Town of Orange Park
Town of Orange Park
Clay County
Town of Orange Park is a town authority in the State of Florida, serving 9,089 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Orange Park against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of Orange Park is the authority having jurisdiction 90% confidence
- Holds
- Building and electrical permitting for residential solar inside the corporate limits of the Town of Orange Park, held by the Town's own Economic & Community Development (ECD) Department / Building Division, plus zoning/LDR review and fire review. BUT THE TOWN HOLDS THE JURISDICTION WITHOUT HOLDING THE STAFF. Its own Inspections page states 'Building Inspections for commercial and residential properties within the Town of Orange Park are conducted by UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES. All permit applications should be submitted to the Town of Orange Park and our staff will coordinate with Universal Engineering Sciences during the inspection process.' The personnel line settles it - the discriminator named in the brief. The Town's adopted FY2026-27 budget shows the segregated Building & Permit Fund (Fund 106) with PERSONNEL SERVICES of $0.00 in every year FY2023-24 through FY2026-27, against 'PROF SVCS-INSPECTIONS' of $80,962 / $88,800 / $90,000 / $90,000; and the Position History Report gives the whole ECD department exactly three full-time posts - Economic Development Director, Planning & Permitting Coordinator, Events & Recreation Coordinator - with no building official, no plans examiner and no inspector. The ECD Director, Stephen Smith, is AICP-certified, a planner. The fee schedule prices 'Building Official Services $75/ per hour'. So the Building Official is contracted, and Orange Park is a wholly outsourced building department of the DeBary / West Park / Minneola type, with a new operator name for this survey: UES. FIRE IS IN-HOUSE AND CODIFIED. The Town runs its own Orange Park Fire Department (24 full-time posts including a Deputy Chief/Fire Marshal; Chief John Contestabile), and Code Sec. 22-24(a) names the fire AHJ by office: 'The chief of the fire department or his designee of the town shall be responsible for the enforcement of the Town of Orange Park Fire Prevention Code.' The Town also maintains a Firefighters' Pension Plan at Code Appendix D. The building permit application's fee box carries a separate 'OPFD Plans Review' line. Note that the Fire Prevention Code Fee Schedule at Sec. 22-27 is entirely occupancy-based commercial (licensed operating facilities, apartments, assembly, detention, industrial, mercantile) with no one- and two-family dwelling category and no PV line - so detached single-family solar does not appear on the fire review list. CLAY COUNTY DOES NOT PERMIT HERE. The county's own Building Division pages claim no municipal reach and make no jurisdiction statement; the Town issues, numbers, fees and finals its permits in its own name through its own iWorQ instance. One fossil to flag: Code Sec. 12-65(a), carried forward from the 1967 Code, refers to 'any additional fees incurred by the town resulting from services rendered by the county inspection personnel' - the parallel building-side clause at Sec. 12-19(e) has been modernised to 'authorized inspection personnel', which is what the county reference has in practice become. The county does retain School Impact Fees ($10,551 per single-family unit) and other impact fees collected through the Town, and the building application has a 'CC Plans Review' fee line whose scope the Town does not explain.
- Delegated to
- Plan review and inspection: UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES (UES), a private firm (corporate office 4205 Vineland Rd Ste L1, Orlando FL 32811), under contract funded at $90,000/yr from the Town's Building & Permit Fund. FS 553.791 private providers engaged by the contractor are also accepted, with a Notice to Building Official, Plan Compliance Affidavit, qualifications, $1M/$2M liability insurance and (new under HB 803, effective 1 Jul 2026) a signed Fee Owner Acknowledgement; private-provider inspections are booked by email to ecd@townop.com, never through the portal. A further electrical inspection is performed by the utility: the portal carries a dedicated 'Electrical - JEA Safety Ins' inspection type, and the Town states 'In the event of an emergency involving electric service that occurs after normal business hours, JEA has the authority to inspect the work and restore power.'
- Overridden by
- (1) FS 163.04(1) expressly prohibits the adoption of any local ordinance 'which prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors' - so no Orange Park board or design standard could be applied to bar rooftop PV; FS 163.04(2) likewise voids any HOA or deed restriction prohibiting solar, leaving an HOA only the power to specify roof placement 'within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south'. (2) FS 553.792 (as amended by ch. 2026-63) sets the permit-review clock the Town has not published one for: 5 business days for an existing single-family dwelling permit - electrical included - where the work is valued under $15,000, 30 business days otherwise, with a 10%-per-day fee reduction for missing it. FS 553.792(1)(d) also requires the Town to maintain an expedited-processing policy on its website; none was found. (3) The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and the Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition are adopted by FLOATING reference (Code Secs. 12-19(a), 22-22), so the code year is a state fact and changes in Orange Park automatically with no local instrument. (4) CS/CS/HB 803, effective 1 July 2026, creates the under-$7,500 single-family permit exemption - but it excludes electrical and structural work, so it never reaches a solar job. (5) THE UTILITY IS A REAL SECOND GATE AND HAS NO STATE FLOOR BENEATH IT. JEA is municipally owned and therefore sits outside FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 under Fla. Stat. 366.91: its own governing authority makes its rules. That is why JEA requires an external AC disconnect on EVERY residential system with no small-system exemption, where FPL's Tier 1 (<=10 kW) requires none.
- Why not higher
- The AHJ finding rests on Town instruments only: the codified Code (Municode content API, jobId 481049, Supplement 11, codified through Ord. 16-25 adopted 21 Oct 2025), the live iWorQ portal in the Town's name, the June 2026 fee schedule, and the adopted FY2026-27 budget with its segregated FS 553.80(7) building fund. The outsourcing finding rests on the Town's own Inspections page naming UES, corroborated independently by the $0 personnel line and the $90,000 contracted-inspections line in that same budget and by a Position History Report that lists every post in the department. Held at 90 rather than higher for three reasons. First, the FS 553.80(7)(b) utilization report itself was not located - the budget fund is a stronger instrument in substance but it is not that report. Second, the UES contract document was not retrieved, so the scope and start date of the engagement are not evidenced. Third, no real finaled permit could be pulled: the iWorQ public permit search is reCAPTCHA-gated and returned an empty table to every direct query, so the affirmative permit-record test recommended in the brief could not be run. The inspection-type dropdown was recovered in full as a partial substitute and contains no solar or photovoltaic type.
- Permit required
- Yes. A permit is required for residential rooftop PV. Code Sec. 12-64(a): 'A permit will be required to do any electrical construction of any character, install any electrical wiring,88%
- Permit cost
- No solar line exists on the fee schedule. A residential rooftop PV job is priced from the generic lines.70%
- Plan review
- The Town publishes no plan-review turnaround of its own. The binding floor is state law: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions,75%
- Portal
- iWorQ. Two distinct instances: permit and inspection lookup plus inspection requests at https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600,95%
- Electrical code
- NEC 2020. The Town adopts the NEC by reference with no edition named (Code Sec. 12-44, last amended 1987) and Sec.88%
- Own placard wording
- No for the Town. For the utility: JEA mandates EXACT wording only for cogeneration, not for behind-the-meter PV.85%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal or phone. The Town's own forms state: 'ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE CALLED FOR 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO (904) 264-2635 OR LOG ONTO: https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600'.92%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. A permit is required for residential rooftop PV. Code Sec. 12-64(a): 'A permit will be required to do any electrical construction of any character, Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate. A building permit and an electrical permit are separate instruments with separate applications and separate base fees. Q4 Plan review — The Town publishes no plan-review turnaround of its own. The binding floor is state law: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, Q18 Where you file — iWorQ. Two distinct instances: permit and inspection lookup plus inspection requests at https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600, Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. A permit is required for residential rooftop PV. Code Sec. 12-64(a): 'A permit will be required to do any electrical construction of any character, install any electrical wiring,88% source
- What it costs
- No solar line exists on the fee schedule. A residential rooftop PV job is priced from the generic lines.70% source
- Plan review turnaround
- The Town publishes no plan-review turnaround of its own. The binding floor is state law: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions,75% source
- Key document
- fee schedule + permit application cited by 4 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes - the Town of Orange Park is the AHJ for residential solar inside town limits. Permits are applied for, issued, fee'd and finaled in the Town's own name through the Town's own Economic & Community Development (ECD) Department / Building Division and the Town's own iWorQ portal instance. Clay County does NOT permit inside the town. 92% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both building AND electrical, held by the Town as the permitting jurisdiction - but the technical work is contracted out. Plan review and inspection are performed by UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES (UES) under contract; the Town's role is intake, fee collection, zoning/LDR review and records. Fire review/inspection is the Town's OWN Orange Park Fire Department (Code Sec. 22-24(a) names 'the chief of the fire department or his designee' as the enforcer of the Fire Prevention Code). JEA performs an additional electrical safety inspection on certain work. FS 553.791 private providers are also accepted. 90% · department page + adopted budget
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. A permit is required for residential rooftop PV. Code Sec. 12-64(a): 'A permit will be required to do any electrical construction of any character, install any electrical wiring, apparatus or equipment, or make any extension or changes to existing systems of wiring for light, heat or power within the limits of the town'. The new HB 803 minor-work exemption cannot be used: it excludes electrical work and structural work outright. 88% · ordinance + department notice
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate. A building permit and an electrical permit are separate instruments with separate applications and separate base fees. 90% · fee schedule + permit application
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No. There is no Town architectural or design approval step for a rooftop retrofit. The Town's Design Review Board function exists but its jurisdiction is enumerated exhaustively at LDR 2.08.06(c) and reaches only: '(1) New and newly sited single- and two-family dwellings as provided in section 2.05.19; (2) Garage and carport additions attached to single- and two-family dwellings...; and (3) Garage and carport accessory structures'. A PV array on an existing roof is none of those. On the private side, FS 163.04(2) bars any deed restriction or HOA from prohibiting solar collectors; an HOA may only specify the roof location 'within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors.' 88% · ordinance + state statute
- Is there a historic-district review? No. The Town has a Historic Preservation Board (Code Sec. 20-130, seated and active) but it is purely advisory: its duty is that it 'shall review and propose ordinances concerning historic preservation'. Secs. 20-131 through 20-139 are RESERVED - the operative provisions were never adopted. There is no certificate of appropriateness, no designated landmark or historic district, and no design guidelines in the Code. 85% · ordinance + board page + pending ordinance list
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No windstorm certification instrument of the Town's own. Statewide Florida Product Approval applies: the Town requires a PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SHEET (PAIS) 'As required by Florida Statue 553.842 and Florida Administrative Code 9B-72'. Orange Park is in Clay County and is therefore OUTSIDE the High Velocity Hurricane Zone, which is Miami-Dade and Broward only; no NOA is required. 75% · permit form
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No. Rooftop PV is not a listed conditional use and no council approval is required. The Town's conditional-use and variance route (LDR 2.08.14, heard by the Planning and Zoning Board) is not engaged by a rooftop retrofit, and Site Plan Review is expressly inapplicable: LDR 4.01.00 states the article's provisions 'are not applicable to existing buildings that are not proposed for new construction, additions, landscaping, or changes'. 72% · ordinance
