City of St. Marks

Wakulla County · Florida ← All authorities

City of St. Marks

Wakulla County

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

City of St. Marks is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 274 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for City of St. Marks against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

City of St. Marks is not the permitting authority for residential solar here 90% confidence
Holds
Zoning and site-plan approval, Land Development Code compliance, and floodplain administration (the city manager is the designated floodplain administrator, Sec. 38-14), including the city's own local amendments to the Florida Building Code at Secs. 38-88 and 38-89. The city does NOT hold building or electrical permitting, plan review, or inspection. It is still a mandatory first step: a completed site-plan application package plus fee must be approved by the city and a compliance letter issued to the county building inspector before a permit is submitted to the county.
Delegated to
Wakulla County Building Department, 3095 Crawfordville Highway, Crawfordville FL 32327, (850) 926-7636 — Building Official Clyde Collins; Building Inspectors Henry West and Warren Mohrfeld; portal CitizenServe; inspection line (850) 309-3562.
Overridden by
FS 163.04(1) prohibits any local ordinance that prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors, and FS 163.04(2) limits a deed restriction or HOA to specifying roof location within an orientation to the south or 45 degrees east or west of due south. FS 471.003(2)(h) sets a statewide electrical PE-stamp exemption ($125,000 / 600 amperes at 240V residential). The Florida Building Code, adopted by floating reference at Wakulla County Code Sec. 8-1 and pulled into the city by St. Marks Code Sec. 14-1, overrides the Land Development Code where they disagree (Sec. 8-1 says so expressly). Talquin Electric Cooperative's Interconnection Agreement sits DOWNSTREAM of the AHJ, not above it: it requires the local code official's inspection and approval before parallel operation.
Why not higher
Direct, first-hand evidence gathered in this run. The city's own Permits page states verbatim: 'The City of St. Marks has adopted the Wakulla County Building Code... The site plan application package MUST be submitted to the city before any work begins and before a permit is submitted to the county.' The codified ordinance agrees: Sec. 14-1 'The city hereby adopts the building code of the county, as amended, as the building code for the city' (Ord. 73-1, 1973), and Sec. 14-2 requires the fee 'before the issuance of a compliance letter to the county building inspector by the city'. The county side was re-proved independently, not inherited: the Wakulla County Building Department page names its own Building Official, two Building Inspectors and permit techs and states it 'reviews building plans, issues permits, and conducts inspections'. The city's own published page set was walked in full and it has no building department, no building official, no permit portal and no inspector — its only utilities are water and wastewater. Held at 90 rather than 95 for one reason: Sec. 14-2's codified city fee ($25 residential) has been superseded by Ordinance 2025-05 ($35), which shows the codified chapter is two years stale (Municode's banner: 'Codified through Ordinance No. 2023-02, enacted June 8, 2023, Supp. No. 18'), so other parts of Chapter 14 could also have moved without appearing in the code.

https://www.cityofstmarks.com/departments/permits.php

Permit required
Yes, and twice over: a city development permit/site-plan approval (Land Development Code Sec. 12.01.01 — 'No development activity may be undertaken unless the activity is authorized by a…90%
Permit cost
Composite, paid to two bodies. CITY (Ordinance 2025-05, first reading 10 Apr 2025): Residential Application Fee $35.00; Plan Review $35.00; Administrative Fee for Zoning Hearing $25.00;80%
Plan review
City: 2–4 business days for a site-plan application package that does not require a Local Planning Board meeting, 'providing no additional administrative work is needed';92%
Portal
County: CitizenServe (Wakulla County Building Department Permit Portal). City: no portal — the site-plan application package is filed with City Hall, 788 Port Leon Drive, (850) 925-6224.90%
Electrical code
No NEC edition is named by either authority. The city adopts the county's building code (Sec. 14-1) and the county adopts 'The Florida Building Code,70%
Own placard wording
No.85%
Booking an inspection
Portal or phone, through the county. 'Inspection requests may be submitted online through the CitizenServe Portal or by calling the Inspection Line at (850) 309-3562.' The city does not…92%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes, and twice over: a city development permit/site-plan approval (Land Development Code Sec. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Not stated for PV. The county fee schedule carries a standalone 'Photovoltaic solar system' permit line AND a separate 'Residential Electrical' line ($75 single… Q4 Plan review — City: 2–4 business days for a site-plan application package that does not require a Local Planning Board meeting, Q18 Where you file — County: CitizenServe (Wakulla County Building Department Permit Portal). City: no portal — the site-plan application package is filed with City Hall, Q20

