Town of St. Leo
Town of St. Leo
Pasco County
Town of St. Leo is a town authority in the State of Florida, serving 2,362 residents. This page is the permit route for that jurisdiction: the fifteen steps from working out who has a say over an address through to permission to operate, the documents this authority publishes, and 62 answers taken from those documents and dated.
Jurisdiction & key facts
The standing 62-question set, answered for Town of St. Leo against this authority’s own published documents. Every answer carries the confidence it was recorded at and the document it came from. Where nothing is published we say so and show where we looked — a blank here is a finding, not a gap.
Town of St. Leo is the authority having jurisdiction 97% confidence
- Holds
- Zoning / Land Development Code compliance only (the Town's own Zoning Compliance Application, signed by the Town and by the Town Fire Inspector, is a condition precedent to any permit), plus issuance of the Certificate of Completion and Certificate of Occupancy under Town Code Sec. 14-20(f) and the office of town fire safety inspector under Sec. 22-2. The Town performs no building, electrical or fire plan review or inspection itself.
- Delegated to
- BUILDING / ELECTRICAL / MECHANICAL / PLUMBING / GAS: City of Dade City Building Division (38020 Meridian Ave, Dade City FL 33525; 352-521-1460; buildingpermits@dadecityfl.com; contact Mike Barthle) - permitting, plan review, inspection, permit records and contractor registration. FIRE: Pasco County Fire Rescue - fire permitting, plan review and inspection via PascoGateway (Accela); fire suppression and first response via the Pasco County municipal fire service unit (MSTU) under the interlocal agreement of 23 September 2003. CONTRACTOR LICENSING: Pasco County Contractor Licensing Division (813-847-8009). PRIVATE PROVIDERS may perform plan review and inspection under FS 553.791 and do so heavily - 698 private provider inspections in Dade City in FY2021.
- Overridden by
- FS 553.79(1)(c) overrides all three published local permit-expiry rules (4 months, 180 days, 6 months) with a one-year term for a single-family dwelling. FS 553.792(1)(a) caps plan review at 30 business days (5 business days under $15,000), against a published 4-6 week / 2-6 week clock and an express refusal to expedite. FS 553.791(2)(b) bars plan-review and inspection fees where a private provider is used; the operator's 2008 fee resolution predates that and provides no such waiver. FS 163.04 preempts HOA and deed-restriction bans on solar collectors. FAC 25-6.065 governs interconnection because Tampa Electric is an investor-owned utility. Town Ordinance 24-06 provides that where its adopted codes conflict with any other law, 'the more stringent requirement shall apply'.
- Why not higher
- The building delegation is proved four independent ways: (1) sentence one of the Town's Building page states the Town 'contracts with the City of Dade City for all building inspection and permitting'; (2) the Town's own /building/page/building-permit-application returns a 302 to dadecityfl.com; (3) it is codified - Town Code Sec. 14-20(c) authorises delegation by resolution and Sec. 14-20(g) makes the Town's fee schedule 'the same as the schedule of building permit fees and costs adopted from time to time by the agent delegated to provide building official services'; (4) the operator's FS 553.80(7)(b) Building Permit & Inspection Utilization Report carries a named revenue line 'Building Inspections - St. Leo' ($105,753.72 FY2020; $13,090.42 FY2021) alongside one for San Antonio. The iWorQ citizen portal names St Leo by name and requires the Town's approval to be obtained first and uploaded. The fire delegation is codified at Sec. 22-1 and restated on two Town pages. The nine budget-based delegation tests could not be run at all here: the Town publishes ONLY the one-page Chapter 200 TRIM budget summary (no departmental detail, no revenue accounts, no payroll lines) for every year from FY2017-18 to FY2025-26 - there is no line-item budget to test. Confidence 95 rather than 100 because no interlocal agreement document for the Dade City arrangement is published on either site; it is proved by conduct, codification and the operator's statutory report rather than by the instrument itself. FIFTH AND BEST PROOF, from a state register rather than an inference: the Florida Building Code Information System surcharge-jurisdiction registry at floridabuilding.org/sc/sc_org_srch.aspx — the list of every local government that remits the FS 553.721 (1%) and FS 468.631 (1.5%) permit surcharges, i.e. every local government that actually ISSUES building permits — holds 392 entries and 'Town of St. Leo' IS NOT ONE OF THEM. Nor is 'City of San Antonio', the other town Dade City serves. 'City of Dade City' IS present, and so are County of Pasco, City of Zephyrhills, City of Port Richey and City of New Port Richey, so the register covers Pasco municipalities and the absence is real rather than a coverage gap. That is run 234's city-absence/operator-presence matched pair, recovered in one keyless GET.
- Permit required
- Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a): no person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve,93%
- Permit cost
- NOT PUBLISHABLE AS A SINGLE NUMBER — and that is the finding, not a gap. Two authorities charge, and only one of them publishes rates.78%
- Plan review
- The operator publishes TWO DIFFERENT review clocks in two places, and both sit against a statutory cap.90%
- Portal
- Two portals for one job, plus a paper step. BUILDING: iWorQ Citizen Portal at https://dadepermit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dadepermit (inspection requests and results at…93%
- Electrical code
- NEC 2020. Two independent adoptions, and the operator prints the year correctly: Dade City Code Sec.94%
- Own placard wording
- No. Neither the Town of St. Leo nor the City of Dade City specifies placard wording. The only prescribed wording in force here is Tampa Electric's 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT…85%
- Booking an inspection
- Portal, phone or email — all three published by the operator. Online: portal.iworq.net/DADE/permits/600 ('Requesting inspections/viewing results online').92%
Permitting 5 steps · 28 questions
Whether a permit is needed — Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a): no person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, Q3 Electrical and building permits — Separate. Dade City lists 'Electrical Permit' as its own permit type with its own submittal list, Q4 Plan review — The operator publishes TWO DIFFERENT review clocks in two places, and both sit against a statutory cap. Q18 Where you file — Two portals for one job, plus a paper step. BUILDING: iWorQ Citizen Portal at https://dadepermit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dadepermit (inspection requests and… Q20
- Permit required
- Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a): no person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, convert or demolish any building or structure without first obtaining a building permit.93% source
- What it costs
- NOT PUBLISHABLE AS A SINGLE NUMBER — and that is the finding, not a gap. Two authorities charge, and only one of them publishes rates.78% source
- Plan review turnaround
- The operator publishes TWO DIFFERENT review clocks in two places, and both sit against a statutory cap. The Building Permit Requirements page: 'Be advised our review time is anywhere from 4-6 weeks.90% source
- Key document
- ordinance cited by 5 open the document
-
Confirm who has a say over your address
A city address is usually permitted by the city, not the county — but not always, and some authorities keep building and hand electrical to someone else. Getting this wrong costs the whole submittal, because every requirement below belongs to whoever actually holds jurisdiction. Check the overlays in the same pass: an HOA, a historic district, a windstorm certification or a system-size cap can reshape the design, and all of them are cheaper to find now than after the array is laid out.
- Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Yes — the Town of St. Leo is the AHJ, but it performs almost none of the work itself: it retains zoning/land-development review (its own Zoning Compliance Application is a condition precedent to any permit) and delegates building permitting, plan review, inspection, permit records and contractor registration to the CITY OF DADE CITY Building Division, and fire permitting/plan review/inspection to PASCO COUNTY (Fire Rescue). Not Pasco County for building — the county prior is wrong here. 97% · department page
- What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Delegated. Building + electrical + mechanical + plumbing + gas permitting, plan review, inspection and contractor registration: City of Dade City Building Division (38020 Meridian Ave, 352-521-1460), which states it services Dade City, San Antonio and Saint Leo. Fire permitting, plan review and inspection: Pasco County Fire Rescue via PascoGateway; fire suppression via the Pasco County municipal fire service unit MSTU. Zoning/land-development compliance: retained by the Town (Zoning Compliance Application, Town Clerk). Contractor LICENSING: Pasco County Contractor Licensing Division (813-847-8009). 95% · department page
- Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a): no person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, convert or demolish any building or structure without first obtaining a building permit. Dade City's published permit-exemption list (Sec. 22-61(b)(3)) covers only small pre-manufactured sheds, sub-1-metre satellite dishes and small temporary pools — solar is not exempt. 93% · ordinance
- Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Separate. Dade City lists 'Electrical Permit' as its own permit type with its own submittal list, and Resolution 2008-0997 prices Electrical Permit Fees (section VIII) separately from Building Permit Fees (section V), each with its own $35 base fee and a 'minimum of $35.00 per category'. The permit application states 'a separate permit may be required for electrical, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, air conditioning, gas, or other installations not specifically included in the application.' 85% · permit requirements page
- Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? No town-level architectural or design review for a rooftop array on an existing single-family dwelling. Zero hits for 'architectural review', 'architectural approval' or 'design review' in the whole Town Code; the visual-corridor and architectural-character standards in LDC Sec. 10.9 apply to planned unit developments and Sec. 8.1 to special-exception uses, and LDC Sec. 10.3.A exempts 'the construction or alteration of a single-family dwelling or duplex on a lot in a valid recorded subdivision plat ... or on a lot of record' from development review altogether. A private HOA may exist on a given parcel; the Town Code only requires HOA covenants for subdivisions with streets/utilities/common open space (LDC Sec. 14.12), and FS 163.04 preempts HOA prohibitions on solar collectors. 80% · ordinance
- Is there a historic-district review? No. The Town has no historic-district or historic-preservation chapter and designates no historic district in its Code; the only occurrences of 'historic district' in 847,323 characters are inside LDC Sec. 8.1.1, the wireless-communication-facility section, which lets the Town deny a tower within 1,000 feet of a designated historic landmark. The Town's aesthetic instrument is instead the Visual Corridor Study (Res. No. 01-03, 11 Aug 2001), which is applied through PUD and special-exception review, not to single-family alterations. 78% · ordinance
- Is a wind or windstorm certification required? No separate windstorm certification. Pasco County is not in the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone (Miami-Dade and Broward only), so compliance runs through Florida Product Approval under the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), adopted by Town Code Sec. 14-19(1) and Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(1). Dade City does require Florida Product Approval numbers in the description of work for re-roofing permits, which is the nearest published analogue, and an Opening Protection Exception Form (25% rule) exists at county level. 70% · permit requirements page
- Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? No. A rooftop array on an existing single-family dwelling is exempt from development review entirely under LDC Sec. 10.3.A, so no general site plan, special exception or Town Commission approval is triggered — only the Zoning Compliance Application. (Utility-scale 'Solar facilities per F.S. 163.3205' are a Permitted use, and only in the Agricultural district; 'Floating solar facilities' are an accessory use on constructed water storage reservoirs under LDC Sec. 5.13, added by Ord. 26-02 on 10 Nov 2025.) 80% · ordinance
- Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? No local cap. Nothing in the Town Code, the LDC or Dade City ch. 22 limits the size of a residential generating system. The operative limits are the utility's: FAC 25-6.065(4)(a) and TECO's tiers — Tier 1 up to 10 kW AC, Tier 2 over 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 over 100 kW to 2 MW — and in every tier the gross power rating may not exceed 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating, with the customer paying for any service upgrade needed to stay under that 90% threshold (TECO Tier 1 clause 8). For inverter-based systems the AC nameplate is the DC nameplate multiplied by 0.85 (25-6.065(2)(b)). 82% · utility DG manual
-
Check who is allowed to apply
Several authorities require the electrical permit to be pulled by a licensed electrician, or require the contractor to be registered with them BEFORE applying. Registration is not same-day. This is second on the list rather than fourth because it is the step most likely to stop the job before the drawings matter.
- Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? A licensed contractor. Dade City Code Sec. 22-31 recognises 'Solar contractor' as a primary classification and 'Solar energy installation contractor' as a specialty classification, both to the minimum licensing requirements of the county construction licensing entity; electrical work is by an electrical contractor (subcontractor block on the application). Town Code Sec. 14-28(a) requires all construction to be performed by a contractor qualified under FS ch. 489. A homeowner may pull the permit on a primary residence with a notarised Owner Disclosure Statement. 85% · ordinance
- Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Yes — twice over. Contractors must be registered with the Dade City Building Department before permit release ('General & Sub contractors must be signed & registered with us prior to release'), using a joint form headed 'TOWN OF SAINT LEO / CITY OF DADE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT' that requires workers' comp and liability insurance naming BOTH the Town of Saint Leo and the City of Dade City as certificate holder, the state licence, a tax receipt/competency card and a notarised authorisation letter. Separately, Town Code Sec. 14-28(b) requires every construction company operating in the Town to keep its qualified business licence on file with the town clerk or building official, plus any annual registration fee set by the commission. 95% · form
- Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Yes. Dade City requires a NOTARIZED permit application from homeowners as well as contractors, plus a notarised homeowner disclosure statement if the homeowner is pulling the permit. Pasco County's Building Construction page states the Florida Building Code owner-builder exemption applies to an owner's primary residence and not to a rental. 88% · department page
-
Build the submittal package
Almost everywhere wants a site plan, a one-line or three-line electrical diagram, equipment cut sheets with listings, and a structural attachment detail. Build it against the published checklist rather than the last jurisdiction you worked in — the checklist is what the reviewer marks against.
- What documents make up a complete submittal? Two-stage, and no PV-specific checklist exists anywhere. STAGE 1, Town of St. Leo: Zoning Compliance Application (rev. 4/10/2023) with (i) three sets of site plans showing clear setbacks for proposed and existing structures (four if in a PUD), (ii) a Certificate of Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance listing the Town of St. Leo as an additional insured, (iii) a front-elevation drawing for new structures, (iv) an Affidavit of Authorization/Ownership if the applicant is a representative. Requires both a 'St. Leo Signature for Approval' and a 'Fire Inspector Signature for Approval'. STAGE 2, City of Dade City (uploaded to iWorQ with the Town approval attached): notarised Building Permit Application, site plan, Notice of Commencement (required where valuation exceeds $5,000 for electrical work), contractor registration, and for electrical work a description listing type of work, number of fixtures, TECO layout number where applicable and number of amps. 82% · form
- How many copies, and in what format? Three sets of site plans to the Town (four if the project is in a PUD). To Dade City: digital submission is preferred and online application is 'the preferred method', but the application itself must be uploaded NOTARIZED; the Town's zoning approval must be obtained first and uploaded with the request. 88% · form
- Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Yes, and two different specifications apply. Town Code Sec. 14-20(e): a dimensional scaled plan indicating the roof and surface shape, size, lot size, area, and height and location of all buildings to be erected, altered or moved and of any building already on the lot, plus a written statement of existing and intended use. Dade City Code Sec. 22-61(b)(1): drawings must show the location of the proposed and every existing building or structure, all impervious area existing and proposed, all roads and rights-of-way, septic/drainfield/well locations where applicable, all man-made and natural surface waters, proposed and existing water lines and meters, proposed final grade, a north arrow, and a stated scale; the building official may require a boundary line survey or a flood elevation survey if the site is in FIRM zone A or V. 92% · ordinance
- Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Not required by any published document — an absence with a denominator, not an unchecked box. Dade City's Electrical Permit submittal list names only the application, a description of work (type, number of fixtures, TECO layout number where applicable, number of amps) and an NOC over $5,000. Searched: the Dade City building permit requirements page, all 17 linked Dade City building forms, the 8-page fee resolution, Town Code ch. 14 and the whole 847k-character Town Code, and the Town's four building forms. The NEC (2020) is adopted by reference, so NEC 705.10/690 documentation obligations still bite at inspection. 65% · permit requirements page
- Are string and conductor calculations required? Not required by any published document. Same denominator as q11. The one 'plans, calculations and specs on site' requirement found in St. Leo's documents is on the Zoning Compliance Application OVER THE COUNTER FIRE form and is expressly tied to FS 553.7932, which by its own definitions covers only fire alarm system projects (<=20 devices) and fire sprinkler system projects (<=20 sprinklers) — it does not reach solar. 60% · form
- Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No published threshold for solar. Dade City requires 'a set of engineered plans (signed & sealed)' by permit TYPE — new single-family homes, sheds, carports/aluminium structures, signs and pools — and solar is not a listed type. Nothing in the Town Code or the operator's code sets a structural PE trigger for a roof-mounted array; FBC 107 leaves it to the building official. 55% · permit requirements page
- Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? No local threshold published. The state exemption governs: FS 471.003(2)(h) exempts electrical work below the statutory value/ampacity trigger from the PE-seal requirement. Dade City Sec. 22-61(d) makes the building official the authority having jurisdiction for enforcing the National Electrical Code, so the seal decision sits with him under the FBC. 60% · ordinance
-
Apply and pay
Most authorities now take the whole application through a portal, and several states cap or constrain what a residential solar permit may cost. Check whether plan check is billed separately before you quote the job.
- Which permit portal does this authority use? Two portals for one job, plus a paper step. BUILDING: iWorQ Citizen Portal at https://dadepermit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dadepermit (inspection requests and results at http://www.portal.iworq.net/DADE/permits/600). FIRE: PascoGateway, which is an Accela Citizen Access tenant at https://aca-prod.accela.com/PASCO/. TOWN ZONING COMPLIANCE: no portal — a paper/PDF application to the Town Clerk (TownClerk@TownofStLeo.org). 93% · portal
- Can the whole application be completed online? No. Three reasons, all published: the Town's Zoning Compliance approval must be obtained FIRST and uploaded with the Dade City application ('If applying for a permit with City of San Antonio or St Leo, be sure to obtain their approval first. This must be uploaded with your application request.'); the Dade City application must be uploaded NOTARIZED (physical presence or online notarization); and the Town's own zoning-compliance step is a paper form requiring wet signatures from both the Town and the Fire Inspector. Payment is online after the permit number is issued. 88% · portal
- What does a residential solar permit cost? NOT PUBLISHABLE AS A SINGLE NUMBER — and that is the finding, not a gap. Two authorities charge, and only one of them publishes rates. (A) CITY OF DADE CITY, Resolution 2008-0997 (adopted 26 Aug 2008, effective 1 Oct 2008 — still the live schedule, re-uploaded March 2026 under a second filename): Electrical Permit base fee $35.00, plus 'see fees in valuation table'. Valuation table: $1,000 and less no fee unless an inspection is needed ($35 per inspection); $1,000-$50,000 = $35.00 for the first $1,000 plus $7.00 per additional thousand or fraction; $50,000-$100,000 = $378.00 for the first $50,000 plus $6.00 per additional thousand; $100,000-$500,000 = $678 plus $5.00 per thousand; over $500,000 = $2,678 plus $4.00 per thousand. Valuation may not be less than the current ICC Building Valuation Data. Plans Examination fee: minimum $30.00, and equal to ONE-HALF the building permit fee where the valuation table is used. Site Examination fee $35.00 where a site plan is required. Minimum $35 per category. So a $25,000 declared-valuation PV job computes to $203 of valuation fee plus the $35 base, and a plan-examination charge of half the permit fee on top — but the resolution does not say unambiguously which figure 'the Building Permit fee' means, so the total is a range not a point. (B) TOWN OF ST. LEO: an UNCAPPED ACTUAL-COST PASS-THROUGH with no published rate of any kind — 'the applicant will be billed for expenses related to the Town of St. Leo's Attorney, Planning Consultant, Fire Inspector and other Town of St. Leo staff review of the application ... assessed monthly', and the Commission may demand an advance payment. No hourly rate, no cap, no schedule is published anywhere on the Town site. (C) Credit-card payments to Dade City carry a 3.5% convenience fee, minimum $2.50. (D) NO SURCHARGE IS DISCLOSED ANYWHERE — the FS 553.721 (1%) and FS 468.631 (1.5%) surcharges appear nowhere in the 8-page fee resolution, on the permit application, or in either code; zero hits for 'surcharge' in 847k characters of Town Code, 129k of Dade City ch. 22/fire/franchises, and the OCR'd fee schedule. (E) Development impact fees do not apply to a PV retrofit: LDC Art. XVIII charges $1,000 only per NEW dwelling unit or new business. 78% · fee schedule
- How is the fee calculated? Valuation, tiered (a declining marginal rate by valuation band), plus a flat $35 base per permit and per category. Not flat, not per-kW, not per-panel. Dade City Resolution 2008-0997 sections I, V.C and VIII. 92% · fee schedule
- Is there a separate plan-check fee? Yes. A separate 'Plans Examination' fee: minimum $30.00, and equal to one-half of the building permit fee where the fee is computed on the valuation table. A deposit toward permitting fees of $0.02 per square foot (minimum $35) is payable at plan submittal and credited against the permit fee. A separate $35 Site Examination fee applies where site plans are required. Plan-examination and site-examination fees are expressly NON-REFUNDABLE. 88% · fee schedule
-
Plan review — and start the utility in parallel
Interconnection is a separate process from the permit and usually the longer pole. Where the utility does not depend on the permit being issued, running both at once is the single biggest saving available on a residential job.
- What is the stated plan-review turnaround? The operator publishes TWO DIFFERENT review clocks in two places, and both sit against a statutory cap. The Building Permit Requirements page: 'Be advised our review time is anywhere from 4-6 weeks. We do not offer expedite services and are processed in the order they are received.' The iWorQ citizen portal landing page: 'If your permit request require a review, our review time is 2-6 weeks.' Against those, FS 553.792(1)(a) requires approval/denial within 30 BUSINESS days for a residential permit on a structure under 7,500 sq ft, and within 5 BUSINESS days for structural/electrical work on an existing single-family dwelling valued under $15,000. Six weeks is exactly 30 business days, so the published ceiling is at the statutory limit; the '4-6 weeks, no expedite' statement is flatly inconsistent with the 5-business-day limb for a sub-$15,000 job. 90% · department page
- How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? FOUR DIFFERENT PUBLISHED ANSWERS IN ONE JURISDICTION, three of them below the statutory floor. (1) Town Code Sec. 14-20(h): 'A building permit shall become void FOUR MONTHS from the date of issuance unless substantial progress has been made by that date ... as determined by the building official.' (2) Dade City Code Sec. 22-62(1): void if work is not commenced within 180 DAYS of issuance, or if suspended/abandoned for 60 DAYS after commencement; extensions of up to 90 days each. (3) The Dade City Building Permit Application: invalid unless commenced within SIX MONTHS, or suspended/abandoned for six months; failure to obtain an approved inspection within 180 days of the previous approved inspection constitutes abandonment — citing 'FBC 2001, Chapter 1, section 104.5.1', a code edition twenty-five years out of date. (4) FS 553.79(1)(c): a building permit issued by a local government FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING expires ONE YEAR after issuance, or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later. The statute governs a residential PV permit. 92% · statute
- Which utility handles interconnection here? Tampa Electric Company (TECO). Settled two ways without a parcel map: the Town Code's APPENDIX A - FRANCHISES lists exactly two franchises in force, Peoples Gas System (Ord. 01-001, 2000, 30 years) and TAMPA ELECTRIC CO. (Ord. No. 18-04, 3 May 2018, 30 years) — one electric franchise only, and a town cannot grant itself one; and the operator's own permit paperwork requires a 'Tampa Electric Company (TECO) power approval Letter', a 'TECO layout #' on electrical permits and a 'Teco Letter that power has been disconnected' for demolition. Dade City's own Appendix A carries the same grantee (Ord. No. 439, 8 Jan 1980). NOTE: EIA-861 Service_Territory_2024 shows FOUR retail sellers in Pasco County — Duke Energy Florida, Sumter Electric Coop (SECO), Tampa Electric Co and Withlacoochee River Electric Coop — so 'Pasco is Duke/WREC/TECO' undercounts; the franchise table is what pins St. Leo to TECO. TECO reported 28,828 residential net-metered PV installations and 337.6 MW residential DC capacity in Florida for 2024. 93% · ordinance
- Where does the utility sit in the sequence? After permit, and after the AHJ's final inspection. FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) requires every IOU standard interconnection agreement to contain 'a requirement that customer-owned renewable generation must be inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation in parallel'. TECO's own Tier 1 step list requires 'Proof of inspection and approval by local code authority' with the application, and TECO then performs its own inspection including verification of an acceptable disconnect switch. TECO executes the agreement within 30 CALENDAR days of a completed application (Tier 1 clause 9), and the customer must return the executed agreement at least 30 calendar days before beginning parallel operations (25-6.065(7)(d)). 92% · utility DG manual
28 questions answered against Town of St. Leo’s own published documents
Q1 Is this authority the AHJ for residential solar at this address? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes — the Town of St. Leo is the AHJ, but it performs almost none of the work itself: it retains zoning/land-development review (its own Zoning Compliance Application is a condition precedent to any permit) and delegates building permitting, plan review, inspection, permit records and contractor registration to the CITY OF DADE CITY Building Division, and fire permitting/plan review/inspection to PASCO COUNTY (Fire Rescue). Not Pasco County for building — the county prior is wrong here.
