Lee County
Lee County
State of Florida
Lee County is the 9th largest jurisdiction in Florida — 760,822 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Lee County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Lee County is the authority having jurisdiction 90% confidence
- Holds
- Building and Electrical, combined into one 'Solar' permit record that Lee County reviews and inspects itself — in the unincorporated area only. Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Bonita Springs, Estero, Sanibel and the Town of Fort Myers Beach each run their own building department and self-permit residential solar within their city limits; Lee County's authority stops at those boundaries.
- Overridden by
- Not delegation but a genuine parallel-authority split at the municipal boundary (see 'holds'). Within that, state law binds Lee County's process at several points: FS 163.04 bars any deed restriction/HOA covenant from prohibiting solar collectors outright (HOA may only reasonably regulate placement/orientation). FS 553.792, as amended by HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026), sets the maximum days Lee County may take to approve/deny a permit application (5 or 30 business days depending on value/size — see q18) and FS 125.56(4)(d), also amended by HB 803, puts a 1-year floor under county-issued single-family permit validity. Fire-permit review for a small number of activities is split off from Lee County DCD to three independent fire districts (Bonita Springs Fire Control and Rescue District, Village of Estero Fire Rescue District, Fort Myers Beach Fire Control District) per Lee County's own Fire Application and Permitting Guide — but that guide's scope is fire alarms/suppression/tanks/generators, and Lee's Solar-Photovoltaic Guide does not route PV permits through fire-district review at all, so this split matters less for a plain rooftop PV job than the brief's '~13 independent fire districts' framing suggests; I found only 3 districts that take over BUILDING-PERMIT fire review from the county, with the county handling fire review for the rest of unincorporated Lee directly. Interconnection/PTO sits with the customer's utility (FPL or LCEC, split by territory — see q22), which the County's own permit does not control ('the permit holder may need to contact [utility] for approval prior to activating the system' is the general pattern, mirrored in FPL's own net-metering guidelines).
- Why not higher
- leegov.com/permits states projects within Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Estero, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach or Sanibel must permit through that city; leegov.com's Solar-Photovoltaic Guide (dated 12/19/2023) and Fee Schedule page are addressed to 'Lee County Community Development – Building & Permitting Services' with no municipal carve-in. The Fire Application and Permitting Guide (leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Fire%20Guide.pdf) names the three fire districts verbatim and states 'For all other projects in Unincorporated Lee County, new Fire Permit applications can be completed with Lee County Building and Permitting Services.' HB 803 enrolled text (flsenate.gov) confirms the FS 553.792 and FS 125.56(4)(d) amendments verbatim.
- Permit required
- Yes — a Solar/Photovoltaic permit is required95%
- Permit cost
- Under the fee schedule effective 15 Apr 2026: Application Fee $50 + Technology Fee $35 (both per application) + Operational Support Fee (a percentage of total review & inspection fees,90%
- Plan review
- Lee County publishes no solar-specific turnaround target of its own (checked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, the Residential Building Guide,68%
- Portal
- eConnect (built on the Accela Citizen Access / Accela Automation platform) at https://accelaaca.leegov.com/aca/85%
- Electrical code
- 2020 — the guide cites 'National Electric Code (NFPA 70) (2020)' as an applicable code for solar/PV,85%
- Own placard wording
- No — Lee County specifies no placard wording of its own; its only instruction is that the Electrical Diagram show 'required signage,' which is a pointer to code compliance rather than…70%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal (eConnect, 24/7) or Phone (Automated Inspection System / IVR, 239-533-8997); a text-message ('SelecTXT') option to 855-527-1863 is also offered88%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes — a Solar/Photovoltaic permit is required Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined — one 'Solar' eConnect record type covers both the structural and electrical scope; Q4 Plan review — Lee County publishes no solar-specific turnaround target of its own (checked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, the Residential Building Guide, Q18 Where you file — eConnect (built on the Accela Citizen Access / Accela Automation platform) at https://accelaaca.leegov.com/aca/ Q20
- Permit required
- Yes — a Solar/Photovoltaic permit is required95% source
- What it costs
- Under the fee schedule effective 15 Apr 2026: Application Fee $50 + Technology Fee $35 (both per application) + Operational Support Fee (a percentage of total review & inspection fees,90% source
- Plan review turnaround
- Lee County publishes no solar-specific turnaround target of its own (checked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, the Residential Building Guide,68% source
- Key document
- County permit/application guide + enrolled act Ch. 2026-63 (FS 125.56(4)(d)) cited by 19 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — Lee County DCD Building & Permitting Services is the AHJ for residential solar in unincorporated Lee County 92% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both — Lee County issues one combined 'Solar' permit record covering both the building/structural review and the electrical review, and performs its own inspections 82% · County permit/application guide (rev. 12/19/2023)
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes — a Solar/Photovoltaic permit is required 95% · County permit/application guide
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined — one 'Solar' eConnect record type covers both the structural and electrical scope; there is no separate stand-alone electrical permit for the PV work itself 80% · County permit/application guide
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — an HOA/deed restriction cannot be used to prohibit a residential solar installation. Florida Statute 163.04(1): a deed restriction, covenant, declaration or similar binding agreement 'may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting' solar collectors. An association may only reasonably regulate placement (e.g., confining panels to an orientation within 45° east or west of due south) where that does not impair the system's effective operation. 85% · Florida Statute 163.04
- Is there a historic-district review? Yes, conditionally — 'Historical Architectural Review' is a conditional required document: 'If the project is within a Historic District or is a Designated Historic Property, follow the regulations for Designated Historic Districts on the Lee County website.' 82% · County permit/application guide
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Yes — Wind Load Calculations Documentation is a required document for every PV system: signed/sealed documentation from a Florida-registered design professional verifying the system meets calculated wind load, including the wind uplift zone and pressure for the roof zone in question. Ground-mounted systems must comply with ASCE 7 §1609.1; roof-mounted systems with ASCE 7 §1510.7.1. 88% · County permit/application guide
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No Specific Use Permit or Board/Council approval requirement was found for a residential rooftop or accessory ground-mount PV system 55% · County permit/application guide + LDC Ch. 6 Div. 3 table of contents
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No county-level generation-size cap was found. The eConnect application asks for the system's kW and Amps for record-keeping, not against a stated ceiling. The practical ceilings that exist are set by the interconnecting utility's net-metering tiers, not the County: FPL Tier 1 ≤10 kW / Tier 2 >10–100 kW / Tier 3 >100 kW–2,000 kW; LCEC Tier 1 0–10 kW / Tier 2 10–100 kW / Tier 3 100 kW–1 MW. 60% · County permit/application guide + utility tier pages
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either — a contractor with a State-issued license registered with Lee County (or a Lee County certificate of competency) may pull the permit, or an owner-builder may self-permit 75% · County permit/application guide
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes — a licensed contractor must be registered with Lee County (State license registered with the County, or a County-issued certificate of competency) before pulling the permit 88% · County permit/application guide
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes — owner-builder self-permit is available via the paper application route only 85% · County permit/application guide