Permit required
Yes, and twice over: a city development permit/site-plan approval (Land Development Code Sec. 12.01.01 — 'No development activity may be undertaken unless the activity is authorized by a development…90% source
What it costs
Composite, paid to two bodies. CITY (Ordinance 2025-05, first reading 10 Apr 2025): Residential Application Fee $35.00; Plan Review $35.00; Administrative Fee for Zoning Hearing $25.00;80% source
Plan review turnaround
City: 2–4 business days for a site-plan application package that does not require a Local Planning Board meeting, 'providing no additional administrative work is needed';92% source
Key document
authority permit page + adopting ordinance cited by 4 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? No — not for building or electrical. The City of St. Marks has adopted the Wakulla County Building Code (St. Marks Code Sec. 14-1) and the building/electrical permit is issued and inspected by the Wakulla County Building Department. The city IS a mandatory gate in front of that: a completed site-plan application package plus fee must be approved by the city, and a compliance letter issued to the county building inspector, before a permit is submitted to the county. 95% · authority permit page + adopting ordinance
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Delegated. City keeps: zoning/site-plan approval, land development code compliance, and floodplain administration (the city manager is the designated floodplain administrator, Sec. 38-14). County takes: building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and roofing permitting, plan review and inspection. 90% · adopting ordinance
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes, and twice over: a city development permit/site-plan approval (Land Development Code Sec. 12.01.01 — 'No development activity may be undertaken unless the activity is authorized by a development permit'; 'development' includes 'building, installing, enlarging, replacing or substantially restoring a structure'), and a Wakulla County building/electrical permit. 90% · ordinance
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Not stated for PV. The county fee schedule carries a standalone 'Photovoltaic solar system' permit line AND a separate 'Residential Electrical' line ($75 single inspection / $115 multiple inspections); other combination jobs in the same schedule (boat lift, in-ground pool) are billed as a base fee plus a distinct 'Electric' line, which suggests an electrical line is added rather than combined — but the schedule does not say so for PV. 50% · fee schedule
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — neither the city nor the county conditions a permit on HOA or architectural approval. Private HOA approval does exist in at least one St. Marks subdivision: the city's own 10 Sep 2026 Planning Board package contains an architectural approval letter from Villages of St. Marks Homeowners Association, Inc. filed alongside a site plan application. Statewide override: FS 163.04(2) says a deed restriction or covenant 'may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors'; an HOA may only 'determine the specific location where solar collectors may be installed on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45° east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors.' 85% · statute + authority agenda package
    • Is there a historic-district review? No. The St. Marks code contains no historic-district designation, no historic preservation board, no design review and no certificate-of-appropriateness procedure. The Land Development Code's Article V (Resource Protection Standards) covers trees, environmentally sensitive lands and endangered species habitat only — sections 5.03.00 and 5.05.00 are Reserved. Historic protection appears only as intent language (LDC 1.05.02.H) and comprehensive plan policies, plus one operative provision: Sec. 38-45, a flood-code variance for historic buildings. 85% · ordinance (full-text search with controls)
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate windstorm certification is required. What applies instead: Florida Product Approval (the county publishes a PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET that 'must be completed for products requiring a FL Product Approval Number' and must be signed, and it appears on every county checklist), and the county's codified wind-speed contour lines. St. Marks sits south and west of every contour, which puts it in the 130 MPH zone for Risk Category II buildings. 75% · department page + filed site plan
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No Special Use Permit or Council approval is codified for residential rooftop PV, and FS 163.04(1) expressly prohibits any local ordinance 'which prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors'. But there is a real discretionary step: the city routes site-plan packages either to administrative approval or to a Local Planning Board (Local Planning Agency) meeting. 'Simple projects (i.e. AC changeout, fill dirt, fences, reroofs) do not require a Local Planning Board meeting, unless the City Manager or City Attorney deem it necessary.' Solar is not on that simple list, so a monthly Planning Board hearing is possible. 70% · department page + statute
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No local kW cap on residential generation in either code. The effective cap is the utility's: Talquin's Interconnection Agreement defines a Renewable Generation System as 'rated at no more than 1000 kilowatts (kW) alternating current (AC) power output', with insurance tiers at not less than $100,000 for 10 kW or less, $1,000,000 above 10 kW to 100 kW, and $2,000,000 above 100 kW to 1,000 kW. 80% · utility interconnection agreement
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A Florida state-certified contractor, or a contractor locally licensed under Wakulla County's Certificate of Competency scheme (county Code Sec. 8-2, amendment 102.2), or the homeowner as an owner-builder. The county's checklists require that 'Subs must hold a Wakulla County Competency Card or State Certification'. 85% · published checklist + ordinance
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes. Wakulla County requires new contractors to register with the Building Department before applying: state-certified licence, general liability and workers' compensation certificates naming Wakulla County as certificate holder at 3095 Crawfordville Hwy, workers' comp exemption if applicable, Florida Business Tax Receipt, current phone/email for the licence holder, and a notarised Letter of Authorization if someone else collects permits. 95% · department page
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. 'Property owners may act as their own contractor under Florida's Owner-Builder provisions. However, all construction must comply with Wakulla County regulations, the Florida Building Code... Owner-builders are held to the same standards as licensed contractors.' A notarised Homeowner's Affidavit is required whenever the homeowner does any of the work, and the county publishes an OWNER BUILDER STATEMENT form. 92% · department page
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? Two packages, in sequence. (1) CITY — an 'Application for Site Plan Approval' with: digital copy of site plan; completed application; deed and legal description; boundary survey; fees; stormwater certification; transportation concurrency review application; two physical copies of the site plan; and 'Other items may also be required'. (2) COUNTY — no PV-specific submittal checklist exists. The county Document Center publishes 34 files (23 named 'Checklist ...' covering Addition, Commercial, DCA, Deck, Demo, Docks, Enclosure, House Moving, MH, Misc, PBSHED, Pool, ReRoof, Remodel, SFD, Screenroom/Porch, Tent, Workshop/Garage) and none is solar or PV. The nearest applicable general items are the Sub-Contractors List, Product Approval Specification Sheet, Notice of Commencement and Homeowner's Affidavit. 75% · completed application filed in the authority's own agenda package
    • How many copies, and in what format? City: two physical copies of the site plan plus one digital copy. County: not stated — the CitizenServe portal takes document uploads and the county also accepts in-person application, but no copy count is published. 70% · completed application filed in the authority's own agenda package
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes — a site plan is the centre of the city's submittal. From the city's Application for Site Plan Approval, the plan/application must show: project name and intended use; property owner(s) and agent; location and parcel ID; acreage; NFIP panel number and effective date, flood zone and base flood elevation; total parcel area in sq ft; impervious surface area; number of buildings; number of stories and height; parking and driveway area in sq ft; number of parking spaces; floor area ratio. A boundary survey and the recorded deed accompany it. 75% · completed application filed in the authority's own agenda package
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Not required by either AHJ's published materials. The requirement comes from the utility: Talquin Electric Cooperative's Solar page requires a 'Line Diagram of Renewable Generation Service and Output Level' as one of four documents returned to the Cooperative. 80% · utility program page
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No PV-specific threshold is published by either authority. What the county does require, generally: for a new one- or two-family dwelling, two sets of structural plans signed and sealed by a Florida licensed architect or engineer, OR two sets of plans with a detailed wind load analysis signed and sealed; and 'All Construction plans A, AE & VE flood zones shall be sealed by a Florida Licensed Architect or Engineer (8th Edition FBC Residential 322.3.9)'. Almost all of St. Marks is in an A/AE/VE zone. Whether that reaches a rooftop PV retrofit is not stated anywhere. 60% · published checklist
    • Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No local requirement. Statewide floor only: FS 471.003(2)(h) exempts a licensed electrical contractor from engineer licensure where the project requires an electrical system valued at $125,000 or less AND an aggregate service capacity of 600 amperes (240 volts) or less on a residential electrical system. 85% · statute
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? County: CitizenServe (Wakulla County Building Department Permit Portal). City: no portal — the site-plan application package is filed with City Hall, 788 Port Leon Drive, (850) 925-6224. 90% · portal landing page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? No, not end to end. The county half can be done entirely online through CitizenServe (submit applications, upload documents, monitor progress, pay, schedule inspections). The city half cannot: the site-plan application package must be submitted to the city with 'The property owners original signature', and the city states 'No over-the-counter or verbal approvals will be provided.' 80% · department page + portal
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? Composite, paid to two bodies. CITY (Ordinance 2025-05, first reading 10 Apr 2025): Residential Application Fee $35.00; Plan Review $35.00; Administrative Fee for Zoning Hearing $25.00; Zoning Determination Request $75.00; Pre-application conference $150.00; engineering and/or City Attorney services at hourly rate. 'For simple approvals that do not require a Local Planning Agency Committee hearing (i.e. water heaters, air conditioners, reroofs, fences, fill dirt, and tree removals), only the Application Fee applies.' COUNTY (Resolution 13-61): 'Photovoltaic solar system — Residential — $100.00' AND, on the next line, 'Photovoltaic solar system — up to 4 KW $150.00 / over 4 KW .25 per KW'; plus 'Residential — application and plans review $35.00'. 80% · fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Mixed and internally inconsistent. City: flat, by property type. County: one PV line is a flat $100 regardless of size; the other is size-tiered ($150 up to 4 kW, then $0.25 per kW above 4 kW). Neither is valuation-based. 80% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes, at both levels. City Ordinance 2025-05 lists 'Plan Review' ($35 residential) as its own column separate from the Application Fee. County Resolution 13-61 lists 'Residential — application and plans review: $35.00' separately from the permit fees. 85% · fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? City: 2–4 business days for a site-plan application package that does not require a Local Planning Board meeting, 'providing no additional administrative work is needed'; packages that DO require a Local Planning Board meeting must be submitted complete at least 10 days before the meeting, and the board meets once a month before the Regular Commission Meeting at 6:00pm. County: online applications generally reviewed within 2–4 business days; in-office applications typically 1–3 business days. 92% · department page
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? City floodplain development permit or approval: invalid unless work commences within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended/abandoned for 180 days after commencing; extensions of not more than 180 days each on written justifiable cause (Sec. 38-28). County building permit validity: not published. 70% · ordinance
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc. — most likely, but NOT confirmed for St. Marks specifically. 60% · utility's own about page (inference, not a territory statement)
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After the AHJ. Talquin's Interconnection Agreement, clause 1: 'The Member agrees to provide the Cooperative with written certification that the RGS installation has been inspected by the local code official who has certified that the installation was permitted and has been approved and has met all electrical and mechanical requirements.' Clause 2: 'Such certification shall be delivered to Cooperative prior to the operation of the RGS.' The Solar page lists 'County Inspection/Release' as one of the four documents that must be returned. 95% · utility interconnection agreement

28 questions answered against City of St. Marks’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

No — not for building or electrical. The City of St. Marks has adopted the Wakulla County Building Code (St. Marks Code Sec. 14-1) and the building/electrical permit is issued and inspected by the Wakulla County Building Department. The city IS a mandatory gate in front of that: a completed site-plan application package plus fee must be approved by the city, and a compliance letter issued to the county building inspector, before a permit is submitted to the county.

Why the confidence is not higherThe city's own Permits page says verbatim 'The City of St. Marks has adopted the Wakulla County Building Code' and 'The site plan application package MUST be submitted to the city before any work begins and before a permit is submitted to the county.' Codified at Sec. 14-1 ('The city hereby adopts the building code of the county') and Sec. 14-2 ('before the issuance of a compliance letter to the county building inspector by the city').

authority permit page + adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/departments/permits.php

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Delegated. City keeps: zoning/site-plan approval, land development code compliance, and floodplain administration (the city manager is the designated floodplain administrator, Sec. 38-14). County takes: building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and roofing permitting, plan review and inspection.

