City of St. Augustine
City of St. Augustine
St. Johns County
City of St. Augustine is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 14,329 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of St. Augustine against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of St. Augustine is the authority having jurisdiction 85% confidence
- Holds
- Building, electrical, and all other permitted trades (mechanical, plumbing, roofing, fence, pool, solar, etc.) are permitted and inspected by the City's own Planning & Building Department, headed by Amy Skinner, Director Planning and Building (city employee, 75 King Street, Lobby B/4th Floor). Historic review (HARB) and the Fire Prevention/Life-Safety inspection program are also City-run: HARB sits inside the same Planning & Building Department's Code of Ordinances Div. 3 (Ch. 28), and the St. Augustine Fire Department (101 Malaga Street) runs its own Prevention & Inspection division under Fire Marshal Abby Pedigo and Assistant Fire Marshal Dustin Hamilton — both named on the Fire Department's own current staff page, both on @citystaug.com email domain (no county/sheriff/private-firm signature found anywhere on the Fire, Building, or HARB pages I could reach). Building inspections are stated to be performed by 'city staff' even in the Storm Recovery Permitting Guide's disaster-response section ('Inspections will be performed by city staff and/or other personnel activated by mutual aid system'). No FS 553.80(7)(b) building-department utilization report could be located on the site (searched DocumentCenter, Finance, and Planning & Building pages) to independently confirm personnel counts, so the in-house call rests on the staff-page/masthead evidence above rather than the statutory report.
- Overridden by
- FS 553.79(1)(g)/(26) statewide $7,500 permit-value exemption (city's own page states it takes effect 1 July 2026, but explicitly excludes electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, structural work and anything in a flood hazard area, so it cannot reach a PV system). FS 471.003(2)(h) statewide PE-stamp exemption ($125,000/600A) applies absent a stricter local rule (none found). FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 governs interconnection sequencing for the investor-owned utility serving the address (utility identity not city-confirmed — see Q22).
- Why not higher
- Based on the City's own Building Permit Information page, the Planning & Building Department page (Director Amy Skinner), the HARB/HARB-Applications pages and the codified Municode Ch. 28 Div. 3 (Historic Architectural Review Board), the Fire Department's own Prevention & Inspection staff page, and the Storm Recovery Permitting Guide. Held at 85 rather than higher because (a) I could not independently prove staffing/personnel counts via the statutory FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report (not found on site), and (b) a GIS parcel-level check to rule out unincorporated St. Johns County or St. Augustine Beach for any specific address was not performed for a single test address — the City's own floodplain-adjacent material (Key West's own equivalent finding in this survey) makes clear that a 'St. Augustine' mailing address is not proof of city jurisdiction, and the City publishes an Interactive GIS zoning map (referenced from the Zoning page) as the correct tool to confirm a given parcel.
- Permit required
- Yes. The City's own Building Permit Information page lists 'Solar' as one of its permit types (requiring Solar Plans and Specification Sheets), and the new (eff.92%
- Portal
- Cityworks PLL 'PublicAccess' portal, branded the 'City of St. Augustine Permitting Public Portal,' hosted at gis.citystaug.com/COSAPermits (software version 7.5.0 shown on the login…85%
- Electrical code
- National Electrical Code, 2014 Edition (Code of Ordinances Sec. 8-112) — codified and NOT amended since Ord. No. 18-15 (Dec. 10, 2018).88%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. The City's own Building Permit Information page lists 'Solar' as one of its permit types (requiring Solar Plans and Specification Sheets), and the new (eff. Q3 Electrical and building permits — The City's permit-type list treats 'Solar' as its own single permit type (paired only with 'Solar Plans' + 'Specification Sheets' in both the web page and the… Q4 Where you file — Cityworks PLL 'PublicAccess' portal, branded the 'City of St. Augustine Permitting Public Portal,' hosted at gis.citystaug.com/COSAPermits (software version 7.5.0… Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. The City's own Building Permit Information page lists 'Solar' as one of its permit types (requiring Solar Plans and Specification Sheets), and the new (eff.92% source
- Key document
- department page (links to Owner Builder Affidavit form) cited by 4 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes for parcels actually inside St. Augustine city limits — the Planning & Building Department is the AHJ for residential building/electrical/PV permitting. CAUTION: a 'St. Augustine' mailing address does not guarantee city jurisdiction; St. Augustine Beach is a separate municipality and large areas with St. Augustine addresses are unincorporated St. Johns County. The City's own Zoning page directs users to an Interactive GIS map to confirm. 80% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? The City permits and inspects itself: building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, roofing, fence, pool, solar, and all other listed permit types on the Building Permit Information page, plus HARB (historic) and Fire Prevention/Life-Safety review, all in-house. Contractor Certificate-of-Competency-style licensing is via the State (State Certified/Registered License required per the City's own Contractor Requirements sheet), not a separate county competency-card layer that I could find. 78% · City requirements handout
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. The City's own Building Permit Information page lists 'Solar' as one of its permit types (requiring Solar Plans and Specification Sheets), and the new (eff. 1 July 2026) $7,500 permit-value exemption explicitly still requires permits for 'Electrical... Structural work' regardless of cost — a PV system cannot use that exemption. 92% · department page
