrical part of building code for wet locations.' With 98.09% of the City's land in an SFHA and a design flood elevation of BFE + 3 feet, a wall-mounted battery, a ground-level inverter or a disconnect has to clear the DFE. Sec. 9.23(1)(A) adds a recorded agreement for elevated buildings that there shall be 'no additional... electrical devices except as necessary for safety, installed below the design flood elevation.' ***
Why the confidence is not higherEach limb read first-hand. Note what Holmes Beach's flood ordinance does NOT have: unlike the 2012 state model it follows elsewhere, Sec. 9.73(4) offers no 'or meet the requirements of ASCE 24' alternative — there is one compliance route for ground-level hardware, not two. Marked at 88 because the City publishes no ESS guidance and the conclusion is assembled from three instruments.
codified LDC Secs. 9.23 and 9.73 + FPL Electric Service Standards XIII.C + full-text search checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No separate ESS permit or ESS inspection type is published. A battery is permitted work under the ordinary building/electrical permit (Code Sec. 14-68 covers 'any installations, alterations, repairs or replacement of equipment, or systems'), and the City publishes no ESS checklist among its 75-plus building forms and 24 trade checklists. FPL treats storage separately from the PV interconnection — notification, and in some configurations a Small Generator Interconnection Application of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherProved absence: the Forms & Checklists page was enumerated by HREF rather than by link label (the hrefs are flat filenames such as 'Solar Checklist.pdf', 'Mechanical Changeout Checklist.pdf'), and there is no battery, ESS or energy-storage entry among them; and 'battery'/'energy storage' return zero across the codified corpus. Marked at 80 because the portal's permit-type catalogue is behind a login and could name an ESS type the website does not.
authority's own Forms & Checklists index (enumerated by href) + full-text search of the code checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/forms_and_checklists.php
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes — and read the DEFINITION before the rules. LDC Sec. 1.4: 'Accessory structure: A STRUCTURE, ANY PART OF WHICH IS LOCATED MORE THAN 36 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND, on the same parcel of property as a principal structure and the use of which is incidental to the use of the principal structure... FOR FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PURPOSES, THIS TERM INCLUDES ONLY THOSE ACCESSORY STRUCTURES USED FOR PARKING AND STORAGE.' And 'Structure: Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires a permanent location on land or attachment to something having a permanent location on land.' So a ground-mounted array whose top is more than 36 inches above the ground is an accessory structure for zoning, and a roof-mounted array is part of the principal building rather than an accessory structure. THE GEOMETRY IS THE REAL CONSTRAINT: 'Yard: A required open space unoccupied by any structure or portion of a structure FROM 48 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND, UPWARD' — so a ground mount above 48 inches cannot stand in any required yard, and the required yards are large (R-1AA front 25-30 ft, side 10-15 ft, rear 15-20 ft; waterfront 20-50 ft; Gulf 50 ft from the erosion control line). For FLOOD purposes a ground mount is not an 'accessory structure' at all — it falls under LDC Sec. 9.73 'other development' and, in V zones and Coastal A, Sec. 9.76, which requires analyses by qualified registered design professionals demonstrating no harmful diversion of floodwaters or wave run-up.
Why the confidence is not higherAll four definitions and both flood sections read verbatim. Marked at 82 because no Holmes Beach instrument names a ground-mounted PV array, so the classification is applied from definitions rather than from an express rule, and because LDC Art. VI's district regulations do not use the phrase 'accessory structure' at all (0 hits in 239,211 characters), which leaves the residual accessory-use test to a reviewer.
