City of St. Augustine Beach
City of St. Augustine Beach
St. Johns County
City of St. Augustine Beach is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 6,803 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of St. Augustine Beach against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of St. Augustine Beach is the authority having jurisdiction 95% confidence
- Holds
- building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, roofing and solar permitting, plan review and inspection, in-house, for everything inside the city limits
- Delegated to
- St. Johns County Fire Marshal's Office for fire review and for permitting of fire safety systems (sprinklers) only. FS 553.791 private providers are accepted for plan review and inspection, with a 25% fee discount, when disclosed before permit issuance.
- Overridden by
- Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and NEC 2020 by operation of state law; FPL's Electric Service Standards Section XIII and Net Metering Guidelines govern interconnection, the AC disconnect and the placards; FS 163.04 limits private HOA restrictions on solar.
- Why not higher
- The city's own Building & Zoning page states the Building Department issues permits, performs inspections and issues COs, and names 904-471-8758 / onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org as the desk. The FS 553.80(7)(b) Building Permit and Inspection Utilization Report for FY2023-24 shows 1,465 permits issued and 2,934 inspections conducted by the city with 5 dedicated personnel. The separate Fire-sprinkler permits page says in the city's own words that 'The Beach utilizes the St. Johns County Fire Marshal's Office for our Fire reviews and for permitting of Fire safety systems... We do not permit these ourselves'. NOTHING was carried across from the City of St. Augustine file: that city is a separate authority to the north-west, named as such on this city's own Jurisdictions and Municipalities page, and none of its historic-gate or guidelines material applies here.
- Permit required
- Yes. A permit is required. Solar is not among the exemptions in the locally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.2, and the current fee resolution carries a dedicated 'F.92%
- Permit cost
- $185 base: permit issuance $35.00 plus 'Photovoltaic/thermal permit (per building/unit)' $150.00, under section F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES of Resolution 26-05 (adopted 13 July 2026).92%
- Portal
- Edmunds GovTech 'CPSS' - Construction Permit Self-Service, at https://broker.edmundsassoc.com/CPSS/?municipalId=SAUGFL.95%
- Electrical code
- NEC 2020, in force by state adoption with an effective date of 31 December 2023, as referenced by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023). The city adopts no NEC edition of its own.90%
- Own placard wording
- No. The City of St. Augustine Beach specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else.85%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal, phone or email - all three. CPSS ('log into our online portal'), or call 904-471-8758, or email the completed Inspection Request Form to onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org.95%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. A permit is required. Solar is not among the exemptions in the locally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.2, Q3 Electrical and building permits — UNRESOLVED and it matters. The fee schedule places 'F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES' as its own section, separate from 'E. Q4 Where you file — Edmunds GovTech 'CPSS' - Construction Permit Self-Service, at https://broker.edmundsassoc.com/CPSS/?municipalId=SAUGFL. Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. A permit is required. Solar is not among the exemptions in the locally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.2, and the current fee resolution carries a dedicated 'F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES' section.92% source
- What it costs
- $185 base: permit issuance $35.00 plus 'Photovoltaic/thermal permit (per building/unit)' $150.00, under section F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES of Resolution 26-05 (adopted 13 July 2026).92% source
- Key document
- codified ordinance (LDR Sec. 5.07.00-5.07.01, Art. II definitions, Art. XI Boards and Agencies) cited by 4 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes. The City of St. Augustine Beach Building Department is the AHJ for residential solar inside the city limits (the city occupies roughly 2-3 miles of Anastasia Island; St. Johns County jurisdiction begins at the city border). 95% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both. The city permits and inspects building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, roofing and solar itself. It delegates only fire review and fire-safety-system permitting to the St. Johns County Fire Marshal's Office. 92% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. A permit is required. Solar is not among the exemptions in the locally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.2, and the current fee resolution carries a dedicated 'F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES' section. 92% · adopting ordinance exhibit
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? UNRESOLVED and it matters. The fee schedule places 'F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES' as its own section, separate from 'E. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES', which reads as a single combined solar permit. But the city's Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application states on its face: 'I understand that a separate permit shall be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks and air conditioners, etc.' The two instruments point different ways and no published document reconciles them. 55% · fee resolution + permit application
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No. The city requires no HOA or architectural approval for a residential rooftop array. The only design/appearance review in the code - LDR Sec. 12.02.07.F and Appendix A 'Supplemental Criteria for Community Appearance Standards' - applies expressly and only to 'final development plans for commercial structures'. Private HOA covenants are a separate matter and are limited by FS 163.04, which the city does not restate. 88% · codified ordinance (LDR Art. XII and Appendix A)
- Is there a historic-district review? No. There is no historic-district review of any kind in this city. No certificate of appropriateness, no designation procedure, no historic preservation board, no alteration trigger, no design guidelines, no dollar-value ladder. The only historic-preservation text in the entire code is LDR Sec. 5.07.01 (added by Ord. No. 24-11, 6 November 2024), a two-sentence policy commitment: the city 'shall protect significant archaeological and historic sites by identifying sites... included in the Florida Bureau of Historic Resources' Master Site File and shall pursue the designation of those historic resources that may be nominated for inclusion on the National Register', plus a stop-work-and-evaluate clause for artefacts found during development ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. Neither limb reaches a privately owned dwelling. 90% · codified ordinance (LDR Sec. 5.07.00-5.07.01, Art. II definitions, Art. XI Boards and Agencies)
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate windstorm certification. Florida Product Approval is required: the Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application has a single-product block and the city publishes its own multi-product 'Product Approval Specification Sheet for the City of St. Augustine Beach, Florida', cited to FS 553.842 and FAC 9B-72, and asking for the approval number including the decimal. This is NOT an HVHZ jurisdiction (HVHZ is Miami-Dade and Broward only), but the city is in the ASCE 7 wind-borne debris region - the city's own Re-roof Mitigation form points installers to the St. Johns County wind-borne region map. 85% · permit form
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No. LDR Sec. 12.01.03.C expressly excepts 'The alteration of an existing building or structure so long as no change is made to its gross floor area, its use, or the amount of impervious surface on the site' from the requirement for a final development order - which is exactly a rooftop retrofit. A development permit is then issued by the building and zoning department on a departmental form and 'may be acted upon by the department without public hearing or notice' (Sec. 12.04.01). The only route to the City Commission is Sec. 6.01.04.b.1, for items forced above the height limit by other state law or the Federal Telecommunications Act. 88% · codified ordinance (LDR Sec. 12.01.03, 12.04.01)
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No city cap. The caps are FPL's: Tier 1 up to 10 kW AC, Tier 2 >10 to 100 kW, Tier 3 >100 kW to 2 MW; the system must be estimated to produce less than 115% of the customer's annual kWh consumption; customer generation is limited to 90 percent of the FPL distribution service rating, and systems exceeding 90% of existing service capacity 'may incur additional expense'. AC rating = DC array rating x 0.85. Any NEM system 50 kW or greater must interconnect at 120/208V or 277/480V wye three-phase. 88% · utility interconnection guidelines
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A licensed electrical contractor, or a qualifying owner/builder. The Electrical Permit Application requires the electrical contractor's printed name, signature, STATE LICENSE # and CITY LICENSE #, and must be notarised (physical presence or online notarisation). 88% · permit application form
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes. Every contractor must register with the city before working inside the city limits: proof of state or St. Johns County licence, proof of liability and workers' compensation insurance naming the City of St. Augustine Beach as certificate holder, and an $80 city licence fee, biennial. Replacement cards $20. A solar contractor also needs a local business tax receipt: Code Sec. 12-x contractor schedule item (pp) 'Solar installation .....$77.18'. 95% · registration form + fee resolution + codified business tax schedule
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. The city publishes an Owner/Builder General Information and Permitting page and an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement, while warning at length against being pushed into an owner/builder permit by an unlicensed contractor. 90% · department page + form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? No solar-specific submittal list is published. The general residential package is: completed and notarised Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application (owner AND contractor signatures both notarised); current warranty deed or property card; site plan per FBC 107.2.6; signed and sealed plans; Florida Product Approval Specification Sheet (FS 553.842 / FAC 9B-72); Owner Authorization Form where an agent applies; recorded Notice of Commencement before the first inspection. Electrical work adds the separate notarised Electrical Permit Application. 70% · published checklist
