St. Lucie County

St. Lucie County

State of Florida

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

St. Lucie County is a county authority in the State of Florida, serving 329,226 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for St. Lucie County against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

St. Lucie County is the authority having jurisdiction 92% confidence
Holds
Building and Electrical, in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County only
Delegated to
Not delegated — Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, and the Town of St. Lucie Village are independent, self-permitting AHJs for their own city/town limits. Port St. Lucie (population ~281,097, 2026 est.) alone is larger than the unincorporated county (~76,600 est. 2020 per the county's own page); Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Village also issue their own permits.
Overridden by
State law on two fronts: (1) HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, in force 1 Jul 2026) amended FS 553.79/FS 125.56(4)(d) to set a ONE-YEAR permit-validity floor, which conflicts with the county's own published 180-day expiration language (see q19) — a live, unresolved contradiction, not a resolved override. (2) Utility interconnection is split: most of the unincorporated county is FPL territory, but Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA), a municipally-owned electric utility, serves roughly 20 sq mi OUTSIDE Fort Pierce's city limits (Lakewood Park, White City, Fort Pierce North/South CDPs) that still sit within the county's unincorporated permitting jurisdiction — so for those addresses the utility gatekeeper is FPUA, not FPL.
Why not higher
County's own Permitting/Zoning page states its jurisdiction is 'Unincorporated St. Lucie County' by name and separately names all three self-permitting municipalities with their own contact info. Utility split confirmed from FPUA's own service-area page, not assumed from PowerToChoose.

https://web.archive.org/web/20260814172251/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning

Permit required
Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in the unincorporated county.92%
Permit cost
$75.00 flat, for the 'Solar Photovoltaic PV System' line item under Residential Permits.80%
Plan review
Not stated specifically for solar. The county's general goal (per its Building FAQ) is a Building Permit within 14 workdays,60%
Portal
Tyler EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' portal, linked from the county's permitting pages as 'St. Lucie County's Citizen Self Service (Tyler EnerGov)' at stlucieco.gov/CitizenSelfService.95%
Electrical code
2020 NEC — adopted statewide via the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), Chapter 27 Electrical, which references NFPA 70-2020 by incorporation. This is a statewide adoption; St.85%
Own placard wording
No — the county does not specify its own placard wording. Wording follows NEC 2020's standard rapid-shutdown/label language (statewide);65%
Booking an inspection
Portal (EnerGov Citizen Self Service, online) or Phone (a dedicated automated inspection line, (855) 636-0606 — caller needs their permit number ready).75%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in the unincorporated county. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Combined — Solar Photovoltaic PV System has its own single $75 permit-fee line item on the county's Residential Permits fee schedule, Q4 Plan review — Not stated specifically for solar. The county's general goal (per its Building FAQ) is a Building Permit within 14 workdays, Q18 Where you file — Tyler EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' portal, linked from the county's permitting pages as 'St. Q20

