City of Titusville
City of Titusville
Brevard County
City of Titusville is a city authority in the State of Florida, serving 48,789 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for City of Titusville against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
City of Titusville is the authority having jurisdiction 88% confidence
- Holds
- Building, Electrical, and Fire — all held directly by the City of Titusville. The Building Department issues and inspects both building and electrical work itself (its combined 'Building/All Trades' application has a dedicated Electrical contractor/license line, and its fee ordinance separately prices a stand-alone Electrical Permit); the City's own Fire Marshal explicitly states 'As the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), the Office of the Fire Marshal is responsible for the maintenance and enforcement of the adopted Fire Code.' Nothing found on the City's site suggests Brevard County performs any building, electrical, or fire function inside Titusville city limits.
- Overridden by
- Florida Power & Light (FPL) controls interconnection/energization sequencing under its own PSC-filed tariff (Sheet No. 9.050 §3.4): FPL requires proof of the City's completed permit inspection/certification before it will treat a system as approved for parallel operation, and the City does not itself notify FPL. No county- or state-level override of the City's building/electrical/fire scope was found; the state adopts the Florida Building Code and Florida Fire Prevention Code by reference, which the City in turn administers.
- Why not higher
- Cross-checked three independent City-published sources (Building Department page, Building Permit Fee Schedule Ordinance 33-2021, and the Office of the Fire Marshal page) which are mutually consistent in showing the City holds building, electrical, and fire itself with no county role. The one open uncertainty is whether solar is processed as a single combined permit or generates linked sub-permits per trade in the BS&A Online system (see Q4) — that ambiguity does not change who the AHJ is, only how the paperwork is structured.
- Permit required
- Yes95%
- Permit cost
- No flat solar fee exists — cost is valuation-based per Ordinance 33-2021 Table A: $100 for the first $2,000 of value plus $6.00 per additional $1,000 (up to $100,000), e.g.85%
- Portal
- BS&A Online (bsaonline.com, uid=2751)95%
- Electrical code
- City's own Building Department page currently states (verbatim, undated): 'the National Electric Code National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)-70 (2017)' — this reads as at least one…50%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal (BS&A Online) or Phone — building inspections via bsaonline.com/?uid=2751 or 321-567-3760; fire inspections via a separate line, 321-567-3800 option 190%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined, with some ambiguity — solar is applied for on the single 'Building/All Trades' application (one Permit # field) with both 'Building' and 'Electric' as… Q4 Where you file — BS&A Online (bsaonline.com, uid=2751) Q20
- Permit required
- Yes95% source
- What it costs
- No flat solar fee exists — cost is valuation-based per Ordinance 33-2021 Table A: $100 for the first $2,000 of value plus $6.00 per additional $1,000 (up to $100,000), e.g.85% source
- Key document
- department page / portal landing page cited by 5 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — the City of Titusville Building Department is the AHJ for residential solar within city limits (Brevard County) 95% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both — Building AND Electrical are permitted and inspected by the City itself (plus Fire, via its own Fire Marshal); nothing is delegated to Brevard County 90% · fee ordinance + permit application
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes 95% · permit application form
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined, with some ambiguity — solar is applied for on the single 'Building/All Trades' application (one Permit # field) with both 'Building' and 'Electric' as checkable trade boxes on the same form, rather than a solar-specific separate application 55% · permit application form
- Is there a historic-district review? Only for individually-designated historic landmarks, not a citywide/neighborhood historic district — a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) under Historic Preservation Code Sec. 29-119 is required for 'any material alteration' to one of the City's ~12 individually-designated local historic resources (a specific list of named properties/addresses). A typical (non-designated) residential address has no historic-district review. 80% · city department page + COA application
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Yes, indirectly — any plans documenting compliance with Florida Building Code Chapter 16 (wind loading / hurricane and storm wind resistance) must be sealed by a Florida-registered architect or engineer, per City policy; Brevard County is in the wind-borne-debris region (not HVHZ) so FBC Ch. 16 wind-load compliance applies to roof-mounted racking attachment. 70% · department page
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No City zoning cap on residential PV system size was found on any Titusville-published page. The practical ceiling in practice comes from FPL's net-metering interconnection tiers, not city ordinance: Tier 1 (≤10 kW AC, and ≤115% of the customer's prior 12-month kWh usage, and ≤90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating), Tier 2 (10–100 kW), Tier 3 (101 kW–2 MW). 55% · utility tariff (context; no city source found)
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either — a licensed electrical contractor, OR the homeowner acting as owner-builder 90% · owner-builder disclosure form (city-published)