codified LDC Sec. 1.4 definitions + Secs. 9.73, 9.76 + district regulations checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
It depends on the TAP POINT, not on the kilowatts — ask the tap point before quoting the label and hardware count. (a) A UL 1741-listed, inverter-based Tier 1 system (10 kW AC or less) needs NO customer-installed manual disconnect: FPL tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.1, and FAC 25-6.065(6)(a) 'Inverter-based Tier 1 customer-owned renewable generation systems shall be exempt from this requirement, unless the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense.' (b) FPL Section XIII.A.4 is tier-scoped: 'All tier 2 and tier 3 systems require an FPL approved visually open Distributed Energy Resource (DER) disconnect switch.' (c) BUT Section XIII.A.5 is NOT tier-scoped: 'If the interconnection is performed on the LINE SIDE of the customers main electrical panel (per NEC) A MANUAL AC DISCONNECT IS REQUIRED between AC generation output and the point of interconnection to FPL facilities. The manual disconnect switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET and must always remain accessible to FPL.' Where a switch is required: visible open (blades, jaws and air gap visible, not obscured by any dead-front or arc shield), lockable in the open position, FPL padlock shank 3/8 inch must fit the cover hasp, the switch may not be modified to accept the lock, enclosure properly grounded, no locked gates/doors/fences between it and the meter socket, and the plans must show the dimension. Tier 1 non-UL-1741 systems also need one (tariff 5.2). The City of Holmes Beach imposes no AC disconnect rule of its own ('disconnect' returns zero in the codified corpus; the only city disconnect wording is the TUG/Pre-Power form's 'DISCONNECT SERVICE'-type sequencing).
Why the confidence is not higherSection XIII read first-hand by OCR; tariff sheets 9.050-9.051 read from an intact text layer; FAC 25-6.065 downloaded from flrules.org as a .doc and converted. The PSC rule alone settles fee, insurance and disconnect for a Tier 1 job without touching a tariff — (4)(e) no fees including application fees, (5)(e) no liability insurance for Tier 1, (6)(a) inverter-based Tier 1 exempt from the manual disconnect.
FPL Electric Service Standards XIII.A.4-A.6 + FPL filed tariff + FAC 25-6.065 read first-hand checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal or phone. 'Building Inspections MAY BE SCHEDULED VIA THE ONLINE PORTAL... For those without computer access, please call the building department directly at 941-708-5833, at least one day in advance and prior to 2 p.m.' The FAQ repeats it: 'Inspections may be requested via the online portal, or by phone at (941) 708-5833.' Only contractors and their authorized agents may request inspections through the portal. 94% · authority's own Building Department page and FAQ
- How much notice is required? One business day, with a hard 2:00 PM cut-off, and an 8:00 AM cancellation deadline. 'Please keep in mind that inspections for the next day must be requested by phone or via the portal no later than 2:00PM. Inspection cancellations must be made by 8:00AM the morning of.' Code Sec. 14-72(b) codifies the one-day rule for electrical work. Separately, Sec. 14-28 (FBC 110.5 as amended) puts a duty the other way: 'The person, company, contractor, or property owner performing the work authorized by a permit shall notify the Building Official that said work is ready for inspection WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS OF COMPLETING SAID WORK. Failure to call for said inspection shall be deemed a violation of this Code.' 92% · authority's own FAQ + codified Secs. 14-72 and 14-28 (FBC 110.5)
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No AM/PM windows are published, and no general same-day service. The one same-day limb is codified and narrow: Code Sec. 14-72(b) — 'SERVICE CHANGES AND OTHER EMERGENCIES MAY BE INSPECTED THE SAME DAY THEY ARE REQUESTED.' That reaches a solar job only where the work includes a service change. Emergency permits generally are expedited but with no published standard: 'PLEASE NOTE: EMERGENCY PERMITS WILL BE EXPEDITED. SPECIFIC ACCOMMODATIONS DEPEND ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES.' 78% · codified ordinance Sec. 14-72(b) + department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes, the City inspects — but it accepts two substitutes, and it has written down exactly which inspections it will NOT let go. (a) City staff perform inspections as the default (11,790 performed in FY2024-25 by 3 Building Official & Inspectors). (b) PRIVATE PROVIDERS are accepted, registered under Code Sec. 14-8 with $1m/$2m professional liability, a fee-owner acknowledgment, and notice to the City's building inspector 'no later than the prior business day by 2:00 p.m.' — 208 private-provider inspections were performed in FY2024-25, against 0 audits. (c) AFFIDAVIT INSPECTION by a Florida-registered PE or Architect under FBC 105.14 and 107.6, on the City's own published 'Affidavit Inspection Report' form, certifying that 'The applicable structure, electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing or roofing systems have been erected or installed in accordance with the requirements of the technical codes.' *** THE RESERVATION IS THE FINDING: that same form states, in capitals, '(NOTE: ***FIRE, ENGINEERING, FEMA, and ZONING INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BY CITY STAFF***)'. On an island that is 98% SFHA, the reserved FEMA inspection reaches every permit and cannot be delegated to a private provider or a PE. *** 90% · authority's own Affidavit Inspection Report form + Code Sec. 14-8 + FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report FY2024-25
