Town of Redington Shores

Pinellas County · Florida ← All authorities

Town of Redington Shores

Pinellas County

Verified Aug. 5, 2026

Town of Redington Shores is a town authority in the State of Florida, serving 2,176 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.

Jurisdiction & key facts

The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of Redington Shores against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.

Town of Redington Shores is the authority having jurisdiction 93% confidence
Holds
building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, gas, zoning and floodplain — all in-house, by its own staff
Overridden by
PCCLB local technical amendments (NEC Art. 250.96 EGC-in-every-raceway; FBC 1609.3 wind 145 mph Risk Cat II; FBC 3109 Pinellas Gulf Beaches Coastal Construction Code) reach the town through its OWN Code Sec. 63-1.A, which adopts codes 'as adopted by the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board under Chapter 75-489, Laws of Florida'. FS 553.79(1)(c) (1-year permit life for a single-family dwelling) overrides codified Sec. 63-17.B's 6/9 months. FS 553.79(1)(f) bars the 'itemized cost valuation breakdown of labor and materials' the town's 28 Aug 2026 checklist demands. FS 163.04(1) bars any ordinance that has the effect of prohibiting solar collectors. Fire is contracted to Seminole Fire Rescue and Madeira Beach; police to the Town of Indian Shores; code enforcement to the Pinellas County Sheriff.
Why not higher
Present in the state permit-issuer register as 'Town of Redington Shores' (id 2361) among 392 entries; fuzzy stem 'redin' returns three Redington towns, fabricated control returns nothing. The Building Department page names Building Official Mike Foley and a Lead Permit Tech, publishes its own phone, portal, forms, fee schedule and inspection catalogue, and the FY25-26 adopted budget carries $185,000 of Building & Inspections payroll. THE TRAP HERE: the big red banner at the top of the town's OWN building page says 'SAFEbuilt will be managing the Redington Beach Building Department' — it is addressed 'ATTN. REDINGTON BEACH RESIDENTS' and concerns the NEIGHBOURING town, whose department Redington Shores used to operate and handed to SAFEbuilt on 10/12 Nov 2025. Redington Shores itself did NOT delegate. Deducted for one live uncertainty: the FY26-27 DRAFT budget (workshop 26 Aug 2026) zeroes every Building & Inspections salary line and raises Other Contractual Services to $363,125, while the org chart in the same document still shows Building Official and Permit Tech as town posts.

https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Permit required
Yes. Solar is not named anywhere, but a PV system is electrical work: Exhibit A ('when a permit IS required') lists 'Electric System - Repair, replace, or new (any part of system,88%
Permit cost
About $498 on a $37,000 job, and there is NO solar line — PV is priced as electrical by valuation.80%
Plan review
Not published by the town. The governing clock is FS 553.792(1)(a): 30 business days for work on a structure under 7,500 sq ft (a typical $37k-$55k PV job is over the $15,000 value limb and…75%
Portal
SmartGov by Granicus, at twn-redingtonshores-fl.smartgovcommunity.com/Public/Home (build v2026.15.0). Portal support 727-262-2218, bldgdept@redshoresfl.com.95%
Electrical code
NEC 2020, as incorporated by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), PLUS the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board amendment to NEC Article 250.96(A): 'All raceways shall…78%
Own placard wording
No. The authority specifies no placard wording of its own.88%
Booking an inspection
Any of three: through the SmartGov portal, by phone on 727-397-5538 option 1 between 8:30 am and 3:00 pm, or by email to bldgdept@redshoresfl.com.95%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions

Whether a permit is needed — Yes. Solar is not named anywhere, but a PV system is electrical work: Exhibit A ('when a permit IS required') lists 'Electric System - Repair, replace, Q3 Electrical and building permits — Either. The fee schedule prices 'Mechanical, Plumbing, & Electrical $35 + $10.00/K of sub-contract, if a separate project', Q4 Plan review — Not published by the town. The governing clock is FS 553.792(1)(a): 30 business days for work on a structure under 7,500 sq ft (a typical $37k-$55k PV job is over… Q18 Where you file — SmartGov by Granicus, at twn-redingtonshores-fl.smartgovcommunity.com/Public/Home (build v2026.15.0). Portal support 727-262-2218, bldgdept@redshoresfl.com. Q20

Permit required
Yes. Solar is not named anywhere, but a PV system is electrical work: Exhibit A ('when a permit IS required') lists 'Electric System - Repair, replace, or new (any part of system,88% source
What it costs
About $498 on a $37,000 job, and there is NO solar line — PV is priced as electrical by valuation. Formula from the Permit Fee Calculations Schedule: $35 application fee + $10.00 per $1,000 of…80% source
Plan review turnaround
Not published by the town. The governing clock is FS 553.792(1)(a): 30 business days for work on a structure under 7,500 sq ft (a typical $37k-$55k PV job is over the $15,000 value limb and under the…75% source
Key document
codified ordinance Sec. 90-237 + P&Z fee schedule (Res. 09-19, variance updated by Res. 13-24) cited by 6 open the document
  1. Confirm who has a say over your address

    A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.

    • Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes. The Town of Redington Shores is the AHJ for residential solar at addresses inside the town limits; it runs its own building department in-house. 95% · state permit-issuer register
    • What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Both, and more: the town permits and inspects building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and gas itself, and does its own zoning and floodplain review. It contracts out fire (Seminole Fire Rescue and Madeira Beach), police (Town of Indian Shores) and code enforcement (Pinellas County Sheriff's Office). 90% · proposed budget (org chart and departmental detail)
    • Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. Solar is not named anywhere, but a PV system is electrical work: Exhibit A ('when a permit IS required') lists 'Electric System - Repair, replace, or new (any part of system, except replacement of fuses or breakers)' and 'Electric Service - Work on existing service or panel (including upgrade)'. Code Sec. 63-16 requires a permit for alterations generally. 88% · published permit-requirement exhibit (rev 6/26/15)
    • Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Either. The fee schedule prices 'Mechanical, Plumbing, & Electrical $35 + $10.00/K of sub-contract, if a separate project', so electrical can be a stand-alone permit or a sub-trade line under a building permit. The town's permit placard carries BOTH a structural 'Solar Tie Down' and an electrical 'Solar Electrical Final' inspection type, so one job can draw on two trade inspection tracks. 70% · fee schedule + permit placard inspection list
    • Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Not by the town, but it is a live gate in practice. The Permit Submittal Checklist requires an 'HOA Approval Notice if required according to by-laws' for commercial remodels only; the Town Manager's March 2026 memo lists 'HOA approval letters' among the reasons permits sit at 'Ready to Issue'. The town is 2,015 housing units for 2,176 people — a condominium town, so an association is the likelier gate than the town. FS 163.04(2) limits what an association may do: it may not prohibit solar collectors, and may determine only the specific roof location 'within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors'. 78% · Florida Statutes + submittal checklist + building department memo
    • Is there a historic-district review? No. There is no historic district, no local register, no preservation board and no certificate-of-appropriateness procedure in Redington Shores. 88% · codified ordinance (absence proved against a named denominator)
    • Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Yes in substance. The PCCLB local technical amendment to FBC 1609.3 sets, verbatim, 'All incorporated and unincorporated Pinellas County, Risk Category I - 135 MPH ... Risk Category II - 145 MPH ... Risk Category III - 155 MPH ... Risk Category IV - 157 MPH with interpolation permitted as allowed in the Code and ASCE 7-16'. A house is Risk Category II, so 145 mph ultimate design wind speed, ASCE 7-16. Code Sec. 63-3.H adds that all nonexpendable structures in windload zones 2 and 3 must withstand 130 mph. No separate windstorm certificate form exists; it is carried in the sealed plans required over $25,000. 85% · county licensing board local technical amendment (FBC 8th Edition 2023)
    • Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No for a rooftop retrofit on a house. Code Sec. 90-237 subjects 'all applications for new construction or substantial improvement, other than single-family detached houses and duplex units east of Gulf Boulevard' to site plan review by the planning and zoning board and final approval by the board of commissioners. A PV retrofit is neither new construction nor, at typical cost, a substantial improvement. If review were ever triggered the P&Z fee schedule prices 'Site Plan (single family residential) $1,000.00' and 'Variance $750.00'. 78% · codified ordinance Sec. 90-237 + P&Z fee schedule (Res. 09-19, variance updated by Res. 13-24)
    • Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? None in the town's rules — 'solar', 'photovoltaic', 'inverter', 'renewable', 'alternative energy', 'energy storage' and 'generator' are all ZERO in the codified Code. The cap that actually bites is the utility's: Duke's Tier 1 standard interconnection agreement is for 'customer-owned renewable generation systems (10kW or less)' and ¶9 adds that total capacity must not exceed 90% of the rating of the service currently provided. Above either, the job moves to Tier 2. 85% · utility tariff + codified ordinance (absence proved)
  2. Check who is allowed to apply

    Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.

    • Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Either: a State of Florida licensed contractor (electrical or the appropriate trade) who has first registered with the Town, or the homeowner of a one- or two-family home under an Owner Builder affidavit. 88% · department page + Code Sec. 63-16
    • Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes. 'All contractors must be registered with Redington Shores' — general liability naming the Town as certificate holder, current State licence certificate, qualifier's driver's licence, workers' comp or exemption, and a notarised Authorized Agent form. Separately, PCCLB registration ENDED for state-certified contractors on 24 June 2024 and is no longer required; town registration is. 95% · published submittal checklist
    • Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes, for one- or two-family homes, with a notarised Owner Builder Affidavit submitted with the application. 95% · published affidavit form
  3. Build the submittal package

    Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.