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? The City's permit-type list treats 'Solar' as its own single permit type (paired only with 'Solar Plans' + 'Specification Sheets' in both the web page and the current 'Documents Required for Building Permits' PDF), distinct from the separately-listed 'Electrical' work implied elsewhere on the same page ('a separate permit must be secured for... ELECTRICAL WORK'). It is unclear whether 'Solar' as filed is a combined building+electrical permit or purely an electrical sub-permit under a different name. 55% · City requirements handout (Documents Required for Building Permits, current)
- Is there a historic-district review? YES — historic-district review is a real pre-permit gate, and it NAMES solar. The City has five locally-designated Historic Preservation zoning districts (HP-1 through HP-5, Code Ch. 28 Div. 4). A Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) is required for most work in an HP district, AND per Code Sec. 28-89/Ch. 28 Div. 3, 'a Certificate of Appropriateness is required before a building permit may be issued' — a pre-permit gate, stated as plainly as Key West's rule. The City's Architectural Guidelines for Historic Preservation (AGHP), the design-guideline document actually applied by HARB, explicitly names 'solar heating panels' under its 'Electrical and Mechanical Equipment' section and 'solar collectors' under its Roof section, with a VISIBILITY-FROM-THE-STREET/PUBLIC-RIGHTS-OF-WAY test: for Post-1821 buildings, electrical/mechanical equipment 'is not appropriate on visible roof locations' and must not be visible from the street or on significant facades; for Pre-1821 buildings, equipment may be on the roof only if completely screened by a parapet wall or lattice; and separately, under the Roof section's prohibited ('Don't') list, changing a roof's character by adding 'dormers, vents, skylights, air conditioners and solar collectors which are visible from public rights-of-way' is expressly disallowed. This sits in the DESIGN GUIDELINES rather than the codified ordinance itself — the same pattern this survey found at Key West. Buildings over 50 years old anywhere in the city (not just in an HP zoning district) can also trigger HARB review per the Building Permit Information page. HARB review is required for MOST work but 'except for those projects that meet pre-approved guidelines' (a staff-level administrative track exists for minor/matching-replacement work per Sec. 28-88/AGHP and the current HARB Applications page). HARB's own review criteria (Sec. 28-89) explicitly distinguish properties that are 'contributing or potentially contributing to a historic district in the National Register of Historic Places' or 'listed as a local historic landmark' from other structures, at least for demolition/relocation review — a contributing-vs-non-contributing distinction is codified, though not spelled out specifically for a solar COA review. 88% · City design guidelines (Architectural Guidelines for Historic Preservation), PDF metadata dated 2012, currently linked as authoritative from the 2026 HARB Appli
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes — contractors must hold a State Certified or Registered License, carry liability insurance of at least $300,000, and provide Workers' Compensation coverage or an exemption form, per the City's own Contractor Requirements sheet (Planning & Building Department). 85% · City requirements handout
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Likely yes via the general Owner-Builder Affidavit route (FS 489.103/489.503), which the City provides as a standard form; not solar-specific and not confirmed to extend to the electrical trade specifically. 55% · department page (links to Owner Builder Affidavit form)
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? For the 'Solar' permit type specifically, the City's own Building Permit Information page and its 'Documents Required for Building Permits' PDF list exactly two required items: Solar Plans, and Specification Sheets. Notably, unlike most other permit types on the same list (Deck, Garage, New Single Family Home, etc.), no Property Survey is listed as required for Solar. 88% · City requirements handout, corroborated by department web page
- How many copies, and in what format? Electronic only, through the online Permit Portal; the City states it 'currently exclusively issues permits online,' and building submittals must follow the City's Electronic Submission Standards (Google Chrome required). 80% · department page
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Not required for the Solar permit type specifically — the Solar line item on the City's documents-required list carries no Property Survey requirement, unlike most other permit types (Deck, Garage, Shed, New Construction, etc., all of which do list a Property Survey). 70% · City requirements handout
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No City-specific structural PE-stamp threshold for solar was found; the statewide floor is FS 471.003(2)(h): no PE stamp required for electrical work performed by a licensed contractor valued at $125,000 or less with 600A or less aggregate service capacity on a residential system. 60% · Florida Statute (state floor)
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Same statewide floor as Q13: FS 471.003(2)(h), $125,000/600A. 58% · Florida Statute (state floor)
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Cityworks PLL 'PublicAccess' portal, branded the 'City of St. Augustine Permitting Public Portal,' hosted at gis.citystaug.com/COSAPermits (software version 7.5.0 shown on the login screen). A SEPARATE payment-only portal, 'Navigator' (cityofstaugustinefl.tylerportico.com), handles utility billing, business license and general billing payments but is NOT the permit-tracking system. 85% · live portal (navigated directly)
- Can the whole application be completed online? Application submittal, status tracking, and document upload can be completed online end-to-end through the Permit Portal (account required). Fee PAYMENT could not be confirmed as available online for building/electrical/solar permits — the related Civil Plan Review portal FAQ states explicitly 'Payment is not currently accepted online; email Public Works Permits Technician for payment options,' and no online-payment statement was found for the building-permit side specifically. 65% · department page (Permit Portal FAQ)