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated. Inspections stay with the City of Holmes Beach Building Department (Building Official Neal Schwartz; Inspector Scott Drees). The optional substitutes are a private provider registered with the City under Code Sec. 14-8 and FS 553.791, or a Florida-registered PE or Architect filing the City's Affidavit Inspection Report under FBC 105.14/107.6 — both at the applicant's election, and neither reaching fire, engineering, FEMA or zoning inspections, which the City reserves to its own staff. West Manatee Fire & Rescue District holds fire for COMMERCIAL projects only. 88% · department staff roster + codified Sec. 14-8 + affidavit form
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? No solar-specific inspection catalogue is published; the sequence has to be assembled. Electrical, codified at Sec. 14-72(c): 'Electrical work shall require the following inspections: TEMPORARY POLE, SERVICE CHANGE, WORK UNDER OR ENCASED IN A SLAB, ROUGH-IN, FINAL, and other special work as determined by the electrical official', with (d) 'No electrical work shall be covered or concealed until inspected and approved.' On a rooftop retrofit that reduces to a rough-in (where applicable) and a final, plus a service-change inspection if the service is upgraded. Building side: the Solar Affidavit 'must be submitted prior to scheduling the Final Inspection' is the only sequencing the City publishes for solar. Every permit also carries the reserved FEMA and zoning inspections that the City will not delegate. Sec. 14-73(a): 'the electrical official or his agent shall record the inspection date and the inspector's initials on the permit card that is posted at the job site.' 70% · codified Sec. 14-72(c) + Solar checklist (affidavit timing)
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes on the electrical side. Code Sec. 14-72(c) names 'rough-in' among the required electrical inspections, and Sec. 14-72(d) makes it mandatory in substance: 'No electrical work shall be covered or concealed until inspected and approved.' There is no mid-roof inspection for solar — the City's photo-inspection regimes (Roof Photo Inspection Guidelines, effective 16 March 2023, and Mechanical Photo Inspection Guidelines) are scoped to re-roofing and mechanical changeouts respectively and do not extend to solar. Sec. 14-72(e) allows the electrical official to waive an inspection by written notice. 80% · codified Sec. 14-72 + authority's own photo inspection guidelines
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes for plan review, no for inspection. The City publishes a 'Residential Plan Review Checklist 2023 FBC' (11 pages, file timestamp 24 June 2024) with General, Zoning, Building, Electrical, Elevator, Fire Sprinklers/Alarm, Plumbing, Mechanical, Gas and Life Safety sections, each item tickable OK / N/A / See Comments, and a contractor signature block ('Contractor shall sign the last page of the plan review check sheet prior to a permit being issued'). It also publishes 24 per-trade submittal checklists including the dedicated Solar one, plus Roof and Mechanical Photo Inspection Guidelines. It does NOT publish an inspection checklist for solar. *** THE SOLAR-THERMAL TRAP IS LIVE ON THIS DOCUMENT: the Mechanical section's item 11 is 'Solar Installations'. That is the mechanical (thermal/pool-heating) route, NOT the PV route — a PV job runs through the Building and Electrical sections and the separate Solar submittal checklist. Do not read the Mechanical line as the photovoltaic requirement. *** 80% · authority's own Residential Plan Review Checklist
- What must be on site at inspection? Approved plans, the posted permit card, and a recorded and posted Notice of Commencement. Residential Plan Review Checklist item 21: 'APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ALWAYS ON SITE. A RED TAG WILL BE ISSUED IF PLANS ARE NOT ON SITE DURING AN INSPECTION.' Code Sec. 14-73(a) requires a permit card posted at the job site on which the inspector records the date and initials. The permit application carries the statutory warning: 'A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION', and the FAQ adds 'Failure to provide a Notice of Commencement will result in cancellation of requested inspection.' For a solar job the notarised-equivalent Solar Affidavit, signed and sealed by the contractor of record, must be submitted before the Final is scheduled. Checklist item 9 makes sediment and erosion control a standing site condition whose failure 'would cancel any inspections and a Red Tag will be placed on the job site'. 90% · authority's own plan review checklist + permit application + FAQ + codified Sec. 14-73