    • What documents make up a complete submittal? General requirements for every permit: permit application completed, signed and NOTARISED BY BOTH the owner and the contractor; Owner Builder Affidavit if applicable; sub-contractor form if applicable; an ITEMIZED COST VALUATION BREAKDOWN OF LABOR AND MATERIALS; and a recorded Notice of Commencement for contracted work over $5,000. For the ELECTRICAL category the only extra item is 'Code compliant construction drawing / location of work'. Over $25,000 in value, Code Sec. 63-16.A adds sealed plans. *** THE ITEMISED LABOUR-AND-MATERIALS BREAKDOWN IS BARRED BY FS 553.79(1)(f), which says a local government may not require a contract or 'any associated document, including ... material costs lists, labor costs'. The checklist demanding it is dated 28 Aug 2026. *** 90% · published submittal checklist
    • How many copies, and in what format? Contradictory, and the town has three live answers. Code Sec. 63-2 (as amended by Ord. 2025-01, 11 Jun 2025): 'three copies of proposed plans and specifications'. Code Sec. 63-16: THREE sealed sets if the work is over $25,000, TWO copies of the work plan if under. The portal and the checklist contemplate electronic upload with no copy count at all. Nobody has reconciled them. 70% · codified ordinance (Supp. 16, through Ord. 25-03, 13 Aug 2025)
    • Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes. Code Sec. 63-16.B requires a work plan 'showing the lot and the relation of the work to the lot'. Because 100.00% of the town's land is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, Code Sec. 63-40.A also fires on every job: the site plan must show flood hazard areas and zone(s), base flood elevation(s), ground elevations, the location of proposed and existing structures, any fill, the Coastal Construction Control Line (or a note that the site is seaward of it), any dune or mangrove alteration, and 'designation of proposed design flood elevation based on base flood elevation plus two feet of freeboard'. 85% · codified ordinance Sec. 63-40
    • Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Not required by name. No published document asks for a one-line or three-line diagram; the electrical submittal requirement is the single line 'Code compliant construction drawing / location of work'. 72% · published submittal checklist (absence proved against a named denominator)
    • Are string and conductor calculations required? Not required by name — no published document asks for string or conductor calculations. 70% · department forms list (absence proved against a named denominator)
    • Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? $25,000 of work value. Code Sec. 63-16.A: 'For all new buildings or alterations over $25,000.00 in value in the estimate of the town building official, or his designee, three sets of plans and specifications bearing the seal of a registered, certified professional architect or engineer ... shall be submitted.' A typical residential PV job is over that line, so SEALED PLANS ARE THE NORM HERE. 88% · codified ordinance Sec. 63-16.A
    • Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Same threshold and same clause: over $25,000 the sealed 'plans and specifications' requirement of Sec. 63-16.A is not limited by trade. No separate electrical-engineer requirement is published. 68% · codified ordinance Sec. 63-16.A
  4. Apply and pay

    Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.

    • Which permit portal does this authority use? SmartGov by Granicus, at twn-redingtonshores-fl.smartgovcommunity.com/Public/Home (build v2026.15.0). Portal support 727-262-2218, bldgdept@redshoresfl.com. 95% · permit portal
    • Can the whole application be completed online? Nearly, but not on a first application. The portal takes the application, the uploads, inspection scheduling and payment (card at +3%, or e-check at $2.00 flat). Two things block a wholly electronic first submission: the permit application must be signed and NOTARISED by both the owner and the contractor, and a first-time contractor cannot self-register — 'Contact bldgdept@redshoresfl.com to request a link and access code.' 85% · published permit guide + portal
    • What does a residential solar permit cost? About $498 on a $37,000 job, and there is NO solar line — PV is priced as electrical by valuation. Formula from the Permit Fee Calculations Schedule: $35 application fee + $10.00 per $1,000 of sub-contract value (electrical as a separate project, not new construction) + a nonrefundable 20% plan review fee on that subtotal because the project is over $5,000 + a 2.5% building code surcharge ($4.00 minimum). Worked: $35 + $370 = $405; +20% = $486; +2.5% = $498.15. At $55,000: ~$719.55. At $15,000: ~$227.55. Add 3% if paying by card, or $2.00 flat by e-check. *** BEWARE THE OTHER DOCUMENT: the town's media library also holds Permit-Fees-2024.pdf, which prices 'IV-I-2. Photovoltaic Systems - Each (includes Building, Plan Review & Electrical) $250.00' — but that file is BYTE-IDENTICAL (md5 bda23350005488fe847dc38466e20660) to the Pinellas County FY24 Adopted Budget extract SAFEbuilt serves for Belleair Bluffs and North Redington Beach, it is linked from ZERO of the town's 96 pages, and it is not this town's schedule. *** 80% · published fee schedule
    • How is the fee calculated? Valuation — $10.00 per $1,000 of project/sub-contract value for non-new-construction work, on top of a $35 flat application fee, with a percentage plan-review add-on and a percentage surcharge. (New construction runs on a separate banded table starting at $10.00 per $1,000 for the first $500,000.) 90% · published fee schedule
    • Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes. 'Plan Review Fee: If the project is over $5,000.00, or requires a plan or product approval, add nonrefundable 20% of above subtotal, due at time of submission.' Nonrefundable, and payable at submission rather than at issue. 92% · published fee schedule + Code Sec. 63-18
  5. Plan review — and start the utility in parallel

    Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.

    • What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Not published by the town. The governing clock is FS 553.792(1)(a): 30 business days for work on a structure under 7,500 sq ft (a typical $37k-$55k PV job is over the $15,000 value limb and under the size limb), or 5 business days if the work is under $15,000. What the town does publish is throughput, monthly: in March 2026 it received 48 permit applications and issued 26, held 9 under review, completed 301 inspections and carried 533 open permits. 75% · town manager's monthly building department memo + Florida Statutes
    • How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? THE TOWN SAYS FOUR DIFFERENT THINGS, AND ALL FOUR ARE SHORTER THAN THE STATUTE ALLOWS. Code Sec. 63-17: invalid unless work is commenced within 60 DAYS of issuance; expires by limitation at 6 MONTHS if the work is $25,000 or less and 9 MONTHS if more; one 90-day extension at half the original permit fee. The fee schedule repeats the 6/9-month rule. The permit application says the permit 'is invalid after 90 days if the project is not started'. The Building Permit Placard says void if work is not commenced within 6 months, or after 90 days if the contractor or owner fails to schedule the inspection, or if work is suspended or abandoned for 90 days. FS 553.79(1)(c), read verbatim today: 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later.' 92% · Florida Statutes + codified ordinance Sec. 63-17 + fee schedule + permit placard
    • Which utility handles interconnection here? Duke Energy Florida, LLC. 92% · town-published utility notice + code + budget
    • Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit, for PTO: Duke's Tier 1 agreement ¶7 makes the customer provide 'Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' certifying that the installation 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' — so Duke waits on the town's final. But the town pushes Duke EARLIER for anything touching the service: its own 7-13-2026 notice tells homeowners and contractors to 'incorporate Duke utility requirements into your plan - before Plan Review', because Duke may require permanent stairs, a 3' x 5' landing at the meter, and safe access for meter replacement and emergency disconnects, and 'these requirements may lead to stair and landing encroachments'. 80% · utility tariff (Section VII, Third Revised Sheet No. 7.310, eff. 29 Apr 2013) + town notice

28 questions answered against Town of Redington Shores’s own published documents

Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes. The Town of Redington Shores is the AHJ for residential solar at addresses inside the town limits; it runs its own building department in-house.

Why the confidence is not higherListed in floridabuilding.org's statewide register of local governments that actually issue building permits (392 entries, id 2361, found by fuzzy stem after run 248's 'Belleaiir Bluffs' typo lesson). Its own Building Department page names the Building Official and Lead Permit Tech and publishes forms, fees, a portal and an inspection catalogue.

state permit-issuer register checked 2026-09-13 https://www.floridabuilding.org/sc/sc_org_srch.aspx

Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Both, and more: the town permits and inspects building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and gas itself, and does its own zoning and floodplain review. It contracts out fire (Seminole Fire Rescue and Madeira Beach), police (Town of Indian Shores) and code enforcement (Pinellas County Sheriff's Office).

Why the confidence is not higherFY2026-27 proposed budget org chart: Town Manager over Public Works, Building Official (with Permit Tech), Town Clerk and Management Analyst, with 'Police Protection - Indian Shores', 'Fire Control - Seminole & Madeira' and 'Code Enforcement - PCSO' shown as outside providers. The building page lists the same trades and gives Seminole Fire's number for fire inspections. Not 100 because the FY26-27 budget is a draft presented at a 26 Aug 2026 workshop, not an adopted document.

proposed budget (org chart and departmental detail) checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/2026-2027-Proposed-Budget.pdf

Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Yes. Solar is not named anywhere, but a PV system is electrical work: Exhibit A ('when a permit IS required') lists 'Electric System - Repair, replace, or new (any part of system, except replacement of fuses or breakers)' and 'Electric Service - Work on existing service or panel (including upgrade)'. Code Sec. 63-16 requires a permit for alterations generally.

Why the confidence is not higherThe word 'solar' occurs ZERO times in the 1,371,405 characters of the codified Code (controls in the same pass: 'electrical' 31, fabricated 'zzqqxplorp' 0), zero times in the 378,932 characters of the town's 96 website pages, and zero times in Exhibits A and B. So the permit obligation is inferred from the electrical category, not read off a solar line. Exhibit B (work needing no permit) does not reach it either.

published permit-requirement exhibit (rev 6/26/15) checked 2026-09-13 http://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/permit-exibit-a.pdf

Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope

Either. The fee schedule prices 'Mechanical, Plumbing, & Electrical $35 + $10.00/K of sub-contract, if a separate project', so electrical can be a stand-alone permit or a sub-trade line under a building permit. The town's permit placard carries BOTH a structural 'Solar Tie Down' and an electrical 'Solar Electrical Final' inspection type, so one job can draw on two trade inspection tracks.

Why the confidence is not higherRead off the fee schedule's own wording plus the inspection-type checklist printed on the Building Permit Placard inside the Private Provider Packet. Nothing states a policy in words; 70 because this is inferred from how the money and the inspections are organised, not from a published rule.

fee schedule + permit placard inspection list checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Permit-Fee-Calculations-Schedule.pdf

Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply

Either: a State of Florida licensed contractor (electrical or the appropriate trade) who has first registered with the Town, or the homeowner of a one- or two-family home under an Owner Builder affidavit.

