Town of Caryville
Town of Caryville
Washington County
Town of Caryville is a town authority in the State of Florida, serving 301 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Caryville against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of Caryville is not the permitting authority for residential solar here 88% confidence
- Holds
- One mandatory town-level step and nothing else. The County's residential planning instructions state: 'A letter from the Town of Wausau, Ebro, and Caryville is required for any new development within the City limits' - that letter is attached to the County Land Use Application, so for new development inside the Caryville town limits the Town Hall (4436 Old Spanish Trail, 850-548-5571) is the FIRST stop, before the County Planning Department and well before the County Building Department. Beyond that letter, Caryville holds nothing relevant to residential rooftop PV: no building department, no building official, no plans examiner, no inspector, no permits, no fee schedule, no adopted codes of its own, and no fire department of its own.
- Delegated to
- Washington County. Land development review (Land Use Certificate, $50, ten working days to issue or deny) sits with the Washington County Planning Department, 1331 South Blvd., Chipley, 850-415-5093. Building permits, electrical (trade) permits, plan review, inspections, contractor registration and certificates of occupancy sit with the Washington County Building Department, 1331 South Blvd. Suite 900, 850-638-6195, Building Official Charles Vannatter. Addressing sits with the County E-911 Addressing Department, 850-638-6325. The governing land development code is the County's own, which Caryville's own Town Council co-adopted.
- Overridden by
- The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), adopted statewide by FAC 61G20-1.001 (rule effective 18 March 2026) and in force over any local rule. The Florida Fire Prevention Code - NFPA 1 and NFPA 101, Florida 2021 editions, FAC 69A-60.003 and .004, effective 31 December 2023 - which FAC 69A-60.002(1) makes 'the minimum fire prevention code deemed adopted by each municipality, county, and special district with firesafety responsibilities', so it binds Caryville by operation of law whether or not the Town has ever passed anything. NFPA 70, the National Electrical Code, 2020 edition (FAC 69A-60.005(2)(qq)). F.S. 163.04(1), which expressly prohibits the adoption of any ordinance that 'prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors', and 163.04(2), which voids any deed restriction or covenant doing the same and leaves such a body only the power to place collectors within south plus-or-minus 45 degrees where that does not impair performance. F.S. 553.792, which sets binding plan-review deadlines (5 business days for an electrical or structural permit on an existing single-family dwelling where the work is worth under $15,000; 30 business days otherwise for a structure under 7,500 sq ft) with a 10%-per-day fee reduction for missing them. F.S. 553.79(1)(c), under which a single-family dwelling permit expires one year after issuance or on the effective date of the next FBC edition, whichever is later. F.S. 471.003(2)(h), which exempts a ch. 489 licensed electrical contractor from engineering licensure at $125,000 / 600 A residential or less. F.S. 489.103, the owner-builder exemption. At utility level, if the parcel is served by West Florida Electric Cooperative then F.S. 366.91 places the co-op outside the FPSC's investor-owned net-metering rule and WFEC's own Agreement for Member-Owned Generation governs; if the parcel is FPL, FPSC Rule 25-6.065 and FPL's own interconnection standard govern and neither was read in this run.
- Why not higher
- Proved in this run from first-party sources, and deliberately NOT inherited from the Washington County or City of Vernon runs. County side, four documents read today: (1) the Planning Department page states it 'regulates land development within the unincorporated areas of Washington County, and the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau in accordance with the Washington County Land Development Code (LDC) and Comprehensive Plan'; (2) the current Application for Land Use Certificate, revision 09/29/2025, carries a 'Municipality' checkbox row 'Unincorporated / Vernon / Wausau / Ebro / Caryville', and the instruction sheet in the same packet carries the Caryville letter requirement; (3) Washington County LDC 1.01.02 ('The Board of County Commissioners and the governing bodies of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon and Wausau, in adopting and enforcing the code...'), 1.03.01 (the Comprehensive Plan is the 'Washington County (including the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau)' plan), 1.06.01 (the Code 'is intended to replace all previous land development regulations of Washington County (unincorporated areas) and the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau'), 1.10.01 (adopted by the BOCC 'and the City/Town Councils of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau, to be effective December 14, 2023'), 9.01.01 (the Planning Department 'shall also perform these administrative functions for the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau') and 9.02.02/9.02.03 (the Planning Commission is established by the BOCC and those four town councils and is the Local Planning Agency for them); and LDC 10.06.01, which routes the applicant to 'a building permit application to the County Building Department'; (4) the County Directory lists 'Town of Caryville, (850) 548-5571, 4436 Old Spanish Trail' under Municipalities with no permit contact of any kind. Town side, the negative was checked two ways as required: caryvillefl.com now refuses TCP connections to curl AND to WebFetch (ECONNREFUSED on 165.227.206.185:443), and the Internet Archive was used instead - the last live capture, 24 April 2024, has a complete four-item menu (Home, Accessibility, Council Members, Contact Form), the WordPress REST API captures for all four pages were read in full and contain no building, permit, planning, zoning, code or fee content, and the June 2025 capture is a bare 'Hello World!' placeholder with domain-parking assets, so the town has no current web presence at all. Caryville has no entry in Municode's complete Florida client list (416 clients; only Chipley and Washington County appear from this county). Held at 88, not higher, for three honest gaps. First, no single document says in words 'Washington County issues building permits inside the Town of Caryville' - the LDC proves the land-development half outright, and the building half is read from the Caryville checkbox on the county land-use form plus LDC 10.06.01 plus the total absence of any Caryville building function. Second, Washington County Code ch. 14 (Building Code, Electrical Code) carries NO territorial applicability clause - it says the code is 'adopted for use in Washington County, Florida' - whereas other chapters (26-33, 50-163, 66-63) expressly limit themselves to the unincorporated area; the reach of ch. 14 into Caryville is therefore inferred from that contrast rather than stated. Third, the direct permit-record proof is missing: the county's iWorq portal records a 'Municipality' field on every permit, and in the 314 most recent permits readable without a captcha (17 Aug to 11 Sep 2026) fourteen are stamped 'Chipley' and three 'Vernon' - proving the County does issue inside municipal limits in this county - but none is stamped 'Caryville', and the portal's search is gated behind an invisible reCAPTCHA that could not be exercised here, so the historic record could not be searched. Caryville's population is small enough that a month-long window containing no permit inside its limits proves nothing either way. Separately NOT established: whether Caryville has ever passed the 'official act' required by County Code s. 30-33 to elect into the county fire authority. Caryville publishes no ordinances anywhere, so that act can neither be found nor ruled out. The town has no fire department of its own - the County Directory lists Chipley VFD, Country Oaks VFD, Ebro VFD and Vernon VFD as independent departments with their own phone numbers, while the station at a Caryville address, 'Hinson Crossroads, 5487 Douglas Ferry Rd., Caryville', answers on the Washington County Fire Services number 850-415-5026 - which points to county fire coverage but is not the same thing as the electing act. Do not assume either way.
- Permit required
- Yes. A building permit is required, and the County's Building Permit Application carries a 'Solar System' checkbox in its project-type grid.92%
- Permit cost
- Building side: the fee schedule (Construction Permit Fees 'Schedule A', effective 09/01/2024, republished April 2026) lists 'Solar System Installation - Based on Building Valuation Table'.75%
- Plan review
- Washington County publishes no turnaround time of its own. The binding numbers are statutory: F.S.80%
- Portal
- iWorq Systems. The county's public portal is portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL, module 601 ('Permits'), which offers permit search (by permit number, permit date, permit type, parcel number,85%
- Electrical code
- NFPA 70, the National Electrical Code, 2020 edition. Washington County Code s. 14-68 adopts 'The National Electric Code, as it is adopted by the State of Florida,85%
- Own placard wording
- No. Neither Caryville nor Washington County specifies any placard wording of its own.78%
- Booking an inspection
- Phone, primarily. The Building Inspection Procedures open with 'YOU MUST HAVE THE PERMIT NUMBER AND TYPE OF INSPECTION WHEN CALLING FOR INSPECTION' and the department page says to 'contact…80%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. A building permit is required, and the County's Building Permit Application carries a 'Solar System' checkbox in its project-type grid. Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate. The County uses two different forms: an Application for Building Permit and a separate Trade Permit Application (which is where ELECTRIC / GCE / FPL /… Q4 Plan review — Washington County publishes no turnaround time of its own. The binding numbers are statutory: F.S. Q18 Where you file — iWorq Systems. The county's public portal is portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL, module 601 ('Permits'), which offers permit search (by permit number, permit date, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. A building permit is required, and the County's Building Permit Application carries a 'Solar System' checkbox in its project-type grid.92% source
- What it costs
- Building side: the fee schedule (Construction Permit Fees 'Schedule A', effective 09/01/2024, republished April 2026) lists 'Solar System Installation - Based on Building Valuation Table'.75% source
- Plan review turnaround
- Washington County publishes no turnaround time of its own. The binding numbers are statutory: F.S. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions,80% source
- Key document
- department page cited by 4 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? No. The Town of Caryville is not the AHJ for residential solar. Building permits, electrical permits, plan review, inspections and certificates of occupancy inside the Caryville town limits are issued and performed by the WASHINGTON COUNTY Building Department (1331 South Blvd., Suite 900, Chipley FL 32428, 850-638-6195, Building Official Charles Vannatter), after a land-use step at the Washington County Planning Department (same address, 850-415-5093). Caryville does retain ONE mandatory step of its own: the County's residential planning instructions state 'A letter from the Town of Wausau, Ebro, and Caryville is required for any new development within the City limits', and that letter must be attached to the County Land Use Application. Town Hall: 4436 Old Spanish Trail, Caryville FL 32427, 850-548-5571. 88% · authority handout
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Delegated. Caryville permits nothing relevant to rooftop PV. Land development review (Land Use Certificate, $50) sits with the Washington County Planning Department; building permits, electrical (trade) permits, plan review, inspections, contractor registration and certificates of occupancy sit with the Washington County Building Department; E-911 addressing with the County E-911 Addressing Department (850-638-6325); driveway permits with County Public Works. Caryville's only retained step is the town letter for new development within the town limits. 85% · codified ordinance
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. A building permit is required, and the County's Building Permit Application carries a 'Solar System' checkbox in its project-type grid. Under LDC 10.06.02(A) 'the erection, alteration, or reconstruction of any building or structure ... shall not be commenced without obtaining a Building Permit from the Building Department', and F.S. 553.79(1)(a) makes it unlawful to alter a building anywhere in Florida without a permit from the enforcing agency. 92% · permit application form
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate. The County uses two different forms: an Application for Building Permit and a separate Trade Permit Application (which is where ELECTRIC / GCE / FPL / WFECA-G, job cost, service change and amps are declared). The building permit application states in terms: 'I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, AIR CONDITIONERS, and etc.' The fee schedule likewise prices 'Building Permit' and 'Electrical Permit' as separate items. 90% · permit application form
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Not by the AHJ. The county states plainly that it does not enforce private restrictions: 'Washington County Building Department does not have the authority to enforce deed restrictions or covenants on properties', and its residential instructions warn that 'Some Subdivisions have Architectural Review Committees that require approval of the placement of a dwelling and accessory buildings ... Washington County makes no warranties as to whether the residence meets the requirements of any Architectural Review Committee.' Separately, F.S. 163.04(2) voids any deed restriction, covenant or similar agreement that prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting solar collectors, and leaves such a body only the power to determine the specific location on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south, and only if that does not impair the effective operation of the collectors. 82% · permit application form
- Is there a historic-district review? No historic district covering Caryville was found. The LDC does carry a Historical and Archaeological land use overlay (2.03.03) and requires approval for development on or beside a designated historic site (1.05.02(O), 4.06.02), with referral to the Florida Division of Historical Resources - so if a specific Caryville parcel is on the Florida Master Site File the overlay bites. Nothing designates the town or any part of it as a district. 60% · codified ordinance
