City of Mulberry
City of Mulberry
Polk County
City of Mulberry is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 3,952 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Mulberry against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Mulberry is the authority having jurisdiction 94% confidence
- Holds
- Building and electrical, within the city limits of Mulberry. The City runs its own Building Department, its own Accela tenant, its own contractor registration, its own adopted fee schedule and its own inspections; solar has a dedicated 'Solar Permit' (BSOL) record type. Competency certification for the construction trades is handled by the Municipal Board of Examiners, Inc. of Polk County under the Sec. 6-17(6) amendment - a licensing/permitting split, not a delegation of permitting. Police services are contracted to the Polk County Sheriff's Office; the Fire Department is the City's own.
- Overridden by
- State law sets the technical code and the clock: FBC 8th Ed. (2023) with NEC 2020 (eff. 31 Dec 2023) and FFPC 8th Ed. (2023) override the City's codified 1993 NEC (Sec. 6-36) and 1994 Standard Building Code (Sec. 6-16). FS 553.792 as amended by s. 10, ch. 2026-63 sets review-timeline floors and a 10%-per-day fee reduction. FS 553.79(1)(g), added by s. 8 of the same chapter, creates a $7,500 no-permit exemption that cannot reach solar because (g)2.b excludes all electrical work on a single-family property and (g)2.a excludes any property in a flood hazard area. FS 553.791 lets the applicant elect a private provider, and s. 9 of ch. 2026-63 adds 'solar energy and energy storage installations or alterations' to the definition of a single-trade inspection - the only place the word 'solar' appears in the whole of ch. 2026-63. FS 720.3035(1)(c), new at s. 11, bars an association from requiring a building permit before its own architectural review. Interconnection is governed by Tampa Electric under FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 and TECO's SESR 2025, and TECO's PTO, not the City's final, is the last gate before operation.
- Why not higher
- Established from the City's own live permitting system rather than from a description of it: its own Accela agency code, its own record types including a dedicated Solar Permit, 27 issued BSOL permits with named certified solar contractors, its own registration checklist naming 'City of Mulberry Building Department', its own resolution-adopted fee schedule, and its own FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report. Polk County's Building Division has no role inside the city limits, consistent with every other incorporated Polk municipality checked in this survey.
https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Building&TabName=Building
- Permit required
- Yes. A permit is required, and Mulberry has a dedicated 'Solar Permit' type for it. Code Sec. 6-106 additionally makes a permit mandatory for 'any electrical construction of any character…95%
- Permit cost
- Valuation-based, from the adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (Res. RES-2024-15 Exhibit A, effective 1 Oct 2024).90%
- Plan review
- No locally published plan-review turnaround. The statutory floor governs: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 (as amended by s. 10, ch. 2026-63, eff.88%
- Portal
- Accela Citizen Access, the City's own tenant: aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY. Modules: Building, Planning, Enforcement, Business Tax. Phone on the portal masthead is (863) 425-1125.96%
- Electrical code
- NEC 2020, in force statewide through the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023. WATCH THIS: Mulberry's own codified electrical code, Sec.92%
- Own placard wording
- Yes — but the wording comes from the utility, not the AHJ. TECO specifies the placard legends verbatim: 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' (Detail J);90%
- Booking an inspection
- By notice to the inspection office. Code Sec. 6-126(a) requires notice of readiness giving permit number, owner name, electrical contractor name,62%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. A permit is required, and Mulberry has a dedicated 'Solar Permit' type for it. Code Sec. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined in practice — one 'Solar Permit' (BSOL-) record per job covers the installation; Q4 Plan review — No locally published plan-review turnaround. The statutory floor governs: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 (as amended by s. 10, ch. 2026-63, eff. Q18 Where you file — Accela Citizen Access, the City's own tenant: aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY. Modules: Building, Planning, Enforcement, Business Tax. Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. A permit is required, and Mulberry has a dedicated 'Solar Permit' type for it. Code Sec. 6-106 additionally makes a permit mandatory for 'any electrical construction of any character ...95% source
- What it costs
- Valuation-based, from the adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (Res. RES-2024-15 Exhibit A, effective 1 Oct 2024).90% source
- Plan review turnaround
- No locally published plan-review turnaround. The statutory floor governs: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 (as amended by s. 10, ch. 2026-63, eff.88% source
- Key document
- live permit records (Power Provider field) + adopted budget + code cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — the City of Mulberry Building Department is the AHJ for residential solar inside the city limits. It runs its own Accela tenant (aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY), its own contractor registration, its own adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (Res. RES-2024-15), and 27 live 'Solar Permit' (BSOL-) records issued 2025-2026. Polk County Building Division has no jurisdiction inside the city. 96% · permit portal + department page + adopted fee resolution
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both — the City issues and inspects building and electrical work itself. Solar is filed as its own record type, 'Solar Permit' (record-type value Building/Solar/NA/NA, permit prefix BSOL-), alongside separate Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Re-Roof and Residential Accessory types. 93% · permit portal record-type list + Code of Ordinances ch. 6 art. III
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. A permit is required, and Mulberry has a dedicated 'Solar Permit' type for it. Code Sec. 6-106 additionally makes a permit mandatory for 'any electrical construction of any character ... or make any extensions or changes to existing systems of wiring'. Note: the new FS 553.79(1)(g) $7,500 no-permit exemption (s. 8, ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026) can NEVER reach a PV job — (g)2.b excludes any electrical work on a single-family property, and (g)2.a excludes any property partly or wholly in a flood hazard area. 95% · enrolled session law + live permit portal
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined in practice — one 'Solar Permit' (BSOL-) record per job covers the installation; the city does not open a companion Electrical permit for the PV work on the records examined. The Code's separate electrical-permit machinery (Sec. 6-106 et seq.) is administered through that record. 78% · live permit record
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No HOA or architectural approval is required by the City. The Code contains no architectural review board and no covenant-compliance gate on a building permit. New for 2026: FS 720.3035(1)(c), added by s. 11 of ch. 2026-63 effective 1 Jul 2026, bars an association or its architectural committee from requiring a building permit to have been issued as a prerequisite for the association's own review. A private HOA covenant may still apply as between owner and association, limited by FS 163.04. 82% · Unified Land Development Code (searched)
- Is there a historic-district review? Yes, but only on an individually designated historic site — Mulberry has designated sites, not a historic district. ULDC 2.02.01(B): 'No demolition, alteration, or relocation of a historic structure shall be permitted except as provided below', and the exceptions are (1) work not requiring a construction permit, (2) work approved by the Building Director that restores the structure's original appearance, and (3) work approved by the CITY COMMISSION, on Planning Board recommendation, that will not preserve or re-create the original appearance. A rooftop array on a designated historic structure requires a permit and does not restore original appearance, so it falls in (3). Designation is by City Commission on Planning Board recommendation; National Register and Florida Master Site File properties are presumed to qualify. 84% · ULDC 2.02.01
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate local wind or windstorm certification. Mulberry is inland Polk County — outside the HVHZ (Miami-Dade and Broward only) and outside the coastal wind-borne debris region. Compliance runs through Florida Product Approval, which the Accela application asks for by name as part of the permit packet. 85% · code search (absence) + live application field
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for a rooftop array. One codified trap for a GROUND mount: ULDC 2.05.00(A) forbids an accessory structure on a parcel that has no principal structure except where the CITY COMMISSION approves it case by case, on findings about height, size and location, a plot plan, principal-structure setbacks, and common ownership of an adjacent parcel holding the principal structure. 80% · ULDC 2.05.00
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No local system-size cap. The operative tiers are the utility's: PSC Rule 25-6.065(4)(a) and TECO SESR — Tier 1 is 10 kW or less, Tier 2 is over 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 is over 100 kW to 2 MW, and the gross power rating may not exceed 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating. For inverter-based systems AC nameplate is computed as DC nameplate x 0.85. 88% · FL PSC Rule 25-6.065(4) + TECO SESR
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A contractor holding an appropriate Florida licence and registered with the City. The live record for BSOL-26-0004 names a CERTIFIED SOLAR CONTRACTOR (CVC56923). The Accela licence-type list carries CERTIFIED SOLAR, CERTIFIED SOLAR CONTRACTOR, CERTIFIED ELECTRICAL, Master Electrician and Owner - Builder. For the electrical work itself Code Sec. 6-61(a) requires an electrical contractor, supervised by that contractor or a master electrician, with a journeyman on the job at all times. 88% · live permit record + Code Sec. 6-61
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes — registration with the City of Mulberry Building Department is required before a permit will be issued. The published checklist is: a current Business Tax Receipt from a Florida county or city; a General Liability certificate and a Workers' Comp certificate or exemption in the licence holder's name, with the certificate holder shown as 'City of Mulberry Building Department, P.O. Box 707, Mulberry, FL 33860'; the State Certified Registration Form; and optionally an Accela Associated User Form. Codified at Sec. 6-82 (electrical, $5.00 annual registration fee, $5,000 bond, $25,000/$50,000 public liability, $10,000 property damage) and at the Standard Building Code Sec. 106.2(g) amendment ($20.00 annual for building contractors). 93% · department page + Code Sec. 6-82 / SBC 106.2 amendment
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. Code Sec. 6-61(b) lets a bona fide owner wire an EXISTING single-family dwelling he occupies, on four conditions: submit plans and specifications to the senior electrical inspector for approval; make application and secure an electrical permit before starting; file an affidavit that he is a bona fide owner, will do the work himself and will not hire anyone for any part of it; and pay the fees. The Standard Building Code Sec. 106.7 amendment adds owner-builder rights for a new single-family home (one per three years). An 'Owner/Builder Affidavit' and an 'Owner Builder-Contractor Pre-Power Request' are published, and 'Owner - Builder' is a live Accela licence type. 90% · Code of Ordinances ch. 6 art. III
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Submitted through Accela. The live BSOL application collects: the permit packet (plans, supporting documents, Florida Product Approval) submitted electronically; total value of work; size of property and of building; parcel number; owner and licensed professional; and answers to gate questions — gate code required, result of a code violation, applicant is the owner, preliminary submittal, Florida Statute 119 exempt/non-exempt, Flood Plain Y/N, Wetlands Y/N, 'Will a Private Provider be doing Plan Review or Inspections?', and Power Provider. A Notice of Commencement is published as a required form. No solar-specific checklist is published. 85% · live permit record application data
