City of South Bay

Palm Beach County · Florida ← All authorities

City of South Bay

Palm Beach County

Verified Aug. 6, 2026

City of South Bay is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 4,860 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for City of South Bay against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

City of South Bay is the authority having jurisdiction 93% confidence
Holds
Building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and roofing permitting, plan review and inspection; zoning review; and floodplain administration. The City issues its own permits under its own codified fee schedule and performs its own inspections through four inspection types (Building Inspection, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing).
Delegated to
Fire prevention and fire code enforcement: Palm Beach County Fire Rescue, via the County Fire/Rescue MSTU — PBC Code Sec. 26-51(b) names 'the City of South Bay' among the consenting municipalities, as most recently amended by Ord. No. 2025-028 adopted 2 December 2025, and PBC Code Sec. 12-56(b) puts the County's Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code in force inside any municipality lawfully within that MSTU. Water and sewer: Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department, linked as the provider from the City's own Departments menu. Law enforcement: Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office under contract since 1 December 2005. AND A SEPARATE, UNNAMED DELEGATION: the Building Official / plans examiner function is not a budgeted City post — every plan review on all nine live permits is signed 'Pedro Vieira', a name absent from the City's staff directory, organisational chart and FY2025-26 position summary, against $40,000 of Professional Services in Community Development and Planning. The contracting firm could not be established because the City's Agenda Center is empty and its published agenda run stops in 2021.
Overridden by
FS 553.73 (Florida Building Code preemption — the City's Secs. 6-19 and 12-1 are floating adoptions with no year, so the code edition is a state fact, not a local one); FS 553.792 (plan-review clock, applying unstated because the City publishes no turnaround); FS 489.103 (owner-builder exemption); FS 553.791 (private provider, unmentioned by the City); PSC Rule 25-6.065 (interconnection and net metering — FPL is investor-owned, so the rule binds, Tier 1 liability insurance is PROHIBITED and the Tier 1 application fee is $0); and Chapter 98-287, Laws of Florida as amended, under which Palm Beach County Code Sec. 7-36(b) purports to adopt the FBC and NEC as minimum standards 'for all municipal and unincorporated areas' while Sec. 7-36(c) confines applicability to the unincorporated area — an internal contradiction that changes nothing in practice, since the County's technical amendments sit in an article expressly scoped to unincorporated areas and neither government's instruments contain any PV provision at all.
Why not higher
The City is unambiguously the permitting authority: a codified fee schedule amended five weeks before the code snapshot (Ord. No. 05-2026, 2 June 2026), $92,500 of budgeted building permit revenue, a Building Division described in its own budget narrative as doing plan review, permit issuance and inspection, and a live public register of nine real permits issued between 17 August and 9 September 2026 with plan reviews, fees, payments and inspections attached. Held at 93 rather than higher for one reason: the technical officer who signs the plan reviews and (presumably) performs the inspections is not a City employee and is not named in any City publication, so an installer cannot find out in advance who will review the job or under what contract.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Permit required
Yes. A permit is required for electrical work and for work on the roof; the City's own 'Why Building Permits Are Required' handout lists 'Electrical' and 'Re-Roofing/Siding' among work…90%
Permit cost
Valuation-based, and there is no flat solar fee. Codified Sec. 6-20(c): primary permit fee = 2.00% of the first $10,000 of construction value + 1.00% of $10,001-$500,000 + 0.50% above…90%
Plan review
Not published. Observed in practice across nine live permits: same business day to two business days.72%
Portal
iWorq. Two faces: the Citizen Portal for applications at southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl (linked from the City's home page Quick Links as 'Permitting, Code,95%
Electrical code
NEC 2020, reaching South Bay through the Florida Building Code rather than through any local adoption.88%
Own placard wording
No. The City of South Bay specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else.88%
Booking an inspection
Portal. Inspections are requested from the iWorq permit register: find the permit row, use the request link in the Inspection column, choose an inspection type and a date, and submit.82%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes. A permit is required for electrical work and for work on the roof; the City's own 'Why Building Permits Are Required' handout lists 'Electrical' and… Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate, but as a SUB-PERMIT under a primary permit, and the sub-permit carries no extra permit fee. Code Sec. Q4 Plan review — Not published. Observed in practice across nine live permits: same business day to two business days. Q18 Where you file — iWorq. Two faces: the Citizen Portal for applications at southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl (linked from the City's home page Quick Links as… Q20

Permit required
Yes. A permit is required for electrical work and for work on the roof; the City's own 'Why Building Permits Are Required' handout lists 'Electrical' and 'Re-Roofing/Siding' among work requiring a…90% source
What it costs
Valuation-based, and there is no flat solar fee. Codified Sec. 6-20(c): primary permit fee = 2.00% of the first $10,000 of construction value + 1.00% of $10,001-$500,000 + 0.50% above $500,000,90% source
Plan review turnaround
Not published. Observed in practice across nine live permits: same business day to two business days. #4913-26 (Electrical, meter-main upgrade) was applied for and approved on 19 Aug 2026;72% source
Key document
codified ordinance cited by 4 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — the City of South Bay is the AHJ for building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, roofing, zoning and floodplain permitting of residential rooftop PV inside the city limits. It runs its own Building Division, issues its own permits and performs its own inspections. Fire is NOT the City's: it is Palm Beach County Fire Rescue via the PBC Fire/Rescue MSTU. 95% · codified ordinance
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both, and more: the City permits and inspects Building, Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing itself (plus Roofing and Right-of-Way). Electrical is taken as a SUB-PERMIT under a primary permit. Fire is delegated to Palm Beach County Fire Rescue. Water and sewer are Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department. Electricity is FPL. 92% · permit portal
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. A permit is required for electrical work and for work on the roof; the City's own 'Why Building Permits Are Required' handout lists 'Electrical' and 'Re-Roofing/Siding' among work requiring a permit, and its two-page exempt list does not exempt anything resembling a PV array. 90% · published handout
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate, but as a SUB-PERMIT under a primary permit, and the sub-permit carries no extra permit fee. Code Sec. 6-20(c)(1): 'Primary permit fees shall include the fees for sub-permits'. The City's Sub-Permit Application demands the primary permit number at the top ('FOR SUB-PERMITS PLEASE PROVIDE PRIMARY PERMIT NO') and offers ELECTRICAL as one of its work types. A stand-alone Electrical permit is also possible where there is no primary (live permit #4913-26 is one). 85% · codified ordinance
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — advisory only, and the City says so twice. The Building Division Permit Application states 'A Building Permit does not assure compliance with your Homeowners Association's rules, regulation and/or deed restrictions. We advise you to obtain approval from you Homeowners Association before improving your property' and 'Issuance of a permit is not authorization to violate any public or private restrictions'. There is NO codified mandatory association co-signature. 88% · published form
    • Is there a historic-district review? No. South Bay has no historic-preservation ordinance, no historic district, no architectural review board and no certificate of appropriateness. The Code contains a BROKEN CROSS-REFERENCE that would mislead a reader: Sec. 33-08(b) subjects small-wireless siting to 'the provisions of chapter 38 of this Code, historic preservation' — and there is no Chapter 38. The Code runs Chapter 1 to Chapter 35 plus Appendix A (Zoning) and Appendix B (Franchises). 85% · codified ordinance
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate windstorm certification. Wind resistance runs through the Florida Building Code and Florida Product Approval / NOA. South Bay is NOT in the High Velocity Hurricane Zone — the HVHZ is Miami-Dade and Broward only, and South Bay is in Palm Beach County. The City's roofing checklists do demand an 'NOA or FL Approval #' for every roof panel, underlayment and fastener, which is the shape a PV racking submittal would take. 75% · published form
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for a rooftop array. Appendix A Zoning Sec. 8.1 permits in R-1 'single one (1) family dwellings with accessory buildings customarily incident thereto', and a rooftop PV system is an accessory use of the dwelling, not a listed use. The special-exception list for R-1 (Sec. 8.2) covers planned developments, churches, schools, private clubs, parks and 'Public utility structures and buildings such as sewage disposal works, water pumping plants, electric substations, police and fire stations' — utility-scale infrastructure, which should NOT be read onto a householder's array. No City Commission approval is required for a residential PV permit. 62% · codified ordinance
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No municipal cap. The binding limits are the utility's: FPL Tier 1 is 10 kW AC or less, Tier 2 is over 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 is over 100 kW to 2 MW, and the gross power rating 'does not exceed 90% of the Customer's utility distribution service rating'. Critically, the AC nameplate is computed as installed DC nameplate x 0.85, so about 11.76 kW DC is the Tier 1 ceiling. 88% · utility tariff
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A contractor holding a state DBPR licence or a Palm Beach County Certificate of Competency in the appropriate trade, who has first registered with the City; or the property owner under the FS 489.103 owner-builder exemption. The City's Contractors Application for Registration lists 'Solar' as one of its accepted licence categories alongside Electrical, Building, Residential and Specialty. 88% · published form
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes. Contractor registration with the City is mandatory before a permit is issued. The form requires a County Business Tax Receipt, a Certificate of Competency or state licence, a Certificate of Insurance for liability AND workers' compensation 'issued to the City Of South Bay', articles of incorporation or fictitious-name registration, and a notarised qualifier signature. 90% · published form
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. There is a dedicated three-page 'Pre-Requisite Form for Owner/Builder Permitting' plus the FS 489.103 Owner Builder Disclosure Statement printed on the main permit application, and the iWorq portal carries an 'Owner Builder Permit Form' as a first-class online route. Nothing in either document excludes solar or photovoltaic work. 82% · published form
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? No PV-specific checklist exists. The general package is: (1) the notarised City of South Bay Building Division Permit Application (owner AND contractor signatures, both notarised, with 'STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PALM BEACH' blocks); (2) plans/specifications uploaded as attachments; (3) contractor registration already on file with the City; (4) a recorded Notice of Commencement, posted on the job site BEFORE the first inspection; (5) for a sub-permit, the Sub-Permit Application quoting the primary permit number. The application also demands Flood Zone and Finished Floor Elevation on every job. 78% · published form
    • How many copies, and in what format? Electronic. The iWorq Citizen Portal's Building Permit form takes the application and supporting documents as uploaded files (at least one required, 25 MB per file). Paper over the counter at 335 SW 2nd Ave remains available. No copy count is published for either route. 62% · permit portal
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? No site-plan content is specified for PV or for electrical work. The online application collects site address, parcel number, square feet, project cost and project description plus uploads; the paper application adds Flood Zone and Finished Floor Elevation. A separate Subdivision Application exists but is for platting, not for an accessory installation. One site-plan requirement does reach a PV job indirectly and it comes from the utility, not the City: FPL requires that plans show the dimension between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch. 60% · codified ordinance
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? iWorq. Two faces: the Citizen Portal for applications at southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl (linked from the City's home page Quick Links as 'Permitting, Code, Business Tax Receipts Portal'), and a public permit register plus inspection-request scheduler at southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600. 95% · permit portal
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes for the application. The Citizen Portal takes a Building Permit application online with applicant, owner, tenant, contractor and licence, site address, parcel number, project cost, square feet and description, plus required file uploads; there are dedicated online routes for Owner Builder, Sub Permit, AC Changeout, the five roofing types and Right-of-Way. Inspections are requested from the register. Payment: several live permits were paid by counter receipt number, and the City's separate Pay Online link is a Clover checkout widget, so the money leg is not certainly online end-to-end. 85% · permit portal
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? Valuation-based, and there is no flat solar fee. Codified Sec. 6-20(c): primary permit fee = 2.00% of the first $10,000 of construction value + 1.00% of $10,001-$500,000 + 0.50% above $500,000, minimum $50.00; PLUS a residential building plan review fee of 30% of the permit fee, minimum $105.00; PLUS a 'Surcharge Fee (Effective July 1, 2026)' of 25% of (permit fee + plan review fee) that appears on every live permit but is NOT in the codified schedule. The observed floor for any residential permit is $193.75. A $25,000 residential PV job computes to roughly $350 permit + $105 plan review + $113.75 surcharge = about $568.75; a multi-family or condo roof is priced as COMMERCIAL (50% plan review, $131.25 minimum). 90% · permit portal
    • How is the fee calculated? Valuation — a tiered percentage of construction value, with a $50 minimum, plus a percentage-of-permit-fee plan review charge and a percentage surcharge. Construction value is taken from the ICC building valuation data table, or from the contractor's contract value where the table does not cover the scope of work — which is the case for photovoltaics. 95% · codified ordinance
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes, and it is charged at application and is non-refundable. Residential: 30% of the estimated permit fee, minimum $105.00. Commercial: 50%, minimum $131.25. 'Review fee is in addition to the permit fee is due at time of application. Review fees are not refundable.' 95% · codified ordinance
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Not published. Observed in practice across nine live permits: same business day to two business days. #4913-26 (Electrical, meter-main upgrade) was applied for and approved on 19 Aug 2026; #4915-26 same day; #4912-26 same day; #4911-26 two days; #4916-26 two days; #4919-26 next day. 72% · permit portal
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Two years maximum. The permit becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 6 months, or if work is suspended or abandoned for 6 months after commencing; and 'Permit will be considered suspended or abandoned if it does not pass an inspection within 180 days.' Renewal is 65% of the original permit fee per required 90-day extension, minimum $105. 90% · published form
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light Company (FPL). A single investor-owned utility for the whole city — there is no municipal electric system and no co-operative. 96% · codified ordinance
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with two hard gates at the end. FPL strongly recommends written interconnection approval BEFORE procuring material; the City permit runs independently; and then the City's final inspection is a precondition of FPL energising the system. FPL's Tier 1 Agreement Sec. 3.4 requires the customer 'to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation', and Sec. 3.5 requires the customer to notify FPL at least TEN CALENDAR DAYS before placing the equipment in service. 88% · utility tariff