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A recorded final approval on the posted permit card, and then a Certificate of Completion (a Certificate of Occupancy only where occupancy changes). Code Sec. 14-73(a): 'When electrical work is approved, the electrical official or his agent shall record the inspection date and the inspector's initials on the permit card that is posted at the job site.' The Residential Plan Review Checklist carries both 'Certificate of Completion Required' and 'Certificate of Occupancy Required' as separate tickable items, and the City publishes a 'Certificate of Occupancy Request Form'. For a solar retrofit on an existing dwelling the operative document is the Certificate of Completion. 76% · authority's own plan review checklist + codified Sec. 14-73(a)
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? BOTH, and they are different events — do not collapse them. (a) SERVICE CONNECTION / POWER RELEASE is the CITY's duty, codified: Sec. 14-73(b) — 'Upon final inspection and approval of the electrical installation and other related building, plumbing, and mechanical work, when required, THE ELECTRICAL OFFICIAL OR HIS AGENT SHALL NOTIFY THE POWER COMPANY TO CONNECT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.' The City's TUG/Pre-Power agreement works the same way in reverse — the applicant asks the City to authorise 'the appropriate utility company to energize the facility', and the Building Official reserves the right 'to direct the utility to terminate electrical service without notice'. (b) INTERCONNECTION / PTO is the INSTALLER's or customer's: FPL tariff Sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.4 — 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation... that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' — and Sec. 3.5, 'The Customer shall notify FPL at least TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS prior to initially placing Customer's equipment and protective apparatus in service and FPL shall have the right to have personnel present on the in-service date.' 86% · FPL filed tariff Sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.4-3.5 + codified ordinance Sec. 14-73(b)
- Is there a re-inspection fee? Yes — a re-inspection fee applies to EVERY failed inspection, with no free first re-inspection. Code Sec. 2-201(7): 'A re-inspection fee applies to all failed inspections.' The amount is set by resolution of the city commission and is not published (see q15). For comparison the City does publish re-inspection fees in one adjacent programme — Vacation Rental Certificates at $50.00 first re-inspection and $75.00 second — but those are not building permit fees. 82% · codified ordinance Sec. 2-201(7)
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Plan-review comments are issued through Citizenserve and cleared by a formal resubmittal; field corrections are cleared by calling a re-inspection. The City publishes a 'Letter of Transmittal for Resubmittals & Revisions' form (updated November 2022) for the plan-review loop, and the Residential Plan Review Checklist instructs 'Please correct the bolded comments' with a per-section Comments block. Field side, Code Sec. 14-72(f): 'The permit holder or his agent shall correct work that is inspected but not approved and shall then request a reinspection. The electrical official shall notify the permit holder whenever the work does not comply with the electrical code.' A re-inspection fee attaches to every failed inspection. A red tag stops work where approved plans are not on site or erosion control has failed. 76% · authority's own forms index + plan review checklist + codified Sec. 14-72(f)
14 questions answered against City of Holmes Beach’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal or phone. 'Building Inspections MAY BE SCHEDULED VIA THE ONLINE PORTAL... For those without computer access, please call the building department directly at 941-708-5833, at least one day in advance and prior to 2 p.m.' The FAQ repeats it: 'Inspections may be requested via the online portal, or by phone at (941) 708-5833.' Only contractors and their authorized agents may request inspections through the portal.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo first-party pages agreeing, read this run. Codified backstop: Sec. 14-72(b), 'The permit holder or his agent shall request inspection at least a day before work is ready for inspection.'
authority's own Building Department page and FAQ checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/index.php
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
One business day, with a hard 2:00 PM cut-off, and an 8:00 AM cancellation deadline. 'Please keep in mind that inspections for the next day must be requested by phone or via the portal no later than 2:00PM. Inspection cancellations must be made by 8:00AM the morning of.' Code Sec. 14-72(b) codifies the one-day rule for electrical work. Separately, Sec. 14-28 (FBC 110.5 as amended) puts a duty the other way: 'The person, company, contractor, or property owner performing the work authorized by a permit shall notify the Building Official that said work is ready for inspection WITHIN FIVE (5) BUSINESS DAYS OF COMPLETING SAID WORK. Failure to call for said inspection shall be deemed a violation of this Code.'