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic, through the Accela Citizen Access portal — no copy count is published. The application itself records 'How is the permit packet (plans, supporting documents, FL product approval, etc.) submitted?: Electronically'. 82% · live permit record
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No local structural PE-stamp threshold is published. The state floor applies: the FBC governs, and the application asks only for Florida Product Approval. Two of four BSOL records examined were run through a private provider (FS 553.791), which requires a Chapter 471 PE, Chapter 481 architect or Chapter 468 building code administrator/inspector to sign the plan-compliance affidavit. 55% · department page + code search (absence)
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No local electrical PE-stamp rule. FS 471.003(2)(h) sets the state exemption at $125,000 / 600 amps; some older local documents statewide still cite a $50,000 trigger, and Mulberry publishes neither. 50% · state statute + local absence
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Accela Citizen Access, the City's own tenant: aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY. Modules: Building, Planning, Enforcement, Business Tax. Phone on the portal masthead is (863) 425-1125. 96% · permit portal
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes. The department page says 'Apply here for a permit (in Accela)', the application records the packet as submitted 'Electronically', and an Accela Associated User Form lets a licence holder delegate portal access to staff. 92% · department page + live permit record
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Valuation-based, from the adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (Res. RES-2024-15 Exhibit A, effective 1 Oct 2024). Worked examples off the table: $10,000 valuation = $117.15; $15,000 = $161.10; $20,000 = $203.69; $25,000 = $247.63; $30,000 = $290.22. A plan review fee of ONE-HALF the permit fee is added for all permits over $1,000 requiring review, so a real $27,000 rooftop job is about $264.92 + $132.46 = $397.38. Revised Plan Review Fee $100.00; Re-stamp Plan Fee $55.00; Permit Renewal Fee $25.00. All fees rise automatically 5% every two calendar years on 1 October. Real BSOL job valuations seen: $10,000, $18,325.86, $23,000, $27,923.75, $29,716, $29,810, $32,000, $40,000, $41,231. 90% · adopted fee schedule (Res. RES-2024-15 Exh. A)
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation — a per-$1,000 sliding table to $100,000 ($39.95 at $1,000 rising to about $797 at $98,000), then $814.74 plus $8.11 per additional thousand to $500,000, then $4,056.09 plus $3.48 per additional thousand. Valuation of new construction uses the current ICC 'Building Valuation Data' sheet; otherwise 'generally accepted industry standards'. 94% · adopted fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes — Section 2(c)(i): 'PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR ALL PERMITS OVER $1,000.00 & REQUIRING REVIEW, COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL-RESIDENTIAL: Plan Review Fee: One-half (1/2) of building permit fee.' A Revised Plan Review Fee of $100.00 applies to resubmittals. 93% · adopted fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? No locally published plan-review turnaround. The statutory floor governs: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 (as amended by s. 10, ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026) gives 5 business days for an electrical or other single-trade permit on an EXISTING single-family dwelling where the value of the work is under $15,000, and 30 business days for a residential permit where the structure is under 7,500 sq ft. FS 553.792(1)(e) cuts the permit fee by 10% for each business day late (20% per day on a revision round under (1)(g)). Most Mulberry PV jobs are valued above $15,000, so the 30-business-day track is the realistic one. 88% · Florida Statutes 553.792
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Six months for the electrical permit — Code Sec. 6-108(a): 'The permit shall be valid for six months unless extended by the administrator.' A 'Permit Renewal Request for Expired Permits' form is published and the fee schedule prices a Permit Renewal Fee at $25.00. CONFLICT WORTH CARRYING: FS 553.79(1)(c), as amended by s. 8 of ch. 2026-63 effective 1 Jul 2026, provides that 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later.' The codified six months is below that floor. 88% · Code Sec. 6-108 + FS 553.79(1)(c)
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Tampa Electric Company (TECO). The City is NOT an electric utility. 92% · live permit records (Power Provider field) + adopted budget + code
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with a hard gate at the end. PSC Rule 25-6.065(5)(a) requires that customer-owned renewable generation 'must be inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation in parallel'; TECO's own interconnection package (SESR Drawing 7.52 note 1) requires a COPY OF THE AHJ APPROVED ELECTRICAL PERMIT, an engineered one-line in PDF, the enrollment application, the tier interconnection agreement, insurance, a photo of each disconnect close enough to read the placarding, and a pull-back photo showing the meter can and all disconnects together. Rule 25-6.065(5)(b) puts a 10-day pre-energization notice on the customer. SESR 7.52 note 11: operating before PTO is prohibited and may cause service disconnection. 90% · FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 + TECO SESR 2025
28 questions answered against City of Mulberry’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — the City of Mulberry Building Department is the AHJ for residential solar inside the city limits. It runs its own Accela tenant (aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY), its own contractor registration, its own adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (Res. RES-2024-15), and 27 live 'Solar Permit' (BSOL-) records issued 2025-2026. Polk County Building Division has no jurisdiction inside the city.
Why the confidence is not higherFour independent city-side instruments agree: the Accela tenant is Mulberry's own and carries a dedicated 'Solar Permit' record type; the Building Department page runs its own contractor registration into 'City of Mulberry Building Department, P.O. Box 707'; the city adopts its own fee schedule by resolution; and the FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report for FY2019/20 reports 3 personnel dedicated to enforcing the FBC and 256 permits issued. Nothing suggests delegation to the County or to a private operator at department level (private providers are offered per job under FS 553.791, which is the applicant's election, not a delegation).
permit portal + department page + adopted fee resolution checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Building&TabName=Building
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both — the City issues and inspects building and electrical work itself. Solar is filed as its own record type, 'Solar Permit' (record-type value Building/Solar/NA/NA, permit prefix BSOL-), alongside separate Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, Re-Roof and Residential Accessory types.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off the live Accela Building-module record-type list; corroborated by Code Ch. 6 Art. III Div. 2 (the Building & Zoning Codes Department administers the electric code and the electrical inspector issues and inspects electrical permits) and by the 27 BSOL records. Solar sits at the same level as Electrical, not under Residential, so it covers both residential and commercial.
permit portal record-type list + Code of Ordinances ch. 6 art. III checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Building&TabName=Building
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. A permit is required, and Mulberry has a dedicated 'Solar Permit' type for it. Code Sec. 6-106 additionally makes a permit mandatory for 'any electrical construction of any character ... or make any extensions or changes to existing systems of wiring'. Note: the new FS 553.79(1)(g) $7,500 no-permit exemption (s. 8, ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026) can NEVER reach a PV job — (g)2.b excludes any electrical work on a single-family property, and (g)2.a excludes any property partly or wholly in a flood hazard area.
Why the confidence is not higherLive portal shows 27 issued BSOL Solar Permits 2025-2026. The statutory exclusions were read in the enrolled text of CS/CS/HB 803 (ch. 2026-63) at bill lines 412-433, not from a summary. This settles the caller's open question: the 'local forms exclude solar' pattern reported at eight authorities is not local drafting at all — the electrical and flood-hazard carve-outs are in the enacted state statute.
enrolled session law + live permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/803/BillText/er/PDF
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined in practice — one 'Solar Permit' (BSOL-) record per job covers the installation; the city does not open a companion Electrical permit for the PV work on the records examined. The Code's separate electrical-permit machinery (Sec. 6-106 et seq.) is administered through that record.
Why the confidence is not higherFour BSOL detail records examined each carry a single record number, a single licensed professional (a CERTIFIED SOLAR CONTRACTOR on BSOL-26-0004) and a single 'Total Value of Work'; no related electrical record is shown. 78 rather than higher because the anonymous portal view does not expose the Related Records panel, so a companion sub-permit cannot be ruled out from outside.
live permit record checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A contractor holding an appropriate Florida licence and registered with the City. The live record for BSOL-26-0004 names a CERTIFIED SOLAR CONTRACTOR (CVC56923). The Accela licence-type list carries CERTIFIED SOLAR, CERTIFIED SOLAR CONTRACTOR, CERTIFIED ELECTRICAL, Master Electrician and Owner - Builder. For the electrical work itself Code Sec. 6-61(a) requires an electrical contractor, supervised by that contractor or a master electrician, with a journeyman on the job at all times.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo sources: the live permit record's Licensed Professional block, and the codified electrical article. Sec. 6-61(a) is 1976 text and predates the state solar-contractor licence category, so read it as the floor for the electrical scope rather than as a bar on a CVC solar contractor — the live record proves a CVC licence is accepted.
live permit record + Code Sec. 6-61 checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes — registration with the City of Mulberry Building Department is required before a permit will be issued. The published checklist is: a current Business Tax Receipt from a Florida county or city; a General Liability certificate and a Workers' Comp certificate or exemption in the licence holder's name, with the certificate holder shown as 'City of Mulberry Building Department, P.O. Box 707, Mulberry, FL 33860'; the State Certified Registration Form; and optionally an Accela Associated User Form. Codified at Sec. 6-82 (electrical, $5.00 annual registration fee, $5,000 bond, $25,000/$50,000 public liability, $10,000 property damage) and at the Standard Building Code Sec. 106.2(g) amendment ($20.00 annual for building contractors).
Why the confidence is not higherThe live department page gives the operative checklist; the Code gives the codified bond/insurance minimums and dollar figures. The codified dollar amounts are 1976-96 text and are almost certainly not what is collected today — treat the $5/$20 registration fees and the $5,000 bond as historical and confirm at the counter.
department page + Code Sec. 6-82 / SBC 106.2 amendment checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes. Code Sec. 6-61(b) lets a bona fide owner wire an EXISTING single-family dwelling he occupies, on four conditions: submit plans and specifications to the senior electrical inspector for approval; make application and secure an electrical permit before starting; file an affidavit that he is a bona fide owner, will do the work himself and will not hire anyone for any part of it; and pay the fees. The Standard Building Code Sec. 106.7 amendment adds owner-builder rights for a new single-family home (one per three years). An 'Owner/Builder Affidavit' and an 'Owner Builder-Contractor Pre-Power Request' are published, and 'Owner - Builder' is a live Accela licence type.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text plus two published forms plus the portal licence list. Note the asymmetry a self-installer must plan for: the owner-builder route TRIGGERS a plans-and-specifications submittal that Sec. 6-107(a) otherwise waives for single-family work.