28 questions answered against City of South Bay’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes — the City of South Bay is the AHJ for building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, roofing, zoning and floodplain permitting of residential rooftop PV inside the city limits. It runs its own Building Division, issues its own permits and performs its own inspections. Fire is NOT the City's: it is Palm Beach County Fire Rescue via the PBC Fire/Rescue MSTU.

Why the confidence is not higherFour independent instruments, three of them first-party and current. (a) Code Sec. 6-19 'The Florida Building Code is in effect in the city' and Sec. 6-20 a full codified building permit fee schedule amended by Ord. No. 05-2026 on 2 June 2026. (b) The FY2025-26 adopted budget carries revenue account 001-032-322000 BUILDING PERMIT at $92,500 proposed and a Community Development and Planning department at $331,447 whose narrative says the Building Division does 'comprehensive plan review, permit issuance, and a building construction inspection process'. (c) A LIVE iWorq permit register showing nine real South Bay permits issued Aug-Sep 2026 (#4911-26 to #4919-26) with plan reviews, fees, payments and inspections. (d) Fire is delegated: PBC Code Sec. 26-51(b), as amended by Ord. No. 2025-028 adopted 2 Dec 2025, names 'the City of South Bay' among the municipalities inside the county Fire/Rescue MSTU. Not 100 because the Building Official is not a budgeted City FTE and is not named in any City publication (see q101).

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-19AD

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both, and more: the City permits and inspects Building, Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing itself (plus Roofing and Right-of-Way). Electrical is taken as a SUB-PERMIT under a primary permit. Fire is delegated to Palm Beach County Fire Rescue. Water and sewer are Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department. Electricity is FPL.

Why the confidence is not higherThe iWorq inspection-request calendar's own inspection-type catalogue has exactly four entries — 'Building Inspection', 'Electrical', 'Mechanical', 'Plumbing' — and live permit #4913-26 is a City-issued Electrical permit for a 200A meter-main upgrade that the City itself inspected and closed. The City's Sub-Permit Application form takes ELECTRICAL / PLUMBING / MECHANICAL / LOW VOLTAGE / ROOFING / REFRIGERATION under a primary permit number. Fire: PBC Code Secs. 26-51(b) and 12-56(b). Water/sewer: the City's own Departments menu links 'Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department' as the provider.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes. A permit is required for electrical work and for work on the roof; the City's own 'Why Building Permits Are Required' handout lists 'Electrical' and 'Re-Roofing/Siding' among work requiring a permit, and its two-page exempt list does not exempt anything resembling a PV array.

Why the confidence is not higherCity of South Bay 'Building Permit Requirements' handout, page 1 lists Electrical among 'EXAMPLES OF WORK REQUIRING A PERMIT'; page 2's exempt list covers only like-for-like replacements (fixtures, outlets, faucets, satellite dishes of 1 m or less, roof-covering repair under 12 months). No solar entry either way. Corroborated by live Electrical permit #4913-26 for a meter-main upgrade. Not higher because no City document names solar or photovoltaic anywhere.

published handout checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/349/Building-Permit-Requirements

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Separate, but as a SUB-PERMIT under a primary permit, and the sub-permit carries no extra permit fee. Code Sec. 6-20(c)(1): 'Primary permit fees shall include the fees for sub-permits'. The City's Sub-Permit Application demands the primary permit number at the top ('FOR SUB-PERMITS PLEASE PROVIDE PRIMARY PERMIT NO') and offers ELECTRICAL as one of its work types. A stand-alone Electrical permit is also possible where there is no primary (live permit #4913-26 is one).

Why the confidence is not higherTwo City instruments agree: the codified fee schedule folds sub-permit fees into the primary fee, and the Sub-Permit Application form requires a primary permit number. The residual doubt is which route a PV job takes in practice — the City publishes no work-type guidance, and I could not reach a real South Bay solar permit (the portal search is CAPTCHA-gated).

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

A contractor holding a state DBPR licence or a Palm Beach County Certificate of Competency in the appropriate trade, who has first registered with the City; or the property owner under the FS 489.103 owner-builder exemption. The City's Contractors Application for Registration lists 'Solar' as one of its accepted licence categories alongside Electrical, Building, Residential and Specialty.

Why the confidence is not higherCity of South Bay 'Contractors Application for Registration' names the accepted categories: General, Building, Electrical, Residential, Plumbing, Mechanical, Sheet Metal, Solar, Underground Utility, Roofing, Swimming Pool, Specialty. Note the ambiguity flagged in the method file: Florida's DBPR 'Solar Contractor' certification (CVC/CVR) covers solar thermal, pool heating AND photovoltaic, so the word on this form does not by itself prove a PV-specific route. The permit application also carries an Owner/Builder box and the FS 489.103 disclosure.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/348/Contractors-Registration-Form

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes. Contractor registration with the City is mandatory before a permit is issued. The form requires a County Business Tax Receipt, a Certificate of Competency or state licence, a Certificate of Insurance for liability AND workers' compensation 'issued to the City Of South Bay', articles of incorporation or fictitious-name registration, and a notarised qualifier signature.