Why the confidence is not higherCity side from Sec. 14-1/14-2 and Sec. 38-14 in the city's codified ordinances; county side from the Wakulla County Building Department's own 'Our Services' list (permitting, plan review, inspections, contractor registration). Held below 95 because no single document states the split in one sentence — it is assembled from the city code, the city permits page and the county department page.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH14BUBURE_S14-1COBUCO

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes, and twice over: a city development permit/site-plan approval (Land Development Code Sec. 12.01.01 — 'No development activity may be undertaken unless the activity is authorized by a development permit'; 'development' includes 'building, installing, enlarging, replacing or substantially restoring a structure'), and a Wakulla County building/electrical permit.

Why the confidence is not higherLDC Sec. 12.01.01 plus the definitions at Sec. 12.00.03, read together with the city permits page and the county fee schedule's standing 'Photovoltaic solar system' permit line. Neither document names solar explicitly, so this is the general rule applied to PV rather than a PV-specific statement.

ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_APXBLADECO_ARTXIIADEN_12.01.01GE

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Not stated for PV. The county fee schedule carries a standalone 'Photovoltaic solar system' permit line AND a separate 'Residential Electrical' line ($75 single inspection / $115 multiple inspections); other combination jobs in the same schedule (boat lift, in-ground pool) are billed as a base fee plus a distinct 'Electric' line, which suggests an electrical line is added rather than combined — but the schedule does not say so for PV.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from the structure of the county's own fee schedule, not a statement. 50 because the schedule is silent on the point and the resolution dates from 2013.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Resolution%2013-61%20Building%20Fees.remediated.pdf

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

A Florida state-certified contractor, or a contractor locally licensed under Wakulla County's Certificate of Competency scheme (county Code Sec. 8-2, amendment 102.2), or the homeowner as an owner-builder. The county's checklists require that 'Subs must hold a Wakulla County Competency Card or State Certification'.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty checklists (Misc, SFD, Re-Roof all carry the same line) plus county Code Sec. 8-2's locally-licensed-contractor requirements and the county's owner-builder paragraph. Held at 85 because no document addresses the electrical permit for a PV job specifically.

published checklist + ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Checklist%20Misc.remediated.pdf

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes. Wakulla County requires new contractors to register with the Building Department before applying: state-certified licence, general liability and workers' compensation certificates naming Wakulla County as certificate holder at 3095 Crawfordville Hwy, workers' comp exemption if applicable, Florida Business Tax Receipt, current phone/email for the licence holder, and a notarised Letter of Authorization if someone else collects permits.

Why the confidence is not higherThe county's own New Contractor Registration page lists these verbatim, and the Permit Application and Fees page repeats that 'New contractors who have never registered in Wakulla County will need to register with the Building department prior to creating an account.'

department page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/new_contractor_registration.php

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes. 'Property owners may act as their own contractor under Florida's Owner-Builder provisions. However, all construction must comply with Wakulla County regulations, the Florida Building Code... Owner-builders are held to the same standards as licensed contractors.' A notarised Homeowner's Affidavit is required whenever the homeowner does any of the work, and the county publishes an OWNER BUILDER STATEMENT form.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the county's Permit Application and Fees page; the affidavit requirement appears on every county checklist and the form is in the county Document Center.

department page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/permit_fee.php

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

Two packages, in sequence. (1) CITY — an 'Application for Site Plan Approval' with: digital copy of site plan; completed application; deed and legal description; boundary survey; fees; stormwater certification; transportation concurrency review application; two physical copies of the site plan; and 'Other items may also be required'. (2) COUNTY — no PV-specific submittal checklist exists. The county Document Center publishes 34 files (23 named 'Checklist ...' covering Addition, Commercial, DCA, Deck, Demo, Docks, Enclosure, House Moving, MH, Misc, PBSHED, Pool, ReRoof, Remodel, SFD, Screenroom/Porch, Tent, Workshop/Garage) and none is solar or PV. The nearest applicable general items are the Sub-Contractors List, Product Approval Specification Sheet, Notice of Commencement and Homeowner's Affidavit.

Why the confidence is not higherThe city's required-items list is transcribed from a completed Application for Site Plan Approval and its transmittal checklist inside the city's own 10 Sep 2026 Planning Board agenda package — the city does not publish a blank form or checklist anywhere on its site (its Permits page Document Center renders with zero categories). The county absence is proved: I enumerated all 34 PDFs linked from the county Document Center page in this run. 75 rather than higher because the city's list comes from a filed application rather than a published form.

completed application filed in the authority's own agenda package checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/City%20Commission%20Meetings/Planning-Board-09102026-Package.pdf

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

City: two physical copies of the site plan plus one digital copy. County: not stated — the CitizenServe portal takes document uploads and the county also accepts in-person application, but no copy count is published.

Why the confidence is not higherCity figure from the required-items list on the Application for Site Plan Approval in the city's Planning Board package. County side is an absence I looked for on the Permit Application and Fees page and in all 34 Document Center files and did not find.

completed application filed in the authority's own agenda package checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/City%20Commission%20Meetings/Planning-Board-09102026-Package.pdf

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Yes — a site plan is the centre of the city's submittal. From the city's Application for Site Plan Approval, the plan/application must show: project name and intended use; property owner(s) and agent; location and parcel ID; acreage; NFIP panel number and effective date, flood zone and base flood elevation; total parcel area in sq ft; impervious surface area; number of buildings; number of stories and height; parking and driveway area in sq ft; number of parking spaces; floor area ratio. A boundary survey and the recorded deed accompany it.

Why the confidence is not higherTranscribed from the completed Application for Site Plan Approval in the city's own Planning Board agenda package (10 Sep 2026). The city publishes no blank form, so field names come from a filled example. Nothing in the form is PV-specific.

completed application filed in the authority's own agenda package checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/City%20Commission%20Meetings/Planning-Board-09102026-Package.pdf

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Not required by either AHJ's published materials. The requirement comes from the utility: Talquin Electric Cooperative's Solar page requires a 'Line Diagram of Renewable Generation Service and Output Level' as one of four documents returned to the Cooperative.

Why the confidence is not higherTalquin's own Solar page lists it. The AHJ side is a proved absence — no PV checklist exists in the county Document Center (34 files enumerated) and a full-text search of the complete St. Marks code found no PV provision. 80 because Talquin does not say whether a one-line or three-line diagram is wanted.

utility program page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/account/energy-efficiency/solar/

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCity Permits page (its Document Center renders with zero categories); Ordinance 2025-05 fee schedule; the complete codified St. Marks Code and Land Development Code pulled in full via the Municode API (757 documents, ~970 KB, searched with positive controls 'electrical'/'Florida Building Code' hitting and fabricated controls 'zzqqx'/'qxzzwv' returning nothing); all 34 files linked from the Wakulla County Building Department Document Center, with Checklist Misc, Checklist SFD and Checklist ReRoof downloaded and read in full; Wakulla County Resolution 13-61 fee schedule read as text. No string, conductor or voltage-drop calculation requirement appears anywhere, and no PV submittal document exists to carry one.

https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

No PV-specific threshold is published by either authority. What the county does require, generally: for a new one- or two-family dwelling, two sets of structural plans signed and sealed by a Florida licensed architect or engineer, OR two sets of plans with a detailed wind load analysis signed and sealed; and 'All Construction plans A, AE & VE flood zones shall be sealed by a Florida Licensed Architect or Engineer (8th Edition FBC Residential 322.3.9)'. Almost all of St. Marks is in an A/AE/VE zone. Whether that reaches a rooftop PV retrofit is not stated anywhere.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the county's SFD checklist (revision stamp SFD 7/2025). 60 because the checklist is written for new dwellings and no document extends or excludes it for a PV retrofit — this is the closest published rule, not a rule about solar.

published checklist checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Checklist%20SFD.remediated.pdf

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

No local requirement. Statewide floor only: FS 471.003(2)(h) exempts a licensed electrical contractor from engineer licensure where the project requires an electrical system valued at $125,000 or less AND an aggregate service capacity of 600 amperes (240 volts) or less on a residential electrical system.