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Required: (1) Site/Plot Plan showing solar component locations and point of interconnection; (2) Electrical Diagram (array configuration, wiring methods, overcurrent protection, inverter, disconnects, required signage, AC connection to building); (3) Manufacturer specification sheets for all components; (4) Wind Load Calculations, signed/sealed by a FL-registered design professional (ground mount to ASCE 7 §1609.1, roof mount to ASCE 7 §1510.7.1); (5) Weight Limit Documentation (<5 lbs/sq ft distributed, <45 lbs per attachment point); (6) Construction drawings showing system placement on the roof plan. Conditional, if applicable: No-Rise Certificate (regulatory floodway), Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement, Proof of Ownership, Solar Roof Truss Affidavit (pool heaters), Historical Architectural Review (historic district/property), Notice of Commencement (value > $5,000). 92% · County permit/application guide
- How many copies, and in what format? Paper (owner-builder only): three collated sets of plans plus the Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement, submitted in person. Electronic (eConnect, mandatory for contractors): documents attached individually to the record in the Attachments window — the guide does not instruct applicants to merge everything into a single PDF the way some other Florida counties do. 70% · County permit/application guide
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. Site/plot plan must show the location of solar system components and the location of other mechanical equipment on the structure, particularly the point of interconnection with electrical or water service and the location of the electrical or water service equipment. 88% · County permit/application guide
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Yes — an Electrical Diagram is a required document, showing PV array configuration, wiring methods, overcurrent protection, inverter, disconnects, required signage and the AC connection to the building 88% · County permit/application guide
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Not named as a separate document — string and conductor sizing calculations are not listed as their own required item; they would have to be shown within the required 'Electrical Diagram' (which must show wiring methods and overcurrent protection) for the reviewer to size conductors against the NEC 55% · County permit/application guide
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Yes, for every PV permit — Wind Load Calculations Documentation must be 'signed and sealed documentation from a Florida state registered design professional verifying that the proposed system will meet the calculated wind load,' including the wind uplift zone and pressure for the specific roof zone. Ground-mounted systems must comply with ASCE 7 §1609.1; rooftop-mounted systems with ASCE 7 §1510.7.1. 88% · County permit/application guide
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Not stated as required for a typical residential system — the guide's required-document list calls for a Florida-licensed design professional's seal on the wind-load/structural documentation, but names no separate electrical-engineer seal requirement for the Electrical Diagram 55% · County permit/application guide
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? eConnect (built on the Accela Citizen Access / Accela Automation platform) at https://accelaaca.leegov.com/aca/ 85% · portal landing page + County guide
- Can the whole application be completed online? Yes for contractors — CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO USE ECONNECT for the full application, attachments, tracking, payment and inspection scheduling. Owner-builders may instead use a paper application submitted in person (and must appear in person to sign for the issued permit regardless of submission method). 85% · County permit/application guide
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Under the fee schedule effective 15 Apr 2026: Application Fee $50 + Technology Fee $35 (both per application) + Operational Support Fee (a percentage of total review & inspection fees, fluctuates quarterly) + Solar Plan Review $25 (initial; $25 per resubmission) + Solar Regulatory Review $25 (initial; $25 per resubmission) + Inspections at $50 per required inspection for roof- or ground-mounted PV (typically two — 207 Solar Final and 305 Electrical Final — so ~$100), or $75 covering up to 2 inspections for 'All Other Types' (pool/water heaters). A straightforward roof-mount PV job therefore runs roughly $50+$35+$25+$25+$100 = $235 plus the OSF percentage and any Admin/Radon state surcharge. 90% · current fee schedule (adopted 17 Mar 2026, eff. 15 Apr 2026)
- How is the fee calculated? Flat (itemized flat fees per service — application, technology, plan review, regulatory review, per inspection — plus a percentage-based Operational Support Fee layered on top of the total) 78% · current fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes — Plan Review ($25/$25) and Regulatory Review ($25/$25) are both charged as separate line items from the per-inspection fees 88% · current fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Lee County publishes no solar-specific turnaround target of its own (checked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, the Residential Building Guide, leegov.com/permits and leegov.com/dcd/fees — none states a business-day figure for solar plan review). The binding ceiling is now statutory: FS 553.792, as amended by HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026), requires a local government to approve/deny within 5 business days only for an existing single-family dwelling's electrical (etc.) permit valued under $15,000 — a threshold most rooftop PV systems exceed — otherwise within 30 business days for permits (including electrical) on a structure under 7,500 sq ft, which covers essentially every single-family home. So a typical Lee County residential PV permit is bound by the 30-business-day statutory ceiling, not the 5-day one, unless the installed system's value is under $15,000. 68% · enrolled act, Ch. 2026-63, §[amending 553.792]
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Two mechanisms both apply. (1) Administrative expiration: 'Issued permits must pass at least one inspection within 180 days from issuance or the permit will expire' (County's own guide). (2) Statutory floor: FS 125.56(4)(d), as amended by HB 803 (eff. 1 Jul 2026), provides that 'a building permit issued by a county for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later' — a floor under overall permit life, layered on top of (not replacing) the 180-day no-inspection-activity rule. 78% · County permit/application guide + enrolled act Ch. 2026-63 (FS 125.56(4)(d))
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Split by location within unincorporated Lee County — both Florida Power & Light (FPL) and Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC) serve unincorporated Lee County territory, and which one applies depends on the specific address (LCEC's own materials describe a broad multi-county territory that includes North Fort Myers, Pine Island, Captiva/Sanibel-adjacent areas and parts of Lehigh Acres; FPL serves the remaining unincorporated areas). I could not obtain a single authoritative parcel-level boundary map from either utility in this run. 55% · utility service-territory page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit / parallel — the County's own permit process does not depend on the utility, but the utility will not grant Permission to Operate (or install the required bi-directional meter) until it receives evidence the County has approved/inspected the work. FPL: 'Operation of the renewable generation system, except for testing and inspection, prior to the installation of a new bi-directional meter is strictly prohibited,' and FPL's guidelines instruct the customer to provide FPL a copy of the approved permit or an inspection confirmation once construction is complete. 70% · utility net-metering guidelines
28 questions answered against Lee County’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — Lee County DCD Building & Permitting Services is the AHJ for residential solar in unincorporated Lee County
Why the confidence is not higherleegov.com/permits: projects in Bonita Springs, Cape Coral, Estero, Fort Myers, Fort Myers Beach or Sanibel must permit through that city; everything else (unincorporated) permits through Lee County DCD. The Solar-Photovoltaic Guide is issued by 'Lee County Community Development – Building & Permitting Services'.
department page checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/permits
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both — Lee County issues one combined 'Solar' permit record covering both the building/structural review and the electrical review, and performs its own inspections
Why the confidence is not higherThe Solar-Photovoltaic Guide's eConnect steps have the applicant select record type 'Trades >> Solar' (a single record), attach one 'Electrical Diagram' plus structural wind-load/weight documents, and the guide lists both '207 Solar Final' and '305 Electrical Final' as the required inspections under that one permit — not two separate permits.
County permit/application guide (rev. 12/19/2023) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — a Solar/Photovoltaic permit is required
Why the confidence is not higherGuide, Section 1 (Permit Description): 'A Solar/Photovoltaic permit is required to add or modify any solar pool heater, solar hot water heater, rooftop HVAC collector, or any photovoltaic power system for any residential or commercial property.'