Why the confidence is not higherCity of South Bay 'Contractors Application for Registration', which ends with an 'Office Approval / Review and approved by / Date Issued' block — i.e. the City vets and issues the registration. Not 95 because the form itself is undated and does not state the word 'mandatory'; the requirement is inferred from the approval block and from the fact the form exists as one of only four documents on the Planning and Building page.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/348/Contractors-Registration-Form

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes. There is a dedicated three-page 'Pre-Requisite Form for Owner/Builder Permitting' plus the FS 489.103 Owner Builder Disclosure Statement printed on the main permit application, and the iWorq portal carries an 'Owner Builder Permit Form' as a first-class online route. Nothing in either document excludes solar or photovoltaic work.

Why the confidence is not higherThe owner-builder pre-requisite form asks 15 questions (who does the labour in each trade, who supervises, liability and property-damage insurance, withholding, workers' comp, whether the space will be rented/leased/sold, prior owner-builder work, and 'What Code books do you own for reference? Building / Electric / HVAC / Plumbing') and must be 'REVIEWED AND SIGNED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BAY'. Recovered by OCR — the PDF has no text layer. 82 not higher because the form is generic and the City publishes no statement on whether it will accept an owner-builder PV application, and because the state exemption itself is narrower than the form implies.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/242/Owner-Builder-Permit-Application

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

No PV-specific checklist exists. The general package is: (1) the notarised City of South Bay Building Division Permit Application (owner AND contractor signatures, both notarised, with 'STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF PALM BEACH' blocks); (2) plans/specifications uploaded as attachments; (3) contractor registration already on file with the City; (4) a recorded Notice of Commencement, posted on the job site BEFORE the first inspection; (5) for a sub-permit, the Sub-Permit Application quoting the primary permit number. The application also demands Flood Zone and Finished Floor Elevation on every job.

Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the City's four published Planning and Building forms and the iWorq online Building Permit form (which requires applicant, owner, tenant, contractor with licence number, site address, parcel number, project cost, square feet, project description and at least one uploaded file of up to 25 MB). 78 because it is a general package inferred from generic forms, not a published solar submittal list — no such list exists anywhere in the 392-document DocumentCenter, the 58-URL sitemap or the portal.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/246/Building-Permit-Application

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Electronic. The iWorq Citizen Portal's Building Permit form takes the application and supporting documents as uploaded files (at least one required, 25 MB per file). Paper over the counter at 335 SW 2nd Ave remains available. No copy count is published for either route.

Why the confidence is not higherThe portal's online Building Permit form markup carries a required file input with data-maxFileSize='25.0'; the portal home instructs 'Please apply using the Building Permit Form Link and attach the application for the appropriate project'. Live permits show 1 to 12 files uploaded each. 62 because the City publishes no submittal-format instruction of its own — the copy count and any paper-set requirement are simply not stated, and I am describing the mechanism rather than a published rule.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

No site-plan content is specified for PV or for electrical work. The online application collects site address, parcel number, square feet, project cost and project description plus uploads; the paper application adds Flood Zone and Finished Floor Elevation. A separate Subdivision Application exists but is for platting, not for an accessory installation. One site-plan requirement does reach a PV job indirectly and it comes from the utility, not the City: FPL requires that plans show the dimension between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.

Why the confidence is not higherSearched the whole 929,000-character codified Code (Chapter 6 Building, Chapter 22 Planning and Development, Appendix A Zoning), the four published Planning and Building forms, the 392-document DocumentCenter enumeration and the portal's own application form. Code Sec. 6-20(c)(24) proves a zoning review exists as a fee line ($94.50) but says nothing about what it looks at. 60 because this is a proved absence at City level dressed as an answer; the only positive content is FPL's.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWhether a one-line or three-line diagram is required. Searched: the whole 929,000-character codified Code (Chapter 6 Building and Construction Regulations in full, Chapter 22 Planning and Development, Appendix A Zoning) — 'one-line' 0 hits, 'three-line' 0, 'diagram' 0; the City's four published Planning and Building forms (Building Permit Requirements, Contractors Registration, Notice of Commencement, Subdivision Application) plus the Building Division Permit Application, Sub-Permit Application, Owner-Builder pre-requisite form and the nine-page Roof Package, three of which needed OCR; the complete 392-document DocumentCenter (ids 1-900 swept serially); and the iWorq Citizen Portal's own online Building Permit form, whose only document requirement is a single file upload. THE UTILITY DOES REQUIRE ONE for larger systems: FPL Electric Service Standards Sec. XIII.A.3 requires meter numbers on Single Line Diagrams, and Sec. XIII.A.7 requires a one-line (sometimes three-line) diagram where a System Impact Study is ordered — but that is FPL, not the AHJ, and it is not stated for Tier 1.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWhether string and conductor calculations are required. Same corpus as q11: 'conductor' appears only in Chapter 33 (communications facilities in the right-of-way) and in FPL's material, never in a City submittal requirement; 'calculation' 0 hits in a submittal context. The online application collects only project cost, square feet and a free-text description. No City document distinguishes a PV submittal from any other electrical submittal.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedStructural PE stamp and its threshold. Searched the codified Code (Chapter 6 in full, including the single FBC-Residential technical amendment at Sec. 6-21 which is about flood elevation only; Secs. 6-22 to 6-43 are Reserved), the City's forms, the Roof Package (which requires 'a Florida Registered Design Professional' letter for sheath-over and for non-standard re-nailing patterns, but that is a roof-covering rule, not a PV attachment rule), and the DocumentCenter. The City states no threshold of its own; the Florida Building Code governs unstated. The nearest published hook is Sec. 6-20(c)(19), which lets the building official charge 'Professional service charges... at the actual cost' for 'structural engineering' he requires — an open-ended, unpriced rider, but not a threshold.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedElectrical PE stamp and its threshold. Nothing in the Code (the City has no electrical chapter at all — Chapter 10 is ELECTIONS, and the only 'National Electrical Code' reference in the whole Code is a standards list in Chapter 33 for communications facilities), nothing on the forms, nothing in the portal, nothing in the 392-document DocumentCenter. The FS 471.003(2)(h) state exemption threshold is the operative rule and I did not re-verify its current figures from the statute in this run, so I am not recording it as an answer.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

Valuation-based, and there is no flat solar fee. Codified Sec. 6-20(c): primary permit fee = 2.00% of the first $10,000 of construction value + 1.00% of $10,001-$500,000 + 0.50% above $500,000, minimum $50.00; PLUS a residential building plan review fee of 30% of the permit fee, minimum $105.00; PLUS a 'Surcharge Fee (Effective July 1, 2026)' of 25% of (permit fee + plan review fee) that appears on every live permit but is NOT in the codified schedule. The observed floor for any residential permit is $193.75. A $25,000 residential PV job computes to roughly $350 permit + $105 plan review + $113.75 surcharge = about $568.75; a multi-family or condo roof is priced as COMMERCIAL (50% plan review, $131.25 minimum).

Why the confidence is not higherThe formula is codified at Sec. 6-20(c)(1)-(2), amended by Ord. No. 05-2026 on 2 June 2026. I verified it arithmetically against all nine live permits in the City's iWorq register: e.g. #4911-26 at $10,807 -> $208.07 (2% of 10,000 + 1% of 807), #4916-26 at $7,282 -> $145.64, #4919-26 at $4,950 -> $99.00, #4912-26 at $1,000 -> the $50 minimum. The 25% surcharge reconciles exactly on all nine ($38.75 on $155.00; $58.95 on $235.80; $78.27 on $313.07). 90 and not higher BECAUSE THE WORKED PV FIGURE IS MY ARITHMETIC ON AN ASSUMED $25,000 CONTRACT VALUE, not a quoted price, and because the 25% surcharge is charged under a name that does not appear in the adopted fee ordinance.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Valuation — a tiered percentage of construction value, with a $50 minimum, plus a percentage-of-permit-fee plan review charge and a percentage surcharge. Construction value is taken from the ICC building valuation data table, or from the contractor's contract value where the table does not cover the scope of work — which is the case for photovoltaics.

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 6-20(c)(1): 'Based on construction value determined using the latest published schedule of building valuation data as compiled by the International Code Council, Inc.... The contractor's contract value shall only be used when the table does not cover the scope of work in the proposed project.' The ICC table has no PV line, so a PV permit is priced off the contract — which is why the City's application says 'Applicant may be asked to provide a copy of a signed contract to determine job value.'

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes, and it is charged at application and is non-refundable. Residential: 30% of the estimated permit fee, minimum $105.00. Commercial: 50%, minimum $131.25. 'Review fee is in addition to the permit fee is due at time of application. Review fees are not refundable.'

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 6-20(c)(2)a-d verbatim, and every one of the nine live permits carries a line reading 'Residential Building Plan Review Fee Minimum (effective July 1, 2026): $105.00' or 'Commercial Building Plan Review Fee Minimum (effective July 1, 2026): $131.25'. The minimum bites on every small job: on a $1,000 permit the plan review ($105) is more than twice the permit fee ($50).

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Not published. Observed in practice across nine live permits: same business day to two business days. #4913-26 (Electrical, meter-main upgrade) was applied for and approved on 19 Aug 2026; #4915-26 same day; #4912-26 same day; #4911-26 two days; #4916-26 two days; #4919-26 next day.

Why the confidence is not higherNo plan-review turnaround is stated anywhere in the Code, on the department page, on any form or in the portal; FS 553.792's statutory clock applies unstated. The figures above are read off the Plan Reviews block of each live permit record in the City's iWorq register (application date vs. the dated 'Approved - Pedro Vieira' entry). 72 because nine permits over four weeks is a small sample, none of them is a PV job, and a solar plan review may behave differently.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

Two years maximum. The permit becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 6 months, or if work is suspended or abandoned for 6 months after commencing; and 'Permit will be considered suspended or abandoned if it does not pass an inspection within 180 days.' Renewal is 65% of the original permit fee per required 90-day extension, minimum $105.

