Town of Pomona Park
Town of Pomona Park
Putnam County
Town of Pomona Park is a town authority in the State of Florida, serving 784 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Pomona Park against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of Pomona Park is not the permitting authority for residential solar here 58% confidence
- Holds
- Zoning determinations (its own Residential/Commercial/Agricultural Zoning Letters, reviewed by a 'Town Zoning Officer'), code enforcement, and (per its Comprehensive Plan) conservation/floodplain land-use classification. Building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and gas permitting show no town-side capacity at all -- no form, no dedicated fee line, no staff -- and are treated here as delegated in practice to Putnam County, consistent with (but not as explicitly conceded as) the pattern already filed for Interlachen.
- Delegated to
- Putnam County Planning, Building and Zoning Department -- inferred from a four-part absence test on the Town's own current materials (no building-permit form, no distinguishable building-permit fee/revenue line, no Building Department expenditure category in any published budget year, no Building Official/Inspector/Plan Reviewer in the Town's own staff directory) plus Pomona Park's absence from the floridabuilding.org statewide register (392 entries, positive controls behaving as expected) and Putnam County's own current Building Department page, which lists Pomona Park among five towns with 'no inter-local agreements for services.' Corroborated independently, in a completely different municipal-service domain, by Putnam County's own Solid Waste Special Assessments schedule (Exhibit K of its current fee resolution), which groups 'Unincorporated Areas (Including Welaka, Pomona Park, and Interlachen)' as a single rate class distinct from 'Incorporated Areas (Palatka and Crescent City)' -- i.e., the County's own fee-setting document treats Pomona Park as functionally unincorporated for at least one other core municipal function, not just building.
- Overridden by
- FS 163.04 bars any HOA, deed-restriction, or architectural/historic review body from prohibiting or effectively prohibiting solar collectors regardless of which government issues the underlying permit; the only reserved discretion is roof placement within a 45-degree arc of due south where that does not impair operation. No HOA/architectural board was found for Pomona Park (q24), so this mainly matters if one is later found in the unreachable Zoning Ordinance/LDC.
- Why not higher
- PUTNAM COUNTY HAS A NAMED, STANDING FIVE-CITY CONFLICT ON THIS EXACT QUESTION, AND POMONA PARK IS THE FOURTH CITY ON THAT LIST NOW CHECKED (after Palatka [133, confidence 55, contested/on-register], Crescent City [273, confidence 50, contested/on-register], and Interlachen [285, confidence 60, off-register, town's own Comp Plan concedes delegation verbatim]). Pomona Park's OWN evidence is a genuinely mixed picture relative to the caller's standing hypothesis (that 'no inter-local agreements' is about formal INSTRUMENTS rather than about who issues permits, and that a county can be the building authority by DEFAULT where a town never built its own capacity, with no document existing to disclaim because none is needed): ON THE SIDE OF THE HYPOTHESIS -- Pomona Park is ABSENT from the statewide register (re-verified first-hand today, not inherited: 392 entries, positive controls Polk City/Crescent City/Palatka/Welaka all present, Pomona Park and Interlachen both absent); its own current Staff Directory (fetched fresh today) names seven positions and NONE is a Building Official, Inspector, or Plan Reviewer; its own Forms page offers three Zoning Letters and NO Building Permit Application; its own three published Budget Summaries (FY2020-21 through FY2022-23, the only years published) show a flat, trivial $500/year 'Permit Fees' line and literally no Building Department expenditure category in any year, in a budget rolled into just five broad categories; its own Zoning Letter site-plan checklist requires compliance with 'Putnam County Land Development Code section 7.02.02' for floor-area-ratio and impervious-surface calculations, meaning the Town's own zoning process borrows the COUNTY's development standards rather than maintaining independent ones; and Putnam County's OWN Solid Waste fee schedule (an entirely separate municipal function, found independently this run) groups Pomona Park together with Welaka and Interlachen as functionally 'Unincorporated Areas,' distinct from Palatka/Crescent City's 'Incorporated Areas' tier -- suggesting the county treats this specific set of towns as lacking independent municipal infrastructure across MULTIPLE domains, not just building, which is exactly the shape the default-authority hypothesis predicts (no instrument needed because the town never built the capacity an instrument would have transferred). AGAINST (or at least COMPLICATING) THE HYPOTHESIS -- unlike Interlachen, Pomona Park's own adopted Comprehensive Plan contains NO verbatim statement naming Putnam County as the building-permit issuer; instead it repeatedly assumes, in its Capital Improvements element, that 'the Town Building Official' issues building permits, development orders, and certificates of concurrency (Policies H.1.4.2, H.1.6.2, H.1.7.1, H.1.7.6, H.1.7.9, H.1.7.11) -- language that, if taken at face value, would mean the Town has its own building authority. This run reads that language as likely-unimplemented boilerplate (it never corresponds to any staffed position anywhere else on the Town's site, and the same Comprehensive Plan elsewhere merely lists 'the County Building Department' among entities to 'coordinate' with, alongside the County School Board and Sheriff's Office -- genuinely separate county bodies the Town plainly does not operate, which is weaker, more ambiguous language than Interlachen's explicit 'in issuing building permits for the Town of Interlachen' concession) -- but this run did NOT confirm that reading against an independent source (e.g., a direct statement from the Town or County that the 'Town Building Official' language is vestigial), so it is flagged rather than resolved. NET: on the caller's specific four-part evidentiary test ('a permitting town has FORMS, a FEE LINE, a REVENUE LINE and a PERSON'), Pomona Park fails all four more cleanly than either Palatka or Crescent City (both of which are at least on the register), and as cleanly as Interlachen -- but Pomona Park lacks Interlachen's single strongest piece of evidence, an explicit town-document concession, so confidence is set to 58, essentially even with Interlachen's 60 (slightly lower for the missing explicit concession, offset by the additional independent solid-waste corroboration Interlachen's file does not have). THIS RUN'S OWN EVIDENCE, TAKEN AS A WHOLE, SUPPORTS THE HYPOTHESIS RATHER THAN UNDERCUTTING OR BEING SILENT ON IT: no formal interlocal instrument was found or was expected to be found, and the independent solid-waste-schedule corroboration is a genuinely new data point (not available from the Palatka/Crescent City/Interlachen files) suggesting the county's role here is a general default-service pattern across functions rather than a building-specific arrangement. This is reported as this run's own finding, not as the confirmed truth of the caller's hypothesis, which remains a hypothesis.