Why the confidence is not higherFour independent proofs of the building delegation: (1) sentence one of the Town's Building page — 'The Town of St. Leo contracts with the City of Dade City for all building inspection and permitting'; (2) the Town's own /building/page/building-permit-application 302s to dadecityfl.com; (3) codified at Code Sec. 14-20(c) and (g); (4) Dade City's FS 553.80(7)(b) Building Permit & Inspection Utilization Report carries a named revenue line 'Building Inspections - St. Leo' ($105,753.72 FY2020, $13,090.42 FY2021). A fifth proof from a state register: the FBCIS surcharge-jurisdiction registry (392 local governments that remit the FS 553.721/468.631 permit surcharges) contains 'City of Dade City' and 'County of Pasco' but NOT 'Town of St. Leo' — and not 'City of San Antonio' either, the other town Dade City serves.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/building
Q2 What does this authority permit itself, and what does it delegate? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Delegated. Building + electrical + mechanical + plumbing + gas permitting, plan review, inspection and contractor registration: City of Dade City Building Division (38020 Meridian Ave, 352-521-1460), which states it services Dade City, San Antonio and Saint Leo. Fire permitting, plan review and inspection: Pasco County Fire Rescue via PascoGateway; fire suppression via the Pasco County municipal fire service unit MSTU. Zoning/land-development compliance: retained by the Town (Zoning Compliance Application, Town Clerk). Contractor LICENSING: Pasco County Contractor Licensing Division (813-847-8009).
Why the confidence is not higherDade City building department page names all three municipalities it serves; Town Code Sec. 22-1 records the 23 Sep 2003 interlocal with Pasco County and the Town's consent to inclusion in the county MSTU; Town fire pages say the Town 'contracts with Pasco County for all fire permits'; the licensing number is printed on the Dade City permit application. Corroborated by the FBCIS surcharge-jurisdiction registry, in which Dade City appears and St. Leo does not.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/index.php
Q3 Is a permit required for a residential rooftop PV system? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a): no person shall erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, convert or demolish any building or structure without first obtaining a building permit. Dade City's published permit-exemption list (Sec. 22-61(b)(3)) covers only small pre-manufactured sheds, sub-1-metre satellite dishes and small temporary pools — solar is not exempt.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo instruments read in full; no PV-specific exemption anywhere in 847,323 characters of the Town Code or in Dade City ch. 22.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q4 Is there a separate electrical permit, or is it combined? Core Jurisdiction & scope
Separate. Dade City lists 'Electrical Permit' as its own permit type with its own submittal list, and Resolution 2008-0997 prices Electrical Permit Fees (section VIII) separately from Building Permit Fees (section V), each with its own $35 base fee and a 'minimum of $35.00 per category'. The permit application states 'a separate permit may be required for electrical, plumbing, signs, wells, pools, air conditioning, gas, or other installations not specifically included in the application.'
Why the confidence is not higherInferred from the operator's fee resolution structure and application text rather than a solar-specific statement; no document distinguishes a combined solar permit.
permit requirements page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q5 Who is allowed to pull the electrical permit? Core Who may apply
A licensed contractor. Dade City Code Sec. 22-31 recognises 'Solar contractor' as a primary classification and 'Solar energy installation contractor' as a specialty classification, both to the minimum licensing requirements of the county construction licensing entity; electrical work is by an electrical contractor (subcontractor block on the application). Town Code Sec. 14-28(a) requires all construction to be performed by a contractor qualified under FS ch. 489. A homeowner may pull the permit on a primary residence with a notarised Owner Disclosure Statement.
Why the confidence is not higherLicence classifications read first-hand in the operator's code; the owner-builder route is stated on the Dade City building page and on Pasco County's Building Construction page, not in a St. Leo document.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q6 Must the contractor be registered with this authority before applying? Core Who may apply
Yes — twice over. Contractors must be registered with the Dade City Building Department before permit release ('General & Sub contractors must be signed & registered with us prior to release'), using a joint form headed 'TOWN OF SAINT LEO / CITY OF DADE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT' that requires workers' comp and liability insurance naming BOTH the Town of Saint Leo and the City of Dade City as certificate holder, the state licence, a tax receipt/competency card and a notarised authorisation letter. Separately, Town Code Sec. 14-28(b) requires every construction company operating in the Town to keep its qualified business licence on file with the town clerk or building official, plus any annual registration fee set by the commission.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth instruments read first-hand; the joint form is published on the Town's own site.
form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/building/page/contractor-registration
Q7 Is a homeowner permitted to self-install and self-permit? Who may apply
Yes. Dade City requires a NOTARIZED permit application from homeowners as well as contractors, plus a notarised homeowner disclosure statement if the homeowner is pulling the permit. Pasco County's Building Construction page states the Florida Building Code owner-builder exemption applies to an owner's primary residence and not to a rental.
Why the confidence is not higherOperator's own page and form; no St. Leo-specific statement.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/index.php
Q8 What documents make up a complete submittal? Core Submittal package
Two-stage, and no PV-specific checklist exists anywhere. STAGE 1, Town of St. Leo: Zoning Compliance Application (rev. 4/10/2023) with (i) three sets of site plans showing clear setbacks for proposed and existing structures (four if in a PUD), (ii) a Certificate of Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance listing the Town of St. Leo as an additional insured, (iii) a front-elevation drawing for new structures, (iv) an Affidavit of Authorization/Ownership if the applicant is a representative. Requires both a 'St. Leo Signature for Approval' and a 'Fire Inspector Signature for Approval'. STAGE 2, City of Dade City (uploaded to iWorQ with the Town approval attached): notarised Building Permit Application, site plan, Notice of Commencement (required where valuation exceeds $5,000 for electrical work), contractor registration, and for electrical work a description listing type of work, number of fixtures, TECO layout number where applicable and number of amps.
Why the confidence is not higherAssembled from the Town's own application and the operator's published per-permit-type lists; neither names solar, so the PV package is inferred from the electrical permit type. No one-line diagram, structural calculation or PE stamp is named in any published list.
form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/administration/page/zoning-compliance-application
Q9 How many copies, and in what format? Submittal package
Three sets of site plans to the Town (four if the project is in a PUD). To Dade City: digital submission is preferred and online application is 'the preferred method', but the application itself must be uploaded NOTARIZED; the Town's zoning approval must be obtained first and uploaded with the request.
Why the confidence is not higherCopy counts are stated on the Town's form; the notarisation and upload sequence are stated on the operator's page and repeated on the iWorQ portal landing page.
form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/administration/page/zoning-compliance-application
Q10 Is a site plan required, and what must it show? Core Submittal package
Yes, and two different specifications apply. Town Code Sec. 14-20(e): a dimensional scaled plan indicating the roof and surface shape, size, lot size, area, and height and location of all buildings to be erected, altered or moved and of any building already on the lot, plus a written statement of existing and intended use. Dade City Code Sec. 22-61(b)(1): drawings must show the location of the proposed and every existing building or structure, all impervious area existing and proposed, all roads and rights-of-way, septic/drainfield/well locations where applicable, all man-made and natural surface waters, proposed and existing water lines and meters, proposed final grade, a north arrow, and a stated scale; the building official may require a boundary line survey or a flood elevation survey if the site is in FIRM zone A or V.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth read first-hand and both are in force; neither is solar-specific, and the Town's form also asks for setbacks from each property line and lot dimensions.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q11 Is a one-line / three-line diagram required? Core Drawings & calculations
Not required by any published document — an absence with a denominator, not an unchecked box. Dade City's Electrical Permit submittal list names only the application, a description of work (type, number of fixtures, TECO layout number where applicable, number of amps) and an NOC over $5,000. Searched: the Dade City building permit requirements page, all 17 linked Dade City building forms, the 8-page fee resolution, Town Code ch. 14 and the whole 847k-character Town Code, and the Town's four building forms. The NEC (2020) is adopted by reference, so NEC 705.10/690 documentation obligations still bite at inspection.
Why the confidence is not higherA negative from a complete enumeration of what the two authorities publish; a plan reviewer can still require one under FBC 107. Confidence held down because the operator publishes no solar-specific checklist at all.
permit requirements page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q12 Are string and conductor calculations required? Drawings & calculations
Not required by any published document. Same denominator as q11. The one 'plans, calculations and specs on site' requirement found in St. Leo's documents is on the Zoning Compliance Application OVER THE COUNTER FIRE form and is expressly tied to FS 553.7932, which by its own definitions covers only fire alarm system projects (<=20 devices) and fire sprinkler system projects (<=20 sprinklers) — it does not reach solar.
Why the confidence is not higherThe scope of FS 553.7932 was read first-hand to avoid mis-applying the town's own sentence to a PV job.
form checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/administration/page/zoning-compliance-fire-application
Q13 Is a structural PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Core Engineering & stamps
No published threshold for solar. Dade City requires 'a set of engineered plans (signed & sealed)' by permit TYPE — new single-family homes, sheds, carports/aluminium structures, signs and pools — and solar is not a listed type. Nothing in the Town Code or the operator's code sets a structural PE trigger for a roof-mounted array; FBC 107 leaves it to the building official.
Why the confidence is not higherInference from an enumerated by-type list that omits solar, not from a solar-specific statement. Treat as 'discretionary, no published trigger'.
permit requirements page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q14 Is an electrical PE stamp required, and at what threshold? Engineering & stamps
No local threshold published. The state exemption governs: FS 471.003(2)(h) exempts electrical work below the statutory value/ampacity trigger from the PE-seal requirement. Dade City Sec. 22-61(d) makes the building official the authority having jurisdiction for enforcing the National Electrical Code, so the seal decision sits with him under the FBC.
Why the confidence is not higherLocal absence proved against the same denominator as q11/q13; the statutory limb is cited but the current figure in FS 471.003(2)(h) was not re-read in this run, so do not quote a dollar figure from this record.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q15 What does a residential solar permit cost? Core Fees
NOT PUBLISHABLE AS A SINGLE NUMBER — and that is the finding, not a gap. Two authorities charge, and only one of them publishes rates. (A) CITY OF DADE CITY, Resolution 2008-0997 (adopted 26 Aug 2008, effective 1 Oct 2008 — still the live schedule, re-uploaded March 2026 under a second filename): Electrical Permit base fee $35.00, plus 'see fees in valuation table'. Valuation table: $1,000 and less no fee unless an inspection is needed ($35 per inspection); $1,000-$50,000 = $35.00 for the first $1,000 plus $7.00 per additional thousand or fraction; $50,000-$100,000 = $378.00 for the first $50,000 plus $6.00 per additional thousand; $100,000-$500,000 = $678 plus $5.00 per thousand; over $500,000 = $2,678 plus $4.00 per thousand. Valuation may not be less than the current ICC Building Valuation Data. Plans Examination fee: minimum $30.00, and equal to ONE-HALF the building permit fee where the valuation table is used. Site Examination fee $35.00 where a site plan is required. Minimum $35 per category. So a $25,000 declared-valuation PV job computes to $203 of valuation fee plus the $35 base, and a plan-examination charge of half the permit fee on top — but the resolution does not say unambiguously which figure 'the Building Permit fee' means, so the total is a range not a point. (B) TOWN OF ST. LEO: an UNCAPPED ACTUAL-COST PASS-THROUGH with no published rate of any kind — 'the applicant will be billed for expenses related to the Town of St. Leo's Attorney, Planning Consultant, Fire Inspector and other Town of St. Leo staff review of the application ... assessed monthly', and the Commission may demand an advance payment. No hourly rate, no cap, no schedule is published anywhere on the Town site. (C) Credit-card payments to Dade City carry a 3.5% convenience fee, minimum $2.50. (D) NO SURCHARGE IS DISCLOSED ANYWHERE — the FS 553.721 (1%) and FS 468.631 (1.5%) surcharges appear nowhere in the 8-page fee resolution, on the permit application, or in either code; zero hits for 'surcharge' in 847k characters of Town Code, 129k of Dade City ch. 22/fire/franchises, and the OCR'd fee schedule. (E) Development impact fees do not apply to a PV retrofit: LDC Art. XVIII charges $1,000 only per NEW dwelling unit or new business.
