City of Miramar

Broward County · Florida ← All authorities

City of Miramar

Broward County

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

City of Miramar is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 134,721 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Miramar against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

City of Miramar is the authority having jurisdiction 88% confidence
Holds
Building and Electrical (both permitted, plan-reviewed and inspected in-house by Miramar's Building, Planning & Zoning Division/Building Division; Fire plan review performed in-house by Miramar Fire Rescue's Fire Prevention Bureau).
Overridden by
Broward County's Board of Rules and Appeals (BORA) amends and formally interprets the Florida Building Code/Fire Prevention Code county-wide in ways binding on Miramar's Building Official — most importantly the county-wide 'Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix' (Board Policy #09-02, independently OCR'd and verified by me) setting PE/RA-stamp, HVHZ product-approval and NEC Art. 690 diagram requirements, and Formal Interpretation FI-31 (Board-approved 12 Oct 2023, effective 31 Dec 2023, independently text-extracted by me) exempting rooftop PV/solar-thermal from the general FBC 1522.3/1522.3.1 rooftop-equipment clearance rule. BORA amends/interprets the code but issues no permits itself. Separately, Florida Power & Light (FPL) — an investor-owned utility, confirmed via Miramar's own water/wastewater-only Utilities Dept. page — independently controls interconnection and Permission-to-Operate under its own PSC-filed tariff (Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement), which itself requires the City's own permit/inspection sign-off as a precondition (Sec. 3.4) before parallel operation begins.
Why not higher
Miramar's own 'Solar PV System Application Package' (Building, Planning & Zoning Division letterhead) is the operative city document for permitting residential rooftop PV, listing in-house required documents and inspections; the department's own staff directory shows an in-house Building Official, Electrical Chief and Structural Chief (no third-party-staffing indicator like Pembroke Pines' @cgasolutions.com addresses was found for Miramar). Broward County's own Building Code Division serves only the Broward Municipal Services District plus the airport, not incorporated Miramar — confirmed by the general BORA/Broward Building Dept. jurisdictional pattern already established for other Broward municipalities. Checked 11 Sep 2026.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Permit required
Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV.95%
Permit cost
No dedicated flat/PV fee line exists (confirmed absent from the FY2026 Schedule of User Fees with a working positive control 'electrical'=1 hit / 'building'=41 hits and fabricated control…82%
Plan review
Prescreen completeness check within 5 City working days of receipt. If deemed complete and the project falls under the F.S.85%
Portal
Tyler Technologies EnerGov Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal.95%
Booking an inspection
Portal or Phone — 'Inspections can be requested in two ways: Online: Select Permits & Self Services... By phone: 954-602-3200.'90%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate — the package requires completing distinct Building and Electrical permit applications ('per application, per discipline'); Q4 Plan review — Prescreen completeness check within 5 City working days of receipt. If deemed complete and the project falls under the F.S. Q18 Where you file — Tyler Technologies EnerGov Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal. Q20