- Permit required
- Yes, by strong inference from the same county documents applicable if delegation holds: Putnam County's 'When is a Permit Required' brochure lists 'Adding New Wiring,65%
- Permit cost
- No PV-specific fee line exists anywhere reached: not in Putnam County's current fee resolution (all 14 exhibits, OCR'd, 'permit' passing positive control at 104 hits,55%
- Plan review
- No Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific turnaround is published for either the Town's zoning-letter step or the county's building-permit step;55%
- Portal
- CitizenServe is the platform Putnam County's own current Building Department page advertises ('Online Permitting (Citizenserve)'),60%
- Booking an inspection
- If Putnam County processes the permit: primarily through the online permit portal (dead, see q20), with an email fallback -- Putnam County's Building Department page states,55%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes, by strong inference from the same county documents applicable if delegation holds: Putnam County's 'When is a Permit Required' brochure lists 'Adding New… Q3 Electrical and building permits — Ambiguous / can be either, on the same county fee resolution that would govern if delegation holds: Putnam's current fee resolution prices a 'Small Scope Project'… Q4 Plan review — No Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific turnaround is published for either the Town's zoning-letter step or the county's building-permit step; Q18 Where you file — CitizenServe is the platform Putnam County's own current Building Department page advertises ('Online Permitting (Citizenserve)'), Q20
- Permit required
- Yes, by strong inference from the same county documents applicable if delegation holds: Putnam County's 'When is a Permit Required' brochure lists 'Adding New Wiring,65% source
- What it costs
- No PV-specific fee line exists anywhere reached: not in Putnam County's current fee resolution (all 14 exhibits, OCR'd, 'permit' passing positive control at 104 hits,55% source
- Plan review turnaround
- No Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific turnaround is published for either the Town's zoning-letter step or the county's building-permit step;55% source
- Key document
- county fee resolution vs. permit application boilerplate -- conditional on delegation cited by 6 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Contested, but the weight of the evidence favors DELEGATION (Putnam County acting as building authority by default, in the absence of any town-side building capacity) over genuine self-run AHJ status -- see the jurisdiction block for the full multi-source picture, which is a mix of town-side absences (stronger than Interlachen's) and an ambiguous, likely-boilerplate Comprehensive Plan reference to a 'Town Building Official' that does not correspond to any actually-staffed position. 58% · town staff directory + town forms page + town budget summaries + county department page + statewide register (five-source composite)
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? The Town keeps zoning determinations in-house via its own 'Zoning Letter' process (Residential/Commercial/Agricultural), reviewed and approved by a 'Town Zoning Officer' with a Town Seal, plus code enforcement and (per its Comprehensive Plan) floodplain/conservation land-use administration. Building-permit issuance itself is not evidenced on the Town's own site at all (no form, no fee line, no staff) and is delegated in practice to Putnam County per q1's composite evidence. 56% · town zoning letter forms (current, undated but live)
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes, by strong inference from the same county documents applicable if delegation holds: Putnam County's 'When is a Permit Required' brochure lists 'Adding New Wiring, Fixtures or Devices' and 'Replace/Add Electrical Systems, Wiring or Equipment' as building-permit-triggering work, and rooftop PV never appears on its enumerated no-permit-required list. No document -- Town or County -- names solar/PV by name anywhere reached (a proven zero across the Town's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Letters and the County's fee resolution, permit-required brochure, and Building Permit Application, all with passing 'electrical'/'permit' positive controls and zero-hit fabricated controls). 65% · county permit-or-no-permit brochure (enumerated, no PV-specific line) -- applies only if delegation at q1 holds
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Ambiguous / can be either, on the same county fee resolution that would govern if delegation holds: Putnam's current fee resolution prices a 'Small Scope Project' as ONE combined permit covering Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, and Fuel/Gas trades together (base fee plus per-trade add-ons, e.g. 'Electrical Add $20 per subpanel') for a project needing 3 inspection trips or fewer -- a typical rooftop PV retrofit would likely qualify. But the County's Building Permit Application boilerplate states 'a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELL, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, and AIR CONDITIONERS, etc.' Neither document is solar-specific, and neither is Pomona-Park-specific. 48% · county fee resolution vs. permit application boilerplate -- conditional on delegation
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No HOA/architectural-approval gate found on the Town's own site: no architectural review board is named on the Town's site, no HOA/deed-restriction language appears in the Comprehensive Plan (fully text-searched, zero hits for 'homeowner,' 'architectural review,' or 'deed restriction' against a passing 'the'=491-hit positive control and 'zzqqx'=0-hit fabricated control), and no Land Development Code or Zoning Ordinance could be reached to check further (Municode outage, see extra_findings). 55% · town comprehensive plan (enumerated, zero hits) -- bounded by Municode outage
- Is there a historic-district review? No historic-district review requirement found: zero mentions of 'historic' anywhere in the Comprehensive Plan (passing controls as at q24), and the Town's own site lists a general '/community/page/history' page that is narrative town history, not a regulatory historic-preservation program. 55% · town comprehensive plan (enumerated, zero hits) -- bounded by Municode outage
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? For a solar installation specifically, IF Putnam County is the issuing authority: a Florida-registered Solar Contractor or Electrical Contractor. Putnam County's 'Residential Electrical Service Standards' (2019) states verbatim: 'Interactive solar systems installed in conjunction with or added to residential electrical service must be designed by a Florida registered Engineer and must be installed by a Florida registered Solar or Electrical Contractor.' 60% · county technical standard sheet -- conditional on delegation