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 6 months. A permit becomes invalid if work does not begin within 6 months of issuance, or if started work is stopped/abandoned for 6 months. 90% · department page
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Not confirmed by name from any City document. No electric franchise appears in Code of Ordinances Ch. 14 (Franchises), which covers only sightseeing-vehicle, cable-TV, and animal-drawn-vehicle franchises — an electric franchise, if any, is not codified there. The City's own FY2025-26 budget carries a populated 'Franchise Fees' line ($2,275,000-$2,433,000) separate from a 'Utility Service Taxes' line ($1,780,000-$1,983,000) in the General Fund, and Code Ch. 17 Art. II (Public Service Tax) levies a generic 10% tax on 'each purchase of electricity' within city limits — both consistent with an investor-owned retail electric utility operating under an UNCODIFIED franchise agreement, but neither document names the utility. No municipal electric utility was found (the City's only 'Electric' web page is the Municipal Marina's boat-slip shore-power rate sheet, unrelated to residential retail electric service) and St. Augustine is not on this survey's list of confirmed Florida municipal utilities. Given St. Johns County is overwhelmingly FPL territory elsewhere in this survey (with Beaches Energy Services confirmed only in the Jacksonville Beach/Ponte Vedra area), FPL is the most probable utility but this is an elimination-based inference, not a City confirmation. 50% · City adopted budget (General Fund revenue detail)
28 questions answered against City of St. Augustine’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes for parcels actually inside St. Augustine city limits — the Planning & Building Department is the AHJ for residential building/electrical/PV permitting. CAUTION: a 'St. Augustine' mailing address does not guarantee city jurisdiction; St. Augustine Beach is a separate municipality and large areas with St. Augustine addresses are unincorporated St. Johns County. The City's own Zoning page directs users to an Interactive GIS map to confirm.
Why the confidence is not higherDepartment pages and codified Ch. 28/Ch. 8 confirm the City permits and inspects in-house within its limits; the address-vs-jurisdiction caveat follows this survey's own confirmed Key West finding and was not separately parcel-tested here.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1200/Zoning
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
The City permits and inspects itself: building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, roofing, fence, pool, solar, and all other listed permit types on the Building Permit Information page, plus HARB (historic) and Fire Prevention/Life-Safety review, all in-house. Contractor Certificate-of-Competency-style licensing is via the State (State Certified/Registered License required per the City's own Contractor Requirements sheet), not a separate county competency-card layer that I could find.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect reading of the City's Building Permit Information page (permit-type dropdown list) and the Contractor Requirements PDF, which requires only a 'State Certified or Registered License' — no county Certificate of Competency is mentioned, unlike several other Florida authorities in this survey.
City requirements handout checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/137/Contractor-Requirements-PDF
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. The City's own Building Permit Information page lists 'Solar' as one of its permit types (requiring Solar Plans and Specification Sheets), and the new (eff. 1 July 2026) $7,500 permit-value exemption explicitly still requires permits for 'Electrical... Structural work' regardless of cost — a PV system cannot use that exemption.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth facts are stated plainly on the City's own current Building Permit Information page.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1199/Building-Permit-Information
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
The City's permit-type list treats 'Solar' as its own single permit type (paired only with 'Solar Plans' + 'Specification Sheets' in both the web page and the current 'Documents Required for Building Permits' PDF), distinct from the separately-listed 'Electrical' work implied elsewhere on the same page ('a separate permit must be secured for... ELECTRICAL WORK'). It is unclear whether 'Solar' as filed is a combined building+electrical permit or purely an electrical sub-permit under a different name.
Why the confidence is not higherThe general Building Permit Application boilerplate requires separate permits per trade, but 'Solar' appears as its own single line item in both the web dropdown and the PDF checklist, with no separate 'Solar Electrical' line — genuine ambiguity, not confirmed either way from City material.
City requirements handout (Documents Required for Building Permits, current) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page, Contractor Requirements PDF, Documents Required for Building Permits PDF — none states specifically who may pull the ELECTRICAL sub-permit for a solar job (as opposed to general contractor licensing requirements)
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes — contractors must hold a State Certified or Registered License, carry liability insurance of at least $300,000, and provide Workers' Compensation coverage or an exemption form, per the City's own Contractor Requirements sheet (Planning & Building Department).
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from the City's current one-page Contractor Requirements PDF, headed 'CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT.'
City requirements handout checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/137/Contractor-Requirements-PDF
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Likely yes via the general Owner-Builder Affidavit route (FS 489.103/489.503), which the City provides as a standard form; not solar-specific and not confirmed to extend to the electrical trade specifically.