Permit required
Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV.95% source
What it costs
No dedicated flat/PV fee line exists (confirmed absent from the FY2026 Schedule of User Fees with a working positive control 'electrical'=1 hit / 'building'=41 hits and fabricated control 'zzqqx'=0…82% source
Plan review turnaround
Prescreen completeness check within 5 City working days of receipt. If deemed complete and the project falls under the F.S.85% source
Key document
city solar permit application package (Affidavit of Awareness of HOA Regulations, quoting City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1)) cited by 10 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — the City of Miramar Building, Planning & Zoning Division (Building Division) is the AHJ for residential rooftop solar at Miramar addresses. 92% · city solar permit application package
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both — Miramar permits, plan-reviews and inspects Building and Electrical itself for residential PV (no delegation to Broward County). Fire plan review is performed in-house by Miramar Fire Rescue's Fire Prevention Bureau alongside Building. 90% · city solar permit application package + department staff directory
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV. 95% · city Permitting Information page (HB 803 guidance) + solar application package
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate — the package requires completing distinct Building and Electrical permit applications ('per application, per discipline'); the FY2026 fee schedule likewise charges the $75 residential application fee 'per application, per discipline (building, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing)'. 75% · city solar permit application package + FY2026 fee schedule
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — the City does not require prior HOA/architectural approval as a precondition to permit issuance, but it DOES require every applicant (even those not in an HOA) to sign a notarized 'Affidavit of Awareness of Homeowner's Association Regulations' acknowledging that the applicant's property may still be subject to additional HOA regulation despite the City's permit — per Miramar City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1). 88% · city solar permit application package (Affidavit of Awareness of HOA Regulations, quoting City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1))
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No stand-alone 'windstorm certification' document is named, but its function is folded into the mandatory PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift/lateral-force, connection-design and dead-load documentation that Broward's BORA matrix requires for every roof-mounted PV/solar-thermal installation, because Broward is in the HVHZ. 65% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (HVHZ wind-load documentation)
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No Miramar zoning-level generation cap was found in the documents I could access. The practical ceiling in FPL territory is set by FPL's own net-metering tiers rather than a City rule: Tier 1 (no application fee) applies up to 10 kW AC and not more than 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating; larger systems move to FPL's Tier 2/3 agreements; the Tier 1 agreement itself caps combined generation at any one meter at 2 MW gross power rating. 55% · FPL Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (filed PSC tariff) — utility-side ceiling only
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either — (A) a Florida-licensed contractor limited to the scope of their F.S. 489 license, or (B) an Owner/Builder for residential-only work (with photo ID, proof of ownership, and homestead-exemption verification). 92% · city solar permit application package
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes — a homeowner may self-install and self-permit as Owner/Builder for residential work, per F.S. 489.103's owner-builder exemption. 92% · city solar permit application package (Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement)
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Per Miramar's Solar PV System Application Package: (1) completed permit application(s) for the applicable disciplines (Electrical & Building); (2) Affidavit of Awareness of HOA Association (mandatory even outside an HOA, per City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1)); (3) Installation cost (labor & materials) for valuation, FBC 109.3; (4) Owner Notification of Roof Mounted Equipment, signed by homeowner (per BORA Policy #09-02(F)); (5) One set of plans (up to 11x17, or two sets if larger) signed & sealed by a PE or Registered Architect showing equipment location/attachment plus specifications; (6) Affidavit of Identical Documents if plans are digitally signed/sealed; (7) Special Inspector Form for Roof-Mounted Connection System (discretionary, per Broward Admin. Code Sec. 110.10); (8) Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement if filing as owner-builder. A recorded Notice of Commencement is also required if job value exceeds $5,000 (F.S. 713.13). 92% · city solar permit application package
    • How many copies, and in what format? One set of plans/specifications not exceeding 11in x 17in; if plans exceed that size, two (2) sets are required. Electronic/digital submittal is accepted and must be True PDF (photos converted to PDF are rejected) when digitally signed and sealed; the City implemented an Electronic Plan Review (EnerGov) system in 2025 for concurrent-discipline review. 85% · city solar permit application package + Permitting Information page
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? No dedicated 'site plan' (property lines/easements/meter locations) is called for in Miramar's residential rooftop-PV checklist — the only drawing requirement is a PE/RA-sealed plan set showing equipment location and attachment on the structure. A full site plan is a Broward/BORA general submittal concept (BCAP Sec. 105.3.2: application must describe the land by legal description/address) rather than a PV-specific itemized requirement. 62% · city solar permit application package
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — an electrical diagram is required, designed in accordance with NEC Article 690 (Solar Photovoltaic Systems) in its entirety. This is imposed county-wide by Broward's Board of Rules and Appeals (BORA), which binds every Broward building official including Miramar's. 80% · BORA Board Policy #09-02, Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (OCR'd, effective 15 May 2009)
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Required for all roof-mounted PV installations, with no dollar-value threshold stated — Miramar's own package requires 'One (1) set of plans signed & sealed by Professional Engineer or Registered Architect' for every application, and the Broward-wide BORA matrix requires PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift/lateral, connection and dead-load documentation for every roof-mounted photovoltaic panel and solar-thermal installation because Broward is in the HVHZ. 90% · city solar permit application package + BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix
    • Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Only above a threshold: an electrical PE stamp is required if (a) the system value exceeds $50,000, or (b) the aggregate residential service capacity is 600A/240V or more (800A/240V or more for commercial/industrial) — per the BORA matrix, itself citing F.S. 471.003(h)'s contractor-exemption threshold. Below those thresholds no separate electrical PE stamp is required (the installing electrical/solar contractor's own F.S. 489/553 exemption applies). 80% · BORA Board Policy #09-02, citing F.S. 471.003(h)
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Tyler Technologies EnerGov Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal. 95% · city Online Permitting page (direct link to Tyler EnerGov Self Service)
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes — the City states the CSS/EnerGov Portal lets applicants 'Submit permit applications, upload required documents, pay fees, request inspections, and view permit and inspection status online.' 90% · city Permitting Information page
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? No dedicated flat/PV fee line exists (confirmed absent from the FY2026 Schedule of User Fees with a working positive control 'electrical'=1 hit / 'building'=41 hits and fabricated control 'zzqqx'=0 hits). Residential solar instead pays the City's general valuation-based structure per discipline (Building and Electrical): a $75 application fee per discipline, PLUS a 1.75% of construction-cost permit fee per discipline, PLUS a 0.75% of construction-cost Plan Examination Fee, plus small statutory pass-through surcharges (Broward County Fee ~0.52/$1,000; FL DBPR 553.721 surcharge 1% of permit fee; FL 468.631 fee 1.5% of permit fee; 8% City Administrative Surcharge on most Building fees). 82% · FY2026 Schedule of User Fees, City Council Resolution R25-212 (17 Sep 2025)
    • How is the fee calculated? Valuation — the permit fee is 1.75% of the cost of construction (per discipline), plus a separate 0.75% plan-examination fee, not a flat, per-kW, or per-panel charge. 90% · FY2026 Schedule of User Fees
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes — a separate Plan Examination Fee equal to 0.75% of estimated construction cost (covering the initial review plus two correction cycles; a $500 flat fee applies per discipline after the third review), distinct from the 1.75% permit fee. 92% · FY2026 Schedule of User Fees
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Prescreen completeness check within 5 City working days of receipt. If deemed complete and the project falls under the F.S. 553.792 statutory categories (residential dwellings/individual condo units under 7,500 sf, including electrical/roofing/mechanical permits, is one listed category), the first plan-review cycle must be completed within 30 business days (60 business days if the dwelling is 7,500 sf or greater). Subsequent review cycles after applicant corrections must be completed within 10 business days. Applicants may waive these statutory timelines (notarized waiver form uploaded to EnerGov) in exchange for standard concurrent review with outside agencies. 85% · city Permitting Information / Permit Timelines page (implementing F.S. 553.792)
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 1 year (365 days) from issuance, per Florida Statute 553.79(1)(c) as amended by 2026 HB 803, which sets a statewide floor of one year for a permit 'issued by a local government' — a floor that binds Miramar as a municipality. I could not find a Miramar-specific building-permit-expiration clause stating a different number (the only Miramar expiration language found was for wastewater industrial-user permits, which is unrelated). 60% · city HB 803 guidance page + FS 553.79(1)(c) as amended by 2026 HB 803
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) — an investor-owned utility, not a City utility. 85% · city Utilities Dept. page (water/wastewater only) + FPL Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (filed tariff)
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel but ultimately gated on the permit: the customer may submit FPL's interconnection application independently of the City permit process, but FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 3.4) requires the Customer to 'provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' confirming the work 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' — so final parallel operation (PTO) cannot occur until City permitting/inspection is complete, even though the FPL paperwork itself can run alongside. 82% · FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff, Rate Schedule Sheet 9.050-9.054)

28 questions answered against City of Miramar’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes — the City of Miramar Building, Planning & Zoning Division (Building Division) is the AHJ for residential rooftop solar at Miramar addresses.

Why the confidence is not higherMiramar's own 'Solar PV System Application Package' is issued on 'City of Miramar | Building Division' letterhead and states the required documents, inspections (Electrical Rough B238, Final Electrical B910, Final Building B999) and contact info (954-602-3200) for solar permitting within the city. Miramar is one of Broward's ~29-30 self-permitting municipalities; Broward County's own Building Code Division serves only the Broward Municipal Services District (BMSD) and the airport, not incorporated Miramar.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both — Miramar permits, plan-reviews and inspects Building and Electrical itself for residential PV (no delegation to Broward County). Fire plan review is performed in-house by Miramar Fire Rescue's Fire Prevention Bureau alongside Building.