- How many copies, and in what format? Digital: one set, emailed to onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org, broken into separate PDF attachments each labelled by what it is (e.g. 'Site Plan', 'Energy Sheets'); anything over 25 MB must be split across multiple emails. Paper: two sets of plans and specs ('We no longer require 3 copies'), each sheet signed and sealed by the design professional - printed copies of digitally certified signatures are NOT accepted. 92% · department handout
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes, a site plan is required (FBC-Building 107.2.6). Published contents: building dimensions and all setbacks from property lines; north arrow, A/C pad, pool, fencing, driveway, sidewalks, accessory buildings; finished floor elevation, mid-lot and all lot-corner elevations; direction of surface stormwater flow; protected trees to remain (and, on in-fill lots, protected trees to be removed); septic and private well locations; area of impervious surface. Nothing solar-specific (no array outline, no module count, no equipment location requirement). 75% · published checklist
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No PV-specific structural PE threshold. But a discretionary one reaches every property in this city: Coastal Construction Code Sec. 6-75 requires that applications for building permits for all construction in the coastal building zone and on coastal barrier islands, 'if not of normal or usual design as determined by the building official', be certified by a Florida-registered architect or professional engineer stating that the design complies with the article. Sec. 6-72 defines the coastal building zone on a barrier island as 5,000 feet landward of the CCCL or the entire island, whichever is less - and St. Augustine Beach sits entirely on Anastasia Island, about one mile wide. Sec. 6-74(a)(1) applies the article to 'improvement to major structures', and a dwelling is a major structure. 70% · codified ordinance (Ch. 6 Art. VII, Ord. No. 147, 2-3-86)
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Electrical PE seal required only where the system's value exceeds $125,000 AND the aggregate service capacity exceeds 600 amperes at 240V on a residential electrical system (800A commercial/industrial). Cited to FS 471.003(2)(h). 92% · adopting ordinance exhibit
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Edmunds GovTech 'CPSS' - Construction Permit Self-Service, at https://broker.edmundsassoc.com/CPSS/?municipalId=SAUGFL. Payments run through Edmunds WIPP at https://wipp.edmundsgovtech.cloud/home?wippId=SAUG. Guest Access is open with no login and no captcha. 95% · permit portal
- Can the whole application be completed online? No, and the city says so emphatically. 'To submit applications/plans online, email onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org. We ask that you do not upload attachments through the portal, as they will not be deemed "submitted" to our office. We are not alerted to uploads; the attachments are for approved, reviewed documents only.' The portal handles records lookup, inspection requests and payment; intake is by email or in person. 95% · department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? $185 base: permit issuance $35.00 plus 'Photovoltaic/thermal permit (per building/unit)' $150.00, under section F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES of Resolution 26-05 (adopted 13 July 2026). Add plan review at 50% (see Q17), the state surcharges of 1% under FS 553.721 and 1.5% under FS 468.631 (each minimum $2.00), and a 2% City of St. Augustine Beach technology surcharge. A private provider takes 25% off the inspection fee and 25% off the plan review fee if disclosed before permit issuance. 92% · fee schedule (Resolution 26-05, 13 July 2026)
- How is the fee calculated? Flat, per building/unit ($150) plus a flat issuance fee ($35), with a percentage plan-review component and percentage surcharges on top. Not valuation-based, not per kW, not per panel. 90% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes. Under F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES item 3, plan review is '50% of permit value'. Note the wording differs from every neighbouring section: B.2.c, B.3.e, B.5.c, B.6.d and E.11 all say '50% of permit fee'. 'Permit value' and 'permit fee' are not the same quantity and the resolution never defines the former. Also: B.1.b requires the plan review fee to be paid at submittal, before review, and it is non-refundable but credited to the final permit fee. 85% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days, twice over. An application is 'deemed to have been abandoned becoming null and void 180 days after the date of filing' unless pursued in good faith or a permit issued (building official may grant extensions of up to 90 days each). An issued permit becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 180 days or is suspended/abandoned for 180 days; work is 'in active progress' when the permit has received an approved inspection within 180 days. Extension fee $53.00; permit-application extension and issued-permit extension forms are both published. 92% · adopting ordinance exhibit + permit application
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light (FPL). Not JEA, not a municipal utility, not a co-op. 95% · permit application form + budget + FMPA member list
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, wrapping the permit on both sides. FPL: 'All interconnection applications must be approved prior to installation and operation of the renewable energy system' and the customer 'must complete an application, interconnect agreement, obtain a building permit'. After construction, FPL requires a copy of the approved permit or a screen print from the local authority's website showing electrical and mechanical inspection signed off, description of work, address, permit number and building department name, before the bi-directional meter is set. Operating before the bi-directional meter is installed is 'strictly prohibited'. 88% · utility interconnection guidelines
28 questions answered against City of St. Augustine Beach’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. The City of St. Augustine Beach Building Department is the AHJ for residential solar inside the city limits (the city occupies roughly 2-3 miles of Anastasia Island; St. Johns County jurisdiction begins at the city border).
Why the confidence is not higherCity Building & Zoning page and the city's own Jurisdictions and Municipalities page, plus a first-party FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report showing the city issuing and inspecting its own permits.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/289/Jurisdictions-and-Municipalities
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both. The city permits and inspects building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, roofing and solar itself. It delegates only fire review and fire-safety-system permitting to the St. Johns County Fire Marshal's Office.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding & Zoning page plus the Fire-sprinkler permits page, which states the delegation in the city's own words. Residential rooftop PV would not normally route to fire review at all.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/294/Fire-sprinkler-permits
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. A permit is required. Solar is not among the exemptions in the locally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.2, and the current fee resolution carries a dedicated 'F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES' section.
Why the confidence is not higherLocally adopted 2023 FBC Chapter 1 (Ord. 23-10, Exhibit A) lists 19 building exemptions and 3 electrical exemptions; none covers solar or PV. Resolution 26-05, adopted 13 July 2026, prices a 'Photovoltaic/thermal permit'.
adopting ordinance exhibit checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/282/2023-FBC-Locally-Adopted-Chapter-1
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
UNRESOLVED and it matters. The fee schedule places 'F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES' as its own section, separate from 'E. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES', which reads as a single combined solar permit. But the city's Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application states on its face: 'I understand that a separate permit shall be secured for electrical work, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, furnaces, boilers, heaters, tanks and air conditioners, etc.' The two instruments point different ways and no published document reconciles them.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo of the authority's own current documents disagree. Recorded as a conflict rather than picked, because a wrong answer here changes the fee and the inspection count on every job.
fee resolution + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A licensed electrical contractor, or a qualifying owner/builder. The Electrical Permit Application requires the electrical contractor's printed name, signature, STATE LICENSE # and CITY LICENSE #, and must be notarised (physical presence or online notarisation).
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the city's Electrical Permit Application, revision 09/19/2024. The owner/builder route is separately documented with a disclosure statement.
permit application form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/500/Electrical-Permit-Application
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes. Every contractor must register with the city before working inside the city limits: proof of state or St. Johns County licence, proof of liability and workers' compensation insurance naming the City of St. Augustine Beach as certificate holder, and an $80 city licence fee, biennial. Replacement cards $20. A solar contractor also needs a local business tax receipt: Code Sec. 12-x contractor schedule item (pp) 'Solar installation .....$77.18'.
Why the confidence is not higherContractor Registration Form states the requirement and the $80 fee; Resolution 26-05 item A.13 repeats 'issuance and/or renewal of a construction contractor license is $80.00 and is biennial'. The $77.18 line is a BUSINESS TAX RECEIPT rate in Chapter 12, NOT a permit fee - it sits in an alphabetical contractor list between 'Siding, gutters, soffit, fascia' and 'Sprinkler system'. Easy to misread as a solar permit fee; it is not one.
registration form + fee resolution + codified business tax schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/503/Contractor-Registration-Form
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes. The city publishes an Owner/Builder General Information and Permitting page and an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement, while warning at length against being pushed into an owner/builder permit by an unlicensed contractor.