Why the confidence is not higherRead from the enacted statute text on leg.state.fl.us in this run. 85 rather than higher because this is a statewide exemption from PE licensure, not an AHJ statement that no stamp is wanted — neither the city nor the county publishes anything on electrical PE stamps.

statute checked 2026-09-14 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0400-0499/0471/Sections/0471.003.html

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

Composite, paid to two bodies. CITY (Ordinance 2025-05, first reading 10 Apr 2025): Residential Application Fee $35.00; Plan Review $35.00; Administrative Fee for Zoning Hearing $25.00; Zoning Determination Request $75.00; Pre-application conference $150.00; engineering and/or City Attorney services at hourly rate. 'For simple approvals that do not require a Local Planning Agency Committee hearing (i.e. water heaters, air conditioners, reroofs, fences, fill dirt, and tree removals), only the Application Fee applies.' COUNTY (Resolution 13-61): 'Photovoltaic solar system — Residential — $100.00' AND, on the next line, 'Photovoltaic solar system — up to 4 KW $150.00 / over 4 KW .25 per KW'; plus 'Residential — application and plans review $35.00'.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth fee documents were downloaded and read as text in this run. Held at 80 for two reasons: the county schedule contains two different, unreconciled PV lines (Resolution 13-61 dates from 2013 though the county re-uploaded the PDF in Nov 2025 and still links it as the current schedule), and the city's 'simple approvals' list does not name solar, so whether a PV job pays $35 or $70 at the city is not determinable from the document.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/Building%20and%20zoning/Ordinance%202025-05%20Building%20Fees.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Mixed and internally inconsistent. City: flat, by property type. County: one PV line is a flat $100 regardless of size; the other is size-tiered ($150 up to 4 kW, then $0.25 per kW above 4 kW). Neither is valuation-based.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth lines appear in the same county resolution, one immediately below the other. Reported as a conflict rather than resolved, because the document itself does not resolve it.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Resolution%2013-61%20Building%20Fees.remediated.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes, at both levels. City Ordinance 2025-05 lists 'Plan Review' ($35 residential) as its own column separate from the Application Fee. County Resolution 13-61 lists 'Residential — application and plans review: $35.00' separately from the permit fees.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly from both fee documents. 85 because the city's note that 'only the Application Fee applies' for simple approvals means the $35 plan review may not be charged on every job.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/Building%20and%20zoning/Ordinance%202025-05%20Building%20Fees.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

City: 2–4 business days for a site-plan application package that does not require a Local Planning Board meeting, 'providing no additional administrative work is needed'; packages that DO require a Local Planning Board meeting must be submitted complete at least 10 days before the meeting, and the board meets once a month before the Regular Commission Meeting at 6:00pm. County: online applications generally reviewed within 2–4 business days; in-office applications typically 1–3 business days.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth figures are stated plainly on the authorities' own current pages. 92 rather than 95 because neither is specific to solar and both are qualified ('generally', 'typically', 'providing no additional administrative work').

department page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/departments/permits.php

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

City floodplain development permit or approval: invalid unless work commences within 180 days of issuance, or if work is suspended/abandoned for 180 days after commencing; extensions of not more than 180 days each on written justifiable cause (Sec. 38-28). County building permit validity: not published.

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 38-28 read in full from the codified city ordinance. 70 because a rooftop PV job's permit is a county building permit, and the 180-day rule I can source is the city's floodplain permit — the county's own expiry rule is not published on any page or document I reached.

ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH38FL_ARTIAD_DIV4PE_S38-28EX

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

County: CitizenServe (Wakulla County Building Department Permit Portal). City: no portal — the site-plan application package is filed with City Hall, 788 Port Leon Drive, (850) 925-6224.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty portal named on its own Citizenserve Portal page. City absence proved by walking the city's entire published page set (Government, Departments, Community, Utility Billing, Permits, Building & Zoning) in this run — the only online systems the city runs are utility bill payment and e-billing.

portal landing page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

No, not end to end. The county half can be done entirely online through CitizenServe (submit applications, upload documents, monitor progress, pay, schedule inspections). The city half cannot: the site-plan application package must be submitted to the city with 'The property owners original signature', and the city states 'No over-the-counter or verbal approvals will be provided.'

Why the confidence is not higherCounty claim quoted from its Citizenserve Portal page; city constraint quoted from its Permits page. 80 because the city does not say outright that email submission is refused — only that an original signature is required and no verbal/counter approval is given.

department page + portal checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/departments/permits.php

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Talquin Electric Cooperative, Inc. — most likely, but NOT confirmed for St. Marks specifically.

Why the confidence is not higherEvidence chain, all gathered in this run: Talquin's own history page says the cooperative 'expanded into Liberty, Leon, and Wakulla counties' and that 'Our service territory spans from Florida's Gulf Coast to the Florida/Georgia state line'; it runs a Crawfordville (Wakulla County) member services office; and its solar programme requires a 'County Inspection/Release', which matches Wakulla County being the inspecting authority. On the city side, St. Marks publishes only water and wastewater utilities, its Charter's electric-service provisions were deleted as repealed, and it levies a 10% tax on the purchase of electric current (Sec. 66-1) plus franchise fees — i.e. it buys power from someone else rather than selling it. What I could NOT find is any document naming St. Marks as a Talquin service point: Talquin publishes no territory map I could reach, and the St. Marks code references a 'City of Tallahassee Power Line' right-of-way running through Section 35 (the City of Tallahassee also owns the Purdom generating station at St. Marks), which is a real reason not to be certain. 60, and it should be confirmed from a bill or a Talquin address check before being relied on.

utility's own about page (inference, not a territory statement) checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/about-us/who-we-are/

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

After the AHJ. Talquin's Interconnection Agreement, clause 1: 'The Member agrees to provide the Cooperative with written certification that the RGS installation has been inspected by the local code official who has certified that the installation was permitted and has been approved and has met all electrical and mechanical requirements.' Clause 2: 'Such certification shall be delivered to Cooperative prior to the operation of the RGS.' The Solar page lists 'County Inspection/Release' as one of the four documents that must be returned.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the utility's own Interconnection Agreement PDF (revision stamped 01-29-2021), extracted with pdftotext in this run.

utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No — neither the city nor the county conditions a permit on HOA or architectural approval. Private HOA approval does exist in at least one St. Marks subdivision: the city's own 10 Sep 2026 Planning Board package contains an architectural approval letter from Villages of St. Marks Homeowners Association, Inc. filed alongside a site plan application. Statewide override: FS 163.04(2) says a deed restriction or covenant 'may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors'; an HOA may only 'determine the specific location where solar collectors may be installed on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45° east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors.'

Why the confidence is not higherStatute text read from leg.state.fl.us in this run; the HOA letter read from the city's own agenda package. 85 because the city does not publish a statement about HOA approval either way — the 'No' is inference from its absence in the permits page, the fee ordinance and the whole Land Development Code.

statute + authority agenda package checked 2026-09-14 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163.04.html

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

No. The St. Marks code contains no historic-district designation, no historic preservation board, no design review and no certificate-of-appropriateness procedure. The Land Development Code's Article V (Resource Protection Standards) covers trees, environmentally sensitive lands and endangered species habitat only — sections 5.03.00 and 5.05.00 are Reserved. Historic protection appears only as intent language (LDC 1.05.02.H) and comprehensive plan policies, plus one operative provision: Sec. 38-45, a flood-code variance for historic buildings.

Why the confidence is not higherProved by full-text search over the complete codified St. Marks code pulled in this run (757 documents, ~970 KB): 'historic district' 0 hits, 'certificate of appropriateness' 0 hits; the 46 'historic' hits are all comprehensive plan policies, tree provisions, or Sec. 38-45. Search controls in the same run: 'electrical' 37 hits and 'Florida Building Code' 61 hits (positive), 'zzqqx' and 'qxzzwv' 0 hits (fabricated). 85 not 95 because designation could exist outside the code (e.g. a National Register listing) without a local review trigger.

ordinance (full-text search with controls) checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_APXBLADECO_ARTVREPRST

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

No separate windstorm certification is required. What applies instead: Florida Product Approval (the county publishes a PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET that 'must be completed for products requiring a FL Product Approval Number' and must be signed, and it appears on every county checklist), and the county's codified wind-speed contour lines. St. Marks sits south and west of every contour, which puts it in the 130 MPH zone for Risk Category II buildings.