Why the confidence is not higherThe three clauses are printed on both the City's Building Division Permit Application and its Sub-Permit Application; the renewal terms are codified at Sec. 6-20(c)(12)a. 90 rather than 95 because the application form carries 'Rev. 7/1/2007' — an eighteen-year-old document — while the fee schedule was amended in June 2026, so the two are of very different vintages even though they do not conflict.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/246/Building-Permit-Application

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

iWorq. Two faces: the Citizen Portal for applications at southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl (linked from the City's home page Quick Links as 'Permitting, Code, Business Tax Receipts Portal'), and a public permit register plus inspection-request scheduler at southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600.

Why the confidence is not higherThe apply-side URL is linked from the City's own home page. The register side is a second iWorq tenant slug for the same city; both render 'South Bay, FL' in their own headers and the register carries real South Bay parcel numbers and addresses. Note the register is NOT linked anywhere on the City website — not in the 58-URL XML sitemap, not in the 97-link HTML sitemap, not on the Planning and Building page.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes for the application. The Citizen Portal takes a Building Permit application online with applicant, owner, tenant, contractor and licence, site address, parcel number, project cost, square feet and description, plus required file uploads; there are dedicated online routes for Owner Builder, Sub Permit, AC Changeout, the five roofing types and Right-of-Way. Inspections are requested from the register. Payment: several live permits were paid by counter receipt number, and the City's separate Pay Online link is a Clover checkout widget, so the money leg is not certainly online end-to-end.

Why the confidence is not higherLive permits carry a 'Web Form - Buildings Applications' letter (#4911-26, #4913-26, #4916-26, #4919-26), proving the online intake is genuinely in use. 85 because payment is the gap: the Payments block on the live permits shows receipt numbers like 000688 and 42208 rather than card references, and www.southbaycity.com/1268/Pay-Online is a stand-alone Clover checkout page, not a portal-integrated permit payment.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbayfl.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/southbayfl

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Florida Power & Light Company (FPL). A single investor-owned utility for the whole city — there is no municipal electric system and no co-operative.

Why the confidence is not higherSettled five ways, three of them first-party and dispositive. (1) THE FRANCHISE IS CODIFIED: Code Appendix B, Article I 'POWER AND LIGHT FRANCHISE', adopted by Ordinance No. 6-2005 on 9 November 2004, grants Florida Power & Light Company a 30-year non-exclusive franchise 'throughout all of the incorporated areas' of the City, at 5.90 percent of billed revenues, repealing the previous Ord. No. 76-18 of 1 November 1977. (2) THE NON-COMPETING COVENANT READS THE RIGHT WAY: Section 6 has the CITY agree 'not to engage in the distribution and/or sale, in competition with the Grantee, of electric capacity and/or electric energy to any ultimate consumer'. (3) BOTH BUDGET LINES EXIST AND NEITHER NAMES A SELLER, so they were read together: FY2025-26 revenue accounts 001-031-313100 ELECTRICAL FRANCHISE FEE $235,000 and 001-031-314100 ELECTRICAL UTILITY TAX $315,000 sit on the REVENUE side while '543100 Electric' appears as an operating EXPENSE in several departments — a city that sold power would do neither. (4) Code Sec. 30-77(a) levies a 10% public service tax on 'each and every purchase of electricity', payable 'by the purchaser... to the seller thereof' — the City is the taxing authority, not the seller. (5) Appendix B contains only two franchises, Power and Light and Solid Waste; there is no second electric grant. I specifically checked for the Glades Electric error: zero hits for 'Glades Electric', 'cooperative' or 'Lake Worth Beach' in the whole 929,000-character Code.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_APXBFR_ARTIPOLIFR

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

Parallel, with two hard gates at the end. FPL strongly recommends written interconnection approval BEFORE procuring material; the City permit runs independently; and then the City's final inspection is a precondition of FPL energising the system. FPL's Tier 1 Agreement Sec. 3.4 requires the customer 'to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation', and Sec. 3.5 requires the customer to notify FPL at least TEN CALENDAR DAYS before placing the equipment in service.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement (Second Revised Tariff Sheet No. 9.050) Secs. 3.4 and 3.5, and FPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII (revision 10-30-25) 'It is highly recommended that customers obtain FPL's written interconnection approval prior to procuring any material.' Corroborated on the City side by live permit #4913-26, whose final inspection note reads 'OK to energize' — the City's inspector is the one who releases the job. 88 and not higher because the City publishes no sequencing statement of its own.

utility tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No — advisory only, and the City says so twice. The Building Division Permit Application states 'A Building Permit does not assure compliance with your Homeowners Association's rules, regulation and/or deed restrictions. We advise you to obtain approval from you Homeowners Association before improving your property' and 'Issuance of a permit is not authorization to violate any public or private restrictions'. There is NO codified mandatory association co-signature.

Why the confidence is not higherI ran the caller's 'association' + 'approv' sweep across the whole Code: 24 occurrences of 'association', none of them a permitting gate — they are the American Standards Association (noise measurement), the Manufacturing Chemists' Association, the Electronic Industries Association, 'firm, partnership, association' boilerplate in definitions, a recycling-collection scheduling clause in the Solid Waste franchise, and one small-wireless clause in Chapter 33 that repeats the FS 337.401 HOA carve-out. Zero hits for 'homeowners association' in the codified text. 88 because absence of a codified gate does not stop a private deed restriction binding an individual owner.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/246/Building-Permit-Application

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

No. South Bay has no historic-preservation ordinance, no historic district, no architectural review board and no certificate of appropriateness. The Code contains a BROKEN CROSS-REFERENCE that would mislead a reader: Sec. 33-08(b) subjects small-wireless siting to 'the provisions of chapter 38 of this Code, historic preservation' — and there is no Chapter 38. The Code runs Chapter 1 to Chapter 35 plus Appendix A (Zoning) and Appendix B (Franchises).

Why the confidence is not higherWhole-corpus search with controls: 'certificate of appropriateness' 0, 'architectural review' 0, 'design review' 0; 'historic' 15 hits, of which the regulatory ones are all in Chapter 34 Floodplain Management (the FBC Existing Building Chapter 12 historic-structure variance and definition) plus the dead Chapter 38 reference and one sign-code mention of a route marker to a 'historic' site. Controls in the same run: 'building' 703, 'permit' 507, 'electrical' 24; fabricated 'zzqqxvv' 0 and 'qwertyuiop' 0.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH33COFAPURI-W_S33-08WIFA

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

No separate windstorm certification. Wind resistance runs through the Florida Building Code and Florida Product Approval / NOA. South Bay is NOT in the High Velocity Hurricane Zone — the HVHZ is Miami-Dade and Broward only, and South Bay is in Palm Beach County. The City's roofing checklists do demand an 'NOA or FL Approval #' for every roof panel, underlayment and fastener, which is the shape a PV racking submittal would take.

Why the confidence is not higher'windstorm' returns 0 in the whole Code; wind appears 13 times, none of it a certification requirement for accessory installations. The Product Approval practice is read off the City's own Metal Roof Panels / Concrete-Clay Roof Tile / Shingles-Shakes installation checklists, recovered by OCR. 75 because I am reading a roof-covering practice across to PV racking, which the City has never written down.

published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/238/Roof-Package-Permit-Applications

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

Not for a rooftop array. Appendix A Zoning Sec. 8.1 permits in R-1 'single one (1) family dwellings with accessory buildings customarily incident thereto', and a rooftop PV system is an accessory use of the dwelling, not a listed use. The special-exception list for R-1 (Sec. 8.2) covers planned developments, churches, schools, private clubs, parks and 'Public utility structures and buildings such as sewage disposal works, water pumping plants, electric substations, police and fire stations' — utility-scale infrastructure, which should NOT be read onto a householder's array. No City Commission approval is required for a residential PV permit.