Why the confidence is not higherDedicated city page plus the disclosure form; standard FS 489.103(7) route.
department page + form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/291/OwnerBuilder-General-Information-and-Per
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
No solar-specific submittal list is published. The general residential package is: completed and notarised Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application (owner AND contractor signatures both notarised); current warranty deed or property card; site plan per FBC 107.2.6; signed and sealed plans; Florida Product Approval Specification Sheet (FS 553.842 / FAC 9B-72); Owner Authorization Form where an agent applies; recorded Notice of Commencement before the first inspection. Electrical work adds the separate notarised Electrical Permit Application.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the Residential Sufficiency Checklist, the Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application and the Steps to Permitting handout. The sufficiency checklist is written for new construction (it asks for a paid St. Johns County utility tap receipt, energy sheets and truss engineering), so it over-specifies a rooftop PV retrofit and nothing published tells an installer which lines fall away.
published checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/542/Residential-Sufficiency-Checklist
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Digital: one set, emailed to onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org, broken into separate PDF attachments each labelled by what it is (e.g. 'Site Plan', 'Energy Sheets'); anything over 25 MB must be split across multiple emails. Paper: two sets of plans and specs ('We no longer require 3 copies'), each sheet signed and sealed by the design professional - printed copies of digitally certified signatures are NOT accepted.
Why the confidence is not higherStated on the Building & Zoning page and in the Steps to Permitting handout in the city's own words.
department handout checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/557/Steps-to-Permitting
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes, a site plan is required (FBC-Building 107.2.6). Published contents: building dimensions and all setbacks from property lines; north arrow, A/C pad, pool, fencing, driveway, sidewalks, accessory buildings; finished floor elevation, mid-lot and all lot-corner elevations; direction of surface stormwater flow; protected trees to remain (and, on in-fill lots, protected trees to be removed); septic and private well locations; area of impervious surface. Nothing solar-specific (no array outline, no module count, no equipment location requirement).
Why the confidence is not higherResidential Plan Review Checklist, SITE PLAN section. The checklist names its own authority throughout ('City of St. Augustine Beach - Building Inspection Division', 'PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET FOR THE CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH, FLORIDA') - it is NOT contaminated from another jurisdiction. But its header says 'Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023)' while its footer says 'Draft Update February 3, 2021', so the document contradicts itself on its own vintage.
published checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/543/Residential-Plan-Review-Checklist
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedResidential Plan Review Checklist (2 pp), Residential Sufficiency Checklist, Commercial Sufficiency Checklist, Steps to Permitting, Electrical Permit Application, Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application, and the whole 66-document Forms & Applications index. No one-line or three-line diagram requirement appears anywhere. FPL requires an SLD for its own interconnection application, but that is the utility's document, not the AHJ's.
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame set as Q11. The Residential Plan Review Checklist has a LOAD CALCULATIONS section but it is ACCA Manual J HVAC sizing, not PV string or conductor calculations. No electrical calculation requirement is published.
https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/543/Residential-Plan-Review-Checklist
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No PV-specific structural PE threshold. But a discretionary one reaches every property in this city: Coastal Construction Code Sec. 6-75 requires that applications for building permits for all construction in the coastal building zone and on coastal barrier islands, 'if not of normal or usual design as determined by the building official', be certified by a Florida-registered architect or professional engineer stating that the design complies with the article. Sec. 6-72 defines the coastal building zone on a barrier island as 5,000 feet landward of the CCCL or the entire island, whichever is less - and St. Augustine Beach sits entirely on Anastasia Island, about one mile wide. Sec. 6-74(a)(1) applies the article to 'improvement to major structures', and a dwelling is a major structure.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the codified text. The trigger is the building official's judgement of 'normal or usual design', which is unpublished, so the practical threshold for a rooftop array cannot be stated - only the fact that the discretion exists and covers the whole city.
codified ordinance (Ch. 6 Art. VII, Ord. No. 147, 2-3-86) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Electrical PE seal required only where the system's value exceeds $125,000 AND the aggregate service capacity exceeds 600 amperes at 240V on a residential electrical system (800A commercial/industrial). Cited to FS 471.003(2)(h).
Why the confidence is not higherLocally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.3.1.2 item 5, current 2023 edition. This is the CURRENT statutory threshold - the city is not carrying the stale $50,000 figure some Florida authorities still print.
adopting ordinance exhibit checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/282/2023-FBC-Locally-Adopted-Chapter-1
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
$185 base: permit issuance $35.00 plus 'Photovoltaic/thermal permit (per building/unit)' $150.00, under section F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES of Resolution 26-05 (adopted 13 July 2026). Add plan review at 50% (see Q17), the state surcharges of 1% under FS 553.721 and 1.5% under FS 468.631 (each minimum $2.00), and a 2% City of St. Augustine Beach technology surcharge. A private provider takes 25% off the inspection fee and 25% off the plan review fee if disclosed before permit issuance.
Why the confidence is not higherRead line by line from the current fee resolution. One caveat that would change the total: the 2% technology surcharge is worded as applying 'on all building, mechanical, gas, electric and plumbing permits' - solar is its own section F and is not named, so whether the surcharge attaches to a solar permit is not settled by the document.
fee schedule (Resolution 26-05, 13 July 2026) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Flat, per building/unit ($150) plus a flat issuance fee ($35), with a percentage plan-review component and percentage surcharges on top. Not valuation-based, not per kW, not per panel.
Why the confidence is not higherSection F of Resolution 26-05 prices the PV permit 'per building/unit' with no size or value variable, in contrast to the electrical section which is banded by amperes.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes. Under F. SOLAR PERMIT FEES item 3, plan review is '50% of permit value'. Note the wording differs from every neighbouring section: B.2.c, B.3.e, B.5.c, B.6.d and E.11 all say '50% of permit fee'. 'Permit value' and 'permit fee' are not the same quantity and the resolution never defines the former. Also: B.1.b requires the plan review fee to be paid at submittal, before review, and it is non-refundable but credited to the final permit fee.
Why the confidence is not higherA real internal inconsistency in the current fee resolution, flagged rather than resolved. If read as 50% of the $185 permit fee, plan review is ~$92.50; if read as 50% of the declared job value it would be enormous, which cannot be the intent - but the document says what it says.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding & Zoning page, Steps to Permitting, the locally adopted 2023 FBC Chapter 1 (43 pp), Resolution 26-05, and the CPSS portal. The city publishes NO business-day plan-review clock. FBC Ch.1 105.3.1 says only that the building official shall examine applications 'within a reasonable time after filing' and shall issue 'as soon as practicable'. Steps to Permitting says 'Residential roofing, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing permits can be issued immediately in person' - solar is conspicuously NOT in that list, and no turnaround is stated for it. The FS 553.792 statutory clock applies by operation of law but is not restated locally, and no FS 553.792(1)(d) policy is published. Searched the city site for '553.792' - zero results (controls: 'electrical' 289 results, 'zzqqxfoo' no results). No waiver of FS 553.792 appears on any application form.
https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/557/Steps-to-Permitting
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days, twice over. An application is 'deemed to have been abandoned becoming null and void 180 days after the date of filing' unless pursued in good faith or a permit issued (building official may grant extensions of up to 90 days each). An issued permit becomes null and void if work is not commenced within 180 days or is suspended/abandoned for 180 days; work is 'in active progress' when the permit has received an approved inspection within 180 days. Extension fee $53.00; permit-application extension and issued-permit extension forms are both published.
Why the confidence is not higherLocally adopted FBC Chapter 1 sections 105.3.2 and 105.4.1.3, plus the notice printed on the face of both the Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application and the Electrical Permit Application.
adopting ordinance exhibit + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/282/2023-FBC-Locally-Adopted-Chapter-1
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Edmunds GovTech 'CPSS' - Construction Permit Self-Service, at https://broker.edmundsassoc.com/CPSS/?municipalId=SAUGFL. Payments run through Edmunds WIPP at https://wipp.edmundsgovtech.cloud/home?wippId=SAUG. Guest Access is open with no login and no captcha.
Why the confidence is not higherLinked from the city's Building & Zoning page and confirmed by opening it: the landing page is branded 'CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE BEACH, FL - Construction Permit Self-Service'. CPSS is a GWT application - plain curl returns a 2.6 KB bootstrap shell with no content, so a rendered browser is required. Vendor note for the catalogue: Edmunds GovTech / CPSS.
permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://broker.edmundsassoc.com/CPSS/?municipalId=SAUGFL
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No, and the city says so emphatically. 'To submit applications/plans online, email onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org. We ask that you do not upload attachments through the portal, as they will not be deemed "submitted" to our office. We are not alerted to uploads; the attachments are for approved, reviewed documents only.' The portal handles records lookup, inspection requests and payment; intake is by email or in person.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the city's Building & Zoning page. This is an unusual and commercially important split - an installer who uploads a package to CPSS has not applied.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/288/Building-Zoning
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Florida Power & Light (FPL). Not JEA, not a municipal utility, not a co-op.