Why the confidence is not higherEvery rate above was read first-hand: the fee resolution is a scanned PDF that extracts as 8 characters and had to be rendered at 300 dpi and OCR'd. Confidence is 78 rather than 90 because (i) the operator's schedule is 18 years old and predates the statutes that now govern fee structure, (ii) the plan-examination base is textually ambiguous, and (iii) the Town side is genuinely unpublished, so no honest total exists. Do not invent an estimate for the Town component.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/City%20of%20Dade%20CIty%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf
Q16 How is the fee calculated? Core Fees
Valuation, tiered (a declining marginal rate by valuation band), plus a flat $35 base per permit and per category. Not flat, not per-kW, not per-panel. Dade City Resolution 2008-0997 sections I, V.C and VIII.
Why the confidence is not higherRead first-hand from the OCR'd resolution; the same valuation table governs building, plumbing, electrical and mechanical permits by cross-reference.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/City%20of%20Dade%20CIty%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf
Q17 Is there a separate plan-check fee? Fees
Yes. A separate 'Plans Examination' fee: minimum $30.00, and equal to one-half of the building permit fee where the fee is computed on the valuation table. A deposit toward permitting fees of $0.02 per square foot (minimum $35) is payable at plan submittal and credited against the permit fee. A separate $35 Site Examination fee applies where site plans are required. Plan-examination and site-examination fees are expressly NON-REFUNDABLE.
Why the confidence is not higherAll four limbs read first-hand from the OCR'd resolution sections II, III and XII.G.3.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/City%20of%20Dade%20CIty%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf
Q18 What is the stated plan-review turnaround? Core Timeline & validity
The operator publishes TWO DIFFERENT review clocks in two places, and both sit against a statutory cap. The Building Permit Requirements page: 'Be advised our review time is anywhere from 4-6 weeks. We do not offer expedite services and are processed in the order they are received.' The iWorQ citizen portal landing page: 'If your permit request require a review, our review time is 2-6 weeks.' Against those, FS 553.792(1)(a) requires approval/denial within 30 BUSINESS days for a residential permit on a structure under 7,500 sq ft, and within 5 BUSINESS days for structural/electrical work on an existing single-family dwelling valued under $15,000. Six weeks is exactly 30 business days, so the published ceiling is at the statutory limit; the '4-6 weeks, no expedite' statement is flatly inconsistent with the 5-business-day limb for a sub-$15,000 job.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth published clocks read first-hand on the same day; the statutory limbs read first-hand from FS 553.792 on leg.state.fl.us. The Town of St. Leo publishes no clock of its own for its zoning-compliance step, which precedes all of this.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q19 How long is an issued permit valid before it expires? Timeline & validity
FOUR DIFFERENT PUBLISHED ANSWERS IN ONE JURISDICTION, three of them below the statutory floor. (1) Town Code Sec. 14-20(h): 'A building permit shall become void FOUR MONTHS from the date of issuance unless substantial progress has been made by that date ... as determined by the building official.' (2) Dade City Code Sec. 22-62(1): void if work is not commenced within 180 DAYS of issuance, or if suspended/abandoned for 60 DAYS after commencement; extensions of up to 90 days each. (3) The Dade City Building Permit Application: invalid unless commenced within SIX MONTHS, or suspended/abandoned for six months; failure to obtain an approved inspection within 180 days of the previous approved inspection constitutes abandonment — citing 'FBC 2001, Chapter 1, section 104.5.1', a code edition twenty-five years out of date. (4) FS 553.79(1)(c): a building permit issued by a local government FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING expires ONE YEAR after issuance, or on the effective date of the next edition of the Florida Building Code, whichever is later. The statute governs a residential PV permit.
Why the confidence is not higherAll four read first-hand: two codified sections, the live application PDF, and the statute text from leg.state.fl.us. The statute also requires a written expiration notice at least 30 days before expiry; nothing in either local instrument mentions it.
statute checked 2026-09-13 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.79.html
Q20 Which permit portal does this authority use? Core Portal & process
Two portals for one job, plus a paper step. BUILDING: iWorQ Citizen Portal at https://dadepermit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dadepermit (inspection requests and results at http://www.portal.iworq.net/DADE/permits/600). FIRE: PascoGateway, which is an Accela Citizen Access tenant at https://aca-prod.accela.com/PASCO/. TOWN ZONING COMPLIANCE: no portal — a paper/PDF application to the Town Clerk (TownClerk@TownofStLeo.org).
Why the confidence is not higherThe iWorQ landing page names St Leo by name; the Town's 'Fire Permit Application' link resolves to the Accela ACA host. Portal identification is from the link targets, not the button labels.
portal checked 2026-09-13 https://dadepermit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dadepermit
Q21 Can the whole application be completed online? Core Portal & process
No. Three reasons, all published: the Town's Zoning Compliance approval must be obtained FIRST and uploaded with the Dade City application ('If applying for a permit with City of San Antonio or St Leo, be sure to obtain their approval first. This must be uploaded with your application request.'); the Dade City application must be uploaded NOTARIZED (physical presence or online notarization); and the Town's own zoning-compliance step is a paper form requiring wet signatures from both the Town and the Fire Inspector. Payment is online after the permit number is issued.
Why the confidence is not higherSequence read first-hand from the iWorQ portal text, the Dade City building page and the Town's application form.
portal checked 2026-09-13 https://dadepermit.portal.iworq.net/portalhome/dadepermit
Q22 Which utility handles interconnection here? Core Utility interconnection
Tampa Electric Company (TECO). Settled two ways without a parcel map: the Town Code's APPENDIX A - FRANCHISES lists exactly two franchises in force, Peoples Gas System (Ord. 01-001, 2000, 30 years) and TAMPA ELECTRIC CO. (Ord. No. 18-04, 3 May 2018, 30 years) — one electric franchise only, and a town cannot grant itself one; and the operator's own permit paperwork requires a 'Tampa Electric Company (TECO) power approval Letter', a 'TECO layout #' on electrical permits and a 'Teco Letter that power has been disconnected' for demolition. Dade City's own Appendix A carries the same grantee (Ord. No. 439, 8 Jan 1980). NOTE: EIA-861 Service_Territory_2024 shows FOUR retail sellers in Pasco County — Duke Energy Florida, Sumter Electric Coop (SECO), Tampa Electric Co and Withlacoochee River Electric Coop — so 'Pasco is Duke/WREC/TECO' undercounts; the franchise table is what pins St. Leo to TECO. TECO reported 28,828 residential net-metered PV installations and 337.6 MW residential DC capacity in Florida for 2024.
Why the confidence is not higherFranchise appendix and two codes read first-hand; EIA-861 2024 downloaded and read rather than relying on the county seller list in the brief. TECO's balancing-authority code is TEC, which is not itself proof of retail service — the franchise is.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q23 Where does the utility sit in the sequence? Core Utility interconnection
After permit, and after the AHJ's final inspection. FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) requires every IOU standard interconnection agreement to contain 'a requirement that customer-owned renewable generation must be inspected and approved by local code officials prior to its operation in parallel'. TECO's own Tier 1 step list requires 'Proof of inspection and approval by local code authority' with the application, and TECO then performs its own inspection including verification of an acceptable disconnect switch. TECO executes the agreement within 30 CALENDAR days of a completed application (Tier 1 clause 9), and the customer must return the executed agreement at least 30 calendar days before beginning parallel operations (25-6.065(7)(d)).
Why the confidence is not higherRule text downloaded from flrules.org as the adopted .doc and read in full; TECO Tier 1 agreement PDF read in full.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/solarsolutions/solarprograms/connectingyoursolar/netmeteringapplication/
Q24 Is a HOA or architectural approval required first? Overlays & special cases
No town-level architectural or design review for a rooftop array on an existing single-family dwelling. Zero hits for 'architectural review', 'architectural approval' or 'design review' in the whole Town Code; the visual-corridor and architectural-character standards in LDC Sec. 10.9 apply to planned unit developments and Sec. 8.1 to special-exception uses, and LDC Sec. 10.3.A exempts 'the construction or alteration of a single-family dwelling or duplex on a lot in a valid recorded subdivision plat ... or on a lot of record' from development review altogether. A private HOA may exist on a given parcel; the Town Code only requires HOA covenants for subdivisions with streets/utilities/common open space (LDC Sec. 14.12), and FS 163.04 preempts HOA prohibitions on solar collectors.
Why the confidence is not higherRead the opening words of the site-plan trigger (Sec. 10.1) and then the exemption list (Sec. 10.3) rather than pattern-matching; the exemption reaches 'alteration' of an existing dwelling, which is what a retrofit PV job is.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q25 Is there a historic-district review? Overlays & special cases
No. The Town has no historic-district or historic-preservation chapter and designates no historic district in its Code; the only occurrences of 'historic district' in 847,323 characters are inside LDC Sec. 8.1.1, the wireless-communication-facility section, which lets the Town deny a tower within 1,000 feet of a designated historic landmark. The Town's aesthetic instrument is instead the Visual Corridor Study (Res. No. 01-03, 11 Aug 2001), which is applied through PUD and special-exception review, not to single-family alterations.
Why the confidence is not higherA negative from a complete grep of the whole codified corpus with a fabricated-term control at zero and 'electrical' as the positive control at 19 hits; note Dade City by contrast HAS a historic register (ch. 54) and triples the permit fee for unpermitted work on it — but that is the operator's own city limits, not St. Leo.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q26 Is a wind or windstorm certification required? Overlays & special cases
No separate windstorm certification. Pasco County is not in the High-Velocity Hurricane Zone (Miami-Dade and Broward only), so compliance runs through Florida Product Approval under the Florida Building Code 8th Edition (2023), adopted by Town Code Sec. 14-19(1) and Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(1). Dade City does require Florida Product Approval numbers in the description of work for re-roofing permits, which is the nearest published analogue, and an Opening Protection Exception Form (25% rule) exists at county level.
Why the confidence is not higherThe product-approval requirement is published for roofing, not for solar; extended to PV by inference from the same code adoption, hence 70.
permit requirements page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q27 Is a Specific Use Permit or Council approval ever required? Overlays & special cases
No. A rooftop array on an existing single-family dwelling is exempt from development review entirely under LDC Sec. 10.3.A, so no general site plan, special exception or Town Commission approval is triggered — only the Zoning Compliance Application. (Utility-scale 'Solar facilities per F.S. 163.3205' are a Permitted use, and only in the Agricultural district; 'Floating solar facilities' are an accessory use on constructed water storage reservoirs under LDC Sec. 5.13, added by Ord. 26-02 on 10 Nov 2025.)
Why the confidence is not higherThe exemption and the permitted-use table were both read first-hand. Note the trap: all 18 'solar' hits and both 'photovoltaic' hits in the Town Code are about utility-scale and floating solar facilities under FS 163.3205/163.32051 — the Code says nothing whatever about rooftop residential PV.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q28 Is there a system-size cap on residential generation? Overlays & special cases
No local cap. Nothing in the Town Code, the LDC or Dade City ch. 22 limits the size of a residential generating system. The operative limits are the utility's: FAC 25-6.065(4)(a) and TECO's tiers — Tier 1 up to 10 kW AC, Tier 2 over 10 kW to 100 kW, Tier 3 over 100 kW to 2 MW — and in every tier the gross power rating may not exceed 90% of the customer's utility distribution service rating, with the customer paying for any service upgrade needed to stay under that 90% threshold (TECO Tier 1 clause 8). For inverter-based systems the AC nameplate is the DC nameplate multiplied by 0.85 (25-6.065(2)(b)).
Why the confidence is not higherLocal absence proved against the full codified corpus; the utility limits read first-hand from the rule and the Tier 1 agreement.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/solarsolutions/solarprograms/connectingyoursolar/netmeteringapplication/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Install 5 steps · 20 questions
-
Build to the code editions actually in force here
The NEC edition a jurisdiction enforces is often a cycle behind the newest one published, and local amendments sit on top of it. Rapid shutdown, conductor sizing and labelling all change between editions, so the edition in force is the first thing to establish, not the last.
