City of Key Colony Beach
City of Key Colony Beach
Monroe County
City of Key Colony Beach is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 790 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Key Colony Beach against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Key Colony Beach is the authority having jurisdiction 88% confidence
- Holds
- Building AND electrical, in-house, plus its own fire-safety plan review and fire inspections. The City of Key Colony Beach runs its own Building Department at 600 West Ocean Drive with a city-employed Building Official (Tony Loreno), a Building Assistant and a Code Enforcement Officer, and permits through its own Citizenserve portal (installation ID 326). Code of Ordinances Sec. 6-4 creates the building official post by city-commission appointment and vests plan review, permit issuance, field inspection, stop-work orders, certificate-of-occupancy issuance and code-enforcement-officer duties in that one post; Sec. 6-6(7)(c)1 funds that same official's certification as the City's fire safety inspector, so fire plan review is in-house too rather than sitting with Monroe County Fire Rescue. Nothing in the Code delegates building, electrical or fire plan review to Monroe County or to a private plan-review firm. Rooftop PV is permitted under Sec. 6-6(1)(d), 'Any electrical, plumbing or mechanical addition or alteration', and the codified fee schedule at Sec. 1-10 carries a named 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation' line. The brief's framing of this authority was correct: it is the AHJ and it is the city, not the county.
- Overridden by
- Four overrides, all real. (1) THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE IS STATEWIDE AND THE CITY'S ADOPTION IS ROLLING. Code Sec. 6-2 adopts the Florida Building Codes, ICC, NFPA, NEC, ASHRAE and IAMPO in their 'latest editions, revisions and amendments' and then, in Sec. 6-2(b), says the most restrictive of them applies - so the edition in force is the state's (FBC 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 Dec 2023, F.A.C. 61G20-1.001; NEC 2020 through FBC Chapter 35; Florida Fire Prevention Code NFPA 1 and NFPA 101, Florida 2021 Editions, F.A.C. 69A-60.003/.004), not one the City names. The City's only FBC amendments (Secs. 6-25, 6-26, 6-27) are flood and V-zone only and touch nothing solar. (2) FLA. STAT. 553.792 CAPS REVIEW TIME. 30 business days for a residential or electrical permit on a structure under 7,500 sq ft; 5 business days to say what is missing or the application is automatically deemed complete; 10% off the permit fee for each business day the City is late. (3) FLA. STAT. 163.04 PREEMPTS PROHIBITION. Subsection (1) expressly forbids a local ordinance that prohibits or 'has the effect of prohibiting' the installation of solar collectors; subsection (2) voids deed restrictions to the same effect and limits an approving entity to specifying roof location within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south, and only where that does not impair effective operation. This sits in visible tension with Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-28, under which the Building Official's opinion that work on a one- or two-unit dwelling is not architecturally 'harmonious in character and appearance with existing buildings in the neighborhood' means the permit 'shall not be issued except after recommendation by the planning and zoning committee and approval by the city commission' - and with LDR Sec. 101-33(2)-(3), which caps screened rooftop 'mechanical appurtenances' erected above the district height limit at 8% of roof area and 5 feet above the main structure. Whether either provision reaches flush-mounted rooftop PV is unresolved on the documents; I report the tension and do not resolve it. (4) THE UTILITY IS A COOPERATIVE, NOT A PSC-TARIFFED IOU. Florida Keys Electric Cooperative - named by the City itself in Code Sec. 6-6(5) - governs interconnection through its own Tier 1/2/3 Standard Interconnection Agreements (current versions dated 9 April 2026), which adopt FPSC Rule 25-6.065 definitions by reference rather than being set by the Commission. FKEC, not the City, sets the manual-disconnect requirement (conditional for UL 1741 inverter-based Tier 1 systems), the only placard in the whole chain, the 10 kW Tier 1 ceiling, the 90%-of-service-rating limit and a net-zero annual sizing policy enforced at a January true-up with mandatory export limiting within 90 days. Two live conflicts to carry forward: the solar permit fee ($500 flat codified at Sec. 1-10 versus valuation-based electrical-alteration pricing in Building Department Resolution 2026-01, which has no solar line), and the no-permit threshold ($1,000 in Code Sec. 6-6(1)(b) versus $2,500 in Resolution 2026-01).
- Why not higher
- Direct first-party evidence: the City's own Building Department & Code Enforcement page naming a city-employed Building Official with a keycolonybeach.net address and a city phone extension; the complete codified Code of Ordinances Chapter 6 (Buildings) and Land Development Regulations, pulled chapter by chapter through the Municode content API and read in full rather than searched blind; the current Building Permit Fee Schedule (Resolution 2026-01, adopted 19 February 2026), which is a scanned image PDF with no text layer that I rendered at 300dpi and OCR'd myself; the Building Application & Inspection Procedure; the Application for Building Permit (rev. 2, 07 Feb 2025); the Contractor Registration, Owner/Builder Disclosure and Private Provider forms; and the Citizenserve portal branded to the City. Held at 88 rather than higher for three specific gaps: (a) no city-limits GIS lookup exists on the City's site, so which '33051' addresses are inside the city versus unincorporated Monroe County could not be tested - the same risk pattern that bites elsewhere in the Keys; (b) the Citizenserve permit-type list is behind a login, so whether a standalone electrical permit or a separate ESS permit type exists is unproven; (c) the City publishes no solar-specific checklist, plan-review criteria or inspection sequence at all, so much of the installation and inspection detail in this file is the state code answering rather than this authority.
https://keycolonybeach.net/building-department-and-code-enforcement/
- Permit required
- Yes - a permit is required. Sec. 6-6(1)(d) requires a building permit for 'any electrical, plumbing or mechanical addition or alteration',88%
- Permit cost
- CONFLICT, both sources current and first-party. (a) The CODIFIED fee schedule at Sec. 1-10 of the Code of Ordinances carries a named line: 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation $500.00'…70%
- Plan review
- The City publishes no turnaround of its own. The binding figure is statutory: Fla. Stat. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve,72%
- Portal
- Citizenserve (www2.citizenserve.com), installation ID 326, branded 'KEY COLONY BEACH, FL'. It covers permitting, licensing, development projects and code enforcement.92%
- Electrical code
- 2020 NEC. The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) references 'NFPA 70-20 National Electrical Code (NEC)' in its Chapter 35 referenced standards,80%
- Own placard wording
- No - the City specifies no placard wording of its own.80%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal, phone or email. The City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure says 'Call or email to schedule inspection, please allow 24 hours';82%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes - a permit is required. Sec. 6-6(1)(d) requires a building permit for 'any electrical, plumbing or mechanical addition or alteration', Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined - the City issues one building permit; electrical is carried inside it as a named subcontractor line with its own stated cost, Q4 Plan review — The City publishes no turnaround of its own. The binding figure is statutory: Fla. Stat. Q18 Where you file — Citizenserve (www2.citizenserve.com), installation ID 326, branded 'KEY COLONY BEACH, FL'. Q20
- Permit required
- Yes - a permit is required. Sec. 6-6(1)(d) requires a building permit for 'any electrical, plumbing or mechanical addition or alteration',88% source
- What it costs
- CONFLICT, both sources current and first-party. (a) The CODIFIED fee schedule at Sec. 1-10 of the Code of Ordinances carries a named line: 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation $500.00' plus an…70% source
- Plan review turnaround
- The City publishes no turnaround of its own. The binding figure is statutory: Fla. Stat. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve,72% source
- Key document
- municipal code + published procedure cited by 11 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes - the City of Key Colony Beach Building Department is the AHJ for residential building and electrical permitting, plan review and inspection inside the city limits, including rooftop PV 92% · department page + municipal code
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both - the City permits and inspects building AND electrical itself, and also performs its own fire-safety plan review and fire inspections through the Building Official, who is separately certified as the City's fire safety inspector. Nothing is delegated to Monroe County. 85% · municipal code
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes - a permit is required. Sec. 6-6(1)(d) requires a building permit for 'any electrical, plumbing or mechanical addition or alteration', and the codified fee schedule carries a named line 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation'. 88% · municipal code
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined - the City issues one building permit; electrical is carried inside it as a named subcontractor line with its own stated cost, and the fee schedule prices 'ELECTRICAL' inside the same additions/alterations fee table rather than as a separate permit type 65% · permit application form + fee schedule
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No - HOA or architectural-association approval is not a City permitting prerequisite. Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-30 says expressly: 'It is not the responsibility of the city (including the building official) to enforce compliance with any deed restrictions.' Separately, Fla. Stat. 163.04(2) bars any deed restriction, covenant or declaration from prohibiting solar collectors, and bars an approving entity from denying permission - it may only specify location on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south, and only where that does not impair effective operation. 78% · land development regulations + state statute
- Is there a historic-district review? No - there is no historic-district review in Key Colony Beach. The city has no historic preservation ordinance, no historic district, and no historic preservation board. 72% · municipal code (absence proved by full-text search)
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No windstorm certification in the Texas/TDI sense. What is required instead is Florida Product Approval: the City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure requires NOAs (Notices of Acceptance / product approvals) to be submitted with the application. Key Colony Beach sits in the wind-borne debris region but NOT in the High Velocity Hurricane Zone (HVHZ is Miami-Dade and Broward only). Sec. 6-3(9) requires hurricane shutters on all new construction and on existing structures undergoing remodelling, designed to a minimum 150 mph 3-second gust per ASCE 7 and to SSTD 12-97 large-missile impact, with fasteners physically verified before the certificate of occupancy. 70% · municipal code + published procedure
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Yes - and this is the most consequential local overlay in this file. Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-28 (Architecture): 'In the event that an application is made for a building permit for construction of a one or two unit dwelling, or the performance of work on such an existing building, that, in the opinion of the building official, does not meet the criteria cited above [architectural style and materials harmonious in character and appearance with existing buildings in the neighborhood, appropriate to their surroundings], such permit shall not be issued except after recommendation by the planning and zoning committee and approval by the city commission.' Code Sec. 6-3(2)(b) mirrors this. So a single official's aesthetic judgement can convert a rooftop PV permit into a Planning & Zoning recommendation plus a City Commission vote. 80% · land development regulations
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No cap in City law. The caps that bite are the utility's: FKEC Tier 1 covers systems 10 kW AC or less; the Gross Power Rating must not exceed 90% of the member's utility distribution service rating; and FKEC's net-metering policy states 'Member generation shall be no larger than required to achieve yearly net zero usage', sized on the average peak consumption of the three highest months in the last 12. FKEC reviews production against consumption at an annual January true-up and can require export limiting (inverter power limiting) within 90 days, with physical disconnection for non-compliance. Tier 2 is >10 to 100 kW, Tier 3 >100 kW to 1 MW. 82% · utility net-metering page + interconnection agreement
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either - Sec. 6-6(2)(a): the application 'must be submitted by a person certified or licensed by either the State of Florida or Monroe County to do the work for which the permit is desired', with an exception for the owner of a single-family dwelling building or improving it for the owner's own use 88% · municipal code
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes - contractors must register with the City's Building Department before applying. The Contractor Registration Form requires business and qualifier details plus up-to-date copies of every licence pertaining to the work (State of Florida, Monroe County), an occupational licence or business tax receipt, a general liability certificate naming the City of Key Colony Beach as certificate holder, and workers' compensation or an exemption affidavit. 88% · department form