Why the confidence is not higherProved first-party three ways and the caller's three hypotheses were tested, not assumed. (1) The city's own Electrical Permit Application prints 'SERVICE FROM: FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT' as fixed text at the top - no blank, no checkbox. (2) The city's Early Power Agreement & Release Request prints 'Power Company: Florida Power & Light' and refers to an 'FPL TUG service check'. (3) fmpa.com/members/ lists every Florida municipal utility and St. Augustine Beach is NOT among them, while the FY2026 budget books 'Franchise Fees - Electric $496,000' beside 'Franchise Fee - Gas $0.00' - a present electric franchise line is the positive form of the diagnostic that proves a municipal utility by its absence.
permit application form + budget + FMPA member list checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/500/Electrical-Permit-Application
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, wrapping the permit on both sides. FPL: 'All interconnection applications must be approved prior to installation and operation of the renewable energy system' and the customer 'must complete an application, interconnect agreement, obtain a building permit'. After construction, FPL requires a copy of the approved permit or a screen print from the local authority's website showing electrical and mechanical inspection signed off, description of work, address, permit number and building department name, before the bi-directional meter is set. Operating before the bi-directional meter is installed is 'strictly prohibited'.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Net Metering Guidelines, current page. The city imposes no sequencing rule of its own; nothing in the code or the forms conditions a solar permit on utility approval.
utility interconnection guidelines checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No. The city requires no HOA or architectural approval for a residential rooftop array. The only design/appearance review in the code - LDR Sec. 12.02.07.F and Appendix A 'Supplemental Criteria for Community Appearance Standards' - applies expressly and only to 'final development plans for commercial structures'. Private HOA covenants are a separate matter and are limited by FS 163.04, which the city does not restate.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the scoping language of 12.02.07.F and of the Supplemental Criteria appendix directly; both say commercial. A 1.5 MB whole-code search returned zero hits for '163.04' and no HOA approval requirement anywhere (the four 'homeowners association' hits are about flexible tree setbacks, stormwater facility maintenance, private roadway ownership and a definition).
codified ordinance (LDR Art. XII and Appendix A) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No. There is no historic-district review of any kind in this city. No certificate of appropriateness, no designation procedure, no historic preservation board, no alteration trigger, no design guidelines, no dollar-value ladder. The only historic-preservation text in the entire code is LDR Sec. 5.07.01 (added by Ord. No. 24-11, 6 November 2024), a two-sentence policy commitment: the city 'shall protect significant archaeological and historic sites by identifying sites... included in the Florida Bureau of Historic Resources' Master Site File and shall pursue the designation of those historic resources that may be nominated for inclusion on the National Register', plus a stop-work-and-evaluate clause for artefacts found during development ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. Neither limb reaches a privately owned dwelling.
Why the confidence is not higherSearched MECHANISMS, not titles, across the full 1.5 MB corpus with controls passing in the same run (positive 'electrical' 27 hits, fabricated 'zzqqx' 0 hits): 'certificate of appropriateness' 0, 'preservation board' 0, 'historic district' 0, 'architectural review' 0, 'design review' 0, 'appurtenances' 2 (neither historic), 'shall not issue' 1 (not historic). The single 'landmark' hit is the city-seal ordinance forbidding use of the seal to designate landmarks. ONE DANGLING ENABLING CLAUSE: the LDR definition of 'Development' at Sec. 2.00.00 includes item 6, 'Alteration of a historic property for which authorization is required under this Code' - but no section of this Code requires such authorization. It is an enabling clause pointing at nothing. NOTHING was carried across from the City of St. Augustine, which is a separate authority.
codified ordinance (LDR Sec. 5.07.00-5.07.01, Art. II definitions, Art. XI Boards and Agencies) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No separate windstorm certification. Florida Product Approval is required: the Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application has a single-product block and the city publishes its own multi-product 'Product Approval Specification Sheet for the City of St. Augustine Beach, Florida', cited to FS 553.842 and FAC 9B-72, and asking for the approval number including the decimal. This is NOT an HVHZ jurisdiction (HVHZ is Miami-Dade and Broward only), but the city is in the ASCE 7 wind-borne debris region - the city's own Re-roof Mitigation form points installers to the St. Johns County wind-borne region map.
Why the confidence is not higherProduct approval requirement read from the application and checklist. The wind-borne debris point is inferred from the city's own reroof form, which applies the FS 553.844 wind-borne-region test.
permit form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/546/Product-Approval-Specification-Sheet
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No. LDR Sec. 12.01.03.C expressly excepts 'The alteration of an existing building or structure so long as no change is made to its gross floor area, its use, or the amount of impervious surface on the site' from the requirement for a final development order - which is exactly a rooftop retrofit. A development permit is then issued by the building and zoning department on a departmental form and 'may be acted upon by the department without public hearing or notice' (Sec. 12.04.01). The only route to the City Commission is Sec. 6.01.04.b.1, for items forced above the height limit by other state law or the Federal Telecommunications Act.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the exception list and the procedure section directly. Clean staff-level path for a roof-mounted array.
codified ordinance (LDR Sec. 12.01.03, 12.04.01) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No city cap. The caps are FPL's: Tier 1 up to 10 kW AC, Tier 2 >10 to 100 kW, Tier 3 >100 kW to 2 MW; the system must be estimated to produce less than 115% of the customer's annual kWh consumption; customer generation is limited to 90 percent of the FPL distribution service rating, and systems exceeding 90% of existing service capacity 'may incur additional expense'. AC rating = DC array rating x 0.85. Any NEM system 50 kW or greater must interconnect at 120/208V or 277/480V wye three-phase.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Net Metering Guidelines and ESS Section XIII, both current. Whole-code search found no generation cap, no kW limit and no roof-coverage limit in the city's own instruments.