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Yes, in the Florida sense. Washington County Code s. 14-37 creates a wind speed line 'along State Road 20, which runs through southern Washington County, and passes through Ebro, Florida', and sets 120 mph for all portions of the county lying NORTH of SR 20 and 130 mph south of it. Caryville is in the far north-west of the county, well north of SR 20, so 120 mph is the design wind speed. Separately, Florida Product Approval is the mechanism: the Trade Permit Application has a field 'FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL CODE', and the Building Inspection Procedures require that a 'Product Approval Sheet must be on file in the Building Department prior to inspection'. 80% · codified ordinance
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Not for residential rooftop PV. A Special Exception (with a public hearing, $750 plus noticing costs) is required only for a 'Solar farm', which LDC 1.11.01 defines as 'A use of land containing solar panels, ancillary equipment and buildings uses for the collection, storage, and transmission of power resulting from the solar energy received from the panels, said property being owned by a non-profit or for-profit public or private company' - i.e. a commercial installation, not a householder's array. LDC 2.02.04(L) then imposes a 100-foot setback from abutting residential land, a 25-foot landscape buffer, a 100-foot buffer from the Choctawhatchee River, Holmes Creek and Econfina Creek, tree-removal standards, and a decommissioning surety bond. 82% · codified ordinance
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No cap in the county code. The only size threshold that bites here is at utility level: West Florida Electric pays an energy credit of 5.2 cents per kWh 'for solar installations smaller than 25 kW', and charges $4.94 per kW of overall system capacity as a pass-through from PowerSouth, filed with the Florida Public Service Commission. 70% · utility DG manual
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A Florida-licensed contractor qualified under ch. 489 part II (the Trade Permit Application asks for 'CONTRACTOR NAME' and the Contractor's License Registration asks for the state licence), or the property owner under the F.S. 489.103 owner-builder exemption, for which the County publishes an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement. 78% · permit application form
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes. The Building Department page says permits 'may be emailed to permits@washingtonfl.com given you are currently registered with the Washington County Building Department'. Registration requires a completed application form, a current copy of the state licence and driver's licence, a certificate of insurance for general liability and workers' compensation naming 'WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT' as certificate holder (a copy of the policy is expressly not accepted), a letter of authorization if anyone other than the licence holder is to pull permits, and a $35 Certified Contractor Admin Fee. 90% · authority handout
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. The County publishes an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement (2024) implementing the F.S. 489.103 exemption, which lets an owner build or improve a one-family or two-family residence for their own use, provided the owner is the responsible party of record, provides direct onsite supervision, and does not hire unlicensed people. The statute's one-year sale/lease presumption applies. 85% · authority handout
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? There is no solar-specific submittal checklist. What the county's published documents require, in order: (1) an approved Land Use Application / Land Use Certificate from the Planning Department, with a recorded deed and a simple site map, $50; (2) a valid E-911 address, $25, if the parcel has none; (3) a driveway permit if required; then (4) the Building Permit Application, signed and notarized, with the valuation of work and the 'Solar System' box ticked; (5) a Trade Permit Application for the electrical work; (6) a certified copy of the Notice of Commencement if the construction cost is $2,500 or more, which must be provided to the Building Department and posted on the jobsite before the first inspection; (7) contractor registration on file; (8) the $35 non-refundable Plan Submittal fee; (9) an Elevation Certificate by a licensed surveyor or engineer where the parcel is in a flood zone; (10) Florida Product Approval numbers for roof-attached components. 70% · department page
- How many copies, and in what format? Not published as a copy count or format. The practical route the county states: if the contractor is already registered, permits may be EMAILED to permits@washingtonfl.com, with emailed and faxed permits taking up to 3 business days to process; 'All other permits should be brought into the office for processing'. The building permit application must be signed and notarized. A 3.5% convenience fee applies to all credit card transactions from 17 March 2025. 62% · department page
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. LDC 10.01.03(C): 'Each Application for a Land Use Certificate shall be accompanied by a plot plan drawn to scale showing the actual dimensions of the lot to be built upon, the size, shape, height, and location of the buildings to be erected, dimensions and location of existing buildings, and width of front, side, and rear yards, and any historical or environmentally sensitive areas located on the site.' The county's residential instructions add 'A simple site map and copy of deed are required for a land use application.' 85% · codified ordinance
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Not published. No Washington County document states whether a one-line or three-line diagram must be submitted for a residential PV permit - the county publishes no plan-submittal checklist for solar, and the Building Permit and Trade Permit applications ask only for a description of work, job cost and amps. This is an absence of a published requirement, not a statement that the plans examiner will not ask for one. 65% · department page
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Not published. Nothing in the county's forms, fee schedule, inspection procedures, Code of Ordinances or Land Development Code requires string or conductor calculations for a residential PV submittal. 60% · codified ordinance
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No county threshold is published. Florida law is what governs: F.S. 471.003(2)(h) exempts a ch. 489 licensed electrical contractor from the engineering-licensure requirement for work they install where the electrical system has a value of $125,000 or less AND an aggregate service capacity of 600 amperes (240 volts) or less on a residential system - which covers essentially every residential rooftop PV job. The county's Building Permit Application has an 'ARCHITECT'S/ENGINEER'S NAME' block but states no threshold at which it must be filled. 70% · state statute
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Same as q13 - no county threshold published; F.S. 471.003(2)(h) is the operative rule and exempts the licensed electrical contractor at $125,000 / 600 A residential or less. 70% · state statute
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? iWorq Systems. The county's public portal is portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL, module 601 ('Permits'), which offers permit search (by permit number, permit date, permit type, parcel number, applicant name or applicant address) and an online Inspection Request form. The Building Department page links it as 'Permit Searches ... For Searches between 11/06/2014 to Current Date'. The county also runs a separate Diligent OnePlatform portal (washingtonfl.community.diligentoneplatform.com) for meetings/records, not permits. 85% · portal
- Can the whole application be completed online? No. The county's stated route is email or in person: 'Permits may be emailed to permits@washingtonfl.com given you are currently registered with the Washington County Building Department ... All other permits should be brought into the office for processing.' The iWorq portal supports permit search and inspection requests, not application submission, and the Building Permit Application must be signed and NOTARIZED. This sits awkwardly with F.S. 553.79(1)(b), which requires a local enforcement agency to allow applicants to submit completed applications including payments electronically, and to post every application type and its required attachments on its website - the county does post its forms, but there is no online application. 75% · department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? Building side: the fee schedule (Construction Permit Fees 'Schedule A', effective 09/01/2024, republished April 2026) lists 'Solar System Installation - Based on Building Valuation Table'. The building permit fee table is $100 for valuations of $10,000 and less; $252 for the first $10,000 plus $6 per additional $1,000 up to $50,000; $492 for the first $50,000 plus $5 per additional $1,000 up to $100,000. Add a $35 non-refundable Plan Submittal fee, a plan review fee of 15% or $35 whichever is greater, and a state radon surcharge of 3% or $4.00 whichever is greater. Electrical side: 'Electrical Permit: Single Family Residential $125' (or 'Residential Service Upgrade/Temp Pole $100 minimum' if that is how the job is written). Planning side: Land Use Certificate $50 (new) or $25 (revision/renewal). A 3.5% convenience fee applies to card payments. Indicative total for a typical residential rooftop PV job: roughly $345-$500 depending on declared valuation. 75% · fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation (tiered). The solar line points to the Building Valuation Table, and the building permit fee table is a tiered valuation schedule ($100 up to $10,000; $252 + $6/$1,000 to $50,000; $492 + $5/$1,000 to $100,000; $742 + $4/$1,000 to $500,000; $2,342 + $3/$1,000 above). The electrical permit, by contrast, is a flat $125 for single-family residential. The plan review fee is percentage-based (15% or $35 minimum). 78% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes, two of them. A NON-REFUNDABLE PLAN SUBMITTAL FEE of $35 collected at the time of submittal, charged again on every re-submittal and addendum; and a separate FEE FOR REVIEW OF PLANS assessed 'at a minimum of $35 or 15%, whichever is greater', collected at permit issuance along with the permit fee and radon surcharge. 85% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Washington County publishes no turnaround time of its own. The binding numbers are statutory: F.S. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions, or deny within 5 BUSINESS DAYS for an electrical, structural, roofing or accessory-structure permit on an existing single-family residential dwelling where the value of the work is less than $15,000; 30 business days where the structure is under 7,500 sq ft and the $15,000 test is not met. F.S. 553.792(1)(c) gives the county 5 business days to say in writing what is missing, failing which the application is automatically deemed complete. Missing a deadline costs the county 10% of the permit fee per business day (20% per day after a timely resubmittal). 80% · state statute
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Three different statements are in force and they do not agree. (a) LDC 10.06.02(B)(1): a Building Permit expires and becomes null and void if work is not commenced, having called for and received a satisfactory inspection, within SIX MONTHS of issuance, or if the work is not completed within ONE YEAR, extendable by the Building Official. (b) The Building Permit Application itself: 'the building permit is valid as long as there is construction progress and an approved inspection is recorded within each 180 days (6 months) period.' (c) F.S. 553.79(1)(c): a building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after issuance or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later. The Trade Permit Application adds: 'This permit is VOID after six (6) months from issuance unless the work it covers has been commenced and has had ongoing inspections.' 80% · codified ordinance
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Not resolvable at town level - it is parcel-by-parcel, and the County's own form says so. The Application for Land Use Certificate has a 'Power Company:' row with three tick boxes, 'GCE / FPL / WFE' (Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative, Florida Power & Light, West Florida Electric Cooperative), and the Trade Permit Application repeats 'ELECTRIC: GCE / FPL / WFECA-G'. The County Directory lists only two power companies for the county: 'Florida Power Lights, 1195 Jackson Ave., Chipley, 850-415-4207' and 'West Florida Electric, 905 St. John's Rd., Bonifay, 800-342-7400'. For Caryville specifically the realistic pair is FPL (successor to Gulf Power) or West Florida Electric Cooperative; WFEC's nearest district office is Bonifay. 55% · permit application form
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Parallel, with the utility's final approval coming AFTER the AHJ's inspection. If West Florida Electric serves the parcel: the member signs the Agreement for Member-Owned Generation, submits the Interconnection Application and Compliance Form with a $135 application fee, and WFEC approves or disapproves within TEN BUSINESS DAYS; but among the things the member must supply is 'documentation showing the MOG has been inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation', and Section F of the Compliance Form is signed first by the code inspector ('Satisfies Code Requirements') and only then by the utility ('Satisfies Utility Requirements'). Washington County Code s. 14-74 points the same way from the county end: 'Any new service or existing service that has been altered or repaired shall not be connected until a local utility company has received an authorized inspection certificate.' 75% · utility DG manual
28 questions answered against Town of Caryville’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
No. The Town of Caryville is not the AHJ for residential solar. Building permits, electrical permits, plan review, inspections and certificates of occupancy inside the Caryville town limits are issued and performed by the WASHINGTON COUNTY Building Department (1331 South Blvd., Suite 900, Chipley FL 32428, 850-638-6195, Building Official Charles Vannatter), after a land-use step at the Washington County Planning Department (same address, 850-415-5093). Caryville does retain ONE mandatory step of its own: the County's residential planning instructions state 'A letter from the Town of Wausau, Ebro, and Caryville is required for any new development within the City limits', and that letter must be attached to the County Land Use Application. Town Hall: 4436 Old Spanish Trail, Caryville FL 32427, 850-548-5571.