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes, but tightly restricted. Sec. 6-6(2)(c) allows an individual to alter or repair his own residence or build a new one under Fla. Stat. 489.103(7), (9); the owner/builder is limited to ONE permit in five years for a new single-family dwelling, must be present on the job site whenever work is in progress and during every inspection, and anyone assisting other than a 'common labourer' must be state-licensed or Monroe County certified. A notarised Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement must be completed before the permit issues. 90% · municipal code + department form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Per the City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure: 'Submit complete application including contract, drawings, NOA's [Florida/Miami-Dade product approvals] with permit fee for review and approval.' Sec. 6-6(3)-(4) adds: written application at the office of the city clerk giving the full legal description (lot, block, subdivision), three complete sets of plans, and drawings showing building locations, elevations and setbacks from a recent survey, and 'plans and elevations showing structural design and diagrams for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and roofing installations', plus the names of the electrical and roofing subcontractors. A recorded Notice of Commencement is required before the first inspection, and registered contractors must file Subcontractor Sign-On forms. 80% · published procedure + municipal code
- How many copies, and in what format? Three (3) complete sets of plans - Sec. 6-6(3): 'Said application must be accompanied by three (3) complete sets of plans.' No page size or digital-format requirement is published. 60% · municipal code
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. Sec. 6-6(4) requires drawings showing the location of all buildings with front, side and rear elevations and heights, the distance of all setbacks from property lines 'as determined from a recent survey', driveways with finished elevations, lot perimeter walls and fences, and for residential work the elevation of the lowest supporting member and lowest finished habitable floor relative to mean sea level. A lot survey by a registered surveyor is required specifically before construction of a seawall, a new building or an external addition to one, or a boundary fence. 70% · municipal code
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes in substance, though not by that name. Sec. 6-6(4)(j) requires 'Plans and elevations showing structural design and diagrams for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and roofing installations.' Neither 'one-line' nor 'three-line' appears anywhere in the Code (searched the full codified text of both the Code of Ordinances and the Land Development Regulations). 65% · municipal code
- Are string and conductor calculations required? No - string and conductor calculations are not called for by any published City document. Sec. 6-6(4) sets out the complete list of required drawing contents and asks only for 'diagrams for electrical ... installations'; the Building Application & Inspection Procedure asks for application, contract, drawings and NOAs. 60% · municipal code
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No PV-specific threshold is published. What the Code does require: Sec. 6-3(1)(b) and Sec. 6-6(4)(h) oblige a registered professional engineer to seal the plans and write to the City certifying that supports are designed and anchored for base-flood loads and that the structure is designed to remain standing against wind without shielding. Sec. 6-6(1)(b) leaves 'what constitutes major structural repair' to the building official. So whether a rooftop PV attachment needs a sealed structural letter is at the Building Official's discretion, not at a stated kW or square-foot threshold. 55% · municipal code
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Not required by any published City document. The Code's engineering-seal requirements (Sec. 6-3(1)(b), 6-6(4)(h), 6-6(4)(i)) are all structural, flood or grading; no electrical PE seal is mentioned anywhere. 58% · municipal code
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Citizenserve (www2.citizenserve.com), installation ID 326, branded 'KEY COLONY BEACH, FL'. It covers permitting, licensing, development projects and code enforcement. 92% · portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes, per the portal's own description: 'Learn when you need a permit, submittal requirements, apply online, view review status, pay permit fees and schedule inspections all from your home, office or mobile device.' Caveat: the codified Sec. 6-6(3) still says 'An application for a building permit shall be made in writing at the office of the city clerk', and the City has not reconciled the two. 70% · portal landing page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? CONFLICT, both sources current and first-party. (a) The CODIFIED fee schedule at Sec. 1-10 of the Code of Ordinances carries a named line: 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation $500.00' plus an additional 2.5% State surcharge. (b) The Building Department's own current fee schedule, Resolution 2026-01 adopted 19 February 2026, contains NO solar line at all and prices the work generically: 'ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS - Costs of up to $2,500 flat fee $100; Costs greater than $2,500, per $1,000 or any part thereof $35', plus a Building Surcharge of 2.5% of the permit fee (minimum $4.00) and a Fire Safety Plan Review fee of $125 for single-family. On a $15,000 residential PV job route (b) computes to roughly $525 plus surcharge, so the two routes happen to land close - but they are different instruments and I am not resolving them. 70% · codified fee schedule (conflicting with department fee resolution)
- How is the fee calculated? Both bases are live, depending which instrument you read: FLAT $500 under the codified Sec. 1-10 solar line, or VALUATION ($100 flat up to $2,500 of job cost, then $35 per $1,000 or any part thereof) under Building Department Resolution 2026-01. A 2.5% state surcharge applies on top either way. 65% · fee schedule + codified fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? No separate building plan-check fee - Resolution 2026-01 prices plan review inside the permit fee. There IS a separate FIRE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW fee: minimum $75.00, single-family $125.00, duplex $225.00. A 10% discount on the building permit fee is available where an approved private inspection provider is used and this is raised during the application process or before the first City inspection. 78% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? The City publishes no turnaround of its own. The binding figure is statutory: Fla. Stat. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions or deny within 30 BUSINESS DAYS of a complete and sufficient application for a residential or electrical permit where the structure is under 7,500 sq ft; 553.792(1)(c) requires written notice within 5 business days saying what is missing, failing which the application is automatically deemed complete; 553.792(1)(e) cuts the permit fee by 10% for each business day the deadline is missed. 72% · state statute
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 15 months maximum from the date granted. The City's Application for Building Permit form carries the notice in capitals: 'THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A 15 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM FROM DATE GRANTED.' For remodel/alteration work (which is the category a rooftop PV job falls in) Sec. 6-8 adds a separate control: work must not be discontinued for more than 30 days - evidenced by failure to call an inspection within 30 days of the last one - and such a discontinuance results in an indefinite extension of the permit coupled with a $3.00 per day fee until the work is completed and approved. 75% · permit application form + municipal code
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Keys Electric Cooperative (FKEC) - a member-owned rural electric cooperative headquartered at 91630 Overseas Highway, Tavernier FL. 92% · municipal code + utility page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with a hard city-side gate at the end. FKEC's Tier 1 agreement requires: a completed application to FKEC to start the process (no application fee for Tier 1); FKEC executes the interconnection agreement within 30 calendar days of a completed application; the Member 'agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation ... that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications'; and the Member must notify FKEC at least 10 calendar days before first placing the equipment in service. Parallel operation must begin within one year of FKEC executing the agreement. 75% · utility interconnection agreement
28 questions answered against City of Key Colony Beach’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes - the City of Key Colony Beach Building Department is the AHJ for residential building and electrical permitting, plan review and inspection inside the city limits, including rooftop PV
Why the confidence is not higherThe City runs its own in-house Building Department with a named, city-employed Building Official (Tony Loreno, BuildingOfficial@keycolonybeach.net, city phone extension) and a Building Assistant; Code of Ordinances Sec. 6-4 creates the building official post by city-commission appointment and gives it plan review, permit issuance, field inspection, stop-work and certificate-of-occupancy powers. No county department or private plan-review firm is named anywhere in the City's building material. Held at 92 rather than higher only because no city-limits GIS parcel tool was found, so which '33051' mailing addresses fall inside the city versus unincorporated Monroe County could not be tested.
department page + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/building-department-and-code-enforcement/
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both - the City permits and inspects building AND electrical itself, and also performs its own fire-safety plan review and fire inspections through the Building Official, who is separately certified as the City's fire safety inspector. Nothing is delegated to Monroe County.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 6-4(2) gives the building official plan review, permit issuance and field inspection for all permitted work; Sec. 6-6(7)(c)1 funds 'the continued certification and education of the building official as the fire safety inspector as required by Florida Statute', so fire plan review sits with the same person rather than with a county fire marshal. The Code carries no delegation clause to Monroe County for building or electrical. Held at 85 because the Code does not spell out an electrical-inspector qualification separate from the building official.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes - a permit is required. Sec. 6-6(1)(d) requires a building permit for 'any electrical, plumbing or mechanical addition or alteration', and the codified fee schedule carries a named line 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation'.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo independent first-party sources: Sec. 6-6(1)(d) of the Code, and a solar-specific fee line in the codified schedule at Sec. 1-10. Note a live threshold conflict: Sec. 6-6(1)(b) says a project over $1,000 estimated cost requires a permit, while the current Building Department fee schedule (Res. 2026-01, adopted 19 Feb 2026) says 'No permit required for estimated work under $2,500, however, an inspection may be necessary as determined by the Building Official, with a charge of $25.00'. A very small PV job could fall between the two figures. Reported, not resolved.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined - the City issues one building permit; electrical is carried inside it as a named subcontractor line with its own stated cost, and the fee schedule prices 'ELECTRICAL' inside the same additions/alterations fee table rather than as a separate permit type
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's own Application for Building Permit form has a block 'LIST ALL SUBCONTRACTORS, COUNTY & STATE LICENSE NUMBER AND COST' with an ELECTRICAL / LICENSE # / COST row, and the fee schedule's second fee band is headed 'SEA WALLS, ... ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS' as one priced category. Held at 65 because neither document says in words whether a standalone electrical permit can be pulled on its own, and the Citizenserve portal's permit-type list is behind a login I could not pass.
permit application form + fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/KCB-Building-Permit-2-7-25.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either - Sec. 6-6(2)(a): the application 'must be submitted by a person certified or licensed by either the State of Florida or Monroe County to do the work for which the permit is desired', with an exception for the owner of a single-family dwelling building or improving it for the owner's own use
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from the codified text. For PV this means a Florida-licensed contractor whose licence covers the work (state certified/registered solar, electrical, or building/residential contractor) or a Monroe County certificate of competency holder. Held at 88 because the Code does not itself list which Florida licence classifications cover photovoltaic work - that sits in Fla. Stat. ch. 489, which I did not open in this run.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes - contractors must register with the City's Building Department before applying. The Contractor Registration Form requires business and qualifier details plus up-to-date copies of every licence pertaining to the work (State of Florida, Monroe County), an occupational licence or business tax receipt, a general liability certificate naming the City of Key Colony Beach as certificate holder, and workers' compensation or an exemption affidavit.