utility interconnection guidelines checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020, in force by state adoption with an effective date of 31 December 2023, as referenced by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023). The city adopts no NEC edition of its own. 90% · permit application form + state adoption
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023). Code Sec. 6-1: 'The 2023 edition of the Building Officials Association of Florida (BOAF) Model Administrative Code Chapter 1 for the 8th Edition (2023) of the Florida Building Code, entitled "Scope and Administration", as modified in attached Exhibit "A", is adopted by reference' (Ord. No. 20-16, 1-4-21; Ord. No. 23-10, 1-8-24). The city publishes both the 2020 and 2023 locally adopted Chapter 1 PDFs. 95% · adopting ordinance + published exhibit
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code (currently 8th Edition, 2023) by operation of state law, referenced by LDR Sec. 6.07.09 (Ord. No. 18-08, 7-2-18): 'For provisions related to fire prevention, refer to the Florida Fire Prevention Code.' THE CODIFIED FIRE CHAPTER IS A FOSSIL AND CONTRADICTS THIS: Code Sec. 9-16, still on the books and last touched in 1995, reads 'There is adopted by reference the 1994 edition of the Standard Fire Prevention Code, as promulgated by the Southern Building Code Congress' - a model code that ceased to exist. Chapter 9 contains nothing else; Secs. 9-1 to 9-15 are Reserved. 80% · codified ordinance (Ch. 9 Art. II and LDR Sec. 6.07.09)
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. (a) FBC Chapter 1 is adopted 'as modified in attached Exhibit A' - the local modifications include a city-specific permit-exemption list (e.g. fences over 6 ft other than masonry are exempt EXCEPT on the A1A Beach Boulevard right-of-way boundary; sheds under 120 sq ft and wooden decks under 12 inches are exempt only if NOT in a special flood hazard area). (b) A 1986 Coastal Construction Code (Ch. 6 Art. VII) applies to the whole barrier island. (c) LDR Sec. 6.01.04.b caps rooftop equipment at 10 feet above the structure. (d) LDR Sec. 5.01.01.C.5 is a solar-specific tree-removal provision. (e) LDR Sec. 5.03.07 is the state model floodplain ordinance adopted by Ord. No. 18-01. 85% · adopting ordinance exhibit + codified ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? FBC 8th Edition (2023) and NEC 2020, plus - for any construction in the coastal building zone, which on this barrier island is the whole city - the city's own Coastal Construction Code, Ch. 6 Art. VII. Sec. 6-73 provides that where this article conflicts with other codes, 'the requirements resulting in more restrictive design shall apply'. 85% · codified ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of St. Augustine Beach on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Required, to NEC 2020 Article 690.12, by operation of the Florida Building Code. Neither the city code nor any city form restates or amends rapid shutdown - a whole-code search for 'rapid shutdown' returned zero hits with controls passing. 80% · adopted code edition
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The city specifies no placards at all. FPL does, and its Electric Service Standards Section XIII (revision dated 10-30-25) gives the exact wording. AT THE INTERCONNECTING METER CAN: 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / [enter sources here] / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. AT THE DER DISCONNECT SWITCH: 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. BATTERY: 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility."' Plus, for tier 2/3, a sign at the meter noting the location of the disconnect switch and a warning sign on the switch indicating that both sides may be energized. NEC 2020 Article 690/705 labels apply on top by code. 90% · utility electric service standards, Section XIII rev. 10-30-25
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No. The City of St. Augustine Beach specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else. 85% · codified ordinance + published forms
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? City: nothing. FPL: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with engraved letters. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements.' No letter height and no colour are specified anywhere in FPL Section XIII. 88% · utility electric service standards
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, decisively. Every placard on a St. Augustine Beach solar job comes from FPL, not from the AHJ - the city requires none. See Q38 for the wording and Q40 for the material spec. 90% · utility electric service standards
- Where must the labels be placed? FPL: at the interconnecting meter can, and at the DER disconnect switch. The battery placard goes on the meter enclosure. For tier 2/3, a sign noting the disconnect switch location goes at the meter, and a 'both sides may be energized' warning goes on the switch itself. 88% · utility electric service standards
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Depends on tier AND on tap point, and for a normal residential job the answer is NO DISCONNECT. FPL ESS Section XIII (rev. 10-30-25): 'All tier 2 and tier 3 systems require an FPL approved visually open Distributed Energy Resource (DER) disconnect switch... mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket within 10 feet and must always remain accessible to FPL. Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch. There shall be no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' Tier 1 is 10 kW AC and below, so a typical residential array is exempt. THE REAL DOMESTIC TRIGGER IS THE TAP POINT: 'FPL recommends that all interconnections will be performed on the load side of the customer's main electrical panel. If the interconnection is performed on the line side of the customers main electrical panel (per NEC) a manual AC disconnect is required between AC generation output and the point of interconnection to FPL facilities' - again separate from but adjacent to the meter socket, within 10 feet. Switch spec: visible open (blades, jaws and air gap visible, not obscured by a dead-front or arc-shield), lockable open, must accept a 3/8-inch FPL padlock shank on the cover hasp, must not be modified to accept the lock, enclosure grounded, blades de-energized when open per NEC 404.6(C). 92% · utility electric service standards, Section XIII rev. 10-30-25
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, on two separate lists. (1) Florida Product Approval - FS 553.842 / FAC 9B-72 - evidenced by the city's own Product Approval Specification Sheet, which asks for the 'Florida / Miami Dade Product Approval Number (including decimal number)'. (2) FPL requires a UL 1741 SA and IEEE 1547 certified grid-interactive inverter: 'Inverters that have not been certified to UL Standard will be denied interconnection'; the 2025 ESS prefers UL 1741 SB. Battery equipment must be NRTL-certified to UL 1741, or DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device. 88% · permit form + utility guidelines
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, under FPL's policy; the city code is completely silent (zero hits for 'battery' or 'energy storage' in 1.5 MB of code, controls passing). FPL: NRTL certification to UL 1741; placard on the meter enclosure; energy stored by a PV-coupled battery is for the customer's use only and 'at this time the customer may not export power from the battery to the grid'; a battery installed WITHOUT renewable generation and intended as emergency backup may be charged from the grid and needs NO interconnection agreement, but the customer must ensure no back-feed; a battery designed to charge from the grid and operate interconnected must be notified to FPL, currently via a Small Generator Interconnection Application. 85% · utility electric service standards
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? No solar-specific ground-mount provision exists. A ground-mounted array would be handled as an accessory structure under LDR Sec. 7.01.01 (general standards for accessory structures) and, if in the special flood hazard area, as 'other development' under LDR Sec. 5.03.07(c)(5), which requires it to be located and constructed to minimise flood damage, anchored against flotation, built of flood damage-resistant materials, and to have its mechanical and electrical systems above the design flood elevation. 65% · codified ordinance (LDR Art. VII, Sec. 5.03.07)
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local service-upgrade or busbar rule. The city prices electrical permits by ampere band (0-150A $85, 151-400A $125, 401-1000A $175, 1001A+ $0.175/amp) and has a 'Service change per meter/unit $65.00' line, but imposes no technical rule. The operative constraint is FPL's: customer generation limited to 90 percent of the FPL distribution service rating, with FPL upsizing facilities at the customer's expense. 70% · fee schedule + utility guidelines
20 questions answered against City of St. Augustine Beach’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
NEC 2020, in force by state adoption with an effective date of 31 December 2023, as referenced by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023). The city adopts no NEC edition of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherThe city's instruments print the FBC edition, never an NEC year - the Electrical Permit Application says only 'the adopted edition of the National Electric Code'. Recorded as 2020 per the Florida state position; the '2023' that appears on this city's documents is the FBC 8th Edition label, not an NEC edition.
permit application form + state adoption checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/500/Electrical-Permit-Application
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023). Code Sec. 6-1: 'The 2023 edition of the Building Officials Association of Florida (BOAF) Model Administrative Code Chapter 1 for the 8th Edition (2023) of the Florida Building Code, entitled "Scope and Administration", as modified in attached Exhibit "A", is adopted by reference' (Ord. No. 20-16, 1-4-21; Ord. No. 23-10, 1-8-24). The city publishes both the 2020 and 2023 locally adopted Chapter 1 PDFs.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified adopting section plus the city's own published Exhibit A. The editor's note says Exhibit A 'is not set out herein' in the code, but the city publishes it as a 43-page PDF on the Building & Zoning page - so the amendment text IS reachable, contrary to what the code note implies.
adopting ordinance + published exhibit checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/282/2023-FBC-Locally-Adopted-Chapter-1
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code (currently 8th Edition, 2023) by operation of state law, referenced by LDR Sec. 6.07.09 (Ord. No. 18-08, 7-2-18): 'For provisions related to fire prevention, refer to the Florida Fire Prevention Code.' THE CODIFIED FIRE CHAPTER IS A FOSSIL AND CONTRADICTS THIS: Code Sec. 9-16, still on the books and last touched in 1995, reads 'There is adopted by reference the 1994 edition of the Standard Fire Prevention Code, as promulgated by the Southern Building Code Congress' - a model code that ceased to exist. Chapter 9 contains nothing else; Secs. 9-1 to 9-15 are Reserved.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth texts read in full. The 2018 LDR section is later and points at the live state code, and state law would preempt the 1994 SFPC in any event, but a search of the fire chapter alone would return the wrong answer.
codified ordinance (Ch. 9 Art. II and LDR Sec. 6.07.09) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes. (a) FBC Chapter 1 is adopted 'as modified in attached Exhibit A' - the local modifications include a city-specific permit-exemption list (e.g. fences over 6 ft other than masonry are exempt EXCEPT on the A1A Beach Boulevard right-of-way boundary; sheds under 120 sq ft and wooden decks under 12 inches are exempt only if NOT in a special flood hazard area). (b) A 1986 Coastal Construction Code (Ch. 6 Art. VII) applies to the whole barrier island. (c) LDR Sec. 6.01.04.b caps rooftop equipment at 10 feet above the structure. (d) LDR Sec. 5.01.01.C.5 is a solar-specific tree-removal provision. (e) LDR Sec. 5.03.07 is the state model floodplain ordinance adopted by Ord. No. 18-01.