Code of Ordinances ch. 6 art. III checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Submitted through Accela. The live BSOL application collects: the permit packet (plans, supporting documents, Florida Product Approval) submitted electronically; total value of work; size of property and of building; parcel number; owner and licensed professional; and answers to gate questions — gate code required, result of a code violation, applicant is the owner, preliminary submittal, Florida Statute 119 exempt/non-exempt, Flood Plain Y/N, Wetlands Y/N, 'Will a Private Provider be doing Plan Review or Inspections?', and Power Provider. A Notice of Commencement is published as a required form. No solar-specific checklist is published.
Why the confidence is not higherRead field-by-field off a live BSOL record's Application Information block, so this is what the city actually asks rather than what a checklist says. 85 because the record shows the answered fields, not a blank form, so an unanswered optional field would not appear.
live permit record application data checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic, through the Accela Citizen Access portal — no copy count is published. The application itself records 'How is the permit packet (plans, supporting documents, FL product approval, etc.) submitted?: Electronically'.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from the live record. No paper-copy requirement appears anywhere on the department page, the forms page or the fee schedule.
live permit record checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (all 10 pages rendered and read), the Building Department page, the 'Forms (Needed to apply for a permit)' attachment list (18 items), the whole 365-item document library filtered for 'solar/permit/application/checklist', and the live BSOL application field set in Accela. No site-plan requirement for a residential rooftop PV permit is published; the Accela application collects parcel number, property size and building size but no site plan field. ULDC 2.05.00(E) would require an accessory structure to appear on a site development plan only where one is otherwise required under ULDC 7.04.00, which a rooftop retrofit does not trigger. Site plan review, if triggered, is priced at 50% of the building permit fee plus 'any other expenses determined to be necessary by the administrative official' (Schedule of Development Fees, Res. RES-2024-17).
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCode ch. 6 arts. I-III, the fee schedule, the Building Department page, the forms list and the document library: the City states no one-line or three-line diagram requirement. The requirement exists one level up, at the utility: TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 note 1 requires an ENGINEERED ONE-LINE DIAGRAM IN PDF FORMAT and states that a hand-drawn one or a photograph of one will not be accepted. Recorded here rather than as a city answer because the question asks what this authority requires.
https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame sources as q11 plus the live BSOL application field set. No string, conductor, voltage-drop or ampacity calculation is asked for by the City or by TECO's published package.
https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department/page/forms-needed-apply-permit
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No local structural PE-stamp threshold is published. The state floor applies: the FBC governs, and the application asks only for Florida Product Approval. Two of four BSOL records examined were run through a private provider (FS 553.791), which requires a Chapter 471 PE, Chapter 481 architect or Chapter 468 building code administrator/inspector to sign the plan-compliance affidavit.
Why the confidence is not higher55 because this is an absence plus an inference. Searched the Code (ch. 6 arts. I-III, ULDC arts. 1-9), the fee schedule, the forms page and the document library: no engineering threshold appears. The private-provider credential list is on the department page and is about who may review, not about when a stamp is required.
department page + code search (absence) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No local electrical PE-stamp rule. FS 471.003(2)(h) sets the state exemption at $125,000 / 600 amps; some older local documents statewide still cite a $50,000 trigger, and Mulberry publishes neither.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from state law plus a proved local absence. 50 because the city says nothing at all — the value is the statewide floor, not a Mulberry fact.
state statute + local absence checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Valuation-based, from the adopted Schedule of Building Permit Fees (Res. RES-2024-15 Exhibit A, effective 1 Oct 2024). Worked examples off the table: $10,000 valuation = $117.15; $15,000 = $161.10; $20,000 = $203.69; $25,000 = $247.63; $30,000 = $290.22. A plan review fee of ONE-HALF the permit fee is added for all permits over $1,000 requiring review, so a real $27,000 rooftop job is about $264.92 + $132.46 = $397.38. Revised Plan Review Fee $100.00; Re-stamp Plan Fee $55.00; Permit Renewal Fee $25.00. All fees rise automatically 5% every two calendar years on 1 October. Real BSOL job valuations seen: $10,000, $18,325.86, $23,000, $27,923.75, $29,716, $29,810, $32,000, $40,000, $41,231.
Why the confidence is not higherThe schedule is an image-only scan with no text layer; it was rendered page by page with pdf.js and read directly, never summarised. 90 rather than 95 because there is no solar line item — Sec. 2(a)(xii) routes electrical/mechanical/plumbing permits to the valuation table on 'generally accepted market value of the work', and Sec. 2(e) lets the Building Official assign the most similar category at discretion where no fee is expressly provided, so the exact figure depends on the valuation the city accepts.
adopted fee schedule (Res. RES-2024-15 Exh. A) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/media/526
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation — a per-$1,000 sliding table to $100,000 ($39.95 at $1,000 rising to about $797 at $98,000), then $814.74 plus $8.11 per additional thousand to $500,000, then $4,056.09 plus $3.48 per additional thousand. Valuation of new construction uses the current ICC 'Building Valuation Data' sheet; otherwise 'generally accepted industry standards'.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off the rendered schedule, Section 2(a)(i)-(iii) and 2(b). Not flat, not per-kW, not per-panel.
adopted fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/media/526
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes — Section 2(c)(i): 'PLAN REVIEW FEE FOR ALL PERMITS OVER $1,000.00 & REQUIRING REVIEW, COMMERCIAL-INDUSTRIAL-RESIDENTIAL: Plan Review Fee: One-half (1/2) of building permit fee.' A Revised Plan Review Fee of $100.00 applies to resubmittals.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off the rendered schedule. The 'requiring review' qualifier is doing work: it leaves open whether every rooftop PV permit is plan-reviewed, and the FY2025-26 budget shows plan review revenue ($50,000) at about a fifth of permit revenue ($231,987), consistent with not every permit being reviewed.
adopted fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/media/526
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
No locally published plan-review turnaround. The statutory floor governs: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 (as amended by s. 10, ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026) gives 5 business days for an electrical or other single-trade permit on an EXISTING single-family dwelling where the value of the work is under $15,000, and 30 business days for a residential permit where the structure is under 7,500 sq ft. FS 553.792(1)(e) cuts the permit fee by 10% for each business day late (20% per day on a revision round under (1)(g)). Most Mulberry PV jobs are valued above $15,000, so the 30-business-day track is the realistic one.
Why the confidence is not higherStatute read in full from the Legislature's own site; the local absence was proved against the department page, the forms page, the fee schedule and the site search. 88 because the city publishes no local commitment at all, so this is the floor rather than observed practice.
Florida Statutes 553.792 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.792.html
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Six months for the electrical permit — Code Sec. 6-108(a): 'The permit shall be valid for six months unless extended by the administrator.' A 'Permit Renewal Request for Expired Permits' form is published and the fee schedule prices a Permit Renewal Fee at $25.00. CONFLICT WORTH CARRYING: FS 553.79(1)(c), as amended by s. 8 of ch. 2026-63 effective 1 Jul 2026, provides that 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later.' The codified six months is below that floor.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth texts read directly. 88 because the six-month clause is 1976 text about electrical permits and the statute speaks to permits for a single-family dwelling; which one the city applies to a BSOL solar permit is not published, and the answer matters for a job that stalls.
Code Sec. 6-108 + FS 553.79(1)(c) checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Accela Citizen Access, the City's own tenant: aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY. Modules: Building, Planning, Enforcement, Business Tax. Phone on the portal masthead is (863) 425-1125.
Why the confidence is not higherFetched and read the live portal. This is Mulberry's own agency code, not Polk County's POLKCO tenant.
permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Default.aspx
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes. The department page says 'Apply here for a permit (in Accela)', the application records the packet as submitted 'Electronically', and an Accela Associated User Form lets a licence holder delegate portal access to staff.
Why the confidence is not higherDepartment page plus the live record's own field. Registration and licence-holder paperwork is emailed to the department separately (bonnie@cityofmulberryfl.com), so the contractor onboarding step is not fully self-service.
department page + live permit record checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department/page/forms-needed-apply-permit
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Tampa Electric Company (TECO). The City is NOT an electric utility.
Why the confidence is not higherTHE RUNG THAT ANSWERED IT IS A NEW ONE, AND IT IS BETTER THAN ANY ON THE CALLER'S LADDER: Mulberry's own solar permit application has a required 'Power Provider' field, and the live records expose it. BSOL-26-0004 reads 'Power Provider: TECO'; BSOL-25-0014 reads 'Power Provider: Tampa Electric'; BSOL-25-0013's project description reads 'INSTALL ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR PV SYSTEM UTILITY COMPANY: TECO'. Three live records, two of them in a structured field. Corroborated negatively two ways from the FY2025-26 adopted budget: the city books 001-314.1000 UTILITY SERVICE TAX - ELECTRICITY ($450,000) and 001-323.1000 FRANCHISE FEES - ELECTRICITY ($400,000) — it taxes and franchises somebody else's electric sales — and Code ch. 19 Utilities contains articles for sewer, water, water treatment, wastewater, cross-connection and stormwater and NO electric article. Caveat: the Power Provider field is free text and one record had a private provider's firm name typed into it, so it is a strong but not infallible field. Duke Energy Florida is not named anywhere in the code, the budget or any permit examined.
live permit records (Power Provider field) + adopted budget + code checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, with a hard gate at the end. PSC Rule 25-6.065(5)(a) requires that customer-owned renewable generation 'must be inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation in parallel'; TECO's own interconnection package (SESR Drawing 7.52 note 1) requires a COPY OF THE AHJ APPROVED ELECTRICAL PERMIT, an engineered one-line in PDF, the enrollment application, the tier interconnection agreement, insurance, a photo of each disconnect close enough to read the placarding, and a pull-back photo showing the meter can and all disconnects together. Rule 25-6.065(5)(b) puts a 10-day pre-energization notice on the customer. SESR 7.52 note 11: operating before PTO is prohibited and may cause service disconnection.