- Which NEC edition is in force? NEC 2020. Two independent adoptions, and the operator prints the year correctly: Dade City Code Sec. 22-61(a)(2) adopts 'NFPA National Electric Code (2020) Edition, as amended from time to time'; Town Code Sec. 14-19(1)f adopts 'the provisions of the National Electrical Code, as adopted by the Florida Building Commissioner, and all subsequent amendments' — a floating adoption that tracks the FBC, which currently carries the 2020 NEC effective 31 Dec 2023. Do not read the '2023' in 'Florida Building Code Eighth Edition (2023)' as an NEC year. 94% · ordinance
- Which building code edition is in force? Florida Building Code, Eighth Edition (2023), including the Residential, Existing Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fuel Gas volumes. Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(1) names the edition; Town Code Sec. 14-19(1) adopts the FBC and its volumes by reference 'and all subsequent amendments', so the Town's adoption floats. Town Ordinance 24-06 (adopted 13 May 2024) separately adopts 'The Florida Building Code, as now and subsequently amended'. Dade City also adopts the International Property Maintenance Code (2021). 94% · ordinance
- Which fire code edition is in force? Florida Fire Prevention Code, Eighth Edition — plus, in St. Leo specifically, NFPA 101 Life Safety Code and NFPA 1 Fire Prevention Code adopted BY NAME. This comes from Town Ordinance 24-06, adopted 13 May 2024, which is NOT in the codified Code (the Supplement History Table marks it 'Omit', Supp. 16) and whose full text is recoverable only from the FS 166.041(4) business-impact-statement PDF on the Town's website: the Town adopts NFPA 101, NFPA 1, the Florida Fire Prevention Code and the Florida Building Code 'as now and subsequently amended'; 'Copies of all codes are on file in the Office of the Pasco County Emergency Services Department'; and 'If any conflict occurs between this section and any other applicable state, law ordinance, rule or regulation, the more stringent requirement shall apply.' Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(4) adopts the FFPC Eighth Edition for its own limits. 90% · ordinance
- Are there local amendments to any of the above? Yes, on both sides of the delegation. TOWN OF ST. LEO, Code Sec. 14-19.1 (Ord. 15-01, 9 Feb 2015) adds two sections to the Florida Building Code: new 107.6.1, which bars the building official from relying on affidavits and plans submitted under FBC 105.14/107.6 for the flood load and flood-resistant construction requirements; and new 117, applying the local floodplain variance procedure to FBC 1612.4 and FBC-R R322. CITY OF DADE CITY, Sec. 22-61(b) adopts ten local building regulations including a prescriptive site-drawing content list, a permit-exemption list, required first-floor framing inspections in flood zones, a mandatory approved heat source, a 300 sq ft minimum net usable floor area, and a MINIMUM FIRST-FLOOR ELEVATION OF 78 FEET ASL for all residences — but that last one is expressly scoped to 'the incorporated areas of the city', so it does not travel to St. Leo. 92% · ordinance
- What is the installation judged against? The 2020 National Electrical Code as adopted through the Florida Building Code, enforced by the CITY OF DADE CITY building official, who is expressly named the authority having jurisdiction for the NEC: Dade City Sec. 22-61(d) — 'the building official ... shall be included as the authority having jurisdiction for enforcing the National Electrical Code and all other codes adopted in subsection (a) of this section.' There are no local electrical amendments in either code. 90% · ordinance
-
Fire access, setbacks and pathways
Ridge setbacks and roof access pathways are fire-service requirements and they constrain the array layout. They are the most common cause of a redesign after the fire department comments on a plan set.
Nothing recorded for Town of St. Leo on this step yet — 1 question checked and found unpublished. The guidance above is general.
-
Rapid shutdown
Which rapid-shutdown rule applies follows directly from the NEC edition in force, and the initiation device has to be at a location the fire service can reach and identify. This is inspected, and it is labelled.
- Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Required, to the 2020 NEC (Article 690.12), by adoption rather than by any local rule. Both the adopting instruments were read first-hand — Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(2) names the 2020 NEC, Town Sec. 14-19(1)f floats to the FBC's NEC — but neither authority publishes any rapid-shutdown guidance, labelling specification or inspection item of its own, and the NEC article text itself sits behind a subscription viewer and was not read in this run. 80% · ordinance
-
Labels and placards
The NEC sets a baseline for permanent markings at the service equipment and the disconnecting means. On top of that, an authority may specify its own wording, and the utility may specify more again. Where any of them writes its own text, a generic off-the-shelf label set will not pass — this is the detail most often fixed on a return visit.
- Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? One placard, and it comes from the utility, not the AHJ. TAMPA ELECTRIC requires a placard at the meter reading 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH', engraved or stamped, identifying the location of the isolation means; a photograph of the disconnect switch showing the approved placard must be submitted with the interconnection application. Neither the Town of St. Leo nor the City of Dade City specifies any placard of its own — NEC 690/705 marking requirements apply by adoption only. 90% · utility DG manual
- Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? No. Neither the Town of St. Leo nor the City of Dade City specifies placard wording. The only prescribed wording in force here is Tampa Electric's 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH'. 85% · ordinance
- Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Specified by the utility, in detail, and by neither AHJ. TECO SESR 2025: 'The placard shall be non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic with engraved or stamped lettering a minimum of 1/4 inch high, epoxy glued or riveted to the mounting surface. Peel and stick labels, paint, or marking pens are not acceptable.' No colour is specified. The same material and lettering standard is applied elsewhere in SESR to meter identification tags. 92% · utility DG manual
- Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Not specified locally. Neither authority requires a site plan or facility-map placard, and TECO's requirement is a location placard for the isolation means, not a site map. NEC 705.10 applies by adoption of the 2020 NEC, so the plant-identification documentation it requires is enforceable at inspection even though nobody here publishes a form for it. 60% · utility DG manual
- Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY source of a placard requirement. TECO requires the 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' placard at the meter, to the SESR material spec (non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic, engraved or stamped, >=1/4 inch lettering, epoxy glued or riveted; no peel-and-stick, paint or marker), and requires a PHOTOGRAPH of the disconnect switch showing the placard to be submitted with the Tier 1 application. TECO publishes a sample photograph. This is verified twice: by TECO's own inspection before the agreement is executed, and by the photo in the application file. 93% · utility DG manual
- Where must the labels be placed? At the meter. TECO SESR: 'The Customer shall provide a placard AT THE METER identifying the location of the isolation means.' The disconnect switch it identifies must itself be 'mounted separate from the meter socket on an exterior surface adjacent to the meter' (Tier 1 agreement clause 11), readily accessible to TECO and lockable in the open position with a TECO padlock. 92% · utility DG manual
-
Disconnect, storage and listed equipment
Where the AC disconnect must sit relative to the meter is usually the utility's rule, not the building department's. Battery storage frequently carries its own permit, its own inspection and its own fire conditions.
- Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? REQUIRED — and this is a third Florida disconnect regime, distinct from FPL's. TECO Tier 1 agreement clause 11: the customer shall install, AT THE COMPANY'S EXPENSE and subject to the Company's approval of the cost, a manual disconnect switch of the visible load break type providing a separation point between the AC output and customer wiring, 'mounted separate from the meter socket on an exterior surface adjacent to the meter', readily accessible to TECO and capable of being locked open with a TECO padlock. Reimbursement is capped at $320 single-phase and $395 three-phase. This is lawful because FAC 25-6.065(6)(a) exempts inverter-based Tier 1 systems from a manual disconnect ONLY 'unless the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense' — TECO exercises that exception and pays. Interconnection approval is expressly 'dependent on a successful inspection performed by Tampa Electric, including verification of an acceptable disconnect switch'. 94% · utility DG manual
- Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Yes. FAC 25-6.065(4)(b) requires the generation to have been submitted by the manufacturer to a nationally recognised testing and certification laboratory and tested and listed for continuous interactive operation, and 25-6.065(3) names the standards: IEEE 1547 (2003), IEEE 1547.1 (2005) and UL 1741 (2005). 25-6.065(4)(c) additionally requires a utility-interactive inverter or equivalent certified device that automatically isolates the generation if the grid loses power. TECO's Tier 1 agreement clause 1 carries the same certification undertaking, and the manufacturer's installation, operation and maintenance instructions for the inverter must be supplied with the application (a web link is acceptable). 90% · statute
- Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Permitted, with no local energy-storage ordinance of any kind. Zero hits for 'battery', 'energy storage' or 'ESS' as a regulated use in the Town Code outside the utility-scale solar-facility DEFINITION (which lists 'battery systems' as a component of a FS 163.3205 solar facility). The governing instruments are the adopted codes: FFPC 8th Edition, NFPA 1 and NFPA 101, all adopted by name in Town Ordinance 24-06. On the utility side TECO treats storage separately: a battery interconnection application is required in addition to the solar one, and TECO publishes a Battery Owner Agreement in tariff section 8. 70% · ordinance
- Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Nothing published locally. Neither authority lists an ESS permit type or an ESS inspection: Dade City's permit-type list runs new single-family home, pool, re-roof, electrical, A/C mechanical, gas, shed, carport/aluminium, fence, demolition, signs and fireworks, and storage is not among them; an ESS would be permitted as electrical work. TECO does require a SEPARATE battery interconnection application alongside the solar one. 65% · permit requirements page
- Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a) requires a permit for any 'structure', defined to include things 'whether stationary or movable', and LDC Sec. 7.4 then regulates it as an accessory structure: it may not be located in a required buffer or the required front yard setback; if not more than ten feet high it may sit in the side or rear yard setback area with a minimum five-foot side/rear setback; ANY accessory structure more than ten feet in height may only be located in the rear yard and must meet the district's rear and side setback and height requirements; it counts toward both floor area ratio and impervious surface ratio; and a property is limited to TWO accessory structures (fences, walls, pools and stormwater/reclaimed-water ponds excluded). In the Permanently Open Land district accessory structures must also be sited to minimise obstruction of lake-front view corridors. 82% · ordinance
- Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? One rule, and it is a fee rather than a technical limit: Dade City Resolution 2008-0997 section VIII.B.3 prices 'Service Upgrade' at $0.15 PER AMP on top of the $35 electrical base fee. No busbar-sizing, 120%-rule or service-capacity amendment exists in either code — NEC 705.12 governs unmodified. TECO adds a capacity constraint from the other direction: the system's gross power rating may not exceed 90% of the customer's distribution service rating, and the customer pays for any upgrade needed to stay under it. 82% · fee schedule
- Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Nothing published. No mounting system, attachment spacing, uplift or racking requirement appears in the Town Code (847,323 characters), the Land Development Code, Dade City ch. 22, Resolution 2008-0997, or any of the 21 building forms published by the two authorities. The Florida Building Code and Florida Product Approval govern by default. 60% · ordinance
20 questions answered against Town of St. Leo’s own published documents
Q29 Which NEC edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
NEC 2020. Two independent adoptions, and the operator prints the year correctly: Dade City Code Sec. 22-61(a)(2) adopts 'NFPA National Electric Code (2020) Edition, as amended from time to time'; Town Code Sec. 14-19(1)f adopts 'the provisions of the National Electrical Code, as adopted by the Florida Building Commissioner, and all subsequent amendments' — a floating adoption that tracks the FBC, which currently carries the 2020 NEC effective 31 Dec 2023. Do not read the '2023' in 'Florida Building Code Eighth Edition (2023)' as an NEC year.
Why the confidence is not higherThe operator's codified section names the edition explicitly, which is rare; the Town's own adoption is floating and therefore not a local fact.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q30 Which building code edition is in force? Core Code editions in force
Florida Building Code, Eighth Edition (2023), including the Residential, Existing Building, Mechanical, Plumbing and Fuel Gas volumes. Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(1) names the edition; Town Code Sec. 14-19(1) adopts the FBC and its volumes by reference 'and all subsequent amendments', so the Town's adoption floats. Town Ordinance 24-06 (adopted 13 May 2024) separately adopts 'The Florida Building Code, as now and subsequently amended'. Dade City also adopts the International Property Maintenance Code (2021).