Why the confidence is not higherFirst-party City form, listed on the Building Department page and on the Forms page. Held at 88 because the form itself does not state a processing time or an expiry/renewal cycle for the registration.
department form checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Contractor-Registration-Form.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes, but tightly restricted. Sec. 6-6(2)(c) allows an individual to alter or repair his own residence or build a new one under Fla. Stat. 489.103(7), (9); the owner/builder is limited to ONE permit in five years for a new single-family dwelling, must be present on the job site whenever work is in progress and during every inspection, and anyone assisting other than a 'common labourer' must be state-licensed or Monroe County certified. A notarised Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement must be completed before the permit issues.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text plus the City's own disclosure form. The five-year single-permit limit is expressly tied to construction of a NEW single-family dwelling, so its bite on a rooftop PV alteration is ambiguous; that ambiguity is why this is 90 and not higher.
municipal code + department form checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Owner-Builder-Disclosure-Statement-rev-10.30.23.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Per the City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure: 'Submit complete application including contract, drawings, NOA's [Florida/Miami-Dade product approvals] with permit fee for review and approval.' Sec. 6-6(3)-(4) adds: written application at the office of the city clerk giving the full legal description (lot, block, subdivision), three complete sets of plans, and drawings showing building locations, elevations and setbacks from a recent survey, and 'plans and elevations showing structural design and diagrams for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and roofing installations', plus the names of the electrical and roofing subcontractors. A recorded Notice of Commencement is required before the first inspection, and registered contractors must file Subcontractor Sign-On forms.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from three first-party documents that agree. Held at 80 because none of them is a solar-specific checklist - the City publishes no PV submittal checklist at all, so what a reviewer actually expects for a PV package (module/inverter cut sheets, racking product approval numbers, attachment detail) is inferred from the general rule about NOAs and electrical diagrams rather than stated.
published procedure + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Three (3) complete sets of plans - Sec. 6-6(3): 'Said application must be accompanied by three (3) complete sets of plans.' No page size or digital-format requirement is published.
Why the confidence is not higherThe codified figure is unambiguous, but it predates the Citizenserve portal, through which the City now says applications are submitted and reviewed online; neither the portal landing page nor the Building Department page restates a copy count or a file format. So the codified '3 sets' may be dead letter for portal submittals. Held at 60 for that reason, not because the text is unclear.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. Sec. 6-6(4) requires drawings showing the location of all buildings with front, side and rear elevations and heights, the distance of all setbacks from property lines 'as determined from a recent survey', driveways with finished elevations, lot perimeter walls and fences, and for residential work the elevation of the lowest supporting member and lowest finished habitable floor relative to mean sea level. A lot survey by a registered surveyor is required specifically before construction of a seawall, a new building or an external addition to one, or a boundary fence.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified list, read in full. Held at 70 because the surveyor trigger is written for seawalls, new buildings, external additions and boundary fences - a rooftop PV array is arguably none of those, so whether a fresh survey is demanded for a PV permit is not settled by the text.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes in substance, though not by that name. Sec. 6-6(4)(j) requires 'Plans and elevations showing structural design and diagrams for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and roofing installations.' Neither 'one-line' nor 'three-line' appears anywhere in the Code (searched the full codified text of both the Code of Ordinances and the Land Development Regulations).
Why the confidence is not higherThe requirement for an electrical diagram is first-party and explicit; the specific form of that diagram is not. Held at 65 because a reviewer could satisfy 6-6(4)(j) with something less than a NEC-style one-line, and the City publishes no PV plan-review checklist to settle it.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
No - string and conductor calculations are not called for by any published City document. Sec. 6-6(4) sets out the complete list of required drawing contents and asks only for 'diagrams for electrical ... installations'; the Building Application & Inspection Procedure asks for application, contract, drawings and NOAs.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved this run in the two places it would be stated: the codified submittal-contents list and the City's own application procedure. Searched the whole codified text for 'conductor' (0 hits), 'ampacity' (0 hits) and 'busbar' (0 hits), with 'electrical' as positive control (23 hits) and 'zzqqx' as fabricated control (0 hits). Held at 60 rather than higher because the underlying NEC 2020 review would still require the numbers on the drawings even if no local document names them.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No PV-specific threshold is published. What the Code does require: Sec. 6-3(1)(b) and Sec. 6-6(4)(h) oblige a registered professional engineer to seal the plans and write to the City certifying that supports are designed and anchored for base-flood loads and that the structure is designed to remain standing against wind without shielding. Sec. 6-6(1)(b) leaves 'what constitutes major structural repair' to the building official. So whether a rooftop PV attachment needs a sealed structural letter is at the Building Official's discretion, not at a stated kW or square-foot threshold.
Why the confidence is not higherThe engineering-certification language is first-party and clear, but it is written for new construction on pilings and columns, not for adding an array to an existing roof. I found no City document that resolves the PV case either way, and the Building Official's discretion under 6-6(1)(b) is explicit. 55 reflects that this is a reading of two general provisions, not a PV rule.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Not required by any published City document. The Code's engineering-seal requirements (Sec. 6-3(1)(b), 6-6(4)(h), 6-6(4)(i)) are all structural, flood or grading; no electrical PE seal is mentioned anywhere.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved this run against the full codified text of both Code and Land Development Regulations plus the application form and procedure; controls passed ('electrical' 23 hits, 'zzqqx' 0). Held at 58 because Florida practice sometimes puts an electrical engineer's seal in play through the Building Official's general authority to require 'such other information as the building official may require' (Sec. 6-6(4)(o)).
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
CONFLICT, both sources current and first-party. (a) The CODIFIED fee schedule at Sec. 1-10 of the Code of Ordinances carries a named line: 'Permit fee for Solar Panel Installation $500.00' plus an additional 2.5% State surcharge. (b) The Building Department's own current fee schedule, Resolution 2026-01 adopted 19 February 2026, contains NO solar line at all and prices the work generically: 'ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS - Costs of up to $2,500 flat fee $100; Costs greater than $2,500, per $1,000 or any part thereof $35', plus a Building Surcharge of 2.5% of the permit fee (minimum $4.00) and a Fire Safety Plan Review fee of $125 for single-family. On a $15,000 residential PV job route (b) computes to roughly $525 plus surcharge, so the two routes happen to land close - but they are different instruments and I am not resolving them.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth read first-hand. (a) is in the code as codified through Ord. No. 2025-511 enacted 21 May 2026 (Supp. 36), in a table headed 'SCHEDULE OF VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES (Updated Fall 2022)' whose last cited amending ordinance is Ord. No. 2021-467 of 28 Oct 2021 - an odd home for a permit fee, which is part of why this is 70. (b) is a scanned image PDF with no text layer; I rendered it at 300dpi and OCR'd it myself rather than trusting any summary, and the strikethrough/underline convention used for amendments makes some struck figures hard to read.
codified fee schedule (conflicting with department fee resolution) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH1GEPR
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Both bases are live, depending which instrument you read: FLAT $500 under the codified Sec. 1-10 solar line, or VALUATION ($100 flat up to $2,500 of job cost, then $35 per $1,000 or any part thereof) under Building Department Resolution 2026-01. A 2.5% state surcharge applies on top either way.
Why the confidence is not higherSame conflict as Q15, same two first-party documents. 65 because I can prove both texts exist and are current but cannot prove which one the counter actually charges.
fee schedule + codified fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2026-01-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Amendment-ADOPTED-2.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
No separate building plan-check fee - Resolution 2026-01 prices plan review inside the permit fee. There IS a separate FIRE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW fee: minimum $75.00, single-family $125.00, duplex $225.00. A 10% discount on the building permit fee is available where an approved private inspection provider is used and this is raised during the application process or before the first City inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off the OCR'd current fee schedule. Held at 78 because the schedule does not say whether the fire safety plan review fee is levied on every permit or only on permits with life-safety scope - a rooftop PV permit may or may not attract the $125.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2026-01-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Amendment-ADOPTED-2.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
The City publishes no turnaround of its own. The binding figure is statutory: Fla. Stat. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions or deny within 30 BUSINESS DAYS of a complete and sufficient application for a residential or electrical permit where the structure is under 7,500 sq ft; 553.792(1)(c) requires written notice within 5 business days saying what is missing, failing which the application is automatically deemed complete; 553.792(1)(e) cuts the permit fee by 10% for each business day the deadline is missed.