Why the confidence is not higherRead from Appendix A Articles VIII (R-1), IX (R-2), X (R-3) and XXI. 62 because this is an inference from silence: the Code contains ZERO occurrences of solar, photovoltaic or renewable, so no provision says a residential array is permitted, and a zoning officer applying Sec. 8.1 literally to a ground-mounted array would be on defensible ground. The scope trap in Sec. 8.2(3) is live and I have stepped over it deliberately.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_APXAZO_ARTVIIISIFADWDI

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No municipal cap. The binding limits are the utility's: FPL Tier 1 is 10 kW AC or less, Tier 2 is over 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 is over 100 kW to 2 MW, and the gross power rating 'does not exceed 90% of the Customer's utility distribution service rating'. Critically, the AC nameplate is computed as installed DC nameplate x 0.85, so about 11.76 kW DC is the Tier 1 ceiling.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement Secs. 1.1 and 2.1, and PSC Rule 25-6.065(2)(a). The City side is a proved absence: zero occurrences of solar, photovoltaic or renewable in 929,000 characters of codified text, with controls passing. 88 and not higher because the DC-to-AC 0.85 conversion is the kind of clause installers get wrong and I have not seen FPL apply it to a South Bay job.

utility tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020, reaching South Bay through the Florida Building Code rather than through any local adoption. The City has NO electrical chapter and NO local NEC adoption ordinance: Chapter 10 of the Code is ELECTIONS, not electricity, and the single occurrence of 'National Electrical Code' in the whole Code is inside Chapter 33, a standards list for communications facilities in the right-of-way. 88% · codified ordinance
    • Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), by floating adoption. Sec. 6-19 in full: 'The Florida Building Code is in effect in the city.' 90% · codified ordinance
    • Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), AS AMENDED by the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code, effective 31 December 2023. The City's Chapter 12 is a single sentence — 'The Florida Fire Prevention Code is the fire code for the city' — and does not itself adopt the County amendments; the County amendments reach inside South Bay because the City is inside the County Fire/Rescue MSTU. 88% · codified ordinance
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — exactly one, and it is the commercially important one for this city. Code Sec. 6-21 'Technical amendments to the Florida Building Code, Residential' rewrites R322.2.1 Elevation requirements to require the lowest floor at BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS 1 FOOT (or the design flood elevation, whichever is higher) in flood hazard areas, in Coastal A Zones, and for below-grade basements; and in AO zones the FIRM depth number plus 1 foot, or at least 3 feet where no depth number is given. Adopted by Ord. No. 8-2017 on 15 Aug 2017. Secs. 6-22 to 6-43 are Reserved — there are no other technical amendments. 95% · codified ordinance
    • What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) including NEC 2020, plus the City's single FBC-Residential amendment at Sec. 6-21 (BFE+1), plus Chapter 34 Floodplain Management, plus the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code. There is no local electrical amendment of any kind. 85% · codified ordinance
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? None locally — and this is a controlled negative in BOTH governments. Access pathways and ridge setbacks for a South Bay PV job come from the base Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (NFPA 1 Florida edition), with nothing added by the City or by Palm Beach County. 82% · adopted local amendments
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Required, to NEC 2020 Article 690.12, via the Florida Building Code. Neither the City nor Palm Beach County restates or modifies rapid shutdown anywhere. 78% · codified ordinance
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The AUTHORITY requires none. Every placard on a South Bay job comes from FPL. At the interconnecting meter can: 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. At the DER disconnect switch: 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. With battery storage, a placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.' 90% · utility standard
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No. The City of South Bay specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else. 88% · codified ordinance
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Nothing from the City. From FPL: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED letters. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements.' No letter height and no colour is specified — engraving and weather/UV resistance are the whole specification. 88% · utility standard
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, comprehensively — and since the AHJ requires none, FPL's specification IS the signage scope of work in South Bay. Two labels are mandated (meter can, DER disconnect), both engraved on permanent weatherproof/UV-resistant placards; a third placard on the meter enclosure if battery storage is present; and a fourth, rarely quoted, where FPL agrees a remote disconnect location: 'the customer shall install a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches'. 92% · utility standard
    • Where must the labels be placed? At the interconnecting meter can, and at the DER disconnect switch. Battery placard: permanently affixed to the meter enclosure. Remote-disconnect plaque: adjacent to FPL's meter socket. The disconnect itself, where required, goes separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket and WITHIN 10 FEET of it, with no locked gates, doors or fences between the two, and the plans must show the dimension. 92% · utility standard
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? It depends on the tier and on the tap point, and all three Tier 1 limbs matter. (1) UL 1741 listed, inverter-based Tier 1 (10 kW AC or less): NO customer-installed manual disconnect at all. (2) Tier 1 systems that are NOT UL 1741 inverter-based: FPL 'shall require' one, at customer expense, visible load break type, mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, accessible, lockable open with a single FPL padlock. (3) Where FPL agrees a remote location, a permanent weather-proof plaque goes adjacent to the meter socket. Tier 2 and Tier 3 always require an FPL-approved visually open DER disconnect: within 10 feet of the meter socket, separate but adjacent, lockable in the open position, FPL padlock shank of 3/8 inch must fit the cover hasp, the switch may not be modified to take the lock, no locked gates/doors/fences, enclosure grounded, and the plans must show the dimension. TAP POINT OVERRIDES TIER: a line-side interconnection ahead of the main panel requires a manual AC disconnect regardless. AND THE 10 kW CONTRADICTION IS STILL OPEN in the current manual — Section XIII.A.4 exempts Tier 1 (10 kW or less) while the DER Disconnect Switch Utility Requirements page in the same section says FPL requires a disconnect 'for all DER installations ranging from 10kW to 2MW', so a system at exactly 10 kW is covered by both. 92% · utility tariff
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, two lists. FPL: the inverter 'must utilize a certified UL 1741 SA and IEEE 1547 grid interactive inverter. Inverters that have not been certified to UL Standard will be denied interconnection.' The City: nothing PV-specific, but its roofing checklists demand an 'NOA or FL Approval #' for every roof component, which is the Florida Product Approval regime a racking submittal would be judged against under the FBC. 88% · utility standard
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, with no local rule at all and three conditions from the utility. FPL Section XIII.C: battery equipment behind the meter must comply with UL 1741; 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility."'; battery energy 'may not export power from the battery to the grid' where the battery is integrated with customer-owned renewable generation; and stand-alone storage is not 'renewable energy' under PSC Rule 25-6.065, so its output is not net metered. 80% · utility standard
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Treated as an accessory building, and the zoning consequences are real even though no clause mentions solar. Appendix A defines 'Accessory building' as 'A structure erected on a lot to serve a purpose auxiliary to the prime purpose for which the lot is zoned'. Sec. 21.1(7) forbids an accessory building 'in the area between the front wall building line of the dwelling structure and the street line' — no front-yard array. Sec. 21.1(8) requires at least TEN FEET from any side or rear property line. In R-1 an accessory building may not exceed one storey or fifteen feet (Sec. 8.3). And the height-exception list at Sec. 21.1(1) — chimneys, water tanks, commercial radio/TV antennas, elevator lofts, spires, flag poles, parapet walls — does NOT include solar. 72% · codified ordinance

20 questions answered against City of South Bay’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

NEC 2020, reaching South Bay through the Florida Building Code rather than through any local adoption. The City has NO electrical chapter and NO local NEC adoption ordinance: Chapter 10 of the Code is ELECTIONS, not electricity, and the single occurrence of 'National Electrical Code' in the whole Code is inside Chapter 33, a standards list for communications facilities in the right-of-way.

Why the confidence is not higherCode Sec. 6-19 adopts 'The Florida Building Code' with no year — a floating adoption, silent rather than stale, which is the cleanest form of it. The NEC edition is therefore not a local fact: FBC 8th Edition (2023) incorporates NEC 2020, effective 31 December 2023, per FS 553.73 preemption and the method file's NFPA enforcement-map baseline. I checked for the Pahokee spelling trap ('2008 National ELECTION Code'): searching 'NATIONAL EL' returns three hits in South Bay's Code, two of them 'national election campaign' in the sign definitions and one the genuine Chapter 33 reference. 88 because the year is carried from the state baseline, not from a South Bay instrument — no City document states an NEC year at all.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-19AD

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), by floating adoption. Sec. 6-19 in full: 'The Florida Building Code is in effect in the city.'

Why the confidence is not higherCodified Sec. 6-19, history (Code 1969, Sec. 6-1; Code 1983, Sec. 5-16; Ord. No. 1-81; Ord. No. 4-85), with a state-law reference to FS 553.73. The edition number is the current statewide cycle, not a local statement. Worth knowing for a plan set: the City's own roofing checklists still say 'FBC 7th Edition 2020' on their faces and are stamped 'Rev: DEC 2020', two cycles behind the code actually in force.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-19AD

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), AS AMENDED by the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code, effective 31 December 2023. The City's Chapter 12 is a single sentence — 'The Florida Fire Prevention Code is the fire code for the city' — and does not itself adopt the County amendments; the County amendments reach inside South Bay because the City is inside the County Fire/Rescue MSTU.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo instruments. City Code Sec. 12-1 (floating, no year). PBC Code Sec. 12-56(b): 'The provisions of this Code shall be in full force and effect in Palm Beach County within the boundaries of any fire-rescue municipal service taxing unit (MSTU) established by ordinance, including within the unincorporated area and within the boundaries of any municipality that is lawfully included within any such MSTU' — and PBC Sec. 26-51(b), amended by Ord. No. 2025-028 on 2 Dec 2025, names 'the City of South Bay' in that MSTU. 88 rather than 95 because the City's own one-line chapter does not mention the County amendments at all, so an applicant reading only the City's code would not know they apply.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH12FIPRPR_S12-1FIPRCO

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes — exactly one, and it is the commercially important one for this city. Code Sec. 6-21 'Technical amendments to the Florida Building Code, Residential' rewrites R322.2.1 Elevation requirements to require the lowest floor at BASE FLOOD ELEVATION PLUS 1 FOOT (or the design flood elevation, whichever is higher) in flood hazard areas, in Coastal A Zones, and for below-grade basements; and in AO zones the FIRM depth number plus 1 foot, or at least 3 feet where no depth number is given. Adopted by Ord. No. 8-2017 on 15 Aug 2017. Secs. 6-22 to 6-43 are Reserved — there are no other technical amendments.

Why the confidence is not higherCodified Sec. 6-21 read in full. This is the caller's 'freeboard without the word' case and it fired: the word 'freeboard' returns ZERO hits in the entire 929,000-character Code, and the flood chapter's own design-flood-elevation definition adds nothing to BFE. The number lives in the FBC amendments section of the BUILDING chapter, not in the flood chapter.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-21TEAMFLBUCORE

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) including NEC 2020, plus the City's single FBC-Residential amendment at Sec. 6-21 (BFE+1), plus Chapter 34 Floodplain Management, plus the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code. There is no local electrical amendment of any kind.