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No Town cap. The cap is JEA's: under the DG Policy a system's Gross Power Rating must not exceed 90 percent of the customer's Utility Distribution Service Rating, and must fall in a defined range - DG-1 is 'Less than or equal to 2 MW'. For inverter-based systems GPR is calculated as installed DC nameplate x 0.85. JEA reserves the right to impose aggregate limits but states 'Currently, no aggregate JEA system load limit is proposed for interconnection of private solar'. JEA's TIIR adds that the customer pays a CIAC charge if combined DER (customer plus neighbours) exceeds 120% of the JEA transformer rating, and charges a $1,000 application fee for systems 100 kW and above. 85% · utility DG policy + utility technical requirements
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A master electrician / licensed electrical contractor. Code Sec. 12-64(b): 'Permits to do electrical work will be issued to master electricians who are duly qualified under the provisions of this article'. The Town's electrical application has dedicated 'Master's Name', 'Master's Signature' and 'ST License #' fields. A homeowner may alternatively self-permit under the owner-builder route (see q7). 85% · ordinance + permit application
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes. The Town requires contractor registration before permits can be pulled: a copy of the State of Florida contractor's licence, proof of general liability insurance, and proof of workers' compensation insurance or an exemption certificate, with the Town of Orange Park named as certificate holder. 92% · department page
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. A homeowner may self-permit and self-install on a one- or two-family dwelling for their own use, by completing and having notarised the Town's 'OWNER AS BUILDER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT' (the FS 489.103(7) owner-builder exemption). The Town's forms page asks directly: 'Are you the homeowner completing the work yourself? This form will need to be completed and notarized.' There is NO solar-specific carve-out excluding PV from the owner-builder route. 88% · notarised disclosure form
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? There is no PV-specific submittal checklist. The generic building-permit submittal, printed on the Town's own application under 'INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PERMIT', is: (1) two sets of complete plans and one floor plan; (2) survey of property; (3) pollution control form if applicable; (4) contractor's licence; (5) worker's compensation / liability insurance; (6) notice of commencement if applicable; (7) deed; (8) PDF; (9) two site plans. A Product Approval Information Sheet (PAIS) is also required under FS 553.842. The electrical permit application separately collects service size, feeders, and 'Motors or Generators' ratings. 75% · permit application
- How many copies, and in what format? Two sets of complete plans plus one floor plan, and 'PDF'. Applications may be submitted electronically through the Town's iWorQ permit-request portal (with the application attached), emailed as a PDF to ECD@townop.com, or delivered in person at Town Hall. 75% · permit application + department page
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Not required by any published Town document for a residential system. Note that the utility, not the Town, is where the diagram requirement sits: JEA's TIIR requires 'Electrical one line diagram required for review on residential services above 200A and all commercial services' - but that clause sits in section 4.3.1.1 Standby Generation, not in the behind-the-meter PV section 4.3.1.4, which routes design review through the PowerClerk application instead. 55% · permit application + utility technical requirements
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? iWorQ. Two distinct instances: permit and inspection lookup plus inspection requests at https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600, and permit-request submission at https://orangeparkpermitreq.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/orangeparkpermitreq. 95% · portal landing page
- Can the whole application be completed online? Partially. A permit request can be submitted online through the iWorQ citizen portal with the completed application attached, and inspections can be requested online. But the portal is a request channel rather than a full application: the Town equally accepts a PDF by email to ECD@townop.com or paper in person, private-provider inspections are expressly NOT to be scheduled through the portal (email only), and the public permit search is reCAPTCHA-gated. 80% · portal + department page
- What does a residential solar permit cost? No solar line exists on the fee schedule. A residential rooftop PV job is priced from the generic lines. ELECTRICAL PERMIT: $75 base fee, plus item 5 'Single unit or group of motors, generators and transformers... One hp or kw through five hp or kw (per hp or kw) $2.00; Five hp or kw through 30 hp or kw (per hp or kw) $1.00', plus item 6 'Service meter equipment and/or feeders: for each 100 amps or fraction thereof up to 600 volts $10.00' where the service is touched. BUILDING PERMIT (if required for the roof attachment): $75 base plus the greater of $0.18/SF or $4.00 per $1,000 of estimated value. Added to ALL permits: $20 Technology Fee, plus Radon at $4.00 or 2% of the permit fee if greater. Plan review is billed separately at $75/hour. 70% · fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Tiered / per-unit on the electrical side (a flat $75 base plus per-kW and per-amp increments), and valuation-or-area on the building side (flat $75 base plus the greater of $0.18 per square foot or $4.00 per $1,000 of estimated value). Flat add-ons: $20 technology fee on all permits, radon $4.00 or 2%. 85% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes. 'Plan Review Fee $75/ per hour' and 'Revised Plan Review Fee $75/ per hour' are separate lines under PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES, alongside 'Building Official Services $75/ per hour'. 88% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? The Town publishes no plan-review turnaround of its own. The binding floor is state law: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions, or deny 'Within 5 business days after receiving a complete and sufficient application, for an applicant using a local government plans reviewer to obtain the following building permits for an existing single-family residential dwelling if the value of the work is less than $15,000: structural, accessory structure, alarm, ELECTRICAL...'. If the work exceeds $15,000 the 30-business-day tier at (1)(a)2 applies. FS 553.792(1)(e) reduces the permit fee by 10% per business day of delay. 75% · state statute
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? 180 days. LDR 2.08.16.05: 'If the work described in any permit has not begun within 180 days from the date of issuance thereof, said permit shall expire... Work described in any building permit shall be considered to be in active progress when the permit has received an approved inspection within 180 days. A permit that has been suspended due to inactivity is eligible to be reactivated if it receives an approved inspection within ten days.' On the private-provider route the Town states separately that if any inspection is more than 180 calendar days from issuance or the last passed inspection, 'a repurchase of the permit will be required prior to any permit finalization actions.' 92% · ordinance
- Which utility handles interconnection here? JEA (formerly Jacksonville Electric Authority), a municipally owned utility of the City of Jacksonville. NOT Clay Electric Cooperative and NOT Florida Power & Light, neither of which appears anywhere in the Town Code. 95% · franchise ordinance + adopted budget + utility page
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Both ends. BEFORE installation: JEA's DG Policy requires that 'An application form must be submitted by the customer and approved by JEA prior to initiating installation or construction of any distributed generation system' (PowerClerk). AFTER the AHJ permit: the electrical work is permitted and inspected by the AHJ, the permit office then notifies JEA, a JEA engineer inspects the interconnection, and only then does a JEA meter technician fit the dual-register meter and the system may be energised. 90% · utility DG policy + utility page
28 questions answered against Town of Orange Park’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes - the Town of Orange Park is the AHJ for residential solar inside town limits. Permits are applied for, issued, fee'd and finaled in the Town's own name through the Town's own Economic & Community Development (ECD) Department / Building Division and the Town's own iWorQ portal instance. Clay County does NOT permit inside the town.
Why the confidence is not higherThree independent Town instruments: (1) Code Ch. 12 Art. II-III adopts the FBC and the NEC for the town and Sec. 12-20 makes 'the building inspector of the town' the administrator; (2) the Town runs its own live iWorQ permit portal at portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK; (3) the Town's own FY2026-27 budget carries a segregated 'Fund 106 - BUILDING & PERMIT FUND' receipting BUILDING PERMITS, ELECTRICAL PERMITS, TECHNOLOGY FEES and BLDG PERMIT SURCHARGES in the Town's name (FS 553.80(7) fee segregation). Not 100 because the Town holds the jurisdiction but performs none of the plan review or inspection itself - see q2/q52.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/building-inspections--permitting
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Both building AND electrical, held by the Town as the permitting jurisdiction - but the technical work is contracted out. Plan review and inspection are performed by UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES (UES) under contract; the Town's role is intake, fee collection, zoning/LDR review and records. Fire review/inspection is the Town's OWN Orange Park Fire Department (Code Sec. 22-24(a) names 'the chief of the fire department or his designee' as the enforcer of the Fire Prevention Code). JEA performs an additional electrical safety inspection on certain work. FS 553.791 private providers are also accepted.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's own Inspections page states verbatim: 'Building Inspections for commercial and residential properties within the Town of Orange Park are conducted by Universal Engineering Sciences. All permit applications should be submitted to the Town of Orange Park and our staff will coordinate with Universal Engineering Sciences during the inspection process.' and 'The Town also coordinates electrical permit inspections with JEA for certain types of work.' Corroborated by the budget: Fund 106 personnel line is $0.00 in all four years while 'PROF SVCS-INSPECTIONS' is $90,000, and the Position History Report shows ECD has exactly 3 FT staff (Economic Development Director, Planning & Permitting Coordinator, Events & Recreation Coordinator) with no building official or inspector. The fee schedule prices 'Building Official Services $75/hour', i.e. an hourly contracted official.
department page + adopted budget checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/inspections
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. A permit is required for residential rooftop PV. Code Sec. 12-64(a): 'A permit will be required to do any electrical construction of any character, install any electrical wiring, apparatus or equipment, or make any extension or changes to existing systems of wiring for light, heat or power within the limits of the town'. The new HB 803 minor-work exemption cannot be used: it excludes electrical work and structural work outright.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 12-64(a) is unambiguous on the electrical side. The Town's own HB 803 notice (created 30 Jun 2026, effective 1 Jul 2026) states the under-$7,500 exemption still requires a permit for 'Electrical, plumbing, mechanical, or gas work' and 'Structural work'. Not higher because no Town document names photovoltaic/solar PV anywhere - the conclusion is from the general electrical-permit clause, not a PV-specific rule.
ordinance + department notice checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH12BUBURE&productId=11379
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Separate. A building permit and an electrical permit are separate instruments with separate applications and separate base fees.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's Building Permit Application states on its face: 'I understand that a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRIC WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELLS, POOLS, FURNANCES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, AND AIR CONDITIONERS'. The fee schedule lists 'Electrical Permit $75' as a distinct ASSOCIATED PERMIT with its own base fee, and there is a separate 'APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL PERMIT' form. Fund 106 receipts BUILDING PERMITS and ELECTRICAL PERMITS as separate revenue lines.
fee schedule + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Permit_Fee_Schedule(4).pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A master electrician / licensed electrical contractor. Code Sec. 12-64(b): 'Permits to do electrical work will be issued to master electricians who are duly qualified under the provisions of this article'. The Town's electrical application has dedicated 'Master's Name', 'Master's Signature' and 'ST License #' fields. A homeowner may alternatively self-permit under the owner-builder route (see q7).