Permit required
Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in the unincorporated county.92% source
What it costs
$75.00 flat, for the 'Solar Photovoltaic PV System' line item under Residential Permits.80% source
Plan review turnaround
Not stated specifically for solar. The county's general goal (per its Building FAQ) is a Building Permit within 14 workdays,60% source
Key document
department FAQ page (contradicts HB 803 state floor — flagged) cited by 4 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — St. Lucie County Building & Code Regulation Division is the AHJ for residential solar, but ONLY in the unincorporated area. Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, and the Town of St. Lucie Village each issue their own permits and are separate AHJs, not delegates of the county. 95% · department page
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both — the County's Building & Code Regulation Division issues and inspects both Building and Electrical permits itself, but only in the unincorporated area. It does not delegate to the cities; Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Village are independent, self-permitting AHJs sitting alongside the county, not under it. 92% · department page + adopting ordinance
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in the unincorporated county. 92% · department exemption list (checked for absence) + FAQ page
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Combined — Solar Photovoltaic PV System has its own single $75 permit-fee line item on the county's Residential Permits fee schedule, separate from the generic 'Electrical' line ($100), consistent with one combined Building/Electrical PV permit rather than the applicant pulling two separate permits. 65% · fee schedule
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No — not required by the county as part of the building-permit process. Nothing in the LDC's Solar Energy section (7.10.28) or on the Permit Applications document list requires HOA/architectural-approval evidence for a permit, and Florida law (FS 163.04) already limits an HOA's ability to prohibit residential solar outright. 65% · ordinance (read in full for absence) + document list
    • Is there a historic-district review? Only if the specific property carries an individual local historic designation. LDC §4.11.09 (Certificate of Appropriateness) requires COA approval before any exterior alteration — which would include rooftop PV — on a property 'designated pursuant to this ordinance,' and states 'No permit shall be issued by the County that affects any property designated pursuant to this ordinance without a Certificate of Appropriateness.' This is not a general requirement for all residential parcels — only individually-designated historic properties or contributing structures in a locally-designated historic district. 82% · ordinance
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Effectively yes in practice, though not stated as a solar-specific requirement. The county requires a signed/sealed 'Certification for Design Load Compliance, 8th Edition' (using ASCE 7-22 wind design) for most permits; the form allows an exemption only for interior renovations and 'certain minor building permits at the discretion of the plan reviewer' — so whether a given residential PV job needs formal wind certification is a plan-reviewer judgment call, not a blanket requirement or exemption. 68% · county structural certification form
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Yes, but only for utility-scale 'Solar Generation Stations,' never for ordinary residential rooftop/accessory PV. LDC §7.10.28(A)(1): Solar Generation Stations are a permitted use (Minor Site Plan only) in the AG-1, AG-2.5 and AG-5 agricultural districts; in any other zoning district a Solar Generation Station requires a Major Site Plan submitted concurrently with a Conditional Use Permit (i.e., Board of County Commissioners approval). 90% · ordinance
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No kW/generation-capacity cap for residential accessory solar. Instead the county regulates by height and setback: roof-mounted panels are exempt from building-height limits but must sit >=3 ft from the roof edge; wall/building-integrated systems may not exceed 10 ft above the zoning district's max height; ground/pole-mounted systems are capped at 10 ft above the primary structure's base floor elevation, may encroach into side/rear setbacks only if <=6 ft tall and >=5 ft from the property line, and are barred from front/side-corner yards absent specific waiver conditions. 88% · ordinance
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either — a Florida state-licensed/certified electrical contractor, OR the homeowner acting as owner-builder under FS 489.103(7) if they own and occupy the home. 88% · department FAQ page
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? No — no separate local pre-registration/competency-card step is described for state-certified contractors. The county's Contractor Licensing division polices unlicensed-contractor complaints and licenses motor carriers, but its own page does not describe a registration requirement before a state-certified electrical/solar contractor can apply for a permit. 62% · department page
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes — a homeowner may self-permit and self-install as owner-builder under FS 489.103(7), provided they own and occupy the property; if they do not personally perform all trades, they must supervise and hire licensed subcontractors for electrical work. 90% · department FAQ page
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? No dedicated solar/PV checklist is published. The county's Permit Checklists index lists exactly 7 checklists (Child Safety Barrier, Fence, New Single-Family Residence/Addition, Commercial Building, Marine Construction, Mobile Home, Mobile Home Worksheet, Owner Builder Flowchart) and none is solar-specific. A residential PV submittal therefore uses the generic Building Permit Application plus, where electrical work is involved, the county's Electrical Affidavit. 70% · department checklist index (absence proven)
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No fixed numeric threshold found; the county requires a design professional's signed-and-sealed 'Certification for Design Load Compliance, 8th Edition' (ASCE 7-22 wind design) for most permits, but the form itself states it is 'not required for interior renovations...and certain minor building permits at the discretion of the plan reviewer' — i.e., whether a residential rooftop PV job needs the structural PE certification is a case-by-case call by the plan reviewer, not a published kW/weight/valuation threshold. 70% · county structural certification form
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? Tyler EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' portal, linked from the county's permitting pages as 'St. Lucie County's Citizen Self Service (Tyler EnerGov)' at stlucieco.gov/CitizenSelfService. 95% · portal landing page
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Yes for most of the process — apply, upload plans/documents, pay fees, check for review comments, and request inspections are all done through the EnerGov portal per the county's own Owner-Builder flowchart. The one in-person step is notarizing the Owner-Builder Affidavit (owner-builder route only) or appearing in person to sign the building permit as owner-builder. 80% · county process flowchart
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? $75.00 flat, for the 'Solar Photovoltaic PV System' line item under Residential Permits. 80% · fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Flat fee ($75, regardless of system size/valuation) for the residential PV line item. 82% · fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? No separate plan-check fee for residential — the fee schedule's Residential Permits section is headed 'Residential Plan Review & Permit Fees are based upon one- & two-family dwellings...' meaning the $75 solar line already bundles plan review and permit issuance. A distinct, value-based Plan Review fee schedule exists but is explicitly for 'Commercial and Miscellaneous' permits. 72% · fee schedule
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Not stated specifically for solar. The county's general goal (per its Building FAQ) is a Building Permit within 14 workdays, but 'Minor permits are usually approved within 24-48 hours' — and a flat-fee, single-inspection-trip trade permit like residential PV is a strong fit for that minor-permit / 24-48-hour track rather than the 14-workday track. 60% · department FAQ page
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days — 'Permits expire and become null and void if work is not started and an inspection is not requested within 180 days. After work has commenced, the permit will expire when work is suspended or abandoned within the same time frames.' 85% · department FAQ page (contradicts HB 803 state floor — flagged)
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Split by location. Most of unincorporated St. Lucie County is served by Florida Power & Light (FPL). BUT Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) — a municipally-owned electric utility — has an electric service area of about 35 sq mi, of which only ~14.7 sq mi is inside the Fort Pierce city limits; the remaining ~20 sq mi is OUTSIDE the city, in unincorporated communities such as Lakewood Park, White City, and the Fort Pierce North/South CDPs. Any address in those unincorporated pockets interconnects through FPUA, not FPL. 78% · utility's own service-area page
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit (with the interconnection application itself often filed in parallel). FPL's Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement requires 'the Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' confirming the install 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' before FPL will finalize interconnection/PTO. 78% · utility tariff / interconnection agreement

28 questions answered against St. Lucie County’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes — St. Lucie County Building & Code Regulation Division is the AHJ for residential solar, but ONLY in the unincorporated area. Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, and the Town of St. Lucie Village each issue their own permits and are separate AHJs, not delegates of the county.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty's own Permitting/Zoning page states verbatim: 'St. Lucie County Building & Code Regulation Division has building permitting jurisdiction over Unincorporated St. Lucie County, which consists of 418 square miles and has an estimated population of 76,600 in 2020. Several cities/towns in St. Lucie County (the City of Ft Pierce, the City of Port St. Lucie, and the Town of St. Lucie Village) have their permitting requirements and issue permits to their residents.' Port St. Lucie alone (~281,000 residents, World Population Review 2026) is far larger than the unincorporated county the record actually covers.

department page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260814172251/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both — the County's Building & Code Regulation Division issues and inspects both Building and Electrical permits itself, but only in the unincorporated area. It does not delegate to the cities; Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Village are independent, self-permitting AHJs sitting alongside the county, not under it.

Why the confidence is not higherConfirmed on the county's own permitting page (see q1) plus the Building Code adoption ordinance (Sec. 13.00.01, Ord. 2024-038) which applies 'to the unincorporated areas of the County' only.

department page + adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260814172251/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes, a permit is required for residential rooftop PV in the unincorporated county.

Why the confidence is not higherThe county's current 'Items Not Requiring a Permit' page was read in full (every bullet, ~35 items: A/C repair, ceiling fan, drywall patch, satellite dish, etc.) and contains no solar/PV exemption. The Building FAQ page separately states permits are required per FBC 102.2 for 'every...structure or facility or floating residential structure, or any appurtenances connected...to such buildings'.

department exemption list (checked for absence) + FAQ page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260316053507/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/items-not-requiring-a-permit

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Combined — Solar Photovoltaic PV System has its own single $75 permit-fee line item on the county's Residential Permits fee schedule, separate from the generic 'Electrical' line ($100), consistent with one combined Building/Electrical PV permit rather than the applicant pulling two separate permits.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from the fee schedule structure alone; no county page states in words whether solar is 'combined' vs 'separate.' Fee schedule is the 2025-05 capture of the document tied to Resolution 2025-93 (still the resolution number cited on the live permit-applications page as of its most recent capture).

fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either — a Florida state-licensed/certified electrical contractor, OR the homeowner acting as owner-builder under FS 489.103(7) if they own and occupy the home.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty Building FAQ, verbatim: 'Do I need a contractor? Not if you own and occupy the house. State statutes 489.103(7) allow the owners of real property to act as their contractor... Owners acting as their own contractor...are required to personally appear and sign the permit application.'

department FAQ page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260314081817/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/building-faq-s

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

No — no separate local pre-registration/competency-card step is described for state-certified contractors. The county's Contractor Licensing division polices unlicensed-contractor complaints and licenses motor carriers, but its own page does not describe a registration requirement before a state-certified electrical/solar contractor can apply for a permit.