Why the confidence is not higherFAQ and department page read first-hand; both codified limbs read verbatim. The five-business-day duty to CALL FOR inspection after completing work is unusual and is recorded because it is enforceable as a code violation.
authority's own FAQ + codified Secs. 14-72 and 14-28 (FBC 110.5) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department_faq/index.php
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
No AM/PM windows are published, and no general same-day service. The one same-day limb is codified and narrow: Code Sec. 14-72(b) — 'SERVICE CHANGES AND OTHER EMERGENCIES MAY BE INSPECTED THE SAME DAY THEY ARE REQUESTED.' That reaches a solar job only where the work includes a service change. Emergency permits generally are expedited but with no published standard: 'PLEASE NOTE: EMERGENCY PERMITS WILL BE EXPEDITED. SPECIFIC ACCOMMODATIONS DEPEND ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES.'
Why the confidence is not higherCodified limb read verbatim; the absence of published windows proved across the Building Department page, the FAQ and the 301-page website corpus. Marked at 78 because the portal, which is where windows would normally be shown, is behind a login.
codified ordinance Sec. 14-72(b) + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes, the City inspects — but it accepts two substitutes, and it has written down exactly which inspections it will NOT let go. (a) City staff perform inspections as the default (11,790 performed in FY2024-25 by 3 Building Official & Inspectors). (b) PRIVATE PROVIDERS are accepted, registered under Code Sec. 14-8 with $1m/$2m professional liability, a fee-owner acknowledgment, and notice to the City's building inspector 'no later than the prior business day by 2:00 p.m.' — 208 private-provider inspections were performed in FY2024-25, against 0 audits. (c) AFFIDAVIT INSPECTION by a Florida-registered PE or Architect under FBC 105.14 and 107.6, on the City's own published 'Affidavit Inspection Report' form, certifying that 'The applicable structure, electrical, gas, mechanical, plumbing or roofing systems have been erected or installed in accordance with the requirements of the technical codes.' *** THE RESERVATION IS THE FINDING: that same form states, in capitals, '(NOTE: ***FIRE, ENGINEERING, FEMA, and ZONING INSPECTIONS MUST BE DONE BY CITY STAFF***)'. On an island that is 98% SFHA, the reserved FEMA inspection reaches every permit and cannot be delegated to a private provider or a PE. ***
Why the confidence is not higherAll three routes read first-hand: the utilization report, Code Sec. 14-8 and the Private Provider Information Packet, and the Affidavit Inspection Report form (dated June 22, 2021). *** AND THE FEE LIMB IS ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE STATUTE: Sec. 14-8(4) gives only 'a credit of 15 percent towards the applicable inspection fee and permit fee' where a private provider does all plans review and inspections, and 7.5% where only inspections are privately provided — while FS 553.791(2)(b), read first-hand, says 'The local jurisdiction MAY NOT CHARGE FEES for plans review or building inspections if the fee owner or the fee owner's contractor hires a private provider to perform such services. The local enforcement agency may not charge punitive administrative fees when a fee owner has chosen to work with a private provider.' FS 553.791(2)(d)'s 25%/50% reductions are COMMERCIAL-ONLY and so are not the measure here. The City's own Private Provider Information Packet repeats the 15%/7.5% figures. ***
authority's own Affidavit Inspection Report form + Code Sec. 14-8 + FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report FY2024-25 checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/AFFIDAVIT_INSPECTION_REPORT.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated. Inspections stay with the City of Holmes Beach Building Department (Building Official Neal Schwartz; Inspector Scott Drees). The optional substitutes are a private provider registered with the City under Code Sec. 14-8 and FS 553.791, or a Florida-registered PE or Architect filing the City's Affidavit Inspection Report under FBC 105.14/107.6 — both at the applicant's election, and neither reaching fire, engineering, FEMA or zoning inspections, which the City reserves to its own staff. West Manatee Fire & Rescue District holds fire for COMMERCIAL projects only.