Why the confidence is not higherThe contour descriptions are on the county's own Wind Speed Lines page; St. Marks' position relative to them is my reading of the described routes (they run along US 98, the Wakulla River, CR 365 and Spring Creek Highway, all north/east of the town). Independently corroborated: a St. Marks site plan filed in the city's 10 Sep 2026 Planning Board package states 'Design wind speed 130 mph ultimate (ASCE 7), Exposure C assumed'. 75 because I am reading a boundary from a written route description, not from a map.

department page + filed site plan checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/wind_speed_lines.php

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

No Special Use Permit or Council approval is codified for residential rooftop PV, and FS 163.04(1) expressly prohibits any local ordinance 'which prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors'. But there is a real discretionary step: the city routes site-plan packages either to administrative approval or to a Local Planning Board (Local Planning Agency) meeting. 'Simple projects (i.e. AC changeout, fill dirt, fences, reroofs) do not require a Local Planning Board meeting, unless the City Manager or City Attorney deem it necessary.' Solar is not on that simple list, so a monthly Planning Board hearing is possible.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the city's Permits page and the enacted statute. 70 because the city's simple-project list is illustrative ('i.e.') and does not say where PV falls — whether a rooftop array is heard by the Planning Board is a judgement the City Manager makes, not something published.

department page + statute checked 2026-09-14 https://www.cityofstmarks.com/departments/permits.php

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No local kW cap on residential generation in either code. The effective cap is the utility's: Talquin's Interconnection Agreement defines a Renewable Generation System as 'rated at no more than 1000 kilowatts (kW) alternating current (AC) power output', with insurance tiers at not less than $100,000 for 10 kW or less, $1,000,000 above 10 kW to 100 kW, and $2,000,000 above 100 kW to 1,000 kW.

Why the confidence is not higherUtility figures quoted from the Interconnection Agreement. The local absence is proved by full-text search of the complete St. Marks code (no 'photovoltaic', no 'PV', no kW cap) with positive and fabricated controls passing in the same run, plus a Municode search of the Wakulla County code ('photovoltaic' 0 hits, control 'Florida Building Code' 172 hits, fabricated 'zzqqxwv' 0 hits).

utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? No NEC edition is named by either authority. The city adopts the county's building code (Sec. 14-1) and the county adopts 'The Florida Building Code, as amended from time to time' by reference (county Code Sec. 8-1) — so the NEC edition in force is whichever one the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) references. The only direct NEC reference anywhere in the county code is a floating one in its Mobile Home Code, Sec. 8-111, to 'the most recently adopted version of the National Electrical Code', which does not govern site-built dwellings. 70% · adopting ordinance
    • Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023). 90% · published checklist + adopting ordinance
    • Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, no edition named. The City of St. Marks adopts no fire code of its own: Chapter 34 creates the St. Marks Fire Department (Ord. 66-4) and nothing else — Secs. 34-1 through 34-18 are Reserved. The county's Building Department states it is 'primarily responsible for administering and enforcing the Florida Building Codes, Florida Fire Prevention Code and the adopted Ordinances for Wakulla County Building Construction', and its fee resolution is expressly a schedule of fees 'FOR INSPECTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND FIRE PREVENTION CODE'. 75% · department page + ordinance (full-text search with controls)
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes — the city has substantive local amendments to the Florida Building Code, in its flood chapter. Sec. 38-88 amends FBC Residential R322.2.1, R322.2.2 and R322.3.2 to require lowest floors at base flood elevation PLUS ONE FOOT (or the design flood elevation, whichever is higher), and prohibits fill for structural support in V zones. Sec. 38-89 amends FBC Building 1612.4 to add 1612.4.3, requiring 'The minimum elevation requirements shall be as specified in ASCE 24 or the base flood elevation plus two feet, whichever is higher.' Both by Ord. 2022-01 (10 Nov 2022) as amended by Ord. 2023-01 (9 Mar 2023). The county separately has administrative amendments under its Code Sec. 8-2 (Board of Building Trades and Appeals, local competency licensing). 92% · adopting ordinance
    • What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), adopted by Wakulla County Code Sec. 8-1 and pulled into the city by St. Marks Code Sec. 14-1; PLUS the city's flood-code amendments at Secs. 38-88 and 38-89; PLUS the St. Marks Land Development Code for siting, setbacks and impervious surface. Electrical work is judged under the FBC's referenced NEC (edition not named locally, see q29). 85% · adopting ordinance
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    • What ridge setback and access pathways are required? No local rule. Neither the City of St. Marks nor Wakulla County publishes any ridge setback, roof access pathway or smoke ventilation amendment for PV. Those requirements therefore come entirely from the Florida Fire Prevention Code and Florida Building Code as adopted, enforced by the Wakulla County Building Department (which also acts as county fire inspector under county Code Sec. 8-2, amendment 102.1(5)). 70% · ordinance full-text search with controls
  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? No local rule. Rapid shutdown is required only to the extent the NEC edition referenced by the Florida Building Code requires it; neither the city nor the county names an NEC edition or adds a rapid-shutdown amendment. 70% · ordinance full-text search with controls
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? None of its own. Neither the City of St. Marks nor Wakulla County requires any solar placard beyond whatever the adopted Florida Building Code and its referenced NEC require. The utility does not require a placard either — Talquin's requirements are documentary (interconnection agreement, line diagram, insurance, county inspection/release) plus a lockable manual disconnect switch. 80% · document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search + utility documents
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No. 85% · ordinance full-text search with controls
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No. No letter height, colour, contrast, or material specification is published by either authority. 85% · document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search
    • Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Not required locally beyond whatever the adopted code requires. Neither authority requires a site plan or facility map placard at the service equipment. 70% · document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes. Talquin Electric Cooperative requires, beyond the AHJ: a signed Interconnection Agreement; a Line Diagram of the Renewable Generation Service and its output level; Proof of Insurance (not less than $100,000 for 10 kW or less, $1,000,000 above 10 kW to 100 kW, $2,000,000 above 100 kW to 1,000 kW), attached to the agreement with all renewals provided; a County Inspection/Release — written certification that a local code official inspected, permitted and approved the installation; and written equipment specifications certifying that the RGS, inverters and associated equipment 'adhere to IEEE 1547 Standards, UL 1741 Standards, the National Electric Code, and, if applicable, has been approved by the Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC Std 203-05)'. These are documentary requirements, not placards. 90% · utility interconnection agreement
    • Where must the labels be placed? Not specified by either AHJ. The utility specifies location for one piece of equipment only: the manual disconnect switch must be 'mounted separately from the meter socket', 'readily accessible at all times to the Cooperative' and 'capable of being locked in the open position by the Cooperative'. 75% · utility interconnection agreement
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Set by the utility, not the AHJ: 'The Member shall, at the Member's expense, install and maintain a manual disconnect switch to provide a separation point between the AC power output of the RGS and any Member facilities connected to the Cooperative's electrical system. The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted separately from the meter socket and shall be readily accessible at all times to the Cooperative and shall be capable of being locked in the open position by the Cooperative.' No distance from the meter is specified. 90% · utility interconnection agreement
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Not by the AHJ, but effectively yes by two other routes. Florida Product Approval applies to building products through the county's PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET, which 'must be completed for products requiring a FL Product Approval Number' and must be signed. And Talquin requires written certification that the RGS, inverters and associated equipment adhere to IEEE 1547, UL 1741, the National Electric Code, and where applicable FSEC Std 203-05. 80% · utility interconnection agreement + published checklist
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? No local battery or ESS provision at either level. What would apply in St. Marks is the flood rule: Sec. 38-79(5) requires electrical systems above the design flood elevation (BFE+1 residential, ASCE 24 or BFE+2 building, per Secs. 38-88/38-89), with only minimum life-safety service permitted below and then only if it meets the wet-location provisions — which in practice puts a battery above BFE across nearly the whole city. Fire-side rules come from the Florida Fire Prevention Code with no local amendment. 70% · ordinance full-text search with controls
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No. Neither authority has a separate ESS permit type, fee line, or inspection. The county's fee schedule has no energy-storage entry and its checklist set has no ESS sheet. 70% · fee schedule + document centre enumeration
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Not named as such. A ground-mounted array would be regulated as an accessory structure under Land Development Code Sec. 7.01.01: it requires a permitted principal development on the parcel; it 'shall not be located in a required buffer, landscape area, or minimum building setback area'; it 'shall be included in all calculations of impervious surface and stormwater runoff'; and it must be shown on the development plan. In flood zones the city's Sec. 38-87 also caps non-elevated accessory structures at one story and 600 sq ft in Zone A/AE and 100 sq ft in Zone V/VE, requires anchoring against flotation and flood-damage-resistant materials, and requires electrical systems elevated to or above BFE. 65% · ordinance
    • Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No busbar or service-upgrade rule. But there is a local electrical siting rule that bites hard in St. Marks, which is almost entirely in AE/VE flood zones: Sec. 38-79(5) requires all development to 'Have mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems above the design flood elevation, except that minimum electric service required to address life safety and electric code requirements is permitted below the design flood elevation provided it conforms to the provisions of the electrical part of building code for wet locations.' Sec. 38-87(5) adds that non-elevated accessory structures must have 'mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems, including plumbing fixtures, elevated to or above the base flood elevation.' Design flood elevation here is BFE+1 (residential) or ASCE 24 / BFE+2 (building), per Secs. 38-88 and 38-89. 85% · ordinance
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No. Neither the city nor the county specifies a mounting system, attachment type or attachment spacing. Mounting is governed by the Florida Building Code and Florida Product Approval, with the county's PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET the only local paperwork touching it. 75% · document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search