Why the confidence is not higherRule text pulled from flrules.org as the adopted .doc via a live tid harvested from ruleNo.asp?id=25-6.065; SESR notes recovered by OCR of the image-only drawing page at 350 dpi. So: apply to TECO in parallel with the city permit, but the city's approved permit is an input to TECO and TECO's PTO is the last step.
FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 + TECO SESR 2025 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=0&tid=5455200&type=1&file=25-6.065.doc
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No HOA or architectural approval is required by the City. The Code contains no architectural review board and no covenant-compliance gate on a building permit. New for 2026: FS 720.3035(1)(c), added by s. 11 of ch. 2026-63 effective 1 Jul 2026, bars an association or its architectural committee from requiring a building permit to have been issued as a prerequisite for the association's own review. A private HOA covenant may still apply as between owner and association, limited by FS 163.04.
Why the confidence is not higherControls passed on the code corpus (1.69M characters, 'electrical' 144 hits, fabricated term 0 hits). Searched 'association' across the ULDC: every hit is about gated-community maintenance obligations and disclosure, none is an approval gate. Also checked specifically whether Mulberry has re-enacted FS 163.04's HOA-limiting language as a municipal restriction with the protective proviso stripped — it has not; '163.04' appears nowhere in the code.
Unified Land Development Code (searched) checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIIIUNLADECO_ART2RESPDI&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Yes, but only on an individually designated historic site — Mulberry has designated sites, not a historic district. ULDC 2.02.01(B): 'No demolition, alteration, or relocation of a historic structure shall be permitted except as provided below', and the exceptions are (1) work not requiring a construction permit, (2) work approved by the Building Director that restores the structure's original appearance, and (3) work approved by the CITY COMMISSION, on Planning Board recommendation, that will not preserve or re-create the original appearance. A rooftop array on a designated historic structure requires a permit and does not restore original appearance, so it falls in (3). Designation is by City Commission on Planning Board recommendation; National Register and Florida Master Site File properties are presumed to qualify.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the applicability limb first, as the caller's method requires: the gate reaches designated historic sites only, so it is off the table for the overwhelming majority of Mulberry addresses. 84 because the city publishes no list of designated sites that could be checked against an address.
ULDC 2.02.01 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIIIUNLADECO_ART2RESPDI&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No separate local wind or windstorm certification. Mulberry is inland Polk County — outside the HVHZ (Miami-Dade and Broward only) and outside the coastal wind-borne debris region. Compliance runs through Florida Product Approval, which the Accela application asks for by name as part of the permit packet.
Why the confidence is not higherCode searched for 'wind load', 'mph', 'windborne', 'wind-borne', 'impact resist', 'product approval': zero substantive hits in 1.69M characters against a working positive control. The Product Approval requirement comes from the live application field, not from a local ordinance.
code search (absence) + live application field checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Not for a rooftop array. One codified trap for a GROUND mount: ULDC 2.05.00(A) forbids an accessory structure on a parcel that has no principal structure except where the CITY COMMISSION approves it case by case, on findings about height, size and location, a plot plan, principal-structure setbacks, and common ownership of an adjacent parcel holding the principal structure.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Table of Land Uses carries no solar entry at all (zero 'solar' hits code-wide), so there is no conditional-use or special-exception line for PV. The Commission gate is the accessory-structure rule, which bites only on a vacant-lot ground mount.
ULDC 2.05.00 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIIIUNLADECO_ART2RESPDI&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No local system-size cap. The operative tiers are the utility's: PSC Rule 25-6.065(4)(a) and TECO SESR — Tier 1 is 10 kW or less, Tier 2 is over 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 is over 100 kW to 2 MW, and the gross power rating may not exceed 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating. For inverter-based systems AC nameplate is computed as DC nameplate x 0.85.
Why the confidence is not higherRule text and SESR read directly. The 90%-of-service-rating limit is the one that actually constrains a Mulberry house, and it interacts with Code Sec. 6-147(a), which sets a 100 amp minimum residential service.
FL PSC Rule 25-6.065(4) + TECO SESR checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=0&tid=5455200&type=1&file=25-6.065.doc
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020, in force statewide through the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023. WATCH THIS: Mulberry's own codified electrical code, Sec. 6-36, still adopts 'The National Electric Code, 1993 Edition' (Ord. 7.96, 6 Feb 1996). That is a fossil superseded by the state-adopted FBC, and it is the third-oldest codified NEC found in this survey after Callaway (1984) and Hialeah Gardens (1990). 92% · FBC effective dates + Code Sec. 6-36
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023, enforced by the City as the state-adopted code. The codified local building code, Sec. 6-16, still adopts 'The Standard Building Code, 1994 Edition' (Ord. 1.96, 6 Feb 1996) with local amendments at Sec. 6-17 — a second fossil. 92% · FBC effective dates + Code Sec. 6-16
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), based on NFPA 1 (2021) and NFPA 101 (2021) with Florida amendments, adopted by the State Fire Marshal under ch. 633 F.S. Mulberry has its own Fire Department. Its codified adoption, Sec. 7-1, is a floating adoption by reference to FS 633.0215 that then names 'the Florida Fire Prevention Code Handbook, 20xx Edition' — the placeholder was never filled in. 85% · State Fire Marshal + Code Sec. 7-1
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. Mulberry carries real local electrical amendments that survive in the codified text: Sec. 6-37 (the 50%-of-system rule and the service-entrance review), Sec. 6-147 (minimum service sizes), Sec. 6-148 (separate main disconnect per dwelling unit), Sec. 6-128(c)-(e) (contractor decal and stencilling), Sec. 6-126 (inspection notice timing), Sec. 6-82 (contractor registration), and the Standard Building Code amendments at Sec. 6-17. 90% · Code ch. 6 arts. II-III
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code 8th Ed. (2023) and NEC 2020, plus the surviving local electrical amendments in Code ch. 6 art. III. Mulberry's electrical article carries a CITED AUTHORITY THAT DOES NOT EXIST: the art. III footnote reads 'State Law reference - Adoption of certain minimum electrical standards required, F.S. 553.19', and the Statutory Reference Table maps 553.19 to Ch. 6 Art. III. leg.state.fl.us returns 'The statute you have selected cannot be found' for 553.19 in the 2026 Florida Statutes. This is the third Florida authority in this survey adopting an electrical code on a non-existent citation — a copied Municode template. 90% · Florida Statutes lookup (negative) + Code ch. 6 art. III footnote
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? No local ridge-setback or access-pathway amendment. The Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Ed. (2023) and FBC provisions apply as adopted. Mulberry's fire chapter regulates burning permits, Knox-Box installations, hazard inspections and the fire services assessment; it contains no PV article and no rooftop access provision. 80% · Code ch. 7 (searched)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Rapid shutdown applies as NEC 2020 Article 690.12, through the FBC 8th Ed. (2023). Mulberry does not restate it, does not amend it, and does not publish a PV inspection checklist that references it. 78% · FBC/NEC edition + proved local absence
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Two layers. UTILITY (binding on every TECO job): SESR Section II requires a placard AT THE METER identifying the location of the isolation means; SESR Drawing 7.52 (effective 7-21-25) requires, on the FRONT COVER of the customer-provided utility disconnect, a placard identifying the presence of an on-site power generation source (Detail J, reading ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH); where multiple disconnects are required, placards numbered sequentially, e.g. 1 OF 3 (Detail K, note 6); where approved, a METER CAN VARIANCE / DISCONNECT LOCATION placard stating, facing the meter can, the distance in feet and the direction right/left/behind to each disconnect, compass points not acceptable (Detail L, note 8); and, where pre-approved, a DISCONNECT LOCATION MAP PLACARD (Detail M, note 13). CITY: Code Sec. 6-128(c) requires the electrical contractor to stencil or decal contractor name, address and phone on the main switch or panel; (d) requires all circuits to be properly identified before a final is accepted; (e) requires, on multimeter installations, the location served stencilled on each meter base or panel in letters at least two inches high. 93% · TECO SESR 2025 (Section II + Drawing 7.52, OCR)
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Yes — but the wording comes from the utility, not the AHJ. TECO specifies the placard legends verbatim: 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' (Detail J); the same with a sequential suffix such as '1 OF 3' (Detail K); the variance placard in the form 'ON SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT LOCATED 27 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF UTILITY METER' (Detail L); and the map placard 'CAUTION! POWER TO THIS BUILDING IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY ON ADJACENT STRUCTURE WITH SAFETY DISCONNECTS AS SHOWN PER NEC 705.10' (Detail M). The City specifies its own wording only for the condemned-wiring notice (Sec. 6-56(f)) and requires the contractor decal content at Sec. 6-128(c). 90% · TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Details J-M (OCR)
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Yes. TECO SESR note 5 and Section II: non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic plates; engraved or stamped lettering a MINIMUM OF ONE QUARTER INCH HIGH; WHITE LETTERING ON A RED BACKGROUND; permanent, durable, UV resistant; EPOXY GLUED OR RIVETED to the mounting surface. Expressly NOT acceptable: duplication, peel-and-stick labels, paint, marking pens, or scratching. City: Code Sec. 6-128(e) requires two-inch minimum letters for the multimeter location stencil; Sec. 6-3 requires address numbers not less than three inches high in a contrasting colour. 94% · TECO SESR Section II + Drawing 7.52 note 5
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Yes, at utility level, and this BREAKS the seven-authority NEC 705.10 silence. TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Detail M is a DISCONNECT LOCATION MAP PLACARD whose specimen legend reads 'CAUTION! POWER TO THIS BUILDING IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY ON ADJACENT STRUCTURE WITH SAFETY DISCONNECTS AS SHOWN PER NEC 705.10'. Note 13 makes it conditional: map placards are used only where approved after discussion with Tampa Electric, and they do not replace the meter-can variance or disconnect-location placard. The City of Mulberry itself specifies no facility map placard. 88% · TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Detail M (OCR)