Why the confidence is not higherStatute read in full from the Florida Senate's 2025 statutes. It binds Key Colony Beach as a Florida local government, and 553.792(1)(b) says local timeframes apply instead only if MORE stringent - I found no shorter local figure. 72 rather than higher because this is a statewide ceiling, not evidence of what this small department actually turns round, and the City's own site states nothing.
state statute checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2025/553.792
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
15 months maximum from the date granted. The City's Application for Building Permit form carries the notice in capitals: 'THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR A 15 MONTH PERIOD MAXIMUM FROM DATE GRANTED.' For remodel/alteration work (which is the category a rooftop PV job falls in) Sec. 6-8 adds a separate control: work must not be discontinued for more than 30 days - evidenced by failure to call an inspection within 30 days of the last one - and such a discontinuance results in an indefinite extension of the permit coupled with a $3.00 per day fee until the work is completed and approved.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth first-party: the current permit form (rev. 2, 07 Feb 2025) and the codified text. Held at 75 because Sec. 6-7's expiry machinery (180-day discontinuance, 15-month completion) is written for NEW CONSTRUCTION while Sec. 6-8 governs remodelling, and the 15-month notice on the form does not say which of the two it is restating.
permit application form + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/KCB-Building-Permit-2-7-25.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Citizenserve (www2.citizenserve.com), installation ID 326, branded 'KEY COLONY BEACH, FL'. It covers permitting, licensing, development projects and code enforcement.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Building Department page links to it as 'Online Code Enforcement, Permitting & Licensing' and the portal's own landing page is branded to the City. 92 not 95 only because the portal's permit application flow is behind a login I did not create.
portal landing page checked 2026-09-13 https://www2.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showHomePage&ctzPagePrefix=Portal_&installationID=326
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes, per the portal's own description: 'Learn when you need a permit, submittal requirements, apply online, view review status, pay permit fees and schedule inspections all from your home, office or mobile device.' Caveat: the codified Sec. 6-6(3) still says 'An application for a building permit shall be made in writing at the office of the city clerk', and the City has not reconciled the two.
Why the confidence is not higherPortal text is first-party. Held at 70 because (a) that codified sentence is unrepealed, (b) the Contractor Registration Form still offers only in-person, post or email as its three routes, and (c) the permit-type list and any PV-specific upload requirements sit behind a login, so I could not confirm a PV permit can in fact be completed end to end online.
portal landing page checked 2026-09-13 https://www2.citizenserve.com/Portal/PortalController?Action=showHomePage&ctzPagePrefix=Portal_&installationID=326
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Florida Keys Electric Cooperative (FKEC) - a member-owned rural electric cooperative headquartered at 91630 Overseas Highway, Tavernier FL.
Why the confidence is not higherNamed by the City itself in its own codified text: Sec. 6-6(5) forbids issuing a building permit for a single-family dwelling until affidavits are provided from the Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority (water) and 'from the Florida Keys Electric Cooperative showing that there will be an adequate electricity supply'. That is a first-party city-side confirmation, not a ZIP-code lookup. 92 because the provision is written for new dwellings, so it proves territory rather than proving anything about a PV retrofit.
municipal code + utility page checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, with a hard city-side gate at the end. FKEC's Tier 1 agreement requires: a completed application to FKEC to start the process (no application fee for Tier 1); FKEC executes the interconnection agreement within 30 calendar days of a completed application; the Member 'agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation ... that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications'; and the Member must notify FKEC at least 10 calendar days before first placing the equipment in service. Parallel operation must begin within one year of FKEC executing the agreement.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the current Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement (file dated 040926, i.e. 9 April 2026). 'Parallel' is the best fit of the four options because the FKEC application can run alongside the city permit but FKEC's final step cannot happen until the City has inspected and certified. 75 because the agreement nowhere says the FKEC application must precede the City permit, and the City nowhere says an FKEC document is needed at PV permit intake (its FKEC affidavit rule, Sec. 6-6(5), is written for new dwellings).
utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/wp-content/uploads/Tier-1-Standard-Interconnection-Agreement-040926.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No - HOA or architectural-association approval is not a City permitting prerequisite. Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-30 says expressly: 'It is not the responsibility of the city (including the building official) to enforce compliance with any deed restrictions.' Separately, Fla. Stat. 163.04(2) bars any deed restriction, covenant or declaration from prohibiting solar collectors, and bars an approving entity from denying permission - it may only specify location on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south, and only where that does not impair effective operation.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth texts read in full. Held at 78 because the City does run its own architectural-harmony gate (see Q27), which is a city function rather than an HOA one but produces a similar practical obstacle, and because condominium and co-operative buildings are common in Key Colony Beach and a condo association's own consent to roof work is a private-law matter the City does not police.
land development regulations + state statute checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/land_development_regulations_?nodeId=SUHITA_ARTIVSURE
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No - there is no historic-district review in Key Colony Beach. The city has no historic preservation ordinance, no historic district, and no historic preservation board.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved this run against the full codified text of both the Code of Ordinances and the Land Development Regulations. 'historic' returns 17 hits, every one of them either publisher boilerplate or the Florida Building Code, Existing Building Chapter 12 flood-exception definition of 'historic structure'; none creates a district or a review. Controls in the same corpus: 'electrical' 23 hits (positive), 'zzqqx' 0 (fabricated). Held at 72 because the city incorporated in 1957 and a separate county or National Register overlay was not tested.
municipal code (absence proved by full-text search) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No windstorm certification in the Texas/TDI sense. What is required instead is Florida Product Approval: the City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure requires NOAs (Notices of Acceptance / product approvals) to be submitted with the application. Key Colony Beach sits in the wind-borne debris region but NOT in the High Velocity Hurricane Zone (HVHZ is Miami-Dade and Broward only). Sec. 6-3(9) requires hurricane shutters on all new construction and on existing structures undergoing remodelling, designed to a minimum 150 mph 3-second gust per ASCE 7 and to SSTD 12-97 large-missile impact, with fasteners physically verified before the certificate of occupancy.
Why the confidence is not higherThe NOA requirement is first-party and is the practical equivalent question for a PV racking submittal. Held at 70 because the 150 mph / SSTD 12-97 figures in Sec. 6-3(9) are visibly stale - SSTD 12-97 and the Dade County Building Codes Compliance Office are both superseded, and current ASCE 7-22 design wind speeds for Monroe County are materially higher - and because Sec. 6-2(b) then says the most restrictive of the adopted codes applies, so the codified number is a floor, not the design value.
municipal code + published procedure checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Yes - and this is the most consequential local overlay in this file. Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-28 (Architecture): 'In the event that an application is made for a building permit for construction of a one or two unit dwelling, or the performance of work on such an existing building, that, in the opinion of the building official, does not meet the criteria cited above [architectural style and materials harmonious in character and appearance with existing buildings in the neighborhood, appropriate to their surroundings], such permit shall not be issued except after recommendation by the planning and zoning committee and approval by the city commission.' Code Sec. 6-3(2)(b) mirrors this. So a single official's aesthetic judgement can convert a rooftop PV permit into a Planning & Zoning recommendation plus a City Commission vote.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the codified Land Development Regulations (Supp. 14, codified through Ord. No. 2025-507 adopted 22 Jan 2026) and cross-checked against Code Sec. 6-3(2)(b). Held at 80 because the trigger is discretionary ('in the opinion of the building official') and I found no evidence either way that it has ever been applied to solar; note also the live tension with Fla. Stat. 163.04(1), which expressly prohibits a local ordinance that 'has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors'. I report both and resolve neither.
land development regulations checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/land_development_regulations_?nodeId=SUHITA_ARTIVSURE
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No cap in City law. The caps that bite are the utility's: FKEC Tier 1 covers systems 10 kW AC or less; the Gross Power Rating must not exceed 90% of the member's utility distribution service rating; and FKEC's net-metering policy states 'Member generation shall be no larger than required to achieve yearly net zero usage', sized on the average peak consumption of the three highest months in the last 12. FKEC reviews production against consumption at an annual January true-up and can require export limiting (inverter power limiting) within 90 days, with physical disconnection for non-compliance. Tier 2 is >10 to 100 kW, Tier 3 >100 kW to 1 MW.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from FKEC's net-metering page and the current Tier 1 agreement. The City-side absence was proved against the full codified text (no kW, no system-size and no generation cap anywhere; 'solar' appears exactly once in the whole Code, as the fee line). 82 because the net-zero sizing rule is stated as policy prose rather than as a numbered tariff provision, and FKEC's discretion in applying it is not bounded in the text.