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Likely yes if Putnam County is the issuing authority: the County's current fee resolution has a dedicated 'Contractor Licensing Fees' section including a 'Local/Registered Contractor License -- Initial (2 Years) $120.00' plus a 'Records Management Fee for Certified Contractors' -- implying local registration before a state-certified contractor may pull a permit countywide. 55% · county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? If Putnam County processes the permit: per the County's Building Permit Application submittal checklist -- Application Complete; Owner/Builder Affidavit or Duly Licensed Contractor with Sub-Contractor(s) listed; Approved Site Plan; Zoning Letter (the Town's own document from q2 is explicitly one of the checklist's own line items); ownership verification or Warranty Deed; Notice of Commencement; Plans/Construction Documents; Roof/Floor Truss Drawings; Energy Forms including EPL Display Card; Product Approval Form; and, where applicable, DBPR Letter of Manufacture, MH Installation & Set-up Form, Site Work Permit, and External Agency Approval. 55% · county building permit application (stale, still live) -- conditional on delegation
- How many copies, and in what format? Per the same checklist: Plans/Construction Documents - 2 sets; Roof/Floor Truss Drawings - 2 sets; Energy Forms (including EPL Display Card) - 3 sets. 55% · county building permit application -- conditional on delegation
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes -- an 'Approved Site Plan' is one of the checked boxes on the county's submittal checklist, and the Town's own Zoning Letter forms (q2) each separately require 'Site plan must be drawn to scale and approved by Town Zoning Officer' with a detailed site-plan checklist (north arrow, setbacks, impervious surface ratio, floor area ratio per 'Putnam County Land Development Code section 7.02.02') before the Zoning Letter itself is approved. So a site plan is required at the Town's own zoning-gate stage regardless of which government ultimately issues the building permit. 70% · town zoning letter site-plan checklist (current, town-side)
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No stated size threshold: the county's Residential Electrical Service Standards say 'Interactive solar systems... must be designed by a Florida registered Engineer' with no exception for small systems, and no Town document creates or references a size threshold at all. 55% · county technical standard -- conditional on delegation
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? CitizenServe is the platform Putnam County's own current Building Department page advertises ('Online Permitting (Citizenserve)'), but the specific linked portal address is dead: citizenserve.com/putnam returns the generic CitizenServe corporate marketing homepage, not a Putnam County portal, confirmed by a fresh fetch today (byte-identical to the generic citizenserve.com homepage already on file from a sibling run of the same URL). 60% · county department page + dead portal link (verified today)
- Can the whole application be completed online? Not currently, as far as could be verified: the county's own advertised online-permitting link is dead (q20), and the Town publishes no permit portal of its own -- only its three static Zoning Letter PDFs, which are printable, signature-based forms with no online submission path. 55% · town forms page (enumerated) + county portal test
- What does a residential solar permit cost? No PV-specific fee line exists anywhere reached: not in Putnam County's current fee resolution (all 14 exhibits, OCR'd, 'permit' passing positive control at 104 hits, 'zzqqx' fabricated control at 0 hits, and the specific fee-schedule text re-used and re-verified from a sibling run's extraction of the same document today), and not in the Town's own Zoning Letter forms (which price only a flat, undifferentiated zoning-letter fee with no line items by trade). The likely applicable route, if the County is the issuer, is either a flat Small-Scope fee with per-trade add-ons or a percentage-of-ICC-valuation Alteration fee -- see q16. 55% · county fee resolution (enumerated) + town zoning letter forms (enumerated)
- How is the fee calculated? See q15 -- either a flat Small-Scope fee with per-trade add-ons (e.g., 'Electrical Add $20 per subpanel'), or a percentage-of-ICC-valuation Alteration fee, roughly 0.2%-0.29% of declared value based on the county's general Alteration fee table, with an $80-$180+ range depending on whether an electric hookup is included. This is a valuation-based schedule and is itself an FS 553.79(1)(f) exposure if it is what actually applies to a PV job (see extra_findings). 50% · county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes, if Putnam County is the issuer: Section VI, Plan Review Fees, prices Residential (1 & 2 Family) New Construction/Additions/Alterations plan review at 10% of the permit fee (minimum $35). 55% · county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? No Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific turnaround is published for either the Town's zoning-letter step or the county's building-permit step; the applicable default, if the County issues, is the Florida statutory clock, FS 553.792(1)(a): 5 business days for existing single-family work under $15,000 in value, or 30 business days for a structure under 7,500 sq ft (the limb that governs a typical $37k-55k PV job). 55% · FS 553.792(1)(a) statutory default -- conditional on delegation
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Bounded to two candidates, not closed to one: Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Florida Power & Light Co. Both are the only two retail electric sellers EIA-861 lists for Putnam County (Service_Territory_2024.xlsx, re-verified today, md5 60bdde3ecc2f367759855676e5cf24d5 -- byte-identical to prior runs' fetches of the same statewide file), and both HIFLD retail-service-territory layers (COOP and Investor-Owned) intersect Pomona Park's FULL TIGERweb place polygon at 100% overlap when point-sampled (39,419/39,419 sample points inside the town fall inside BOTH polygons) -- the identical overlapping-HIFLD-polygon wall already logged for Crescent City and Interlachen in this same county, so this run is reporting that wall rather than re-deriving it. The Town's own budget carries a single, undifferentiated 'Franchise Taxes' line ($35,100 in the last published year) and a single 'Utility Taxes' line ($39,000) with no per-seller breakout in any of the three years published, so the Town's own ledger cannot close the split either. Putnam County's generic countywide Building Permit Application offers an 'Electric Company' checkbox with four options (FP&L / Clay Palatka / Lake Kerr / Keystone -- the latter three all Clay Electric district offices), which does not resolve which applies specifically to Pomona Park. No county or town GIS 'Electric Service Areas' layer was found, and Clay Electric's own 'Quick Facts' page does not name Pomona Park. 55% · EIA-861 (bounds candidates) + HIFLD polygon sample (fails to close, matches known wall) + town budget (fails to close)
28 questions answered against Town of Pomona Park’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Contested, but the weight of the evidence favors DELEGATION (Putnam County acting as building authority by default, in the absence of any town-side building capacity) over genuine self-run AHJ status -- see the jurisdiction block for the full multi-source picture, which is a mix of town-side absences (stronger than Interlachen's) and an ambiguous, likely-boilerplate Comprehensive Plan reference to a 'Town Building Official' that does not correspond to any actually-staffed position.