20 questions answered against City of St. Marks’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

No NEC edition is named by either authority. The city adopts the county's building code (Sec. 14-1) and the county adopts 'The Florida Building Code, as amended from time to time' by reference (county Code Sec. 8-1) — so the NEC edition in force is whichever one the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) references. The only direct NEC reference anywhere in the county code is a floating one in its Mobile Home Code, Sec. 8-111, to 'the most recently adopted version of the National Electrical Code', which does not govern site-built dwellings.

Why the confidence is not higherThe adoption chain is solid and was re-read in this run. The NEC year itself is NOT established: I could not extract the FBC 8th Edition referenced-standards chapter — codes.iccsafe.org returned 403 to WebFetch and a JavaScript shell with no NFPA text to curl, and its API endpoints 403'd. 70 covers the 'no local edition is named' finding; do not treat the NEC year as answered here.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/wakulla_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTILADECO_CH8BUCOCO_ARTIGEPR_S8-1FLBUCODO

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023).

Why the confidence is not higherThe county's SFD checklist (revision stamp SFD 7/2025) cites '8th Edition FBC Residential 322.3.9' by name, and the county Building Department page states it administers and enforces the Florida Building Code. The county's adopting ordinance itself (Sec. 8-1) is a floating reference to 'the Florida Building Code, as amended from time to time', so the edition comes from the checklist, not the ordinance — hence 90 rather than 95.

published checklist + adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Checklist%20SFD.remediated.pdf

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

Florida Fire Prevention Code, no edition named. The City of St. Marks adopts no fire code of its own: Chapter 34 creates the St. Marks Fire Department (Ord. 66-4) and nothing else — Secs. 34-1 through 34-18 are Reserved. The county's Building Department states it is 'primarily responsible for administering and enforcing the Florida Building Codes, Florida Fire Prevention Code and the adopted Ordinances for Wakulla County Building Construction', and its fee resolution is expressly a schedule of fees 'FOR INSPECTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND FIRE PREVENTION CODE'.

Why the confidence is not higherCity absence proved by full-text search of the complete codified city code in this run: 'Fire Prevention Code' 0 hits, the four 'fire code' hits are all incidental references inside flood-code amendments. County side quoted from its department page. 75 because no edition year is stated anywhere by either body.

department page + ordinance (full-text search with controls) checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/index.php

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes — the city has substantive local amendments to the Florida Building Code, in its flood chapter. Sec. 38-88 amends FBC Residential R322.2.1, R322.2.2 and R322.3.2 to require lowest floors at base flood elevation PLUS ONE FOOT (or the design flood elevation, whichever is higher), and prohibits fill for structural support in V zones. Sec. 38-89 amends FBC Building 1612.4 to add 1612.4.3, requiring 'The minimum elevation requirements shall be as specified in ASCE 24 or the base flood elevation plus two feet, whichever is higher.' Both by Ord. 2022-01 (10 Nov 2022) as amended by Ord. 2023-01 (9 Mar 2023). The county separately has administrative amendments under its Code Sec. 8-2 (Board of Building Trades and Appeals, local competency licensing).

Why the confidence is not higherSection text read in full from the codified city ordinance in this run, with ordinance numbers and dates as printed. 92 because these are flood amendments, not solar amendments — they matter to PV through equipment elevation, not directly.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH38FL_ARTIIIFLSIDE_DIV7OTDE_S38-89AMFLBUCOBU

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), adopted by Wakulla County Code Sec. 8-1 and pulled into the city by St. Marks Code Sec. 14-1; PLUS the city's flood-code amendments at Secs. 38-88 and 38-89; PLUS the St. Marks Land Development Code for siting, setbacks and impervious surface. Electrical work is judged under the FBC's referenced NEC (edition not named locally, see q29).

Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from three documents all read in this run. 85 because no single source states the full stack for a solar job.

adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH14BUBURE_S14-1COBUCO

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

No busbar or service-upgrade rule. But there is a local electrical siting rule that bites hard in St. Marks, which is almost entirely in AE/VE flood zones: Sec. 38-79(5) requires all development to 'Have mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems above the design flood elevation, except that minimum electric service required to address life safety and electric code requirements is permitted below the design flood elevation provided it conforms to the provisions of the electrical part of building code for wet locations.' Sec. 38-87(5) adds that non-elevated accessory structures must have 'mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems, including plumbing fixtures, elevated to or above the base flood elevation.' Design flood elevation here is BFE+1 (residential) or ASCE 24 / BFE+2 (building), per Secs. 38-88 and 38-89.

Why the confidence is not higherSection text read verbatim from the codified city ordinance in this run. 85 because the sections are general flood provisions that do not mention inverters, disconnects or PV — they apply to a PV installation by their own terms, not by a solar-specific statement.

ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH38FL_ARTIIIFLSIDE_DIV7OTDE_S38-79GEREOTDE

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

No. Neither the city nor the county specifies a mounting system, attachment type or attachment spacing. Mounting is governed by the Florida Building Code and Florida Product Approval, with the county's PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET the only local paperwork touching it.

Why the confidence is not higherProved absence: full-text search over the complete St. Marks code found no PV, mounting or attachment provision (controls passed in the same run); all 34 county Document Center files were enumerated and none is a solar or mounting document; the county fee schedule has no mounting line. 75 rather than higher because an unpublished plan-review practice could still impose one.

document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

No local rule. Neither the City of St. Marks nor Wakulla County publishes any ridge setback, roof access pathway or smoke ventilation amendment for PV. Those requirements therefore come entirely from the Florida Fire Prevention Code and Florida Building Code as adopted, enforced by the Wakulla County Building Department (which also acts as county fire inspector under county Code Sec. 8-2, amendment 102.1(5)).

Why the confidence is not higherThe local absence is proved: the complete St. Marks code was searched full-text with controls passing ('setback' 33 hits, so the term works; no PV/pathway provision anywhere), and the county's 34 published documents contain no fire-access sheet. 70 and not higher because I could not extract the state fire code text itself in this run to state what the pathways actually are — the finding here is 'no local amendment', not 'no requirement'.

ordinance full-text search with controls checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH34FIPRPR

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

No local rule. Rapid shutdown is required only to the extent the NEC edition referenced by the Florida Building Code requires it; neither the city nor the county names an NEC edition or adds a rapid-shutdown amendment.

Why the confidence is not higherProved absence locally — 'rapid shutdown' returns 0 hits across the complete St. Marks code with positive controls passing in the same run, and the Wakulla County code was searched via the Municode API ('photovoltaic' 0 hits, control 'Florida Building Code' 172 hits, fabricated 'zzqqxwv' 0 hits). 70 because the NEC year, and therefore the actual rapid-shutdown standard, is not established (see q29).

ordinance full-text search with controls checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/wakulla_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTILADECO_CH8BUCOCO_ARTIGEPR_S8-1FLBUCODO

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

None of its own. Neither the City of St. Marks nor Wakulla County requires any solar placard beyond whatever the adopted Florida Building Code and its referenced NEC require. The utility does not require a placard either — Talquin's requirements are documentary (interconnection agreement, line diagram, insurance, county inspection/release) plus a lockable manual disconnect switch.