utility net-metering page + interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/energy-efficiency/green-power/solar-net-metering/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2020 NEC. The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) references 'NFPA 70-20 National Electrical Code (NEC)' in its Chapter 35 referenced standards, and FBC-B 2701.1 makes NFPA 70 govern the design and installation of electrical systems. Locally, Code Sec. 6-2(a)(1)d adopts 'NEC (National Electric Code)' and Sec. 6-2(a)(2) adopts 'the latest editions, revisions and amendments of these codes'. 80% · state code referenced-standards table (secondary reproduction)
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023 - adopted statewide by F.A.C. Rule 61G20-1.001 ('The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), as updated by the Florida Building Commission on June 20, 2023, April 16, 2024, August 13, 2024, December 10, 2024, December 20, 2024, April 15, 2025, and December 9, 2025 ... is hereby adopted as the building code for the State of Florida'), rule version effective 18 March 2026. The 9th Edition (2026) exists only in draft on the Commission's site. Locally adopted through Code Sec. 6-2(a)(1)a, 'The Florida Building Codes'. 92% · state adopting rule
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition - NFPA 1, the Fire Code, Florida 2021 Edition (F.A.C. Rule 69A-60.003) and NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code, Florida 2021 Edition (Rule 69A-60.004), both effective 31 December 2023. Locally, Code Sec. 6-2(a)(1)c adopts 'NFPA (National Fire Protection Association)' in its latest editions, and Sec. 6-6(7)(c) makes the City's Building Official the certified fire safety inspector. 88% · state adopting rule
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. Code Sec. 6-25 amends the Florida Building Code, Building (minimum plan review criteria 107.3.5 and required inspections 110.3, inserting a City of Key Colony Beach VE-Zone Certification form, FEMA Elevation Certificate submissions at foundation and final, and local SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE / SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT definitions); Sec. 6-26 amends the FBC, Existing Building with the same definitions; Sec. 6-27 amends the FBC, Residential Sec. R322 (enclosed areas below design flood elevation, breakaway walls, and a City V-Zone Certification form). Sec. 6-3 adds 22 further local construction specifications on top of the FBC. Sec. 6-2(b) states that where the adopted codes differ, 'the most restrictive code shall apply.' NONE of these amendments touches photovoltaics, electrical signage, rapid shutdown, batteries or roof access. 85% · municipal code
- What is the installation judged against? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) - Residential Sec. R324 for one- and two-family dwellings, plus NFPA 70 (2020 NEC) for the electrical work, plus the Florida Fire Prevention Code, plus the City's own Chapter 6 additional construction specifications and flood amendments. Where these differ, Code Sec. 6-2(b) makes the most restrictive govern. 80% · municipal code + state code
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? FBC-R R324.6, unamended locally. Pathways: not fewer than two pathways, on separate roof planes, from lowest roof edge to ridge, not less than 36 inches wide, on all buildings, at least one of them on the street or driveway side; and for each roof plane carrying an array, a 36-inch pathway from lowest roof edge to ridge on that plane, an adjacent plane, or straddling both. Pathways must be over areas capable of supporting firefighters and in areas with minimal obstructions. Ridge setback: not less than 18 inches clear on BOTH sides of a horizontal ridge where the array occupies not more than 33% of the plan-view total roof area; not less than 36 inches on both sides where it occupies more than 33%. With an NFPA 13D or P2904 sprinkler system in the dwelling, those thresholds move to 66%. Panels may not be placed on the portion of a roof below an emergency escape and rescue opening, and a 36-inch pathway must be provided to that opening. Exceptions: detached non-habitable structures; where the code official determines rooftop operations will not be employed; and roofs with slopes of 2:12 or less. 85% · state code
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes - rapid shutdown to the 2020 NEC (NFPA 70-2020 Article 690.12), which applies through FBC-B 2701.1 and FBC-R R324.3 ('Photovoltaic systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Sections R324.3.1 through R324.7.1, NFPA 70 and the manufacturer's installation instructions'). The City adds nothing and subtracts nothing. 78% · state code
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The City of Key Colony Beach specifies NO placards of its own - none at the service equipment, none at the array, none anywhere. What applies is the 2020 NEC as adopted through the Florida Building Code. The one extra requirement in the chain comes from the utility, not the AHJ: FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.3 requires a permanent weather-proof placard adjacent to FKEC's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch, but only where FKEC and the member have agreed to site that switch somewhere other than adjacent to the meter. 70% · municipal code (absence proved) + utility agreement
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No - the City specifies no placard wording of its own. 80% · municipal code (absence proved by full-text search)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? The City specifies no letter height, colour or material. The only material specification anywhere in the chain is FKEC's: its disconnect-location placard, where required, must be 'permanent weather-proof'. No dimension, colour or font is given by either body. 75% · municipal code (absence proved) + utility agreement
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Nothing required by the City. A site-plan / facility-map placard, if required, comes solely from the 2020 NEC as adopted through the Florida Building Code, not from any Key Colony Beach instrument. 55% · municipal code (absence proved by full-text search)
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes - exactly one, and it is conditional. FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.3: where FKEC determines that siting the manual disconnect adjacent to its meter socket 'would not be practical from a safety perspective and/or design considerations', and FKEC and the member agree an alternative location, 'the member shall install a permanent weather-proof placard adjacent to FKEC's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches.' Note the upstream condition: Sec. 5.1 makes the manual disconnect itself discretionary for UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems ('may require a member-installed manual disconnect switch based on system interconnection'), and only Sec. 5.2 - non-UL-1741 systems - makes it mandatory. So for a normal UL 1741 rooftop PV system the placard requirement is two conditions deep. 85% · utility interconnection agreement
- Where must the labels be placed? The City specifies no placement. FKEC's one placard goes adjacent to the FKEC meter socket. Where a manual disconnect IS required, it must be 'mounted separately from, but adjacent to, the FKEC meter socket', remain readily accessible to FKEC, and be capable of being locked in the open position with a single FKEC utility padlock. 75% · utility interconnection agreement
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Where required, adjacent to the meter. FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.2: a manual disconnect switch 'of the visible load break type to provide a separation point between the AC power output of the Member-owned renewable generation and any member wiring connected to FKEC's system. The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted separately from, but adjacent to, the FKEC meter socket', readily accessible to FKEC and lockable in the open position with a single FKEC utility padlock. Sec. 5.3 permits an alternative agreed location where adjacency is impractical for safety or design reasons, with the weather-proof locating placard described in Q42. CRITICAL QUALIFIER: Sec. 5.1 makes the switch CONDITIONAL for UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems - FKEC 'may require' one 'based on system interconnection' - and Sec. 5.2's mandatory language is written for Tier 1 systems that are NOT UL 1741 inverter based. 88% · utility interconnection agreement
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, on two tracks. (1) FBC-R R324.3.1: photovoltaic panels and modules shall be listed and labelled in accordance with UL 1703; inverters listed and labelled to UL 1741; grid-connected systems shall use inverters listed for utility interaction; mounting systems listed and labelled to UL 2703 shall be installed per the manufacturer's instructions and their listings. (2) Florida Product Approval / Miami-Dade NOAs - the City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure requires NOAs to be submitted with the application, which for a Monroe County wind-borne-debris-region roof is where racking approval is proved. FKEC adds a third, overlapping demand: Tier 1 Sec. 3.1 requires certification to IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, NEC 690, NEC 705, NEC 706 and UL 1741, with the manufacturer's specification sheets accepted as the written report. 80% · state code + published procedure + utility agreement
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, under FBC-R Sec. R328 with no local amendment. R328.2: ESS shall be listed and labelled to UL 9540. R328.3.1: individual units separated by not less than 3 feet unless smaller distances are documented by large-scale fire testing per the Florida Fire Prevention Code. R328.4 locations: detached garages and detached accessory structures; attached garages separated per R302.6; outdoors or on the exterior side of exterior walls at least 3 feet from doors and windows entering the dwelling; enclosed utility closets, basements, storage or utility spaces with finished or non-combustible walls and ceilings (unfinished wood framing needs 5/8-inch Type X gypsum). Not in sleeping rooms, nor in closets or spaces opening directly into them. R328.5 ratings: 20 kWh maximum per unit; aggregate not exceeding 40 kWh in utility closets, basements and storage/utility spaces, or 80 kWh in garages, detached accessory structures, on exterior walls, or outdoors on the ground - above which the Florida Fire Prevention Code governs. R328.7: smoke alarms per R314 plus an interconnected heat detector where smoke alarms cannot be sited. Exempt from R328 entirely: ESS listed to UL 9540 and marked 'For use in residential dwelling units' installed per the manufacturer's instructions and NFPA 70, and ESS under 1 kWh. 78% · state code
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, in effect. FBC-R R324.7: 'Ground-mounted photovoltaic systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Section R301' - the building-planning design-criteria section, i.e. treated as a structure for load and wind design. R324.7.1 then leaves fire separation distances to be 'determined by the local jurisdiction', and Key Colony Beach has published no such determination. Locally, Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-26 (accessory structures and uses) and the district setback tables would also apply to anything placed in a yard. Practical note: Key Colony Beach is a small, fully built-out island city of narrow canal-front lots, so ground mount is unlikely to arise. 60% · state code + land development regulations
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No City-specific PV mounting or attachment-spacing rule exists. The governing requirement is FBC-R R324.4.1.2: 'Rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panel or module systems and their supports shall be designed and installed for wind loads in accordance with ASCE 7', with R324.4.1.1 requiring the covered roof portions to be designed for dead load including panel weight, and R324.4.3 requiring roof penetrations to be flashed and sealed per FBC-R Chapter 9. Racking must additionally carry Florida Product Approval / NOA, which the City demands at intake. Code Sec. 6-3's detailed fastening specifications (hurricane straps, roof sheathing, six nails per shingle, two #10 screws per roof tile) govern the building's own construction, not PV racking. 62% · state code
20 questions answered against City of Key Colony Beach’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2020 NEC. The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) references 'NFPA 70-20 National Electrical Code (NEC)' in its Chapter 35 referenced standards, and FBC-B 2701.1 makes NFPA 70 govern the design and installation of electrical systems. Locally, Code Sec. 6-2(a)(1)d adopts 'NEC (National Electric Code)' and Sec. 6-2(a)(2) adopts 'the latest editions, revisions and amendments of these codes'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe edition is pinned by the FBC's own referenced-standards table, read through UpCodes' reproduction of the 2023 FBC Building Chapter 35 rather than from ICC's own viewer, which is JavaScript-only and returned no content. That is a reliable secondary rather than the adopting document itself, which is why this is 80. Note the local wrinkle: Sec. 6-2's 'latest editions' language is a rolling adoption, so the City's own ordinance does not pin an edition - the FBC does.
state code referenced-standards table (secondary reproduction) checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-building-code-2023/chapter/35/referenced-standards
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023 - adopted statewide by F.A.C. Rule 61G20-1.001 ('The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), as updated by the Florida Building Commission on June 20, 2023, April 16, 2024, August 13, 2024, December 10, 2024, December 20, 2024, April 15, 2025, and December 9, 2025 ... is hereby adopted as the building code for the State of Florida'), rule version effective 18 March 2026. The 9th Edition (2026) exists only in draft on the Commission's site. Locally adopted through Code Sec. 6-2(a)(1)a, 'The Florida Building Codes'.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo independent state sources: the Florida Building Commission's own home page banner and the text of Rule 61G20-1.001, which I pulled as the actual .doc from flrules.org rather than reading a summary. 92 rather than 95 because the local adopting ordinance uses rolling 'latest edition' language and never names the edition itself.
state adopting rule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=61G20-1
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition - NFPA 1, the Fire Code, Florida 2021 Edition (F.A.C. Rule 69A-60.003) and NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code, Florida 2021 Edition (Rule 69A-60.004), both effective 31 December 2023. Locally, Code Sec. 6-2(a)(1)c adopts 'NFPA (National Fire Protection Association)' in its latest editions, and Sec. 6-6(7)(c) makes the City's Building Official the certified fire safety inspector.