Why the confidence is not higherThe solar application package requires 'All required applications... based on the scope of work (Electrical & Building)'; the Building, Planning & Zoning Dept. staff directory lists an in-house Building Official (Julio Briceno), Electrical Chief (Scott Douglas), Structural Chief and Mechanical/Plumbing Chiefs; the Fire Prevention Bureau page states it 'reviews all plans in conjunction with the building department' prior to permit issuance.

city solar permit application package + department staff directory checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV.

Why the confidence is not higherThe city's own 10-page Solar PV System Application Package exists specifically to process this permit and lists required documents and 3 required inspections. Separately, Miramar's HB 803 guidance (effective 1 Jul 2026) confirms the new $7,500 minor-work exemption explicitly EXCLUDES electrical work ('Electrical work... IS STILL REQUIRED' for a permit) — and residential PV always includes an electrical scope. Controls run against the solar packet text: 'electrical' = 5 hits, fabricated 'zzqqx' = 0 hits.

city Permitting Information page (HB 803 guidance) + solar application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Separate — the package requires completing distinct Building and Electrical permit applications ('per application, per discipline'); the FY2026 fee schedule likewise charges the $75 residential application fee 'per application, per discipline (building, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing)'.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the solar application package ('All required applications shall be completed based on the scope of work (Electrical & Building)') and FY2026 Schedule of User Fees Section I.A.1. Marked down because no Miramar document uses the word 'separate' or 'combined' explicitly; this is my reading of 'per discipline' language.

city solar permit application package + FY2026 fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either — (A) a Florida-licensed contractor limited to the scope of their F.S. 489 license, or (B) an Owner/Builder for residential-only work (with photo ID, proof of ownership, and homestead-exemption verification).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim section heading 'WHO CAN APPLY (A or B)' in the city's Solar PV System Application Package.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMiramar's Solar PV System Application Package (no registration precondition stated) and the Building Permitting Process page, which publishes only a 'ContractorUpdates@miramarfl.gov' address for contractors to submit registration updates — this shows a registration process exists but does not state that registration must be completed BEFORE a permit application can be filed.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes — a homeowner may self-install and self-permit as Owner/Builder for residential work, per F.S. 489.103's owner-builder exemption.

Why the confidence is not higherSolar application package Section B ('Owner/Builder for Residential Only') plus a dedicated bundled 'Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement' form (F.S. 489.103) that must be signed, notarized and submitted.

city solar permit application package (Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Per Miramar's Solar PV System Application Package: (1) completed permit application(s) for the applicable disciplines (Electrical & Building); (2) Affidavit of Awareness of HOA Association (mandatory even outside an HOA, per City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1)); (3) Installation cost (labor & materials) for valuation, FBC 109.3; (4) Owner Notification of Roof Mounted Equipment, signed by homeowner (per BORA Policy #09-02(F)); (5) One set of plans (up to 11x17, or two sets if larger) signed & sealed by a PE or Registered Architect showing equipment location/attachment plus specifications; (6) Affidavit of Identical Documents if plans are digitally signed/sealed; (7) Special Inspector Form for Roof-Mounted Connection System (discretionary, per Broward Admin. Code Sec. 110.10); (8) Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement if filing as owner-builder. A recorded Notice of Commencement is also required if job value exceeds $5,000 (F.S. 713.13).

Why the confidence is not higherAll items verbatim/paraphrased from the city's own 10-page Solar PV System Application Package, checked with a positive control ('electrical' = 5 hits) and fabricated control ('zzqqx' = 0 hits) confirming the extraction was reading real text, not a summary.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

One set of plans/specifications not exceeding 11in x 17in; if plans exceed that size, two (2) sets are required. Electronic/digital submittal is accepted and must be True PDF (photos converted to PDF are rejected) when digitally signed and sealed; the City implemented an Electronic Plan Review (EnerGov) system in 2025 for concurrent-discipline review.

Why the confidence is not higherPage-size/copy-count rule verbatim from the solar application package; digital-format rule verbatim from the bundled 'Affidavit of Identical Documents for Digital Submittal' form; EnerGov rollout described on the city's own Permitting Information page ('In 2025, the City of Miramar implemented an Electronic Plan Review (EnerGov) system').

city solar permit application package + Permitting Information page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

No dedicated 'site plan' (property lines/easements/meter locations) is called for in Miramar's residential rooftop-PV checklist — the only drawing requirement is a PE/RA-sealed plan set showing equipment location and attachment on the structure. A full site plan is a Broward/BORA general submittal concept (BCAP Sec. 105.3.2: application must describe the land by legal description/address) rather than a PV-specific itemized requirement.

Why the confidence is not higherAbsence checked directly against the 10-page solar application package (which itemizes every other required document in detail) with working positive/fabricated controls; no 'site plan' item appears. This is a plausible but not certain absence — the general Broward BCAP 105.3.2 language could still be applied case-by-case by a plan reviewer.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Yes — an electrical diagram is required, designed in accordance with NEC Article 690 (Solar Photovoltaic Systems) in its entirety. This is imposed county-wide by Broward's Board of Rules and Appeals (BORA), which binds every Broward building official including Miramar's.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (Board Policy #09-02), OCR'd directly from the archived scanned PDF myself (no text layer in the original) and cross-checked with a positive control ('electrical' hits) and fabricated control ('zzqqx' = 0 hits). This is a Broward-wide administrative requirement rather than a Miramar-specific ordinance I opened directly, but Broward Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 101.2 (quoted in the same document) states the chapter 'shall apply countywide in both incorporated and unincorporated areas of Broward County.'

BORA Board Policy #09-02, Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (OCR'd, effective 15 May 2009) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMiramar's own Solar PV System Application Package (full text read, no 'string' or 'conductor calculation' item) and the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (requires an NEC Art. 690 diagram 'in its entirety' but does not separately name string/conductor sizing calculations as a submittal line item).

https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

Required for all roof-mounted PV installations, with no dollar-value threshold stated — Miramar's own package requires 'One (1) set of plans signed & sealed by Professional Engineer or Registered Architect' for every application, and the Broward-wide BORA matrix requires PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift/lateral, connection and dead-load documentation for every roof-mounted photovoltaic panel and solar-thermal installation because Broward is in the HVHZ.