Why the confidence is not higherTown's own current Staff Directory (7 positions: Mayor, Superintendent, Town Clerk, 4 Council Members plus 2 more, Finance Officer/Deputy Clerk, Independent Auditor) names NO Building Official, Building Inspector, or Plan Reviewer. The Town's own Forms page offers only three Zoning Letters (Residential/Commercial/Agricultural) and no Building Permit Application. The Town's own published budget summaries (FY2020-21 through FY2022-23, the only years published) show a flat, trivial $500/year 'Permit Fees' revenue line every year and NO Building Department or Protective Inspection expenditure category at all, in a summary that rolls all spending into just five categories (General Government, Public Safety, Transportation, Economic Environment, Culture/Recreation). Pomona Park is ABSENT from the floridabuilding.org statewide register of 392 permit-issuing local governments (positive controls Polk City/Crescent City/Palatka/Welaka present; re-verified first-hand today). Putnam County's own current Building Department page lists Pomona Park among five towns (with Palatka, Crescent City, Interlachen, Welaka) having 'no inter-local agreements for services' -- but the phone number and address it gives for Pomona Park (386-649-4902, 1775 US Hwy 17 South) is simply the Town's own general switchboard/Town Hall address, confirmed by cross-checking the Town's own Contact page, not a dedicated building line. Against delegation: the Town's own adopted 2045 Comprehensive Plan contains several Capital Improvements policies (H.1.4.2, H.1.6.2, H.1.7.1/.6/.9/.11) that assume a 'Town Building Official' issues building permits, development orders, and certificates of concurrency -- but this Comp Plan language never names Putnam County as the issuer (unlike Interlachen's Policy 1.3, which does so verbatim), and no such Building Official appears anywhere else on the Town's own site, so this reads as unimplemented boilerplate rather than a genuine town-side department.
town staff directory + town forms page + town budget summaries + county department page + statewide register (five-source composite) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/2287/town_of_pomona_park_2045_plan.pdf
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
The Town keeps zoning determinations in-house via its own 'Zoning Letter' process (Residential/Commercial/Agricultural), reviewed and approved by a 'Town Zoning Officer' with a Town Seal, plus code enforcement and (per its Comprehensive Plan) floodplain/conservation land-use administration. Building-permit issuance itself is not evidenced on the Town's own site at all (no form, no fee line, no staff) and is delegated in practice to Putnam County per q1's composite evidence.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect read of the Town's own three Zoning Letter PDFs (the only permitting-adjacent forms the Town publishes) plus its Comprehensive Plan and Contact/Directory pages.
town zoning letter forms (current, undated but live) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/administration/page/2399/residential_zoning_letter.pdf
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes, by strong inference from the same county documents applicable if delegation holds: Putnam County's 'When is a Permit Required' brochure lists 'Adding New Wiring, Fixtures or Devices' and 'Replace/Add Electrical Systems, Wiring or Equipment' as building-permit-triggering work, and rooftop PV never appears on its enumerated no-permit-required list. No document -- Town or County -- names solar/PV by name anywhere reached (a proven zero across the Town's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Letters and the County's fee resolution, permit-required brochure, and Building Permit Application, all with passing 'electrical'/'permit' positive controls and zero-hit fabricated controls).
Why the confidence is not higherEnumerated inference, not a direct solar-specific statement, and capped further below Interlachen's equivalent answer because Pomona Park's own jurisdiction is less firmly established than Interlachen's.
county permit-or-no-permit brochure (enumerated, no PV-specific line) -- applies only if delegation at q1 holds checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/When.is_.a.permit.required.English.2016.pdf
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Ambiguous / can be either, on the same county fee resolution that would govern if delegation holds: Putnam's current fee resolution prices a 'Small Scope Project' as ONE combined permit covering Building, Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, and Fuel/Gas trades together (base fee plus per-trade add-ons, e.g. 'Electrical Add $20 per subpanel') for a project needing 3 inspection trips or fewer -- a typical rooftop PV retrofit would likely qualify. But the County's Building Permit Application boilerplate states 'a separate permit must be secured for ELECTRICAL WORK, PLUMBING, SIGNS, WELL, POOLS, FURNACES, BOILERS, HEATERS, TANKS, and AIR CONDITIONERS, etc.' Neither document is solar-specific, and neither is Pomona-Park-specific.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect read of both documents; genuine internal tension not resolved by either, and this entire answer is conditional on the unsettled jurisdiction question at q1.
county fee resolution vs. permit application boilerplate -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
For a solar installation specifically, IF Putnam County is the issuing authority: a Florida-registered Solar Contractor or Electrical Contractor. Putnam County's 'Residential Electrical Service Standards' (2019) states verbatim: 'Interactive solar systems installed in conjunction with or added to residential electrical service must be designed by a Florida registered Engineer and must be installed by a Florida registered Solar or Electrical Contractor.'