Why the confidence is not higherRe-proved in this run from four first-party sources, not inherited from the Washington County or City of Vernon runs. (1) The County Planning Department page, read today, states it 'regulates land development within the unincorporated areas of Washington County, and the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau in accordance with the Washington County Land Development Code (LDC) and Comprehensive Plan'. (2) The County's current Application for Land Use Certificate (revision dated 09/29/2025) carries a 'Municipality' checkbox row reading 'Unincorporated / Vernon / Wausau / Ebro / Caryville', and the instruction sheet bound into the same packet carries the Caryville letter requirement quoted above. (3) Washington County LDC 1.01.02 says the Code is adopted by 'The Board of County Commissioners and the governing bodies of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon and Wausau', and LDC 10.06.01 routes the applicant to 'a building permit application to the County Building Department'. (4) The Town of Caryville's own website (caryvillefl.com) currently refuses TCP connections to both curl and WebFetch and its last live Internet Archive capture, 24 Apr 2024, shows a four-item menu - Home, Accessibility, Council Members, Contact Form - with no building, permits, planning, zoning or fee page anywhere on the site; the June 2025 capture is a bare 'Hello World!' placeholder. Held at 88 rather than higher because no single document says in one sentence 'Washington County issues building permits inside the Town of Caryville': the conclusion is the combination of the Caryville checkbox on the county land-use form, the LDC that Caryville's own council co-adopted, and the total absence of any Caryville permit function.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2554/wc_new_construction_residential_permit_instructions_10062023.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Delegated. Caryville permits nothing relevant to rooftop PV. Land development review (Land Use Certificate, $50) sits with the Washington County Planning Department; building permits, electrical (trade) permits, plan review, inspections, contractor registration and certificates of occupancy sit with the Washington County Building Department; E-911 addressing with the County E-911 Addressing Department (850-638-6325); driveway permits with County Public Works. Caryville's only retained step is the town letter for new development within the town limits.
Why the confidence is not higherLDC 1.06.01: this Code 'is intended to replace all previous land development regulations of Washington County (unincorporated areas) and the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau' - i.e. Caryville's council handed its land development regulation to the County when it co-adopted Ord. 2023-16 on 14 Dec 2023. LDC 9.01.01 says the Planning Department 'shall also perform these administrative functions for the municipalities of Caryville, Ebro, Vernon, and Wausau'. The Building Department's own page says it 'is responsible for issuing Building Permits, Reviewing Plans, and Performing Electrical & Building Inspections and maintaining Contractors Licensing'. Held at 85 because the building and electrical chapters (County Code ch. 14) contain no territorial clause at all - they say the code is 'adopted for use in Washington County, Florida' - so their application inside Caryville is read from the absence of an unincorporated-only limitation (which other chapters, e.g. 26-33, 50-163 and 66-63, do carry expressly), not from an express statement.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIILADECO_ARTIGEPR_1.06.00REOTRE_1.06.01REOTRE
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. A building permit is required, and the County's Building Permit Application carries a 'Solar System' checkbox in its project-type grid. Under LDC 10.06.02(A) 'the erection, alteration, or reconstruction of any building or structure ... shall not be commenced without obtaining a Building Permit from the Building Department', and F.S. 553.79(1)(a) makes it unlawful to alter a building anywhere in Florida without a permit from the enforcing agency.
Why the confidence is not higherThree independent sources agree and all were read in this run: the county application form itself (revised 02/2025) lists 'Solar System' as a permit type; the county fee schedule has a 'Solar System Installation' line; LDC 10.06.02(A) and F.S. 553.79(1)(a) are the legal basis. Held below 95 only because no county document says in words 'a permit is required for residential rooftop PV' - the Solar System checkbox and the fee line are what carry it.
permit application form checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1631/building_permit_application-_2025_-_highlighted_-fillable.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Separate. The County uses two different forms: an Application for Building Permit and a separate Trade Permit Application (which is where ELECTRIC / GCE / FPL / WFECA-G, job cost, service change and amps are declared). The building permit application states in terms: 'I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, AIR CONDITIONERS, and etc.' The fee schedule likewise prices 'Building Permit' and 'Electrical Permit' as separate items.
Why the confidence is not higherStated on the face of the county's own application form and corroborated by two separate forms and two separate fee lines. Held at 90 rather than 95 because neither form says specifically how a rooftop PV job is split between them, and the live permit portal shows solar-adjacent work being pulled as standalone 'Electrical' permits with no paired 'Building' permit in several cases.
permit application form checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1631/building_permit_application-_2025_-_highlighted_-fillable.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A Florida-licensed contractor qualified under ch. 489 part II (the Trade Permit Application asks for 'CONTRACTOR NAME' and the Contractor's License Registration asks for the state licence), or the property owner under the F.S. 489.103 owner-builder exemption, for which the County publishes an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from three county forms plus the statute: the Trade Permit Application's contractor block, the county's Contractor's License Registration packet (which requires a current copy of the state licence), and the county's own Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement 2024. No county document says in words 'only a licensed electrical contractor may pull the electrical permit', so the trade restriction itself comes from state law rather than from a Washington County publication.
permit application form checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1892/trade_permit_application_-_ada_04_30_25.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes. The Building Department page says permits 'may be emailed to permits@washingtonfl.com given you are currently registered with the Washington County Building Department'. Registration requires a completed application form, a current copy of the state licence and driver's licence, a certificate of insurance for general liability and workers' compensation naming 'WASHINGTON COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT' as certificate holder (a copy of the policy is expressly not accepted), a letter of authorization if anyone other than the licence holder is to pull permits, and a $35 Certified Contractor Admin Fee.
Why the confidence is not higherStated directly on the department page and set out step by step in the Contractor's License Registration packet (revised 8/2024), which also says 'Certified contractors are not required to pay a license fee' but must pay the $35 administration fee - the same $35 'Certified Contractor Admin Fee' line that appears on the fee schedule. Held at 90 because the two documents describe the fee slightly differently.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2695/certified_contractors_license_registraion_-_ada_8_2024.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes. The County publishes an Owner-Builder Disclosure Statement (2024) implementing the F.S. 489.103 exemption, which lets an owner build or improve a one-family or two-family residence for their own use, provided the owner is the responsible party of record, provides direct onsite supervision, and does not hire unlicensed people. The statute's one-year sale/lease presumption applies.
Why the confidence is not higherThe county form exists and was downloaded and read in this run; the statutory text of F.S. 489.103 was read from the 2026 Florida Statutes. Held at 85 because the county form does not address solar or electrical work specifically, and Florida's owner-builder exemption interacts with the separate electrical-contractor licensing rules in ch. 489 part II in a way no Washington County document explains.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2730/owner-builder_disclosure_statement_2024.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
There is no solar-specific submittal checklist. What the county's published documents require, in order: (1) an approved Land Use Application / Land Use Certificate from the Planning Department, with a recorded deed and a simple site map, $50; (2) a valid E-911 address, $25, if the parcel has none; (3) a driveway permit if required; then (4) the Building Permit Application, signed and notarized, with the valuation of work and the 'Solar System' box ticked; (5) a Trade Permit Application for the electrical work; (6) a certified copy of the Notice of Commencement if the construction cost is $2,500 or more, which must be provided to the Building Department and posted on the jobsite before the first inspection; (7) contractor registration on file; (8) the $35 non-refundable Plan Submittal fee; (9) an Elevation Certificate by a licensed surveyor or engineer where the parcel is in a flood zone; (10) Florida Product Approval numbers for roof-attached components.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery element is quoted from a county document read in this run, but the list is assembled rather than published as one checklist - the county publishes no submittal checklist of any kind for solar. Absence proved: the complete Building Department document library (13 files) and Planning document library (18 files) were enumerated and none names solar or photovoltaic; the two hits for 'solar' anywhere in county material are the Solar System checkbox on the application and the Solar System Installation fee line. Positive control: 'electrical' hits 8 of the 11 PDFs extracted; fabricated control 'zzqqx' hits none.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Not published as a copy count or format. The practical route the county states: if the contractor is already registered, permits may be EMAILED to permits@washingtonfl.com, with emailed and faxed permits taking up to 3 business days to process; 'All other permits should be brought into the office for processing'. The building permit application must be signed and notarized. A 3.5% convenience fee applies to all credit card transactions from 17 March 2025.
Why the confidence is not higherThe email/in-office split and the 3-day processing note are quoted verbatim from the Building Department page; the notarisation requirement is on the face of the application. No county document states a number of copies or a sheet size, and none was found in either document library, so the copy-count part of this question is genuinely unanswered rather than unlooked-for.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes. LDC 10.01.03(C): 'Each Application for a Land Use Certificate shall be accompanied by a plot plan drawn to scale showing the actual dimensions of the lot to be built upon, the size, shape, height, and location of the buildings to be erected, dimensions and location of existing buildings, and width of front, side, and rear yards, and any historical or environmentally sensitive areas located on the site.' The county's residential instructions add 'A simple site map and copy of deed are required for a land use application.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the codified LDC and from the county's own instruction sheet, both read in this run. Held at 85 because neither text addresses a rooftop retrofit: LDC 10.01.03(A) lists the structures that trigger a Land Use Certificate (single-family residence, mobile home, modular home, swimming pool, accessory structure, 'Utility (power, well, septic, etc.)', lot split, temporary offices, and anything the Development Administrator deems similar) and it is not certain on the face of it whether a roof-mounted PV array falls under 'Utility (power...)' or under the Administrator's catch-all.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIILADECO_ARTXADEN
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Not published. No Washington County document states whether a one-line or three-line diagram must be submitted for a residential PV permit - the county publishes no plan-submittal checklist for solar, and the Building Permit and Trade Permit applications ask only for a description of work, job cost and amps. This is an absence of a published requirement, not a statement that the plans examiner will not ask for one.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved in this run by enumerating both county document libraries in full (13 building, 18 planning files, all downloaded or listed) and by a full-text Municode search of the Code of Ordinances and Land Development Code. Controls: 'electrical' returns 47 code hits and appears in 8 of 11 extracted PDFs; the fabricated term 'zzqqx' returns 0 code hits and 0 PDF hits. Confidence capped at 65 because an unpublished requirement can still be enforced at the counter.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Not published. Nothing in the county's forms, fee schedule, inspection procedures, Code of Ordinances or Land Development Code requires string or conductor calculations for a residential PV submittal.
Why the confidence is not higherSame enumeration and same controls as q11. Lower than q11 only because conductor sizing is partly governed by the county's own codified electrical amendments (Code ss. 14-80, 14-81, 14-83, which set minimum conductor sizes), so a plans examiner has a local basis to ask for calculations even though no form requests them.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No county threshold is published. Florida law is what governs: F.S. 471.003(2)(h) exempts a ch. 489 licensed electrical contractor from the engineering-licensure requirement for work they install where the electrical system has a value of $125,000 or less AND an aggregate service capacity of 600 amperes (240 volts) or less on a residential system - which covers essentially every residential rooftop PV job. The county's Building Permit Application has an 'ARCHITECT'S/ENGINEER'S NAME' block but states no threshold at which it must be filled.
Why the confidence is not higherThe statutory text was read from the 2026 Florida Statutes in this run. The county side is a proved absence: no PE-stamp threshold appears in the Building Permit Application, the fee schedule, the inspection procedures, ch. 14 of the Code, or the LDC. Held at 70 because F.S. 471.003(2)(h) is an exemption from engineering licensure for the designer, not a direct answer to 'does this AHJ require a structural PE stamp on a PV attachment detail', and Washington County has not published its own position.
state statute checked 2026-09-14 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0400-0499/0471/Sections/0471.003.html
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Same as q13 - no county threshold published; F.S. 471.003(2)(h) is the operative rule and exempts the licensed electrical contractor at $125,000 / 600 A residential or less.
Why the confidence is not higherAs q13. The county publishes no electrical PE-stamp threshold anywhere in its forms, fee schedule or codified electrical article.
state statute checked 2026-09-14 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0400-0499/0471/Sections/0471.003.html
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
Building side: the fee schedule (Construction Permit Fees 'Schedule A', effective 09/01/2024, republished April 2026) lists 'Solar System Installation - Based on Building Valuation Table'. The building permit fee table is $100 for valuations of $10,000 and less; $252 for the first $10,000 plus $6 per additional $1,000 up to $50,000; $492 for the first $50,000 plus $5 per additional $1,000 up to $100,000. Add a $35 non-refundable Plan Submittal fee, a plan review fee of 15% or $35 whichever is greater, and a state radon surcharge of 3% or $4.00 whichever is greater. Electrical side: 'Electrical Permit: Single Family Residential $125' (or 'Residential Service Upgrade/Temp Pole $100 minimum' if that is how the job is written). Planning side: Land Use Certificate $50 (new) or $25 (revision/renewal). A 3.5% convenience fee applies to card payments. Indicative total for a typical residential rooftop PV job: roughly $345-$500 depending on declared valuation.