Why the confidence is not higherCode text and the form agree. Not higher because Sec. 12-64 is carried forward from the 1967 Code (Code 1967 Sec. 10-1) and uses the pre-DBPR term 'master electrician', while the current form asks for a State of Florida licence number - the practical test today is a state electrical contractor licence registered with the Town.
ordinance + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH12BUBURE&productId=11379
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes. The Town requires contractor registration before permits can be pulled: a copy of the State of Florida contractor's licence, proof of general liability insurance, and proof of workers' compensation insurance or an exemption certificate, with the Town of Orange Park named as certificate holder.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Town's Contractor Registration page states all three requirements and the certificate-holder address (2042 Park Ave). Not 95+ because the page does not give a registration fee, expiry or renewal cycle.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/contractor-registration
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes. A homeowner may self-permit and self-install on a one- or two-family dwelling for their own use, by completing and having notarised the Town's 'OWNER AS BUILDER DISCLOSURE STATEMENT' (the FS 489.103(7) owner-builder exemption). The Town's forms page asks directly: 'Are you the homeowner completing the work yourself? This form will need to be completed and notarized.' There is NO solar-specific carve-out excluding PV from the owner-builder route.
Why the confidence is not higherThe disclosure form is the Town's own, on Town letterhead, and states 'I understand that I may build or improve a one family home or two family residence'. The absence of a solar exclusion matters because two other Florida authorities in this survey (Orange City, Sebring) DO bar self-install for solar specifically - here the form carries no such line. Not higher because the form is dated Feb 2024 and its commercial threshold ($75,000) predates the current statutory figure, so the document is slightly stale.
notarised disclosure form checked 2026-09-13 https://townoforangefl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mwhite_townop_com/_layouts/15/download.aspx?share=EZW_hp3J9OFJsri9LkrsIPAB7H_ZuEJYhRaZJUUPdXBUHA
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
There is no PV-specific submittal checklist. The generic building-permit submittal, printed on the Town's own application under 'INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR PERMIT', is: (1) two sets of complete plans and one floor plan; (2) survey of property; (3) pollution control form if applicable; (4) contractor's licence; (5) worker's compensation / liability insurance; (6) notice of commencement if applicable; (7) deed; (8) PDF; (9) two site plans. A Product Approval Information Sheet (PAIS) is also required under FS 553.842. The electrical permit application separately collects service size, feeders, and 'Motors or Generators' ratings.
Why the confidence is not higherThe list is verbatim from the Town's own Building Permit Application (revised 9/8/2020). Confidence held down because the list is written for new construction and additions and nothing in it is tailored to a rooftop retrofit; a solar installer would be told at the counter which items actually apply.
permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://townoforangefl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mwhite_townop_com/_layouts/15/download.aspx?share=EUwo4a2JqvtMs01fuFwVSbABhWeTUIvmdO6OYcvpu8dX2g
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Two sets of complete plans plus one floor plan, and 'PDF'. Applications may be submitted electronically through the Town's iWorQ permit-request portal (with the application attached), emailed as a PDF to ECD@townop.com, or delivered in person at Town Hall.
Why the confidence is not higherCopies count is from the application's own required-information list; the three submission routes are stated verbatim on the ECD Forms & Applications page ('Completed applications can either be submitted here, a pdf copy emailed to ECD@townop.com, or in person at Town Hall'). Not higher because the paper 'two sets' line and the electronic route coexist on current pages without the Town saying which governs.
permit application + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/departments1/economic-and-community-development/economic--community-development-forms--applications
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo PV-specific site-plan requirement exists. The Building Permit Application's required-information list item 9 asks for 'Two site plans, showing dimensions & shape of the lot, location of buildings, layout of the trees, elevations and drainage ways and off-street parking or loading spaces as required under the provisions of Article II' - but that is written for new construction and additions, and LDR 4.01.00 (Site Plan Review) states its provisions 'are not applicable to existing buildings that are not proposed for new construction, additions, landscaping, or changes'. So for a rooftop retrofit the Town has published nothing, and for a ground mount the applicable requirement would be the generic accessory-structure siting rules at LDR 2.05.21.01 rather than a PV site-plan spec. Looked in: Building Permit Application, Electrical Permit Application, ECD Forms & Applications page, Permitting page, Bulletin List, codified LDR Articles II and IV.
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Not required by any published Town document for a residential system. Note that the utility, not the Town, is where the diagram requirement sits: JEA's TIIR requires 'Electrical one line diagram required for review on residential services above 200A and all commercial services' - but that clause sits in section 4.3.1.1 Standby Generation, not in the behind-the-meter PV section 4.3.1.4, which routes design review through the PowerClerk application instead.
Why the confidence is not higherProven absence on the Town side: the electrical permit application has no diagram field or attachment requirement, no checklist on the site mentions a one-line, and controlled search of the whole codified Town Code returned zero hits for 'photovoltaic', 'inverter' and 'rapid shutdown' while positive controls ('electrical' 71, 'permit' 818) passed and fabricated controls ('zzqqx', 'qwertzuiop', 'flurble') returned zero. Low confidence because JEA's PowerClerk application content could not be inspected (login-gated) and may itself demand a one-line.
permit application + utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://townoforangefl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mwhite_townop_com/_layouts/15/download.aspx?share=ETl8Z-7kBaBKuPvIpmnLc-QBcVwsViHkuy5ekRX_vlF58A
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedString and conductor calculations. The Electrical Permit Application collects conductor size, amps, copper/aluminium, switch/breaker rating, phases, wires, volts and raceway for a new service, and feeder counts and sizes - but asks for no calculations and requires no attachment. No checklist or bulletin mentions calculations. Controlled search of the full codified corpus: 'inverter' 0 hits, 'photovoltaic' 0 hits, positive controls 'electrical' 71 and 'permit' 818 passing, fabricated controls 'zzqqx'/'qwertzuiop'/'flurble' all 0. Looked in: Electrical Permit Application, fee schedule, Bulletin List, Code Ch. 12 Art. III, ECD forms page.
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedStructural PE stamp threshold. The Town sets none of its own for residential work: 'professional engineer' appears only four times in the whole codified corpus - twice for communication towers (EIA/TIA-222-F verification), once at LDR 4.07.00 for site plans subject to Section 4.01.00 (which excludes existing buildings not proposed for new construction), and once for a floodway no-rise certification. The Building Permit Application has a 'FLORIDA DESIGN PROFESSIONAL' block but no threshold stated. Whatever applies therefore comes from the FBC itself, not from Orange Park. Looked in: codified Code Ch. 12 and the full LDR under controlled search, Building Permit Application, fee schedule, Bulletin List.
https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIIILADERE_ARTIIZO&productId=11379
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedElectrical PE stamp threshold. No Town instrument names one; controlled search found no 'PE stamp' and no engineering threshold in Chapter 12 Article III. The governing rule would be FS 471.003(2)(h), which the survey baseline records at $125,000 / 600A with some local documents still citing an older $50,000 trigger - but no Orange Park document cites either figure, so the local position is genuinely unpublished rather than merely stale. Looked in: Code Ch. 12 Art. III, Electrical Permit Application, fee schedule, Private Provider Requirements, Bulletin List.
https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH12BUBURE&productId=11379
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
No solar line exists on the fee schedule. A residential rooftop PV job is priced from the generic lines. ELECTRICAL PERMIT: $75 base fee, plus item 5 'Single unit or group of motors, generators and transformers... One hp or kw through five hp or kw (per hp or kw) $2.00; Five hp or kw through 30 hp or kw (per hp or kw) $1.00', plus item 6 'Service meter equipment and/or feeders: for each 100 amps or fraction thereof up to 600 volts $10.00' where the service is touched. BUILDING PERMIT (if required for the roof attachment): $75 base plus the greater of $0.18/SF or $4.00 per $1,000 of estimated value. Added to ALL permits: $20 Technology Fee, plus Radon at $4.00 or 2% of the permit fee if greater. Plan review is billed separately at $75/hour.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery figure is quoted verbatim from the Town's own Application and Permit Fee Schedule (PDF metadata CreationDate 12 Jun 2026, so current) and each is independently confirmed in the codified fee text at Code Secs. 12-19(d) and 12-65(c). Held at 70 because the schedule has NO photovoltaic line: whether an inverter is charged under the 'motors, generators and transformers' line, and whether a building permit is pulled at all for a flush roof mount, are the Town's call at intake and are not published.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Permit_Fee_Schedule(4).pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Tiered / per-unit on the electrical side (a flat $75 base plus per-kW and per-amp increments), and valuation-or-area on the building side (flat $75 base plus the greater of $0.18 per square foot or $4.00 per $1,000 of estimated value). Flat add-ons: $20 technology fee on all permits, radon $4.00 or 2%.
Why the confidence is not higherDirectly from the fee schedule and codified at Secs. 12-19(d)(2) and 12-65(c). Not higher only because the question's single-choice options do not fit a schedule that is simultaneously flat, tiered and valuation-based.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Permit_Fee_Schedule(4).pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes. 'Plan Review Fee $75/ per hour' and 'Revised Plan Review Fee $75/ per hour' are separate lines under PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION FEES, alongside 'Building Official Services $75/ per hour'.
Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the current (June 2026) fee schedule. Not higher because the schedule does not say whether the hourly plan-review charge is applied to small residential permits in practice or only to projects that consume reviewer time beyond the base fee.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Permit_Fee_Schedule(4).pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
The Town publishes no plan-review turnaround of its own. The binding floor is state law: FS 553.792(1)(a)1 requires a local government to approve, approve with conditions, or deny 'Within 5 business days after receiving a complete and sufficient application, for an applicant using a local government plans reviewer to obtain the following building permits for an existing single-family residential dwelling if the value of the work is less than $15,000: structural, accessory structure, alarm, ELECTRICAL...'. If the work exceeds $15,000 the 30-business-day tier at (1)(a)2 applies. FS 553.792(1)(e) reduces the permit fee by 10% per business day of delay.
Why the confidence is not higherThe statute text was read live from leg.state.fl.us and its history line shows it was amended by ch. 2026-63, so it is current. Recorded at 75 not 90 because this is the state floor, NOT the Town's own published expectation - and FS 553.792(1)(d) requires the Town to 'maintain on its website a policy containing procedures and expectations for expedited processing', which was searched for on the permitting, building, inspections and forms pages and not found.
state statute checked 2026-09-13 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.792.html
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
180 days. LDR 2.08.16.05: 'If the work described in any permit has not begun within 180 days from the date of issuance thereof, said permit shall expire... Work described in any building permit shall be considered to be in active progress when the permit has received an approved inspection within 180 days. A permit that has been suspended due to inactivity is eligible to be reactivated if it receives an approved inspection within ten days.' On the private-provider route the Town states separately that if any inspection is more than 180 calendar days from issuance or the last passed inspection, 'a repurchase of the permit will be required prior to any permit finalization actions.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from the codified LDR (Supplement 11, codified through Ord. 16-25 adopted 21 Oct 2025) and corroborated by the Town's own current Private Provider Requirements sheet (PDF created 17 Jul 2026). Not 95 because the reactivation fee is said to be 'set forth by the Town Code' but no reactivation fee line appears on the fee schedule.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIIILADERE_ARTIIZO&productId=11379
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
iWorQ. Two distinct instances: permit and inspection lookup plus inspection requests at https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600, and permit-request submission at https://orangeparkpermitreq.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/orangeparkpermitreq.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth URLs are linked from the Town's own permitting page and both were fetched live and render Town-branded pages naming 'Orange Park'. The inspection-request URL is also printed on the face of the Town's Building Permit Application and its Electrical Permit Application.
portal landing page checked 2026-09-13 https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Partially. A permit request can be submitted online through the iWorQ citizen portal with the completed application attached, and inspections can be requested online. But the portal is a request channel rather than a full application: the Town equally accepts a PDF by email to ECD@townop.com or paper in person, private-provider inspections are expressly NOT to be scheduled through the portal (email only), and the public permit search is reCAPTCHA-gated.
Why the confidence is not higherAll four limbs are from the Town's own pages (ECD Forms page for the three submission routes, Inspections and Private Provider pages for the private-provider email carve-out) and from live fetches of both portal URLs. Not higher because whether fees can be paid online was not established - the fee schedule lists an 'OTH CUR CHGS - CONV FEE' line in Fund 106, which implies card payment, but no payment page was reached.
portal + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://orangeparkpermitreq.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/orangeparkpermitreq
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
JEA (formerly Jacksonville Electric Authority), a municipally owned utility of the City of Jacksonville. NOT Clay Electric Cooperative and NOT Florida Power & Light, neither of which appears anywhere in the Town Code.
Why the confidence is not higherSettled four independent ways, all first-party. (1) The Town Code's own Appendix A, Article I - ELECTRICITY is Ordinance No. 305 (7-22-1969), 'AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY... AN ELECTRIC FRANCHISE', granting 'the exclusive right, privilege or franchise' for four years and continuing 'on a year-to-year basis until terminated' on 90 days' notice; Section 8 has the Town agree 'not to engage in the business of distributing and selling electricity during the life of this franchise... in competition with the grantee'. It is the only electricity franchise in the Code - controlled search returned 0 hits for 'Clay Electric' and 0 for 'Florida Power' across the full 2.4 MB codified corpus with positive controls passing. (2) The Town's adopted FY2026-27 budget states 'Franchise fees collected by the Town of Orange Park include electric service (JEA)' and books $812,000 of FRANCHISE FEE - ELECTRICITY. (3) The Town's own FAQ: 'Who do I call about a street light out within the Town Limits? Contact JEA at (904) 665-6000.' (4) JEA's own Electric Systems page: 'JEA's service area covers approximately 900 square miles... covering most of Duval County and portions of Clay and St. Johns Counties.' The caller's Clay Electric hypothesis is disproved.
franchise ordinance + adopted budget + utility page checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=APXAFR&productId=11379
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Both ends. BEFORE installation: JEA's DG Policy requires that 'An application form must be submitted by the customer and approved by JEA prior to initiating installation or construction of any distributed generation system' (PowerClerk). AFTER the AHJ permit: the electrical work is permitted and inspected by the AHJ, the permit office then notifies JEA, a JEA engineer inspects the interconnection, and only then does a JEA meter technician fit the dual-register meter and the system may be energised.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth limbs are quoted from JEA's own current documents - the DG Policy PDF (effective 1 April 2018, still the live linked policy) and the Requirements After Installation page. Not higher because the archived capture of the Requirements page is 31 Jul 2026 (the live page is behind a JavaScript bot gate) though the text is unchanged across the March and July 2026 captures.
utility DG policy + utility page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Distributed_Generation_Policy/
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No. There is no Town architectural or design approval step for a rooftop retrofit. The Town's Design Review Board function exists but its jurisdiction is enumerated exhaustively at LDR 2.08.06(c) and reaches only: '(1) New and newly sited single- and two-family dwellings as provided in section 2.05.19; (2) Garage and carport additions attached to single- and two-family dwellings...; and (3) Garage and carport accessory structures'. A PV array on an existing roof is none of those. On the private side, FS 163.04(2) bars any deed restriction or HOA from prohibiting solar collectors; an HOA may only specify the roof location 'within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe DRB scope was read from the codified LDR and cross-checked against Bulletin B-03-21, which confirms the DRB gate applies to garage/carport work on single- and two-family dwellings (Ord. 15-21). The statute was read live from leg.state.fl.us. Not higher because the Town has no published statement that PV is outside DRB review - the conclusion is from the closed list in 2.08.06(c) and the scope clause in 2.05.19(b) ('shall apply to all new and newly sited single-family dwellings and garage and carport additions'), which is an inference from two code sections rather than an express exclusion.
ordinance + state statute checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIIILADERE_ARTIIZO&productId=11379
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No. The Town has a Historic Preservation Board (Code Sec. 20-130, seated and active) but it is purely advisory: its duty is that it 'shall review and propose ordinances concerning historic preservation'. Secs. 20-131 through 20-139 are RESERVED - the operative provisions were never adopted. There is no certificate of appropriateness, no designated landmark or historic district, and no design guidelines in the Code.
Why the confidence is not higherControlled search of the full codified corpus returned 0 hits for 'certificate of appropriateness', 0 for 'architectural review', 0 for 'appearance board', and the single 'historic district' hit is inside the HPB's own purpose clause; positive controls passed and three fabricated controls returned zero. The Boards & Committees page confirms the HPB is seated (five members, terms to 2029) and repeats the same purpose language with no review power. The pending/uncodified ordinance list was also checked: the Proposed Ordinances page shows only Ord. 12-26 (FY26/27 budget) pending and adopted Ords. 01-26 to 11-26, none of which touch design review, appearance or historic designation. Not higher because a board with 'historic aesthetic' in its charter could in principle be given teeth by a future ordinance.
ordinance + board page + pending ordinance list checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/government/town-council/boards--committees
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No windstorm certification instrument of the Town's own. Statewide Florida Product Approval applies: the Town requires a PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION SHEET (PAIS) 'As required by Florida Statue 553.842 and Florida Administrative Code 9B-72'. Orange Park is in Clay County and is therefore OUTSIDE the High Velocity Hurricane Zone, which is Miami-Dade and Broward only; no NOA is required.
Why the confidence is not higherThe PAIS form is the Town's own and is listed on the ECD forms page. Held at 75 for two reasons: the form's own citation to 'Florida Administrative Code 9B-72' is stale (product-approval rules moved to 61G20-3 years ago), and the PAIS category list has no solar or PV row at all - a PV racking system would have to be entered under 'F. Structural Components - 13. Other' or 'H. New Exterior Envelope Products', which is the installer's judgement rather than a published instruction.
permit form checked 2026-09-13 https://townoforangefl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mwhite_townop_com/_layouts/15/download.aspx?share=IQA2M_Kav0R6RZPb3P8PhOdLAZtw5lHRMcl2U81k1jqY9bo
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No. Rooftop PV is not a listed conditional use and no council approval is required. The Town's conditional-use and variance route (LDR 2.08.14, heard by the Planning and Zoning Board) is not engaged by a rooftop retrofit, and Site Plan Review is expressly inapplicable: LDR 4.01.00 states the article's provisions 'are not applicable to existing buildings that are not proposed for new construction, additions, landscaping, or changes'.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the codified LDR, with the Site Plan Review applicability clause quoted directly. Held at 72 because this is a proven absence of any solar-specific approval requirement rather than an express Town statement that no council approval is needed; a ground-mounted array large enough to read as a principal use has not been tested against the use tables.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIIILADERE_ARTIIZO&productId=11379
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No Town cap. The cap is JEA's: under the DG Policy a system's Gross Power Rating must not exceed 90 percent of the customer's Utility Distribution Service Rating, and must fall in a defined range - DG-1 is 'Less than or equal to 2 MW'. For inverter-based systems GPR is calculated as installed DC nameplate x 0.85. JEA reserves the right to impose aggregate limits but states 'Currently, no aggregate JEA system load limit is proposed for interconnection of private solar'. JEA's TIIR adds that the customer pays a CIAC charge if combined DER (customer plus neighbours) exceeds 120% of the JEA transformer rating, and charges a $1,000 application fee for systems 100 kW and above.