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding page: 'The Town of Redington Shores ordinance requires that all contractors be licensed in the State of Florida' and 'Residential homeowners of one or two-family homes can apply for an Owner Builder permit.' Code Sec. 63-16.C requires a valid State of Florida and/or Pinellas County licence for electrical work. 88 because no document names 'electrician' for PV specifically — solar is unnamed everywhere.

department page + Code Sec. 63-16 checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply

Yes. 'All contractors must be registered with Redington Shores' — general liability naming the Town as certificate holder, current State licence certificate, qualifier's driver's licence, workers' comp or exemption, and a notarised Authorized Agent form. Separately, PCCLB registration ENDED for state-certified contractors on 24 June 2024 and is no longer required; town registration is.

Why the confidence is not higherPermit Submittal Checklist dated 28 Aug 2026 (five pages, authored by the Lead Permit Tech), first block. The building page states the PCCLB change with its date. NOTE a stale document: the Permit Guide (March 2024) still says 'Contractors must be active with Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board (PCCLB)' — three months before the rule changed, and still published.

published submittal checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf

Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply

Yes, for one- or two-family homes, with a notarised Owner Builder Affidavit submitted with the application.

Why the confidence is not higherBuilding page 'Residential Homeowners' block and the Owner Builder Affidavit form in the FORMS list; the affidavit is also named in the Permit Submittal Checklist's general requirements.

published affidavit form checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/redington-shores-owner-builder-affidavit.pdf

Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package

General requirements for every permit: permit application completed, signed and NOTARISED BY BOTH the owner and the contractor; Owner Builder Affidavit if applicable; sub-contractor form if applicable; an ITEMIZED COST VALUATION BREAKDOWN OF LABOR AND MATERIALS; and a recorded Notice of Commencement for contracted work over $5,000. For the ELECTRICAL category the only extra item is 'Code compliant construction drawing / location of work'. Over $25,000 in value, Code Sec. 63-16.A adds sealed plans. *** THE ITEMISED LABOUR-AND-MATERIALS BREAKDOWN IS BARRED BY FS 553.79(1)(f), which says a local government may not require a contract or 'any associated document, including ... material costs lists, labor costs'. The checklist demanding it is dated 28 Aug 2026. ***

Why the confidence is not higherPermit Submittal Checklist 28 Aug 2026, General Requirements and ELECTRICAL blocks, read in full from the PDF text layer. The statutory conflict is stated from the verified text of FS 553.79(1)(f) quoted in the standing brief; the checklist wording is verbatim.

published submittal checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf

Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package

Contradictory, and the town has three live answers. Code Sec. 63-2 (as amended by Ord. 2025-01, 11 Jun 2025): 'three copies of proposed plans and specifications'. Code Sec. 63-16: THREE sealed sets if the work is over $25,000, TWO copies of the work plan if under. The portal and the checklist contemplate electronic upload with no copy count at all. Nobody has reconciled them.

Why the confidence is not higherAll three read directly: Sec. 63-2 and Sec. 63-16 from the codified text, the portal from its own page. 70 because a reader cannot tell which governs; the newest instrument (Ord. 2025-01) says three, and it does not carve out the under-$25,000 case that Sec. 63-16.B still states.

codified ordinance (Supp. 16, through Ord. 25-03, 13 Aug 2025) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package

Yes. Code Sec. 63-16.B requires a work plan 'showing the lot and the relation of the work to the lot'. Because 100.00% of the town's land is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, Code Sec. 63-40.A also fires on every job: the site plan must show flood hazard areas and zone(s), base flood elevation(s), ground elevations, the location of proposed and existing structures, any fill, the Coastal Construction Control Line (or a note that the site is seaward of it), any dune or mangrove alteration, and 'designation of proposed design flood elevation based on base flood elevation plus two feet of freeboard'.

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 63-16.B and Sec. 63-40.A read in full from the codified text. The 100% SFHA figure is this run's own measurement (below, q47). 85 because Sec. 63-40's last sentence lets the floodplain administrator waive submissions 'not required to be prepared by a registered design professional' where review is unnecessary — so a rooftop retrofit may in practice be waived, and no published policy says when.

codified ordinance Sec. 63-40 checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations

Not required by name. No published document asks for a one-line or three-line diagram; the electrical submittal requirement is the single line 'Code compliant construction drawing / location of work'.

Why the confidence is not higherProved by enumeration over a named denominator: 'one-line', 'one line diagram', 'three-line' and 'riser' appear zero times in the 1,371,405-character codified Code, zero times in the five-page Permit Submittal Checklist of 28 Aug 2026, zero times in the two-page permit application, and zero times in the 19-page Private Provider Packet (controls in the Code pass: 'electrical' 31, 'zzqqxplorp' 0). 72 rather than higher because a plan reviewer can still demand one under 'code compliant construction drawing'.

published submittal checklist (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf

Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations

Not required by name — no published document asks for string or conductor calculations.

Why the confidence is not higherSame enumeration as q11 across the codified Code, the 28 Aug 2026 checklist, the permit application and the Private Provider Packet: no 'calculation' requirement touching electrical. The only calculation sheets the town publishes are the Impervious Surface Calculation Sheet and the Seawall Elevation Worksheet. 70 because the reviewer's discretion is unbounded.

department forms list (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps

$25,000 of work value. Code Sec. 63-16.A: 'For all new buildings or alterations over $25,000.00 in value in the estimate of the town building official, or his designee, three sets of plans and specifications bearing the seal of a registered, certified professional architect or engineer ... shall be submitted.' A typical residential PV job is over that line, so SEALED PLANS ARE THE NORM HERE.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the codified Code. 88 rather than 95 because the section says 'plans and specifications' generally rather than naming a structural calculation, and because the building official holds the valuation. Corroborated indirectly: the Pinellas County schedule the town also hosts prices solar as 'Building, Plan Review for wind resistance engineering'.

codified ordinance Sec. 63-16.A checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps

Same threshold and same clause: over $25,000 the sealed 'plans and specifications' requirement of Sec. 63-16.A is not limited by trade. No separate electrical-engineer requirement is published.

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 63-16.A is trade-neutral on its face; nothing else in the Code, the checklist or the forms distinguishes an electrical stamp. 68 because in practice a structural seal on the attachment is what the wind-engineering language points at, and no document says whether the electrical design needs its own seal.

codified ordinance Sec. 63-16.A checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees

About $498 on a $37,000 job, and there is NO solar line — PV is priced as electrical by valuation. Formula from the Permit Fee Calculations Schedule: $35 application fee + $10.00 per $1,000 of sub-contract value (electrical as a separate project, not new construction) + a nonrefundable 20% plan review fee on that subtotal because the project is over $5,000 + a 2.5% building code surcharge ($4.00 minimum). Worked: $35 + $370 = $405; +20% = $486; +2.5% = $498.15. At $55,000: ~$719.55. At $15,000: ~$227.55. Add 3% if paying by card, or $2.00 flat by e-check. *** BEWARE THE OTHER DOCUMENT: the town's media library also holds Permit-Fees-2024.pdf, which prices 'IV-I-2. Photovoltaic Systems - Each (includes Building, Plan Review & Electrical) $250.00' — but that file is BYTE-IDENTICAL (md5 bda23350005488fe847dc38466e20660) to the Pinellas County FY24 Adopted Budget extract SAFEbuilt serves for Belleair Bluffs and North Redington Beach, it is linked from ZERO of the town's 96 pages, and it is not this town's schedule. ***

Why the confidence is not higherEvery figure read from the town's own one-page Permit Fee Calculations Schedule (Title 'TOWN OF REDINGTON SHORES', Author 'Town of Redington Shores', created 13 Jun 2024). 80 not higher for three reasons: (1) the schedule states '$35.00 for every Permit' AND repeats '$35 +' inside each trade line, so it is unclear whether $35 is charged once or twice, while Code Sec. 63-20.A says an application fee is charged only on work of $25,000 or more; (2) the schedule is two years old and the Town Manager's memo of 1 Apr 2026 says the attorney is 'finalizing the internal cost analysis to ensure our proposed fees accurately reflect the staff time and resources required' — a new schedule is in preparation; (3) whether a solar contractor's whole contract counts as 'sub-contract' value is not stated.

published fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Permit-Fee-Calculations-Schedule.pdf

Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees

Valuation — $10.00 per $1,000 of project/sub-contract value for non-new-construction work, on top of a $35 flat application fee, with a percentage plan-review add-on and a percentage surcharge. (New construction runs on a separate banded table starting at $10.00 per $1,000 for the first $500,000.)

Why the confidence is not higherRead directly off the fee schedule, which is organised by trade and by dollars-per-thousand. 90 because the schedule does not say which line a solar retrofit falls on — 'Building & misc. $35 + $10.00/K (NOT new construction)' and 'Electrical $35 + $10.00/K of sub-contract, if a separate project' price identically, so the ambiguity does not change the money.

published fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Permit-Fee-Calculations-Schedule.pdf

Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees

Yes. 'Plan Review Fee: If the project is over $5,000.00, or requires a plan or product approval, add nonrefundable 20% of above subtotal, due at time of submission.' Nonrefundable, and payable at submission rather than at issue.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the fee schedule. Code Sec. 63-18.A/B is the enabling provision and confirms a separate plan review fee 'payable prior to any plan review action'. 92 because Sec. 63-18.B frames detailed plan review as triggered by alteration 'which involve 25 percent or more of the present building's capacity or value', which a PV retrofit usually is not — yet the fee schedule's own trigger is $5,000. The two triggers disagree.

published fee schedule + Code Sec. 63-18 checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Permit-Fee-Calculations-Schedule.pdf

Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity

Not published by the town. The governing clock is FS 553.792(1)(a): 30 business days for work on a structure under 7,500 sq ft (a typical $37k-$55k PV job is over the $15,000 value limb and under the size limb), or 5 business days if the work is under $15,000. What the town does publish is throughput, monthly: in March 2026 it received 48 permit applications and issued 26, held 9 under review, completed 301 inspections and carried 533 open permits.