Why the confidence is not higherEach amendment read in its own text. Exhibit A is published as a PDF rather than codified, so a code-only search understates the local amendment set.
adopting ordinance exhibit + codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/282/2023-FBC-Locally-Adopted-Chapter-1
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
FBC 8th Edition (2023) and NEC 2020, plus - for any construction in the coastal building zone, which on this barrier island is the whole city - the city's own Coastal Construction Code, Ch. 6 Art. VII. Sec. 6-73 provides that where this article conflicts with other codes, 'the requirements resulting in more restrictive design shall apply'.
Why the confidence is not higherAdopting sections read directly. The Coastal Code's own technical content is obsolete (see Q35 not_found note) but its conflict-resolution clause and its PE-certification trigger are live.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No local service-upgrade or busbar rule. The city prices electrical permits by ampere band (0-150A $85, 151-400A $125, 401-1000A $175, 1001A+ $0.175/amp) and has a 'Service change per meter/unit $65.00' line, but imposes no technical rule. The operative constraint is FPL's: customer generation limited to 90 percent of the FPL distribution service rating, with FPL upsizing facilities at the customer's expense.
Why the confidence is not higherWhole-code search plus the fee resolution; the absence of a local rule is proved, the FPL limit is quoted.
fee schedule + utility guidelines checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedWhole codified corpus (1.51 MB harvested node-by-node from api.municode.com, Supp. 16, codified through Ord. 25-11 of 6 Oct 2025), the locally adopted FBC Chapter 1, and all published forms. No mounting system, attachment spacing or racking requirement for solar. NOTE ON THE COASTAL CODE: Ch. 6 Art. VII does carry structural requirements, but they are a 1986 fossil - Sec. 6-87(h)(2) requires design 'in accordance with Section 1205 of the 1986 revisions to the 1985 Standard Building Code using a fastest mile-wind velocity of one hundred ten (110) miles per hour', and Sec. 6-72 defines elevations against NGVD 1929, with design guidance pointed at the 1984 Shore Protection Manual. All of it is superseded by the FBC and ASCE 7 and none of it speaks to rooftop equipment attachment.
https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedWhole codified corpus (zero hits for 'NFPA', 'rapid shutdown', 'access pathway', 'ridge setback'; controls passing), Chapter 9 Fire Prevention and Protection in full (it contains one live section, Sec. 9-16, adopting the defunct 1994 Standard Fire Prevention Code), LDR Sec. 6.07.09, and the Fire-sprinkler permits page. The city adopts no local fire amendment and sets no PV ridge setback or access pathway. Whatever applies comes from the Florida Fire Prevention Code by state adoption, and the St. Johns County Fire Marshal's role here is limited to fire-safety-system permitting, which a residential rooftop array does not trigger.
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Required, to NEC 2020 Article 690.12, by operation of the Florida Building Code. Neither the city code nor any city form restates or amends rapid shutdown - a whole-code search for 'rapid shutdown' returned zero hits with controls passing.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the adopted code edition; the city adds nothing. Recorded as the state floor, not as a local rule.
adopted code edition checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/500/Electrical-Permit-Application
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The city specifies no placards at all. FPL does, and its Electric Service Standards Section XIII (revision dated 10-30-25) gives the exact wording. AT THE INTERCONNECTING METER CAN: 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / [enter sources here] / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. AT THE DER DISCONNECT SWITCH: 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'. BATTERY: 'A placard must be permanently affixed to the meter enclosure stating "Battery storage utilized in this facility."' Plus, for tier 2/3, a sign at the meter noting the location of the disconnect switch and a warning sign on the switch indicating that both sides may be energized. NEC 2020 Article 690/705 labels apply on top by code.
Why the confidence is not higherExtracted by OCR from FPL ESS pages 161-172 (Section XIII pages 1-13). IMPORTANT EXTRACTION NOTE: pdftotext returns Section XIII as garbage - the later pages of electric-service-standards.pdf use a custom font encoding and come out as mojibake. Rendering at 200 dpi with pdftoppm and running tesseract recovers it cleanly. The meter-can WARNING label sits under section A.6 'Labeling', which governs net metering generally (all tiers); the DER disconnect label only arises where a DER disconnect is required. FPL's own HTML guidelines page does not reproduce this wording, so the ESS is the document to cite.
utility electric service standards, Section XIII rev. 10-30-25 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No. The City of St. Augustine Beach specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else.
Why the confidence is not higherWhole-code search across 1.5 MB with controls passing returned zero hits for placard, label wording, or signage requirements outside Article VIII (commercial/advertising signs, which is about sign permits and has nothing to do with equipment labelling). The published forms and the fee schedule are likewise silent.
codified ordinance + published forms checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
City: nothing. FPL: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with engraved letters. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements.' No letter height and no colour are specified anywhere in FPL Section XIII.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the OCR of FPL ESS Section XIII page 2 and repeated verbatim on page 9. The material requirement (permanent, weatherproof/UV resistant, engraved) is a real manufacturing spec; the absence of a height or colour spec is a genuine gap in FPL's own document, not a failure to look.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedWhole codified corpus, all published forms, Resolution 26-05, and FPL ESS Section XIII pages 1-13 (OCR'd). Nobody restates NEC 690.56 / 705.10. FPL requires a single-line diagram and meter numbers on its interconnection submission, and requires a sign at the meter noting the DER disconnect LOCATION for tier 2/3 - but neither is a site-plan or facility-map placard on the building. No AHJ requirement exists.
https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, decisively. Every placard on a St. Augustine Beach solar job comes from FPL, not from the AHJ - the city requires none. See Q38 for the wording and Q40 for the material spec.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth sides established first-party: the city's silence proved by controlled whole-code and forms search, FPL's requirement quoted from its current ESS.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
FPL: at the interconnecting meter can, and at the DER disconnect switch. The battery placard goes on the meter enclosure. For tier 2/3, a sign noting the disconnect switch location goes at the meter, and a 'both sides may be energized' warning goes on the switch itself.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL ESS Section XIII, A.6 Labeling: 'The following labels must be installed at the interconnecting meter can and the DER disconnect switch.' The city specifies no placement.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, on two separate lists. (1) Florida Product Approval - FS 553.842 / FAC 9B-72 - evidenced by the city's own Product Approval Specification Sheet, which asks for the 'Florida / Miami Dade Product Approval Number (including decimal number)'. (2) FPL requires a UL 1741 SA and IEEE 1547 certified grid-interactive inverter: 'Inverters that have not been certified to UL Standard will be denied interconnection'; the 2025 ESS prefers UL 1741 SB. Battery equipment must be NRTL-certified to UL 1741, or DC-coupled behind a UL 1741 listed device.
Why the confidence is not higherProduct approval from the city's form; the inverter and battery listing requirements quoted from FPL's current guidelines and ESS Section XIII.
permit form + utility guidelines checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/546/Product-Approval-Specification-Sheet
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Permitted, under FPL's policy; the city code is completely silent (zero hits for 'battery' or 'energy storage' in 1.5 MB of code, controls passing). FPL: NRTL certification to UL 1741; placard on the meter enclosure; energy stored by a PV-coupled battery is for the customer's use only and 'at this time the customer may not export power from the battery to the grid'; a battery installed WITHOUT renewable generation and intended as emergency backup may be charged from the grid and needs NO interconnection agreement, but the customer must ensure no back-feed; a battery designed to charge from the grid and operate interconnected must be notified to FPL, currently via a Small Generator Interconnection Application.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL ESS Section XIII part D, OCR'd, cross-checked against the HTML guidelines page which carries the same policy in shorter form.
utility electric service standards checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedResolution 26-05 in full (11 pp, every fee section read - there is no ESS, battery or energy-storage line anywhere; the nearest is 'Generator $65.00' under electrical, which has its own published Generator Worksheet), the whole codified corpus (zero hits for 'battery' or 'energy storage'), the Forms & Applications index, and the Inspection Request Form (no ESS inspection type). The city has no separate ESS permit and no ESS inspection. A battery would be priced and inspected as electrical work.