Why the confidence is not higherProved absence at three levels in this run: 'placard' returns 0 hits across the complete St. Marks code (controls passed); all 34 county Document Center files were enumerated with no labelling sheet among them; and both the Talquin Solar page and the full six-page Interconnection Agreement were read in full with no placard clause. 80 because an inspector could still enforce NEC labelling as a matter of practice without publishing anything.

document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search + utility documents checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No.

Why the confidence is not higher'placard' 0 hits and 'label' 4 hits across the complete St. Marks code, and all four 'label' hits are about parts of the Code being labelled (e.g. 'there is not a separate part of the Code labeled Subdivision Regulations') and plat annotation — none is a signage requirement. Positive controls passed in the same run.

ordinance full-text search with controls checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH14BUBURE

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No. No letter height, colour, contrast, or material specification is published by either authority.

Why the confidence is not higherSame search basis as q39; also confirmed nothing of the kind appears in the county's 34 published documents or in its fee schedule.

document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Not required locally beyond whatever the adopted code requires. Neither authority requires a site plan or facility map placard at the service equipment.

Why the confidence is not higherLocal absence proved by the same searches as q38–q40. 70 rather than higher because the governing requirement would sit in the NEC edition referenced by the FBC, which I could not pin in this run (see q29), so I cannot say what the code-level requirement actually is.

document centre enumeration + ordinance full-text search checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes. Talquin Electric Cooperative requires, beyond the AHJ: a signed Interconnection Agreement; a Line Diagram of the Renewable Generation Service and its output level; Proof of Insurance (not less than $100,000 for 10 kW or less, $1,000,000 above 10 kW to 100 kW, $2,000,000 above 100 kW to 1,000 kW), attached to the agreement with all renewals provided; a County Inspection/Release — written certification that a local code official inspected, permitted and approved the installation; and written equipment specifications certifying that the RGS, inverters and associated equipment 'adhere to IEEE 1547 Standards, UL 1741 Standards, the National Electric Code, and, if applicable, has been approved by the Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC Std 203-05)'. These are documentary requirements, not placards.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from Talquin's Solar page and its Interconnection Agreement PDF, both read in this run. 90 rather than 95 because the agreement's revision stamp is 01-29-2021 and no newer version is linked.

utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Not specified by either AHJ. The utility specifies location for one piece of equipment only: the manual disconnect switch must be 'mounted separately from the meter socket', 'readily accessible at all times to the Cooperative' and 'capable of being locked in the open position by the Cooperative'.

Why the confidence is not higherUtility text quoted from clause 9 of the Interconnection Agreement. The AHJ absence rests on the same proved searches as q38. 75 because no document anywhere in this run addresses where NEC labels go.

utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Not by the AHJ, but effectively yes by two other routes. Florida Product Approval applies to building products through the county's PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFICATION SHEET, which 'must be completed for products requiring a FL Product Approval Number' and must be signed. And Talquin requires written certification that the RGS, inverters and associated equipment adhere to IEEE 1547, UL 1741, the National Electric Code, and where applicable FSEC Std 203-05.

Why the confidence is not higherProduct Approval form named on the county Document Center page and required on every county checklist read in this run; the equipment standards quoted from clause 3 of the Interconnection Agreement. 80 because neither is an 'approved list' of PV equipment in the sense the question asks — they are certification routes.

utility interconnection agreement + published checklist checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

No local battery or ESS provision at either level. What would apply in St. Marks is the flood rule: Sec. 38-79(5) requires electrical systems above the design flood elevation (BFE+1 residential, ASCE 24 or BFE+2 building, per Secs. 38-88/38-89), with only minimum life-safety service permitted below and then only if it meets the wet-location provisions — which in practice puts a battery above BFE across nearly the whole city. Fire-side rules come from the Florida Fire Prevention Code with no local amendment.

Why the confidence is not higherProved absence: 'battery' and 'energy storage' return 0 hits across the complete St. Marks code with positive controls passing in the same run; the county fee schedule was read as text and has no ESS line (its seven apparent hits are all false positives — 'Business', 'necessary', 'hourly'); none of the county's 34 published documents mentions batteries. 70 because the flood rule is my application of a general provision to an ESS, not a statement about ESS.

ordinance full-text search with controls checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_CH38FL_ARTIIIFLSIDE_DIV7OTDE_S38-79GEREOTDE

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

No. Neither authority has a separate ESS permit type, fee line, or inspection. The county's fee schedule has no energy-storage entry and its checklist set has no ESS sheet.

Why the confidence is not higherSame evidence as q45 — county fee schedule read as text in full, 34-document Document Center enumerated, city code searched full-text with controls. 70 because a permit type can exist inside CitizenServe without appearing in the published fee resolution.

fee schedule + document centre enumeration checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Resolution%2013-61%20Building%20Fees.remediated.pdf

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Not named as such. A ground-mounted array would be regulated as an accessory structure under Land Development Code Sec. 7.01.01: it requires a permitted principal development on the parcel; it 'shall not be located in a required buffer, landscape area, or minimum building setback area'; it 'shall be included in all calculations of impervious surface and stormwater runoff'; and it must be shown on the development plan. In flood zones the city's Sec. 38-87 also caps non-elevated accessory structures at one story and 600 sq ft in Zone A/AE and 100 sq ft in Zone V/VE, requires anchoring against flotation and flood-damage-resistant materials, and requires electrical systems elevated to or above BFE.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth sections read in full in this run. 65 because solar is nowhere named — Article VII's enumerated accessory structures are storage buildings, greenhouses, pools and fences — so this is the general accessory-structure rule applied to a ground mount, and Sec. 38-87 by its terms covers accessory structures 'used only for parking or storage', which an array is not.

ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._marks/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIICOOR_APXBLADECO_ARTVIIACSTUS_7.01.01GESTRE

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

Set by the utility, not the AHJ: 'The Member shall, at the Member's expense, install and maintain a manual disconnect switch to provide a separation point between the AC power output of the RGS and any Member facilities connected to the Cooperative's electrical system. The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted separately from the meter socket and shall be readily accessible at all times to the Cooperative and shall be capable of being locked in the open position by the Cooperative.' No distance from the meter is specified.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from clause 9 of Talquin's Interconnection Agreement, extracted with pdftotext in this run. 90 because the agreement's revision stamp is 01-29-2021.

utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Portal or phone, through the county. 'Inspection requests may be submitted online through the CitizenServe Portal or by calling the Inspection Line at (850) 309-3562.' The city does not inspect and books nothing. 92% · department page
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — Wakulla County performs it, and the city does not. The county's Building Department lists two named Building Inspectors (Henry West and Warren Mohrfeld) under Building Official Clyde Collins, and states that it 'conducts inspections for residential and commercial projects'. The county also recognises the Florida private-provider route: its CitizenServe reports include 'Private Provider CO/CC Documents' and 'Private Provider Permit Documents'. 85% · department page
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated to another government. Where a job is not inspected by the county's own inspectors it is because the owner elected a private provider under Florida's private-provider statute — a per-job election, not a standing delegation. The City of St. Marks delegates to Wakulla County, not the other way round. 80% · portal landing page
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    Nothing recorded for City of St. Marks on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? No. The county publishes submittal checklists, not inspection checklists. All 34 files in its Building Department Document Center were enumerated in this run: 23 'Checklist ...' sheets (Addition, Commercial, DCA, Deck, Demo, Docks, Enclosure, House Moving, MH, Misc, PBSHED, Pool, ReRoof, Remodel, SFD, Screenroom/Porch, Tent, Workshop/Garage), forms (Asbestos Affidavit, Roofing Affidavit, Owner Builder Statement, Notice of Commencement, Subs List, Product Approval Specification Sheet, two Letters of Authorization, Notice to Swimming Pool Owner), and policy documents. None is an inspection checklist and none is solar. 75% · document centre enumeration
    • What must be on site at inspection? A printed Building-Inspection Job card, posted visibly at the construction site: 'Once your permit has been issued, please print your Building-Inspection Job card (located in the Documents tab) and post it visibly at the construction site as required.' Separately, a recorded Notice of Commencement must be on file before any inspection is given — 'NO inspections will be given until we have a recorded NOC on file.' 90% · department page + published checklist
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? Not stated for a PV or electrical-only job. The county's CitizenServe public report categories are 'Residential CO/CC Documents — View Certificates of Occupancy and Certificates of Completion for residential building permits', which implies a Certificate of Completion is what closes out work that does not create occupancy. 55% · portal landing page (inference)
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? The installer/member notifies the utility, not the AHJ. The Member delivers written certification of the local code official's inspection and approval, equipment specifications, proof of insurance and the signed Interconnection Agreement to Talquin; then 'Once the Cooperative has received the Member's written documentation that the requirements of this Interconnection Agreement have been met and the correct operation of the manual switch has been demonstrated to Cooperative, the Cooperative will, within ten (10) business days, send written notice that parallel operation of the RGS may commence.' 92% · utility interconnection agreement
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $50.00 flat, per the county's Resolution 13-61 fee schedule ('Re-Inspection fees $50.00'). 85% · fee schedule

14 questions answered against City of St. Marks’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal or phone, through the county. 'Inspection requests may be submitted online through the CitizenServe Portal or by calling the Inspection Line at (850) 309-3562.' The city does not inspect and books nothing.