Why the confidence is not higherThe absence is proved: 'turnaround', 'business days', 'review time' and 'plan review time' appear nowhere on the Building Department page, in the Permit Guide, in the checklist or in the codified Code (1,371,405 chars, controls passing). FS 553.792 is quoted from the standing brief's first-hand statute read of 13 Sep 2026. The throughput figures are from the Town Manager's 'Building Department Update' memo of 1 Apr 2026, published as an agenda item and linked from the building page as 'For the latest permit stats'. NOTE: FS 553.79(1)(e) requires a local enforcement agency to post its permit-processing procedures on its website, and this town posts none.

town manager's monthly building department memo + Florida Statutes checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/H8-MEMO-BUILDING-DEPT-UPDATE-Mar-2026.pdf

Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity

THE TOWN SAYS FOUR DIFFERENT THINGS, AND ALL FOUR ARE SHORTER THAN THE STATUTE ALLOWS. Code Sec. 63-17: invalid unless work is commenced within 60 DAYS of issuance; expires by limitation at 6 MONTHS if the work is $25,000 or less and 9 MONTHS if more; one 90-day extension at half the original permit fee. The fee schedule repeats the 6/9-month rule. The permit application says the permit 'is invalid after 90 days if the project is not started'. The Building Permit Placard says void if work is not commenced within 6 months, or after 90 days if the contractor or owner fails to schedule the inspection, or if work is suspended or abandoned for 90 days. FS 553.79(1)(c), read verbatim today: 'A building permit issued by a local government for a single-family dwelling expires 1 year after the issuance of the permit or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later.'

Why the confidence is not higherAll four town statements read directly, and the statute fetched and read from leg.state.fl.us in this run. 92 rather than 95 only because the statute's final sentence — 'this paragraph does not prevent a local government from extending a building permit beyond the expiration date' — means the town's extension machinery is lawful even though its expiry dates are not.

Florida Statutes + codified ordinance Sec. 63-17 + fee schedule + permit placard checked 2026-09-13 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.79.html

Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process

SmartGov by Granicus, at twn-redingtonshores-fl.smartgovcommunity.com/Public/Home (build v2026.15.0). Portal support 727-262-2218, bldgdept@redshoresfl.com.

Why the confidence is not higherFetched directly; the page identifies itself as 'Powered by SmartGov, © 2011 - 2026 Granicus' and is branded 'Town of Redington Shores, FL Public Portal'. This is the first SmartGov jurisdiction in this survey.

permit portal checked 2026-09-13 https://twn-redingtonshores-fl.smartgovcommunity.com/Public/Home

Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process

Nearly, but not on a first application. The portal takes the application, the uploads, inspection scheduling and payment (card at +3%, or e-check at $2.00 flat). Two things block a wholly electronic first submission: the permit application must be signed and NOTARISED by both the owner and the contractor, and a first-time contractor cannot self-register — 'Contact bldgdept@redshoresfl.com to request a link and access code.'

Why the confidence is not higherPortal landing page and Permit Guide, read directly; the notarisation requirement is from the 28 Aug 2026 checklist. 85 because remote online notarisation is lawful in Florida and no document says it is refused.

published permit guide + portal checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/RS-Permit-Guide.pdf

Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection

Duke Energy Florida, LLC.

Why the confidence is not higherFour independent town-side rungs: (1) the Building Department page links a notice it published itself, 'DUKE ENERGY SERVICE REQUIREMENTS ON NEW BUILDS AND ELEVATED HOMES', dated 7-13-2026; (2) the Permit Submittal Checklist requires a 'Duke no conflict letter' for swimming pools; (3) Code Sec. 137-1.B requires underground power systems to be installed to drawings 'prepared by Florida Power Corporation' — Duke's predecessor in the Florida Power Corp -> Progress Energy -> Duke chain; (4) the budget shows a NON-ZERO Electric Franchise Fee revenue line of $240,000 (FY26-27) plus $230,267 actual, which proves the town is not itself the seller. 92 rather than 95 because Pinellas County has two retail sellers (Duke and Tampa Electric per the EIA-861 read recorded in run 248, not re-proved in this run) and no parcel-level franchise map was found.

town-published utility notice + code + budget checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/NOTICE-TO-CONTRACTORS-DUKE-REQUIREMENTS-7-13-26.pdf

Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection

After permit, for PTO: Duke's Tier 1 agreement ¶7 makes the customer provide 'Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation' certifying that the installation 'was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications' — so Duke waits on the town's final. But the town pushes Duke EARLIER for anything touching the service: its own 7-13-2026 notice tells homeowners and contractors to 'incorporate Duke utility requirements into your plan - before Plan Review', because Duke may require permanent stairs, a 3' x 5' landing at the meter, and safe access for meter replacement and emergency disconnects, and 'these requirements may lead to stair and landing encroachments'.

Why the confidence is not higherDuke Tier 1 tariff paragraph read from a 300 dpi OCR of the PDF this run (it has no text layer); the town notice read from its text layer. 80 because the town notice is written for new builds and elevated homes rather than for a rooftop retrofit, and no document sets out the PV sequence explicitly.

utility tariff (Section VII, Third Revised Sheet No. 7.310, eff. 29 Apr 2013) + town notice checked 2026-09-13 https://www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/for-your-business/generate-your-own-renewable/florida/tier-1-contract.pdf

Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases

Not by the town, but it is a live gate in practice. The Permit Submittal Checklist requires an 'HOA Approval Notice if required according to by-laws' for commercial remodels only; the Town Manager's March 2026 memo lists 'HOA approval letters' among the reasons permits sit at 'Ready to Issue'. The town is 2,015 housing units for 2,176 people — a condominium town, so an association is the likelier gate than the town. FS 163.04(2) limits what an association may do: it may not prohibit solar collectors, and may determine only the specific roof location 'within an orientation to the south or within 45 degrees east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors'.

Why the confidence is not higherChecklist and memo read directly; housing-unit count from TIGERweb Census 2020 (GEOID 1259750, POP100 2,176, HU100 2,015); FS 163.04 fetched and read verbatim from leg.state.fl.us this run. 78 because no town document makes HOA approval a condition of permit issue in terms — the memo describes it as a practical hold.

Florida Statutes + submittal checklist + building department memo checked 2026-09-13 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163.04.html

Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases

No. There is no historic district, no local register, no preservation board and no certificate-of-appropriateness procedure in Redington Shores.

Why the confidence is not higherProved by enumeration: 'historic' returns 31 hits in the 1,371,405-character codified Code and every one is either the flood code's definition of 'Historic structure' (a structure eligible for the FBC Existing Building Chapter 12 exception), the Sec. 63-42.D flood variance for such a structure, or editor's boilerplate. 'Historic district', 'preservation board', 'certificate of appropriateness' and 'landmark' are all zero. Controls in the same pass: 'electrical' 31, 'zzqqxplorp' 0. 88 rather than 95 because National Register listings were not separately checked — though per the standing brief NR listing alone imposes nothing on a private owner spending private money.

codified ordinance (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases

Yes in substance. The PCCLB local technical amendment to FBC 1609.3 sets, verbatim, 'All incorporated and unincorporated Pinellas County, Risk Category I - 135 MPH ... Risk Category II - 145 MPH ... Risk Category III - 155 MPH ... Risk Category IV - 157 MPH with interpolation permitted as allowed in the Code and ASCE 7-16'. A house is Risk Category II, so 145 mph ultimate design wind speed, ASCE 7-16. Code Sec. 63-3.H adds that all nonexpendable structures in windload zones 2 and 3 must withstand 130 mph. No separate windstorm certificate form exists; it is carried in the sealed plans required over $25,000.

Why the confidence is not higherAmendment fetched from pcclb.com and read verbatim in this run; Sec. 63-3.H read from the codified Code. 85 because no town document names a windstorm certification as a submittal item — the requirement lands on the engineering, not on a form.

county licensing board local technical amendment (FBC 8th Edition 2023) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pcclb.com/pdf/lta/2023/building_1609.3.pdf

Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases

No for a rooftop retrofit on a house. Code Sec. 90-237 subjects 'all applications for new construction or substantial improvement, other than single-family detached houses and duplex units east of Gulf Boulevard' to site plan review by the planning and zoning board and final approval by the board of commissioners. A PV retrofit is neither new construction nor, at typical cost, a substantial improvement. If review were ever triggered the P&Z fee schedule prices 'Site Plan (single family residential) $1,000.00' and 'Variance $750.00'.

Why the confidence is not higherSec. 90-237 read in full. 78 because the opening words carry a real ambiguity the town has never resolved: 'other than single-family detached houses and duplex units east of Gulf Boulevard' can be read as exempting all single-family houses, or as exempting only those east of Gulf Boulevard — which would put Gulf-front houses into board review. The P&Z fee figures are from a TOSHIBA scan with no text layer, recovered by rendering at 500 dpi and OCRing twice at different page-segmentation modes; both reads agreed line for line.

codified ordinance Sec. 90-237 + P&Z fee schedule (Res. 09-19, variance updated by Res. 13-24) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases

None in the town's rules — 'solar', 'photovoltaic', 'inverter', 'renewable', 'alternative energy', 'energy storage' and 'generator' are all ZERO in the codified Code. The cap that actually bites is the utility's: Duke's Tier 1 standard interconnection agreement is for 'customer-owned renewable generation systems (10kW or less)' and ¶9 adds that total capacity must not exceed 90% of the rating of the service currently provided. Above either, the job moves to Tier 2.

Why the confidence is not higherCode enumeration with controls passing ('electrical' 31, 'zzqqxplorp' 0) over 1,371,405 characters; Duke's caps read from the 300 dpi OCR of the tariff this run. 85 because the Tier 2 threshold and its paperwork were not read in this run.

utility tariff + codified ordinance (absence proved) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/for-your-business/generate-your-own-renewable/florida/tier-1-contract.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Install 5 steps · 20 questions
  1. Build to the code editions actually in force here

    The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.

    • Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020, as incorporated by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), PLUS the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board amendment to NEC Article 250.96(A): 'All raceways shall contain an equipment-grounding conductor sized in accordance with Table 250.122.' PRICE THE EGC IN ON EVERY RACEWAY. 78% · county licensing board local technical amendment (FBC 8th Edition 2023) + Code Sec. 63-1
    • Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), reached by a floating adoption. Code Sec. 63-1.A adopts the FBC 'including their latest editions and revisions, now in effect or as hereinafter may be modified and amended' but still names '2010 Florida Building Code (FBC), as effective March 15, 2012' as its example; the Permit Submittal Checklist of 28 Aug 2026 names 'the FBC 8th Edition Existing Building Code'; the Building Department page says 'the current edition of the Florida Building Code'; and the PCCLB amendments the town adopts are headed 'FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 8th EDITION (2023)'. The Roofing Affidavit form is titled 'FBC 2023'. 85% · codified ordinance Sec. 63-1 + department checklist
    • Which fire code edition is in force? The town adopts NO fire code of its own. The only reference in the entire codified Code is Sec. 63-1.B, which designates the Planning and Zoning Board (or the PCCLB 'as applicable to the context') as the board of adjustments and appeals 'pursuant to the land development regulations of the town, the Florida Building Codes and the Florida Fire Code'. Fire service is contracted out to Seminole Fire Rescue (727-393-8711) and Madeira Beach. For fire inspections the town says: call Seminole, then 'provide a copy of your fire inspection to the building department'. 65% · department page + budget org chart + codified ordinance enumeration
    • Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes, on two tracks. (1) County licensing board amendments reaching the town through Code Sec. 63-1.A: NEC Article 250.96 (EGC in every raceway), FBC 1609.3 (145 mph Risk Category II, ASCE 7-16), FBC 3109 (Pinellas Gulf Beaches Coastal Construction Code), plus plumbing, fuel gas and residential amendments. (2) The town's own FBC Chapter 1 and flood amendments in Code Sec. 63-1.C and Chapter 63 Part 2: FBC 104.10.1, 107.6.1, added Section 117, 1612.4.1 (ASCE 24 or BFE+2, whichever is higher), R322.2.1, R322.2.2, 1612.2 and FBC Existing Building 202 (5-year cumulative substantial improvement). 92% · codified ordinance Sec. 63-1 + county licensing board amendments
    • What is the installation judged against? The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and NEC 2020, both as amended by the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board; the Pinellas Gulf Beaches Coastal Construction Code; the town's own Chapter 63 Part 2 flood damage prevention article; ASCE 7-16 at 145 mph ultimate design wind speed for a Risk Category II house; and FEMA/NFIP requirements. The permit application's OFFICE USE ONLY block has a field headed 'CODE IN EFFECT:' that the town fills in per permit. 85% · department page + codified ordinance + county amendments
  2. Fire access, setbacks and pathways

    Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.

    Nothing recorded for Town of Redington Shores on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.

  3. Rapid shutdown

    Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.

    • Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Yes — NEC 2020 Article 690.12 applies through the adopted code. The town adds nothing: 'rapid shutdown' occurs zero times in the codified Code and zero times across the town's 96 website pages, and the PCCLB's only NEC amendment is to Article 250.96. 75% · adopted code + county amendment set (absence of local variation proved)
  4. Labels and placards

    The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.

  5. Disconnect, storage and listed equipment

    Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.

    • Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? No rule on either side. The town specifies nothing about AC disconnect location, and Duke's Tier 1 agreement does not require a customer-installed manual disconnect at all — ¶10 refers to 'the manual disconnect switch, IF AVAILABLE, or ... disconnecting the meter', which is conditional language, not a requirement. 70% · utility tariff + codified ordinance (absences proved)
    • Must equipment be on a specific approved list? No approved-equipment list of the town's own, but two listing gates apply. Florida Product Approval is required by the checklist for products in its named categories (windows and doors; 'Florida Product Approval for brackets or stands (including installation manual)' for mechanical) — a mounting system is a bracket or stand on that wording. Duke's Tier 1 agreement ¶6 requires 'a utility-interactive inverter, or other device certified pursuant to item 5 listed above, that performs the function of automatically isolating the Customer-owned generation equipment from the electric grid in the event the electric grid loses power'. 72% · published submittal checklist + utility tariff
    • Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? The town has no battery or energy-storage rule of any kind. 'battery' returns 3 hits in the 1,371,405-character codified Code and all three are the same cross-reference list of state criminal statutes (FS 784.011 assault, 784.041 felony battery, 784.045 aggravated battery); 'energy storage', 'ESS', 'lithium' and 'storage system' are zero. Batteries are therefore neither permitted nor prohibited by name — they fall to the FBC and the fire code, and the fire code here belongs to Seminole Fire Rescue and Madeira Beach. 65% · codified ordinance (town-side absence proved; fire side unreached)
    • Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? No. There is no separate ESS permit type and no ESS or battery inspection type. The town's full inspection catalogue — the type list printed on its own Building Permit Placard, running to well over a hundred named types across structural, plumbing, electrical, gas, mechanical, fire and pool — contains 'Solar Tie Down', 'Solar Plumbing Final' and 'Solar Electrical Final' but nothing for storage. 75% · town Building Permit Placard inspection list (absence proved against a named denominator)
    • Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes, and the flood rules make a ground mount hard here. Code Sec. 63-5.A defines 'Structure' as 'Anything constructed, erected, or installed, whether permanent or portable, the use of which requires a location on the ground'. Then: (a) 100.00% OF THE TOWN'S LAND IS IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA and 8.07% is VE; (b) Sec. 63-43 prohibits accessory structures outright in coastal high hazard areas (Zone V/VE) and, elsewhere, permits them below BFE only for parking or storage, one-storey, not larger than 600 sq ft, with flood-damage-resistant materials below BFE+1 and 'mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems, including plumbing fixtures, elevated to or above the base flood elevation plus one foot'; (c) because a PV array is not 'used for parking or storage', Sec. 63-43 does not reach it and the catch-all does: Sec. 63-66.A, 'other development', requires anything not otherwise provided for to be anchored against flotation, built of flood-damage-resistant materials, and to 'have mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION', which Sec. 63-40.A(7) fixes at BFE PLUS TWO FEET. With BFEs of 9 to 13 ft across the town, that puts a ground mount's electrical 11 to 15 ft above datum. Zoning adds setbacks for accessory structures and a 100 sq ft / 10 ft cap on 'storage sheds, utility buildings, or lockers'. 85% · codified ordinance Sec. 63-5, 63-40, 63-43, 63-66 + FEMA NFHL measurement
    • Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? No local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing. The single electrical amendment in force is the PCCLB's EGC-in-every-raceway addition to NEC 250.96(A); busbar, 120% rule and service-upgrade questions fall to NEC 2020 unamended. An upgrade to the existing service or panel does need its own permit (Exhibit A, 'Electric Service - Work on existing service or panel (including upgrade)'). 80% · county amendment register + codified ordinance (absence proved against a named denominator)
    • Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Nothing solar-specific is specified. The attachment is governed by the sealed plans required over $25,000 (Sec. 63-16.A) against ASCE 7-16 at 145 mph, and it draws its own inspection: the town's Building Permit Placard carries a structural inspection type 'Solar Tie Down'. The nearest analogous codified rule is Sec. 90-174 for satellite antennas, which requires ground mounts to be anchored 'so that in the event of flooding, such ground mounts shall not come out of the ground' with 'plans and specifications for such mounts ... submitted to and approved by the building inspector prior to any installation' — but that section is scoped to satellite antennas and cannot fire on PV. 70% · town Building Permit Placard inspection list (inside the Private Provider Packet) + codified ordinance

20 questions answered against Town of Redington Shores’s own published documents

Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

NEC 2020, as incorporated by the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), PLUS the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board amendment to NEC Article 250.96(A): 'All raceways shall contain an equipment-grounding conductor sized in accordance with Table 250.122.' PRICE THE EGC IN ON EVERY RACEWAY.

Why the confidence is not higherThe PCCLB amendment was fetched and read verbatim this run; its own fiscal impact statement says 'this requirement has been in effect in Pinellas County since 1987'. THE FOOTING HERE IS STRONGER THAN AT ANY PREVIOUS PINELLAS AUTHORITY: Code Sec. 63-1.A adopts by reference codes 'as adopted by the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board under Chapter 75-489, Laws of Florida, Parts I and II', so the amendment reaches a Redington Shores job through the town's own ordinance, not merely through the board's countywide jurisdiction (Kenneth City had an interlocal; Belleair Bluffs had nothing). Only 78 because of the edition muddle: Sec. 63-1.A names 'the 2010 Florida Building Code (FBC), as effective March 15, 2012' while also adopting 'their latest editions and revisions, now in effect or as hereinafter may be modified and amended' — a floating adoption with a fossilised example — and the town's own 28 Aug 2026 checklist names 'the FBC 8th Edition Existing Building Code'.

county licensing board local technical amendment (FBC 8th Edition 2023) + Code Sec. 63-1 checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pcclb.com/pdf/lta/2023/NFPA70.pdf

Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force

Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), reached by a floating adoption. Code Sec. 63-1.A adopts the FBC 'including their latest editions and revisions, now in effect or as hereinafter may be modified and amended' but still names '2010 Florida Building Code (FBC), as effective March 15, 2012' as its example; the Permit Submittal Checklist of 28 Aug 2026 names 'the FBC 8th Edition Existing Building Code'; the Building Department page says 'the current edition of the Florida Building Code'; and the PCCLB amendments the town adopts are headed 'FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 8th EDITION (2023)'. The Roofing Affidavit form is titled 'FBC 2023'.

Why the confidence is not higherFour documents read directly. 85 because the codified text's named edition is fourteen years old and only the floating language rescues it; a reader of the Code alone would get the wrong answer.

codified ordinance Sec. 63-1 + department checklist checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force

The town adopts NO fire code of its own. The only reference in the entire codified Code is Sec. 63-1.B, which designates the Planning and Zoning Board (or the PCCLB 'as applicable to the context') as the board of adjustments and appeals 'pursuant to the land development regulations of the town, the Florida Building Codes and the Florida Fire Code'. Fire service is contracted out to Seminole Fire Rescue (727-393-8711) and Madeira Beach. For fire inspections the town says: call Seminole, then 'provide a copy of your fire inspection to the building department'.