Why the confidence is not higherDirect verbatim quote from the county's own current technical standard; capped below the Interlachen equivalent because whether this county document actually governs Pomona Park permits is itself the contested q1 finding, not an established fact the way it is for Interlachen (whose own Comp Plan concedes delegation outright).
county technical standard sheet -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Likely yes if Putnam County is the issuing authority: the County's current fee resolution has a dedicated 'Contractor Licensing Fees' section including a 'Local/Registered Contractor License -- Initial (2 Years) $120.00' plus a 'Records Management Fee for Certified Contractors' -- implying local registration before a state-certified contractor may pull a permit countywide.
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from a fee-schedule line item, not a stated rule, and conditional on the unsettled q1 delegation question.
county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedThe Town's own Zoning Letters, Comprehensive Plan, and Putnam County's Residential Electrical Service Standards / Building Permit Application are all silent on owner-builder self-installation/self-permitting for solar specifically. Florida's dedicated solar owner-builder limb, FS 489.103(7)(a)3, is itself conditioned on a DOE 'SunShot Rooftop Solar Challenge' grant program that ended around 2014 and cannot be relied on as a live route. No Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific statement found.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
If Putnam County processes the permit: per the County's Building Permit Application submittal checklist -- Application Complete; Owner/Builder Affidavit or Duly Licensed Contractor with Sub-Contractor(s) listed; Approved Site Plan; Zoning Letter (the Town's own document from q2 is explicitly one of the checklist's own line items); ownership verification or Warranty Deed; Notice of Commencement; Plans/Construction Documents; Roof/Floor Truss Drawings; Energy Forms including EPL Display Card; Product Approval Form; and, where applicable, DBPR Letter of Manufacture, MH Installation & Set-up Form, Site Work Permit, and External Agency Approval.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect submittal checklist on the county's own currently-live application form, itself dated 'Revised 7/19/2017 ... Effective until December 31, 2017' -- nearly nine years past its own stated expiry -- and generic countywide, not solar- or Pomona-Park-specific; the county's own checklist naming a 'Zoning Letter' as a required submittal item is a genuine internal cross-reference to the Town's own gate, which raises confidence that this checklist is the operative one if the county is in fact the issuer.
county building permit application (stale, still live) -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Permit.Fillable.2016-1.pdf
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Per the same checklist: Plans/Construction Documents - 2 sets; Roof/Floor Truss Drawings - 2 sets; Energy Forms (including EPL Display Card) - 3 sets.
Why the confidence is not higherSame stale-but-only-published county form as q8, same delegation caveat.
county building permit application -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Permit.Fillable.2016-1.pdf
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes -- an 'Approved Site Plan' is one of the checked boxes on the county's submittal checklist, and the Town's own Zoning Letter forms (q2) each separately require 'Site plan must be drawn to scale and approved by Town Zoning Officer' with a detailed site-plan checklist (north arrow, setbacks, impervious surface ratio, floor area ratio per 'Putnam County Land Development Code section 7.02.02') before the Zoning Letter itself is approved. So a site plan is required at the Town's own zoning-gate stage regardless of which government ultimately issues the building permit.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect read of the Town's own Zoning Letter site-plan checklist, which is Town-side evidence independent of the contested delegation question -- one of the highest-confidence answers in this file because it does not depend on resolving q1.
town zoning letter site-plan checklist (current, town-side) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/administration/page/2399/residential_zoning_letter.pdf
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo one-line/three-line electrical diagram requirement stated in the Town's Zoning Letters or Comprehensive Plan, or in the County's fee resolution, permit application, or Residential Electrical Service Standards.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo string/conductor calculation requirement stated for solar specifically; the county's Residential Electrical Service Standards give general NEC-table-based service-entrance guidance only, nothing solar-specific, and the Town's own documents are silent.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo structural PE stamp threshold found for roof-mounted or ground-mounted PV in any Town or Putnam County document reached.
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No stated size threshold: the county's Residential Electrical Service Standards say 'Interactive solar systems... must be designed by a Florida registered Engineer' with no exception for small systems, and no Town document creates or references a size threshold at all.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence read against a document that would have carried a threshold if one existed; conditional on delegation (q1).
county technical standard -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
No PV-specific fee line exists anywhere reached: not in Putnam County's current fee resolution (all 14 exhibits, OCR'd, 'permit' passing positive control at 104 hits, 'zzqqx' fabricated control at 0 hits, and the specific fee-schedule text re-used and re-verified from a sibling run's extraction of the same document today), and not in the Town's own Zoning Letter forms (which price only a flat, undifferentiated zoning-letter fee with no line items by trade). The likely applicable route, if the County is the issuer, is either a flat Small-Scope fee with per-trade add-ons or a percentage-of-ICC-valuation Alteration fee -- see q16.