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the county's own Citizenserve Portal page in this run. 92 because it is not solar-specific.

department page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWakulla County Citizenserve Portal page and Permit Application and Fees page (both give the inspection line and the portal but no notice period); county Resolution 13-61; all 34 county Document Center files. No advance-notice requirement is published.

https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWakulla County Citizenserve Portal page and Permit Application and Fees page; all 34 county Document Center files. Nothing about same-day requests or AM/PM inspection windows is published.

https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes — Wakulla County performs it, and the city does not. The county's Building Department lists two named Building Inspectors (Henry West and Warren Mohrfeld) under Building Official Clyde Collins, and states that it 'conducts inspections for residential and commercial projects'. The county also recognises the Florida private-provider route: its CitizenServe reports include 'Private Provider CO/CC Documents' and 'Private Provider Permit Documents'.

Why the confidence is not higherStaff list and services statement read from the county Building Department page in this run; private-provider report categories from the Citizenserve Portal page. 85 because neither page mentions solar, and the private-provider categories are evidence that the route is used rather than a policy statement about it.

department page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/index.php

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated to another government. Where a job is not inspected by the county's own inspectors it is because the owner elected a private provider under Florida's private-provider statute — a per-job election, not a standing delegation. The City of St. Marks delegates to Wakulla County, not the other way round.

Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the county's CitizenServe report categories ('Private Provider CO/CC Documents', 'Private Provider Permit Documents') plus the city's Sec. 14-1/14-2 adoption of the county code. 80 because the county publishes no private-provider policy page — the categories are the only evidence.

portal landing page checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWakulla County Building Department index, Permit Application and Fees, and Citizenserve Portal pages; all 34 Document Center files (none is an inspection-sequence sheet); Resolution 13-61, which distinguishes 'Residential Electrical — Single Inspection $75 / Multiple Inspections $115' but never names the stages or their order. No inspection sequence for a PV job is published.

https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedAll 34 county Document Center files. The only in-progress inspection named anywhere is on the Re-Roof checklist ('Contractors Only – Homeowner permits require an in-progress inspection'), which is about re-roofing, not PV. Nothing states whether a rough-in or mid-roof inspection applies to a solar installation.

https://www.mywakulla.com/Checklist%20ReRoof.remediated.pdf

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWakulla County Building Department index and Citizenserve Portal pages; all 34 Document Center files; the complete St. Marks code searched full-text with controls ('placard' 0 hits, 'label' 4 non-signage hits). Neither authority publishes anything about what an inspector verifies, so I cannot say whether labels and listings are checked.

https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/index.php

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

No. The county publishes submittal checklists, not inspection checklists. All 34 files in its Building Department Document Center were enumerated in this run: 23 'Checklist ...' sheets (Addition, Commercial, DCA, Deck, Demo, Docks, Enclosure, House Moving, MH, Misc, PBSHED, Pool, ReRoof, Remodel, SFD, Screenroom/Porch, Tent, Workshop/Garage), forms (Asbestos Affidavit, Roofing Affidavit, Owner Builder Statement, Notice of Commencement, Subs List, Product Approval Specification Sheet, two Letters of Authorization, Notice to Swimming Pool Owner), and policy documents. None is an inspection checklist and none is solar.

Why the confidence is not higherEnumerated directly from the county's Document Center page HTML in this run, and three of the checklists (Misc, SFD, ReRoof) were downloaded and read in full to confirm they are submittal documents. 75 because an inspection checklist could exist inside CitizenServe behind login.

document centre enumeration checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/document_center.php

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

A printed Building-Inspection Job card, posted visibly at the construction site: 'Once your permit has been issued, please print your Building-Inspection Job card (located in the Documents tab) and post it visibly at the construction site as required.' Separately, a recorded Notice of Commencement must be on file before any inspection is given — 'NO inspections will be given until we have a recorded NOC on file.'

Why the confidence is not higherJob card quoted from the county Citizenserve Portal page; NOC condition quoted from the county's checklists (identical wording on Misc, SFD and ReRoof). 90 because neither is solar-specific.

department page + published checklist checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$50.00 flat, per the county's Resolution 13-61 fee schedule ('Re-Inspection fees $50.00').

Why the confidence is not higherRead from the fee schedule PDF as text in this run. 85 because Resolution 13-61 dates from 2013, although the county re-uploaded the PDF in November 2025 and still links it as the current schedule.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/Resolution%2013-61%20Building%20Fees.remediated.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedWakulla County Permit Application and Fees page, which says only 'If corrections or additional information are required, processing times may be extended'; the Citizenserve Portal page; all 34 Document Center files. How a correction notice is issued, and how it is cleared, is not published.

https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/permit_fee.php

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Not stated for a PV or electrical-only job. The county's CitizenServe public report categories are 'Residential CO/CC Documents — View Certificates of Occupancy and Certificates of Completion for residential building permits', which implies a Certificate of Completion is what closes out work that does not create occupancy.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from the portal's report category names, which is the only published evidence either authority offers. 55 because nothing states what is issued on a passed final for a solar job, and no sample document was reachable.

portal landing page (inference) checked 2026-09-14 https://www.mywakulla.com/departments/building_department1/citizenserve_portal.php

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

The installer/member notifies the utility, not the AHJ. The Member delivers written certification of the local code official's inspection and approval, equipment specifications, proof of insurance and the signed Interconnection Agreement to Talquin; then 'Once the Cooperative has received the Member's written documentation that the requirements of this Interconnection Agreement have been met and the correct operation of the manual switch has been demonstrated to Cooperative, the Cooperative will, within ten (10) business days, send written notice that parallel operation of the RGS may commence.'

Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from clause 13 of Talquin's Interconnection Agreement, read in this run. 92 because the agreement's revision stamp is 01-29-2021 and no newer version is published.

utility interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-14 https://www.talquinelectric.com/wp-content/uploads/Interconnection-Agreement-For-Member-Owned-RGS-Revision-01-29-2021-Final-1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.

Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 85%

No.

Size, colour & material 85%

No. No letter height, colour, contrast, or material specification is published by either authority.

Where they go 75%

Not specified by either AHJ. The utility specifies location for one piece of equipment only: the manual disconnect switch must be 'mounted separately from the meter socket', 'readily accessible at all times to the Cooperative' and 'capable of being locked in the open position by the Cooperative'.

What the utility wants on top 90%

Yes. Talquin Electric Cooperative requires, beyond the AHJ: a signed Interconnection Agreement; a Line Diagram of the Renewable Generation Service and its output level; Proof of Insurance (not less than $100,000 for 10 kW or less, $1,000,000 above 10 kW to 100 kW, $2,000,000 above 100 kW to 1,000 kW), attached to the agreement with all renewals provided; a County Inspection/Release — written certification that a local code official inspected, permitted and approved the installation; and written equipment specifications certifying that the RGS, inverters and associated equipment 'adhere to IEEE 1547 Standards, UL 1741 Standards, the National Electric Code, and, if applicable, has been approved by the Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC Std 203-05)'. These are documentary requirements, not placards.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Solar Requirements
Required placards
Local Planning Board meetings are held once a month, before the Regular Commission Meeting at either 5:00pm or 5:30pm dependent upon the number of projects being heard. Please keep in mind that the City of St. Marks provides oversight of our own zoning regulations and how the FEMA flood zone requirements are applied to submittals. An approval letter is not just a simple letter we type up and sign.
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
City
County
Wakulla County
Regions covered
Authority Contact
Building Department
Booking & Scheduling