Why the confidence is not higherComposite of Secs. 6-19, 6-21, 12-1 and Chapter 34, and PBC Secs. 12-56(b)/12-57. 85 because the fire limb depends on the MSTU chain rather than on a City adopting ordinance, and because the City has published nothing that tells an installer any of this.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedAny local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing. The City has no electrical chapter and no local amendments to the electrical part of the FBC — Sec. 6-21 is the only technical amendment and it concerns flood elevation. Searched the whole Code ('busbar' 0, 'service upgrade' 0, 'ampacity' 0, 'main panel' 0), the forms and the portal. A live specimen exists and says nothing: permit #4913-26 is a 200-amp meter-main upgrade that passed on a single final with no recorded condition beyond 'OK to energize'. The 120% rule therefore reaches South Bay only through NEC 2020 705.12 via the FBC.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedAny required mounting system or attachment spacing. Zero PV content in the Code. The City does publish detailed attachment specifications — 8d ring-shank nails at 6 inches on centre for re-nailing, 4 inches at plywood edges for re-sheathing with minimum 19/32 inch plywood, and per-zone field/perimeter/corner fastener spacing tables for metal panels and tile — but every one of them is for a ROOF COVERING, in the Roof Package Permit Applications document, and none is written for or extended to a PV racking attachment. Recovered by OCR of a nine-page PDF with no text layer.

https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/238/Roof-Package-Permit-Applications

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

None locally — and this is a controlled negative in BOTH governments. Access pathways and ridge setbacks for a South Bay PV job come from the base Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (NFPA 1 Florida edition), with nothing added by the City or by Palm Beach County.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo independent proofs. City: zero occurrences of solar, photovoltaic, photo-voltaic or renewable in 929,000 characters of codified text, controls 'building' 703 / 'permit' 507 / 'electrical' 24 passing and fabricated 'zzqqxvv' / 'qwertyuiop' returning 0. County: I downloaded and extracted the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code (58 pages, effective 31 December 2023, 118,393 characters) and searched it first-hand — solar 0, photovoltaic 0, ' PV' 0, 'energy storage' 0, against positive controls 'access' 48, 'battery' 3, 'rooftop' 1, and fabricated 'zzqqxvv' 0. 82 rather than higher because the caller's point about NFPA 1's PV pathway relief being written around one- and two-family dwellings matters here: 447 of South Bay's 1,147 housing units are multi-family, and I have not read the NFPA 1 Florida edition text itself this run.

adopted local amendments checked 2026-09-13 http://discover.pbcgov.org/pbcfr/CRRD/Documents/Local-Amendments-FFPC-8th.pdf

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Required, to NEC 2020 Article 690.12, via the Florida Building Code. Neither the City nor Palm Beach County restates or modifies rapid shutdown anywhere.

Why the confidence is not higher'rapid shutdown' returns 0 in the City Code, 0 in the PBC FFPC Local Amendments and 0 in the PBC Code of Ordinances, in each case alongside passing positive controls. The requirement therefore rests entirely on the state code cycle. 78 because the answer is entirely inherited from the NEC edition in force (q29), which is itself a state fact, and no South Bay document says the words.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-19AD

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

The AUTHORITY requires none. Every placard on a South Bay job comes from FPL. At the interconnecting meter can: 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / ENTER SOURCES HERE / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. At the DER disconnect switch: 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. With battery storage, a placard permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.'

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.A.6 and XIII.C.1, revision stamp 10-30-25, recovered by rendering pages 100-173 at 300 dpi and OCRing them — pdftotext returns mojibake for the whole August-2026 manual, not just Section XIII. 74 of 74 pages rendered and checked, no silent truncation. NOTE THE SCOPE POINT: the labelling paragraph is NOT tier-limited even though the DER disconnect itself is, so a Tier 1 system with no disconnect still appears to owe the meter-can label. City side is a proved zero (see q39).

utility standard checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No. The City of South Bay specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else.

Why the confidence is not higherWhole-corpus search of the codified Code: 'placard' 0 occurrences, 'label' 2 (neither a signage requirement — one is a data-label reference, one is in the dangerous-buildings notice text). The only wording the City mandates anywhere is the dangerous-building notice at Sec. 6-61(9). Also searched the four published Planning and Building forms, the OCR'd roofing package, the owner-builder form and the 392-document DocumentCenter enumeration. 88 because a counter-level practice could exist that is nowhere written down, and the portal search is CAPTCHA-gated so I could not open a real South Bay solar permit to check.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing from the City. From FPL: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED letters. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements.' No letter height and no colour is specified — engraving and weather/UV resistance are the whole specification.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.A.6, revision 10-30-25, recovered by OCR. The City side is the same proved zero as q39. 88 because FPL states a material and a method but no dimensions, so an installer still has to fall back on NEC 110.21(B) marking practice for legibility.

utility standard checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedNEC 705.10 site-plan / facility-map placard. Neither government and neither utility restates it. Searched the City's Code (929,000 characters, 'placard' 0, 'site plan' 25 all in subdivision and zoning contexts, '705' 0), the Palm Beach County Code (5.35 million characters), the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the Florida Fire Prevention Code (58 pages, 118,393 characters, extracted and searched first-hand), and FPL's Electric Service Standards Section XIII in full (OCR of pages 100-173 of the current August-2026 manual, revision 10-30-25), whose labelling paragraph XIII.A.6 specifies only the meter-can and DER-disconnect legends. EIGHTH RUN RUNNING IN THIS SURVEY THAT NOBODY RESTATES 705.10.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes, comprehensively — and since the AHJ requires none, FPL's specification IS the signage scope of work in South Bay. Two labels are mandated (meter can, DER disconnect), both engraved on permanent weatherproof/UV-resistant placards; a third placard on the meter enclosure if battery storage is present; and a fourth, rarely quoted, where FPL agrees a remote disconnect location: 'the customer shall install a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches'.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.A.6 and XIII.C.1 (OCR of the August-2026 manual, revision 10-30-25) plus the filed Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement Sec. 5.3 on Second Revised Tariff Sheet No. 9.050 for the remote-location plaque. Three separate FPL instruments read first-hand.

utility standard checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

At the interconnecting meter can, and at the DER disconnect switch. Battery placard: permanently affixed to the meter enclosure. Remote-disconnect plaque: adjacent to FPL's meter socket. The disconnect itself, where required, goes separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket and WITHIN 10 FEET of it, with no locked gates, doors or fences between the two, and the plans must show the dimension.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards Sections XIII.A.4, XIII.A.6 and XIII.C.1, and the DER Disconnect Switch Utility Requirements page in the same section, all read from the OCR'd current manual. The 10-foot dimension and the plan-dimension requirement are stated twice in the manual, which is why this is at 92.

utility standard checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Yes, two lists. FPL: the inverter 'must utilize a certified UL 1741 SA and IEEE 1547 grid interactive inverter. Inverters that have not been certified to UL Standard will be denied interconnection.' The City: nothing PV-specific, but its roofing checklists demand an 'NOA or FL Approval #' for every roof component, which is the Florida Product Approval regime a racking submittal would be judged against under the FBC.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.A.1 (revision 10-30-25) and Tier 1 Agreement Sec. 3.1 ('submitted by a manufacturer to a nationally recognized testing and certification laboratory'). The Product Approval limb is read across from the City's Metal Roof Panels and Concrete-Clay Roof Tile installation checklists. 88 because the second limb is an inference from roof-covering practice, not a published PV rule.

utility standard checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Permitted, with no local rule at all and three conditions from the utility. FPL Section XIII.C: battery equipment behind the meter must comply with UL 1741; 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility."'; battery energy 'may not export power from the battery to the grid' where the battery is integrated with customer-owned renewable generation; and stand-alone storage is not 'renewable energy' under PSC Rule 25-6.065, so its output is not net metered.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Electric Service Standards Section XIII.C.1 to C.4, OCR'd from the current manual. City side: 'battery' and 'energy storage' both return 0 in the codified Code; the PBC FFPC Local Amendments return 'battery' 3 times, none of them an ESS provision. 80 because the fire side of an ESS install falls to the base FFPC / NFPA 855 by reference, which I did not read this run.

utility standard checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWhether a separate ESS permit or inspection exists. 'battery' and 'energy storage' both return 0 in the City's Code with controls passing; the iWorq inspection-type catalogue has four entries (Building Inspection, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing) and no ESS type; the City publishes no ESS form among its 392 DocumentCenter documents or on either portal; and the Palm Beach County Local Amendments to the FFPC contain no ESS provision ('energy storage' 0, 'battery' 3, none of them regulatory). The only battery rule that reaches a South Bay job is FPL's, at Section XIII.C, and that is an interconnection condition rather than a permit.

https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Treated as an accessory building, and the zoning consequences are real even though no clause mentions solar. Appendix A defines 'Accessory building' as 'A structure erected on a lot to serve a purpose auxiliary to the prime purpose for which the lot is zoned'. Sec. 21.1(7) forbids an accessory building 'in the area between the front wall building line of the dwelling structure and the street line' — no front-yard array. Sec. 21.1(8) requires at least TEN FEET from any side or rear property line. In R-1 an accessory building may not exceed one storey or fifteen feet (Sec. 8.3). And the height-exception list at Sec. 21.1(1) — chimneys, water tanks, commercial radio/TV antennas, elevator lofts, spires, flag poles, parapet walls — does NOT include solar.