Why the confidence is not higherCity publishes an 'Owner Builder Affidavit' PDF linked from the Building Permit Information page's 'Additional documents that may be needed' list; this is the general statewide owner-builder exemption mechanism, not a solar-specific statement.
department page (links to Owner Builder Affidavit form) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1199/Building-Permit-Information
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
For the 'Solar' permit type specifically, the City's own Building Permit Information page and its 'Documents Required for Building Permits' PDF list exactly two required items: Solar Plans, and Specification Sheets. Notably, unlike most other permit types on the same list (Deck, Garage, New Single Family Home, etc.), no Property Survey is listed as required for Solar.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly quoted, verbatim and identically, from both the City's Building Permit Information web page and its current 'Documents Required for Building Permits' PDF — two independent City documents agree exactly.
City requirements handout, corroborated by department web page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Electronic only, through the online Permit Portal; the City states it 'currently exclusively issues permits online,' and building submittals must follow the City's Electronic Submission Standards (Google Chrome required).
Why the confidence is not higherStorm Recovery Permitting Guide states permits are issued exclusively online; Building Permit Information page requires review of 'Electronic Submission Standards (PDF)' before uploading and specifies Google Chrome is required.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1199/Building-Permit-Information
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Not required for the Solar permit type specifically — the Solar line item on the City's documents-required list carries no Property Survey requirement, unlike most other permit types (Deck, Garage, Shed, New Construction, etc., all of which do list a Property Survey).
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the absence of a Property Survey line under 'Solar' on the same official checklist where nearly every other permit type explicitly lists one — a structured omission, not a gap in my search.
City requirements handout checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page and Documents Required PDF — the Solar line item lists only 'Solar Plans' and 'Specification Sheets', neither document specifies a one-line/three-line diagram requirement by name
https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame Solar line item as q11 — no string/conductor calculation requirement named
https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No City-specific structural PE-stamp threshold for solar was found; the statewide floor is FS 471.003(2)(h): no PE stamp required for electrical work performed by a licensed contractor valued at $125,000 or less with 600A or less aggregate service capacity on a residential system.
Why the confidence is not higherState floor cited from the Florida Statutes directly; no City ordinance, fee schedule, or Solar-specific document stating a different (e.g., stricter, no-threshold) local rule was found despite searching Ch. 8 (Adopted Building Codes) and the Building Permit Information page.
Florida Statute (state floor) checked 2026-09-12 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0400-0499/0471/Sections/0471.003.html
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Same statewide floor as Q13: FS 471.003(2)(h), $125,000/600A.
Why the confidence is not higherNo City-specific electrical PE-stamp rule found beyond the state floor.
Florida Statute (state floor) checked 2026-09-12 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0400-0499/0471/Sections/0471.003.html
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedcitystaug.com sitemap.xml (grepped for 'fee'), DocumentCenter/Search (tried 'Schedule of Fees', 'building fee', 'permit fee' — all three queries returned an identical generic HR-forms result set, indicating the DocumentCenter search endpoint is not functioning as a real search on this site), Finance and Budget-Information pages — no residential solar/building/electrical fee schedule document could be located or reached
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame fee-schedule search as q15 — could not determine flat vs. valuation-based calculation without the schedule itself
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame fee-schedule search as q15
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page (full text read) — no stated plan-review turnaround for any permit type, residential or commercial
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
6 months. A permit becomes invalid if work does not begin within 6 months of issuance, or if started work is stopped/abandoned for 6 months.
Why the confidence is not higherStated verbatim on the City's own current Building Permit Information page under 'Permit Time Limits,' and repeated on the 'Documents Required for Building Permits' PDF footer.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1199/Building-Permit-Information
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Cityworks PLL 'PublicAccess' portal, branded the 'City of St. Augustine Permitting Public Portal,' hosted at gis.citystaug.com/COSAPermits (software version 7.5.0 shown on the login screen). A SEPARATE payment-only portal, 'Navigator' (cityofstaugustinefl.tylerportico.com), handles utility billing, business license and general billing payments but is NOT the permit-tracking system.
Why the confidence is not higherConfirmed directly by navigating to both live portals: the /1082/Permit-Portal page links to gis.citystaug.com/COSAPermits/registration, which resolves to a Cityworks PublicAccess login screen naming the City by name; the Tyler Portico 'Navigator' link found elsewhere on the site resolves to a bill-pay-only landing page with no permit content.
live portal (navigated directly) checked 2026-09-12 https://gis.citystaug.com/COSAPermits/login
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Application submittal, status tracking, and document upload can be completed online end-to-end through the Permit Portal (account required). Fee PAYMENT could not be confirmed as available online for building/electrical/solar permits — the related Civil Plan Review portal FAQ states explicitly 'Payment is not currently accepted online; email Public Works Permits Technician for payment options,' and no online-payment statement was found for the building-permit side specifically.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Permit Portal page (civil plan review) explicitly states payment is not accepted online; the Building Permit Information page's process list includes 'Pay any required permit fees' as a discrete step without saying whether that happens in-portal or by other means, so I could not confirm the building-permit payment channel is the same as the civil one.