Why the confidence is not higherAll figures are quoted from the county's own current fee schedule and planning fee schedule, both downloaded and text-extracted in this run. Held at 75 for a real ambiguity the document itself creates: 'Based on Building Valuation Table' points at the ICC square-foot construction cost table reproduced on the same PDF, and that table's own 'Important Points' box says 'The BVD is not intended to apply to alterations or repairs to existing buildings' - which a rooftop retrofit is. So the county's stated basis for the solar fee does not fit the job it is applied to, and in practice the fee is most likely computed from declared contract valuation against the dollar tiers. The PDF is an OCR'd scan (produced by OmniPage CSDK 21) with visible character errors elsewhere in the text, though the fee lines themselves extracted cleanly.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2953/building_department_fees_4_2026.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation (tiered). The solar line points to the Building Valuation Table, and the building permit fee table is a tiered valuation schedule ($100 up to $10,000; $252 + $6/$1,000 to $50,000; $492 + $5/$1,000 to $100,000; $742 + $4/$1,000 to $500,000; $2,342 + $3/$1,000 above). The electrical permit, by contrast, is a flat $125 for single-family residential. The plan review fee is percentage-based (15% or $35 minimum).
Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the fee schedule. Held at 78 because the schedule mixes bases - the solar line is valuation-based, the residential electrical line is flat, and there is a second, inconsistent residential building line reading 'Building Permit: Residential (2024 February ICC Sq Ft Costs) $165.67' which is a per-square-foot figure. Which of those a solar permit is actually charged against is not resolved by the document.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2953/building_department_fees_4_2026.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes, two of them. A NON-REFUNDABLE PLAN SUBMITTAL FEE of $35 collected at the time of submittal, charged again on every re-submittal and addendum; and a separate FEE FOR REVIEW OF PLANS assessed 'at a minimum of $35 or 15%, whichever is greater', collected at permit issuance along with the permit fee and radon surcharge.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the first page of the county fee schedule PDF, effective 22 July 2024. Held at 85 because that page is the most OCR-damaged part of the document ('NON-REFUNDABLE PLAN SUBMITTAL IFEE', 're-submits:als', 'submitt'2d') and because it does not say whether a small alteration permit like a rooftop PV job triggers plan review at all.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2953/building_department_fees_4_2026.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
Washington County publishes no turnaround time of its own. The binding numbers are statutory: F.S. 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions, or deny within 5 BUSINESS DAYS for an electrical, structural, roofing or accessory-structure permit on an existing single-family residential dwelling where the value of the work is less than $15,000; 30 business days where the structure is under 7,500 sq ft and the $15,000 test is not met. F.S. 553.792(1)(c) gives the county 5 business days to say in writing what is missing, failing which the application is automatically deemed complete. Missing a deadline costs the county 10% of the permit fee per business day (20% per day after a timely resubmittal).
Why the confidence is not higherThe statute was read from the 2026 Florida Statutes in this run, including its 2026 amendment (s. 10, ch. 2026-63). The county-side absence was proved by enumerating both document libraries and reading the Building Department page, which gives a 3-business-day figure for processing EMAILED permits but no plan-review turnaround. Held at 80 because which statutory tier a rooftop PV job falls into depends on the declared value of work, and because F.S. 553.792(1)(d) requires the county to publish an expedited-processing policy on its website - no such policy was found on washingtonfl.gov.
state statute checked 2026-09-14 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.792.html
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Three different statements are in force and they do not agree. (a) LDC 10.06.02(B)(1): a Building Permit expires and becomes null and void if work is not commenced, having called for and received a satisfactory inspection, within SIX MONTHS of issuance, or if the work is not completed within ONE YEAR, extendable by the Building Official. (b) The Building Permit Application itself: 'the building permit is valid as long as there is construction progress and an approved inspection is recorded within each 180 days (6 months) period.' (c) F.S. 553.79(1)(c): a building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after issuance or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later. The Trade Permit Application adds: 'This permit is VOID after six (6) months from issuance unless the work it covers has been commenced and has had ongoing inspections.'
Why the confidence is not higherAll four texts were read in this run. Reported as a conflict rather than resolved, because the LDC's one-year completion deadline and the application's rolling 180-day inspection rule are different mechanisms, and the statutory floor is different again. For an installer the operative rule is the shortest one that bites: get an inspection within 180 days.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIILADECO_ARTXADEN
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
iWorq Systems. The county's public portal is portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL, module 601 ('Permits'), which offers permit search (by permit number, permit date, permit type, parcel number, applicant name or applicant address) and an online Inspection Request form. The Building Department page links it as 'Permit Searches ... For Searches between 11/06/2014 to Current Date'. The county also runs a separate Diligent OnePlatform portal (washingtonfl.community.diligentoneplatform.com) for meetings/records, not permits.
Why the confidence is not higherThe portal was loaded and its forms inspected in this run; the permit detail pages carry Permit Number, Permit Type, Land Use Approval date, Municipality, Power Company, Septic Permit, Driveway Permit and Flood Zone fields. Held at 85 because the portal's own search is gated behind an invisible Google reCAPTCHA and could not be exercised from this environment, so only the default 21-page recent window (314 permits, 17 Aug to 11 Sep 2026) could be read.
portal checked 2026-09-14 https://portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL/permits/601
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No. The county's stated route is email or in person: 'Permits may be emailed to permits@washingtonfl.com given you are currently registered with the Washington County Building Department ... All other permits should be brought into the office for processing.' The iWorq portal supports permit search and inspection requests, not application submission, and the Building Permit Application must be signed and NOTARIZED. This sits awkwardly with F.S. 553.79(1)(b), which requires a local enforcement agency to allow applicants to submit completed applications including payments electronically, and to post every application type and its required attachments on its website - the county does post its forms, but there is no online application.
Why the confidence is not higherThe email/in-office wording is quoted from the Building Department page; the notarisation requirement is on the face of the application; the portal's route set was read from its HTML (permit search, /inspection-request/, /scheduler/) with no application endpoint. The statutory duty was read from the 2026 statutes. Held at 75 because 'email your application as a PDF' arguably satisfies F.S. 553.79(1)(b), which lists e-mail submission in PDF as an accepted method - so the tension may be apparent rather than real.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Not resolvable at town level - it is parcel-by-parcel, and the County's own form says so. The Application for Land Use Certificate has a 'Power Company:' row with three tick boxes, 'GCE / FPL / WFE' (Gulf Coast Electric Cooperative, Florida Power & Light, West Florida Electric Cooperative), and the Trade Permit Application repeats 'ELECTRIC: GCE / FPL / WFECA-G'. The County Directory lists only two power companies for the county: 'Florida Power Lights, 1195 Jackson Ave., Chipley, 850-415-4207' and 'West Florida Electric, 905 St. John's Rd., Bonifay, 800-342-7400'. For Caryville specifically the realistic pair is FPL (successor to Gulf Power) or West Florida Electric Cooperative; WFEC's nearest district office is Bonifay.
Why the confidence is not higherHonest inference, not a sourced fact. The HIFLD/EIA retail service territory polygons were queried at four points inside the Census 2020 Caryville town boundary (centroid +30.7753, -085.8120) and BOTH the West Florida Electric Cooperative polygon and the Gulf Power polygon returned a hit at every point - those polygons are county-level approximations and overlap, so they cannot settle a parcel. WFEC's own site search for 'Caryville' returns 'did not match any pages'. The single county permit in the readable portal window at a Caryville mailing address (3756 Yates Settlement Rd) has a blank Power Company field. Confidence 55 and no higher: name both and check the meter before quoting a job.
permit application form checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1654/land_use_certificate_application_for_website_09292025.pdf
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Parallel, with the utility's final approval coming AFTER the AHJ's inspection. If West Florida Electric serves the parcel: the member signs the Agreement for Member-Owned Generation, submits the Interconnection Application and Compliance Form with a $135 application fee, and WFEC approves or disapproves within TEN BUSINESS DAYS; but among the things the member must supply is 'documentation showing the MOG has been inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation', and Section F of the Compliance Form is signed first by the code inspector ('Satisfies Code Requirements') and only then by the utility ('Satisfies Utility Requirements'). Washington County Code s. 14-74 points the same way from the county end: 'Any new service or existing service that has been altered or repaired shall not be connected until a local utility company has received an authorized inspection certificate.'
Why the confidence is not higherBoth WFEC documents were downloaded and text-extracted in this run, as was the codified county electrical article. Held at 75 because it is established only for the West Florida Electric case: if the parcel is served by FPL, FPL's interconnection standard and its position in the sequence were NOT read in this run and should not be assumed to match.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/content/394/MOG%20Agreement%20Revised%20May%202025.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
Not by the AHJ. The county states plainly that it does not enforce private restrictions: 'Washington County Building Department does not have the authority to enforce deed restrictions or covenants on properties', and its residential instructions warn that 'Some Subdivisions have Architectural Review Committees that require approval of the placement of a dwelling and accessory buildings ... Washington County makes no warranties as to whether the residence meets the requirements of any Architectural Review Committee.' Separately, F.S. 163.04(2) voids any deed restriction, covenant or similar agreement that prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting solar collectors, and leaves such a body only the power to determine the specific location on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south, and only if that does not impair the effective operation of the collectors.
Why the confidence is not higherThe county wording is quoted from its permit application and its residential instruction sheet; F.S. 163.04 was read from the 2026 Florida Statutes. Held at 82 because the county fee schedule's sign section does say 'ARC Approval if in Sunny Hills or Leisure Lakes Subdivision or inside any city limits' - that clause is about SIGNS, not buildings, but it shows the county does sometimes make an ARC or municipal sign-off a condition of issuing, and no equivalent clause exists for building permits.
permit application form checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1631/building_permit_application-_2025_-_highlighted_-fillable.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No historic district covering Caryville was found. The LDC does carry a Historical and Archaeological land use overlay (2.03.03) and requires approval for development on or beside a designated historic site (1.05.02(O), 4.06.02), with referral to the Florida Division of Historical Resources - so if a specific Caryville parcel is on the Florida Master Site File the overlay bites. Nothing designates the town or any part of it as a district.
Why the confidence is not higherA full-text Municode search of the county code for 'historic' returned 24 hits, all read at headline level; none names Caryville or any Caryville district. Controls passed on the same search engine ('electrical' 47 hits, 'zzqqx' 0). Held at 60 because a Master Site File listing is parcel-level data held by the state, not by the county code, and was not queried in this run - so 'no district' is proved but 'no designated site on your parcel' is not.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIILADECO_ARTIILAUSVEBU
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Yes, in the Florida sense. Washington County Code s. 14-37 creates a wind speed line 'along State Road 20, which runs through southern Washington County, and passes through Ebro, Florida', and sets 120 mph for all portions of the county lying NORTH of SR 20 and 130 mph south of it. Caryville is in the far north-west of the county, well north of SR 20, so 120 mph is the design wind speed. Separately, Florida Product Approval is the mechanism: the Trade Permit Application has a field 'FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL CODE', and the Building Inspection Procedures require that a 'Product Approval Sheet must be on file in the Building Department prior to inspection'.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three texts were read in this run. Held at 80 because the product approval field on the Trade Permit Application sits in the ROOF block rather than in a general block, and no county document says whether PV racking and attachments need a Florida Product Approval number of their own or ride on the roof assembly's.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Not for residential rooftop PV. A Special Exception (with a public hearing, $750 plus noticing costs) is required only for a 'Solar farm', which LDC 1.11.01 defines as 'A use of land containing solar panels, ancillary equipment and buildings uses for the collection, storage, and transmission of power resulting from the solar energy received from the panels, said property being owned by a non-profit or for-profit public or private company' - i.e. a commercial installation, not a householder's array. LDC 2.02.04(L) then imposes a 100-foot setback from abutting residential land, a 25-foot landscape buffer, a 100-foot buffer from the Choctawhatchee River, Holmes Creek and Econfina Creek, tree-removal standards, and a decommissioning surety bond.