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Combined — one 'Solar' eConnect record type covers both the structural and electrical scope; there is no separate stand-alone electrical permit for the PV work itself
Why the confidence is not highereConnect Step 1 has the applicant select Trades >> Solar (a single record type with sub-options Photovoltaic / Pool & Water Heater / Pool Heater / Rooftop HVAC Collector / Water Heater — no separate 'Electrical' option); the required Electrical Diagram and inspection list (207 Solar Final + 305 Electrical Final) sit inside that one record.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
Either — a contractor with a State-issued license registered with Lee County (or a Lee County certificate of competency) may pull the permit, or an owner-builder may self-permit
Why the confidence is not higherGuide: 'If a licensed contractor is providing the service for this permit, they must have either a State-issued license registered with Lee County or have a Lee County-issued certificate of competency;' and separately, 'If the applicant is an owner-builder and not a licensed contractor, an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement must be attached.' Deduction: the guide does not restrict the electrical scope specifically to an electrical/solar-classed contractor as opposed to a general/building contractor — that distinction sits in state contractor-licensing law (Ch. 489, F.S.), not in this County document.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes — a licensed contractor must be registered with Lee County (State license registered with the County, or a County-issued certificate of competency) before pulling the permit
Why the confidence is not higherGuide verbatim, Section 2.B.3: contractor 'must have either a State-issued license registered with Lee County or have a Lee County-issued certificate of competency,' both requiring current insurance/workers'-comp proof, verifiable at the County's 'Contractor Search' tool.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes — owner-builder self-permit is available via the paper application route only
Why the confidence is not higherGuide: 'Paper applications can only be submitted by Owner-Builders,' with an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement required; and separately, 'Owner-Builders are required by Florida Statute to personally appear at the Lee County Public Works Building ... to sign for the building permit regardless of how it was submitted.'
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Required: (1) Site/Plot Plan showing solar component locations and point of interconnection; (2) Electrical Diagram (array configuration, wiring methods, overcurrent protection, inverter, disconnects, required signage, AC connection to building); (3) Manufacturer specification sheets for all components; (4) Wind Load Calculations, signed/sealed by a FL-registered design professional (ground mount to ASCE 7 §1609.1, roof mount to ASCE 7 §1510.7.1); (5) Weight Limit Documentation (<5 lbs/sq ft distributed, <45 lbs per attachment point); (6) Construction drawings showing system placement on the roof plan. Conditional, if applicable: No-Rise Certificate (regulatory floodway), Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement, Proof of Ownership, Solar Roof Truss Affidavit (pool heaters), Historical Architectural Review (historic district/property), Notice of Commencement (value > $5,000).
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Section 3 of the County's own Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, current as of the last-revision stamp printed on the document (12/19/2023).
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Paper (owner-builder only): three collated sets of plans plus the Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement, submitted in person. Electronic (eConnect, mandatory for contractors): documents attached individually to the record in the Attachments window — the guide does not instruct applicants to merge everything into a single PDF the way some other Florida counties do.
Why the confidence is not higherGuide, Section 2.A: 'INCLUDE THREE COLLATED SETS OF PLANS for paper submissions.' Section 2.B.5 for eConnect says 'In the Attachments window, Add the required and conditional documents' — no 'one complete PDF' instruction is given anywhere in this guide, unlike some neighboring counties, so I am not assuming one.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. Site/plot plan must show the location of solar system components and the location of other mechanical equipment on the structure, particularly the point of interconnection with electrical or water service and the location of the electrical or water service equipment.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 3, Required Document 1 (Site Plan/Plot Plan).
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Yes — an Electrical Diagram is a required document, showing PV array configuration, wiring methods, overcurrent protection, inverter, disconnects, required signage and the AC connection to the building
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 3, Required Document 2.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Not named as a separate document — string and conductor sizing calculations are not listed as their own required item; they would have to be shown within the required 'Electrical Diagram' (which must show wiring methods and overcurrent protection) for the reviewer to size conductors against the NEC
Why the confidence is not higherI read the full Required/Conditional Documents list in Section 3 of the guide end to end; there is no line item titled 'string calculations' or 'conductor calculations' as several other AHJs publish separately. This is an absence read from a complete, dated county checklist, not a statement that none is ever requested at review.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Yes, for every PV permit — Wind Load Calculations Documentation must be 'signed and sealed documentation from a Florida state registered design professional verifying that the proposed system will meet the calculated wind load,' including the wind uplift zone and pressure for the specific roof zone. Ground-mounted systems must comply with ASCE 7 §1609.1; rooftop-mounted systems with ASCE 7 §1510.7.1.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 3, Required Document 4. Unlike some California counties, Lee County's guide states no small-system/low-weight exemption from the seal requirement — the requirement reads as universal for PV.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Not stated as required for a typical residential system — the guide's required-document list calls for a Florida-licensed design professional's seal on the wind-load/structural documentation, but names no separate electrical-engineer seal requirement for the Electrical Diagram
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence read from the complete Section 3 document list, which specifies sealing only for the Wind Load Calculations item; residential detached one- and two-family dwelling electrical work is also generally exempt from mandatory PE review under Ch. 471, F.S. practice-of-engineering exemptions, which is consistent with the guide's silence.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Under the fee schedule effective 15 Apr 2026: Application Fee $50 + Technology Fee $35 (both per application) + Operational Support Fee (a percentage of total review & inspection fees, fluctuates quarterly) + Solar Plan Review $25 (initial; $25 per resubmission) + Solar Regulatory Review $25 (initial; $25 per resubmission) + Inspections at $50 per required inspection for roof- or ground-mounted PV (typically two — 207 Solar Final and 305 Electrical Final — so ~$100), or $75 covering up to 2 inspections for 'All Other Types' (pool/water heaters). A straightforward roof-mount PV job therefore runs roughly $50+$35+$25+$25+$100 = $235 plus the OSF percentage and any Admin/Radon state surcharge.
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the live current fee-schedule page (raw HTML, not a summarized PDF), which states the Board of County Commissioners approved these fees 17 Mar 2026, effective 15 Apr 2026, and explicitly supersedes the prior Sections 2-3, 2-4 and 2-7. Today's date (11 Sep 2026) is after the effective date, so this is the currently governing schedule, updating the brief's pre-change figures which happened to match these except for the newly split roof/ground $50 lines and the Application/Technology/OSF layer.
current fee schedule (adopted 17 Mar 2026, eff. 15 Apr 2026) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/fees/bldpermitfeeschedule
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Flat (itemized flat fees per service — application, technology, plan review, regulatory review, per inspection — plus a percentage-based Operational Support Fee layered on top of the total)
Why the confidence is not higherNone of the Solar line items in the current fee schedule scale with kW, panel count or declared valuation; each is a fixed dollar amount per occurrence. The OSF is the one percentage-based element, described as '% of total review & inspection fees.'
current fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/fees/bldpermitfeeschedule
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes — Plan Review ($25/$25) and Regulatory Review ($25/$25) are both charged as separate line items from the per-inspection fees
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the current fee schedule's 'Solar' fee table.
current fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/fees/bldpermitfeeschedule
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Lee County publishes no solar-specific turnaround target of its own (checked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, the Residential Building Guide, leegov.com/permits and leegov.com/dcd/fees — none states a business-day figure for solar plan review). The binding ceiling is now statutory: FS 553.792, as amended by HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, eff. 1 Jul 2026), requires a local government to approve/deny within 5 business days only for an existing single-family dwelling's electrical (etc.) permit valued under $15,000 — a threshold most rooftop PV systems exceed — otherwise within 30 business days for permits (including electrical) on a structure under 7,500 sq ft, which covers essentially every single-family home. So a typical Lee County residential PV permit is bound by the 30-business-day statutory ceiling, not the 5-day one, unless the installed system's value is under $15,000.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence confirmed across four of the County's own current pages/documents; the statutory figures are read verbatim from the enrolled HB 803 text amending FS 553.792(1)(a)1–2. The $15,000 threshold-vs-typical-system-cost reasoning is my inference, not a County or state statement that PV specifically falls in the 30-day bucket — an installer with an unusually small system could fall under the 5-day bucket instead.
enrolled act, Ch. 2026-63, §[amending 553.792] checked 2026-09-11 https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/803/BillText/er/PDF
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Two mechanisms both apply. (1) Administrative expiration: 'Issued permits must pass at least one inspection within 180 days from issuance or the permit will expire' (County's own guide). (2) Statutory floor: FS 125.56(4)(d), as amended by HB 803 (eff. 1 Jul 2026), provides that 'a building permit issued by a county for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later' — a floor under overall permit life, layered on top of (not replacing) the 180-day no-inspection-activity rule.
Why the confidence is not higher(1) is verbatim, County guide, Section 5. (2) is verbatim from the enrolled HB 803 text. The guide predates HB 803 (stamped 12/19/2023), so I cannot confirm the County has updated its own public wording to reference the new 1-year statutory floor yet — I am reading the two provisions together rather than finding them reconciled in one County document.
County permit/application guide + enrolled act Ch. 2026-63 (FS 125.56(4)(d)) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
eConnect (built on the Accela Citizen Access / Accela Automation platform) at https://accelaaca.leegov.com/aca/
Why the confidence is not higherThe County's Solar-Photovoltaic Guide directs applicants to 'Lee County's eConnect online permitting system'; the portal URL resolves to an Accela Citizen Access instance.
portal landing page + County guide checked 2026-09-11 https://accelaaca.leegov.com/aca/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Yes for contractors — CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO USE ECONNECT for the full application, attachments, tracking, payment and inspection scheduling. Owner-builders may instead use a paper application submitted in person (and must appear in person to sign for the issued permit regardless of submission method).
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 2 ('CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED TO USE ECONNECT') and Sections 5–7 (payment/inspection scheduling all described through eConnect).
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Split by location within unincorporated Lee County — both Florida Power & Light (FPL) and Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC) serve unincorporated Lee County territory, and which one applies depends on the specific address (LCEC's own materials describe a broad multi-county territory that includes North Fort Myers, Pine Island, Captiva/Sanibel-adjacent areas and parts of Lehigh Acres; FPL serves the remaining unincorporated areas). I could not obtain a single authoritative parcel-level boundary map from either utility in this run.
Why the confidence is not higherLCEC's own 'about us'/service-territory pages describe LCEC's footprint qualitatively ('the six-county LCEC service territory ... vibrant urban and resort areas') without naming a hard boundary against FPL; secondary sources agree the split exists but I have not confirmed a specific unincorporated parcel either way. Per the govbot rule against trusting PowerToChoose, I did not use it and am instead flagging this as needing per-address confirmation from the utility rather than asserting one utility county-wide.
utility service-territory page checked 2026-09-11 http://www.lcec.net/my-cooperative/about-us/service-territory
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit / parallel — the County's own permit process does not depend on the utility, but the utility will not grant Permission to Operate (or install the required bi-directional meter) until it receives evidence the County has approved/inspected the work. FPL: 'Operation of the renewable generation system, except for testing and inspection, prior to the installation of a new bi-directional meter is strictly prohibited,' and FPL's guidelines instruct the customer to provide FPL a copy of the approved permit or an inspection confirmation once construction is complete.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from FPL's own published Net Metering Guidelines. I could not retrieve an equivalent LCEC-specific statement in this run (LCEC's net-metering page links to PDFs — an application/compliance form and an electric service handbook — that I was not able to open the content of), so this is confirmed for FPL territory and assumed, not confirmed, for LCEC territory.
utility net-metering guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No — an HOA/deed restriction cannot be used to prohibit a residential solar installation. Florida Statute 163.04(1): a deed restriction, covenant, declaration or similar binding agreement 'may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting' solar collectors. An association may only reasonably regulate placement (e.g., confining panels to an orientation within 45° east or west of due south) where that does not impair the system's effective operation.
Why the confidence is not higherState statute, current (2025) codification; this is a statewide floor that Lee County itself does not alter — the County's own Solar-Photovoltaic Guide does not mention HOA approval as a prerequisite anywhere in its required/conditional document list.
Florida Statute 163.04 checked 2026-09-11 https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2025/163.04
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
Yes, conditionally — 'Historical Architectural Review' is a conditional required document: 'If the project is within a Historic District or is a Designated Historic Property, follow the regulations for Designated Historic Districts on the Lee County website.'
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 3, Conditional Document 11.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Yes — Wind Load Calculations Documentation is a required document for every PV system: signed/sealed documentation from a Florida-registered design professional verifying the system meets calculated wind load, including the wind uplift zone and pressure for the roof zone in question. Ground-mounted systems must comply with ASCE 7 §1609.1; roof-mounted systems with ASCE 7 §1510.7.1.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 3, Required Document 4 — this functions as Lee County's wind/windstorm certification (Florida has no separate TDI-style windstorm certificate scheme like Texas).
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No Specific Use Permit or Board/Council approval requirement was found for a residential rooftop or accessory ground-mount PV system
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence read from the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide (no SUP/rezoning/Board hearing step appears anywhere in its process) and from the table of contents of LDC Chapter 6, Article II, Division 3 (Building Code), §§6-111–6-120, none titled for solar or discretionary review. I did not separately search LDC Chapter 34 (Zoning) for every possible agricultural/rural district overlay that might apply to a large ground-mount system, so this is not proven exhaustively for every zoning district.
County permit/application guide + LDC Ch. 6 Div. 3 table of contents checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No county-level generation-size cap was found. The eConnect application asks for the system's kW and Amps for record-keeping, not against a stated ceiling. The practical ceilings that exist are set by the interconnecting utility's net-metering tiers, not the County: FPL Tier 1 ≤10 kW / Tier 2 >10–100 kW / Tier 3 >100 kW–2,000 kW; LCEC Tier 1 0–10 kW / Tier 2 10–100 kW / Tier 3 100 kW–1 MW.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence read from the complete eConnect field list in the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide (Section 2.B.4) and from the LDC Ch.6 Division 3 table of contents; utility tier figures are the utilities' own published numbers, not a Lee County rule.