Why the confidence is not higherProven zero for a PV-specific line across the county's full fee schedule (enumerated, not sampled) plus the Town's own three fee-bearing forms; conditional on delegation for the county-side finding.
county fee resolution (enumerated) + town zoning letter forms (enumerated) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
See q15 -- either a flat Small-Scope fee with per-trade add-ons (e.g., 'Electrical Add $20 per subpanel'), or a percentage-of-ICC-valuation Alteration fee, roughly 0.2%-0.29% of declared value based on the county's general Alteration fee table, with an $80-$180+ range depending on whether an electric hookup is included. This is a valuation-based schedule and is itself an FS 553.79(1)(f) exposure if it is what actually applies to a PV job (see extra_findings).
Why the confidence is not higherInference from the county's general fee table, not a solar-specific rate; doubly conditional (on delegation, and on which schedule row actually governs PV).
county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes, if Putnam County is the issuer: Section VI, Plan Review Fees, prices Residential (1 & 2 Family) New Construction/Additions/Alterations plan review at 10% of the permit fee (minimum $35).
Why the confidence is not higherDirect county fee-schedule quote; conditional on delegation.
county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
No Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific turnaround is published for either the Town's zoning-letter step or the county's building-permit step; the applicable default, if the County issues, is the Florida statutory clock, FS 553.792(1)(a): 5 business days for existing single-family work under $15,000 in value, or 30 business days for a structure under 7,500 sq ft (the limb that governs a typical $37k-55k PV job).
Why the confidence is not higherStatutory default reasoning, not an authority-published clock; conditional on delegation.
FS 553.792(1)(a) statutory default -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo stated permit-lapse/expiration period found in any Town document; the county's general fee-resolution renewal/re-inspection language was not independently re-verified for Pomona Park this run (time-bounded) and is not repeated here as an assumed fact.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
CitizenServe is the platform Putnam County's own current Building Department page advertises ('Online Permitting (Citizenserve)'), but the specific linked portal address is dead: citizenserve.com/putnam returns the generic CitizenServe corporate marketing homepage, not a Putnam County portal, confirmed by a fresh fetch today (byte-identical to the generic citizenserve.com homepage already on file from a sibling run of the same URL).
Why the confidence is not higherDirect fetch and byte-comparison performed today; the county's own advertised link does not resolve to a working portal for any of Putnam's cities as far as this run could determine.
county department page + dead portal link (verified today) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
Not currently, as far as could be verified: the county's own advertised online-permitting link is dead (q20), and the Town publishes no permit portal of its own -- only its three static Zoning Letter PDFs, which are printable, signature-based forms with no online submission path.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect site enumeration of the Town's own Forms page plus the dead-link finding at q20.
town forms page (enumerated) + county portal test checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/forms
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Bounded to two candidates, not closed to one: Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc. and Florida Power & Light Co. Both are the only two retail electric sellers EIA-861 lists for Putnam County (Service_Territory_2024.xlsx, re-verified today, md5 60bdde3ecc2f367759855676e5cf24d5 -- byte-identical to prior runs' fetches of the same statewide file), and both HIFLD retail-service-territory layers (COOP and Investor-Owned) intersect Pomona Park's FULL TIGERweb place polygon at 100% overlap when point-sampled (39,419/39,419 sample points inside the town fall inside BOTH polygons) -- the identical overlapping-HIFLD-polygon wall already logged for Crescent City and Interlachen in this same county, so this run is reporting that wall rather than re-deriving it. The Town's own budget carries a single, undifferentiated 'Franchise Taxes' line ($35,100 in the last published year) and a single 'Utility Taxes' line ($39,000) with no per-seller breakout in any of the three years published, so the Town's own ledger cannot close the split either. Putnam County's generic countywide Building Permit Application offers an 'Electric Company' checkbox with four options (FP&L / Clay Palatka / Lake Kerr / Keystone -- the latter three all Clay Electric district offices), which does not resolve which applies specifically to Pomona Park. No county or town GIS 'Electric Service Areas' layer was found, and Clay Electric's own 'Quick Facts' page does not name Pomona Park.
Why the confidence is not higherMultiple independent methods tried (EIA-861, HIFLD polygon sampling against the full place polygon not a centroid, town budget franchise/utility-tax lines, county permit-form checkbox, county GIS, utility's own communities-served page) and all either confirm both candidates are plausible or fail to close the split -- an honest bounded answer, not a guess.
EIA-861 (bounds candidates) + HIFLD polygon sample (fails to close, matches known wall) + town budget (fails to close) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/zip/f8612024.zip
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo Pomona-Park- or Putnam-specific document found describing where utility interconnection/PTO sits relative to whichever government's building/electrical permit is the operative one.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No HOA/architectural-approval gate found on the Town's own site: no architectural review board is named on the Town's site, no HOA/deed-restriction language appears in the Comprehensive Plan (fully text-searched, zero hits for 'homeowner,' 'architectural review,' or 'deed restriction' against a passing 'the'=491-hit positive control and 'zzqqx'=0-hit fabricated control), and no Land Development Code or Zoning Ordinance could be reached to check further (Municode outage, see extra_findings).
Why the confidence is not higherProven zero across the one town-side document fully reached (the Comprehensive Plan); the Town's actual Zoning Ordinance/LDC could not be checked because Municode is unreachable today (control-verified), so this is a bounded absence, not a certified one.
town comprehensive plan (enumerated, zero hits) -- bounded by Municode outage checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/2287/town_of_pomona_park_2045_plan.pdf
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No historic-district review requirement found: zero mentions of 'historic' anywhere in the Comprehensive Plan (passing controls as at q24), and the Town's own site lists a general '/community/page/history' page that is narrative town history, not a regulatory historic-preservation program.