Why the confidence is not higherThe definition and the special-exception standards were read in full from the codified LDC in this run, and the $750 fee from the Planning fee schedule. Held at 82 because 'solar farm' is the ONLY solar term anywhere in the county's code - a full-text search returned exactly three hits, all of them the solar-farm use, the allowable-use table entry and the definition - so the line between a large residential ground mount and a 'solar farm' has never been drawn by this authority.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIILADECO_ARTIILAUSVEBU
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No cap in the county code. The only size threshold that bites here is at utility level: West Florida Electric pays an energy credit of 5.2 cents per kWh 'for solar installations smaller than 25 kW', and charges $4.94 per kW of overall system capacity as a pass-through from PowerSouth, filed with the Florida Public Service Commission.
Why the confidence is not higherThe absence in the code is proved: a full-text Municode search for 'solar' across the whole Washington County code returned three hits, none of them a residential size cap, with the positive and fabricated controls passing. The 25 kW figure is quoted from WFEC's own Solar Energy page, read today. Held at 70 because the WFEC page describes a rate threshold rather than an interconnection limit, and because if the parcel is FPL the applicable thresholds (FPSC Rule 25-6.065 tiering) were not read in this run.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/solar-energy
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? NFPA 70, the National Electrical Code, 2020 edition. Washington County Code s. 14-68 adopts 'The National Electric Code, as it is adopted by the State of Florida, as it may be amended and updated from time to time', so the county tracks the state. Florida Administrative Code 69A-60.005(2)(qq) names the edition in force: 'NFPA 70, 2020 edition, National Electrical Code.' 85% · adopting regulation
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023). Florida Administrative Code 61G20-1.001(1), effective 18 March 2026, reads: 'The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), as updated by the Florida Building Commission on June 20, 2023, April 16, 2024, August 13, 2024, December 10, 2024, December 20, 2024, April 15, 2025, and December 9, 2025, and incorporated herein by reference is hereby adopted as the building code for the State of Florida.' Washington County Code s. 14-36 adopts 'The Florida Building Code, as it may be amended and updated from time to time'. The county's own Building Permit Application carries the header 'Code in effect 8th Edition Florida Building Code'. 95% · adopting regulation
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition - NFPA 1, the Fire Code, Florida 2021 Edition (FAC 69A-60.003) together with NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code, Florida 2021 Edition (FAC 69A-60.004), both effective 31 December 2023, plus the referenced publications added by FAC 69A-60.005. FAC 69A-60.002(1) makes this self-executing for Caryville: 'The Florida Fire Prevention Code is the minimum fire prevention code deemed adopted by each municipality, county, and special district with firesafety responsibilities, and applies to every building and structure throughout the state'. Washington County Code s. 30-32 adopts the same code from the county side, and s. 30-33 makes the Board of County Commissioners the fire authority having jurisdiction over the unincorporated area 'and those municipalities located within the county which, by official act of their governing body, elect to come within the jurisdiction of the county authority'. 90% · adopting regulation
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes, on the county side - and they are old. Washington County Code ch. 14 art. III (Electrical Code, ss. 14-66 to 14-89, from Ord. 80-2 of 12 May 1980) carries a long list of local electrical rules that sit on top of the NEC: s. 14-72 (service conductors in metal conduit from the point of attachment to the master disconnect; point of attachment not less than 12 ft above ground; service-disconnecting means with overcurrent protection at a readily accessible location nearest the point of entrance, and no service entrance conductors extending beyond 25 ft from the point of attachment without that protection); s. 14-73 (meters on residences mounted outside, centre 4 to 6 ft above grade); s. 14-79 (underwriter's label required on electrical equipment); s. 14-80 (no service conductor smaller than no. 8 AWG copper; main service switch operating handle max 6 ft, min 3.5 ft above grade; services of 400 A or less to have conductors of the same size and insulation type); s. 14-81 (no receptacle or lighting conductor smaller than no. 12 AWG; service disconnects and panels readily accessible and not in bathrooms; any service rewired or repaired to conform; no service complete until legibly indexed); s. 14-83 (grounding conductor in copper, not smaller than no. 8 AWG, connected on the supply side of the service disconnecting means). Also s. 14-37 (wind speed line), s. 14-1 (state-code exemptions) and the LDC's Appendix A Floodplain Management Ordinance, which is expressly framed as 'local administrative amendments to the Florida Building Code'. 72% · codified ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) and the NEC 2020 as adopted by the State of Florida, enforced by the Washington County Building Department, plus Washington County Code ch. 14 art. III's local electrical provisions, plus the Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1 / NFPA 101, Florida 2021 editions), plus the LDC's Appendix A Floodplain Management Ordinance where the parcel is in a flood hazard area. The county's own framing: 'The permitting and inspection procedure established for Washington County is required by Florida Statute and ensures contractors follow the State of Florida Building Codes.' 80% · department page
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for Town of Caryville on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes, by the code in force rather than by any local rule: the NEC 2020 applies in Caryville (see q29) and Article 690.12 is its rapid-shutdown requirement for PV systems on buildings. Washington County has adopted no amendment to it and publishes nothing about rapid shutdown. 68% · adopting regulation
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? None of its own. Washington County specifies no PV placards at the service equipment, and neither does the Town of Caryville. What applies is the NEC 2020's own labelling (690.13(B), 690.56(C), 705.10 and the 690.12(D) rapid-shutdown label). The one local labelling rule in the county code is Code s. 14-79, and it is about equipment marking rather than placards: all electrical materials, apparatus, fittings, appliances, devices and appurtenances 'shall bear the manufacturer's name, trademark or other identification symbol along with markings giving voltage, type of current, wattage and other pertinent information ... and shall bear the underwriter's label'. 75% · codified ordinance
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No. Neither Caryville nor Washington County specifies any placard wording of its own. 78% · codified ordinance
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? No. No letter height, colour, material or durability specification is published by this authority or by the county. 75% · codified ordinance
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? No local requirement. Whatever plaque or directory applies comes from NEC 2020 705.10 (and 690.56 for the PV system) as the edition in force; Washington County adds nothing and specifies no content. The county's own site-plan requirement is at the land-use stage, not at the service equipment: LDC 10.01.03(C) requires a plot plan to scale with lot dimensions, building sizes, shapes, heights and locations and yard widths. 70% · codified ordinance
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? For West Florida Electric: no, none beyond the NEC. WFEC's Agreement for Member-Owned Generation (revised May 2025) and its Interconnection Application and Compliance Form (revised 2025) contain no placard, label, warning or signage requirement at all - the only signage-adjacent requirement is that the manual AC disconnect be 'capable of being locked in the open position with a utility padlock'. For FPL, not established in this run. 72% · utility DG manual
- Where must the labels be placed? No local rule on placement. The only positional requirements published by anyone in this chain are utility-side and concern hardware, not labels: WFEC requires the manual disconnect switch to be 'mounted separate from the meter socket' and 'readily accessible to Cooperative'; County Code s. 14-73 requires residential meters outside with the centre 4 to 6 ft above grade; s. 14-81 requires service disconnects and panels to be readily accessible and not in bathrooms. 70% · utility DG manual
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? If West Florida Electric serves the parcel, the requirement is explicit and unusual: the member must 'Install a manual disconnect switch of the visible load break type to provide a separation point between the AC power output of the MOG and any Member wiring connected to Cooperative's system. The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted SEPARATE FROM THE METER SOCKET and shall be readily accessible to Cooperative and capable of being locked in the open position with a utility padlock. Cooperative may open the switch, isolating the MOG (or the premises), without prior notice to Member.' The Interconnection Application also asks the installer to state the 'AC Disconnect Location' on the form. The county adds only that residential meters must be outside with the centre 4 to 6 ft above grade (Code s. 14-73) and that service disconnects and panels must be readily accessible (s. 14-81). For FPL-served parcels, not established. 85% · utility DG manual
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes, in three overlapping ways. Washington County Code s. 14-79 requires all electrical equipment to bear the underwriter's label. Florida Product Approval numbers are recorded on the permit (the Trade Permit Application has a 'FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL CODE' field) and the Building Inspection Procedures require a Product Approval Sheet on file with the Building Department before inspection. And on the utility side, WFEC's Compliance Form requires the contractor to certify hardware compliance with UL 1741, UL 1703 and IEEE 1262-1995, and installation to IEEE 929 and the current NEC, while the MOG Agreement requires certifications to IEEE 1547 (2003), IEEE 1547.1 (2005) and UL 1741 (2005) plus proof of general liability insurance of not less than $100,000. 80% · utility DG manual
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, with nothing specific published by this authority. There is no battery or energy-storage provision anywhere in the Washington County code - a full-text search for 'battery' returns only assault, hazardous-waste and auto-repair contexts, and 'energy storage' returns only outdoor-storage definitions. What governs is the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and the Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1 / NFPA 855 as referenced), neither of whose text could be read here. WFEC's Interconnection Application has a 'Batteries' manufacturer/model field, so a battery is contemplated on the interconnection side. 55% · codified ordinance
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No separate ESS permit type and no separate ESS inspection are published. The county fee schedule lists building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, roofing, structure relocation, demolition, mobile home setup, swimming pool, alarm, gas, sign, fire sprinkler and hood suppression permits - and a Solar System Installation line - with nothing for energy storage; the Building Inspection Procedures list ten inspections, none of them ESS. 70% · fee schedule
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, by inference - and there are Caryville-specific setbacks that matter. A residential ground mount is not a 'solar farm' under LDC 1.11.01 (that definition requires the property to be 'owned by a non-profit or for-profit public or private company'), so it falls to be treated as an accessory structure under LDC 2.04.03, taking the setbacks in Table 2.02.06 for the parcel's Future Land Use category and 'not ... closer than ten (10) feet from any structure'. Two further constraints bite hard in Caryville, which sits on the Choctawhatchee River: LDC 4.04.02(B) requires a ONE-HUNDRED-FOOT development setback from the ordinary mean high-water line of the Choctawhatchee River (fifty feet for ordinary surface water bodies), 4.04.02(A) forbids development within thirty feet of a wetland, and LDC 2.05.04(A) prohibits permanent structures in the buffer except docks, piers and boat ramps. In a flood hazard area, Appendix A s. 307.1 also applies to 'other development' - anchored against flotation, flood damage-resistant materials, and mechanical/plumbing/electrical systems above the design flood elevation or per ASCE 24. 62% · codified ordinance
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No busbar or 120% rule of its own, and no solar-specific service-upgrade rule. What exists are the 1980 local electrical provisions listed at q32 - most relevant to a PV job being s. 14-80 (service switch handle height 3.5 to 6 ft above grade; services 400 A or less to use conductors of the same size and same type of insulation), s. 14-72(c) (service disconnecting means with overcurrent protection at a readily accessible location nearest the point of entrance of the service entrance conductors, and no SE conductors beyond 25 ft from the point of attachment without it), s. 14-81 (all service disconnects and panels readily accessible, not in bathrooms or in a room whose only access is through a bathroom; any service being rewired or repaired shall conform to this article; no service complete until legibly indexed), and s. 14-73 (residential meters outside, centre 4 to 6 ft above grade). The fee schedule prices a service upgrade separately: 'Electrical Permit: Residential Service Upgrade/Temp Pole $100 minimum'. 72% · codified ordinance
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Not published. No Washington County document or code section specifies a mounting system, an attachment type, or an attachment spacing for rooftop PV. Attachment is governed by the Florida Building Code's structural and wind provisions at a 120 mph design wind speed for the part of the county north of SR 20, with Florida Product Approval numbers recorded on the permit and the Product Approval Sheet on file before inspection. 60% · codified ordinance
20 questions answered against Town of Caryville’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
NFPA 70, the National Electrical Code, 2020 edition. Washington County Code s. 14-68 adopts 'The National Electric Code, as it is adopted by the State of Florida, as it may be amended and updated from time to time', so the county tracks the state. Florida Administrative Code 69A-60.005(2)(qq) names the edition in force: 'NFPA 70, 2020 edition, National Electrical Code.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe county adoption clause was read from the codified ordinance and the state edition from the Florida Administrative Code chapter 69A-60 rule text, downloaded from flrules.org in this run. Held at 85 rather than higher because the cleanest confirmation would be the Florida Building Code's own Chapter 35 referenced-standards list, and the FBC text is copyrighted and sits behind the ICC viewer, which returns a hard 403 to every technique available here - so the NEC edition is established from the fire code's reference list plus the county's tracking clause, not from the building code itself.