Why the confidence is not higherRead from Appendix A Articles IV (Definitions), VIII (R-1) and XXI (Supplemental Regulations). 72 because every word of this is an inference: the Code contains zero occurrences of solar, so no provision has ever been applied to an array, and the City's own definition of 'Building' ('has one or more floors and a roof') arguably excludes a ground mount from 'accessory building' altogether while leaving it a 'structure'. An installer should get a written zoning determination before quoting a ground mount here.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_APXAZO_ARTXXISUREAPSPSEALDI

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

It depends on the tier and on the tap point, and all three Tier 1 limbs matter. (1) UL 1741 listed, inverter-based Tier 1 (10 kW AC or less): NO customer-installed manual disconnect at all. (2) Tier 1 systems that are NOT UL 1741 inverter-based: FPL 'shall require' one, at customer expense, visible load break type, mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, accessible, lockable open with a single FPL padlock. (3) Where FPL agrees a remote location, a permanent weather-proof plaque goes adjacent to the meter socket. Tier 2 and Tier 3 always require an FPL-approved visually open DER disconnect: within 10 feet of the meter socket, separate but adjacent, lockable in the open position, FPL padlock shank of 3/8 inch must fit the cover hasp, the switch may not be modified to take the lock, no locked gates/doors/fences, enclosure grounded, and the plans must show the dimension. TAP POINT OVERRIDES TIER: a line-side interconnection ahead of the main panel requires a manual AC disconnect regardless. AND THE 10 kW CONTRADICTION IS STILL OPEN in the current manual — Section XIII.A.4 exempts Tier 1 (10 kW or less) while the DER Disconnect Switch Utility Requirements page in the same section says FPL requires a disconnect 'for all DER installations ranging from 10kW to 2MW', so a system at exactly 10 kW is covered by both.

Why the confidence is not higherFour instruments read first-hand: PSC Rule 25-6.065(6)(a) ('Inverter-based Tier 1 customer-owned renewable generation systems shall be exempt from this requirement, unless the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense'); FPL Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement Secs. 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 on Second Revised Tariff Sheet No. 9.050; FPL Electric Service Standards Secs. XIII.A.4 and XIII.A.5; and the DER Disconnect Switch Utility Requirements page, all from the current August-2026 manual at revision 10-30-25. Note the rule says 'inverter-based' where FPL's agreement says 'U.L.1741 Listed, inverter-based' — the tariff is narrower than the rule. 92 rather than higher solely because of the unresolved 10 kW overlap.

utility tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Portal. Inspections are requested from the iWorq permit register: find the permit row, use the request link in the Inspection column, choose an inspection type and a date, and submit. There is a second, older instruction on the City's roofing checklists: 'Contact the Building Department the day of the inspection between 7:00A-7:30A to obtain inspection timeframe.' 82% · permit portal
    • How much notice is required? Next business day. On Sunday 13 September 2026 the portal's inspection date selector offered 65 dates beginning Monday 14 September 2026 — same-day booking is not offered — and the list contains weekdays only, no Saturdays or Sundays, running out to early December. 85% · permit portal
    • Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No AM/PM window and no time slot. The scheduler offers a DATE only — unlike some Florida iWorq tenants, South Bay's inspection request carries no time selector at all. The timeframe is obtained by telephoning the Building Department between 7:00 and 7:30 am on the morning of the inspection. 78% · permit portal
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes. The City performs its own inspections through its Building Division, across four inspection types — Building Inspection, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing. There is no PV or solar inspection type in the catalogue, so a residential array would be booked as Electrical and/or Building Inspection. 88% · permit portal
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated for inspections — the City books and performs them. But the PLAN REVIEW and Building Official function are not staffed by a budgeted City employee: every plan review on all nine live permits is signed 'Pedro Vieira', a name that appears nowhere in the City's staff directory, organisational chart or position summary, and the Community Development and Planning department carries $40,000 of Professional Services against a four-post establishment that contains no Building Official, inspector or plans examiner. The contracting firm is not named in any reachable City document. 70% · adopted budget
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? The catalogue is Building Inspection, Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing, with no PV-specific type. For a job of this shape the observed sequence is a single final: live Electrical permit #4913-26 (meter-main upgrade) carries exactly one inspection, 'Final Pass', requested 'Requesting final electrical', completed the same day with the note 'OK to energize'. Live Plumbing permit #4915-26 likewise carries one 'Final Pass'. Roofing jobs additionally carry a sheathing/re-nail inspection and, for tile, a Tile In-Progress inspection. 72% · permit portal
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No published rough-in or mid-roof requirement for a PV job, and none observed. The one live residential Electrical permit (#4913-26) closed on a single Final. A rough-in stage does exist for roofing work — the City requires a sheathing nailing/re-nailing inspection and will not accept a contractor affidavit or engineering certification in its place without the Building Official's prior approval. 58% · permit portal
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes, but it is a per-permit document, not a public PV checklist. Every issued permit in the register generates an 'Inspection Checklist' letter alongside the 'Building Permit' letter — six of the nine live permits carry one, dated one to two days after approval. The City publishes no inspection checklist as a downloadable document. 70% · permit portal
    • What must be on site at inspection? The permit card, the approved plans, and a recorded Notice of Commencement posted on the job site. The Notice of Commencement requirement is stated in capitals on both City application forms: 'A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.' The fee schedule confirms the first two by pricing their absence: Sec. 6-20(c)(25) charges $105.00 for 'Any unwarranted inspection trip where work not ready for inspection, there is no permit card on job site or plans not on job site or no access to property'. 85% · codified ordinance
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? A passed final inspection closes the permit, and for an electrical job the operative output is the inspector's release: live permit #4913-26 closed with 'Final Pass' and the note 'OK to energize'. Certificates of occupancy and completion exist and are priced separately ($157.50 residential on 24-hour notice, $183.75 on less than 24 hours; conditional CO $131.25 for a single-family residence) but are structure-related and would not normally be issued for a rooftop array. 78% · permit portal
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? The INSTALLER (or customer) notifies FPL; the AHJ does nothing. FPL's filed Tier 1 Agreement Sec. 3.4: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' Sec. 3.5 adds: 'The Customer shall notify FPL at least ten (10) calendar days prior to initially placing Customer's equipment and protective apparatus into service.' South Bay has no codified power-release duty on its own inspector — unlike neighbouring Belle Glade — but its inspector's final note on live permit #4913-26 reads 'OK to energize', so the City's sign-off is the document that unlocks the FPL step. 92% · utility tariff
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? Yes, and it escalates. First re-inspection $78.75. Second of the same type $78.75 plus a $50.00 penalty. Third $78.75 plus $75.00. Fourth $78.75 plus $100.00. Cancellation fee $52.50. An unwarranted inspection trip (not ready, no permit card, no plans, no access) is $105.00. A miscellaneous inspection is $94.50 each and an after-hours, weekend or holiday inspection is $262.50. 95% · codified ordinance
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Through the portal, as a dated note on the plan review. The plan review status goes to 'Building On Hold-Additional Information' with a dated Note stating what is wanted, an upload box sits directly under it, and once the applicant uploads, a second dated plan review entry appears ('re-review of shed tie down') and flips to 'Approved'. Two live examples: #4918-26, note '09/09/2026 - please provide what will be the support for the shed. shed shall not be sat directly to ground. also provide info on how it will be anchored down', re-reviewed and approved the same day; #4917-26, still on hold. 85% · permit portal

14 questions answered against City of South Bay’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal. Inspections are requested from the iWorq permit register: find the permit row, use the request link in the Inspection column, choose an inspection type and a date, and submit. There is a second, older instruction on the City's roofing checklists: 'Contact the Building Department the day of the inspection between 7:00A-7:30A to obtain inspection timeframe.'

Why the confidence is not higherThe register carries a live scheduler form posting to southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/scheduler/600/..., and the portal's own help page says 'locate the Inspection column on the far right side of the permit row. Click on the request link and fill out the necessary information.' The 7:00-7:30 am call appears four times in the City's OCR'd roof package. 82 because the two routes coexist without the City reconciling them, and the roof package is stamped Rev: DEC 2020.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Next business day. On Sunday 13 September 2026 the portal's inspection date selector offered 65 dates beginning Monday 14 September 2026 — same-day booking is not offered — and the list contains weekdays only, no Saturdays or Sundays, running out to early December.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the inspection scheduler's own HTML select controls (inspectiondt and inspectioncaldt), which is a first-party, dated constraint rather than a published policy. 85 because the City publishes no notice-period statement anywhere and a same-day slot might still be obtainable by telephone under the 7:00-7:30 am roofing instruction.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

No AM/PM window and no time slot. The scheduler offers a DATE only — unlike some Florida iWorq tenants, South Bay's inspection request carries no time selector at all. The timeframe is obtained by telephoning the Building Department between 7:00 and 7:30 am on the morning of the inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherThe scheduler's select controls are inspectiontypecal_id (four inspection types) and inspectioncaldt (65 weekday dates); there is no time control in the markup. The morning-call practice comes from the City's Metal Roof, Tile Roof, Shingles-Shakes and Flat Roof policy pages, recovered by OCR. 78 because the practice statement sits on roofing documents and may not extend to an electrical or building final.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes. The City performs its own inspections through its Building Division, across four inspection types — Building Inspection, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing. There is no PV or solar inspection type in the catalogue, so a residential array would be booked as Electrical and/or Building Inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo proofs. The scheduler's inspectiontypecal_id select is the City's own inspection-type catalogue and contains exactly those four. Live permit #4913-26 (Electrical, 200A meter-main upgrade, single-family) was inspected by the City on 25 Aug 2026 — 'Final Pass', completed same day, note 'OK to energize. CCB BN4964.' 88 because the person performing the inspection is not a budgeted City FTE (see q101) and the City has never published who does the work.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated for inspections — the City books and performs them. But the PLAN REVIEW and Building Official function are not staffed by a budgeted City employee: every plan review on all nine live permits is signed 'Pedro Vieira', a name that appears nowhere in the City's staff directory, organisational chart or position summary, and the Community Development and Planning department carries $40,000 of Professional Services against a four-post establishment that contains no Building Official, inspector or plans examiner. The contracting firm is not named in any reachable City document.