Why the confidence is not higherThe town-side absence is proved by enumeration: the codified Code's chapter list was walked in full (761 TOC leaves, 902 documents, 1,371,405 characters) and there is no fire prevention chapter — Chapter 77 'Fire and Firearms' is fireworks and firearms discharge. The providers are named in the FY26-27 budget org chart ('Fire Control - Seminole & Madeira', $300,000) and on the building page. 65 and no higher because the EDITION is genuinely unreached: neither Seminole's nor Madeira Beach's fire chapter was read in this run, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code itself is paywalled.

department page + budget org chart + codified ordinance enumeration checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force

Yes, on two tracks. (1) County licensing board amendments reaching the town through Code Sec. 63-1.A: NEC Article 250.96 (EGC in every raceway), FBC 1609.3 (145 mph Risk Category II, ASCE 7-16), FBC 3109 (Pinellas Gulf Beaches Coastal Construction Code), plus plumbing, fuel gas and residential amendments. (2) The town's own FBC Chapter 1 and flood amendments in Code Sec. 63-1.C and Chapter 63 Part 2: FBC 104.10.1, 107.6.1, added Section 117, 1612.4.1 (ASCE 24 or BFE+2, whichever is higher), R322.2.1, R322.2.2, 1612.2 and FBC Existing Building 202 (5-year cumulative substantial improvement).

Why the confidence is not higherAll of it read directly — the PCCLB amendments from pcclb.com in this run, the town's amendment list from the codified Sec. 63-1.C. The building page adds a fifth instrument by name: 'All codes, ordinances, policies, and regulations for Florida Building Code (FBC), Pinellas Gulf Beaches Coastal Construction Code (PGBCCC); Town of Redington Shores (Town) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) must be complied with.' 92 because the PGBCCC amendment PDF (pcclb.com/pdf/lta/2023/3109.1.pdf, 25 pages) is a TOSHIBA scan with no text layer and was NOT read in this run.

codified ordinance Sec. 63-1 + county licensing board amendments checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical

The Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023) and NEC 2020, both as amended by the Pinellas County Construction Licensing Board; the Pinellas Gulf Beaches Coastal Construction Code; the town's own Chapter 63 Part 2 flood damage prevention article; ASCE 7-16 at 145 mph ultimate design wind speed for a Risk Category II house; and FEMA/NFIP requirements. The permit application's OFFICE USE ONLY block has a field headed 'CODE IN EFFECT:' that the town fills in per permit.

Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the building page's own compliance sentence, Code Sec. 63-1 and 63-3.H, and the PCCLB amendments read this run. 85 because the PGBCCC text itself was not extracted.

department page + codified ordinance + county amendments checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical

No local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing. The single electrical amendment in force is the PCCLB's EGC-in-every-raceway addition to NEC 250.96(A); busbar, 120% rule and service-upgrade questions fall to NEC 2020 unamended. An upgrade to the existing service or panel does need its own permit (Exhibit A, 'Electric Service - Work on existing service or panel (including upgrade)').

Why the confidence is not higherProved by enumeration over the codified Code (1,371,405 chars, controls passing): 'busbar', 'bus bar', '120 percent', 'service upgrade' and 'ampacity' are all zero, and 'electrical' 31 hits were read. The PCCLB amendment list was enumerated in full from pcclb.com/amendments.htm and contains exactly two NEC items historically (250.96 and, in older cycles, 285.3/280.3) — only 250.96 survives in the 2023 set. 80 because Duke's own service requirements for meter access on elevated homes can force physical changes the code does not.

county amendment register + codified ordinance (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pcclb.com/amendments.htm

Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting

Nothing solar-specific is specified. The attachment is governed by the sealed plans required over $25,000 (Sec. 63-16.A) against ASCE 7-16 at 145 mph, and it draws its own inspection: the town's Building Permit Placard carries a structural inspection type 'Solar Tie Down'. The nearest analogous codified rule is Sec. 90-174 for satellite antennas, which requires ground mounts to be anchored 'so that in the event of flooding, such ground mounts shall not come out of the ground' with 'plans and specifications for such mounts ... submitted to and approved by the building inspector prior to any installation' — but that section is scoped to satellite antennas and cannot fire on PV.

Why the confidence is not higherPlacard inspection list and Sec. 90-174 read directly; the solar absence is the same enumeration as q28. 70 because 'Solar Tie Down' is a bare inspection-type name with no published acceptance criteria, and because the Sec. 90-174 analogy is exactly that — an analogy.

town Building Permit Placard inspection list (inside the Private Provider Packet) + codified ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Private-Provider-Packet-RS.pdf

Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedCOULD NOT REACH, not proved absent. The town adopts no fire prevention code of its own — the codified Code's chapter list was walked in full (761 TOC leaves, 902 documents, 1,371,405 characters, controls passing: 'electrical' 31, 'zzqqxplorp' 0) and there is no fire chapter; Chapter 77 'Fire and Firearms' is fireworks and firearms discharge, and the only 'Florida Fire Code' reference is Sec. 63-1.B's board-of-appeals designation. Fire service is contracted to Seminole Fire Rescue (727-393-8711) and Madeira Beach per the FY26-27 budget org chart ('Fire Control - Seminole & Madeira', $300,000). I did NOT read Seminole's or Madeira Beach's own fire chapters, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code is paywalled. Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are therefore unreached, not absent. Next run: read the Seminole Fire Rescue district's and the City of Madeira Beach's fire chapters and find the interlocal that splits them.

https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/2026-2027-Proposed-Budget.pdf

Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown

Yes — NEC 2020 Article 690.12 applies through the adopted code. The town adds nothing: 'rapid shutdown' occurs zero times in the codified Code and zero times across the town's 96 website pages, and the PCCLB's only NEC amendment is to Article 250.96.

Why the confidence is not higherEnumeration with controls passing over 1,371,405 characters of code and 378,932 characters of site text; the PCCLB 2023 amendment set was listed in full from pcclb.com/amendments.htm. 75 rather than higher because the requirement is reached by inference from the adopted NEC edition (itself only 78-confidence, see q29) rather than from any local statement.

adopted code + county amendment set (absence of local variation proved) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.pcclb.com/pdf/lta/2023/NFPA70.pdf

Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling

None beyond what NEC 2020 itself requires. The town specifies no placards at the service equipment, and neither does the utility.

Why the confidence is not higherTown side proved by enumeration: 'placard' returns 2 hits in the 1,371,405-character codified Code and both are irrelevant (the definition of 'Sign', and a rule about vehicles displaying hazardous material warning placards); 'label' returns 1; 'warning' and 'signage' carry nothing electrical. Controls passing. Utility side re-proved independently in this run rather than inherited: the Duke Tier 1 agreement has no text layer, so all four pages were rendered at 300 dpi and OCR'd — 'placard' 0, 'label' 0, 'warning' 0, and all ten 'sign' hits are assign/design/signature. 85 because the NEC requirements themselves were not re-read from the code book.

codified ordinance + utility tariff (both absences proved this run) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No. The authority specifies no placard wording of its own.

Why the confidence is not higherSame enumeration as q38 over a named denominator — 1,371,405 characters of codified Code with controls passing, plus the 96 website pages, the fee schedule, the permit application, the 28 Aug 2026 checklist, the inspection catalogue and the 19-page Private Provider Packet. Nothing in any of them prescribes wording.

codified ordinance and published forms (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No. No letter height, colour or material is specified for any electrical or PV label. (The Code does specify letter heights in its SIGN article, for commercial signage, which has nothing to do with equipment labelling.)

Why the confidence is not higherSame enumeration. The only dimensional lettering rules in the Code sit in the Chapter 90 sign article and are scoped to advertising signs. 85 because the sign article is long and was read by keyword rather than end to end.

codified ordinance (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No local requirement. Whatever NEC 2020 705.10 / 690.56(C) requires applies through the adopted code; the town adds nothing and asks for nothing on the plans beyond 'code compliant construction drawing / location of work'.

Why the confidence is not higherEnumeration as above; 'facility map', 'site plan placard' and 'directory' are zero in the Code, and the electrical block of the 28 Aug 2026 checklist is one line. 78 because the NEC text was not re-read.

published submittal checklist + codified ordinance (absence proved) checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf

Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No. Duke Energy Florida's Tier 1 standard interconnection agreement specifies no placards, labels or warning signs at all.

Why the confidence is not higherRE-PROVED IN THIS RUN rather than inherited. The tariff (Section VII, Third Revised Sheet No. 7.310, cancels Second Revised Sheet No. 7.310, effective April 29, 2013, four pages) 200s to curl_cffi with a Chrome impersonation and has NO text layer — pdftotext returns 4 characters. Rendered at 300 dpi and OCR'd page by page: 'placard' 0, 'label' 0, 'warning' 0 across all four pages. What the tariff does say: ¶8 only RECOMMENDS $100,000 general liability cover; ¶9 caps Tier 1 at 10 kW gross and 90% of the service rating; ¶10 lets Duke isolate the system 'using the manual disconnect switch, if available, or by disconnecting the meter'. 88 rather than 95 because this is an OCR of a scan.

utility tariff, OCR'd at 300 dpi in this run checked 2026-09-13 https://www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/for-your-business/generate-your-own-renewable/florida/tier-1-contract.pdf

Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling

No local or utility rule on label placement. NEC 2020's own placement rules govern unamended.

Why the confidence is not higherBoth absences proved in this run (q38, q42). 80 because it is an absence on both sides rather than a positive statement by anyone.

codified ordinance + utility tariff (absences proved) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing

No approved-equipment list of the town's own, but two listing gates apply. Florida Product Approval is required by the checklist for products in its named categories (windows and doors; 'Florida Product Approval for brackets or stands (including installation manual)' for mechanical) — a mounting system is a bracket or stand on that wording. Duke's Tier 1 agreement ¶6 requires 'a utility-interactive inverter, or other device certified pursuant to item 5 listed above, that performs the function of automatically isolating the Customer-owned generation equipment from the electric grid in the event the electric grid loses power'.