department page (Permit Portal FAQ) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1082/Permit-Portal
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Not confirmed by name from any City document. No electric franchise appears in Code of Ordinances Ch. 14 (Franchises), which covers only sightseeing-vehicle, cable-TV, and animal-drawn-vehicle franchises — an electric franchise, if any, is not codified there. The City's own FY2025-26 budget carries a populated 'Franchise Fees' line ($2,275,000-$2,433,000) separate from a 'Utility Service Taxes' line ($1,780,000-$1,983,000) in the General Fund, and Code Ch. 17 Art. II (Public Service Tax) levies a generic 10% tax on 'each purchase of electricity' within city limits — both consistent with an investor-owned retail electric utility operating under an UNCODIFIED franchise agreement, but neither document names the utility. No municipal electric utility was found (the City's only 'Electric' web page is the Municipal Marina's boat-slip shore-power rate sheet, unrelated to residential retail electric service) and St. Augustine is not on this survey's list of confirmed Florida municipal utilities. Given St. Johns County is overwhelmingly FPL territory elsewhere in this survey (with Beaches Energy Services confirmed only in the Jacksonville Beach/Ponte Vedra area), FPL is the most probable utility but this is an elimination-based inference, not a City confirmation.
Why the confidence is not higherFranchise-chapter state: PRESENT BUT FOR OTHER UTILITIES ONLY (electric franchise, if any, not codified in Ch. 14) — a 'weak' franchise/utility-tax signal (populated Franchise Fees + Utility Service Tax budget lines, generic Public Service Tax ordinance) that proves SOME investor-owned electric seller exists but does not name it. FPL is not confirmed and this must be treated as inference per this survey's own repeated caution against assuming FPL by elimination/adjacency.
City adopted budget (General Fund revenue detail) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/8935/2025-2026-Adopted-Budget
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information, Permit Portal, and Utility-Review pages — none discusses utility interconnection sequencing; the utility itself is unconfirmed (q22), so a utility-specific sequencing answer could not be sourced (the state PSC floor would apply only if the utility is confirmed investor-owned)
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page (full text read) — no HOA/architectural-approval precondition or disclaimer language found (contrast Ocoee, which has an explicit HOA disclaimer on its building permit application)
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
YES — historic-district review is a real pre-permit gate, and it NAMES solar. The City has five locally-designated Historic Preservation zoning districts (HP-1 through HP-5, Code Ch. 28 Div. 4). A Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) is required for most work in an HP district, AND per Code Sec. 28-89/Ch. 28 Div. 3, 'a Certificate of Appropriateness is required before a building permit may be issued' — a pre-permit gate, stated as plainly as Key West's rule. The City's Architectural Guidelines for Historic Preservation (AGHP), the design-guideline document actually applied by HARB, explicitly names 'solar heating panels' under its 'Electrical and Mechanical Equipment' section and 'solar collectors' under its Roof section, with a VISIBILITY-FROM-THE-STREET/PUBLIC-RIGHTS-OF-WAY test: for Post-1821 buildings, electrical/mechanical equipment 'is not appropriate on visible roof locations' and must not be visible from the street or on significant facades; for Pre-1821 buildings, equipment may be on the roof only if completely screened by a parapet wall or lattice; and separately, under the Roof section's prohibited ('Don't') list, changing a roof's character by adding 'dormers, vents, skylights, air conditioners and solar collectors which are visible from public rights-of-way' is expressly disallowed. This sits in the DESIGN GUIDELINES rather than the codified ordinance itself — the same pattern this survey found at Key West. Buildings over 50 years old anywhere in the city (not just in an HP zoning district) can also trigger HARB review per the Building Permit Information page. HARB review is required for MOST work but 'except for those projects that meet pre-approved guidelines' (a staff-level administrative track exists for minor/matching-replacement work per Sec. 28-88/AGHP and the current HARB Applications page). HARB's own review criteria (Sec. 28-89) explicitly distinguish properties that are 'contributing or potentially contributing to a historic district in the National Register of Historic Places' or 'listed as a local historic landmark' from other structures, at least for demolition/relocation review — a contributing-vs-non-contributing distinction is codified, though not spelled out specifically for a solar COA review.
Why the confidence is not higherThe pre-permit COA gate and the five HP districts are directly quoted from Municode Code of Ordinances Ch. 28 (positive/fabricated search controls both passed: 'electrical' returned real hits, 'zzqqx' returned zero). The AGHP visibility rule and the explicit 'solar heating panels'/'solar collectors' language are quoted directly from the City's own current Architectural Guidelines for Historic Preservation PDF (linked from the live 2026 HARB Applications page), extracted with pdftotext -layout (text layer present, not OCR'd) — but that PDF's own internal creation metadata dates it to 26 Oct 2012 (Author: Jennifer Wolfe, Microsoft Word 2010), predating NEC 690.12 rapid shutdown; it is still the document the City's current (2026) HARB Applications page links to as authoritative, so it is CARRIED-FORWARD content at a real risk of being stale in ways not yet caught (e.g., it never mentions rapid shutdown or PV inverters, only 'solar heating panels'/'solar collectors' — 2012-era framing, closer to solar thermal than modern PV, though the plain text would clearly capture PV panels too). Confidence held below 90 for that staleness risk and because I did not find a document stating a staff-vs-board dollar/scope THRESHOLD specific to solar as crisply as Tarpon Springs' quick-reference chart.