Why the confidence is not higherComposite of the staff roster, Sec. 14-8, the affidavit form's reservation and the City's own routing statement, all read this run. Marked at 88 because the private-provider and affidavit routes are real and in live use (208 private-provider inspections in FY2024-25), so 'the City inspects' is the default rather than the only answer.
department staff roster + codified Sec. 14-8 + affidavit form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/index.php
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
No solar-specific inspection catalogue is published; the sequence has to be assembled. Electrical, codified at Sec. 14-72(c): 'Electrical work shall require the following inspections: TEMPORARY POLE, SERVICE CHANGE, WORK UNDER OR ENCASED IN A SLAB, ROUGH-IN, FINAL, and other special work as determined by the electrical official', with (d) 'No electrical work shall be covered or concealed until inspected and approved.' On a rooftop retrofit that reduces to a rough-in (where applicable) and a final, plus a service-change inspection if the service is upgraded. Building side: the Solar Affidavit 'must be submitted prior to scheduling the Final Inspection' is the only sequencing the City publishes for solar. Every permit also carries the reserved FEMA and zoning inspections that the City will not delegate. Sec. 14-73(a): 'the electrical official or his agent shall record the inspection date and the inspector's initials on the permit card that is posted at the job site.'
Why the confidence is not higherBOUNDED, and the bound is named: the Citizenserve portal for installation 185 is entirely behind a login — showApplyPermitPage, showSearchPage and showHomePage all return the login form anonymously — so the portal's inspection-type list for a Solar permit could not be reached, and the City publishes no inspection-type table on its website. The codified electrical sequence is solid; the building-side sequence is inferred from the affidavit timing.
codified Sec. 14-72(c) + Solar checklist (affidavit timing) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Yes on the electrical side. Code Sec. 14-72(c) names 'rough-in' among the required electrical inspections, and Sec. 14-72(d) makes it mandatory in substance: 'No electrical work shall be covered or concealed until inspected and approved.' There is no mid-roof inspection for solar — the City's photo-inspection regimes (Roof Photo Inspection Guidelines, effective 16 March 2023, and Mechanical Photo Inspection Guidelines) are scoped to re-roofing and mechanical changeouts respectively and do not extend to solar. Sec. 14-72(e) allows the electrical official to waive an inspection by written notice.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified limbs read verbatim; the photo-inspection scoping read first-hand from the two guideline documents ('Effective 03/16/2023 all RE-ROOFING PROJECTS are required to submit the following photos for inspection'). Marked at 80 because on a typical rooftop retrofit with surface conduit there may be nothing concealed, and the City publishes no statement about whether it books a rough-in on a solar permit.
codified Sec. 14-72 + authority's own photo inspection guidelines checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedWhether the inspector verifies labels and listings in the field is not published. Looked in: the City's Residential Plan Review Checklist 2023 FBC (its Electrical section lists Service Size, Underground Service, Wiring Diagram, Over Current Protection, Grounding, Receptacles/Switches, GFCI/ARC Fault, A/C Equipment, Appliances, Hazardous Location, Special Occupancy, Swimming Pool, Sign, Elevators, Fire Alarm, Communication, Elevation (BFE), Generator, Other — no label-verification item); the dedicated Solar checklist (which requires signage to be shown on the WIRING DIAGRAM at plan review, and Product Approval numbers for all products, but says nothing about field verification); the Affidavit Inspection Report form (which certifies compliance with 'the technical codes' generally); the Roof and Mechanical Photo Inspection Guidelines (both scoped to their own trades and both silent on labels); Code Ch. 14 Art. III Secs. 14-72 and 14-73; and the 301-page city website corpus. PARTIAL POSITIVE, recorded here rather than as an answer: Product Approval numbers ARE verified, but at plan review, not at inspection. BOUNDED by the fact that the Citizenserve portal for installation 185 is entirely behind a login, so any inspection-result detail or inspector checklist held there could not be reached, and by the ~5-month codification gap (Municode current through Ord. 26-03, enacted 1 April 2026, posted 11 May 2026).