Why the confidence is not higherCorroborated by two independent sources: Miramar's own Solar PV System Application Package (city-specific, no threshold language) and the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (county-wide, HVHZ-driven, no threshold gating the PE/RA stamp).

city solar permit application package + BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Only above a threshold: an electrical PE stamp is required if (a) the system value exceeds $50,000, or (b) the aggregate residential service capacity is 600A/240V or more (800A/240V or more for commercial/industrial) — per the BORA matrix, itself citing F.S. 471.003(h)'s contractor-exemption threshold. Below those thresholds no separate electrical PE stamp is required (the installing electrical/solar contractor's own F.S. 489/553 exemption applies).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, OCR'd and independently verified by me (not just carried over from a prior run); Broward-wide, binding on Miramar.

BORA Board Policy #09-02, citing F.S. 471.003(h) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

No dedicated flat/PV fee line exists (confirmed absent from the FY2026 Schedule of User Fees with a working positive control 'electrical'=1 hit / 'building'=41 hits and fabricated control 'zzqqx'=0 hits). Residential solar instead pays the City's general valuation-based structure per discipline (Building and Electrical): a $75 application fee per discipline, PLUS a 1.75% of construction-cost permit fee per discipline, PLUS a 0.75% of construction-cost Plan Examination Fee, plus small statutory pass-through surcharges (Broward County Fee ~0.52/$1,000; FL DBPR 553.721 surcharge 1% of permit fee; FL 468.631 fee 1.5% of permit fee; 8% City Administrative Surcharge on most Building fees).

Why the confidence is not higherAll rates verbatim from the FY2026 Schedule of User Fees ('As Adopted — Resolution R25-212, September 17, 2025' stamped on the document body itself, not just its filename/metadata, which misleadingly says 'Proposed'). Marked down because I could not compute one single dollar figure for a 'typical' residential system without an assumed job valuation, and because the schedule does not separately break out solar from the general building/electrical fee structure.

FY2026 Schedule of User Fees, City Council Resolution R25-212 (17 Sep 2025) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/7/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/fy2026-schedule-of-user-fees-final.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Valuation — the permit fee is 1.75% of the cost of construction (per discipline), plus a separate 0.75% plan-examination fee, not a flat, per-kW, or per-panel charge.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from FY2026 Schedule of User Fees Section I.A.1.a and I.B.1.a.

FY2026 Schedule of User Fees checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/7/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/fy2026-schedule-of-user-fees-final.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes — a separate Plan Examination Fee equal to 0.75% of estimated construction cost (covering the initial review plus two correction cycles; a $500 flat fee applies per discipline after the third review), distinct from the 1.75% permit fee.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from FY2026 Schedule of User Fees Section I.B.1.

FY2026 Schedule of User Fees checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/7/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/fy2026-schedule-of-user-fees-final.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Prescreen completeness check within 5 City working days of receipt. If deemed complete and the project falls under the F.S. 553.792 statutory categories (residential dwellings/individual condo units under 7,500 sf, including electrical/roofing/mechanical permits, is one listed category), the first plan-review cycle must be completed within 30 business days (60 business days if the dwelling is 7,500 sf or greater). Subsequent review cycles after applicant corrections must be completed within 10 business days. Applicants may waive these statutory timelines (notarized waiver form uploaded to EnerGov) in exchange for standard concurrent review with outside agencies.

Why the confidence is not higherAll figures verbatim from the City's own 'Miramar Building Permitting Process' / Permit Timelines page, which implements Florida Statute 553.792 as amended by HB 803. This is the City's live, current published guidance (references July 2026 HB 803 effective date).

city Permitting Information / Permit Timelines page (implementing F.S. 553.792) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

1 year (365 days) from issuance, per Florida Statute 553.79(1)(c) as amended by 2026 HB 803, which sets a statewide floor of one year for a permit 'issued by a local government' — a floor that binds Miramar as a municipality. I could not find a Miramar-specific building-permit-expiration clause stating a different number (the only Miramar expiration language found was for wastewater industrial-user permits, which is unrelated).

Why the confidence is not higherThe HB 803 one-year floor is state law, and Miramar's own site independently confirms it is implementing HB 803 (its Permit Exemptions page, effective 1 Jul 2026, cites 'CS/CS/HB 803'), but I did not locate Miramar's own building-permit-expiration ordinance text stating '1 year' or '365 days' outright — this is inference from the statewide floor plus evidence the City is actively applying HB 803.

city HB 803 guidance page + FS 553.79(1)(c) as amended by 2026 HB 803 checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Tyler Technologies EnerGov Citizen Self Service (CSS) Portal.

Why the confidence is not higherDirect link found on the city's own 'Apply for Miramar Building Permits Online' page: https://miramarfl-energovweb.tylerhost.net/apps/SelfService#/home; the Permitting Information page repeatedly refers to 'the EnerGov system' and 'Citizen Self Service (CSS Portal)'.

city Online Permitting page (direct link to Tyler EnerGov Self Service) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Online-Permitting

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes — the City states the CSS/EnerGov Portal lets applicants 'Submit permit applications, upload required documents, pay fees, request inspections, and view permit and inspection status online.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the city's own Permitting Information page 'Resources and Support' section.

city Permitting Information page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) — an investor-owned utility, not a City utility.

Why the confidence is not higherMiramar's own Utilities Department page describes its scope as exclusively water treatment and wastewater treatment/disposal ('East/West Water Treatment Plant', 'Wastewater Collection Maintenance') with no electric generation/distribution function, consistent with the pattern found in the neighboring City of Pembroke Pines. FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (a PSC-filed tariff sheet) is the operative document governing residential PV interconnection in FPL territory, which includes Broward County/Miramar.

city Utilities Dept. page (water/wastewater only) + FPL Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (filed tariff) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Utilities

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Parallel but ultimately gated on the permit: the customer may submit FPL's interconnection application independently of the City permit process, but FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 3.4) requires the Customer to 'provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' confirming the work 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' — so final parallel operation (PTO) cannot occur until City permitting/inspection is complete, even though the FPL paperwork itself can run alongside.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly (not carried over) from FPL's own PSC-filed tariff sheet ('Second Revised Sheet No. 9.050', Interconnection Agreement for Customer-Owned Renewable Generation, Tier 1 — 10 kW or Less), Section 3.4, downloaded and text-extracted by me from the Wayback-archived copy.

FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff, Rate Schedule Sheet 9.050-9.054) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260711082052/https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No — the City does not require prior HOA/architectural approval as a precondition to permit issuance, but it DOES require every applicant (even those not in an HOA) to sign a notarized 'Affidavit of Awareness of Homeowner's Association Regulations' acknowledging that the applicant's property may still be subject to additional HOA regulation despite the City's permit — per Miramar City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the bundled 'Affidavit of Awareness of Homeowner's Association Regulations' form in the Solar PV System Application Package, which quotes City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1) directly.

city solar permit application package (Affidavit of Awareness of HOA Regulations, quoting City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1)) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMiramar's Solar PV System Application Package (no historic-district item; controls confirmed the document search was working) and the Building, Planning & Zoning department page, which lists a 'Historic Miramar Advisory Board' among the city's advisory boards but does not state that solar permits in any historic overlay trigger a distinct design/architectural review step. I could not access Miramar's Land Development Code on Municode (returns 403 without a Referer header that available tools could not attach; a headless-Chrome load of the Angular app rendered only the navigation shell with no populated search results) to confirm whether a historic-district overlay exists and whether it would apply.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

No stand-alone 'windstorm certification' document is named, but its function is folded into the mandatory PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift/lateral-force, connection-design and dead-load documentation that Broward's BORA matrix requires for every roof-mounted PV/solar-thermal installation, because Broward is in the HVHZ.

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (independently OCR'd and verified by me) rather than a Miramar document using the term 'windstorm certification.'

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (HVHZ wind-load documentation) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedMiramar's Solar PV System Application Package (no SUP/Council-approval item; controls confirmed search was working) and the Building Permitting Process page. Could not confirm from Miramar's Land Development Code (Municode access blocked — see q25) whether any residential PV configuration (e.g., oversized ground mount) ever triggers a Special Use Permit or Commission approval.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No Miramar zoning-level generation cap was found in the documents I could access. The practical ceiling in FPL territory is set by FPL's own net-metering tiers rather than a City rule: Tier 1 (no application fee) applies up to 10 kW AC and not more than 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating; larger systems move to FPL's Tier 2/3 agreements; the Tier 1 agreement itself caps combined generation at any one meter at 2 MW gross power rating.

Why the confidence is not higherAbsence checked against Miramar's own solar application package and fee schedule (no cap language found, with working controls); the FPL figures are read directly from FPL's own filed Tier 1 tariff sheet, Sections 2.1 and 7.4. Land Development Code was not reachable to rule out a City-side zoning cap (see q25).

FPL Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (filed PSC tariff) — utility-side ceiling only checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260711082052/https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    Nothing recorded for City of Miramar on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, rapid shutdown is required — the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix requires the electrical diagram to be 'designed in accordance to the National Electrical Code Article 690... in its entirety,' which includes NEC 690.12 (Rapid Shutdown). I could not confirm which NEC edition is currently referenced by the 8th-edition FBC (see q29), so I cannot state which edition's 690.12 language applies. 58% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (NEC Art. 690 'in its entirety')
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, conditionally — FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 5.3) requires the customer to install, at their own expense, 'a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches' in the case where the switch itself cannot practically be mounted adjacent to the meter socket. (Under Sec. 5.1, most modern UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems do not require a manual disconnect switch or plaque at all.) 82% · FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff)
    • Where must the labels be placed? Where a manual disconnect switch is required at all (non-UL-1741-inverter-based Tier 1 systems, or where FPL determines one is needed), it must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket; if that is impractical, the switch may be relocated elsewhere on the premises but a permanent weatherproof location-plaque must then be placed adjacent to the meter socket instead. No Miramar-specific labeling-location rule beyond NEC was found for other equipment labels (rapid-shutdown label, disconnect labels, etc.). 75% · FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff)
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket — where a manual disconnect switch is required at all. (UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems, which cover most modern residential PV, do not require a customer-installed manual disconnect switch under FPL's own tariff.) 88% · FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff, Rate Schedule Sheet 9.052)
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, functionally — the BORA matrix requires FSEC Certification and NEC 110.3(B) listed/labeled-equipment compliance as component documentation, and every HVHZ roof-attachment component (panel, racking, clamps, flashing, fasteners) must carry a current Florida Product Approval marked for HVHZ use, or a Miami-Dade County NOA. 75% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (NEC 110.3(B) / FSEC citation)
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No single prescribed mounting system or spacing is named locally, but every roof-attached PV component (panels, racking, clamps, flashing) must carry current HVHZ product approval (a statewide Florida Product Approval marked for HVHZ use, or a Miami-Dade County NOA) plus PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift, lateral-force and connection-design calculations, because Broward is in the HVHZ — per the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, county-wide and binding on Miramar. 72% · BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix + statewide HVHZ product-approval mechanism

20 questions answered against City of Miramar’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedAttempted to confirm the specific NEC/NFPA 70 edition referenced by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) Electrical provisions via floridabuilding.org (DBPR's Florida Building Code Online) and the Florida DBPR site (connection refused); neither the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix nor Miramar's own solar application package states an NEC edition number — both cite only 'NEC Article 690' generically.

https://floridabuilding.org/bc/bc_default.aspx

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) — Building, Residential and Existing Building volumes — effective 31 December 2023.

Why the confidence is not higherThis edition/date is printed directly inside Miramar's OWN Solar PV System Application Package, on the bundled 'Special Building Inspector' form: 'FBC 8TH EDITION (2023)... SECTION 110.10 - BROWARD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 8TH EDITION (2023)'. Independently corroborated by BORA Formal Interpretation #31 (Board-approved 12 Oct 2023, 'EFFECTIVE DATE: December 31, 2023'), which I downloaded and text-extracted myself.

city solar permit application package (bundled BORA Special Inspector form, citing FBC 8th Ed. 2023) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition, with Broward County Amendments — binding county-wide, including incorporated Miramar.

Why the confidence is not higherBORA's own CodeAppeals page links 'Municode – Florida Fire Prevention Code, Broward County Amendments (8th Edition)'; Broward County Administrative Chapter 1 Sec. 101.2 (quoted verbatim inside the BORA Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, which I OCR'd myself) states the chapter 'shall apply countywide in both incorporated and unincorporated areas of Broward County, Florida.' I did not find a Miramar-specific fire-code adoption ordinance confirming it hasn't further amended this edition.