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, decisively — everything in Q38-Q41 is the utility's, not the AHJ's. Mulberry publishes no PV placard requirement of any kind; TECO publishes five placard types with a full material, colour, letter-height and fixing specification, plus a photographic proof requirement (SESR 7.52 note 1: a photo of each disconnect close enough to read the placarding, and a pull-back photo showing the meter can and all disconnects in one frame). 93% · TECO SESR 2025
- Where must the labels be placed? Utility disconnect placard: on the FRONT COVER of the customer-provided utility disconnect switch. Isolation-means placard: AT THE METER. Meter-can variance placard: on the meter can. The disconnect itself: mounted adjacent to the utility meter socket enclosure, within a maximum of 6 feet, in the line of sight, with the centreline of the throwable handle 4 feet 6 inches to 5 feet above final grade and a 3-inch minimum / 6-foot maximum offset from the meter per Details G and H. City: contractor decal on the main switch or panel; multimeter stencil on each meter base or panel. 92% · TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Details G, H, J + Section II
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? TECO requires a manual load-break disconnect switch giving a LOCKABLE VISIBLE BREAK between the utility grid and the AC output of the RGS or ESS, customer-provided, mounted ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY METER SOCKET ENCLOSURE WITHIN A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 6 FEET AND IN THE LINE OF SIGHT, with the handle centreline 4 feet 6 inches to 5 feet from final grade, grounded per NEC/AHJ, lockable open with a single utility padlock. A circuit breaker, molded case switch or push-stop button does NOT provide a visible break and is not acceptable. If the 6-foot/line-of-sight rule cannot be met, permission must be requested from Tampa Electric BEFORE installation. THE TENSION TO CARRY: PSC Rule 25-6.065(6)(a) says 'Inverter-based Tier 1 customer-owned renewable generation systems SHALL BE EXEMPT from this requirement, UNLESS the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense.' TECO's SESR states the requirement flatly for all RGS with no Tier 1 carve-out, so on a Tier 1 (<=10 kW inverter-based) Mulberry job the switch is required but the rule puts the cost on TECO. 91% · FL PSC Rule 25-6.065(6) + TECO SESR Section II and Drawing 7.52
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes — Florida Product Approval. The Accela application asks in terms whether the permit packet includes 'plans, supporting documents, FL product approval'. Beyond that, PSC Rule 25-6.065(4)(b)-(c) requires the generating equipment to have been tested and listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for continuous interactive operation, and to include a utility-interactive inverter certified to UL 1741 (2005), IEEE 1547 (2003) and IEEE 1547.1 (2005). 88% · live permit application + PSC Rule 25-6.065(3)-(4)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Yes, batteries are permitted and are being permitted. BSOL-25-0012 (24 Nov 2025, 1020 Aruba Ave, $41,231) is described as 'solar electric panels plus battery' and is Closed - Complete. There is no Mulberry ESS ordinance and no local battery condition. The operative conditions are TECO's: SESR Drawing 7.52 treats RGS/ESS combinations, RGS-only, ESS-only and battery add-ons as separate configurations, each requiring a utility disconnect and placarding, and note 12 provides that ELECTRIC VEHICLES SHALL BE CONSIDERED A STANDARD ESS and must be connected electrically behind a disconnect. Note 1 requires a fresh enrollment application and tier agreement for a battery added to an existing array. 87% · live permit record + TECO SESR Drawing 7.52
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No. There is no ESS or battery record type in the Accela Building module — the types are Civil Plan, Commercial Fire, Commercial Multi-Family, Commercial New, Commercial Renovation, Commercial Roofing, Commercial Sign, Commercial Tent, Demolition, Electrical, Fence-Wall, Gas, Mechanical, Mobile Home (double/single), New Single Family Residence, Plumbing, Pool, Re-Roof, Residential Accessory, Residential Driveway, Residential Renovation-Addition, Solar, and Window and Door. A battery is permitted inside the Solar Permit, as BSOL-25-0012 shows. 90% · permit portal record-type list
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes. ULDC Art. 9 defines Structure as 'Anything constructed or installed which is rigidly and permanently attached to the ground or to another object which is rigidly and permanently attached to the ground ... including but not limited to supporting walls, signs, screened or unscreened enclosures covered by a permanent roof, swimming pools, POLES, and pipelines.' A pier- or footing-mounted array is squarely inside that. It is then an accessory structure under ULDC 2.05.00 and must: be in the SIDE OR REAR YARD and not in a required landscape buffer (C); sit at least FIVE FEET from any interior lot line (H); be separated at least five feet from other structures and from the principal structure (G); be no larger than the principal structure (F); comply with the FBC (B); be counted in impervious-surface and stormwater calculations (D); and be shown on a site development plan where one is required (E). There is no clause exempting residential mechanical or electrical equipment from setbacks — ULDC 2.02.12(D) allows mechanical equipment to project no more than three feet into a setback and no further. 83% · ULDC Art. 9 definitions + ULDC 2.05.00
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes, and it is unusually specific. Code Sec. 6-37: (a) where MORE THAN 50 PERCENT of the electrical system is remodeled or changed as determined by the electrical inspector, the ENTIRE electrical system must meet current code; and when wiring for any added load is installed, 'the service entrance shall also be reviewed and sizes increased to carry the new total load, as necessary'; (b) additional circuit-breaker capacity shall be added to protect any added load, and a new panel must have at least one spare circuit; (d) on a service change, an old panel reused as a subpanel must be fed with approved rigid conduit, IMC, EMT or a four-conductor cable. Sec. 6-147(a) sets a 100 amp minimum residential service; Sec. 6-148 requires a separate main disconnect per dwelling unit. 91% · Code Secs. 6-37, 6-147, 6-148
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No local mounting or attachment-spacing rule. The binding site rule comes from the utility: TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Detail G requires NO PANELS CLOSER THAN A 3-FOOT RADIUS FROM THE SERVICE MAST, and requires access to the meter to be maintained per SESR Section II.E.2. 84% · TECO SESR 2025 Drawing 7.52 (OCR of image-only page)
20 questions answered against City of Mulberry’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
NEC 2020, in force statewide through the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023. WATCH THIS: Mulberry's own codified electrical code, Sec. 6-36, still adopts 'The National Electric Code, 1993 Edition' (Ord. 7.96, 6 Feb 1996). That is a fossil superseded by the state-adopted FBC, and it is the third-oldest codified NEC found in this survey after Callaway (1984) and Hialeah Gardens (1990).
Why the confidence is not higherThe 1993 adoption was read in the current supplement (codified through Ord. 2026-02, adopted 7 Apr 2026, posted 23 Jul 2026), so it is live codified text, not a stale mirror. It does not change the answer — FS 553.73 preempts the technical code — but any installer quoting the Mulberry code book will read 1993.
FBC effective dates + Code Sec. 6-36 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.floridabuilding.org/fbc/Publications/2023_Effective_Dates.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023, enforced by the City as the state-adopted code. The codified local building code, Sec. 6-16, still adopts 'The Standard Building Code, 1994 Edition' (Ord. 1.96, 6 Feb 1996) with local amendments at Sec. 6-17 — a second fossil.
Why the confidence is not higherSame reasoning as Q29. The Sec. 6-17 amendments are still operative in substance for contractor registration, owner-builder rights and the doubled-fee penalty for starting work without a permit, so the fossil is not entirely inert.
FBC effective dates + Code Sec. 6-16 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.floridabuilding.org/fbc/Publications/2023_Effective_Dates.pdf
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), based on NFPA 1 (2021) and NFPA 101 (2021) with Florida amendments, adopted by the State Fire Marshal under ch. 633 F.S. Mulberry has its own Fire Department. Its codified adoption, Sec. 7-1, is a floating adoption by reference to FS 633.0215 that then names 'the Florida Fire Prevention Code Handbook, 20xx Edition' — the placeholder was never filled in.
Why the confidence is not higherThe literal '20xx' is in the current supplement. It does not create a gap (the floating reference to 633.0215 does the work) but it is a codification defect worth recording, and it is a new shape for this survey.
State Fire Marshal + Code Sec. 7-1 checked 2026-09-13 https://myfloridacfo.com/division/sfm/bfp/florida-fire-prevention-code
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes. Mulberry carries real local electrical amendments that survive in the codified text: Sec. 6-37 (the 50%-of-system rule and the service-entrance review), Sec. 6-147 (minimum service sizes), Sec. 6-148 (separate main disconnect per dwelling unit), Sec. 6-128(c)-(e) (contractor decal and stencilling), Sec. 6-126 (inspection notice timing), Sec. 6-82 (contractor registration), and the Standard Building Code amendments at Sec. 6-17.
Why the confidence is not higherAll read in the current supplement. Whether the city still enforces the 1976 electrical amendments against an FBC-era job is not published — but they are what is codified.
Code ch. 6 arts. II-III checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code 8th Ed. (2023) and NEC 2020, plus the surviving local electrical amendments in Code ch. 6 art. III. Mulberry's electrical article carries a CITED AUTHORITY THAT DOES NOT EXIST: the art. III footnote reads 'State Law reference - Adoption of certain minimum electrical standards required, F.S. 553.19', and the Statutory Reference Table maps 553.19 to Ch. 6 Art. III. leg.state.fl.us returns 'The statute you have selected cannot be found' for 553.19 in the 2026 Florida Statutes. This is the third Florida authority in this survey adopting an electrical code on a non-existent citation — a copied Municode template.
Why the confidence is not higherVerified by fetching FS 553.19 directly rather than inferring: the page renders the Legislature's own 'cannot be found' message. 553.73 (cited in the building article) and 553.792 and 553.791 all resolve normally from the same URL pattern, so the failure is specific to 553.19 and not a broken retrieval.
Florida Statutes lookup (negative) + Code ch. 6 art. III footnote checked 2026-09-13 https://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.19.html
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Yes, and it is unusually specific. Code Sec. 6-37: (a) where MORE THAN 50 PERCENT of the electrical system is remodeled or changed as determined by the electrical inspector, the ENTIRE electrical system must meet current code; and when wiring for any added load is installed, 'the service entrance shall also be reviewed and sizes increased to carry the new total load, as necessary'; (b) additional circuit-breaker capacity shall be added to protect any added load, and a new panel must have at least one spare circuit; (d) on a service change, an old panel reused as a subpanel must be fed with approved rigid conduit, IMC, EMT or a four-conductor cable. Sec. 6-147(a) sets a 100 amp minimum residential service; Sec. 6-148 requires a separate main disconnect per dwelling unit.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly codified and directly relevant: a PV interconnection is 'wiring for added load', so (a)'s service-entrance review and (b)'s breaker-capacity duty are the local overlay on the NEC 705.12 busbar calculation. One BSOL record (BSOL-26-0001) in fact reads 'INSTALL NEW 150 AMP MAIN BREAKER TO EXISTING INTERIOR SUB PANEL', which is exactly this rule biting.