Why the confidence is not higherChecklist and tariff read directly. 72 because the checklist's Florida Product Approval line sits under MECHANICAL, not ELECTRICAL, and no document says whether a PV racking system is treated as a 'bracket or stand'; that is a live question to put to the building official.

published submittal checklist + utility tariff checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf

Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS

The town has no battery or energy-storage rule of any kind. 'battery' returns 3 hits in the 1,371,405-character codified Code and all three are the same cross-reference list of state criminal statutes (FS 784.011 assault, 784.041 felony battery, 784.045 aggravated battery); 'energy storage', 'ESS', 'lithium' and 'storage system' are zero. Batteries are therefore neither permitted nor prohibited by name — they fall to the FBC and the fire code, and the fire code here belongs to Seminole Fire Rescue and Madeira Beach.

Why the confidence is not higherThe town-side enumeration is solid (controls passing: 'electrical' 31, 'zzqqxplorp' 0) and is a real finding. 65 and no higher because the part that actually governs an ESS — the fire authority's rules — was NOT reached in this run: neither Seminole's nor Madeira Beach's fire chapter was read, and the Florida Fire Prevention Code is paywalled. Do not read this as 'batteries are unregulated here'.

codified ordinance (town-side absence proved; fire side unreached) checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS

No. There is no separate ESS permit type and no ESS or battery inspection type. The town's full inspection catalogue — the type list printed on its own Building Permit Placard, running to well over a hundred named types across structural, plumbing, electrical, gas, mechanical, fire and pool — contains 'Solar Tie Down', 'Solar Plumbing Final' and 'Solar Electrical Final' but nothing for storage.

Why the confidence is not higherEnumerated from the placard's checkbox list and from the separate one-page TOWN OF REDINGTON SHORES INSPECTIONS sheet. 75 because an ESS would in practice be inspected under Electrical Final, and no published policy says otherwise.

town Building Permit Placard inspection list (absence proved against a named denominator) checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Private-Provider-Packet-RS.pdf

Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount

Yes, and the flood rules make a ground mount hard here. Code Sec. 63-5.A defines 'Structure' as 'Anything constructed, erected, or installed, whether permanent or portable, the use of which requires a location on the ground'. Then: (a) 100.00% OF THE TOWN'S LAND IS IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA and 8.07% is VE; (b) Sec. 63-43 prohibits accessory structures outright in coastal high hazard areas (Zone V/VE) and, elsewhere, permits them below BFE only for parking or storage, one-storey, not larger than 600 sq ft, with flood-damage-resistant materials below BFE+1 and 'mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems, including plumbing fixtures, elevated to or above the base flood elevation plus one foot'; (c) because a PV array is not 'used for parking or storage', Sec. 63-43 does not reach it and the catch-all does: Sec. 63-66.A, 'other development', requires anything not otherwise provided for to be anchored against flotation, built of flood-damage-resistant materials, and to 'have mechanical, plumbing, and electrical systems ABOVE THE DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION', which Sec. 63-40.A(7) fixes at BFE PLUS TWO FEET. With BFEs of 9 to 13 ft across the town, that puts a ground mount's electrical 11 to 15 ft above datum. Zoning adds setbacks for accessory structures and a 100 sq ft / 10 ft cap on 'storage sheds, utility buildings, or lockers'.

Why the confidence is not higherEvery clause read from the codified text. The flood percentages are this run's own measurement: FEMA NFHL layer 28 on the town bbox at 20 records/page returned 17 polygons and 29,094 vertices; the Census 2020 place polygon (GEOID 1259750) was sampled on a 400x400 lattice giving 88,207 interior points, and the TIGERweb Areal Hydrography land mask removed 69.54% against a Census AREAWATER share of 69.54% — an exact match to two decimals — leaving 26,866 land points. TWO INDEPENDENTLY WRITTEN SAMPLERS (shapely prepare + contains_xy, and a hand-written numpy even-odd ray-caster over the raw ESRI rings) agreed on the point counts, the land mask and the headline: SFHA 100.00%, VE 8.07%, ZERO land points in Zone X. An AE representative-point positive control passed; a fabricated point at (0,0) returned nothing. 85 rather than higher because the two samplers differ on the internal AE split (AE BFE 10: 60.7% vs 63.0%; AE BFE 11: 30.3% vs 28.0%) where adjacent AE polygons share a boundary, so quote those two as ranges.

codified ordinance Sec. 63-5, 63-40, 63-43, 63-66 + FEMA NFHL measurement checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/redington_shores/codes/code_of_ordinances

Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment

No rule on either side. The town specifies nothing about AC disconnect location, and Duke's Tier 1 agreement does not require a customer-installed manual disconnect at all — ¶10 refers to 'the manual disconnect switch, IF AVAILABLE, or ... disconnecting the meter', which is conditional language, not a requirement.

Why the confidence is not higherTown absence from the same code enumeration ('disconnect' carries nothing electrical in the codified Code); Duke's wording from the 300 dpi OCR this run. 70 because the four-page Tier 1 agreement is the whole of Duke's published Tier 1 paperwork that was read, and Duke's separate technical requirements for meter access on elevated homes (which the town republishes) do bear on where equipment can physically go.

utility tariff + codified ordinance (absences proved) checked 2026-09-13 https://www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/for-your-business/generate-your-own-renewable/florida/tier-1-contract.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
  1. Book it

    Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.

    • How is an inspection booked? Any of three: through the SmartGov portal, by phone on 727-397-5538 option 1 between 8:30 am and 3:00 pm, or by email to bldgdept@redshoresfl.com. 95% · department page
    • How much notice is required? Next business day, with a 3:00 pm cut-off the day before. 'Next-day Inspections must be called in by 3:00 pm' and 'The cutoff time for next day inspections is 3:00 pm.' 95% · department page
    • Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? No AM/PM windows are offered and no same-day service is published. Inspections are performed Monday through Friday between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm. Results may take up to 24 hours to appear in the portal. 88% · department page
  2. Know who turns up

    Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.

    • Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Yes. The town's own building department performs the inspections, with a private-provider alternative available to the owner or contractor under FS 553.791. 95% · department page + building department memo + adopted budget
    • If delegated, to whom? Not delegated. The only alternative route is a private provider chosen and paid by the fee owner under FS 553.791, and the town's 19-page Private Provider Packet RESERVES NOTHING — 'reserv' occurs zero times in it, so there is no list of inspections the town keeps to itself. 88% · published private provider packet
  3. Work the stages in order

    A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.

    • Which inspections are required, and in what order? For a rooftop PV retrofit, from the town's own inspection type list: 'Solar Tie Down' (the structural attachment), 'Solar Electrical Final', and a Final Building. Electrical Rough-In applies only where work will be concealed behind wall or ceiling membranes. Code Sec. 63-19 makes inspections mandatory 'before covering any walls or ceilings, in order that framing plus electrical, plumbing or air-conditioning/heating rough-ins may be inspected' and 'at other phase points required by the building code and listed by the building department'. 72% · town Building Permit Placard inspection list + Code Sec. 63-19
    • Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? No mid-roof inspection exists. An Electrical Rough-In type exists and Code Sec. 63-19.B makes it mandatory before any wall or ceiling is covered — so it fires only if the PV conduit will be concealed. There is no 'mid-roof' or 'in-progress roof' type in the town's catalogue; the roof types are Roofing/Deck (a) Dry-In and (b) Final, and Re-Roof Dry-in/Flashing and Re-Roof Final. 70% · published inspection catalogue + Code Sec. 63-19
  4. Have the paperwork on site

    The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.

    • Is there a published inspection checklist? Yes, three of them, and they disagree. (1) TORS-Inspections-1.pdf, a one-page catalogue describing what each inspection covers by trade. (2) Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf, five pages by category, which also reprints FBC 110.3 'Required inspections'. (3) The Building Permit Placard inside the Private Provider Packet, whose checkbox list is the fullest catalogue the town publishes — and the only one with solar types on it. 90% · published inspection catalogue
    • What must be on site at inspection? 'Permit Placard, Notice of Commencement, Approved Site and Building Plans must be posted on site in permit box or dry location by front door.' The placard itself adds 'POST PERMIT PLACARD ON JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES & MUST BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET'. The NOC must be recorded at the courthouse and posted before the first inspection, and is required for contracted work over $5,000. 95% · department page + town permit placard
  5. Sign-off, and permission to operate

    Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.

    • What is issued on pass? A passed Final, not a Certificate of Occupancy. The town's CO list is explicitly a new-construction list — 'All new construction requires a final zoning inspection for C/O' — and runs to final survey, final elevation certificate, Coastal A or V Zone certificate, driveway agreement, termite certificate, recorded non-conversion agreement, blower door test, insulation certificate, EPL display card and the Building Official's approval. A PV retrofit triggers none of those; it closes on the Solar Electrical Final and the Final Building, visible in the portal. 70% · department page
    • Who notifies the utility for PTO? The installer or customer, not the AHJ. Duke Tier 1 ¶7: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' The town publishes nothing about notifying Duke. 85% · utility tariff, OCR'd at 300 dpi in this run
    • Is there a re-inspection fee? $45.00. 90% · published fee schedule
    • How are corrections issued and cleared? Through the portal, with email and phone as the fallbacks. Results are viewable in the permit portal (up to 24 hours to appear), or by calling 727-397-5538 option 1, or by emailing bldgdept@redshoresfl.com. Applications carry visible statuses — the Town Manager's March 2026 memo reports them as Under Review, Disapproved, Payment Pending, Ready to Issue and Incomplete Applications, and notes 'View Notes on your application' as a portal feature. 65% · building department memo + portal pages

14 questions answered against Town of Redington Shores’s own published documents

Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling

Any of three: through the SmartGov portal, by phone on 727-397-5538 option 1 between 8:30 am and 3:00 pm, or by email to bldgdept@redshoresfl.com.

Why the confidence is not higherAll three stated on the Building Department page in the same paragraph, and the portal's own 'My Inspections - schedule inspections' function is described in the contractor registration pages.

department page checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling

Next business day, with a 3:00 pm cut-off the day before. 'Next-day Inspections must be called in by 3:00 pm' and 'The cutoff time for next day inspections is 3:00 pm.'