Why the confidence is not higherTwo codified adoptions plus one uncodified ordinance, all read first-hand.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q31 Which fire code edition is in force? Code editions in force
Florida Fire Prevention Code, Eighth Edition — plus, in St. Leo specifically, NFPA 101 Life Safety Code and NFPA 1 Fire Prevention Code adopted BY NAME. This comes from Town Ordinance 24-06, adopted 13 May 2024, which is NOT in the codified Code (the Supplement History Table marks it 'Omit', Supp. 16) and whose full text is recoverable only from the FS 166.041(4) business-impact-statement PDF on the Town's website: the Town adopts NFPA 101, NFPA 1, the Florida Fire Prevention Code and the Florida Building Code 'as now and subsequently amended'; 'Copies of all codes are on file in the Office of the Pasco County Emergency Services Department'; and 'If any conflict occurs between this section and any other applicable state, law ordinance, rule or regulation, the more stringent requirement shall apply.' Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(4) adopts the FFPC Eighth Edition for its own limits.
Why the confidence is not higherThe ordinance text was recovered from a document the site labels only 'ORD 24-06 Business Impact Statement' — it is a scanned Konica Minolta PDF that extracts as 15 characters and had to be rendered and OCR'd. Reading only Municode would have missed the NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 adoptions entirely.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/towncommission/page/business-impact-statement-ord-24-06-amending-updating-life-safety-fire
Q32 Are there local amendments to any of the above? Core Code editions in force
Yes, on both sides of the delegation. TOWN OF ST. LEO, Code Sec. 14-19.1 (Ord. 15-01, 9 Feb 2015) adds two sections to the Florida Building Code: new 107.6.1, which bars the building official from relying on affidavits and plans submitted under FBC 105.14/107.6 for the flood load and flood-resistant construction requirements; and new 117, applying the local floodplain variance procedure to FBC 1612.4 and FBC-R R322. CITY OF DADE CITY, Sec. 22-61(b) adopts ten local building regulations including a prescriptive site-drawing content list, a permit-exemption list, required first-floor framing inspections in flood zones, a mandatory approved heat source, a 300 sq ft minimum net usable floor area, and a MINIMUM FIRST-FLOOR ELEVATION OF 78 FEET ASL for all residences — but that last one is expressly scoped to 'the incorporated areas of the city', so it does not travel to St. Leo.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth amendment sets read in full. The Dade City 78-ft rule is the trap to avoid: once delegation is proved you must re-ask freeboard against the operator's code, and here the operator's rule turns out to be geographically self-limited.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q33 What is the installation judged against? Core Electrical
The 2020 National Electrical Code as adopted through the Florida Building Code, enforced by the CITY OF DADE CITY building official, who is expressly named the authority having jurisdiction for the NEC: Dade City Sec. 22-61(d) — 'the building official ... shall be included as the authority having jurisdiction for enforcing the National Electrical Code and all other codes adopted in subsection (a) of this section.' There are no local electrical amendments in either code.
Why the confidence is not higherThe AHJ-for-the-NEC designation is explicit and rare; local-amendment absence proved by reading both construction-standards articles in full.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q34 Is there a local rule on service upgrades or busbar sizing? Electrical
One rule, and it is a fee rather than a technical limit: Dade City Resolution 2008-0997 section VIII.B.3 prices 'Service Upgrade' at $0.15 PER AMP on top of the $35 electrical base fee. No busbar-sizing, 120%-rule or service-capacity amendment exists in either code — NEC 705.12 governs unmodified. TECO adds a capacity constraint from the other direction: the system's gross power rating may not exceed 90% of the customer's distribution service rating, and the customer pays for any upgrade needed to stay under it.
Why the confidence is not higherFee line read from the OCR'd resolution; technical absence proved across both codes with controls.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/City%20of%20Dade%20CIty%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf
Q35 Is a specific mounting system or attachment spacing required? Structural & mounting
Nothing published. No mounting system, attachment spacing, uplift or racking requirement appears in the Town Code (847,323 characters), the Land Development Code, Dade City ch. 22, Resolution 2008-0997, or any of the 21 building forms published by the two authorities. The Florida Building Code and Florida Product Approval govern by default.
Why the confidence is not higherAn absence with a named denominator rather than an unchecked box; held at 60 because a plan reviewer may still impose requirements under FBC 107 and neither authority publishes a solar checklist at all.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q36 What ridge setback and access pathways are required? Core Fire pathways & setbacks
Nothing published by this authority.
Where we lookedFire access pathways and ridge setbacks for residential PV. Searched: the whole codified Town Code (847,323 characters, Supp. 18 through Ord. 26-04 of 9 Feb 2026) with a fabricated-term control at 0 hits and 'electrical' at 19 as the positive control; Town Code ch. 22 (Fire Prevention and Protection) in full; the full text of uncodified Town Ordinance 24-06 recovered by OCR from its business-impact-statement PDF; Dade City Code ch. 22 and the Fire Prevention and Protection chapter; the Dade City Fire Inspection Requirements page and its five linked test documents; the Pasco County Fire Rescue fee schedules as adopted by St. Leo Res. 24-05 and Dade City Amended Res. 2024-22; and Pasco County's Building Construction and Permits and Forms pages (zero hits for 'solar' or 'photovoltaic' on both). The adopting instruments ARE established - FFPC 8th Edition plus NFPA 1 and NFPA 101 adopted by name - but the operative dimensions live in FBC-R R324 and NFPA 1 chapter 11.12, both behind subscription viewers that were not read in this run. Recording a dimension from general NFPA knowledge would be a fabrication, so this is UNREACHED rather than absent.
Q37 Is rapid shutdown required, and to which NEC edition? Core Rapid shutdown
Required, to the 2020 NEC (Article 690.12), by adoption rather than by any local rule. Both the adopting instruments were read first-hand — Dade City Sec. 22-61(a)(2) names the 2020 NEC, Town Sec. 14-19(1)f floats to the FBC's NEC — but neither authority publishes any rapid-shutdown guidance, labelling specification or inspection item of its own, and the NEC article text itself sits behind a subscription viewer and was not read in this run.
Why the confidence is not higherConfidence is 80, not 95, precisely because the adoption is proved and the article text is not: the answer rests on which edition is in force, which is documented, plus the fact that 690.12 is in that edition.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q38 Which placards does this authority require at the service equipment? Core Labels Signage & labelling
One placard, and it comes from the utility, not the AHJ. TAMPA ELECTRIC requires a placard at the meter reading 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH', engraved or stamped, identifying the location of the isolation means; a photograph of the disconnect switch showing the approved placard must be submitted with the interconnection application. Neither the Town of St. Leo nor the City of Dade City specifies any placard of its own — NEC 690/705 marking requirements apply by adoption only.
Why the confidence is not higherRequirement stated on TECO's application page and specified in TECO SESR 2025 (Standard Electrical Service Requirements, Version 1.0, October 2025) section on customer-owned generation; AHJ absence proved across both codes and all published forms.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/solarsolutions/solarprograms/connectingyoursolar/netmeteringapplication/
Q39 Does the authority specify placard wording of its own? Core Labels Signage & labelling
No. Neither the Town of St. Leo nor the City of Dade City specifies placard wording. The only prescribed wording in force here is Tampa Electric's 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH'.
Why the confidence is not higherNegative proved by full-text search of both codes, the fee resolution and every published form, with a fabricated-term control returning zero and 'electrical' returning 19 hits as a positive control.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q40 Does it specify letter height, colour or material? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Specified by the utility, in detail, and by neither AHJ. TECO SESR 2025: 'The placard shall be non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic with engraved or stamped lettering a minimum of 1/4 inch high, epoxy glued or riveted to the mounting surface. Peel and stick labels, paint, or marking pens are not acceptable.' No colour is specified. The same material and lettering standard is applied elsewhere in SESR to meter identification tags.
Why the confidence is not higherRead verbatim from the 143-page SESR 2025 PDF, which has a text layer; the spec sits in the customer-owned-generation subsection, not in a solar-specific document.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/48c9b1/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q41 Is a site plan / facility map placard required, and what must it show? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Not specified locally. Neither authority requires a site plan or facility-map placard, and TECO's requirement is a location placard for the isolation means, not a site map. NEC 705.10 applies by adoption of the 2020 NEC, so the plant-identification documentation it requires is enforceable at inspection even though nobody here publishes a form for it.
Why the confidence is not higherAn absence with a denominator (both codes, the fee resolution, 21 forms, the SESR and the Tier 1 agreement) plus the adopted-code fallback; held at 60 because the NEC text was not read first-hand.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/48c9b1/siteassets/files/content/sesr.pdf
Q42 Does the UTILITY specify placards beyond the AHJ's? Core Labels Signage & labelling
Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY source of a placard requirement. TECO requires the 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' placard at the meter, to the SESR material spec (non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic, engraved or stamped, >=1/4 inch lettering, epoxy glued or riveted; no peel-and-stick, paint or marker), and requires a PHOTOGRAPH of the disconnect switch showing the placard to be submitted with the Tier 1 application. TECO publishes a sample photograph. This is verified twice: by TECO's own inspection before the agreement is executed, and by the photo in the application file.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth the wording and the material spec read first-hand from two TECO documents; the photo-submission requirement is on the application page.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/solarsolutions/solarprograms/connectingyoursolar/netmeteringapplication/
Q43 Where must the labels be placed? Core Labels Signage & labelling
At the meter. TECO SESR: 'The Customer shall provide a placard AT THE METER identifying the location of the isolation means.' The disconnect switch it identifies must itself be 'mounted separate from the meter socket on an exterior surface adjacent to the meter' (Tier 1 agreement clause 11), readily accessible to TECO and lockable in the open position with a TECO padlock.
Why the confidence is not higherTwo documents agree; neither AHJ specifies placement.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c91e/siteassets/files/tariff/tariffsection8/stndinterconnagmttier1_if.pdf
Q44 Must equipment be on a specific approved list? Equipment listing
Yes. FAC 25-6.065(4)(b) requires the generation to have been submitted by the manufacturer to a nationally recognised testing and certification laboratory and tested and listed for continuous interactive operation, and 25-6.065(3) names the standards: IEEE 1547 (2003), IEEE 1547.1 (2005) and UL 1741 (2005). 25-6.065(4)(c) additionally requires a utility-interactive inverter or equivalent certified device that automatically isolates the generation if the grid loses power. TECO's Tier 1 agreement clause 1 carries the same certification undertaking, and the manufacturer's installation, operation and maintenance instructions for the inverter must be supplied with the application (a web link is acceptable).
Why the confidence is not higherRule text and agreement both read in full; no separate AHJ approved-list exists.
statute checked 2026-09-13 https://www.flrules.org/gateway/readFile.asp?sid=0&tid=5455200&type=1&file=25-6.065.doc
Q45 Are batteries permitted, and under what conditions? Core Battery / ESS
Permitted, with no local energy-storage ordinance of any kind. Zero hits for 'battery', 'energy storage' or 'ESS' as a regulated use in the Town Code outside the utility-scale solar-facility DEFINITION (which lists 'battery systems' as a component of a FS 163.3205 solar facility). The governing instruments are the adopted codes: FFPC 8th Edition, NFPA 1 and NFPA 101, all adopted by name in Town Ordinance 24-06. On the utility side TECO treats storage separately: a battery interconnection application is required in addition to the solar one, and TECO publishes a Battery Owner Agreement in tariff section 8.
Why the confidence is not higherLocal absence proved across the codified corpus; the fire-code content that actually governs an ESS sits in NFPA 1 chapter 52 / FFPC behind a subscription viewer and was not read first-hand, so the conditions themselves are not established here.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://www.townofstleo.org/towncommission/page/business-impact-statement-ord-24-06-amending-updating-life-safety-fire
Q46 Is there a separate ESS permit or inspection? Battery / ESS
Nothing published locally. Neither authority lists an ESS permit type or an ESS inspection: Dade City's permit-type list runs new single-family home, pool, re-roof, electrical, A/C mechanical, gas, shed, carport/aluminium, fence, demolition, signs and fireworks, and storage is not among them; an ESS would be permitted as electrical work. TECO does require a SEPARATE battery interconnection application alongside the solar one.