Why the confidence is not higherAll quoted from JEA's own DG Policy PDF and the current TIIR. Confidence is 85 rather than 95 because the DG Policy is dated effective 1 April 2018 and its 'no aggregate limit' statement is eight years old, while the TIIR (2025) was written under a newer regime; the two have not been reconciled by JEA.
utility DG policy + utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Distributed_Generation_Policy/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020. The Town adopts the NEC by reference with no edition named (Code Sec. 12-44, last amended 1987) and Sec. 12-45(a) says 'the latest edition of the National Electrical Code'; the operative edition therefore comes from the state. The Florida Building Code, Building, 8th Edition (2023) Chapter 35 Referenced Standards lists 'NFPA 70-20 National Electrical Code (NEC)'. 88% · adopting regulation + referenced standards
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023, together with the Florida Residential Building Code and Florida Existing Building Code. The Town's adoption FLOATS: Code Sec. 12-19(a) adopts 'the most current versions' and provides that state amendments 'shall automatically become effective within the town without further action by the town council'. 93% · adopting ordinance + department page
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition. Code Sec. 22-22 floats: 'There is hereby adopted the most current version of the Florida Fire Prevention Code... when the state legislature or the state fire marshal amends the Florida Fire Prevention Code, then those amendments shall automatically become effective within the town without further action by the town council.' Sec. 22-23 was last amended by Ord. No. 16-25 on 21 Oct 2025, so the chapter is live law, not a fossil. 90% · adopting ordinance + department page
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes, but none of them touch solar. The only real local amendments to the building code are floodplain: Code Sec. 12-19(b) expands FBC Building sections 107.6 and 117, adding 107.6.1 (permits may not be issued on affidavit for flood load and flood resistance requirements) and 117.1 (local floodplain variance procedure under FS 553.73(5)). A second, STALE adoption sits at Sec. 12-19(c), which adopts 'the Florida Model Energy Efficiency Code (including page 1-2A, but omitting page 1-2), published by the state energy office' - a document and a publisher that no longer exist, superseded by the FBC Energy Conservation volume. No local amendment anywhere addresses PV, rapid shutdown, roof access or placards. 85% · adopting ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and Florida Residential Building Code for the structural attachment, NEC 2020 for the electrical work, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition - all adopted by floating reference with no PV-specific local amendment. In practice the installation is also judged against JEA's DER Technical Interconnection and Interoperability Requirements (2025), which adopts IEEE 1547-2018 with 1547a-2020 for all DER interconnected to its distribution system. 85% · adopting ordinance + utility technical requirements
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
- What ridge setback and access pathways are required? No local ridge-setback or roof-access-pathway rule exists. The requirement is whatever the Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition imposes, adopted by floating reference at Code Sec. 22-22 and enforced by the Orange Park Fire Department under Sec. 22-24(a). The Town has adopted no amendment on the point and publishes no dimensions. 62% · adopting ordinance
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes - rapid shutdown is required, to the 2020 NEC (Article 690.12), because the 2020 NEC is the edition in force in Florida under the FBC 8th Edition (2023). The Town has adopted no amendment relaxing or altering it: 'rapid shutdown' appears nowhere in the Town Code. 78% · referenced standards + controlled code search
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? The Town of Orange Park requires NO placard of its own - there is no PV or ESS signage provision anywhere in its code, fee schedule, forms or bulletins. The requirement is JEA's. For behind-the-meter residential PV, JEA's TIIR section 4.3.1.4 states: 'A sign is required at both the utility and battery load disconnect locations. If the disconnect(s) are located more than 10 feet away or not visible from the meter, a separate sign is required at the JEA meter that either visually or clearly depicts in text the location of the disconnect(s).' 88% · utility technical requirements
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No for the Town. For the utility: JEA mandates EXACT wording only for cogeneration, not for behind-the-meter PV. Section 4.3.1.2 requires a cogeneration disconnect to be 'permanently labeled clearly stating “Cogenerator - JEA Disconnect Switch”'. For BTM PV and battery systems under 4.3.1.4 there is no mandated text: 'The description on the sign may be text or a visual depiction.' 85% · utility technical requirements
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Yes - JEA specifies the physical sign, identically in sections 4.3.1.2, 4.3.1.3 and 4.3.1.4: RED background, approximately 6 inches by 6 inches (4.3.1.2 says 'at a minimum, six inches by six inches'), 3/8 inch WHITE lettering, and 'comprised of metal, hard plastic, or weatherproof vinyl'. The Town of Orange Park specifies nothing. 90% · utility technical requirements
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Not required. Neither the Town nor JEA requires a site plan or facility-map placard. The Town has no PV signage provision at all, and JEA's TIIR requires only the disconnect-location signs described at q38 - including the 'visually or clearly depicts in text the location of the disconnect(s)' sign at the meter, which is a location pointer and not a facility map. Whatever NEC 2020 705.10 / 690.13 require as part of the adopted code stands on its own with no local or utility addition. 68% · utility technical requirements + controlled code search
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes, and the utility is the ONLY source of placard requirements here. Everything at q38, q39, q40 and q43 is JEA's; the AHJ requires nothing. This is the cleanest form of the split in this survey - a town with zero signage law sitting under a municipal utility with a detailed one. 90% · utility technical requirements
- Where must the labels be placed? At the utility disconnect; and at the battery load disconnect as well if a permanently mounted battery is present. If the disconnect(s) are more than 10 feet from the meter or not visible from it, an additional sign goes at the JEA revenue meter showing where the disconnect is. The disconnects themselves 'must be external, accessible, lockable with a JEA padlock (5/16” shank) and near the meter'. 90% · utility technical requirements
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? An external AC disconnect is REQUIRED for every residential system, with NO small-system exemption. JEA TIIR 4.3.1.4: 'For residential and commercial customers, these systems require a utility disconnect... These disconnects must be external to the home or facility... All isolation devices must be external, accessible, lockable with a JEA padlock (5/16” shank) and near the meter. If the disconnect switch(es) cannot be located visibly or reasonably near the meter, ensure there is a sign (provided by the contractor) at the meter... indicating where the disconnect switch is located... All other utility disconnects must be AC and at the facility voltage.' 92% · utility technical requirements
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Two overlapping regimes, neither of them the Town's own creation. Building components must carry statewide Florida Product Approval under FS 553.842, evidenced on the Town's Product Approval Information Sheet by manufacturer, product, code version, FL number and quality-assurance expiry. On the electrical side JEA requires DER equipment to meet IEEE 1547-2018 as amended by IEEE 1547a-2020: 'All DERs interconnecting under these TIIRs shall meet requirements as specified in IEEE 1547-2018 and be certified accordingly.' 78% · permit form + utility technical requirements
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Batteries are permitted. The Town imposes no condition of its own - there is no ESS provision in the code, no ESS line on the fee schedule and no ESS inspection type in the permit portal. JEA's conditions are specific: a SEPARATE battery load disconnect is required in addition to the utility disconnect (this 'also includes all stand-alone battery systems capable of V2H, V2G, and systems capable of islanding'); both disconnects must be external to the home, accessible and lockable with a JEA padlock; a sign is required at both; and 'Any residential systems with a battery, including V2H systems, require a scheduled safety inspection in PowerClerk (PV only inspections do not require scheduling with the customer/contractor)'. 85% · utility technical requirements + controlled code search
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No separate ESS permit or ESS inspection at the Town level: the June 2026 fee schedule has no battery or energy-storage line, and the iWorQ inspection-type list (40 types, read in full) contains no ESS or battery type. The separate inspection sits with the utility - JEA requires a scheduled PowerClerk safety inspection for any residential system with a battery, where a PV-only system needs no scheduled appointment. 72% · fee schedule + permit portal
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes - a ground-mounted array would be regulated as an accessory structure, since LDR 2.05.21.01 covers 'Accessory uses and structures... of a nature customarily incidental and clearly subordinate to a permitted or permissible principal use'. The generic accessory-structure rules would then apply: not in a required front or side yard in a residential district (with corner/through-lot exceptions); a detached accessory structure separated from the main structure by at least ten feet may sit in a required side or rear yard 'but not less than three feet from any lot line'; height capped at '16 feet in height or 70 percent of the height of the principal structure... whichever is greater'; and its impervious floor area counts toward lot coverage 'except for swimming pools and structures that do not have a roof impervious to weather'. 62% · ordinance
20 questions answered against Town of Orange Park’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
NEC 2020. The Town adopts the NEC by reference with no edition named (Code Sec. 12-44, last amended 1987) and Sec. 12-45(a) says 'the latest edition of the National Electrical Code'; the operative edition therefore comes from the state. The Florida Building Code, Building, 8th Edition (2023) Chapter 35 Referenced Standards lists 'NFPA 70-20 National Electrical Code (NEC)'.
Why the confidence is not higherThe FBC referenced-standards entry was read as code text this run, and floridabuilding.org states live today that 'The Effective Date for the Florida Building Code, 8th Edition (2023), is December 31, 2023' with a 2026 Update still in committee - so the 8th Edition, and with it NEC 2020, is still in force. Not higher because the FBC Chapter 35 text was read from the UpCodes mirror (codes.iccsafe.org is JavaScript/paywall-gated), and because the Town's own Sec. 12-44 names no edition, so a local official could in principle read 'latest edition' as something else.
adopting regulation + referenced standards checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-building-code-2023/chapter/35/referenced-standards
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), effective 31 December 2023, together with the Florida Residential Building Code and Florida Existing Building Code. The Town's adoption FLOATS: Code Sec. 12-19(a) adopts 'the most current versions' and provides that state amendments 'shall automatically become effective within the town without further action by the town council'.