Why the confidence is not higherRead in full on the county's current Contractor Licensing page; no registration requirement stated. Florida law (FS 489.113(2)) also generally bars counties from requiring separate local registration of a state-certified contractor. Confidence held below 70 because the page's silence is not an explicit 'no registration required' statement.

department page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260814172348/https://www.stlucieco.gov/residents/household/contractor-licensing

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes — a homeowner may self-permit and self-install as owner-builder under FS 489.103(7), provided they own and occupy the property; if they do not personally perform all trades, they must supervise and hire licensed subcontractors for electrical work.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty Building FAQ page, 'Do I need a contractor?' answer quoted directly; also the county's 'Owner Builder Affidavit' and 'Owner Builder Permit Flowchart' documents exist specifically to process this path.

department FAQ page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260314081817/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/building-faq-s

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

No dedicated solar/PV checklist is published. The county's Permit Checklists index lists exactly 7 checklists (Child Safety Barrier, Fence, New Single-Family Residence/Addition, Commercial Building, Marine Construction, Mobile Home, Mobile Home Worksheet, Owner Builder Flowchart) and none is solar-specific. A residential PV submittal therefore uses the generic Building Permit Application plus, where electrical work is involved, the county's Electrical Affidavit.

Why the confidence is not higherFull text of the Permit Checklists index page was read; 'solar' appears only in an unrelated nav-menu link (Solar and Energy Loan Fund) not as a checklist title. This is a proven absence of a PV-specific checklist, not a failure to look.

department checklist index (absence proven) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260804180105/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-checklists

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedPermit Checklists index and Permit Applications document list (52 documents enumerated) — no page states a copy count or accepted file format beyond general portal upload; the Building Permit Application 2021 PDF itself (which might state this) returned a soft-404 in every Wayback capture attempted

https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-applications

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedPermit Checklists index (no PV checklist exists) and the Building Permit Application 2021 PDF, which could not be retrieved — the linked document (showpublisheddocument/8229/638796297199970000) has no Wayback capture and the live stlucieco.gov host returns an Akamai 403 to every fetch attempted

https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-applications

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame as q10 — no PV-specific checklist exists and the general Building Permit Application form (which would list submittal contents) could not be retrieved from either the live site (403) or Wayback (no capture of that specific document)

https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-applications

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame gap as q11 — no PV checklist, and the underlying generic application form is unreachable

https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-applications

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

No fixed numeric threshold found; the county requires a design professional's signed-and-sealed 'Certification for Design Load Compliance, 8th Edition' (ASCE 7-22 wind design) for most permits, but the form itself states it is 'not required for interior renovations...and certain minor building permits at the discretion of the plan reviewer' — i.e., whether a residential rooftop PV job needs the structural PE certification is a case-by-case call by the plan reviewer, not a published kW/weight/valuation threshold.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the county's own Design Load Compliance Certification form (Revised 5/28/2024), the document used for structural sign-off under FBC 8th Edition.

county structural certification form checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206id_/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8181/638525719942600000

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked the Building Code adoption ordinance (Sec. 13.00.01), the fee schedule, and the Permit Checklists index — none states an electrical-PE-stamp threshold specific to residential PV; this is likely governed by the statewide FBC 8th Ed. threshold for electrical engineering, which was not independently verified this session

https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CO_CH10BUBURE

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

$75.00 flat, for the 'Solar Photovoltaic PV System' line item under Residential Permits.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty Building Permit Fees schedule (captured 19 May 2025, tied to a document still linked from the live permit-applications page under Resolution 2025-93). The most current version of the same document (linked live under the same document ID 9775) could not be fully read — every Wayback capture of the newer version is truncated mid-file by Wayback's own length cap — so this is the most recent complete copy obtainable.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Flat fee ($75, regardless of system size/valuation) for the residential PV line item.

Why the confidence is not higherSame fee schedule; solar is listed as a flat per-permit dollar amount, not value-based (value-based calculation is reserved for New Construction and Commercial/Misc. Plan Review in the same document).

fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

No separate plan-check fee for residential — the fee schedule's Residential Permits section is headed 'Residential Plan Review & Permit Fees are based upon one- & two-family dwellings...' meaning the $75 solar line already bundles plan review and permit issuance. A distinct, value-based Plan Review fee schedule exists but is explicitly for 'Commercial and Miscellaneous' permits.

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the fee schedule's own section headers and the 'Plan Review Fees' table, which scopes itself to commercial/misc. permits (with a $75 minimum) rather than residential trade permits like solar.

fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Not stated specifically for solar. The county's general goal (per its Building FAQ) is a Building Permit within 14 workdays, but 'Minor permits are usually approved within 24-48 hours' — and a flat-fee, single-inspection-trip trade permit like residential PV is a strong fit for that minor-permit / 24-48-hour track rather than the 14-workday track.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the county's Building FAQ page; the page does not name solar specifically, so which of the two stated turnaround figures applies to PV is an inference from the fee-schedule's 'minor trade permit' structure, not a direct statement.

department FAQ page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260314081817/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/building-faq-s

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

180 days — 'Permits expire and become null and void if work is not started and an inspection is not requested within 180 days. After work has commenced, the permit will expire when work is suspended or abandoned within the same time frames.'

Why the confidence is not higherThis is the same 180-day trap seen at Volusia, Manatee, Tampa and Lake: it contradicts the one-year permit-validity floor set by HB 803 (Ch. 2026-63, in force 1 Jul 2026), which amended FS 553.79/FS 125.56(4)(d). The county's public-facing FAQ has not been updated to reflect the new state floor as of this capture (14 Mar 2026, i.e. AFTER HB 803 took effect); the stated 180-day figure is likely no longer legally enforceable for permits issued after 1 Jul 2026 but is what the county publishes.

department FAQ page (contradicts HB 803 state floor — flagged) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260314081817/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/building-faq-s

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

Tyler EnerGov 'Citizen Self Service' portal, linked from the county's permitting pages as 'St. Lucie County's Citizen Self Service (Tyler EnerGov)' at stlucieco.gov/CitizenSelfService.

Why the confidence is not higherNamed identically across the Permitting/Zoning landing page, the Permit Applications page, and the Building Inspections page, all pointing to the same portal; the county was mid-upgrade to '2025.1 EnerGov' per banner text on multiple pages at time of capture.

portal landing page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260814172251/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Yes for most of the process — apply, upload plans/documents, pay fees, check for review comments, and request inspections are all done through the EnerGov portal per the county's own Owner-Builder flowchart. The one in-person step is notarizing the Owner-Builder Affidavit (owner-builder route only) or appearing in person to sign the building permit as owner-builder.