County permit/application guide + utility tier pages checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? 2020 — the guide cites 'National Electric Code (NFPA 70) (2020)' as an applicable code for solar/PV, consistent with the 2020 NEC base cycle of the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) currently in force statewide. Florida's 9th Edition FBC cycle (which may adopt a newer NEC) is not yet in force — public comment closed in early 2026 and the edition is not expected effective until on or about 31 Dec 2026. 85% · County permit/application guide
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) — currently in force statewide (and in Lee County) and cited by name in both the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide and the Fire Application and Permitting Guide. The 9th Edition (2026) is expected to take effect on/about 31 Dec 2026, i.e. after this survey date but within the same calendar year. 88% · County permit/application guide
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), which is based on NFPA 1 (Uniform Fire Code) and NFPA 101 (Life Safety Code) with Florida Administrative Code amendments 85% · County Fire permit/application guide
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes, generally — Lee County has a substantial history of LDC Chapter 6 amendments to FBC administrative sections (e.g., Ordinance 06-17 rewrote FBC Chapter 1 administration sections, permit fee/condition provisions, wind-borne debris map references), and §6-112 separately codifies Lee County's own Wind Borne Debris Region and Basic Wind Speed Map. However, no Lee-specific amendment addressing solar/PV specifically was found. 68% · Lee County Ordinance No. 06-17 (LDC Ch. 6 Building Code Amendments) + LDC Ch.6 Div.3 TOC
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and the 2020 NEC, as adopted/amended by Lee County LDC Chapter 6 (Buildings and Building Regulations), plus the County's own Wind Load Calculation and Weight Limit documentation requirements collected at permit issuance and checked against the approved plans and manufacturer specifications at inspection. 78% · County permit/application guide + fee schedule
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? State-adopted standard, no Lee-specific amendment found: Florida Building Code, Residential, §R324.6 — not fewer than two pathways, on separate roof planes, from lowest roof edge to ridge, each at least 36 inches wide; ridge setback of at least 18 inches on both sides of a horizontal ridge where the PV array occupies 33% or less of the plan-view roof area, or at least 36 inches where it occupies more than 33% (relaxed to an 18-inch setback up to 66% coverage where an NFPA 13D residential sprinkler system is installed). 75% · Florida Building Code, Residential (state-adopted)
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — required under NEC 2020 Article 690.12 (the NEC edition in force per q29). No Lee-specific rapid-shutdown amendment was found; the County's Electrical Diagram requirement lists 'Disconnects' as an item to show but adds no rapid-shutdown-specific instruction of its own. 65% · County permit/application guide (NEC edition) + NEC 2020 Art. 690.12
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Lee County requires 'required signage' as an element the Electrical Diagram must show, but does not itself enumerate a placard list — it points to code compliance. Via the NEC 2020 edition in force, the placards a Lee County inspector would check for on a typical residential system include: PV disconnecting means labels (690.13/705.10 series), rapid-shutdown label (690.56(C)), DC arc-flash/shock-hazard warning at combiner/junction boxes and disconnects, and a plaque/directory at the service equipment identifying multiple power sources (705.10) where the inverter is not co-located with the main service. 62% · County permit/application guide
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No — Lee County specifies no placard wording of its own; its only instruction is that the Electrical Diagram show 'required signage,' which is a pointer to code compliance rather than County-authored text 70% · County permit/application guide
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Not specified by Lee County. Governed instead by the NEC 2020 edition in force generically (Art. 690/705 labeling rules: labels must be permanent, reflective, weather-resistant and use specified minimum letter sizes/colors depending on the specific label type) — no Lee-specific letter-height, color or material rule was found. 50% · County permit/application guide (absence)
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Not a Lee County-specific requirement, but required under the NEC 2020 edition in force: NEC Art. 705.10, 'Identification of Power Sources,' requires a plaque or directory at the service disconnecting means (and at the PV disconnecting means if not co-located) identifying the location of all sources of power supplying the building. 55% · County permit/application guide + NEC 2020 Art. 705.10
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, for FPL territory, above the 10 kW Tier 1 threshold most residential rooftop systems fall under: FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines require, for Tier 2/3 systems (>10 kW), a manual, visible load-break disconnect switch mounted adjacent to the meter socket, lockable with a single FPL padlock, plus 'a sign noting the location of the disconnect switch ... installed at the meter' and a separate warning sign that both sides of the switch may be energized. Tier 1 systems (≤10 kW, i.e. most residential rooftop PV) using inverters listed to UL 1741 are explicitly exempted from that separate switch and its signage. LCEC's published net-metering page does not itself spell out an equivalent placard/label specification in the material I could access (it links to a PDF application/compliance form and an electric-service handbook I was not able to open the content of in this run). 68% · utility net-metering guidelines
- Where must the labels be placed? At each PV disconnect (per the Electrical Diagram's 'Disconnects' item, per Lee County); at the point of interconnection with electrical/water service (per the required Site Plan); and, in FPL territory for Tier 2/3 systems only, at the meter socket noting the disconnect location. 65% · County permit/application guide + FPL guidelines
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Utility rule, not a County rule. FPL (Tier 2/3, >10 kW): manual disconnect switch 'mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket,' readily accessible to FPL and lockable with a single FPL padlock. FPL Tier 1 (≤10 kW, most residential rooftop PV) using UL-1741-listed inverters is exempt from that separate switch — the inverter's integral disconnect, sited per NEC, suffices. LCEC's equivalent specification was not retrieved in this run (its published net-metering page links to PDFs whose content I could not open). 65% · utility net-metering guidelines
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No Lee County-specific approved-equipment list was found; the general NEC/FBC requirement that equipment be listed and labeled for its installed use (NEC 110.3) is the applicable standard 55% · County permit/application guide (absence)
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Not addressed by Lee County's Solar-Photovoltaic Guide — the eConnect 'Type of Permit' field for a Solar record offers only Photovoltaic, System Pool & Water Heater, Pool Heater, Rooftop HVAC Collector, and Water Heater; there is no Battery/ESS option. Batteries would therefore need to be reviewed under Lee County's general Electrical trade permit and/or Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1, which incorporates NFPA 855 stationary-ESS provisions by reference) rather than under the Solar-PV record type itself. 58% · County permit/application guide (absence)
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Not established as a separate permit/inspection type by the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide; no distinct ESS permit or ESS-specific inspection code was found (the SelecTXT/IVR inspection-code list has no Battery/ESS code — the closest PV-adjacent codes are 207 Solar Final and 305 Electrical Final) 55% · County inspection-code brochure (absence)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, effectively — a ground-mounted PV system triggers a '101 Foundation/Footing' inspection (not required for roof-mount) and must comply with the general structural wind-load standard for structures (ASCE 7 §1609.1) rather than the roof-mounted-system-specific provision (ASCE 7 §1510.7.1) that applies to rooftop PV. 72% · County permit/application guide
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Not found — no Lee County-specific local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing for PV was located 40% · County permit/application guide
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? No named mounting system or attachment-spacing standard, but a governing weight limit: Weight Limit Documentation must verify the system has a distributed weight of less than 5 pounds per square foot AND less than 45 pounds per attachment point to the roof. 82% · County permit/application guide
20 questions answered against Lee County’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
2020 — the guide cites 'National Electric Code (NFPA 70) (2020)' as an applicable code for solar/PV, consistent with the 2020 NEC base cycle of the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) currently in force statewide. Florida's 9th Edition FBC cycle (which may adopt a newer NEC) is not yet in force — public comment closed in early 2026 and the edition is not expected effective until on or about 31 Dec 2026.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 2020 NEC citation is verbatim from the County's own Solar-Photovoltaic Guide; the 9th-edition timing is from secondary trade-press coverage (permitplace.com, revolutionflorida.com) rather than the Florida Building Commission itself, since I did not independently verify the Commission's rulemaking calendar in this run.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) — currently in force statewide (and in Lee County) and cited by name in both the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide and the Fire Application and Permitting Guide. The 9th Edition (2026) is expected to take effect on/about 31 Dec 2026, i.e. after this survey date but within the same calendar year.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim citation in two of the County's own current guides.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition (2023), which is based on NFPA 1 (Uniform Fire Code) and NFPA 101 (Life Safety Code) with Florida Administrative Code amendments
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, County's own Fire Application and Permitting Guide: 'The Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition, which encompasses the National Fire Protection Association 1, Uniform Fire Code and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, Florida Administrative Code.' The Solar-Photovoltaic Guide itself does not separately cite the fire code (a routine PV job does not route through Fire plan review), so this is confirmed from the parallel Fire Guide rather than the Solar Guide.