Code Secs. 6-37, 6-147, 6-148 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No local mounting or attachment-spacing rule. The binding site rule comes from the utility: TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Detail G requires NO PANELS CLOSER THAN A 3-FOOT RADIUS FROM THE SERVICE MAST, and requires access to the meter to be maintained per SESR Section II.E.2.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 3-foot mast clearance is on an image-only drawing page with no text layer; recovered by rendering page 135 of the SESR PDF at 350 dpi and OCRing it. Verified the rest of the code corpus has no mounting standard.
TECO SESR 2025 Drawing 7.52 (OCR of image-only page) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
No local ridge-setback or access-pathway amendment. The Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Ed. (2023) and FBC provisions apply as adopted. Mulberry's fire chapter regulates burning permits, Knox-Box installations, hazard inspections and the fire services assessment; it contains no PV article and no rooftop access provision.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the whole of Code ch. 7 (59,385 characters) section by section. 'Solar' returns zero hits across the entire code against a passing positive control, so this is a proved absence, qualified by the code being current only to Ord. 2026-02 (7 Apr 2026, posted 23 Jul 2026).
Code ch. 7 (searched) checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH7FIPRCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Rapid shutdown applies as NEC 2020 Article 690.12, through the FBC 8th Ed. (2023). Mulberry does not restate it, does not amend it, and does not publish a PV inspection checklist that references it.
Why the confidence is not higherState-level answer plus a proved local absence. 78 because the answer is entirely inherited: the city's own codified electrical code is the 1993 NEC, which predates rapid shutdown altogether, so there is a real risk of an installer being shown the wrong book at the counter.
FBC/NEC edition + proved local absence checked 2026-09-13 https://www.floridabuilding.org/fbc/Publications/2023_Effective_Dates.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Two layers. UTILITY (binding on every TECO job): SESR Section II requires a placard AT THE METER identifying the location of the isolation means; SESR Drawing 7.52 (effective 7-21-25) requires, on the FRONT COVER of the customer-provided utility disconnect, a placard identifying the presence of an on-site power generation source (Detail J, reading ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH); where multiple disconnects are required, placards numbered sequentially, e.g. 1 OF 3 (Detail K, note 6); where approved, a METER CAN VARIANCE / DISCONNECT LOCATION placard stating, facing the meter can, the distance in feet and the direction right/left/behind to each disconnect, compass points not acceptable (Detail L, note 8); and, where pre-approved, a DISCONNECT LOCATION MAP PLACARD (Detail M, note 13). CITY: Code Sec. 6-128(c) requires the electrical contractor to stencil or decal contractor name, address and phone on the main switch or panel; (d) requires all circuits to be properly identified before a final is accepted; (e) requires, on multimeter installations, the location served stencilled on each meter base or panel in letters at least two inches high.
Why the confidence is not higherTHE CALLER'S 'TECO REQUIRES NO PLACARDS' LINE IS WRONG AND IS NOW BROKEN WITH A CITATION. Four placard types on Drawing 7.52 plus the separate meter placard in SESR Section II — five in total. The drawing pages are image-only and were recovered by OCR at 350 dpi of PDF pages 131 and 136; the Section II text came out of pdftotext -layout. The city's own placard rules are generic electrical, not PV-specific.
TECO SESR 2025 (Section II + Drawing 7.52, OCR) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — but the wording comes from the utility, not the AHJ. TECO specifies the placard legends verbatim: 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' (Detail J); the same with a sequential suffix such as '1 OF 3' (Detail K); the variance placard in the form 'ON SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT LOCATED 27 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF UTILITY METER' (Detail L); and the map placard 'CAUTION! POWER TO THIS BUILDING IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY ON ADJACENT STRUCTURE WITH SAFETY DISCONNECTS AS SHOWN PER NEC 705.10' (Detail M). The City specifies its own wording only for the condemned-wiring notice (Sec. 6-56(f)) and requires the contractor decal content at Sec. 6-128(c).
Why the confidence is not higherLegends transcribed from a 350-dpi OCR of SESR page 136; the OCR is clean enough to read the legends but the Detail L distance '27 FEET' is an example on the drawing, not a fixed value.
TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Details J-M (OCR) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes. TECO SESR note 5 and Section II: non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic plates; engraved or stamped lettering a MINIMUM OF ONE QUARTER INCH HIGH; WHITE LETTERING ON A RED BACKGROUND; permanent, durable, UV resistant; EPOXY GLUED OR RIVETED to the mounting surface. Expressly NOT acceptable: duplication, peel-and-stick labels, paint, marking pens, or scratching. City: Code Sec. 6-128(e) requires two-inch minimum letters for the multimeter location stencil; Sec. 6-3 requires address numbers not less than three inches high in a contrasting colour.
Why the confidence is not higherThe material/height/fixing spec appears twice in the SESR — once in the Section II running text (text layer) and once in Drawing 7.52 note 5 (OCR) — and the two agree, which is a strong cross-check on the OCR.
TECO SESR Section II + Drawing 7.52 note 5 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, at utility level, and this BREAKS the seven-authority NEC 705.10 silence. TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Detail M is a DISCONNECT LOCATION MAP PLACARD whose specimen legend reads 'CAUTION! POWER TO THIS BUILDING IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY ON ADJACENT STRUCTURE WITH SAFETY DISCONNECTS AS SHOWN PER NEC 705.10'. Note 13 makes it conditional: map placards are used only where approved after discussion with Tampa Electric, and they do not replace the meter-can variance or disconnect-location placard. The City of Mulberry itself specifies no facility map placard.
Why the confidence is not higherThe caller asked to confirm or break the streak; it is broken, with the express citation on the face of the drawing. Note the scope limit — this is a pre-approved conditional placard for a multi-structure or remote-array case, not a blanket 705.10 restatement.
TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Detail M (OCR) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, decisively — everything in Q38-Q41 is the utility's, not the AHJ's. Mulberry publishes no PV placard requirement of any kind; TECO publishes five placard types with a full material, colour, letter-height and fixing specification, plus a photographic proof requirement (SESR 7.52 note 1: a photo of each disconnect close enough to read the placarding, and a pull-back photo showing the meter can and all disconnects in one frame).
Why the confidence is not higherThe photo requirement is the practical teeth: a placard that does not photograph legibly fails the interconnection package, independently of whether the city inspector looks at it.
TECO SESR 2025 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Utility disconnect placard: on the FRONT COVER of the customer-provided utility disconnect switch. Isolation-means placard: AT THE METER. Meter-can variance placard: on the meter can. The disconnect itself: mounted adjacent to the utility meter socket enclosure, within a maximum of 6 feet, in the line of sight, with the centreline of the throwable handle 4 feet 6 inches to 5 feet above final grade and a 3-inch minimum / 6-foot maximum offset from the meter per Details G and H. City: contractor decal on the main switch or panel; multimeter stencil on each meter base or panel.
Why the confidence is not higherDimensions read from Drawing 7.52 pages 1 and 5 by OCR and cross-checked against the SESR Section II running text, which gives the same 'mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the meter socket' rule.
TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 Details G, H, J + Section II checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c963/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes — Florida Product Approval. The Accela application asks in terms whether the permit packet includes 'plans, supporting documents, FL product approval'. Beyond that, PSC Rule 25-6.065(4)(b)-(c) requires the generating equipment to have been tested and listed by a nationally recognized testing laboratory for continuous interactive operation, and to include a utility-interactive inverter certified to UL 1741 (2005), IEEE 1547 (2003) and IEEE 1547.1 (2005).
Why the confidence is not higherThe Product Approval requirement is from the live application field rather than a checklist; the listing requirement is from the adopted PSC rule. No Mulberry-specific approved-equipment list exists.
live permit application + PSC Rule 25-6.065(3)-(4) checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Yes, batteries are permitted and are being permitted. BSOL-25-0012 (24 Nov 2025, 1020 Aruba Ave, $41,231) is described as 'solar electric panels plus battery' and is Closed - Complete. There is no Mulberry ESS ordinance and no local battery condition. The operative conditions are TECO's: SESR Drawing 7.52 treats RGS/ESS combinations, RGS-only, ESS-only and battery add-ons as separate configurations, each requiring a utility disconnect and placarding, and note 12 provides that ELECTRIC VEHICLES SHALL BE CONSIDERED A STANDARD ESS and must be connected electrically behind a disconnect. Note 1 requires a fresh enrollment application and tier agreement for a battery added to an existing array.
Why the confidence is not higherA real closed permit proves the practice; the conditions come from the utility standard. 'Battery', 'ESS' and 'energy storage' return zero substantive hits in the 1.69M-character code corpus against a passing positive control.
live permit record + TECO SESR Drawing 7.52 checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Building&TabName=Building
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No. There is no ESS or battery record type in the Accela Building module — the types are Civil Plan, Commercial Fire, Commercial Multi-Family, Commercial New, Commercial Renovation, Commercial Roofing, Commercial Sign, Commercial Tent, Demolition, Electrical, Fence-Wall, Gas, Mechanical, Mobile Home (double/single), New Single Family Residence, Plumbing, Pool, Re-Roof, Residential Accessory, Residential Driveway, Residential Renovation-Addition, Solar, and Window and Door. A battery is permitted inside the Solar Permit, as BSOL-25-0012 shows.
Why the confidence is not higherThe full record-type list was read off the live portal, so this is an enumerated absence rather than a search miss.
permit portal record-type list checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapHome.aspx?module=Building&TabName=Building
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes. ULDC Art. 9 defines Structure as 'Anything constructed or installed which is rigidly and permanently attached to the ground or to another object which is rigidly and permanently attached to the ground ... including but not limited to supporting walls, signs, screened or unscreened enclosures covered by a permanent roof, swimming pools, POLES, and pipelines.' A pier- or footing-mounted array is squarely inside that. It is then an accessory structure under ULDC 2.05.00 and must: be in the SIDE OR REAR YARD and not in a required landscape buffer (C); sit at least FIVE FEET from any interior lot line (H); be separated at least five feet from other structures and from the principal structure (G); be no larger than the principal structure (F); comply with the FBC (B); be counted in impervious-surface and stormwater calculations (D); and be shown on a site development plan where one is required (E). There is no clause exempting residential mechanical or electrical equipment from setbacks — ULDC 2.02.12(D) allows mechanical equipment to project no more than three feet into a setback and no further.