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes 90% · department page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes 90% · owner-builder disclosure form (city-published)
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? The 'Building/All Trades' permit application (with the Solar box checked, plus a separate Electrical contractor line if applicable), Notice of Commencement where required, and a 'Plans and Specifications Checklist' — the checklist is referenced by name on the City's Plans & Specification Requirements page but is not itself published as a downloadable file (likely handed out by the permitting office or generated per-project in the BSA Online portal) 65% · department page
- How many copies, and in what format? Primarily electronic: the City stopped accepting paper plans larger than 11x17 and 'encourages the use of our online portal and uploading your plans electronically' (BS&A Online). No specific number-of-copies figure is published for smaller paper submittals. 65% · department page
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? A Florida-registered architect or engineer must seal plans that include 'details showing plans comply with Chapter 16 of the Florida Building Code, which addresses wind loading or hurricane and storm wind resistance requirements' — this generic City policy is not solar-specific but would capture structural/wind-load documentation for a rooftop PV racking attachment. It also separately applies to buildings 3+ stories, ≥5,000 sq ft, or of assembly/institutional/multi-family occupancy (not the typical single-family PV case). 70% · department page
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? BS&A Online (bsaonline.com, uid=2751) 95% · department page / portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Largely yes, with a manual registration step first — the application and payment can be completed on BS&A Online, but first-time users must email the Building Department to be linked/PIN-enabled before the portal account works 75% · department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? No flat solar fee exists — cost is valuation-based per Ordinance 33-2021 Table A: $100 for the first $2,000 of value plus $6.00 per additional $1,000 (up to $100,000), e.g. roughly $208 building-permit fee for a $20,000 PV system, PLUS a 50% plan-review fee (~$104), PLUS a 2.5% state DBPR Homeowners' Recovery Fund surcharge (min $4). No separate 'solar' or 'photovoltaic' fee line exists in the ordinance. 85% · fee ordinance
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation (Based on Value/'BOV') 90% · fee ordinance
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes — 50% of the building permit fee 85% · fee ordinance
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Florida Power & Light (FPL) 95% · city department page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit (for energization) — FPL's own interconnection agreement requires the customer to first provide 'Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' confirming the work 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' before FPL treats the system as approved for parallel operation. The interconnection application itself can be filed in parallel with the building permit process. 80% · utility tariff (FPSC-filed)
28 questions answered against City of Titusville’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — the City of Titusville Building Department is the AHJ for residential solar within city limits (Brevard County)
Why the confidence is not higherCity's own Building Department page administers all building/electrical permitting and contractor registration; Fire Marshal page separately states the City Fire Marshal is 'the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)'; no reference anywhere on the City's site to Brevard County handling any part of residential permitting inside Titusville.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both — Building AND Electrical are permitted and inspected by the City itself (plus Fire, via its own Fire Marshal); nothing is delegated to Brevard County
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's Building Permit Fee Schedule (Ord. 33-2021) lists an 'Electrical Permit (Stand Alone)' fee line billed by the City itself; the combined 'Building/All Trades' permit application has its own 'ELECTRICAL' contractor/license line; the Office of the Fire Marshal page states it is 'the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)' for fire code enforcement. No mention of Brevard County performing any of these functions inside city limits.
fee ordinance + permit application checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherThe City's 'Building/All Trades' permit application (used for all trade permits) lists 'Solar' as one of the checkable Permit Type boxes alongside Fence, Roofing, Generator, etc. — confirming a permit is required and is the routing mechanism used.
permit application form checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/DocumentCenter/View/135
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined, with some ambiguity — solar is applied for on the single 'Building/All Trades' application (one Permit # field) with both 'Building' and 'Electric' as checkable trade boxes on the same form, rather than a solar-specific separate application
Why the confidence is not higherThe application form is a single multi-trade document with one 'PERMIT #' field and checkboxes for Building/Electric/Mechanical/Plumbing plus a 'Solar' item type, suggesting one combined permit. However the same form's boilerplate warns 'a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK...' — generic language written for trades like roofing/pools that incidentally touch electrical, not solar-specific — so I cannot rule out that BSA Online (the permitting software) spawns a linked sub-permit per trade under one project number. No solar-specific instruction was found to resolve this.