City design guidelines (Architectural Guidelines for Historic Preservation), PDF metadata dated 2012, currently linked as authoritative from the 2026 HARB Appli checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/153/Architectural-Guidelines-for-Historic-Preservation-PDF
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page and Documents Required PDF — Product Approval Numbers are required for Roof/Doors&Windows generally, but no separate 'wind/windstorm certification' distinct from standard Florida Product Approval was found for Solar specifically
https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCode of Ordinances Ch. 28 (Zoning) mini-TOC read in full — no Specific Use Permit process applicable to residential rooftop PV was found; Planning & Zoning Board approval is mentioned only for tree removal and docks/bulkheads
https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH28ZO
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedMunicode search for 'solar' and 'photovoltaic' (0 results each, both with passing positive control 'electrical' and passing fabricated control 'zzqqx' in the same session) across the full Code of Ordinances, including Ch. 28 Zoning Sec. 28-344 (Essential public services) — no residential generation system-size cap exists in the codified ordinance
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? National Electrical Code, 2014 Edition (Code of Ordinances Sec. 8-112) — codified and NOT amended since Ord. No. 18-15 (Dec. 10, 2018). This is STALE relative to the Florida statewide floor established elsewhere in this survey (NEC 2020, effective 31 Dec 2023, under FBC 8th Ed. 2023): St. Augustine's own codified electric-code section is four years further behind than most other Florida authorities checked in this survey, none of which found an NEC edition older than 2020 codified as still in force. 88% · codified ordinance (Sec. 8-112)
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, Building, 7th Edition (2020) — Code of Ordinances Sec. 8-101, last amended by Ord. No. 21-10 (14 June 2021). This is one cycle behind the current statewide FBC 8th Edition (2023) baseline established elsewhere in this survey and corroborated from floridabuilding.org. 85% · codified ordinance (Sec. 8-101)
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, 6th Edition (Code of Ordinances Secs. 8-501, 8-502) — two editions behind the current statewide 8th Edition (2023) floor. 82% · codified ordinance (Secs. 8-501/8-502)
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. The Building Code section (Sec. 8-101) has been amended by ordinance as recently as 2021 (Ord. 21-10) and the same Article II framework saw a new section added in October 2025 (Sec. 8-117, condominium milestone-inspection repair timelines, Ord. 25-31) — so the chapter is actively maintained in places even though the core code-edition citations (Secs. 8-101, 8-112, 8-501/502) have not themselves been touched to move to the current statewide editions. 80% · codified ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? Installation is judged against the codified Florida Building Code 7th Edition (2020) and National Electrical Code 2014 Edition (referenced as NFPA 70 via FBC Ch. 27) per Secs. 8-101/8-112 — both stale relative to the current statewide floor (FBC 8th Ed. 2023 / NEC 2020). No City document was found stating a different, newer edition is actually being enforced in practice, so I cannot say this is 'floating forward' silent adoption rather than a genuine fossil; it should be verified with Planning & Building staff before relying on it for an actual job. 75% · codified ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of St. Augustine on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? The codified electric code is NEC 2014 Edition (Sec. 8-112), which itself contains an initial (2014-vintage) version of NEC 690.12 rapid shutdown, but not the stronger module-level/2017-2020-vintage rapid shutdown requirements found in later editions. No City document explicitly discusses rapid shutdown by name or edition. 50% · inference from codified NEC edition (Sec. 8-112)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
Nothing recorded for City of St. Augustine on this step yet — 6 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes, but historic-district-specific rather than a general busbar rule: Code Sec. 22-3 requires that 'all new electrical services or electrical service upgrades installed within the historic preservation district... shall be served underground from the existing public service utilities, whether or not the existing [service is aboveground].' A PV-driven service upgrade at a property inside HP-1 through HP-5 would trigger this undergrounding requirement. No general (non-historic) City rule on service-upgrade sizing or busbar capacity was found. 78% · codified ordinance (Sec. 22-3), read via search excerpt
20 questions answered against City of St. Augustine’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
National Electrical Code, 2014 Edition (Code of Ordinances Sec. 8-112) — codified and NOT amended since Ord. No. 18-15 (Dec. 10, 2018). This is STALE relative to the Florida statewide floor established elsewhere in this survey (NEC 2020, effective 31 Dec 2023, under FBC 8th Ed. 2023): St. Augustine's own codified electric-code section is four years further behind than most other Florida authorities checked in this survey, none of which found an NEC edition older than 2020 codified as still in force.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the City's own current Code of Ordinances, Sec. 8-112 ('The National Electric Code, 2014 Edition... is adopted and incorporated by reference'), read directly via Municode (positive control 'electrical' passed with real hits in the same session; fabricated control 'zzqqx' returned zero). No newer amending ordinance to Sec. 8-112 was found (last touched 2018), and no City permit form or web page was found stating a different (newer) NEC year, so — unlike several other Florida authorities in this survey — there is no live-page-vs-code contradiction to resolve here; the code itself is simply old.