BORA CodeAppeals page (Florida Fire Prevention Code, Broward County Amendments, 8th Ed.) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Pages/Default.aspx

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes. Two independent local-amendment layers apply: (1) Broward County/BORA maintains county-wide technical amendments to the 8th-edition FBC (e.g., HVHZ wind-speed figures of 140 mph for Broward vs. 146 mph for Miami-Dade, per R4403.9.2, quoted in the BORA matrix), binding on Miramar; and (2) Miramar has its own municipal amendments, e.g., City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1) mandating the HOA-awareness affidavit on every building permit application, which is a Miramar-specific addition layered on top of the state/county code.

Why the confidence is not higherThe Broward wind-speed figures were read directly by me from the OCR'd BORA matrix; the Miramar-specific ordinance citation (Sec. 22-29(c)(1)) is quoted verbatim on the city's own HOA-affidavit form bundled in the solar application package.

city solar permit application package (Miramar City Code Sec. 22-29(c)(1)) + BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) — Building/Residential/Existing Building volumes — as locally amended by Broward County's BORA (HVHZ wind-load figures, Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix) and by Miramar's own municipal code sections (e.g., Sec. 22-29(c)(1)); electrically, against NEC Article 690 'in its entirety' per the BORA matrix.

Why the confidence is not higherComposite of the sources cited at q30-q32; no single Miramar document states this synthesis in one place.

city solar permit application package + BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked Miramar's Solar PV System Application Package and FY2026 Schedule of User Fees for 'service upgrade,' 'busbar,' 'bus bar,' '200 amp,' and '120% rule' — none found (controls confirmed the search was reading real text: 'electrical' = 5/1 hits respectively, 'zzqqx' = 0). Could not check the Land Development Code or a separate electrical-amendments ordinance (Municode access blocked, see q25).

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/7/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/fy2026-schedule-of-user-fees-final.pdf

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

No single prescribed mounting system or spacing is named locally, but every roof-attached PV component (panels, racking, clamps, flashing) must carry current HVHZ product approval (a statewide Florida Product Approval marked for HVHZ use, or a Miami-Dade County NOA) plus PE/RA-sealed wind-load, uplift, lateral-force and connection-design calculations, because Broward is in the HVHZ — per the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix, county-wide and binding on Miramar.

Why the confidence is not higherPE/RA wind-load documentation requirement verified directly by my own OCR of the BORA matrix; the HVHZ product-approval mechanism (Florida Product Approval vs. Miami-Dade NOA) is the general statewide HVHZ rule rather than language I found stated in a Miramar-specific document.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix + statewide HVHZ product-approval mechanism checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (which sets a general Table R4402.11.3 rooftop-equipment clearance/height table, but BORA Formal Interpretation #31 explicitly rules that FBC 1522.3/1522.3.1 rooftop-clearance rules 'are not intended to be applied to rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panels and solar thermal installations') and Miramar's Fire Prevention Bureau page (general fire-plan-review description, no numeric ridge-setback or fire-access-pathway figures for rooftop PV). No Broward or Miramar document I could open states a specific ridge setback or access-pathway dimension for residential PV.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240519185438/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/2023%20Formal%20Interpretations%20(8th%20Edition).pdf

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes, rapid shutdown is required — the BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix requires the electrical diagram to be 'designed in accordance to the National Electrical Code Article 690... in its entirety,' which includes NEC 690.12 (Rapid Shutdown). I could not confirm which NEC edition is currently referenced by the 8th-edition FBC (see q29), so I cannot state which edition's 690.12 language applies.

Why the confidence is not higherThe 'yes' is a reasonable inference from the 'NEC Art. 690 in its entirety' requirement (verified myself via OCR) rather than a Miramar or Broward document naming 'rapid shutdown' specifically; the edition is unconfirmed (q29 not_found).

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (NEC Art. 690 'in its entirety') checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked Miramar's full 10-page Solar PV System Application Package end-to-end (positive control 'electrical'=5 hits, fabricated 'zzqqx'=0 hits) — it contains no placard/label/marking section at all; it is purely an application-and-affidavit package, not an installation-standards document. Could not check the Land Development Code (Municode blocked, see q25) for a separate signage ordinance.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame search as q38 — no placard-wording language found in Miramar's own solar package; Land Development Code unreachable.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame search as q38 — no letter-height/colour/material language found in Miramar's own solar package; Land Development Code unreachable.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame search as q38 — no site-plan/facility-map placard language found in Miramar's own solar package; Land Development Code unreachable.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes, conditionally — FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 5.3) requires the customer to install, at their own expense, 'a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches' in the case where the switch itself cannot practically be mounted adjacent to the meter socket. (Under Sec. 5.1, most modern UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems do not require a manual disconnect switch or plaque at all.)

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly by me from FPL's own PSC-filed Tier 1 tariff sheet (Wayback-archived copy, text-extracted), not carried over from another agent's characterization.

FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260711082052/https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Where a manual disconnect switch is required at all (non-UL-1741-inverter-based Tier 1 systems, or where FPL determines one is needed), it must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket; if that is impractical, the switch may be relocated elsewhere on the premises but a permanent weatherproof location-plaque must then be placed adjacent to the meter socket instead. No Miramar-specific labeling-location rule beyond NEC was found for other equipment labels (rapid-shutdown label, disconnect labels, etc.).

Why the confidence is not higherFPL placement rule read directly from FPL's own Tier 1 tariff Sec. 5.2-5.3; the 'no Miramar-specific rule beyond NEC' portion is the same absence documented at q38-41.

FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260711082052/https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Yes, functionally — the BORA matrix requires FSEC Certification and NEC 110.3(B) listed/labeled-equipment compliance as component documentation, and every HVHZ roof-attachment component (panel, racking, clamps, flashing, fasteners) must carry a current Florida Product Approval marked for HVHZ use, or a Miami-Dade County NOA.

Why the confidence is not higherNEC 110.3(B)/FSEC citation verified directly by my own OCR of the BORA matrix; the HVHZ product-approval mechanism is the general statewide/HVHZ-county rule rather than Miramar-specific ordinance text I opened.