Why the confidence is not higherSec. 12-19(a) quoted verbatim from the codified text; the Town's own Building Division page displays 'Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023)' as a tile; and floridabuilding.org confirms the edition and effective date live today. Not 95+ only because the floating clause means the answer changes automatically on the day the 9th Edition takes effect, with no local instrument to check.
adopting ordinance + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/building-inspections--permitting
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition. Code Sec. 22-22 floats: 'There is hereby adopted the most current version of the Florida Fire Prevention Code... when the state legislature or the state fire marshal amends the Florida Fire Prevention Code, then those amendments shall automatically become effective within the town without further action by the town council.' Sec. 22-23 was last amended by Ord. No. 16-25 on 21 Oct 2025, so the chapter is live law, not a fossil.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified text quoted verbatim, and the Town's Building Division page displays 'Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition' as a tile. Not higher because, as with the building code, the floating adoption means the edition is a state fact rather than a local one.
adopting ordinance + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH22FIPRPR&productId=11379
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes, but none of them touch solar. The only real local amendments to the building code are floodplain: Code Sec. 12-19(b) expands FBC Building sections 107.6 and 117, adding 107.6.1 (permits may not be issued on affidavit for flood load and flood resistance requirements) and 117.1 (local floodplain variance procedure under FS 553.73(5)). A second, STALE adoption sits at Sec. 12-19(c), which adopts 'the Florida Model Energy Efficiency Code (including page 1-2A, but omitting page 1-2), published by the state energy office' - a document and a publisher that no longer exist, superseded by the FBC Energy Conservation volume. No local amendment anywhere addresses PV, rapid shutdown, roof access or placards.
Why the confidence is not higherRead from the codified Chapter 12 and confirmed by controlled search of the whole corpus: 'photovoltaic' 0, 'rapid shutdown' 0, 'energy storage' 0, 'inverter' 0, 'solar collector' 0, against positive controls 'electrical' 71 / 'permit' 818 and three fabricated controls at zero. Not higher because the Town's Bulletin List is dated June 2022 and a newer administrative amendment could exist that is neither codified nor bulletined.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH12BUBURE&productId=11379
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and Florida Residential Building Code for the structural attachment, NEC 2020 for the electrical work, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition - all adopted by floating reference with no PV-specific local amendment. In practice the installation is also judged against JEA's DER Technical Interconnection and Interoperability Requirements (2025), which adopts IEEE 1547-2018 with 1547a-2020 for all DER interconnected to its distribution system.
Why the confidence is not higherEach limb has its own instrument (Code Secs. 12-19, 12-44, 22-22; JEA TIIR section 1.2). Not higher because the Town publishes no PV inspection criteria of its own, so what a UES inspector actually checks on a solar final is not documented anywhere public.
adopting ordinance + utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH12BUBURE&productId=11379
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedLocal rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing. Nothing local. The electrical fee schedule prices service work by ampacity (item 6: 'Service meter equipment and/or feeders: for each 100 amps or fraction thereof up to 600 volts $10.00') and the application has 'New Service' and 'Increase Service' checkboxes, but neither sets a rule. Code Sec. 12-45(a) says only that consumer wiring 'shall be installed and maintained in accordance with the latest edition of the National Electrical Code and local requirements'. JEA's TIIR addresses transformer and grounding compatibility (section 4.4) but not customer busbar sizing. Looked in: Code Ch. 12 Art. III under controlled search, fee schedule, Electrical Permit Application, JEA TIIR sections 4.3 and 4.4.
https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH12BUBURE&productId=11379
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedMounting system or attachment spacing. No Town requirement exists - the Product Approval Information Sheet has no solar or PV category and no racking row, and controlled search of the code found no attachment, racking or mounting provision for PV. Bulletin B-01-21 does impose roof-deck attachment and secondary water barrier requirements under FBC Existing Building 706.7.1 and 706.7.2, but that is a re-roofing mitigation rule and not a PV mounting spec. Looked in: PAIS form, Bulletin List, Code Ch. 12, full LDR under controlled search.
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
No local ridge-setback or roof-access-pathway rule exists. The requirement is whatever the Florida Fire Prevention Code 8th Edition imposes, adopted by floating reference at Code Sec. 22-22 and enforced by the Orange Park Fire Department under Sec. 22-24(a). The Town has adopted no amendment on the point and publishes no dimensions.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence proven by controlled search: 'ridge setback' 0 and 'access pathway' 0 across the full codified corpus including Chapter 22, with positive controls passing ('roof' 99, 'electrical' 71) and fabricated controls at zero. Confidence is deliberately low because this is a pointer to a state code this run did not open - the actual pathway dimensions were not read from the FFPC text, only established as not being locally modified.
adopting ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIITOCO_CH22FIPRPR&productId=11379
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Yes - rapid shutdown is required, to the 2020 NEC (Article 690.12), because the 2020 NEC is the edition in force in Florida under the FBC 8th Edition (2023). The Town has adopted no amendment relaxing or altering it: 'rapid shutdown' appears nowhere in the Town Code.
Why the confidence is not higherThe NEC edition is established at q29 from the FBC Chapter 35 entry 'NFPA 70-20', and the local-amendment absence is proven by controlled search. Held at 78 because the requirement is derived from the adopted edition rather than stated by any Orange Park document - no Town or UES handout mentions rapid shutdown at all. JEA's TIIR does reference RSDs, but only as an acceptable battery load disconnect, not as a PV requirement.
referenced standards + controlled code search checked 2026-09-13 https://up.codes/viewer/florida/fl-building-code-2023/chapter/35/referenced-standards
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
The Town of Orange Park requires NO placard of its own - there is no PV or ESS signage provision anywhere in its code, fee schedule, forms or bulletins. The requirement is JEA's. For behind-the-meter residential PV, JEA's TIIR section 4.3.1.4 states: 'A sign is required at both the utility and battery load disconnect locations. If the disconnect(s) are located more than 10 feet away or not visible from the meter, a separate sign is required at the JEA meter that either visually or clearly depicts in text the location of the disconnect(s).'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from JEA's current TIIR (PDF title 'JEA's Distributed Energy Resource (DER) Technical Interconnection and Interoperability Requirements', metadata CreationDate 4 Mar 2025, applying to applications received on and after 1 April 2025). The Town-side absence is proven by controlled search: 'placard' returns only three sign-ordinance definitions, and 'photovoltaic' returns zero. Not higher because JEA's PowerClerk application content is login-gated and could add site-specific signage conditions.
utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No for the Town. For the utility: JEA mandates EXACT wording only for cogeneration, not for behind-the-meter PV. Section 4.3.1.2 requires a cogeneration disconnect to be 'permanently labeled clearly stating “Cogenerator - JEA Disconnect Switch”'. For BTM PV and battery systems under 4.3.1.4 there is no mandated text: 'The description on the sign may be text or a visual depiction.'
Why the confidence is not higherBoth clauses quoted verbatim from the current TIIR. This is a meaningful distinction for label manufacture - a JEA job needs a sign meeting the physical spec, but the installer chooses the wording or a pictogram. Not higher because JEA field practice may impose a house style that the TIIR does not print.
utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes - JEA specifies the physical sign, identically in sections 4.3.1.2, 4.3.1.3 and 4.3.1.4: RED background, approximately 6 inches by 6 inches (4.3.1.2 says 'at a minimum, six inches by six inches'), 3/8 inch WHITE lettering, and 'comprised of metal, hard plastic, or weatherproof vinyl'. The Town of Orange Park specifies nothing.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim, three times over, from the current TIIR. Not 95 because 4.3.1.2 says 'at a minimum, six inches by six inches' while 4.3.1.4 says 'approximately 6”x6”' - a minimum in one clause and an approximation in the other, which matters if a sign is made to exactly 6x6.
utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Not required. Neither the Town nor JEA requires a site plan or facility-map placard. The Town has no PV signage provision at all, and JEA's TIIR requires only the disconnect-location signs described at q38 - including the 'visually or clearly depicts in text the location of the disconnect(s)' sign at the meter, which is a location pointer and not a facility map. Whatever NEC 2020 705.10 / 690.13 require as part of the adopted code stands on its own with no local or utility addition.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth absences are proven rather than assumed: controlled search of the full Town corpus (no 'photovoltaic', no 'placard' outside sign-ordinance definitions) and a full read of the TIIR's signage clauses. Held at 68 because the TIIR was read in full only for sections 4.3 and 4.4 plus keyword sweeps across all 45 pages - a facility-map requirement buried in the commissioning chapter cannot be entirely excluded.
utility technical requirements + controlled code search checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes, and the utility is the ONLY source of placard requirements here. Everything at q38, q39, q40 and q43 is JEA's; the AHJ requires nothing. This is the cleanest form of the split in this survey - a town with zero signage law sitting under a municipal utility with a detailed one.
Why the confidence is not higherEstablished by reading both sides: the full codified Town Code under controlled search (zero PV signage content) and JEA's current TIIR (detailed signage spec). Not higher for the same reason as q41 - the TIIR was keyword-swept rather than read line-by-line end to end.
utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the utility disconnect; and at the battery load disconnect as well if a permanently mounted battery is present. If the disconnect(s) are more than 10 feet from the meter or not visible from it, an additional sign goes at the JEA revenue meter showing where the disconnect is. The disconnects themselves 'must be external, accessible, lockable with a JEA padlock (5/16” shank) and near the meter'.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from TIIR 4.3.1.4. Not higher because 'near the meter' is not dimensioned - only the 10-foot trigger for the extra meter sign is.
utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Two overlapping regimes, neither of them the Town's own creation. Building components must carry statewide Florida Product Approval under FS 553.842, evidenced on the Town's Product Approval Information Sheet by manufacturer, product, code version, FL number and quality-assurance expiry. On the electrical side JEA requires DER equipment to meet IEEE 1547-2018 as amended by IEEE 1547a-2020: 'All DERs interconnecting under these TIIRs shall meet requirements as specified in IEEE 1547-2018 and be certified accordingly.'
Why the confidence is not higherBoth requirements quoted from the instruments themselves (the Town's PAIS form and TIIR section 1.2). Held at 78 because the PAIS has no PV category, so which FL approval number a racking system must carry is not something the Town tells the applicant.
permit form + utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://townoforangefl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mwhite_townop_com/_layouts/15/download.aspx?share=IQA2M_Kav0R6RZPb3P8PhOdLAZtw5lHRMcl2U81k1jqY9bo
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Batteries are permitted. The Town imposes no condition of its own - there is no ESS provision in the code, no ESS line on the fee schedule and no ESS inspection type in the permit portal. JEA's conditions are specific: a SEPARATE battery load disconnect is required in addition to the utility disconnect (this 'also includes all stand-alone battery systems capable of V2H, V2G, and systems capable of islanding'); both disconnects must be external to the home, accessible and lockable with a JEA padlock; a sign is required at both; and 'Any residential systems with a battery, including V2H systems, require a scheduled safety inspection in PowerClerk (PV only inspections do not require scheduling with the customer/contractor)'.