permit application form checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/DocumentCenter/View/135
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either — a licensed electrical contractor, OR the homeowner acting as owner-builder
Why the confidence is not higherThe permit application has a dedicated 'ELECTRICAL: ___ LICENSE #:___' contractor line for licensed electricians. Separately, the City publishes its own 'Electrical Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement,' which quotes the FS 489 licensing exemption allowing a property owner to act as their own electrical contractor for a single-family or duplex residence they own and occupy.
owner-builder disclosure form (city-published) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/DocumentCenter/View/2730
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page, verbatim: 'If you are a new contractor wanting to register with the City of Titusville, please email buildingpermits@titusville.com with the following documents: State License and/or County Comp Card, Business Tax Receipt..., General Liability and Workman's Comp with the City of Titusville listed as the certificate holder.'
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes
Why the confidence is not higherCity's 'Electrical Owner/Builder Disclosure Statement' explicitly implements the FS 489 owner-builder exemption: 'You may install electrical wiring... for a single-family or duplex residence... The home... must be for your own use and occupancy.' This is a City-issued form used at permit intake, so self-install/self-permit is an available path, not merely a state-law abstraction.
owner-builder disclosure form (city-published) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/DocumentCenter/View/2730
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
The 'Building/All Trades' permit application (with the Solar box checked, plus a separate Electrical contractor line if applicable), Notice of Commencement where required, and a 'Plans and Specifications Checklist' — the checklist is referenced by name on the City's Plans & Specification Requirements page but is not itself published as a downloadable file (likely handed out by the permitting office or generated per-project in the BSA Online portal)
Why the confidence is not higherPlans & Specification Requirements page states: 'A "Plans and Specifications Checklist" is provided to assist you in making sure that your plans are complete' but supplies no link. Site search for 'checklist' (62 hits, search proven functional by 'electrical'=92/'zzqqx'=0 controls) surfaces the page itself but no attached solar checklist document.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/203/Plans-Specification-Requirements
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Primarily electronic: the City stopped accepting paper plans larger than 11x17 and 'encourages the use of our online portal and uploading your plans electronically' (BS&A Online). No specific number-of-copies figure is published for smaller paper submittals.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page: 'Beginning June 1st the Titusville Building Department will no longer accept any paper plans larger than 11 by 17. The Building Department encourages the use of our online portal and uploading your plans electronically.'
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Plans & Specification Requirements, Preparation of Plans, and the Building/All Trades application — none itemize what a site plan for a PV permit must show; only a generic, unpublished 'Plans and Specifications Checklist' is referenced by name.
https://www.titusville.com/203/Plans-Specification-Requirements
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Plans & Specification Requirements, Preparation of Plans, the permit application, and site search for 'one-line'/'diagram' terms were not run to exhaustion, but no page on titusville.com states a one-line/three-line diagram requirement for solar.
https://www.titusville.com/203/Plans-Specification-Requirements
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame pages as Q11 checked; no mention of string or conductor calculation requirements anywhere on the City's site.
https://www.titusville.com/203/Plans-Specification-Requirements
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
A Florida-registered architect or engineer must seal plans that include 'details showing plans comply with Chapter 16 of the Florida Building Code, which addresses wind loading or hurricane and storm wind resistance requirements' — this generic City policy is not solar-specific but would capture structural/wind-load documentation for a rooftop PV racking attachment. It also separately applies to buildings 3+ stories, ≥5,000 sq ft, or of assembly/institutional/multi-family occupancy (not the typical single-family PV case).
Why the confidence is not higherCity's 'Preparation of Plans' page lists these as the conditions requiring an architect/engineer seal; it is a general building-wide policy (not a solar-specific threshold), so applicability to a routine SFR PV racking submittal is an inference, not an explicit solar rule.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/204/Preparation-of-Plans
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedPreparation of Plans page gives only a general architect/engineer seal policy (see Q13/Q26); it does not separately name an electrical PE-stamp threshold.