Why the confidence is not higherRule titles and effective dates read from the Florida Department of State's rule chapter listing for 69A-60. 88 rather than higher because I read the chapter index rather than pulling each rule's full text, and because the City's own adoption is by rolling reference with no fire-code edition named.
state adopting rule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=69A-60
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes. Code Sec. 6-25 amends the Florida Building Code, Building (minimum plan review criteria 107.3.5 and required inspections 110.3, inserting a City of Key Colony Beach VE-Zone Certification form, FEMA Elevation Certificate submissions at foundation and final, and local SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE / SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT definitions); Sec. 6-26 amends the FBC, Existing Building with the same definitions; Sec. 6-27 amends the FBC, Residential Sec. R322 (enclosed areas below design flood elevation, breakaway walls, and a City V-Zone Certification form). Sec. 6-3 adds 22 further local construction specifications on top of the FBC. Sec. 6-2(b) states that where the adopted codes differ, 'the most restrictive code shall apply.' NONE of these amendments touches photovoltaics, electrical signage, rapid shutdown, batteries or roof access.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three amendment sections read in full (Ord. No. 2018-456A of 10 Jan 2019 as amended by Ord. No. 2024-492 of 17 Oct 2024). The 'none touches PV' half is an absence proved this run by full-text search of the whole codified corpus: 'photovoltaic' 0, 'rapid shutdown' 0, 'placard' 0, 'label' 0, 'battery' 0, 'ground mount' 0, against 'electrical' 23 (positive control) and 'zzqqx' 0 (fabricated control).
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) - Residential Sec. R324 for one- and two-family dwellings, plus NFPA 70 (2020 NEC) for the electrical work, plus the Florida Fire Prevention Code, plus the City's own Chapter 6 additional construction specifications and flood amendments. Where these differ, Code Sec. 6-2(b) makes the most restrictive govern.
Why the confidence is not higherComposed from the local adopting section and the state code in force, both verified this run. 80 because the City publishes no PV inspection or plan-review criteria of its own, so what an inspector actually judges against on site is inferred from the adopted codes rather than stated by the City.
municipal code + state code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFull codified text of the City of Key Colony Beach Code of Ordinances (Supp. 36, codified through Ord. No. 2025-511 enacted 21 May 2026) and Land Development Regulations (Supp. 14, through Ord. No. 2025-507 adopted 22 Jan 2026), pulled chapter by chapter through the Municode content API and searched in full: 'busbar' 0 hits, 'service upgrade' 0 hits, 'ampacity' 0 hits, 'conductor' 0 hits. Controls in the same corpus passed - 'electrical' 23 hits (positive), 'zzqqx' 0 (fabricated). Also read Code Secs. 6-25, 6-26 and 6-27, which are the City's only Florida Building Code amendments and are entirely flood/V-zone; and the current Building Department fee schedule (Res. 2026-01). No local service-upgrade or busbar-sizing rule exists in any of them; the 2020 NEC 705.12 rules would apply unamended, but that is the state code answering, not this authority.
https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No City-specific PV mounting or attachment-spacing rule exists. The governing requirement is FBC-R R324.4.1.2: 'Rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panel or module systems and their supports shall be designed and installed for wind loads in accordance with ASCE 7', with R324.4.1.1 requiring the covered roof portions to be designed for dead load including panel weight, and R324.4.3 requiring roof penetrations to be flashed and sealed per FBC-R Chapter 9. Racking must additionally carry Florida Product Approval / NOA, which the City demands at intake. Code Sec. 6-3's detailed fastening specifications (hurricane straps, roof sheathing, six nails per shingle, two #10 screws per roof tile) govern the building's own construction, not PV racking.
Why the confidence is not higherThe state-code half is first-party text; the 'no local rule' half is proved by full-text search of the codified corpus (0 hits for photovoltaic, ground mount, rapid shutdown). Held at 62 because Monroe County carries among the highest design wind speeds in Florida and the practical attachment spacing will be set by the racking manufacturer's Florida Product Approval for that wind speed - a number the City does not publish and I could not obtain, since no KCB document states the site design wind speed.
state code checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-residential-code-2023/chapter/3/building-planning
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
FBC-R R324.6, unamended locally. Pathways: not fewer than two pathways, on separate roof planes, from lowest roof edge to ridge, not less than 36 inches wide, on all buildings, at least one of them on the street or driveway side; and for each roof plane carrying an array, a 36-inch pathway from lowest roof edge to ridge on that plane, an adjacent plane, or straddling both. Pathways must be over areas capable of supporting firefighters and in areas with minimal obstructions. Ridge setback: not less than 18 inches clear on BOTH sides of a horizontal ridge where the array occupies not more than 33% of the plan-view total roof area; not less than 36 inches on both sides where it occupies more than 33%. With an NFPA 13D or P2904 sprinkler system in the dwelling, those thresholds move to 66%. Panels may not be placed on the portion of a roof below an emergency escape and rescue opening, and a 36-inch pathway must be provided to that opening. Exceptions: detached non-habitable structures; where the code official determines rooftop operations will not be employed; and roofs with slopes of 2:12 or less.
Why the confidence is not higherRead in full from the 2023 Florida Building Code, Residential, 8th Edition. The absence of any local amendment is proved by full-text search of the City's codified corpus (controls passed). Held at 85 because this is read through UpCodes' reproduction rather than the state's own viewer, and because the 'code official may determine rooftop operations will not be employed' exception hands real discretion to Key Colony Beach's Building Official which the City has not published a policy on.
state code checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-residential-code-2023/chapter/3/building-planning
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes - rapid shutdown to the 2020 NEC (NFPA 70-2020 Article 690.12), which applies through FBC-B 2701.1 and FBC-R R324.3 ('Photovoltaic systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Sections R324.3.1 through R324.7.1, NFPA 70 and the manufacturer's installation instructions'). The City adds nothing and subtracts nothing.
Why the confidence is not higherThe chain from local adoption to NEC 2020 is proved first-party at each link (Code Sec. 6-2 -> FBC 8th Ed 2023 -> Chapter 35 'NFPA 70-20'). Held at 78 because I did not retrieve the text of NEC 690.12 itself in this run, so the article number is stated from the adopted edition rather than quoted from it.
state code checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-residential-code-2023/chapter/3/building-planning
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The City of Key Colony Beach specifies NO placards of its own - none at the service equipment, none at the array, none anywhere. What applies is the 2020 NEC as adopted through the Florida Building Code. The one extra requirement in the chain comes from the utility, not the AHJ: FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.3 requires a permanent weather-proof placard adjacent to FKEC's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch, but only where FKEC and the member have agreed to site that switch somewhere other than adjacent to the meter.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City-side absence is proved this run by full-text search of the entire codified corpus: 'placard' 0 hits, 'label' 0 hits, 'signage' only in the Land Development Regulations sign-ordinance sense, against 'electrical' 23 hits (positive control) and 'zzqqx' 0 (fabricated control). The FKEC clause is quoted from the current Tier 1 agreement. 70 rather than higher because I did not retrieve NEC 690/705 text in this run, so I can say what the City requires (nothing) with more confidence than I can enumerate what the adopted NEC requires.
municipal code (absence proved) + utility agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No - the City specifies no placard wording of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved this run by full-text search of the complete codified Code of Ordinances (Supp. 36, through Ord. 2025-511 of 21 May 2026) and Land Development Regulations (Supp. 14), plus every published Building Department form and the fee schedule. 'placard' 0 hits, 'label' 0 hits; controls passed ('electrical' 23, 'zzqqx' 0). 80 rather than higher because the Citizenserve portal's permit-condition text is behind a login, and a condition sheet attached to an issued permit would not appear in any document I can reach.
municipal code (absence proved by full-text search) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The City specifies no letter height, colour or material. The only material specification anywhere in the chain is FKEC's: its disconnect-location placard, where required, must be 'permanent weather-proof'. No dimension, colour or font is given by either body.
Why the confidence is not higherSame absence proof as Q39; the FKEC wording is quoted from Tier 1 Sec. 5.3. 75 because the adopted NEC carries its own marking requirements whose detail I did not retrieve this run.
municipal code (absence proved) + utility agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/wp-content/uploads/Tier-1-Standard-Interconnection-Agreement-040926.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing required by the City. A site-plan / facility-map placard, if required, comes solely from the 2020 NEC as adopted through the Florida Building Code, not from any Key Colony Beach instrument.
Why the confidence is not higherThe City-side absence is well proved (full-text search, controls passed). The pointer to the NEC is where this weakens: I did not retrieve NEC 690.56 or 705.10 text in this run, so I can only say where the requirement lives, not what it says. 55 reflects that honestly.
municipal code (absence proved by full-text search) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes - exactly one, and it is conditional. FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.3: where FKEC determines that siting the manual disconnect adjacent to its meter socket 'would not be practical from a safety perspective and/or design considerations', and FKEC and the member agree an alternative location, 'the member shall install a permanent weather-proof placard adjacent to FKEC's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches.' Note the upstream condition: Sec. 5.1 makes the manual disconnect itself discretionary for UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems ('may require a member-installed manual disconnect switch based on system interconnection'), and only Sec. 5.2 - non-UL-1741 systems - makes it mandatory. So for a normal UL 1741 rooftop PV system the placard requirement is two conditions deep.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the current Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement, file dated 9 April 2026. 85 rather than higher because FKEC's Tier 2 and Tier 3 agreements were not read in this run, and because 'based on system interconnection' is undefined, so whether any given Key Colony Beach install gets the switch (and therefore possibly the placard) is FKEC's engineering call.
utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/wp-content/uploads/Tier-1-Standard-Interconnection-Agreement-040926.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The City specifies no placement. FKEC's one placard goes adjacent to the FKEC meter socket. Where a manual disconnect IS required, it must be 'mounted separately from, but adjacent to, the FKEC meter socket', remain readily accessible to FKEC, and be capable of being locked in the open position with a single FKEC utility padlock.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from Tier 1 Secs. 5.2 and 5.3; City-side absence proved by full-text search with controls passed. 75 because NEC-mandated label placement (service equipment, disconnecting means, array) was not retrieved this run.
utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/wp-content/uploads/Tier-1-Standard-Interconnection-Agreement-040926.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, on two tracks. (1) FBC-R R324.3.1: photovoltaic panels and modules shall be listed and labelled in accordance with UL 1703; inverters listed and labelled to UL 1741; grid-connected systems shall use inverters listed for utility interaction; mounting systems listed and labelled to UL 2703 shall be installed per the manufacturer's instructions and their listings. (2) Florida Product Approval / Miami-Dade NOAs - the City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure requires NOAs to be submitted with the application, which for a Monroe County wind-borne-debris-region roof is where racking approval is proved. FKEC adds a third, overlapping demand: Tier 1 Sec. 3.1 requires certification to IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, NEC 690, NEC 705, NEC 706 and UL 1741, with the manufacturer's specification sheets accepted as the written report.