Why the confidence is not higherCounty 'Owner Builder Residential Permit' flowchart (a published process diagram) shows 'Create an EnerGov account online' -> 'Apply for residential permit and upload documents' -> ...-> 'Request inspections as applicable via the portal' as the full loop, with only the owner-builder affidavit signature/notarization requiring an in-person county visit.

county process flowchart checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206id_/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8954/638249276140970000

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Split by location. Most of unincorporated St. Lucie County is served by Florida Power & Light (FPL). BUT Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) — a municipally-owned electric utility — has an electric service area of about 35 sq mi, of which only ~14.7 sq mi is inside the Fort Pierce city limits; the remaining ~20 sq mi is OUTSIDE the city, in unincorporated communities such as Lakewood Park, White City, and the Fort Pierce North/South CDPs. Any address in those unincorporated pockets interconnects through FPUA, not FPL.

Why the confidence is not higherFPUA's own 'Electric Service Area Map' page and search-indexed description confirm the 35 sq mi / 14.7 sq mi-inside-city-limits split and name the specific unincorporated CDPs served. This is exactly the PowerToChoose-style trap the brief warns about, but confirmed from the utility's own page rather than assumed — FPL is NOT the sole utility for the county's unincorporated AHJ area.

utility's own service-area page checked 2026-09-11 https://fpua.com/electric-service-area-map/

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

After permit (with the interconnection application itself often filed in parallel). FPL's Tier 1 Interconnection Agreement requires 'the Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' confirming the install 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' before FPL will finalize interconnection/PTO.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, FPL Tier 1 (<=10kW) Net Metering Interconnection Agreement, Section 3.4, PSC tariff sheet effective 1 Jan 2022 (Second Revised Sheet No. 9.050) — the most recent version findable. FPUA's equivalent requirement (for the FPUA-served unincorporated pockets, see q22) was not separately checked this session.

utility tariff / interconnection agreement checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

No — not required by the county as part of the building-permit process. Nothing in the LDC's Solar Energy section (7.10.28) or on the Permit Applications document list requires HOA/architectural-approval evidence for a permit, and Florida law (FS 163.04) already limits an HOA's ability to prohibit residential solar outright.

Why the confidence is not higherLDC §7.10.28 was read in full and contains no HOA/ACC reference; the county's 52-document Permit Applications list (see q8/q9) contains no 'HOA approval' or 'ACC letter' item. Absence proven by reading both in full, but this is a negative inference rather than an explicit 'no HOA approval needed' statement.

ordinance (read in full for absence) + document list checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHVIIDEDEIMST_7.10.00SUST_7.10.28SOEN

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

Only if the specific property carries an individual local historic designation. LDC §4.11.09 (Certificate of Appropriateness) requires COA approval before any exterior alteration — which would include rooftop PV — on a property 'designated pursuant to this ordinance,' and states 'No permit shall be issued by the County that affects any property designated pursuant to this ordinance without a Certificate of Appropriateness.' This is not a general requirement for all residential parcels — only individually-designated historic properties or contributing structures in a locally-designated historic district.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from LDC §4.11.09(A)(1)-(2), retrieved via the Municode content API (job 494778, node CHIVSPDI_4.11.00HIPR_4.11.09CEAP).

ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHIVSPDI_4.11.00HIPR_4.11.09CEAP

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

Effectively yes in practice, though not stated as a solar-specific requirement. The county requires a signed/sealed 'Certification for Design Load Compliance, 8th Edition' (using ASCE 7-22 wind design) for most permits; the form allows an exemption only for interior renovations and 'certain minor building permits at the discretion of the plan reviewer' — so whether a given residential PV job needs formal wind certification is a plan-reviewer judgment call, not a blanket requirement or exemption.

Why the confidence is not higherSame Design Load Compliance Certification form as q13 — St. Lucie is Atlantic-coastal with high design wind speeds, so this ASCE 7-22 wind-design certification is the applicable local mechanism, though the form does not name 'solar' specifically.

county structural certification form checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206id_/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8181/638525719942600000

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

Yes, but only for utility-scale 'Solar Generation Stations,' never for ordinary residential rooftop/accessory PV. LDC §7.10.28(A)(1): Solar Generation Stations are a permitted use (Minor Site Plan only) in the AG-1, AG-2.5 and AG-5 agricultural districts; in any other zoning district a Solar Generation Station requires a Major Site Plan submitted concurrently with a Conditional Use Permit (i.e., Board of County Commissioners approval).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from LDC §7.10.28(A)(1), retrieved via Municode API. Residential accessory solar (§7.10.28(B)) has no such requirement.

ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHVIIDEDEIMST_7.10.00SUST_7.10.28SOEN

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

No kW/generation-capacity cap for residential accessory solar. Instead the county regulates by height and setback: roof-mounted panels are exempt from building-height limits but must sit >=3 ft from the roof edge; wall/building-integrated systems may not exceed 10 ft above the zoning district's max height; ground/pole-mounted systems are capped at 10 ft above the primary structure's base floor elevation, may encroach into side/rear setbacks only if <=6 ft tall and >=5 ft from the property line, and are barred from front/side-corner yards absent specific waiver conditions.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, LDC §7.10.28(B)(1)-(5), current through Ord. No. 2024-29 (10-1-2024) per the job history banner (Supplement 36, publish date 7 Apr 2026).

ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHVIIDEDEIMST_7.10.00SUST_7.10.28SOEN

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? 2020 NEC — adopted statewide via the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), Chapter 27 Electrical, which references NFPA 70-2020 by incorporation. This is a statewide adoption; St. Lucie County has not amended Chapter 27. 85% · adopting ordinance + state code cross-reference
    • Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), with St. Lucie County Administrative Amendments to Chapter 1 'Administration' of the Building Volume and Appendix Q 'Tiny Houses' of the Residential Volume. 95% · adopting ordinance
    • Which fire code edition is in force? 'The most current edition of the Florida Fire Prevention Code (Chapter 69A-60, F.A.C.)' — the St. Lucie County Fire District adopts a floating/always-current edition rather than naming a fixed edition number, per its Fire Prevention Code Resolution. 85% · fire district resolution
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes. Building: County Administrative Amendments to FBC Ch. 1 and Appendix Q (Ord. 2024-038). Fire: St. Lucie County Fire District amendments to special-hazard/access-roadway-clearance provisions (Res. 740-23) layered onto the 'most current' FFPC. Land Development Code: LDC §7.10.28 Solar Energy supplemental design standards apply on top of the base building/electrical code for siting, setback and height. 90% · adopting ordinances (combined)
    • What is the installation judged against? FBC 8th Edition (2023) + NEC 2020 (via FBC Ch. 27) for construction/electrical compliance, plus LDC §7.10.28's solar-specific siting/height/setback standards for zoning compliance. No separate solar-specific electrical standard exists locally beyond the state-adopted NEC. 85% · ordinance (combined)
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    Nothing recorded for St. Lucie County on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, rapid shutdown is required, to NEC 2020 Article 690.12 — the edition currently in force via FBC 8th Edition Ch. 27 (see q29). No county amendment to this requirement was found. 78% · inference from adopted code edition
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

    • Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? No county-specific placard list published. What is required comes from two places: (1) NEC 2020 Art. 690/705 rapid-shutdown and PV-source labels (statewide via FBC adoption), and (2) FPL's Tier 1 tariff, which requires a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to the meter socket if the manual disconnect switch cannot be sited there directly (§5.3). 72% · ordinance (absence) + utility tariff
    • Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No — the county does not specify its own placard wording. Wording follows NEC 2020's standard rapid-shutdown/label language (statewide); FPL's tariff requires a plaque that 'indicat[es] the location of the manual disconnect switch' but does not prescribe exact wording. 65% · ordinance (absence) + utility tariff
    • Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Not specified locally. FPL's tariff requires the disconnect-location plaque to be 'permanent' and 'weather-proof' (i.e., material durability) but states nothing about letter height or colour; those specs (where they exist) come from NEC 2020 Art. 690.56 at the state level, not from St. Lucie County or FPL. 62% · utility tariff (partial) + ordinance (absence)
    • Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — FPL (Tier 1, <=10kW) requires a permanent, weather-proof plaque adjacent to its meter socket identifying the location of the manual disconnect switch whenever that switch cannot be mounted directly adjacent to the meter for safety/design reasons (§5.3). It also requires the visible-load-break manual disconnect itself to be lockable with a single FPL utility padlock (§5.2) for any Tier 1 system that is not a UL 1741-listed inverter-based system. 85% · utility tariff
    • Where must the labels be placed? The manual disconnect switch (where required) must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket, remain readily accessible to FPL, and be capable of being locked open with a single FPL utility padlock. If site conditions make an adjacent switch impractical, the switch may be relocated elsewhere on the premises PROVIDED a permanent weather-proof plaque is placed adjacent to the meter socket stating the switch's actual location. 85% · utility tariff
  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? The AC (manual) disconnect switch must be mounted separate from, but immediately adjacent to, the FPL meter socket — readily accessible to FPL and lockable open with a single FPL padlock. (UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems are exempt from needing this separate switch at all, per §5.1.) 85% · utility DG/interconnection tariff
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, for interconnection — FPL requires the customer-owned renewable-generation equipment to be 'submitted by a manufacturer to a nationally recognized testing and certification laboratory, and...tested and listed...for continuous interactive operation with an electric distribution system in compliance with...IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, and UL 1741.' No separate county 'approved equipment list' exists beyond this utility-level listing requirement. 80% · utility tariff
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Not addressed by any St. Lucie County-specific ordinance found. Full-text search of the county's Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code for 'battery' and 'energy storage' returned only unrelated hits (definitions of unrelated terms, aircraft parking, wetlands storage, a communications-tower definition) — no residential ESS/battery permitting provision. Batteries are therefore governed only by whatever the (state-adopted) Florida Fire Prevention Code / NFPA 855 requires by reference, with no local amendment layered on top. 68% · full-text code search (absence proven with controls)
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No dedicated ESS/battery permit fee or line item is published — the Residential Permits fee schedule was read in full and contains no 'battery,' 'ESS' or 'energy storage' entry (closest is 'Generator Residential' at $125, a different equipment class). A battery add-on would most likely be folded into the Electrical ($100) or Solar Photovoltaic PV System ($75) line rather than triggering a separate permit type, but no document states this explicitly. 60% · fee schedule (absence proven)
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, explicitly. 'All solar panels and devices are considered structures and subject to the requirements from the Land Development Code, together with all other applicable codes and ordinances.' 95% · ordinance
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Roof-mounted panels must be located at least 3 feet from the roof edge (LDC §7.10.28(B)(1), amended by Ord. 2024-29, 10-1-2024). No additional local rule on rail/attachment spacing was found beyond this edge setback and the general FBC 8th Ed./ASCE 7-22 wind-load requirements (see q13/q26). 85% · ordinance

20 questions answered against St. Lucie County’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

2020 NEC — adopted statewide via the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), Chapter 27 Electrical, which references NFPA 70-2020 by incorporation. This is a statewide adoption; St. Lucie County has not amended Chapter 27.

Why the confidence is not higherFBC 8th Ed. (2023) is confirmed as the county's adopted building code (Sec. 13.00.01, Ord. 2024-038); the NEC 2020 tie-in via FBC Ch. 27 is a state-level fact (ICC/Florida Building Commission publication) not itself re-verified against the primary ICC text this session — flagged accordingly.

adopting ordinance + state code cross-reference checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHXIIIBUREPUWOCOMA_13.00.00BUCO_13.00.01BUCO

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), with St. Lucie County Administrative Amendments to Chapter 1 'Administration' of the Building Volume and Appendix Q 'Tiny Houses' of the Residential Volume.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, County Code §13.00.01(A)-(B), 'Ord. No. 2024-038, Pt. A, 12-3-2024,' retrieved via the Municode content API for the Land Development Code (job 494778).

adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHXIIIBUREPUWOCOMA_13.00.00BUCO_13.00.01BUCO

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

'The most current edition of the Florida Fire Prevention Code (Chapter 69A-60, F.A.C.)' — the St. Lucie County Fire District adopts a floating/always-current edition rather than naming a fixed edition number, per its Fire Prevention Code Resolution.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, St. Lucie County Fire District Resolution No. 740-23, Section 1(B)(1): 'The most current edition of the Florida Fire Prevention Code (Chapter 69A-60, FAC) and its incorporated standards and codes.' This resolution also amended access-roadway clearance provisions; it contains no solar/PV/ESS-specific language (checked directly, see q36/q45).

fire district resolution checked 2026-09-11 https://builder1.revize.com/revize/stluciefiredistrictfl/Documents/About%20SLCFD/Annual%20Reports%20and%20Financial%20Transparency/Budget/Resolution%20No.%20740-23%20Fire%20Prevention%20Code%20and%20Fee%20Schedule%20Update_signed.pdf

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes. Building: County Administrative Amendments to FBC Ch. 1 and Appendix Q (Ord. 2024-038). Fire: St. Lucie County Fire District amendments to special-hazard/access-roadway-clearance provisions (Res. 740-23) layered onto the 'most current' FFPC. Land Development Code: LDC §7.10.28 Solar Energy supplemental design standards apply on top of the base building/electrical code for siting, setback and height.