adopting regulation checked 2026-09-14 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=69A-60
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023). Florida Administrative Code 61G20-1.001(1), effective 18 March 2026, reads: 'The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), as updated by the Florida Building Commission on June 20, 2023, April 16, 2024, August 13, 2024, December 10, 2024, December 20, 2024, April 15, 2025, and December 9, 2025, and incorporated herein by reference is hereby adopted as the building code for the State of Florida.' Washington County Code s. 14-36 adopts 'The Florida Building Code, as it may be amended and updated from time to time'. The county's own Building Permit Application carries the header 'Code in effect 8th Edition Florida Building Code'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe rule text was downloaded from flrules.org and read in this run (the rule's own effective date, 18 March 2026, is on the rule page), and it agrees with the county's current application form. This is the state's own adopting regulation naming the edition in words.
adopting regulation checked 2026-09-14 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ruleno.asp?id=61G20-1.001
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, 8th Edition - NFPA 1, the Fire Code, Florida 2021 Edition (FAC 69A-60.003) together with NFPA 101, the Life Safety Code, Florida 2021 Edition (FAC 69A-60.004), both effective 31 December 2023, plus the referenced publications added by FAC 69A-60.005. FAC 69A-60.002(1) makes this self-executing for Caryville: 'The Florida Fire Prevention Code is the minimum fire prevention code deemed adopted by each municipality, county, and special district with firesafety responsibilities, and applies to every building and structure throughout the state'. Washington County Code s. 30-32 adopts the same code from the county side, and s. 30-33 makes the Board of County Commissioners the fire authority having jurisdiction over the unincorporated area 'and those municipalities located within the county which, by official act of their governing body, elect to come within the jurisdiction of the county authority'.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth FAC rule texts were downloaded and read in this run; the county chapter was read from Municode. Held at 90 because whether Caryville has passed the 'official act' electing into the county fire authority under s. 30-33 could NOT be established - the town publishes no ordinances and its website is dead - so the code that applies is certain while the officer who enforces it is not. See q53.
adopting regulation checked 2026-09-14 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=69A-60
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes, on the county side - and they are old. Washington County Code ch. 14 art. III (Electrical Code, ss. 14-66 to 14-89, from Ord. 80-2 of 12 May 1980) carries a long list of local electrical rules that sit on top of the NEC: s. 14-72 (service conductors in metal conduit from the point of attachment to the master disconnect; point of attachment not less than 12 ft above ground; service-disconnecting means with overcurrent protection at a readily accessible location nearest the point of entrance, and no service entrance conductors extending beyond 25 ft from the point of attachment without that protection); s. 14-73 (meters on residences mounted outside, centre 4 to 6 ft above grade); s. 14-79 (underwriter's label required on electrical equipment); s. 14-80 (no service conductor smaller than no. 8 AWG copper; main service switch operating handle max 6 ft, min 3.5 ft above grade; services of 400 A or less to have conductors of the same size and insulation type); s. 14-81 (no receptacle or lighting conductor smaller than no. 12 AWG; service disconnects and panels readily accessible and not in bathrooms; any service rewired or repaired to conform; no service complete until legibly indexed); s. 14-83 (grounding conductor in copper, not smaller than no. 8 AWG, connected on the supply side of the service disconnecting means). Also s. 14-37 (wind speed line), s. 14-1 (state-code exemptions) and the LDC's Appendix A Floodplain Management Ordinance, which is expressly framed as 'local administrative amendments to the Florida Building Code'.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery provision was read in full from the codified ordinance in this run. Held at 72 for two reasons. First, ch. 14 contains NO territorial applicability clause, so its reach into the Caryville town limits is inferred from the absence of an unincorporated-only limitation rather than stated. Second, these amendments date from 1980 and one of them (s. 14-75(b)(5)) still cites the 1993 National Electrical Code by name, so how much of art. III a 2026 plans examiner actually enforces against a PV job is not knowable from the text.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023) and the NEC 2020 as adopted by the State of Florida, enforced by the Washington County Building Department, plus Washington County Code ch. 14 art. III's local electrical provisions, plus the Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1 / NFPA 101, Florida 2021 editions), plus the LDC's Appendix A Floodplain Management Ordinance where the parcel is in a flood hazard area. The county's own framing: 'The permitting and inspection procedure established for Washington County is required by Florida Statute and ensures contractors follow the State of Florida Building Codes.'
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the adopting regulations and codified ordinances read in this run, and from the Building Department page's own words. Held at 80 because the stack is assembled rather than published as a stack by the authority, and because of the ch. 14 territorial question flagged at q32.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
No busbar or 120% rule of its own, and no solar-specific service-upgrade rule. What exists are the 1980 local electrical provisions listed at q32 - most relevant to a PV job being s. 14-80 (service switch handle height 3.5 to 6 ft above grade; services 400 A or less to use conductors of the same size and same type of insulation), s. 14-72(c) (service disconnecting means with overcurrent protection at a readily accessible location nearest the point of entrance of the service entrance conductors, and no SE conductors beyond 25 ft from the point of attachment without it), s. 14-81 (all service disconnects and panels readily accessible, not in bathrooms or in a room whose only access is through a bathroom; any service being rewired or repaired shall conform to this article; no service complete until legibly indexed), and s. 14-73 (residential meters outside, centre 4 to 6 ft above grade). The fee schedule prices a service upgrade separately: 'Electrical Permit: Residential Service Upgrade/Temp Pole $100 minimum'.
Why the confidence is not higherRead in full from the codified article and the fee schedule in this run. A full-text code search for 'busbar' equivalents found nothing; the only solar hits in the whole code are the three solar-farm entries. Same two caveats as q32 - no territorial clause, and 1980-vintage text.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Not published. No Washington County document or code section specifies a mounting system, an attachment type, or an attachment spacing for rooftop PV. Attachment is governed by the Florida Building Code's structural and wind provisions at a 120 mph design wind speed for the part of the county north of SR 20, with Florida Product Approval numbers recorded on the permit and the Product Approval Sheet on file before inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherThe absence was proved by enumerating both county document libraries in full and by a full-text code search, with controls passing. The positive part (wind speed, product approval) is sourced to Code s. 14-37 and the Building Inspection Procedures. Held at 60 because the FBC's own attachment requirements could not be read - the code text is behind the ICC viewer, which 403s every route available here.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedWashington County Code ch. 30 (Fire Prevention and Protection) in full; the LDC in full; both county document libraries (13 Building Department files, 18 Planning Department files) enumerated and the only fire-services document is a family fire-safety drill sheet; a full-text Municode search of the whole county code for 'solar' (3 hits, all solar-farm), 'setback' (37 hits, none PV) and 'photovoltaic' (0 hits), with 'electrical' (47 hits) as the positive control and 'zzqqx' (0 hits) as the fabricated control. The governing text is NFPA 1, Florida 2021 Edition, adopted by FAC 69A-60.003 - its ridge-setback and roof-access provisions could NOT be read: the rule itself says NFPA 1 Florida 2021 'is copyrighted material that cannot be copied' and is available only 'in a read-only, non-printable, non-downloadable format at the Division of State Fire Marshal website', which is a JavaScript viewer, and the ICC and NFPA hosts return hard 403s to every technique available in this environment. Unreachable source, not a proved absence.
https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=69A-60
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes, by the code in force rather than by any local rule: the NEC 2020 applies in Caryville (see q29) and Article 690.12 is its rapid-shutdown requirement for PV systems on buildings. Washington County has adopted no amendment to it and publishes nothing about rapid shutdown.
Why the confidence is not higherThe edition is solidly sourced (FAC 69A-60.005(2)(qq) plus County Code s. 14-68). The absence of a local amendment is proved by a full-text code search with controls passing and by enumerating both county document libraries - 'rapid shutdown' returns zero hits anywhere in county material. Held at 68 because the NEC text itself could not be opened in this run: NFPA's and ICC's hosts 403 every route available here, so the CONTENT of 690.12 is asserted from the edition rather than quoted from the clause.
adopting regulation checked 2026-09-14 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=69A-60
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
None of its own. Washington County specifies no PV placards at the service equipment, and neither does the Town of Caryville. What applies is the NEC 2020's own labelling (690.13(B), 690.56(C), 705.10 and the 690.12(D) rapid-shutdown label). The one local labelling rule in the county code is Code s. 14-79, and it is about equipment marking rather than placards: all electrical materials, apparatus, fittings, appliances, devices and appurtenances 'shall bear the manufacturer's name, trademark or other identification symbol along with markings giving voltage, type of current, wattage and other pertinent information ... and shall bear the underwriter's label'.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proved in this run: full-text Municode search of the whole county code for 'placard' (0 hits) and 'label' (hits only s. 14-79 and unrelated solid-waste text), plus grep of all 11 extracted county PDFs for 'placard' (0), 'label' (0) and 'photovoltaic' (0), with 'electrical' as positive control (8 of 11 files) and 'zzqqx' as fabricated control (0). Held at 75 rather than higher because a county with no published placard spec still has an inspector who works to the NEC, and the NEC clause text could not be read here.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No. Neither Caryville nor Washington County specifies any placard wording of its own.
Why the confidence is not higherSame proved absence and same controls as q38. The county's only labelling provision, Code s. 14-79, prescribes manufacturer marking and an underwriter's label on equipment, not the wording of any warning placard.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No. No letter height, colour, material or durability specification is published by this authority or by the county.
Why the confidence is not higherSame proved absence and same controls as q38 - 'placard' returns nothing in the code, and none of the 11 extracted county PDFs contains the word.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No local requirement. Whatever plaque or directory applies comes from NEC 2020 705.10 (and 690.56 for the PV system) as the edition in force; Washington County adds nothing and specifies no content. The county's own site-plan requirement is at the land-use stage, not at the service equipment: LDC 10.01.03(C) requires a plot plan to scale with lot dimensions, building sizes, shapes, heights and locations and yard widths.
Why the confidence is not higherSame proved absence and controls as q38. The land-use plot-plan requirement was read from the codified LDC. Held at 70 because the NEC clause content could not be read here.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
For West Florida Electric: no, none beyond the NEC. WFEC's Agreement for Member-Owned Generation (revised May 2025) and its Interconnection Application and Compliance Form (revised 2025) contain no placard, label, warning or signage requirement at all - the only signage-adjacent requirement is that the manual AC disconnect be 'capable of being locked in the open position with a utility padlock'. For FPL, not established in this run.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth WFEC PDFs were downloaded and text-extracted in this run and searched: 'placard' 0 hits, 'label' 0 hits, 'warning' 0 hits across all three WFEC solar documents; positive controls 'disconnect' (6 hits) and 'inspect' (5 hits) both fire; fabricated control 'zzqqx' 0. Held at 72 and NOT higher because the utility is parcel-specific here (q22) and FPL's interconnection standard was not opened in this run - if the meter is FPL, this answer does not apply.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/content/394/MOG%20Agreement%20Revised%20May%202025.pdf
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No local rule on placement. The only positional requirements published by anyone in this chain are utility-side and concern hardware, not labels: WFEC requires the manual disconnect switch to be 'mounted separate from the meter socket' and 'readily accessible to Cooperative'; County Code s. 14-73 requires residential meters outside with the centre 4 to 6 ft above grade; s. 14-81 requires service disconnects and panels to be readily accessible and not in bathrooms.