https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Residential%20Plan%20Review%20Checklist%202023%20FBC.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Yes for plan review, no for inspection. The City publishes a 'Residential Plan Review Checklist 2023 FBC' (11 pages, file timestamp 24 June 2024) with General, Zoning, Building, Electrical, Elevator, Fire Sprinklers/Alarm, Plumbing, Mechanical, Gas and Life Safety sections, each item tickable OK / N/A / See Comments, and a contractor signature block ('Contractor shall sign the last page of the plan review check sheet prior to a permit being issued'). It also publishes 24 per-trade submittal checklists including the dedicated Solar one, plus Roof and Mechanical Photo Inspection Guidelines. It does NOT publish an inspection checklist for solar. *** THE SOLAR-THERMAL TRAP IS LIVE ON THIS DOCUMENT: the Mechanical section's item 11 is 'Solar Installations'. That is the mechanical (thermal/pool-heating) route, NOT the PV route — a PV job runs through the Building and Electrical sections and the separate Solar submittal checklist. Do not read the Mechanical line as the photovoltaic requirement. ***
Why the confidence is not higherBoth documents read first-hand and name-checked (the plan review checklist names 'City of Holmes Beach' and uses the City's own setback tables and 5801 Marina Drive address). Marked at 80 because the question asks about an inspection checklist and the honest answer is split.
authority's own Residential Plan Review Checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Residential%20Plan%20Review%20Checklist%202023%20FBC.pdf
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Approved plans, the posted permit card, and a recorded and posted Notice of Commencement. Residential Plan Review Checklist item 21: 'APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ALWAYS ON SITE. A RED TAG WILL BE ISSUED IF PLANS ARE NOT ON SITE DURING AN INSPECTION.' Code Sec. 14-73(a) requires a permit card posted at the job site on which the inspector records the date and initials. The permit application carries the statutory warning: 'A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION', and the FAQ adds 'Failure to provide a Notice of Commencement will result in cancellation of requested inspection.' For a solar job the notarised-equivalent Solar Affidavit, signed and sealed by the contractor of record, must be submitted before the Final is scheduled. Checklist item 9 makes sediment and erosion control a standing site condition whose failure 'would cancel any inspections and a Red Tag will be placed on the job site'.
Why the confidence is not higherFour instruments read first-hand and agreeing. The NOC threshold itself is recorded as a conflict at q8 ($2,500 on the FAQ per Ch. 713 FS, $5,000 on the Solar checklist).
authority's own plan review checklist + permit application + FAQ + codified Sec. 14-73 checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Residential%20Plan%20Review%20Checklist%202023%20FBC.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Yes — a re-inspection fee applies to EVERY failed inspection, with no free first re-inspection. Code Sec. 2-201(7): 'A re-inspection fee applies to all failed inspections.' The amount is set by resolution of the city commission and is not published (see q15). For comparison the City does publish re-inspection fees in one adjacent programme — Vacation Rental Certificates at $50.00 first re-inspection and $75.00 second — but those are not building permit fees.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified rule read verbatim; the absence of a published amount proved across the Forms & Checklists index, the Building Department pages, the FAQ and the adopted budget. Marked at 82 because the rule is certain and only the number is missing.
codified ordinance Sec. 2-201(7) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/holmes_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Plan-review comments are issued through Citizenserve and cleared by a formal resubmittal; field corrections are cleared by calling a re-inspection. The City publishes a 'Letter of Transmittal for Resubmittals & Revisions' form (updated November 2022) for the plan-review loop, and the Residential Plan Review Checklist instructs 'Please correct the bolded comments' with a per-section Comments block. Field side, Code Sec. 14-72(f): 'The permit holder or his agent shall correct work that is inspected but not approved and shall then request a reinspection. The electrical official shall notify the permit holder whenever the work does not comply with the electrical code.' A re-inspection fee attaches to every failed inspection. A red tag stops work where approved plans are not on site or erosion control has failed.
Why the confidence is not higherAll limbs read first-hand. Marked at 76 because the City publishes no correction-notice format, no revision turnaround, and no escalation rule for repeated rejections (contrast Biscayne Park's fourfold plan-review fee on a third rejection) — and the portal where the comments actually appear is behind a login.