Why the confidence is not higherCombines §13.00.01 (building amendments), Fire District Res. 740-23 (fire amendments), and LDC §7.10.28 (zoning/solar-specific amendments) — all read directly this session.

adopting ordinances (combined) checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHXIIIBUREPUWOCOMA_13.00.00BUCO_13.00.01BUCO

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

FBC 8th Edition (2023) + NEC 2020 (via FBC Ch. 27) for construction/electrical compliance, plus LDC §7.10.28's solar-specific siting/height/setback standards for zoning compliance. No separate solar-specific electrical standard exists locally beyond the state-adopted NEC.

Why the confidence is not higherSynthesis of §13.00.01 (building code adoption) and LDC §7.10.28 (solar zoning standards), both read directly.

ordinance (combined) checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHVIIDEDEIMST_7.10.00SUST_7.10.28SOEN

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSearched St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code (Municode full-text search, clientId 7802) for 'busbar', 'service upgrade' and 'load side' — searches ran successfully (fabricated control 'zzqqx' = 0 hits, positive control 'electrical' = 99 hits) but returned nothing addressing service-upgrade or busbar-sizing rules specific to this county; this is governed by the statewide NEC 705.12 without a found local amendment

https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Roof-mounted panels must be located at least 3 feet from the roof edge (LDC §7.10.28(B)(1), amended by Ord. 2024-29, 10-1-2024). No additional local rule on rail/attachment spacing was found beyond this edge setback and the general FBC 8th Ed./ASCE 7-22 wind-load requirements (see q13/q26).

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim LDC §7.10.28(B)(1): 'Solar panels installed on rooftops shall be located at least three (3) feet from the roof edge.' Note this is 3 feet in the current codified text (post-Oct-2024 amendment), not the 2-foot figure that older third-party summaries of this county still repeat — the ordinance itself, not a secondary source, was read.

ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHVIIDEDEIMST_7.10.00SUST_7.10.28SOEN

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked LDC §7.10.28 Solar Energy (no ridge-setback/fire-pathway language) and St. Lucie County Fire District Resolution 740-23 (no PV-specific access-pathway section; grepped for 'solar', 'photovoltaic', 'PV', 'battery', 'rapid shutdown', 'setback... roof', 'ridge', 'pathway' — none present). This is likely governed by the Florida Fire Prevention Code's incorporated NFPA 1 §11.12 solar PV provisions at the state level, which were not independently re-verified this session

https://builder1.revize.com/revize/stluciefiredistrictfl/Documents/About%20SLCFD/Annual%20Reports%20and%20Financial%20Transparency/Budget/Resolution%20No.%20740-23%20Fire%20Prevention%20Code%20and%20Fee%20Schedule%20Update_signed.pdf

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes, rapid shutdown is required, to NEC 2020 Article 690.12 — the edition currently in force via FBC 8th Edition Ch. 27 (see q29). No county amendment to this requirement was found.

Why the confidence is not higherDerived from the confirmed NEC 2020 adoption (q29); no St. Lucie-specific rapid-shutdown amendment exists in the LDC or Fire District resolution (both checked directly for 'rapid shutdown' — zero hits).

inference from adopted code edition checked 2026-09-11 https://builder1.revize.com/revize/stluciefiredistrictfl/Documents/About%20SLCFD/Annual%20Reports%20and%20Financial%20Transparency/Budget/Resolution%20No.%20740-23%20Fire%20Prevention%20Code%20and%20Fee%20Schedule%20Update_signed.pdf

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No county-specific placard list published. What is required comes from two places: (1) NEC 2020 Art. 690/705 rapid-shutdown and PV-source labels (statewide via FBC adoption), and (2) FPL's Tier 1 tariff, which requires a permanent weather-proof plaque adjacent to the meter socket if the manual disconnect switch cannot be sited there directly (§5.3).

Why the confidence is not higherLDC §7.10.28 and the Fire District resolution were both checked directly for placard language and contain none; the FPL plaque requirement is verbatim from the Tier 1 tariff.

ordinance (absence) + utility tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No — the county does not specify its own placard wording. Wording follows NEC 2020's standard rapid-shutdown/label language (statewide); FPL's tariff requires a plaque that 'indicat[es] the location of the manual disconnect switch' but does not prescribe exact wording.

Why the confidence is not higherLDC §7.10.28 and Fire District Res. 740-23 both checked directly; neither prescribes placard text. FPL tariff §5.3 read directly — requires content/purpose but not verbatim wording.

ordinance (absence) + utility tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Not specified locally. FPL's tariff requires the disconnect-location plaque to be 'permanent' and 'weather-proof' (i.e., material durability) but states nothing about letter height or colour; those specs (where they exist) come from NEC 2020 Art. 690.56 at the state level, not from St. Lucie County or FPL.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tier 1 tariff §5.3 read directly for exact wording; LDC and Fire District resolution checked and contain nothing on placard letter height/colour/material.

utility tariff (partial) + ordinance (absence) checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked LDC §7.10.28, Fire District Res. 740-23, and the FPL Tier 1 tariff for a site-plan/facility-map placard requirement (NEC 705.10 is a multi-source-of-power placard, typically relevant to systems with on-site generation plus utility service and batteries) — none of the three county/utility documents addresses this; would need to be sourced from the state FFPC/NEC text directly

https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

Yes — FPL (Tier 1, <=10kW) requires a permanent, weather-proof plaque adjacent to its meter socket identifying the location of the manual disconnect switch whenever that switch cannot be mounted directly adjacent to the meter for safety/design reasons (§5.3). It also requires the visible-load-break manual disconnect itself to be lockable with a single FPL utility padlock (§5.2) for any Tier 1 system that is not a UL 1741-listed inverter-based system.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, FPL Tier 1 Net Metering Interconnection Agreement, Sections 5.1-5.3, PSC tariff sheet effective 1 Jan 2022 (Second Revised Sheet No. 9.050). FPUA's equivalent policy (relevant to the unincorporated pockets it serves, see q22) was not checked this session.