Why the confidence is not higherAn absence from a complete enumeration of the operator's published permit types; the TECO requirement is stated on its Go Solar page.
permit requirements page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q47 Is a ground mount treated as a structure? Core Ground mount
Yes. Town Code Sec. 14-20(a) requires a permit for any 'structure', defined to include things 'whether stationary or movable', and LDC Sec. 7.4 then regulates it as an accessory structure: it may not be located in a required buffer or the required front yard setback; if not more than ten feet high it may sit in the side or rear yard setback area with a minimum five-foot side/rear setback; ANY accessory structure more than ten feet in height may only be located in the rear yard and must meet the district's rear and side setback and height requirements; it counts toward both floor area ratio and impervious surface ratio; and a property is limited to TWO accessory structures (fences, walls, pools and stormwater/reclaimed-water ponds excluded). In the Permanently Open Land district accessory structures must also be sited to minimise obstruction of lake-front view corridors.
Why the confidence is not higherRules read first-hand and applied to a ground mount by classification, not by a solar-specific clause — the Code has none. The two-structure cap is the sharp edge: a lot that already has a shed and a detached garage has no room for a permitted ground mount.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q48 Where must the AC disconnect be, relative to the meter? Core Utility equipment
REQUIRED — and this is a third Florida disconnect regime, distinct from FPL's. TECO Tier 1 agreement clause 11: the customer shall install, AT THE COMPANY'S EXPENSE and subject to the Company's approval of the cost, a manual disconnect switch of the visible load break type providing a separation point between the AC output and customer wiring, 'mounted separate from the meter socket on an exterior surface adjacent to the meter', readily accessible to TECO and capable of being locked open with a TECO padlock. Reimbursement is capped at $320 single-phase and $395 three-phase. This is lawful because FAC 25-6.065(6)(a) exempts inverter-based Tier 1 systems from a manual disconnect ONLY 'unless the manual disconnect switch is installed at the investor-owned utility's expense' — TECO exercises that exception and pays. Interconnection approval is expressly 'dependent on a successful inspection performed by Tampa Electric, including verification of an acceptable disconnect switch'.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth the rule's 'unless' limb and the tariff clause read first-hand in the same session; the dollar reimbursement caps are published on TECO's application page. Do not carry FPL's 'no disconnect at Tier 1' answer into TECO territory.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/49c91e/siteassets/files/tariff/tariffsection8/stndinterconnagmttier1_if.pdf
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
Inspection 5 steps · 14 questions
-
Book it
Booking is a portal, a phone call or an email depending on the authority, and the notice required is rarely zero. Book before the work is finished rather than after — the lead time, not the work, is usually what sets the date.
- How is an inspection booked? Portal, phone or email — all three published by the operator. Online: portal.iworq.net/DADE/permits/600 ('Requesting inspections/viewing results online'). Email: buildingpermits@dadecityfl.com. Phone: 352-521-1460. Fax: 352-521-1498. The Town of St. Leo also publishes its own Building Construction Inspection Request form which routes to Dade City ('PLEASE FAX YOUR REQUEST TO 352 521 1498 OR E-MAIL TO jdiaz@dadecityfl.com') and asks for permit number, job site location, type of inspection, date requested, contact name and phone. 92% · department page
- How much notice is required? Next business day, unless the request is received by 8:00 a.m. on the day itself. Dade City: 'Inspection request are done the next business day unless received by 8:00 am the day of or if requested for a future date.' The request must include permit number, job site location, type of inspection, date requested, contact name and phone, and any miscellaneous access information (gate lock number, permit card location, time frame). 92% · department page
- Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Same-day is available if the request is in by 8:00 a.m.; otherwise next business day, and future dates may be booked. No AM/PM windows and no arrival-time commitment are published. Office hours are Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. After-hours inspections are available only by prepayment 24 hours in advance at actual expenditure (salary plus benefits), two hours minimum, and only if approved by the Building Official or his designee (Resolution 2008-0997, XII.N). 85% · department page
-
Know who turns up
Some authorities inspect their own solar work; some delegate it, and a few do not inspect the PV equipment itself at all. Who is coming determines what they will look at.
- Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Delegated. The Town of St. Leo performs no building or electrical inspection of its own; the City of Dade City Building Division performs them, and a private provider may perform them instead under FS 553.791. The Town DOES retain a fire-side signature: its Zoning Compliance Application carries a 'Fire Inspector Signature for Approval' line alongside the 'St. Leo Signature for Approval' line, and Town Code Sec. 22-2 creates the office of town fire safety inspector as an ex officio agent of the State Fire Marshal. 92% · utilization report
- If delegated, to whom? City of Dade City Building Division, 38020 Meridian Ave, Dade City FL 33525, 352-521-1460, buildingpermits@dadecityfl.com — for building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and gas permitting, plan review, inspection, permit records and contractor registration. Pasco County Fire Rescue — for fire permitting, plan review and inspection, via PascoGateway (Accela). Pasco County Contractor Licensing Division, 813-847-8009 — for contractor licensing. Private providers registered with Dade City may perform plan review and inspection under FS 553.791. 93% · department page
-
Work the stages in order
A rough-in or mid-roof inspection, where one is required, has to happen before the work it covers is closed up. Missing a stage means opening something back up, and it is the most expensive kind of correction.
- Which inspections are required, and in what order? Not published as a sequence. Dade City Sec. 22-61(b)(6) refers to 'the required inspections section in the building division development handbook' and then adds one item to it — a first-floor framing inspection after the foundation inspection where the floor construction is in a flood zone and/or is wood and more than one storey — but the handbook itself is not published on the site, does not appear in the Document Center, and is not in the Code. The only other sequencing facts published are that all re-inspection fees must be paid before a final inspection and that an occupancy affidavit bearing the notarised signature of the general contractor or owner-builder must be on file before occupancy is sought. 60% · ordinance
- Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Not published for solar. The only additional inspection Dade City codifies is a FIRST-FLOOR FRAMING inspection after the foundation inspection, and only where the floor construction is in a flood zone and/or of wood construction and more than one storey — flagged by a stamp on the approved plans. Nothing addresses a mid-roof or rough-in stage for a PV array. 55% · ordinance
-
Have the paperwork on site
The approved plan set, the permit, and the equipment listings should be on site and reachable. Inspectors routinely verify that installed equipment matches what was approved, and that the labels are the ones the plan set promised.
- Is there a published inspection checklist? No. No inspection checklist is published by either authority. The 'building division development handbook' cited in Dade City Sec. 22-61(b)(6) is not on the website, not in the Revize Document Center and not in the Code; the Town of St. Leo publishes four building forms (zoning compliance application, inspection request, inspection affidavit, contractor registration) and none is a checklist. Note FS 553.79(1)(b) requires a local enforcement agency to post each type of building permit application with a list of all required attachments and requirements — Dade City does that by permit type, but publishes no solar type at all. 75% · department page
- What must be on site at inspection? The permit card, the approved set of plans, and a recorded and posted Notice of Commencement. This is recoverable only from the re-inspection fee list in Resolution 2008-0997, XII.A, which charges a re-inspection fee when: the address is wrong; repairs or corrections were not made; work is condemned; the work was not ready; THE PERMIT IS NOT POSTED AT THE JOB SITE; THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT POSTED; the septic stub-out is not Health Department approved; or THE APPROVED SET OF PLANS IS NOT AT THE JOB SITE. The permit application adds that a Notice of Commencement must be recorded and posted on the job site BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. (The 'all plans, calculations and specs shall be on site' sentence on the Town's over-the-counter fire form is scoped by FS 553.7932 to fire alarm and sprinkler projects and does not reach a PV job.) 85% · fee schedule
- Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Not published. Neither authority publishes an inspection scope, checklist or verification list, so there is no document saying whether labels and listings are checked. What IS documented is that the utility checks: TECO performs its own inspection 'including verification of an acceptable disconnect switch' before executing the interconnection agreement, and requires a photograph showing the engraved placard. Dade City Sec. 22-61(d) makes the building official the AHJ for enforcing the NEC, which carries the label requirements. 60% · utility DG manual
-
Sign-off, and permission to operate
Passing gives you a final or an equivalent sign-off. That is not the same as permission to operate: PTO comes from the utility, and who tells the utility the inspection passed varies. A system left switched off for weeks is usually waiting on this handover.
- What is issued on pass? A Certificate of Completion, then a Certificate of Occupancy — and the Town, not the operator, issues them. Town Code Sec. 14-20(f): 'Upon completion of construction, provided fire code compliance has been approved by the town fire inspector, AND building code compliance has been approved by the building official, the building official shall issue a certificate of completion to the applicant. Upon issuance of the certificate of completion and determination by the town commission or its designee that conditions of development approval have been met, the town clerk or building official shall issue a certificate of occupancy.' Sec. 14-21 bars any certificate of occupancy until every Land Development Code permit, approval and condition has been obtained. For electrical work the operative event is the POWER RELEASE, which Dade City withholds until impact fees and all re-inspection fees are paid. 88% · ordinance
- Who notifies the utility for PTO? The installer. TECO's published process: 'Once your installers are finished, they'll submit a solar interconnection application (and a battery interconnection application, if applicable), to Tampa Electric. After receiving the application, Tampa Electric will perform an inspection of the system, including the disconnect switch.' The application package must include 'Proof of inspection and approval by local code authority', so the AHJ's final is an input the installer forwards — the AHJ does not notify TECO. TECO then executes the agreement within 30 calendar days of a completed application and installs a bi-directional net meter at no additional cost to the customer. 88% · utility DG manual
- Is there a re-inspection fee? Yes, a three-step ladder on the building side and a four-step one on the fire side. BUILDING (Resolution 2008-0997, XII.A): $40.00 for the first additional inspection, $80.00 for the second, $160.00 for the third on the same infraction; and XII.D sets a $35.00 minimum for all regulated on-site inspections for any trade. FIRE (Pasco County Fire Rescue fee schedule, adopted by St. Leo Resolution 24-05 on 11 March 2024 and by Dade City Amended Resolution 2024-22): initial re-inspection $0, 2nd $85, 3rd $90, 4th $200. NOTE: FS 553.79(7)(a) requires a 10% refund of the permit AND inspection fees when work fails an inspection and no code-based reason is given within 5 business days, with the FS 553.721/468.631 surcharges recalculated — no local document mentions this, and the 2008 resolution's refund section (XII.G) instead retains 30% of the permit fee for administrative processing, refuses any refund under $40 or where an inspection has been conducted, and makes plan- and site-examination fees non-refundable. 85% · fee schedule
- How are corrections issued and cleared? Not published as a procedure. Neither authority publishes how corrections are issued or cleared; the inspection request form has 'Special comments by inspector', 'Date Inspected', 'Date Finaled' and 'Inspector' fields and results are viewable through the iWorQ portal, which is the whole of it. The governing rules are statutory: FS 553.79(1)(a) requires a local enforcing agency denying or revoking a permit to identify the specific plan or project features that do not comply and the specific code chapters and sections relied on, with a plans reviewer or building code administrator who fails to do so subject to discipline under FS 468.621(1)(i); and FS 553.79(7)(a) gives the 10% refund where a failed inspection is not explained within 5 business days. 55% · statute
14 questions answered against Town of St. Leo’s own published documents
Q49 How is an inspection booked? Core Booking & scheduling
Portal, phone or email — all three published by the operator. Online: portal.iworq.net/DADE/permits/600 ('Requesting inspections/viewing results online'). Email: buildingpermits@dadecityfl.com. Phone: 352-521-1460. Fax: 352-521-1498. The Town of St. Leo also publishes its own Building Construction Inspection Request form which routes to Dade City ('PLEASE FAX YOUR REQUEST TO 352 521 1498 OR E-MAIL TO jdiaz@dadecityfl.com') and asks for permit number, job site location, type of inspection, date requested, contact name and phone.
Why the confidence is not higherThree routes published in two places and consistent; FS 553.79(1)(d) independently requires electronic submission to be accepted.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/index.php
Q50 How much notice is required? Core Booking & scheduling
Next business day, unless the request is received by 8:00 a.m. on the day itself. Dade City: 'Inspection request are done the next business day unless received by 8:00 am the day of or if requested for a future date.' The request must include permit number, job site location, type of inspection, date requested, contact name and phone, and any miscellaneous access information (gate lock number, permit card location, time frame).