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
No flat solar fee exists — cost is valuation-based per Ordinance 33-2021 Table A: $100 for the first $2,000 of value plus $6.00 per additional $1,000 (up to $100,000), e.g. roughly $208 building-permit fee for a $20,000 PV system, PLUS a 50% plan-review fee (~$104), PLUS a 2.5% state DBPR Homeowners' Recovery Fund surcharge (min $4). No separate 'solar' or 'photovoltaic' fee line exists in the ordinance.
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance No. 33-2021 (Building Permit Fee Schedule), Sec. 6A-1: Table A valuation formula; Sec. 6A-1(d) plan review fee = 50% of building permit fee; Sec. 6A-1(e) state-mandated DBPR/BCAIB/CILB fee = 2.5%, $4 minimum (FS 468.631, FS 553.721). Confirmed via CivicPlus site-search controls ('solar'=30 hits/'electrical'=92/'zzqqx'=0) that no dedicated PV fee line exists anywhere on the site.
fee ordinance checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation (Based on Value/'BOV')
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance 33-2021 prices 'Electrical Permit (Stand Alone)' and general building permits as 'BOV' against Table A (a valuation-tiered schedule); no per-kW, per-panel, flat, or otherwise-tiered solar line exists.
fee ordinance checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes — 50% of the building permit fee
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance 33-2021 Sec. 6A-1(d): 'The plan review fee shall be fifty percent (50%) of the building permit fee.' The exemption list (re-roof, A/C change-out, electrical service/panel change-out not upgrade, small accessory structures, etc.) does not include solar/PV, so the plan-review fee applies.
fee ordinance checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Building Department, Permits/Forms/Policies, Plans & Specification Requirements, and the fee ordinance — none publish a plan-review turnaround SLA in business days. Certificates of Occupancy page states only a 3-business-day minimum for C of O processing, which is a different question.
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFee ordinance references only a 6-month resubmittal trigger for permit renewal, not the base validity/expiration period; the FBC administrative chapter (and any local amendment to it) that actually sets permit validity is codified only in the Land Development Regulations on library.municode.com/fl/titusville, which disallows ClaudeBot in robots.txt (verified: 'User-agent: ClaudeBot / Disallow: /'), so it could not be checked directly. HB 803 (FS 553.79(1)(c)) sets a statewide one-year floor effective 1 Jul 2026 as context, not proof of Titusville's current published figure.
https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
BS&A Online (bsaonline.com, uid=2751)
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page: 'We have a portal for on-line permitting. Please register using this link - BSA Online.' Both the Online Permit Application Link and Online Payments link resolve to bsaonline.com/?uid=2751.
department page / portal landing page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Largely yes, with a manual registration step first — the application and payment can be completed on BS&A Online, but first-time users must email the Building Department to be linked/PIN-enabled before the portal account works
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page: '...once you have registered, send your username and email address to BuildingPermits@Titusville.com to be linked to the portal. To obtain your web pin, please email your address/company name and username to buildingpermits@titusville.com.' So the first-time setup is not fully self-service online.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Florida Power & Light (FPL)
Why the confidence is not higherCity of Titusville's own 'Important Numbers' page lists: 'Utilities Electric Florida Power and Light: 321-723-7795' — the only electric utility listed.
city department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/658/Important-Numbers
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit (for energization) — FPL's own interconnection agreement requires the customer to first provide 'Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' confirming the work 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' before FPL treats the system as approved for parallel operation. The interconnection application itself can be filed in parallel with the building permit process.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tariff Sheet No. 9.050, Section 3.4 (Interconnection Agreement for Customer-Owned Renewable Generation, Tier 1): verified directly from the current PDF (effective 1 Jan 2026). This is FPL's standard territory-wide language, not Titusville-specific text, but it is the utility that actually governs this sequencing for every Titusville address.
utility tariff (FPSC-filed) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked the Building Department, Permits/Forms/Policies, and Land Development Regulations landing pages; no HOA/architectural-approval requirement is stated. The substantive zoning text (if any) would sit in the LDC on library.municode.com, blocked by robots.txt.
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Only for individually-designated historic landmarks, not a citywide/neighborhood historic district — a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) under Historic Preservation Code Sec. 29-119 is required for 'any material alteration' to one of the City's ~12 individually-designated local historic resources (a specific list of named properties/addresses). A typical (non-designated) residential address has no historic-district review.