County Fire permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Fire%20Guide.pdf
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes, generally — Lee County has a substantial history of LDC Chapter 6 amendments to FBC administrative sections (e.g., Ordinance 06-17 rewrote FBC Chapter 1 administration sections, permit fee/condition provisions, wind-borne debris map references), and §6-112 separately codifies Lee County's own Wind Borne Debris Region and Basic Wind Speed Map. However, no Lee-specific amendment addressing solar/PV specifically was found.
Why the confidence is not higherI ran controls on Ordinance 06-17's full text (24 pages): 'electrical' returns many hits (positive control passes), 'solar'/'photovoltaic'/'zzqqx' return zero hits each (fabricated control also zero, confirming the search mechanism itself works and isn't silently failing both ways). I also read the full LDC Ch.6 Art.II Div.3 section-heading table of contents (§§6-111–6-120) and none is titled for solar. This proves no LOCAL solar-specific amendment in the sources I could reach; it does not prove the current (2023-cycle) general amendments carried in §6-111 are unchanged from the 2006 ordinance I could read the full text of, since I could not retrieve the current codified §6-111 text itself (elaws.us timed out repeatedly on that specific section).
Lee County Ordinance No. 06-17 (LDC Ch. 6 Building Code Amendments) + LDC Ch.6 Div.3 TOC checked 2026-09-11 https://mcclibraryfunctions.azurewebsites.us/api/ordinanceDownload/12625/221350/pdf
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and the 2020 NEC, as adopted/amended by Lee County LDC Chapter 6 (Buildings and Building Regulations), plus the County's own Wind Load Calculation and Weight Limit documentation requirements collected at permit issuance and checked against the approved plans and manufacturer specifications at inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherComposite of the code editions named in the County's own guides (q29–q31) and the required-document list (q8/q13/q26), which functions as the yardstick since Lee's guide does not describe a separate 'no code review performed' OTC path the way some other counties do — Lee's solar permit does undergo Plan Review and Regulatory Review per its own current fee schedule.
County permit/application guide + fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Not found — no Lee County-specific local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing for PV was located
Why the confidence is not higherChecked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide's full required/conditional document list and the LDC Ch.6 Div.3 section table of contents (§§6-111–6-120); neither mentions service-panel upgrades, busbar sizing, or a supplemental permit trigger for them. Recorded as not_found rather than a confident absence because I could not retrieve the full current text of §6-111 (site timeouts) where such a provision could plausibly sit.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
No named mounting system or attachment-spacing standard, but a governing weight limit: Weight Limit Documentation must verify the system has a distributed weight of less than 5 pounds per square foot AND less than 45 pounds per attachment point to the roof.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 3, Required Document 5.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
State-adopted standard, no Lee-specific amendment found: Florida Building Code, Residential, §R324.6 — not fewer than two pathways, on separate roof planes, from lowest roof edge to ridge, each at least 36 inches wide; ridge setback of at least 18 inches on both sides of a horizontal ridge where the PV array occupies 33% or less of the plan-view roof area, or at least 36 inches where it occupies more than 33% (relaxed to an 18-inch setback up to 66% coverage where an NFPA 13D residential sprinkler system is installed).
Why the confidence is not higherR324.6/R324.6.1/R324.6.2/R324.6.2.1 text confirmed against the ICC code-hosting site for the Florida Residential Code (2020-cycle numbering, which the current 8th Edition (2023) carries forward under the same section numbers per ICC's own FBC-R volume listing). Neither the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide nor the LDC Ch.6 Div.3 table of contents contains a Lee-specific override of this section, which is why I am treating it as the state floor rather than a County rule.
Florida Building Code, Residential (state-adopted) checked 2026-09-11 https://codes.iccsafe.org/s/FLRC2020P1/chapter-3-building-planning/FLRC2020P1-Pt03-Ch03-SecR324.6
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes — required under NEC 2020 Article 690.12 (the NEC edition in force per q29). No Lee-specific rapid-shutdown amendment was found; the County's Electrical Diagram requirement lists 'Disconnects' as an item to show but adds no rapid-shutdown-specific instruction of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 'no local addition' half is read from the absence of any rapid-shutdown language in the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide; the 'yes, required' half is inference from the NEC edition in force rather than a County statement naming Art. 690.12 by number.
County permit/application guide (NEC edition) + NEC 2020 Art. 690.12 checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Lee County requires 'required signage' as an element the Electrical Diagram must show, but does not itself enumerate a placard list — it points to code compliance. Via the NEC 2020 edition in force, the placards a Lee County inspector would check for on a typical residential system include: PV disconnecting means labels (690.13/705.10 series), rapid-shutdown label (690.56(C)), DC arc-flash/shock-hazard warning at combiner/junction boxes and disconnects, and a plaque/directory at the service equipment identifying multiple power sources (705.10) where the inverter is not co-located with the main service.
Why the confidence is not higherThe 'required signage' phrase is verbatim from the County's Electrical Diagram requirement (Guide Section 3, Required Document 2); the detailed placard list is my reading of the NEC 2020 articles that phrase is pointing to, not a County-published table the way Alameda's adopted-by-reference Solar Permitting Guidebook provides — Florida imposes no equivalent statewide solar-permitting-guidebook signage table that I could find in this run.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No — Lee County specifies no placard wording of its own; its only instruction is that the Electrical Diagram show 'required signage,' which is a pointer to code compliance rather than County-authored text
Why the confidence is not higherI read the full Solar-Photovoltaic Guide and found no quoted label text anywhere in it; the only signage-adjacent sentence is the 'required signage' bullet under the Electrical Diagram requirement.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Not specified by Lee County. Governed instead by the NEC 2020 edition in force generically (Art. 690/705 labeling rules: labels must be permanent, reflective, weather-resistant and use specified minimum letter sizes/colors depending on the specific label type) — no Lee-specific letter-height, color or material rule was found.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence read from the full Solar-Photovoltaic Guide text; the fallback to NEC 2020 generic labeling rules is inference, not a County or state document I read in full for this run.
County permit/application guide (absence) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Not a Lee County-specific requirement, but required under the NEC 2020 edition in force: NEC Art. 705.10, 'Identification of Power Sources,' requires a plaque or directory at the service disconnecting means (and at the PV disconnecting means if not co-located) identifying the location of all sources of power supplying the building.
Why the confidence is not higherThis is inference from the NEC edition Lee County has adopted (q29), not a statement Lee County's own guide makes — the guide's Electrical Diagram requirement lists 'Disconnects' generically but does not separately call out a facility-map/directory placard.