Why the confidence is not higherSame proved absence for labels (q38 controls) plus the three positional rules quoted from documents read in this run. Held at 70 because label placement is then entirely NEC-driven and the NEC text could not be opened here.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/content/394/MOG%20Agreement%20Revised%20May%202025.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes, in three overlapping ways. Washington County Code s. 14-79 requires all electrical equipment to bear the underwriter's label. Florida Product Approval numbers are recorded on the permit (the Trade Permit Application has a 'FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL CODE' field) and the Building Inspection Procedures require a Product Approval Sheet on file with the Building Department before inspection. And on the utility side, WFEC's Compliance Form requires the contractor to certify hardware compliance with UL 1741, UL 1703 and IEEE 1262-1995, and installation to IEEE 929 and the current NEC, while the MOG Agreement requires certifications to IEEE 1547 (2003), IEEE 1547.1 (2005) and UL 1741 (2005) plus proof of general liability insurance of not less than $100,000.
Why the confidence is not higherEach requirement was read from the document named, in this run. Held at 80 because the WFEC standards are dated to old editions (IEEE 1547-2003, UL 1741-2005, IEEE 1262-1995) that no current inverter is certified to by those exact vintages, so what the co-op actually accepts in 2026 is not determinable from the paperwork, and because the utility half only applies if WFEC serves the parcel.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/content/393/Interconnection%20App%20compliance%20form%202025_docx.pdf
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Permitted, with nothing specific published by this authority. There is no battery or energy-storage provision anywhere in the Washington County code - a full-text search for 'battery' returns only assault, hazardous-waste and auto-repair contexts, and 'energy storage' returns only outdoor-storage definitions. What governs is the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and the Florida Fire Prevention Code (NFPA 1 / NFPA 855 as referenced), neither of whose text could be read here. WFEC's Interconnection Application has a 'Batteries' manufacturer/model field, so a battery is contemplated on the interconnection side.
Why the confidence is not higherThe county-side absence is proved with controls passing ('electrical' 47 hits, 'zzqqx' 0). The state-side requirements are asserted from the adopted code editions rather than quoted, because NFPA and ICC hosts return hard 403s here. 55 reflects that: the absence is solid, the positive content is not.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH30FIPRPR
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No separate ESS permit type and no separate ESS inspection are published. The county fee schedule lists building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, roofing, structure relocation, demolition, mobile home setup, swimming pool, alarm, gas, sign, fire sprinkler and hood suppression permits - and a Solar System Installation line - with nothing for energy storage; the Building Inspection Procedures list ten inspections, none of them ESS.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth documents were downloaded and read in full in this run, and neither contains an ESS line. Positive control: the fee schedule does contain 'Alarm Permits', 'Fire Sprinkler System' and 'Hood/Fire Suppression System' lines, so the schedule is granular enough that an ESS line would show if it existed; fabricated control 'zzqqx' returns nothing.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/2953/building_department_fees_4_2026.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes, by inference - and there are Caryville-specific setbacks that matter. A residential ground mount is not a 'solar farm' under LDC 1.11.01 (that definition requires the property to be 'owned by a non-profit or for-profit public or private company'), so it falls to be treated as an accessory structure under LDC 2.04.03, taking the setbacks in Table 2.02.06 for the parcel's Future Land Use category and 'not ... closer than ten (10) feet from any structure'. Two further constraints bite hard in Caryville, which sits on the Choctawhatchee River: LDC 4.04.02(B) requires a ONE-HUNDRED-FOOT development setback from the ordinary mean high-water line of the Choctawhatchee River (fifty feet for ordinary surface water bodies), 4.04.02(A) forbids development within thirty feet of a wetland, and LDC 2.05.04(A) prohibits permanent structures in the buffer except docks, piers and boat ramps. In a flood hazard area, Appendix A s. 307.1 also applies to 'other development' - anchored against flotation, flood damage-resistant materials, and mechanical/plumbing/electrical systems above the design flood elevation or per ASCE 24.
Why the confidence is not higherThe setbacks, the buffer rule, the accessory-structure rule and the floodplain section were all read in full from the codified LDC in this run. Held at 62 because the central step is an inference: no Washington County document says anywhere that a residential ground-mount PV array is an accessory structure. It is read from the solar-farm definition excluding a householder's array plus 2.04.03's list of what accessory structures are, and a plans examiner could reach a different view.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIILADECO_ARTIVREPR
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
If West Florida Electric serves the parcel, the requirement is explicit and unusual: the member must 'Install a manual disconnect switch of the visible load break type to provide a separation point between the AC power output of the MOG and any Member wiring connected to Cooperative's system. The manual disconnect switch shall be mounted SEPARATE FROM THE METER SOCKET and shall be readily accessible to Cooperative and capable of being locked in the open position with a utility padlock. Cooperative may open the switch, isolating the MOG (or the premises), without prior notice to Member.' The Interconnection Application also asks the installer to state the 'AC Disconnect Location' on the form. The county adds only that residential meters must be outside with the centre 4 to 6 ft above grade (Code s. 14-73) and that service disconnects and panels must be readily accessible (s. 14-81). For FPL-served parcels, not established.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the WFEC Agreement for Member-Owned Generation, revised May 2025, downloaded and text-extracted in this run. Held at 85 rather than higher only because it is utility-conditional - see q22 - and because the agreement does not state a distance from the meter, only that the switch is separate from the meter socket.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/content/394/MOG%20Agreement%20Revised%20May%202025.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Phone, primarily. The Building Inspection Procedures open with 'YOU MUST HAVE THE PERMIT NUMBER AND TYPE OF INSPECTION WHEN CALLING FOR INSPECTION' and the department page says to 'contact Building Department staff' on 850-638-6195. The Building Department page also carries an email link headed 'Building Inspection Requests'. There is in addition an online Inspection Request form on the iWorq portal (portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL/inspection-request/601/...) which asks for an Access Code, requester name, phone, email, requested date and requested time. 80% · authority handout
- How much notice is required? 24 to 48 hours. The Building Department page: 'Due to a high demand in requests for inspections, please contact Building Department staff at least 24-48 hours prior to inspection date.' 88% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Not published as AM/PM windows. The iWorq Inspection Request form offers a free choice of requested date and a requested TIME in five-minute increments running from 07:00, and carries a list of dates marked unavailable, so the portal asks for a specific time rather than a half-day window. Nothing states that the requested time is honoured. 55% · portal
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Delegated - to Washington County, which performs its own. The Town of Caryville performs no inspections of any kind. Washington County's Building Department states that it 'is responsible for issuing Building Permits, Reviewing Plans, and Performing Electrical & Building Inspections and maintaining Contractors Licensing'. Florida's private provider route under F.S. 553.791 is also live here: the county's public permit list shows permits issued with an applicant recorded as 'J. CORB, LLC (PRIVATE PROVIDER GEORGE WILSON)'. 85% · department page
- If delegated, to whom? Washington County Building Department, 1331 South Blvd., Suite 900, Chipley FL 32428, 850-638-6195, permits@washingtonfl.com; Building Official Charles Vannatter, Office Manager Felicia Brown, Permit Technicians Jennifer Enck and Ann Baker; hours M-F 8-4. Fire review, if any is performed on a PV or ESS job, is the open question: Washington County Code s. 30-33 makes the Board of County Commissioners the fire AHJ for the unincorporated area and for those municipalities that elect in by official act of their governing body, and s. 30-34 has the AHJ designate a fire official. Caryville has no fire department of its own - the County Directory's fire list names Chipley VFD, Country Oaks VFD, Ebro VFD and Vernon VFD as separate departments with their own numbers, but the station serving Caryville is 'Hinson Crossroads, 850-415-5026, 5487 Douglas Ferry Rd., Caryville, FL 32427' on the Washington County Fire Services number. No official act of the Caryville Town Council electing into the county fire authority could be found. 80% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? No solar sequence is published. The county's published Building Inspection Procedures list ten inspections, in this order, for NEW CONSTRUCTION: 1 temporary electrical service; 2 footer; 3 under-slab (rough-in plumbing); 4 floor slab; 5 concrete block building; 6 nailing and strapping; 7 dry-in (framing complete, plumbing top out, mechanical rough-in, electrical rough-in complete with panel set, roofing completed, brick tie); 8 insulation; 9 temporary/permanent power to certificate of occupancy; 10 final / certificate of occupancy. None of these maps onto a rooftop PV retrofit, for which the realistic sequence (electrical rough and final, or a single final) is not published. 62% · authority handout
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? For new construction, yes - a dry-in inspection is required at stage 7, taken before anything is covered, with the electrical rough-in complete and the panel set (breakers need not be installed at that inspection), and County Code s. 14-78 makes it unlawful to conceal any electrical wiring or equipment until it has been inspected. For a rooftop PV retrofit, no mid-roof or rough-in stage is published. 65% · authority handout
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes. 'BUILDING INSPECTION PROCEDURES' (Washington County Building Department, revised 8/2024) is a published, downloadable inspection checklist: it lists what must be posted on the job before work commences, the ten required inspections with what each covers, the no-cover-before-inspection rule, and the re-inspection fee. 88% · authority handout
- What must be on site at inspection? Posted on the job before any new construction may commence: the address, the prints, the inspection card, and the Notice of Commencement, with the permit board installed so that it may be viewed from the street. Proper permits (building, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, roofing) must be in hand before any inspection is made. A certified copy of the Notice of Commencement must be provided to the Building Department and posted on the jobsite before the first inspection can be performed, for any improvement with a construction cost of $2,500 or more. The Product Approval Sheet must be on file in the Building Department prior to the floor slab inspection, and the soil treatment sticker goes on the permit board. 85% · authority handout
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Not stated for labels specifically, but the county's own rules point that way. County Code s. 14-79 requires all electrical equipment to bear the manufacturer's markings and the underwriter's label, so listing is a codified compliance item the inspector is enforcing; the Building Inspection Procedures require a Product Approval Sheet to be on file in the Building Department before the floor slab inspection; and s. 14-78 requires the inspector, on finding work satisfactory, to place a notice or certificate at the service switch. No document says the inspector checks PV placards. 55% · codified ordinance
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? For new construction, a Certificate of Occupancy: 'Building will be released for permanent power. Certificate of Occupancy can be picked up at the Building Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm the next business day.' For an alteration such as a rooftop PV retrofit, no CO is issued and what the installer gets is an approved final inspection - on the electrical side, the s. 14-78(e) notice or certificate posted at the service switch, which is also what the utility needs (see q62). 65% · authority handout
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? The installer or the member does, not the AHJ. WFEC's MOG Agreement paragraph 2(e) requires the member to submit 'documentation showing the MOG has been inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation', and the Compliance Form's Section F is signed first by the inspector ('1. Satisfies Code Requirements - Inspector Name / Inspector Signature') and then by the utility ('2. Satisfies Utility Requirements - Utility Rep Signature'), with paragraph 8 saying the co-op 'shall sign the F(2) of the Compliance section and return a copy to Member' on approval. Washington County Code s. 14-74 is consistent from the county end: 'Any new service or existing service that has been altered or repaired shall not be connected until a local utility company has received an authorized inspection certificate.' 72% · utility DG manual
- Is there a re-inspection fee? $75. The fee schedule lists 'Reinspection Fee: Commercial & Residential $75', and the Building Inspection Procedures state: 'Any inspection that is not ready when the inspector gets to the site or inspections that fail will be required to pay a $75.00 re-inspection fee (Building Official will determine when this fee will apply).' 90% · authority handout
- How are corrections issued and cleared? By a posted notice at the service switch for electrical work, and by not proceeding. County Code s. 14-78(e): on inspection, if the work is satisfactory 'the inspector shall place a notice or certificate at the service switch or other suitable place stating that the electrical work has been inspected and found to be in accordance with the rules'; if it is not, 'the inspector shall post a notice or certificate stating that this wiring does not conform to this article, has been condemned, and shall not be covered or connected until approved by the inspector'. The inspection handout adds: 'DO NOT PROCEED with work until inspection is made and approved', and a failed inspection draws the $75 re-inspection fee. A re-submittal of rejected plans re-triggers the $35 non-refundable plan submittal fee. 72% · codified ordinance
14 questions answered against Town of Caryville’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Phone, primarily. The Building Inspection Procedures open with 'YOU MUST HAVE THE PERMIT NUMBER AND TYPE OF INSPECTION WHEN CALLING FOR INSPECTION' and the department page says to 'contact Building Department staff' on 850-638-6195. The Building Department page also carries an email link headed 'Building Inspection Requests'. There is in addition an online Inspection Request form on the iWorq portal (portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL/inspection-request/601/...) which asks for an Access Code, requester name, phone, email, requested date and requested time.