Why the confidence is not higherThe definition and the accessory-structure rules are codified; applying them to PV is inference, because 'solar' appears nowhere in the code and the illustrative list of typical accessory structures does not name it (though it ends 'and other similar structures'). 83 rather than higher for that reason. All 27 live BSOL permits examined are roof-mounted, so no ground mount has yet tested this.
ULDC Art. 9 definitions + ULDC 2.05.00 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIIIUNLADECO_ART9DE&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
TECO requires a manual load-break disconnect switch giving a LOCKABLE VISIBLE BREAK between the utility grid and the AC output of the RGS or ESS, customer-provided, mounted ADJACENT TO THE UTILITY METER SOCKET ENCLOSURE WITHIN A MAXIMUM DISTANCE OF 6 FEET AND IN THE LINE OF SIGHT, with the handle centreline 4 feet 6 inches to 5 feet from final grade, grounded per NEC/AHJ, lockable open with a single utility padlock. A circuit breaker, molded case switch or push-stop button does NOT provide a visible break and is not acceptable. If the 6-foot/line-of-sight rule cannot be met, permission must be requested from Tampa Electric BEFORE installation. THE TENSION TO CARRY: PSC Rule 25-6.065(6)(a) says 'Inverter-based Tier 1 customer-owned renewable generation systems SHALL BE EXEMPT from this requirement, UNLESS the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense.' TECO's SESR states the requirement flatly for all RGS with no Tier 1 carve-out, so on a Tier 1 (<=10 kW inverter-based) Mulberry job the switch is required but the rule puts the cost on TECO.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth instruments read in full and in their original form — the rule as the adopted .doc from flrules.org via a live tid, the SESR by pdftotext plus 350-dpi OCR of the image-only drawing. The unless-clause is the reconciliation; it matches the Temple Terrace finding that TECO pays for the Tier 1 disconnect. This is NOT the FPL answer: never carry FPL's Tier 1 no-disconnect rule into TECO territory.
FL PSC Rule 25-6.065(6) + TECO SESR Section II and Drawing 7.52 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=0&tid=5455200&type=1&file=25-6.065.doc
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? By notice to the inspection office. Code Sec. 6-126(a) requires notice of readiness giving permit number, owner name, electrical contractor name, and the date and time the job will be ready. The portal is Accela, which normally carries inspection scheduling for a registered user; the anonymous view does not expose it, and the city publishes no scheduling page. 62% · Code Sec. 6-126 + portal
- How much notice is required? Notice must reach the inspection office NOT LATER THAN 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR to the day inspection is desired. Code Sec. 6-126(b) then commits the city: 'Inspections will be performed on the day desired if at all possible, and shall be COMPLETED BY THE END OF THE SECOND WORKING DAY after proper notice has been received.' 86% · Code Sec. 6-126
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — the City performs its own inspections through its electrical inspector and building official, unless the applicant elects a private provider under FS 553.791. Both routes are live: of four BSOL records examined, two answered 'Will a Private Provider be doing Plan Review or Inspections?' with No and two with Yes. 90% · live permit records + FS 553.80(7)(b) report
- If delegated, to whom? Where a private provider is elected, to a licensed private provider firm chosen by the fee owner — Nobility Inspections appears on BSOL-26-0002 and BSOL-25-0014. The City requires, at permit application: a signed Notice to the Building Official; the private provider's Chapter 471 PE, Chapter 481 architect or Chapter 468 Standard Building Code Administrator/Standard Inspector licences; a signed and notarised Duly Authorized Representatives' Employment Affidavit; a signed and notarised Private Provider Plan Compliance Affidavit; a signed and notarised Affidavit for Building Code Inspection Services; and certificates of insurance. All forms are provided by the City and no substitutions are accepted unless Florida law requires it. Inspection reports must be completely filled out and signed. 91% · department page + published private-provider forms + live records
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Rough-in, then final, plus a utility power step. Code Sec. 6-127(a): 'A rough-in inspection will be required for all wiring installations', and nothing may be sealed or concealed until inspected and approval posted on the job. Sec. 6-128: on passing final, the electrical inspector issues a final certificate of approval. Sec. 6-60: no power company may connect without a written release from the electrical inspector. The published 'Owner Builder-Contractor Pre-Power Request' form (rev. 6/6/25) exists for connecting power BEFORE all finals pass. Live BSOL records show a single workflow moving 'Inspection Phase' to 'Closed - Complete'. 84% · Code Secs. 6-126 to 6-128, 6-60 + pre-power form
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes — 'A rough-in inspection will be required for all wiring installations' (Sec. 6-127(a)), and all wiring in conduit must be inspected before switches, panel fronts, receptacles or covers are installed unless the electrical inspector approves otherwise. For a rooftop retrofit the practical effect is that concealed conductor runs must be inspected before they are closed up. 82% · Code Sec. 6-127
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No. Mulberry publishes no inspection checklist of any kind, and no solar or PV checklist. The published document set for the Building Department is 18 items and is entirely affidavits, registration forms, cancellations, contractor changes, a Notice of Commencement, a re-roof affidavit, residential pool safety requirements, a demolition instruction sheet, a permit renewal request and the private-provider forms. 88% · department forms list + document library enumeration
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Partly, and it is codified. Sec. 6-128(d): 'No job of wiring for light, heat or power will be accepted on a final inspection unless the proper protective devices have been installed and ALL CIRCUITS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.' Sec. 6-128(c) requires the contractor decal on the main switch or panel. There is no codified duty to verify equipment listings, and no published PV labelling checklist. The utility, not the city, is the one that photographically verifies PV placards. 80% · Code Sec. 6-128
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A final certificate of approval, plus a release for power. Code Sec. 6-128(a): on passing final the electrical inspector 'shall issue a final certificate of approval certifying that the installation has been inspected and found to comply', with the proviso that 'release for power shall not be given on any job known to be in violation of one or more other city ordinances'. In the portal a completed job shows as 'Closed - Complete'. A Certificate of Occupancy is not issued for a PV retrofit to an occupied dwelling. 87% · Code Sec. 6-128 + live permit records
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Split, and Mulberry is codified on the city side — this is the 'power release' pattern, not the usual installer-only answer. Code Sec. 6-60: 'It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation furnishing electrical current ... to connect his, their or its distribution system with any installation of wiring ... within the city without having first received a RELEASE FROM THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR. The release shall be given by the electrical inspector immediately after the certificate ... has been issued. The electrical inspector may give verbal release for expedience and shall immediately attach a proper indication of approval on the job site and ISSUE A WRITTEN RELEASE TO THE POWER COMPANY.' On the interconnection side the duty is the customer's: PSC Rule 25-6.065(5)(b) requires the customer to notify the utility at least 10 days before initially placing the equipment in service, and TECO requires the customer/installer to file the enrollment application, tier agreement, engineered one-line, insurance, disconnect photographs and a COPY OF THE AHJ-APPROVED ELECTRICAL PERMIT. So: the City releases power to TECO; the installer drives PTO. 89% · Code Sec. 6-60 + PSC Rule 25-6.065(5)(b) + TECO SESR
- Is there a re-inspection fee? UNASCERTAINABLE FROM THE ADOPTED INSTRUMENT — and that is the finding. Schedule of Building Permit Fees Section 2(d) reads: 'A re-inspection may be scheduled in the same manner as an inspection using the INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND FEES provision of Section 1 of this Schedule. The fee for a re-inspection shall be the same as that announced for an inspection in the INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND FEES provision of Section 1 of this Schedule.' Section 1 of the Schedule contains only three provisions — WHEN REQUIRED, a sentence on electrical/mechanical/plumbing valuations, and FEES TO BE PAID IN FULL. There is NO 'INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND FEES' provision in Section 1. The cross-reference is dangling, in both directions, in the currently effective schedule. Separately, Code Sec. 7-6(b) prices FIRE hazard re-inspections at $30.00 first and $55.00 each additional — a different subject. 86% · adopted fee schedule Sections 1 and 2(d)-(e)
14 questions answered against City of Mulberry’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
By notice to the inspection office. Code Sec. 6-126(a) requires notice of readiness giving permit number, owner name, electrical contractor name, and the date and time the job will be ready. The portal is Accela, which normally carries inspection scheduling for a registered user; the anonymous view does not expose it, and the city publishes no scheduling page.
Why the confidence is not higher62 because the codified method is a notice to the office (phone/counter era) and the modern method is almost certainly the Accela portal, but neither is stated on any current published page. Looked at the Building Department page, the forms page, the document library and the portal.
Code Sec. 6-126 + portal checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Notice must reach the inspection office NOT LATER THAN 5:00 P.M. ON THE DAY PRIOR to the day inspection is desired. Code Sec. 6-126(b) then commits the city: 'Inspections will be performed on the day desired if at all possible, and shall be COMPLETED BY THE END OF THE SECOND WORKING DAY after proper notice has been received.'
Why the confidence is not higherCodified and unusually explicit — a two-working-day outside limit is a real service commitment, and few authorities in this survey codify one. 86 because it is 1976 text carried into the current supplement and the city publishes no current restatement.
Code Sec. 6-126 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page, forms page, document library, Accela portal (anonymous view), and Code Sec. 6-126. Sec. 6-126(b) says inspections 'will be performed on the day desired if at all possible' and must be completed by end of the second working day, which implies a same-day possibility but publishes no AM/PM windows and no booking calendar.
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — the City performs its own inspections through its electrical inspector and building official, unless the applicant elects a private provider under FS 553.791. Both routes are live: of four BSOL records examined, two answered 'Will a Private Provider be doing Plan Review or Inspections?' with No and two with Yes.