authority's own forms index + plan review checklist + codified Sec. 14-72(f) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.holmesbeachfl.org/departments/building_department/forms_and_checklists.php
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A recorded final approval on the posted permit card, and then a Certificate of Completion (a Certificate of Occupancy only where occupancy changes). Code Sec. 14-73(a): 'When electrical work is approved, the electrical official or his agent shall record the inspection date and the inspector's initials on the permit card that is posted at the job site.' The Residential Plan Review Checklist carries both 'Certificate of Completion Required' and 'Certificate of Occupancy Required' as separate tickable items, and the City publishes a 'Certificate of Occupancy Request Form'. For a solar retrofit on an existing dwelling the operative document is the Certificate of Completion.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified card-signing rule and the checklist's two distinct items read first-hand. Recorded at 76 because the City nowhere states which of the two a trade permit closes with, and because FS 553.79(16)(c) lets a local agency close a permit six years after issuance without a final inspection where no apparent safety hazard exists — so 'closed' and 'passed' are not the same event here.
authority's own plan review checklist + codified Sec. 14-73(a) checked 2026-09-13 https://cms9files1.revize.com/holmesbeachfl/Residential%20Plan%20Review%20Checklist%202023%20FBC.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
BOTH, and they are different events — do not collapse them. (a) SERVICE CONNECTION / POWER RELEASE is the CITY's duty, codified: Sec. 14-73(b) — 'Upon final inspection and approval of the electrical installation and other related building, plumbing, and mechanical work, when required, THE ELECTRICAL OFFICIAL OR HIS AGENT SHALL NOTIFY THE POWER COMPANY TO CONNECT ELECTRICAL SERVICE.' The City's TUG/Pre-Power agreement works the same way in reverse — the applicant asks the City to authorise 'the appropriate utility company to energize the facility', and the Building Official reserves the right 'to direct the utility to terminate electrical service without notice'. (b) INTERCONNECTION / PTO is the INSTALLER's or customer's: FPL tariff Sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.4 — 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation... that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' — and Sec. 3.5, 'The Customer shall notify FPL at least TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS prior to initially placing Customer's equipment and protective apparatus in service and FPL shall have the right to have personnel present on the in-service date.'
Why the confidence is not higherBoth limbs read verbatim from primary instruments. Recorded at 86 rather than higher because Sec. 14-73(b) derives from the 1978 Code and predates net metering, so its 'connect electrical service' duty is about service release rather than PTO, and because Holmes Beach publishes nothing about the interconnection sequence at all ('net meter', 'interconnection' and 'PTO' return zero across its code and website).
FPL filed tariff Sheet 9.050 Sec. 3.4-3.5 + codified ordinance Sec. 14-73(b) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 82%
No — not for solar. The City specifies no placard wording for a PV system. The ONLY City-specified placard wording found anywhere in its instruments is on the TUG or Pre-Power Application and Agreement: 'Sign must be affixed to electrical panel warning of "ENERGIZED PARTS"' — a temporary-power requirement, not a solar one. The other City placard provisions are the unsafe-structure notices in Sec. 14-28 (FBC 116.1.4, 'This Structure is Unsafe and/or Unfit for Human Habitation').
Size, colour & material 80%
The City specifies nothing. FPL specifies MATERIAL and METHOD but no dimensions: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED LETTERS' (Section XIII.A.6). There is no letter height, no colour, no substrate thickness and no font anywhere in the 13 pages of Section XIII, and none in the Tier 1 tariff. For the relocated-disconnect case the tariff adds only 'a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches' (Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3) — again with no dimensions.
Where they go 92%
At the interconnecting meter can and at the DER disconnect switch (FPL XIII.A.6). The battery placard goes on the meter enclosure (XIII.C.1). Where a required manual disconnect has been relocated by agreement, the location plaque goes adjacent to FPL's meter socket (tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3). The DER disconnect itself, where required, must be 'mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket WITHIN 10 FEET and must always remain accessible to FPL', with 'no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch', and 'Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' The City specifies no label locations of its own.
What the utility wants on top 92%
Yes, and they are the only real placard requirements on the job. FPL Section XIII.A.6 (not tier-scoped, mandatory 'must') requires engraved, permanent, weatherproof/UV-resistant placards at the interconnecting meter can AND at the DER disconnect switch, with the wording set out at q38. FPL Section XIII.C.1 requires, for any behind-the-meter battery, 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility"', and requires the storage equipment to carry NRTL certification to the current UL 1741 standard, with non-UL-1741 storage 'DC coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device'. FPL tariff Sheet 9.051 Sec. 5.3 adds a weather-proof location plaque where a required manual disconnect has been relocated.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.