utility tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

The manual disconnect switch (where required) must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket, remain readily accessible to FPL, and be capable of being locked open with a single FPL utility padlock. If site conditions make an adjacent switch impractical, the switch may be relocated elsewhere on the premises PROVIDED a permanent weather-proof plaque is placed adjacent to the meter socket stating the switch's actual location.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, FPL Tier 1 tariff §5.2-5.3 (same source as q42).

utility tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

Yes, for interconnection — FPL requires the customer-owned renewable-generation equipment to be 'submitted by a manufacturer to a nationally recognized testing and certification laboratory, and...tested and listed...for continuous interactive operation with an electric distribution system in compliance with...IEEE 1547, IEEE 1547.1, and UL 1741.' No separate county 'approved equipment list' exists beyond this utility-level listing requirement.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, FPL Tier 1 tariff §3.1.

utility tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

Not addressed by any St. Lucie County-specific ordinance found. Full-text search of the county's Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code for 'battery' and 'energy storage' returned only unrelated hits (definitions of unrelated terms, aircraft parking, wetlands storage, a communications-tower definition) — no residential ESS/battery permitting provision. Batteries are therefore governed only by whatever the (state-adopted) Florida Fire Prevention Code / NFPA 855 requires by reference, with no local amendment layered on top.

Why the confidence is not higherMunicode full-text search against clientId 7802 (St. Lucie County) for both terms, with passing controls in the same run: fabricated term 'zzqqx' = 0 hits, positive control 'electrical' = 99 hits, confirming the search engine was functioning and this is a real absence, not a broken query.

full-text code search (absence proven with controls) checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

No dedicated ESS/battery permit fee or line item is published — the Residential Permits fee schedule was read in full and contains no 'battery,' 'ESS' or 'energy storage' entry (closest is 'Generator Residential' at $125, a different equipment class). A battery add-on would most likely be folded into the Electrical ($100) or Solar Photovoltaic PV System ($75) line rather than triggering a separate permit type, but no document states this explicitly.

Why the confidence is not higherFull residential fee table read directly (see q15/q16); absence of a battery/ESS line is a real finding, but the inference about which existing line it would be billed under is not stated anywhere.

fee schedule (absence proven) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Yes, explicitly. 'All solar panels and devices are considered structures and subject to the requirements from the Land Development Code, together with all other applicable codes and ordinances.'

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, LDC §7.10.28(B)(1).

ordinance checked 2026-09-11 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._lucie_county/codes/land_development_code?nodeId=CHVIIDEDEIMST_7.10.00SUST_7.10.28SOEN

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

The AC (manual) disconnect switch must be mounted separate from, but immediately adjacent to, the FPL meter socket — readily accessible to FPL and lockable open with a single FPL padlock. (UL 1741-listed inverter-based Tier 1 systems are exempt from needing this separate switch at all, per §5.1.)

Why the confidence is not higherSame FPL Tier 1 tariff, §5.1-5.2, as q42/q43.

utility DG/interconnection tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Portal (EnerGov Citizen Self Service, online) or Phone (a dedicated automated inspection line, (855) 636-0606 — caller needs their permit number ready). 75% · department page
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes, in the unincorporated county — the county's own Building Inspectors perform the final inspection. This is 'Delegated' only in the sense that Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Village are independent AHJs that inspect their own permits; the county does not delegate its unincorporated-area inspections to anyone. 90% · department page
    • If delegated, to whom? Not applicable for the county's own unincorporated-area record — the county does not delegate its inspections. (For addresses inside Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, or St. Lucie Village, inspection sits with that city's own building department, which is a separate AHJ, not a delegate of the county.) 85% · department page
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? Not documented specifically for solar. The fee schedule states 'All permits include 1 inspection trip. If required, each additional inspection/trip is $75.00 each' — implying the standard PV permit is designed around a single Final inspection rather than a multi-stage rough-in/final sequence, but no county document names 'Final Electrical' or an inspection sequence for PV by name. 60% · fee schedule (inference)
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? No — proven absence. The Permit Checklists index (the exact place a published inspection checklist would appear) lists only application/submittal checklists (see q8) with no separate 'inspection checklist' for any trade, solar included. 78% · department checklist index (absence proven)
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? A Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for new construction; for retrofit/minor permits such as an existing-home solar installation, the county instead issues a Certificate of Completion (COC) upon request once all fees are paid and required inspections pass. 75% · department FAQ page
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? Installer/Customer — FPL's Tier 1 process requires 'the Customer shall provide FPL a completed application' to commence interconnection (§2.3), which in practice is filed by the installer on the homeowner's behalf; FPL's execution of the agreement (and, implicitly, PTO) additionally depends on the customer providing proof of local building-code-official inspection/certification (§3.4) — so the AHJ's role is limited to certifying the permit was approved, not to notifying the utility itself. 65% · utility tariff
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? Tiered: $75 for the 1st re-inspection, $100 for the 2nd, $150 for the 3rd, and $150 for any re-inspection beyond the 3rd. A Stop Work Order reinstatement is a separate $100 fee. Private-provider permits get a 25% reduction on these fees. 82% · fee schedule
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections/plan-review comments are posted to the applicant's EnerGov Citizen Self Service portal account for the applicant to check and respond to online ('Check for updates or required responses online' per the Owner-Builder flowchart); the fee schedule additionally charges a Plan Revision fee ($75 per revision, plus $25/extra page, escalating to 4x the original fee after the 3rd re-review of the same item) once a correction requires a resubmittal. 58% · process flowchart + fee schedule

14 questions answered against St. Lucie County’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Portal (EnerGov Citizen Self Service, online) or Phone (a dedicated automated inspection line, (855) 636-0606 — caller needs their permit number ready).

Why the confidence is not higherCounty Building Inspections page states both options; page capture is from Dec 2022 but the same EnerGov portal is still referenced identically on 2026 captures of the FAQ and Permitting/Zoning pages, so the phone-line detail is the only unverified-as-current element.

department page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20221208053540/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/building-inspections

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding Inspections page and Building FAQ page (both read in full) state hours of operation and how to book, but neither states a minimum notice period (e.g. '24 hours before 3pm') for scheduling an inspection

https://web.archive.org/web/20221208053540/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/building-inspections

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedSame two pages checked — no mention of same-day booking or AM/PM appointment windows; inspectors are described as being in the field 7:30am-3:00pm and reachable 3-4pm, but no window system for the applicant is described

https://web.archive.org/web/20221208053540/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/building-inspections

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes, in the unincorporated county — the county's own Building Inspectors perform the final inspection. This is 'Delegated' only in the sense that Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Village are independent AHJs that inspect their own permits; the county does not delegate its unincorporated-area inspections to anyone.