Why the confidence is not higherThe phone route is quoted from the county's own inspection procedures handout; the email link and the 24-48 hour note are on the department page; the portal form's fields were read from the portal's HTML in this run. Held at 80 because the portal's inspection request needs a per-permit Access Code that could not be exercised from here, so it is not certain that it is offered to every permit holder.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
24 to 48 hours. The Building Department page: 'Due to a high demand in requests for inspections, please contact Building Department staff at least 24-48 hours prior to inspection date.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the department page, read today. Held at 88 because it is written as a request ('please contact ... at least') rather than as a rule, and no ordinance fixes a notice period.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Not published as AM/PM windows. The iWorq Inspection Request form offers a free choice of requested date and a requested TIME in five-minute increments running from 07:00, and carries a list of dates marked unavailable, so the portal asks for a specific time rather than a half-day window. Nothing states that the requested time is honoured.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the portal's own form markup in this run (the time select and the inspectionUnavailableDates check were both present in the page source). Held at 55: the presence of a time picker is a fact, but reading it as the authority's scheduling policy is inference, and no county document mentions same-day service or windows at all.
portal checked 2026-09-14 https://portal.iworq.net/WASHINGTONFL/permits/601
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Delegated - to Washington County, which performs its own. The Town of Caryville performs no inspections of any kind. Washington County's Building Department states that it 'is responsible for issuing Building Permits, Reviewing Plans, and Performing Electrical & Building Inspections and maintaining Contractors Licensing'. Florida's private provider route under F.S. 553.791 is also live here: the county's public permit list shows permits issued with an applicant recorded as 'J. CORB, LLC (PRIVATE PROVIDER GEORGE WILSON)'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe county statement is quoted from its department page; the private-provider evidence is a live permit record read in the iWorq portal in this run (permit 20262464, 18 Aug 2026). Held at 85 because no document addresses a solar final inspection specifically, and because the private-provider observation is one roofing permit rather than a published county policy.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/departments/building/about/
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
Washington County Building Department, 1331 South Blvd., Suite 900, Chipley FL 32428, 850-638-6195, permits@washingtonfl.com; Building Official Charles Vannatter, Office Manager Felicia Brown, Permit Technicians Jennifer Enck and Ann Baker; hours M-F 8-4. Fire review, if any is performed on a PV or ESS job, is the open question: Washington County Code s. 30-33 makes the Board of County Commissioners the fire AHJ for the unincorporated area and for those municipalities that elect in by official act of their governing body, and s. 30-34 has the AHJ designate a fire official. Caryville has no fire department of its own - the County Directory's fire list names Chipley VFD, Country Oaks VFD, Ebro VFD and Vernon VFD as separate departments with their own numbers, but the station serving Caryville is 'Hinson Crossroads, 850-415-5026, 5487 Douglas Ferry Rd., Caryville, FL 32427' on the Washington County Fire Services number. No official act of the Caryville Town Council electing into the county fire authority could be found.
Why the confidence is not higherNames, address and phone read from the Building Department page today; the fire picture from the County Directory page and codified ch. 30, both read in this run. The building/electrical half is solid. The fire half is expressly NOT established: Caryville publishes no ordinances at all (its website is dead and was only ever four pages), so the s. 30-33 electing act can be neither found nor ruled out, and the inference that the county fire official covers Caryville rests on the county running the station at a Caryville address on a county phone number.
department page checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/directory/
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
No solar sequence is published. The county's published Building Inspection Procedures list ten inspections, in this order, for NEW CONSTRUCTION: 1 temporary electrical service; 2 footer; 3 under-slab (rough-in plumbing); 4 floor slab; 5 concrete block building; 6 nailing and strapping; 7 dry-in (framing complete, plumbing top out, mechanical rough-in, electrical rough-in complete with panel set, roofing completed, brick tie); 8 insulation; 9 temporary/permanent power to certificate of occupancy; 10 final / certificate of occupancy. None of these maps onto a rooftop PV retrofit, for which the realistic sequence (electrical rough and final, or a single final) is not published.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ten-stage list is quoted verbatim from the county handout, revised 8/2024, extracted in this run. Held at 62 because the document is expressly a new-construction list - it opens 'The following shall be posted on job before any new construction may commence' - and the county publishes nothing at all about the inspection sequence for an alteration.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
For new construction, yes - a dry-in inspection is required at stage 7, taken before anything is covered, with the electrical rough-in complete and the panel set (breakers need not be installed at that inspection), and County Code s. 14-78 makes it unlawful to conceal any electrical wiring or equipment until it has been inspected. For a rooftop PV retrofit, no mid-roof or rough-in stage is published.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth the handout stage and the codified concealment rule were read in this run. Held at 65 because s. 14-78 is a general no-cover-before-inspection rule rather than a scheduled mid-roof stage, and because the published stage list does not cover alterations.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Not stated for labels specifically, but the county's own rules point that way. County Code s. 14-79 requires all electrical equipment to bear the manufacturer's markings and the underwriter's label, so listing is a codified compliance item the inspector is enforcing; the Building Inspection Procedures require a Product Approval Sheet to be on file in the Building Department before the floor slab inspection; and s. 14-78 requires the inspector, on finding work satisfactory, to place a notice or certificate at the service switch. No document says the inspector checks PV placards.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from two codified provisions plus the published inspection handout, all read in this run - not a statement by the authority. Held at 55 deliberately: the label question the survey is asking about is PV placards, and nothing in this authority's published material addresses them at all.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Yes. 'BUILDING INSPECTION PROCEDURES' (Washington County Building Department, revised 8/2024) is a published, downloadable inspection checklist: it lists what must be posted on the job before work commences, the ten required inspections with what each covers, the no-cover-before-inspection rule, and the re-inspection fee.
Why the confidence is not higherThe document was downloaded and read in full in this run. Held at 88 rather than higher because it is a new-construction checklist and there is no published checklist for an alteration such as a rooftop PV retrofit.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Posted on the job before any new construction may commence: the address, the prints, the inspection card, and the Notice of Commencement, with the permit board installed so that it may be viewed from the street. Proper permits (building, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, roofing) must be in hand before any inspection is made. A certified copy of the Notice of Commencement must be provided to the Building Department and posted on the jobsite before the first inspection can be performed, for any improvement with a construction cost of $2,500 or more. The Product Approval Sheet must be on file in the Building Department prior to the floor slab inspection, and the soil treatment sticker goes on the permit board.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the Building Inspection Procedures handout and from the Building Permit Application's Notice of Commencement paragraph, both read in this run. Held at 85 because the handout's framing is new construction, so which items the county insists on for a retrofit permit is not spelled out.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
$75. The fee schedule lists 'Reinspection Fee: Commercial & Residential $75', and the Building Inspection Procedures state: 'Any inspection that is not ready when the inspector gets to the site or inspections that fail will be required to pay a $75.00 re-inspection fee (Building Official will determine when this fee will apply).'
Why the confidence is not higherThe same figure appears in two independent county documents, both read in this run - the fee schedule and the inspection handout - and the handout also states the trigger and the discretion. Held at 90 because the schedule's header date (effective 09/01/2024) is older than its April 2026 republication, and the Building Official has express discretion over when the fee applies.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
By a posted notice at the service switch for electrical work, and by not proceeding. County Code s. 14-78(e): on inspection, if the work is satisfactory 'the inspector shall place a notice or certificate at the service switch or other suitable place stating that the electrical work has been inspected and found to be in accordance with the rules'; if it is not, 'the inspector shall post a notice or certificate stating that this wiring does not conform to this article, has been condemned, and shall not be covered or connected until approved by the inspector'. The inspection handout adds: 'DO NOT PROCEED with work until inspection is made and approved', and a failed inspection draws the $75 re-inspection fee. A re-submittal of rejected plans re-triggers the $35 non-refundable plan submittal fee.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted from the codified electrical article, the inspection handout and the fee schedule, all read in this run. Held at 72 because s. 14-78 is a 1980 electrical-specific procedure and the county publishes no general corrections-notice process, no correction-letter format and no re-inspection scheduling rule.
codified ordinance checked 2026-09-14 https://library.municode.com/fl/washington_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTICOOR_CH14BUBURE
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
For new construction, a Certificate of Occupancy: 'Building will be released for permanent power. Certificate of Occupancy can be picked up at the Building Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:00 pm the next business day.' For an alteration such as a rooftop PV retrofit, no CO is issued and what the installer gets is an approved final inspection - on the electrical side, the s. 14-78(e) notice or certificate posted at the service switch, which is also what the utility needs (see q62).
Why the confidence is not higherThe CO wording is quoted verbatim from the county's inspection handout; the alteration position is inference from the handout being a new-construction document and from s. 14-78(e). Held at 65 because the county has published nothing about what closes out an alteration permit.
authority handout checked 2026-09-14 https://washingtonfl.gov/site/assets/files/1683/building_inspection_procedures_8_2024-_ada.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
The installer or the member does, not the AHJ. WFEC's MOG Agreement paragraph 2(e) requires the member to submit 'documentation showing the MOG has been inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation', and the Compliance Form's Section F is signed first by the inspector ('1. Satisfies Code Requirements - Inspector Name / Inspector Signature') and then by the utility ('2. Satisfies Utility Requirements - Utility Rep Signature'), with paragraph 8 saying the co-op 'shall sign the F(2) of the Compliance section and return a copy to Member' on approval. Washington County Code s. 14-74 is consistent from the county end: 'Any new service or existing service that has been altered or repaired shall not be connected until a local utility company has received an authorized inspection certificate.'
Why the confidence is not higherBoth WFEC documents and the codified county section were read in this run. Held at 72 because s. 14-74 does not say WHO transmits the inspection certificate to the utility, only that the utility must have received it, and because the whole WFEC half is conditional on WFEC serving the parcel (q22) - if the meter is FPL, the PTO route was not established in this run.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-14 https://www.westflorida.coop/content/394/MOG%20Agreement%20Revised%20May%202025.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 78%
No. Neither Caryville nor Washington County specifies any placard wording of its own.
Size, colour & material 75%
No. No letter height, colour, material or durability specification is published by this authority or by the county.
Where they go 70%
No local rule on placement. The only positional requirements published by anyone in this chain are utility-side and concern hardware, not labels: WFEC requires the manual disconnect switch to be 'mounted separate from the meter socket' and 'readily accessible to Cooperative'; County Code s. 14-73 requires residential meters outside with the centre 4 to 6 ft above grade; s. 14-81 requires service disconnects and panels to be readily accessible and not in bathrooms.
What the utility wants on top 72%
For West Florida Electric: no, none beyond the NEC. WFEC's Agreement for Member-Owned Generation (revised May 2025) and its Interconnection Application and Compliance Form (revised 2025) contain no placard, label, warning or signage requirement at all - the only signage-adjacent requirement is that the manual AC disconnect be 'capable of being locked in the open position with a utility padlock'. For FPL, not established in this run.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.