County permit/application guide + NEC 2020 Art. 705.10 checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, for FPL territory, above the 10 kW Tier 1 threshold most residential rooftop systems fall under: FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines require, for Tier 2/3 systems (>10 kW), a manual, visible load-break disconnect switch mounted adjacent to the meter socket, lockable with a single FPL padlock, plus 'a sign noting the location of the disconnect switch ... installed at the meter' and a separate warning sign that both sides of the switch may be energized. Tier 1 systems (≤10 kW, i.e. most residential rooftop PV) using inverters listed to UL 1741 are explicitly exempted from that separate switch and its signage. LCEC's published net-metering page does not itself spell out an equivalent placard/label specification in the material I could access (it links to a PDF application/compliance form and an electric-service handbook I was not able to open the content of in this run).
Why the confidence is not higherFPL half is verbatim from FPL's own current Net Metering Guidelines page. LCEC half is a genuine gap, not an assumption that LCEC has no such requirement — flagged accordingly rather than answered as an absence.
utility net-metering guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At each PV disconnect (per the Electrical Diagram's 'Disconnects' item, per Lee County); at the point of interconnection with electrical/water service (per the required Site Plan); and, in FPL territory for Tier 2/3 systems only, at the meter socket noting the disconnect location.
Why the confidence is not higherCombines the County's own Site Plan and Electrical Diagram requirements with FPL's Tier 2/3 meter-location signage rule; the detailed NEC placement rules (junction boxes, raceways, rapid-shutdown initiation point) are inferred from the NEC 2020 edition in force rather than stated by Lee County itself.
County permit/application guide + FPL guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
No Lee County-specific approved-equipment list was found; the general NEC/FBC requirement that equipment be listed and labeled for its installed use (NEC 110.3) is the applicable standard
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence read from the full Solar-Photovoltaic Guide and the LDC Ch.6 Div.3 table of contents — neither names an approved-products list.
County permit/application guide (absence) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Not addressed by Lee County's Solar-Photovoltaic Guide — the eConnect 'Type of Permit' field for a Solar record offers only Photovoltaic, System Pool & Water Heater, Pool Heater, Rooftop HVAC Collector, and Water Heater; there is no Battery/ESS option. Batteries would therefore need to be reviewed under Lee County's general Electrical trade permit and/or Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1, which incorporates NFPA 855 stationary-ESS provisions by reference) rather than under the Solar-PV record type itself.
Why the confidence is not higherI read the complete 'Type of Permit' option list quoted verbatim in Guide Section 2.B.4 — it is short and fully enumerated, so the absence of a Battery/ESS option is a real finding, not a missed scroll. I did not separately pull an Electrical Application and Permitting Guide (leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Electric%20Guide.pdf, found in search but not opened in this run) to confirm how batteries are actually classified there.
County permit/application guide (absence) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Not established as a separate permit/inspection type by the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide; no distinct ESS permit or ESS-specific inspection code was found (the SelecTXT/IVR inspection-code list has no Battery/ESS code — the closest PV-adjacent codes are 207 Solar Final and 305 Electrical Final)
Why the confidence is not higherChecked the full inspection code list in Lee County's own 'Inspection Scheduling Instructions' brochure — it enumerates ~60 codes across building, plumbing, electrical, fire and other trades and none is titled for battery/ESS.
County inspection-code brochure (absence) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/Documents/AccelaUpgrade/SelecTXTBrochure.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, effectively — a ground-mounted PV system triggers a '101 Foundation/Footing' inspection (not required for roof-mount) and must comply with the general structural wind-load standard for structures (ASCE 7 §1609.1) rather than the roof-mounted-system-specific provision (ASCE 7 §1510.7.1) that applies to rooftop PV.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth distinctions are verbatim from the County's own Solar-Photovoltaic Guide (Section 3 wind-load standards; Section 7 inspection list), though the guide never uses the word 'structure' outright — this is my reading of the two different code tracks the guide sends ground-mount and roof-mount systems down.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Utility rule, not a County rule. FPL (Tier 2/3, >10 kW): manual disconnect switch 'mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket,' readily accessible to FPL and lockable with a single FPL padlock. FPL Tier 1 (≤10 kW, most residential rooftop PV) using UL-1741-listed inverters is exempt from that separate switch — the inverter's integral disconnect, sited per NEC, suffices. LCEC's equivalent specification was not retrieved in this run (its published net-metering page links to PDFs whose content I could not open).
Why the confidence is not higherFPL text verbatim from FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines page. LCEC gap flagged rather than assumed.
utility net-metering guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal (eConnect, 24/7) or Phone (Automated Inspection System / IVR, 239-533-8997); a text-message ('SelecTXT') option to 855-527-1863 is also offered 88% · County inspection-scheduling brochure + Solar-PV Guide
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes — Lee County DCD performs its own final solar inspections (207 Solar Final, 305 Electrical Final, plus 101 Foundation/Footing for ground-mount) for permits it issues, i.e. within unincorporated Lee County 85% · County permit/application guide
- If delegated, to whom? Not delegated for County-issued permits, but the applicant may elect a licensed private provider under FS 553.791 instead of a County inspector ('Private Provider Inspections' is a Yes/No field on the eConnect application). Separately, this is not the AHJ for the six self-permitting municipalities (Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Bonita Springs, Estero, Sanibel, Fort Myers Beach), each of which inspects its own permits. 80% · County permit/application guide
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Roof-mounted PV: 207 Solar Final, then 305 Electrical Final. Ground-mounted PV: 101 Foundation/Footing first, then 207 Solar Final and 305 Electrical Final. 90% · County permit/application guide
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No for roof-mounted PV — only the two Final inspections (207 Solar Final, 305 Electrical Final) are listed, with no rough-in/mid-roof stage. For ground-mounted PV, the 101 Foundation/Footing inspection functions as an equivalent early-stage inspection, but that is specific to the foundation scope, not a general rough-in of the array. 72% · County permit/application guide + inspection-code brochure
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- What must be on site at inspection? The Permit, the Approved Plans, and the Manufacturers' Specifications are required to be onsite during the inspection 88% · County permit/application guide
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Not stated explicitly in the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, but implied — the guide requires 'The Permit, Approved Plans and Manufacturers' Specifications' to be onsite at inspection, which an inspector would use to check installed equipment/labels against the approved submittal and the NEC 2020 marking requirements 50% · County permit/application guide (inference)
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? Certificate of Compliance (for a stand-alone solar permit on an existing structure) — issued once all required inspections have passed and all outstanding conditional documents/fees are satisfied, closing the permit 85% · County permit/application guide
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer/customer — Lee County's own permit process does not notify the utility. FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines direct the customer to 'provide a copy of the approved permit or a screen print from the local authority's website' along with confirmation of a passed inspection before FPL will install the required bi-directional meter and grant Permission to Operate. 68% · utility net-metering guidelines
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $50 per inspection 85% · current fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? For application/plan-review corrections: a consolidated 'Notice of Rejection' is emailed to the applicant identifying specific points of failure; the applicant has 30 days to correct and resubmit (via eConnect, with attachments kept under the same file names for correct versioning; or in person for paper applications), with a cover letter addressing each point of failure required with the resubmittal. For inspection-stage corrections, the guide does not describe a distinct process beyond the $50 re-inspection fee applying when work fails or is not ready. 75% · County permit/application guide
14 questions answered against Lee County’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal (eConnect, 24/7) or Phone (Automated Inspection System / IVR, 239-533-8997); a text-message ('SelecTXT') option to 855-527-1863 is also offered
Why the confidence is not higherGuide Section 7 gives the eConnect and phone routes verbatim; the County's own 'Inspection Scheduling Instructions' brochure additionally documents the SelecTXT text-message channel with the same phone number and express-command syntax.