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
No solar-specific ground-mount provision exists. A ground-mounted array would be handled as an accessory structure under LDR Sec. 7.01.01 (general standards for accessory structures) and, if in the special flood hazard area, as 'other development' under LDR Sec. 5.03.07(c)(5), which requires it to be located and constructed to minimise flood damage, anchored against flotation, built of flood damage-resistant materials, and to have its mechanical and electrical systems above the design flood elevation.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from two of the authority's own codified sections, not from any text naming solar. LDR Art. VII contains only four accessory-structure sections (general standards, pools/hot tubs, fences/retaining walls, temporary construction fences) and none contemplates a generating array, so an installer should expect a judgement call at the counter.
codified ordinance (LDR Art. VII, Sec. 5.03.07) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine_beach/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Depends on tier AND on tap point, and for a normal residential job the answer is NO DISCONNECT. FPL ESS Section XIII (rev. 10-30-25): 'All tier 2 and tier 3 systems require an FPL approved visually open Distributed Energy Resource (DER) disconnect switch... mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket within 10 feet and must always remain accessible to FPL. Plans must show dimensions between the location of the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch. There shall be no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' Tier 1 is 10 kW AC and below, so a typical residential array is exempt. THE REAL DOMESTIC TRIGGER IS THE TAP POINT: 'FPL recommends that all interconnections will be performed on the load side of the customer's main electrical panel. If the interconnection is performed on the line side of the customers main electrical panel (per NEC) a manual AC disconnect is required between AC generation output and the point of interconnection to FPL facilities' - again separate from but adjacent to the meter socket, within 10 feet. Switch spec: visible open (blades, jaws and air gap visible, not obscured by a dead-front or arc-shield), lockable open, must accept a 3/8-inch FPL padlock shank on the cover hasp, must not be modified to accept the lock, enclosure grounded, blades de-energized when open per NEC 404.6(C).
Why the confidence is not higherOCR'd from FPL ESS Section XIII pages 1-2 and page 7 ('DER Disconnect Switch Utility Requirements'), dated 10-30-25, and corroborated by FPL's current HTML guidelines page which independently scopes the disconnect to tiers 2 and 3. This confirms the caller's note and supersedes any older tier-1-disconnect claim.
utility electric service standards, Section XIII rev. 10-30-25 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal, phone or email - all three. CPSS ('log into our online portal'), or call 904-471-8758, or email the completed Inspection Request Form to onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org. 95% · department page + form
- How much notice is required? Next business day. The CPSS login page carries the standing notice: 'PLEASE ALLOW UNTIL THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOR SCHEDULING AND RESULTS OF ALL INSPECTIONS.' One exception found: the reroof 'In Progress' inspection 'must be scheduled prior to 8:00 a.m. on the day the inspection is needed.' 85% · permit portal notice + published form
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No AM/PM windows are offered. The city's own language for an in-progress inspection is: 'The inspector will arrive and inspect your work at any stage. You are not required to wait for the inspector or leave any area exposed to the weather.' If no access is provided, or the approved job-copy plans are not available, a $20.00 fee is assessed to the permit. After-hours inspections requiring overtime need the Building Official's approval and cost $200.00, paid before the inspection. 78% · published form + fee schedule
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes. The city performs its own inspections. FS 553.791 private providers are accepted as an alternative, at a 25% discount on the inspection fee and 25% on plan review, applied 'only when the private provider is disclosed prior to permit issuance'; the city publishes a full private-provider pack (firm application, licence-holder registration, Notice to Building Official, plan compliance affidavit, inspection log). 92% · FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report + fee schedule
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated. The only function that leaves the city is fire review and fire-safety-system permitting, which goes to the St. Johns County Fire Marshal's Office (FirePrevention@sjcfl.us, 904-209-1740) - and that does not touch residential rooftop PV. 88% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? No solar-specific sequence is published. The city's Inspection Request Form ('Inspections are as per section 110 of the 8th Edition (2023) FBC') lists the full taxonomy by trade. ELECTRICAL: Temp Pole, Under Slab, Rough Wiring, Meter Can, Service Change, Energize Bldg., Informational, Final. BUILDING: Foundation/Footers, Fill Cells, Framing, Siding/Soffits, Beams & Columns, Windows & Doors, Fire Wall, Roof & Wall Sheathing, Flashing, Drywall, Roof Deck & Tie, Partial RD&T, InProgress, Tree Removal, Lot Grading, Stucco Lathe, Informational, Final. ROOF: In Progress, Flashing, Informational, Final. Observed in practice: a live electrical permit in CPSS (P2601412, applied 09/02/2026, 'ELECTRIC - PANEL CHANGE') auto-scheduled exactly three inspections - ELECTRIC ROUGH, ELECTRIC INFORMATIONAL, ELECTRIC FINAL. 78% · published form + permit portal record
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Yes for electrical work generally - 'Rough Wiring' is a standing inspection type and a real panel-change permit in the portal carries ELECTRIC ROUGH. There is also a generic 'InProgress' building inspection and an 'In Progress' roof inspection. Whether a rooftop PV retrofit is routed through a rough-in is not published. 65% · published form + permit portal record
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No published INSPECTION checklist. The city does publish plan-review instruments: a two-page Residential Plan Review Checklist keyed to FBC 8th Edition (2023), a one-page Residential Sufficiency Checklist and a Commercial Sufficiency Checklist. All three are intake/plan-review documents, not inspection checklists, and none mentions solar or PV. 82% · department forms index
- What must be on site at inspection? The approved job-copy plans must be on site - 'Upon a scheduled inspection if no access is provided or the approved job copy plans are not available there shall be a fee of $20.00 assessed to the permit that the inspection was scheduled for.' A recorded Notice of Commencement must be recorded AND posted on the job site before the first inspection. 90% · fee schedule + permit application
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A passed Final inspection, recorded against the permit in CPSS. A Certificate of Occupancy is issued for new construction, not for a retrofit - the Building Department's stated remit is 'the issuance of permits, Inspection of completed work, and the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for new construction'. Residential early-power release additionally requires an approved Insulation inspection and an approved Meter Can inspection including meter base connections (commercial requires an approved 'Energize Building' inspection). 80% · department page + published form
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? The customer/installer, not the AHJ. FPL: 'Once construction is complete, a customer should provide a copy of the approved permit or a screen print from the local authority's website indicating the permit has been approved', showing electrical and mechanical inspection signed off by the local inspector, the description of work, the address, the permit number and the building department name. The city has no PTO notification role. Convenient here: CPSS Guest Access renders permit status publicly, so the 'screen print from the local authority's website' route works without a login. 90% · utility interconnection guidelines
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $80.00. Resolution 26-05 B.19 'Reinspection Fee $80.00', and item A.2 explains the mechanism: the permit fee entitles the holder to an initial and one follow-up inspection for each mandatory inspection type, and '$80.00 dollars for each additional inspection required to assure compliance'. Beyond that, FS 553.80(2)(c) is restated in the schedule: for any inspection after an initial inspection and one subsequent reinspection for the SAME code violation, the fee is FOUR TIMES the initial or first reinspection fee, whichever is greater. Stormwater reinspections are separately priced at $53.00, with extra inspections for uncorrected items at 2x that. 90% · fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? The inspector inspects and notes deficiencies; partially complete work is inspected on the completed portions where compliance can be determined. Corrections are cleared by re-inspection ($80 after the free follow-up). Plan corrections go through a published Revision Request form; revision fees are billed at $53.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum. On the plan-review side the city restates FS 553.80(2)(b): a local government may not request additional information more than three times unless waived in writing, must respond within 15 days after a first resubmittal and 10 days after a second, must offer a meeting before a third request, and after a third rejection for the same continuously-noted violation must charge four times the plan-review proportion of the permit fee. 82% · fee schedule + adopting ordinance exhibit
14 questions answered against City of St. Augustine Beach’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal, phone or email - all three. CPSS ('log into our online portal'), or call 904-471-8758, or email the completed Inspection Request Form to onlinepermitting@cityofsab.org.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding & Zoning page names all three routes; the city publishes a one-page Inspection Request Form listing every inspection type by trade.
department page + form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/519/Inspection-Request-Form
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Next business day. The CPSS login page carries the standing notice: 'PLEASE ALLOW UNTIL THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOR SCHEDULING AND RESULTS OF ALL INSPECTIONS.' One exception found: the reroof 'In Progress' inspection 'must be scheduled prior to 8:00 a.m. on the day the inspection is needed.'