Why the confidence is not higherFY2025-26 adopted budget, Community Development and Planning POSITION SUMMARY: Economic and Business Development Manager 1, Community Development/Fiscal Specialist 1, Code Enforcement Officer 1, Community Navigator 1. Account 531300 Professional services: $40,000 adopted for FY2025-26 ($45,000 adopted / $43,764 expended FY2024-25). The name Pedro Vieira is read off the Plan Reviews block of live permits #4911-26 through #4919-26. 70 because I could not establish the firm: South Bay's AgendaCenter is EMPTY (no categories, no items) and the DocumentCenter's agenda run stops in 2021, so the Pahokee 'search resolutions for piggyback' route had nothing to search. This is a could-not-establish, not a proved absence.

adopted budget checked 2026-09-13 https://www.southbaycity.com/DocumentCenter/View/309/2025-2026-Budget

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

The catalogue is Building Inspection, Electrical, Mechanical and Plumbing, with no PV-specific type. For a job of this shape the observed sequence is a single final: live Electrical permit #4913-26 (meter-main upgrade) carries exactly one inspection, 'Final Pass', requested 'Requesting final electrical', completed the same day with the note 'OK to energize'. Live Plumbing permit #4915-26 likewise carries one 'Final Pass'. Roofing jobs additionally carry a sheathing/re-nail inspection and, for tile, a Tile In-Progress inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherInspection-type catalogue from the scheduler markup; sequences from the Inspections block of live permits #4913-26 and #4915-26; the roofing stages from the City's OCR'd roof package. 72 because neither specimen is a PV job, the permit register's search box is CAPTCHA-gated so I could not reach one, and a City that publishes no inspection sequence may sequence a PV job differently.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

No published rough-in or mid-roof requirement for a PV job, and none observed. The one live residential Electrical permit (#4913-26) closed on a single Final. A rough-in stage does exist for roofing work — the City requires a sheathing nailing/re-nailing inspection and will not accept a contractor affidavit or engineering certification in its place without the Building Official's prior approval.

Why the confidence is not higherLive permit #4913-26's Inspections block shows only 'Final Pass'. The roofing rough-in comes from the City's Policies and Procedures pages in the roof package ('Contractor to coordinate sheathing (nailing or re-nailing) inspection with Building Department'). 58 because I am generalising from a single non-PV electrical specimen to PV, and because the roofing stage could plausibly be demanded on a PV job that disturbs the deck.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWhether the inspector verifies labels and listings. COULD NOT ESTABLISH rather than proved absent, and the reason is bounded. The City publishes no inspection checklist as a document (an 'Inspection Checklist' letter is generated per permit inside the portal, but its content is behind the per-permit print route). The permit register's search box is CAPTCHA-gated, so I could not open a South Bay solar permit to read an inspector's note on labelling; the nine reachable permits are the nine most recent and none is a PV job. What IS established: the four-entry inspection-type catalogue contains no PV type, and the one live electrical final carries the free-text note 'OK to energize. CCB BN4964.' with no mention of labels.

https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Yes, but it is a per-permit document, not a public PV checklist. Every issued permit in the register generates an 'Inspection Checklist' letter alongside the 'Building Permit' letter — six of the nine live permits carry one, dated one to two days after approval. The City publishes no inspection checklist as a downloadable document.

Why the confidence is not higherThe Letters block of live permits #4911-26, #4912-26, #4913-26, #4915-26, #4916-26 and #4918-26 each lists a dated 'Inspection Checklist Print' entry. Its contents are behind the portal's per-permit print route and I did not open one. 70 because the existence is certain but the content is unknown, and nothing published tells an installer what will be checked on a PV array.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

The permit card, the approved plans, and a recorded Notice of Commencement posted on the job site. The Notice of Commencement requirement is stated in capitals on both City application forms: 'A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.' The fee schedule confirms the first two by pricing their absence: Sec. 6-20(c)(25) charges $105.00 for 'Any unwarranted inspection trip where work not ready for inspection, there is no permit card on job site or plans not on job site or no access to property'.

Why the confidence is not higherTwo City instruments that corroborate each other from opposite directions — the application's warning, and the codified penalty for arriving without the card or the plans. Notice of Commencement form also published separately (DocumentCenter 241). 85 because the City publishes no site-documents list as such; I have reconstructed it.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

Yes, and it escalates. First re-inspection $78.75. Second of the same type $78.75 plus a $50.00 penalty. Third $78.75 plus $75.00. Fourth $78.75 plus $100.00. Cancellation fee $52.50. An unwarranted inspection trip (not ready, no permit card, no plans, no access) is $105.00. A miscellaneous inspection is $94.50 each and an after-hours, weekend or holiday inspection is $262.50.

Why the confidence is not higherCodified Sec. 6-20(c)(5), (6), (16) and (25), as amended by Ord. No. 04-2024 (16 Apr 2024) and Ord. No. 05-2026 (2 June 2026). Note for pricing a job: the 25% 'Surcharge Fee' observed on every live permit would presumably apply on top of these too, though I have not seen a live re-inspection charge to confirm it.

codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/south_bay/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH6BUCORE_ARTIIBUCO_S6-20PEFESC

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Through the portal, as a dated note on the plan review. The plan review status goes to 'Building On Hold-Additional Information' with a dated Note stating what is wanted, an upload box sits directly under it, and once the applicant uploads, a second dated plan review entry appears ('re-review of shed tie down') and flips to 'Approved'. Two live examples: #4918-26, note '09/09/2026 - please provide what will be the support for the shed. shed shall not be sat directly to ground. also provide info on how it will be anchored down', re-reviewed and approved the same day; #4917-26, still on hold.

Why the confidence is not higherRead off the Plan Reviews blocks of live permits #4917-26 and #4918-26 in the City's iWorq register, including the round trip from On Hold to Approved within 24 hours. 85 because this is observed mechanism rather than published procedure — the City states no corrections policy anywhere — and because inspection corrections (as opposed to plan corrections) were not observed: no live permit in the window failed an inspection.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

A passed final inspection closes the permit, and for an electrical job the operative output is the inspector's release: live permit #4913-26 closed with 'Final Pass' and the note 'OK to energize'. Certificates of occupancy and completion exist and are priced separately ($157.50 residential on 24-hour notice, $183.75 on less than 24 hours; conditional CO $131.25 for a single-family residence) but are structure-related and would not normally be issued for a rooftop array.

Why the confidence is not higherLive permit #4913-26's Inspections block and Status ('Closed'), plus codified Sec. 6-20(c)(17) and (23). 78 because no document states what is issued on pass; I am reading it off one real electrical permit, and 'OK to energize' is an inspector's free-text note rather than a named instrument.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://southbay.portal.iworq.net/southbay/permits/600

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

The INSTALLER (or customer) notifies FPL; the AHJ does nothing. FPL's filed Tier 1 Agreement Sec. 3.4: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' Sec. 3.5 adds: 'The Customer shall notify FPL at least ten (10) calendar days prior to initially placing Customer's equipment and protective apparatus into service.' South Bay has no codified power-release duty on its own inspector — unlike neighbouring Belle Glade — but its inspector's final note on live permit #4913-26 reads 'OK to energize', so the City's sign-off is the document that unlocks the FPL step.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tier 1 Standard Interconnection Agreement Secs. 3.4 and 3.5, Second Revised Tariff Sheet No. 9.050, read first-hand. City side: the Code has no electrical chapter at all (Chapter 10 is Elections) and 'release of power' returns nothing, so there is no South Bay analogue to Belle Glade's Sec. 7-67. 92 because the ten-day notice and the certification duty are unambiguous in a filed tariff.

utility tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.

Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 88%

No. The City of South Bay specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else.

Size, colour & material 88%

Nothing from the City. From FPL: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with ENGRAVED letters. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements.' No letter height and no colour is specified — engraving and weather/UV resistance are the whole specification.

Where they go 92%

At the interconnecting meter can, and at the DER disconnect switch. Battery placard: permanently affixed to the meter enclosure. Remote-disconnect plaque: adjacent to FPL's meter socket. The disconnect itself, where required, goes separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket and WITHIN 10 FEET of it, with no locked gates, doors or fences between the two, and the plans must show the dimension.

What the utility wants on top 92%

Yes, comprehensively — and since the AHJ requires none, FPL's specification IS the signage scope of work in South Bay. Two labels are mandated (meter can, DER disconnect), both engraved on permanent weatherproof/UV-resistant placards; a third placard on the meter enclosure if battery storage is present; and a fourth, rarely quoted, where FPL agrees a remote disconnect location: 'the customer shall install a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to FPL's meter socket indicating the location of the manual disconnect switch or switches'.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Solar Requirements
Notes
Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://www.southbaycity.com/planning-and-building/pages/downloadable-forms
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
City
County
Palm Beach County
Regions covered
Authority Contact
Building Department
Booking & Scheduling