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from TIIR 4.3.1.4; the Town-side absence proven by controlled search ('energy storage' 0, 'battery' 4 hits all unrelated - assault and battery, e-cigarettes, RV equipment). Not higher because the Florida Fire Prevention Code's own ESS provisions apply through Sec. 22-22 and were not read this run.
utility technical requirements + controlled code search checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
No separate ESS permit or ESS inspection at the Town level: the June 2026 fee schedule has no battery or energy-storage line, and the iWorQ inspection-type list (40 types, read in full) contains no ESS or battery type. The separate inspection sits with the utility - JEA requires a scheduled PowerClerk safety inspection for any residential system with a battery, where a PV-only system needs no scheduled appointment.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth instruments were read directly: the full fee schedule text and the complete portal inspection-type dropdown. Held at 72 because a battery would still be permitted under the generic electrical permit and could attract an 'Electrical - General' or 'Other - Other' inspection, so 'no separate permit' is about the published schedule rather than about practice.
fee schedule + permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Permit_Fee_Schedule(4).pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes - a ground-mounted array would be regulated as an accessory structure, since LDR 2.05.21.01 covers 'Accessory uses and structures... of a nature customarily incidental and clearly subordinate to a permitted or permissible principal use'. The generic accessory-structure rules would then apply: not in a required front or side yard in a residential district (with corner/through-lot exceptions); a detached accessory structure separated from the main structure by at least ten feet may sit in a required side or rear yard 'but not less than three feet from any lot line'; height capped at '16 feet in height or 70 percent of the height of the principal structure... whichever is greater'; and its impervious floor area counts toward lot coverage 'except for swimming pools and structures that do not have a roof impervious to weather'.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery quoted rule is real codified text, but nothing in the Code names solar or ground-mount - 'ground mount' returns a single hit and it is about flagpoles. This is inference from the generic accessory-structure section, which is how a zoning official would most likely treat it, not a published Town position. The lot-coverage carve-out for 'structures that do not have a roof impervious to weather' is genuinely ambiguous for a tilted PV array and would need a counter determination.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIIILADERE_ARTIIZO&productId=11379
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
An external AC disconnect is REQUIRED for every residential system, with NO small-system exemption. JEA TIIR 4.3.1.4: 'For residential and commercial customers, these systems require a utility disconnect... These disconnects must be external to the home or facility... All isolation devices must be external, accessible, lockable with a JEA padlock (5/16” shank) and near the meter. If the disconnect switch(es) cannot be located visibly or reasonably near the meter, ensure there is a sign (provided by the contractor) at the meter... indicating where the disconnect switch is located... All other utility disconnects must be AC and at the facility voltage.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from JEA's own current TIIR. This matters commercially: JEA is a municipal utility and sits outside FL PSC Rule 25-6.065 under Fla. Stat. 366.91, so there is no state Tier-1 exemption beneath it - unlike FPL, whose Tier 1 (<=10 kW) needs no AC disconnect at all. Not 95 because the TIIR does not dimension 'near the meter' and leaves the 10-foot figure as the trigger for extra signage rather than as a placement limit.
utility technical requirements checked 2026-09-13 https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/JEA_DER_TIIR_web_version/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal or phone. The Town's own forms state: 'ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE CALLED FOR 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO (904) 264-2635 OR LOG ONTO: https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600'. The portal route requires an access code tied to the permit ('Need your access code? Email me my code'). Private-provider inspections are the exception and must go by email to ecd@townop.com, never through the portal. 92% · permit application + portal
- How much notice is required? 24 hours. 'ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE CALLED FOR 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE'. The operational form of this is stated on the Inspections page: 'All inspections must be requested by 5:00 p.m. Monday - Friday to be on schedule for the next business day.' The portal itself states '***Inspection requests are only accepted during business hours, Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:00pm***' and blocks weekend dates. 90% · department page + portal + permit application
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No AM/PM windows and no same-day service are published. The only scheduling granularity offered is next-business-day, requested by 5:00 p.m. The portal's date picker accepts a requested DATE only, rejects weekends ('Weekends are not available dates for inspections'), and carries an unavailable-dates list. 70% · portal + department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Delegated. The Town does not perform its own inspections at all - not for solar, not for anything. 'Building Inspections for commercial and residential properties within the Town of Orange Park are conducted by Universal Engineering Sciences.' Separately, JEA performs an electrical safety inspection on certain work, and the Town also accepts FS 553.791 private providers engaged by the contractor. 88% · department page + adopted budget
- If delegated, to whom? UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES (UES) - a private engineering firm, corporate office 4205 Vineland Rd Ste L1, Orlando, FL 32811, which offers 'Field Inspections & Code Compliance' as a service line and operates municipal permitting-and-inspection portals for Florida cities. This is a new name for this survey's list of private building-department operators (previously PDCS, SAFEbuilt, CAP Government, EPCI, Willdan, Alpha). 85% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? No PV-specific inspection sequence is published. The complete published inspection-type list from the Town's own portal (40 types, read in full) that could bear on a solar job is: Electrical - Rough, Electrical - Cover Up, Electrical - JEA Safety Ins, Electrical - Final, Electrical - Temp Power, Electrical - General; plus Building - Final, Building - Framing, Building - Nailing, Building - Roof/In-Progress, Building - Roof/Final, Building - Re-inspection; plus Fire - Other. There is NO solar or photovoltaic inspection type at all. 70% · permit portal
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Rough-stage electrical inspection types exist and can be booked - 'Electrical - Rough' and 'Electrical - Cover Up' - but no document says a rough-in is mandatory for PV. The one codified mid-work roof requirement is Bulletin B-02-21, 'Residential Roof-over Inspection Requirement: A roof-over requires a Pre-inspection for a roof recovery prior to installing a new roof' - that is a re-roof rule, not a solar rule. Code Sec. 12-65(b) supplies the stick: 'Fees for work covered up prior to inspection shall be twice the amount of the regular permit fee... The inspection shall require the covered work be exposed before reinspection.' 58% · portal + department bulletin + ordinance
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No. There is no published inspection checklist of any kind - solar or general. The Building Division publishes a permit fee schedule, a bulletin list (last updated 2022), an HB 803 exemption notice, a private-provider requirements sheet and a set of application forms; none is an inspection checklist, and there is no solar handout. 72% · department pages
- What must be on site at inspection? A certified copy of the recorded Notice of Commencement, before the FIRST inspection. The Building Permit Application carries the statutory warning: 'A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.' The permit itself must show fees paid, marked on its face (Code Sec. 12-65(a)). 75% · permit application + ordinance
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A passed final inspection. For work that creates or changes occupancy a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the ECD Director under LDR 2.08.17 ('No person shall use or occupy... until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued by the economic and community development department director'); the portal carries both 'Building - CO' and 'Building - Final' as distinct inspection types. On the private-provider route the closing instrument is a Certificate of Compliance submitted by the provider. 70% · ordinance + portal + department document
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? The AHJ. JEA's own Requirements After Installation page sets it out: 'Confirm that your electric contractor has notified the appropriate permit office for your system to be inspected. After the electric work is inspected and approved, THE PERMIT OFFICE WILL SEND JEA AN OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION. JEA WILL NOT PROCEED UNTIL WE RECEIVE THAT NOTIFICATION.' A JEA engineer then inspects the interconnection and a JEA meter technician fits the dual-register meter, after which the customer may energise. Energising early is penalised: 'If this occurs, JEA will discontinue electrical service to the location until the system is disconnected from the grid.' 90% · utility page
- Is there a re-inspection fee? Two different figures are in force and they do not agree. The current (June 2026) fee schedule and Code Sec. 12-19(d)(16) both say $75.00 - the schedule phrasing is 'Re-inspection or cancellation w/out notice $75/ per hour' and the code phrasing is 'Reinspection or additional inspection due to delay or not being ready .....75.00'. But the ELECTRICAL fee section, Code Sec. 12-65(c)(9), says 'Additional inspection due to delay or not being ready .....50.00', and that $50 line is reproduced in the fee schedule's own electrical block. Separately, Sec. 12-65(b) doubles the permit fee where work was covered up before inspection. 80% · fee schedule + ordinance
14 questions answered against Town of Orange Park’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal or phone. The Town's own forms state: 'ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE CALLED FOR 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO (904) 264-2635 OR LOG ONTO: https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600'. The portal route requires an access code tied to the permit ('Need your access code? Email me my code'). Private-provider inspections are the exception and must go by email to ecd@townop.com, never through the portal.
Why the confidence is not higherThe phone-or-portal instruction is printed on the face of both the Building Permit Application and the Electrical Permit Application, and the portal was fetched live and renders the request form. Not higher because the Electrical Permit Application (dated 4-6-15) still prints the older URL townoforangepark.com/inspections rather than the iWorQ link.
permit application + portal checked 2026-09-13 https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
24 hours. 'ALL INSPECTIONS MUST BE CALLED FOR 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE'. The operational form of this is stated on the Inspections page: 'All inspections must be requested by 5:00 p.m. Monday - Friday to be on schedule for the next business day.' The portal itself states '***Inspection requests are only accepted during business hours, Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:00pm***' and blocks weekend dates.
Why the confidence is not higherThree concordant Town sources - the permit applications, the Inspections page, and the live portal banner and date validator. Not higher because the applications say 24 hours while the Inspections page says 5:00 p.m. for the next business day, which are not quite the same cut-off.
department page + portal + permit application checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/inspections
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
No AM/PM windows and no same-day service are published. The only scheduling granularity offered is next-business-day, requested by 5:00 p.m. The portal's date picker accepts a requested DATE only, rejects weekends ('Weekends are not available dates for inspections'), and carries an unavailable-dates list.
Why the confidence is not higherEstablished by reading the live portal's request form and its JavaScript date validator plus the Inspections page. Held at 70 because this is an absence of published windows rather than a Town statement that none are offered - a caller to (904) 264-2635 might well be given a morning or afternoon.
portal + department page checked 2026-09-13 https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Delegated. The Town does not perform its own inspections at all - not for solar, not for anything. 'Building Inspections for commercial and residential properties within the Town of Orange Park are conducted by Universal Engineering Sciences.' Separately, JEA performs an electrical safety inspection on certain work, and the Town also accepts FS 553.791 private providers engaged by the contractor.