Why the confidence is not higherRead off the portal landing page and the Re-roof Mitigation form. The 8 a.m. rule is written for reroofs; whether it generalises to other in-progress inspections is not stated.
permit portal notice + published form checked 2026-09-13 https://broker.edmundsassoc.com/CPSS/?municipalId=SAUGFL
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
No AM/PM windows are offered. The city's own language for an in-progress inspection is: 'The inspector will arrive and inspect your work at any stage. You are not required to wait for the inspector or leave any area exposed to the weather.' If no access is provided, or the approved job-copy plans are not available, a $20.00 fee is assessed to the permit. After-hours inspections requiring overtime need the Building Official's approval and cost $200.00, paid before the inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the Re-roof Mitigation form and Resolution 26-05 items A.5 and A.14. No document offers a time window, and the 'arrive at any stage' language is the closest the city comes to addressing it.
published form + fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/544/Reroof-Mitigation-Form
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes. The city performs its own inspections. FS 553.791 private providers are accepted as an alternative, at a 25% discount on the inspection fee and 25% on plan review, applied 'only when the private provider is disclosed prior to permit issuance'; the city publishes a full private-provider pack (firm application, licence-holder registration, Notice to Building Official, plan compliance affidavit, inspection log).
Why the confidence is not higherFS 553.80(7)(b) report for FY2023-24 records 2,934 inspections conducted, of which 158 by a private provider - i.e. the city does the overwhelming majority itself. Fee resolution and the private-provider pack confirm the alternative route.
FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report + fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/447/Fiscal-Year-2024-Anual-ReportPDF
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated. The only function that leaves the city is fire review and fire-safety-system permitting, which goes to the St. Johns County Fire Marshal's Office (FirePrevention@sjcfl.us, 904-209-1740) - and that does not touch residential rooftop PV.
Why the confidence is not higherFire-sprinkler permits page states the arrangement in the city's own words; the FS 553.80 report shows in-house inspection volume.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/294/Fire-sprinkler-permits
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
No solar-specific sequence is published. The city's Inspection Request Form ('Inspections are as per section 110 of the 8th Edition (2023) FBC') lists the full taxonomy by trade. ELECTRICAL: Temp Pole, Under Slab, Rough Wiring, Meter Can, Service Change, Energize Bldg., Informational, Final. BUILDING: Foundation/Footers, Fill Cells, Framing, Siding/Soffits, Beams & Columns, Windows & Doors, Fire Wall, Roof & Wall Sheathing, Flashing, Drywall, Roof Deck & Tie, Partial RD&T, InProgress, Tree Removal, Lot Grading, Stucco Lathe, Informational, Final. ROOF: In Progress, Flashing, Informational, Final. Observed in practice: a live electrical permit in CPSS (P2601412, applied 09/02/2026, 'ELECTRIC - PANEL CHANGE') auto-scheduled exactly three inspections - ELECTRIC ROUGH, ELECTRIC INFORMATIONAL, ELECTRIC FINAL.
Why the confidence is not higherForm read in full; the practice datapoint taken from the city's own public permit portal. An installer can infer the likely PV set (electric rough / informational / electric final, plus a building final if a separate building permit issues) but the city has not published it.
published form + permit portal record checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/519/Inspection-Request-Form
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Yes for electrical work generally - 'Rough Wiring' is a standing inspection type and a real panel-change permit in the portal carries ELECTRIC ROUGH. There is also a generic 'InProgress' building inspection and an 'In Progress' roof inspection. Whether a rooftop PV retrofit is routed through a rough-in is not published.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the city's own inspection taxonomy plus one observed permit record. No solar-specific statement exists either way, so this is honestly an inference and is scored as one.
published form + permit portal record checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/519/Inspection-Request-Form
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedAll three published checklists, the Inspection Request Form, the Building & Zoning page and one live permit's inspection record in CPSS. Nothing states whether the inspector verifies labels and listings. The only adjacent evidence is that Florida Product Approval numbers are collected at plan review, which implies listing is checked on paper rather than in the field - but that is not enough to record an answer.
https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/519/Inspection-Request-Form
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No published INSPECTION checklist. The city does publish plan-review instruments: a two-page Residential Plan Review Checklist keyed to FBC 8th Edition (2023), a one-page Residential Sufficiency Checklist and a Commercial Sufficiency Checklist. All three are intake/plan-review documents, not inspection checklists, and none mentions solar or PV.
Why the confidence is not higherWhole Forms & Applications page enumerated (66 documents); nothing inspection-checklist shaped. The distinction between a plan-review checklist and an inspection checklist is real and worth keeping - an installer looking for what the inspector will check has nothing to read.
department forms index checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/347/Forms-Applications
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The approved job-copy plans must be on site - 'Upon a scheduled inspection if no access is provided or the approved job copy plans are not available there shall be a fee of $20.00 assessed to the permit that the inspection was scheduled for.' A recorded Notice of Commencement must be recorded AND posted on the job site before the first inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherResolution 26-05 item A.14 for the plans, and the statutory warning printed on the face of the Building Permit/Clearance Sheet Application for the NOC.
fee schedule + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$80.00. Resolution 26-05 B.19 'Reinspection Fee $80.00', and item A.2 explains the mechanism: the permit fee entitles the holder to an initial and one follow-up inspection for each mandatory inspection type, and '$80.00 dollars for each additional inspection required to assure compliance'. Beyond that, FS 553.80(2)(c) is restated in the schedule: for any inspection after an initial inspection and one subsequent reinspection for the SAME code violation, the fee is FOUR TIMES the initial or first reinspection fee, whichever is greater. Stormwater reinspections are separately priced at $53.00, with extra inspections for uncorrected items at 2x that.
Why the confidence is not higherRead line by line from the current fee resolution.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
The inspector inspects and notes deficiencies; partially complete work is inspected on the completed portions where compliance can be determined. Corrections are cleared by re-inspection ($80 after the free follow-up). Plan corrections go through a published Revision Request form; revision fees are billed at $53.00 per hour with a one-hour minimum. On the plan-review side the city restates FS 553.80(2)(b): a local government may not request additional information more than three times unless waived in writing, must respond within 15 days after a first resubmittal and 10 days after a second, must offer a meeting before a third request, and after a third rejection for the same continuously-noted violation must charge four times the plan-review proportion of the permit fee.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from Resolution 26-05 items A.2, A.3.b, A.8 and A.9 and from locally adopted FBC Chapter 1 section 105.3.1.3. Statutory machinery restated locally, which is worth knowing because it is enforceable at this counter.
fee schedule + adopting ordinance exhibit checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/2699/Resolution-26-05-Establishing-Fees-for-Building-Permits-and-Other-Related-Services
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A passed Final inspection, recorded against the permit in CPSS. A Certificate of Occupancy is issued for new construction, not for a retrofit - the Building Department's stated remit is 'the issuance of permits, Inspection of completed work, and the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for new construction'. Residential early-power release additionally requires an approved Insulation inspection and an approved Meter Can inspection including meter base connections (commercial requires an approved 'Energize Building' inspection).
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding & Zoning page for the CO scoping, the Early Power Agreement & Release Request (rev. 06/23/2025) for the energization gate, and the observed portal record for how a final is recorded. No document names what a solar job specifically receives on pass.
department page + published form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.staugbch.com/DocumentCenter/View/501/Early-Power-Agreement-Release-Request
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
The customer/installer, not the AHJ. FPL: 'Once construction is complete, a customer should provide a copy of the approved permit or a screen print from the local authority's website indicating the permit has been approved', showing electrical and mechanical inspection signed off by the local inspector, the description of work, the address, the permit number and the building department name. The city has no PTO notification role. Convenient here: CPSS Guest Access renders permit status publicly, so the 'screen print from the local authority's website' route works without a login.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from FPL's current Net Metering Guidelines; the portal behaviour verified directly.
utility interconnection guidelines checked 2026-09-13 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 85%
No. The City of St. Augustine Beach specifies no placard wording of its own, for solar or for anything else.
Size, colour & material 88%
City: nothing. FPL: 'All labels must be permanent and weatherproof/UV resistant placard with engraved letters. The customer is responsible for all labeling requirements.' No letter height and no colour are specified anywhere in FPL Section XIII.
Where they go 88%
FPL: at the interconnecting meter can, and at the DER disconnect switch. The battery placard goes on the meter enclosure. For tier 2/3, a sign noting the disconnect switch location goes at the meter, and a 'both sides may be energized' warning goes on the switch itself.
What the utility wants on top 90%
Yes, decisively. Every placard on a St. Augustine Beach solar job comes from FPL, not from the AHJ - the city requires none. See Q38 for the wording and Q40 for the material spec.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.