Why the confidence is not higherRead verbatim from the operator's building department page; no equivalent statement exists on any Town of St. Leo page.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/index.php
Q51 Are same-day or AM/PM windows offered? Booking & scheduling
Same-day is available if the request is in by 8:00 a.m.; otherwise next business day, and future dates may be booked. No AM/PM windows and no arrival-time commitment are published. Office hours are Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. After-hours inspections are available only by prepayment 24 hours in advance at actual expenditure (salary plus benefits), two hours minimum, and only if approved by the Building Official or his designee (Resolution 2008-0997, XII.N).
Why the confidence is not higherThe same-day rule and the after-hours rule come from two different documents, both read first-hand; the absence of AM/PM windows is a negative from the operator's only two inspection-related publications.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/index.php
Q52 Does this AHJ perform its own final solar inspection? Core Who inspects
Delegated. The Town of St. Leo performs no building or electrical inspection of its own; the City of Dade City Building Division performs them, and a private provider may perform them instead under FS 553.791. The Town DOES retain a fire-side signature: its Zoning Compliance Application carries a 'Fire Inspector Signature for Approval' line alongside the 'St. Leo Signature for Approval' line, and Town Code Sec. 22-2 creates the office of town fire safety inspector as an ex officio agent of the State Fire Marshal.
Why the confidence is not higherDelegation proved four ways (see jurisdiction); the private-provider share is substantial — Dade City's FS 553.80(7)(b) report shows 698 private provider inspections in FY2021 against 40 (re)inspections conducted by the City itself, with only 3 dedicated personnel.
utilization report checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/Building%20Permit%20%20Inspection%20Utilization%20Report%20-%209-30-21.pdf
Q53 If delegated, to whom? Core Who inspects
City of Dade City Building Division, 38020 Meridian Ave, Dade City FL 33525, 352-521-1460, buildingpermits@dadecityfl.com — for building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing and gas permitting, plan review, inspection, permit records and contractor registration. Pasco County Fire Rescue — for fire permitting, plan review and inspection, via PascoGateway (Accela). Pasco County Contractor Licensing Division, 813-847-8009 — for contractor licensing. Private providers registered with Dade City may perform plan review and inspection under FS 553.791.
Why the confidence is not higherDade City's building page names the three municipalities it serves; the county fire delegation is codified at Town Code Sec. 22-1 and restated on the Town's fire pages.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/index.php
Q54 Which inspections are required, and in what order? Core Stages & sequence
Not published as a sequence. Dade City Sec. 22-61(b)(6) refers to 'the required inspections section in the building division development handbook' and then adds one item to it — a first-floor framing inspection after the foundation inspection where the floor construction is in a flood zone and/or is wood and more than one storey — but the handbook itself is not published on the site, does not appear in the Document Center, and is not in the Code. The only other sequencing facts published are that all re-inspection fees must be paid before a final inspection and that an occupancy affidavit bearing the notarised signature of the general contractor or owner-builder must be on file before occupancy is sought.
Why the confidence is not higherAn absence with a named denominator — the handbook is referenced by the operator's own code and is genuinely unpublished — rather than a failure to look. For a PV job the practical sequence is the electrical rough/final plus TECO's own inspection, but no document says so.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q55 Is a rough-in or mid-roof inspection required? Stages & sequence
Not published for solar. The only additional inspection Dade City codifies is a FIRST-FLOOR FRAMING inspection after the foundation inspection, and only where the floor construction is in a flood zone and/or of wood construction and more than one storey — flagged by a stamp on the approved plans. Nothing addresses a mid-roof or rough-in stage for a PV array.
Why the confidence is not higherAbsence measured against Dade City Sec. 22-61(b)(6), the permit requirements page and the unpublished handbook it cites; held low because the handbook could not be read.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/dade_city/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q56 Does the inspector verify labels and listings? Core What is checked
Not published. Neither authority publishes an inspection scope, checklist or verification list, so there is no document saying whether labels and listings are checked. What IS documented is that the utility checks: TECO performs its own inspection 'including verification of an acceptable disconnect switch' before executing the interconnection agreement, and requires a photograph showing the engraved placard. Dade City Sec. 22-61(d) makes the building official the AHJ for enforcing the NEC, which carries the label requirements.
Why the confidence is not higherRecorded as an answer with its denominator rather than a blank: the absence of any published inspection scope is itself the finding, and the utility-side verification is documented.
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/solarsolutions/solarprograms/connectingyoursolar/netmeteringapplication/
Q57 Is there a published inspection checklist? Core What is checked
No. No inspection checklist is published by either authority. The 'building division development handbook' cited in Dade City Sec. 22-61(b)(6) is not on the website, not in the Revize Document Center and not in the Code; the Town of St. Leo publishes four building forms (zoning compliance application, inspection request, inspection affidavit, contractor registration) and none is a checklist. Note FS 553.79(1)(b) requires a local enforcement agency to post each type of building permit application with a list of all required attachments and requirements — Dade City does that by permit type, but publishes no solar type at all.
Why the confidence is not higherDenominator: 316 URLs in the Town sitemap, every Dade City building-department link, and the Revize Document Center paths. The Town's own site search is broken (see jurisdiction note), so enumeration was by sitemap, not by search.
department page checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/our_government/departments/building_department/building_permit_requirements.php
Q58 What must be on site at inspection? Core Documents on site
The permit card, the approved set of plans, and a recorded and posted Notice of Commencement. This is recoverable only from the re-inspection fee list in Resolution 2008-0997, XII.A, which charges a re-inspection fee when: the address is wrong; repairs or corrections were not made; work is condemned; the work was not ready; THE PERMIT IS NOT POSTED AT THE JOB SITE; THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT POSTED; the septic stub-out is not Health Department approved; or THE APPROVED SET OF PLANS IS NOT AT THE JOB SITE. The permit application adds that a Notice of Commencement must be recorded and posted on the job site BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. (The 'all plans, calculations and specs shall be on site' sentence on the Town's over-the-counter fire form is scoped by FS 553.7932 to fire alarm and sprinkler projects and does not reach a PV job.)
Why the confidence is not higherDerived from what the authority PENALISES rather than from a published requirement list — the fee schedule is the only document that states it. Access details (gate lock number, permit card location) are asked for on the inspection request.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/City%20of%20Dade%20CIty%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf
Q59 Is there a re-inspection fee? Corrections & re-inspection
Yes, a three-step ladder on the building side and a four-step one on the fire side. BUILDING (Resolution 2008-0997, XII.A): $40.00 for the first additional inspection, $80.00 for the second, $160.00 for the third on the same infraction; and XII.D sets a $35.00 minimum for all regulated on-site inspections for any trade. FIRE (Pasco County Fire Rescue fee schedule, adopted by St. Leo Resolution 24-05 on 11 March 2024 and by Dade City Amended Resolution 2024-22): initial re-inspection $0, 2nd $85, 3rd $90, 4th $200. NOTE: FS 553.79(7)(a) requires a 10% refund of the permit AND inspection fees when work fails an inspection and no code-based reason is given within 5 business days, with the FS 553.721/468.631 surcharges recalculated — no local document mentions this, and the 2008 resolution's refund section (XII.G) instead retains 30% of the permit fee for administrative processing, refuses any refund under $40 or where an inspection has been conducted, and makes plan- and site-examination fees non-refundable.
Why the confidence is not higherBoth ladders read first-hand from scanned documents rendered and OCR'd; the statutory refund was read first-hand from FS 553.79. The 2008 schedule also carries an older fire re-inspection ladder ($100/$250/$500) at section XI.9 which the 2024 PCFR adoption supersedes.
fee schedule checked 2026-09-13 https://www.dadecityfl.com/City%20of%20Dade%20CIty%20Permit%20Fee%20Schedule.pdf
Q60 How are corrections issued and cleared? Corrections & re-inspection
Not published as a procedure. Neither authority publishes how corrections are issued or cleared; the inspection request form has 'Special comments by inspector', 'Date Inspected', 'Date Finaled' and 'Inspector' fields and results are viewable through the iWorQ portal, which is the whole of it. The governing rules are statutory: FS 553.79(1)(a) requires a local enforcing agency denying or revoking a permit to identify the specific plan or project features that do not comply and the specific code chapters and sections relied on, with a plans reviewer or building code administrator who fails to do so subject to discipline under FS 468.621(1)(i); and FS 553.79(7)(a) gives the 10% refund where a failed inspection is not explained within 5 business days.
Why the confidence is not higherAn absence with a denominator plus the statutory backstop, which was read first-hand. Held at 55 because a procedure may exist inside the unpublished development handbook.
statute checked 2026-09-13 http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0500-0599/0553/Sections/0553.79.html
Q61 What is issued on pass? Core Final sign-off & PTO
A Certificate of Completion, then a Certificate of Occupancy — and the Town, not the operator, issues them. Town Code Sec. 14-20(f): 'Upon completion of construction, provided fire code compliance has been approved by the town fire inspector, AND building code compliance has been approved by the building official, the building official shall issue a certificate of completion to the applicant. Upon issuance of the certificate of completion and determination by the town commission or its designee that conditions of development approval have been met, the town clerk or building official shall issue a certificate of occupancy.' Sec. 14-21 bars any certificate of occupancy until every Land Development Code permit, approval and condition has been obtained. For electrical work the operative event is the POWER RELEASE, which Dade City withholds until impact fees and all re-inspection fees are paid.
Why the confidence is not higherCodified language read verbatim; the two-signature gate (town fire inspector AND building official) is the unusual part and matches the two signature lines on the Zoning Compliance Application.
ordinance checked 2026-09-13 https://library.municode.com/fl/st._leo/codes/code_of_ordinances
Q62 Who notifies the utility for PTO? Core Final sign-off & PTO
The installer. TECO's published process: 'Once your installers are finished, they'll submit a solar interconnection application (and a battery interconnection application, if applicable), to Tampa Electric. After receiving the application, Tampa Electric will perform an inspection of the system, including the disconnect switch.' The application package must include 'Proof of inspection and approval by local code authority', so the AHJ's final is an input the installer forwards — the AHJ does not notify TECO. TECO then executes the agreement within 30 calendar days of a completed application and installs a bi-directional net meter at no additional cost to the customer.
Why the confidence is not higherRead first-hand from TECO's Go Solar and Steps to Connect pages and corroborated by FAC 25-6.065(5)(a) and (7)(c).
utility DG manual checked 2026-09-13 https://www.tampaelectric.com/solarsolutions/solareducation/gosolar/
Lines marked with a percentage were read off this authority’s own published documents. Unmarked guidance is general good practice, not this jurisdiction’s rule — always confirm against the authority before you submit.
No change record for this authority yet. Values arrive here as they are researched, and each one is dated.
Labels & placards for this authority
Wording 85%
No. Neither the Town of St. Leo nor the City of Dade City specifies placard wording. The only prescribed wording in force here is Tampa Electric's 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH'.
Size, colour & material 92%
Specified by the utility, in detail, and by neither AHJ. TECO SESR 2025: 'The placard shall be non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic with engraved or stamped lettering a minimum of 1/4 inch high, epoxy glued or riveted to the mounting surface. Peel and stick labels, paint, or marking pens are not acceptable.' No colour is specified. The same material and lettering standard is applied elsewhere in SESR to meter identification tags.
Where they go 92%
At the meter. TECO SESR: 'The Customer shall provide a placard AT THE METER identifying the location of the isolation means.' The disconnect switch it identifies must itself be 'mounted separate from the meter socket on an exterior surface adjacent to the meter' (Tier 1 agreement clause 11), readily accessible to TECO and lockable in the open position with a TECO padlock.
What the utility wants on top 93%
Yes — and here the utility is the ONLY source of a placard requirement. TECO requires the 'ON-SITE GENERATION UTILITY DISCONNECT SWITCH' placard at the meter, to the SESR material spec (non-ferrous metal or poly-plastic, engraved or stamped, >=1/4 inch lettering, epoxy glued or riveted; no peel-and-stick, paint or marker), and requires a PHOTOGRAPH of the disconnect switch showing the placard to be submitted with the Tier 1 application. TECO publishes a sample photograph. This is verified twice: by TECO's own inspection before the agreement is executed, and by the photo in the application file.
Each figure above is sourced and dated in the full answer set below (questions 38–43). Where an authority’s own published sheet is older than the code it has adopted, the answer says so.
Their website
Solar Requirements
Average approval time — application to PTO
From the CPUC interconnection record. Bars show the average days taken each year; a year with no recorded projects is left blank rather than drawn as zero.