Why the confidence is not higherProven zero in the one reachable town document; same Municode-outage caveat as q24 applies to the un-reachable Zoning Ordinance/LDC.
town comprehensive plan (enumerated, zero hits) -- bounded by Municode outage checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/2287/town_of_pomona_park_2045_plan.pdf
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo town- or county-specific wind/windstorm certification requirement beyond the statewide Florida Building Code wind-speed map was found; the Town's Zoning Ordinance/LDC (which might address this) is unreachable today (Municode outage).
https://library.municode.com/fl/pomona_park/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo special-exception or conditional-use requirement specific to solar/PV equipment or 'essential services' was found in the Comprehensive Plan beyond the FLU element's utility-scale 'Solar facilities' permitted-use clause noted in extra_findings, which addresses land use classification, not building-permit conditions.
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo system-size cap on residential generation found in any Town or Putnam County document reached; neither Clay Electric's nor FPL's net-metering tariff was independently checked against Pomona Park specifically this run (time-bounded).
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- What is the installation judged against? If Putnam County is the issuer: per the County's Residential Electrical Service Standards, 'Electrical Service must be constructed in compliance with National Electrical Code' (year unspecified in the document itself). 55% · county technical standard -- conditional on delegation
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for Town of Pomona Park on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
Nothing recorded for Town of Pomona Park on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
Nothing recorded for Town of Pomona Park on this step yet — 6 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Not addressed either way. Zero mentions of 'battery,' 'storage' (in an energy-storage sense), or 'energy storage' anywhere in the Comprehensive Plan (fully searched with passing positive/fabricated controls; the document's only 'storage' hits are hazardous-material and water-storage-tank references, unrelated to ESS). 50% · town comprehensive plan (enumerated, zero relevant hits)
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Likely yes if a generic 'structure' definition from a reachable code applied, but Pomona Park's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC (which would carry that definition) is unreachable today (Municode outage), so this cannot be confirmed the way it could for Interlachen. 45% · unreachable -- inference only
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Yes, per the same county standard: 'Residential 120/240 volt single phase 100 ampere through 400 ampere service feeders may be installed using the allowed 83% reduction' (i.e., NEC 310.15(B)(7)-style service-conductor reduction for dwelling services). 55% · county technical standard -- conditional on delegation
20 questions answered against Town of Pomona Park’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo NEC edition adoption found for Pomona Park or Putnam County. The county's own Building Permit Application leaves a blank 'Code Edition: ___________' field rather than stating one, and the Town's Zoning Ordinance/LDC (which might state one) is unreachable (Municode outage).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Permit.Fillable.2016-1.pdf
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedSame as q29 -- no FBC edition adoption ordinance found; blank 'Code Edition' field on the county's permit application; Municode unreachable (control-verified today: target and known-good Jacksonville Beach control both serve the identical byte-for-byte 6,095-byte placeholder shell).
https://library.municode.com/fl/pomona_park/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo fire code edition found for Pomona Park; no fire-code-specific document was located on either the Town's or Putnam County's site, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code itself is paywalled (unread means unreached, per the brief).
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedCannot determine what local amendments exist without a reachable Code of Ordinances; Municode is unreachable (control-verified today, not inherited from a prior run) and no self-hosted Code/LDC PDF exists on the Town's own Documents or Forms pages (checked: only the Comprehensive Plan, three budget summaries, three Zoning Letters, and one unrelated project-narrative .docx are published there).
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
If Putnam County is the issuer: per the County's Residential Electrical Service Standards, 'Electrical Service must be constructed in compliance with National Electrical Code' (year unspecified in the document itself).
Why the confidence is not higherDirect county quote; NEC year itself not stated anywhere reached; conditional on delegation.
county technical standard -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
Yes, per the same county standard: 'Residential 120/240 volt single phase 100 ampere through 400 ampere service feeders may be installed using the allowed 83% reduction' (i.e., NEC 310.15(B)(7)-style service-conductor reduction for dwelling services).
Why the confidence is not higherDirect county quote; conditional on delegation.
county technical standard -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo mounting-system or attachment-spacing requirement found in any Town or Putnam County document reached.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo ridge setback or fire-access pathway requirement for rooftop PV found in any Town or Putnam County document reached; the Florida Fire Prevention Code itself is paywalled (unread means unreached).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedZero mentions of 'rapid shutdown' or 'disconnect' anywhere in the Town's Comprehensive Plan (the only town-side document fully reachable), and no NEC edition is established locally (q29/q33) from which a rapid-shutdown requirement could be dated.
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo placard/labelling/equipment-listing requirement of any kind found in the Town's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Letter forms, or the county's fee resolution, Building Permit Application, Residential Electrical Service Standards, or 'When is a Permit Required' brochure -- all documents reached were checked and none addresses solar signage or equipment listing. The Town's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC, which might address this, is unreachable (Municode outage).
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Not addressed either way. Zero mentions of 'battery,' 'storage' (in an energy-storage sense), or 'energy storage' anywhere in the Comprehensive Plan (fully searched with passing positive/fabricated controls; the document's only 'storage' hits are hazardous-material and water-storage-tank references, unrelated to ESS).
Why the confidence is not higherProven absence across the one document fully reached; does not establish that batteries are prohibited, only that no rule -- for or against -- was found, and the Town's Zoning Ordinance/LDC is unreachable to check further.
town comprehensive plan (enumerated, zero relevant hits) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pomonapark.com/sites/default/files/fileattachments/planning/page/2287/town_of_pomona_park_2045_plan.pdf
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo separate ESS permit or inspection type found in the county's fee resolution's exhibits or the Town's own forms.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Likely yes if a generic 'structure' definition from a reachable code applied, but Pomona Park's own Zoning Ordinance/LDC (which would carry that definition) is unreachable today (Municode outage), so this cannot be confirmed the way it could for Interlachen.