codified ordinance (Sec. 8-112) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH8BUBURE_ARTIIADBUCO
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, Building, 7th Edition (2020) — Code of Ordinances Sec. 8-101, last amended by Ord. No. 21-10 (14 June 2021). This is one cycle behind the current statewide FBC 8th Edition (2023) baseline established elsewhere in this survey and corroborated from floridabuilding.org.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from Sec. 8-101, the City's own current codified adoption section, via Municode with passing search controls. I could not find a City permit-application masthead (unlike Ocoee's or Venice's) that states a conflicting/newer FBC year to compare against, so this is recorded as a plain codified-text staleness finding rather than a form-vs-code contradiction.
codified ordinance (Sec. 8-101) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH8BUBURE_ARTIIADBUCO
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, 6th Edition (Code of Ordinances Secs. 8-501, 8-502) — two editions behind the current statewide 8th Edition (2023) floor.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from Secs. 8-501 ('fire prevention code') and 8-502 ('life safety code'), both citing the Florida Fire Prevention Code '6th Edition, and all subsequent amendments and revisions,' via Municode with passing search controls. This is the most stale of the three code editions checked here (Building: 1 cycle behind; Electric: 3 cycles/multiple years behind; Fire: 2 cycles behind) — consistent with the brief's caution to check the electrical chapter first, though here the fire chapter is also clearly stale.
codified ordinance (Secs. 8-501/8-502) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH8BUBURE_ARTIIADBUCO
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes. The Building Code section (Sec. 8-101) has been amended by ordinance as recently as 2021 (Ord. 21-10) and the same Article II framework saw a new section added in October 2025 (Sec. 8-117, condominium milestone-inspection repair timelines, Ord. 25-31) — so the chapter is actively maintained in places even though the core code-edition citations (Secs. 8-101, 8-112, 8-501/502) have not themselves been touched to move to the current statewide editions.
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance citation lines quoted directly from Municode's codified text for each section; this is a case of SELECTIVE local amendment (some sections updated, the core code-edition sections left stale) rather than either a frozen fossil or full silent adoption.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH8BUBURE_ARTIIADBUCO
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
Installation is judged against the codified Florida Building Code 7th Edition (2020) and National Electrical Code 2014 Edition (referenced as NFPA 70 via FBC Ch. 27) per Secs. 8-101/8-112 — both stale relative to the current statewide floor (FBC 8th Ed. 2023 / NEC 2020). No City document was found stating a different, newer edition is actually being enforced in practice, so I cannot say this is 'floating forward' silent adoption rather than a genuine fossil; it should be verified with Planning & Building staff before relying on it for an actual job.
Why the confidence is not higherSame codified sections as Q29/Q30, read together; I flag the uncertainty about actual enforcement practice honestly rather than assuming either the stale code or the statewide floor controls in practice.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH8BUBURE_ARTIIADBUCO
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Yes, but historic-district-specific rather than a general busbar rule: Code Sec. 22-3 requires that 'all new electrical services or electrical service upgrades installed within the historic preservation district... shall be served underground from the existing public service utilities, whether or not the existing [service is aboveground].' A PV-driven service upgrade at a property inside HP-1 through HP-5 would trigger this undergrounding requirement. No general (non-historic) City rule on service-upgrade sizing or busbar capacity was found.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from Municode search result snippet for Sec. 22-3 (Ch. 22, Streets/Sidewalks/Parks/Misc. Public Places, Art. I); I was not able to load the full section text (a link-click did not navigate in the rendered browser session), so the quoted portion is the search-result excerpt rather than the full codified text — flagged at slightly reduced confidence for that reason.
codified ordinance (Sec. 22-3), read via search excerpt checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH22STSIPAMIPUPL
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information/Documents Required PDF (Solar line item) — no mounting-system or attachment-spacing specification published
https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFire Department, Prevention & Inspection, and Inspection Information pages (full text read) — no ridge-setback or fire-access-pathway rule for rooftop PV published; Fire Prevention Code Ch. 8 Art. VI codified text (6th Ed., read in full) contains no PV-specific pathway rule either
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
The codified electric code is NEC 2014 Edition (Sec. 8-112), which itself contains an initial (2014-vintage) version of NEC 690.12 rapid shutdown, but not the stronger module-level/2017-2020-vintage rapid shutdown requirements found in later editions. No City document explicitly discusses rapid shutdown by name or edition.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the NEC edition alone (Q29); NEC 2014 was in fact the first edition to introduce Art. 690.12 rapid shutdown in a limited form, so this is not as severe a gap as the pre-2017 documents flagged elsewhere in this survey (e.g., Miami Lakes, Leesburg), but the installation is not being judged against the current, stronger rapid-shutdown text either. No City solar guideline or checklist mentions '690.12' or 'rapid shutdown' by name.