Why the confidence is not higherThree first-party sources agreeing. 80 because the City does not publish a list of accepted product approval numbers or say which of the two tracks it checks at intake for a PV job.
state code + published procedure + utility agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-residential-code-2023/chapter/3/building-planning
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Permitted, under FBC-R Sec. R328 with no local amendment. R328.2: ESS shall be listed and labelled to UL 9540. R328.3.1: individual units separated by not less than 3 feet unless smaller distances are documented by large-scale fire testing per the Florida Fire Prevention Code. R328.4 locations: detached garages and detached accessory structures; attached garages separated per R302.6; outdoors or on the exterior side of exterior walls at least 3 feet from doors and windows entering the dwelling; enclosed utility closets, basements, storage or utility spaces with finished or non-combustible walls and ceilings (unfinished wood framing needs 5/8-inch Type X gypsum). Not in sleeping rooms, nor in closets or spaces opening directly into them. R328.5 ratings: 20 kWh maximum per unit; aggregate not exceeding 40 kWh in utility closets, basements and storage/utility spaces, or 80 kWh in garages, detached accessory structures, on exterior walls, or outdoors on the ground - above which the Florida Fire Prevention Code governs. R328.7: smoke alarms per R314 plus an interconnected heat detector where smoke alarms cannot be sited. Exempt from R328 entirely: ESS listed to UL 9540 and marked 'For use in residential dwelling units' installed per the manufacturer's instructions and NFPA 70, and ESS under 1 kWh.
Why the confidence is not higherRead in full from the 2023 FBC, Residential. The local absence is proved: 'battery' 0 hits and 'storage system' 0 hits in the complete codified corpus, controls passed. 78 because this is read through a secondary reproduction of the state code, and because Key Colony Beach has no published fire-code contact or ESS policy of its own to say how the R328.1 exception is applied locally.
state code checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-residential-code-2023/chapter/3/building-planning
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page form list (15 forms) and Forms page (12 building forms) - no ESS or battery form; current Building Permit Fee Schedule Resolution 2026-01, OCR'd page by page from the scanned original - no ESS, battery or energy-storage fee line anywhere; full codified Code of Ordinances and Land Development Regulations - 'battery' 0 hits, 'storage system' 0 hits, 'energy storage' 0 hits, controls passed. The Citizenserve portal's permit-type list, which would settle whether a separate ESS permit type exists, is behind a login I did not create. So whether Key Colony Beach issues a separate ESS permit or a separate ESS inspection is genuinely unpublished, not absent.
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, in effect. FBC-R R324.7: 'Ground-mounted photovoltaic systems shall be designed and installed in accordance with Section R301' - the building-planning design-criteria section, i.e. treated as a structure for load and wind design. R324.7.1 then leaves fire separation distances to be 'determined by the local jurisdiction', and Key Colony Beach has published no such determination. Locally, Land Development Regulations Sec. 101-26 (accessory structures and uses) and the district setback tables would also apply to anything placed in a yard. Practical note: Key Colony Beach is a small, fully built-out island city of narrow canal-front lots, so ground mount is unlikely to arise.
Why the confidence is not higherThe state-code half is first-party text. Held at 60 because the two City-side halves are inference rather than statement: the LDR's accessory-structure list (antennas, dockside shelters, dock boxes, flag poles, garages and tool sheds) does not name solar, and the R324.7.1 fire-separation determination the state code delegates to the City simply does not exist in any published City document.
state code + land development regulations checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-residential-code-2023/chapter/3/building-planning
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Where required, adjacent to the meter. FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.2: a manual disconnect switch 'of the visible load break type to provide a separation point between the AC power output of the Member-owned renewable generation and any member wiring connected to FKEC's system. The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted separately from, but adjacent to, the FKEC meter socket', readily accessible to FKEC and lockable in the open position with a single FKEC utility padlock. Sec. 5.3 permits an alternative agreed location where adjacency is impractical for safety or design reasons, with the weather-proof locating placard described in Q42. CRITICAL QUALIFIER: Sec. 5.1 makes the switch CONDITIONAL for UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems - FKEC 'may require' one 'based on system interconnection' - and Sec. 5.2's mandatory language is written for Tier 1 systems that are NOT UL 1741 inverter based.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the current Tier 1 agreement (9 April 2026). The City specifies nothing about disconnect location - proved by full-text search of the codified corpus with controls passed. 88 because Tier 2 and Tier 3 were not read this run and 'based on system interconnection' is undefined.
utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/wp-content/uploads/Tier-1-Standard-Interconnection-Agreement-040926.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal, phone or email. The City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure says 'Call or email to schedule inspection, please allow 24 hours'; the Citizenserve portal separately advertises scheduling inspections online. Code Sec. 6-9(b)(2) says requests are made to the building official, who records the date ready, the address and legal description, the name of the party calling and the type of inspection. 82% · published procedure + portal + municipal code
- How much notice is required? 24 hours - one full working day. The procedure says 'please allow 24 hours'; Code Sec. 6-9(a) puts it as 'The builder shall notify the building official when work is ready for inspection, and allow one (1) full working day for completion of the inspection.' 85% · published procedure + municipal code
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes - the City's own Building Official performs the inspections (Code Sec. 6-4(2)(d), 'Make field inspections and issue inspection reports to contractor'; Sec. 6-9(a), the building official establishes the inspection schedule and 'shall inspect all permitted work at least once every thirty (30) days'). There is a statutory alternative the City actively supports: a private provider under Fla. Stat. 553.791, for which the City publishes a Notice to Building Official packet and gives a 10% discount on the building permit fee where it is raised during the application process or before the first City inspection. One local determination worth knowing: the City's Building Official has determined that 'the use of private plan review requires the use of the private provider for both private plan review and private inspection services' - you cannot split them. 85% · municipal code + department form
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated. The City Building Official inspects. The only alternative inspector is a Florida-licensed or certified private provider engaged and paid by the fee owner or the fee owner's contractor under Fla. Stat. 553.791, whose scope is expressly limited to building-code compliance and 'does not include review for fire code, land use, environmental or other codes'. 80% · department form
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Not published as a list. Code Sec. 6-9(a) puts it entirely in the Building Official's hands: 'The building official shall establish a schedule of building inspections and approvals shall be granted in accordance with the schedule during the course of construction or alteration' - and that schedule is not published anywhere on the City's site. What IS fixed: a recorded Notice of Commencement before the first inspection; requests may be made only by the builder or by the plumbing, electrical, mechanical or roofing subcontractor (Sec. 6-9(b)(1)); the building official must inspect all permitted work at least once every 30 days; and Code Sec. 6-25's amendment to FBC 110.3 lists foundation through final for building work. No PV-specific sequence exists. 60% · municipal code
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No - the City publishes no inspection checklist. Code Sec. 6-11(b) refers to 'satisfactory completion of the certificate of occupancy check list', but that checklist is not among the fifteen Building Department forms published on the department page or the twelve on the Forms page, and no PV or electrical checklist exists at all. 70% · department page (absence proved)
- What must be on site at inspection? Per the City's own procedure: 'For Inspection, have paperwork on-site for inspector to review and approve work.' Code Sec. 6-6(9) additionally requires the building permit to be permanently displayed at the site from start to completion of construction, clearly visible from the street, encased in plastic and affixed to a display board on a separate post, on the temporary power pole, or on an existing building - and the building official uses that display board as the location for signed inspection slips. A recorded Notice of Commencement must be in place before the first inspection. 85% · published procedure + municipal code
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? For a PV alteration: an approved inspection ticket left in the permit package (effectively a green tag / final). A Certificate of Occupancy is a separate instrument reserved by Sec. 6-11 for new construction and changes of use, requiring a sealed elevation certification, a contractor or owner certification that the building was built to the approved plans, cleanup-bond satisfaction, a signed sewer tie-in certificate and correct address numbers - none of which maps to a rooftop PV job. 70% · published procedure + municipal code
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer (the FKEC member, in practice the contractor acting for them). FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 3.4: 'The Member agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' Sec. 3.5: 'The Member shall notify FKEC at least ten (10) calendar days prior to initially placing Member's equipment and protective apparatus in service and FKEC shall have the right to have personnel present on the in-service date.' The City does not notify the utility. 85% · utility interconnection agreement
- Is there a re-inspection fee? No flat building re-inspection fee is published. Code Sec. 6-6(7)(b) instead authorises the building official to charge additional inspection fees, at his determination, for: work not ready for inspection when called; condemned work resulting from faulty construction; work not in accordance with plan; the builder's request for on-job advice; excessive time spent at the office with the builder or his representative; and engineered deviations approved by the city engineer. Resolution 2026-01 carries a '$25.00' inspection charge for sub-threshold work and a 'Safety re-inspection fee' of $0.00 within 30 days / $100.00 after 30 days, but that line sits under BUSINESS TAX ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSPECTION FEES, not under building permits. 70% · municipal code + fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Per the City's own procedure: 'For a passed inspection, an approved ticket will be left in permit package. Failed inspections will be notified by ticket and a phone call.' The permit display board is the designated place for signed inspection slips (Sec. 6-6(9)). Code Sec. 6-9(a) adds that if the builder fails to call a required inspection, the building official may at his option require a letter of compliance from the applicant's engineer or require the builder to tear down the work done since the last completed inspection, appealable to the city commission within ten working days. Sec. 6-9(c) provides for stop orders posted on site. 80% · published procedure + municipal code
14 questions answered against City of Key Colony Beach’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal, phone or email. The City's own Building Application & Inspection Procedure says 'Call or email to schedule inspection, please allow 24 hours'; the Citizenserve portal separately advertises scheduling inspections online. Code Sec. 6-9(b)(2) says requests are made to the building official, who records the date ready, the address and legal description, the name of the party calling and the type of inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherThree first-party sources agreeing on substance. 82 because the procedure PDF is undated on its face and predates the portal, and the portal's inspection-scheduling screen is behind a login.
published procedure + portal + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
24 hours - one full working day. The procedure says 'please allow 24 hours'; Code Sec. 6-9(a) puts it as 'The builder shall notify the building official when work is ready for inspection, and allow one (1) full working day for completion of the inspection.'