Why the confidence is not higherRead off live records plus the department's published private-provider requirements. The FY2019/20 utilization report records 3 personnel dedicated to FBC enforcement, 556 inspections requested and 556 conducted, 0 by private provider and 0 private-provider audits — so in-house was the whole picture then and the private-provider route has grown since.
live permit records + FS 553.80(7)(b) report checked 2026-09-13 https://aca-prod.accela.com/MULBERRY/Cap/CapDetail.aspx?Module=Building&TabName=Building&capID1=REC26&capID2=00000&capID3=0008Y&agencyCode=MULBERRY&IsToShowInspection=
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Where a private provider is elected, to a licensed private provider firm chosen by the fee owner — Nobility Inspections appears on BSOL-26-0002 and BSOL-25-0014. The City requires, at permit application: a signed Notice to the Building Official; the private provider's Chapter 471 PE, Chapter 481 architect or Chapter 468 Standard Building Code Administrator/Standard Inspector licences; a signed and notarised Duly Authorized Representatives' Employment Affidavit; a signed and notarised Private Provider Plan Compliance Affidavit; a signed and notarised Affidavit for Building Code Inspection Services; and certificates of insurance. All forms are provided by the City and no substitutions are accepted unless Florida law requires it. Inspection reports must be completely filled out and signed.
Why the confidence is not higherDepartment page plus the five published forms plus live records naming a firm. The city also invokes FS 553.791(16) to deem its notices delivered on successful email transmission.
department page + published private-provider forms + live records checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Rough-in, then final, plus a utility power step. Code Sec. 6-127(a): 'A rough-in inspection will be required for all wiring installations', and nothing may be sealed or concealed until inspected and approval posted on the job. Sec. 6-128: on passing final, the electrical inspector issues a final certificate of approval. Sec. 6-60: no power company may connect without a written release from the electrical inspector. The published 'Owner Builder-Contractor Pre-Power Request' form (rev. 6/6/25) exists for connecting power BEFORE all finals pass. Live BSOL records show a single workflow moving 'Inspection Phase' to 'Closed - Complete'.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified sequence plus the published pre-power form plus observed portal statuses. 84 because the city publishes no inspection-type list for a solar permit, so the exact named inspections on a BSOL record are not visible anonymously.
Code Secs. 6-126 to 6-128, 6-60 + pre-power form checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Yes — 'A rough-in inspection will be required for all wiring installations' (Sec. 6-127(a)), and all wiring in conduit must be inspected before switches, panel fronts, receptacles or covers are installed unless the electrical inspector approves otherwise. For a rooftop retrofit the practical effect is that concealed conductor runs must be inspected before they are closed up.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified without exception for retrofit or PV. 82 because a modern rooftop PV job is largely surface-mounted and the inspector's discretion under (d) is where this actually gets resolved.
Code Sec. 6-127 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Partly, and it is codified. Sec. 6-128(d): 'No job of wiring for light, heat or power will be accepted on a final inspection unless the proper protective devices have been installed and ALL CIRCUITS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY IDENTIFIED.' Sec. 6-128(c) requires the contractor decal on the main switch or panel. There is no codified duty to verify equipment listings, and no published PV labelling checklist. The utility, not the city, is the one that photographically verifies PV placards.
Why the confidence is not higherCircuit identification is a labelling check in substance and is a condition of acceptance, which is stronger than most authorities in this survey. Listings are covered indirectly through Florida Product Approval at application.
Code Sec. 6-128 checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No. Mulberry publishes no inspection checklist of any kind, and no solar or PV checklist. The published document set for the Building Department is 18 items and is entirely affidavits, registration forms, cancellations, contractor changes, a Notice of Commencement, a re-roof affidavit, residential pool safety requirements, a demolition instruction sheet, a permit renewal request and the private-provider forms.
Why the confidence is not higherEnumerated, not inferred: the full Building Department attachment list was read, the whole 365-item document library was enumerated and filtered, and the site search was run with controls ('inspection' returns real pages; fabricated terms return 'Your search yielded no results'). Qualified by codification and publication staleness — several forms carry 2025-2026 revision stamps, so the set is current.
department forms list + document library enumeration checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/building-department/page/forms-needed-apply-permit
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page, forms page (18 attachments), document library (365 items), fee schedule (all 10 pages), and Code ch. 6 arts. II-III. Nothing states what must be on site at inspection. The only adjacent codified duties are Sec. 6-127(c) (notice of approval posted on the job by the inspector) and Sec. 6-128(c) (contractor decal on the main switch or panel). TECO separately requires photographs of every disconnect and of the whole wall, but that is an interconnection submittal, not a site-presence rule.
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
UNASCERTAINABLE FROM THE ADOPTED INSTRUMENT — and that is the finding. Schedule of Building Permit Fees Section 2(d) reads: 'A re-inspection may be scheduled in the same manner as an inspection using the INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND FEES provision of Section 1 of this Schedule. The fee for a re-inspection shall be the same as that announced for an inspection in the INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND FEES provision of Section 1 of this Schedule.' Section 1 of the Schedule contains only three provisions — WHEN REQUIRED, a sentence on electrical/mechanical/plumbing valuations, and FEES TO BE PAID IN FULL. There is NO 'INSPECTION PROCEDURE AND FEES' provision in Section 1. The cross-reference is dangling, in both directions, in the currently effective schedule. Separately, Code Sec. 7-6(b) prices FIRE hazard re-inspections at $30.00 first and $55.00 each additional — a different subject.
Why the confidence is not higherVerified by rendering and reading every page of the image-only schedule rather than trusting a summary: page 4 and the top of page 5 are the whole of Section 1, and page 10 carries Section 2(d) twice invoking a provision that is not there. Section 2(e) then lets the Building Official price anything unprovided by analogy at his discretion, which is how this is presumably resolved in practice.
adopted fee schedule Sections 1 and 2(d)-(e) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.cityofmulberryfl.org/media/526
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Department page, forms page, document library, fee schedule and Code ch. 6 art. III. No correction-notice or re-submittal procedure is published. The adjacent published instruments are the 'Revision to Construction Plans or Plan Documents' form and the $100.00 Revised Plan Review Fee, which price a correction round without describing the process. FS 553.792(1)(f)-(g) supplies the statutory procedure by default: written notice by email or USPS stating why the application fails, 10 business days for the applicant to submit revisions, then 10 business days for the agency to approve or deny, with a 20% per-day fee reduction thereafter.
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A final certificate of approval, plus a release for power. Code Sec. 6-128(a): on passing final the electrical inspector 'shall issue a final certificate of approval certifying that the installation has been inspected and found to comply', with the proviso that 'release for power shall not be given on any job known to be in violation of one or more other city ordinances'. In the portal a completed job shows as 'Closed - Complete'. A Certificate of Occupancy is not issued for a PV retrofit to an occupied dwelling.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified plus observed portal status on five closed BSOL records.
Code Sec. 6-128 + live permit records checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Split, and Mulberry is codified on the city side — this is the 'power release' pattern, not the usual installer-only answer. Code Sec. 6-60: 'It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation furnishing electrical current ... to connect his, their or its distribution system with any installation of wiring ... within the city without having first received a RELEASE FROM THE ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR. The release shall be given by the electrical inspector immediately after the certificate ... has been issued. The electrical inspector may give verbal release for expedience and shall immediately attach a proper indication of approval on the job site and ISSUE A WRITTEN RELEASE TO THE POWER COMPANY.' On the interconnection side the duty is the customer's: PSC Rule 25-6.065(5)(b) requires the customer to notify the utility at least 10 days before initially placing the equipment in service, and TECO requires the customer/installer to file the enrollment application, tier agreement, engineered one-line, insurance, disconnect photographs and a COPY OF THE AHJ-APPROVED ELECTRICAL PERMIT. So: the City releases power to TECO; the installer drives PTO.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth limbs read in their own instruments. The codified written release to the power company is the unusual half and is what distinguishes Mulberry from the many authorities where the installer does everything.
Code Sec. 6-60 + PSC Rule 25-6.065(5)(b) + TECO SESR checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=494821&nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUBURE_ARTIIIELCO&productId=14520&groupChunks=true
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
City of Mulberry writes its own placard wording. A standard NEC label set will not satisfy it — the exact text, and in most cases the size, colour and font, are specified below.
Wording 90%
Yes — but the wording comes from the utility, not the AHJ. TECO specifies the placard legends verbatim: 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' (Detail J); the same with a sequential suffix such as '1 OF 3' (Detail K); the variance placard in the form 'ON SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT LOCATED 27 FEET TO THE RIGHT OF UTILITY METER' (Detail L); and the map placard 'CAUTION! POWER TO THIS BUILDING IS ALSO SUPPLIED FROM ROOF MOUNTED SOLAR ARRAY ON ADJACENT STRUCTURE WITH SAFETY DISCONNECTS AS SHOWN PER NEC 705.10' (Detail M). The City specifies its own wording only for the condemned-wiring notice (Sec. 6-56(f)) and requires the contractor decal content at Sec. 6-128(c).
Size, colour & material 94%
Yes. TECO SESR note 5 and Section II: non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic plates; engraved or stamped lettering a MINIMUM OF ONE QUARTER INCH HIGH; WHITE LETTERING ON A RED BACKGROUND; permanent, durable, UV resistant; EPOXY GLUED OR RIVETED to the mounting surface. Expressly NOT acceptable: duplication, peel-and-stick labels, paint, marking pens, or scratching. City: Code Sec. 6-128(e) requires two-inch minimum letters for the multimeter location stencil; Sec. 6-3 requires address numbers not less than three inches high in a contrasting colour.
Where they go 92%
Utility disconnect placard: on the FRONT COVER of the customer-provided utility disconnect switch. Isolation-means placard: AT THE METER. Meter-can variance placard: on the meter can. The disconnect itself: mounted adjacent to the utility meter socket enclosure, within a maximum of 6 feet, in the line of sight, with the centreline of the throwable handle 4 feet 6 inches to 5 feet above final grade and a 3-inch minimum / 6-foot maximum offset from the meter per Details G and H. City: contractor decal on the main switch or panel; multimeter stencil on each meter base or panel.
What the utility wants on top 93%
Yes, decisively — everything in Q38-Q41 is the utility's, not the AHJ's. Mulberry publishes no PV placard requirement of any kind; TECO publishes five placard types with a full material, colour, letter-height and fixing specification, plus a photographic proof requirement (SESR 7.52 note 1: a photo of each disconnect close enough to read the placarding, and a pull-back photo showing the meter can and all disconnects in one frame).
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.