Why the confidence is not higherThe Inspections page is the Town's own and states it in terms. The budget corroborates decisively: the Building & Permit Fund's PERSONNEL SERVICES line is $0.00 across FY2023-24 actual through FY2026-27 budget while 'PROF SVCS-INSPECTIONS' runs $80,962 / $88,800 / $90,000 / $90,000, and the Position History Report shows no building official or inspector among ECD's three full-time posts. Not higher because the contract itself was not retrieved, so the scope and start date of the UES engagement are not documented here.
department page + adopted budget checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/inspections
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES (UES) - a private engineering firm, corporate office 4205 Vineland Rd Ste L1, Orlando, FL 32811, which offers 'Field Inspections & Code Compliance' as a service line and operates municipal permitting-and-inspection portals for Florida cities. This is a new name for this survey's list of private building-department operators (previously PDCS, SAFEbuilt, CAP Government, EPCI, Willdan, Alpha).
Why the confidence is not higherNamed by the Town on its own Inspections page; the firm's existence, Florida base and building-code service line were confirmed independently from teamues.com. Not higher because the Town does not say whether UES also performs the plan review and supplies the Building Official, though the fee schedule's 'Building Official Services $75/ per hour' line and the Private Provider Requirements sheet's reference to 'the Town of Orange Park's Building Official' together imply a contracted official.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/business/inspections
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
No PV-specific inspection sequence is published. The complete published inspection-type list from the Town's own portal (40 types, read in full) that could bear on a solar job is: Electrical - Rough, Electrical - Cover Up, Electrical - JEA Safety Ins, Electrical - Final, Electrical - Temp Power, Electrical - General; plus Building - Final, Building - Framing, Building - Nailing, Building - Roof/In-Progress, Building - Roof/Final, Building - Re-inspection; plus Fire - Other. There is NO solar or photovoltaic inspection type at all.
Why the confidence is not higherThe list was read directly from the live portal's inspection-request dropdown, so it is an exact enumeration of what the Town's system can book. Held at 70 because the ORDER for a PV job is not published anywhere and has to be inferred; the presence of a dedicated 'Electrical - JEA Safety Ins' type is the notable find, corroborating the Town's statement that it coordinates electrical inspections with JEA.
permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://portal.iworq.net/ORANGEPARK/permits/600
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Rough-stage electrical inspection types exist and can be booked - 'Electrical - Rough' and 'Electrical - Cover Up' - but no document says a rough-in is mandatory for PV. The one codified mid-work roof requirement is Bulletin B-02-21, 'Residential Roof-over Inspection Requirement: A roof-over requires a Pre-inspection for a roof recovery prior to installing a new roof' - that is a re-roof rule, not a solar rule. Code Sec. 12-65(b) supplies the stick: 'Fees for work covered up prior to inspection shall be twice the amount of the regular permit fee... The inspection shall require the covered work be exposed before reinspection.'
Why the confidence is not higherThe inspection types are from the live portal, the bulletin from the Town's own Bulletin List PDF, and the cover-up penalty from the codified fee section. Low confidence because the question is whether a rough-in is REQUIRED for PV and no document answers that; the components are real but the conclusion for solar is not published.
portal + department bulletin + ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Town_of_Orange_Park_Bulletin.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedWhether the inspector verifies labels and listings. Nothing is published on what is checked at any inspection. The Town performs no inspections itself (they are contracted to Universal Engineering Sciences) and publishes no inspection criteria, checklist or report template; the iWorQ inspection-type list gives type names only, with no scope. UES publishes nothing address-specific. Looked in: Inspections page, Permitting page, Building Division page, Bulletin List, fee schedule, the live iWorQ portal, and teamues.com.
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No. There is no published inspection checklist of any kind - solar or general. The Building Division publishes a permit fee schedule, a bulletin list (last updated 2022), an HB 803 exemption notice, a private-provider requirements sheet and a set of application forms; none is an inspection checklist, and there is no solar handout.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery Building Division page on the site was enumerated from the sitemap and by following links off the permitting page - Building Division, Permitting, Inspections, Private Providers, Contractor Registration, Post-Storm Permitting Plan, ECD Forms & Applications - and each was fetched and read. Held at 72 because the Town's sitemap.xml is incomplete (it omits /p/business/permitting and /p/business/inspections, both of which exist), so an unlinked checklist page cannot be fully excluded.
department pages checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townoforangepark.com/p/departments1/economic-and-community-development/economic--community-development-forms--applications
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
A certified copy of the recorded Notice of Commencement, before the FIRST inspection. The Building Permit Application carries the statutory warning: 'A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MUST BE RECORDED AND POSTED ON THE JOB SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.' The permit itself must show fees paid, marked on its face (Code Sec. 12-65(a)).
Why the confidence is not higherThe NOC requirement is printed on the Town's own application. Held at 75 because FS 713.13 only triggers the NOC above a value threshold, and a small rooftop PV job may fall below it - the Town does not publish where it draws that line.
permit application + ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://townoforangefl-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mwhite_townop_com/_layouts/15/download.aspx?share=EUwo4a2JqvtMs01fuFwVSbABhWeTUIvmdO6OYcvpu8dX2g
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Two different figures are in force and they do not agree. The current (June 2026) fee schedule and Code Sec. 12-19(d)(16) both say $75.00 - the schedule phrasing is 'Re-inspection or cancellation w/out notice $75/ per hour' and the code phrasing is 'Reinspection or additional inspection due to delay or not being ready .....75.00'. But the ELECTRICAL fee section, Code Sec. 12-65(c)(9), says 'Additional inspection due to delay or not being ready .....50.00', and that $50 line is reproduced in the fee schedule's own electrical block. Separately, Sec. 12-65(b) doubles the permit fee where work was covered up before inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherAll three figures were read from the primary instruments - the fee schedule PDF and the codified Chapter 12 - and they genuinely conflict: building re-inspection $75, electrical re-inspection $50. Recorded as a discrepancy rather than resolved, per the rule on conflicting local documents. Not higher because the fee schedule's '$75/ per hour' wording introduces a third reading (hourly rather than flat).
fee schedule + ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://cdn.saffire.com/files.ashx?t=fg&rid=TheTownOrngPark&f=Permit_Fee_Schedule(4).pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedHow corrections are issued and cleared. No Town document describes a correction notice, a re-submittal route or a clearance procedure. The nearest published items are the re-inspection fee lines (Code Secs. 12-19(d)(16) and 12-65(c)(9)) and, for the private-provider route only, the 48-hour email reporting rule and Certificate of Compliance procedure. The iWorQ portal's public view offers an inspection-request form and a reCAPTCHA-gated permit search, and does not expose inspection results without a permit access code. Looked in: Inspections page, Private Provider page and Requirements sheet, Bulletin List, fee schedule, the live portal.
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A passed final inspection. For work that creates or changes occupancy a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the ECD Director under LDR 2.08.17 ('No person shall use or occupy... until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued by the economic and community development department director'); the portal carries both 'Building - CO' and 'Building - Final' as distinct inspection types. On the private-provider route the closing instrument is a Certificate of Compliance submitted by the provider.
Why the confidence is not higherThe CO provision is codified text, the two inspection types are from the live portal, and the Certificate of Compliance is named on the Town's own Private Provider Requirements sheet. Held at 70 because a rooftop PV retrofit does not change occupancy, so which of Final / Certificate of Completion the Town actually issues on a solar job is not published.
ordinance + portal + department document checked 2026-09-13 https://api.municode.com/CodesContent?jobId=481049&nodeId=PTIIILADERE_ARTIIZO&productId=11379
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
The AHJ. JEA's own Requirements After Installation page sets it out: 'Confirm that your electric contractor has notified the appropriate permit office for your system to be inspected. After the electric work is inspected and approved, THE PERMIT OFFICE WILL SEND JEA AN OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION. JEA WILL NOT PROCEED UNTIL WE RECEIVE THAT NOTIFICATION.' A JEA engineer then inspects the interconnection and a JEA meter technician fits the dual-register meter, after which the customer may energise. Energising early is penalised: 'If this occurs, JEA will discontinue electrical service to the location until the system is disconnected from the grid.'
Why the confidence is not higherQuoted verbatim from JEA's own page. This is the third Florida utility in this survey to place the power-release notification duty on the AHJ rather than the installer, after Lynn Haven and Belle Glade. Not higher because the page was read from a 31 July 2026 Wayback capture - the live page sits behind a JavaScript bot gate - though the text is identical in the 7 March 2026 capture, so it has been stable across five months.
utility page checked 2026-09-13 https://web.archive.org/web/20260731142203/https://www.jea.com/Environment/Solar_Options/Distributed_Generation/Requirements_After_Installation/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 85%
No for the Town. For the utility: JEA mandates EXACT wording only for cogeneration, not for behind-the-meter PV. Section 4.3.1.2 requires a cogeneration disconnect to be 'permanently labeled clearly stating “Cogenerator - JEA Disconnect Switch”'. For BTM PV and battery systems under 4.3.1.4 there is no mandated text: 'The description on the sign may be text or a visual depiction.'
Size, colour & material 90%
Yes - JEA specifies the physical sign, identically in sections 4.3.1.2, 4.3.1.3 and 4.3.1.4: RED background, approximately 6 inches by 6 inches (4.3.1.2 says 'at a minimum, six inches by six inches'), 3/8 inch WHITE lettering, and 'comprised of metal, hard plastic, or weatherproof vinyl'. The Town of Orange Park specifies nothing.
Where they go 90%
At the utility disconnect; and at the battery load disconnect as well if a permanently mounted battery is present. If the disconnect(s) are more than 10 feet from the meter or not visible from it, an additional sign goes at the JEA revenue meter showing where the disconnect is. The disconnects themselves 'must be external, accessible, lockable with a JEA padlock (5/16” shank) and near the meter'.
What the utility wants on top 90%
Yes, and the utility is the ONLY source of placard requirements here. Everything at q38, q39, q40 and q43 is JEA's; the AHJ requires nothing. This is the cleanest form of the split in this survey - a town with zero signage law sitting under a municipal utility with a detailed one.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.