Why the confidence is not higherTwo first-party sources in agreement. 85 because neither says whether the 24 hours is counted from the request or from the requested date, and the department's published hours are 7:30 am to 3:30 pm.
published procedure + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department & Code Enforcement page (states only 'Hours: 7:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m.'), the City's Building Application & Inspection Procedure ('Call or email to schedule inspection, please allow 24 hours' - no window offered), Code Sec. 6-9 (notice and request contents, no windows), Code Sec. 6-10 (working days Monday to Saturday, working hours 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., six named holidays - but that governs construction activity, not inspection slots), and the Citizenserve portal landing page. No AM/PM window, same-day option or arrival estimate is published anywhere.
https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes - the City's own Building Official performs the inspections (Code Sec. 6-4(2)(d), 'Make field inspections and issue inspection reports to contractor'; Sec. 6-9(a), the building official establishes the inspection schedule and 'shall inspect all permitted work at least once every thirty (30) days'). There is a statutory alternative the City actively supports: a private provider under Fla. Stat. 553.791, for which the City publishes a Notice to Building Official packet and gives a 10% discount on the building permit fee where it is raised during the application process or before the first City inspection. One local determination worth knowing: the City's Building Official has determined that 'the use of private plan review requires the use of the private provider for both private plan review and private inspection services' - you cannot split them.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text plus the City's own private-provider packet (form revision 07/2021) plus the current fee schedule. 85 because Key Colony Beach has one full-time Building Official and one Building Assistant, so real-world coverage during absence is not addressed by any published document.
municipal code + department form checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/building-department-and-code-enforcement/
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated. The City Building Official inspects. The only alternative inspector is a Florida-licensed or certified private provider engaged and paid by the fee owner or the fee owner's contractor under Fla. Stat. 553.791, whose scope is expressly limited to building-code compliance and 'does not include review for fire code, land use, environmental or other codes'.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the City's own private-provider Notice to Building Official form. 80 because the City publishes no list of accepted private providers and no acceptance criteria beyond the statute.
department form checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Private-Provider-Packet.pdf.pdf
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Not published as a list. Code Sec. 6-9(a) puts it entirely in the Building Official's hands: 'The building official shall establish a schedule of building inspections and approvals shall be granted in accordance with the schedule during the course of construction or alteration' - and that schedule is not published anywhere on the City's site. What IS fixed: a recorded Notice of Commencement before the first inspection; requests may be made only by the builder or by the plumbing, electrical, mechanical or roofing subcontractor (Sec. 6-9(b)(1)); the building official must inspect all permitted work at least once every 30 days; and Code Sec. 6-25's amendment to FBC 110.3 lists foundation through final for building work. No PV-specific sequence exists.
Why the confidence is not higherThe delegation-to-the-official half is first-party and unambiguous; the consequence is that there is genuinely no published sequence for a solar job. 60 reflects that this answer is mostly a description of an absence rather than a sequence a contractor could plan to.
municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCode Sec. 6-9 (Inspections) in full - it delegates the inspection schedule wholly to the building official and names no stages; Code Sec. 6-25's amendment to FBC 110.3 'Required inspections', which lists foundation and final with flood-certificate hooks and is expressly marked 'Building [partial shown]'; the Building Application & Inspection Procedure, which describes the mechanics of calling an inspection but names no stage; and the full form list on both the Building Department and Forms pages. Nothing states whether a rough-in or mid-roof inspection is required, and no PV-specific stage list exists.
https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Application & Inspection Procedure (says only 'have paperwork on-site for inspector to review and approve work'); Code Sec. 6-4(2) powers and duties of the building official and Sec. 6-9 inspections - neither mentions verifying labels or equipment listings; the complete codified corpus, where 'label' returns 0 hits and 'listing'/'listed' appear only in unrelated senses, controls passed. FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 3.4 requires the local code official to certify that the installation 'has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications', which implies some verification, but that is the utility describing a duty it expects of the City rather than the City stating its own inspection scope. Not enough to record either way.
https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No - the City publishes no inspection checklist. Code Sec. 6-11(b) refers to 'satisfactory completion of the certificate of occupancy check list', but that checklist is not among the fifteen Building Department forms published on the department page or the twelve on the Forms page, and no PV or electrical checklist exists at all.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved this run by reading both published form lists in full and by full-text searching the codified corpus. 70 rather than higher because a checklist could exist inside the Citizenserve portal behind the login, or be handed out at the counter.
department page (absence proved) checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/building-department-and-code-enforcement/
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Per the City's own procedure: 'For Inspection, have paperwork on-site for inspector to review and approve work.' Code Sec. 6-6(9) additionally requires the building permit to be permanently displayed at the site from start to completion of construction, clearly visible from the street, encased in plastic and affixed to a display board on a separate post, on the temporary power pole, or on an existing building - and the building official uses that display board as the location for signed inspection slips. A recorded Notice of Commencement must be in place before the first inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo first-party sources agreeing. 85 because 'paperwork' is not itemised - the City does not say whether approved plans, product approvals or manufacturer instructions specifically must be on site.
published procedure + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
No flat building re-inspection fee is published. Code Sec. 6-6(7)(b) instead authorises the building official to charge additional inspection fees, at his determination, for: work not ready for inspection when called; condemned work resulting from faulty construction; work not in accordance with plan; the builder's request for on-job advice; excessive time spent at the office with the builder or his representative; and engineered deviations approved by the city engineer. Resolution 2026-01 carries a '$25.00' inspection charge for sub-threshold work and a 'Safety re-inspection fee' of $0.00 within 30 days / $100.00 after 30 days, but that line sits under BUSINESS TAX ADMINISTRATIVE AND INSPECTION FEES, not under building permits.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth documents read first-hand; the fee schedule was OCR'd from a scanned image by me, not summarised. 70 because the discretionary nature of Sec. 6-6(7)(b) means there is no number a contractor can plan against, and because I may be reading the placement of the $100 safety re-inspection line more narrowly than the City does.
municipal code + fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/key_colony_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BU
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Per the City's own procedure: 'For a passed inspection, an approved ticket will be left in permit package. Failed inspections will be notified by ticket and a phone call.' The permit display board is the designated place for signed inspection slips (Sec. 6-6(9)). Code Sec. 6-9(a) adds that if the builder fails to call a required inspection, the building official may at his option require a letter of compliance from the applicant's engineer or require the builder to tear down the work done since the last completed inspection, appealable to the city commission within ten working days. Sec. 6-9(c) provides for stop orders posted on site.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the City's own procedure and codified text. 80 because the procedure PDF carries no revision date on its face and the portal may now carry correction notices electronically.
published procedure + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
For a PV alteration: an approved inspection ticket left in the permit package (effectively a green tag / final). A Certificate of Occupancy is a separate instrument reserved by Sec. 6-11 for new construction and changes of use, requiring a sealed elevation certification, a contractor or owner certification that the building was built to the approved plans, cleanup-bond satisfaction, a signed sewer tie-in certificate and correct address numbers - none of which maps to a rooftop PV job.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ticket practice is first-party from the City's own procedure; the CO scope is codified. 70 because no City document says in words what closes out an electrical alteration permit, so the 'ticket, not CO' reading is inference from the two texts.
published procedure + municipal code checked 2026-09-13 https://keycolonybeach.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Building-Application-Inspection-Procedure.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer (the FKEC member, in practice the contractor acting for them). FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 3.4: 'The Member agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' Sec. 3.5: 'The Member shall notify FKEC at least ten (10) calendar days prior to initially placing Member's equipment and protective apparatus in service and FKEC shall have the right to have personnel present on the in-service date.' The City does not notify the utility.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the current Tier 1 agreement (9 April 2026). 85 because the agreement does not prescribe a form for the code-official certification, so what Key Colony Beach's Building Official will actually sign - and whether the inspection ticket alone suffices - is not established by either side's documents.
utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fkec.com/wp-content/uploads/Tier-1-Standard-Interconnection-Agreement-040926.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 80%
No - the City specifies no placard wording of its own.
Size, colour & material 75%
The City specifies no letter height, colour or material. The only material specification anywhere in the chain is FKEC's: its disconnect-location placard, where required, must be 'permanent weather-proof'. No dimension, colour or font is given by either body.
Where they go 75%
The City specifies no placement. FKEC's one placard goes adjacent to the FKEC meter socket. Where a manual disconnect IS required, it must be 'mounted separately from, but adjacent to, the FKEC meter socket', remain readily accessible to FKEC, and be capable of being locked in the open position with a single FKEC utility padlock.
What the utility wants on top 85%
Yes - exactly one, and it is conditional. FKEC Tier 1 Sec. 5.3: where FKEC determines that siting the manual disconnect adjacent to its meter socket 'would not be practical from a safety perspective and/or design considerations', and FKEC and the member agree an alternative location, 'the member shall install a permanent weather-proof placard adjacent to FKEC's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches.' Note the upstream condition: Sec. 5.1 makes the manual disconnect itself discretionary for UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems ('may require a member-installed manual disconnect switch based on system interconnection'), and only Sec. 5.2 - non-UL-1741 systems - makes it mandatory. So for a normal UL 1741 rooftop PV system the placard requirement is two conditions deep.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.