Why the confidence is not higherStated twice on the Building Department page, once in the hours block at the top and once in the Inspections block. Modified 2 Sep 2026, eleven days before this run.

department page checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling

No AM/PM windows are offered and no same-day service is published. Inspections are performed Monday through Friday between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm. Results may take up to 24 hours to appear in the portal.

Why the confidence is not higherAll three sentences read from the Building Department page. 88 because the absence of AM/PM windows is an absence rather than a statement — the page simply gives a single daily window.

department page checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects

Yes. The town's own building department performs the inspections, with a private-provider alternative available to the owner or contractor under FS 553.791.

Why the confidence is not higher'All permits require building inspections. Inspections are performed Monday through Friday between 9:00 am and 3:00 pm' on the department page; the department completed 301 inspections in March 2026 per the Town Manager's memo; the FY25-26 adopted budget carries $185,000 of Building & Inspections payroll. The Private Provider Packet is published as a form.

department page + building department memo + adopted budget checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects

Not delegated. The only alternative route is a private provider chosen and paid by the fee owner under FS 553.791, and the town's 19-page Private Provider Packet RESERVES NOTHING — 'reserv' occurs zero times in it, so there is no list of inspections the town keeps to itself.

Why the confidence is not higherThe packet was read in full (54,313 characters of text layer). It does impose one local condition on the route: the CONTRACTOR EC SPOT SURVEY AFFIDAVIT says 'no Inspection activity is allowed after the slab inspection has been PASSED, until a spot survey & under construction elevation certificate has been submitted to and approved by the Town', with notification within 48 hours — irrelevant to a rooftop retrofit but fatal to a ground mount's schedule. 88 because the packet miscites its own governing statute twice on page 2 ('Florida Statute 553.491' and 'F.S. 553.971(2)(a)' where the section is FS 553.791), which is not confidence-inspiring about the rest.

published private provider packet checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Private-Provider-Packet-RS.pdf

Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence

For a rooftop PV retrofit, from the town's own inspection type list: 'Solar Tie Down' (the structural attachment), 'Solar Electrical Final', and a Final Building. Electrical Rough-In applies only where work will be concealed behind wall or ceiling membranes. Code Sec. 63-19 makes inspections mandatory 'before covering any walls or ceilings, in order that framing plus electrical, plumbing or air-conditioning/heating rough-ins may be inspected' and 'at other phase points required by the building code and listed by the building department'.

Why the confidence is not higherThe three solar types are named on the town's Building Permit Placard checkbox list inside the Private Provider Packet — THE ONLY PLACE IN THE WHOLE PUBLISHED SET WHERE THE WORD 'SOLAR' APPEARS AT ALL. The town's separate one-page inspection sheet (TORS-Inspections-1.pdf, created 2012, modified 13 Jun 2024) has no solar type: its electrical track is Underground, Rough-In, Final. 72 because no document states the order, and the two town documents disagree about whether solar types exist.

town Building Permit Placard inspection list + Code Sec. 63-19 checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Private-Provider-Packet-RS.pdf

Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence

No mid-roof inspection exists. An Electrical Rough-In type exists and Code Sec. 63-19.B makes it mandatory before any wall or ceiling is covered — so it fires only if the PV conduit will be concealed. There is no 'mid-roof' or 'in-progress roof' type in the town's catalogue; the roof types are Roofing/Deck (a) Dry-In and (b) Final, and Re-Roof Dry-in/Flashing and Re-Roof Final.

Why the confidence is not higherEnumerated from both inspection lists. 70 because whether a given PV run counts as concealed work is the inspector's call and nothing published settles it.

published inspection catalogue + Code Sec. 63-19 checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/TORS-Inspections-1.pdf

Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked

Nothing published by this authority.

Where we lookedNot published. Looked in the Building Department page's Inspections block; the one-page inspection catalogue TORS-Inspections-1.pdf, whose Electrical Final entry says only 'To be made after the building is complete, all required electrical fixtures are in place and properly connected or protected and the structure is ready for occupancy'; the five-page Permit Submittal Checklist of 28 Aug 2026 including its reprint of FBC 110.3; the Building Permit Placard's full inspection-type list; the 19-page Private Provider Packet including its INSPECTION REPORT form; and the codified Code Sec. 63-19. None of them says whether an inspector verifies labels or equipment listings. This is a genuine silence about practice rather than a rule I could locate — the honest answer needs a phone call to the building department on 727-397-5538.

https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/TORS-Inspections-1.pdf

Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked

Yes, three of them, and they disagree. (1) TORS-Inspections-1.pdf, a one-page catalogue describing what each inspection covers by trade. (2) Permit-Submittal-Checklist-8.28.26.pdf, five pages by category, which also reprints FBC 110.3 'Required inspections'. (3) The Building Permit Placard inside the Private Provider Packet, whose checkbox list is the fullest catalogue the town publishes — and the only one with solar types on it.

Why the confidence is not higherAll three fetched and read. 90 rather than 95 because the published checklists are organised around new construction, remodels, docks, pools, windows and roofs, and none of them has a solar or PV section — the solar types survive only on the placard.

published inspection catalogue checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/TORS-Inspections-1.pdf

Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site

'Permit Placard, Notice of Commencement, Approved Site and Building Plans must be posted on site in permit box or dry location by front door.' The placard itself adds 'POST PERMIT PLACARD ON JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES & MUST BE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET'. The NOC must be recorded at the courthouse and posted before the first inspection, and is required for contracted work over $5,000.

Why the confidence is not higherThe first sentence is verbatim from the Building Department page's 'Construct Standards' block; the second is verbatim from the town's own placard; the NOC rule is on the department page, in the checklist and in the FS 713.135 warning printed on the permit application.

department page + town permit placard checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection

$45.00.

Why the confidence is not higher'Re-inspection Fee: $45.00' on the Permit Fee Calculations Schedule. The budget confirms the account exists ('432.255 Reinspection Fees'). 90 because the schedule is dated June 2024 and a rewrite is in progress, and because there is no published re-inspection LADDER — no escalation for a second or third failure, unlike neighbouring Pinellas schedules which run $75/$300. Also note FS 553.79(7)(a): the town must refund 10 percent of the permit and inspection fees where work fails an inspection and the inspector does not give a code-based reason within 5 business days; no town document mentions that duty.

published fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Permit-Fee-Calculations-Schedule.pdf

Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection

Through the portal, with email and phone as the fallbacks. Results are viewable in the permit portal (up to 24 hours to appear), or by calling 727-397-5538 option 1, or by emailing bldgdept@redshoresfl.com. Applications carry visible statuses — the Town Manager's March 2026 memo reports them as Under Review, Disapproved, Payment Pending, Ready to Issue and Incomplete Applications, and notes 'View Notes on your application' as a portal feature.

Why the confidence is not higherPortal features from the contractor registration pages, statuses from the March 2026 memo, contact routes from the department page. 65 because no document sets out a correction procedure as such — no correction letter format, no resubmittal clock, no limit on rounds. The town does publish a Resubmittal/Revision Application form, which is the paper route.

building department memo + portal pages checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/H8-MEMO-BUILDING-DEPT-UPDATE-Mar-2026.pdf

Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO

A passed Final, not a Certificate of Occupancy. The town's CO list is explicitly a new-construction list — 'All new construction requires a final zoning inspection for C/O' — and runs to final survey, final elevation certificate, Coastal A or V Zone certificate, driveway agreement, termite certificate, recorded non-conversion agreement, blower door test, insulation certificate, EPL display card and the Building Official's approval. A PV retrofit triggers none of those; it closes on the Solar Electrical Final and the Final Building, visible in the portal.

Why the confidence is not higherCO list read verbatim from the department page. 70 because no document says in terms what a trade permit closes with — this is inference from the CO list being scoped to new construction and from the portal being the record of inspection results.

department page checked 2026-09-13 https://townofredingtonshores.com/building-department/

Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO

The installer or customer, not the AHJ. Duke Tier 1 ¶7: 'The Customer agrees to provide Local Building Code Official inspection and certification of installation. The certification shall reflect that the local code official has inspected and certified that the installation was permitted, has been approved, and has met all electrical and mechanical qualifications.' The town publishes nothing about notifying Duke.

Why the confidence is not higherVerbatim from the 300 dpi OCR of the tariff read in this run; the town-side absence proved by enumeration over the code and the 96 site pages ('PTO', 'permission to operate' and 'interconnection' are zero). 85 because it is an OCR of a scan and because Duke's Tier 1 application/compliance form, referenced by the agreement, was not fetched.

utility tariff, OCR'd at 300 dpi in this run checked 2026-09-13 https://www.duke-energy.com/-/media/pdfs/for-your-business/generate-your-own-renewable/florida/tier-1-contract.pdf

Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.

No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.

Labels & placards for this authority

Wording 88%

No. The authority specifies no placard wording of its own.

Size, colour & material 85%

No. No letter height, colour or material is specified for any electrical or PV label. (The Code does specify letter heights in its SIGN article, for commercial signage, which has nothing to do with equipment labelling.)

Where they go 80%

No local or utility rule on label placement. NEC 2020's own placement rules govern unamended.

What the utility wants on top 88%

No. Duke Energy Florida's Tier 1 standard interconnection agreement specifies no placards, labels or warning signs at all.

Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.

Their website
Solar Requirements
Required placards
No such work may be done outside of these hours, legal holidays, or on Sundays. Construct Standards Clean up and remove construction debris daily or dumpster. All new developments shall utilize erosion/runoff control devices during construction and prior to any earthwork. Permit Placard, Notice of Commencement, Approved Site and Building Plans must be posted on site in permit box or dry location b
Separate fire inspection
The cutoff time for next day inspections is 3:00 pm. You may call 727-397-5538 (option 1) for inspections between the hours of 8:30 am and 3:00 pm, email bldgdept@redshoresfl.com or log into your online account and schedule through the portal. For Fire Inspections call Seminole Fire Dept. Please pro
Average approval time — application to PTO

From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.

About this authority
Type
Town
County
Pinellas County
Regions covered
Authority Contact
Building Department
Direct Phone
727-397-5538
Booking & Scheduling