Why the confidence is not higherNo Pomona-Park-specific definition could be read; inference only, and weaker than the equivalent Interlachen answer because that Town's Zoning Ordinance was reachable and this one is not.
unreachable -- inference only checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/pomona_park/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo rule found on AC disconnect placement relative to the meter in any Town or Putnam County document reached.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? If Putnam County processes the permit: primarily through the online permit portal (dead, see q20), with an email fallback -- Putnam County's Building Department page states, 'If you are unable to request inspection through your online permit portal, you may request inspection through email... provide permit number, address, inspection type, and date requested.' 55% · county department page -- conditional on delegation
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Not AM/PM-windowed as far as documented: the county's own page states 'Inspectors are available 8:30 am - 9:00 am,' suggesting a single morning check-in/dispatch window rather than a chosen AM or PM slot. 55% · county department page -- conditional on delegation
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? If Putnam County is the issuer: yes, in-house -- the County's Building Department page (fetched fresh today) names Building Official Leo Wadeson, five field inspectors (Jimmy Reynolds, Valerie Harman, Brett Stoltenberg, Chuck Miksch, Ben Taylor), and three Plans Examiners (Donald Peckham -- Chief, Phillip Copeland, Douglas Landes), all salaried county staff at 2509 Crill Ave, Palatka. 58% · county department page (fetched fresh today) -- conditional on delegation
- If delegated, to whom? If delegated per q1: to the Putnam County Building Department, 2509 Crill Ave, Palatka -- Building Official Leo Wadeson, with the named field inspectors and plans examiners at q52. If NOT delegated, the Town has no identifiable building staff at all (q1), which is itself informative about who does NOT do the work, even though this run cannot say with certainty who does. 55% · county department page -- conditional on delegation
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
Nothing recorded for Town of Pomona Park on this step yet — 2 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
Nothing recorded for Town of Pomona Park on this step yet — 3 questions checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- Is there a re-inspection fee? If Putnam County is the issuer: yes, $30.00 -- 'A fee of thirty dollars ($30.00) may be charged for excessive inspections and/or re-inspections pursuant to Chapter 553.80.2(c), Florida Statutes' per the county's current fee resolution. 55% · county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation
14 questions answered against Town of Pomona Park’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
If Putnam County processes the permit: primarily through the online permit portal (dead, see q20), with an email fallback -- Putnam County's Building Department page states, 'If you are unable to request inspection through your online permit portal, you may request inspection through email... provide permit number, address, inspection type, and date requested.'
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote from the county's own current page, combined with this run's own confirmation today that the linked portal is dead; conditional on delegation.
county department page -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo stated notice period (e.g., '24 hours,' '3pm cutoff') found for booking a Putnam County inspection in any document reached.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Not AM/PM-windowed as far as documented: the county's own page states 'Inspectors are available 8:30 am - 9:00 am,' suggesting a single morning check-in/dispatch window rather than a chosen AM or PM slot.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect quote; does not itself confirm whether inspections are actually performed only in that half-hour or whether that is merely when inspectors can be reached to schedule; conditional on delegation.
county department page -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
If Putnam County is the issuer: yes, in-house -- the County's Building Department page (fetched fresh today) names Building Official Leo Wadeson, five field inspectors (Jimmy Reynolds, Valerie Harman, Brett Stoltenberg, Chuck Miksch, Ben Taylor), and three Plans Examiners (Donald Peckham -- Chief, Phillip Copeland, Douglas Landes), all salaried county staff at 2509 Crill Ave, Palatka.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect, freshly-fetched read of the county's own staff page; conditional on the q1 delegation finding, since none of these staff are named specifically for Pomona Park.
county department page (fetched fresh today) -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
If delegated per q1: to the Putnam County Building Department, 2509 Crill Ave, Palatka -- Building Official Leo Wadeson, with the named field inspectors and plans examiners at q52. If NOT delegated, the Town has no identifiable building staff at all (q1), which is itself informative about who does NOT do the work, even though this run cannot say with certainty who does.
Why the confidence is not higherSame sourcing as q52; the honest answer names the only candidate organization with actual staff, while flagging that the underlying jurisdiction question is unresolved.
county department page -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo solar-specific inspection sequence (e.g., rough-in, mid-roof, final) is published by Putnam County or the Town; no inspection catalogue naming PV/solar was found anywhere reached (see extra_findings for the four-list PV-absence enumeration).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo rough-in or mid-roof inspection requirement found for PV specifically.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo statement found on whether the inspector verifies equipment labels/listings.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo published inspection checklist located for Putnam County or Pomona Park -- one of the brief's four PV-absence-proof lists (fee schedule, permit-or-no-permit list, inspection catalogue, live portal permit-type menu) could not be checked at all because the live portal (CitizenServe) is dead (q20).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/departments/development-services/building-department/
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo statement found on what must be physically present on site at inspection.
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
If Putnam County is the issuer: yes, $30.00 -- 'A fee of thirty dollars ($30.00) may be charged for excessive inspections and/or re-inspections pursuant to Chapter 553.80.2(c), Florida Statutes' per the county's current fee resolution.
Why the confidence is not higherDirect county fee-resolution quote; conditional on delegation.
county fee resolution -- conditional on delegation checked 2026-09-13 https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo description found of how correction items are issued or cleared (e.g., a correction notice form, an online status flag).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo document states what is issued on a passed final inspection for a solar job specifically (e.g., a Certificate of Completion vs. simply a signed-off permit card).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025_permit_fees.pdf
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedNo document states who is responsible for notifying the utility for PTO (installer vs. homeowner vs. AHJ).
https://www.putnam-fl.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Residential-Electric-Service2019.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording None%
Size, colour & material None%
Where they go None%
What the utility wants on top None%
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.