Why the confidence is not higherCity's 'Local Historic Designations' page lists the named designated properties and states: 'The Historic Preservation Code, Section 29-119 requires the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness for any material alteration, restoration, addition, rehabilitation, renovation, excavation, relocation, or demolition of any architectural building, structure, object or landscape features that have been designated as a historic resource.' The COA application form does not carve out solar or street-visibility specifically.
city department page + COA application checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/569/Local-Historic-Designations
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Yes, indirectly — any plans documenting compliance with Florida Building Code Chapter 16 (wind loading / hurricane and storm wind resistance) must be sealed by a Florida-registered architect or engineer, per City policy; Brevard County is in the wind-borne-debris region (not HVHZ) so FBC Ch. 16 wind-load compliance applies to roof-mounted racking attachment.
Why the confidence is not higherCity's 'Preparation of Plans' page lists 'Details showing plans comply with Chapter 16 of the Florida Building Code' as one of the conditions triggering a required architect/engineer seal. This is a general policy, not a solar-specific certification requirement, so it is an inference rather than an explicit rule naming solar.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/204/Preparation-of-Plans
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo City page addresses a Specific Use Permit or Council approval requirement for residential solar; the LDC (where such a provision would live) is on library.municode.com, blocked by robots.txt for ClaudeBot.
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No City zoning cap on residential PV system size was found on any Titusville-published page. The practical ceiling in practice comes from FPL's net-metering interconnection tiers, not city ordinance: Tier 1 (≤10 kW AC, and ≤115% of the customer's prior 12-month kWh usage, and ≤90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating), Tier 2 (10–100 kW), Tier 3 (101 kW–2 MW).
Why the confidence is not higherChecked the fee ordinance, the Building/All Trades permit application, and site search ('solar'=30 hits, controls pass) — none impose or mention a system-size cap. The FPL Tier 1 definition (Tariff Sheet 9.050 §2.1) is a utility interconnection/net-metering threshold, not a City zoning limit, so it is offered as context rather than a direct answer to a City-imposed cap.
utility tariff (context; no city source found) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? City's own Building Department page currently states (verbatim, undated): 'the National Electric Code National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)-70 (2017)' — this reads as at least one adoption cycle stale versus the statewide-current cycle (the 8th Edition (2023) FBC cycle, which the State adopted with a newer NEC cross-reference); no revision date is shown on the page to confirm whether this notice was ever updated. 50% · department page
- Which building code edition is in force? City's own Building Department page currently states (verbatim, undated): 'the Florida Building Code, the Edition (2020)' — i.e. the 7th Edition FBC. As with the NEC citation above, this appears not to have been updated to reflect the current 8th Edition (2023) statewide cycle. 50% · department page
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code and NFPA 70 (National Electrical Code), as adopted by the City — per the Building Department's own 'State Notice' — though see Q29/Q30 for the staleness caveat on which specific editions that notice currently names. 60% · department page
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for City of Titusville on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Rapid shutdown is required as an NEC 690.12 requirement under whichever NEC edition is currently adopted; the City's own page currently cites NEC 2017 (see Q29 staleness caveat), and rapid shutdown has been mandatory since the 2014/2017 NEC cycle, so it applies either way. 55% · department page (inference)
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — FPL's Electric Service Standards require placards beyond anything published by the City: at the meter can, 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; at the DER/generation AC disconnect, 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; and for battery storage behind the meter, a placard reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.' 80% · utility service-standards manual
- Where must the labels be placed? Per FPL's Electric Service Standards: the meter-can warning label goes at the interconnecting meter can; a matching placard goes at the DER/generation AC disconnect switch, which itself must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, with no locked gates/doors/fences between them (and no farther than 10 ft from the DER disconnect per the accompanying wiring diagram). No additional Titusville-specific placement rule was found. 75% · utility service-standards manual
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? The AC (DER) disconnect must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket (Tier 1 non-UL-1741 systems), or, per Tier 2/3, installed on the AC side of the system between the meter and the disconnect with no locked gates/doors/fences in between. 80% · utility tariff / service-standards manual
20 questions answered against City of Titusville’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
City's own Building Department page currently states (verbatim, undated): 'the National Electric Code National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)-70 (2017)' — this reads as at least one adoption cycle stale versus the statewide-current cycle (the 8th Edition (2023) FBC cycle, which the State adopted with a newer NEC cross-reference); no revision date is shown on the page to confirm whether this notice was ever updated.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted directly from the City's live Building Department page under 'State Notice.' Flagged low-confidence because (a) the notice is undated, (b) it explicitly pairs with 'Florida Building Code, the Edition (2020)' (7th Edition), which by the state's own cycle should have been superseded by the 8th Edition (2023)/its NEC cross-reference by the time of this check (12 Sep 2026), and (c) no other Titusville-published page corroborates or contradicts it.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
City's own Building Department page currently states (verbatim, undated): 'the Florida Building Code, the Edition (2020)' — i.e. the 7th Edition FBC. As with the NEC citation above, this appears not to have been updated to reflect the current 8th Edition (2023) statewide cycle.