inference from codified NEC edition (Sec. 8-112) checked 2026-09-12 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._augustine/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH8BUBURE_ARTIIADBUCO
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page, Documents Required PDF, HARB pages, and Municode search for 'solar'/'photovoltaic' (0 codified hits) — no placard requirement of any kind found
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as q38 — no placard wording published
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as q38 — no letter height/colour/material spec published
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as q38 — no site-plan/facility-map placard spec published
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedUtility not confirmed (q22), so the utility's own placard requirement could not be sourced; if FPL, its Electric Service Standards would be the document to check (not reached this run)
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as q38/q42 — no City or reachable utility document specifies label placement
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information/Documents Required PDF — no equipment-listing (e.g., UL/FSEC) requirement stated for Solar beyond generic 'Specification Sheets'
https://www.citystaug.com/DocumentCenter/View/7854/Documents-Required-for-Building-Permits-PDF
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedMunicode search for 'energy storage' and 'battery' (no dedicated hits — only unrelated 'exterior storage' and 'storage of pollutants' definitions returned, with passing positive/fabricated controls run earlier in the same session) — no battery/ESS permitting condition found anywhere in the Code of Ordinances
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame search as q45 — no separate ESS permit or inspection type named
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedMunicode search for 'ground mount' (returned only wireless-telecommunications-facility ground-mount provisions, Ch. 28 Art. V) — no PV ground-mount structure classification found anywhere in Code Ch. 28 Zoning or Ch. 8 Building
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedUtility not confirmed (q22); Utility-Review page (full text read) contains no AC-disconnect location spec; the FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 state floor would apply if the utility is confirmed investor-owned, but I did not want to present the floor as a City or utility-specific answer without the utility name
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
Nothing recorded for City of St. Augustine on this step yet — 3 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — City staff perform final building/electrical inspections; no delegation to county or a private provider was found. 78% · department page
- If delegated, to whom? N/A — not delegated (see Q52). 70% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
Nothing recorded for City of St. Augustine on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
Nothing recorded for City of St. Augustine on this step yet — 3 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- How are corrections issued and cleared? The City publishes a 'Revision Form (PDF)' among the additional documents listed on the Building Permit Information page, implying corrections/plan revisions are submitted via that form and routed through the Permit Portal, but no PV-specific or general correction-and-clearance procedure narrative was found. 45% · department page (form link)
14 questions answered against City of St. Augustine’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information page and Permit Portal page (full text read) — inspections are presumably requested through the Permit Portal (per the general permitting-process list: 'Schedule a final inspection after the work is complete'), but no dedicated booking-method page equivalent to 'Daily Building Inspections' (which is itself a near-empty stub page with no real content) was found
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDaily Building Inspections page (near-empty stub — title and nav only, no body content) and Building Permit Information page — no notice period stated
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame stub page as q50 — no AM/PM or same-day window information published
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — City staff perform final building/electrical inspections; no delegation to county or a private provider was found.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Storm Recovery Permitting Guide states plainly, even for disaster response, 'Inspections will be performed by city staff and/or other personnel activated by mutual aid system' (the mutual aid being an emergency-only backstop, not routine delegation); 'buildinginspection@citystaug.com' is the City's own inspection contact throughout the Building Permit Information and Storm Recovery pages.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1325/Storm-Recovery-Permitting-Guide
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
N/A — not delegated (see Q52).
Why the confidence is not higherFollows from Q52.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1325/Storm-Recovery-Permitting-Guide
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information, Daily Building Inspections (stub), and Documents Required PDF — no inspection sequence for Solar (or any trade) is published
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as q54 — no rough-in/mid-roof inspection requirement stated for PV or roofing generally
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame as q54 — no statement that the inspector verifies labels/listings as a discrete checked item
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedDaily Building Inspections stub page, Building Permit Information page, and a DocumentCenter search (non-functional search endpoint, see q15 note) — no published PV or general building inspection checklist found, in contrast to the HARB Completeness Review Checklist which does exist for historic applications
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information and Documents Required PDF — no PV-specific on-site document list found
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFee-schedule search (see q15 note on the non-functional DocumentCenter search) — no re-inspection fee amount located
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
The City publishes a 'Revision Form (PDF)' among the additional documents listed on the Building Permit Information page, implying corrections/plan revisions are submitted via that form and routed through the Permit Portal, but no PV-specific or general correction-and-clearance procedure narrative was found.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the existence of the Revision Form link alone; no page describes the correction workflow end-to-end.
department page (form link) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.citystaug.com/1199/Building-Permit-Information
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedBuilding Permit Information and Daily Building Inspections (stub) pages — no statement of what document/status (CO, Final, Green Tag) is issued specifically on passing a PV/electrical final inspection
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedUtility not confirmed (q22) so the utility-notification-for-PTO mechanism could not be sourced to a specific utility document; no City page states the City notifies the utility
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording None%
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go None%
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.