BORA Uniform Solar Permit Submittal Matrix (NEC 110.3(B) / FSEC citation) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20240616140513/https://www.broward.org/CodeAppeals/Documents/SolarThermalElectPermits.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked Miramar's Solar PV System Application Package and Fire Prevention Bureau page for 'battery,' 'energy storage,' and 'ESS' — none found (controls confirmed the search was functional). Could not check the Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition's NFPA 1/NFPA 855 battery/ESS provisions directly, nor a Miramar-specific ESS ordinance (Land Development Code unreachable, see q25).

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame search as q45 — no ESS-permit language found in Miramar's own materials; could not confirm from the Florida Fire Prevention Code or Land Development Code directly.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked Miramar's Solar PV System Application Package for 'ground mount' / 'ground-mounted' — no hits (controls confirmed the search was functional); the package appears written for roof-mounted systems only. Could not confirm from the Land Development Code (Municode unreachable, see q25) whether a ground-mount array is classified as an accessory structure.

https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket — where a manual disconnect switch is required at all. (UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems, which cover most modern residential PV, do not require a customer-installed manual disconnect switch under FPL's own tariff.)

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly by me from FPL's own filed PSC tariff, 'Interconnection Agreement for Customer-Owned Renewable Generation, Tier 1' Sections 5.1-5.2, downloaded and text-extracted from the archived copy.

FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff, Rate Schedule Sheet 9.052) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260711082052/https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Portal or Phone — 'Inspections can be requested in two ways: Online: Select Permits & Self Services... By phone: 954-602-3200.' 90% · city Permitting Information page
    • How much notice is required? Effectively next-business-day notice: inspections requested before 3:00 p.m. are conducted the next business day; inspections requested after 3:00 p.m. are conducted on the 2nd business day. Inspection requests made on Friday or over the weekend will not be honored for the following Monday. 85% · city Permitting Information page
    • Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No fixed AM/PM window is offered for booking; instead, applicants can call the Building Division inspectors between 7:30-8:00 a.m. on the morning of a scheduled inspection to get an arrival-time window, or call 4:30-5:30 p.m. to ask about the previous day's inspection results. Daily Inspection Times are posted/updated at 8:00 a.m. daily. 82% · city Permitting Information page
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — Miramar's own Building Division performs the required solar inspections in-house (Electrical Rough, Final Electrical, Final Building), not delegated to Broward County or a private staffing contractor. The department's staff directory lists an in-house Building Official, Electrical Chief, and Structural Chief, all with @miramarfl.gov addresses (unlike neighboring Pembroke Pines, whose Building Dept. staff carry @cgasolutions.com addresses — no equivalent third-party-staffing indicator was found for Miramar). 85% · city Permitting Information page (staff contact list) + solar application package
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated — inspected by Miramar's own Building Division staff (Building Official Julio Briceno; Electrical Chief Scott Douglas; Structural Chief Oniel E. Toledo), per the department's published contact list. 82% · city Permitting Information page (staff contact list)
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? Three inspections, in this order: (1) Electrical Rough (code B238); (2) Final Electrical (code B910); (3) Final Building (code B999) — for which the Special Inspector's Certificate of Compliance for roof anchorage/panel installation must be available at the time of Final Building. 95% · city solar permit application package
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes — Electrical Rough (B238) is a required inspection distinct from Final Electrical (B910), performed before the roof/panel work is closed up. 92% · city solar permit application package
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes — the City's own 10-page 'Solar PV System Application Package' functions as a published checklist, itemizing required documents and the three required inspections in sequence. 88% · city Applications & Forms page (Solar PV System Application Package listing)
    • What must be on site at inspection? At inspection: the approved/signed plans and manufacturer's equipment specifications; the Special Inspector's Certificate of Compliance for roof anchorage/panel installation (must be available at Final Building; if digitally signed, accompanied by an Affidavit of Identical Documents); and, if the job value exceeds $5,000 (F.S. 713.13), a recorded Notice of Commencement posted on the job site before the first inspection. 88% · city solar permit application package
    • Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Not explicitly stated as a checklist item in any Miramar document I could open, but it follows from what the package DOES require: a 'Special Inspector Certificate of Compliance for the roof anchorage and panels installation' must be available at Final Building, and the BORA matrix requires FSEC/NEC 110.3(B) listing documentation as part of the submittal that Final inspection is checking work against. 45% · city solar permit application package (Special Inspector Certificate requirement)
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? Final (not a Certificate of Occupancy) — the permit is closed out on passing Final Electrical (B910) and Final Building (B999); Miramar's Solar PV Application Package lists these as the terminal inspections and does not reference a CO for a PV retrofit. (The FY2026 fee schedule treats a Certificate of Occupancy as a distinct, separately-charged service tied to occupancy changes, not to a like-for-like PV retrofit permit.) 68% · city solar permit application package + FY2026 fee schedule (CO as a distinct service)
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer/Customer — FPL's net-metering interconnection is a separate application the customer or their installer submits directly to FPL. FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 3.5) requires 'the Customer' to notify FPL at least 10 calendar days before placing the system in service; FPL then grants Permission to Operate once its own review, plus the required Local Building Code Official inspection certification (Sec. 3.4), are satisfied. 85% · FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff)
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $80 for the 1st and 2nd re-inspection (same inspection type); $80 for each additional re-inspection thereafter; a $100 re-inspection fine (separate line item); and $100 for a same-day re-inspection request. 92% · FY2026 Schedule of User Fees, Resolution R25-212
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections are issued as written rejection/correction comments through the EnerGov online portal and by email ('An Application Completeness Check will be conducted... If your application is not complete, you will be notified through the Online Portal and via email'). The applicant must submit reworked/corrected plans within 10 business days of that notice or the application is denied and becomes null and void; once corrections are received, the City must approve or deny within a further 10 business days. 85% · city Permitting Information page

14 questions answered against City of Miramar’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal or Phone — 'Inspections can be requested in two ways: Online: Select Permits & Self Services... By phone: 954-602-3200.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the city's own Permitting Information page.

city Permitting Information page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Effectively next-business-day notice: inspections requested before 3:00 p.m. are conducted the next business day; inspections requested after 3:00 p.m. are conducted on the 2nd business day. Inspection requests made on Friday or over the weekend will not be honored for the following Monday.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the city's own Permitting Information page.

city Permitting Information page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

No fixed AM/PM window is offered for booking; instead, applicants can call the Building Division inspectors between 7:30-8:00 a.m. on the morning of a scheduled inspection to get an arrival-time window, or call 4:30-5:30 p.m. to ask about the previous day's inspection results. Daily Inspection Times are posted/updated at 8:00 a.m. daily.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the city's own Permitting Information page.

city Permitting Information page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes — Miramar's own Building Division performs the required solar inspections in-house (Electrical Rough, Final Electrical, Final Building), not delegated to Broward County or a private staffing contractor. The department's staff directory lists an in-house Building Official, Electrical Chief, and Structural Chief, all with @miramarfl.gov addresses (unlike neighboring Pembroke Pines, whose Building Dept. staff carry @cgasolutions.com addresses — no equivalent third-party-staffing indicator was found for Miramar).