Why the confidence is not higherSame source/caveat as Q29 — quoted from the City's live 'State Notice' text on the Building Department page, undated, and apparently one cycle behind the state's current adoption.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedChecked Fire Department and Office of the Fire Marshal pages — neither names a specific Florida Fire Prevention Code / NFPA 1 edition; site search for 'Fire Prevention Code' surfaced only generic department pages, no edition citation.
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCannot confirm or rule out local amendments to the code editions in Q29-31 because the LDC/administrative-amendment chapter is only reachable at library.municode.com/fl/titusville, which disallows ClaudeBot in robots.txt.
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code and NFPA 70 (National Electrical Code), as adopted by the City — per the Building Department's own 'State Notice' — though see Q29/Q30 for the staleness caveat on which specific editions that notice currently names.
Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Department page 'State Notice' paragraph names FBC and NFPA-70 as 'the statewide minimum construction standards' the City enforces; no Titusville-specific amendment beyond this was found (LDC/administrative amendments are only reachable via library.municode.com, which disallows ClaudeBot in robots.txt).
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo City page addresses service-upgrade or busbar-sizing rules; would be in adopted NEC amendments in the LDC, blocked by robots.txt.
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo mounting-system or attachment-spacing requirement found on any Titusville-published page.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo ridge-setback or fire-access-pathway requirement found on Fire Department, Fire Marshal, or Building Department pages; this would be in the adopted Fire Code amendments in the LDC, blocked by robots.txt.
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Rapid shutdown is required as an NEC 690.12 requirement under whichever NEC edition is currently adopted; the City's own page currently cites NEC 2017 (see Q29 staleness caveat), and rapid shutdown has been mandatory since the 2014/2017 NEC cycle, so it applies either way.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from Q29's sourced NEC citation plus the fact that rapid shutdown (690.12) has been a NEC requirement since the 2014/2017 cycle; no Titusville-specific rapid-shutdown page or amendment was found.
department page (inference) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSite search for 'placard' returns exactly 1 result (an unrelated council-meeting minutes page), proving the City publishes no placard specification of its own beyond code-by-reference; positive control 'electrical' returned 92 hits and fabricated control 'zzqqx' returned 0, so the search itself is functioning.
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=placard
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame absence as Q38 — no City-specified placard wording found (search proven functional per Q38 controls).
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=placard
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame absence as Q38 — no City-specified letter height, colour, or material found.
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=placard
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo City-published facility-map/site-plan placard spec found; site search for 'placard' (1 hit, unrelated) and 'disconnect' (7 hits, all unrelated to solar) both confirm no dedicated City page exists.
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=disconnect
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — FPL's Electric Service Standards require placards beyond anything published by the City: at the meter can, 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; at the DER/generation AC disconnect, 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; and for battery storage behind the meter, a placard reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.'
Why the confidence is not higherIndependently OCR-verified (pdftoppm 300dpi + tesseract, since these pages are Type 3/embedded-font and do not extract as text) from FPL's current 'Electric Service Standards' PDF, pp. 161-162 (meter/DER placards) and p. 170 (battery placard). This is a utility-level requirement applicable territory-wide, not a Titusville-specific ordinance — the City itself publishes no placard specification (site search for 'placard' returns exactly 1 hit, an unrelated council-minutes page, confirming the City has none of its own).
utility service-standards manual checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Per FPL's Electric Service Standards: the meter-can warning label goes at the interconnecting meter can; a matching placard goes at the DER/generation AC disconnect switch, which itself must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, with no locked gates/doors/fences between them (and no farther than 10 ft from the DER disconnect per the accompanying wiring diagram). No additional Titusville-specific placement rule was found.