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding Inspections page names 'Our Building Inspectors' as county staff performing inspections; consistent with the county being its own AHJ for the unincorporated area (q1/q2).

department page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20221208053540/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/building-inspections

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not applicable for the county's own unincorporated-area record — the county does not delegate its inspections. (For addresses inside Port St. Lucie, Fort Pierce, or St. Lucie Village, inspection sits with that city's own building department, which is a separate AHJ, not a delegate of the county.)

Why the confidence is not higherSame evidence as q1/q52 — those three municipalities were confirmed self-permitting/self-inspecting via their own department pages.

department page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260814172251/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

Not documented specifically for solar. The fee schedule states 'All permits include 1 inspection trip. If required, each additional inspection/trip is $75.00 each' — implying the standard PV permit is designed around a single Final inspection rather than a multi-stage rough-in/final sequence, but no county document names 'Final Electrical' or an inspection sequence for PV by name.

Why the confidence is not higherInference from the fee schedule's '1 inspection trip included' language; no dedicated solar inspection-sequence document exists (see q8 absence).

fee schedule (inference) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedNo PV-specific checklist or inspection-stage document exists (see q8/q54 absence); could not confirm whether a rough-in/mid-roof inspection is ever required for PV specifically

https://web.archive.org/web/20260804180105/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-checklists

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedBuilding Inspections and Building FAQ pages (both read in full) describe scheduling and general inspection purpose but do not state that the inspector specifically checks labels/equipment listings; this would ordinarily follow from NEC 110.3(B)/FBC administrative provisions but no county-specific statement was found

https://web.archive.org/web/20221208053540/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/building-inspections

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

No — proven absence. The Permit Checklists index (the exact place a published inspection checklist would appear) lists only application/submittal checklists (see q8) with no separate 'inspection checklist' for any trade, solar included.

Why the confidence is not higherFull text of the Permit Checklists index page read; contains 7 items total, none an inspection checklist.

department checklist index (absence proven) checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260804180105/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/permit-checklists

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedChecked Building Inspections and Building FAQ pages for an 'on-site at inspection' documents list (e.g. approved plans, permit card) — the FAQ mentions 'The list of required inspections is provided with the permit placard' but does not itemize what paperwork must physically be present at the inspection

https://web.archive.org/web/20221208053540/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/building-inspections

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

Tiered: $75 for the 1st re-inspection, $100 for the 2nd, $150 for the 3rd, and $150 for any re-inspection beyond the 3rd. A Stop Work Order reinstatement is a separate $100 fee. Private-provider permits get a 25% reduction on these fees.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, county fee schedule, 'Re-inspection Fees' table (captured 19 May 2025, tied to Resolution 2025-93 — see q15 note on the newer version being unreadable due to Wayback truncation).

fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20250519203150/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9775/638817977715770000

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Corrections/plan-review comments are posted to the applicant's EnerGov Citizen Self Service portal account for the applicant to check and respond to online ('Check for updates or required responses online' per the Owner-Builder flowchart); the fee schedule additionally charges a Plan Revision fee ($75 per revision, plus $25/extra page, escalating to 4x the original fee after the 3rd re-review of the same item) once a correction requires a resubmittal.

Why the confidence is not higherCombines the Owner-Builder flowchart's portal step with the fee schedule's Plan Revisions line item; no single document describes the full correction-and-clearance workflow end-to-end.

process flowchart + fee schedule checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20251229161206id_/https://www.stlucieco.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/8954/638249276140970000

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

A Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for new construction; for retrofit/minor permits such as an existing-home solar installation, the county instead issues a Certificate of Completion (COC) upon request once all fees are paid and required inspections pass.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim, Building FAQ: 'New Home - Once all fees are paid and all required inspections are completed, the applicant will be issued a CO... Upon request, a COC (Certificate of Completion) for minor projects can be obtained.'

department FAQ page checked 2026-09-11 https://web.archive.org/web/20260314081817/https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning/building-faq-s

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

Installer/Customer — FPL's Tier 1 process requires 'the Customer shall provide FPL a completed application' to commence interconnection (§2.3), which in practice is filed by the installer on the homeowner's behalf; FPL's execution of the agreement (and, implicitly, PTO) additionally depends on the customer providing proof of local building-code-official inspection/certification (§3.4) — so the AHJ's role is limited to certifying the permit was approved, not to notifying the utility itself.

Why the confidence is not higherFPL Tier 1 tariff §2.3 and §3.4 (same document as q23/q42-44).

utility tariff checked 2026-09-11 https://www.fpl.com/content/dam/fplgp/us/en/clean-energy/net-metering/pdfs/net-metering-tier1.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.

Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 65%

No — the county does not specify its own placard wording. Wording follows NEC 2020's standard rapid-shutdown/label language (statewide); FPL's tariff requires a plaque that 'indicat[es] the location of the manual disconnect switch' but does not prescribe exact wording.

Size, colour & material 62%

Not specified locally. FPL's tariff requires the disconnect-location plaque to be 'permanent' and 'weather-proof' (i.e., material durability) but states nothing about letter height or colour; those specs (where they exist) come from NEC 2020 Art. 690.56 at the state level, not from St. Lucie County or FPL.

Where they go 85%

The manual disconnect switch (where required) must be mounted separate from, but adjacent to, the FPL meter socket, remain readily accessible to FPL, and be capable of being locked open with a single FPL utility padlock. If site conditions make an adjacent switch impractical, the switch may be relocated elsewhere on the premises PROVIDED a permanent weather-proof plaque is placed adjacent to the meter socket stating the switch's actual location.

What the utility wants on top 85%

Yes — FPL (Tier 1, <=10kW) requires a permanent, weather-proof plaque adjacent to its meter socket identifying the location of the manual disconnect switch whenever that switch cannot be mounted directly adjacent to the meter for safety/design reasons (§5.3). It also requires the visible-load-break manual disconnect itself to be lockable with a single FPL utility padlock (§5.2) for any Tier 1 system that is not a UL 1741-listed inverter-based system.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Solar Requirements
Notes
Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning --- Fetch failed: HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-and-services/planning-and-development-services/permitting-zoning
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
County
County
St. Lucie County
Regions covered
Authority Contact
Building Department
Direct Phone
(772) 462-1553
Booking & Scheduling