Why the confidence is not higherInspection list verbatim from the solar application package; staff email domains checked directly on the city's own Permitting Information contact block, all showing @miramarfl.gov.

city Permitting Information page (staff contact list) + solar application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated — inspected by Miramar's own Building Division staff (Building Official Julio Briceno; Electrical Chief Scott Douglas; Structural Chief Oniel E. Toledo), per the department's published contact list.

Why the confidence is not higherNames, titles and @miramarfl.gov emails read directly from the city's own Permitting Information page.

city Permitting Information page (staff contact list) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

Three inspections, in this order: (1) Electrical Rough (code B238); (2) Final Electrical (code B910); (3) Final Building (code B999) — for which the Special Inspector's Certificate of Compliance for roof anchorage/panel installation must be available at the time of Final Building.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, 'REQUIRED INSPECTIONS' section of the city's own Solar PV System Application Package.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

Yes — Electrical Rough (B238) is a required inspection distinct from Final Electrical (B910), performed before the roof/panel work is closed up.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, city's own Solar PV System Application Package.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Not explicitly stated as a checklist item in any Miramar document I could open, but it follows from what the package DOES require: a 'Special Inspector Certificate of Compliance for the roof anchorage and panels installation' must be available at Final Building, and the BORA matrix requires FSEC/NEC 110.3(B) listing documentation as part of the submittal that Final inspection is checking work against.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from the Special Inspector Certificate requirement (verbatim from Miramar's own package) plus the BORA matrix's listing-documentation requirement (independently OCR'd by me); no Miramar document states in terms that the field inspector personally checks labels/listings.

city solar permit application package (Special Inspector Certificate requirement) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Yes — the City's own 10-page 'Solar PV System Application Package' functions as a published checklist, itemizing required documents and the three required inspections in sequence.

Why the confidence is not higherThe document itself is the checklist; found via the Building Permit Applications & Forms page.

city Applications & Forms page (Solar PV System Application Package listing) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Applications-Forms

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

At inspection: the approved/signed plans and manufacturer's equipment specifications; the Special Inspector's Certificate of Compliance for roof anchorage/panel installation (must be available at Final Building; if digitally signed, accompanied by an Affidavit of Identical Documents); and, if the job value exceeds $5,000 (F.S. 713.13), a recorded Notice of Commencement posted on the job site before the first inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherAll verbatim from the city's own Solar PV System Application Package.

city solar permit application package checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$80 for the 1st and 2nd re-inspection (same inspection type); $80 for each additional re-inspection thereafter; a $100 re-inspection fine (separate line item); and $100 for a same-day re-inspection request.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, FY2026 Schedule of User Fees Section I.A.8.

FY2026 Schedule of User Fees, Resolution R25-212 checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/7/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/fy2026-schedule-of-user-fees-final.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Corrections are issued as written rejection/correction comments through the EnerGov online portal and by email ('An Application Completeness Check will be conducted... If your application is not complete, you will be notified through the Online Portal and via email'). The applicant must submit reworked/corrected plans within 10 business days of that notice or the application is denied and becomes null and void; once corrections are received, the City must approve or deny within a further 10 business days.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the city's own Permitting Information / Permit Timelines page, describing its F.S. 553.792 process.

city Permitting Information page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Building-Permits-Inspections/Permitting-Information

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Final (not a Certificate of Occupancy) — the permit is closed out on passing Final Electrical (B910) and Final Building (B999); Miramar's Solar PV Application Package lists these as the terminal inspections and does not reference a CO for a PV retrofit. (The FY2026 fee schedule treats a Certificate of Occupancy as a distinct, separately-charged service tied to occupancy changes, not to a like-for-like PV retrofit permit.)

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the inspection sequence in the city's own solar package plus the separate CO fee line in the FY2026 fee schedule; no Miramar document states in terms what document is 'issued' on a PV permit's final pass.

city solar permit application package + FY2026 fee schedule (CO as a distinct service) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.miramarfl.gov/files/assets/public/v/3/buildingplanningzoning/documents/application-and-forms/solar-system-app.-package-fbc-2023-03.pdf

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Installer/Customer — FPL's net-metering interconnection is a separate application the customer or their installer submits directly to FPL. FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 3.5) requires 'the Customer' to notify FPL at least 10 calendar days before placing the system in service; FPL then grants Permission to Operate once its own review, plus the required Local Building Code Official inspection certification (Sec. 3.4), are satisfied.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly by me from FPL's own filed PSC tariff sheet, Sections 3.4-3.5.

FPL Interconnection Agreement, Tier 1 (filed PSC tariff) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260711082052/https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.

Labels & placards for this authority

Wording None%

Size, colour & material None%

Where they go 75%

Where a manual disconnect switch is required at all (non-UL-1741-inverter-based Tier 1 systems, or where FPL determines one is needed), it must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket; if that is impractical, the switch may be relocated elsewhere on the premises but a permanent weatherproof location-plaque must then be placed adjacent to the meter socket instead. No Miramar-specific labeling-location rule beyond NEC was found for other equipment labels (rapid-shutdown label, disconnect labels, etc.).

What the utility wants on top 82%

Yes, conditionally — FPL's own Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement (Sec. 5.3) requires the customer to install, at their own expense, 'a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches' in the case where the switch itself cannot practically be mounted adjacent to the meter socket. (Under Sec. 5.1, most modern UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems do not require a manual disconnect switch or plaque at all.)

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Solar Requirements
Notes
Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.miramarfl.gov/Departments/Building-Planning-Zoning/Sustainable-Living/Solar-Energy/Solar-Permitting
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
City
County
Broward County
Regions covered
Authority Contact
Building Department
Direct Phone
(954) 602-3200
Booking & Scheduling