Why the confidence is not higherSame OCR-verified source as Q42/Q48, pp. 161-165: 'The manual disconnect switch must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter... There shall be no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch' and a wiring diagram noting 'NO GREATER THAN 10 FT FROM DER DISCONNECT.'
utility service-standards manual checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/partner/pdf/electric-service-standards.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo City page requires a specific approved-equipment list; not addressed on Building Department, Preparation of Plans, or the permit application.
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSite search for 'battery' (39 hits, all irrelevant — e.g. 'Sexual Battery Victims Rights') and 'energy storage' (172 hits, top results unrelated) prove the City publishes no battery/ESS-specific guidance of its own; the governing Florida Fire Prevention Code (which incorporates NFPA 855 by reference statewide) is only reachable, as adopted locally, via the LDC on library.municode.com, blocked by robots.txt.
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=battery
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame reasoning as Q45 — no City page states whether a separate ESS permit/inspection exists.
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=energy+storage
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo City page states whether a ground-mounted PV array is treated as a structure; this determination would sit in the LDC's structure/accessory-structure definitions on library.municode.com, blocked by robots.txt.
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
The AC (DER) disconnect must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket (Tier 1 non-UL-1741 systems), or, per Tier 2/3, installed on the AC side of the system between the meter and the disconnect with no locked gates/doors/fences in between.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tariff Sheet No. 9.050 §5.2 (Tier 1): 'The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket.' Electric Service Standards p. 161 (Tier 2/3, OCR-verified): 'The DER disconnect switch must be installed on the AC side of the system... mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter... There shall be no locked gates, doors or fences between the meter socket and the DER disconnect switch.' Utility-level answer (FPL is the interconnecting utility for all Titusville addresses), not a City ordinance.
utility tariff / service-standards manual checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal (BS&A Online) or Phone — building inspections via bsaonline.com/?uid=2751 or 321-567-3760; fire inspections via a separate line, 321-567-3800 option 1 90% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? AM windows can be requested: 'If a specific time is needed, you may contact the building inspectors directly at 321-567-3767 between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 am on the morning of the scheduled inspection.' No PM-specific window or same-day guarantee is stated. 70% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — the City performs its own final solar inspection (Building Department inspectors); not delegated to Brevard County or a third party 85% · department page (inference from absence of delegation)
- If delegated, to whom? N/A — not delegated (see Q52) 85% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
Nothing recorded for City of Titusville on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
Nothing recorded for City of Titusville on this step yet — 3 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Final (a passed final-inspection status on the existing permit) rather than a new Certificate of Occupancy — the City's own excerpted FBC 111.1/111.2 language ties a Certificate of Occupancy to new construction or a change in occupancy classification, which a rooftop PV retrofit to an existing single-family home does not trigger. 60% · department page (inference)
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer/customer — FPL requires the customer (typically via the installer) to submit a completed interconnection application and subsequently provide FPL with proof of the local building-permit final inspection/certification before FPL treats the system as approved; the City does not itself notify FPL. 65% · utility tariff (FPSC-filed)
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $100.00 90% · fee ordinance
14 questions answered against City of Titusville’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal (BS&A Online) or Phone — building inspections via bsaonline.com/?uid=2751 or 321-567-3760; fire inspections via a separate line, 321-567-3800 option 1
Why the confidence is not higher'Automated Inspection Request' page: 'To schedule an inspection please see call the number or use the link provided below: (321) 567-3760 https://bsaonline.com/?uid=2751 (321) 567-3800 - Fire Inspection - Option 1.'
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/582/Automated-Inspection-Request
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedAutomated Inspection Request page states only that a specific AM time can be requested 'on the morning of the scheduled inspection' (see Q51); it does not state a minimum advance-notice period (e.g., business days) for booking the inspection itself.
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
AM windows can be requested: 'If a specific time is needed, you may contact the building inspectors directly at 321-567-3767 between the hours of 7:00 am and 8:00 am on the morning of the scheduled inspection.' No PM-specific window or same-day guarantee is stated.