County inspection-scheduling brochure + Solar-PV Guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/Documents/AccelaUpgrade/SelecTXTBrochure.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedleegov.com/dcd/BldPermitServ/Insp/InsFAQ (returns genuine HTTP 404, confirmed via curl with browser user-agent, not a JS-rendering issue); search-engine summaries of that dead page were not treated as a source
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedsame dead InsFAQ URL as q50; also checked the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide and the SelecTXT inspection-scheduling brochure, neither of which states an AM/PM-window or same-day policy
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Yes — Lee County DCD performs its own final solar inspections (207 Solar Final, 305 Electrical Final, plus 101 Foundation/Footing for ground-mount) for permits it issues, i.e. within unincorporated Lee County
Why the confidence is not higherThe whole inspection-request process (Section 7 of the Guide, the SelecTXT brochure) is addressed to Lee County's own inspection scheduling system; nothing in the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide describes delegation to a private provider by default (though FS 553.791 private-provider inspection remains an applicant option — see eConnect's 'Private Provider Inspections' field in the application).
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Not delegated for County-issued permits, but the applicant may elect a licensed private provider under FS 553.791 instead of a County inspector ('Private Provider Inspections' is a Yes/No field on the eConnect application). Separately, this is not the AHJ for the six self-permitting municipalities (Cape Coral, Fort Myers, Bonita Springs, Estero, Sanibel, Fort Myers Beach), each of which inspects its own permits.
Why the confidence is not higherThe private-provider option is verbatim from Guide Section 2.B.4 ('Private Provider Inspections: Will the project be inspected by a private provider? ... Private Provider Inspections are required if electing to use Private Provider Review services'); the municipal split is confirmed at q1/jurisdiction.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Roof-mounted PV: 207 Solar Final, then 305 Electrical Final. Ground-mounted PV: 101 Foundation/Footing first, then 207 Solar Final and 305 Electrical Final.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 7, 'Common Inspections Include' list, broken out by mount type.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
No for roof-mounted PV — only the two Final inspections (207 Solar Final, 305 Electrical Final) are listed, with no rough-in/mid-roof stage. For ground-mounted PV, the 101 Foundation/Footing inspection functions as an equivalent early-stage inspection, but that is specific to the foundation scope, not a general rough-in of the array.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the same Section 7 list as q54 — the general building-code '105 Rough Framing' and '304 Rough Electrical' codes exist in the County's IVR code list (SelecTXT brochure) but are not named as required for PV in the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide's own 'Common Inspections' section.
County permit/application guide + inspection-code brochure checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Not stated explicitly in the Solar-Photovoltaic Guide, but implied — the guide requires 'The Permit, Approved Plans and Manufacturers' Specifications' to be onsite at inspection, which an inspector would use to check installed equipment/labels against the approved submittal and the NEC 2020 marking requirements
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the onsite-documents requirement (Guide Section 7) rather than a County statement that inspectors explicitly check labels/listings as a checklist item.
County permit/application guide (inference) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedleegov.com/dcd/document-search (document/case search portal, no solar/checklist hits) and the known set of PermittingDocs guide PDFs found via search; could not load the PermittingDocs directory index to confirm completeness
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The Permit, the Approved Plans, and the Manufacturers' Specifications are required to be onsite during the inspection
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 7.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$50 per inspection
Why the confidence is not higherCurrent fee schedule, Administrative/Operational > Inspections: 'Re-Inspections, Per Inspection, $50' — this is the general re-inspection line applying across permit types including Solar, replacing the prior (pre-15 Apr 2026) $50 re-inspection fee under the now-superseded Section 2-7.
current fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/fees/bldpermitfeeschedule
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
For application/plan-review corrections: a consolidated 'Notice of Rejection' is emailed to the applicant identifying specific points of failure; the applicant has 30 days to correct and resubmit (via eConnect, with attachments kept under the same file names for correct versioning; or in person for paper applications), with a cover letter addressing each point of failure required with the resubmittal. For inspection-stage corrections, the guide does not describe a distinct process beyond the $50 re-inspection fee applying when work fails or is not ready.
Why the confidence is not higherThe rejection/30-day/cover-letter process is verbatim, Guide Section 4 ('Notice of Rejection'); the inspection-stage half is inferred from the fee schedule's generic re-inspection line (q59) rather than a described corrections workflow.
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Certificate of Compliance (for a stand-alone solar permit on an existing structure) — issued once all required inspections have passed and all outstanding conditional documents/fees are satisfied, closing the permit
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Guide Section 8: 'Once all inspections have passed, and all outstanding conditional documents and fees have been satisfied, the Certificate of Compliance is issued and the permit is closed.'
County permit/application guide checked 2026-09-11 https://www.leegov.com/dcd/PermittingDocs/Solar-Photovoltaic%20Guide.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Installer/customer — Lee County's own permit process does not notify the utility. FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines direct the customer to 'provide a copy of the approved permit or a screen print from the local authority's website' along with confirmation of a passed inspection before FPL will install the required bi-directional meter and grant Permission to Operate.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from FPL's own guidelines; confirmed for FPL territory only — I was not able to open the content of LCEC's equivalent application/compliance-form PDF in this run to confirm LCEC follows the identical pattern.
utility net-metering guidelines checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/clean-energy/net-metering/guidelines.html
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 70%
No — Lee County specifies no placard wording of its own; its only instruction is that the Electrical Diagram show 'required signage,' which is a pointer to code compliance rather than County-authored text
Size, colour & material 50%
Not specified by Lee County. Governed instead by the NEC 2020 edition in force generically (Art. 690/705 labeling rules: labels must be permanent, reflective, weather-resistant and use specified minimum letter sizes/colors depending on the specific label type) — no Lee-specific letter-height, color or material rule was found.
Where they go 65%
At each PV disconnect (per the Electrical Diagram's 'Disconnects' item, per Lee County); at the point of interconnection with electrical/water service (per the required Site Plan); and, in FPL territory for Tier 2/3 systems only, at the meter socket noting the disconnect location.
What the utility wants on top 68%
Yes, for FPL territory, above the 10 kW Tier 1 threshold most residential rooftop systems fall under: FPL's own Net Metering Guidelines require, for Tier 2/3 systems (>10 kW), a manual, visible load-break disconnect switch mounted adjacent to the meter socket, lockable with a single FPL padlock, plus 'a sign noting the location of the disconnect switch ... installed at the meter' and a separate warning sign that both sides of the switch may be energized. Tier 1 systems (≤10 kW, i.e. most residential rooftop PV) using inverters listed to UL 1741 are explicitly exempted from that separate switch and its signage. LCEC's published net-metering page does not itself spell out an equivalent placard/label specification in the material I could access (it links to a PDF application/compliance form and an electric-service handbook I was not able to open the content of in this run).
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.