Why the confidence is not higherAutomated Inspection Request page, quoted verbatim.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/582/Automated-Inspection-Request
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — the City performs its own final solar inspection (Building Department inspectors); not delegated to Brevard County or a third party
Why the confidence is not higherConsistent with the City's own Building Department holding electrical, its self-described contractor registration/inspection process, and the Fire Marshal's own AHJ statement; no mention anywhere on the City's site of inspections being delegated to Brevard County or a private provider (Florida's FS 553.791 alternative-plans-review/private-provider option is available but is an applicant choice, not a delegation of the City's own inspection role, and the fee ordinance treats it as an add-on administrative fee on top of the City's own review).
department page (inference from absence of delegation) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
N/A — not delegated (see Q52)
Why the confidence is not higherThe City performs its own inspections; there is no delegate to name.
department page checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/187/Building-Department
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published inspection sequence/stage list for solar specifically was found on the Building Department, Automated Inspection Request, or Fire Marshal pages, and no inspection-code list (of the kind other Florida cities publish, e.g. a numbered 'SOLAR FINAL' code) was found via site search.
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo statement found on whether a rough-in or mid-roof inspection is required for solar specifically.
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published statement that the inspector verifies labels/listings; not addressed on any City inspection page.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published inspection checklist for solar was found on the City's site (search for 'checklist' returns the general Plans & Specification Requirements page, not a solar-specific inspection checklist).
https://www.titusville.com/Search/Results?searchPhrase=checklist
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published list of what must be physically on site at a solar inspection (e.g., posted permit card, approved plans) beyond the generic re-inspection-fee triggers in the fee ordinance (permit card not posted, approved plans not on site — see Q59), which describe causes for a re-inspection charge rather than an affirmative on-site-documents checklist.
https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$100.00
Why the confidence is not higherOrdinance 33-2021 Sec. 6A-1(f): 'When extra inspection trips are necessary due to, wrong address, third call on failed work, additional work done after inspection has been made, permit card not posted, Notice of Commencement not posted, approved plans not on site or work not ready for inspection when called, a charge of $100.00 shall be paid... At the discretion of the building official, the re-inspection fee may be waived due to extenuating circumstances.'
fee ordinance checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/1245/Building-Permit-Fee-Schedule-Ordinance-No-33-2021
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published procedure for how corrections are issued and cleared was found on any City inspection or building-department page.
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Final (a passed final-inspection status on the existing permit) rather than a new Certificate of Occupancy — the City's own excerpted FBC 111.1/111.2 language ties a Certificate of Occupancy to new construction or a change in occupancy classification, which a rooftop PV retrofit to an existing single-family home does not trigger.
Why the confidence is not higherCertificates of Occupancy page quotes FBC 111.1 ('No building or structure shall be used or occupied... until the building official has issued a certificate of occupancy') and 111.2 in the context of new construction/occupancy changes; no Titusville page states that a routine PV addition to an existing home receives a new CO rather than simply a finaled permit.
department page (inference) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.titusville.com/200/Certificates-of-Occupancy
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer/customer — FPL requires the customer (typically via the installer) to submit a completed interconnection application and subsequently provide FPL with proof of the local building-permit final inspection/certification before FPL treats the system as approved; the City does not itself notify FPL.
Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tariff Sheet No. 9.050 §3.4 places the burden on 'the Customer' to provide FPL with the local code official's certification; §2.3 says 'In order to commence the process for interconnection the Customer shall provide FPL a completed application.' Utility-level answer, not Titusville-specific text.
utility tariff (FPSC-filed) checked 2026-09-12 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/rates/pdf/electric-tariff-section9.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording None%
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go 75%
Per FPL's Electric Service Standards: the meter-can warning label goes at the interconnecting meter can; a matching placard goes at the DER/generation AC disconnect switch, which itself must be mounted separate from but adjacent to the FPL meter socket, with no locked gates/doors/fences between them (and no farther than 10 ft from the DER disconnect per the accompanying wiring diagram). No additional Titusville-specific placement rule was found.
What the utility wants on top 80%
Yes — FPL's Electric Service Standards require placards beyond anything published by the City: at the meter can, 'WARNING / MULTI POWER SOURCES / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; at the DER/generation AC disconnect, 'GENERATION SYSTEM AC DISCONNECT / RATED AC OUTPUT CURRENT ** AMPS / NOMINAL OPERATING VOLTAGE ** VOLTS'; and for battery storage behind the meter, a placard reading 'Battery storage utilized in this facility.'
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.